Next Article in Journal
An Experimental Approach for Secondary Consensus Control Tuning for Inverter-Based Islanded Microgrids
Next Article in Special Issue
Simulation Analysis of a Single-Phase AC Circuit with a Nonlinear Load
Previous Article in Journal
Carbon Tax in Taiwan: Path Dependence and the High-Carbon Regime
Previous Article in Special Issue
Harmonic Compensation via Grid-Tied Three-Phase Inverter with Variable Structure I&I Observer-Based Control Scheme
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Short-Circuit Fault Diagnosis on Induction Motors through Electric Current Phasor Analysis and Fuzzy Logic

by
Josue A. Reyes-Malanche
1,
Francisco J. Villalobos-Pina
2,
Efraın Ramırez-Velasco
2,
Eduardo Cabal-Yepez
3,
Geovanni Hernandez-Gomez
3 and
Misael Lopez-Ramirez
3,*
1
Departamento de Produccion y Seguridad Industrial, Universidad Tecnologica de Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes 20200, Mexico
2
Departamento de Ingeniería Electrica Electronica, TecNm/Instituto Tecnologico de Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes 20256, Mexico
3
Multidisciplinary Studies Department, Engineering Division, Campus Irapuato-Salamanca, University of Guanajuato, Guanajuato 38944, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 12 December 2022 / Revised: 21 December 2022 / Accepted: 23 December 2022 / Published: 3 January 2023

Abstract

:
Online monitoring of induction motors has increased significantly in recent years because these devices are essential components of any industrial process. Incipient fault detection in induction motors avoids interruptions in manufacturing processes and facilitates maintenance tasks to reduce induction motor timeout. Therefore, the proposal of novel approaches to assist in the detection and classification of induction motor faults is in order. In this work, a reliable and noninvasive novel technique that does not require computational demanding operations, since it just performs arithmetic calculations, is introduced for detecting and locating short-circuit faults in the stator windings of an induction motor. This method relies on phasor analysis and the RMS values of line currents, followed by a small set of simple if-then rules to perform the diagnosis and identification of stator winding faults. Obtained results from different experimental tests on a rewound induction motor stator to induce short-circuit faults demonstrate that the proposed approach is capable of identifying and locating incipient and advanced deficiencies in the windings’ insulation with high effectiveness.

1. Introduction

Induction motors, particularly three-phase induction motors, play a key role in industry because of their advantages over other kinds of electrical machinery. Therefore, it is imperative that these motors operate in reliable, good conditions [1]. In the literature, it has been reported that around 40% of induction motor faults are provoked by defects in the stator windings [2]. These faults initiate as incipient short-circuit connections between coils in the same winding because of insulation degradation provoked by the thermal stress in which they operate. In some cases, the defect might expand as far as to cause short-circuit faults among feeding phases or between feeding phases and ground, with catastrophic results. Even though the winding insulation condition can be assessed offline, online determination techniques that do not intervene with induction motor working operations are preferred.
Nowadays, electric-machine condition monitoring has gained relevance because of its capability to reduce operational costs; therefore, new techniques have been proposed that are capable of performing an online, non-invasive analysis for detecting incipient faults while the machine is working [3]. However, one of the crucial issues is the lack of a reliable mathematical model for describing a faulty motor. For instance, between-coil, short-circuit fault detection is performed by [4] utilizing phase current magnitudes and fuzzy logic; however, using the motor phase currents without comprehending their dynamics will require a performance of several simulations, either through a computer-based model as a finite element, or a considerable number of experiments to retrieve enough information that can be useful for implementing the fuzzy logic system in charge of detecting the fault. In [5], a methodology based on a fuzzy logic classifier is introduced for detecting stator faults in induction motors; however, since phase current magnitudes change depending on the motor load, an extensive database is required for the fuzzy logic system to be capable of detecting the fault. Using harmonic components in phase currents or in the stator current spatial vector is a common technique for detecting induction motor faults [6]; however, these harmonic components have even been found in healthy motors because of inherent asymmetries in the machine. In [7], short-circuit faults between coil turns in an induction motor are identified by utilizing multiple refence frameworks and an eccentricity indicator along with Park’s instantaneous space phasor module.
Electric current and vibration signals have been frequently used in industry for monitoring purposes. The analysis of these signals by themselves has been useful for detecting some specific faults. In [8], electromechanical faults in a three-phase induction motor are detected by applying a methodology that combines electric current analysis with the processing of infrared images from thermographic cameras. Ref. [9] introduces a fault diagnosis technique based on acoustic signals from a healthy motor, a motor with damaged bearings, and a motor with faulty bearings and a short circuit in one of its windings. A methodology based on the analysis of the startup electric current from an induction motor through the estimation of the signal homogeneity and its fourth statistical moments, which are used as inputs to an artificial neural network (ANN), is proposed in [2] for identifying multiple faults. In [10], an artificial intelligence-based technique is proposed that analyzes electric current measurements for detecting mechanical and electrical faults in three-phase induction motors. This technique makes use of an ANN for classifying the failure. In [11], a convolutional ANN (CNN) is employed for detecting and classifying winding defects in an induction motor by examination of the raw stator current values at different damage levels.
In [12], electric faults are detected in induction motors by means of computer modeling and an experimental validation analyzing electric faults in the stator, rotor bar fissure, and damaged short-circuited rings. Short-circuit faults are detected in [13] through utilizing external magnetic field measurements from an induction motor. This method computes the energy of the detailed decomposition from the magnetic field discrete wavelet transform during the induction motor transient between its startup and standstill states. The wavelet transform provides a detailed analysis of unidimensional and bidimensional signals by performing a multilevel decomposition. An approach for detecting incipient short-circuit faults in the voltage source of inverter-fed induction motors is presented in [14], taking into account that non-sinusoidal input voltage, along with short-circuit defects, induce harmonic components in the current signal, complicating the fault diagnosis based on the spectral analysis. A method for open-circuit diagnosis in power inverters is proposed in [15] by phasor representation analysis of electric currents in the time domain; the methodology is compared against spectral analysis through fast Fourier transform and multiresolution examination utilizing wavelet transform. In [16], a configuration for detecting multiple faults, such as between-coil short circuits and encoder defects, is introduced. The approach utilizes a structural representation of the system based on a dynamic mathematical model of the motor to analyze its constitution through matrix operations. A negative-sequence-current compensation is used in [17] to increase the sensitivity and precision on detecting incipient faults on an induction motor under different disturbances since the negative-sequence current in a faulty motor contains characteristic components from the defects as well as from the disturbances.
In this work, phasor representation analysis is applied followed by a fuzzy logic classifier for detecting and classifying short-circuit faults in three-phase induction motors online. The novel introduced technique only requires three sensors to acquire the three-phase electric current power supply to perform a noninvasive condition monitoring; hence, the induction motor working condition is not modified. On the other hand, the proposed approach does not require computational demanding operations since it just performs the arithmetic differences from the RMS values of the line currents, followed by a fuzzy logic classifier based on simple linguistic if-then rules for detecting and classifying short-circuit faults in three-phase induction motors, outperforming previous approaches in the related literature. From experimentally obtained results, it is demonstrated that the proposed approach is capable of identifying and locating incipient and advanced short-circuit faults in the stator windings of an induction motor with high accuracy.

2. Short-Circuit Fault Diagnosis Scheme

The proposed method for fault detection and recognition of short-circuited coils utilizes the phase and line current magnitudes of the induction motor since they show a particular behavior when a fault condition occurs. Phase and line currents exhibit asymmetries and specific patterns in their trajectories, which can be described and examined by means of phasor analysis.
Phasor representation analysis on the three-phase currents of an induction motor can be used for open-circuit and short-circuit fault diagnosis. The connection of the stator windings in a three-phase induction motor can be depicted as in Figure 1.
Short-circuit faults in the stator windings of an induction motor can be categorized as:
(i)
Partial-winding short circuit.
(ii)
Full-winding short circuit.
A short-circuit fault in the full winding of one phase will stop the induction motor because of the protection system activation against over currents; hence, only incipient short-circuit faults are considered. Figure 1 depicts a short-circuit defect beginning to form on the Ic-phase inductance by closing tap T2 or T3, so that an unbalanced three-phase load is generated because the Ic-phase inductance decreases as a consequence of the partial short-circuit fault; in other words, if a between-coils short circuit occurs, the winding impedance is reduced since two or more coils were connected in series before, and they will be made null after the short-circuit fault occurs. As consequence, the electric current through the Ic-phase inductance is higher than the current going through any of the other two windings.

2.1. Short-Circuit Fault Analysis

The short-circuit fault analysis is performed by considering the phasor representations of the stator phase and line currents in a healthy induction motor utilizing the per-unit system, as depicted in Figure 2.
(a)
Phasor representation of the phase currents.
I a   =   1     0 I b   =   1   120 I c   =   1     120
(b)
Phasor representation of the line currents.
I b a   =   3     0 I a c   =   3     150 I c b   =   3     90
Considering that any balanced three-phase current system in an induction motor stator must comply with Ia + Ib + Ic = 0 because of the absence of a neutral grounded connection, it is possible to obtain phasor components or coordinates for each current in the induction motor stator in relation to the different reference systems; where, from Figure 2, and Equations (1) and (2), it can be observed that a specific phase current is always perpendicular to a corresponding line current, establishing three reference systems:
I a     I c b I b     I a c I c     I b a
When a short-circuit fault occurs in the stator winding of phase Ic, the most appropriate reference system to establish phase and line current behavior is IcIba. Figure 3 shows the phasor components for the electric currents feeding an induction motor in good operational condition taking the Ic − Iba reference system as basis.
The projections of the electric currents to the induction motor on the Ic − Iba reference system directions are obtained as follows:
I a   = 1 2 ( I b a I c ) I b   = 1 2 ( I b a I c ) I c   = I c I b a   = I b a I a c   = 1 2 ( I b a + 3 I c ) I c b   = 1 2 ( I b a 3 I c )
From (4), it can be noticed that when the magnitude of Ic increases because of a short circuit on its corresponding winding, Ia and Ib magnitudes also rise but in different proportions. The augmentation of Ia and Ib magnitudes are due to the growing of their corresponding components in Ic direction; however, Iba remains without change. Figure 4 depicts the magnitude and phase angle (ϕ) variations for currents Ia and Ib when either an open-circuit or a short-circuit fault occurs in the Ic current phase of a three-phase power supply to an induction motor.
In Figure 4, the red zone denotes the varying sectors for Ia and Ib magnitudes and phase angles when the Ic amplitude drops until reaching zero (Ic = 0). Under this condition, Ia and Ib go through these regions until setting on the opposite phase to each other, over the vertical axis; hence, phase current Ia goes 30° forwards, whereas phase current Ib moves 30° backwards. It is worth noticing that the magnitude and phase angle of line current Iba remain unchanged, while Ia and Ib go through this red zone.
In Figure 4, the blue region represents the fluctuating zone for Ia and Ib amplitudes and phase angles when the Ic magnitude increases because of a short circuit. In this case, Ia and Ib move through this blue area from their starting value when there is not a failure; therefore, phase current Ia falls behind 30°, whereas phase current Ib advances 30°. It is important to notice that the magnitude and phase angle of line current Icb do not change, while Ia and Ib move through this blue zone.
Even though the phasor representation analysis can detect variations in the magnitude and phase angle of the electric currents feeding an induction motor, the open- and short-circuit faults can be detected and distinguished through the fluctuation in the magnitude of line currents. However, if a line current does not exhibit any change in its magnitude, despite there being a short circuit in any of the phase currents, it is still possible to detect and isolate the fault.

2.2. Fuzzy Logic

As previously described, an artificial intelligence technique that can take advantage of phase and line current behavior to identify short-circuit faults in an induction motor winding is fuzzy logic since by knowing the current asymmetries, only three comparisons of the current magnitudes are required for detecting and locating the fault through a Mamdani type inference system. In this work, simple if-then rules are used for performing these comparisons, which assume the following structure:
If x is A, then y is B
where, A and B are linguistic values defined by fuzzy sets in the universes of discourse X and Y, respectively. The sentence “x is A” is called the premise or antecedent, whereas “y is B” is known as the conclusion or consequent [18]. The fuzzy rules are defined by considering the RMS values of line currents Icb, Iac, and Iba to the induction motor, which are obtained as:
I b a   = I a I b I a c   = I c I a I c b   = I b I c
where Ia, Ib, and Ic are the phase currents.
The RMS values of the line currents and the operations defined in (6) are used for obtaining the linguistic rules in (7) to detect and classify short-circuit faults.
r 1 = | I c b r m s I a c r m s | r 2 = | I c b r m s I b a r m s | r 3 = | I a c r m s I b a r m s |
If r1r2r3 ≈ 0    then there is no fault
If r1 ≈ 0    then there is a fault in phase Ic
If r2 ≈ 0    then there is a fault in phase Ib
If r3 ≈ 0    then there is a fault in phase Ia

3. Experimental Results

Figure 5 depicts the configuration scheme of the system utilized for experimentation, and Figure 6 shows the test bench constructed for performing the experiments, which consist of a 3 Hp, 220/440 V at 60 Hz three-phase induction motor from SIEMENS rotating at 1800 rpm with 4-ploles in a double-star connection. The induction motor is connected to the power supply through a three-phase inverter that controls the provided voltage and frequency utilizing a personal computer and a data acquisition system DSP TMS320F28335 from Texas Instruments with a sampling rate of 3.840 kHz. The winding of one input phase is modified so that 5% and 12% short-circuit faults are replicated. A common generator that transfers voltage to a resistive load is coupled to the induction motor as a load.
The phase and line currents of the motor in healthy condition are obtained and depicted in Figure 7 and Figure 8, respectively. From these figures, it can be observed that the three current amplitudes, either the phase or the line currents, have the same magnitude because there is not any short-circuit fault in the stator windings.
The unbalanced phase and line currents from an induction motor with a 5% short-circuit fault in the phase-C stator winding using the tap T2 of the start connection is switched on, as depicted in Figure 1.
The greatest increment in the phase-C current Ic is shown in Figure 9. This magnitude growth is due to the short-circuit fault among the coils of the corresponding stator windings in the induction motor. It can be observed that the magnitude increases on each phase and current Ia and Ib are around half of that one on Ic because of the short-circuit fault, as it can be computed directly by utilizing (4).
In Figure 10, it can be observed that line current Iba remains constant since it is perpendicular to phase current Ic where the short-circuit fault occurs. In other words, line current Iba and phase current Ic are linearly independent, whereas line currents Iac and Icb are dependent on the Ic current of the faulty stator winding; hence, Iac and Icb experience some variations. From these dependence and independence relations among corresponding line and phase currents, it is possible to detect and locate short-circuit faults in the stator windings of the induction motor.
Figure 11 shows a higher escalation of the current Ic amplitude since more coils are short-circuited by activating the tap T3 in the start connection. The number of short-circuited coils is equivalent to 12% of the winding. The fluctuations in the phase current amplitudes can be determined by (4).
In Figure 12, it can be observed once more that the amplitude of line current Iba remains without change, which can be deduced analytically by (4), whereas the magnitude of line currents Iac and Icb have more amplitude variations.
Table 1 and Table 2 show phase and line current behavior, respectively, before and after a short-circuit fault occurs in the phase Ic stator winding of the induction motor. From Table 1, it can be noticed how the magnitude of the phase current Ic amplitude significantly increases regarding the amplitude magnitude of phase currents Ia and Ib, whose corresponding windings are in a healthy condition. Because of the faulty condition in phase Ic, the percentage of short-circuited coils also increases. Meanwhile, in Table 2, it can be observed how the magnitude of the line current Iba amplitude remains practically unchanged.
Hence, from what has been stated before, it is clear that knowing the phase and line currents’ behavior, before and after a short-circuit fault occurs in any stator winding of a three-phase induction motor, it will be possible to identify and classify the occurrence of a short-circuit fault by performing the arithmetic operations defined in (6) and applying the linguistic rules in (7).
Table 3 displays the differences r1, r2, and r3 obtained from the corresponding RMS values from line currents Icb, Iac, and Iba, applying (6) to five different experiments conducted on a healthy motor. By employing the fuzzy logic linguistic rules defined in (7), it is determined that the condition r1r2r3 ≈ 0 is satisfied; therefore, it can be resolved that the three-phase induction motor under examination is healthy.
Results in Table 3 can be verified graphically by the line current waveforms depicted in Figure 8, where the magnitudes of the three-line current amplitudes are relatively the same, corroborating through the fuzzy rule r1r2r3 ≈ 0 that the stator windings in the induction motor are healthy.
The behavior of line currents changes by inducing a short-circuit fault in the stator winding corresponding to phase Ic, so that, two-line currents show variations on the magnitude of their amplitudes, whereas the magnitude of the third line current amplitude remains invariable, as depicted in Figure 10 and Figure 12. From this, the corresponding linguistic fuzzy logic rule that identifies and classifies the fault (r1 ≈ 0) can be corroborated as described arithmetically in Table 4 for 5%, and Table 5 for 12% in the coils in the stator winding corresponding to the short-circuited phase Ic.

4. Discussion

A statistical analysis is performed by computing the mean (μ) and standard deviation (σ) of the line current differences r1, r2, and r3 for a healthy motor, as shown in Table 3; a motor with 5% of the coils in its phase Ic winding short-circuited, as shown in Table 4; and a motor with 12% of the coils in its phase Ic winding short-circuited, as shown in Table 5. An empirical three-sigma (3σ) rule, which ensures a certainty of at least 99.7%, is used on the arithmetic line current differences r1, r2, and r3 to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method. From this 3σ analysis, it can be observed that for all cases, the arithmetic line current differences r2 and r3 vary between the thresholds defined by the corresponding mean value plus/minus three times the related standard deviation (σ), whereas the line current difference r1 essentially remains without change for the three cases: (1) a healthy motor, (2) a motor with 5% and (3) a motor with 12% of the coils in its phase Ic winding short-circuited, as depicted in Figure 13, Figure 14 and Figure 15, respectively, when the failure is located in the stator winding corresponding to phase Ic of an induction motor.
From Figure 13, it can be observed that for a healthy motor, the three line current differences r1, r2 and r3 have very similar probability density functions; however, as the short-circuit fault appears and increases from 5% to 12% in the coils in the phase Ic winding, the mean (μ) and standard deviation (σ) of the line current differences r2 and r3 change and separate from the mean (μ) and standard deviation (σ) of the line current difference r1, as depicted in Figure 14 and Figure 15, endorsing the utilization of the linguistic fuzzy rules defined in (7) for detecting and locating the short-circuit fault automatically.

5. Conclusions

Around 40% of induction motor faults are provoked by defects in the stator windings. These defects may provoke short circuits among feeding phases with catastrophic results. Most proposed techniques in the literature assess the winding insulation condition offline utilizing complex analysis methods; however, an online diagnostic technique that does not interfere with the induction motor’s working operation would be preferred. Therefore, in this work, a short-circuit fault detection approach is proposed which does not require the motor to stop to diagnose its operational condition. The proposed procedure utilizes a phasor representation analysis that consists of computing the arithmetic differences from the RMS values of the line currents, followed by a fuzzy logic classifier based on simple linguistic if-then rules to detect and classify short-circuit faults in three-phase induction motors. From the analysis of the obtained results and the 3σ-rule examination, it is demonstrated that the proposed straightforward technique allows an online implementation since it demands low computational resources and, knowing the behavior of phase and line currents as well as their corresponding magnitudes, the presence of a short-circuit fault and the feeding phase where it occurs can be determined through simple linguistic if-then rules, allowing diagnosis of the induction motor’s operational condition without interfering with its working operation. Furthermore, the proposed method is highly reliable under distinct operating scenarios since, for the case of induction motors fed through a variable speed drive (VSD), variations in the power supply amplitude or phase will be lessened through the inherent rectifying process; when the induction motors are fed directly from the power supply, variations in the amplitude or the harmonic contents of the power supply will be compensated due to Ia + Ib + Ic = 0 for any current three-phase balanced system with a neutral ground connection absent.
Future work will focus on performing a thorough analysis on how the proposed technique effectiveness for detecting short-circuit faults is affected when the induction motor load varies continuously. On the other hand, the introduced approach will be assessed for identifying open-circuit faults in the stator windings in induction motors, as well as for detecting short- and open-circuit faults in the windings of brushless dc (BLDC) motors.

Author Contributions

J.A.R.-M. and F.J.V.-P. performed the methodology implementation and helped during data analysis and result interpretation; E.R.-V. helped during experimentation for data acquisition; E.C.-Y. helped during the manuscript writing, assessed the obtained results, and helped in document preparation; G.H.-G. helped with programming and computing analysis; M.L.-R. assessed the obtained results and helped in document preparation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is unavailable due to privacy.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by Departamento de Produccion y Seguridad Industrial, Universidad Tecnologica de Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, DEPI-ITA-TecNm (Departamento de Posgrado e Investigacion—Instituto Tecnologico de Aguascalientes/Tecnologico Nacional de Mexico), and Multidisciplinary Studies Department, Engineering Division, Campus Irapuato-Salamanca, University of Guanajuato.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Siddiqui, K.M.; Sahay, K.; Giri, V.K. Health monitoring and fault diagnosis in induction motor—A review. Int. J. Adv. Res. Electr. Electron. Instrum. Eng. 2014, 3, 6549–6565. Available online: http://www.ijareeie.com/upload/2014/january/12_Health.pdf (accessed on 9 August 2022).
  2. Martinez-Herrera, A.L.; Ferrucho-Alvarez, E.R.; Ledesma-Carrillo, L.M.; Mata-Chavez, R.I.; Lopez-Ramirez, M.; Cabal-Yepez, E. Multiple fault detection in induction motors through homogeneity and kurtosis computation. Energies 2022, 15, 1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Alsaedi, M.A. Fault diagnosis of three-phase induction motor: A review. Optics 2015, 4, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Azgomi, H.F.; Poshtan, J. Induction motor stator fault detection via fuzzy logic. In Proceedings of the 21st Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE), Mashhad, Iran, 14–16 May 2013; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zamarron, A.; Rodriguez, S. Diagnostico de fallas en el motor de induccion usando logica difusa. Rev. Iberoam. Cienc. 2015, 2, 163–171. Available online: http://www.reibci.org/publicados/2015/marzo/0900113.pdf (accessed on 17 August 2022).
  6. Pineda-Sanchez, M.; Puche-Panadero, R.; Riera-Guasp, M.; Perez-Cruz, J.; Roger-Folch, J.; Pons-Llinares, J.; Climente-Alarco, V.; Antonino-Daviu, J.A. Application of the Teager–Kaiser energy operator to the fault diagnosis of induction motors. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2013, 28, 1036–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Paz-Parra, A.; Amaya-Enciso, M.C.; Olaya-Ochoa, J.; Palacios-Penaranda, J.A. Stator fault diagnosis on squirrel cage induction motors by ESA and EPVA. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Power Electronics and Power Quality Applications (PEPQA), Bogota, Colombia, 6–7 July 2013; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Picazo-Rodenas, M.J.; Antonino-Daviu, J.; Climente-Alarcon, V.; Royo-Pastor, R.; Mota-Villar, A. Combination of noninvasive approaches for general assessment of induction motors. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2015, 51, 2172–2180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Glowacz, A.; Glowacz, W.; Glowacz, Z.; Kozik, J. Early fault diagnosis of bearing and stator faults of the single-phase induction motor using acoustic signals. Measurement 2018, 113, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gargiulo, F.; Liccardo, A.; Schiano Lo Moriello, R. A non-invasive method based on AI and current measurements for the detection of faults in three-phase motors. Energies 2022, 15, 4407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Skowron, M.; Orlowska-Kowalska, T.; Wolkiewicz, M.; Kowalski, C.T. Convolutional neural network-based stator current data-driven incipient stator fault diagnosis of inverter-fed induction motor. Energies 2020, 13, 1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Villalobos-Pina, F.J.; Alvarez-Salas, R. Algoritmo robusto para el diagnostico de fallas electricas en el motor de induccion trifasico basado en herramientas espectrales y ondeletas. Rev. Iberoam. Autom. Inform. Ind. 2015, 12, 292–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cherif, H.; Menacer, A.; Romary, R.; Pusca, R. Dispersion field analysis using discrete wavelet transform for inter-turn stator fault detection in induction motors. In Proceedings of the IEEE 11th International Symposium on Diagnostics for Electrical Machines, Power Electronics and Drives (SDEMPED), Tinos, Greece, 29 August–1 September 2017; pp. 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Vinayak, B.A.; Anand, K.A.; Jagadanand, G. Wavelet-based real-time stator fault detection of inverter-fed induction motor. IET Electr. Power Appl. 2020, 14, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Reyes-Malanche, J.A.; Villalobos-Pina, F.J.; Cabal-Yepez, E.; Alvarez-Salas, R.; Rodriguez-Donate, C. Open-circuit fault diagnosis in power inverters through currents analysis in time domain. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2021, 70, 3517512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hasan Ebrahimi, S.; Choux, M.; Huynh, V.K. Real-time detection of incipient inter-turn short circuit and sensor faults in permanent magnet synchronous motor drives based on generalized likelihood ratio test and structural analysis. Sensors 2022, 22, 3407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Khader Bouzid, M.B.; Champenois, G.; Tnani, S. Reliable stator fault detection based on the induction motor negative sequence current compensation. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2018, 95, 490–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tang, Y.M.; Zhang, L.; Bao, G.Q.; Ren, F.J.; Pedrycz, W. Symmetric implicational algorithm derived from intuitionistic fuzzy entropy. Iran. J. Fuzzy. Syst. 2022, 19, 27–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Stator winding representation in parallel double-star connection of a three-phase induction motor.
Figure 1. Stator winding representation in parallel double-star connection of a three-phase induction motor.
Energies 16 00516 g001
Figure 2. Electric current phasor representation in the Ia − Icb reference system.
Figure 2. Electric current phasor representation in the Ia − Icb reference system.
Energies 16 00516 g002
Figure 3. Electric current phasor representation in the Ic − Iba reference system.
Figure 3. Electric current phasor representation in the Ic − Iba reference system.
Energies 16 00516 g003
Figure 4. Phase currents Ia and Ib shifting range when a faulty condition occurs in phase current Ic.
Figure 4. Phase currents Ia and Ib shifting range when a faulty condition occurs in phase current Ic.
Energies 16 00516 g004
Figure 5. Test bench scheme for experimentation.
Figure 5. Test bench scheme for experimentation.
Energies 16 00516 g005
Figure 6. Experimental setup.
Figure 6. Experimental setup.
Energies 16 00516 g006
Figure 7. Phase currents from an induction motor in healthy condition.
Figure 7. Phase currents from an induction motor in healthy condition.
Energies 16 00516 g007
Figure 8. Line currents from an induction motor in healthy condition.
Figure 8. Line currents from an induction motor in healthy condition.
Energies 16 00516 g008
Figure 9. Phase currents from an induction motor with a 5% short-circuit fault condition on phase-C of its stator winding.
Figure 9. Phase currents from an induction motor with a 5% short-circuit fault condition on phase-C of its stator winding.
Energies 16 00516 g009
Figure 10. Line currents from an induction motor with a 5% short-circuit fault condition on phase-C of its stator winding.
Figure 10. Line currents from an induction motor with a 5% short-circuit fault condition on phase-C of its stator winding.
Energies 16 00516 g010
Figure 11. Phase currents from an induction motor with a 12% short-circuit fault condition on phase-C of its stator winding.
Figure 11. Phase currents from an induction motor with a 12% short-circuit fault condition on phase-C of its stator winding.
Energies 16 00516 g011
Figure 12. Line currents from an induction motor with a 12% short-circuit fault condition on phase-C of its stator winding.
Figure 12. Line currents from an induction motor with a 12% short-circuit fault condition on phase-C of its stator winding.
Energies 16 00516 g012
Figure 13. Probability density functions (PDF) for the arithmetic differences r1, r2, and r3 from a healthy motor.
Figure 13. Probability density functions (PDF) for the arithmetic differences r1, r2, and r3 from a healthy motor.
Energies 16 00516 g013
Figure 14. PDF for the arithmetic differences r1, r2, and r3 from a motor with 5% of the coils in its phase Ic winding short-circuited.
Figure 14. PDF for the arithmetic differences r1, r2, and r3 from a motor with 5% of the coils in its phase Ic winding short-circuited.
Energies 16 00516 g014
Figure 15. PDF for the arithmetic differences r1, r2, and r3 from a motor with 12% of the coils in its phase Ic winding short-circuited.
Figure 15. PDF for the arithmetic differences r1, r2, and r3 from a motor with 12% of the coils in its phase Ic winding short-circuited.
Energies 16 00516 g015
Table 1. RMS value of phase currents.
Table 1. RMS value of phase currents.
Phase
Current
Healthy
Motor
Short-Circuited Coils
5%12%
Ia3.26393.28823.0821
Ib3.21143.22663.1265
Ic3.35723.61423.839
Table 2. RMS value of line currents.
Table 2. RMS value of line currents.
Phase
Current
Healthy
Motor
Short-Circuited Coils
5%12%
Iba5.79885.32285.2723
Iac5.69066.12076.2114
Icb5.73136.13856.3001
Table 3. Arithmetic differences obtained from the RMS values of the line currents from a healthy motor.
Table 3. Arithmetic differences obtained from the RMS values of the line currents from a healthy motor.
Line Current
Differences
Trials
12345
r10.03180.03030.08330.16710.0794
r20.12940.02520.13260.02420.0685
r30.09760.00510.04930.1430.1474
Table 4. Arithmetic differences of the line current RMS values from a motor with 5% of the coils in its phase Ic winding short circuited.
Table 4. Arithmetic differences of the line current RMS values from a motor with 5% of the coils in its phase Ic winding short circuited.
Line Current
Differences
Trials
12345
r10.08920.14340.13830.02140.0847
r20.49820.47850.47810.39770.3752
r30.40890.33510.33970.41920.4017
Table 5. Arithmetic differences of the line current RMS values from a motor with 12% of the coils in its phase Ic winding short-circuited.
Table 5. Arithmetic differences of the line current RMS values from a motor with 12% of the coils in its phase Ic winding short-circuited.
Line Current
Differences
Trials
12345
r10.14370.01330.13640.09090.0286
r20.64940.51430.63860.60980.6303
r30.50570.50110.50220.53800.6016
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Reyes-Malanche, J.A.; Villalobos-Pina, F.J.; Ramırez-Velasco, E.; Cabal-Yepez, E.; Hernandez-Gomez, G.; Lopez-Ramirez, M. Short-Circuit Fault Diagnosis on Induction Motors through Electric Current Phasor Analysis and Fuzzy Logic. Energies 2023, 16, 516. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/en16010516

AMA Style

Reyes-Malanche JA, Villalobos-Pina FJ, Ramırez-Velasco E, Cabal-Yepez E, Hernandez-Gomez G, Lopez-Ramirez M. Short-Circuit Fault Diagnosis on Induction Motors through Electric Current Phasor Analysis and Fuzzy Logic. Energies. 2023; 16(1):516. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/en16010516

Chicago/Turabian Style

Reyes-Malanche, Josue A., Francisco J. Villalobos-Pina, Efraın Ramırez-Velasco, Eduardo Cabal-Yepez, Geovanni Hernandez-Gomez, and Misael Lopez-Ramirez. 2023. "Short-Circuit Fault Diagnosis on Induction Motors through Electric Current Phasor Analysis and Fuzzy Logic" Energies 16, no. 1: 516. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/en16010516

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop