Next Article in Journal
Soiling Spectral and Module Temperature Effects: Comparisons of Competing Operating Parameters for Four Commercial PV Module Technologies
Previous Article in Journal
Advanced Methods in Rotating Machines
Previous Article in Special Issue
Wastewater Treatment and Biogas Production: Innovative Technologies, Research and Development Directions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Progress and Challenges in Biohydrogen Production

by
Joanna Kazimierowicz
1,
Marcin Dębowski
2,* and
Marcin Zieliński
2
1
Department of Water Supply and Sewage Systems, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland
2
Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-720 Olsztyn, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 12 July 2022 / Revised: 20 July 2022 / Accepted: 26 July 2022 / Published: 27 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wastewater Treatment and Biogas Production)

1. Background

According to data from the International Energy Agency (IEA), in order to achieve net-zero CO2 emissions by 2050, approximately 306 million tonnes of green hydrogen (H2) must be produced annually [1]. Green H2 is produced by the electrolysis of water, which requires a high amount of electricity. In order to be carbon-neutral, the electricity used to power the process must come from renewable sources such as solar or wind power. Therefore, only 4% of the world’s H2 production is currently produced by this method. This direction, although ecologically justified, is a more expensive and more complicated method of obtaining H2 than, for example, steam methane reforming (SMR), which is currently used to produce most of the H2 used in industry. The blue (with CO2 capture) and gray (without CO2 capture) hydrogen produced in the SMR technology constitute approximately 95% of all currently produced types of H2. The IEA reports that H2 production will have to grow at a rate of 66% in 2020–2030 and then 23% in 2030–2050 [1].
Although the combustion of hydrogen fuel does not emit CO2 and other greenhouse gases, taking the above into account, its carbon footprint is still significant and depends on the technology of its production. Therefore, there is a justified need to search for methods of H2 production that will be both technologically and economically competitive for the current solutions, in addition to being environmentally friendly. An alternative may be biological methods that fit directly into the principles of circular economy, material and energy recycling and support the idea of reducing greenhouse gas emissions to the atmosphere. Such technologies include anaerobic dark fermentation and biophotolysis.

2. Overview of Undertaken Research Issues

The investigation on dark fermentation methods for the H2 production focuses primarily on the selection of the suitable organic substrate, effective pre-treatment techniques and the determination of the technological parameters used. The methods based on direct biophotolysis require the determination of the most efficient conditions for microalgae biomass cultivations and the course of the H2 production phase. An important aspect of the biological methods of H2 production is their optimization and assessment of technological, economic and environmental effectiveness.

2.1. Dark Fermentation

Liu et al., 2020 [2], verified the efficiency of biohydrogen production from co-fermentation of cattle manure and food waste. In order to maximize the process, the proportions of the tested substrates, their initial concentration in the reactors and the hydraulic retention time were determined. The results showed that the co-fermentation of cattle manure and food waste is an economically promising approach to biohydrogen production [2]. The solid and liquid fractions of food waste were also tested by Hovorukha et al., 2021 [3]. In order to intensify of the dark fermentation, a granular microbial preparation (GMP) method was used, which allowed obtaining 102 dm3 H2/kg solid waste and 2.3 dm3 H2/dm3 of liquid fraction. Anaerobic digestion led to a 91-fold reduction in the mass of the substrate and a 3-fold reduction in organic pollutant concentrations in the wastewater [3]. GMP was also used in the studies of Tashyrev et al., 2022 [4], to intensify H2 production with food waste coupled with liquid organic leachate purification. The four-module direct-flow installation was used in this study and efficiently joined anaerobic and aerobic bacteria with other micro- and macroorganisms to simultaneously recycle organic waste and remediate the resulting leachate and H2 production [4]. Another paper presents the optimal conditions for the production of H2 from microalgae biomass (Chlorella sp.) using enriched anaerobic mixed cultures as an inoculum [5]. It has been proved that pH and temperature had the main influence on the efficiency of H2 production. The highest production was observed at pH 7 and 35 °C [5]. Cárdenas et al., 2018, demonstrated the possibility of producing H2 from coffee mucilage combined with organic wastes (wholesale market garbage) in a dark fermentation process. The highest cumulative volume of H2, 25.9 dm3, was obtained using the 8:2 ratio (coffee mucilage: organic waste) after 72 h, which corresponded to 1.295 dm3 H2/dm3 of substrates [6]. The same authors performed the analysis and estimation of the H2 production from coffee mucilage mixed with organic wastes by dark anaerobic fermentation in a co-digestion system using an artificial neural network and fuzzy logic model [7].

2.2. Pre-Treatment Methods

The analysis of the available methods of pre-treatment of organic substrates before H2 anaerobic digestion was presented by Singh et al., 2022 [8]. The authors conclude that for cost-effective biohydrogen production, the substrate should be cheap and renewable. Substrates including algal biomass, agriculture residue and wastewaters are readily available. Moreover, substrates rich in starch and cellulose such as plant stalks or agricultural waste or food industry waste such as cheese whey are reported to support dark fermentation. However, their direct utilization as a substrate is not recommended due to their complex nature. Therefore, they must be pre-treated before being used to release fermentable sugars [8]. In other studies [9], simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) and pre-hydrolysis with SSF (PSSF) were used to produce H2 from the biomass of Chlorella sp. This yielded 170 cm3 H2/gVS (volatile solids). Pre-hydrolyzing the biomass at 50 °C for 12 h resulted in the production of 1.8 g/dm3 of reducing sugars, leading to a H2 yield of 172 cm3 H2/gVS [9]. Other authors have studied a simultaneous processing of sugar beet pulp (SBP) for H2 production using various pre-treatment methods [10]. The experiments showed that pre-treatment in 140 °C resulted in the highest H2 yields of 113 dm3/kgVS [10].

2.3. Direct Biophotolysis

Touloupakis et al., 2021 [11] summarized the current state of knowledge related to the production of H2 in the biophotolysis process. The article presents the direct and indirect biochemical mechanisms of the processes of H2 production by using microalgae biomass. The obtained efficiency of producing this gas is also presented depending on the algae species, type of photobioreactors used and technological conditions and the culture medium. The presented analyses proved that the production of H2 in this manner is not economically justified, and there is a need for further optimization related to the selection of algae strains and technological parameters [11]. Dębowski et al., 2021 [12], presented the photobiological production of H2 by microalgae compared to other technologies presented in the literature. The authors concluded that the use of microalgae is a highly promising method of producing H2 via biological processes. There is sufficient data from laboratory-scale studies to start experiments in pilot systems on a semi-industrial scale. However, validation tests must be carried out to verify whether natural water or wastewater can be used as nutrient sources. Other technological issues to be addressed are methods to enrich, refine, store and use biohydrogen [12].

3. Summary

Considering the need to reduce CO2 emissions by implementing clean-energy systems, an important research issue is the development of biohydrogen production. An important step in the progress of any technology based on biological processes is to thoroughly understand the mechanisms and conditions for obtaining efficient process results. Research on a laboratory scale and reviews summarizing the achievements to date are very important due to the cognitive aspect. They make it possible to gather the appropriate knowledge and background to carry out the appropriate optimization procedures, increase the scale of experiments, enable solutions to be raised to a higher technical readiness level (TRL) and the final implementation on a large scale. The mentioned works published in Energies fit perfectly into the current and innovative research trends developed by scientists around the world.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.K., M.D. and M.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, J.K. and M.D.; writing—review and editing, J.K., M.D. and M.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. IEA. Energy Technology Perspectives 2020. In Special Report on Carbon Capture Utilisation and Storage; IEA: Paris, France, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  2. Liu, S.; Li, W.; Zheng, G.; Yang, H.; Li, L. Optimization of Cattle Manure and Food Waste Co-Digestion for Biohydrogen Production in a Mesophilic Semi-Continuous Process. Energies 2020, 13, 3848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hovorukha, V.; Havryliuk, O.; Gladka, G.; Tashyrev, O.; Kalinichenko, A.; Sporek, M.; Dołhańczuk-Śródka, A. Hydrogen Dark Fermentation for Degradation of Solid and Liquid Food Waste. Energies 2021, 14, 1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tashyrev, O.; Hovorukha, V.; Havryliuk, O.; Sioma, I.; Gladka, G.; Kalinichenko, O.; Włodarczyk, P.; Suszanowicz, D.; Zhuk, H.; Ivanov, Y. Spatial Succession for Degradation of Solid Multicomponent Food Waste and Purification of Toxic Leachate with the Obtaining of Biohydrogen and Biomethane. Energies 2022, 15, 911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Usmanbaha, N.; Jariyaboon, R.; Reungsang, A.; Kongjan, P.; Chu, C.-Y. Optimization of Batch Dark Fermentation of Chlorella sp. Using Mixed-Cultures for Simultaneous Hydrogen and Butyric Acid Production. Energies 2019, 12, 2529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Cárdenas, E.L.M.; Zapata-Zapata, A.D.; Kim, D. Hydrogen Production from Coffee Mucilage in Dark Fermentation with Organic Wastes. Energies 2019, 12, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Moreno Cárdenas, E.L.; Zapata-Zapata, A.D.; Kim, D. Modeling Dark Fermentation of Coffee Mucilage Wastes for Hydrogen Production: Artificial Neural Network Model vs. Fuzzy Logic Model. Energies 2020, 13, 1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Singh, H.; Tomar, S.; Qureshi, K.A.; Jaremko, M.; Rai, P.K. Recent Advances in Biomass Pretreatment Technologies for Biohydrogen Production. Energies 2022, 15, 999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Giang, T.T.; Lunprom, S.; Liao, Q.; Reungsang, A.; Salakkam, A. Enhancing Hydrogen Production from Chlorella sp. Biomass by Pre-Hydrolysis with Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation (PSSF). Energies 2019, 12, 908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Cieciura-Włoch, W.; Binczarski, M.; Tomaszewska, J.; Borowski, S.; Domański, J.; Dziugan, P.; Witońska, I. The Use of Acidic Hydrolysates after Furfural Production from Sugar Waste Biomass as a Fermentation Medium in the Biotechnological Production of Hydrogen. Energies 2019, 12, 3222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Touloupakis, E.; Faraloni, C.; Silva Benavides, A.M.; Torzillo, G. Recent Achievements in Microalgal Photobiological Hydrogen Production. Energies 2021, 14, 7170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dębowski, M.; Dudek, M.; Zieliński, M.; Nowicka, A.; Kazimierowicz, J. Microalgal Hydrogen Production in Relation to Other Biomass-Based Technologies—A Review. Energies 2021, 14, 6025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kazimierowicz, J.; Dębowski, M.; Zieliński, M. Progress and Challenges in Biohydrogen Production. Energies 2022, 15, 5413. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/en15155413

AMA Style

Kazimierowicz J, Dębowski M, Zieliński M. Progress and Challenges in Biohydrogen Production. Energies. 2022; 15(15):5413. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/en15155413

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kazimierowicz, Joanna, Marcin Dębowski, and Marcin Zieliński. 2022. "Progress and Challenges in Biohydrogen Production" Energies 15, no. 15: 5413. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/en15155413

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop