Next Article in Journal
Species Diversity of Mycoplankton on the Background of Selected Indicators of Water Quality in Stratified Mesotrophic Lakes
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of the Impact of Landscape Patterns on Urban Heat Islands: A Case Study of Chengdu, China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Heavy Metal Pollution and Risk Assessment of Surface Dust in the Arid NW China

1
College of Geographical Science and Tourism, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China
2
China State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China
3
Research Centre for Ecology and Environment of CA, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China
4
School of Geographic Sciences, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000, China
5
Key Laboratory of Smart City and Environment Modelling of Higher Education Institute, College of Resources and Environment Science, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(20), 13296; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph192013296
Submission received: 9 August 2022 / Revised: 10 October 2022 / Accepted: 12 October 2022 / Published: 15 October 2022

Abstract

:
High concentrations of heavy metals (HMs) in urban surface dust (USD) can be extremely hazardous to urban ecology and human health. Oasis cities are located at the edge of deserts and are more exposed to salt/sandstorms, and they face a significantly higher accumulation of USD than wet or semi-humid areas. However, systematic studies on the pollution and risk assessment of HMs in USD in oasis cities have rarely been conducted. This study systematically analyzed the enrichment status, spatial distribution, pollution levels, health risks, and sources of HMs in USD in a typical oasis city (Changji city). The results showed that the average concentrations of Pb, Ni, As, Cd, Hg, and Cu in the USD of Changji city were 46.83, 26.35, 9.92, 0.21, 0.047, and 59.33 mg/kg, respectively, and the results of the pollution index evaluation showed moderate Pb, Hg, and Cu pollution, mild Cd pollution, and no Ni or As pollution. The spatial distribution of HM concentrations in the USD was substantially heterogeneous. High values of Pb, Hg, and Cu concentrations were mainly observed in areas with relatively intensive transportation and commercial activities, and high values of Cd and Ni were observed in industrial areas. The health risk assessment showed that HMs do not pose non-carcinogenic risks to humans at their current level, but they pose a carcinogenic risk to children, with As contributing the largest carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks. The source identification of HMs showed that the main pollution of HMs were traffic sources for Pb and Cu, industrial sources for Ni and Cd, natural sources for As, and coal-fired sources for Hg. According to the results of the quantitative analysis with the positive matrix factorization, the contribution of pollution sources followed this order: industrial sources (31.08%) > traffic sources (26.80%) > coal-fired sources (23.31%) > natural sources (18.81%).

1. Introduction

Urban surface dust (USD) is a pollutant consisting of one or more organic and inorganic particles with strong environmental indicator effects, and its sources are mainly influenced by a combination of natural and anthropogenic factors, such as industrial emissions, transportation, urban construction, municipal emissions, atmospheric deposition, and soil erosion [1,2,3,4,5,6]. USD with high concentrations of heavy metals (HMs) poses serious risks to urban ecology and human health [7,8]. In recent years, with rapid urbanization and industrialization, a large number of people have moved from rural areas to cities, leading to an explosive increase in the type or quantity of pollutants in the urban ecosystem. Consequently, the balance of the urban ecosystem has deteriorated, thus impairing the self-healing capacity of the ecosystem and eventually leading to a variety of pollution problems in the urban ecosystem [9,10]. USD generally has a loose structure, tiny particles, and a relatively smooth attachment surface, and it can enter the atmosphere through resuspension under external disturbances. In addition, some dust can be transported to areas far from the pollution source through atmospheric turbulence and the prevailing winds [11,12,13]. Meanwhile, some particles suspended in the atmosphere may irritate the nose, throat, and eyes, and dust particles less than 2.5 µm in diameter can enter the lungs directly, thus posing serious health risks [14,15]. In addition, dust suspended in the atmosphere continuously enters urban ecosystems under the influence of both gravity and precipitation [16,17,18]. Moreover, USD can enter urban water bodies through the surface runoff formed by precipitation and municipal road cleaning, thus leading to the continuous enrichment of many toxic pollutants in water bodies and eventually threatening the growth and reproduction of aquatic plants and animals [19,20,21]. In addition, many HMs accumulate in the human body over long periods of time through accidental ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact, thus causing irreversible damage to human health [22,23,24]. Therefore, USD can serve as a comprehensive indicator of the quality of the urban ecological environment [25,26].
Many methods have been used to quantify the pollution levels, ecological risks, health risks, and sources of HMs in USD [27,28,29,30]. The pollution index method is often used to quantitatively analyze the pollution levels of HMs in USD because of its simple calculation and relatively accurate assessment results. For example, studies on the pollution levels of HMs in USD in Zhengzhou (China), Surgut (Russia), Bandar Abbas (Iran), and Sonbhadra (India) using the geoaccumulation index [31], enrichment factor [32], Nemerow pollution index [33], and Tomlinson pollution load index [34], respectively, have revealed the HM contamination of urban ecosystems. Various models have been developed for assessing the risks of HMs to humans, including BCA (risk-based corrective action) [35], the CLEA (Contaminated Land Exposure Assessment) [36], and the HHRE (Human Health Risk Evaluation) [8]. These models require the input of contaminant exposure parameters and environmental parameters, which improves the accuracy of the assessment results [37]. Therefore, the above models are often used to quantify the health risk of HMs in surface dust to humans, among which the BCA model is the most widely used. Zhang et al. [38], Chen et al. [39], and Xiao et al. [40] used the BCA model to evaluate the health risks of HMs in USD from different cities in China and showed that HMs pose some health hazards to humans. Roy et al. [15] quantitatively analyzed HMs in USD on a global scale and found that children in Asia and Australia are already at the edge of susceptibility to non-carcinogenic health risks from Pb in USD. Children are generally more exposed to HMs from USD than adults [41,42]. As different cities have large differences in many natural and socioeconomic aspects, such as topographical conditions, climatic characteristics, soil types, urban scale, and industry types, the main sources of HMs are variable [43,44,45,46]. Therefore, the accurate source identification of HMs in USD is the key to reducing the risk of HMs to the urban ecological environment and human health [47]. The diffusion model and the receptor model are the main methods used for the quantitative analysis of HMs pollution sources [48]. Among them, the receptor model has been widely used because it does not depend on the emission conditions, topography, and meteorological data of the pollution sources compared to the diffusion model and the diffusion process of pollutants need not be tracked, thus avoiding the uncertainty of the input data of the diffusion model [49,50,51,52].
Oasis cities are built on a large-scale desert background substrate, and their urban development is largely constrained by the distribution characteristics of the water system [53,54]. In addition, oasis cities have a dry climate, sparse vegetation, and exposed surfaces due to a low precipitation and high evaporation, and their urban ecological environment is vulnerable to dust storms under the effects of human activities and atmospheric disturbances [26,55]. Luo et al. [56] quantitatively analyzed the contamination and health risk of HMs in the dust of typical oasis cities from sandstorms and found HM contamination derived from anthropogenic activities; moreover, exposure through ingestion poses the greatest health risk to humans. Yu et al. [57] reported that the dust concentration in the atmosphere of the oasis cities (Kashgar and Hotan) on the edge of the Tarim Basin was higher than that of Urumqi and Lanzhou, but the concentration was similar to that of Jeddah and Mecca in Saudi Arabia. In addition, dust pollution in oasis cities is one of the major contributors to a reduced human life expectancy [58]. Overall, the long-term enrichment of HMs in the USD of oasis cities has had adverse effects on the urban ecological environment and human health.
An assessment report on global dust storms found that about 75% of the global dust originated from natural sources, with dry climates, sparse vegetation, and loose soil in arid areas becoming the largest production areas of sand sources [59,60,61]. Oasis cities are located at the edges of deserts, and the frequency and intensity of dust storms are usually higher than those in humid areas, which has a negative impact on urban ecology and residents’ health [62,63,64]. A study of HMs in air dust from a typical oasis city in Iran found that most of the HMs in Zabol air dust had a high bioaccessibility and the associated HMs produced carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks for both adults and children that were greater than the safety threshold [65]. This indicates that HM contamination in Zabol air dust has posed some risk to human health. Another large oasis city in Iran (Ahvaz) has a high contamination of HMs in surface dust, with Hg, Pb, Mn, V, and Cr exhibiting higher health risks to residents of both residential and industrial areas [66]. The concentration of particulate-bound Hg in the USD of different oasis cities (Ahvaz, Asaluyeh, and Zabol) is associated with industrial development and oil- and gas-related activities [67]. In addition, children pose a considerable non-carcinogenic health risk to their bodies through the inhalation of indoor dust in Ahvaz. Overall, HMs in the USD of oasis cities are significantly harmful to urban ecology and human health [68,69]. Therefore, in this study, a typical oasis city (Changji city) was selected as the study area, and the enrichment status, spatial distribution, pollution level, health risk, and sources of HMs in USD were quantitatively analyzed in order to provide data support for monitoring ecological safety and human health in oasis cities in arid regions. The primary objectives of the research are: (1) to analyze the concentration of HMs in USD and their pollution levels; (2) to draw a 3D map of HM concentrations and pollution levels; (3) to assess the carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks of HMs to humans; and (4) to quantitatively analyze the sources of HMs in USD.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Changji city is a typical oasis city in the arid northwest of China [70]. It is one of the core cities of the northern slope economic belt of the Tianshan Mountains and the Silk Road Economic Belt in Xinjiang, NW China. The study area is located in the northern piedmont plains of the Tianshan Mountains, on the southern edge of the Junggar Basin. It covers 77.43 km2 and is located at 87°13′17″87°21′05″ E and 43°57′04″44°03′06″ N, with elevations ranging from 480 m to 593 m (Figure 1). The city has a continental desert climate with average annual air temperatures, precipitation, and evaporation of 6.8 °C, 190 mm, and 1780 mm, respectively, and prevailing northwest and southeast winds throughout the year [71]. In addition, Changji enjoys superior geographical conditions and is known as the “throat of the Western Regions”. It is the golden channel and a bridgehead linking China to Central Asia and Europe [72,73]. The area has variable but huge quantities of proven mineral resources. The land use type in the study area is dominated by construction land, agricultural land, and urban periphery. The resident population in the urban area of Changji was approximately 420,000 in 2019, and the regional economic growth is dominated by secondary and tertiary industries.

2.2. Sample Collection, Analysis, and Quality Control

In October 2019, 52 USD samples were collected from major urban areas in Changji which had been considerably affected by anthropogenic activities, using the methodology described in “NY/T 395-2012” [74] (Figure 1). In order to avoid human contamination, the dust samples were collected using non-metallic instruments such as brushes and dustpans. To ensure the representativeness of the samples, each sample was mixed with five subsamples within the preset sample point range of 50 m × 50 m. All samples were air-dried in the laboratory and weighed 0.500 g after passing through 0.15 mm of nylon mesh. Next, the samples were digested by an HCl-HNO3-HF-HClO4 solution [75]. The duplicate and blank samples were set according to the Chinese national standards (GSS-12) for quality control. Finally, the concentrations of Pb, Ni, and Cd were measured using an atomic absorption spectrometer (GFAAS; SOLAAR-M6, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), the concentrations of As and Hg were measured using an atomic fluorescence photometer (BAF-2000, Baode Instrument Co., Beijing, China), and the concentration of Cu was measured using an inductively coupled plasma (ICP-5000, Focused Photonics Inc., Hangzhou, China) emission spectrometer [76]. The Ni, As, Hg, and Cu testing standards are “GB/T 17139-1997” [77], “GB/T 22105.2-2008” [78], “GB/T 22105.1-2008” [79], and “GB/T 17138-1997” [80], respectively. The determination of lead and cadmium was done according to the standard “GB/T 17140-1997” [81]. The detection limits of Pb, Ni, As, Cd, Hg, and Cu were 0.10, 0.4, 0.01, 0.06, 0.002, and 0.01 mg/kg, respectively, and their recoveries ranged from 95.16% to 106.55%.

2.3. Pollution Assessment of HMs

The Nemerow comprehensive pollution index (NPI), which is based on a single pollution index, was applied to quantify the pollution level of HMs. This method provides scientific and reasonable pollution evaluation results by taking into account the average pollution level of all participating elements as well as the main contaminants in the quantitative assessment of the pollution status of HMs [82]. It was calculated using the following Equation:
P i = C i / S i
N P I = ( P i max 2 + P i ave 2 ) / 2
where Pi and Ci indicate the single contamination index and the concentration of element i, respectively, and Si indicates the background value of element i in the soils of Xinjiang [60]. Pimax and Piave indicate the maximum and average values of Pi, respectively. Pi and NPI classification standards refer to [83].

2.4. Analysis of the Sources of HMs

The positive matrix factorization (PMF) receptor model has been widely used to quantify the contribution of pollution sources, which decomposes the concentration data matrix X (m × n) consisting of m samples with n elements into a factor score matrix g (m × p), a factor loading matrix f (p × n), and a residual matrix e (m × n), and the main computational Equations are as follows [84]:
X i = k = 1 p g i j f i j + e i j
Q = i = 1 n j = 1 m ( δ i j u i j )
U n c = { 5 / 6 × M D L ( δ × c ) 2 + ( M D L ) 2 C M D L C > M D L
where Xij represents the measured concentration matrix of element i in sample j, gjk represents the contribution matrix of source k to sample j, fki represents the concentration matrix of element i in source k, eij represents the residual matrix, Q represents the objective function for solving the optimal g and f under non-negative restrictions (Q values close to the degree of freedom of the data set indicate a better fit), U represents the uncertainty, MDL represents the detection limit, δ represents the relative standard deviation, and c represents the concentration of the tested element.

2.5. Health Risk Assessment of HMs

2.5.1. Exposure Analysis

The exposure level of HMs was assessed on the basis of the chronic daily intake (CDI, mg/(kg·d)) of dust in humans [85,86]. The US EPA health risk model was used in this research, and the corresponding parameters were localized with reference to the related research results in China in order to quantify the average daily exposure of HMs from USD to children and adults via three routes, namely ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact. The calculation Equations are listed in Equations (6) and (9):
CDI ingest = ( C i × IngR × CF × EF × ED ) × ( BW × AT ) 1
CDI inhale = ( C i × InhR × EF × ED ) × ( PEF × BW × AT ) 1
CDI dermal = ( C i × SA × AF × ABS × EF × ED × CF ) × ( BW × AT ) 1
CDI total = CDI ingest + CDI inhale + CDI dermal
where CDIingest, CDIinhale, and CDIdermal denote the average daily exposure dose by ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact routes, respectively. CDItotal denotes the total average daily exposure, Ci denotes the measured concentration of HM, and the parameters and their meanings are listed in Table 1.

2.5.2. Non-Carcinogenic Risk Assessment

The hazard quotient (HQ) was used to calculate the magnitude of the potential non-carcinogenic risk of individual HMs to humans. The hazard quotients of all HMs denote the non-carcinogenic hazard index (HI), which was calculated as follows:
HQ i j = CDI i j / RfD i j
HI = HQ i j = HQ ingest + HQ inhale + HQ dermal
where HQij denotes the non-carcinogenic risk quotient of element i under the jth exposure pathway. An HQ or HI < 1 indicates that the potential non-carcinogenic risk of HMs to humans is negligible, and an HQ or HI ≥ 1 indicates that HMs may pose non-carcinogenic risks to humans [92].

2.5.3. Carcinogenic Risk Assessment

According to the classification list developed by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) [96], carcinogenic elements include Ni, As, and Cd. Therefore, their carcinogenic risk was quantitatively assessed using Equations (12) and (13):
HI = HQ i j = HQ ingest + HQ inhale + HQ dermal
TCR = CR i j = CR ingest + CR inhale + CR dermal
where CRij denotes the carcinogenic risk quotient of element i under the jth exposure pathway, SF, CR, and TCR denote the carcinogenic slope coefficient, carcinogenic risk quotient, and the total carcinogenic risk, respectively. If TCR < 10−6, it means that HMs produce negligible health risks to humans. A TCR > 10−4 means that HMs have caused potential carcinogenic risks to humans, and if 10−6 ≤ TCR ≤ 10−4, this means that HMs have caused a risk to societal stability and human health that is acceptable or tolerated [97]. The RfD and SF were determined based on the relevant research results [93,98], as shown in Table 2.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Euclidean Distance Analysis of Impact Factors

ArcGIS 10.2 was used to analyze the Euclidean distance of the construction land, urban green space, agricultural land, water area, roads, and polluting industries in the study area. The spatial relationship between the sampling points and these six influencing factors was drawn (Figure 2). The scale of the urban impervious surfaces is usually positively correlated with the intensity of human activities. In highly developed urban areas, impervious surfaces account for 70% of the total surface [99], and the urban river water quality is impaired when urban imperviousness reaches 12%, and more severely when imperviousness reaches 30% [25]. Therefore, the distance between the sampling point and the artificial surface can reflect the effect of human activities on USD. The urban periphery has the functions of soil fixation, dust suppression, dust absorption, and air purification. Generally, the closer the sampling point is to the urban periphery, the weaker the impact of human activities. Pollutants from fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides used in agricultural production activities remain in the soil for a long time, which is an essential factor affecting the quality of the soil environment. The distance between the sampling point and the agricultural land can reflect the impact of pollutants released in agricultural production activities on USD. Water bodies form in relatively low-lying areas and they determine the migration direction and rate of USD in the water environment. In addition, HMs continuously accumulate in water bodies through a surface runoff, such that they eventually pollute local water bodies and pose threats to aquatic organisms [100]. Therefore, the distance between sampling sites and water bodies can reflect the impact of USD on the urban eco-environment [101]. Road density and traffic volume are essential factors influencing the concentration of HMs in USD. The distance between the sampling site and roads can reflect the influence of traffic emission activities on USD [102]. As a high-energy-consuming production unit in the city, polluting industries can adversely affect the eco-environment of the surrounding areas while maintaining production on a large scale. Polluting industries in the study area are mainly high-energy-consuming enterprises such as urban heating, the power supply, building materials production, and machinery processing and manufacturing. The distance between sampling points and polluting industries can reflect the impact of industrial activities on USD.

3.2. Concentration Characteristics of HMs

As shown in Table 3, the concentration ranges (average) of Pb, Ni, As, Cd, Hg, and Cu in USD were 19.0–104.0 (46.83), 20.0–66.0 (26.35), 7.82–12.70 (9.92), 0.14–0.31 (0.21), 0.023–0.162 (0.047), and 30.0–101.0 (59.33) mg/kg. The Pb, Ni, As, Cd, Hg, and Cu concentrations were 2.41, 0.99, 0.89, 1.71, 2.76, and 2.22 times higher than the corresponding soil background values in Xinjiang [103]. In addition, 26.92% of Ni and 11.54% of As exceeded their background values, indicating that the six elements were enriched to varying degrees. In addition, the skewness coefficients of the HM concentrations were all greater than 0, and the average concentrations were greater than their median values, which indicated that the distribution of HMs in the study area was positively skewed. Overall, the distribution type of the HM concentration data was long-tailed on the right, with large outliers.
According to the grading criteria of the coefficient of variation (CV) and the calculated CVs of the analyzed HMs [83], Pb and Hg were highly variable (CV > 36%), indicating that the concentration of each element varies significantly across the sampling sites, and their sources may be mainly influenced by anthropogenic activities. Meanwhile, Ni and Cu were moderately variable (16% < CV ≤ 36%), which indicates that the elements were influenced by natural and anthropogenic sources. It is noteworthy that 73.08% of the sample points for Ni were below their background values, but its skewness coefficient was as high as 4.07. This indicates the existence of some prominent point sources of pollution. The average concentration of As was lower than its background value and exhibited a low variability (CV < 16%), suggesting that As is dominated by natural sources.

3.3. Pollution Assessment of HMls

Pi and NPI are commonly used to quantify the degree of HM contamination risk in USD. In Figure 3, the average values of Pi followed the order of Hg > Pb > Cu > Cd > Ni > As, with higher Pi values indicating greater levels of contamination. According to the grading criteria, the investigated USD was moderately polluted by Hg (Pi = 2.76), Pb (Pi = 2.41), and Cu (Pi = 2.22), and lightly polluted by Cd (Pi = 1.70). Pollution was not observed for the remaining elements, Ni (Pi = 0.99) and As (Pi = 0.88). The values of NPI ranged from 1.36 to 7.17, with an average value of 2.57, corresponding to the moderate pollution level.
In contrast, on the basis of the maximum Pi and NPI values, USD was heavily polluted by Hg (Pi = 9.53), Pb (Pi = 5.36), and Cu (Pi = 3.78), moderately polluted by Cd (Pi = 1.70), and lightly polluted by As (Pi = 1.13). The maximum value of NPI was 7.17 at the heavy pollution level. This indicated that Hg, Pb, and Cu are the primary pollutants in the USD of the study area. In addition, the value of Pi had a high CV and standard deviation, indicating that the pollution levels of Hg, Pb, and Cu vary significantly across the sampling sites. Overall, the HMs in the USD of the study area were probably derived from anthropogenic sources. Therefore, monitoring and risk control of these three elements should be increased during urban development and construction in Changji city.

3.4. Spatial Distribution of HM Concentrations and Pollution Levels

Analyzing the spatial distribution characteristics of HMs is an effective approach to identify the sources of contaminants and high-pollution hotspots [97]. Spatial three-dimensional (3D) maps of the concentrations of Pb, Ni, As, Cd, Hg, and Cu, and their pollution levels were drawn using the Kriging interpolation method (Figure 4). Overall, the spatial distribution patterns of the HM concentrations and their pollution levels were found to be substantially heterogeneous. Hg was the largest pollutant in the study area, and in the 3D map, Hg pollution was mainly observed in the central part and the northeastern industrial area of the study area, where many activities such as the heating and power supply for the city are concentrated. Pb and Cu were the second and third largest pollutants in the study area. Pb and Cu pollution were mainly observed in the city center, which is associated with a high road density, traffic flow, and vehicle start–stop frequency [6,29]. As was the smallest pollutant in the study area. Its concentration exhibited a “basin”-shaped distribution pattern in the middle of the study area and the concentration was high in the surrounding areas. It is noteworthy that the sampling sites with As concentrations exceeding the background values of the Xinjiang soils were all near agricultural land. In addition, the spatial distribution pattern of As was similar to that of the agricultural land in the study area (Figure 2c). This suggests that agricultural activities may influence the enrichment of As elements. The areas of high values of Ni and Cd concentrations were mainly located in the electrical industrial area and the mechanical industrial area (Figure 2f), and industrial dust emitted from coal combustion, fuel oil, metal plating, and bearing production in factories contained Ni and Cd [104,105]. The spatial distribution pattern of NPI was similar to that of Hg, Pb, and Cu, which indicates that the spatial distribution pattern of NPI was mainly influenced by these elements. According to the field research and data analysis of the study area, high Pb, Cu, and Hg concentrations in USD mainly occur in the city center near the main urban roads, residential and commercial areas, and in the northeastern industrial area, which indicates that transportation, industrial emissions, and commercial activities may be the main sources of HMs in the USD of the study area [6,106,107]. In general, these elements in the USD of the study area were affected by human activities to varying degrees.

3.5. Non-Carcinogenic Risk of HMs

The US EPA health risk model was used to assess the potential health risk of HMs in the study area. Taking into account the physiological and behavioral differences between children and adults, the hazard quotient (HQ) and hazard index (HI) of six HMs on children and adults via ingestion, inhalation, and skin contact pathways were assessed. The HQ values of HMs for children and adults are ranked in Table 4 as HQAs > HQPb > HQCu > HQNi > HQCd > HQHg. The HQ of As and Pb were higher than those of other elements, and they accounted for 65.85% and 27.44% of HI for children, respectively, compared to 65.71% and 27.66% of HI for adults, respectively. Therefore, As and Pb pose the largest major non-carcinogenic health risks in the study area. In terms of the exposure pathways, the average values of the HQ followed the order HQingest > HQdermal > HQinhale. This indicates that unconscious ingestion was the main pathway of exposure to non-carcinogenic health risks. The total HI for children (0.492) was 6.15 times higher than that for adults. This can be explained by the fact that children’s hemoglobin is more sensitive to HMs and they absorb them at a much faster rate than adults [40,108]. According to these findings, HMs in the study area pose much higher potential health risks to children than to adults. However, according to the health risk classification criteria, the values of the HQ and HI for both children and adults were lower than 1, which means that the HMs do not pose non-carcinogenic risks to human health.

3.6. Carcinogenic Risk of HMs

According to the classification list developed by IARC [96], Ni, As, and Cd are considered carcinogenic elements. Therefore, the carcinogenic risk (CR) and the total carcinogenic risk (TCR) of these elements for children and adults were evaluated in this research. As shown in Table 5, the CR of As was the highest in children and adults, followed by Ni, then Cd. The contribution of the CR of As to the TCR was higher than 99%. Therefore, As is the largest carcinogenic risk element in the study area. Overall, the potential carcinogenic risk from the three exposure routes followed the order: ingestion > dermal contact > inhalation. The TCR to children (1.25 × 10−5) was 11.79 times higher than that to adults (1.06 × 10−6), indicating that children are more sensitive to carcinogenic risks than adults. According to the classification standard of the TCR, the potential carcinogenic risk of HMs to children is acceptable or tolerated in the study area, but the health risk to adults can be ignored. Based on the results discussed above, As and Pb were identified as priority control elements in the study area owing to their toxicity and high potential health risk.

3.7. Spatial Distribution of Health Risks

The hotspots of HI for children and adults were mainly distributed in the central and northeastern regions of the study area (Figure 5a), and their spatial distribution patterns were mainly influenced by the concentration of Pb and As. The central part of the study area is the urban center with the highest traffic volume. In addition, there are several mechanical and electrical industrial parks in the northeastern part of the study area [109]. Hou et al. [110] reported on surface dust heavy metals in China for the last 10 years and found that traffic emissions were the largest source of heavy metals in 79% of the surveyed cities. This is mainly related to metallic corrosion, the abrasion of brake pads, and the leakage of a lead–acid battery [111,112,113]. Meanwhile, the spatial distribution of the TCR in children and adults showed a “basin”-shaped distribution pattern (Figure 5b). This was mainly determined by the spatial distribution characteristics of As in the study area. Soil is an important component of USD, and HMs enriched in soil enter the urban surface through resuspension. In China, approximately 10 million hectares of arable land have been polluted, and about 12 million tons of grain are contaminated each year by HMs in soil [114,115]. Studies have shown that agricultural soils in many countries have high concentrations of As [116,117]. Arsenic emissions from agricultural production activities are one of the primary sources of As in USD [118,119]. The study area is surrounded by a large area of irrigated farmland (Figure 2c), and the application of pesticides and fertilizers containing arsenic is a major contributor to the accumulation of As concentrations in farmland soils. The hazard level of HMs is mainly related to their total amount and bioavailability. Research shows that adding K2HPO4 and Na2SiO3 to sprinklers can effectively inhibit the pollution of raised dust and HMs [120]. Therefore, increasing the frequency of cleaning and sprinkling of urban roads will help protect the health of urban residents.

3.8. Sources of HMs

3.8.1. Identification of Sources of HMs

HMs in USD are influenced by natural and anthropogenic sources such as soil parent material, industrial emissions, transportation, and domestic activities [19,20]. Correlation analysis and cluster analysis are often widely used to identify the pollution sources of HMs [121]. The correlation coefficients of the investigated HMs are shown in Figure 6. Pb–Cu, Ni–Cd, and Hg–Cu showed extremely significant positive correlations, indicating that these elements have a strong homogeneity. Meanwhile, Pb–Cd, Ni–Cu, and Cd–Cu showed a significant positive correlation, which means that these elements may have common or similar sources. In addition, the correlation between As and the other five elements was not statistically significant (p > 0.05), indicating that its primary source differed from the other elements.
In this study, based on Ward’s method, the cluster pedigree of HMs in the USD of the study area was drawn (Figure 7). According to the cluster analysis, the six elements were grouped into four clusters (referring to three height distances): Cluster 1 with Hg, Cluster 2 with Cu and Pb, Cluster 3 with As, and Cluster 4 with Cd and Ni. In general, HMs that are divided into the same cluster indicate that they may share common sources.
The concentrations of Hg in Cluster 1 were all higher than the corresponding background values, and their hotspots were mainly located in the central and northeastern parts of the study area where traffic flow and commercial activities were most frequent. Pb and Cu in Cluster 2 showed an extremely significant positive correlation. The high value area of their concentration is mainly distributed near road intersections and main and secondary trunk roads. The concentration of As in cluster 3 was lower than the corresponding background values, and its sample concentration showed a narrow variability. In addition, the spatial distribution characteristics of As concentration were quite different from those of the other five elements. This shows that the main source of As was different from those of other elements. In cluster 4, Cd and Ni showed an extremely significant positive correlation at the 0.01 level, and areas with high Cd and Ni concentrations were mainly distributed in the southern industrial region of the study area.

3.8.2. Analysis of HM Sources Based on PMF

The results of the analysis based on the PMF model are shown in Figure 8. Factor 1 was the largest contributor to Pb and Cu, indicating that Pb and Cu mainly originated from pollution source 1. The 3D hotspot maps of HM concentrations (Figure 4) showed nearly identical distributions of Pb and Cu. In addition, the correlation analysis (Figure 6) and cluster analysis (Figure 7) showed that Pb and Cu share the main pollution sources. The above analysis proves the accuracy of the analytical results of the PMF model. Similarly, the results of the PMF analysis indicated that Ni and Cd originated from pollution source 2, As from pollution source 3, and Hg from pollution source 4.
Factor 1 was the largest contributor to Pb (47.2%) and Cu (47.4%) among the four sources. The spatial distribution characteristics of Pb and Cu concentrations were nearly identical, and their hotspots were mainly distributed in the city center. From the previous discussion, it can be inferred that the central part of the study area has the largest area of urban artificial surface, and the highest road density and traffic flow. Automobiles are the main source of Pb pollution in the urban eco-environment [122]. Pb has been added to fuel as well as car components such as batteries, wheel rims, wheel balancing weights, and aluminum alloys. Pb concentrations in lead–acid batteries in private automobiles and trucks are approximately 10 kg and 12.5 kg, respectively, accounting for more than 90% of a vehicle’s total lead mass [25,123]. Nriagu [124] reported that leaded gasoline has been in use for half a century, and the total amount of lead released into the atmosphere was about 7 million tons in the United States. In 2000, the release of Cu from brake wear in Europe was approximately 2400 tons, accounting for 48% of all sources of Cu [125]. Davis et al. [126] reported that 48% of Cu in urban stormwater runoff was released from brake wear. In addition, previous studies have shown that Pb and Cu in USD mainly originate from transportation activity [127,128,129,130]. Therefore, Factor 1 denotes the source of transportation emissions.
Factor 2 was mainly defined by Ni (64.1%) and Cd (37.2%). The hotspots of Ni and Cd concentrations were mainly located near electrical and mechanical industrial areas in the southern part of the study area. The sources of Cd in USD are complex and mainly related to urban anthropogenic activities such as urban multi-source atmospheric emission, machining, and metal electroplating. In addition, Cd and Ni are reflected in the industrial dust emitted from coal-fired, oil-fired, and bearing production in factories [104,105]. Hence, factor 2 denotes the industrial sources.
The element with the highest loading in Factor 3 was As (41.8%), and its average concentration was lower than the corresponding background value. As showed a low variability among the sampling sites. In addition, As showed a relatively uniform distribution in the study area. Moreover, As was found to be primarily impacted by a combination of the geochemical composition of the parent material of the soil and geogenic processes [20]. Therefore, factor 3 denotes the natural sources.
Factor 4 was related to a strong loading of Hg (54.8%) that might have originated from a single pollution source. This proportion was significantly higher than that of the other elements. Therefore, Hg can be considered as the signature element of factor 4. The results of the pollution evaluation show that Hg was the largest pollutant in the study area (Figure 3). The hotspots of Hg concentration are mainly distributed in the coal-fired northeast industrial area for urban heating and power supply and the city center with the most frequent commercial and domestic activities. In 2019, there were 46 large-scale industrial enterprises in the study area whose energy structure was dominated by coal combustion. In addition, Hg is a volatile component of coal, and nearly 100% of Hg enters the flue gas during the combustion process, and dust collectors have a high dust removal efficiency for oxidized mercury (Hg2+) and particulate Hg [131,132]. However, elemental mercury (Hg0) is extremely insoluble in water and difficult to absorb by dust collectors, thus leading to its escape into the atmosphere [133]. Abliz et al. [134] reported that the main sources of Hg pollution are coal combustion industries and coal gangue dumps. The level of Hg in the environment has increased primarily as a result of industrialization and its byproducts [67,135]. With the second-largest gas reserves in the world, Asaluyeh has the largest oil and gas reserves in Iran. Its petrochemicals contribute significantly to high Hg levels in USD [136,137]. In the study area, heating is facilitated by coal combustion for up to 6 months per year, which is an important reason for the gradual accumulation of Hg in the urban environment. Thus, factor 4 reflects anthropogenic sources, which is primarily coal consumption.
According to the fingerprints of HM sources, the total contribution of the four sources was found to follow the order: industrial emissions (31.08%) > traffic emissions (26.80%) > coal combustion (23.31%) > natural sources (18.81%). Overall, anthropogenic activities were the dominant factor leading to the accumulation of HMs in the USD of in the study area.

4. Conclusions

In this research, 52 USD samples were collected from Changji city, NW China, and the concentrations of Pb, Ni, As, Cd, Hg, and Cu were determined. In brief, the concentrations, pollution levels, spatial distribution, primary sources, and health hazards of these heavy metals were investigated. The average concentrations of Pb, Ni, As, Cd, Hg, and Cu were 2.41, 0.99, 0.89, 1.71, 2.76, and 2.22 times higher than the corresponding background values. According to the results of the pollution assessment, USD in the study area was moderately polluted by Hg, Pb, and Cu, mildly polluted by Cd, and not polluted by Ni and As. The spatial distribution analysis revealed that the hotspots of Pb, Hg, and Cu were mainly located in the city center and northeastern industrial areas. Hotspots of Ni and Cd were mainly located in the electrical and mechanical industrial areas. The route with the highest potential for human exposure to HMs was ingestion, and As and Pb were the main non-carcinogenic elements. Furthermore, As was the largest contributor to carcinogenic risks, although its level of potential health risks is tolerable. The correlation analysis, cluster analysis, and PMF model analysis indicated that the HMs in the USD of the study area mainly originated from four pollution sources. The analytical results based on the PMF model showed that the total contribution rates of industrial emissions, traffic emissions, coal combustion, and natural sources of HMs were 31.08%, 26.80%, 23.31%, and 18.81%, respectively. The results also showed that anthropogenic sources are the primary source of HMs, and thus special attention should be paid to reducing pollution sources and controlling the risk to the environment and human health.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.Y., M.E. and A.H.; methodology, M.E., A.H., X.M., W.Y., K.Q., J.L. and Y.L.; software, X.Y., A.H., K.Q., J.L., Y.L. and Y.W.; validation, X.Y., W.Y., K.Q., J.L., Y.L. and Y.W.; formal analysis, X.Y., M.E., W.Y. and X.M.; data curation, X.Y., W.Y. and Y.W.; writing—original draft preparation, X.Y., M.E. and X.M.; writing—review and editing, X.Y., M.E., A.H. and X.M.; supervision, M.E., X.M. and W.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41867067; U2003301; 42101302), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M703470), and the Strategic Priority Research Pro-gram of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA2006030201) for their sponsorship.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We want to thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions to this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Torghabeh, A.K.; Jahandari, A.; Jamasb, R. Concentration, contamination level, source identification of selective trace elements in Shiraz atmospheric dust sediments (Fars Province, SW Iran). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 6424–6435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jiang, Y.; Shi, L.; Guang, A.-l.; Mu, Z.; Zhan, H.; Wu, Y. Contamination levels and human health risk assessment of toxic heavy metals in street dust in an industrial city in Northwest China. Environ. Geochem. Health 2018, 40, 2007–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, H.; Chen, L.; Yu, L.; Guo, Z.; Shan, C.; Lin, J.; Gu, Y.; Yang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Shao, J. Pollution characteristics and risk assessment of human exposure to oral bioaccessibility of heavy metals via urban street dusts from different functional areas in Chengdu, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 586, 1076–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wang, J.; Huang, J.J.; Mulligan, C. Seasonal source identification and source-specific health risk assessment of pollutants in road dust. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 10063–10076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shahab, A.; Hui, Z.; Rad, S.; Xiao, H.; Siddique, J.; Huang, L.L.; Ullah, H.; Rashid, A.; Taha, M.R.; Zada, N. A comprehensive review on pollution status and associated health risk assessment of human exposure to selected heavy metals in road dust across different cities of the world. Environ. Geochem. Health 2022, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gupta, V.; Bisht, L.; Deep, A.; Gautam, S. Spatial distribution, pollution levels, and risk assessment of potentially toxic metals in road dust from major tourist city, Dehradun, Uttarakhand India. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2022, 36, 3517–3533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jayarathne, A.; Egodawatta, P.; Ayoko, G.A.; Goonetilleke, A. Assessment of ecological and human health risks of metals in urban road dust based on geochemical fractionation and potential bioavailability. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 635, 1609–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kormoker, T.; Kabir, M.; Khan, R.; Islam, M.; Shammi, R.S.; Al, M.A.; Proshad, R.; Tamim, U.; Sarker, M.; Taj, M. Road dust–driven elemental distribution in megacity Dhaka, Bangladesh: Environmental, ecological, and human health risks assessment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 22350–22371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Qadeer, A.; Saqib, Z.A.; Ajmal, Z.; Xing, C.; Khalil, S.K.; Usman, M.; Huang, Y.; Bashir, S.; Ahmad, Z.; Ahmed, S. Concentrations, pollution indices and health risk assessment of heavy metals in road dust from two urbanized cities of Pakistan: Comparing two sampling methods for heavy metals concentration. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 53, 101959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Trujillo-González, J.M.; Torres-Mora, M.A.; Keesstra, S.; Brevik, E.C.; Jiménez-Ballesta, R. Heavy metal accumulation related to population density in road dust samples taken from urban sites under different land uses. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 553, 636–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Huang, B.; Zhou, Y.; Chang, W.; Li, Z.; Zeng, H. Differential characteristics of heavy metal pollution in road dust and its ecological risk in different function areas of Shenzhen city. Ecol. Environ. 2019, 28, 2398. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhu, X.; Yu, W.; Li, F.; Liu, C.; Ma, J.; Yan, J.; Wang, Y.; Tian, R. Spatio-temporal distribution and source identification of heavy metals in particle size fractions of road dust from a typical industrial district. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 780, 146357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Al-Shidi, H.K.; Sulaiman, H.; Al-Reasi, H.A.; Jamil, F.; Aslam, M. Human and ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in different particle sizes of road dust in Muscat, Oman. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 33980–33993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Padoan, E.; Romè, C.; Ajmone-Marsan, F. Bioaccessibility and size distribution of metals in road dust and roadside soils along a peri-urban transect. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 601, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Roy, S.; Gupta, S.K.; Prakash, J.; Habib, G.; Kumar, P. A global perspective of the current state of heavy metal contamination in road dust. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 33230–33251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gavrić, S.; Leonhardt, G.; Marsalek, J.; Viklander, M. Processes improving urban stormwater quality in grass swales and filter strips: A review of research findings. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 669, 431–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Choi, J.Y.; Jeong, H.; Choi, K.-Y.; Hong, G.H.; Yang, D.B.; Kim, K.; Ra, K. Source identification and implications of heavy metals in urban roads for the coastal pollution in a beach town, Busan, Korea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2020, 161, 111724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abdulaziz, M.; Alshehri, A.; Yadav, I.C.; Badri, H. Pollution level and health risk assessment of heavy metals in ambient air and surface dust from Saudi Arabia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2022, 15, 799–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, Y.; Yu, Y.; Yang, Z.; Shen, Z.; Wang, X.; Cai, Y. A comparison of metal distribution in surface dust and soil among super city, town, and rural area. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 7849–7860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hayrat, A.; Eziz, M. Identification of the spatial distributions, pollution levels, sources, and health risk of heavy metals in surface dusts from Korla, NW China. Open Geosci. 2020, 12, 1338–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhao, G.; Zhang, R.; Han, Y.; Meng, J.; Qiao, Q.; Li, H. Pollution characteristics, spatial distribution, and source identification of heavy metals in road dust in a central eastern city in China: A comprehensive survey. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2021, 193, 796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, J.; Deng, H.; Wang, D.; Chen, Z.; Xu, S. Toxic heavy metal contamination and risk assessment of street dust in small towns of Shanghai suburban area, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2013, 20, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Haque, M.; Sultana, S.; Niloy, N.M.; Quraishi, S.B.; Tareq, S.M. Source apportionment, ecological, and human health risks of toxic metals in road dust of densely populated capital and connected major highway of Bangladesh. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 37218–37233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gautam, S.; Patra, A.K.; Kumar, P. Status and chemical characteristics of ambient PM2.5 pollutions in China: A review. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2019, 21, 1649–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hwang, H.-M.; Fiala, M.J.; Park, D.; Wade, T.L. Review of pollutants in urban road dust and stormwater runoff: Part 1. Heavy metals released from vehicles. Int. J. Urban Sci. 2016, 20, 334–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Alghamdi, A.G.; El-Saeid, M.H.; Alzahrani, A.J.; Ibrahim, H.M. Heavy metal pollution and associated health risk assessment of urban dust in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0261957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mihankhah, T.; Saeedi, M.; Karbassi, A. A comparative study of elemental pollution and health risk assessment in urban dust of different land-uses in Tehran’s urban area. Chemosphere 2020, 241, 124984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Jahandari, A. Pollution status and human health risk assessments of selected heavy metals in urban dust of 16 cities in Iran. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 23094–23107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yu, B.; Lu, X.; Fan, X.; Fan, P.; Zuo, L.; Yang, Y.; Wang, L. Analyzing environmental risk, source and spatial distribution of potentially toxic elements in dust of residential area in Xi’an urban area, China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 208, 111679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Delgado-Iniesta, M.J.; Marín-Sanleandro, P.; Díaz-Pereira, E.; Bautista, F.; Romero-Muñoz, M.; Sánchez-Navarro, A. Estimation of Ecological and Human Health Risks Posed by Heavy Metals in Street Dust of Madrid City (Spain). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Faisal, M.; Wu, Z.; Wang, H.; Hussain, Z.; Azam, M.I. Human health risk assessment of heavy metals in the urban road dust of Zhengzhou metropolis, China. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Moskovchenko, D.; Pozhitkov, R.; Soromotin, A.; Tyurin, V. The content and sources of potentially toxic elements in the road dust of surgut (Russia). Atmosphere 2021, 13, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Heidari, M.; Darijani, T.; Alipour, V. Heavy metal pollution of road dust in a city and its highly polluted suburb; quantitative source apportionment and source-specific ecological and health risk assessment. Chemosphere 2021, 273, 129656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ahamad, A.; Raju, N.J.; Madhav, S.; Gossel, W.; Ram, P.; Wycisk, P. Potentially toxic elements in soil and road dust around Sonbhadra industrial region, Uttar Pradesh, India: Source apportionment and health risk assessment. Environ. Res. 2021, 202, 111685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhang, J.; Guo, Y.; Fan, S.; Wang, S.; Shi, Q.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, J. Detoxification of heavy metals attributed to biological and non–biological complexes in soils around copper producing areas throughout China. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 292, 125999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gillings, M.M.; Fry, K.L.; Morrison, A.L.; Taylor, M.P. Spatial distribution and composition of mine dispersed trace metals in residential soil and house dust: Implications for exposure assessment and human health. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 293, 118462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jia, J.; Li, X.; Wu, P.; Liu, Y.; Han, C.; Zhou, L.; Yang, L. Human health risk assessment and safety threshold of harmful trace elements in the soil environment of the Wulantuga open-cast coal mine. Minerals 2015, 5, 837–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, Z.; Anwar, M.; Zibibula, S. Pollution assessment and health risks evaluation of (metalloid) heavy metals in urban street dust of 58 cities in China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 126–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Chen, M.; Pi, L.; Luo, Y.; Geng, M.; Hu, W.; Li, Z.; Su, S.; Gan, Z.; Ding, S. Grain size distribution and health risk assessment of metals in outdoor dust in Chengdu, Southwestern China. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2016, 70, 534–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Xiao, Q.; Zong, Y.; Malik, Z.; Lu, S. Source identification and risk assessment of heavy metals in road dust of steel industrial city (Anshan), Liaoning, Northeast China. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 2020, 26, 1359–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wei, X.; Gao, B.; Wang, P.; Zhou, H.; Lu, J. Pollution characteristics and health risk assessment of heavy metals in street dusts from different functional areas in Beijing, China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 112, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wang, H.; Cai, L.; Wang, Q.; Hu, G.; Chen, L. A comprehensive exploration of risk assessment and source quantification of potentially toxic elements in road dust: A case study from a large Cu smelter in central China. Catena 2021, 196, 104930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kamani, H.; Mahvi, A.; Seyedsalehi, M.; Jaafari, J.; Hoseini, M.; Safari, G.; Dalvand, A.; Aslani, H.; Mirzaei, N.; Ashrafi, S. Contamination and ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in street dust of Tehran, Iran. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 14, 2675–2682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nazarpour, A.; Ghanavati, N.; Watts, M.J. Spatial distribution and human health risk assessment of mercury in street dust resulting from various land-use in Ahvaz, Iran. Environ. Geochem. Health 2018, 40, 693–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Shabanda, I.S.; Koki, I.B.; Low, K.H.; Zain, S.M.; Khor, S.M.; Abu Bakar, N.K. Daily exposure to toxic metals through urban road dust from industrial, commercial, heavy traffic, and residential areas in Petaling Jaya, Malaysia: A health risk assessment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 37193–37211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wang, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, X.C.; Huang, J.; Ge, Y. Impacts of key factors on heavy metal accumulation in urban road-deposited sediments (RDS): Implications for RDS management. Chemosphere 2020, 261, 127786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wahab, M.I.A.; Abd Razak, W.M.A.; Sahani, M.; Khan, M.F. Characteristics and health effect of heavy metals on non-exhaust road dusts in Kuala Lumpur. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 703, 135535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Guo, X.; Li, S.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, B.; Guo, W. Applications of dynamic simulation for source analysis of soil various pollutants based on atmospheric diffusion and deposition model. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 839, 156057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Li, X.; Hussain, S.A.; Sobri, S.; Said, M.S.M. Overviewing the air quality models on air pollution in Sichuan Basin, China. Chemosphere 2021, 271, 129502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Zhu, T.; Wang, X.; Lin, H.; Ren, J.; Wang, C.; Gong, P. Accumulation of pollutants in proglacial lake sediments: Impacts of glacial meltwater and anthropogenic activities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 7901–7910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Men, C.; Liu, R.; Wang, Y.; Cao, L.; Jiao, L.; Li, L.; Wang, Y. Impact of particle sizes on health risks and source-specific health risks for heavy metals in road dust. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 75471–75486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Tan, B.; Wang, H.; Wang, X.; Ma, C.; Zhou, J.; Dai, X. Health risks and source analysis of heavy metal pollution from dust in Tianshui, China. Minerals 2021, 11, 502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Shi, L.; Halik, Ü.; Mamat, Z.; Aishan, T.; Welp, M. Identifying mismatches of ecosystem services supply and demand under semi-arid conditions: The case of the Oasis City Urumqi, China. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2021, 17, 1293–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. El Amrousi, M.; Paleologos, E.K.; Caratelli, P.; Elhakeem, M. Are garden cities in the desert sustainable? The oasis city of Al Ain in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi. Int. Rev. Spat. Plan. Sustain. Dev. 2018, 6, 79–94. [Google Scholar]
  55. Wang, Z.; Shi, P.; Zhang, X.; Tong, H.; Zhang, W.; Liu, Y. Research on landscape pattern construction and ecological restoration of Jiuquan City based on ecological security evaluation. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Luo, H.; Wang, Q.; Guan, Q.; Ma, Y.; Ni, F.; Yang, E.; Zhang, J. Heavy metal pollution levels, source apportionment and risk assessment in dust storms in key cities in Northwest China. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 422, 126878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Yu, H.; Yang, W.; Wang, X.; Yin, B.; Zhang, X.; Wang, J.; Gu, C.; Ming, J.; Geng, C.; Bai, Z. A seriously sand storm mixed air-polluted area in the margin of Tarim Basin: Temporal-spatial distribution and potential sources. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 676, 436–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Baidourela, A.; Halik, Ü.; Aishan, T.; Abliz, A.; Elyas, A. Dust retention effects of Populus alba var. pyramidalis (Bunge) in arid oasis cities Northwest China. Fresenius Environ. Bull 2015, 24, 285–290. [Google Scholar]
  59. Shepherd, G.; Terradellas, E.; Baklanov, A.; Kang, U.; Sprigg, W.; Nickovic, S.; Darvishi Boloorani, A.; Al-Dousari, A.; Basart, S.; Benedetti, A. Global Assessment of Sand and Dust Storms; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  60. Zhou, Y.; Gao, X.; Meng, X.; Lei, J.; Halik, Ü. Characteristics of the spatio-temporal dynamics of aerosols in central asia and their influencing factors. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 2684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Guan, Q.; Cai, A.; Wang, F.; Yang, L.; Xu, C.; Liu, Z. Spatio-temporal variability of particulate matter in the key part of Gansu Province, Western China. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 230, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Amuti, T.; Luo, G. Analysis of land cover change and its driving forces in a desert oasis landscape of Xinjiang, northwest China. Solid Earth 2014, 5, 1071–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Xue, J.; Gui, D.; Lei, J.; Sun, H.; Zeng, F.; Mao, D.; Jin, Q.; Liu, Y. Oasification: An unable evasive process in fighting against desertification for the sustainable development of arid and semiarid regions of China. Catena 2019, 179, 197–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhang, Y.-L.; Cao, F. Fine particulate matter (PM2. 5) in China at a city level. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Behrooz, R.D.; Kaskaoutis, D.; Grivas, G.; Mihalopoulos, N. Human health risk assessment for toxic elements in the extreme ambient dust conditions observed in Sistan, Iran. Chemosphere 2021, 262, 127835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Najmeddin, A.; Keshavarzi, B.; Moore, F.; Lahijanzadeh, A. Source apportionment and health risk assessment of potentially toxic elements in road dust from urban industrial areas of Ahvaz megacity, Iran. Environ. Geochem. Health 2018, 40, 1187–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Dahmardeh Behrooz, R.; Tashakor, M.; Asvad, R.; Esmaili-Sari, A.; Kaskaoutis, D.G. Characteristics and health risk assessment of mercury exposure via indoor and outdoor household dust in three iranian cities. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rybak, J.; Wróbel, M.; Krzyżyńska, R.; Rogula–Kozłowska, W.; Olszowski, T. Is Poland at risk of urban road dust? Comparison studies on mutagenicity of dust. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 314, 120337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chen, H.; Zhan, C.; Liu, S.; Zhang, J.; Liu, H.; Liu, Z.; Liu, T.; Liu, X.; Xiao, W. Pollution Characteristics and Human Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Street Dust from a Typical Industrial Zone in Wuhan City, Central China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gao, C.; Lei, J.; Jin, F. The classification and assessment of vulnerability of man-land system of oasis city in arid area. Front. Earth Sci. 2013, 7, 406–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zeng, H.; Zhang, H.; Wu, X.; Gu, H.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, X.; Li, J. Pollution levels and health risk assessment of particulate phthalic acid esters in arid urban areas. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2017, 8, 188–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Xue, M.; Wang, H.; Wei, Y.; Ma, C.; Yin, Y. Spatial characteristics of land use multifunctionality and their trade-off/synergy in urumqi, China: Implication for land space zoning management. Sustainability 2022, 14, 9285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Yan, Y.; Chai, Z.; Simayi, Z.; Yan, H.; Yang, X.; Yang, S. Dynamic evaluation and prediction of the ecological environment quality of the urban agglomeration on the Northern slope of Tianshan Mountains. arXiv 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. NY/T 395-2012; Technical Rules for Monitoring of Environmental Quality of Farmland Soil. Agricultural Press of China: Beijing, China, 2012. (In Chinese)
  75. Cai, X.; Duan, Z.; Wang, J. Status assessment, spatial distribution and health risk of heavy metals in agricultural soils around mining-impacted communities in China. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2021, 30, 993–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Turhun, M.; Eziz, M. Identification of the distribution, contamination levels, sources, and ecological risks of heavy metals in vineyard soils in the main grape production area of China. Environ. Earth Sci. 2022, 81, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. GB/T 17139-1997; Soil Quality—Determination of Nickel—Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry. China Environmental Protection Administration: Beijing, China, 1997. (In Chinese)
  78. GB/T 22105.2-2008; Soil Quality—Analysis of Total Mercury, Arsenic and Lead Contents—Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry—Part 2: Analysis of Total Arsenic Contents in Soils. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2008. (In Chinese)
  79. GB/T 22105.1-2008; Soil Quality—Analysis of Total Mercury, Arsenic and Lead Contents—Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry—Part 1: Analysis of Total Mercury Contents in Soils. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2008. (In Chinese)
  80. GB/T 17138-1997; Soil Quality—Determination of Copper, Zinc—Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry. China Environmental Protection Administration: Beijing, China, 1997. (In Chinese)
  81. GB/T 17140-1997; Soil Quality—Determination of Lead, Cadmium—Ki-Mibk Extraction Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry. China Environmental Protection Administration: Beijing, China, 1997. (In Chinese)
  82. Song, T.; An, Y.; Cui, G.; Tong, S.; He, J. Bioconcentrations and health risk assessment of heavy metals in crops in the Naoli River Basin agricultural area, Sanjiang Plain, China. Environ. Earth Sci. 2021, 80, 452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Eziz, M.; Mohammad, A.; Mamut, A.; Hini, G. A human health risk assessment of heavy metals in agricultural soils of Yanqi Basin, Silk Road Economic Belt, China. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 2018, 24, 1352–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Othman, M.; Latif, M.T. Pollution characteristics, sources, and health risk assessments of urban road dust in Kuala Lumpur City. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 11227–11245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Gorka, R.; Kumar, R.; Yadav, S.; Verma, A. Health implications, distribution and source apportionment of heavy metals in road deposited dust of Jammu City in north-western India. Chemosphere 2022, 308, 136475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. He, Y.; Peng, C.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, Z.; Xiao, X.; Kong, L. Comparison of heavy metals in urban soil and dust in cities of China: Characteristics and health risks. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Li, F.; Huang, J.; Zeng, G.; Huang, X.; Liu, W.; Wu, H.; Yuan, Y.; He, X.; Lai, M. Spatial distribution and health risk assessment of toxic metals associated with receptor population density in street dust: A case study of Xiandao District, Changsha, Middle China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 6732–6742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. DB11T-656-2009; Environmental Site Assessment Guide. Beijing Municipal Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision: Beijing, China, 2007. (In Chinese)
  89. HJ 25.3-2014; Technical Guidelines for Risk Assessment of Contaminated Sites. China Environmental Science Press: Beijing, China, 2014. (In Chinese)
  90. Duan, X. Outline of Chinese Population Exposure Parameters (Adult’s Volume); Environmental Science Press: Beijing, China, 2016. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  91. Duan, X. Outline of Chinese Population Exposure Parameters (Children’s Volume); Environmental Science Press: Beijing, China, 2016. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  92. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Supplemental guidance for developing soil screening levels for superfund sites. OSWER 2002, 9355, 4–24. [Google Scholar]
  93. Han, X.; Lu, X.; Wu, Y. Health risks and contamination levels of heavy metals in dusts from parks and squares of an industrial city in semi-arid area of China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Li, K.; Liang, T.; Wang, L.; Yang, Z. Contamination and health risk assessment of heavy metals in road dust in Bayan Obo Mining Region in Inner Mongolia, North China. J. Geogr. Sci. 2015, 25, 1439–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Yang, Q.; Li, Z.; Lu, X.; Duan, Q.; Huang, L.; Bi, J. A review of soil heavy metal pollution from industrial and agricultural regions in China: Pollution and risk assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 642, 690–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Loomis, D.; Huang, W.; Chen, G. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) evaluation of the carcinogenicity of outdoor air pollution: Focus on China. Chin. J. Cancer 2014, 33, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Xiao, Q.; Zong, Y.; Lu, S. Assessment of heavy metal pollution and human health risk in urban soils of steel industrial city (Anshan), Liaoning, Northeast China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 120, 377–385. [Google Scholar]
  98. Hini, G.; Eziz, M.; Wang, W.; Ili, A.; Li, X. Spatial distribution, contamination levels, sources, and potential health risk assessment of trace elements in street dusts of Urumqi city, NW China. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 2020, 26, 2112–2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Blansett, K.; Hamlett, J. World environmental and water resources congress 2013: Showcasing the future, In Runoff Ratios for Five Small Urban Karst Watersheds under Different Levels of Imperviousness, 2013; American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA, USA, 2013; pp. 3196–3205. [Google Scholar]
  100. Rice, K.C.; Conko, K.M.; Hornberger, G.M. Anthropogenic sources of arsenic and copper to sediments in a suburban lake, northern Virginia. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 4962–4967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Liu, E.; Wang, X.; Liu, H.; Liang, M.; Zhu, Y.; Li, Z. Chemical speciation, pollution and ecological risk of toxic metals in readily washed off road dust in a megacity (Nanjing), China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 173, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Li, K.; Cui, S.; Zhang, F.; Hough, R.; Fu, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, S.; An, L. Concentrations, possible sources and health risk of heavy metals in multi-media environment of the Songhua River, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. China National Environmental Monitoring Centre. Total Station of China Environment Monitoring. Chinese Soil Element Background Values; China Environment Science Press: Beijing, China, 1990. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  104. Dong, B.; Zhang, R.; Gan, Y.; Cai, L.; Freidenreich, A.; Wang, K.; Guo, T.; Wang, H. Multiple methods for the identification of heavy metal sources in cropland soils from a resource-based region. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 651, 3127–3138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Li, X. Levels and spatial distribution of heavy metals in urban dust in China. Chin. J. Geochem. 2015, 34, 498–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Sadeghdoust, F.; Ghanavati, N.; Nazarpour, A.; Babaenejad, T.; Watts, M.J. Hazard, ecological, and human health risk assessment of heavy metals in street dust in Dezful, Iran. Arab. J. Geosci. 2020, 13, 881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Jadoon, W.A.; Khpalwak, W.; Chidya, R.C.G.; Abdel-Dayem, S.M.M.A.; Takeda, K.; Makhdoom, M.A.; Sakugawa, H. Evaluation of levels, sources and health hazards of road-dust associated toxic metals in Jalalabad and Kabul Cities, Afghanistan. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2018, 74, 32–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Christoforidis, A.; Stamatis, N. Heavy metal contamination in street dust and roadside soil along the major national road in Kavala’s region, Greece. Geoderma 2009, 151, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Wang, G.; Yang, D.; Xia, F.; Zhao, Y. Study on industrial integration development of the energy chemical industry in urumqi-changji-shihezi urban agglomeration, Xinjiang, NW China. Sustainability 2016, 8, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Hou, S.; Zheng, N.; Tang, L.; Ji, X.; Li, Y.; Hua, X. Pollution characteristics, sources, and health risk assessment of human exposure to Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb pollution in urban street dust across China between 2009 and 2018. Environ. Int. 2019, 128, 430–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Gajbhiye, T.; Pandey, S.K.; Malik, T.G.; Kim, K.-H.; Khan, M.L. Micro-morphological analysis of foliar uptake and retention of airborne particulate matter (PM)-bound toxic metals: Implications for their phytoremediation. Chem. Ecol. 2022, 38, 636–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Cao, S.; Duan, X.; Zhao, X.; Wang, B.; Ma, J.; Fan, D.; Sun, C.; He, B.; Wei, F.; Jiang, G. Health risk assessment of various metal (loid) s via multiple exposure pathways on children living near a typical lead-acid battery plant, China. Environ. Pollut. 2015, 200, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Cao, L.; Liu, R.; Zhou, Y.; Men, C.; Li, L. Source variation and tempo-spatial characteristics of health risks of heavy metals in surface dust in Beijing, China. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2021, 36, 2535–2547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Chen, H.; Teng, Y.; Lu, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J. Contamination features and health risk of soil heavy metals in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 512, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Teng, Y.; Ni, S.; Wang, J.; Zuo, R.; Yang, J. A geochemical survey of trace elements in agricultural and non-agricultural topsoil in Dexing area, China. J. Geochem. Explor. 2010, 104, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Rosas-Castor, J.; Guzmán-Mar, J.; Hernández-Ramírez, A.; Garza-González, M.; Hinojosa-Reyes, L. Arsenic accumulation in maize crop (Zea mays): A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 488, 176–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Su, S.; Tsui, C.; Lai, H.; Chen, Z. Food safety and bioavailability evaluations of four vegetables grown in the highly arsenic-contaminated soils on the Guandu Plain of northern Taiwan. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 4091–4107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Tanaka, H.; Tsukuma, H.; Oshima, A. Long-term prospective study of 6104 survivors of arsenic poisoning during infancy due to contaminated milk powder in 1955. J. Epidemiol. 2010, 20, 439–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Bisht, L.; Gupta, V.; Singh, A.; Gautam, A.S.; Gautam, S. Heavy metal concentration and its distribution analysis in urban road dust: A case study from most populated city of Indian state of Uttarakhand. Spat. Spatio-Temporal Epidemiol. 2022, 40, 100470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Zheng, T.; Tan, Y.; Wang, l. Control of heavy metal pollution in urban street dust by passivators. Chin. J. Environ. Eng. 2019, 13, 1237–1244. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  121. Shi, X.; Chen, L.; Wang, J. Multivariate analysis of heavy metal pollution in street dusts of Xianyang city, NW China. Environ. Earth Sci. 2013, 69, 1973–1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Roberts, E.; Serdar, D.; Maroncelli, J.; Davies, H. Control of Toxic Chemicals in Puget Sound—Phase 3: Primary Sources of Selected Toxic Chemicals and Quantities Released in the Puget Sound Basin; 11-03-024; Washington State Department of Ecology: Olympia, WA, USA, 2011.
  123. Hu, Z.; Lu, Z.; Song, B.; Quan, Y. Impact of test cycle on mass, number and particle size distribution of particulates emitted from gasoline direct injection vehicles. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 762, 143128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Nriagu, J.O. The rise and fall of leaded gasoline. Sci. Total Environ. 1990, 92, 13–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Hulskotte, J.; Denier van der Gon, H.A.C.; Visschedijk, A.; Schaap, M. Brake wear from vehicles as an important source of diffuse copper pollution. Water Sci. Technol. A J. Int. Assoc. Water Pollut. Res. 2007, 56, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Davis, A.P.; Shokouhian, M.; Ni, S. Loading estimates of lead, copper, cadmium, and zinc in urban runoff from specific sources. Chemosphere 2001, 44, 997–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Cheng, Z.; Chen, L.; Li, H.; Lin, J.; Yang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Xu, X.; Xian, J.; Shao, J.; Zhu, X. Characteristics and health risk assessment of heavy metals exposure via household dust from urban area in Chengdu, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 619, 621–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Lifset, R.J.; Eckelman, M.J.; Harper, E.; Hausfather, Z.; Urbina, G. Metal lost and found: Dissipative uses and releases of copper in the United States 1975–2000. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 417, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Yoon, S.J.; Hong, S.; Lee, C.; Lee, J.; Kim, T.; Lee, J.; Kim, B.; Noh, J.; Kwon, B.-O.; Khim, J.S. 10 Years long-term assessment on characterizing spatiotemporal trend and source apportionment of metal (loid) s in terrestrial soils along the west coast of South Korea. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 826, 154214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Roy, S.; Gupta, S.K.; Prakash, J.; Habib, G.; Baudh, K.; Nasr, M. Ecological and human health risk assessment of heavy metal contamination in road dust in the National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi, India. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 30413–30425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. LYU, J. Source apportionment and spatial prediction of heavy metals in soils of Yantai coastal zone. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2021, 76, 713–725. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  132. Wang, S.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, B.; Meng, Y.; Hao, J. Mitigation potential of mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants in China. Energy Fuels 2012, 26, 4635–4642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Hu, B.; Liu, B.; Zhou, J.; Guo, J.; Sun, Z.; Meng, W.; Guo, X.; Duan, J. Health risk assessment on heavy metals in urban street dust of Tianjin based on trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 2016, 22, 678–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Abliz, A.; Shi, Q.; Keyimu, M.; Sawut, R. Spatial distribution, source, and risk assessment of soil toxic metals in the coal-mining region of northwestern China. Arab. J. Geosci. 2018, 11, 793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Pacyna, E.G.; Pacyna, J.; Sundseth, K.; Munthe, J.; Kindbom, K.; Wilson, S.; Steenhuisen, F.; Maxson, P. Global emission of mercury to the atmosphere from anthropogenic sources in 2005 and projections to 2020. Atmos. Environ. 2010, 44, 2487–2499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Tashakor, M.; Behrooz, R.D.; Asvad, S.R.; Kaskaoutis, D.G. Tracing of Heavy Metals Embedded in Indoor Dust Particles from the Industrial City of Asaluyeh, South of Iran. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 7905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Abbasi, S.; Keshavarzi, B.; Moore, F.; Mahmoudi, M.R. Fractionation, source identification and risk assessment of potentially toxic elements in street dust of the most important center for petrochemical products, Asaluyeh County, Iran. Environ. Earth Sci. 2018, 77, 673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A map of the study area and sampling points. (a) Location of Xinjiang in China; (b) spatial distribution map of sampling sites in Changji City.
Figure 1. A map of the study area and sampling points. (a) Location of Xinjiang in China; (b) spatial distribution map of sampling sites in Changji City.
Ijerph 19 13296 g001
Figure 2. Spatial distance between sampling points and influence factors. (af) represent the Euclidean distances between sampling sites and artificial surfaces, urban periphery, agricultural land, waterbodies, roads, and polluting enterprises, respectively.
Figure 2. Spatial distance between sampling points and influence factors. (af) represent the Euclidean distances between sampling sites and artificial surfaces, urban periphery, agricultural land, waterbodies, roads, and polluting enterprises, respectively.
Ijerph 19 13296 g002
Figure 3. Box plots of pollution levels of heavy metals.
Figure 3. Box plots of pollution levels of heavy metals.
Ijerph 19 13296 g003
Figure 4. Spatial distributions of metal concentration and pollution grade.
Figure 4. Spatial distributions of metal concentration and pollution grade.
Ijerph 19 13296 g004
Figure 5. Spatial distributions of HI and TCR for children and adults. (a) represents the hazard index (HI) for children and adults; (b) represents total cancer risk (TCR) for children and adults.
Figure 5. Spatial distributions of HI and TCR for children and adults. (a) represents the hazard index (HI) for children and adults; (b) represents total cancer risk (TCR) for children and adults.
Ijerph 19 13296 g005
Figure 6. Correlation heat map of heavy metals. ** represents the significance level of p-value < 0.05.
Figure 6. Correlation heat map of heavy metals. ** represents the significance level of p-value < 0.05.
Ijerph 19 13296 g006
Figure 7. Hierarchical dendrogram of heavy metals was obtained using Ward’s clustering.
Figure 7. Hierarchical dendrogram of heavy metals was obtained using Ward’s clustering.
Ijerph 19 13296 g007
Figure 8. Source composition and source contribution rate of heavy metals based on positive matrix factorization.
Figure 8. Source composition and source contribution rate of heavy metals based on positive matrix factorization.
Ijerph 19 13296 g008
Table 1. The exposure parameters are used to estimate chronic daily intake.
Table 1. The exposure parameters are used to estimate chronic daily intake.
IndicatorsParametersMeaning (Units)ChildrenAdultReference
Exposure factorEFExposure frequency (d/a)350350[87]
EDExposure duration (year)630[88]
ATncAverage exposure time for non-cancer (d)365 × ED365 × ED[89]
ATcaAverage exposure time for cancer (d)365 × 70365 × 70[89]
BWAverage body weight (kg)21.262.4[90,91]
CFUnit conversion factor (kg/mg)1 × 10−61 × 10−6[92]
IngestionIngRConsumption rate of dusts (mg/d)200100[92]
InhalationInhRDust inhalation rate (m3/d)7.516.2[93]
PEFParticulate emission factor (m3/kg)1.36 × 1091.36 × 109[94]
Skin contactAFSkin adherence factor (mg/(cm2/d))0.200.07[92]
SAExposed skin area (cm2)8991600[95]
ABSDermal absorption factor (unitless)Pb = Ni = Hg = Cu = 0.01; As = 0.03; Cd = 0.005[38]
Table 2. Reference dose and slope factor for three exposure pathways of heavy metals.
Table 2. Reference dose and slope factor for three exposure pathways of heavy metals.
ElementsRfD (mg/(kg·d)SF/(mg/kg·d)−1
IngestionInhalationDermal ContactIngestionInhalationDermal Contact
Pb0.00350.003520.000525---
Ni0.0200.02060.0054-0.84-
As0.00030.0001230.00031.500.00431.50
Cd0.0010.0011.0 × 10−5-6.30-
Hg0.00030.00032.4 × 10−5---
Cu0.040.04020.012---
Table 3. Descriptive statistics of heavy metals concentrations in urban surface dusts (n = 52).
Table 3. Descriptive statistics of heavy metals concentrations in urban surface dusts (n = 52).
ItemsPbNiAsCdHgCu
Minimum/(mg/kg)19.020.07.820.140.02330.0
Maximum/(mg/kg)104.066.012.700.310.162101.0
Average/(mg/kg)46.8326.359.920.210.04759.33
Median/(mg/kg)39.5024.009.720.200.042154.50
St. D/(mg/kg)19.717.131.010.030.02417.62
CV/%42.0927.0610.1814.2951.0629.69
Skewness1.364.070.641.742.720.47
Kurtosis1.4219.700.345.8410.00−0.63
Background value/(mg/kg)19.4026.6011.200.120.01726.70
Table 4. The non-carcinogenic risk indexes of heavy metals in urban surface dust.
Table 4. The non-carcinogenic risk indexes of heavy metals in urban surface dust.
HQingestHQinhaleHQdermalHQHI
ChildrenAdultsChildrenAdultsChildrenAdultsChildrenAdultsChildrenAdults
Pb1.28 × 10−12.06 × 10−23.50 × 10−62.44 × 10−67.67 × 10−31.54 × 10−31.35 × 10−12.21 × 10−24.92 × 10−17.99 × 10−2
Ni1.26 × 10−22.02 × 10−33.37 × 10−72.34 × 10−74.19 × 10−48.40 × 10−51.30 × 10−22.11 × 10−3
As3.16 × 10−15.08 × 10−22.12 × 10−51.48 × 10−58.52 × 10−31.71 × 10−33.24 × 10−15.25 × 10−2
Cd1.96 × 10−33.15 × 10−45.40 × 10−83.76 × 10−88.81 × 10−41.77 × 10−42.84 × 10−34.92 × 10−4
Hg1.50 × 10−32.41 × 10−44.12 × 10−82.87 × 10−81.68 × 10−43.37 × 10−51.66 × 10−32.74 × 10−4
Cu1.42 × 10−22.28 × 10−33.89 × 10−72.70 × 10−74.24 × 10−48.51 × 10−51.46 × 10−22.36 × 10−3
Table 5. The carcinogenic risk indexes of heavy metals in urban surface dust.
Table 5. The carcinogenic risk indexes of heavy metals in urban surface dust.
CRingestCRinhaleCRdermalCRTCR
ChildrenAdultsChildrenAdultsChildrenAdultsChildrenAdultsChildrenAdults
Ni--5.00 × 10−101.74 × 10−9--5.00 × 10−101.74 × 10−91.25 × 10−51.06 × 10−5
As1.22 × 10−59.80 × 10−69.63 × 10−133.35 × 10−123.29 × 10−77.68 × 10−71.25 × 10−51.06 × 10−5
Cd--2.92 × 10−111.01 × 10−10--2.92 × 10−112.92 × 10−11
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, X.; Eziz, M.; Hayrat, A.; Ma, X.; Yan, W.; Qian, K.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y. Heavy Metal Pollution and Risk Assessment of Surface Dust in the Arid NW China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 13296. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph192013296

AMA Style

Yang X, Eziz M, Hayrat A, Ma X, Yan W, Qian K, Li J, Liu Y, Wang Y. Heavy Metal Pollution and Risk Assessment of Surface Dust in the Arid NW China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(20):13296. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph192013296

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Xiuyun, Mamattursun Eziz, Adila Hayrat, Xiaofei Ma, Wei Yan, Kaixuan Qian, Jiaxin Li, Yuan Liu, and Yifan Wang. 2022. "Heavy Metal Pollution and Risk Assessment of Surface Dust in the Arid NW China" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 20: 13296. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph192013296

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop