Next Article in Journal
Adverse Drug Reactions and Potentially Inappropriate Medication in Older Patients: Analysis of the Portuguese Pharmacovigilance Database
Next Article in Special Issue
High-Load and Low-Load Resistance Exercise in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: Feasibility and Safety of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Previous Article in Journal
Combination of HLA-DQ2/-DQ8 Haplotypes and a Single MSH5 Gene Variant in a Polish Population of Patients with Type 1 Diabetes as a First Line Screening for Celiac Disease?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prognostic Utility of a New Risk Stratification Protocol for Secondary Prevention in Patients Attending Cardiac Rehabilitation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Exercise Training in Post-COVID-19 Patients: The Need for a Multifactorial Protocol for a Multifactorial Pathophysiology

1
IRCCS Multimedica, 20138 Milan, Italy
2
Division of Cardiology, University of Perugia School of Medicine, 06123 Perugia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 28 February 2022 / Revised: 6 April 2022 / Accepted: 13 April 2022 / Published: 15 April 2022

Abstract

:
The battle against COVID-19 has entered a new phase with Rehabilitation Centres being among the major players, because the medical outcome of COVID-19 patients does not end with the control of pulmonary inflammation marked by a negative virology test, as many patients continue to suffer from long-COVID-19 syndrome. Exercise training is known to be highly valuable in patients with cardiac or lung disease, and it exerts beneficial effects on the immune system and inflammation. We therefore reviewed past and recent papers about exercise training, considering the multifactorial features characterizing post-COVID-19 patients’ clinical conditions. Consequently, we conceived a proposal for a post-COVID-19 patient exercise protocol as a combination of multiple recommended exercise training regimens. Specifically, we built pre-evaluation and exercise training for post-COVID-19 patients taking advantage of the various programs of exercise already validated for diseases that may share pathophysiological and clinical characteristics with long-COVID-19.

1. Introduction

The coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a new disease that is causing a respiratory illness outbreak (COVID-19). It was first identified in December 2019 in China (Wuhan), subsequently spreading throughout the world and becoming a worldwide pandemic [1].
COVID-19 can be described as a multisystem disease with acute and, likely, chronic consequences, as the grim outcome of COVID-19 survivors does not end with the end of pulmonary inflammation. Data from the UK’s Office for National Statistics suggest a prevalence of post-COVID-19 syndrome or long-COVID of about 13.7%, making crucial the need for rehabilitation interventions to promote physical recovery [2]. Consequently, our battle against COVID-19 has entered a new phase that sees Rehabilitation Centres as major players due to the COVID-19 survivors’ sequelae.

2. COVID-19

  • Is it a chronic disease? At the end of the viral and inflammation phase causing the active disease, most patient are discharged without breathlessness at rest, yet often with poor exercise tolerance associated with persistency of COVID-19 signs at RX or CT pre-discharge evaluation (i.e., long-COVID-19 syndrome). Elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines could persist at follow up, causing vascular remodelling and endothelial dysfunction, possibly leading to pulmonary hypertension [3].
  • Is it a multifactorial disease? To date, there is paucity of data about the precise mechanisms underpinning COVID-19 and no single interpretation may unify the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the disease and its consequences, which conceivably are multifactorial. Alterations associated with COVID-19, especially in patients requiring ICU care, involve respiratory function (impairment of alveolar air exchange, decrease in pulmonary ventilation, respiratory muscle dysfunction and, probably, pulmonary fibrosis in the long run), cardiac function (reduced systolic function in some cases and possible persistent myocardial damage in the long run), pulmonary vessels (pulmonary hypertension in some cases due to pulmonary embolism and/or thrombosis), peripheral muscle function (due to deconditioning and decreased lean body mass, fatigue and the effects of hypokalaemia) [4,5], and, likely, liver, kidney, and brain and nervous and immune systems [6]. Finally, decreased exercise capacity is the most common dysfunction (61,4% of discharged mild patients) mainly due to the long-term immobilization or to the muscle invasion by the virus [7].

3. Inflammation and Exercise Training

Exercise training is known to positively affect immune system and inflammation [3]. The acute inflammatory response may be reduced by a regular physical activity through at least five mechanisms: (1) reducing the inflammatory signalling pathway mediated by Toll-like receptors; (2) increasing anti-inflammatory cytokines such as Interleukin-10 and 37, which could inhibit the inflammatory cascade; (3) reducing lung inflammation promoting the conversion from Angiotensin II to Angiotensin 1–7; (4) activating the Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor vasodilator pathway to reduce lung inflammation; and (5) restoring nitric oxide levels in order to counteract endothelial dysfunction [8]. However, different physical activities in terms of intensity and type have different effects on the immune system and inflammation: intense exercise can actually lead to a higher level of inflammatory mediators and to increase the risk of injury and chronic inflammation, while moderate-to-vigorous effort with appropriate resting periods can achieve maximum benefit [9]. The “J curve” concept hypothesizes that excessive bouts of prolonged training can impair immune function, and high intensity exercise may thus be dangerous, helping to exacerbate virus infection, such as COVID-19. On the contrary, moderate intensity exercise improves the immune system and it should be recommended as a non-pharmacological, inexpensive and viable way to cope with COVID-19 virus. The “Forrest Gump” theory states, based on study on ACE axis unbalance, that “regular exercise would not reduce one’s risk of getting infected with SARS-CoV-2 but it would reduce one’s risk of getting severe disease [10,11]”. Moreover, several studies have demonstrated that both acute and chronic exercise training at moderate intensity, improve endothelial dysfunction, muscular blood supply, peripheral O2 extraction, muscular strength, ventilator efficacy, resulting in clinically significant benefits in terms of improved exercise capacity, quality of life and cardio-pulmonary function. Exercise programs in adults hospitalized with an acute or an exacerbation of a chronic respiratory condition, even if disparate, were well tolerated, and adverse events were infrequent with movement out of bed within 24 h of hospitalization with progressive daily movement and progression titrated based on symptoms [12].

4. Exercise Training in Post-COVID-19 Patients

Exercise training is an integral component of evidence-based management programs for many chronic conditions, particularly those involving cardiac and/or pneumological conditions. Consequently, it would appear logical to extrapolate the exercise training scheme already applied to other chronic conditions to long-COVID-19 patients. General recommendations of the European Society of Cardiology advise “to be prepared to handle COVID-19 patients” [13,14], but among Expert Consensus publications about rehabilitation in COVID-19 patients, only a few papers have evaluated the exercise prescriptions in detail, leading to very generic final suggestions [4,15,16,17,18]. Similarly, only a few randomized clinical trials have been performed regarding the safety and efficacy of different exercise programs in COVID-19 patients, with too few patients enrolled to allow evidence-based recommendations. Specifically, Chen et al. [19] published a systemic review and meta-analysis about the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with post-COVID-19, including 3 studies with 233 patients. Tested treatment regimens were device-based respiratory training, cough exercise, diaphragmatic training and stretching exercise. Data showed that pulmonary rehabilitation significantly improved the exercise capacity. More recently, McNarry et al. [20] enrolled 281 COVID-19 patients in a randomized controlled trial, demonstrating that inspiratory muscle training improved symptoms, respiratory muscle strength and aerobic fitness. Ahmadi Hekmatikar et al. [21] published a systematic review about functional and psychological changes after exercise training in post-COVID-19 patients, including 7 studies with 286 patients. They showed that training programs composed of aerobic and resistance exercise may improve the functional capacity and quality of life, but a meta-analysis was not conducted because the included studies had methodological heterogeneities and they did not examine a control group. Even though conclusive validations are scarce with the need for future testing in randomized controlled trials and in real life, we tried to build a scheme of exercise training based on the available data for COVID-19 patients at the moment (Table 1).
Consequently, in addressing the urgent need for a structured exercise program for long-COVID-19, it being considered as a multifactorial disease, we reviewed exercise training recommendations validated for similar diseases from a pathophysiological point of view [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. Table 2 reports different pathophysiology features of COVID-19 and related landmark diseases with specific characteristics.
We summarized review data about exercise prescription in Table 3, reporting different exercise training programs with a general description, COVID-19 related diseases trial data, and COVID-19 trial or Expert Consensus data.
Based on our review, we conceived a proposal of pre-evaluation (Table 4) and exercise training (Table 5) in post-COVID-19 patients as a mixture of different validated programs of linked diseases from a pathophysiological point of view [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39] (Figure 1).

5. The “New Combined Post-COVID-19 Exercise Protocol”

Preliminary evaluation. Accurate global assessment of post-COVID-19 patients before training is a crucial point to tailor the exercise protocol. Table 4 reported the recommended scales and tests in the previous published COVID-19 trials and COVID-19 pertinent disease protocols [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. We highlighted in bold type the most popular and easy to perform ones as the minimum required to set the exercise program.
Patients’ selection. The “new combined post-COVID-19 exercise protocol” has been designed for patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. A safe start for an exercise protocol is suggested 2 weeks after the cessation of severe symptoms and 1 week from mild/moderate COVID-19 illness [4]. Exclusion criteria are: clinical instability, such as heart rate > 100 bpm, blood pressure < 90/60 mmHg or > 140/90 mmHg, blood saturation < 95%, temperature fluctuation, exacerbation of respiratory symptoms or fatigue not alleviated with rest; other disease that are not suitable for exercise; post-intensive care syndrome, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, critical illness myopathy/neuropathy, neurological or neuro-muscular illness; post COVID-19 myocarditis. Specifically, we focused on cardiorespiratory training of COVID-19 patients, excluding non-stable situation and patients affected by myocarditis for which exercise restriction is mandatory until normalization of ventricular function and absence of inflammation biomarkers and inducible arrhythmias (usually for 3–6 months) [54]. Moreover, clinical presentation/complications such as post-intensive care syndrome, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, critical illness myopathy/neuropathy, neurological or neuro-muscular illness, cognitive deficit and psychological sequelae are out of the topic of the present paper, regarding, specifically, the neuro-COVID-19 unit.
Exercise protocol. General suggestions on exercise training [55] specified a multiple exercise program composed of aerobic exercise (200–400 min per week for 5–7 days per week) and resistance training (two sessions per week). Early rehabilitation seems not well tolerated with rapid desaturation. A scheme of 3 weeks ICU followed by 3 weeks acute medical ward and 3 weeks inpatient rehabilitation should be a good option [56]. More recently, the Stanford Hall Consensus Statement [4] recommended to avoid exercise (>3 METS) for between 2 and 3 weeks after the cessation of severe symptoms and 1 week from mild/moderate COVID-19 illness. The proposed exercise protocol is 12 weeks long as a standard suggestion, and it should be carried out in a Rehabilitation Centre under a specialist supervision for safety reasons for at least 2 weeks; at the end of the 2 weeks, the patients can carry it out independently in their own homes or continue in in-hospital setting according to clinical condition and/or patient’s preference.
Table 5 reported in details the “new combined post-COVID-19 exercise protocol”.
Final evaluation. It should be interesting to repeat preliminary evaluation (Table 4) after at least 12 weeks to establish the effectiveness of the “new combined post-COVID-19 exercise protocol” in terms of exercise capacity, quality of life and cardio-pulmonary function.

6. Conclusions

COVID-19 is a multisystem disease with acute and, quite often, chronic consequences, even though limited data are available for exercise prescription in long-COVID-19 patients. The sequelae in those who survive this illness will potentially dominate medical practice for years and rehabilitation medicine should be at the forefront of guiding care for the affected population. We reviewed the previously published protocols on exercise training to build a “new combined post-COVID-19 exercise protocol” tailored for post-COVID-19 patients conceived as frail subjects with interstitial lung disease, likely complicated by cardiac and vascular diseases, as assessed by a specific preliminary evaluation. Future studies are needed to confirm the safety and the efficacy of the “new combined COVID-19 exercise protocol” as a promising strategy to manage long-COVID-19 patients.

Funding

This work has been supported by Ministry of Health—Ricerca Corrente and RCR-2021-23671212 project—to IRCCS MultiMedica.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Achilleos, S.; Quattrocchi, A.; Gabel, J.; Heraclides, A.; Kolokotroni, O.; Constantinou, C.; Ugarte, M.P.; Nicolaou, N.; Rodriguez-Llanes, J.M.; Bennett, C.M.; et al. Excess all-cause mortality and COVID-19-related mortality: A temporal analysis in 22 countries, from January until August 2020. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2022, 51, 35–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jimeno-Almazán, A.; Pallarés, J.G.; Buendía-Romero, Á.; Martínez-Cava, A.; Franco-López, F.; Sanchez-Alcaraz Martínez, B.J.; Bernal-Morel, E.; Courel-Ibáñez, J. Post-COVID-19 Syndrome and the Potential Benefits of Exercise. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 5329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Brugliera, L.; Spina, A.; Castellazzi, P.; Cimino, P.; Arcuri, P.; Deriu, M.G.; Zanetta, C.; Angelone, S.M.; Capitanio, J.F.; Alemanno, F.; et al. Rehabilitative of COVID-19 patients with acute lower extremity Ischemia and amputation. J. Rehabil. Med. 2020, 2, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Barker-Davies, R.M.; O’Sullivan, O.; Senaratne, K.P.P.; Baker, P.; Cranley, M.; Dharm-Datta, S.; Ellis, H.; Goodall, D.; Gough, M.; Lewis, S.; et al. The Stanford Hall consensus statement for post-COVID-19 rehabilitation. Br. J. Sports Med. 2020, 54, 949–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, Y.; Coats, A.J.S.; Zheng, Z.; Adamo, M.; Ambrosio, G.; Anker, S.D.; Butler, J.; Xu, D.; Mao, J.; Khan, M.S.; et al. Management of heart failure patients with COVID-19: A joint position paper of the Chinese Heart Failure Association & National Heart Failure Committee and the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2020, 22, 941–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, J. Rehabilitation management of patients with COVID-19: Lessons learned from the first experiences in China. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2020, 56, 335–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huang, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Ren, L.; Zhao, J.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Fan, G.; Xu, J.; Gu, X.; et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020, 395, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Nigro, E.; Polito, R.; Alferi, A.; Mancini, A.; Imperlini, E.; Elce, A.; Krustrup, P.; Orrù, S.; Buono, P.; Daniele, A. Molecular mechanisms involved in the positivie effects of physical activity on copinc with COVID-19. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2020, 120, 2569–2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rahmati-Ahmadabad, S.; Hossein, F. Exercise against SARS-Cov-2 (COVID 19): Does workout intensity matter? Obes. Med. 2020, 19, 100245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Heffernan, K.S.; Jae, S.Y. Exercise as a medicine for COVID-19: An ACE in the hole? Med. Hypotheses 2020, 142, 109835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kenyon, C. The Forrest Gump approach to preventing severe COVID-19–Reverse the predisposing pro-inflammatory state with exercise. Microbes Infect. 2020, 22, 151–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rice, H.; Harrold, M.; Fowler, R.; Watson, C.; Waterer, G.; Hill, K. Exercise training for adults hospitalized with an acute respiratory condition: A systematic scoping review. Clin. Rehabil. 2020, 34, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Task Force for the Management of COVID-19 of the European Society of Cardiology. ESC guidance for the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular disease during the COVID-19 pandemic: Part 2—Care pathways, treatment, and follow-up. Eur. Heart J. 2021, 43, 1059–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Borg, K.; StamBorg, H. COVID-19 and physical and rehabilitation medicine. J. Rehabil. Med. 2020, 52, jrm00045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mureddu, G.F.; Ambrosetti, M.; Venturini, E.; la Rovere, M.T.; Mazza, A.; Pedretti, R.; Sarullo, F.; Fattirolli, F.; Faggiano, P.; Giallauria, F.; et al. Cardiac rehabilitation activities during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. Position Paper of the AICPR. Monaldi Arch. Chest Dis. 2020, 90, 1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sheehy, L.M. Considerations for Postacute Rehabilitation for Survivors of COVID-19. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020, 6, e19462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yang, L.-L.; Yang, T. Pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Chronic Dis. Transl. Med. 2020, 6, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zeng, B.; Chen, D.; Qiu, Z.; Zhang, M. Expert consensus on protocol of rehabilitation for COVID-19 patients using framework and approaches of WHO International Family Clasifications. Aging Med. 2020, 3, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, H.; Shi, H.; Liu, X.; Sun, T.; Wu, J.; Liu, Z. Effect of pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with post-COVID-19: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Front. Med. 2022, 9, 837420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. McNarry, M.A.; Berg, R.M.; Shelley, J.; Hudson, J.; Saynor, Z.L.; Duckers, J.; Lewis, K.; Davies, G.A.; Mackintosh, K.A. Inspiratory muscle training enhamces recovery post COVID-19: A randomized controlled trial. Eur. Respir. J. 2022; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ahmadi Hekmatikar, A.H.; Ferreira, J.B.; Shahrbanian, S. Functional and psychological changes after exercise training in post-COVID-19 patients discharged from the hospital: A PRISMA-compliant systemic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Angulo, J.; El Assar, A.; Álvarez-Bustosc, A.; Rodríguez-Mañas, L. Physical activity and exercise: Strategies to manage frailty. Redox Biol. 2020, 35, 101513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Afilalo, J. Evaluating and Treating Frailty in Cardiac Rehabilitation. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 2019, 35, 445–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhao, H.; Yu-Xiao, X.; Chen, W. Recommendations for respiratory rehabilitation in adults with COVID-19. Chin. Med J. 2020, 133, 1595–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, K.; Zhang, W.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Chen, Y. Respiratory rehabilitation in elderly patients with COVID-19: A randomized controlled study. Complement. Ther. Clin. Pract. 2020, 39, 101166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Severin, R.; Arena, R.; Lavie, C.J.; Bond, S.; Phillips, S.A. Respiratory Muscle Performance Screening for Infectious Disease Management Following COVID-19: A Highly Pressurized Situation. Am. J. Med. 2020, 133, 1025–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, F.; Liu, N.; Hu, J.Y.; Wu, L.L.; Su, G.S.; Zhong, N.S.; Zheng, Z.G. Pulmonary rehabilitation guidelines in the principle of 4S for patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi 2020, 43, 180. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lau, H.M.; Yin-Fat, G.; Yee-Men Jones, A.; Lee, E.W.; Siu, E.H.; Hui, D.S. A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of an exercise training program in patients recovering from severe acute respiratory syndrome. Aust. J. Physiother. 2005, 51, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Spruit, M.A.; Singh, S.J.; Garvey, C.; ZuWallack, R.; Nici, L.; Rochester, C.; Hill, K.; Holland, A.E.; Lareau, S.C.; Man, W.D.C.; et al. An official American thoracic society/European respiratory society statement: Key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation. Am. I Resp. Crit. Care Med. 2013, 188, e13–e64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vainshelboim, B.; Oliveira, J.; Yehoshua, L.; Weiss, I.; Fox, B.D.; Fruchter, O.; Kramer, M.R. Exercise Training-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program Is Clinically Beneficial for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Respiration 2014, 88, 378–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Curtis, K.; Hopkinson, N.S. Exercise training in interstitial lung disease: Lumping or splitting? Thorax 2017, 72, 589–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Garvey, B.; Paternostro, M.; Larry, F.; Hill, K.; Holland, A.; Limberg, T.; Spruit, M. Pulmonary rehabilitation exercise prescription in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Review of selected guidelines. J. Cardiopulm. Rehab. Prev. 2016, 36, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ehlken, N.; Lichtblau, M.; Klose, H.; Weidenhammer, J.; Fischer, C.; Nechwatal, R.; Uiker, S.; Halank, M.; Olsson, K.; Seeger, W.; et al. Exercise training improves peak oxygen consumption and haemodynamics in patients with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension and inoperable chronic thrombo-embolic pulmonary hypertension: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Eur. Heart J. 2016, 37, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Grünig, E.; Eichstaedt, C.; Barberà, J.-A.; Benjamin, N.; Blanco, I.; Bossone, E.; Cittadini, A.; Coghlan, G.; Corris, P.; D’Alto, M.; et al. ERS statement on exercise training and rehabilitation in patients with severe chronic pulmonary hypertension. Eur. Respir. J. 2019, 53, 1800332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Piepoli, M.F.; Conraads, V.; Corrà, U.; Dickstein, K.; Francis, D.P.; Jaarsma, T.; Mcmurray, J.; Pieske, B.; Piotrowicz, E.; Schmid, J.-P.; et al. Exercise training in heart failure: From theory to practice. A consensus document of the Heart Failure Association and the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2011, 13, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cattadori, G.; Segurini, C.; Picozzi, A.; Padeletti, L.; Anzà, C. Exercise and heart failure: An update. ESC Heart Fail. 2018, 5, 222–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Arena, R. Exercise Training in Group 2 Pulmonary Hypertension: Which Intensity and What Modality. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2011, 13, 454–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mereles, A.; Ehlken, N.; Kreuscher, S.; Ghofrani, S.; Hoeper, M.H.; Halank, M.; Meyer, F.J.; Karger, G.; Buss, J.; Juenger, J.; et al. Exercise and Respiratory Training Improve Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life in Patients with Severe Chronic Pulmonary Hypertension. Circulation 2006, 114, 1482–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Bussotti, M.; Gremigni, P.; Pedretti, R.F.E.; Kransinska, P.; Di Marco, S.; Corbo, P.; Marchese, G.; Totaro, P.; Sommaruga, M. Effects of an Outpatient Service Rehabilitation Programme in Patients Affected by Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: An Observational Study. Cardiovasc. Hematol. Disord. Drug. Targets 2017, 17, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Raj, S.R.; Arnold, A.C.; Barboi, A.; Claydon, V.E.; Limber, J.K.; Lucci, V.M.; Numan, M.; Peltier, A.; Snapper, H.; Vermino, S.; et al. Long-COVID postural tachycardia syndrome: An American Autonomic Society Statement. Clin. Auton. Res. 2021, 31, 365–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bouwstra, H.; Smit, E.B.; Wattel, E.M.; van der Wouden, J.C.; Hertogh, C.M.P.M.; Terluin, B.; Terwee, C.B. Index Measurement Properties of the Barthel Index in Geriatric Rehabilitation. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2019, 20, 420–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kojima, G. Quick and Simple FRAIL Scale Predicts Incident Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental ADL (IADL) Disabilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J. Am. Med Dir. Assoc. 2018, 19, 1063–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Guralnik, J.M.; Ferrucci, L.; Simonsick, E.M.; Salive, M.E.; Wallace, R.B. Lower-extremity Function in Persons Over the Age of 70 Years as a Predictor of Subsequent Disability. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995, 332, 556–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Fried, L.P.; Tangen, C.M.; Walston, J.; Newman, A.B.; Hirsch, C.; Gottdiener, J.; Seeman, T.; Tracy, R.; Kop, W.J.; Burke, G.; et al. Frailty in older study: Evidence for a phenotype. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. 2001, 56, M146–M156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rockwood, K.; Song, X.; MacKnight, C.; Bergman, H.; Hogan, D.B.; McDowell, I.; Mitnitski, A. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ 2005, 173, 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Afilalo, J.; Mottillo, S.; Xue, X.; Colacone, A.; Morais, J.A.; Delaney, J.S.; Afilalo, M. Frailty and adverse outcomes in older adults being discharged from the emergency department: A prospective cohort study. Can. J. Emerg. Med. 2020, 22, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Robles, P.G.; Mathur, S.; Janaudis-Fereira, T.; Dolmage, T.E.; Goldstein, R.S.; Brooks, D. Measurement of peripheral muscle strength in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review. J. Cardiopulm. Rehabil. Prev. 2011, 31, 11–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Puente-Maestu, L.; Palange, P.; Casaburi, R.; Laveneziana, P.; Maltais, F.; Neder, J.A.; O’Donnell Dem Onorati, P.; Porszasz, J.; Rabinovich, R.; Rossiter, H.; et al. Use of exercise testing in the evaluation of interventional efficacy: An official ERS statement. Eur. Respir. J. 2016, 47, 429–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Downs, S.; Marquez, J.; Chiarelli, P. The Berg Balance Scale has high intra- and inter-rater reliability but absolute reliability varies across the scale: A systematic review. J. Physiother. 2013, 59, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Lee, P.H.; Macfarlane, D.J.; Lam, T.H.; Stewart, S.M. Validity of the International Activity Questionnaire Short form: A systematic review. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2011, 8, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Sattler, M.C.; Jaunig, J.; Tösch, C.; Watson, E.D.; Mokkink, L.B.; Dietz, P.; van Poppel, M. Current Evidence of Measurement Properties of Physical Activity Questionnaires for Older Adults: An Updated Systematic Review. Sports Med. 2020, 50, 1271–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Green, C.P.; Porter, C.B.; Bresnahan, D.R.; Spertus, J.A. Development and evaluation of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire: A new health status measure for heart failure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2000, 35, 1245–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Jones, P.W.; Quirk, F.H.; Baveystock, C.M. The St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire. Resp. Med. 1991, 85 (Suppl. SB), 2531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Dermot Phelan Jonathan, H.; Kim Eugene, H. Chung. A game plan for the resumption of sport and exercise after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. JAMA Cardiol. 2020, 5, 1085–1086. [Google Scholar]
  55. Jimesez-Pavon, D.; Carbonell-Baeza, A. Physical exercise as therapy to fight against the mental and physical consequences of COVID-19 quarantine: Special focus in older people. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2020, 63, 386–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kiekens, C.; Boldrini, C.; Andreoli, A.; Avesani, R.; Gamna, F.; Grandi, M.; Lombardi, F.; Lusuardi, M.; Molteni, F.; Perboni, A.; et al. Rehabilitation and respiratory management in the acute and early post-acute phase. “Instant paper from the field” on rehabilitation answers to the COVID-19 emergency. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2020, 56, 323–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The “new combined post COVID-19 exercise protocol” construction scheme.
Figure 1. The “new combined post COVID-19 exercise protocol” construction scheme.
Jcm 11 02228 g001
Table 1. COVID-19 training [15,16,17,18,19,20,21] based on the few available data.
Table 1. COVID-19 training [15,16,17,18,19,20,21] based on the few available data.
COVID-19 Patients Training
-
4/5 sessions/week for 6 weeks
-
Aerobic training: cycle ergometer, steps, walking, treadmill running; 5–30′ at 40–60% max heart rate or 4–6 Borg Scale
-
Resistance training: upper and lower body exercises; 30–80% of 1 RM; 8–12 repetitions
-
Respiratory training: using a commercial hand-held resistance for 3 sets with 10 breaths 2 times/day for 4 weeks in each set at 60% of maximal expiratory mouth pressure with a rest period of 1 min
-
Cough exercise: 3 sets of 10 active coughs
-
Diaphragmatic muscle training: 30 maximal voluntary diaphragmatic contractions in the supine position, placing a medium weight (1–3 kg) on the anterior abdominal wall to resist diaphragmatic descent
-
Stretching exercise: the respiratory muscles are stretched under the guidance of a rehabilitation therapist; the patient was placed in the supine or lateral decubitus position with the knees bent to correct the lumbar curve; patients were ordered to move their arms in flexion, horizontal extension, abduction and external rotation
RM: one repetition maximum, such as maximal weight an individual can lift for just one repetition with correct technique is the gold standard for assessing strength.
Table 2. Different pathophysiology features of COVID-19 and related pertinent diseases.
Table 2. Different pathophysiology features of COVID-19 and related pertinent diseases.
COVID-19 Pathophysiology Features [4,5,6,7,40]Related Landmark Diseases [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]
Respiratory distress with impairment of alveolar air exchange, decrease in pulmonary ventilation and, probably, pulmonary fibrosis in the long runSARS
Interstitial lung disease
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Pulmonary vessels dysfunction with pulmonary hypertension in some cases due to pulmonary embolism and/or thrombosisPulmonary Hypertension
Interstitial lung disease
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Decreased exercise capacity and musculoskeletal deterioration due to the long-term immobilization or to the muscle invasion by the virus, leading to a “frail” post-COVID-19 populationFrailty
Symptomatic high heart rateHeart Failure
Interstitial lung disease
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Pulmonary Hypertension
Cardiac dysfunction: reduced systolic function in some cases and possible persistent myocardial damage in the long runHeart Failure
Table 3. Different exercise training programs with a general description, COVID-19 related diseases trial data and COVID-19 trial/Expert Consensus data.
Table 3. Different exercise training programs with a general description, COVID-19 related diseases trial data and COVID-19 trial/Expert Consensus data.
TrainingGeneral DescriptionCOVID-19
Related Diseases Trial
Data
COVID-19
Trial/Expert Consensus Data
Continuous
Aerobic
training
Characterized by continuous, dynamic, rhythmic activities involving major muscle groups (i.e., walking, treadmill, cycle ergometer, stair climbing, rower, elliptical trainers)
Typically performed at submaximal intensity with the main purpose of progressively moving the anaerobic threshold
Heart rate or oxygen consumption measurement to set training intensity.
SARS-CoV-1COVID-19 trial
Expert Consensus
Frailty
Interstitial lung disease
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Heart Failure
Pulmonary Hypertension
Interval
Training
High/Low intensity: intermittent periods of high/low intensity exercise separated by periods of low intensity/recovery
Heart rate or oxygen consumption measurement to set training intensity.
Heart FailureCOVID-19 trial
Resistance
Training
Primarily anaerobic physical exercises designed to promote muscles force against external weights.
1RM (one-repetition maximum), the maximum amount of weight that a person can possibly lift for one repetition, used to set training intensity.
It promotes less pronounced cardiorespiratory responses when compared to aerobic exercise
SARS-CoV-1COVID-19 trial
Expert Consensus
Frailty
Interstitial lung disease
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Heart Failure
Pulmonary Hypertension
Inspiratory
muscles
training
Inspiration using a commercial hand-held resistanceSARS-CoV-1COVID-19 trial
Expert Consensus
Heart Failure
Pulmonary Hypertension
Cough
Exercise
Sets of active cough under the guidance of a rehabilitation therapist COVID-19 trial
Expert Consensus
Diaphragm
Training
Maximal voluntary diaphragmatic contractions in the supine position, placing a medium weight (1–3 kg) on the anterior abdominal wall to resist diaphragmatic descent COVID-19 trial
Expert Consensus
Stretching
Exercise
The respiratory muscles stretched under the guidance of a rehabilitation therapist; the patient placed in the supine or lateral decubitus position with the knees bent to correct the lumbar curve; patients ordered to move their arms in flexion, horizontal extension, abduction and externalIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosisCOVID-19 trials
Expert Consensus
Flexibility
Exercise
Static and dynamic stretching leading to progressive increase in range of motionFrailty
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Balance
Exercise
Leg stances, semi-tandem and tandem stance, toe walking, heel walking, tandem gait, walking on a balance board, eye–hand and eye–leg coordinationFrailtyExpert Consensus
Deep/
slow breath sessions
Special form of training skilfully mastered by patients through a series of choreographed action routines and with the help of words, pictures, videos or other communication methods. During breathing training, it is necessary to pay attention to the coordination of diaphragm movement with trunk and limb movement so that diaphragm-function training, breathing-mode training and body and joint training can be carried out at the same time.Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Heart Failure
Pulmonary Hypertension
Expert Consensus
Table 4. Preliminary evaluation [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40].
Table 4. Preliminary evaluation [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40].
EvaluationScales or Tests
DisabilityBARTHEL Index [41]
Activities of Daily Living scale (ADL) [42]
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) [43]
FrailtyFried’s Frailty Phenotype [44]
Frailty Index of Accumulative Deficits [45]
5 m Gait Speed [46]
SPPB [43]
StrengthHand Grip Test [47]
EnduranceCardiopulmonary Exercise Test (if available) [48]
6 Minute Walking Test (SpO2 + respiratory rate + Borg scale before/after) [48]
BalanceBerg Balance Scale [49]
SPPB [43]
Respiratory FunctionRest/nocturnal SpO2 [32]
Spirometry [32]
Diffusion capacity [32]
Maximal Inspiratory/Expiratory Pressure (MIP/MEP) [29]
Cardiovascular FunctionTransthoracic echocardiogram [48]
QuestionnaireInternational Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF) [50]
Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) [51]
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) [52]
St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) [53]
Table 5. The new combined post-COVID-19 exercise protocol.
Table 5. The new combined post-COVID-19 exercise protocol.
TrainingModalityFrequencyIntensityDuration
Aerobic
continuous training
Walking or cycling2→5 days/week; 150–300 min/weekWalking 80% of peak walking speed achieved on the 6 MWt; Cycling at 50–60%→70% WR max or 60–75%-->80–85% HR max estimated from 6 MWt or Borg 4–6→10; between AT and RC estimated from CPET20–30 min→65 min per session; 8–12 weeks long
Interval
training
Walking or cycling Short bouts (10–30 s) of moderate–high intensity at 50–100% peak exercise capacity and a longer recovery (80–60 s)30 min aerobic interval training (5 min bout + 1 min rest repeated 5 times)
Resistance/
Strength
training
Upper and lower body strength2–3→5 times/week10–15→40→80% of 1 RM; 3–5 on Borg scale; wall push-ups, chair squat, dumbbells shoulder press, dumbbells biceps curls, dumbbells arm extension and abdominal curl-ups8–12→15 repetitions with 1 min of rest between steps for 1–3→4–6 times; 10→45 min for each session
Inspiratory
muscles
training
Using a commercial hand-held resistance2 times/day;
2 sessions/week
60% of maximal expiratory mouth pressure3 sets with 10 breaths in each set with a rest period of 1 min
Cough
Exercise
Under the guidance of a rehabilitation therapist2 sessions/week 3 sets of 10 active coughs
Diaphragmatic muscle
training
Supine position2 sessions/weekplacing a medium weight (1–3 kg) on the anterior abdominal wall to resist diaphragmatic descent30 maximal voluntary diaphragmatic contractions
Stretching
Exercise
Supine or lateral decubitus with the knees bent to correct the lumbar curve, moving their arms in flexion, horizontal extension, abduction and external rotation Titrate to symptomsOne set of 4–5 stretching exercises for 15–30 s
Balance
Exercise
Leg stances, semi-tandem and tandem stance, toe walking, heel walking, tandem gait, walking on a balance board, eye–hand and eye–leg coordination; under the guidance of a rehabilitation therapist2–3 days/week Among the different training days
Flexibility
Exercise
Static and dynamic stretching leading to progressive increase in range of motion; dynamic stretching in warm-up, whereas static stretching exercise at the end in the cool-down phase; under the guidance of a rehabilitation therapist2–3→5 days/week5 min long
Slow breathing SessionsThe patient connected to a device providing rhythmic sounds for the progressive lowering of the respiratory rate6 b/min 30′ daily 20–30 min for every daily session
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cattadori, G.; Di Marco, S.; Baravelli, M.; Picozzi, A.; Ambrosio, G. Exercise Training in Post-COVID-19 Patients: The Need for a Multifactorial Protocol for a Multifactorial Pathophysiology. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 2228. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcm11082228

AMA Style

Cattadori G, Di Marco S, Baravelli M, Picozzi A, Ambrosio G. Exercise Training in Post-COVID-19 Patients: The Need for a Multifactorial Protocol for a Multifactorial Pathophysiology. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(8):2228. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcm11082228

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cattadori, Gaia, Silvia Di Marco, Massimo Baravelli, Anna Picozzi, and Giuseppe Ambrosio. 2022. "Exercise Training in Post-COVID-19 Patients: The Need for a Multifactorial Protocol for a Multifactorial Pathophysiology" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 8: 2228. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcm11082228

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop