Next Article in Journal
Social and Economic Importance of Forest Companies in Asian Russia: Evidence from Corporate Financial Reporting
Next Article in Special Issue
Soil Chemical Properties Strongly Influence Distributions of Six Kalidium Species in Northwest China
Previous Article in Journal
Potential of Sentinel-1 Data for Spatially and Temporally High-Resolution Detection of Drought Affected Forest Stands
Previous Article in Special Issue
Leaf Stoichiometry of Halophyte Shrubs and Its Relationship with Soil Factors in the Xinjiang Desert
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Forests
Volume 13
Issue 12
10.3390/f13122149
forests-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Potential Geographical Distribution of Medicinal Plant Ephedra sinica Stapf under Climate Change

by
Kai Zhang
1,*,
Zhongyue Liu
2,
Nurbiya Abdukeyum
1 and
Yibo Ling
3
1
College of Life and Geographic Sciences, Kashi University, Kashi 844006, China
2
Senior High School Department, Kashi Special Zone Experimental School, Kashi 844006, China
3
Department of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of Xinjiang, Urumqi 830000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2022, 13(12), 2149; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/f13122149
Submission received: 25 October 2022 / Revised: 9 December 2022 / Accepted: 13 December 2022 / Published: 15 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Adaptation to Extreme Environments in Drylands)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Ephedra sinica Stapf is an important traditional medicinal plant. However, in recent years, due to climate change and human activities, its habitat area and distribution area have been decreasing sharply. In order to provide better protection for E. sinica, it is necessary to study the historical and future potential zoning of E. sinica. The maximum entropy model (MaxEnt) was used to simulate the potential geographical distribution patterns of E. sinica under historical and future climatic conditions simulated using two Shared Socio-economic Pathways. The main results were also analyzed using the jackknife method and ArcGIS. The results showed that: (1) the potential suitable distribution area of E. sinica in China is about 29.18 × 105 km2—high-suitable areas, medium-suitable areas, and low-suitable areas cover 6.38 × 105 km2, 8.62 × 105 km2, 14.18 × 105 km2, respectively—and E. sinica is mainly distributed in Inner Mongolia; (2) precipitation and temperature contribute more to the distribution of E. sinica; (3) under two kinds of SSPs, the total suitable area of E. sinica increased significantly, but the differences between 2021–2040, 2041–2060, 2061–2080, and 2081–2100 are not obvious; (4) the barycentre of E. sinica moves from the historical position to its southwest. The results show that E. sinica can easily adapt to future climates well, and its ecological value will become more important. This study provides scientific guidance for the protection, management, renewal and maintenance of E. sinica.

1. Introduction

Ephedra sinica Stapf is a herbaceous shrub species of the Ephedra genus in the Ephedraceae family. It grows on hillsides, plains, dry wastelands, riverbeds, and grasslands. It has no strict requirements on soil and is strongly resistant to drought and cold. E. sinica is mainly distributed in Liaoning, Jilin, Inner Mongolia, Hebei, Shanxi, Gansu, Henan, and Shaanxi provinces of China. It often forms large simple communities in the distribution areas, with important ecological value in desert community maintenance and stability [1]. Ephedra is a traditional herb [2] that is rich in ephedrine [3]. According to the Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China [4], the original medical plants of the Ephedra genus include E. sinica, Ephedra intermediate Schrenk et C.A.Mey., Ephedra equisetina Bge. Ephedra is a traditional drug proven to treat wind-cold syndrome and is anti-inflammatory and anti-arthritic [5]. Experiments have shown that Ephedra can effectively reduce body temperature and improve metabolism and the immune level, and E. sinica has the best effect among the three kinds of Ephedra medicinal plants [6,7,8]. However, due to climate change and human activities, the total suitable habitat of wild Ephedra is decreasing sharply [9]. Therefore, it is vital to study the impact of climate change on the distribution prediction of wild medicinal plant resources and the impact of future climate change on species distribution for the protection of wild medicinal plant resources.
Many studies have shown that global climate change has an increasing impact on plant growth and distribution and also affects the pattern and function of ecosystems and biota by changing water and heat distribution [10,11]. Some scholars, e.g., Yan et al., found that the Hydrangea macrophylla distribution range is mainly affected by precipitation and temperature [10]. Under a future scenario of increased greenhouse gas emissions, the area of suitable habitats would increase, and the barycentre would have the longest migration distance [10]. For two genetic lineages of Mikania micrantha Kunth, the range will expand for one and decrease for another because of future climate change [12]. The extinction risk of species is related to their limited plasticity and ability to adapt to rapid changes in environmental factors (e.g., temperature or precipitation [13]. However, when involving more species, scholars have found varied changes in distribution in response to climate change or human activities [14,15,16,17]. Therefore, under global climate change, it is a topic worth discussing whether the distribution range and area of species will become larger or smaller.
According to Kim et al.’s [18] research, E. sinica was used to treat symptoms caused by external stressors, and its extract significantly reduces body temperature rise and improves weight loss. Park et al. [19] and Lv et al. [20] studied E. sinica extract, proving that the extract had a preventive effect on ulcerative colitis and had a role in the treatment of adipocyte browning and obesity, respectively. At present, the main focus is on pharmacology, although the potential distribution and distribution pattern changes under historical and future climate scenarios are rare.
For some species, detailed presence/absence occurrence data are available, allowing the use of a variety of standard statistical techniques. However, absence data are not available for most species [21]. The maximum entropy (MaxEnt) model has been widely used to predict the potential geographical distribution based on limited species distribution and bioclimate data under the climate change scenario; the bioclimate data are from the World Climate Database (WorldClim), which contains different time periods and SSPs; as the website is updated, the new database can be better used for climate change analysis [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. He et al. [9] analyzed the important environmental variables affecting the distribution of three Ephedra species using the MaxEnt model, establishing a linear relationship between environmental variables and chemical components and determining which habitats can be used as priority conservation areas, providing a theoretical basis for the restoration, protection and cultivation of Ephedra. However, these papers did not analyze how Ephedra would respond to future climate change. Therefore, under different SSPs, the maximum and minimum potential distribution areas and regional changes of Ephedra need to be clarified.
In recent years, due to climate change and human activities, its habitat area and distribution area have been decreasing sharply. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the suitable habitat of E. sinica under historical and future climate change for its protection, development, and utilization. The MaxEnt model and bioclimatic data in WorldClim were used to analyze the potential suitable distribution and spatio-temporal evolution of E. sinica under two extreme climate scenarios (SSP126, sustainable path and SSP585, unsustainable path) in four different time periods (2021–2040, 2041–2060, 2061–2080, and 2081–2100), indicate the limit range of the distribution of E. sinica under the different climate scenarios, and analyze its main influencing factors. This study provides a scientific basis for the protection, development and utilization of wild medicinal plant resources.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Acquisition of Species Distribution Data

This paper selected China as the study area to study the distribution of E. sinica in China. The geographic distribution data (longitude and latitude) of E. sinica were gathered from the Chinese Virtual Herbarium (CVH, https://www.cvh.ac.cn/, (accessed on 10 September 2022)) and the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF, https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.15468/dl.rc84eb, (accessed on 16 September 2022)). Then, removing duplicate sample points and sample points without accurate longitude and latitude information. Data autocorrelation was disabled in ArcGIS 10.3 (Esri, Redlands, CA, USA), and the resolution was set at 10 km; finally, 56 reliable distribution points were obtained to execute the MaxEnt model program (Figure 1).

2.2. Acquisition of Environment Variable Data

The climate data in this study were all from the global climate database (https://www.worldclim.org/, (accessed on 6 September 2022)), with a spatial resolution of 30″, about 1 km × 1 km. The historical environmental data were 19 bioclimatic factors from 1970 to 2000. The MIROC6 (Model for Interdisciplinary Research On Climate version 6) model was developed by East Asian scholars and can be used to simulate the climate scenarios in East Asia.
This study downloaded the data of SSP126 (maximum) and SSP585 (minimum) climate scenarios, corresponding to the MIROC6 model in CMIP6 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6) in 4 different time periods of 2021–2040, 2041–2060, 2061–2080, and 2081–2100.

2.3. Build MaxEnt Model

MaxEnt mainly constructs models based on the longitude and latitude data of species’ existence points and the data of species’ living environment factors and expresses the degree of habitat suitability of species in the form of probability [30]. Under the condition that the sample size of species points is small and the correlation between various climatic and environmental factors is not clear, the prediction results of the MaxEnt model are better than those of other models, and the MaxEnt model could produce robust and accurate distribution maps [35,36]. During the operation of the MaxEnt model, the importance of variables can be measured by jackknife to avoid the influence of correlation among factors, which truly reflects the importance of each factor [37].
MaxEnt (version 3.4.1, Steven Phillips et al., New York, NY, USA) was used for this study (https://biodiversityinformatics.amnh.org/open_source/maxent/, (accessed on 5 July 2022)). When building the model, the geographic location information data of the sample were divided into 2 parts, of which 75% was randomly selected for model simulation, and the remaining 25% was used for model testing. The 10 simulation results of the MaxEnt model were averaged to determine the contribution of various environmental factors [38,39].
The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis method was used to test the accuracy of the model. The area under the curve (AUC) can easily explain the accuracy of the model simulation [40]. The AUC value range is [0, 1]. If the AUC value is between 0.5 and 0.7, the prediction accuracy is poor. If the AUC value is between 0.7 and 0.9, the prediction accuracy is medium. If the AUC value is >0.9, the prediction accuracy of the model is very high [41,42].
ArcGIS 10.3 (Esri, Redlands, CA, USA) was used to visualize the simulation results and divide the habitat suitability into 4 levels (Jenks’ natural breaks) [27] and reclassify the simulation results into 4 categories: unsuitable areas, low-suitable areas, medium-suitable areas, and high-suitable areas.

3. Results

Firstly, the distribution of E. sinica in China was analyzed. Then, the MaxEnt model was used to analyze the importance of 19 bioclimatic factors on E. sinica. Then, ArcGIS was used to analyze the past potential geographical distribution, adaptability degree, future distribution area, and migration of the distribution center of E. sinica.

3.1. Geographical Distribution

E. sinica is mainly distributed in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hebei Province, Shanxi Province, Shaanxi Province, Beijing City, Gansu Province, and other provinces, with a total of 56 record points; and its distribution scope is concentrated in the semi-humid and semi-arid areas near the Hu Huanyong Line (Figure 1). E. sinica was usually distributed on hillsides, plains, arid wastelands, river beds and grasslands. It has no strict requirements on soil and has strong drought resistance and cold resistance. The provinces where the species distribution points are located meet the main conditions.

3.2. MaxEnt Model Accuracy Test

In this study, the ROC curve analysis method was used to test the accuracy of the MaxEnt model. The average AUC value of the model training set was 0.926 ± 0.022, and the AUC value of 10 simulation training sets was high (Figure 2, Table 1), indicating that the predictive accuracy of the model was good.

3.3. Contribution Percentage of Environment Variables

During the operation of the MaxEnt model, the importance of variables can be measured by jackknife to avoid the influence of correlation among various factors, which truly reflects their importance. The average value according to 10 simulation results of the MaxEnt model was taken to determine the contribution degree and ranking importance of each environmental factor (Table 2).
It can be seen from Table 2 that, among the contribution rates of various climate factors obtained by running the MaxEnt model, the top factors are precipitation seasonality (BIO15, 23.3%), temperature seasonality (BIO4, 21.0), the precipitation of the wettest quarter (BIO13, 19.3%), the minimum temperature of the coldest quarter (BIO6, 8.6%), the maximum temperature of the hottest quarter (BIO5, 5.3%), and the precipitation of the coldest quarter (BIO19, 4.8%), with a cumulative contribution rate of 82.3%; thus, the prediction of E. sinica can yield rich information.
In terms of the importance of the arrangement, the precipitation of the wettest month (BIO13, 26.7%), the precipitation of the wettest quarter (BIO16, 17.6%), the precipitation of the hottest quarter (BIO18, 12.7%), the precipitation seasonality (BIO15, 14.5%), and the average temperature of the wettest quarter (BIO8, 9.1%) add up to 80.6%, which also reflects the importance of precipitation and temperature on the distribution of E. sinica.
Furthermore, based on the training gains of different climate factors analyzed by the jackknife method (Figure 3), the average value of the 10 simulation results shows that the environment variable with the highest gain when simulated alone is BIO12; thus, it itself has the most useful information. BIO15 will reduce the benefit to the greatest extent when omitted; therefore, it has the most information that does not exist in other variables.

3.4. Threshold Analysis of Important Environmental Variables

It can be seen from the response curve analysis that the climate characteristics of E. sinica in China’s distribution area are precipitation seasonality (BIO15; 25.4–150.6), temperature seasonality (BIO4; 308.1%–1773.9%), the precipitation of the wettest month (BIO13; 3.0–768.0 mm), the minimum temperature of the coldest month (BIO6; 37.2–16.6 °C), the maximum temperature of the hottest month (BIO5; 1.8–42.1 °C), and the precipitation of the coldest month (BIO19; 0–461.0 mm). Six bioclimatic factors mainly determine the living range of E. sinica and also show the species’ basic niches formed in the process of adapting to the environment. This shows that the growth of E. sinica is mainly affected by “extreme” precipitation and “extreme” temperature. It has a wide range of temperature tolerance, can withstand a certain degree of low temperature, and is suitable for growing in arid and semi-arid deserts, grassland, sandy land, river beaches, etc. (Figure 4).

3.5. Evaluation of Potential Geographical Distribution and Suitable Areas

The total distribution area of E. sinica in China is about 29.18 × 105 km2, accounting for 30.33% of the land area. High-suitable areas are mainly located in the middle of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, northern Shaanxi Province, northern and central Shanxi Province, central and southern Hebei Province, western Liaoning Province, western Jilin Province, southwestern Heilongjiang Province, northwestern Beijing, Gansu Province, and the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region of Qinghai Province (Figure 5). The optimal area based on model simulation is about 6.38 × 105 km2.
The medium-suitable areas are located around the most suitable regions. There are also some suitable regions in the center of the Tibet Autonomous Region, the center of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Gansu Province, Taiwan and Qinghai Province. The distribution of the medium-suitable area covers about 8.62 × 105 km2 (Figure 5).
The distribution of low-suitability area covers about 14.18 × 105 km2, mainly concentrated in the east and west of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, the east and center of Xinjiang, the west and center of Tibet, the east and west of Qinghai Province, the center and east of Gansu Province, the south of the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, the center of Shaanxi Province, the south and center of Shanxi Province, the north and center of Henan Province, the north of Anhui Province, the north of Jiangsu Province, most of Shandong Province, the east of Liaoning Province, and northeast and center of Jilin Province. There are also a few in Hebei Province, Jiangxi Province and Taiwan Province in the east-central part of Heilongjiang Province (Figure 5).

3.6. Future Trends in the Barycentre of Suitable Habitat

Through simulation, it was found that, under future climate scenarios, the distribution area of E. sinica will become larger, and the distribution range will continue to increase (Table 3). The results infer that the ecological value of E. sinica will become more and more important. Using ArcGIS to analyze the center of gravity transfer trajectories of E. sinica at different suitability levels, it was found that the center of gravity coordinates of high-suitable, medium-suitable, and low-suitable areas were 115.7090° E, 42.0735° N; 115.0260° E, 41.2850° N; and 110.7560° E, and 38.8274° N, respectively, under historical climate conditions. Under SSP126, the distribution barycentre of the three types of suitable areas will shift from northeast to southwest, compared with historical climate conditions. Under SSP585, the gravity center of different suitable areas will also move to the southwest. It shows that climate change will cause the barycentre of the E. sinica distribution area to migrate (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

In this study, the MaxEnt model was selected to simulate the historical potential distribution and future potential distribution of E. sinica; it was found that the simulation accuracy was very good. Some scholars also found that the prediction accuracy indicators of the MaxEnt model are all greater than 0.90 [41,43], which is consistent with these results. Therefore, this model can be used as a powerful tool to study the potential distribution of species and plant distribution under future climate change scenarios [44,45,46]. Of course, some scholars (e.g., Cotto et al.) believed that the high fitting degree of MaxEnt fitting results does not mean that the simulation results can accurately reflect the actual distribution and potential distribution of species [47]. In this regard, we should be more careful in interpreting the results.
The main bioclimatic factors affecting the distribution of E. sinica are precipitation seasonality, temperature seasonality, the precipitation of the wettest month, the minimum temperature of the coldest month, the maximum temperature of the hottest month, and the precipitation of the coldest quarter. The order of importance was as follows, the precipitation of the wettest month, the precipitation of the wettest quarter, the precipitation of the hottest quarter, precipitation seasonality, and the average temperature of the wettest quarter are more important. It can be seen from this that the distribution of E. sinica in China is limited by water and temperature, indicating that E. sinica has a wide range of temperature ecology, can withstand a certain degree of drought, and can grow in arid and semi-arid deserts, grasslands, sandy lands, river beaches, etc.
The distribution center of E. sinica is Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region-Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region–Qinghai Province. Flora of China [1] records that the flowering period of E. sinica is concentrated from May to June, and the seed maturity is concentrated from August to September; there, it can be inferred that E. sinica completes its life cycle in a relatively short time (2–3 months), which is consistent with the hydrothermal conditions in the growing season of E. sinica. The environment in these areas is mainly semi-humid and semi-arid desert and sandy land, with four distinct seasons and harsh conditions. In the assessment area, the very serious and very serious interference areas are mainly distributed in the south and east of Inner Mongolia, and the middle interference areas are concentrated in Gansu and Inner Mongolia [10]. Due to the dry climate, cold waves and frequent wind and sand dust disasters, plants in some areas are difficult to survive, which can be proved by these results and the results of the MaxEnt model.
Withstanding extinction while facing rapid climate change depends on a species’ ability to track its ecological niche or to evolve a new one [47]. The adaptation of plants to arid environments can be reflected by their functional traits [48]. However, when it is difficult to obtain functional traits, the distribution area and distribution area of plants can reflect the adaptation of plants to the environment. This paper has chosen two extreme pathways of social and economic sharing. Under SSP126 and SSP585, the distribution range and area of E. sinica increased significantly, but the two different SSP pathways had no significant impact on the distribution of E. sinica. In the future, due to the impact of human socio-economic activities, the potential distribution of E. sinica will change significantly, E. sinica can adapt well both in the sustainable development pathways and the unsustainable development way, and its distribution area could rapidly expand and be maintained, indicating that the survival prospects of E. sinica are improving under climate change. This may be related to future climate warming and the redistribution of hydrothermal conditions in the temperate zone where E. sinica grows. This is consistent with Wang et al.’s research on the increase in the suitable habitat of Tricholoma matsutake in the western Sichuan Plateau under the future climate scenario [49].
The barycenters of different suitability levels of E. sinica in the future climate were extracted using ArcGIS, and their transfer tracks were analyzed. It was found that the range of E. sinica will move to the southwest in the future. When Xu et al. [26] studied the future distribution of the traditional medicinal plant Rheum nanum Siev. ex Pall., they also found that its distribution center will shift to the south. Similarly, the southwest movement of E. sinica may be due to the redistribution of temperature and precipitation caused by global warming; thus, it moves to the southwest to expand new distribution areas.
The rapid economic growth, overexploitation of natural resources, habitat degradation, pollution and pressure related to global climate change are all serious challenges to plant protection in the new millennium. At the same time, management problems (such as lack of protection awareness of government officials and local people, imperfect legal system) and insufficient basic research on endangered species are also obstacles to success [50]. The protection and sustainable use of biodiversity is an important task of nature conservation. Mankind’s predatory development and utilization of E. sinica may reduce its numbers to a certain extent [9]; for the protection, development, and utilization of E. sinica, therefore, we should not only pay attention to climate change but also consider the impact of human beings.
This paper analyzes the potential distribution of E. sinica, the bioclimatic factors affecting its distribution, and the future distribution changes, obtains some good results, and puts forward some useful suggestions. Whether the simulation results of the MaxEnt model and other niche models are consistent? If not, what is the reason and how to improve? How about the impact of human beings on the distribution of E. sinica, and how to measure the impact of human beings? Are more species consistent with climate change? How can biodiversity be maintained? How does the higher classification unit “genus” adapt to climate change? These all need to be further studied.

5. Conclusions

The MaxEnt model can be used to simulate the potential distribution of species, but attention should be paid to the interpretation of the model results, and excessive inference is not allowed. According to the data collection points and simulated niches of E. sinica, the conditions of temperature and water, namely the combination of water and heat, limit the changes in the actual distribution and future distribution of E. sinica. Therefore, regional moisture and heat conditions should be considered when protecting E. sinica. The existing distribution area of E. sinica is greatly disturbed by human activities, so it is necessary to protect E. sinica pertinently, such as setting up natural reserves, carrying out publicity and education, raising people’s awareness of E. sinica and enhancing the awareness of ecological environment protection.
This study provides a research model for the evolution of the distribution pattern of E. sinica, an important traditional medicinal plant in ethnic minority areas, and also provides a theoretical basis for the protection and management of E. sinica, a single community in desert areas, which is conducive to maintaining regional ecological balance and sustainable development. Of course, in view of the small sample size of research species, it is not enough to study only one kind of plant as an indicator of environmental change and a guide for government decision-making.
In the future, authors will continue to pay attention to plants in arid areas and deduce the response of plants to climate change through experiments and simulation calculations so as to provide better guidance for regional ecological balance and government decision-making. For example, these topics should continue to be studied in depth; the response of more plant species’ geographical distribution patterns to climate change, the analysis of biodiversity maintenance mechanisms, and the adaptive changes in plant evolution should be analyzed from the higher taxon “genus”, etc.
E. sinica, as an important wild medicinal plant resource, should take on-site protection measures for large populations as soon as possible, such as delimiting natural population protection areas and ecological protection areas of E. sinica in Inner Mongolia, which can not only protect the local ecological environment, but also protect the wild resources of E. sinica, and reserve natural germplasm resources for domestication, cultivation and resource development. In addition, E. sinica cultivation should be actively promoted in other potentially suitable areas as the main repair service for ecological restoration of sandy land, and the local people should be guided to cultivate so as to ensure species protection, desert control and economic development into a coordinated and sustainable state.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.Z.; methodology, K.Z.; software, Z.L.; validation, K.Z. and Z.L.; formal analysis, K.Z. and Z.L.; investigation, K.Z. and Z.L.; resources, K.Z.; data curation, K.Z. and Z.L.; writing—original draft preparation, K.Z.; writing—review and editing, Z.L. and N.A.; visualization, Z.L. and N.A.; supervision, Y.L.; project administration, K.Z.; funding acquisition, K.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Kashi University High-level Talents Research Initiation Funding Project, grant number GCC2020ZK-002.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Flora of China. Available online: http://www.iplant.cn/foc (accessed on 2 September 2022).
  2. Ibragic, S.; Sofic, E. Chemical composition of various ephedra species. Bosn. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2015, 15, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Lu, Q.; Wang, J.H.; Zhu, J.M. Atlas of Desert Plants in China, 1st ed.; China Forestry Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2012; p. 16. [Google Scholar]
  4. Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China. Available online: https://db.ouryao.com/yd2020/ (accessed on 2 September 2022).
  5. Yeom, M.J.; Lee, H.C.; Kim, G.H.; Lee, H.J.; Shim, I.; Oh, S.K.; Kang, S.K.; Hahm, D.H. Anti-arthritic effects of Ephedra sinica STAPF herb-acupuncture: Inhibition of lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation and adjuvant-induced polyarthritis. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2006, 100, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Li, H.Y.; Ding, X.Y.; Zhang, D.; An, Q.; Jin, Y.; Zhan, Z.L.; Zheng, Y.G. Herbal textual research on ephedrae herba in famous classical formulas. Chin. J. Exp. Tradit. Med. Formulae 2022, 28, 102–110. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang, B.B.; Zeng, M.N.; Zhang, Q.Q.; Jia, J.F.; Wang, R.; Guo, P.L.; Liu, M.; Jian, L.H.; Feng, W.S.; Zheng, X.K. Intervention effects of Ephedra sinica Stapf, Ephedra intermedia Schrenk et C. A. Mey., and Ephedra equisetina Bge. on rat model of fenghanbiaozheng. Pharmacol. Clin. Chin. Mater. Med. 2022, 38, 121–127. [Google Scholar]
  8. Jia, J.F.; Zeng, M.N.; Zhang, B.B.; Guo, P.L.; Liu, M.; Zhang, Q.Q.; Wang, R.; Zheng, X.K.; Feng, W.S. Study on the differences of immune effects of water extracts of Ephedra sinica Stapf, Ephedra intermedia Schrenk et C. A. Mey., Ephedra equisetina Bge. on wind-cold superficies syndrome in rats. Chem. Life 2021, 41, 2265–2273. [Google Scholar]
  9. He, P.; Li, J.Y.; Li, Y.F.; Xu, N.; Gao, Y.; Guo, L.F.; Huo, T.T.; Peng, C.; Meng, F.Y. Habitat protection and planning for three Ephedra using the MaxEnt and Marxan models. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 133, 108399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yan, X.Y.; Wang, S.C.; Duan, Y.; Han, J.; Huang, D.H.; Zhou, J. Current and future distribution of the deciduous shrub Hydrangea macrophylla in China estimated by MaxEnt. Ecol. Evol. 2021, 11, 16099–16112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, Y.; An, M.T.; Wu, J.Y.; Liu, F.; Wang, W. Geographical distribution pattern and dominant climatic factors of the Paphiopedilum Subgen. Brachypetalum in China. Chin. J. Plant Ecol. 2022, 46, 40–50. [Google Scholar]
  12. Banerjee, A.K.; Mukherjee, A.; Guo, W.X.; Ng, W.L.; Huang, Y.L. Combining ecological niche modeling with genetic lineage information to predict potential distribution of Mikania micrantha Kunth in South and Southeast Asia under predicted climate change. Glob. Ecol. Cons. 2019, 20, e00800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Antúnez, P. Main environmental variables influencing the abundance of plant species under risk category. J. For. Res. 2021, 33, 1209–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Alkhalifah, D.H.M.; Damra, E.; Khalaf, S.M.H.; Hozzein, W.N. Biogeography of black mold Aspergillus niger: Global situation and future perspective under several climate change scenarios using MaxEnt modeling. Diversity 2022, 14, 845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nzei, J.M.; Ngarega, B.K.; Mwanzia, V.M.; Kurauka, J.K.; Wang, Q.F.; Chen, J.M.; Li, Z.Z.; Pan, C. Assessment of climate change and land use effects on Water Lily (Nymphaea L.) habitat suitability in South America. Diversity 2022, 14, 830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cunningham, M.A. Climate change, Agriculture, and Biodiversity: How does shifting agriculture affect habitat availability? Land 2022, 11, 1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Buendía-Espinoza, J.C.; Martínez-Ochoa, E.D.C.; Díaz-Aguilar, I.; Cahuich-Damián, J.E.; Zamora-Elizalde, M.C. Identifying potential planting sites for three non-native plants to be used for soil rehabilitation in the Tula Watershed. Forests 2022, 13, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kim, W.; Lee, W.; Huh, E.; Choi, E.; Jang, Y.P.; Kim, Y.-K.; Lee, T.-H.; Oh, M.S. Ephedra sinica Stapf and gypsum attenuates heat-induced hypothalamic inflammation in mice. Toxins 2020, 12, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Park, S.-J.; Shon, D.-H.; Ryu, Y.-H.; Ko, Y. Extract of Ephedra sinica Stapf induces browning of mouse and human white adipocytes. Foods 2022, 11, 1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lv, M.; Wang, Y.; Wan, X.; Han, B.; Yu, W.; Liang, Q.; Xiang, J.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Qian, Y.; et al. Rapid screening of proanthocyanidins from the roots of Ephedra sinica Stapf and its preventative effects on dextran-sulfate-sodium-induced ulcerative colitis. Metabolites 2022, 12, 957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Phillips, S.J.; Anderson, R.P.; Schapire, R.E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Eco. Model. 2006, 190, 231–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Du, Q.; Wei, C.H.; Liang, C.T.; Yu, J.H.; Wang, H.M.; Wang, W.J. Future climatic adaption of 12 dominant tree species in Northeast China under 3 climatic scenarios by using MaxEnt modeling. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2022, 42, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ma, S.M.; Zhang, M.L.; Chen, X. Potential geographical distribution of Genus Ammopitanthus (Leguminosae) in the Eastern Central Asian Desert and its determinant environmental factors. J. Desert. Res. 2012, 32, 1301–1307. [Google Scholar]
  24. Fungjanthuek, J.; Huang, M.J.; Hughes, A.C.; Huang, J.F.; Chen, H.H.; Gao, J.; Peng, Y.Q. Ecological niche overlap and prediction of the potential distribution of two sympatric ficus (Moraceae) species in the Indo-Burma Region. Forests 2022, 13, 1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, M.L.; Sun, H.Y.; Jiang, X.; Zhou, T.; Zhang, Q.J.; Su, Z.D.; Zhang, Y.N.; Liu, J.N.; Li, Z.H. Simulation and prediction of the potential geographical distribution of Acer cordatum Pax in different climate scenarios. Forests 2022, 13, 1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xu, W.; Zhu, S.; Yang, T.; Cheng, J.; Jin, J. Maximum entropy niche-based modeling for predicting the potential suitable habitats of a traditional medicinal plant (Rheum nanum) in Asia under climate change conditions. Agriculture 2022, 12, 610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Meng, Y.; Ma, J.M.; Wang, Y.Q.; Mo, Y.H. Prediction of distribution area of Loropetalum chinense based on Maxent model. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2020, 40, 8287–8296. [Google Scholar]
  28. Qi, S.; Luo, W.; Chen, K.-L.; Li, X.; Luo, H.L.; Yang, Z.Q.; Yin, D.M. The prediction of the potentially suitable distribution area of Cinnamomum mairei H. Lév in China based on the MaxEnt model. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wan, J.N.; Mbari, M.J.; Wang, S.W.; Liu, B.; Mwangi, B.N.; Rasoarahona, J.R.E.; Xin, H.P.; Zhou, Y.D.; Wang, Q.F. Modeling impacts of climate change on the potential distribution of six endemic baobab species in Madagascar. Plant Divers. 2021, 43, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, L.; Wei, Y.Q.; Wang, J.N.; Zhou, Q.; Liu, F.G.; Chen, Q.; Liu, F. The potential geographical distribution of Lycium ruthenicum Murr under differernt climate change scenarios. Chin. J. Appl. Envion. Biol. 2020, 26, 969–978. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhang, L.X.; Chen, X.L.; Xin, X.G. Short commentary on CMIP6 Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP). Clim. Change Res. 2019, 15, 519–525. [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang, Y.; Li, H.X.; Wang, H.J.; Sun, B.; Chen, H.P. Evaluation of CMIP6 model simulations of extreme precipitation in China and comparison with CMIP5. Acta Meteorol. Sin. 2021, 79, 369–386. [Google Scholar]
  33. Xia, S.; Liu, P.; Jiang, Z.H.; Cheng, J. Simulation evaluation of AMO and PDO with CMIP5 and CMIP6 models in historical experiment. Adv. Earth Sci. 2021, 36, 58–68. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hu, T.; Lv, S.H.; Chang, Y.; Yang, M.X.; Luo, J.X.; Cheng, X.Q. Analysis and prediction of permafrost changes in Qinghai-Xizang Plateau by CMIP6 climate models. Plateau Meteorol. 2022, 41, 363–375. [Google Scholar]
  35. Antúnez, P. Influence of physiography, soil and climate on taxus globosa. Nord. J. Bot. 2021, 39, 03058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kaky, E.; Nolan, V.; Alatawi, A.; Gilbert, F. A comparison between Ensemble and MaxEnt species distribution modelling approaches for conservation: A case study with Egyptian medicinal plants. Ecol. Inform. 2020, 60, 101150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Merow, C.; Smith, M.J.; Silander, J.A., Jr. A partical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distribution: What it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography 2013, 36, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, H.; Zhao, H.X.; Wang, H. Potential geographical distribution of Populus euphratica in China under future climate change scenarios based on MaxEnt model. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2020, 40, 6552–6563. [Google Scholar]
  39. Yan, H.; Ma, S.M.; Wei, B.; Zhang, H.X.; Zhang, D. Historical distribution patterns and environmental drivers of relict shrub Amygdalus pedunculata. Chin. J. Plant Ecol. 2022, 46, 766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ying, L.X.; Liu, Y.; Chen, S.T.; Shen, Z.H. Simulation of the potential range of Pistacia weinmannifolia in Southwest China with climate change based on the maximum-entropy model. Biodivers. Sci. 2016, 24, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chu, J.M.; Li, Y.F.; Zhang, L.; Li, B.; Gao, M.Y.; Tang, X.Q.; Ni, J.W.; Xu, X.Q. Potential distribution range and conservation strategies for the endangered species Amygdalus pedunculata. Biodivers. Sci. 2017, 25, 799–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Kim, J.Y.; Kim, G.-Y.; Do, Y.; Park, H.-S.; Joo, G.-J. Relative importance of hydrological variables in predicting the habitat suitability of Euryale ferox Salisb. J. Plant Ecol. 2018, 11, 169–179. [Google Scholar]
  43. Xiong, Q.L.; He, Y.L.; Deng, F.Y.; Li, T.Y.; Yu, L. Assessment of alpine mean response to climate change in Southwest China based on MaxEnt model. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2019, 39, 9033–9043. [Google Scholar]
  44. Venne, S.; Currie, D.J. Can habitat suitability estimated from MaxEnt predict colonizations and extinctions? Divers. Distrib. 2021, 27, 873–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, W.P.; Hu, Y.Y.; Li, Z.H.; Feng, X.P.; Li, D.W. Predicting suitable distribution areas of Juniperus przewalskii in Qinghai Province under climate change scenarios. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2021, 32, 2514–2524. [Google Scholar]
  46. Liu, Z.L.; Hu, L.L. Prediction of potential distribution and climate change of rare species Cephalotaxus oliveri. For. Resour. Wanagement 2022, 1, 35–42. [Google Scholar]
  47. Cotto, O.; Wessely, J.; Georges, D.; Klonner, G.; Schmid, M.; Dullinger, S.; Thuiller, W.; Guillaume, F. A dynamic eco-evolutionary model predicts slow response of alpine plants to climate warming. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Yang, X.-D.; Anwar, E.; Zhou, J.; He, D.; Gao, Y.-C.; Lv, G.-H.; Cao, Y.-E. Higher association and integration among functional traits in small tree than shrub in resisting drought stress in an arid desert. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2022, 201, 104993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, Q.L.; Wang, R.L.; Zhang, L.P.; Han, Y.J.; Wang, M.T.; Chen, H.; Chen, J.; Guo, W. Climatic ecological suitability and potential distribution of Trichlolma matsutake in western Sichuan Plateau, China Based on MaxEnt model. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2021, 32, 2525–2533. [Google Scholar]
  50. Ma, Y.-P.; Chen, G.; Grumbine, R.E.; Dao, Z.; Sun, W.; Guo, H. Conserving plant species with extremely small populations (psesp) in china. Biodivers. Conserv. 2013, 22, 803–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Forests 13 02149 g001 550
Figure 1. Distribution of E. sinica data points. This map was made based on the standard map No. GS (2019) 1822 downloaded from the National Administration of Surveying, Mapping and Geoinformation (NASG) of China. The base map is unchanged, and the geographical coordinate is WGS84. The same is below.
Figure 1. Distribution of E. sinica data points. This map was made based on the standard map No. GS (2019) 1822 downloaded from the National Administration of Surveying, Mapping and Geoinformation (NASG) of China. The base map is unchanged, and the geographical coordinate is WGS84. The same is below.
Forests 13 02149 g001
Forests 13 02149 g002 550
Figure 2. AUC training values for Ephedra sinica Stapf.
Figure 2. AUC training values for Ephedra sinica Stapf.
Forests 13 02149 g002
Forests 13 02149 g003 550
Figure 3. The Jackknife test with (a) training gain and (b) test gain for variable importance. The blue bar (left part of each variable row) indicates model gain with a single variable, and the cyan bar (right part of each variable row) indicates model gain with the other remaining variables. The red bar (base, all variables) represents the total gain with all variables in the final model.
Figure 3. The Jackknife test with (a) training gain and (b) test gain for variable importance. The blue bar (left part of each variable row) indicates model gain with a single variable, and the cyan bar (right part of each variable row) indicates model gain with the other remaining variables. The red bar (base, all variables) represents the total gain with all variables in the final model.
Forests 13 02149 g003
Forests 13 02149 g004a 550Forests 13 02149 g004b 550Forests 13 02149 g004c 550Forests 13 02149 g004d 550
Figure 4. The response curve of dominant environment variables. (a–f) represent the response curves of ephedra under the influence of BIO15, BIO4, BIO13, BIO6, BIO5 and BIO19 respectively.
Figure 4. The response curve of dominant environment variables. (a–f) represent the response curves of ephedra under the influence of BIO15, BIO4, BIO13, BIO6, BIO5 and BIO19 respectively.
Forests 13 02149 g004aForests 13 02149 g004bForests 13 02149 g004cForests 13 02149 g004d
Forests 13 02149 g005 550
Figure 5. Distribution of suitable areas for E. sinica. The map source is the same as in Figure 1.
Figure 5. Distribution of suitable areas for E. sinica. The map source is the same as in Figure 1.
Forests 13 02149 g005
Forests 13 02149 g006 550
Figure 6. The change trends in the gravity points of the suitable areas for E. sinica under different climatic conditions. The map source is the same as in Figure 1.
Figure 6. The change trends in the gravity points of the suitable areas for E. sinica under different climatic conditions. The map source is the same as in Figure 1.
Forests 13 02149 g006
Table
Table 1. AUC value of ten simulations.
Table 1. AUC value of ten simulations.
AUC Value of Ten Simulations
No.TrainingTest
10.940.94
20.950.88
30.890.91
40.950.91
50.890.91
60.900.94
70.940.91
80.930.88
90.940.82
100.940.94
Table
Table 2. Relative contributions of environmental variables to the Maxent model for E. sinica.
Table 2. Relative contributions of environmental variables to the Maxent model for E. sinica.
Bioclimate VariableContribution (%)Permutation Importance
BIO15Precipitation Seasonality (Coefficient of Variation)23.3014.50
BIO4Temperature Seasonality (standard deviation × 100)21.000.70
BIO13Precipitation of Wettest Month19.3026.70
BIO6Min Temperature of Coldest Month8.601.30
BIO5Max Temperature of Warmest Month5.300.40
BIO19Precipitation of Coldest Quarter4.800.50
BIO12Annual Precipitation3.004.40
BIO16Precipitation of Wettest Quarter2.7017.60
BIO3Isothermality (BIO2/BIO7) (×100)2.501.00
BIO2Mean Diurnal Range (Mean of monthly (max temp—min temp))2.002.60
BIO18Precipitation of Warmest Quarter1.8012.70
BIO8Mean Temperature of Wettest Quarter1.709.10
BIO14Precipitation of Driest Month1.300.60
BIO17Precipitation of Driest Quarter1.104.00
BIO10Mean Temperature of Warmest Quarter0.700.70
BIO7Temperature Annual Range (BIO5–BIO6)0.401.10
BIO9Mean Temperature of Driest Quarter0.401.70
BIO1Annual Mean Temperature0.000.10
BIO11Mean Temperature of Coldest Quarter0.000.20
Table
Table 3. Potential distribution area changes in different periods.
Table 3. Potential distribution area changes in different periods.
Shared Socio-Economic PathwaysTime PeriodsArea (×104 km2)
Historical1970–2000291.76
SSP1262021–2040611.40
2041–2060617.67
2061–2080624.19
2081–2100644.53
SSP5852021–2040630.14
2041–2060648.23
2061–2080621.06
2081–2100644.25
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, K.; Liu, Z.; Abdukeyum, N.; Ling, Y. Potential Geographical Distribution of Medicinal Plant Ephedra sinica Stapf under Climate Change. Forests 2022, 13, 2149. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/f13122149

AMA Style

Zhang K, Liu Z, Abdukeyum N, Ling Y. Potential Geographical Distribution of Medicinal Plant Ephedra sinica Stapf under Climate Change. Forests. 2022; 13(12):2149. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/f13122149

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Kai, Zhongyue Liu, Nurbiya Abdukeyum, and Yibo Ling. 2022. "Potential Geographical Distribution of Medicinal Plant Ephedra sinica Stapf under Climate Change" Forests 13, no. 12: 2149. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/f13122149

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop