Next Article in Journal
Household Smoking Status and Heavy Metal Concentrations in Toenails of Children
Next Article in Special Issue
The Occurrence and Risks of Selected Emerging Pollutants in Drinking Water Source Areas in Henan, China
Previous Article in Journal
Tactile Sensitivity of Women with Turner Syndrome
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Freeze-Thaw Cycles on Phosphorus from Sediments in the Middle Reaches of the Yarlung Zangbo River
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Changes of Bacterial Communities in Response to Prolonged Hydrodynamic Disturbances in the Eutrophic Water-Sediment Systems

1
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China
2
School of Hydraulic Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China
3
Key Laboratory of Integrated Regulation and Resource Development on Shallow Lake of Ministry of Education, College of Environment, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
4
School of Construction Equipment and Municipal Engineering, Jiangsu Vocational Institute of Architectural Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(20), 3868; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph16203868
Submission received: 10 September 2019 / Revised: 30 September 2019 / Accepted: 5 October 2019 / Published: 12 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Water Quality Improvement and Ecological Restoration)

Abstract

:
The effects of hydrodynamic disturbances on the bacterial communities in eutrophic aquatic environments remain poorly understood, despite their importance to ecological evaluation and remediation. This study investigated the evolution of bacterial communities in the water–sediment systems under the influence of three typical velocity conditions with the timescale of 5 weeks. The results demonstrated that higher bacterial diversity and notable differences were detected in sediment compared to water using the 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The phyla Firmicutes and γ-Proteobacteria survived better in both water and sediment under stronger water disturbances. Their relative abundance peaked at 36.0%, 33.2% in water and 38.0%, 43.6% in sediment, respectively, while the phylum Actinobacteria in water had the opposite tendency. Its relative abundance grew rapidly in static control (SC) and peaked at 44.8%, and it almost disappeared in disturbance conditions. These phenomena were caused by the proliferation of genus Exiguobacterium (belonging to Firmicutes), Citrobacter, Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas (belonging to γ-Proteobacteria), and hgcI_clade (belonging to Actinobacteria). The nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) and Venn analysis also revealed significantly different evolutionary trend in the three water-sediment systems. It was most likely caused by the changes of geochemical characteristics (dissolved oxygen (DO) and nutrients). This kind of study can provide helpful information for ecological assessment and remediation strategy in eutrophic aquatic environments.

1. Introduction

Bacterial communities are responsible for the cycling of nutrients, self-purification, and greenhouse gas emissions in aquatic environments [1,2]. Because of bacteria’s sedentary way of life, their community characteristics in water and sediment are the potential integrative indicators for evaluating the health and stability of aquatic environments, especially for eutrophic ecosystems [3,4]. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms controlling their assembly in water and sediment is vital for water eutrophication treatment and remediation.
The bacterial activities in the water–sediment systems are regulated by past and present environmental conditions [5,6]. Many recent studies have focused on the relationships between bacterial communities and physicochemical properties of the habitats. Generally, higher nutrient levels and temperatures may increase bacterial cell numbers and change community composition [7,8]. Dissolved oxygen (DO) can explain the bacterial community variation in the redundancy analysis targeting freshwater [9]. The pH and salinity are also major elements in shaping bacterial communities [9,10,11].
For the natural aquatic environments, runoff is ubiquitous and changeable, and it is the main physical power to shape the bacterial living environments [12,13]. On one hand, sediment resuspension and interface exchange are aggrandized by flow shearing and turbulence [14,15]. Then, the environmental factors vary significantly, especially the nutrient concentration, DO level, and total suspended solid in the water column. Indirectly, the community composition will undergo differential evolution. On the other hand, high water shear stresses can directly decrease the bacterial diversity, slow down the maturation, and change the community composition [16,17,18,19]. Katharina et al. and Li et al. indicated that hydrodynamic regimes could be considered as a set of reasonable predictors of community composition of benthic biofilms [16,19]. However, the habitats (water and sediment) are interactional and interdependent in the aquatic environments. It is often unclear how the abundance and composition of bacterial communities correlate with water disturbances in water-sediment systems.
Our work aimed to investigate the effects of hydraulic forces on bacterial communities in eutrophic water-sediment systems. Three typical hydrodynamic conditions were simulated by using racetrack-style flumes. Using the 16S rRNA gene sequencing and various multivariate statistical methods, the variation of bacterial community diversity and structure in the water and sediment for different periods were studied. The relationship between bacterial communities and geochemical characteristics were also discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling Sites and Experimental Materials

Lake Chaohu, located in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River, is one of the five biggest freshwater lakes in China. The sediment of Lake Chaohu has serious eutrophication issues, and it was subject to multiple sources of pollution over the past decades, including industrial sewage, urban runoff, and combined sewer overflows [20,21]. Nanfei River is the largest river flowing into Lake Chaohu and has a large nutrient loading (TN, 5207.5 ton/year; TP, 418.0 ton/year) [22]. The sampling sites were located at the estuary of Nanfei River, which was subject to hydrodynamic regimes perennially. The distribution of the sampling sites is shown in Figure 1, which was drawn by Inkscape 0.92.4 and Openstreetmap (https://www.openstreetmap.org). Due to the main active and homogeneous layer affecting by water disturbances, the surface sediment samples (0–5 cm) were collected by using a Peterson grab sampler (Punsen, Changzhou, China) [23,24]. The details of the physicochemical characteristics of the sediment are listed in Table S1. All the sediment samples in each site were gathered, mixed, and fully homogenized. After putting into sterile polyethylene bags, the samples were immediately transported to the laboratory and kept at −80 °C until the experiment began.

2.2. Experimental Facilities and Method

Three parallel racetrack-style flumes were employed to conduct the following water disturbance experiments. Our previous study has proved that this type of flumes was effective in simulating the water–sediment interface exchange under the influence of different stream courses [25]. The size and structure are illustrated in Figure 2. The homogenized sediment samples were divided into three parts and spread evenly in the bed of the flumes to a thickness of 5 cm. The experiment employed ultrapure water as the overlying water to avoid the impact of the complex raw water quality. A 20 cm layer of ultrapure water was slowly injected into the flumes via a siphon without disturbing the sediment. Then these water-sediment systems were left undisturbed for a week to serve as a near natural substratum.
The characteristic of velocity is the most critical factor in the change of hydrodynamic conditions. According to in-situ velocity observation and previous reports in the sampling area, three frequent velocities were carried out simultaneously via adjusting rotational-speed of the screw propeller [20,26]. They were static control (SC), slow velocity condition (SVC), and fast velocity condition (FVC). The corresponding average vertical velocities ( U ¯ ) in each condition were set as 0 cm/s, 4.5 cm/s, and 20.8 cm/s, respectively. The experiment lasted for five weeks. During the experiment, the water was recirculated in the flumes and the velocity structures in each condition were controlled steadily and continuously.
The sample collection of water and sediment was conducted weekly. The sampling points are illustrated in Figure 2. Approximately 300 mL of water was collected from each point using a layered hydrophore. The parallel water samples from three points were mixed for homogenization. Each mixed sample was filtered through quartz fiber filters (3 μm pore size) to eliminate suspended solids. Bacterial cells were collected onto polyethersulfone membrane filters (0.22 μm pore size) by using a vacuum filter. The filter membranes with bacterial cells were transferred to sterile tubes and stored at −80 °C until the DNA could be extracted [27]. Meanwhile, the filtrates (100 mL) were used to analyze total phosphorus (TP) and total nitrogen (TN). TP and TN were analyzed by the molybdenum blue and Kjeldahl spectrophotometry method, respectively. For the sediment sampling, a cylindrical sampler (5 cm I.D., 50 cm in length) was used to collect sediment samples. After homogenization and careful washing by sterile deionized water, approximately 4 g of sample was placed in the sterile tube hermetically, than stored at −80 °C until the DNA could be extracted [28]. The water depth was kept constant by adding ultrapure water after each sampling.
Moreover, the flow structures in each flume were controlled for stability during the experiment. The velocities were monitored daily by using an acoustic Doppler velocimeter (Nortek, Oslo, Norway) from the bottom to water surface with 1-cm intervals. The DO and pH values were measured using a HACH HQ30d portable meter (HACH Company, Loveland, CO, USA) daily. The experimental temperature was kept stable at 15 ± 0.3 °C.

2.3. Sample Analysis

The 16S rRNA gene analysis was applied to determine the bacterial communities in the water and sediment samples. The brief process is as follows: the total DNA from the homogenized water and sediment samples was extracted using the Power Water/Soil Sterivex DNA Isolation Kit (MO BIO Laboratories, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA quality was checked on a 1% agarose gel by spectrophotometric analysis with a NanoDrop ND-2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, CA, USA). Amplification of the target fragment was V4 region in the 16S rRNA gene by the primers F515 (GTGYCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA) and R806R (GGACTACNVGGGTWTCTAAT) [29]. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification was performed on a BioRad S1000 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratory, Hercules, CA, USA). The reaction conditions were tripartite: preheating at 94 °C for 5 min; denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, cycle 31 times; annealing at 52 °C for 30 s; extension at 75 °C for 45 s; lasting 72 °C for 10 min. After PCR amplification, the PCR products were stored at 4 °C and then sent to Guangdong Magigene Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China) for Illumina HiSeq sequencing. The quality was checked by the MOTHUR software. Then, the sequences were trimmed and aligned using the SILVA reference database. The sequences were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with a 97% similarity identity cutoff. More detailed information of the 16S rRNA gene analysis is described in References [10,30].

2.4. Multivariate Statistics

Statistical analyses were conducted using the SPSS 19.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) and R 3.6.1 (R Development Core Team Vienna, Austria) (https://www.reproject.org/). The rarefaction curves were analyzed using MOTHUR, with an OTU defined at 97% similarity. The bacterial diversity, richness, and relative abundance were analyzed using the R package “vegan” [31,32]. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) and Venn analysis were applied to determine the spatial relationships among bacterial communities. NMDS analysis was calculated based on the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrix by using the R package “vegan”. Venn diagrams were generated to visualize OTUs common to SC, SVC, and FVC at week 5 using the Venn tool [33]. It is statistically significant in the t-test if the p-value is smaller than 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Physicochemical Properties in the Water-Sediment Systems

No discernible differences in the physico-chemical properties were observed in any water-sediment system over time, implying that the bacterial living environment remained stable in each system from week 0 to week 5. This dynamic equilibrium was similar to previous studies [26]. The average values of DO, TN, TP, and pH were analyzed and shown in Figure 3. The DO values increased with the enhanced water disturbances from 6.3 mg/L in the SC to 9.0 mg/L in the FVC. Due to the strong flow turbulence, the oxygen can be fully mixed, oxygen exchange was promoted, and extra oxygen could be held in the overlying water [34,35]. Meanwhile, nutrient concentrations (TN and TP) showed a similar tendency with DO. TN and TP were 0.6 mg/L and 6.5 mg/L in the FVC, which were 5.4 times and 3.3 times that in the SC. This was due to the sediment resuspension, which released large amounts of nutrients from the eutrophic sediment into the overlying water [12,36]. Similar results were observed in previous research [37,38]. The pH showed no significant statistical differences, and the mean value was 8.43 ± 0.09.

3.2. Diversity of Bacterial Communities

Sequencing data were generated from the 18 water samples and 18 sediment samples. Table S2 is an overview of the OTU numbers and diversity indexes of these samples. As a result, a total of 721 709 sequences (water: 388 398 and sediment: 333 311) was obtained after quality filtering and trimming. The sequences were assigned to 53 050 OTUs (water: 10 934 and sediment: 42 116) with a 97% sequence identity threshold. Rarefaction curves of water and sediment samples are shown in Figure S1 (Supplementary Material). These rarefaction curves approached to a saturation plateau, which indicated that most of the bacterial OTUs were captured.
In the water, the bacterial diversity and richness in the SVC were the highest (mean OTUs of 687, Chao index of 861, Shannon index of 5.71, and Simpson index of 0.06), followed by SC (mean OTUs of 621, Chao index of 755, Shannon index of 4.78, and Simpson index of 0.11) and FVC (mean OTUs of 607, Chao index of 862, Shannon index of 4.70, and Simpson index of 0.12). There might be two reasons: on the one hand, the bacterial cells from the sediment would release into the water column though the resuspension process [39,40]; on the other hand, strong water disturbance (especially FVC) would have the inhibition effect on bacterial diversity and richness [16,41].
In the sediment, as the water velocity increased, the OTUs showed a decreasing trend (p < 0.1), and the mean numbers were 2568 in the SC, 2352 in the SVC, and 2099 in the FVC, respectively. Similar tendencies were found in the Chao richness index and the Shannon and Simpson diversity indexes in the sediment (p < 0.1). The results indicated that strong currents inhibited the bacterial diversity and richness, as the flow shearing force and friction exerted on the bacteria induced the loss of bacterial communities [42].
After comparing the OTU numbers of water and sediment (see Table S2), the mean value of OTUs was 607 in water samples (range: 321–848), which was far less than that in sediment samples (mean: 2340, range: 1246–2995). Unsurprisingly, the Chao richness indexes and Shannon and Simpson diversity indexes revealed a lower level of biodiversity in water (mean Chao index of 826, Shannon index of 5.06, Simpson index of 0.099) than that in sediment (mean Chao index of 2499, Shannon index of 7.58, Simpson index of 0.047). This can be explained by the fact that bacterial communities clustered by environment habitats and sediment have higher adaptability to provide more micro niches [10,43].

3.3. Composition Evolution of Bacterial Community

3.3.1. Phylum

(1) Water
The changes of the bacterial communities in response to water disturbances were investigated. In total, 48 phyla in the water samples were detected by the RDP classifier. As Figure 4a shows, 6 dominant phyla accounted for 94.1% of the total bacterial sequences. They were Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, OD1, and Planctomycetes, which included more than 1.0% of the total bacterial sequences. Notably, the most dominant bacterial phylum were Proteobacteria, and the mean relative abundance was 52.2%. The relative abundance of Proteobacteria in each condition was fluctuant. Among different classes of Proteobacteria, γ-Proteobacteria were predominant (mean: 19.5%) and γ-Proteobacteria gradually increased with the enhanced water disturbances. The reads of γ-Proteobacteria in the SC were 19.2% (0 weeks), and then decreased to 1.9% (5 weeks). In contrast, the relative abundance of γ-Proteobacteria in the FVC increased from 22.3% (0 weeks) to 33.2% (5 weeks), as shown in Figure S2a (Supplementary Material). Firmicutes showed a similar tendency with γProteobacteria (Figure 4a). The reads of Firmicutes decreased from 19.1% and 1.2% in the SC and increased from approximate 17.4% to 23.1% (SVC) and 36.0% (FVC), respectively. The increase in the reads of both γ–Proteobacteria and Firmicutes with water disturbances might be supported by DO and nutrient concentrations (TP and TN) growth. Similar phenomena were reported in previous studies [28,44,45]. Moreover, the reads of Bacteroidetes and OD1 decreased in the SVC and FVC, between weeks 0 and 5, due to the mass proliferation of γ-Proteobacteria and Firmicutes. Meanwhile, the reads of Actinobacteria presented a different trend. The reads of Actinobacteria in the SC were 2.7% (0 weeks), and then peaked at 44.8% (5 weeks). The reads of Actinobacteria almost disappeared under the influence of water disturbances (around 0.5% between week 1 and 5). This might result from the fact that Actinobacteria was negatively correlated with TP levels [28,45]. In the SC, due to the mass proliferation of Actinobacteria, the corresponding reads of Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Bacteroidetes decreased from 19.1%, 57.3% and 12.0% to 1.2%, 40.9%, and 3.1%, respectively. The fluctuations of the reads of OD1 were detected (mean: 8.3%, range: 4.2–22.2%).
(2) Sediment
Relatively richer bacterial communities were detected in sediment samples (shown in Figure 4b). An examination of the database revealed 66 phyla, and there were 12 dominant phyla in sediment (mean relative abundance > 1.0%) during the 5-week period. They accounted for 95.7% of the total bacterial sequences, including Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, OD1, Planctomycetes, Chloroflexi, Gemmatimonadetes, Acidobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Nitrospirae and Cyanobacteria. These dominant phyla were basically consistent with the previous reports in the sediment of Lake Chaohu [46,47]. The most dominant bacterial phylum in each condition were also Proteobacteria, which constituted a high proportion from 38.7% to 50.6% (mean: 42.7%). The γ-Proteobacteria was also the most dominant group, with a mean value of 21.7% among the classes of Proteobacteria (shown in Figure S2b, Supplementary Material). In the SC, the relative abundance of each phylum fluctuated within a narrow range (weeks 0–5), and it indicated that the bacterial communities in the sediment of SC remained basically stable. In the SVC and FVC, the relative abundance of γ-Proteobacteria, Firmicutes and Actinobacteria showed a similar regularity to that in water. The reads of γ-Proteobacteria and Firmicutes increased sharply in the FVC from 16.9%, 13.6% (0 weeks) to 43.6%, 38.0% (5 weeks). Meanwhile, the relative abundance of Actinobacteria showed an opposite trend. The reads of Actinobacteria in the SVC and FVC decreased from 2.2% to 1.1% and 0.5% (weeks 0–5), respectively. As the mass proliferation of γ-Proteobacteria and Firmicutes increased, the relative abundance of other 10 phyla decreased gradually.

3.3.2. Genus

(1) Water
At the genus level, there were 879 genera of known bacteria in water samples, and 21 bacterial genera accounted for more than 0.5% of all sequences on average (see Figure 5a). The genus Exiguobacterium had the highest relative abundance (mean: 18.3%), belonging to phylum Firmicutes. This genus significantly accumulated under the action of strong water flow (p < 0.05). Its relative abundance in the SC decreased from 18.4% to 1.1%, and increased from approximately 16.9% to 22.3% in the SVC and 34.7% in the FVC, respectively. Previous research reported that Exiguobacterium was a genus potentially sensitive to eutrophic water (especially nitrate) [48,49]. The proliferation of Exiguobacterium under the disturbance conditions might result from the increased TN concentrations (Figure 3). A similar tendency was found in genera Citrobacter (mean: 7.9%), Acinetobacter (mean: 7.5%), and Pseudomonas (mean: 2.9%). In the FVC, their relative abundance gradually increased from 10.1%, 7.0%, and 3.4% to 15.1%, 11.9%, and 5.2%, respectively. These genera are aerobic and nutrient-loving, belonging to γ-Proteobacteria [50,51]. The higher DO and nutrient concentrations, which induced by water disturbance, resulted in the growth of these genera. In addition, a significantly higher abundance of genus hgcI_clade of the phylum Actinobacteria was found in the SC, which peaked at 41.7% (5 week). By contrast, the relative abundance of hgcI_clade in the SVC and FVC were very low (range: 0.1–0.4%). Regarding to the previous works, the genus hgcI_clade is known to have competitive advantage over others in an oligotrophic freshwater [52,53]. In this experiment, nutrients were limited in the overlying water during periods of no flow (SC) compared to SVC and FVC. In this case, hgcI_clade was hard to survive and grow in the SVC and FVC due to their high nutrient concentrations. Other genera had no regular variations in each condition.
(2) Sediment
Among the 1121 bacterial genera detected in sediment samples, the 17 dominant bacterial genera (mean relative abundance > 0.5%) are shown in Figure 5b. The top 6 genera were shared in both sediment and water in each condition, including Exiguobacterium (mean: 15.4%), Citrobacter (mean: 7.4%), Acinetobacter (mean: 7.0%), Pseudomonas (mean: 3.7%), Methylotenera (mean: 1.8%), and Ramlibacter (mean: 1.5%), as the genera would exchange between the interactional and interdependent habitats (water and sediment) [54]. Similarly to the water, the abundances of genera Exiguobacterium, Citrobacter, Acinetobacter, and Pseudomonas showed a significant increase with the enhanced water disturbances (p < 0.05). In the FVC, their relative abundance increased from 11.6% to 36.3%, 5.1–17.7%, 4.8–16.7%, and 2.7–8.0%, respectively. The physicochemical properties of the sediment were basically stable along the timescale from week 0 to week 5 (see Table S1). Thus, the regular change of the bacteria in the sediment might be caused by hydrodynamic shear stress [54]. Moreover, no significant regularity was found for the abundance of other genera.

3.4. Spatial Distribution of Bacterial Communities

The NMDS analysis was conducted to determine the UniFrac distance of the bacterial community data in water and sediment samples. It can reveal the dynamics and distribution patterns of community compositions at the OTU-level taxa. The NMDS plots of water and sediment samples are shown in Figure 6a. There was a considerable separation in water samples between no flow (SCW) and disturbance conditions (SVCW and FVCW). It indicated that the microorganisms in overlying water could resettle and vary in the hydrodynamic and resuspension processes. A relatively clear separation was observed between SVCW and FVCW. This may be due to the combined contributions of different physicochemical properties. The bacterial community compositions in sediment (SCS, SVCS, and FVCS) were distributed in different positions from water samples, which could be related to different habitats. Meanwhile, all SCS, SVCS, and FVCS were clustered. This phenomenon indicated that interfacial shear stress had limited contribution to the β-diversity in the sediments of each system.
Venn diagrams can be used to better understand the proportion of shared and unique OTUs generated at each platform. The OTUs comparison of water and sediment samples at week 5 are displayed in Figure 6b,c. In the water, there were 856 OTUs in the three samples altogether, with 128 unique in the SCW, 260 in the SVCW, and 193 in the FVCW (Figure 6b). Compared to the SCW, the SVCW and FVCW were found to share a large number of OTUs (159 OTUs) in common, and it indicated that water disturbances significantly changed the bacterial communities in water. As shown in Figure 6c, there were 3315 in the three sediment samples altogether. The unique OTUs of SC occupied the largest proportion (23.6%) of the total, followed by SVCS (18.9%) and FVCS (7.3%). The result also indicated that stronger currents had the inhibiting effect on bacterial communities of sediment. The details of the shared taxon among groups are shown in Table S3.

4. Conclusions

This study provides insights into the bacterial communities influenced by hydrodynamic disturbances in eutrophic water–sediment systems. The bacterial communities in sediment had a higher diversity than the water. The strong water disturbances had the inhibiting effect on bacterial communities in both water and sediment. However, the relative abundance of phyla Firmicutes and γ–Proteobacteria were found to increase regularly with the enhanced water disturbances, due to the proliferation of genera Exiguobacterium (peaked at 34.7% for water and 36.3% for sediment), Citrobacter (peaked at 15.1% for water and 17.7% for sediment), Acinetobacter (peaked at 11.9% for water and 16.7% for sediment) and Pseudomonas (peaked at 5.2% for water and 8.0% for sediment). The genus hgcI_clade (belonging to phylum Actinobacteria) had a high abundance in the static system (peaked at 41.7% in the water), while it was hard to survive in both water and sediment under the water disturbances. The regular changes of these genera were most likely caused by the changes of DO and nutrients in overlying water, when hydrodynamic and resuspension processes were induced. The results give a better understanding of the responses of bacterial communities to hydrodynamic disturbances in aquatic environments.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/1660-4601/16/20/3868/s1, Table S1: Physical and chemical properties of experimental sediment, Table S2: Comparison of OTU numbers and diversity indexes of bacterial community in the water-sediment systems over time, Table S3: The detailing taxon shared among groups of water and sediment samples at week 5, Figure S1: Rarefaction curves of OTUs richness clustered at 97% sequence identity. (a) Water, (b) Sediment. SC: static control, SVC slow velocity condition, FVC: fast velocity condition. The subscript S denotes the sediment and W denotes the water, Figure S2: Relative abundance of γ-Proteobacteria along the timescale (week 0–5). (a) Water, (b) Sediment. SC: static control, SVC slow velocity condition, FVC: fast velocity condition.

Author Contributions

In this research work, H.C. and Z.H. were involved in resources, methodology and validation under the joint supervision of L.W. and T.Z.; W.C. and W.W. were involved in formal analysis and data curation; Y.W. was involved in investigation; L.C. wrote the paper. All authors approved the final version of the paper.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51809226, 21607123, 51909229 and 51909230), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded project (Grant No. 2018M632390), the natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (Grant No. 18KJB610022 and 18KJD570001) and the Xuzhou Science and Technology Innovation project (Grant No. KC16SG283).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Van der Gucht, K.; Cottenie, K.; Muylaert, K.; Vloemans, N.; Cousin, S.; Declerck, S.; Jeppesen, E.; Conde-Porcuna, J.M.; Schwenk, K.; Zwart, G.; et al. The power of species sorting: Local factors drive bacterial community composition over a wide range of spatial scales. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 20404–20409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Battin, T.J.; Besemer, K.; Bengtsson, M.M.; Romani, A.M.; Packmann, A.I. The ecology and biogeochemistry of stream biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 14, 251–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Wang, Q.; Wang, R.Q.; Tian, C.Y.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, Y.L.; Dai, J.L. Using microbial community functioning as the complementary environmental condition indicator: A case study of an iron deposit tailing area. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2012, 51, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sims, A.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Galaraj, S.; Brown, P.B.; Hu, Z.Q. Toward the development of microbial indicators for wetland assessment. Water Res. 2013, 47, 1711–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Qu, J.Q.; Jia, C.X.; Liu, Q.; Li, Z.; Liu, P.; Yang, M.; Zhao, M.; Li, W.T.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, Q.J. Dynamics of Bacterial Community Diversity and Structure in the Terminal Reservoir of the South-To-North Water Diversion Project in China. Water 2018, 10, 709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Langenheder, S.; Lindstrom, E.S. Factors influencing aquatic and terrestrial bacterial community assembly. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2019, 11, 306–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Adams, H.E.; Crump, B.C.; Kling, G.W. Isolating the effects of storm events on arctic aquatic bacteria: Temperature, nutrients, and community composition as controls on bacterial productivity. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Staley, C.; Gould, T.J.; Wang, P.; Phillips, J.; Cotner, J.B.; Sadowsky, M.J. Bacterial community structure is indicative of chemical inputs in the Upper Mississippi River. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, J.W.; Fu, B.B.; Yang, H.M.; Zhao, M.X.; He, B.Y.; Zhang, X.H. Phylogenetic shifts of bacterioplankton community composition along the Pearl Estuary: The potential impact of hypoxia and nutrients. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ibekwe, A.M.; Ma, J.C.; Murinda, S.E. Bacterial community composition and structure in an Urban River impacted by different pollutant sources. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 566, 1176–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ruuskanen, M.O.; St Pierre, K.A.; St Louis, V.L.; Aris-Brosou, S.; Poulain, A.J. Physicochemical Drivers of Microbial Community Structure in Sediments of Lake Hazen, Nunavut, Canada. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Eggleton, J.; Thomas, K.V. A review of factors affecting the release and bioavailability of contaminants during sediment disturbance events. Environ. Int. 2004, 30, 973–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cheng, H.M.; Hua, Z.L. Distribution, release and removal behaviors of tetrabromobisphenol A in water-sediment systems under prolonged hydrodynamic disturbances. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 636, 402–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cheng, H.M.; Hua, Z.L. Effects of hydrodynamic disturbances and resuspension characteristics on the release of tetrabromobisphenol A from sediment. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 219, 785–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pascolo, S.; Petti, M.; Bosa, S. On the Wave Bottom Shear Stress in Shallow Depths: The Role of Wave Period and Bed Roughness. Water 2018, 10, 1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, Y.; Wang, C.; Zhang, W.L.; Wang, P.F.; Niu, L.H.; Hou, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, L.Q. Modeling the Effects of Hydrodynamic Regimes on Microbial Communities within Fluvial Biofilms: Combining Deterministic and Stochastic Processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 12869–12878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Santos, L.; Cunha, A.; Silva, H.; Cacador, I.; Dias, J.M.; Almeida, A. Influence of salt marsh on bacterial activity in two estuaries with different hydrodynamic characteristics (Ria de Aveiro and Tagus Estuary). FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2007, 60, 429–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rochex, A.; Godon, J.J.; Bernet, N.; Escudie, R. Role of shear stress on composition, diversity and dynamics of biofilm bacterial communities. Water Res. 2008, 42, 4915–4922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Besemer, K.; Singer, G.; Hodl, I.; Battin, T.J. Bacterial community composition of stream biofilms in spatially variable-flow environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 7189–7195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, X.; Yang, X.D.; Dong, X.H.; Liu, E.F. Environmental changes in Chaohu Lake (southeast, China) since the mid 20th century: The interactive impacts of nutrients, hydrology and climate. Limnologica 2013, 43, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Duan, H.T.; Tao, M.; Loiselle, S.A.; Zhao, W.; Cao, Z.G.; Ma, R.H.; Tang, X.X. MODIS observations of cyanobacterial risks in a eutrophic lake: Implications for long-term safety evaluation in drinking-water source. Water Res. 2017, 122, 455–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Huang, J.C.; Zhang, Y.J.; Huang, Q.; Gao, J.F. When and where to reduce nutrient for controlling harmful algal blooms in large eutrophic lake Chaohu, China? Ecol. Indic. 2018, 89, 808–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Qin, B.Q.; Hu, W.P.; Gao, G.; Luo, L.C.; Zhang, J.S. Dynamics of sediment resuspension and the conceptual schema of nutrient release in the large shallow Lake Taihu, China. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2004, 49, 54–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tsertova, N.; Kisand, A.; Baty, F.; Kisand, V. Homogeneous microbial diversity in the upper sediment layers of a shallow lake. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 2013, 70, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Hua, Z.L.; Tang, Z.Q.; Bai, X.; Zhang, J.A.; Yu, L.; Cheng, H.M. Aggregation and resuspension of graphene oxide in simulated natural surface aquatic environments. Environ. Pollut. 2015, 205, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Cheng, H.M.; Hua, Z.L.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.L.; Xie, Z.X.; Zhu, T.Y. Relative effects of wind-induced disturbances and vegetation on tetrabromobisphenol A cycling in shallow lakes: Direct and indirect effects. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 252, 794–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Pinto, A.J.; Xi, C.W.; Raskin, L. Bacterial Community Structure in the Drinking Water Microbiome Is Governed by Filtration Processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 8851–8859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Li, Y.; Zhang, J.J.; Zhang, J.Q.; Xu, W.L.; Mou, Z.S. Microbial Community Structure in the Sediments and Its Relation to Environmental Factors in Eutrophicated Sancha Lake. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bates, S.T.; Berg-Lyons, D.; Caporaso, J.G.; Walters, W.A.; Knight, R.; Fierer, N. Examining the global distribution of dominant archaeal populations in soil. ISME J. 2011, 5, 908–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Febria, C.M.; Beddoes, P.; Fulthorpe, R.R.; Williams, D.D. Bacterial community dynamics in the hyporheic zone of an intermittent stream. ISME J. 2012, 6, 1078–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Oksanen, J.; Blanchet, F.G.; Friendly, M.; Kindt, R.; Legendre, P.; McGlinn, D.; Minchin, P.R.; O’Hara, R.B.; Simpson, G.L.; Solymos, P.; et al. Package “Vegan“. Community Ecol. Package Version 2.5-6. 2019. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/package=vegan (accessed on 1 September 2019).
  32. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  33. Oliveros, J.C. Venny an Interactive Tool for Comparing Lists with Venn Diagrams. Available online: http://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html (accessed on 1 September 2019).
  34. Raboni, M.; Gavasci, R.; Viotti, P. Influence of denitrification reactor retention time distribution (RTD) on dissolved oxygen control and nitrogen removal efficiency. Water Sci. Technol. 2015, 72, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Poindexter, C.M.; Variano, E.A. Gas exchange in wetlands with emergent vegetation: The effects of wind and thermal convection at the air-water interface. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosciences 2013, 118, 1297–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Roberts, D.A. Causes and ecological effects of resuspended contaminated sediments (RCS) in marine environments. Environ. Int. 2012, 40, 230–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhu, L.; Li, X.; Zhang, C.; Duan, Z.Q. Pollutants’ Release, Redistribution and Remediation of Black Smelly River Sediment Based on Re-Suspension and Deep Aeration of Sediment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wu, D.; Hua, Z.L. The effect of vegetation on sediment resuspension and phosphorus release under hydrodynamic disturbance in shallow lakes. Ecol. Eng. 2014, 69, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gremare, A.; Amouroux, J.M.; Cauwet, G.; Charles, F.; Courties, C.; De Bovee, F.; Dinet, A.; Devenon, J.L.; De Madron, X.D.; Ferre, B.; et al. The effects of a strong winter storm on physical and biological variables at a shelf site in the Mediterranean. Oceanol. Acta 2003, 26, 407–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Luo, X.; Xiang, X.Y.; Huang, G.Y.; Song, X.R.; Wang, P.J.; Fu, K.D. Bacterial Abundance and Physicochemical Characteristics of Water and Sediment Associated with Hydroelectric Dam on the Lancang River China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Santos, L.; Santos, A.L.; Coelho, F.J.R.C.; Gomes, N.C.M.; Dias, J.M.; Cunha, A.; Almeida, A. Relation between bacterial activity in the surface microlayer and estuarine hydrodynamics. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2011, 77, 636–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Battin, T.J.; Sloan, W.T.; Kjelleberg, S.; Daims, H.; Head, I.M.; Curtis, T.P.; Eberl, L. Microbial landscapes: New paths to biofilm research. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2007, 5, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Crump, B.C.; Amaral-Zettler, L.A.; Kling, G.W. Microbial diversity in arctic freshwaters is structured by inoculation of microbes from soils. ISME J. 2012, 6, 1629–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. De Wever, A.; Muylaert, K.; Van der Gucht, K.; Pirlot, S.; Cocquyt, C.; Descy, J.P.; Plisnier, P.D.; Vyverman, W. Bacterial community composition in Lake Tanganyika: Vertical and horizontal heterogeneity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 5029–5037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kaevska, M.; Videnska, P.; Sedlar, K.; Slana, I. Seasonal changes in microbial community composition in river water studied using 454-pyrosequencing. SpringerPlus 2016, 5, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Xie, Y.W.; Wang, J.Z.; Wu, Y.; Ren, C.; Song, C.; Yang, J.H.; Yu, H.X.; Giesy, J.P.; Zhang, X.W. Using in situ bacterial communities to monitor contaminants in river sediments. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 212, 348–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Fan, Y.Y.; Li, B.B.; Yang, Z.C.; Cheng, Y.Y.; Liu, D.F.; Yu, H.Q. Mediation of functional gene and bacterial community profiles in the sediments of eutrophic Chaohu Lake by total nitrogen and season. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 250, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sahinkaya, E.; Kilic, A.; Calimlioglu, B.; Toker, Y. Simultaneous bioreduction of nitrate and chromate using sulfur-based mixotrophic denitrification process. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 262, 234–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zhou, S.L.; Zhang, Y.R.; Huang, T.L.; Liu, Y.F.; Fang, K.K.; Zhang, C.H. Microbial aerobic denitrification dominates nitrogen losses from reservoir ecosystem in the spring of Zhoucun reservoir. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 65, 998–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wu, Y.F.; Lin, H.; Yin, W.Z.; Shao, S.C.; Lv, S.H.; Hu, Y.Y. Water Quality and Microbial Community Changes in an Urban River after Micro-Nano Bubble Technology in Situ Treatment. Water 2019, 11, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jung, J.; Park, W. Acinetobacter species as model microorganisms in environmental microbiology: Current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 2533–2548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Keshri, J.; Ram, A.S.P.; Sime-Ngando, T. Distinctive Patterns in the Taxonomical Resolution of Bacterioplankton in the Sediment and Pore Waters of Contrasted Freshwater Lakes. Microb. Ecol. 2018, 75, 662–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Aguilar, P.; Dorador, C.; Vila, I.; Sommaruga, R. Bacterioplankton composition in tropical high-elevation lakes of the Andean plateau. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2018, 94, fiy004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Abia, A.L.K.; James, C.; Ubomba-Jaswa, E.; Momba, M.N.B. Microbial Remobilisation on Riverbed Sediment Disturbance in Experimental Flumes and a Human-Impacted River: Implication for Water Resource Management and Public Health in Developing Sub-Saharan African Countries. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Map of Lake Chaohu in China and the sampling sites (31°41′51″ N, 117°24′16″ E).
Figure 1. Map of Lake Chaohu in China and the sampling sites (31°41′51″ N, 117°24′16″ E).
Ijerph 16 03868 g001
Figure 2. Sketch of the experimental facility (cm) and the sampling points. (a) planform; (b) side elevation. A screw propeller was used to simulate different velocity conditions by adjusting rotational-speed.
Figure 2. Sketch of the experimental facility (cm) and the sampling points. (a) planform; (b) side elevation. A screw propeller was used to simulate different velocity conditions by adjusting rotational-speed.
Ijerph 16 03868 g002
Figure 3. Velocity conditions and physicochemical properties in each water-sediment system. (a) Average vertical velocity ( U ¯ ), (b) Dissolved oxygen (DO), (c) Total phosphorus (TP), (d) Total nitrogen (TN), (e) pH. SC: static control, SVC: slow velocity condition, FVC: fast velocity condition. All the data were the average values from 0 weeks to 5 weeks, and were statistically significant with a p-value < 0.05.
Figure 3. Velocity conditions and physicochemical properties in each water-sediment system. (a) Average vertical velocity ( U ¯ ), (b) Dissolved oxygen (DO), (c) Total phosphorus (TP), (d) Total nitrogen (TN), (e) pH. SC: static control, SVC: slow velocity condition, FVC: fast velocity condition. All the data were the average values from 0 weeks to 5 weeks, and were statistically significant with a p-value < 0.05.
Ijerph 16 03868 g003
Figure 4. Relative abundance of bacterial reads classified at phylum level along the timescale (weeks 0–5) obtained from Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) classifier analysis (mean relative abundance > 1.0%). (a) Water, (b) Sediment. SC: static control, SVC: slow velocity condition, FVC: fast velocity condition.
Figure 4. Relative abundance of bacterial reads classified at phylum level along the timescale (weeks 0–5) obtained from Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) classifier analysis (mean relative abundance > 1.0%). (a) Water, (b) Sediment. SC: static control, SVC: slow velocity condition, FVC: fast velocity condition.
Ijerph 16 03868 g004
Figure 5. Relative abundance of bacterial reads classified at genus level along the timescale (week 0–5) obtained from Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) classifier analysis (mean relative abundance > 0.5%). (a) Water, (b) Sediment.
Figure 5. Relative abundance of bacterial reads classified at genus level along the timescale (week 0–5) obtained from Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) classifier analysis (mean relative abundance > 0.5%). (a) Water, (b) Sediment.
Ijerph 16 03868 g005
Figure 6. (a) Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination visualization of the bacterial communities in the water and sediment along the timescale (week 0–5). (b) Venn diagram of water samples at 5 weeks. (c) Venn diagram of sediment samples at 5 weeks. The detailing taxon shared were shown in Table S3. SC: static control, SVC: slow velocity condition, FVC: fast velocity condition. The subscript S denotes the sediment and W denotes the water.
Figure 6. (a) Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination visualization of the bacterial communities in the water and sediment along the timescale (week 0–5). (b) Venn diagram of water samples at 5 weeks. (c) Venn diagram of sediment samples at 5 weeks. The detailing taxon shared were shown in Table S3. SC: static control, SVC: slow velocity condition, FVC: fast velocity condition. The subscript S denotes the sediment and W denotes the water.
Ijerph 16 03868 g006

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cheng, H.; Cheng, L.; Wang, L.; Zhu, T.; Cai, W.; Hua, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wang, W. Changes of Bacterial Communities in Response to Prolonged Hydrodynamic Disturbances in the Eutrophic Water-Sediment Systems. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3868. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph16203868

AMA Style

Cheng H, Cheng L, Wang L, Zhu T, Cai W, Hua Z, Wang Y, Wang W. Changes of Bacterial Communities in Response to Prolonged Hydrodynamic Disturbances in the Eutrophic Water-Sediment Systems. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(20):3868. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph16203868

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cheng, Haomiao, Ling Cheng, Liang Wang, Tengyi Zhu, Wei Cai, Zulin Hua, Yulin Wang, and Wenfen Wang. 2019. "Changes of Bacterial Communities in Response to Prolonged Hydrodynamic Disturbances in the Eutrophic Water-Sediment Systems" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, no. 20: 3868. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph16203868

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop