Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Mitochondrial DNA Polymorphisms in the Human Cell Lines HepaRG and SJCRH30
Next Article in Special Issue
Identification of QTLs for Stripe Rust Resistance in a Recombinant Inbred Line Population
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of a Surface-Active Protein Extracted from a Marine Strain of Penicillium chrysogenum
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genome Wide Association Study of Karnal Bunt Resistance in a Wheat Germplasm Collection from Afghanistan
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 20
Issue 13
10.3390/ijms20133243
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

LMM24 Encodes Receptor-Like Cytoplasmic Kinase 109, Which Regulates Cell Death and Defense Responses in Rice

by
Yue Zhang
†,
Qunen Liu
†,
Yingxin Zhang
†,
Yuyu Chen
,
Ning Yu
,
Yongrun Cao
,
Xiaodeng Zhan
,
Shihua Cheng
* and
Liyong Cao
*
Key Laboratory for Zhejiang Super Rice Research and State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 310006, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(13), 3243; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms20133243
Submission received: 8 May 2019 / Revised: 27 June 2019 / Accepted: 1 July 2019 / Published: 2 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mapping Plant Genes that Confer Resistance to Biotic Stress)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Lesion mimic mutants are excellent models for research on molecular mechanisms of cell death and defense responses in rice. We identified a new rice lesion mimic mutant lmm24 from a mutant pool of indica rice cultivar “ZhongHui8015”. The LMM24 gene was identified by MutMap, and LMM24 was confirmed as a receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase 109 by amino acid sequence analysis. The lmm24 mutant displayed dark brown lesions in leaves and growth retardation that were not observed in wild-type ZH8015. The results of histochemical staining and TUNEL assays showed enhanced ROS accumulation and cell death in lmm24. Chloroplast degradation was observed in lmm24 leaves, with decreased expression of photosynthesis-related genes and increased expression of the senescence-induced STAYGREEN (SGR) gene and other senescence-associated genes. Furthermore, lmm24 exhibited enhanced resistance to rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae (M. oryzae) and up-regulation of defense response genes. Our data demonstrate that LMM24 regulates cell death and defense responses in rice.

1. Introduction

Lesion mimic mutants (LMMs) display spontaneous lesions in the absence of pathogen attack, environmental stress, or mechanical damage [1], exhibiting a similar phenotype to the pathogen infection-induced hypersensitive response (HR) mediated through programmed cell death (PCD) [2]. Programmed cell death plays an important role in the innate immunity of plants by initiating the cell death process to defend against pathogen infection [3]. In fact, most LMMs show increased resistance to pathogens: The spl30 mutant shows enhanced resistance to the bacterial pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae pv oryzae (Xoo); dj-lm shows enhanced resistance to rice blast (M. oryzae) [4]; and oscul3a shows enhanced resistance to both M. oryzae and Xoo [5,6]. These findings suggest that LMM genes are involved in regulating the plant defense response. Cloning and characterization of LMM genes will likely provide new insights into complex defense pathways in plants.
Lesion mimic mutants have been reported in various plants, such as Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) [7], maize (Zea mays L.) [8], rice (Oryza sativa L.) [9], wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) [10], and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) [11]. In recent years, more and more LMM genes with diverse pathogenesis of lesions have been isolated and characterized in rice. For example, NLS1 encodes an ancient class of CC-NB-LRR-type resistance proteins, with single amino acid substitutions that lead to constitutive activation of defense responses [12]; the SPL11 gene encodes a U-Box/ARM protein, and loss of activity of this protein results in out of control PCD [13]; HPL3 encodes a hydroperoxide lyase, where loss of enzyme function reduces wound-induced green leaf volatile (GLV) emission but increases jasmonic acid (JA) accumulation, producing disease-resembling lesions spread throughout the entirety leaves [14]; and monocot-specific receptor-like kinase SDS2 positively regulates plant cell death and immunity in rice where plants over-expressing SDS2 show cell death on leaves and accumulate higher levels of ROS [15]. Light also plays an important role in the development of lesion mimics in LMMs: the mutant NPR1-OX exhibited a lesion phenotype when grown under low-intensity light conditions (12 h day and night cycle, 28 °C, 90% relative humidity) [16].
Receptor-like cytoplasmic kinases (RLCKs) in plants belong to the super family of receptor-like kinases (RLKs), which lack extracellular ligand-binding domains but show homology to RLKs in kinase domains. Previously, 149 and 379 RLCK encoding genes were identified from Arabidopsis and rice, respectively [17,18]. According to sequence homology, Arabidopsis and rice RLCKs are classified into 17 subgroups and are referred to as RLCK-II and RLCK-IV–RLCK-XIX [19]. Receptor-like cytoplasmic kinases play important roles in diverse developmental processes in plants. By associating with immune receptor kinases (RKs), RLCKs regulate multiple downstream signaling nodes to trigger defense responses against microbial pathogens. OsRLCK176 interacts with chitin elicitor receptor kinase 1 (OsCERK1) and functions downstream of OsCERK1 in the peptidoglycan (PGN) and chitin signaling pathways [20]. Lines expressing RNAi constructs against OsRLCK57, OsRLCK107, and OsRLCK118 result in a burst of ROS and induction of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes by chitin and PGN [21]. Xa21 encodes a receptor-like protein kinase consisting of 1025 amino acids that mediates resistance to Xoo by identifying signaling molecules. Silencing of OsRLCK102 affects Xa21-mediated resistance to Xoo, indicating that OsRLCK102 regulates Xa21-mediated immunity [22]. OsRLCK185 transmits OsCERK1-mediated chitin signaling to activate a MAPK cascade of immune responses to regulate rice resistance to M. oryzae [23]. Receptor-like cytoplasmic kinases also play a role in sexual reproduction [24], stomatal patterning [25], brassinosteroid signaling [26], plant adaptation to abiotic stresses [27], and other developmental processes [28].
MutMap is a method of rapid gene isolation based on whole-genome sequencing [29]. By resequencing the whole genome of a mutant strain, the researchers can obtain all the sequence differences of the mutant genome from the wild-type genome where the only expected differences are related to the mutant phenotype [30]. With MutMap, researchers use a mutagen to mutagenize a rice cultivar to obtain a mutant parent. This mutant is then crossed with a wild-type (WT) parental line. The F1 plants are self-pollinated to generate an F2 population; and DNA from multiple recessive mutant F2 progeny are used for sequencing analysis. The results of sequencing the progeny pool are compared with that of the wild-type pool, and the different sites are used to identify the gene locus associated with the mutant phenotype [31]. In recent years, this technique has been successfully applied for gene mapping in rice: the rice grain size gene WTG1 was cloned by MutMap [32]; Wang et al. (2018) identified a regulator of endosperm development in rice by a modified MutMap method [33]; and Fekih et al. (2013) applied MutMap+ for identification of the Hit9188 mutant with pale-green and dwarf phenotypes [34].
In this study, we identified a lesion mimic mutant, named lmm24, from the mutant pool of the cultivar ZhongHui8015. The lmm24 mutant exhibited spontaneous lesions in leaves. Through physiological and biochemical analyses, we found abnormal ROS accumulation and cell death and early leaf senescence in lmm24. Moreover, lmm24 exhibited enhanced resistance to M. oryzae. Finally, we successfully cloned the LMM24 gene using the MutMap method and found that it encodes the receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase 109.

2. Results

2.1. Characterization of the lmm24 Mutant

The growth of lmm24 was significantly weaker than that of ZhongHui8015 (ZH8015) starting at the seedling stage (Figure 1A) and proceeding throughout the duration of growth of plants. Dark brown lesions began to appear in the lower leaves of lmm24 at the seedling stage (25 days post-sowing (dps)) in the field in summer. Individuals of lmm24 grown in the greenhouse showed lesions at 20 dps (28 °C, 8 h dark, 16 h light), which then spread from the leaf tip to the entire leaf. However, prior to 25 dps, the leaves of the mutant had no lesions (similar to ZH8015 leaves). Moreover, the newly emerging leaves showed no lesions but gradually developed lesions as the plant developed (Figure 1B,C). There were fewer lesions on the flag leaf at the maturation period, which may be related to the temperature and level of illumination of the environment (Figure 1E).
Numerous studies on LMMs have shown that light is an important factor affecting the occurrence of lesions. In order to determine whether lesion formation in lmm24 was affected by light, we conducted an antiglare assay on both ZH8015 and lmm24. The same size of aluminum foil was used to cover newly emerging leaves of the mutant and ZH8015 to prevent light exposure (Figure 1D). In lmm24, areas without exposure to light did not have lesions compared to areas exposed to light. There were no differences between the two parts in ZH8015. Thus, we determined that lmm24 develops lesions in a light-dependent manner.
In addition, compared with ZH8015, plant height, tiller number, grain size, 1000 grain weight, and seed setting rate of lmm24 were significantly reduced (Figure 1F,G and Figure S1).

2.2. Abnormal ROS Accumulation and Cell Death in lmm24

We speculated that the lesion phenotype of LMMs is the result of ROS accumulation leading to cell death. Thus, we investigated ROS accumulation and cell death in lmm24 leaves. Evans blue solution can enter cells undergoing death but cannot enter living cells, so Evans blue staining is a histochemical indicator of cell death. The reagent 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) was used to indicate the accumulation of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Histochemical staining results showed that lmm24 had many Evans blue spots after staining, whereas ZH8015 did not (Figure 2A), indicating mass cell death in lmm24. Comparing DAB staining between the mutant and ZH8015, we found that lmm24 had much stronger H2O2 accumulation than ZH8015 (Figure 2B). Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL) assay is another method to detect cell death. When the cell dies, the DNA breaks and the exposed 3’-OH can be added to fluorescein by the TUNEL reagent, which can be detected by fluorescence microscopy. Our TUNEL assay carried out to detect DNA fragmentation in lmm24 and ZH8015 indicated stronger TUNEL signals were detected in the leaves of lmm24 (Figure 2C), which also suggests that there was much more cell death in lmm24.

2.3. Early Leaf Senescence in lmm24

A common feature of most LMMs is that leaf senescence is a consequence of uncontrolled PCD. The degradation of chloroplasts is a critical indicator of leaf senescence, so we compared the ultrastructure of chloroplasts in lmm24 and ZH8015 using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Chloroplasts were well-developed with rich lamellae and a small number of osmiophilic bodies in ZH8015 (Figure 3A–C), whereas chloroplast membranes were broken and the thylakoid lamellae had loosely arranged mesophyll cells surrounding the lesion areas in lmm24 (Figure 3D–F). Expression levels of photosynthesis-related genes (psaB, psbA, psbB, psbC, cab2R, rpoA, CHLI, CHLD) were significantly down-regulated in lmm24 mutant leaves (Figure 3G), while expression levels of the senescence-induced STAYGREEN (SGR) gene and senescence-associated genes (Osl2, Osl30, Osl43, Osl85) were significantly up-regulated (Figure 3H). At the same time, Ubiquitin was used as a reference gene to analyze the relative expression levels of the above genes, and the results were consistent with the results of β-actin1 as a reference gene (Figure S2). Overall, these results suggest that early leaf senescence occurs in lmm24.

2.4. lmm24 Shows Enhanced Resistance to M. oryzae

Previous studies indicated that some LMMs show enhanced resistance to fungal and bacterial pathogens. To determine whether lmm24 also confers higher resistance to pathogens, we employed the leaf spraying (seedling stage) and punch inoculation (tillering stage) methods to infect ZH8015 and lmm24 plants with the virulent M. oryzae isolate 12-144-1-1 (Figure 4A,B). Seedlings of both the mutant and ZH8015 showed susceptibility, but the morbidity rate of ZH8015 was more serious than that of the mutant. ZH8015 was obviously susceptible at the tillering stage while the mutant was minimally susceptible to disease. The statistical results of lesion area in the two growth stages showed that ZH8015 had significantly higher areas with lesions than the mutant (Figure 4C,D), indicating that lmm24 enhanced resistance to M. oryzae. To determine the mechanism of enhanced resistance of lmm24, we investigated the transcription level of PR genes (PR1a, PBZ1, PR1b, PAL1, AOS2, WRKY45) in ZH8015 and lmm24 (Figure 4E,F); these genes were all significantly upregulated in lmm24. The same experiment was performed using Ubiquitin as a reference gene. Expression levels of PR genes were also significantly greater in lmm24 than in ZH8015 (Figure S3). Together, these results suggested that the lmm24 mutant gene triggered a defense response to M. oryzae, which led to enhanced disease resistance associated with lesion formation in lmm24.

2.5. Genetic Analysis and Use of the MutMap Method to Clone the LMM24 Gene

To isolate the potential causal gene of the observed mutant phenotype, we crossed lmm24 with ZH8015. F1 plants were self-pollinated to obtain F2 progeny. All F1 plants exhibited a ZH8015 phenotype while the F2 progeny exhibited a ZH8015/mutant ratio of 3:1 (Table S1), suggesting that the phenotype of lmm24 was controlled by a single recessive nuclear gene.
The MutMap method was used to map the lmm24 gene. From the F2 population, 30 individual plants with mutant phenotypes were selected to extract DNA which were pooled (pool-M) for genome-wide resequencing. We obtained 22,155,026,400 clean base pairs from pool-M and 6,754,683,300 clean base pairs from ZH8015 pool (pool-WT). Compared with the reference genome, the mapping rate of pool-M was 97.78% and the average depth was 50×; the mapping rate of pool-WT was 97.69% and average depth was 16× (Table S3 and Table S4). These results indicate that the quality and depth of sequencing sufficient for the subsequent SNP analysis.
We used the UnifiedGenotyper module of the GATK3.3 (Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA) software to detect multiple sample SNPs, filtered using VariantFiltration, and annotated SNP results with ANNOVAR (Columbia University, New York, NY, USA). According to the method described by Akira Abe et al. [29], we calculated the SNP index of each SNP and plotted the SNP distributions of 12 chromosomes in rice (Figure S4). Regions with a SNP index of 1 are considered candidate regions for the lmm24 mutant phenotype. Fortunately, only one region on chromosome 3 was selected as a candidate, corresponding to the rice gene BGIOSGA012679 (LOC_Os03g24930) (Figure 5A). We sequenced the cDNA of LOC_Os03g24930 and found two nucleotide mutations (C1009-to-T, C1055-to-T) and a 54 bp insertion; these two loci were in the fourth exon of this gene leading to amino acid changes (Figure 5B). In order to verify the 54 bp insertion, we extracted the DNA of 15 individual plants with mutant phenotypes in the F2 group and carried out agarose gel electrophoresis using a molecular marker at the insertion site (4th Exons F/R, Table S2). The results showed that the 54 bp insertion was present in all 15 individual plants (Figure 5C). Thus, LOC_Os03g24930 is a candidate gene for LMM24.

2.6. Functional Complementation with LOC_Os03g24930 in the lmm24

To verify that LOC_Os03g24930 is the LMM24 gene, the vector COM-lmm24 containing a 5192 bp genomic fragment of ZH8015, consisting of the 1842 bp upstream promoter and 1166 bp downstream terminator of LOC_Os03g24930, was constructed. This vector was then introduced into lmm24 by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation. Of 32 regenerated T0 plants, 27 were positive transformants, and all of them were similar in phenotype to ZH8015 and thus the mutant phenotype of lmm24 was restored. There were no lesions on the leaves (Figure 6A–C). We performed histochemical staining experiments on the leaves of T1 plants. DAB staining results showed that the T1 positive transgenic plants, such as ZH8015, had little accumulation of H2O2 in the leaves. Evans blue staining showed that there was less cell death in the leaves of T1 transgenic plants compared with lmm24. Thus, we determined that mutations on the fourth exon of LOC_Os03g24930 likely caused the mutant phenotype of lmm24.

2.7. LMM24 Encodes Receptor-Like Cytoplasmic Kinase 109 in Rice

As annotated on RGAP (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu), LOC_Os03g24930 (LMM24) is composed of four exons and three introns, a genomic DNA (gDNA) sequence of 2185 bp, a coding sequence of 1344 nucleotides, and encodes a putative 448 amino acid protein with a tyrosine protein kinase domain. Previous research showed that LMM24 encodes receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase 109 (OsRLCK109) [18]. RLCKs in plants belong to the super family of receptor-like kinases (RLKs), which lack extracellular ligand-binding domains. The predicted protein scheme for OsRLCK109 shows a kinase domain (Figure 7A); 108–393 amino acids encode the kinase domain. Multiple series of alignments revealed that this sequence is highly conserved (Figure 7B), and that the LMM24 mutation site is in this conserved sequence.

2.8. Subcellular Localization of OsRLCK109

To determine the subcellular localization of OsRLCK109, we fused OsRLCK109 with GFP, under the control of the constitutive cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter, to obtain the construct 35S::RLCK109-GFP. Then, we transformed the 35S::RLCK109-GFP plasmid into rice protoplasts and co-transformed an 35S::Ghd7.1-CFP plasmid expressed in the nucleus as a marker [35]. We observed the fluorescent signals under a confocal microscope and found green fluorescent signals in both cytoplasm and nucleus where the signal in the nucleus was stronger than in the cytoplasm. This stronger GFP signal was co-localized with the nucleus marker Ghd7.1-CFP (Figure 8). These results suggest that the OsRLCK109 protein was localized mainly in the nucleus but there is also a weaker signal in the cytoplasm.

3. Discussion

3.1. LMM24 is the OsRLCK109 Gene and Functional Mutation of OsRLCK109 Leads to the Mutant Phenotype

Many LMMs have been identified in rice and have been widely applied to the study of PCD and defense responses. In this study, we isolated an LMM, lmm24, from the mutant pool of indica rice “ZhongHui8015”. Dark brown lesions spontaneously formed in lmm24. Moreover, compared with ZH8015, mutant plants were shorter and had fewer tillers, a later growth period, and lower yield (Figure 1 and Figure S1). Like most LMMs, the lesions mainly appeared on the leaves and the growth of the plant was affected; however, the lesions of lmm24 differed from those of most LMMs because production of lesions were light-dependent (Figure 1). The LMM24 gene was identified as LOC_Os03g24930 by MutMap, which encodes OsRLCK109. Sequencing results showed that the replacement of two single bases and a 54 bp insertion occurred on the fourth exon of LMM24, resulting in the change of two amino acids in the kinase domain of OsRLCK109. Mutagenesis by EMS often results in single-base mutations, with fewer examples of large fragment insertions and single-base mutations. The functional complementation of OsRLCK109 restored the mutant to the wild-type phenotype, indicating that the functional mutation of OsRLCK109 is responsible for the mutant phenotypes.

3.2. Cell Death and Early Leaf Senescence are Caused by Functional Mutation of OsRLCK109

The lmm24 mutant displayed spontaneous cell death from the seedling stage to the yellow mature stage. Experimental results show accumulation of H2O2 in lmm24. H2O2 is a major by-product of beta-oxidation and acts as a signal molecule in the promotion of cell death, thus, excessive accumulation of H2O2 is the main cause of lesion formation. Like most LMMs, lmm24 accumulates H2O2 only on leaves. Unfortunately, more research is needed to find the cause. Early leaf senescence also occurred in lmm24 and we found chloroplast degradation in lesion areas of lmm24 by TEM as well as down-regulation of photosynthesis-related genes and up-regulation of the SGR gene and senescence-associated genes. In previous studies on early leaf senescence, senescence and lesions were described as two different traits; only a few studies have described early leaf senescence as one of the characteristics of LMMs [6,9]. We believe that lesions are typical of early leaf senescence and that leaf senescence in LMMs usually happens rapidly, providing a unique tool for understanding leaf senescence.

3.3. OsRLCK109 Regulates Defense Response in Rice from Disease

The defense response is activated in LMMs to increase broad-spectrum disease resistance to pathogens. We found that lmm24 improved resistance to rice blast by inoculation experiments and that PR genes were all significantly upregulated. These results suggest that the defense response is activated in lmm24, but the molecular mechanism of this resistance is unclear. LMM24 encodes OsRLCK109 and, reportedly, RLCKs play a key role in the transmission of immune signals, by associating with immune RKs. Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) located on the plasma membrane are required to perceive the conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) during plant innate immunity. Chitin elicitor receptor kinase 1 (OsCERK1) is a type of PRR; the RLCK family members OsRLCK185, OsRLCK176, OsRLCK57, OsRLCK107, and OsRLCK118 were all reported to be located at the plasma membrane because of their interactions with OsCERK1. However, in our study, OsRLCK109 was located in the nucleus and cytoplasm, so we speculated that OsRLCK109 is involved in an immune pathway different from these RLCKs, but further experimental evidence is needed to support our inference.
In conclusion, functional mutation of OsRLCK109 induces spontaneous lesions in leaves and enhances defense responses in lmm24. Our results suggest that OsRLCK109 may play an important role in regulating cell death and defense responses in rice. Recent advances suggest a key role of RLCKs in RK-mediated signaling. Correspondingly, most RLCKs are localized to the cell membrane. In this study, RLCK109 was mainly located in the nucleus, which differs from findings of previous studies and may provide new avenues to further investigate the role of RLCKs in the immune signaling pathway.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material and Growth Conditions

The lmm24 mutant was isolated from a mutant pool of indica rice ZH8015 by ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS) treatment. A cross was made between lmm24 and ZH8015, the first filial generation (F1) was self-pollinated, and the second generation (F2) was used for genetic analysis. The lmm24 and ZH8015 seeds were grown in a plant growth chamber (14 h light/10 h dark, 28/25 °C, 90% relative humidity) for an inoculation experiment with rice blast. All F2 and parent populations were grown in an experimental paddy field at the China National Rice Research Institute (Hangzhou, Zhejiang province in China) from May to November, 2017.

4.2. Mapping of LMM24

MutMap was performed to map the LMM24 gene according to a previous study [29]. We generated an F2 population from a cross between lmm24 and ZH8015. DNA from the 30 plants with lmm24 phenotypes from this F2 population was pooled using the same amount of DNA from each plant for whole genome sequencing. DNA purity and integrity were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis, and DNA purity was determined by Nanodrop2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The qualified DNA samples were then randomly broken into fragments of 350 bp in length by a Covaris crusher. The library was built using the TruSeq Library Construction Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), and the constructed library was sequenced by an Illumina HiSeqTM PE150 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The indica 93–11 (http://www.rise.genomics.org.cn) genome sequence was used as a reference genome sequence and the SNP/InDel index was calculated according to a previous report [36]. cDNA of LOC_Os03g24930 with a two SNP index of 1 was PCR amplified using primers LMM24F/R. The product was subsequently sequenced to confirm the mutation.

4.3. Complementation of LMM24

A 5192 bp genomic fragment of ZH8015 was PCR amplified using primer pairs P-LMM24 for complementation of the lmm24 mutant phenotype. This fragment consisted of an 1842 bp upstream promoter (Table S2), a 2184 bp gene region, and a 1166 bp downstream terminator. The PCR product was recombined in the binary vector pCAMBIA1300 using an In-Fusion Advantage Cloning kit (Clontech, San Francisco, CA, USA). The resultant expression construct was transformed into lmm24 by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation. The transformation experiment was completed by Wuhan Boyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd (Wuhan, China).

4.4. Histochemical Marker Staining Assay

Leaves (second from the top) of field-grown lmm24 and ZH8015 at 50 dps were used in this assay. Evans blue staining for dead cells and DAB staining for H2O2 accumulation were conducted as previously described [37,38].

4.5. TEM and TUNEL Assay

Samples of ZH8015 and lmm24 leaves (second from the top) at 50 dps were prepared for TEM. The leaf segments were fixed in a 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution at 4 °C overnight. The samples were rinsed three times, each time for 15 min, with 0.1 M, phosphate buffer at PH 7.0. The samples were then fixed with 1% osmic acid solution for 1–2 h, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series and embedded in Spurr’s resin. Ultrathin samples were made as previously described [39,40]. In order to identify nuclear DNA fragmentation, which is also a distinct feature of PCD, we used the TUNEL assay; the test method is based on the report of Ku et al. [41].

4.6. RNA Isolation and qPCR Analysis

Total RNA was isolated from leaves (second from the top) of ZH8015 and lmm24 at 50 dps with the TIANGEN RNAprep Pure Plant Kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China). cDNA was synthesized with a ReverTra Ace kit (TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan) and qPCR was performed on a Roche LightCycler 480 (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) device using a SYBRPremix ExTaq kit (Takara, Dalian, China). The ratio of A260/A280 was 1.8–2.2, and two clear bands of 18s RNA and 28s RNA were distinguishable by agarose gel electrophoresis. Three biological replicates and three technical replicates were performed for each sample. The expression level of the target genes was normalized to that of the β-actin1 gene and Ubiquitin gene (Table S5). The results of qPCR were statistically analyzed using the 2–ΔΔCt method. In addition, the values of ZH8015 were normalized to clearly show the change of lmm24 relative to ZH8015.
Plant materials were grown in the experimental field of the China Rice Research Institute. The leaves were immediately immersed in liquid nitrogen and brought back to the laboratory for storage at −80 °C. DNA was removed using DNase for RNA extraction and DNA was removed again using the ReverTra qPCR gDNA Remover kit before reverse transcription. The cDNA was diluted twice.

4.7. Multiple Sequence Alignment

Gene information was determined using the Rice Genome Annotation Project database (RGAP, http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/). Protein prediction of lmm24 was conducted using the Simple Modular Architecture Research Tools (SMART) program (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/). Homologous sequences of lmm24 were obtained using the NCBI Blastp search program (http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/) and multiple sequence alignments were conducted using the software programs MEGA v7 (http://www.megasoftware.net/) and GENEDOC2.7 (https://www.softpedia.com/get/Science-CAD/GeneDoc.shtml).

4.8. Subcellular Localization

The full-length CDS of LMM24 was amplified by GFP-F/R and the PCR product was cloned into the C-terminus of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) coding region in pJIT163-hGFP vectors. Plasmids 35S::RLCK109-GFP and 35S::GFP were transformed into rice protoplasts prepared from leaf tissues using the polyethylene glycol (PEG)-mediated transformation method. A 35S::Ghd7.1-CFP plasmid was co-transformed as a marker. Fluorescence of GFP was detected using a laser confocal scanning microscope ZEISSLSM 700 (ZEISS, Jena, Germany) 48 h after transfection. GFP can be excited by the 488 nm laser line and is optimally detected at 600 nm. ECFP (enhanced cyan fluorescence protein) was excited at 405 nm and was optimally detected at 550 nm. Mercury lamp was used to excite the fluorescent proteins.

4.9. Pathogen Infection

For disease resistance evaluation, leaves of ZH8015 and lmm24 were inoculated with virulent M. oryzae pathotypes following a previously described procedure [42].

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials can be found at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/1422-0067/20/13/3243/s1.

Author Contributions

S.C. and L.C. conceived and designed the experiments. Yi.Z. and X.Z. created and generated mutant materials. Yu.Z. conducted the experiments and drafted the manuscript with the help of Q.L. Yu.C. helped to analyze experimental data. N.Y. helped to design transgenic experiments. Yo.C. help to implement pathogen infection analysis. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was found by grants from the National Key Transgenic Research Projects (2016ZX08001002), the Natural Science Foundation of Innovation Research Group (31521064), the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science (CAAS-ASTIP-2013-CNRRI).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Bio-ultrastructure analysis Lab. of Analysis center of Agrobiology and environmental sciences, Zhejiang University for TEM analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Xu, X.; Zhang, L.; Liu, B.; Ye, Y.; Wu, Y. Characterization and mapping of a spotted leaf mutant in rice (Oryza sativa). Genet. Mol. Biol. 2014, 37, 406–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Xiao, G.; Zhou, J.; Lu, X.; Huang, R.; Zhang, H. Excessive UDPG resulting from the mutation of UAP1 causes programmed cell death by triggering reactive oxygen species accumulation and caspase-like activity in rice. New Phytol. 2018, 217, 332–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Xu, X.; Chen, Z.; Shi, Y.; Wang, H.; He, Y.; Shi, L.; Chen, T.; Wu, J.; Zhang, X. Functional inactivation of OsGCNT induces enhanced disease resistance to Xanthomonas Oryzae pv. Oryzae in rice. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, Z.; Ding, B.; Zhou, X.; Wang, G. The Rice Dynamin-Related Protein OsDRP1E Negatively Regulates Programmed Cell Death by Controlling the Release of Cytochrome c from Mitochondria. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liu, Q.; Ning, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, N.; Zhao, C.; Zhan, X.; Wu, W.; Chen, D.; Wei, X.; Wang, G.; et al. OsCUL3a Negatively Regulates Cell Death and Immunity by Degrading OsNPR1 in Rice. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 345–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Wang, S.; Lei, C.; Wang, J.; Ma, J.; Tang, S.; Wang, C.; Zhao, K.; Tian, P.; Zhang, H.; Qi, C.; et al. SPL33, encoding an eEF1A-like protein, negatively regulates cell death and defense responses in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 899–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Singh, S.K.; Sung, T.; Chung, T.; Lin, S.; Lin, S.; Liao, J.; Hsieh, W.; Hsieh, M. ACR11 modulates levels of reactive oxygen species and salicylic acid-associated defense response in Arabidopsis. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 11851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sindhu, A.; Janick-Buckner, D.; Buckner, B.; Gray, J.; Zehr, U.; Dilkes, B.P.; Johal, G.S. Propagation of cell death in dropdead1, a sorghum ortholog of the maize lls1 mutant. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0201359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Hong, X.; Hu, D.; Liu, C.; Yang, J.; Li, Y.; Huang, Y.; Feng, Y.; Gong, H.; et al. Functional inactivation of UDP-N-acetylglucosamine pyrophosphorylase 1 (UAP1) induces early leaf senescence and defence responses in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 973–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, F.; Wu, W.; Wang, D.; Yang, W.; Sun, J.; Liu, D.; Zhang, A. Characterization and Genetic Analysis of a Novel Light-Dependent Lesion Mimic Mutant, lm3, Showing Adult-Plant Resistance to Powdery Mildew in Common Wheat. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0155358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rostoks, N.; Schmierer, D.; Mudie, S.; Drader, T.; Brueggeman, R.; Caldwell, D.G.; Waugh, R.; Kleinhofs, A. Barley necrotic locus nec1 encodes the cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel 4 homologous to the Arabidopsis HLM1. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2006, 275, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tang, J.; Zhu, X.; Wang, Y.; Liu, L.; Xu, B.; Li, F.; Fang, J.; Chu, C. Semi-dominant mutations in the CC-NB-LRR-type R gene, NLS1, lead to constitutive activation of defense responses in rice. Plant J. 2011, 66, 996–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zeng, L.R. Spotted leaf11, a Negative Regulator of Plant Cell Death and Defense, Encodes a U-Box/Armadillo Repeat Protein Endowed with E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Activity. Plant Cell Online 2004, 16, 2795–2808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tong, X.; Qi, J.; Zhu, X.; Mao, B.; Zeng, L.; Wang, B.; Li, Q.; Zhou, G.; Xu, X.; Lou, Y.; et al. The rice hydroperoxide lyase OsHPL3 functions in defense responses by modulating the oxylipin pathway. Plant J. 2012, 71, 763–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Fan, J.; Bai, P.; Ning, Y.; Wang, J.; Shi, X.; Xiong, Y.; Zhang, K.; He, F.; Zhang, C.; Wang, R.; et al. The Monocot-Specific Receptor-like Kinase SDS2 Controls Cell Death and Immunity in Rice. Cell Host Microbe 2018, 23, 498–510.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Fitzgerald, H.A.; Chern, M.S.; Navarre, R.; Ronald, P.C. Overexpression of (At)NPR1 in rice leads to a BTH- and environment-induced lesion-mimic/cell death phenotype. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact 2004, 17, 140–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kanda, Y.; Yokotani, N.; Maeda, S.; Nishizawa, Y.; Kamakura, T.; Mori, M. The receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase BSR1 mediates chitin-induced defense signaling in rice cells. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2017, 81, 1497–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Vij, S.; Giri, J.; Dansana, P.K.; Kapoor, S.; Tyagi, A.K. The Receptor-Like Cytoplasmic Kinase (OsRLCK) Gene Family in Rice: Organization, Phylogenetic Relationship, and Expression during Development and Stress. Mol. Plant 2008, 1, 732–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shiu, S.; Karlowski, W.M.; Pan, R.; Tzeng, Y.; Mayer, K.F.X.; Li, W. Comparative Analysis of the Receptor-Like Kinase Family in Arabidopsis and Rice. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 1220–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ao, Y.; Li, Z.; Feng, D.; Xiong, F.; Liu, J.; Li, J.F.; Wang, M.; Wang, J.; Liu, B.; Wang, H.B. OsCERK1 and OsRLCK176 play important roles in peptidoglycan and chitin signaling in rice innate immunity. Plant J. 2014, 80, 1072–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, Z.; Ao, Y.; Feng, D.; Liu, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, H.; Liu, B. OsRLCK 57, OsRLCK107 and OsRLCK118 Positively Regulate Chitin- and PGN-Induced Immunity in Rice. Rice 2017, 10, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Wang, J.; Wu, G.; Peng, C.; Zhou, X.; Li, W.; He, M.; Wang, J.; Yin, J.; Yuan, C.; Ma, W.; et al. The Receptor-Like Cytoplasmic Kinase OsRLCK102 Regulates XA21-Mediated Immunity and Plant Development in Rice. Plant Mol. Biol. Report 2016, 34, 628–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yamaguchi, K.; Yamada, K.; Ishikawa, K.; Yoshimura, S.; Hayashi, N.; Uchihashi, K.; Ishihama, N.; Kishi-Kaboshi, M.; Takahashi, A.; Tsuge, S.; et al. A receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase targeted by a plant pathogen effector is directly phosphorylated by the chitin receptor and mediates rice immunity. Cell Host Microbe 2013, 13, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Liu, J.; Zhong, S.; Guo, X.; Hao, L.; Wei, X.; Huang, Q.; Hou, Y.; Shi, J.; Wang, C.; Gu, H.; et al. Membrane-bound RLCKs LIP1 and LIP2 are essential male factors controlling male-female attraction in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23, 993–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bergmann, D.; Lukowitz, W.; Somerville, C. Stomatal development and pattern controlled by a MAPKK kinase. Science 2004, 304, 1494–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kim, T.; Guan, S.; Burlingame, A.; Wang, Z. The CDG1 kinase mediates brassinosteroid signal transduction from BRI1 receptor kinase to BSU1 phosphatase and GSK3-like kinase BIN2. Mol. Cell 2011, 43, 561–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lee, I.C.; Hong, S.W.; Whang, S.S.; Lim, P.O.; Nam, H.G.; Koo, J.C. Age-Dependent Action of an ABA-Inducible Receptor Kinase, RPK1, as a Positive Regulator of Senescence in Arabidopsis Leaves. Plant and Cell Physiol. 2011, 52, 651–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Liang, X.; Zhou, J.M. Receptor-Like Cytoplasmic Kinases: Central Players in Plant Receptor Kinase-Mediated Signaling. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2018, 69, 267–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Abe, A.; Kosugi, S.; Yoshida, K.; Natsume, S.; Takagi, H.; Kanzaki, H.; Matsumura, H.; Yoshida, K.; Mitsuoka, C.; Tamiru, M.; et al. Genome sequencing reveals agronomically important loci in rice using MutMap. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30, 174–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Candela, H.; Casanova, R.; Micol, J. Getting started in mapping-by-sequencing. Journal of Integrative Plant Biol. 2015, 57, 606–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Takagi, H.; Uemura, A.; Yaegashi, H.; Tamiru, M.; Abe, A.; Mitsuoka, C.; Utsushi, H.; Natsume, S.; Kanzaki, H.; Matsumura, H.; et al. MutMap-Gap: Whole-genome resequencing of mutant F2 progeny bulk combined withde novo assembly of gap regions identifies the rice blast resistance genePii. New Phytol. 2013, 200, 276–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Huang, K.; Wang, D.; Duan, P.; Zhang, B.; Xu, R.; Li, N.; Li, Y. WIDE AND THICK GRAIN 1, which encodes an otubain-like protease with deubiquitination activity, influences grain size and shape in rice. Plant J. 2017, 91, 849–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, L.; Xu, P.; Tu, R.; Meng, S.; Wu, W.; Anis, G.; Hussain, K.; Riaz, A.; et al. WB1, a Regulator of Endosperm Development in Rice, Is Identified by a Modified MutMap Method. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Fekih, R.; Takagi, H.; Tamiru, M.; Abe, A.; Natsume, S.; Yaegashi, H.; Sharma, S.; Sharma, S.; Kanzaki, H.; Matsumura, H.; et al. MutMap+: Genetic Mapping and Mutant Identification without Crossing in Rice. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Gao, H.; Jin, M.; Zheng, X.; Chen, J.; Yuan, D.; Xin, Y.; Wang, M.; Huang, D.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, K.; et al. Days to heading 7, a major quantitative locus determining photoperiod sensitivity and regional adaptation in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. United States Am. 2014, 111, 16337–16342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Fang, N.; Xu, R.; Huang, L.; Zhang, B.; Duan, P.; Li, N.; Luo, Y.; Li, Y. SMALL GRAIN 11 Controls Grain Size, Grain Number and Grain Yield in Rice. Rice 2016, 9, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Lee, D.; Lee, G.; Kim, B.; Jang, S.; Lee, Y.; Yu, Y.; Seo, J.; Kim, S.; Lee, Y.; Lee, J.; et al. Identification of a Spotted Leaf Sheath Gene Involved in Early Senescence and Defense Response in Rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Qin, C.; Li, Y.; Gan, J.; Wang, W.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Y.; Wu, P. OsDGL1, a Homolog of an Oligosaccharyltransferase Complex Subunit, is Involved in N-Glycosylation and Root Development in Rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2013, 54, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sun, L.; Wang, Y.; Liu, L.; Wang, C.; Gan, T.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wang, D.; Niu, M.; Long, W.; et al. Isolation and characterization of a spotted leaf 32 mutant with early leaf senescence and enhanced defense response in rice. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 41846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ku, S.; Yoon, H.; Suh, H.S.; Chung, Y. Male-sterility of thermosensitive genic male-sterile rice is associated with premature programmed cell death of the tapetum. Planta 2003, 217, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, W.; Lei, C.; Cheng, Z.; Jia, Y.; Huang, D.; Wang, J.; Wang, J.; Zhang, X.; Su, N.; Guo, X.; et al. Identification of SSR markers for a broad-spectrum blast resistance gene Pi20(t) for marker-assisted breeding. Mol. Breed 2008, 22, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fekih, R.; Tamiru, M.; Kanzaki, H.; Abe, A.; Yoshida, K.; Kanzaki, E.; Saitoh, H.; Takagi, H.; Natsume, S.; Undan, J.R.; et al. The rice (Oryza sativa L.) LESION MIMIC RESEMBLING, which encodes an AAA-type ATPase, is implicated in defense response. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2015, 290, 611–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 20 03243 g001 550
Figure 1. Phenotypic analyses of lmm24. (A) Comparison of growing situation ZH8015 and lmm24 at seedling stage (15 days post-sowing (dps)). (B) lmm24 plant at tillering stage (50 dps) display dark brown lesions. (C) Lesion mimic phenotype in lmm24 and clean leaf blade in ZH8015. (D) Determination of whether the lmm24 phenotype was light dependent. The area covered with aluminum was indicated by red rectangle frame. (E) ZH8015 and lmm24 plants at harvest period (F) Grain width observation of lmm24 and ZH8015. (G) Grain length observation of lmm24 and ZH8015. Scale bar: 2 cm in (A,C), 1 cm in (D,F,G), 10 cm in (B,E).
Figure 1. Phenotypic analyses of lmm24. (A) Comparison of growing situation ZH8015 and lmm24 at seedling stage (15 days post-sowing (dps)). (B) lmm24 plant at tillering stage (50 dps) display dark brown lesions. (C) Lesion mimic phenotype in lmm24 and clean leaf blade in ZH8015. (D) Determination of whether the lmm24 phenotype was light dependent. The area covered with aluminum was indicated by red rectangle frame. (E) ZH8015 and lmm24 plants at harvest period (F) Grain width observation of lmm24 and ZH8015. (G) Grain length observation of lmm24 and ZH8015. Scale bar: 2 cm in (A,C), 1 cm in (D,F,G), 10 cm in (B,E).
Ijms 20 03243 g001
Ijms 20 03243 g002 550
Figure 2. H2O2 accumulation and cell death detection in ZH8015 and lmm24. (A) Evans blue staining for cell death. (B) Diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining for H2O2 accumulation. (C) DNA fragmentation detection in mesophyll cells by TUNEL assay. Red signal represents staining with propidium iodide, and green signals indicate TUNEL-positive nuclei of dead cells. Scale bar:1 cm in (A,B), 50 μm in (C).
Figure 2. H2O2 accumulation and cell death detection in ZH8015 and lmm24. (A) Evans blue staining for cell death. (B) Diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining for H2O2 accumulation. (C) DNA fragmentation detection in mesophyll cells by TUNEL assay. Red signal represents staining with propidium iodide, and green signals indicate TUNEL-positive nuclei of dead cells. Scale bar:1 cm in (A,B), 50 μm in (C).
Ijms 20 03243 g002
Ijms 20 03243 g003 550
Figure 3. Qualitative TEM observation and genes expression analysis. (A–C) Observation of chloroplasts in ZH8015 mesophyll cells by TEM. C: chloroplast; Thy: thylakoid lamellae; OB: osmiophilic body; CM: chloroplast membrane. (D–F) Observation of chloroplasts in lmm24. (G) Expression levels of photosynthesis-related genes. β-actin1 as a reference gene. (H) Expression levels of SGR gene and senescence-associated genes, β-actin1 as a reference gene. The expression level of each gene in ZH8015 was normalized to 1. Data are means ± SE of three biological replicates. The p-value is calculated by the Mann–Whitney U test method. *p < 0.01.
Figure 3. Qualitative TEM observation and genes expression analysis. (A–C) Observation of chloroplasts in ZH8015 mesophyll cells by TEM. C: chloroplast; Thy: thylakoid lamellae; OB: osmiophilic body; CM: chloroplast membrane. (D–F) Observation of chloroplasts in lmm24. (G) Expression levels of photosynthesis-related genes. β-actin1 as a reference gene. (H) Expression levels of SGR gene and senescence-associated genes, β-actin1 as a reference gene. The expression level of each gene in ZH8015 was normalized to 1. Data are means ± SE of three biological replicates. The p-value is calculated by the Mann–Whitney U test method. *p < 0.01.
Ijms 20 03243 g003
Ijms 20 03243 g004 550
Figure 4. Enhanced resistance in the lmm24 to M. oryzae. (A) Spraying method to infect ZH8015 and lmm24 at seedling stage (20 dps), leaves were photographed at 7 dpi. (B) Punch inoculation method to infect ZH8015 and lmm24 at tillering stage (50 dps), leaves were photographed at 12 dpi. (C) Relative lesion area of the inoculated leaves of ZH8015 and lmm24 plants at seedling stage (7 dpi). Data are means ± SE of 10 plants (Student’s t-test: **p < 0.01) (D) Relative Lesion area of the inoculated leaves of ZH8015 and lmm24 plants at tillering stage (12 dpi). Data are means ± SE of 10 plants (Student’s t-test: *p < 0.01). (E) Expression levels of PR genes in leaves of ZH8015 and lmm24 plants at seedling stage (20 dps). β-actin1 as a reference gene. (F) Expression levels of PR genes in leaves of ZH8015 and lmm24 plants at tillering stage (50 dps), β-actin1 as a reference gene. the expression level of each gene in ZH8015 was normalized to 1. Data are means ± SE of three biological replicates. The p-value is calculated by the Mann–Whitney U test method. *p < 0.01. Scale bar: 3 cm in (A), 2 cm in (B).
Figure 4. Enhanced resistance in the lmm24 to M. oryzae. (A) Spraying method to infect ZH8015 and lmm24 at seedling stage (20 dps), leaves were photographed at 7 dpi. (B) Punch inoculation method to infect ZH8015 and lmm24 at tillering stage (50 dps), leaves were photographed at 12 dpi. (C) Relative lesion area of the inoculated leaves of ZH8015 and lmm24 plants at seedling stage (7 dpi). Data are means ± SE of 10 plants (Student’s t-test: **p < 0.01) (D) Relative Lesion area of the inoculated leaves of ZH8015 and lmm24 plants at tillering stage (12 dpi). Data are means ± SE of 10 plants (Student’s t-test: *p < 0.01). (E) Expression levels of PR genes in leaves of ZH8015 and lmm24 plants at seedling stage (20 dps). β-actin1 as a reference gene. (F) Expression levels of PR genes in leaves of ZH8015 and lmm24 plants at tillering stage (50 dps), β-actin1 as a reference gene. the expression level of each gene in ZH8015 was normalized to 1. Data are means ± SE of three biological replicates. The p-value is calculated by the Mann–Whitney U test method. *p < 0.01. Scale bar: 3 cm in (A), 2 cm in (B).
Ijms 20 03243 g004
Ijms 20 03243 g005 550
Figure 5. Candidate region and structure of LMM24. (A) SNP index Manhattan plot of chromosome 3. Candidate gene sites are shown in the red circle. (B) Structure and mutation site of lmm24. Four exons and three introns are indicated by blue rectangles and black lines. Two C to T point and 54 bp insertion mutation were identified in the fourth exon. Sequence analysis of the mutation site in plants of ZH8015 and lmm24. (C) Agarose gel electrophoresis using a molecular marker at the insertion site. Agarose is 2%. The fragment corresponding to ZH8015 is the size of the PCR product without insertion mutation. The fragment corresponding to lmm24 is the size of the PCR product with the insertion mutation.
Figure 5. Candidate region and structure of LMM24. (A) SNP index Manhattan plot of chromosome 3. Candidate gene sites are shown in the red circle. (B) Structure and mutation site of lmm24. Four exons and three introns are indicated by blue rectangles and black lines. Two C to T point and 54 bp insertion mutation were identified in the fourth exon. Sequence analysis of the mutation site in plants of ZH8015 and lmm24. (C) Agarose gel electrophoresis using a molecular marker at the insertion site. Agarose is 2%. The fragment corresponding to ZH8015 is the size of the PCR product without insertion mutation. The fragment corresponding to lmm24 is the size of the PCR product with the insertion mutation.
Ijms 20 03243 g005
Ijms 20 03243 g006 550
Figure 6. Genetic complementation of LMM24. (A) lmm24 plant transformed with the genomic sequence of ZH8015 (COM-lmm24) was completely recovered to the ZH8015 phenotype at tillering stage. (B) Leaves phenotype of ZH8015, transgenic plant and lmm24. (C) The phenotype of ZH8015, transgenic plant and lmm24 at harvest period. (D) DAB staining experiment. (E) Evans blue staining analysis. Scale bar: 10 cm in (A,C), 2 cm in (B),1 cm in (D,E).
Figure 6. Genetic complementation of LMM24. (A) lmm24 plant transformed with the genomic sequence of ZH8015 (COM-lmm24) was completely recovered to the ZH8015 phenotype at tillering stage. (B) Leaves phenotype of ZH8015, transgenic plant and lmm24. (C) The phenotype of ZH8015, transgenic plant and lmm24 at harvest period. (D) DAB staining experiment. (E) Evans blue staining analysis. Scale bar: 10 cm in (A,C), 2 cm in (B),1 cm in (D,E).
Ijms 20 03243 g006
Ijms 20 03243 g007 550
Figure 7. Predicted domains of OsRLCK109 and multiple sequence alignment. (A) Prediction of OsRLCK109 protein domains on smart website, blue rectangular region indicates the kinase domain. (B) Protein sequence alignment of OsRLCK109 and four other RLCKs, the highly conserved kinase domain is shown in the red box.
Figure 7. Predicted domains of OsRLCK109 and multiple sequence alignment. (A) Prediction of OsRLCK109 protein domains on smart website, blue rectangular region indicates the kinase domain. (B) Protein sequence alignment of OsRLCK109 and four other RLCKs, the highly conserved kinase domain is shown in the red box.
Ijms 20 03243 g007
Ijms 20 03243 g008 550
Figure 8. Subcellular localization of OsRLCK109. 35S::RLCK109-GFP, RLCK109 fused to GFP; 35S::GFP, empty GFP; Ghd7.1-CFP, nucleus marker. Scale bar: 2 μm.
Figure 8. Subcellular localization of OsRLCK109. 35S::RLCK109-GFP, RLCK109 fused to GFP; 35S::GFP, empty GFP; Ghd7.1-CFP, nucleus marker. Scale bar: 2 μm.
Ijms 20 03243 g008

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Yu, N.; Cao, Y.; Zhan, X.; Cheng, S.; Cao, L. LMM24 Encodes Receptor-Like Cytoplasmic Kinase 109, Which Regulates Cell Death and Defense Responses in Rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3243. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms20133243

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Liu Q, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Yu N, Cao Y, Zhan X, Cheng S, Cao L. LMM24 Encodes Receptor-Like Cytoplasmic Kinase 109, Which Regulates Cell Death and Defense Responses in Rice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(13):3243. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms20133243

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yue, Qunen Liu, Yingxin Zhang, Yuyu Chen, Ning Yu, Yongrun Cao, Xiaodeng Zhan, Shihua Cheng, and Liyong Cao. 2019. "LMM24 Encodes Receptor-Like Cytoplasmic Kinase 109, Which Regulates Cell Death and Defense Responses in Rice" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 13: 3243. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms20133243

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop