Next Article in Journal
Short-Term Therapies for Treatment of Acute and Advanced Heart Failure—Why so Few Drugs Available in Clinical Use, Why Even Fewer in the Pipeline?
Next Article in Special Issue
Basis of PD1/PD-L1 Therapies
Previous Article in Journal
2017 ACC/AHA Blood Pressure Classification and Cardiovascular Disease in 15 Million Adults of Age 20–94 Years
Previous Article in Special Issue
Neurological Immune Related Adverse Events Associated with Nivolumab, Ipilimumab, and Pembrolizumab Therapy—Review of the Literature and Future Outlook
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 8
Issue 11
10.3390/jcm8111833
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

PD-L1 Expression and Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Thymic Epithelial Neoplasms

by
Rumi Higuchi
1,
Taichiro Goto
1,*,
Yosuke Hirotsu
2,
Takahiro Nakagomi
1,
Yujiro Yokoyama
1,
Sotaro Otake
1,
Kenji Amemiya
3,
Toshio Oyama
3 and
Masao Omata
2
1
Lung Cancer and Respiratory Disease Center, Yamanashi Central Hospital, Yamanashi 400-8506, Japan
2
Genome Analysis Center, Yamanashi Central Hospital, Yamanashi 400-8506, Japan
3
Department of Pathology, Yamanashi Central Hospital, Yamanashi 400-8506, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8(11), 1833; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcm8111833
Submission received: 11 October 2019 / Revised: 29 October 2019 / Accepted: 30 October 2019 / Published: 1 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human Cancer Immunotherapy with Antibodies to the PD-1 and PD-L1 Pathway)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare malignant mediastinal tumors that are difficult to diagnose and treat. The programmed death 1 (PD-1) receptor and its ligand (PD-L1) are expressed in various malignant tumors and have emerged as potential immunotherapeutic targets. However, the immunobiology of TETs is poorly understood. We evaluated PD-L1 expression and the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (CD8 and CD3 expression) in surgical TET specimens from 39 patients via immunohistochemistry and determined their relation to clinicopathological parameters. Cases with membranous reactivity of the PD-L1 antibody in ≥1% of tumor cells were considered positive. Positive PD-L1 expression was observed in 53.9% of cases. Histologically, PD-L1 expression was positive in 2/6 type A, 2/6 type AB, 3/9 type B1, 4/4 type B2, 5/6 type B3, and 5/8 type C TET cases. Thus, the number of cases with PD-L1 expression and the percent expression of PD-L1 were significantly higher in more aggressive thymomas (type B2 or B3). CD3+ and CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were diffusely and abundantly distributed in all cases. These data suggest that a PD-1/PD-L1 blockade is a promising treatment for TETs, with more beneficial treatment effects for aggressive thymomas such as type B2 or B3.

1. Introduction

Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are relatively rare malignant mediastinal tumors with an incidence of <1% of all adult cancers [1,2]. TETs are histologically classified as thymomas and thymic cancers. The World Health Organization (WHO) categorizes TETs into types A, AB, B1, B2, B3, and C (thymic cancer) according to the degree of aggressiveness (based on a histology) [3,4,5,6]. Complete resection is currently the only curative treatment [7,8,9], and the prognosis is poor for both unresectable and metastatic diseases [10,11]. Considering the limited activity of cytotoxic agents for advanced and refractory cases, the development of novel and innovative therapeutic strategies is essential, which requires a better understanding of thymic immunobiology.
Programmed death 1 (PD-1) is a coinhibitory inducible receptor present in T-cells and macrophages [12]. Tumor cells with an increased expression of the PD-1 ligand, PD-L1, are believed to escape host immunity through activation of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway and the consequent suppression of effector immune responses [13,14,15,16]. The PD-L1 pathway is a unique coinhibitory pathway in cancer immunology, as it is selectively expressed in tumor cells but is very rarely in normal tissue, thereby making it a principal target for immunotherapy [16]. Novel agents resulting in an immune blockade have been introduced and are now widely used in the treatment of various cancers [17,18,19,20]. In particular, monoclonal antibodies targeting PD-1 or PD-L1 exert dramatic responses in many solid tumors, particularly melanoma, lung, and urothelial carcinomas [21,22,23,24]. Clinical trials evaluating the use of these agents in the treatment of thymic carcinoma (type C thymoma) are already underway and have demonstrated promising preliminary clinical outcomes [25,26]; however, in general, the validity, efficacy, and safety of treatment with immune checkpoint blockades have not been sufficiently investigated in TETs, including in other types of thymomas. With the emerging paradigm of immunotherapy in solid tumors, PD-L1 expression in TETs should be carefully studied and analyzed.
Accordingly, we evaluated the expression of PD-L1 and the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in thymic epithelial neoplasms (thymoma and thymic carcinoma) via immunohistochemical staining and analyzed the statistical associations between expression and clinicopathologic features. IL-10 mRNA was also measured to better characterize the aggressiveness of TET. Moreover, we discuss the possible clinical applications of immune checkpoint inhibitors for thymomas through a review of the published literature.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Patients

A retrospective review was performed of tumor specimens available from 39 consecutive patients diagnosed with thymoma or thymic carcinoma undergoing surgical resection (n = 33) or biopsy (n = 6) at our hospital between January 2000 and October 2017. The clinicopathologic characteristics assessed included age, sex, histology, stage, smoking status, and diagnosis of myasthenia gravis (MG). The 2015 WHO classification was used for the histological classification of TET [27]. The study was of a retrospective design and was approved by the institute’s ethics committee.

2.2. Immunohistochemistry for PD-L1 and TILs

Specimens from 20 patients obtained between January 2000 and December 2013 were fixed with 20% nonbuffered formalin, and those obtained from 19 patients between January 2014 and October 2017 were fixed with 10% buffered formalin (Table S1). Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues were sectioned at 5 μm, deparaffinized, rehydrated, and stained in an automated system (Ventana Benchmark ULTRA System; Roche, Tucson, AZ, USA) using commercially available detection kits and antibodies against PD-L1 (28–8, ab205921; Abcam, Tokyo, Japan), CD4 (4B12; Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan), CD8 (D1M8I; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), and CD3 (LN10; Leica Biosystems, Richmond, IL, USA). PD-L1 is primarily located in the cell membrane of tumor cells, and its expression was evaluated semi-quantitatively by two pathologists based on the proportion of PD-L1-positive tumor cells. A PD-L1 expression rate of 1% or greater was defined as PD-L1-positive. CD3 and CD8 were utilized as a marker for pan T lymphocytes and cytotoxic T lymphocytes, respectively. Thus, CD3+ and CD8+ lymphocytes were counted in the tumors, and the percentage of CD8+ lymphocytes in CD3+ lymphocytes was calculated as the TIL fraction, as previously reported [28,29,30].

2.3. mRNA Expression and Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analyses

RNA was isolated from frozen surgical specimens using an AllPrep DNA/RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Tokyo, Japan), and reverse transcription was performed using MultiScribe Reverse Transcriptase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, New York, NY, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. TaqMan™ Gene Expression Assays, including IL10 (Hs00174086_m1), PD-L1 (CD274: Hs00204257_m1), and β-actin (Hs99999903_m1), were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis was performed using the ViiA™ 7 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The PCR reaction was performed with 10 μL TaqMan® Fast Advanced Master Mix, 2 μL cDNA, 1 μL TaqMan™ Gene Expression Assay, and 7 μL nuclease-free water. Amplification reactions were performed in fast mode: 2 min at 50 °C and 20 s at 95 ℃ for denaturation, followed by 45 cycles of 1 s at 95 °C and 20 s at 60 °C. Gene expression was normalized to that of β-actin.

2.4. Statistical Analyses

Continuous variables are reported as means and standard deviations. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-squared test. Multivariate analyses were performed in JMP (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). A two-tailed p < 0.05 denotes a statistically significant difference.

3. Results

3.1. Patient Characteristics

We studied surgical samples from 39 patients with thymic epithelial tumors who received surgery at our hospital between January 2000 and October 2017. Among the 39 patients, 21 were men and 18 were women, and 21 were smokers and 18 were nonsmokers. Histologically, there were six cases of type A, six cases of type AB, nine cases of type B1, four cases of type B2, six cases of type B3, and eight cases of thymic carcinoma (Table S1). All thymic carcinomas were histologically classified as squamous cell carcinoma. The patients’ ages ranged between 23 and 85 (mean ± SD, 62.6 ± 14.6) years. One patient with type B thymoma exhibited comorbidity with MG (Case 22 in Table 1, Case 24 in Table 1).

3.2. Expression of PD-L1 in Tumor Cells

PD-L1 expression was positive (≥1%) in 2/6 patients with type A, 2/6 patients with type AB, 3/9 patients with type B1, 4/4 with type B2, 5/6 with type B3, and 5/8 patients with type C (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3, Table 1). In total, 51.6% of thymoma cases and 62.5% of thymic cancer cases stained positive for PD-L1. In type AB thymoma (n = 6), no cases stained positive for PD-L1 in the type A component of the tumor, and two cases stained positive for PD-L1 only in the type B component (Figure 1E,H), which indicates the possible presence of intratumor heterogeneity in PD-L1 staining.
A multivariate analysis (to identify factors that affect PD-L1 expression) revealed that only WHO classification was a significant determining factor of PD-L1 expression among age (p = 0.41), sex (p = 0.92), smoking habit (p = 0.67), WHO classification (p = 0.01), tumor size (p = 0.41), stage (p = 0.30), and formalin fixation method (p = 0.43). The number of cases with PD-L1 expression was significantly larger in thymoma types with more aggressive histology (type B2 or B3) in the WHO classification than in those with less aggressive histology (type A, AB, or B1) (Figure 4A). In addition, the percent expression of PD-L1 was significantly higher in type B2 or B3 thymoma than in thymomas with lower-grade histology (type A, AB, or B1) (Figure 4B).

3.3. mRNA Expression of PD-L1 and IL-10 in Tumor Tissues

PD-L1 mRNA expression was measured in tumor tissues by using real-time PCR. PD-L1 mRNA expression was higher in type B2, B3, and C TETs than in the other types (Figure 5A), which was consistent with the immunohistochemical findings. As an M2-type cytokine, IL-10 expression was also measured. IL-10 mRNA expression was the highest in type C TET and was significantly higher in higher grades of TET (types B2, B3, and C) than in the lower grades (types A, AB, and B1) (Figure 5B).

3.4. CD8 Expression in Lymphocytes

In all TET samples, CD3+ and CD8+ TILs were abundantly present in the tumors except for one case (Case 30 in Table 1), with 5% frequency of CD8+ expression in CD3+ lymphocytes. The percentage of CD8+ lymphocytes among the CD3+ lymphocytes in the tumors was high, at 82.8% ± 18.3% (mean ± SD) (Table 1).

3.5. CD4-Positive Lymphocytes in Tumor Tissues

CD4-positive lymphocytes were counted in 400× magnification fields under a microscope. The counts were higher in the type B1–3 thymomas than in types A, AB, or C (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

Immune checkpoint blockades are an emerging and hopeful treatment strategy for a variety of cancers [18,31,32]; however, only a subset of patients sustain clinical responses, and establishing a predictive marker for a good response remains challenging. In this context, we have begun to profile TETs for PD-L1 expression and additional immunotherapeutic markers. Here, we found positive PD-L1 expression (≥1%) in 53.9% of all surgical TET samples. None of the clinical parameters, including age, sex, smoking habit, tumor size, and stage, were correlated with PD-L1 immunoexpression, whereas there was a significant association between PD-L1-positive status and more aggressive thymomas (types B2 and B3). Furthermore, CD8+ TILs were abundantly detected in almost all TETs examined, supporting the use of an immune checkpoint inhibitor for TET treatment.
In our study, the expression of IL-10, as one of the M2-type cytokines, was measured by real-time PCR, which revealed that type B2–3 thymomas exhibited a higher expression of IL-10 than the other types of thymomas did. In type B2–3 thymomas, anti-inflammatory mediators are upregulated inside the tumor, thereby inducing a suitable microenvironment for the proliferation of tumor cells. In addition, the number of CD4+ lymphocytes in the tumor tissue was significantly higher in type B1–3 thymomas than in the other types. The abundance of both CD4+ lymphocytes and CD8+ lymphocytes in type B1–3 thymomas suggested that these lymphocytes surrounded the tumor cells and were ready to attack the tumor cells. These data also supported the potential of PD1/PD-L1 blockades as a promising treatment for aggressive thymomas, such as type B2 or B3.
According to the WHO classification, thymomas are classified into types A and B, while thymic carcinomas are categorized as type C. Although thymic carcinomas have cytological characteristics of malignant tumors, thymomas are essentially benign tumors cytologically. Thus, thymic carcinomas tend to be more infiltrating and rapidly aggressive than thymomas. Several studies have reported that PD-L1 expression was upregulated in types B2 and B3, but not in type C [33,34], which is consistent with our findings. This low PD-L1 expression in type C may partly reflect the fact that pathogenesis, histopathology, and biological phenotypes are totally different between types A and B and type C TETs. In addition, a smaller number of CD4+ lymphocytes in type C compared to type B can be attributed to the difference in lymphocyte richness in the microenvironment between types B and C.
Sufficient therapeutic effects of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for TETs have been demonstrated in individual case reports, contributing to the promotion of clinical trials for advanced TETs [35,36]. Subsequently, some phase I clinical trials have used PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for various solid malignant tumors, including TETs, demonstrating acceptable clinical efficacy and safety despite the limited number of recruited patients [37,38]. Two phase II, single-center trials evaluating the clinical feasibility of pembrolizumab for TETs have also recently been reported [25,39]. Giaccone et al. [25] investigated 40 thymic carcinoma patients with disease progression after at least one line of chemotherapy: patients with autoimmune disease or other malignancies were excluded. They found an overall response rate of 22.5%: 1 patient achieved a complete response, 8 achieved a partial response, and 21 achieved stable disease. The toxicity was reported to be well tolerated, and fatigue, diarrhea, and fever were the major side effects noted. However, six (15%) of the patients developed serious autoimmune disorders, and two (5%) patients experienced severe polymyositis and myocarditis that required pacemaker implantation [25]. The other phase II trial, conducted by Cho et al. [39], targeted 33 TET patients (26 with thymic carcinomas and 7 with thymomas). The eligibility criteria included progression after at least one line of platinum-based chemotherapy, and patients with active autoimmune disease were excluded. The response rate in patients with thymic carcinoma and thymoma was 19.2% and 28.6%, respectively. However, various grade 3 or higher immunological side effects were observed in 5 (71.4%) of the 7 patients with thymoma and in 4 (15.4%) of the 26 patients with thymic carcinoma, including hepatitis, myocarditis, MG, thyroiditis, glomerulonephritis, colitis, and subcutaneous myoclonus [39].
Overall, our study suggests that the application of immunotherapy in TET treatment would be lucrative, since PD-L1 positivity was diffuse, strong, and present in a large number of TETs (53.9%), as confirmed in previous reports [33,34,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. To the best of our knowledge, there have been 14 published studies, including the present study, on PD-L1 expression in TETs (Table 2) [33,34,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. Although only a limited number of patients were included in each study due to the fact that TETs are a rare disease, PD-L1 expression was assessed in a total of 801 thymomas and 180 thymic carcinomas, with a wide range in positivity of 18%–92% and 36%–88%, respectively. One possible explanation for these variable findings between studies is the use of different antibodies for immunohistochemistry detection, which could have resulted in variations in the detected staining site, pattern, and intensity of PD-L1. In addition, the studies used different cut-off scores for positivity determinations of PD-L1 expression. Different FDA-approved assays are available for the determination of PD-L1 expression, including the 28–8 assay used in the present study, to select patients with lung cancer for immunotherapy. However, there is no consensus for the most appropriate assay for PD-L1 testing in TETs. Nevertheless, most of these studies also found a correlation of PD-L1 expression with type B histology [33,34,41,42,43,44,47,49,50] (in concordance with our results), which suggests a nonredundant application of immunotherapy for these aggressive types of thymomas.
Apart from PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy, recent studies have identified a missense mutation (chromosome 7 c.74146970T>A) in the GTF2I gene at a high frequency in TETs [51,52]. The recurrent presence of this point mutation in TETs may represent a target for potential therapeutic use, and novel treatment strategies, such as molecular-targeted therapy, gene therapy, or CAR T-cell therapy, are promising for the future.
Our study is certainly limited by its relatively small sample size; thus, a larger series will be needed to more comprehensively evaluate the immunophenotypic landscape of TETs and more clearly elucidate associations with clinical parameters in a more comprehensive multivariate analysis. However, as the major aim of this preliminary analysis was to examine therapeutic targets that should be prioritized for clinical development, the modestly sized cohort can still provide useful insight. The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of TETs represents an important next step in improving outcomes in this otherwise difficult-to-treat disease. Here, we demonstrated that the tumor cells were prevalently surrounded by abundant CD8+ TILs, suggesting that the inhibition of an immune evasion via PD-1/PD-L1 would allow for a strong killing effect specific to tumor cells [53,54,55,56]. This novel finding of the presence of abundant TILs should promote and expedite clinical trials to establish immunotherapies for TETs.

5. Conclusions

The high expression of PD-L1 and abundant CD8+ lymphocytes in TETs provides a theoretical foundation for the clinical adoption of an immunotherapy strategy for targeting PD-1/PD-L1. Clinical trials should be expedited with careful monitoring of adverse effects to best explore the potential immunotherapies and thus improve the outcome of treatment for patients with TETs.

Supplementary Materials

The following is available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/2077-0383/8/11/1833/s1, Table S1: Detailed clinicopathological features and immunophenotypic data of individual patients.

Author Contributions

T.G. and R.H. wrote the manuscript. T.G., T.N., R.H., S.O., and Y.Y. performed the surgery. T.O., K.A., and R.H. carried out the pathological examination. Y.H. and M.O. participated in the molecular analyses. M.O. and T.G. edited the final manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version for submission.

Acknowledgments

We greatly appreciate the contributions of Yoshihiro Miyashita, Yumiko Kakizaki, and Toshiharu Tsutsui in helpful scientific discussions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Engels, E.A. Epidemiology of thymoma and associated malignancies. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2010, 5, S260–S265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Venuta, F.; Anile, M.; Diso, D.; Vitolo, D.; Rendina, E.A.; De Giacomo, T.; Francioni, F.; Coloni, G.F. Thymoma and thymic carcinoma. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2010, 37, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Kondo, K.; Yoshizawa, K.; Tsuyuguchi, M.; Kimura, S.; Sumitomo, M.; Morita, J.; Miyoshi, T.; Sakiyama, S.; Mukai, K.; Monden, Y. Who histologic classification is a prognostic indicator in thymoma. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2004, 77, 1183–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Marx, A.; Chan, J.K.; Coindre, J.M.; Detterbeck, F.; Girard, N.; Harris, N.L.; Jaffe, E.S.; Kurrer, M.O.; Marom, E.M.; Moreira, A.L.; et al. The 2015 world health organization classification of tumors of the thymus: Continuity and changes. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2015, 10, 1383–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Marx, A.; Strobel, P.; Badve, S.S.; Chalabreysse, L.; Chan, J.K.; Chen, G.; de Leval, L.; Detterbeck, F.; Girard, N.; Huang, J.; et al. Itmig consensus statement on the use of the who histological classification of thymoma and thymic carcinoma: Refined definitions, histological criteria, and reporting. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2014, 9, 596–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Moon, J.W.; Lee, K.S.; Shin, M.H.; Kim, S.; Woo, S.Y.; Lee, G.; Han, J.; Shim, Y.M.; Choi, Y.S. Thymic epithelial tumors: Prognostic determinants among clinical, histopathologic, and computed tomography findings. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2015, 99, 462–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Detterbeck, F.C.; Parsons, A.M. Management of stage i and ii thymoma. Thorac. Surg. Clin. 2011, 21, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Litvak, A.M.; Woo, K.; Hayes, S.; Huang, J.; Rimner, A.; Sima, C.S.; Moreira, A.L.; Tsukazan, M.; Riely, G.J. Clinical characteristics and outcomes for patients with thymic carcinoma: Evaluation of masaoka staging. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2014, 9, 1810–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhao, Y.; Shi, J.; Fan, L.; Hu, D.; Yang, J.; Zhao, H. Surgical treatment of thymoma: An 11-year experience with 761 patients. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2016, 49, 1144–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Girard, N.; Lal, R.; Wakelee, H.; Riely, G.J.; Loehrer, P.J. Chemotherapy definitions and policies for thymic malignancies. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2011, 6, S1749–S1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schmitt, J.; Loehrer, P.J., Sr. The role of chemotherapy in advanced thymoma. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2010, 5, S357–S360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Liang, S.C.; Latchman, Y.E.; Buhlmann, J.E.; Tomczak, M.F.; Horwitz, B.H.; Freeman, G.J.; Sharpe, A.H. Regulation of pd-1, pd-l1, and pd-l2 expression during normal and autoimmune responses. Eur. J. Immunol. 2003, 33, 2706–2716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Dong, H.; Zhu, G.; Tamada, K.; Chen, L. B7-h1, a third member of the b7 family, co-stimulates t-cell proliferation and interleukin-10 secretion. Nat. Med. 1999, 5, 1365–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pardoll, D.M. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2012, 12, 252–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Philips, G.K.; Atkins, M. Therapeutic uses of anti-pd-1 and anti-pd-l1 antibodies. Int. Immunol. 2015, 27, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, X.; Teng, F.; Kong, L.; Yu, J. Pd-l1 expression in human cancers and its association with clinical outcomes. OncoTargets Ther. 2016, 9, 5023–5039. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ferris, R.L.; Blumenschein, G., Jr.; Fayette, J.; Guigay, J.; Colevas, A.D.; Licitra, L.; Harrington, K.; Kasper, S.; Vokes, E.E.; Even, C.; et al. Nivolumab for recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 1856–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Motzer, R.J.; Escudier, B.; McDermott, D.F.; George, S.; Hammers, H.J.; Srinivas, S.; Tykodi, S.S.; Sosman, J.A.; Procopio, G.; Plimack, E.R.; et al. Nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 1803–1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Reck, M.; Rodriguez-Abreu, D.; Robinson, A.G.; Hui, R.; Csoszi, T.; Fulop, A.; Gottfried, M.; Peled, N.; Tafreshi, A.; Cuffe, S.; et al. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for pd-l1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 1823–1833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gunturi, A.; McDermott, D.F. Potential of new therapies like anti-pd1 in kidney cancer. Curr. Treat. Options Oncol. 2014, 15, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Brahmer, J.R.; Tykodi, S.S.; Chow, L.Q.; Hwu, W.J.; Topalian, S.L.; Hwu, P.; Drake, C.G.; Camacho, L.H.; Kauh, J.; Odunsi, K.; et al. Safety and activity of anti-pd-l1 antibody in patients with advanced cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 366, 2455–2465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Rotte, A.; D’Orazi, G.; Bhandaru, M. Nobel committee honors tumor immunologists. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 37, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Topalian, S.L.; Sznol, M.; McDermott, D.F.; Kluger, H.M.; Carvajal, R.D.; Sharfman, W.H.; Brahmer, J.R.; Lawrence, D.P.; Atkins, M.B.; Powderly, J.D.; et al. Survival, durable tumor remission, and long-term safety in patients with advanced melanoma receiving nivolumab. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 32, 1020–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Xu, F.; Jin, T.; Zhu, Y.; Dai, C. Immune checkpoint therapy in liver cancer. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 37, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Giaccone, G.; Kim, C.; Thompson, J.; McGuire, C.; Kallakury, B.; Chahine, J.J.; Manning, M.; Mogg, R.; Blumenschein, W.M.; Tan, M.T.; et al. Pembrolizumab in patients with thymic carcinoma: A single-arm, single-centre, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018, 19, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Merveilleux du Vignaux, C.; Maury, J.M.; Girard, N. Novel agents in the treatment of thymic malignancies. Curr. Treat. Options Oncol. 2017, 18, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Travis, W.D.; Brambilla, E.; Nicholson, A.G.; Yatabe, Y.; Austin, J.H.M.; Beasley, M.B.; Chirieac, L.R.; Dacic, S.; Duhig, E.; Flieder, D.B.; et al. The 2015 world health organization classification of lung tumors: Impact of genetic, clinical and radiologic advances since the 2004 classification. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2015, 10, 1243–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cermakova, P.; Melichar, B.; Tomsova, M.; Zoul, Z.; Kalabova, H.; Spacek, J.; Dolezel, M. Prognostic significance of cd3+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with endometrial carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2014, 34, 5555–5561. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hu, X.; Li, Y.Q.; Li, Q.G.; Ma, Y.L.; Peng, J.J.; Cai, S.J. Itgae defines cd8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes predicting a better prognostic survival in colorectal cancer. EBioMedicine 2018, 35, 178–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yu, A.; Mansure, J.J.; Solanki, S.; Siemens, D.R.; Koti, M.; Dias, A.B.T.; Burnier, M.M.; Brimo, F.; Kassouf, W. Presence of lymphocytic infiltrate cytotoxic t lymphocyte cd3+, cd8+, and immunoscore as prognostic marker in patients after radical cystectomy. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0205746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Borghaei, H.; Paz-Ares, L.; Horn, L.; Spigel, D.R.; Steins, M.; Ready, N.E.; Chow, L.Q.; Vokes, E.E.; Felip, E.; Holgado, E.; et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 1627–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Larkin, J.; Chiarion-Sileni, V.; Gonzalez, R.; Grob, J.J.; Cowey, C.L.; Lao, C.D.; Schadendorf, D.; Dummer, R.; Smylie, M.; Rutkowski, P.; et al. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Arbour, K.C.; Naidoo, J.; Steele, K.E.; Ni, A.; Moreira, A.L.; Rekhtman, N.; Robbins, P.B.; Karakunnel, J.; Rimner, A.; Huang, J.; et al. Expression of pd-l1 and other immunotherapeutic targets in thymic epithelial tumors. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0182665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Marchevsky, A.M.; Walts, A.E. Pd-l1, pd-1, cd4, and cd8 expression in neoplastic and nonneoplastic thymus. Hum. Pathol. 2017, 60, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yang, Y.; Ding, L.; Wang, P. Dramatic response to anti-pd-1 therapy in a patient of squamous cell carcinoma of thymus with multiple lung metastases. J. Thorac. Dis. 2016, 8, E535–E537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zander, T.; Aebi, S.; Rast, A.C.; Zander, A.; Winterhalder, R.; Brand, C.; Diebold, J.; Gautschi, O. Response to pembrolizumab in a patient with relapsing thymoma. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2016, 11, e147–e149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Heery, C.R.; O’Sullivan-Coyne, G.; Madan, R.A.; Cordes, L.; Rajan, A.; Rauckhorst, M.; Lamping, E.; Oyelakin, I.; Marte, J.L.; Lepone, L.M.; et al. Avelumab for metastatic or locally advanced previously treated solid tumours (javelin solid tumor): A phase 1a, multicohort, dose-escalation trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017, 18, 587–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yamamoto, N.; Nokihara, H.; Yamada, Y.; Shibata, T.; Tamura, Y.; Seki, Y.; Honda, K.; Tanabe, Y.; Wakui, H.; Tamura, T. Phase i study of nivolumab, an anti-pd-1 antibody, in patients with malignant solid tumors. Invest. New Drugs 2017, 35, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cho, J.; Kim, H.S.; Ku, B.M.; Choi, Y.L.; Cristescu, R.; Han, J.; Sun, J.M.; Lee, S.H.; Ahn, J.S.; Park, K.; et al. Pembrolizumab for patients with refractory or relapsed thymic epithelial tumor: An open-label phase ii trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 37, 2162–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Brown, J.A.; Dorfman, D.M.; Ma, F.R.; Sullivan, E.L.; Munoz, O.; Wood, C.R.; Greenfield, E.A.; Freeman, G.J. Blockade of programmed death-1 ligands on dendritic cells enhances t cell activation and cytokine production. J. Immunol. 2003, 170, 1257–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Chai, X.; Gao, J.; Chen, G.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Y. Correlation between the expression of pd-l1 and clinicopathological features in patients with thymic epithelial tumors. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Enkner, F.; Pichlhofer, B.; Zaharie, A.T.; Krunic, M.; Holper, T.M.; Janik, S.; Moser, B.; Schlangen, K.; Neudert, B.; Walter, K.; et al. Molecular profiling of thymoma and thymic carcinoma: Genetic differences and potential novel therapeutic targets. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 2017, 23, 551–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Guleria, P.; Husain, N.; Shukla, S.; Kumar, S.; Parshad, R.; Jain, D. Pd-l1 immuno-expression assay in thymomas: Study of 84 cases and review of literature. Ann. Diagn. Pathol. 2018, 34, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hakiri, S.; Fukui, T.; Mori, S.; Kawaguchi, K.; Nakamura, S.; Ozeki, N.; Kato, T.; Goto, M.; Yatabe, Y.; Yokoi, K. Clinicopathologic features of thymoma with the expression of programmed death ligand 1. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2019, 107, 418–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Katsuya, Y.; Fujita, Y.; Horinouchi, H.; Ohe, Y.; Watanabe, S.; Tsuta, K. Immunohistochemical status of pd-l1 in thymoma and thymic carcinoma. Lung Cancer 2015, 88, 154–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Owen, D.; Chu, B.; Lehman, A.M.; Annamalai, L.; Yearley, J.H.; Shilo, K.; Otterson, G.A. Expression patterns, prognostic value, and intratumoral heterogeneity of pd-l1 and pd-1 in thymoma and thymic carcinoma. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2018, 13, 1204–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Padda, S.K.; Riess, J.W.; Schwartz, E.J.; Tian, L.; Kohrt, H.E.; Neal, J.W.; West, R.B.; Wakelee, H.A. Diffuse high intensity pd-l1 staining in thymic epithelial tumors. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2015, 10, 500–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tiseo, M.; Damato, A.; Longo, L.; Barbieri, F.; Bertolini, F.; Stefani, A.; Migaldi, M.; Gnetti, L.; Camisa, R.; Bordi, P.; et al. Analysis of a panel of druggable gene mutations and of alk and pd-l1 expression in a series of thymic epithelial tumors (tets). Lung Cancer 2017, 104, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Weissferdt, A.; Fujimoto, J.; Kalhor, N.; Rodriguez, J.; Bassett, R.; Wistuba, I.I.; Moran, C.A. Expression of pd-1 and pd-l1 in thymic epithelial neoplasms. Mod. Pathol. 2017, 30, 826–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yokoyama, S.; Miyoshi, H.; Nishi, T.; Hashiguchi, T.; Mitsuoka, M.; Takamori, S.; Akagi, Y.; Kakuma, T.; Ohshima, K. Clinicopathologic and prognostic implications of programmed death ligand 1 expression in thymoma. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2016, 101, 1361–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Petrini, I.; Meltzer, P.S.; Kim, I.K.; Lucchi, M.; Park, K.S.; Fontanini, G.; Gao, J.; Zucali, P.A.; Calabrese, F.; Favaretto, A.; et al. A specific missense mutation in gtf2i occurs at high frequency in thymic epithelial tumors. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 844–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Radovich, M.; Pickering, C.R.; Felau, I.; Ha, G.; Zhang, H.; Jo, H.; Hoadley, K.A.; Anur, P.; Zhang, J.; McLellan, M.; et al. The integrated genomic landscape of thymic epithelial tumors. Cancer Cell 2018, 33, 244–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Golstein, P.; Griffiths, G.M. An early history of t cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2018, 18, 527–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Khalil, D.N.; Smith, E.L.; Brentjens, R.J.; Wolchok, J.D. The future of cancer treatment: Immunomodulation, cars and combination immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 13, 273–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wang, W.; Green, M.; Choi, J.E.; Gijon, M.; Kennedy, P.D.; Johnson, J.K.; Liao, P.; Lang, X.; Kryczek, I.; Sell, A.; et al. Cd8(+) t cells regulate tumour ferroptosis during cancer immunotherapy. Nature 2019, 569, 270–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zou, W.; Wolchok, J.D.; Chen, L. Pd-l1 (b7-h1) and pd-1 pathway blockade for cancer therapy: Mechanisms, response biomarkers, and combinations. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016, 8, 328rv. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jcm 08 01833 g001 550
Figure 1. Type A and type AB thymoma. Representative cases are shown. (A–C) Type A thymoma: Case 2 in Table 1. (D–I) Type AB thymoma: Case 10 in Table 1. (D–F): Type A component of type AB thymoma. (G–I): Type B component of type AB thymoma. Original magnification, 100×; scale bar, 100 μm.
Figure 1. Type A and type AB thymoma. Representative cases are shown. (A–C) Type A thymoma: Case 2 in Table 1. (D–I) Type AB thymoma: Case 10 in Table 1. (D–F): Type A component of type AB thymoma. (G–I): Type B component of type AB thymoma. Original magnification, 100×; scale bar, 100 μm.
Jcm 08 01833 g001
Jcm 08 01833 g002 550
Figure 2. Histological and immunohistological findings for type B thymoma. Representative cases are shown. Type B1 thymoma: Case 21 in Table 1; Type B2 thymoma: Case 23 in Table 1; Type B3 thymoma: Case 31 in Table 1. Original magnification, 100×; scale bar, 100 μm.
Figure 2. Histological and immunohistological findings for type B thymoma. Representative cases are shown. Type B1 thymoma: Case 21 in Table 1; Type B2 thymoma: Case 23 in Table 1; Type B3 thymoma: Case 31 in Table 1. Original magnification, 100×; scale bar, 100 μm.
Jcm 08 01833 g002
Jcm 08 01833 g003 550
Figure 3. Histological and immunohistological findings for thymic carcinoma. A representative case (Case 38 in Table 1) is shown. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin staining. (B) PD-L1 Immunohistochemical staining. (C) CD8 immunohistochemical staining. Original magnification, 100×; scale bar, 100 μm.
Figure 3. Histological and immunohistological findings for thymic carcinoma. A representative case (Case 38 in Table 1) is shown. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin staining. (B) PD-L1 Immunohistochemical staining. (C) CD8 immunohistochemical staining. Original magnification, 100×; scale bar, 100 μm.
Jcm 08 01833 g003
Jcm 08 01833 g004 550
Figure 4. Comparison of PD-L1 immunohistochemical staining according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of TET. (A) Cases with positive PD-L1 staining. (B) PD-L1 staining score. * p < 0.05 compared to lower grades (#).
Figure 4. Comparison of PD-L1 immunohistochemical staining according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of TET. (A) Cases with positive PD-L1 staining. (B) PD-L1 staining score. * p < 0.05 compared to lower grades (#).
Jcm 08 01833 g004
Jcm 08 01833 g005 550
Figure 5. PD-L1 and IL-10 mRNA expression according to the WHO classification of TET. (A) PD-L1 expression. (B) IL-10 expression. RNA was isolated and mRNA expression was quantified with regard to mRNA expression of β-actin by using real-time PCR. Error bars represent the SDs of the means. * p < 0.05 compared to all other TETs. # p < 0.05 compared to lower grades (types A, AB, and B1).
Figure 5. PD-L1 and IL-10 mRNA expression according to the WHO classification of TET. (A) PD-L1 expression. (B) IL-10 expression. RNA was isolated and mRNA expression was quantified with regard to mRNA expression of β-actin by using real-time PCR. Error bars represent the SDs of the means. * p < 0.05 compared to all other TETs. # p < 0.05 compared to lower grades (types A, AB, and B1).
Jcm 08 01833 g005
Jcm 08 01833 g006 550
Figure 6. Comparison of CD4+ lymphocyte counts according to the WHO classification of TETs. * p < 0.05 compared to type A, AB, and C TETs.
Figure 6. Comparison of CD4+ lymphocyte counts according to the WHO classification of TETs. * p < 0.05 compared to type A, AB, and C TETs.
Jcm 08 01833 g006
Table
Table 1. Immunohistochemical findings for PD-L1 and CD8/CD3 in each patient.
Table 1. Immunohistochemical findings for PD-L1 and CD8/CD3 in each patient.
PathologyCase No.PD-L1 ExpressionCD8/CD3
A (n = 6)1(-)90%
280%90%
3(-)90%
4(-)90%
5(-)90%
630%90%
AB (n = 6)7(-)90%
8(-)90%
9(-)90%
10A(-)/B:3%90%
11(-)90%
12A(-)/B:10%90%
B1 (n = 9)13(-)70%
1470%90%
15(-)90%
16(-)50%
1770%90%
18(-)90%
191%90%
20(-)95%
21(-)90%
B2 (n = 4)2270%90%
2370%90%
2450%90%
2570%90%
B3 (n = 6)26(-)90%
2770%70%
2880%40%
2960%90%
3090%5%
3190%90%
Ca (n = 8)3240%40%
33(-)90%
3490%90%
35(-)90%
36(-)90%
3730%90%
3870%70%
395%90%
(-): means negative staining.
Table
Table 2. Summary of previously published studies of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry in thymomas.
Table 2. Summary of previously published studies of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry in thymomas.
No.Author/YearNo. of Thymoma/Thymic Ca CasesSex Ratio (M/F)MGClone of PD-L1 (Dilution)Criteria for Positivity: Cut-Off Percent PositivityMost Common Histologies with PD-L1 Positivity
1Brown et al. [40]/200326/8NANA29E.2A3, 29E.5A9Not definedThymoma: 81%, Ca: 88%Not defined
2Padda et al. [47]/201565/41.1:1165H1 murine mAb (1:100)
15 rabbit mAb (1:1000)		Intensity of staining (score 0–3): score 3Thymoma: 68%, Ca: 75%B2, Ca
3Katsuya et al. [45]/2015102/370.6:1NAE1L3N (1:800)H-score (staining intensity (0–3) × % of positive cells (0%–100%)): score 3Thymoma: 23% Ca: 70%Ca
4Yokoyama et al. [50]/201682/00.6:118EPR1161 (1:200)Youden’s index: > 38%Thymoma: 53.7% Ca: Not availableB2 and B3
5Enkner et al. [42]/201737/35NANAE1L3NH-score (cut-off not defined)Thymoma: 76% in B3, 13% in A Ca: 53% B3, Ca
6Tiseo et al. [48]/201787/201.2:126E1L3N (1:500)H-score: Score 3Thymoma: 18% Ca: 65%Ca
7Marchevsky et al. [34]/201738/8NANASP142 (1:250)Membranous expression ≥ 6% tumor cellsThymoma: 92% Ca: 50%B2, B3
8Weissferdt et al. [49]/201774/261.3:119EPR4877 (1:250)Strong membranous staining: > 5% tumor cellsThymoma: 64% Ca: 54%B3
9Arbour et al. [33]/201712/111.3:12E1L3NMembranous expression > 25% tumor cellsThymoma: 92% Ca: 36%B2, B3
10Owen et al. [46]/201832/31.1:1NA22C3Intensity of staining (score 0–5): Score 1Thymoma: 81% Ca: 100%Not associated
11Chen et al. [41]/201850/200.8:11SP142Membranous expression ≥ 5% tumor cellsThymoma: 48% Ca: 70%B3, Ca
12Guleria et al. [43]/201884/01.5:128SP263Membranous expression > 25% tumor cellsThymoma: 82%B1, B2, B3
13Hakiri et al. [44]/201981/01:117SP142 (1:50)Membranous expression ≥ 1% tumor cellsThymoma: 27%B2, B3
14Present study31/81.2:1128–8Membranous expression ≥ 1% tumor cellsThymoma: 51.6% Ca: 62.5%B2, B3
Abbreviations: PD-L1, programmed death ligand 1; M, male; F, female; MG, myasthenia gravis; +ve, positive; Ca, carcinoma; Ab, antibody; mAb, monoclonal antibody; PD-1, programmed death 1; NA, not available.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Higuchi, R.; Goto, T.; Hirotsu, Y.; Nakagomi, T.; Yokoyama, Y.; Otake, S.; Amemiya, K.; Oyama, T.; Omata, M. PD-L1 Expression and Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Thymic Epithelial Neoplasms. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1833. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcm8111833

AMA Style

Higuchi R, Goto T, Hirotsu Y, Nakagomi T, Yokoyama Y, Otake S, Amemiya K, Oyama T, Omata M. PD-L1 Expression and Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Thymic Epithelial Neoplasms. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2019; 8(11):1833. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcm8111833

Chicago/Turabian Style

Higuchi, Rumi, Taichiro Goto, Yosuke Hirotsu, Takahiro Nakagomi, Yujiro Yokoyama, Sotaro Otake, Kenji Amemiya, Toshio Oyama, and Masao Omata. 2019. "PD-L1 Expression and Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Thymic Epithelial Neoplasms" Journal of Clinical Medicine 8, no. 11: 1833. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcm8111833

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop