Next Article in Journal
Enrichment of Secondary Wastewater Sludge for Production of Hydrogen from Crude Glycerol and Comparative Evaluation of Mono-, Co- and Mixed-Culture Systems
Next Article in Special Issue
Function and Regulation of Heterotrimeric G Proteins during Chemotaxis
Previous Article in Journal
Survivin Modulates Squamous Cell Carcinoma-Derived Stem-Like Cell Proliferation, Viability and Tumor Formation in Vivo
Previous Article in Special Issue
Protective Role of Proton-Sensing TDAG8 in Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Acute Lung Injury
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 17
Issue 1
10.3390/ijms17010095
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Transactivation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor by G Protein-Coupled Receptors: Recent Progress, Challenges and Future Research

by
Zhixiang Wang
The Department of Medical Genetics and Signal Transduction Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H7, Canada
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17(1), 95; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms17010095
Submission received: 7 December 2015 / Revised: 6 January 2016 / Accepted: 7 January 2016 / Published: 12 January 2016
(This article belongs to the Collection G Protein-Coupled Receptor Signaling and Regulation)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Both G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and receptor-tyrosine kinases (RTKs) regulate large signaling networks, control multiple cell functions and are implicated in many diseases including various cancers. Both of them are also the top therapeutic targets for disease treatment. The discovery of the cross-talk between GPCRs and RTKs connects these two vast signaling networks and complicates the already complicated signaling networks that regulate cell signaling and function. In this review, we focus on the transactivation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a subfamily of RTKs, by GPCRs. Since the first report of EGFR transactivation by GPCR, significant progress has been made including the elucidation of the mechanisms underlying the transactivation. Here, we first provide a basic picture for GPCR, EGFR and EGFR transactivation by GPCR. We then discuss the progress made in the last five years and finally provided our view of the future challenge and future researches needed to overcome these challenges.

1. Introduction

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and receptor-tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are the two largest groups of membrane receptors. They transduce various extracellular stimulus into intracellular signals to regulate almost all kinds of cellular functions. While it was traditionally believed that the main function of GPCR is to catalyze the production of second messages to regulate cell metabolism and the main function of RTKs is to regulate cell growth and differentiation, recent evidence indicates that both of them activate a large intracellular signaling network that controls multiple cell functions [1,2,3,4]. The discovery of the cross-talk between GPCR and RTKs now integrates these two signaling networks together [5,6]. Many RTKs including epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (EGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), and Trks are transactivated by GPCR, however, EGFR transactivation by GPCR is mostly studied. In this review, we will focus on EGFR transactivation. A few reviews have been published recently to discuss the various aspects of RTK transactivation by GPCR [6,7,8]. Here we will focus on the progress during last five years and discuss the challenges and future research of this interesting and important research field.

2. G Protein-Coupled Receptors

G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute a large family of plasma membrane receptors, which is involved in diverse intracellular signaling pathways and regulate multiple functions including vasorelaxation, heart rate, sight, olfaction and biorhythms [9]. The human genome encodes approximately 800 GPCRs, which are grouped into three main classes (A–C) based on sequence homology [2,10]. Recently, GPCRs are also classified into six classes, Rhodopsin-like, Secretin receptor family, Metabotropic glutamate/pheromone, Fungal mating pheromone receptors, Cyclic AMP receptors, and Frizzled/Smoothened [2,11]. The class A/Rhodopsin family comprises the largest number of GPCRs with hundreds of receptors. The class A receptors are further divided into several subtypes including serotonin 5HT1B and 5-HT2B receptors, muscarinic acetylcoline M2 and M3 receptors, and four subtype of opioid receptors [2]. The class B/Secretin family GPCR comprise fifteen receptors in human that are activated by peptide endocrine hormones, peptide paracrine factors and neuropeptides [12]. The class C/Glutamate family GPCR comprise fifteen receptors activated by amino acids and ions [11].
GPCRs are integral membrane proteins with seven transmembrane helices. The extracellular loops of the receptor possess two highly conserved cysteine residues. These two cysteine residues form disulfide bonds, which stabilizes the structure of the receptor. GPCRs lack intrinsic enzymatic activity and function through the coupled heterotrimeric G proteins. The heterotrimeric G protein contains three subunits: Gα, Gβ, and Gγ. Ligand binding to the GPCRs stimulates the dissociation of G proteins into GTP-bound Gα, and Gβγ subunits. The disassociated G protein subunits control the activity of many enzymes including kinases, phospholipase C, and adenylate cyclase to generate second messengers. These intracellular second messengers regulate various cell functions. In addition, the G protein-dependent signaling is further complicated by the existence of many G protein subunits, which can stimulate diverse signaling cascades. Thus far, there are 20 Gα, 6 Gβ, and 11 Gγ subunits reported [6].
There are currently only two protein families shown to regulate GPCR activities: GPCR kinases (GRKs) and β-arrestins [1,6]. GRKs controls GPCR activity by phosphorylating their intracellular domains following the release of the coupled G proteins, which allows the binding of β-arrestins to GPCRs to prevent their re-association with the G proteins. It has been shown recently that β-arrestins also function as scaffolds and activator for many signaling proteins. The interaction between GPCR and β-arrestins allows GPCR to activate downstream signaling cascades, independent of G proteins.

3. Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)

There are more than 90 known protein tyrosine kinase genes in the human genome; 58 encode transmembrane RTKs distributed into 20 subfamilies including EGFR family [13]. EGFR family receptors consist of four members including EGFR/ErbB1/Her1, ErbB2/Her2, ErbB3/Her3, and ErbB4/Her4. Among EGFR family, ErbB3 has impaired kinase activity and ErbB2 is an orphan receptor. Therefore, ligand-induced heterodimerization is an important mechanism to activate all ErbB receptors [4,14,15]. EGFR is a 170 kD transmembrane protein of a single polypeptide chain. The extracellular domain of EGFR contains 622-amino acids and is heavily glycosylated. It also comprises two cysteine rich regions for ligand binding. The transmembrane domain is a short α-helical peptide with 23 amino acids. The intracellular domain with 542 amino acids comprise a conserved protein tyrosine kinase domain and a C-terminal domain containing the regulatory tyrosine residues [16].
EGFR plays important roles in the regulation of cell growth and development [4,14]. Binding of EGF to EGFR stimulates the dimerization of EGFR and the activation of its kinase, which leads to the trans-autophosphorylation of EGFR [3]. Activated EGFR stimulates various signaling cascades that regulate multiple cell functions including cell proliferation, survival, cytoskeleton reorganization, and motility [4,14]. EGFR is also rapidly internalized following its binding to EGF [17]. The signaling proteins forming complexes with EGFR include Shc, Grb2, Src, PLC-γ1, Cbl, and the p85α subunit of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) [18,19,20]. Many signaling pathways are activated by EGFR. For example, activated EGFR binds to Shc/Grb2, which recruits Sos to the plasma membrane to activate Ras. Ras activation leads to the activation of Raf and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK). Extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs), activated by MEK, activate transcription factors such as Elk-1 directly or activate c-fos and SRF through RSK [20,21,22,23]. The activation of PLC-γ1 by EGFR regulates cell mitogenesis and migration [24,25,26,27]. The activated EGFR also stimulates the activation of PI3K-AKT pathway, which protects the cell from undergoing apoptosis [28,29,30].

4. Transactivation of EGFR by GPCRs

Ullrich’s group provide the first evidence supporting the transactivation of GPCRs by RTK. They showed that EGFR and ErbB2 were rapidly phosphorylated following the addition of various GPCR agonists including lysophosphatidic acid, thrombin, and endothelin-1 in Rat-1 cells [31]. The activation of EGFR and ErbB2 was blocked when EGFR kinase was inhibited either by the inhibitor AG1478 or by the expression of dominant-negative EGFR [31]. They further showed that EGFR transactivation occurred in diverse cell types and different types of G proteins [32]. Afterwards, transactivation of EGFR by GPCR has been reported for various receptor tyrosine kinases, including PDGFR [33,34], Trk [35,36], insulin-like growth factor receptor [37,38], vascular endothelial growth factor receptors [39,40], and fibroblast growth factor receptors [41]. Here, we focus on EGFR as it is mostly studied.
Accumulated evidence suggests that there are several mechanisms for the transactivation of the EGFR by GPCR (Figure 1) [6,8,42]. These mechanisms could be classified into two major ones. The first mechanism is the “triple membrane passing signal” (TMPS) pathway (Figure 1A). According to this model, EGFR transactivation by GPCR is controlled by the activation of membrane-bound matrix metalloproteases (MMPs). The most implicated group of MMPs is the ADAM (a disintegrin and metalloprotease) family. MMPs are able to cleave EGFR ligands such as heparin-binding EGF-like factor (HB-EGF), neuregulin, transforming growth factor-α, and amphiregulin. The cleaved ligands are then released into the extracellular space and bind to EGFR, which stimulates the dimerization and activation of EGFR. The activated EGFR is then able to simulate various signaling pathways such as the Ras-Erk pathway and the PI3K-AKT pathway, and regulates various cell functions (Figure 1A). In this model, the signal generated by a GPCR agonist will cross the plasma membrane three times. EGFR transactivation through TMPS pathway has been reported in many cell types following activation by various agonists such as bombesin, 5-hydroxytryptamine, carbachole, angiotensin II, bradykinin, lysophosphatidic acid, endothelin 1, gonadotropin-releasing hormone, phenylephrine, leptin, thrombin, deoxycholic acid, and prostaglandin E2 [6,8,42,43,44]. EGFR transactivation through this mechanism has been implicated in the regulation of many normal cell functions and the growth, development and progression of many diseases such as cancers, kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease.
Under other situations, EGFR is transactivated by GPCR without detectable EGF-like ligands, which suggests that EGFR transactivation by GPCR can also be through intracellular signaling pathways that are ligand-independent (Figure 1B). All of the ligand-independent mechanisms involves the activation of intracellular protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs) such as Src family proteins. The increased PTK activity mediates the phosphorylation of EGFR in its cytosolic domain. The phosphorylated EGFR, in turn, associates with various signaling proteins and initiates the activation of multiple signaling pathways (Figure 1B,C). Several mechanisms have been suggested regarding the pathways leading to the enhanced activity of PTKs [6,8,42,43,45].
A major mechanism requires the ROS production. In this model, activation of GPCRs by agonist stimulates the phosphorylation of p47phox and the activation of NADPH oxidase, which produces reactive oxygen species (ROS) through O2 by using NADPH as electron donor. ROS may unbalance the equilibrium of the intracellular phosphorylation and enhance the activity of intracellular PTKs through two mechanisms: (1) inactivation of protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) by oxidation of its cysteine residue in its catalytic site. This leads to the enhanced activation of PTKs; and (2) stimulation of the proteolysis of regulatory proteins that block PTK activity, which also leads to the higher activity of PTKs [6,8,42]. The increased PKT activity stimulates EGFR transactivation.
The ligand-independent intracellular mechanisms without ROS production have also been suggested. Src family kinases have been shown to be associated with GPCRs. The association may be through the direct interaction between Src SH3 domain and the GPCR cytoplasmic domain that contains consensus proline-rich motifs in its C-terminal tail or third intracellular loop. The interaction could also be through the binding to GPCR-associated proteins including the G protein subunits and β-arrestins. This interaction activates Src family kinases, which phosphorylates EGFR at its intracellular domain [6,8,42].
Ijms 17 00095 g001 1024
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of EGFR transactivation by GPCR. Two mechanisms have been proposed and supported by the available data: TMPS and ligand-independent intracellular pathways. (A) TMPS: In this model, GPCR-induced EGFR transactivation depends on the activation of MMPs that are able to cleave EGFR ligands such as HB-EGF and stimulate ligand shedding. The ligands released into the extracellular space then bind to EGFR and stimulate the dimerization and activation of the receptors, which leads to the activation of signaling cascades; (B) Ligand-independent pathway: This pathway involves the activation of intracellular protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs) such as Src family proteins. Src phosphorylates the tyrosines residues in the cytosolic domain of EGFR. The phosphorylated EGFR is able to interact with downstream signaling proteins, leading to the activation of various signaling pathways. Src could be activated by GPCR through different mechanisms; (C) Future research: Future research should focus on the EGFR transactivation through ligand-independent Src pathway. It is important to determine how Src activates EGFR, the activation status of Src-activated EGFR, and the effects of Src-activated EGFR on the downstream signaling cascades and cell functions. For example, does Src stimulates the dimerization of EGFR? Does Src phosphorylate all the major phosphor tyrosine (Y) residues of EGFR? What are the downstream signaling pathways activated and what is the physiological consequence of this activation?
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of EGFR transactivation by GPCR. Two mechanisms have been proposed and supported by the available data: TMPS and ligand-independent intracellular pathways. (A) TMPS: In this model, GPCR-induced EGFR transactivation depends on the activation of MMPs that are able to cleave EGFR ligands such as HB-EGF and stimulate ligand shedding. The ligands released into the extracellular space then bind to EGFR and stimulate the dimerization and activation of the receptors, which leads to the activation of signaling cascades; (B) Ligand-independent pathway: This pathway involves the activation of intracellular protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs) such as Src family proteins. Src phosphorylates the tyrosines residues in the cytosolic domain of EGFR. The phosphorylated EGFR is able to interact with downstream signaling proteins, leading to the activation of various signaling pathways. Src could be activated by GPCR through different mechanisms; (C) Future research: Future research should focus on the EGFR transactivation through ligand-independent Src pathway. It is important to determine how Src activates EGFR, the activation status of Src-activated EGFR, and the effects of Src-activated EGFR on the downstream signaling cascades and cell functions. For example, does Src stimulates the dimerization of EGFR? Does Src phosphorylate all the major phosphor tyrosine (Y) residues of EGFR? What are the downstream signaling pathways activated and what is the physiological consequence of this activation?
Ijms 17 00095 g001

5. Progress in the Last Five Years

The research in the field of EGFR transactivation by GPCR is continuously flourish with more than 100 papers published in the last five years. However, most of these papers were reporting the identification of EGFR transactivation by a GPCR, which was not reported before, identification of additional downstream signaling pathways activated by EGFR transactivation, or additional physiological role of EGFR transactivation by GPCR. For example, the GPCRs newly identified to transactivate EGFR or other RTKs include formyl peptide receptor-like (FPRL1) [46], BK B2 receptor (B2R) [47,48], bombesin receptor subtype-3 (BRS-3) [49], the orphan GPCR 101 (GPR101) [50], GPR30/GPER-1 [51,52,53,54], GPR109A [55], GPR48 [56,57], GPR87 [58], urotensin-II receptor [59,60], and all subtypes of α1-adrenoceptors (α1-AR), including α1A-AR, α1B-AR, and α1D-AR [61].
There are also significant publications that support the role of EGFR transactivation in various diseases including lung cancer [46,49,62,63,64], breast cancer [51,65,66], oral cancer [67], gastrointestinal carcinoma [68,69], Osteoblasts [70], ovarian cancer [52,71,72], hepatocarcinoma [73], head and neck cancer [74], glioblastoma [75], heart disease [55,59], and renal fibrosis [76].
However, there are some developments worth discussion here.
It was reported that angiotensin-(1–7) inhibits EGFR transactivation via a Mas receptor/Src-dependent pathway [77]. In cultured vascular smooth muscle cells, Ang II and glucose induce the transactivation of EGFR, however, this transactivation is attenuated by angitensin-(1–7) via the activation of Mas receptor [77]. They later showed that Ang-(1–7) acts as a pan-ErbB inhibitor via its Mas receptor [78]. It is well established that GPCR transactivates EGFR through Src, this is the first report that GPCR/Src pathway is involved in the inhibition of EGFR transactivation by other GPCRs.
It was reported that GPRC5A directly binds to EGFR, which negatively regulates EGFR activity [79]. Knockout of GPRC5A enhances EGFR-STAT3 signaling in mouse tracheal epithelial cells and GPRC5A expression inhibits EGF-induced EGFR-STAT3 signaling. Furthermore, GPRC5A associates with EGFR via its 7-transmembrane domains, which is required for the inhibition of EGFR. It was further shown that although the 7-transmembrane domain was found to be required for physical interaction and inhibition of EGFR, none of the individual transmembrane domains was critical for inhibition of EGFR signaling. The authors propose that the interaction between GPRC5A and EGFR impedes the dimerization process of EGFR and restrain EGFR from overactivation following ligand binding; however, in the absence of GPRC5A, the negative regulatory loop on EGFR signaling was disrupted, which leads to the persistent activation of EGFR-STAT3 signaling [79]. It was also shown by FRET that kisspeptin-10 directly associated with EGFR, which leads to the transactivation of EGFR [65]. Previously, very little is known regarding the direct association between GPCR and EGFR. It was reported that somatostatin receptors SSTR1 and SSTR5 associate with EGFR in the absence of agonist, however, SSTR1 and SSTR5 disassociate from EGFR following agonist stimulation. This disassociation modulates EGFR activation and the downstream signaling pathways [80].
GPCR may regulate EGFR activity through the regulation of EGFR degradation pathway. It has been shown that E2/S1P stimulates Cdc42 and blocks EGFR degradation. However, Cdc42 knockdown restores rapid EGFR degradation following E2/S1P activation. Moreover, activation of Cdc42 by E2 is prevented by inhibiting S1P3 receptors, which suggests that S1P receptor plays important role in E2 signaling. This finding provides a novel mechanism to further define the role of E2/S1P on the transactivation of EGFR in breast cancer cells [66]. It was also reported that disruption of lipid raft blocked TGR5 and EGFR interaction. TGR5 signals from plasma membrane rafts that facilitate EGFR interaction and transactivation [81].
It was reported that activation of P2Y2R in human salivary gland cells stimulates the release of neuregulin through metalloprotease, which results the activation of both EGFR and ErbB3 by promoting the heterodimerization of EGFR and ErbB3 [82]. A recent study also support the role of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) in the transactivation of EGFR by GPCR. It was found that FAK coordinates the dynamic assembly and disassembly of a protein complex including both GABA receptor and its effectors, which is essential for the transactivation of EGFR [83]. Moreover, a functional siRNA screen identifies a suite of genes encoding several proteins involved in EGFR transactivation by the angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT1R). These proteins include TRIO, BMjX and CHKA [84].
Some new technologies have also been used to study the transactivation of EGFR and other RTKs by GPCR. Besides the abovementioned FRET technology [65] and siRNA [84], spatial intensity distribution analysis (SpIDA) was also used [85]. SpIDA is based on image analysis, which is able to directly examine the trafficking and oligomerization of endogenous proteins within a single cell. Using this method, it was observed that transactivation of EGFR and TrkB occurred on the same timescale and was directly limited by GPCR activation but the transactivation is independent of the type of the GPCR [85].

6. Challenges and Future Research

As discussed above, while the transactivation of EGFR or other RTK by GPCR continues to attract significant interest from the research community, few significant progress has been made during the last five years. In order to move this research field further, future research has to identify and overcome the various challenges in this field. We believe that the biggest challenge is to understand the molecular mechanism underlying the transactivation of EGFR through ligand-independent pathways, demonstrate the role of transactivation in various disease and develop therapies to target GPCR-mediated EGFR transactivation.
EGFR transactivation by HB-EGF through TMPS mechanism is well defined. EGFR activation by released HB-EGF through TMPS should be quite similar to that by direct HB-EGF stimulation. The mechanism of EGFR activation by ligand is well defined. The activation status and the effects of activated EGFR on downstream signaling cascades and cellular functions are well established. Indeed, the available data regarding EGFR transactivation by cleaved HB-EGF induced by GPCR activation support that the cleaved HB-EGF stimulates the dimerization and phosphorylation of EGFR, which activates various intracellular signaling pathways in the same way as EGFR activated directly by HB-EGF. For example, transactivation of EGFR by released HB-EGF through LPA receptor activation by LPA in Cos-7 cells induces the activation of major EGFR signaling pathways including ERK, PLC-γ1 and PI3K-Akt pathways, which is similar to the direct activation of EGFR by HB-EGF [42].
The weak area that needs specific attention and further research is the transactivation of EGFR by GPCR through ligand-independent pathways (Figure 1C). Regardless how Src is activated by GPCR, it is important to determine how Src activates EGFR, the activation status of Src-activated EGFR, and the effects of Src-activated EGFR on the downstream signaling cascades and cell functions. For example, does Src stimulates the dimerization of EGFR? If yes, how? If not, does Src phosphorylate all the major phosphor tyrosine (Y) residues including Y992, Y1045, Y1068, Y1086, Y1148, and Y1173? If Src only selectively phosphorylates some tyrosine residues of EGFR, what downstream signaling pathways will be active by this partially activated EGFR? What is the physiological consequence of this activation? It was pointed out in a previous review that ligand-independent EGFR transactivation may cause the incomplete activation of EGFR and the downstream signaling cascades [42]. However, no progress has been made.
The only well-established Src-phosphorylated tyrosine residue in EGFR is Y845 [86,87]. However, the effects of Y845 phosphorylation on EGFR activation, the activation of downstream signaling cascade, and the induced-cellular responses are not well defined [86]. For example, Y845 phosphorylation have been shown to regulate cell apoptosis, but some researches indicate an anti-apoptotic role for Y845 phosphorylation [88,89,90,91] and others indicates a pro-apoptotic role of Y845 phosphorylation [92,93,94]. A previous study indicates that EGFR Y845 phosphorylation by Src has no effect on the autophosphorylation of EGFR [87]. However, different from this report, another study shows that EGFR-Y845F mutant augments ligand-stimulated EGFR phosphorylation on its C-terminal tyrosine residues and enhances ligand-induced DNA synthesis [95]. It was further shown that EGFR transphosphorylation at Y845 positively regulates its autophosphorylation, kinase activity and effects on cell proliferation [96].
If only Y845 is phosphorylated in transactivated EGFR through Src by GPCR and all of the major phosphor tyrosine residues are phosphorylated in EGFR transactivated through HB-EGF by GPCR, the overall effects on cellular response will greatly different. Thus, it is essential to understand the mechanisms underlying the transactivation when studying GPCR-induced transactivation of EGFR.
Another research focus should be the clinical relevance of EGFR transactivation by GPCR. While many studies have suggest the relevance of EGFR transactivation by GPCR to various diseases, there is very few clinical data to support the relevance. Most data supporting the cancer-relevance demonstrate the existence of transactivation of EGFR in various cancer cell lines in the lab. Some data are generated with xenograft in mice. Data obtained under these experimental setting show that both EGFR and certain GPCR are co-overexpressed and simultaneous inhibition of both EGFR and GPCR leads to additive or synergistic growth inhibition in cancers [5,62,74,75]. However, as GPCRs have also been shown to stimulate cancer cell proliferation in an-EGFR independent pathway [5,97,98,99], the observed synergism cannot be convincingly attribute to the role of EGFR transactivation by GPCR.
Very few data were obtained with patient samples. It was recently reported that glioblastoma specimens from patients have a 4–17-fold increase in dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) mRNA or 2–4-fold enhancement in protein expression [75]. They also show that the anti-glioblastoma activity of dopamine antagonists is synergistic when combined with EGFR inhibition in cultured cancer cells and in xenograft-bearing mice [75].
To demonstrate the disease-relevance of EGFR transactivation, the most important future research is to obtain data from patients. While it is a difficult task distinguish the effects of EGFR and GPCR activation from the effects of EGFR transactivation by GPCR in a clinical setting, it is very feasible to at least collect significant data to determine whether there is the co-overexpression of EGFR and GPCR in patients and whether this co-overexpression correlates with poor prognosis. It is also important to show whether the combined inhibition of EGFR and GPCR confers synergism in patients by using clinically approved agents. If EGFR transactivation by GPCR plays important role beyond the activation of EGFR and GPCR in diseases, specific disruption of the cross-talk between EGFR and GPCR without inhibition of EGFR and GPCR should have significant inhibitory effects on disease progress. Thus, identification the agents that specifically and efficiently disrupt the transactivation of EGFR by GPCR is an important task in the future research. A likely target of these agents is the ADAM family of matrix metalloproteases if the transactivation of EGFR is through TMPS pathway. If the transactivation of EGFR is through a ligand-independent pathway, the likely target is Src family protein tyrosine kinases. While Src plays important role in cancer independent its role in EGFR transactivation and has been targeted for cancer therapy [100,101], the identification of its role in EGFR transactivation may provide an additional reason to target Src for cancer therapy.

7. Conclusions

Since the first report of EGFR transactivation of GPCR, this topic has attracted enormous attention from the research community. Significant progress has been made, including the elucidation of the mechanisms underlying the transactivation. More and more GPCRs have been identified to be able to transactivate EGFR. Physiological and disease relevance of EGFR transactivation by GPCR have been supported by more data. However, despite continued interest in the research community, no significant progress has been made during the last five years. To significantly advance this research field, future research should be focused on both the molecular mechanisms regarding the transactivation of EGFR through ligand-independent and Src-dependent pathways. The most important task in the future research is to demonstrate the disease relevance of EGFR transactivation by GPCR in clinical settings, and identify potential therapeutic agents to specifically target EGFR transactivation by GPCR.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by CIHR and CBCF to Zhixiang Wang.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Heitzler, D.; Crepieux, P.; Poupon, A.; Clement, F.; Fages, F.; Reiter, E. Towards a systems biology approach of G protein-coupled receptor signalling: Challenges and expectations. Comptes Rendus Biol. 2009, 332, 947–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lee, S.M.; Booe, J.M.; Pioszak, A.A. Structural insights into ligand recognition and selectivity for classes A, B, and C GPCRs. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2015, 763, 196–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lemmon, M.A.; Schlessinger, J. Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell 2010, 141, 1117–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mitsudomi, T.; Yatabe, Y. Epidermal growth factor receptor in relation to tumor development: EGFR gene and cancer. FEBS J. 2010, 277, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bhola, N.E.; Grandis, J.R. Crosstalk between G-protein-coupled receptors and epidermal growth factor receptor in cancer. Front. Biosci. J. Virtual Libr. 2008, 13, 1857–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cattaneo, F.; Guerra, G.; Parisi, M.; de Marinis, M.; Tafuri, D.; Cinelli, M.; Ammendola, R. Cell-surface receptors transactivation mediated by G protein-coupled receptors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 19700–19728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Forrester, S.J.; Kawai, T.; O’Brien, S.; Thomas, W.; Harris, R.C.; Eguchi, S. Epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation: Mechanisms, pathophysiology, and potential therapies in the cardiovascular system. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. George, A.J.; Hannan, R.D.; Thomas, W.G. Unravelling the molecular complexity of GPCR-mediated EGFR transactivation using functional genomics approaches. FEBS J. 2013, 280, 5258–5268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kamato, D.; Rostam, M.A.; Bernard, R.; Piva, T.J.; Mantri, N.; Guidone, D.; Zheng, W.; Osman, N.; Little, P.J. The expansion of GPCR transactivation-dependent signalling to include serine/threonine kinase receptors represents a new cell signalling frontier. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2015, 72, 799–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kolakowski, L.F., Jr. Gcrdb: A G-protein-coupled receptor database. Recept. Channels 1994, 2, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Fredriksson, R.; Lagerstrom, M.C.; Lundin, L.G.; Schioth, H.B. The G-protein-coupled receptors in the human genome form five main families. Phylogenetic analysis, paralogon groups, and fingerprints. Mol. Pharmacol. 2003, 63, 1256–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hoare, S.R. Mechanisms of peptide and nonpeptide ligand binding to class B G-protein-coupled receptors. Drug Discov. Today 2005, 10, 417–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Blume-Jensen, P.; Hunter, T. Oncogenic kinase signalling. Nature 2001, 411, 355–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Citri, A.; Yarden, Y. EGF-ERBB signalling: Towards the systems level. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7, 505–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Arteaga, C.L.; Engelman, J.A. ERBB receptors: From oncogene discovery to basic science to mechanism-based cancer therapeutics. Cancer Cell 2014, 25, 282–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Carpenter, G. Receptors for epidermal growth factor and other polypeptide mitogens. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1987, 56, 881–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sorkin, A.; Goh, L.K. Endocytosis and intracellular trafficking of ErbBs. Exp. Cell Res. 2009, 315, 683–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Pawson, T. Protein modules and signalling networks. Nature 1995, 373, 573–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Pawson, T. Protein-tyrosine kinases-new impressions of SRC and HCK. Nature 1997, 385, 582–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Yarden, Y.; Sliwkowski, M.X. Untangling the ErbB signalling network. Nat. Rev. 2001, 2, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Pearson, G.; Robinson, F.; Gibson, T.B.; Xu, B.E.; Karandikar, M.; Berman, K.; Cobb, M.H. Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways: Regulation and physiological functions. Endocr. Rev. 2001, 22, 153–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Avruch, J. MAP kinase pathways: The first twenty years. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Mol. Cell Res. 2007, 1773, 1150–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wu, P.; Wee, P.; Jiang, J.; Chen, X.; Wang, Z. Differential regulation of transcription factors by location-specific EGF receptor signaling via a spatio-temporal interplay of ERK activation. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e41354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wells, A.; Kassis, J.; Solava, J.; Turner, T.; Lauffenburger, D.A. Growth factor-induced cell motility in tumor invasion. Acta Oncol. 2002, 41, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wang, Z.; Gluck, S.; Zhang, L.; Moran, M.F. Requirement for phospholipase C-gamma1 enzymatic activity in growth factor-induced mitogenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998, 18, 590–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Wang, Z. Akt binds to and phosphorylates phospholipase C-γ1 in response to epidermal growth factor. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2006, 17, 2267–2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Li, S.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Wang, Z. PLC-γ1 and Rac1 coregulate EGF-induced cytoskeleton remodeling and cell migration. Mol. Endocrinol. 2009, 23, 901–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Burgering, B.M.; Coffer, P.J. Protein kinase B (c-Akt) in phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase signal transduction. Nature 1995, 376, 599–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Downward, J. Mechanisms and consequences of activation of protein kinase B/Akt. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1998, 10, 262–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Okano, J.; Gaslightwala, I.; Birnbaum, M.J.; Rustgi, A.K.; Nakagawa, H. Akt/protein kinase B isoforms are differentially regulated by epidermal growth factor stimulation. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 30934–30942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Daub, H.; Weiss, F.U.; Wallasch, C.; Ullrich, A. Role of transactivation of the egf receptor in signalling by G-protein-coupled receptors. Nature 1996, 379, 557–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Daub, H.; Wallasch, C.; Lankenau, A.; Herrlich, A.; Ullrich, A. Signal characteristics of G protein-transactivated EGF receptor. EMBO J. 1997, 16, 7032–7044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Reichardt, H.M.; Kaestner, K.H.; Tuckermann, J.; Kretz, O.; Wessely, O.; Bock, R.; Gass, P.; Schmid, W.; Herrlich, P.; Angel, P.; et al. DNA binding of the glucocorticoid receptor is not essential for survival. Cell 1998, 93, 531–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Heeneman, S.; Haendeler, J.; Saito, Y.; Ishida, M.; Berk, B.C. Angiotensin II induces transactivation of two different populations of the platelet-derived growth factor β receptor. Key role for the p66 adaptor protein Shc. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 15926–15932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lee, F.S.; Chao, M.V. Activation of Trk neurotrophin receptors in the absence of neurotrophins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 3555–3560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lee, F.S.; Rajagopal, R.; Chao, M.V. Distinctive features of Trk neurotrophin receptor transactivation by G protein-coupled receptors. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2002, 13, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tu, H.; Xu, C.; Zhang, W.; Liu, Q.; Rondard, P.; Pin, J.P.; Liu, J. Gabab receptor activation protects neurons from apoptosis via IGF-1 receptor transactivation. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30, 749–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Oligny-Longpre, G.; Corbani, M.; Zhou, J.; Hogue, M.; Guillon, G.; Bouvier, M. Engagement of beta-arrestin by transactivated insulin-like growth factor receptor is needed for V2 vasopressin receptor-stimulated ERK1/2 activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, E1028–E1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Tanimoto, T.; Jin, Z.G.; Berk, B.C. Transactivation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor Flk-1/KDR is involved in sphingosine 1-phosphate-stimulated phosphorylation of Akt and endothelial nitric-oxide synthase (eNOS). J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 42997–43001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Seye, C.I.; Yu, N.; Gonzalez, F.A.; Erb, L.; Weisman, G.A. The P2Y2 nucleotide receptor mediates vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expression through interaction with VEGF receptor-2 (KDR/Flk-1). J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 35679–35686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Rauch, B.H.; Millette, E.; Kenagy, R.D.; Daum, G.; Clowes, A.W. Thrombin- and factor Xa-induced DNA synthesis is mediated by transactivation of fibroblast growth factor receptor-1 in human vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ. Res. 2004, 94, 340–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Liebmann, C. EGF receptor activation by GPCRs: An universal pathway reveals different versions. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2011, 331, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Prenzel, N.; Fischer, O.M.; Streit, S.; Hart, S.; Ullrich, A. The epidermal growth factor receptor family as a central element for cellular signal transduction and diversification. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2001, 8, 11–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ohtsu, H.; Dempsey, P.J.; Eguchi, S. ADAMs as mediators of EGF receptor transactivation by G protein-coupled receptors. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2006, 291, C1–C10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Etkovitz, N.; Tirosh, Y.; Chazan, R.; Jaldety, Y.; Daniel, L.; Rubinstein, S.; Breitbart, H. Bovine sperm acrosome reaction induced by G-protein-coupled receptor agonists is mediated by epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation. Dev. Biol. 2009, 334, 447–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Cattaneo, F.; Iaccio, A.; Guerra, G.; Montagnani, S.; Ammendola, R. Nadph-oxidase-dependent reactive oxygen species mediate egfr transactivation by FPRL1 in WKYMVm-stimulated human lung cancer cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2011, 51, 1126–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Feng, P.H.; Hsiung, T.C.; Kuo, H.P.; Huang, C.D. Cross-talk between bradykinin and epidermal growth factor in regulating IL-6 production in human airway smooth muscle cells. Chang Gung Med. J. 2010, 33, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. Cheng, C.Y.; Tseng, H.C.; Yang, C.M. Bradykinin-mediated cell proliferation depends on transactivation of EGF receptor in corneal fibroblasts. J. Cell. Physiol. 2012, 227, 1367–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Moody, T.W.; Sancho, V.; di Florio, A.; Nuche-Berenguer, B.; Mantey, S.; Jensen, R.T. Bombesin receptor subtype-3 agonists stimulate the growth of lung cancer cells and increase EGF receptor tyrosine phosphorylation. Peptides 2011, 32, 1677–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Cho-Clark, M.; Larco, D.O.; Semsarzadeh, N.N.; Vasta, F.; Mani, S.K.; Wu, T.J. GnRH-(1–5) transactivates egfr in ishikawa human endometrial cells via an orphan G protein-coupled receptor. Mol. Endocrinol. 2014, 28, 80–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Girgert, R.; Emons, G.; Grundker, C. Inactivation of GPR30 reduces growth of triple-negative breast cancer cells: Possible application in targeted therapy. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2012, 134, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Fujiwara, S.; Terai, Y.; Kawaguchi, H.; Takai, M.; Yoo, S.; Tanaka, Y.; Tanaka, T.; Tsunetoh, S.; Sasaki, H.; Kanemura, M.; et al. GPR30 regulates the EGFR-Akt cascade and predicts lower survival in patients with ovarian cancer. J. Ovarian Res. 2012, 5, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kurt, A.H.; Tiftik, R.N.; Un, I.; Ulker, S.; Buyukafsar, K. G protein-coupled estrogen receptor1 (GPER1) may mediate Rho-kinase (rock-2) up-regulation in coronary endothelial cells. Endocr. Regul. 2013, 47, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Jang, E.J.; Seok, Y.M.; Arterburn, J.B.; Olatunji, L.A.; Kim, I.K. GPER-1 agonist G1 induces vasorelaxation through activation of epidermal growth factor receptor-dependent signalling pathway. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2013, 65, 1488–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Li, G.; Deng, X.; Wu, C.; Zhou, Q.; Chen, L.; Shi, Y.; Huang, H.; Zhou, N. Distinct kinetic and spatial patterns of protein kinase C (PKC)- and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-dependent activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 by human nicotinic acid receptor GPR109A. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 31199–31212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wang, Z.; Jin, C.; Li, H.; Li, C.; Hou, Q.; Liu, M.; Dong Xda, E.; Tu, L. GPR48-induced keratinocyte proliferation occurs through HB-EGF mediated EGFR transactivation. FEBS Lett. 2010, 584, 4057–4062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Pan, H.; Cui, H.; Liu, S.; Qian, Y.; Wu, H.; Li, L.; Guan, Y.; Guan, X.; Zhang, L.; Fan, H.Y.; et al. LGR4 gene regulates corpus luteum maturation through modulation of the WNT-mediated EGFR-ERK signaling pathway. Endocrinology 2014, 155, 3624–3637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Ochiai, S.; Furuta, D.; Sugita, K.; Taniura, H.; Fujita, N. GPR87 mediates lysophosphatidic acid-induced colony dispersal in A431 cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2013, 715, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Esposito, G.; Perrino, C.; Cannavo, A.; Schiattarella, G.G.; Borgia, F.; Sannino, A.; Pironti, G.; Gargiulo, G.; di Serafino, L.; Franzone, A.; et al. EGFR trans-activation by urotensin II receptor is mediated by β-arrestin recruitment and confers cardioprotection in pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2011, 106, 577–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Rodriguez-Moyano, M.; Diaz, I.; Dionisio, N.; Zhang, X.; Avila-Medina, J.; Calderon-Sanchez, E.; Trebak, M.; Rosado, J.A.; Ordonez, A.; Smani, T. Urotensin-II promotes vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation through store-operated calcium entry and EGFR transactivation. Cardiovasc. Res. 2013, 100, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Ulu, N.; Henning, R.H.; Guner, S.; Zoto, T.; Duman-Dalkilic, B.; Duin, M.; Gurdal, H. Intracellular transactivation of epidermal growth factor receptor by α1A-adrenoceptor is mediated by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase independently of activation of extracellular signal regulated kinases 1/2 and serine-threonine kinases in chinese hamster ovary cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2013, 347, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  62. Kuzumaki, N.; Suzuki, A.; Narita, M.; Hosoya, T.; Nagasawa, A.; Imai, S.; Yamamizu, K.; Morita, H.; Suzuki, T.; Okada, Y.; et al. Multiple analyses of G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) expression in the development of gefitinib-resistance in transforming non-small-cell lung cancer. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e44368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Lin, X.; Zhong, S.; Ye, X.; Liao, Y.; Yao, F.; Yang, X.; Sun, B.; Zhang, J.; Li, Q.; Gao, Y.; et al. EGFR phosphorylates and inhibits lung tumor suppressor GPRC5A in lung cancer. Mol. Cancer 2014, 13, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Moody, T.W.; Mantey, S.A.; Moreno, P.; Nakamura, T.; Lacivita, E.; Leopoldo, M.; Jensen, R.T. ML-18 is a non-peptide bombesin receptor subtype-3 antagonist which inhibits lung cancer growth. Peptides 2015, 64, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Zajac, M.; Law, J.; Cvetkovic, D.D.; Pampillo, M.; McColl, L.; Pape, C.; di Guglielmo, G.M.; Postovit, L.M.; Babwah, A.V.; Bhattacharya, M. GPR54 (KISS1R) transactivates EGFR to promote breast cancer cell invasiveness. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e21599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Sukocheva, O.; Wadham, C.; Xia, P. Estrogen defines the dynamics and destination of transactivated EGF receptor in breast cancer cells: Role of S1P(3) receptor and Cdc42. Exp. Cell Res. 2013, 319, 455–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Brusevold, I.J.; Tveteraas, I.H.; Aasrum, M.; Odegard, J.; Sandnes, D.L.; Christoffersen, T. Role of LPAR3, PKC and EGFR in LPA-induced cell migration in oral squamous carcinoma cells. BMC Cancer 2014, 14, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Yoshida, K.; Fujino, H.; Otake, S.; Seira, N.; Regan, J.W.; Murayama, T. Induction of cyclooxygenase-2 expression by prostaglandin E2 stimulation of the prostanoid EP4 receptor via coupling to galphai and transactivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor in HCA-7 human colon cancer cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2013, 718, 408–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Tveteraas, I.H.; Aasrum, M.; Brusevold, I.J.; Odegard, J.; Christoffersen, T.; Sandnes, D. Lysophosphatidic acid induces both EGFR-dependent and EGFR-independent effects on DNA synthesis and migration in pancreatic and colorectal carcinoma cells. Tumour Biol. J. Int. Soc. Oncodev. Biol. Med. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Huang, C.Y.; Chen, S.Y.; Tsai, H.C.; Hsu, H.C.; Tang, C.H. Thrombin induces epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation and CCL2 expression in human osteoblasts. Arthritis Rheum. 2012, 64, 3344–3354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Yu, Y.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, X.; Cai, Q.; Zhu, Z.; Jiang, W.; Xu, C. Transactivation of epidermal growth factor receptor through platelet-activating factor/receptor in ovarian cancer cells. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. CR 2014, 33, 856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Yu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Hong, S.; Zhang, M.; Cai, Q.; Jiang, W.; Xu, C. Epidermal growth factor induces platelet-activating factor production through receptors transactivation and cytosolic phospholipase A2 in ovarian cancer cells. J. Ovarian Res. 2014, 7, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Tveteraas, I.H.; Muller, K.M.; Aasrum, M.; Odegard, J.; Dajani, O.; Guren, T.; Sandnes, D.; Christoffersen, T. Mechanisms involved in PGE2-induced transactivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor in MH1C1 hepatocarcinoma cells. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012, 31, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Bhola, N.E.; Thomas, S.M.; Freilino, M.; Joyce, S.; Sahu, A.; Maxwell, J.; Argiris, A.; Seethala, R.; Grandis, J.R. Targeting GPCR-mediated P70S6K activity may improve head and neck cancer response to cetuximab. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 4996–5004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Li, J.; Zhu, S.; Kozono, D.; Ng, K.; Futalan, D.; Shen, Y.; Akers, J.C.; Steed, T.; Kushwaha, D.; Schlabach, M.; et al. Genome-wide shrna screen revealed integrated mitogenic signaling between dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in glioblastoma. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 882–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Chung, H.; Ramachandran, R.; Hollenberg, M.D.; Muruve, D.A. Proteinase-activated receptor-2 transactivation of epidermal growth factor receptor and transforming growth factor-β receptor signaling pathways contributes to renal fibrosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 37319–37331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Akhtar, S.; Yousif, M.H.; Dhaunsi, G.S.; Chandrasekhar, B.; Al-Farsi, O.; Benter, I.F. Angiotensin-(1–7) inhibits epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation via a mas receptor-dependent pathway. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2012, 165, 1390–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Akhtar, S.; Chandrasekhar, B.; Attur, S.; Dhaunsi, G.S.; Yousif, M.H.; Benter, I.F. Transactivation of ErbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases is inhibited by angiotensin-(1–7) via its mas receptor. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0141657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Zhong, S.; Yin, H.; Liao, Y.; Yao, F.; Li, Q.; Zhang, J.; Jiao, H.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, D.; Liu, S.; et al. Lung tumor suppressor GPRC5A binds EGFR and restrains its effector signaling. Cancer Res. 2015, 75, 1801–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Watt, H.L.; Kharmate, G.D.; Kumar, U. Somatostatin receptors 1 and 5 heterodimerize with epidermal growth factor receptor: Agonist-dependent modulation of the downstream MAPK signalling pathway in breast cancer cells. Cell Signal. 2009, 21, 428–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Jensen, D.D.; Godfrey, C.B.; Niklas, C.; Canals, M.; Kocan, M.; Poole, D.P.; Murphy, J.E.; Alemi, F.; Cottrell, G.S.; Korbmacher, C.; et al. The bile acid receptor TGR5 does not interact with beta-arrestins or traffic to endosomes but transmits sustained signals from plasma membrane rafts. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 22942–22960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Ratchford, A.M.; Baker, O.J.; Camden, J.M.; Rikka, S.; Petris, M.J.; Seye, C.I.; Erb, L.; Weisman, G.A. P2Y2 nucleotide receptors mediate metalloprotease-dependent phosphorylation of epidermal growth factor receptor and ErbB3 in human salivary gland cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 7545–7555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Lin, X.; Li, X.; Jiang, M.; Chen, L.; Xu, C.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, H.; Sun, B.; Xu, X.; Nan, F.; et al. An activity-based probe reveals dynamic protein-protein interactions mediating IGF-1R transactivation by the GABA(B) receptor. Biochem. J. 2012, 443, 627–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. George, A.J.; Purdue, B.W.; Gould, C.M.; Thomas, D.W.; Handoko, Y.; Qian, H.; Quaife-Ryan, G.A.; Morgan, K.A.; Simpson, K.J.; Thomas, W.G.; et al. A functional sirna screen identifies genes modulating angiotensin II-mediated EGFR transactivation. J. Cell Sci. 2013, 126, 5377–5390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Swift, J.L.; Godin, A.G.; Dore, K.; Freland, L.; Bouchard, N.; Nimmo, C.; Sergeev, M.; de Koninck, Y.; Wiseman, P.W.; Beaulieu, J.M. Quantification of receptor tyrosine kinase transactivation through direct dimerization and surface density measurements in single cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 7016–7021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Sato, K. Cellular functions regulated by phosphorylation of EGFR on Tyr845. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 10761–10790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Tice, D.A.; Biscardi, J.S.; Nickles, A.L.; Parsons, S.J. Mechanism of biological synergy between cellular Src and epidermal growth factor receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 1415–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Kim, J.H.; Xu, C.; Keum, Y.S.; Reddy, B.; Conney, A.; Kong, A.N. Inhibition of EGFR signaling in human prostate cancer PC-3 cells by combination treatment with β-phenylethyl isothiocyanate and curcumin. Carcinogenesis 2006, 27, 475–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Amorino, G.P.; Deeble, P.D.; Parsons, S.J. Neurotensin stimulates mitogenesis of prostate cancer cells through a novel c-Src/Stat5b pathway. Oncogene 2007, 26, 745–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Ray, R.M.; Bhattacharya, S.; Johnson, L.R. EGFR plays a pivotal role in the regulation of polyamine-dependent apoptosis in intestinal epithelial cells. Cell Signal. 2007, 19, 2519–2527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Samarakoon, R.; Higgins, S.P.; Higgins, C.E.; Higgins, P.J. TGF-beta1-induced plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression in vascular smooth muscle cells requires pp60(c-Src)/EGFR(y845) and Rho/rock signaling. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2008, 44, 527–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Reinehr, R.; Becker, S.; Wettstein, M.; Haussinger, D. Involvement of the Src family kinase yes in bile salt-induced apoptosis. Gastroenterology 2004, 127, 1540–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Reinehr, R.; Becker, S.; Eberle, A.; Grether-Beck, S.; Haussinger, D. Involvement of nadph oxidase isoforms and Src family kinases in CD95-dependent hepatocyte apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 27179–27194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Wang, C.Y.; Wang, Y.T.; Tzeng, D.W.; Yang, J.L. Lead acetate induces EGFR activation upstream of SFK and PKCalpha linkage to the Ras/Raf-1/ERK signaling. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2009, 235, 244–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Gotoh, N.; Tojo, A.; Hino, M.; Yazaki, Y.; Shibuya, M. A highly conserved tyrosine residue at codon 845 within the kinase domain is not required for the transforming activity of human epidermal growth factor receptor. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1992, 186, 768–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Song, H.; Huang, L.; Zhang, M.; Wang, X.; Song, S.; Yang, L. Transphosphorylation of EGFR at Y845 plays an important role in its autophosphorylation and kinase activity. Oncol. Rep. 2014, 31, 2393–2398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Krysan, K.; Reckamp, K.L.; Dalwadi, H.; Sharma, S.; Rozengurt, E.; Dohadwala, M.; Dubinett, S.M. Prostaglandin E2 activates mitogen-activated protein kinase/ERK pathway signaling and cell proliferation in non-small cell lung cancer cells in an epidermal growth factor receptor-independent manner. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 6275–6281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Thomas, S.M.; Bhola, N.E.; Zhang, Q.; Contrucci, S.C.; Wentzel, A.L.; Freilino, M.L.; Gooding, W.E.; Siegfried, J.M.; Chan, D.C.; Grandis, J.R. Cross-talk between G protein-coupled receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathways contributes to growth and invasion of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 11831–11839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Piiper, A.; Elez, R.; You, S.J.; Kronenberger, B.; Loitsch, S.; Roche, S.; Zeuzem, S. Cholecystokinin stimulates extracellular signal-regulated kinase through activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor, yes, and protein kinase C. Signal amplification at the level of Raf by activation of protein kinase cepsilon. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 7065–7072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Guarino, M. Src signaling in cancer invasion. J. Cell. Physiol. 2010, 223, 14–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Chen, Q.; Zhou, Z.; Shan, L.; Zeng, H.; Hua, Y.; Cai, Z. The importance of Src signaling in sarcoma. Oncol. Lett. 2015, 10, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Z. Transactivation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor by G Protein-Coupled Receptors: Recent Progress, Challenges and Future Research. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 95. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms17010095

AMA Style

Wang Z. Transactivation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor by G Protein-Coupled Receptors: Recent Progress, Challenges and Future Research. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016; 17(1):95. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms17010095

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Zhixiang. 2016. "Transactivation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor by G Protein-Coupled Receptors: Recent Progress, Challenges and Future Research" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 17, no. 1: 95. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms17010095

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop