Next Article in Journal
Polycarboxybetaine-Based Hydrogels for the Capture and Release of Circulating Tumor Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Photomotion of Hydrogels with Covalently Attached Azo Dye Moieties—Thermoresponsive and Non-Thermoresponsive Gels
Previous Article in Journal
Advances of Stimulus-Responsive Hydrogels for Bone Defects Repair in Tissue Engineering
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recent Studies on Hydrogels Based on H2O2-Responsive Moieties: Mechanism, Preparation and Application
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Gels
Volume 8
Issue 6
10.3390/gels8060390
gels-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Unravelling the Supramolecular Driving Forces in the Formation of CO2-Responsive Pseudopeptidic Low-Molecular-Weight Hydrogelators

by
Ferran Esteve
1,
Alexis Villanueva-Antolí
2,
Belén Altava
1,*,
Eduardo García-Verdugo
1 and
Santiago V. Luis
1,*
1
Departamento de Química Inorgánica y Orgánica, Universitat Jaume I, Av. Sos Baynat s/n, 12071 Castelló de la Plana, Spain
2
Institute of Advanced Materials (INAM), Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castelló de la Plana, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Gels 2022, 8(6), 390; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/gels8060390
Submission received: 2 June 2022 / Revised: 16 June 2022 / Accepted: 17 June 2022 / Published: 20 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Stimuli-Responsive Polymer Gels)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A new family of C2-symmetric pseudopeptides with a high functional density for supramolecular interactions has been synthetized through the attachment of four amino acid subunits to a diamino aliphatic spacer. The resulting open-chain compounds present remarkable properties as low-molecular-weight hydrogelators. The self-assembled 3D networks were characterized by SEM analyses, observing regular nanofibres with 80–100 nm diameters. Spectroscopic and molecular modelling experiments revealed the presence of strong synergic effects between the H-bonding and π–π interactions, with the best results obtained for the homoleptic tetra-pseudopeptide derived from l-Phe. In addition, these bioinspired hydrogels possessed pH- and CO2-responsive sol–gel transitions. The formation of ammonium carbamate derivatives in the presence of carbon dioxide led to a detrimental change in its adequate self-assembly. CO2 desorption temperatures of ca. 70 °C were assigned to the thermodynamically favoured recovery of the supramolecular gel.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Soft materials based on low-molecular-weight gelators (LMWG) have received significant attention in the last two decades, as they present some interesting features such as well-defined molecular weights, easy structural tuneability, and their capacity to form relatively regular nanostructures [1,2,3,4]. The strength of their 3D networks, and thus, the critical gelation concentration (CGC) of the corresponding supramolecular gels, is extremely dependent on the intermolecular non-covalent interactions present [5,6,7].
Gels formed in aqueous systems, i.e., hydrogels, are of special interest due to the wide variety of applications possible, ranging from tissue engineering [8,9] and controlled drug delivery [10,11,12] to nanoscale electronics [13] and actuators [14,15]. Hydrogelators based on amino acids are very attractive because of the highly tuneable characteristics of the amino acid fragments, their natural origin, and, accordingly, their potential for biocompatibility and biodegradability [16,17,18,19,20,21].
In this regard, C2-symmetric pseudopeptidic compounds displaying apolar spacers have shown remarkable gelating behaviours in different solvents [22], with the presence of additional functional components, such as urea fragments, significantly increasing the stability of the resulting supramolecular gels [23,24]. The introduction of polarfunctionalities in such pseudopeptides with apolar spacers has shown to afford efficient hydrogelators with pH-responsive self-assembling properties [25]. These results highlight the potential of using pseudopeptides as gelators due to the high flexibility of design that such molecules offer. Related approaches have allowed, for instance, the development of bioinspired hydrogels as controlled drug release systems [26].
Upon exposure to external stimuli, the dynamic nature of the different intermolecular interactions involved in the formation of a polymeric supramolecular structure enables reversible sol–gel transitions [27,28,29,30]. Unsurprisingly, many efforts have been devoted to the design of hydrogels that exhibit promising switchable properties on the basis of their different applications [31,32,33]. In this regard, CO2 is an ideal candidate for acting as a stimulus because it is a non-toxic, cheap, and abundant species. Therefore, several CO2-switchable soft materials have been precisely designed, leading to interesting advantages in the fields of chemosensors, absorbents, and drug delivery [34,35,36,37,38,39]. Nevertheless, the vast majority of the amino-based reported systems describe either the use of polymeric materials or the design of CO2-promoted LMWGs that are only suitable for gelation in organic solvents, thus hampering their use in biological applications [40]. An additional hurdle of amine-containing CO2 absorbents is the large energy consumption associated with the high temperatures required for desorption, stressing the need for the development of more efficient systems [41].
Taking these inspiring precedents into account, we report herein the preparation of open-chain C2-symmetric pseudopeptides containing four amino acid units within their structure. These simple compounds can be used to generate stable hydrogels in which self-assembly is governed by π–π interactions and H bonding [42,43]. The resulting supramolecular materials display promising properties for reversible, CO2-controlled hydrogelation. They present a rapid and isothermal CO2 absorption at room temperature, with subsequent CO2 desorption from the resulting ammonium carbamate derivative upon heating at temperatures of <80 °C, which defines a change in the self-assembly process.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis of the Pseudopeptidic Compounds and Gelation Properties of LMWGs

The synthesis of the different C2-symmetric tetra-pseudopeptides, 6a–f, is shown in Scheme 1. Compounds 4a–d were obtained following the previously reported synthetic procedure (Scheme 1) [44].
Briefly, the first step consisted of the synthesis of the activated esters of the l-amino acids, using DCC as the coupling agent. The resulting activated esters, 2a,b, were reacted with the desired diamine to yield the N-Cbz-protected pseudopeptides, 3a–d. The deprotection step to create the compounds 4a–d relied on the use of a HBr/Hac (33%) solution. An additional coupling step with either 2a or 2b resulted in the N-protected tetra-pseudopeptides 5a–f. The subsequent hydrogenation in the presence of palladium on activated carbon led to the desired deprotected tetra-pseudopeptides 6a–f. The overall yields to produce 6a–f from compounds 1a,b ranged from 20% to 40%.
The gelation properties of the tetra-pseudopeptidic compounds 6a–f were assayed in different aqueous mixtures and in water. As shown in Table 1, the nature of the amino acid side chain played a critical role in the self-assembly behaviour. As a matter of fact, the phenylalanine derivative 6b formed gels in water mixtures and in water at 1 mg/mL (entries 2, 17, and 20, Table 1), while the valine-derived compound 6a was not able to yield hydrogels under analogous conditions (entries 1, 18, and 19, Table 1). These results suggested that π–π interactions could be a major requirement for the 3D network to grow. Interestingly, when the gelation properties for compound 6b were assayed in H2O:DMSO (90:10, v/v), an instantaneous gelation process was observed without the need for any external stimuli. On the other hand, when the experiments were performed in EtOH:H2O mixtures, sonication was always needed to obtain similar hydrogels.
The key role of aromatic interactions in the aggregation capacity of these pseudopeptides was confirmed by the results obtained for the heteroleptic compounds 6e and 6f, which contained only two aromatic groups in their side chains instead of the four displayed by 6b. When 1 mg of 6e or 6f was dissolved in H2O:DMSO (90:10, v/v), a clear solution was obtained, thus revealing a lower gelating ability (entries 7 and 9, Table 1). When the concentration of the heteroleptic compounds was increased to 5 mg/mL, this triggered the formation of a weak hydrogel for 6f (entry 10, Table 1), whereas the 6e sample still appeared as a clear solution (entry 8, Table 1). Interestingly, a weak gel was obtained when equimolar amounts of 6e and 6f (0.5 mg/mL each) were mixed, inferring that the two-component mixture was able to self-assemble in fibrillar aggregates (entry 11, Table 1). In view of these results, we also explored the hydrogelation properties of the precursors 4a–4e, although their extremely low solubility in water hampered this approach.
In addition, the effect of the aliphatic spacer length on the gelation ability was also evaluated. Previous studies on related pseudopeptides have demonstrated that, depending on the length of the alkyl aliphatic spacer, the amide groups can be in -syn or -anti disposition [45], which affects their self-assembly behaviour. Dissolving 1 mg of 6c, which has three additional methylene groups in the spacer relative to 6b, in 100 μL of DMSO and adding 900 μL of water led to the formation of a weak gel upon sonication. In order to obtain a stronger gel, 3 mg of 6c was required (entries 3 and 4, Table 1). Compound 6d, which contained an even longer spacer (n = 8), was only able to promote the formation of weak gels, even at 5 mg/mL (entries 5 and 6, Table 1). Thus, the compound with the shortest aliphatic spacer (n = 2), 6b, presented the best gelation properties in aqueous media, most likely as a direct result of the optimal preorganization of the aromatic moieties of the side chains. SEM experiments provided additional insights into the microstructure of the hydrogels. Thus, SEM images for the dried gel of 6b that was obtained in H2O:DMSO (90:10 v/v) allowed the presence of a well-defined interpenetrated network of regular nanofibers, displaying diameters of 80–100 nm, to be observed (Figure 1a–c) [46].
Vial inversion analyses allowed for the quantification of the critical gelation concentration (CGC), which is defined as the minimum amount of gelator required to gelate 1 mL of solvent at a given temperature [12]. The data presented in Table S1 permitted the assignment of a CGC lower than 0.6 mg/mL for compound 6b (see Figure S1). This value demonstrated the remarkable gelation properties of 6b, which belongs to the class of superhydrogelators [47]. UV–VIS spectroscopy was also used to determine the CGC for 6b (Figure 1d). The formation of the gel could be straightforwardly monitored by measuring the absorption changes at 600 nm. A sigmoidal curve was observed with an inflexion point at ca. 0.4 mg/mL. This concentration was in good agreement with the value determined by the vial inversion method.
The thermal stability of the gel formed from 6b (H2O:DMSO (90:10 v/v), 1 mg/mL) was likewise investigated using the vial inversion test (Table S2). The hydrogel was stable until 85 °C, at which point the soft material started to lose its viscosity. This finding was attributed to some evaporation of the water present in the initial solvent mixture. The mechanical properties of this hydrogel (H2O:DMSO (90:10 v/v)) were studied using rheological measurements. A typical LMWG presents a storage and a loss modulus (G′ and G′′, respectively) which are frequency independent, and will break under relatively low strain [48]. Figure 2 displays the rheological results obtained for 6b (1 mg/mL). The storage modulus (G′) of the gel was much higher than the loss modulus (G′′) over the whole range of the frequency sweep, which is characteristic of gel-like materials (Figure 2a). The strain sweep measurement (Figure 2b) showed that both the storage and loss moduli of the gel remained constant up to 10 Pa of stress (3.6% strain), corresponding to the so-called linear viscoelastic region (LVER). Furthermore, the average complex viscosity of the hydrogel was quantified, obtaining a value of 113 Pa·s. The complex viscosity dependence with the angular frequency was also evaluated, observing a linear relationship with the expected negative slope (Figure 2c). By heating the sample prepared in situ on the Peltier geometry, it was possible to evaluate the effect of temperature on the mechanical properties of the pseudopeptidic soft material. For instance, by observing the complex viscosity trend with temperature, a linear range was obtained from 25 to 85 °C (Figure 2d). When the temperature reached values higher than 83 °C, a clear decrease in the viscosity was observed, indicating that the sample was losing its gel-like properties. Hence, the critical gelation temperature (CGT) was identified as 83 °C, which is a value within the same range obtained by the vial inversion method (see Table S2). This material can be classified as a thixotropic gel because, upon shaking the vial, the sample became much more fluid than in its static state; furthermore, after resting the vial for 24 h, the gel could be restored. The same rheological experiments were also performed for 6b at higher gelator concentrations (5 mg/mL in H2O:DMSO (90:10 v/v)). Not surprisingly, the resulting gel demonstrated a higher complex viscosity, with an average value of 1640 Pa·s, and higher G′ and G′′ values. This stronger gel was able to resist oscillation strains of ca. 40 Pa, corroborating the tougher properties of the gel at higher concentrations (Figure S2).
Next, we decided to analyse whether an external stimulus could induce a gel–sol transition [49]. Considering the functional groups present in the chemical structure of 6b, the pH appeared to be a good candidate, as the pseudopeptide presented terminal amino groups (basic) and amide groups (slightly acidic). Therefore, vial inversion tests were carried out on the samples at different pH values, which were controlled by commercially available buffers (Figure S3). The results, presented in Table 2, revealed that the higher the pH was, the more favourable was the formation of the gel. It must be mentioned that the chemical structure of the LMWG was very stable and was not expected to degrade under the assayed conditions. Notwithstanding, these kinds of compounds have been observed to degrade by proteases under biological conditions, which represents an interesting feature in terms of their biodegradability [26].
These pH-dependent results indicated the participation of the terminal amino groups in the formation of the non-covalent network, since when these groups were in their fully protonated form, a completely transparent solution was obtained. Interestingly enough, some crystallization could be observed in the sample at a pH of 1 after aging the vial for one week. The SEM images of the resulting crystalline solid revealed the formation of fibre-like crystals, which were likely the result of the formation of diprotonated ammonium salts for 6b (Figure S4). Therefore, the protonation of the primary amines led to a soluble ammonium salt that hampered the formation of the 3D supramolecular network. It must be noted, however, that 6b was able to form weak gels even at a physiological pH (Table 2, vial 4), which opens a wide scope for future applications in areas such as drug delivery.

2.2. Supramolecular Driving Forces

To obtain relevant information about the supramolecular interactions that governed the formation of these soft materials, a series of 1H NMR and theoretical studies were undertaken. First of all, increasing amounts of water were added to a 3 mM solution of 6b in DMSO-d6, and 1H NMR spectroscopy was used to observe some relevant changes in the characteristic signals of the pseudopeptide. Indeed, most of the peaks of 6b broadened with the addition of water, suggesting the formation of oligomeric aggregates. An upfield shift was observed for the proton signals of the central amide groups (green triangles in Figure 3), indicating a different involvement of hydrogen bonding in the supramolecular aggregates.
In a similar manner, the protons corresponding to the aromatic moieties experienced a shift towards a lower δ. This was especially noticeable for the protons assigned to the aromatic ring of the central amino acid scaffolds, suggesting their participation in hydrophobic interactions. In addition, the methylene protons of the aliphatic central spacer and the benzylic protons also experienced a different electronic environment in the aggregates, as evidenced by the upfield shift for the central methylene protons (orange discontinuous lines, Figure S5).
In terms of the signals for the protons of the water molecules, a progressive downfield evolution could be observed, shifting from 3.35 to 3.93 ppm (Δδ = + 0.58 ppm) when the amount of water reached 20% v/v (purple discontinuous lines, Figure S5). This change in the electronic environment was likely the result of water entrapment in the three-dimensional network that was formed, thus increasing the H bonding. Interestingly, analogous experiments performed for 6f revealed less-pronounced shifts for both the water molecules and the signals from the heteroleptic pseudopeptide (Figures S6 and S7). As a matter of fact, the signal for water shifted by Δδ = +0.28 ppm. Although the aromatic protons of 6f also shifted towards lower δ values in the presence of water, this shift was much less significant than the one observed for 6b (Figure S7). This indicates that the homoleptic tetra-phenylalanine-derived pseudopeptide promoted higher efficiencies in forming the supramolecular aggregates, in good accordance with the trends found in gelation studies (see, for instance, entries 2 and 9, Table 1).
Variable-temperature 1H NMR experiments corroborated the fundamental role of intermolecular hydrogen-bonding and π–π interactions in the self-assembly of the pseudopeptides. Important conformational information was gathered when a sample containing a 3 mM solution of 6b in H2O:DMSO (20:80) was heated from 30 to 80 °C. As expected, the proton signals of the amide groups and water experienced an upfield shift as the temperature increased (ca. Δδ = −0.24 and −0.35 ppm for NHamide and H2O, respectively), suggesting their participation through hydrogen-bonding interactions within the supramolecular network of aggregates (Figure 4a and Figure S8).
A different scenario was observed on behalf of the signals for the aromatic units. The multiplet appearing at 7.21 ppm underwent a minor upfield shift, as marked with a discontinuous red line in Figure 4b. On the other hand, a more pronounced change was noted for the signal appearing at 7.07 ppm at 30 °C, but with the opposite direction than the one found at 7.21 ppm. This trend is in good agreement with interconnected π systems, where one of the aromatic units acts as the π-donor and the other one as the π-acceptor [50]. Additionally, the protons of the chiral carbon centres, the methylene protons of the central spacer, and the benzylic protons experienced a small shift (Δδ = +0.03 ppm, discontinuous orange lines, Figure S8).
Molecular modelling for 6b, 6e, and 6f unravelled the importance of synergic π–π interactions, which were only observed in the case of 6b. All the models were based on the molecular mechanics at the MMFFaq level of theory, taking into account the water solvation (see experimental section for more details). The most stable conformation for the dimeric species was calculated as a simple model to surmise whether each pseudopeptide could form larger aggregates by means of non-covalent forces. The modelized structures for the tetra-pseudopeptidic dimers revealed noteworthy disparities. For instance, the two modelized molecules of 6b adopted a β-sheet spatial disposition that was stabilized by means of intermolecular hydrogen bonds involving the central amide groups of the pseudopeptidic scaffolds. Additionally, the hydrophobic aromatic units were located in the outer part of the molecules, intermolecularly interacting through π–π forces (Figure 5a). Therefore, the adopted conformation allowed for the construction of bigger self-assembled supramolecular structures, leading to the formation of fibre-like aggregates (Figure 5d). On the other hand, the modelized dimers for the heteroleptic tetra-pseudopeptides rather embraced a tangled conformation, only stabilized through intermolecular hydrogen bonding between the amide groups, which precluded an efficient extension of the network to form gels (Figure 5b,c,e).
The non-covalent interactions governing the gel formation for 6b were studied in greater detail. The four amide groups (presenting with an -anti disposition) of each of the pseudopeptidic molecules were highly interconnected with the analogues of the neighbouring molecule, leading to the formation of parallel hydrogen bonds (Figure S9a). The average distance between the O···N atoms involved in the interaction was 2.780 Å (90% vdWN,O) [51], suggesting a strong interaction even in a competitive polar medium. In terms of the hydrophobic interactions between the dimeric species, four different intermolecular edge-to-face π–π interactions were detected (Figure S9b). In addition, weak intramolecular NH···π forces were identified between the phenyl rings of the phenylalanine side chains and the acidic NH proton of the amide groups, further stabilising the whole system (Figure S9c) [52].

2.3. CO2 Stimulus Responsiveness

In view of these promising results, we envisaged that the soft materials could experience a reversible gel-to-sol transition triggered by carbon dioxide. It is well-known that the solubility of carbon dioxide in water leads to a noteworthy decrease in the pH, reaching values between 3.5 and 4 [53]. In addition, amines have been widely used as chemical absorbents of carbon dioxide [54]. The interaction of CO2 with unhindered primary amines is known to generate ammonium carbamate species, because primary amines are more basic and nucleophilic than water [55,56].
We performed 1H NMR analyses using DMSO-d6 as the solvent to obtain information about the formation of ammonium carbamate products [57]. For comparison, the spectrum of the diprotonated (6b·2HCl) species in DMSO was also recorded. Significant differences were observed when comparing the spectra of freshly prepared 6b with the one of (6b·2HCl) and that of 6b after bubbling a CO2 balloon for 5 min (Figure S10). For 6b–CO2, the downfield shift for the proton of the stereogenic carbon (from δ = 3.42 to 4.10 ppm), together with the appearance of new signals at 6.62, 8.24, and 8.59 ppm, could indicate the formation of the ammonium carbamate derivative. While the methylene protons of the central spacer shifted towards lower δ values for (6b·2HCl), no shift was observed for 6b–CO2. Furthermore, a significant downfield shift of the aromatic protons and an increase in the anisochrony of the benzylic protons was observed for 6b–CO2, with the latter being attributed to the lack of free rotation. As expected, the signals of these CO2-derived species decreased with time, even at room temperature, indicating that the interaction with carbon dioxide was reversible (see Figure S11). This quite fast dynamic equilibrium in the NMR tube precluded its study by 13C NMR. Two main approaches have been established in the literature for the formation of carbamate derivatives from diamino compounds: intramolecular asymmetric carbamate salts (Figure S12a), and dimeric symmetric carbamate species (Figure S12b) [55]. As the 1H NMR spectrum of 6b in the presence of CO2 did not reflect a complex mixture of asymmetric signals, the formation of the dimeric symmetric ammonium carbamate species could be considered.
When CO2 was bubbled into the 6b gel sample (1 mg/mL in H2O:DMSO, 90:10 v/v), a transition from a gel to a weak gel was clearly observed by vial inversion, and the gel could not be restored after resting the vial for 24 h. The pH before and after the CO2 adsorption was 8.5 and 5.4, respectively. Thus, by selecting an appropriate pH indicator, it was possible to design a colorimetric probe for the gel–sol transition. The gelation of an aqueous solution of methyl red in DMSO (10% v/v) with 6b (1 mg/mL) led to the expected yellowish gel (Figure 6a—left). After bubbling in the carbon dioxide, a change in the colour of the sample was observed, shifting from yellow to orange (Figure 6a—right). In addition, when comparing the rheological properties of a freshly prepared 6b gel (1 mg/mL in H2O:DMSO 90:10 v/v) and the sample after CO2 absorption, the storage modulus (G′) decreased by more than one order of magnitude. The complex viscosity presented an average value of 5.2 Pa·s, which is more than 20 times smaller than the viscosity of the original gel (113 Pa·s). The formation of a weaker CO2-absorbed soft material was also corroborated with the values of the oscillation strain required for breaking down the gel. Whereas an oscillation strain of 10 Pa was necessary for the gel–liquid transition in the freshly prepared gel, a strain of only 0.7 Pa was necessary for the ammonium carbamate-derived sample (Figure 6b).
Generally, the desorption of CO2 is controlled by temperature for most of the systems reported to date. This is the consequence of ammonium carbamate decomposition at high temperatures, which releases carbon dioxide and the free amino groups [58]. We speculated whether our bioinspired materials could promote hydrogel recovery upon increasing temperatures. The CO2 absorption was conducted at 25 °C under atmospheric conditions and the desorption was carried out at temperatures between 30 and 80 °C. To precisely study the reversibility of the system, we determined the desorption temperature by in situ pH measurements for the sample. The pH of the gel drastically decreased from 8.5 to 5.4 in less than 100 s upon CO2 bubbling. At the same time, the viscosity of the system was clearly reduced after the addition of carbon dioxide. Once the gel had been depleted, we studied the pH variations at different temperatures, providing an insight into the CO2 desorption efficiency (Figure 6c). Interestingly, at temperatures > 70 °C, a significant increase in pH was observed, indicating the decomposition of the carbamate species. To our delight, this system was thus able to promote CO2 desorption at relatively low temperatures, considering that the ammonium carbamate species were formed from primary amino groups [41]. The efficient CO2 release was assigned to the thermodynamically favoured recovery of the supramolecular hydrogel.
Subsequently, we designed a suitable cycle for studying the hydrogel destruction/formation using CO2 as an external stimulus, obtaining promising results in terms of reversibility (Figure 6d). The experiment relied on simple colorimetric analyses using methyl orange as a pH indicator. An orange weak gel was observed after the CO2 absorption, resulting in a RGB green component value of 128. Contrarily, a yellowish colour (RGB green component = 255) was observed when the hydrogel was recovered after heating at 80 °C for 60 min.
Hence, the formation of the carbamate species clearly affected the outcome of the self-assembly of the pseudopeptide. We calculated the most stable conformation for the proposed ammonium carbamate symmetric dimeric derivatives at the MMFFaq level of theory. Interestingly, although some intermolecular hydrogen-bonding interactions were found between the amide groups and the carbamate scaffolds, only one intermolecular π–π interaction was detected, which supported the hypothesis that such aromatic forces are essential for achieving a supramolecular 3D network (Figure S13a). The dimeric ammonium carbamate derivative displayed a tight electrostatic interaction between the terminal ammonium and carbamate groups (Figure S13b), leading to the formation of discrete supramolecular architectures. Furthermore, the salts formed upon exposure to carbon dioxide possessed a higher solubility in water, decreasing the self-assembly efficiency (Figure S13c).

3. Conclusions

Novel open-chain pseudopeptides were successfully synthesized. These bioinspired species demonstrated promising properties as low-molecular-weight hydrogelators, with CGC values as low as 0.6 mg/mL. The nature of the supramolecular interactions governing gel formation was elucidated, revealing a strong cooperativity between hydrogen-bonding and π–π forces. Modifications to the side chain composition and the aliphatic spacer length allowed for the modulation of the properties of the final materials. The presence of terminal amino groups in their basic form was found to be crucial for efficient self-assembly. Sol–gel transitions could be easily triggered by pH modification, obtaining the toughest materials under basic conditions (pH > 8). In addition, the high tendency of primary amines to react with carbon dioxide permitted the CO2 responsiveness of these soft materials to be assayed. In this regard, remarkable results were obtained with desorption temperatures of ca. 70 °C, which were assigned to the thermodynamically favoured recovery of the supramolecular gel.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. General

The reagents and solvents were purchased from commercial suppliers and used without further purification. Deionized water was obtained from MilliQ (Burlington, MA, USA).
The NMR experiments were carried out on a Varian INOVA 500 spectrometer (Mundelein, IL, USA, 500 MHz for 1H and 125 MHz for 13C), on a Bruker 400 (400 MHz for 1H and 100 MHz for 13C), or on a Bruker 300 (300 MHz for 1H and 75 MHz for 13C). Chemical shifts were reported in parts per million using the solvent’s residual peak as the reference.
ATR FT-IR spectra were acquired using a JASCO 6200 device with a MIRacle Single Reflection ATR Diamond/ZnSe accessory. The samples were directly deposited onto the ATR sample holder, and the FT-IR spectra were collected. The raw IR data were processed with JASCO spectral manager software (Version 2).
UV–Vis absorption measurements were carried out on a Hewlett–Packard 8453 spectrophotometer (Palo Alto, CA, USA) with a controlled temperature system.

4.2. Gelation Experiments

In a typical experiment, a weighted amount of the LMWG was mixed with 1 mL of the selected solvent in a 1.5 mL glass vial. Gelation was defined when a homogeneous mixture was obtained that exhibited no gravitational flow upon inversion of the vial. For organic/water solvent mixtures, the LMWG was first dissolved in the corresponding amount of the organic solvent (DMSO or EtOH) and MilliQ water was subsequently added.

4.3. Rheological Experiments

The different gels were characterized using a controlled stress AR-2000 rheometer from TA Instruments (New Castle, DE, USA). A Peltier holder with a plate geometry (60 mm diameter, 500 μm gap) was used for all samples. Frequency sweeps were performed in the angular frequency range 0.1–100 rad s−1 with the instrument in oscillatory mode at 25 °C. Strain sweeps were performed using a frequency of 1 rad s−1 in an amplitude sweep range of 0.01–80% with the instrument in oscillatory mode at 25 °C.

4.4. Molecular Modelling

The lowest energy conformations for the different species considered were calculated at the MMFFaq level of theory using Spartan08 [59]. The stationary points were confirmed by subsequent frequency calculation. All vibrational frequencies were positive. See the supporting information for the Cartesian coordinates.

4.5. Synthetic Protocols

The C2-symmetrical bis(aminoamides) (4) were prepared as previously reported [44].

4.5.1. Synthesis of Cbz-N Protected Tetra-Pseudopeptidic Intermediates (5)

Synthesis of 5a

The compound 2a (7.741 g, 10.686 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous DME (150 mL) at 0 °C in a two-necked round-bottomed flask (500 mL) using a N2 atmosphere. A DME solution (150 mL) of 4a (3.02 g, 11 mmol) was then added dropwise. The reaction mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 1 h and at 25 °C for 18 h. Subsequently, the white suspension was heated for 6 h at 40–50 °C. The resultant white precipitate was filtered off and washed with cold water and cold methanol. The solid product was dried overnight under reduced pressure at 50 °C to yield 5a as a white solid. The yield was 7.09 g (9.79 mmol, 89.0%). The product was used for the subsequent step without further purification.

Synthesis of 5b

Intermediate 5b was successfully synthesized following the same procedure as described for 5a, but using 2b instead of 2a and 4b instead of 4a. The yield was 3.473 g (3.804 mmol, 87.0%). The product was used for the subsequent step without further purification.

Synthesis of 5c

Intermediate 5c was successfully synthesized following the same procedure as described for 5a, but using 2b instead of 2a and 4c instead of 4a. The yield was 3.186 g (3.330 mmol, 76.9%). The product was used for the subsequent step without further purification.

Synthesis of 5d

Intermediate 5d was successfully synthesized following the same procedure as described for 5a, but using 2b instead of 2a and 4d instead of 4a. The yield was 2.209 g (2.192 mmol, 81.6%). The product was used for the subsequent step without further purification.

Synthesis of 5e

Intermediate 5e was successfully synthesized following the same procedure as described for 5a, but using 2b instead of 2a. The yield was 4.931 g (6.001 mmol, 90.9%). The product was used for the subsequent step without further purification.

Synthesis of 5f

Intermediate 5f was successfully synthesized following the same procedure as described for 5a, but using 4b instead of 4a. The yield was 1.238 g (1.506 mmol, 63.2%). The product was used for the subsequent step without further purification.

4.5.2. Synthesis of Tetra-Pseudopeptidic Compounds (6)

Synthesis of 6a

The compound 5a (0.676 g, 0.932 mmol) was suspended in methanol (150 mL) in a 250 mL two-necked round-bottomed flask using an ultrasonic bath. After obtaining a N2 atmosphere, Pd/C (0.198 g, 0.092 mmol) was poured into the flask while nitrogen was being flushed. The nitrogen balloons were then replaced by ones filled with hydrogen and the mixture was stirred for 24 h. The suspension was filtered through a Celite® layer, and the adsorbent was washed with methanol. The final solution was evaporated under reduced pressure to yield pure 6a as a white solid. The yield was 0.346 g (0.758 mmol, 81.3%); the mp was 228–229 °C; [α]D25 = −7.32° (c = 0.1, DMSO); ATR-FTIR: 3278, 3050, 1634, and 1537 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ = 0.85–0.99 (m, 24H), 1.95 (m, 4H), 3.08 (t, J = 14.94, 14.94 Hz, 2H), 3.17 (dd, J = 5.46, 14.16 Hz, 2H), 3.24 (d, J = 6.55 Hz, 2H), and 4.01 (d, J = 7.07 Hz, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) δ = 16.1, 17.3, 18.4, 18.5, 30.4, 31.8, 38.6, 58.8, 60.1, 172.6, and 175.8; HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C22H44N6O4 457.3502; found 457.3498.

Synthesis of 6b

The compound 6b was successfully synthesized following the same procedure as described for 6a, but using 5b instead of 5a. The yield was 0.331 g (0.510 mmol, 82.5%); the mp was 193–195 °C; [α]D25 = −3.42° (c = 0.05, DMSO); ATR-FTIR: 3282, 3042, 1648, and 1535 cm−1; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) δ = 2.41–3.13 (m, 12H), 3.40–3.51 (m, 2H), 4.36–4.48 (m, 2H), and 6.95–7.29 (m, 20H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CD3OD) δ = 37.6, 38.7, 40.3, 54.5, 56.0, 126.4, 126.5, 128.1, 128.2, 129.0, 129.0, 136.9, 137.3, 172.3, and 175.0; HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C38H44N6O4 649.3502; found 649.3508.

Synthesis of 6c

The compound 6c was successfully synthesized following the same procedure as described for 6a, but using 5c instead of 5a. The yield was 1.269 g (1.837 mmol, 78.4%); the mp was 152–154 °C; [α]D25 = −6.21° (c = 0.05, DMSO); ATR-FTIR: 3283, 3042, 1639, and 1529 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ = 0.99 (tt, J = 10.2, 6.3 Hz, 2H), 1.16–1.30 (m, 4H), 2.50–2.64 (m, 2H), 2.75–3.03 (m, 10H), 3.44 (dd, J = 7.8, 5.4 Hz, 2H), 4.45 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), and 7.21–7.01 (m, 20H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) δ = 25.0, 29.8, 39.4, 40.2, 42.0, 55.8, 57.4, 127.8, 127.9, 129.5, 129.6, 130.5, 138.2, 138.8, 172.9, and 176.5; HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C41H50N6O4 691.3972; found 691.3973.

Synthesis of 6d

The compound 6d was successfully synthesized following the same procedure as described for 6a, but using 5d instead of 5a. The yield was 0.485 g (0.662 mmol, 70.1%); the mp was 138–141 °C; [α]D25 = −3.02° (c = 0.05, DMSO); ATR-FTIR: 3272, 3085, 1654, and 1542 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ = 1.01–1.18 (m, 10H), 1.26 (p, J = 7.7, 6.9 Hz, 4H), 2.51–2.65 (m, 2H), 2.76–3.03 (m, 10H), 3.44 (dd, J = 7.7, 5.5 Hz, 2H), 4.45 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), and 7.20–7.01 (m, 10H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) δ = 27.8, 30.2, 39.4, 40.4, 42.1, 55.8, 57.4, 127.8, 127.9, 129.5, 129.6, 130.5, 138.2, 138.8, 172.3, and 176.5; HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C44H56N6O4 733.4441; found 733.4449.

Synthesis of 6e

The compound 6e was successfully synthesized following the same procedure as described for 6a, but using 5e instead of 5a. The yield was 0.263 g (0.475 mmol, 77.4%); the mp was 207–209 °C; [α]D25 = −1.75° (c = 0.05, DMSO); ATR-FTIR: 3280, 3085, 1636, and 1546 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 0.80 (dd, J = 6.8, 5.0 Hz, 6H), 1.92 (h, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 2.63 (dd, J = 13.4, 8.5 Hz, 2H), 2.99 (dd, J = 13.5, 4.3 Hz, 2H), 3.11 (s, 4H), 3.46 (dd, J = 8.6, 4.3 Hz, 2H), 4.10 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.38–7.14 (m, 10H), 7.96 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), and 8.03 (s, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 18.5, 19.6, 31.3, 41.1, 56.5, 57.7, 126.6, 128.6, 129.8, 139.1, 171.4, and 174.4; HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated. for C30H44N6O4 553.3497; found 553.3503.

Synthesis of 6f

The compound 6f was successfully synthesized following the same procedure as described for 6a, but using 5f instead of 5a. The yield was 0.428 g (0.774 mmol, 63.5%); the mp was 184–189 °C; [α]D25 = −8.2° (c = 0.05, DMSO); ATR-FTIR: 3282, 3083, 1636, and 1535 cm−1; 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 0.56 (dd, J = 6.8, 1.5 Hz, 6H), 0.73 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 6H), 1.81 (tdd, J = 6.8, 4.7, 2.0 Hz, 2H), 2.58 (dd, J = 13.3, 8.3 Hz, 2H), 2.76–2.88 (m, 2H), 2.91–2.97 (m, 4H), 3.04 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 2H), 4.43–4.52 (m, 2H), 7.18–7.27 (m, 10H), 7.90 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, 2H), and 8.05 (s, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 17.0, 17.1, 19.9, 31.5, 38.5, 126.7, 128.5, 129.6, 138.2, 171.6, and 174.7; HRMS (ESI/Q-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C30H44N6O4 553.3497; found 553.3508.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/gels8060390/s1: Table S1: CGC results by vial inversion; Figure S1: Vial inversion images for determining CGC; Table S2: Thermal stability results using vial inversion; Figure S2: Rheological measurements for 6b (5 mg/mL); Figure S3: pH dependence vial inversion tests; Figure S4: SEM images for (6b·2HCl) crystals; Figure S5: Partial 1H NMR spectra for 6b titration with H2O; Figure S6: Partial 1H NMR spectra for 6b and 6f titrations with H2O; Figure S7: Partial 1H NMR spectra (aromatic region) for 6b and 6f titrations with H2O; Figure S8: Variable temperature 1H NMR spectra; Figure S9: MMFFaq non-covalent forces 6b-dimer; Figure S10: Partial 1H NMR spectra for CO2 absorption with 6b; Figure S11: Time evolution 1H NMR spectra for CO2 absorption with 6b; Figure S12: Main approaches for carbamate formation with diamines; Figure S13: Molecular models for ammonium carbamate 6b-CO2 species; spectroscopic characterization, cartesian coordinates.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.E. and B.A.; data curation, F.E. and A.V.-A.; formal analysis, F.E. and B.A.; investigation, F.E. and A.V.-A.; funding acquisition, B.A., E.G.-V. and S.V.L.; project administration, B.A. and S.V.L.; resources, B.A., E.G.-V. and S.V.L.; writing—original draft, F.E.; writing—review and editing, F.E., B.A., E.G.-V. and S.V.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Universitat Jaume I, grant number UJI-B2019-40 and UJI-B2021-31; Consellería de Innovació, Universitat, i Ciencia, grant number AICO/2021/139; and FEDER/Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación–Agencia Estatal de Investigación, grant number RTI2018-098233-B-C22.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

F.E. acknowledges MECD for a FPU fellowship (FPU 2017/02060). Technical support from the SCIC of the UJI is gratefully acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References and Note

  1. Dastidar, P. Supramolecular gelling agents: Can they be designed? Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 2699–2715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Buerkle, L.E.; Rowan, S. Supramolecular gels formed from multi-component low molecular weight species. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 6089–6102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Draper, E.R.; Adams, D.J. How should multicomponent supramolecular gels be characterised? Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 3395–3405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Chivers, P.R.A.; Smith, D.K. Shaping and structuring supramolecular gels. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2019, 4, 463–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Levin, A.; Hakala, T.A.; Schnaider, L.; Bernardes, G.J.L.; Gazit, E.; Knowles, T.P.J. Biomimetic peptide self-assembly for functional materials. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2020, 4, 615–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, D.X.; Wang, M.X. Exploring Anion−π Interactions and Their Applications in Supramolecular Chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 2020, 53, 1364–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Stankovic, I.M.; Niu, S.Q.; Hall, M.B.; Zaric, S.O. Role of aromatic amino acids in amyloid self-assembly. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 156, 949–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Piras, C.C.; Smith, D.K. Sequential Assembly of Mutually Interactive Supramolecular Hydrogels and Fabrication of Multi-Domain Materials. Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 11318–11326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cheng, W.; Ding, Z.; Zheng, X.; Lu, Q.; Kong, X.; Zhou, X.; Lumand, G.; Kaplan, D.L. Injectable hydrogel systems with multiple biophysical and biochemical cues for bone regeneration. Biomater. Sci. 2020, 8, 2537–2548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, Z.; Huang, J.; Wu, J. pH-Sensitive nanogels for drug delivery in cancer therapy. Biomater. Sci. 2021, 9, 574–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hoffman, A.S. Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2012, 64, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mayr, J.; Saldias, C.; Diaz, D.D. Release of small bioactive molecules from physical gels. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 1484–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Guo, V.H.; Bae, J.; Fang, Z.W.; Li, P.P.; Zhao, F.; Vu, G.H. Hydrogels and Hydrogel-Derived Materials for Energy and Water Sustainability. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 7642–7707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chen, J.A.; Leung, F.K.C.; Stuart, M.C.A.; Kajitani, T.; Fukushima, T.; van der Giessen, E.; Feringa, B.L. Artificial muscle-like function from hierarchical supramolecular assembly of photoresponsive molecular motors. Nat. Chem. 2018, 10, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Nele, V.; Wojciechowski, J.P.; Armstrong, J.P.K.; Stevens, M.M. Tailoring Gelation Mechanisms for Advanced Hydrogel Applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2002759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fleming, S.; Ulijn, R.V. Design of nanostructures based on aromatic peptide amphiphiles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 8150–8177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dou, X.-Q.; Feng, C.-L. Amino Acids and Peptide-Based Supramolecular Hydrogels for Three-Dimensional Cell Culture. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1604062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ramalhete, S.M.; Nartowski, K.P.; Sarathchandra, N.; Foster, J.S.; Round, A.N.; Angulo, J.; Lloyd, G.O.; Khimyak, Y.Z. Supramolecular Amino Acid Based Hydrogels: Probing the Contribution of Additive Molecules using NMR Spectroscopy. Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 8014–8024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Das, T.; Häring, M.; Haldar, D.; Díaz, D.D. Phenylalanine and derivatives as versatile low-molecular-weight gelators: Design, structure and tailored function. Biomater. Sci. 2018, 6, 38–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Giraud, T.; Hoschtettler, P.; Pickaert, G.; Averlant-Petit, M.-C.; Stefan, L. Emerging low-molecular weight nucleopeptide-based hydrogels: State of the art, applications, challenges and perspectives. Nanoscale 2022, 14, 4908–4921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ulijn, R.V.; Smith, A.M. Designing peptide based nanomaterials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 664–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zanna, N.; Merlettini, A.; Tomasini, C. Self-healing hydrogels triggered by amino acids. Org. Chem. Front. 2016, 3, 1699–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Steed, J.W. Anion-tuned supramolecular gels: A natural evolution from urea supramolecular chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 3686–3699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Valls, A.; Castillo, A.; Porcar, R.; Hietala, S.; Altava, B.; García-Verdugo, E.; Luis, S.V. Urea-Based Low-Molecular-Weight Pseudopeptidic Organogelators for the Encapsulation and Slow Release of (R)-Limonene. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 7051–7061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rubio, J.; Alfonso, I.; Burguete, M.I.; Luis, S.V. Interplay between hydrophilic and hydrophobic interactions in the self-assembly of a gemini amphiphilic pseudopeptide: From nano-spheres to hydrogels. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 2210–2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Valls, A.; Burguete, M.I.; Kuret, L.; Altava, B.; Luis, S.V. Open chain pseudopeptides as hydrogelators with reversible and dynamic responsiveness to pH, temperature and sonication as vehicles for controlled drug delivery. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 348, 118051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Raza, F.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, L.; You, X.; Zhang, J.; Khan, A.; Waseem Khan, M.; Hasnat, M.; Zafar, H.; Wu, J.; et al. Paclitaxel-loaded pH responsive hydrogel based on self-assembled peptides for tumor targeting. Biomater. Sci. 2019, 7, 2023–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cardoso, A.Z.; Alvarez, A.E.A.; Cattoz, B.N.; Griffiths, P.C.; King, S.M.; Frith, W.J.; Adams, D.J. The influence of the kinetics of self-assembly on the properties of dipeptide hydrogels. Faraday Discuss. 2013, 166, 101–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shaikh, H.; Rho, J.Y.; Macdougall, L.J.; Gurnani, P.; Lunn, A.M.; Yang, J.; Huband, S.; Mansfield, E.D.H.; Peltier, R.; Perrier, S. Hydrogel and Organogel Formation by Hierarchical Self-Assembly of Cyclic Peptides Nanotubes. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 19066–19074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chu, C.-W.; Stricker, L.; Kirse, T.M.; Hayduk, M.; Ravoo, B.J. Light-Responsive Arylazopyrazole Gelators: From Organic to Aqueous Media and from Supramolecular to Dynamic Covalent Chemistry. Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 6131–6140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Wang, H.; Heilshorn, S.C. Adaptable Hydrogel Networks with Reversible Linkages for Tissue Engineering. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 3717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chen, W.H.; Liao, W.-C.; Sohn, Y.S.; Fadeev, M.; Cecconello, A.; Nechushtai, R.; Willner, I. Stimuli-Responsive Nucleic Acid-Based Polyacrylamide Hydrogel-Coated Metal–Organic Framework Nanoparticles for Controlled Drug Release. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1705137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Doring, A.; Birnbaum, W.; Kuckling, D. Responsive hydrogels—Structurally and dimensionally optimized smart frameworks for applications in catalysis, micro-system technology and material science. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 7391–7420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Han, D.; Boissiere, O.; Kumar, S.; Tong, X.; Tremblay, L.; Zhao, Y. Two-Way CO2-Switchable Triblock Copolymer Hydrogels. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 7440–7445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, L.; Qian, J.; Fan, Y.; Feng, W.; Tao, Z.; Yang, H. A facile CO2 switchable nanocomposite with reversible transition from sol to self-healable hydrogel. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 62229–62234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jie, K.; Zhou, Y.; Yao, Y.; Shi, B.; Huang, F. CO2-Responsive Pillar[5]arene-Based Molecular Recognition in Water: Establishment and Application in Gas-Controlled Self-Assembly and Release. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 10472–10475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Nagasawa, Y.; Seida, Y.; Gotoh, T.; Furuya, E. Influence of Hydrophobicity of Backbone Polymer in Thermo-Responsive Hydrogel with Immobilized Amine on Cycle Capacity for Absorption and Recovery of CO2. Polymers 2019, 11, 1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Jia, Y.G.; Zhang, M.; Zhu, X.X. CO2-Switchable Self-Healing Host–Guest Hydrogels. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 9696–9701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Satav, S.S.; Bhat, S.; Thayumanavan, S. Feedback Regulated Drug Delivery Vehicles: Carbon Dioxide Responsive Cationic Hydrogels for Antidote Release. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11, 1735–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. George, M.; Weiss, R.G. Chemically Reversible Organogels: Aliphatic Amines as “Latent” Gelators with Carbon Dioxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10393–10394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rao, A.B.; Rubin, E.S. A Technical, Economic, and Environmental Assessment of Amine-Based CO2 Capture Technology for Power Plant Greenhouse Gas Control. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 4467–4475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Allix, F.; Curcio, P.; Nghi Pham, Q.; Pickaert, G.; Jamart-Gregoire, B. Evidence of Intercolumnar π−π Stacking Interactions in Amino-Acid-Based Low-Molecular-Weight Organogels. Langmuir 2010, 26, 16818–16827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ghosh, S.; Adler-Abramovich, L.; Gazit, E.; Verma, S. Spacer driven morphological twist in Phe-Phe dipeptide conjugates. Tetrahedron 2013, 69, 2004–2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Becerril, J.; Bolte, M.; Burguete, M.I.; Galindo, F.; García-España, E.; Luis, S.V.; Miravet, J.F. Efficient Macrocyclization of U-Turn Preorganized Peptidomimetics:  The Role of Intramolecular H-Bond and Solvophobic Effects. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6677–6686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gorla, L.; Martí-Centelles, V.; Altava, B.; Burguete, M.I.; Luis, S.V. The role of the side chain in the conformational and self-assembly patterns of C2-symmetric Val and Phe pseudopeptidic derivatives. CrystEngComm 2019, 21, 2398–2408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Becerril, J.; Escuder, B.; Miravet, J.F.; Gavara, R.; Luis, S.V. Understanding the Expression of Molecular Chirality in the Self-Assembly of a Peptidomimetic Organogelator. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 2005, 481–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Murata, K.; Aoki, M.; Suzuki, T.; Harada, T.; Kawabata, H.; Komori, T.; Ohseto, F.; Ueda, K.; Shinkai, S. Thermal and Light Control of the Sol-Gel Phase Transition in Cholesterol-Based Organic Gels. Novel Helical Aggregation Modes as Detected by Circular Dichroism and Electron Microscopic Observation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 6664–6676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yan, C.; Pochan, D. Rheological properties of peptide-based hydrogels for biomedical and other applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 3528–3540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. El-Husseiny, H.M.; Mady, E.A.; Hamabe, L.; Abugomaa, A.; Shimada, K.; Yoshida, T.; Tanaka, T.; Yokoi, A.; Elbadawy, M.; Tanaka, R. Smart/stimuli-responsive hydrogels: Cutting-edge platforms for tissue engineering and other biomedical applications. Mater. Today Bio 2022, 13, 100186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lin, C.; Skufca, J.; Partch, R.E. New insights into prediction of weak π–π complex association through proton-nuclear magnetic resonance analysis. BMC Chem. 2020, 14, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Alvarez, S. A cartography of the van der Waals territories. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 8617–8636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Alfonso, I.; Burguete, M.I.; Galindo, F.; Luis, S.V.; Vigara, L. Molecular Rotors as Simple Models to Study Amide NH-Aromatic Interactions and Their Role in the Folding of Peptide-like Structures. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 7947–7956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Peng, C.; Crawshaw, J.P.; Maitland, G.C.; Martin Trusler, J.P.; Vega-Mazza, D. The pH of CO2-Saturated Water at Temperatures Between 308 K and 423 K at Pressures up to 15 MPa. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2013, 82, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, M.; Lawal, A.; Stephenson, P.; Sidders, J.; Ramshaw, C. Post-combustion CO2 capture with chemical absorption: A state-of-the-art review. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2011, 89, 1609–1624.A. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Heldebrant, D.J.; Koech, P.K.; Ang, M.T.C.; Liang, C.; Rainbolt, J.E.; Yonker, C.R.; Jessop, P.G. Reversible zwitterionic liquids, the reaction of alkanol guanidines, alkanol amidines, and diamines with CO2. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 713–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Said, R.B.; Kolle, J.M.; Essalah, K.; Tangour, B.; Sayari, A. A Unified Approach to CO2–Amine Reaction Mechanisms. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 26125–26133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Note: Studies in D2O or D2O/DMSO-d6 mixtures could not be performed due to gel formation.
  58. Hampe, E.M.; Rudkevich, D.M. Exploring reversible reactions between CO2 and amines. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 9619–9625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Deppmeier, B.J.; Driessen, A.J.; Hehre, T.S.; Hehre, W.J.; Johnson, J.A.; Klunzinger, P.E.; Leonard, J.M.; Pham, I.N.; Pietro, W.J.; Jianguo, Y. Calculated Using Spartan08 Software at the MMFFaq Level of Theory; Spartan ‘08, build 132 (Mar 27 2009); Wavefunction Inc.: Irvine, CA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
Gels 08 00390 sch001 550
Scheme 1. The synthesis of tetra-pseudopeptidic compounds. (i) DCC, 0 °C, 16 h; (ii) dry DME, ethylene diamine/1,5-diaminopentane/1,8-diaminooctane, r.t., 18 h; (iii) HBr/HAc (33%), 3 h/liquid-liquid extraction at pH = 10; (iv) dry DME, 2, r.t., 18 h; and (v) H2, Pd/C, MeOH. All schemes follow the same formatting.
Scheme 1. The synthesis of tetra-pseudopeptidic compounds. (i) DCC, 0 °C, 16 h; (ii) dry DME, ethylene diamine/1,5-diaminopentane/1,8-diaminooctane, r.t., 18 h; (iii) HBr/HAc (33%), 3 h/liquid-liquid extraction at pH = 10; (iv) dry DME, 2, r.t., 18 h; and (v) H2, Pd/C, MeOH. All schemes follow the same formatting.
Gels 08 00390 sch001
Gels 08 00390 g001 550
Figure 1. (a–c) SEM images for the dried sample of 6b (1 mg/mL) in DMSO:H2O (10:90) and (d) UV absorption at 600 nm for 6b at different concentrations in H2O:DMSO (90:10) [26]. The red line corresponds to the sigmoidal fitting calculated using Origin Software.
Figure 1. (a–c) SEM images for the dried sample of 6b (1 mg/mL) in DMSO:H2O (10:90) and (d) UV absorption at 600 nm for 6b at different concentrations in H2O:DMSO (90:10) [26]. The red line corresponds to the sigmoidal fitting calculated using Origin Software.
Gels 08 00390 g001
Gels 08 00390 g002 550
Figure 2. Rheological measurements for the hydrogel formed from 6b (1 mg/mL, H2O:DMSO (90:10 v/v)). (a) Amplitude sweeps with 1 Hz at 25 °C; (b) frequency sweeps with 0.1 Pa strain at 25 °C; (c) complex viscosity vs. angular frequency; and (d) the dependence of the complex viscosity on the temperature using a heating rate of 0.2 °C/min and a constant frequency of 1 Hz and 0.1% strain.
Figure 2. Rheological measurements for the hydrogel formed from 6b (1 mg/mL, H2O:DMSO (90:10 v/v)). (a) Amplitude sweeps with 1 Hz at 25 °C; (b) frequency sweeps with 0.1 Pa strain at 25 °C; (c) complex viscosity vs. angular frequency; and (d) the dependence of the complex viscosity on the temperature using a heating rate of 0.2 °C/min and a constant frequency of 1 Hz and 0.1% strain.
Gels 08 00390 g002
Gels 08 00390 g003 550
Figure 3. Partial 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) spectra for the titration of 6b (3 mM) with increasing amounts of water. The water content is indicated as v/v (%). The signal for the central amide groups has been marked with green triangles.
Figure 3. Partial 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) spectra for the titration of 6b (3 mM) with increasing amounts of water. The water content is indicated as v/v (%). The signal for the central amide groups has been marked with green triangles.
Gels 08 00390 g003
Gels 08 00390 g004 550
Figure 4. Partial 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) spectra for the variable-temperature experiments of 6b (3 mM, H2O:DMSO, 20:80); (a) amide group region and (b) aromatic region.
Figure 4. Partial 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) spectra for the variable-temperature experiments of 6b (3 mM, H2O:DMSO, 20:80); (a) amide group region and (b) aromatic region.
Gels 08 00390 g004
Gels 08 00390 g005 550
Figure 5. The most stable conformations (Spartan08′, MMFFaq) obtained for the dimers of (a) 6b, (b) 6e, and (c) 6f; (d) a representation of the parallel β-sheet; and (e) the tangled dimeric assemblies.
Figure 5. The most stable conformations (Spartan08′, MMFFaq) obtained for the dimers of (a) 6b, (b) 6e, and (c) 6f; (d) a representation of the parallel β-sheet; and (e) the tangled dimeric assemblies.
Gels 08 00390 g005
Gels 08 00390 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) A vial inversion test for the methyl red with the samples before (left) and after (right) CO2 incorporation (1 mg of 6b in 1 mL of H2O(methyl red):DMSO (90:10)). (b) The storage and loss modulus representation for neat (green and pink, respectively) and CO2-rich (black and red, respectively) samples; the oscillation stress required for the gel-to-liquid transition is highlighted in purple for the CO2-rich sample and in orange for the freshly prepared 6b hydrogel. (c) CO2 absorption/desorption results obtained via in-line monitorization of the pH for the 6b gel (1 mg in 1 mL of H2O:DMSO, 90:10). (d) Cycles for the CO2 absorption/desorption–hydrogel depletion/formation obtained for 6b by measuring the RGB green component observed (1 mg of 6b in 1 mL of H2O:DMSO, 90:10).
Figure 6. (a) A vial inversion test for the methyl red with the samples before (left) and after (right) CO2 incorporation (1 mg of 6b in 1 mL of H2O(methyl red):DMSO (90:10)). (b) The storage and loss modulus representation for neat (green and pink, respectively) and CO2-rich (black and red, respectively) samples; the oscillation stress required for the gel-to-liquid transition is highlighted in purple for the CO2-rich sample and in orange for the freshly prepared 6b hydrogel. (c) CO2 absorption/desorption results obtained via in-line monitorization of the pH for the 6b gel (1 mg in 1 mL of H2O:DMSO, 90:10). (d) Cycles for the CO2 absorption/desorption–hydrogel depletion/formation obtained for 6b by measuring the RGB green component observed (1 mg of 6b in 1 mL of H2O:DMSO, 90:10).
Gels 08 00390 g006
Table
Table 1. Gelation properties of compounds 6a–f in aqueous solutions 1.
Table 1. Gelation properties of compounds 6a–f in aqueous solutions 1.
EntryComp.Solvent(s)Proportion (v/v)Conc. (mg/mL)Result
16aH2O:DMSO90:101S
26bH2O:DMSO90:101G 4
36cH2O:DMSO90:101wG 4
46cH2O:DMSO90:103G 4
56dH2O:DMSO90:101wG 2
66dH2O:DMSO90:105wG 3
76eH2O:DMSO90:101S
86eH2O:DMSO90:105S
96fH2O:DMSO90:101S
106fH2O:DMSO90:105wG 3
116e + 6fH2O:DMSO90:100.5 + 0.5wG
126bH2O:DMSO50:501wG 3
136aH2O:EtOH90:101I
146bH2O:EtOH90:101I
156bH2O:EtOH70:301wG 3
166bH2O:EtOH70:300.5wG 3
176bH2O:EtOH50:501G 3
186aH2O:EtOH50:501S
196aH2O-1I 2
206bH2O-1G 2
1 The gel formation was qualitatively analysed by the vial inversion technique. I: insoluble, S: soluble, wG: weak gel, and G: gel. 2 Heating at 90 °C for 5 min. 3 Ultrasonication for 5 min. 4 Instantaneous formation of gel.
Table
Table 2. Gelation properties as a function of pH for 6b (1 mg/mL) in H2O:DMSO (90:10 v/v).
Table 2. Gelation properties as a function of pH for 6b (1 mg/mL) in H2O:DMSO (90:10 v/v).
VialBuffer (mM)pHResult 1
1- 21.2S
2Citrate (20)4.4wG
3Citrate (20)6.0wG
4Phosphate (30)7.1wG
5HEPES (20)8.1G
1 Gel formation was qualitatively analysed by the vial inversion technique. 2 The sample at pH = 1 was prepared by adding 20 μL of concentrated HCl. S: soluble, wG: weak gel, and G: gel. The buffers were commercially available and, when needed, the pH was adjusted using NaOH or HCl. See Figure S3 for the results of the vial inversion tests.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Esteve, F.; Villanueva-Antolí, A.; Altava, B.; García-Verdugo, E.; Luis, S.V. Unravelling the Supramolecular Driving Forces in the Formation of CO2-Responsive Pseudopeptidic Low-Molecular-Weight Hydrogelators. Gels 2022, 8, 390. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/gels8060390

AMA Style

Esteve F, Villanueva-Antolí A, Altava B, García-Verdugo E, Luis SV. Unravelling the Supramolecular Driving Forces in the Formation of CO2-Responsive Pseudopeptidic Low-Molecular-Weight Hydrogelators. Gels. 2022; 8(6):390. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/gels8060390

Chicago/Turabian Style

Esteve, Ferran, Alexis Villanueva-Antolí, Belén Altava, Eduardo García-Verdugo, and Santiago V. Luis. 2022. "Unravelling the Supramolecular Driving Forces in the Formation of CO2-Responsive Pseudopeptidic Low-Molecular-Weight Hydrogelators" Gels 8, no. 6: 390. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/gels8060390

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop