Next Article in Journal
Advance Care Planning (ACP) vs. Advance Serious Illness Preparations and Planning (ASIPP)
Next Article in Special Issue
Relationship between the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) and the Self-Efficacy Scale among Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Journal
Korean Nursing Students’ First Experiences of Clinical Practice in Psychiatric Nursing: A Phenomenological Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Proposal of Dental Hygiene Diagnosis for Cancer Patients Based on Dental Hygiene Process of Care in Acute Care Hospitals: A Narrative Review

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine & Oral Care Center, Shimane University Hospital, Izumo, Shimane 693-8501, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 11 June 2020 / Revised: 12 July 2020 / Accepted: 16 July 2020 / Published: 18 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oral and Maxillofacial Health Care)

Abstract

:
A narrative review was conducted to propose dental hygiene diagnoses for cancer patients based on dental hygiene process of care in acute care hospitals. Six researchers, including three dental hygienists, all with expertise in oral healthcare for patients with cancer, decided the review outline. All researchers reviewed the literature and developed terminology for dental hygiene diagnoses. The team then modified the terminology and discussed its clarity and acceptability to develop an initial list of dental hygiene diagnosis names according to the dental hygiene human needs conceptual model subscales. In wholesome facial image, one new diagnosis was developed. In protection from health risks, 15 new diagnoses were developed. In biologically sound and functional dentition, 10 new diagnoses were developed. In skin and mucous membrane integrity of the head and neck, 10 new diagnoses were developed. In freedom from head and neck pain, two new diagnoses were developed. In freedom from anxiety and stress, eight new diagnoses were developed. In responsibility for oral health, five new diagnoses were developed. In conceptualization and understanding, three new diagnoses were developed. Based on this study, it is necessary for the academic community to develop a better taxonomy of dental hygiene diagnoses pertaining to dental hygienist clinical practice.

1. Introduction

In 1993, the Dental Hygiene Human Needs Conceptual Model (DH HNCM) was theorized as a framework for advancing dental hygiene practice, education, and research [1]. Originally, the DH HNCM was derived from the Yura and Walsh Human Needs and Nursing Process Theory [2]. In particular, a series of cycles in the nursing process (assessment, diagnosis, planning, implementation, evaluation) was directly incorporated into the dental hygiene process [2]. Later, in 2000, Darby and Walsh revised the DH HNCM from 11 to 8 categories of needs (Table 1) [3]. The DH HNCM provides dental hygienists with a framework for decision making and problem solving in clinical practice and research [4]. In particular, the DH HNCM plays an important role in dental hygiene assessment and dental hygiene diagnosis in the dental hygiene process of care [5]. Dental hygiene diagnosis is defined as identifying “real or potential oral health problems and health behaviors that dental hygienists can address in their education and qualifications”. In general, the statement of dental hygiene diagnosis consists of an etiology phrase and a diagnosis phrase (signs and symptoms; Figure 1) [6].
A nursing diagnosis that encompassed Maslow’s hierarchy of needs was developed in the 1950s and 1960s. It helped prioritize and plan care based on patient-centered approaches [7]. Nursing processes have since developed separately according to different theories, including Henderson, Gordon, and Orem’s [8,9]. The North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA) defines a nursing diagnosis as a clinical judgment about responses to actual or potential health problems on the part of the patient, family, or community, and it provides nurses with an up-to-date taxonomy of nursing diagnoses (Table 2) [7]. Although the taxonomy of nursing diagnoses has some problems, it provides the basis for the selection of nursing interventions that achieve outcomes for which the nurse is accountable [10]. A nursing diagnosis statement is different from a dental hygiene process of care statement in name alone; that is, both statements consist of only one diagnosis phrase. This is also the case for diagnoses made by medical doctors or dentists. Thus, a dental hygiene diagnosis, which includes the etiology phrase, makes it difficult to classify the diagnosis and understand its contents. Therefore, it is necessary to change the rules around dental hygiene diagnoses and make each diagnosis consist of only one name.
In Japan, many dental hygienists work at acute care hospitals and play an important role in oral health management for oral cavities, or perioperative oral and dental management (POM), in cancer treatment [11]. POM was introduced into the Japanese universal health insurance system in April 2012, with the goal or ensuring good oral hygiene both prior to further treatment and in posthospitalization [11]. Cancer treatment, which involves surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, is well known for causing severe oral adverse effects with not only physical but also psychological and social aspects [11,12,13,14]. Accordingly, the job of dental hygienists who work in acute care hospitals not only includes scaling and professional mechanical tooth cleaning, but also encompasses instruction of oral mucositis management and rehabilitation of the oral function for those patients under the supervision of oral and maxillofacial surgeons and hospital dental specialists. In addition, acute care hospital dental hygienists aid in supporting the family, setting up the environment for easy management of the oral cavity, providing instructions about oral care, and cooperating with the patient’s regular general dentists for seamless oral care. Thus, the environment of acute care hospitals, where there are many cancer patients with medical, oral, dental, and nursing problems, makes it easy to develop new names for dental hygienist diagnoses. In addition, our study may play an important role in providing common sense solutions for the oral health management of patients with cancer. Therefore, the aim of this review is to develop a proposal of dental hygiene diagnoses for cancer patients based on the dental hygiene process of care in acute care hospitals.

2. Review Process for the Purpose of Developing Diagnoses

Revision of dental hygiene diagnoses was approached using three phases [15]. First, six members of the research team, which included three dental hygienists, all with expertise in oral healthcare for patients with cancer, gathered for a discussion to decide the review outline. Second, the team reviewed literature, and each member coined new names for dental hygiene diagnoses. Third, the team modified the names and discussed their clarity and acceptability based on two evaluation criteria—that each diagnosis name should contain as few words as possible and that the name could also be used for a nursing diagnosis. Next, an initial list of dental hygiene diagnosis names was developed for each of the DH HNCM subscales. In addition, medical, dental, and nursing conditions or clinical situations with associated dental hygiene diagnoses were presented as collaborative problems (CP).

3. Proposal of Dental Hygiene Diagnosis for Each Subscale

3.1. Wholesome Facial Image (HN1)

Wholesome facial image is defined as the need to feel satisfied with one’s own oral and facial features and breath. Facial image is determined by individuals’ perception of their physical characteristics and their interpretation of how that image is perceived by others. Facial image is influenced by normal and abnormal physical changes and by cultural and societal attitudes and values [3,16,17] (Table 3).
For example, surgical treatment of head and neck cancer containing oral cancer frequently involves extensive resection of the facial structures, resulting in a broad range of facial disfigurements. Consequently, there is often a need to restore parts of the oral and/or facial tissues [18]. These facial disfigurements are generally associated with large impacts on patients’ quality of life, including physical and facial aesthetic changes; functional limitations in the aerodigestive tract; negative consequences on familiar, social, and work relationships; and psychosocial impacts of having cancer and facial alterations [19].
The diagnosis of HN1 was used for acute facial disfigurement resulting from trauma or surgery in the head and neck region.

3.2. Protection from Health Risks (HN2)

Protection from health risks is defined as the need to avoid medical contraindications related to dental hygiene care and to be free from harm or danger involving the integrity of the body structure and environment around the person [3,16,17].
Ishimaru et al. reported that preoperative oral care by a dentist and dental hygienist significantly reduced postoperative complications, such as a decrease in postoperative pneumonia and all-cause mortality, within 30 days of surgery in patients who underwent cancer surgery [20]. In addition, a multicenter retrospective investigation on the efficacy of POM in cancer patients showed that POM decreased the incidence rate of oral mucositis due to chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy [21].
POM that aims to prevent oral and systemic whole-body complications plays an important role in today’s cancer treatment. Accordingly, an HN2 diagnosis is used for when there are whole-body risk factors caused by oral condition and patient’s attitude.

3.3. Biologically Sound and Functional Dentition (HN3)

Biologically sound and functional dentition refers to the need for intact teeth and restorations that defend against harmful microbes, provide for adequate functioning and aesthetics, and reflect appropriate nutrition and diet [3,16,17].
This HN3 diagnosis section was developed by discussing collaborative problems with dentists because the improvement of dentition is absolutely essential in the case of dental treatments such as caries treatment and dental prosthesis. For HN3 diagnoses, dental hygienists need to cooperate with dentists to solve oral problems.

3.4. Skin and Mucous Membrane Integrity of the Head and Neck (HN4)

Skin and mucous membrane integrity of the head and neck is defined as the need for an intact and functioning covering of the person’s head and neck area, including the oral mucous membranes and periodontium [3,16,17].
The cornerstones of treatment for patients with locally advanced unresectable head and neck cancers are surgery and radiotherapy, which might be delivered alone or in various combinations with chemotherapy. High-grade side effects of chemoradiotherapy for these head and neck cancers include not only oral mucositis, but also dermatitis [22].
Thus, the HN4 diagnosis was developed in anticipation of oral adverse effects from high-dose chemotherapy and radiotherapy in cancer treatment.

3.5. Freedom from Head and Neck Pain (HN5)

Freedom from head and neck pain is defined as being exempt from physical discomfort in the head and neck area [3,16,17].
Pain is a common symptom in cancer survivors, and about one-third of them report moderate to severe pain [23]. Pain can be acute or chronic and can be directly related to cancer, associated with diagnostic or therapeutic procedures, or an adverse effect of treatments [24]. Dental hygienists cannot directly approach the pain. Thus, the two diagnoses (acute or chronic pain) were developed to be used flexibly in situations such as when a dental hygienist instructs a patient with head and neck cancer on how to use dental rinse and softly brush teeth for relieving the pain of oral mucositis.

3.6. Freedom from Anxiety and Stress (HN6)

Freedom from fear and stress is defined as feeling safe and being free from emotional discomfort in the oral healthcare environment and receiving appreciation, attention, and respect from others [3,16,17].
Clinical depression as well as depressive symptoms (anxiety and powerlessness) have been reported to increase ineffective coping in cancer patients [25]. The mental condition of cancer patients may affect the behavior of oral health; unfortunately, there is no obvious evidence, but this diagnosis should be used if the patients complain about problems such as anxiety.

3.7. Responsibility for Oral Health (HN7)

Responsibility for oral health is defined as accountability for one’s oral health according to one’s motivation, physical and cognitive capability, and social environment [3,16,17].
The researchers reported in a previous study that there is a possibility that oral-health-related self-efficacy may change throughout the cancer treatment [26]. This is a similar situation in which oral health literacy and each readiness element may worsen. In cancer treatment, attention should be paid to not only superficial behavior but also psychological principles that affect good oral health.

3.8. Conceptualization and Understanding (HN8)

Conceptualization and understanding involve the need to understand ideas and abstractions to make sound judgments about one’s oral health.
In particular, many cancer patients experience spiritual distress and disturbed conceptualization. A previous study showed that intercessory prayer was effective in religious and spiritual scores [27]. Thus, attention should be paid to understanding the patient’s whole body and mentality in addition to multiprofessional cooperation.

4. Limitations

Some limitations should be acknowledged. First, this is a narrative review and not a systematic review. Second, due to lack of evidence about the dental hygiene diagnosis of cancer patients, the practical tips discussed in this review rely mainly on expert opinions. Finally, the purpose of this paper was to propose diagnostic sentences by a narrative review, and it cannot therefore be immediately applied to clinical practice.

5. Conclusions

5.1. Scope for Further Research

The nursing process has so far developed based on the so-called NANDA-I, which is the creation and classification of nursing diagnosis names. In the future, dental hygienists should also create and classify dental hygiene diagnosis names based on this framework. This work will create diagnosis names and will help organize the discipline of dental hygiene. However, this work cannot be done by a single researcher; it should be led by a research team or academic society. It would be necessary for an academic society, along with focus groups, to develop dental hygiene diagnoses based on this review. The development of and agreement upon a systematic method for creating and classifying dental hygiene diagnoses will enable the advancement and subdivision of the theory of dental hygiene.

5.2. Clinical Relevance

This topic is relevant in today’s world, as many are affected by cancer. Furthermore, comprehensive treatment by dental hygienists in oral healthcare can be enhanced by uniform and easy-to-understand diagnosis criteria as part of the process.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.M. and T.K.; funding acquisition, Y.M.; investigation, Y.M., K.I., M.T., and S.O.; methodology, Y.M., K.I., and M.T.; project administration, M.K., and T.K.; supervision, T.K.; validation, M.K., and T.K.; visualization, Y.M., S.O., and T.K.; writing—original draft, Y.M.; writing—review and editing, M.K., S.O., and T.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 20K18829.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the respondents in this study for their willing participation. The authors also extend their appreciation to all staff members of the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine & Oral Care Center, Shimane University Hospital for their kind assistance and support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. MacDonald, L.; Bowen, D.M. Theory analysis of the dental hygiene human needs conceptual model. Int. J. Dent. Hyg. 2017, 15, e163–e172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yura, H. Human need theory: A framework for the nurse supervisor. Health Care Superv. 1986, 4, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Darby, M.L.; Walsh, M.M. Application of the human needs conceptual model to dental hygiene practice. J. Dent. Hyg. 2000, 74, 230–237. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Sato, Y.; Saito, A.; Nakamura–Miura, A.; Kato, E.; Cathcart, G. Application of the dental hygiene human needs conceptual model and the oral health–related quality of life model to the dental hygiene curriculum in Japan. Int. J. Dent. Hyg. 2007, 5, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nishimura, T.; Takahashi, C.; Takahashi, E. Dental hygiene residential care in a 3-year dental hygiene education programme in Japan: Towards dysphagia management based on the dental hygiene process of care. Int. J. Dent. Hyg. 2007, 5, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sensat, M.L. Mobius syndrome: A dental hygiene case study and review of the literature. Int. J. Dent. Hyg. 2003, 1, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Toney-Butler, T.J.; Thayer, J.M. Nursing process. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  8. Huitzi-Egilegor, J.X.; Elorza-Puyadena, M.I.; Urkia-Etxabe, J.M.; Asurabarrena-Iraola, C. Implementation of the nursing process in a health area: Models and assessment structures used. Rev. Lat. Am. Enfermagem 2014, 22, 772–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Malekzadeh, J.; Amouzeshi, Z.; Mazlom, S.R. A quasi–experimental study of the effect of teaching Orem’s self–care model on nursing students’ clinical performance and patient satisfaction. Nurs. Open 2018, 5, 370–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Hogston, R. Nursing diagnosis and classification systems: A position paper. J. Adv. Nurs. 1997, 26, 496–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kurasawa, Y.; Maruoka, Y.; Sekiya, H.; Negishi, A.; Mukohyama, H.; Shigematsu, S.; Sugizaki, J.; Karakida, K.; Ohashi, M.; Ueno, M.; et al. Pneumonia prevention effects of perioperative oral management in approximately 25,000 patients following cancer surgery. Clin. Exp. Dent. Res. 2020, 6, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Saunders, D.P.; Rouleau, T.; Cheng, K.; Yarom, N.; Kandwal, A.; Joy, J.; Kayhan, K.B.; van de Wetering, M.; Brito-Dellan, N.; Kataoka, T.; et al. Systematic review of antimicrobials, mucosal coating agents, anesthetics, and analgesics for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients and clinical practice guidelines. Support. Care Cancer 2020, 28, 2473–2484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. McGuire, D.B.; Fulton, J.S.; Park, J.; Brown, C.G.; Correa, M.E.P.; Eilers, J.; Elad, S.; Gibson, F.; Oberle-Edwards, L.K.; Bowen, J.; et al. Systematic review of basic oral care for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients. Support. Care Cancer 2013, 21, 3165–3177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Olver, I.; Keefe, D.; Herrstedt, J.; Warr, D.; Roila, F.; Ripamonti, C.I. Supportive care in cancer—A MASCC perspective. Support. Care Cancer 2020, 28, 3467–3475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Danser, M.M.; Gomez, S.M.; Van der Weijden, G.A. Tongue coating and tongue brushing: A literature review. Int. J. Dent. Hyg. 2003, 1, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Darby, M.L.; Walsh, M.M. A proposed human needs conceptual model for dental hygiene: Part I. J. Dent. Hyg. 1993, 67, 326–334. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Walsh, M.M.; Darby, M. Application of the human needs conceptual model of dental hygiene to the role of the clinician: Part II. J. Dent. Hyg. 1993, 67, 335–346. [Google Scholar]
  18. Forastiere, A.; Goepfert, H.; Goffinet, D.; Hong, K.W.; Laramore, G.; Mittal, B.; Pfister, D.G.; Ridge, J.; Schuller, D.; Shah, J.; et al. NCCN practice guidelines for head and neck cancer. National comprehensive cancer network. Oncology 1998, 12, 39–147. [Google Scholar]
  19. Costa, E.F.; Nogueira, T.E.; de Souza Lima, N.C.; Mendonca, E.F.; Leles, C.R. A qualitative study of the dimensions of patients’ perceptions of facial disfigurement after head and neck cancer surgery. Spec. Care Dent. 2014, 34, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ishimaru, M.; Matsui, H.; Ono, S.; Hagiwara, Y.; Morita, K.; Yasunaga, H. Preoperative oral care and effect on postoperative complications after major cancer surgery. Br. J. Surg. 2018, 105, 1688–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yamada, S.I.; Soutome, S.; Hasegawa, T.; Toujou, I.; Nakahara, H.; Kawakami, M.; Hirose, M.; Fujita, S.; Komori, T.; Kirita, T.; et al. A multicenter retrospective investigation on the efficacy of perioperative oral management in cancer patients. Medicine 2020, 99, e19129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Selzer, E.; Liederer, S.; Lemaire, C.; Kren, G.; Radonjic, D.; Kornek, G.; Knocke, T.; Pötter, R.; Bachtiary, B. Incidence of dermatitis in head and neck cancer patients treated with primary radiotherapy and cetuximab. Strahlenther. Onkol. 2011, 187, 373–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Green, C.R.; Hart-Johnson, T.; Loeffler, D.R. Cancer–related chronic pain: Examining quality of life in diverse cancer survivors. Cancer 2011, 117, 1994–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Kim, E.S. Neuropathic caner pain: Is it linked to the recurrence of cancer? Korean J. Pain 2015, 28, 73–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jansen, F.; Verdonck-de Leeuw, I.M.; Cuijpers, P.; Leemans, C.R.; Waterboer, T.; Pawlita, M.; Penfold, C.; Thomas, S.J.; Waylen, A.; Ness, A.R. Depressive symptoms in relation to overall survival in people with head and neck cancer: A longitudinal cohort study. Psychooncology 2018, 27, 2245–2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Matsuda, Y.; Karino, M.; Kanno, T. Development and Validation of the Oral Health–Related Self–Efficacy Scale for Cancer Patients. J. Cancer Educ. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Miranda, T.P.S.; Caldeira, S.; de Oliveira, H.F.; Iunes, D.H.; Nogueira, D.A.; Chaves, E.D.C.L.; de Carvalho, E.C. Intercessory prayer on spiritual distress, spiritual coping, anxiety, depression and salivary amylase in breast cancer patients during radiotherapy: Randomized clinical trial. J. Relig. Health 2020, 59, 365–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ellis, M.A.; Sterba, K.R.; Brennan, E.A.; Maurer, S.; Hill, E.G.; Day, T.A.; Graboyes, E.M. A systematic review of patient–reported outcome measures assessing body image disturbance in patients with head and neck cancer. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2019, 160, 941–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Arweiler, N.B.; Auschill, T.M.; Sculean, A. Patient self-care of periodontal pocket infections. Periodontology 2000 2018, 76, 164–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Minakuchi, S.; Tsuga, K.; Ikebe, K.; Ueda, T.; Tamura, F.; Nagao, K.; Furuya, J.; Matsuo, K.; Yamamoto, K.; Kanazawa, M.; et al. Oral hypofunction in the older population: Position paper of the Japanese society of gerodontology in 2016. Gerodontology 2018, 35, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Al-Qurayshi, Z.; Walsh, J.; Owen, S.; Kandil, E. Surgical site infection in head and neck surgery: A national perspective. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2019, 161, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Haque, M.; McKimm, J.; Godman, B.; Abu Bakar, M.; Sartelli, M. Initiatives to reduce postoperative surgical site infections of the head and neck cancer surgery with a special emphasis on developing countries. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2019, 19, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Funahara, M.; Yanamoto, S.; Ueda, M.; Suzuki, T.; Ota, Y.; Nishimaki, F.; Kurita, H.; Yamakawa, N.; Kirita, T.; Okura, M.; et al. Prevention of surgical site infection after oral cancer surgery by topical tetracycline: Results of a multicenter randomized control trial. Medicine 2017, 96, e8891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Miki, Y.; Makuuchi, R.; Honda, S.; Tokunaga, M.; Tanizawa, Y.; Bando, E.; Kawamura, T.; Yurikusa, T.; Tanuma, A.; Terashima, M. Prospective phase II study evaluating the efficacy of swallow ability screening tests and pneumonia prevention using a team approach for elderly patients with gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2018, 21, 353–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Iwata, E.; Hasegawa, T.; Yamada, S.I.; Kawashita, Y.; Yoshimatsu, M.; Mizutani, T.; Nakahara, H.; Mori, K.; Shibuya, Y.; Kurita, H.; et al. Effects of perioperative oral care on prevention of postoperative pneumonia after lung resection: Multicenter retrospective study with propensity score matching analysis. Surgery 2019, 165, 1003–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Swan, K.; Cordier, R.; Brown, T.; Speyer, R. Psychometric properties of visuoperceptual measures of videofluoroscopic and fibre–endoscopic evaluations of swallowing: A systematic review. Dysphagia 2019, 34, 2–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Rosa, R.R.; Bueno, M.; Migliorucci, R.R.; Brasolotto, A.G.; Genaro, K.F.; Berretin–Felix, G. Tongue function and swallowing in individuals with temporomandibular disorders. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2020, 28, e20190355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Okada, T.; Futatsuki, T.; Takesaki, H.; Ooe, T.; Abe, K. Postoperative bleeding after tooth extractions in patients controlled with warfarin—A clinic—Statistical study on the factors influencing postoperative bleeding. Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi 2004, 95, 218–223. [Google Scholar]
  39. Schoenfeld, B.J.; Grgic, J. Effects of range of motion on muscle development during resistance training interventions: A systematic review. SAGE Open Med. 2020, 8, 2050312120901559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Prahlow, J.A.; Prahlow, T.J.; Rakow, R.J.; Prahlow, N.D. Case study: Asphyxia caused by inspissated oral and nasopharyngeal secretions. Am. J. Nurs. 2009, 109, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. John, M.T.; Michalowicz, B.S.; Kotsakis, G.A.; Chu, H. Network meta–analysis of studies included in the clinical practice guideline on the nonsurgical treatment of chronic periodontitis. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2017, 44, 603–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Schenkel, A.B.; Veitz-Keenan, A. Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin—Based composite restorations. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2019, 3, CD010526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Cacciatore, G.; Ugolini, A.; Sforza, C.; Gbinigie, O.; Pluddemann, A. Long-Term effects of functional appliances in treated versus untreated patients with Class II malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0221624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Bollen, A.M. Effects of malocclusions and orthodontics on periodontal health: Evidence from a systematic review. J. Dent. Educ. 2008, 72, 912–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Abt, E.; Carr, A.B.; Worthington, H.V. WITHDRAWN: Interventions for replacing missing teeth: Partially absent dentition. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2019, 7, CD003814. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Carrasco-Garcia, A.; Castellanos-Cosano, L.; Corcuera-Flores, J.R.; Rodriguez-Perez, A.; Torres-Lagares, D.; Machuca-Portillo, G. Influence of marginal bone loss on peri-implantitis: Systematic review of literature. J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 2019, 11, e1045–e1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Dorocka-Bobkowska, B.; Medynski, D.; Prylinski, M. Recent advances in tissue conditioners for prosthetic treatment: A review. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2017, 26, 723–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Limones, A.; Saez-Alcaide, L.M.; Diaz-Parreno, S.A.; Helm, A.; Bornstein, M.M.; Molinero-Mourelle, P. Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) in cancer patients treated with denosumab VS. zoledronic acid: A systematic review and meta–analysis. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal. 2020, 25, e326–e336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jensen, S.B.; Pedersen, A.M.L.; Vissink, A.; Andersen, E.; Brown, C.G.; Davies, A.N.; Dutilh, J.; Fulton, J.S.; Jankovic, L.; Lopes, N.N.; et al. A systematic review of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies: Management strategies and economic impact. Support. Care Cancer 2010, 18, 1061–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pontini, A.; Reho, F.; Giatsidis, G.; Bacci, C.; Azzena, B.; Tiengo, C. Multidisciplinary care in severe pediatric electrical oral burn. Burns 2015, 41, e41–e46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Antikainen, A.; Patinen, P.; Pakkila, J.; Tjaderhane, L.; Anttonen, V. The types and management of dental trauma during military service in Finland. Dent. Traumatol. 2018, 34, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Ferreira, E.B.; Vasques, C.I.; Gadia, R.; Chan, R.J.; Guerra, E.N.S.; Mezzomo, L.A.; Canto, G.D.L.; dos Reis, P.E.D. Topical interventions to prevent acute radiation dermatitis in head and neck cancer patients: A systematic review. Support. Care Cancer 2017, 25, 1001–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mosa, A.S.M.; Hossain, A.M.; Lavoie, B.J.; Yoo, I. Patient–related risk factors for chemotherapy–induced nausea and vomiting: A systematic review. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Billingham, M.J.; Billingham, S.J. Congruence between preferred and actual place of death according to the presence of malignant or non–malignant disease: A systematic review and meta–analysis. BMJ Support. Palliat. Care 2013, 3, 144–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Yilmaz, S.D.; Bal, M.D.; Beji, N.K.; Arvas, M. Ways of coping with stress and perceived social support in gynecologic cancer patients. Cancer Nurs. 2015, 38, E57–E62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Karabulutlu, E.Y. Coping with stress of family caregivers of cancer patients in Turkey. Asia Pac. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2014, 1, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Macek, M.D.; Haynes, D.; Wells, W.; Bauer-Leffler, S.; Cotten, P.A.; Parker, R.M. Measuring conceptual health knowledge in the context of oral health literacy: Preliminary results. J. Public Health Dent. 2010, 70, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Jomar, R.T.; Gomes, R.A.F.; Leite, D.C.; Gomes, H.F.; Peres, E.M.; Junior, E.F.P. Nursing diagnoses in adult/elderly patients undergoing outpatient antineoplastic chemotherapy: A review. Ecancermedicalscience 2017, 11, 736. [Google Scholar]
  59. Leinweber, K.A.; Columbo, J.A.; Kang, R.; Trooboff, S.W.; Goodney, P.P. A review of decision aids for patients considering more than one type of invasive treatment. J. Surg. Res. 2019, 235, 350–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Shunmuga, S.C.; Dhillon, H.M.; Butow, P.N.; Sundaresan, P.; Rutherford, C. A systematic review of body image measures for people diagnosed with head and neck cancer (HNC). Support. Care Cancer 2019, 27, 3657–3666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The flow of dental hygiene assessment and dental hygiene diagnosis in the dental hygiene process of care.
Figure 1. The flow of dental hygiene assessment and dental hygiene diagnosis in the dental hygiene process of care.
Healthcare 08 00217 g001
Table 1. Dental Hygiene Human Needs Conceptual Model.
Table 1. Dental Hygiene Human Needs Conceptual Model.
Human Needs (HN)Contents
HN1Wholesome facial image
HN2Protection from health risks
HN3Biologically sound and functional dentition
HN4Skin and mucous membrane integrity of the head and neck
HN5Freedom from head and neck pain
HN6Freedom from anxiety and stress
HN7Responsibility for oral health
HN8Conceptualization and understanding
Table 2. The North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA) taxonomy.
Table 2. The North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA) taxonomy.
NANDA-IContents
Pattern 1Health perception/health management pattern
Pattern 2Nutritional/metabolic pattern
Pattern 3Elimination pattern
Pattern 4Activity/exercise pattern
Pattern 5Sleep/rest pattern
Pattern 6Cognitive/perceptual pattern
Pattern 7Self-perception pattern
Pattern 8Role/relationship pattern
Pattern 9Sexuality/reproductive pattern
Pattern 10Coping/stress tolerance pattern
Pattern 11Value/belief pattern
Table 3. Proposal of dental hygiene diagnosis categories in cancer treatment in an acute care hospital.
Table 3. Proposal of dental hygiene diagnosis categories in cancer treatment in an acute care hospital.
Human Needs (HN) Conceptual ModelDiagnosisDefining CharacteristicsReference
HN1: Wholesome facial image Disturbed body imageThe condition in which there is confusion in regard to the mental picture of one’s physical self.[28]
HN2: Protection from health risksRisk for infection The condition in which there is an increased risk of being invaded by pathogenic organisms.[20,29,30,31]
Delayed surgical recovery The condition of vulnerability to an extension of the number of postoperative days required to initiate and perform activities that maintain life, health, and well-being, which may compromise health.[32,33]
Risk for aspiration The condition of being at risk for entry of gastrointestinal secretions, oropharyngeal secretions, solids, or fluids into tracheobronchial passages.[30,34]
Ineffective self-oral health management The condition in which patients cannot express the desire to manage oral health for treatment and prevention of complications.-
Ineffective family self-oral health management The condition in which families cannot achieve the goal of oral health or are at risk.-
Risk for ventilator associated pneumoniaThe condition of being at risk for ventilator-associated pneumonia by aspiration.[35]
Swallowing disorder *CP The condition in which there has been a diagnosis of swallowing disorder.
The condition in which a patient complains about deglutition.
[36]
Feeding self-care deficit The condition in which the ability to perform or complete feeding activities is impaired.[37]
Risk for oral bleeding The condition in which there is postoperative oral bleeding or oral bleeding due to low platelet count during chemotherapy.[38]
Impaired physical mobility *CP The condition in which there is a diagnosis of impaired physical mobility.
The condition in which there is a limit to intentional body movements and limb movements that can be executed by patients themselves.
[39]
Risk for ineffective respiratory functionThe condition in which air passage through the respiratory tract is threatened.[40]
Ineffective airway clearanceThe condition of inability to remove secretions or obstructions from the respiratory tract.[40]
Readiness for enhanced nutritionThe condition in which nutrition intake is sufficient for metabolism and further strengthening is possible.-
Impaired communicationThe condition of inability to exchange ideas and requests with others.-
Impaired verbal communicationThe condition in which any or all of the ability to receive, process, and convey words or letter sounds is diminished.-
HN3: Biologically sound and functional dentitionPeriodontal disease *CPThe condition in which diagnosis of periodontal disease has been made by a dentist.[41]
Caries *CPThe condition in which diagnosis of caries has been made by a dentist.[42]
Malocclusion *CPThe condition in which diagnosis of malocclusion has been made by a dentist.[43]
Malalignment *CPThe condition in which diagnosis of malalignment has been made by a dentist.[44]
Missing teeth *CPThe condition in which diagnosis of missing teeth has been made by a dentist.[45]
Crown fracture *CPThe condition in which diagnosis of crown fracture has been made by a dentist.[42]
Ill-fitting prosthesis *CPThe condition in which diagnosis of ill-fitting prosthesis has been made by a dentist.[42]
Peri-implantitis *CPThe condition in which diagnosis of peri-implantitis has been made by a dentist.[46]
Ill-fitting denture *CPThe condition in which diagnosis of ill-fitting denture has been made by a dentist.[47]
Masticatory disturbance *CPThe condition in which diagnosis of masticatory disturbance has been made by a dentist.[30]
HN4: Skin and mucous membrane integrity of the head and neckOral mucositis *CPThe condition in which diagnosis of oral mucositis has been made by a dentist or medical doctor.[12]
Surgical site infection *CPThe condition in which diagnosis of surgical site infection has been made by a dentist or medical doctor.[32,33]
Osteonecrosis of the jaws *CPThe condition in which diagnosis of osteonecrosis of the jaws has been made by a dentist or medical doctor.[48]
Dry mouthThe condition in which the salivary glands in the mouth do not make enough saliva to keep the mouth wet.[49]
Abnormal tongue shape and colorThe condition in which the tongue turns red, yellow, purple, or another color and changes shape.-
Stomatitis *CPThe condition in which diagnosis of stomatitis has been made by a dentist or medical doctor.[12]
Bite wound *CPThe condition in which diagnosis of bite wound has been made by a dentist or medical doctor.-
Oral burn *CPThe condition in which diagnosis of oral burn has been made by a dentist or medical doctor.[50]
Oral trauma *CPThe condition in which diagnosis of oral trauma has been made by a dentist or medical doctor.[51]
Radiodermatitis *CPThe condition in which diagnosis of radiodermatitis has been made by a dentist or medical doctor.[52]
HN5: Freedom from head and neck painAcute painThe condition in which a patient complains about acute pain.-
Chronic painThe condition in which a patient complains about chronic pain.-
HN6: Freedom from anxiety and stressNausea and vomitingThe condition in which a patient complains about stomach discomfort and the sensation of wanting to vomit or vomiting.[53]
PowerlessnessThe condition of lacking self-control, which is caused by stress in patients with cancer.[54]
Death anxietyThe condition in which one experiences a feeling of dread, apprehension, or solicitude (i.e., anxiety) when one thinks of the process of dying or ceasing.[54]
AnxietyThe condition in which a patient experiences a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease about something with an uncertain outcome.[54]
FearThe condition in which a patient experiences a feeling of unpleasant emotion caused by the threat of danger, pain, or harm.[54]
Ineffective copingThe condition in which a patient is unable to realistically assess stressors and use available resources to cope with stress.[55]
Readiness for enhanced copingThe condition in which there are cognitive and behavioral efforts to manage demands that are sufficient for well-being and that can be strengthened.[55]
Disabled family copingThe condition in which caregiver’s experience stress when patients cannot cope with the symptoms they are experiencing.[56]
HN7: Responsibility for oral healthLow oral-health-related self-efficacyThe condition in which the patients cannot execute courses of oral health action required to deal with prospective situations.[26]
Low oral literacyThe condition in which individuals have the capacity to obtain, process, and understand basic oral health information and services needed to make appropriate oral health decisions.[57]
Deficient knowledgeThe condition in which individuals have a lack of cognitive information or psychomotor ability needed for health restoration, preservation, or health promotion.[58]
Readiness for enhanced knowledgeThe condition in which the presence or acquisition of cognitive information related to the oral health topic is sufficient for meeting health-related goals and can be strengthened.[58]
Readiness for enhanced oral self-careThe condition in which a patient is able to regulate and integrate a therapeutic regimen into their daily living for the treatment of illness and its sequelae in a way that is sufficient for meeting health-related goals and that can be strengthened.[58]
HN8: Conceptualization and understandingDecisional conflictThe condition in which there is uncertainty about which course of action to take when the choice among competing actions involves risk, loss, or a challenge to one’s values and beliefs.[59]
Disturbed self-conceptThe condition in which there is a negative state of change about the way a person feels, thinks, or views him or herself.[60]
Spiritual distressThe condition in which the ability to experience and integrate meaning and purpose in life through connectedness with self, others, art, music, literature, nature, and/or a power greater than oneself is impaired.[58]
*CP: This problem presents medical and dental conditions or clinical situations with associated dental hygiene diagnoses and collaborative problems.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Matsuda, Y.; Karino, M.; Okuma, S.; Ikebuchi, K.; Takeda, M.; Kanno, T. Proposal of Dental Hygiene Diagnosis for Cancer Patients Based on Dental Hygiene Process of Care in Acute Care Hospitals: A Narrative Review. Healthcare 2020, 8, 217. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/healthcare8030217

AMA Style

Matsuda Y, Karino M, Okuma S, Ikebuchi K, Takeda M, Kanno T. Proposal of Dental Hygiene Diagnosis for Cancer Patients Based on Dental Hygiene Process of Care in Acute Care Hospitals: A Narrative Review. Healthcare. 2020; 8(3):217. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/healthcare8030217

Chicago/Turabian Style

Matsuda, Yuhei, Masaaki Karino, Satoe Okuma, Kumi Ikebuchi, Mayu Takeda, and Takahiro Kanno. 2020. "Proposal of Dental Hygiene Diagnosis for Cancer Patients Based on Dental Hygiene Process of Care in Acute Care Hospitals: A Narrative Review" Healthcare 8, no. 3: 217. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/healthcare8030217

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop