Next Article in Journal
Radiological Explorations of Patients with Upper or Febrile Urinary Tract Infection
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Monkeypox (MPOX) Knowledge and Vaccination Intention among Health and Life Sciences Students in Algeria: A Cross-Sectional Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Infectious Disease Reports
Volume 16
Issue 2
10.3390/idr16020014
idr-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

The Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Antimicrobial Resistance Determinants of Helicobacter pylori Detected in Dyspeptic Patients in North–Central Bangladesh

by
Syeda Jannatul Ferdaus
1,
Shyamal Kumar Paul
2,
Syeda Anjuman Nasreen
1,
Nazia Haque
1,
Mohammad Sadekuzzaman
3,
Mohammad Reazul Karim
4,
Syed Mahmudul Islam
5,
Abdullah Al Mamun
1,
Fardousi Akter Sathi
1,
Proma Basak
6,
Rifat Binte Nahid
1,
Suraiya Aktar
7 and
Nobumichi Kobayashi
8,*
1
Department of Microbiology, Mymensingh Medical College, Mymensingh 2200, Bangladesh
2
Netrokona Medical College, Netrokona 2400, Bangladesh
3
Department of Livestock Services, Central Disease Investigation Laboratory (CDIL), 48, KaziAlauddin Road, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh
4
Department of Gastroenterology, Mymensingh Medical College, Mymensingh 2200, Bangladesh
5
Department of Microbiology and Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh
6
Shaheed Syed Nazrul Islam Medical College, Kishoreganj 2300, Bangladesh
7
Department of Microbiology, Dhaka Central International Medical College and Hospital, 2/1 Ring Road, Shyamoli, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh
8
Department of Hygiene, School of Medicine, Sapporo Medical University, S-1 W-17, Chuo-ku, Sapporo 060-8556, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Infect. Dis. Rep. 2024, 16(2), 181-188; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/idr16020014
Submission received: 14 January 2024 / Revised: 3 February 2024 / Accepted: 20 February 2024 / Published: 22 February 2024
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Chronic infection of Helicobacter pylori represents a key factor in the etiology of gastrointestinal diseases, with high endemicity in South Asia. The present study aimed to determine the prevalence of H. pylori among dyspeptic patients in north–central Bangladesh (Mymensingh) and analyze risk factors of infection and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) determinants in the pathogen. Endoscopic gastrointestinal biopsy samples were collected from dyspeptic patients for a one-year period from March 2022 and were checked for the presence of H. pylori via the rapid urease test and PCR and further analyzed for the status of virulence factors vacA/cagA and genetic determinants related to AMR via PCR with direct sequencing or RFLP. Among a total of 221 samples collected, 80 (36%) were positive for H. pylori, with the vacA+/cagA+ genotype being detected in almost half of them. H. pylori was most prevalent in the age group of 41–50-year-olds, with it being more common in males and rural residents with a lower economic status and using nonfiltered water, though the rates of these factors were not significantly different from those of the H. pylori-negative group. Relatively higher frequency was noted for the A2147G mutation in 23S rRNA, related to clarithromycin resistance (18%, 7/39). Amino acid substitutions in PBP-1A (T556S) and GyrA (N87K and D91N) and a 200 bp deletion in rdxA were detected in samples from some patients with recurrence after treatment with amoxicillin, levofloxacin, and metronidazole, respectively. The present study describes the epidemiological features of H. pylori infection in the area outside the capital in Bangladesh, revealing the spread of AMR-associated mutations.

1. Introduction

Helicobacter pylori is one of the most common pathogenic bacteria in humans and is associated with the pathogenesis of gastritis, gastroduodenal ulcers, gastric cancer, and other diseases worldwide [1]. This bacterium colonizes the epithelium of the human stomach, and its prevalence is typically 80–90% in developing countries, which is higher than in developed countries (<40%) [2]. Among the H. pylori-positive population, 10–20% are estimated to have a lifetime risk of developing ulcerative disease, while 1–2% have a risk of gastric cancer [3]. It has become evident from a number of clinical trials that H. pylori eradication therapy is beneficial to symptomatic patients by preventing the progression of gastric diseases. Although the regimens of eradication therapy have been designed and widely applied, successful eradication of H. pylori is still a global challenge. The increased risk of H. pylori infection is related to environmental factors, including living in low-income countries and having a lower socioeconomic status [4], occupation, water supply, and dietary habits [5,6]. Accordingly, to clarify such risk factors may contribute to the prevention of H. pylori-associated diseases.
In South Asia, higher seroprevalence of H. pylori in asymptomatic populations was described (>90% in Bangladesh; ~81% in India) compared with other Asian regions more than two decades ago [7,8]. In a recent epidemiological study of H. pylori in Bangladesh, its prevalence was reported to be 33–47% in gastroduodenal biopsy samples obtained through the rapid urease test (RUT) and PCR [9,10]. For the eradication of H. pylori, a triple therapy including a proton pump inhibitor combined with two antimicrobials, amoxicillin (AMX) and clarithromycin (CLA) or metronidazole (MNZ), is the standard first-line regimen. In Bangladesh, a CLA-based triple regimen remains the first option, and levofloxacin (LVX)-based triple therapy is recommended as a second option after failure of CLA-containing therapy [11]. However, high rates of resistance of H. pylori to CLA (10–30%), MNZ (78–95%), and LVX (66%) have been documented in some reports, in contrast to a low rate against AMX (3.6–6.6%) [12,13,14]. Furthermore, in Bangladesh, mutations responsible for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) were detected in H. pylori genes, including 23S rRNA, gyrA, and rdxA [15,16]. The reported high rate of AMR associated with the presumptive high prevalence of H. pylori provides a rationale for its monitoring in the country. Nevertheless, the available information on the prevalence and AMR of H. pylori were obtained mostly in the capital city, Dhaka, and based on somewhat older study subjects, indicating the need for updated data from a region other than the capital to understand the present situation of H. pylori infection in this country. In the present study, we examined the latest prevalence of H. pylori in dyspeptic patients in an area distant from Dhaka and risk factors and AMR with its genetic determinants.

2. Materials and Methods

This study was conducted as a cross-sectional, observational study. Endoscopic gastroduodenal biopsy specimens were collected from dyspeptic patients attending the gastroenterology department of Mymensingh Medical College Hospital. Patients who presented with symptoms of dyspepsia for more than one month were included in this study, and dyspeptic symptoms were defined as one or more of the following: (1) upper abdominal or lower chest pain with or without food intake, (2) regurgitation, heartburn, and water brash, (3) anorexia, nausea, and vomiting, and (4) bloating, belching, and flatulence. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) individuals over 65 years of age and those who had a severe medical or surgical illness such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, previous gastric surgery, etc., (2) medication history of proton pump inhibitors, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, colloidal bismuth compounds, or antibiotics for the eradication of H. pylori over the past four weeks, and (3) previously diagnosed stomach cancer. From one patient, only one specimen was used for this study. The specimens were stored at −80 °C until they were analyzed. The patients’ information, including their clinical history, lifestyle habits, and risk factors, was recorded in the case report form via interview.
Detection of H. pylori in the specimens was performed via RUT using Christensen’s urea agar media (HiMedia laboratories pvt Ltd., Mumbai, India) and PCR targeting 16S rRNA and ureC (glmM) with primers and conditions as described previously [17,18,19]. For H. pylori PCR-positive samples, the presence of vacA and cagA was examined via PCR as described previously [20,21]. In the PCR of vacA, genotypes s1 and s2 were discriminated by product size with primers VA1-F and VA1-R [20]. In this study, H. pylori-positive patients who received antimicrobials for H. pylori eradication therapy 6–12 months previous were regarded as those having inappropriate therapy or carrying antimicrobial-resistant H. pylori strains. Therefore, samples from these patients were selected for analysis of the presence of genetic mutations related to AMR. Partial nucleotide sequences of the PBP-1A gene and gyrA were determined via Sanger sequencing of PCR products to detect mutations that are responsible for resistance to AMX and LVX, respectively [22,23]. Deletion of the rdxA gene, one of the genetic mechanisms of MNZ resistance, was examined via PCR to identify the different sizes of PCR products [24]. A2147G mutations (formerly described as A2143G [25]) in 23S rRNA, a common mechanism of CLA resistance, were analyzed by PCR-RFLP as described previously [24]. To confirm species of H. pylori, the sequences of partial 16S rRNA gene, 23srRNA, cagA, and ureC were determined for representative samples (JHP_100, JHP_103, JHP_101, and JHP_102) and deposited to GenBank under accession numbers OQ247937, OQ379921, OQ319145, and OQ319146, respectively.
The difference in the rate of risk factors and variables of patients between H. pylori-positive and -negative patients was statistically analyzed via Fisher’s exact test with the use of js-STAR XR ver.1.1.9 software (https://www.kisnet.or.jp/nappa/software/star/index.htm (accessed on 22 December 2023)). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

During the study period, a total of 221 gastroduodenal specimens were collected from patients with dyspeptic symptoms. Of them, 72 and 71 samples were found to be positive for H. pylori via RUT and PCR targeting the 16S rRNA gene as well as ureC, respectively, and 63 samples were found to be positive via both screening methods. In the present study, H. pylori-positive cases were defined as those positive in either the RUT or PCR. Accordingly, 80 cases (36% of all of the study subjects) were determined as having H. pylori infection. The most common endoscopic finding in H. pylori-positive cases was antral gastritis, followed by erosive gastritis and nodular gastritis (Table 1). However, between H. pylori-positive and -negative cases, no significant difference was found in the proportion of clinical findings. In duodenal ulcers, PCR showed a slightly higher detection rate of H. pylori than the RUT.
H. pylori was most prevalent in the age group of 41–50-year-olds (40%), followed by 31–40-year-olds (31%) and 21–30-year-olds (18%), with it being more common in males (61%) than females (39%) (Table 2). Among the H. pylori-positive cases (n = 80), 74% (n = 59) lived in rural areas, with 63% (n = 50) having a lower socioeconomic status. Rates of smoking, use of nonfiltered water, and a family history of peptic ulcer disease (PUD) were higher in H. pylori-positive cases than in H. pylori-negative cases. However, differences in the prevalence of the demographic variables and risk factors analyzed were not statistically significant between the H. pylori-positive and -negative groups.
Among the 44 H. pylori-positive samples which were available for PCR targeting virulence factor genes, 36 were positive for both vacA and cagA, while 8 were vacA(+)/cagA(−) (Table 3). Among the 44 vacA-positive samples, most of them showed the s1 genotype (n = 43), while only one sample showed the s2 genotype. vacA(+)/cagA(+) was found in 67–86% of cases of PUD, gastritis, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
Major mutations related to resistance to CLA, MNZ, LVX, and AMX were analyzed for selected cases that had undergone antimicrobial therapy 6–12 months prior, with approximately 39 (49%), 30 (38%), 5 (6%), and 5 (6%) H. pylori-positive cases, respectively (Table 4). A2147G substitution causing CLA resistance was identified via PCR-RFLP (Figure S1a). This mutation was found in 18% (7/39) of samples tested. A 200-bp deletion in rdxA was detected in only two samples (7%) via PCR to discriminate different sizes of product (Figure S1b). In PBP-1A, the T556S substitution that alters the penicillin-binding motif (KTG to KSG) was detected in one specimen. Among the five LVX-resistant cases, two different substitutions in the quinolone resistance determining region (QRDR) were detected in three samples from three cases.

4. Discussion

H. pylori infection is recognized as being involved in a subset of dyspepsia, which represents a wide spectrum of gastrointestinal disorders affecting up to 25% of the population sporadically [26]. In Bangladesh, as well as other South Asian countries, high seroprevalence of H. pylori has been described since the 1990s [8], with 91% being seropositive in the young healthy male population [7]. Among children in a poor peri-urban community, prevalence measured via the urea breath test was reported to be 68% while varying depending on age group [27]. While there was a dearth of information in the 2000s, a histological study on the gastric mucosa of patients with abdominal complaints revealed the infection rate of H. pylori to be 60.2% (2008–2010) [28]. More recent studies on adult dyspeptic patients reported the overall H. pylori prevalence to be 47% (44% with the RUT) (2015) [9] and 32.9% (with the RUT, PCR, and histology) (2018–2019) [10]. These detection rates of H. pylori were comparable to our present study showing a prevalence of 36% (the RUT and PCR) among dyspeptic patients in north–central Bangladesh (Mymensingh). Therefore, the recent prevalence of H. pylori among dyspeptic patients in the country seems to be similar. In other Asian and African countries, a similar prevalence of H. pylori was described, e.g., 40.9% (the CLO test) in Qatar [29], 36% (histology) in Uganda [30], and 31.2% (histology, the RUT, and culture) in Iran [31]. Nevertheless, the notably high detection rate of H. pylori (PCR and the CLO test) (67%) was shown in a study in southern Bangladesh (Chittagong) [32], suggesting the presence of highly endemic areas within the country. Although recent information on seroprevalence is limited, Sarker and coworkers reported 86.8% and 67.5% seropositivity in gastric cancer patients and controls, respectively (2013–2014), in Dhaka [33], indicating that high prevalence was maintained in some populations. Globally, the prevalence of H. pylori is considered to be decreasing continuously [6]. With the spread of eradication therapy for H. pylori infection and the improvement of hygienic conditions, a reduction in H. pylori prevalence is expected in Bangladesh. To confirm the change in prevalence, continuous monitoring of the same area/population with the same detection method for H. pylori may be necessary.
In the present study, the H. pylori-positive rate was higher in males and in the 41–50-year age group, which was similar to that observed in another study in Bangladesh [10]. Although a significant difference was not found, H. pylori-positive cases showed a higher proportion of some risk factors, e.g., residence in rural areas, nonfiltered water, and smoking, compared with H. pylori-negative cases. This finding is consistent with the view that H. pylori infection is associated with dietary habits and lifestyle, as described previously [5,6]. However, >60% of both H. pylori-positive and -negative cases were categorized into a group of lower socioeconomic status in our study, probably due to local areas in low-income country. This finding suggests that dyspepsia in the study population was also related to factors or pathogens other than H. pylori, which might be linked to lower socioeconomic status and low hygienic conditions.
According to a systematic review of AMR in H. pylori in the Asia–Pacific region, the highest resistance rate was described against MNZ (61%), followed by LVX (35%), CLA (30%), and AMX (6%), and there was an increasing trend in the resistance rates [34]. The prevalence of AMR was shown to be remarkable in South Asian countries [35]. In Bangladesh, high resistance rates to MNZ (96%), LVX (66%), and CLA (39%) were reported for isolates in 2014 [13,14], though the resistance rates to MNZ and CLA in 1999–2001 were lower (77.5% and 10%, respectively) [12]. In the present study, though the exact AMR rate was not evaluated, patients who might have inappropriate therapy or AMR strains were more frequent for those who received CLA and MNZ previously (49% and 38% of H. pylori-positive patients, respectively) than LVX and AMX. These findings contrast with the previously published results in Bangladesh [13,14] and suggest the increasing trend of resistance to CLA and a relative decrease in MNZ resistance. Such a difference in the rate of AMR may be related to the practice of eradication therapy in our study site.
Genetic mechanisms causing resistance to CLA, LVX, and MNZ in H. pylori detected in our present study were also described in recent studies in Bangladesh [15,16], indicating the potential spread of these resistance mechanisms. The A2147G mutation in 23S rRNA detected in 18% of specimens in our study was also reported in 45.5% of CLA-resistant strains [16], showing its dominance as a resistance mechanism. N87K and D91N in GyrA detected in our study are also described as the most frequent mutations in LVX-resistant strains [16]. In contrast, T556S in PBP-1A detected in our study has never been found in Bangladesh previously, though other mutations in PBP-1a, -2, -3, and -4 have been reported [16]. The T556S substitution is located in the penicillin-binding motif and was demonstrated to confer AMX resistance [36] and found in clinical isolates in Argentina [37,38], while this mutation has been rarely reported. Identification of this PBP-1A mutation in Bangladesh suggests the spread of AMX resistance, which may indicate the need for prudent eradication therapy for H. pylori infection.
This study has some limitations. For the detection of H. pylori, only one biopsy sample was taken from a patient, which might cause false-negative results because of the irregular distribution of bacteria in the gastric mucosa, resulting in a potentially lower positive rate. Thus, it is possible that the significant difference in incidence rates of any risk factors might not be evident between H. pylori-positive and -negative groups. In the analysis of the genetic mechanisms of AMR, only a limited number of genes and mutations were examined. Although the targeted mutations were detected, the presence and frequency of other genetic mechanisms were undetermined.
The present study revealed the prevalence of H. pylori in dyspeptic patients in north-central Bangladesh, along with the risk factors, AMR, and a part of their genetic mechanisms. Though the prevalence of H. pylori was comparable to that in the capital city, Dhaka, considering the presence of potential false-positive samples, the actual prevalence is suggested to be higher. Therefore, further surveillance of H. pylori via accurate diagnostic methods is required, particularly in various rural areas within the country. In addition, periodic studies in the same location will also be valuable to describe the trend of prevalence and risk factors for H. pylori infection. Regarding AMR, the surveillance of resistance rates to CLA and MNZ may be primarily important. The genetic mechanisms of resistance should be thoroughly clarified since the available information is still limited in Bangladesh. The diversity and frequency of the resistance mechanisms may reveal a potential spread of specific resistant strains, which will provide basic information to contribute to the control of H. pylori infection.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/idr16020014/s1. Figure S1: Detection of mutations in 23S rRNA and rdxA associated with resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole, respectively.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.J.F. and S.K.P.; methodology, S.J.F., S.A.N. and N.H.; formal analysis, S.J.F. and N.K.; investigation, S.J.F. and N.K.; resources, M.S., M.R.K., S.M.I., A.A.M., F.A.S., P.B., R.B.N. and S.A.; writing—original draft preparation, S.J.F.; writing—review and editing, N.K.; supervision, S.K.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Mymensingh Medical College (MMC/IRB/2022/449, 8 August 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

In this manuscript, additional data is only Supplementary Material Figure S1.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all of the physicians and staff of the Department of Gastroenterology for their cooperation in patient selection and sample collection throughout this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Amieva, M.R.; El-Omar, E.M. Host-bacterial interactions in Helicobacter pylori infection. Gastroenterology 2008, 134, 306–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Perez-Perez, G.I.; Rothenbacher, D.; Brenner, H. Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection. Helicobacter 2004, 9 (Suppl. S1), 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kusters, J.G.; van Vliet, A.H.; Kuipers, E.J. Pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2006, 19, 449–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Goh, K.L. Prevalence of and risk factors for Helicobacter pylori infection in a multi-racial dyspeptic Malaysian population undergoing endoscopy. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 1997, 12, S29–S35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Monno, R.; De Laurentiis, V.; Trerotoli, P.; Roselli, A.M.; Ierardi, E.; Portincasa, P. Helicobacter pylori infection: Association with dietary habits and socioeconomic conditions. Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol. 2019, 43, 603–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Leja, M.; Grinberga-Derica, I.; Bilgilier, C.; Steininger, C. Review: Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection. Helicobacter 2019, 24 (Suppl. S1), e12635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ahmad, M.M.; Rahman, M.; Rumi, A.K.; Islam, S.; Huq, F.; Chowdhury, M.F.; Jinnah, F.; Morshed, M.G.; Hassan, M.S.; Khan, A.K. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in asymptomatic population—A pilot serological study in Bangladesh. J. Epidemiol. 1997, 7, 251–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Miwa, H.; Go, M.F.; Sato, N. H. pylori and gastric cancer: The Asian enigma. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2002, 97, 1106–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Aftab, H.; Yamaoka, Y.; Ahmed, F.; Khan, A.A.; Subsomwong, P.; Miftahussurur, M.; Uchida, T.; Malaty, H.M. Validation of diagnostic tests and epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection in Bangladesh. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2018, 12, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tanni, N.N.; Ahmed, S.; Anwar, S.; Kismat, S.; Halder, K.; Nesa, M.; Habib, F.B. Endoscopic and histopathological findings in adult dyspeptic patients, and their association with Helicobacter pylori infection in Dhaka, Bangladesh. IJID Reg. 2021, 2, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hasan, M. Dyspepsia in primary care practice in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Med. J. 2013, 42, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nahar, S.; Mukhopadhyay, A.K.; Khan, R.; Ahmad, M.M.; Datta, S.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Dhar, S.C.; Sarker, S.A.; Engstrand, L.; Berg, D.E.; et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori strains isolated in Bangladesh. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 4856–4858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Aftab, H.; Miftahussurur, M.; Subsomwong, P.; Ahmed, F.; Khan, A.K.; Yamaoka, Y. Helicobacter pylori antibiotic susceptibility patterns in Bangladesh: Emerging levofloxacin resistance. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2016, 10, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Miftahussurur, M.; Aftab, H.; Shrestha, P.K.; Sharma, R.P.; Subsomwong, P.; Waskito, L.A.; Doohan, D.; Fauzia, K.A.; Yamaoka, Y. Effective therapeutic regimens in two South Asian countries with high resistance to major Helicobacter pylori antibiotics. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2019, 8, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tanni, N.N.; Anwar, S.; Ahmed, S.; Halder, K.; Nesa, M.; Kismat, S. Mutational Analysis of Clarithromycin and Levofloxacin Resistance in Helicobacter pylori from Gastric Biopsy Specimens in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Bangladesh J. Med. Microbiol. 2019, 13, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fauzia, K.A.; Aftab, H.; Tshibangu-Kabamba, E.; Alfaray, R.I.; Saruuljavkhlan, B.; Cimuanga-Mukanya, A.; Matsumoto, T.; Subsomwong, P.; Akada, J.; Miftahussurur, M.; et al. Mutations Related to Antibiotics Resistance in Helicobacter pylori Clinical Isolates from Bangladesh. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ho, S.A.; Hoyle, J.A.; Lewis, F.A.; Secker, A.D.; Cross, D.; Mapstone, N.P.; Dixon, M.F.; Wyatt, J.I.; Tompkins, D.S.; Taylor, G.R. Direct polymerase chain reaction test for detection of Helicobacter pylori in humans and animals. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1991, 29, 2543–2549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abdelmalek, S.; Shokry, K.; Hamed, W.; Abdelnaser, M.; Aboubakr, A.; Elenin, S.A.; Ali, M.; Mostafa, M.; Abou-Okada, M. The validity evaluation of different 16srRNA gene primers for helicobacter detection urgently requesting to design new specific primers. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 10737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lu, J.J.; Perng, C.L.; Shyu, R.Y.; Chen, C.H.; Lou, Q.; Chong, S.K.; Lee, C.H. Comparison of five PCR methods for detection of Helicobacter pylori DNA in gastric tissues. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999, 37, 772–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Atherton, J.C.; Cao, P.; Peek, R.M., Jr.; Tummuru, M.K.; Blaser, M.J.; Cover, T.L. Mosaicism in vacuolating cytotoxin alleles of Helicobacter pylori. Association of specific vacA types with cytotoxin production and peptic ulceration. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 17771–17777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chattopadhyay, S.; Patra, R.; Ramamurthy, T.; Chowdhury, A.; Santra, A.; Dhali, G.K.; Bhattacharya, S.K.; Berg, D.E.; Nair, G.B.; Mukhopadhyay, A.K. Multiplex PCR assay for rapid detection and genotyping of Helicobacter pylori directly from biopsy specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 2821–2824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kageyama, C.; Sato, M.; Sakae, H.; Obayashi, Y.; Kawahara, Y.; Mima, T.; Matsushita, O.; Yokota, K.; Mizuno, M.; Okada, H. Increase in antibiotic resistant Helicobacter pylori in a University Hospital in Japan. Infect. Drug Resist. 2019, 12, 597–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wang, L.H.; Cheng, H.; Hu, F.L.; Li, J. Distribution of gyrA mutations in fluoroquinolone-resistant Helicobacter pylori strains. World J. Gastroenterol. 2010, 16, 2272–2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Amin, M.; Shayesteh, A.A.; Serajian, A.; Goodarzi, H. Assessment of metronidazole and clarithromycin resistance among Helicobacter pylori isolates of Ahvaz (southwest of Iran) during 2015–2016 by phenotypic and molecular methods. Jundishapur J. Microbiol. 2019, 12, e80156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tamayo, E.; Montes, M.; Fernández-Reyes, M.; Lizasoain, J.; Ibarra, B.; Mendarte, U.; Zapata, E.; Mendiola, J.; Pérez-Trallero, E. Clarithromycin resistance in Helicobacter pylori and its molecular determinants in Northern Spain, 2013–2015. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2017, 9, 43–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Selgrad, M.; Kandulski, A.; Malfertheiner, P. Dyspepsia and Helicobacter pylori. Dig. Dis. 2008, 26, 210–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sarker, S.A.; Mahalanabis, D.; Hildebrand, P.; Rahaman, M.M.; Bardhan, P.K.; Fuchs, G.; Beglinger, C.; Gyr, K. Helicobacter pylori: Prevalence, transmission, and serum pepsinogen II concentrations in children of a poor periurban community in Bangladesh. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1997, 25, 990–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Matsuhisa, T.; Aftab, H. Observation of gastric mucosa in Bangladesh, the country with the lowest incidence of gastric cancer, and Japan, the country with the highest incidence. Helicobacter 2012, 17, 396–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Naushad, V.A.; Purayil, N.K.; Badi, A.; Chandra, P.; Abuzaid, H.O.; Abuhmaira, M.M.; Lutf, A.; Paramba, F.; Varikkodan, I.; Elzouki, A.Y. Potential Predictors and Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori Infection Among Adult Patients with Dyspepsia: A Retrospective Study from Qatar. Cureus 2021, 13, e16216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Oling, M.; Odongo, J.; Kituuka, O.; Galukande, M. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in dyspeptic patients at a tertiary hospital in a low resource setting. BMC Res. Notes 2015, 8, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Niknam, R.; Seddigh, M.; Fattahi, M.R.; Dehghanian, A.; Mahmoudi, L. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in patients with dyspepsia. Jundishapur J. Microbiol. 2014, 7, e12676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Habib, A.M.; Alam, M.J.; Rudra, B.; Quader, M.A.; Al-Forkan, M. Analysis of Helicobacter pylori Prevalence in Chittagong, Bangladesh, Based on PCR and CLO Test. Microbiol. Insights 2016, 9, 47–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Sarker, K.K.; Kabir, M.J.; Bhuyian, A.K.M.M.U.; Alam, M.S.; Chowdhury, F.R.; Ahad, M.A.; Rahman, M.A.; Rahman, M.M. H. pylori infection and gastric cancer in Bangladesh: A case-control study. Int. J. Surg. Oncol. 2017, 2, e44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hong, T.C.; El-Omar, E.M.; Kuo, Y.T.; Wu, J.Y.; Chen, M.J.; Chen, C.C.; Fang, Y.J.; Leow, A.H.R.; Lu, H.; Lin, J.T.; et al. Primary antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori in the Asia-Pacific region between 1990 and 2022: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2024, 9, 56–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Shrestha, A.B.; Pokharel, P.; Sapkota, U.H.; Shrestha, S.; Mohamed, S.A.; Khanal, S.; Jha, S.K.; Mohanty, A.; Padhi, B.K.; Asija, A. Drug Resistance Patterns of Commonly Used Antibiotics for the Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection among South Asian Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2023, 8, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kwon, D.H.; Dore, M.P.; Kim, J.J.; Kato, M.; Lee, M.; Wu, J.Y.; Graham, D.Y. High-level beta-lactam resistance associated with acquired multidrug resistance in Helicobacter pylori. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 2169–2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Matteo, M.J.; Granados, G.; Olmos, M.; Wonaga, A.; Catalano, M. Helicobacter pylori amoxicillin heteroresistance due to point mutations in PBP-1A in isogenic isolates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2008, 61, 474–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zerbetto De Palma, G.; Mendiondo, N.; Wonaga, A.; Viola, L.; Ibarra, D.; Campitelli, E.; Salim, N.; Corti, R.; Goldman, C.; Catalano, M. Occurrence of Mutations in the Antimicrobial Target Genes Related to Levofloxacin, Clarithromycin, and Amoxicillin Resistance in Helicobacter pylori Isolates from Buenos Aires City. Microb. Drug Resist. 2017, 23, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Clinical outcome of patients in cases with and without H. pylori infection.
Table 1. Clinical outcome of patients in cases with and without H. pylori infection.
Endoscopic Finding/Disease Type (Total n = 221)Number of H. pylori-Positive Samples (% in Endoscopic Finding)Number of Cases (% in Cases)
RUT (n = 72)PCR (n = 71)H. pylori-Positive (n = 80 *2)H. pylori-Negative (n = 141)p-Value
Normal mucosa (6)1 (17%)1 (17%)1 (1.3%)5 (3.5%)0.421
Antral gastritis (52)19 (37%)18 (35%)22 (28%)30 (21%)0.324
Erosive gastritis (50)17 (34%)16 (32%)17 (21%)33 (23%)0.741
Nodular gastritis (35)12 (34%)13(37%)13 (16%)22 (16%)1.000
Gastric ulcer (29)7 (24%)5 (17%)7 (8.8%)22 (16%)0.103
Duodenal ulcer (31)8 (26%)12 (39%)12 (15%)19 (13%)0.559
Gastric cancer (3)1 (33%)1 (33%)1 (1.3%)2 (1.4%)1.000
GERD *1 (15)7 (47%)5 (33%)7 (8.8%)8 (5.7%)0.412
*1 gastroesophageal reflux disease. *2 H. pylori-positive cases by RUT and/or PCR.
Table 2. Demographic and risk factors of H. pylori-positive and -negative cases.
Table 2. Demographic and risk factors of H. pylori-positive and -negative cases.
VariableNumber of Cases (%)
H. pylori-Positive (n = 80)H. pylori-Negative (n = 141)p-Value
Age group (years)
<20 (18–20)2 (2.5%)8 (5.6%)0.335
21–3014 (18%)31 (22%)0.489
31–4025 (31%)38 (27%)0.537
41–5032 (40%)47 (33%)0.248
51–606 (7.5%)14 (10%)0.632
61–651 (1.2%)3 (2.1%)1.000
Sex: male/female49 (61%)/31 (39%)82 (58%)/59 (42%)0.672
Residential area
Rural59 (74%)93 (66%)0.290
Urban21 (26%)48 (34%)0.290
Risk factors
Lower socioeconomic status *150 (63%)102 (73%)0.134
Consumption of restaurant food, meat10 (12.5%)30 (27%)0.145
Nonfiltered water48 (60%)70 (50%)0.161
Family history of PUD30 (38%)45 (32%)0.460
Smoking37 (46.2%)50 (35%)0.538
*1 Estimated annual income of patient was used to classify this category based on criteria of the World Bank Atlas Method (low-income economics, July 2021).
Table 3. Virulence genes and endoscopic finding of H. pylori (n = 44).
Table 3. Virulence genes and endoscopic finding of H. pylori (n = 44).
Virulence Gene Status No. of SamplesNo. of Cases with Clinical Finding (% in the Finding)
PUD (n = 11)Gastritis (n = 29)GERD (n = 3)Others (n = 1)
vacA+, cagA+368 (73)25 (86)2 (67)1 (100)
vacA+, cagA−83 (27)4 (14)1 (33)0
Table 4. Mutations related to antimicrobial resistance in H. pylori.
Table 4. Mutations related to antimicrobial resistance in H. pylori.
Antimicrobial Resistance Observed ClinicallyGene AnalyzedMutation IdentifiedNo. of Samples with Resistance Suspected by Clinical Course (% in 80 H. pylori-Positive Samples)No. of Samples with Mutation (% in Examined Samples)
Clarithromycin23S rRNAA2147G39 (49%)7 (18%)
MetronidazolerdxA200-bp deletion30 (38%)2 (7%)
AmoxicillinPBP-1AT556S5 (6%)1 (20%)
LevofloxacinGyrAN87K5 (6%)1 (20%)
D91N5 (6%)2 (40%)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ferdaus, S.J.; Paul, S.K.; Nasreen, S.A.; Haque, N.; Sadekuzzaman, M.; Karim, M.R.; Islam, S.M.; Al Mamun, A.; Sathi, F.A.; Basak, P.; et al. The Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Antimicrobial Resistance Determinants of Helicobacter pylori Detected in Dyspeptic Patients in North–Central Bangladesh. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2024, 16, 181-188. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/idr16020014

AMA Style

Ferdaus SJ, Paul SK, Nasreen SA, Haque N, Sadekuzzaman M, Karim MR, Islam SM, Al Mamun A, Sathi FA, Basak P, et al. The Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Antimicrobial Resistance Determinants of Helicobacter pylori Detected in Dyspeptic Patients in North–Central Bangladesh. Infectious Disease Reports. 2024; 16(2):181-188. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/idr16020014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ferdaus, Syeda Jannatul, Shyamal Kumar Paul, Syeda Anjuman Nasreen, Nazia Haque, Mohammad Sadekuzzaman, Mohammad Reazul Karim, Syed Mahmudul Islam, Abdullah Al Mamun, Fardousi Akter Sathi, Proma Basak, and et al. 2024. "The Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Antimicrobial Resistance Determinants of Helicobacter pylori Detected in Dyspeptic Patients in North–Central Bangladesh" Infectious Disease Reports 16, no. 2: 181-188. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/idr16020014

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop