Next Article in Journal
Characterization of Five New Monosporascus Species: Adaptation to Environmental Factors, Pathogenicity to Cucurbits and Sensitivity to Fungicides
Next Article in Special Issue
Application of Probiotic Yeasts on Candida Species Associated Infection
Previous Article in Journal
Phytophthora palmivora–Cocoa Interaction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Antagonistic Yeasts: A Promising Alternative to Chemical Fungicides for Controlling Postharvest Decay of Fruit
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Interactive Impact of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Elevated CO2 on Growth and Functional Food Value of Thymus vulgare

by
Talaat H. Habeeb
1,
Mohamed Abdel-Mawgoud
2,
Ramy S. Yehia
3,4,
Ahmed Mohamed Ali Khalil
5,
Ahmed M. Saleh
4,* and
Hamada AbdElgawad
6,*
1
Biology Department, Faculty of Science at Yanbu, Taibah University, King Khalid Rd., Al Amoedi, Yanbu El-Bahr 46423, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Desert Research Centre, Cairo 11753, Egypt
3
Department of Biological Sciences, College of Science, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt
5
Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 13759, Egypt
6
Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef 62511, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 25 July 2020 / Revised: 24 August 2020 / Accepted: 4 September 2020 / Published: 9 September 2020

Abstract

:
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and elevated CO2 (eCO2) have been effectively integrated to the agricultural procedures as an ecofriendly approach to support the production and quality of plants. However, less attention has been given to the synchronous application of AMF and eCO2 and how that could affect the global plant metabolism. This study was conducted to investigate the effects of AMF and eCO2, individually or in combination, on growth, photosynthesis, metabolism and the functional food value of Thymus vulgare. Results revealed that both AMF and eCO2 treatments improved the photosynthesis and biomass production, however much more positive impact was obtained by their synchronous application. Moreover, the levels of the majority of the detected sugars, organic acids, amino acids, unsaturated fatty acids, volatile compounds, phenolic acids and flavonoids were further improved as a result of the synergistic action of AMF and eCO2, as compared to the individual treatments. Overall, this study clearly shows that co-application of AMF and eCO2 induces a synergistic biofertilization impact and enhances the functional food value of T. vulgare by affecting its global metabolism.

1. Introduction

Herbal plants have been widely used in traditional and folk medicine as an effectual solution to cure many diseases, being a big store for bioactive compounds, especially secondary metabolites [1]. They are known to have various biological activities such as antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory and anticancer properties [2]. Recently, a priority was given to herbal plants in terms of enhancing the production of the economically important phytochemicals through the application of cultivation procedures under stimulated growth conditions [3]. In this aspect, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) have been regarded as one of the most important beneficial microorganisms that are able to associate with almost two thirds of terrestrial plants improving their growth and stress tolerance [4]. In some cases, mycorrhizal symbiosis is essential as the host plant cannot grow normally and/or survive without it [5]. The beneficial effects of AMF symbiotic association with plants include enhanced levels of mineral nutrients and accumulation of primary and secondary metabolites [6]. From environmental point of view, AMF can keep the balance of soil aggregates, hence, able to fight erosion [7]. Accordingly, AMF represent a promising trend that has found its way in the sustainable agricultural productivity [8]. For instance, utilization of AMF for enhancing the production and quality of aromatic plants have been reported [8]. In this regard, several medicinal aromatic plants, such as pennyroyal and parsley, showed enhanced levels of bioactive metabolites when associated with AMF [6].
In another aspect, the exposure of plants to elevated CO2 (eCO2) has been regarded as an effective approach to improve the nutritional and medicinal values of herbal plants [9]. eCO2 can increase plant growth and productivity either directly by enhancing photosynthesis [10] or indirectly by stimulating plant water use efficiency [11]. On the other hand, the effect of eCO2 on belowground communities, including AMF, are still not fully understood [12]. What is well known is that the higher the photosynthetic activity, under eCO2, the more the photosynthate transfer to plant roots and the higher release to the associated microbial communities [13]. Furthermore, as being dependent on their host plant for carbon, AMF may be sensitive to global climatic changes that influence their host [14]. Therefore, such triple effect resulting from interactions among plant, AMF and eCO2 is expected to have beneficial roles in increasing the productivity and quality of crops and medicinal plants.
One of the well-known plants for both culinary and medicinal purposes is Thymus vulgaris L., a member of the family Lamiaceae, being widely used in folk medicine for treatment of several diseases like bedwetting, diarrhea, stomach ache, arthritis, sore throat, cough, bronchitis and chest congestion [15]. The biological activities of T. vulgaris are mainly ascribed to its content of secondary metabolites, particularly essential oils that have been extensively studied for antioxidant, antimicrobial and antitumor activities [16]. Thus, improving the accumulation of these phytochemicals in T. vulgaris could support its nutritional, medicinal and pharmacological properties. In this regard, previous studies have reported the positive impacts of both AMF and eCO2 on the growth and quality of herbal plant [17,18], however, the complete picture on how AMF-eCO2 combination affect primary and secondary metabolomes is not fully drawn [19,20]. In addition, metabolic profiling of the host plant is essential to understand the mechanisms behind the changes occurring in response to the individual and/or combined effect of AMF and eCO2. So far, the detailed metabolic implications induced by the synchronous application of eCO2 and AMF on plants are not investigated. Thus, the current study was conducted to explore, in details, the individual and combined impacts of eCO2 and AMF on T. vulgaris, as a model herbal plant. We have assessed the changes in mycorrhizal colonization, plant biomass production, photosynthesis, respiration and levels of individual primary (sugars, amino acids, fatty acids and organic acids), secondary (phenolic acids and flavonoids) metabolites and volatile oils. Further, the associated changes in nutritional and medicinal values of T. vulgaris were investigated.

2. Material and Method

2.1. Experimental Setup, Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

Soil potting was mixed with sterilized sand (1:3) and inculcated with a pure commercial inoculum of Rhizophagus irregularis (MUCL 41,833 obtained from Glomeromycota in vitro collection (GINCO)) at a concentration of 50 spores per soil in a pot (25 × 15 cm). The control treatments were represented by non-inoculated soil. The seeds of T. vulgaris were disinfected then sown in both treated and non-treated soils. Plants were grown in a controlled greenhouse at 21/18 °C, 16/8 h day/night, and 60% humidity, they were regularly watered. The pots inn each of the control and AMF-inoculated groups were equally subdivided into two sub-groups, one subjected to 410 ppm CO2 (ambient CO2; aCO2) and the other subjected to 620 ppm CO2 (elevated CO2; eCO2,) through the time course of the experiment. The plants were harvested after 6 weeks, then the aerial parts were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −20 °C to be used in different plant analyses. For determination of dry matter and mineral elements, plant shoots were washed with distilled water and dried at 75 °C for 72 h.

2.2. Mycorrhizal Parameters

Mycorrhizal colonization was demonstrated following Phillips and Hayman [21]. About 0.5 g of fresh roots were clarified with potassium hydroxide (10% w/v) and potassium hydroxide (10%) + hydrogen peroxide (10% v/v) in a ratio of 1:1 (v/v), then stained with 0.05% trypan blue in lactoglycerol. A stereomicroscope (40×) was used to show the stained roots, while the colonization rate was calculated by using gridline intersect method [22].

2.3. Photosynthesis Parameters

The light-saturated photosynthetic rates (μmol CO2 m−2 s−1) of mature leaves were measured (LI-COR LI- 6400, LI-COR Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA), according to AbdElgawad et al. [23]. Dark respiration was determined as the absolute CO2 exchange rate determined at photosynthetic photon flux density (μmolm−2 s−1).

2.4. Metabolic Profiling

For extraction of sugars, plant tissues were homogenized in 50% (v/v) acetonitrile. The method described by Hamad et al. [24] was applied to identify the individual sugars in the plant extract by using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), then comparing their retention time with those of a standard mixture. Quantification of the sugar samples was achieved based on peak area comparison with a calibration curve of the corresponding standards. Organic acids were extracted in phosphoric acid (0.1% v/v) supplemented with butylated hydroxyanisole (3 g/L) and then analyzed using HPLC with a SUPELCOGEL C-610H column coupled to a UV detection system set at 210 nm (LaChromL-7455 diode array, LaChrom, Tokyo, Japan). The concentration of each organic acid was calculated by using a calibration curve [24]. For extraction of amino acids, a known weight of plant tissues was vigorously homogenized in 80% aqueous ethanol. Amino acids were measured using a Waters Acquity UPLC-tqd system (Milford, Worcester County, MA, USA) equipped with a BEH amide 2.1 × 50 column. The lipophilic fraction of plant samples was obtained by extraction in chloroform/methanol (2:1, v/v). Thereafter, fatty acids were detected, according to Hassan et al. [25], by using GC/MS analysis (Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, CA, USA) with an HP-5 MS column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 mm). Fatty acids were quantified using NIST 05 database and Golm Metabolome Database (http://gmd.mpimp-golm.mpg.de). Phenolic acids and flavonoids were extracted in acetone-water solution (4:1 v/v) for 24 h. The method outlined in Hamad et al. [24] was followed up for determination of Phenolic acids and flavonoids using an HPLC system (SCL-10A vp, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). The concentration of each compound was calculated with a calibration curve of the corresponding standard. For extraction of volatile oils, two hundred gm of fresh plant material were subjected to steam distillation with about 500 mL of water, where the volatiles were collected [26]. The levels of volatiles were determined using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) according to the method outlined by El Hattab et al. [27].

2.5. Determination of Biological Activities

Several methods were used to determine the total antioxidant capacities of the plant extract, including the ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC), inhibition of LDL (low density lipoprotein) oxidation (TBARS and conjugated dienes) and inhibition of hemolysis assays [23,24]. For LDL oxidation, dialyzed LDL (100 μg protein/mL) was diluted in 10 mM PBS (phosphate buffered saline containing 0.01 Mphosphate-buffer and 0.15 M NaCl, pH 7.4) and incubated at 37 °C in presence or absence of 10 μM CuSO4. Oxidation was performed with or without the sample solution of colostrum proteins. After incubation, lipid peroxidation of the LDL was measured. Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) was determined at 532 nm/600 nm, using 1,1,3,3-Tetramethoxypropane as standard for calibration curve, while conjugated diene formation was measured at 232 nm of LDL solution (100 μg protein/mL) in PBS incubated with CuSO4 (10 μM) in the absence or presence of various concentrations of bovine colostrums protein [28].

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Experiments were carried out following a randomized complete block design. Data normality and the homogeneity of variances were checked using the Kolmogorove–Smirnov test and Levene’s test, respectively. Each experiment was done in five replicates (n = 5). All the data was subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Student’s t-test at probability levels of 0.05, 0.01 or 0.001 was used to test the difference between the treatment and control or between AMF alone and the combined AMF+eCO2 treatment. All statistical tests were performed using the computer program PASW statistics 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. AMF Colonization and Hyphal Growth

It is known that AMF are largely dependent on their host plant for carbon, so they are sensitive to climatic changes that affect their host plant [14]. In this sense, eCO2 could have an indirect effect on mycorrhizal colonization by promoting carbon assimilation and allocation to roots [29]. Since AMF are attached to plant roots, they are lucky to receive higher amount of photosynthates under eCO2 before other soil microbes [30]. Herein, the mycorrhizal growth was significantly enhanced in T. vulgare by AMF treatments (Table 1). Such mycorrhizal proliferation was much more stimulated under eCO2 conditions. Several studies have demonstrated some positive effects for eCO2 on AMF-plant association such as increased mycorrhizal root length [14] and increased extra-radical hyphae [31]. However, other studies did not show any beneficial effects for eCO2 on AMF growth in host plants [32,33]. Therefore, the impact of eCO2 levels on mycorrhizal growth seems to be dependent on plant species, AMF species and soil type [34]. In fact, as being a member of Glomeraceae, the ratio of R. irregularis has been reported to be more positively influenced by eCO2 than others, e.g., Gigasporaceae [35].

3.2. AMF and eCO2 Acts Synergistically to Improve Photosynthetic Capacity and Biomass Production

It has been known that the photosynthetic rate, and consequently biomass production, could be improved under the effect of AMF inoculation, as a result of the expected increased nutrients uptake [36], and also under eCO2 atmosphere due to the enhancement of the carboxylation reaction of rubisco [37]. Supporting this hypothesis, the current results revealed that eCO2 and AMF independently, and to more extent in combination, promoted photosynthetic rate and biomass production in T. vulgare (Figure 1). Such increments were much more induced by the interaction between both treatments.
Similar to our results, the positive effects of eCO2 on biomass of T. vulgaris and some other medicinal plants, Ocimum basilicum, Origanum vulgare, Mentha piperita and Mentha spicata, have been previously investigated [38]. Moreover, the increased biomass production in plants inoculated with AMF was reported [39]. Regarding the interaction between eCO2 and AMF, It is well known that eCO2 stimulates the photosynthetic rate and plant growth [40], which in turn, affects the allocation of photosynthates to AMF, consequently makes more C available to AMF colonizing the roots [13], thus, increasing sink strength in mycorrhizal plants, and eventually this leads to increased C storage in soils [41]. Such effect is hypothesized to create a balance between carbon cost and nutrient benefits, besides reducing the negative effects of down regulation of photosynthesis caused by acclimation of plants to long-term exposure to eCO2 [42]. In this regard, it has been found that both eCO2 and AMF, when applied individually or in combination, improved biomass production of Pisum sativum and lettuce [32,43]. In addition, it has been indicated that mycorrhizal plants have higher photosynthetic rate [33] when grown under high CO2 levels. However, such an effect might differ among variable cultivars [44]. In contrast, it was supposed that eCO2 may impair the beneficial effects of AMF on plant biomass, especially when the fungal community is dominated by Glomus species [45]. This might be due to the difference among AMF taxa in their exchange of carbon and nutrients [46].

3.3. Application of AMF and eCO2 Improves the Nutritional Value of T. vulgare

It was assumed that the nutritive value of plants is highly related to its content of primary metabolites, e.g., sugars, proteins and lipids [9]. In this regard, sugars and organic acids are related to taste and flavor [47], essential amino acids are involved in some biological processes, such as protein synthesis [48] and a lower saturated/unsaturated fatty acids (SFA/USFA) ratio is linked to cardio-protective effects [49]. It has been reported that the higher the CO2 levels, the higher the rate of photosynthetic activity, which is linked to the enhancement of the carboxylation reaction of rubisco, the enzyme responsible for CO2 fixation [37]. As a consequence of photosynthesis improvement, sugars could be accumulated and also broken down via dark respiration, resulting in production of the precursors necessary for synthesis of different classes of primary and secondary metabolites [50]. Supporting such a concept, the individual AMF and eCO2 treatments induced significant increases in the content of total soluble sugar of T. vulgare, about 1.6 folds, however, starch was significantly accumulated under eCO2 only (Table 2, Figure 2). Further, the synchronous application of AMF and eCO2 caused a significant accumulation in the levels of the majority of the measured sugars relative to AMF alone treatment. Similarly, CO2 enrichment enhanced the accumulation of sucrose and starch in oil palm [51], and increased the accumulation of total soluble carbohydrates and starch in ginger varieties [52]. AMF treatments were found to induce the accumulation of total soluble sugars in lettuce [53]. Further, the interaction between AMF and CO2 improved forage quality of alfalfa plants by increasing the levels of glucose, fructose and hemicellulose and decreasing that of lignin [54].
Besides, the current results revealed that the combined AMF and eCO2 treatment induced a significant increase in the majority of the detected organic acids, amino acids (including both essential and non-essential amino acids) and fatty acids in T. vulgare, relative to AMF alone (Table 2, Figure 2). Regarding the individual treatments, AMF was more efficient in inducing the accumulation of these primary metabolites than eCO2. All AMF and/or eCO2 treatments did not affect the SFA/USFA ratio. Similarly, it was reported that AMF-inoculated maize plants, under low temperature, had higher amino acid concentrations than non-mycorrizal ones, especially for Thr, Lys, Gly, Ala and His contents [55]. In contrast, proline content was reduced in mycorhizal Capsicum annuum grown under saline conditions [56]. Moreover, different effects of eCO2 on amino acids were reported, which were reduced in barley [57], increased in spring wheat [58], or were not affected in maize [59]. It was also shown that organic acid levels were increased in mycorrhizal Pinus sylvestris grown under heavy metal concentrations [60], while they were not increased in Portulacaria afra under eCO2 [61]. The concentration of most fatty acids of soybean was unchanged under higher levels of CO2 [62]. On the other hand, a significant increase in the levels of individual fatty acids was reported in parsley and dill grown under eCO2, which is more evident on UFA than SFA [9]. Therefore, the synchronous application of AMF and eCO2 could be beneficial to avoid the negative impact of the individual treatment and/or to support their positive effects.

3.4. AMF and eCO2 Promote the Accumulation of Phenolic Compounds and Volatile Oils in T. vulgare

Mycorrhizal symbiosis with medicinal plants has been recognized to induce the accumulation of secondary metabolites, especially phenolic compounds which play an important role in curing several ailments [63]. The present results showed that protocatechuic, p-coumaric and rosmarinic acids are the most abundant phenolic acids; while apigenin, kaempferol, quercetin and luteolin are the predominant flavonoid in T. vulgare (Table 3). Similarly, previous studies revealed the presence of some phenolic acids such as cinnamic, carnosic and rosmarinic acids, and also flavonoids such as luteolin and apigenin derivatives in T. vulgare [64]. There was a significant increment in the levels of the majority of the detected phenolic acids and flavonoids in T. vulgare under AMF and/or eCO2 treatments, however the combined treatment was much more efficient than the individual ones (Figure 2). On the other hand, in consistence with the previous studies [65], the present results revealed the presence of 16 volatile oils in T. vulgare, whereas 1,8-cineol, carvacrol and p-cymene are the most dominant followed by less amounts of linalol, α- and β-pineno, α-Phellandrene, myrecene and thymol (Table 3). There is also a significant increase in the volatile oils of T. vulgare, under the individual and combined treatments.
Supporting our results, several studies have investigated the potential effects of eCO2 and AMF, separately and in combination, on the levels of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity in a variety of plant species. For instance, AMF treatments caused an increase in phenolic compounds content of lettuce [53,66], and in the antioxidant capacity of sweet basil [67]. Moreover, the flavonoids of some wild plants, such as Libidibia ferrea, were found to be accumulated by mycorrhizal association [68]. Similarly, eCO2 induced the accumulation of some phenolic compounds in birch [69], and Zingiber officinale [52]. However, a low phenolic content was reported for some plants such as rice [70] under eCO2. Regarding the interaction between eCO2 and AMF, it was reported that the induction of secondary metabolites in lettuce and alfalfa by AMF was negatively affected under eCO2, probably due to utilization of photoassimilates for increasing plant biomass and for AMF growth as well, at the expense of secondary metabolism [43,44]. Therefore, it could be suggested that climatic changes might have an impact on AMF, which in turn, affect the metabolic functions of their host plants.
Several scenarios have been proposed to explain the induction of secondary metabolites in response to AMF associations and eCO2. It was found that AMF could affect secondary metabolites through improved photosynthesis and mineral content of the host plants, activation of pathways involved in synthesis of secondary metabolites, or higher expression of some genes related to secondary metabolism [68]. On the other hand, the eCO2-induced changes in plant secondary metabolism have been attributed to either excess amount of non-structural carbohydrates, resulting in an increment in carbon-based secondary metabolites [9,37,51].

3.5. AMF and eCO2-Induced Changes in Secondary Metabolites Support the Biological Activities of T. vulgare

Reactive oxygen species and free radicals have been recognized to induce harmful effects on living organisms. In this aspect, antioxidants, such as phenolic compounds and volatile oils, could act as free radical scavengers [71]. The present results showed an increase in the total antioxidant capacities of T. vulgare, tested by different methods (FRAP, ORAC, inhibition of LDL oxidation (TBARS and conjugated dienes) and inhibition of hemolysis), under the effects of AMF and/or eCO2 (Table 3). It was previously reported that the antioxidant properties exhibited by T. vulgare extracts have been attributed to their content of volatile oils, especially carvacrol and thymol [72], flavonoids such as apigenin and luteolin derivatives and phenolic acids such as cinnamic and rosmarinic acids [64]. Moreover, some phenolic compounds were previously isolated from T. vulgare and proved to inhibit oxidative hemolysis [73]. The decreased levels of lipid peroxidation products such as TBARS and conjugated dienes might be ascribed to some protective effects of thymol [74].

4. Conclusions

Based on the above results, it is clear that the tested plant, T. vulgare, has benefited from the independent and combined effects of both AMF and eCO2, however their synchronous application is much more beneficial. Such positive impacts are being reflected on improved biomass production and higher accumulation of primary (sugars, amino acids, fatty acids and organic acids), and secondary (phenolic acids, flavonoids and volatile oils) metabolites. T. vulgare plants grown under synchronous application of AMF and eCO2 have taken much advantage over those grown under the individual effects of both factors in terms of improved growth and bioactive components. Thus, the current study clearly shows that co-application of AMF and eCO2 is a promising approach to improve the growth and the nutritional and health promoting values of T. vulgare. Further, the robust monitoring of primary and secondary metabolites presented herein could support our understanding about the mechanisms behind the positive impacts of AMF and eCO2 on plants.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: A.M.S., H.A., A.M.A.K. Conducted the main experiment: T.H.H., R.S.Y, A.M.A.K. Measured the fungal related parameters: R.S.Y., A.M.A.K. Performed the metabolite profiling: H.A., A.M.S., M.A.-M. Measured the biological activities: M.A.-M., Analyzed the data: A.M.S., M.A.-M., A.M.A.K., T.H.H. Wrote the original draft: M.A.-M., T.H.H., Reviewed, edited and prepared the MS for submission: A.M.S., H.A., A.M.A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Morales, F.; Padilla, S.; Falconí, F. Medicinal plants used in traditional herbal medicine in the province of Chimborazo, Ecuador. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 14, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Kurian, A. Health benefits of herbs and spices. In Handbook of Herbs and Spices, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; Volume 2, pp. 72–88. [Google Scholar]
  3. Abdelgawad, H.; Saleh, A.M.; Al, S.; Selim, S.; Hassan, M.O.; Wadaan, M.A.M.; Shuikan, A.M.; Mohamed, H.S.; Hozzein, W.N. Utilization of actinobacteria to enhance the production and quality of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) fruits in a semi-arid environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 665, 690–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wang, B.; Qiu, Y.-L. Phylogenetic distribution and evolution of mycorrhizas in land plants. Mycorrhiza 2006, 16, 299–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Van der Heijden, M.G.A.; Boller, T.; Wiemken, A.; Sanders, I.R. Different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal species are potential determinants of plant community structure. Ecology 1998, 79, 2082–2091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gashgari, R.; Selim, S.; Abdel-Mawgoud, M.; Warrad, M.; Habeeb, T.H.; Saleh, A.M.; AbdElgawad, H. Arbuscular mycorrhizae induce a global metabolic change and improve the nutritional and health benefits of pennyroyal and parsley. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2020, 42, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rillig, M.C. Arbuscular mycorrhizae, glomalin, and soil aggregation. Can. J. Soil Sci. 2004, 84, 355–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Smith, S.E.; Read, D.J. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: London, UK; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  9. Saleh, A.M.; Selim, S.; Al Jaouni, S.; AbdElgawad, H. CO2 enrichment can enhance the nutritional and health benefits of parsley (Petroselinum crispum L.) and dill (Anethum graveolens L.). Food Chem. 2018, 269, 519–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ainsworth, E.A.; Long, S.P. What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. New Phytol. 2005, 165, 351–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Morgan, J.A.; Mosier, A.R.; Milchunas, D.G.; LeCain, D.R.; Nelson, J.A.; Parton, W.J. CO2 enhances productivity, alters species composition, and reduces digestibility of shortgrass steppe vegetation. Ecol. Appl. 2004, 14, 208–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Van der Putten, W.H.; Bradford, M.A.; Pernilla Brinkman, E.; van de Voorde, T.F.J.; Veen, G.F. Where, when and how plant–soil feedback matters in a changing world. Funct. Ecol. 2016, 30, 1109–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Staddon, P.L.; Reinsch, S.; Olsson, P.A.; Ambus, P.; Lüscher, A.; Jakobsen, I. A decade of free-air CO2 enrichment increased the carbon throughput in a grass-clover ecosystem but did not drastically change carbon allocation patterns. Funct. Ecol. 2014, 28, 538–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Rillig, M.C.; Wright, S.F.; Shaw, M.R.; Field, C.B. Artificial climate warming positively affects arbuscular mycorrhizae but decreases soil aggregate water stability in an annual grassland. Oikos 2002, 97, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Fachini-Queiroz, F.C.; Kummer, R.; Estevao-Silva, C.F.; Carvalho, M.D.D.B.; Cunha, J.M.; Grespan, R.; Bersani-Amado, C.A.; Cuman, R.K.N. Effects of thymol and carvacrol, constituents of Thymus vulgaris L. essential oil, on the inflammatory response. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2012, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Nikolić, M.; Glamočlija, J.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Calhelha, R.C.; Fernandes, Â.; Marković, T.; Marković, D.; Giweli, A.; Soković, M. Chemical composition, antimicrobial, antioxidant and antitumor activity of Thymus serpyllum L., Thymus algeriensis Boiss. and Reut and Thymus vulgaris L. essential oils. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 52, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rajashekar, C.B. Elevated CO2 levels affect phytochemicals and nutritional quality of food crops. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Selvaraj, T.; Sumithra, P. Effect of Glomus aggregatum and plant growth promoting rhizomicroorganisms on growth, nutrition and content of secondary metabolites in Glycyrrhiza glabra L. Indian J. Appl. Pure Biol. 2011, 26, 283–290. [Google Scholar]
  19. Saleh, A.M.; Abdel-Mawgoud, M.; Hassan, A.R.; Habeeb, T.H.; Yehia, R.S.; AbdElgawad, H. Global metabolic changes induced by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in oregano plants grown under ambient and elevated levels of atmospheric CO2. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 151, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. French, K.E. Engineering mycorrhizal symbioses to alter plant metabolism and improve crop health. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Phillips, J.M.; Hayman, D.S. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1970, 55, 158–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Giovannetti, M.; Mosse, B. An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New Phytol. 1980, 84, 489–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. AbdElgawad, H.; De Vos, D.; Zinta, G.; Domagalska, M.A.; Beemster, G.T.S.; Asard, H. Grassland species differentially regulate proline concentrations under future climate conditions: An integrated biochemical and modelling approach. New Phytol. 2015, 208, 354–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Hamad, I.; AbdElgawad, H.; Al Jaouni, S.; Zinta, G.; Asard, H.; Hassan, S.; Hegab, M.; Hagagy, N.; Selim, S. Metabolic analysis of various date palm fruit (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cultivars from Saudi Arabia to assess their nutritional quality. Molecules 2015, 20, 13620–13641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hassan, M.O.; Saleh, A.M.; Abdelgawad, H. Sonchus oleraceus residue improves nutritive and health-promoting value of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): A metabolic study. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 2092–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Manzan, A.C.C.M.; Toniolo, F.S.; Bredow, E.; Povh, N.P. Extraction of essential oil and pigments from Curcuma longa [L.] by steam distillation and extraction with volatile solvents. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 6802–6807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. El Hattab, M.; Culioli, G.; Piovetti, L.; Chitour, S.E.; Valls, R. Comparison of various extraction methods for identification and determination of volatile metabolites from the brown alga Dictyopteris membranacea. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1143, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, C.-W.; Chang, C.-Y.; Chiang, S.-H. The inhibition effect of cell DNA oxidative damage and LDL oxidation by bovine colostrums. Molecules 2016, 21, 1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Zhu, X.; Song, F.; Liu, S.; Liu, F. Role of arbuscular mycorrhiza in alleviating salinity stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown under ambient and elevated CO2. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2016, 202, 486–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Drigo, B.; Kowalchuk, G.A.; Knapp, B.A.; Pijl, A.S.; Boschker, H.T.S.; Van Veen, J.A. Impacts of 3 years of elevated atmospheric CO2 on rhizosphere carbon flow and microbial community dynamics. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2013, 19, 621–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tingey, D.T.; Phillips, D.L.; Johnson, M.G. Elevated CO2 and conifer roots: Effects on growth, life span and turnover. New Phytol. 2000, 147, 87–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gavito, M.E.; Curtis, P.S.; Mikkelsen, T.N.; Jakobsen, I. Atmospheric CO2 and mycorrhiza effects on biomass allocation and nutrient uptake of nodulated pea (Pisum sativum L.) plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2000, 51, 1931–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Staddon, P.L.; Fitter, A.H.; Graves, J.D. Effect of elevated atmospheric CO2 on mycorrhizal colonization, external mycorrhizal hyphal production and phosphorus inflow in Plantago lanceolata and Trifolium repens in association with the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae. Glob. Chang. Biol. 1999, 5, 347–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Compant, S.; van der Heijden, M.G.A.; Sessitsch, A. Climate change effects on beneficial plant–microorganism interactions. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2010, 73, 197–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Cotton, T.E.A.; Fitter, A.H.; Miller, R.M.; Dumbrell, A.J.; Helgason, T. Fungi in the future: Interannual variation and effects of atmospheric change on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. New Phytol. 2015, 205, 1598–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Fredeen, A.L.; Rao, I.M.; Terry, N. Influence of phosphorus nutrition on growth and carbon partitioning in Glycine max. Plant Physiol. 1989, 89, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Al Jaouni, S.; Saleh, A.M.; Wadaan, M.A.M.; Hozzein, W.N.; Selim, S.; AbdElgawad, H. Elevated CO2 induces a global metabolic change in basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) and peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) and improves their biological activity. J. Plant Physiol. 2018, 224–225, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Tisserat, B. Influence of ultra-high carbon dioxide levels on growth and morphogenesis of Lamiaceae species in soil. J. Herbs. Spices Med. Plants 2002, 9, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hartwig, U.A.; Wittmann, P.; Braun, R.; Hartwig-Räz, B.; Jansa, J.; Mozafar, A.; Lüscher, A.; Leuchtmann, A.; Frossard, E.; Nösberger, J. Arbuscular mycorrhiza infection enhances the growth response of Lolium perenne to elevated atmospheric p CO2. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53, 1207–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ainsworth, E.A.; Rogers, A. The response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to rising [CO2]: Mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant. Cell Environ. 2007, 30, 258–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gifford, R.M. The global carbon cycle: A viewpoint on the missing sink. Funct. Plant Biol. 1994, 21, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Makino, A.; Mae, T. Photosynthesis and plant growth at elevated levels of CO2. Plant Cell Physiol. 1999, 40, 999–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Baslam, M.; Garmendia, I.; Goicoechea, N. Elevated CO2 may impair the beneficial effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the mineral and phytochemical quality of lettuce. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2012, 161, 180–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Baslam, M.; Erice, G.; Goicoechea, N. Impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and atmospheric CO2 concentration on the biomass production and partitioning in the forage legume alfalfa. Symbiosis 2012, 58, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Johnson, N.C.; Wolf, J.; Reyes, M.A.; Panter, A.; Koch, G.W.; Redman, A. Species of plants and associated arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi mediate mycorrhizal responses to CO2 enrichment. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2005, 11, 1156–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pearson, J.N.; Jakobsen, I. Symbiotic exchange of carbon and phosphorus between cucumber and three arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 1993, 124, 481–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Malundo, T.M.M.; Shewfelt, R.L.; Ware, G.O.; Baldwin, E.A. Sugars and acids influence flavor properties of mango (Mangifera indica). J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2001, 126, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Al-Alawi, R.A.; Al-Mashiqri, J.H.; Al-Nadabi, J.S.M.; Al-Shihi, B.I. Date palm tree ( Phoenix dactylifera L.): Natural products and therapeutic options. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Livingstone, K.M.; Lovegrove, J.A.; Givens, D.I. The impact of substituting SFA in dairy products with MUFA or PUFA on CVD risk: Evidence from human intervention studies. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2012, 25, 193–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Leakey, A.D.B.; Ainsworth, E.A.; Bernacchi, C.J.; Rogers, A.; Long, S.P.; Ort, D.R. Elevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: Six important lessons from FACE. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 2859–2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ibrahim, M.H.; Jaafar, H.Z.E. Impact of elevated carbon dioxide on primary, secondary metabolites and antioxidant responses of Eleais guineensis Jacq.(Oil Palm) seedlings. Molecules 2012, 17, 5195–5211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Ghasemzadeh, A.; Jaafar, H. Effect of CO2 enrichment on synthesis of some primary and secondary metabolites in ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 1101–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Baslam, M.; Garmendia, I.; Goicoechea, N.; Unidad, V.; Icvv, Z. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) improved growth and nutritional quality of greenhouse-grown lettuce. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 5504–5515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Baslam, M.; Antolín, M.C.; Gogorcena, Y.; Muñoz, F.; Goicoechea, N. Changes in alfalfa forage quality and stem carbohydrates induced by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and elevated atmospheric CO2. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2014, 164, 190–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Zhu, X.; Song, F.; Liu, F. Altered amino acid profile of arbuscular mycorrhizal maize plants under low temperature stress. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2016, 179, 186–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Beltrano, J.; Ruscitti, M.; Arango, M.C.; Ronco, M. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhiza inoculation on plant growth, biological and physiological parameters and mineral nutrition in pepper grown under different salinity and p levels. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2013, 13, 123–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Sicher, R.C. Effects of CO2 enrichment on soluble amino acids and organic acids in barley primary leaves as a function of age, photoperiod and chlorosis. Plant Sci. 2008, 174, 576–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Oehme, V.; Högy, P.; Zebitz, C.P.W.; Fangmeier, A. Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations on phloem sap composition of spring crops and aphid performance. J. Plant Interact. 2013, 8, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Leakey, A.D.B.; Uribelarrea, M.; Ainsworth, E.A.; Naidu, S.L.; Rogers, A.; Ort, D.R.; Long, S.P. Photosynthesis, productivity, and yield of maize are not affected by open-air elevation of CO2 concentration in the absence of drought. Plant Physiol. 2006, 140, 779–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Ahonen-Jonnarth, U.; Van Hees, P.A.W.; Lundström, U.S.; Finlay, R.D. Organic acids produced by mycorrhizal Pinus sylvestris exposed to elevated aluminium and heavy metal concentrations. New Phytol. 2000, 146, 557–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Huerta, A.J.; Ting, I.P. Effects of various levels of CO2 on the induction of Crassulacean acid metabolism in Portulacaria afra (L.) Jacq. Plant Physiol. 1988, 88, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Zheng, G.; Chen, J.; Li, W. Impacts of CO2 elevation on the physiology and seed quality of soybean. Plant Divers. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Jurkiewicz, A.; Ryszka, P.; Anielska, T.; Waligórski, P. Optimization of culture conditions of Arnica montana L.: Effects of mycorrhizal fungi and competing plants. Mycorrhiza 2010, 20, 293–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Roby, M.H.H.; Sarhan, M.A.; Selim, K.A.-H.; Khalel, K.I. Evaluation of antioxidant activity, total phenols and phenolic compounds in thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.), sage (Salvia officinalis L.), and marjoram (Origanum majorana L.) extracts. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 43, 827–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mancini, E.; Senatore, F.; del Monte, D.; de Martino, L.; Grulova, D.; Scognamiglio, M.; Snoussi, M.; de Feo, V. Studies on chemical composition, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of five Thymus vulgaris L. essential oils. Molecules 2015, 20, 12016–12028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Baslam, M.; Esteban, R.; García-Plazaola, J.I.; Goicoechea, N. Effectiveness of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) for inducing the accumulation of major carotenoids, chlorophylls and tocopherol in green and red leaf lettuces. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 3119–3128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Hristozkova, M.; Gigova, L.; Geneva, M.; Stancheva, I.; Vasileva, I.; Sichanova, M.; Mincheva, J. Mycorrhizal fungi and microalgae modulate antioxidant capacity of basil plants. J. Plant Prot. Res. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Dos Santos, E.L.; da Silva, F.A.; da Silva, F.S.B. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increase the phenolic compounds concentration in the bark of the stem of libidibia ferrea in field conditions. Open Microbiol. J. 2017, 11, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Peltonen, P.A.; Vapaavuori, E.; Julkunen-Tiitto, R. Accumulation of phenolic compounds in birch leaves is changed by elevated carbon dioxide and ozone. Glob. Change Biol. 2005, 11, 1305–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Goufo, P.; Pereira, J.; Figueiredo, N.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Carranca, C.; Rosa, E.A.S.; Trindade, H. Effect of elevated carbon dioxide (CO2) on phenolic acids, flavonoids, tocopherols, tocotrienols, γ-oryzanol and antioxidant capacities of rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Cereal Sci. 2014, 59, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Santos-Sánchez, N.F.; Salas-Coronado, R.; Villanueva-Cañongo, C.; Hernández-Carlos, B. Antioxidant compounds and their antioxidant mechanism. In Antioxidants; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  72. Chizzola, R.; Michitsch, H.; Franz, C. Antioxidative properties of Thymus vulgaris leaves: Comparison of different extracts and essential oil chemotypes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 6897–6904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Haraguchi, H.; Saito, T.; Ishikawa, H.; Date, H.; Kataoka, S.; Tamura, Y.; Mizutani, K. Antiperoxidative components in Thymus vulgaris. Planta Med. 1996, 62, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Meeran, N.; Fizur, M.; Javed, H.; Al Taee, H.; Azimullah, S.; Ojha, S.K. Pharmacological properties and molecular mechanisms of thymol: Prospects for its therapeutic potential and pharmaceutical development. Front. Pharmacol. 2017, 8, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Fresh mass (A), dry mass (B), and rates of photosynthesis (C) and respiration (D) in Thymus vulgare grown under normal conditions (control) or the effect of eCO2 (620 ppm), AMF or their combination (AMF-eCO2). Values are mean ± standard error of five independent replicates. Asterisks indicate significant changes (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01) compared to control, as revealed by the Student’s t-test. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences (a p < 0.05; b p < 0.01) between AMF alone and the combined AMF+eCO2 treatment.
Figure 1. Fresh mass (A), dry mass (B), and rates of photosynthesis (C) and respiration (D) in Thymus vulgare grown under normal conditions (control) or the effect of eCO2 (620 ppm), AMF or their combination (AMF-eCO2). Values are mean ± standard error of five independent replicates. Asterisks indicate significant changes (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01) compared to control, as revealed by the Student’s t-test. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences (a p < 0.05; b p < 0.01) between AMF alone and the combined AMF+eCO2 treatment.
Jof 06 00168 g001
Figure 2. Heatmap of fold change in the contents of primary and secondary metabolites of Thymus vulgare grown under the effect of eCO2 (620 ppm), AMF or their combination (AMF-eCO2). Asterisks indicate significant (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01) increased fold changes compared to control (untreated plants), as revealed by Student’s t-test. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences (a p < 0.05; b p < 0.01) between AMF alone and the combined AMF+eCO2 treatment.
Figure 2. Heatmap of fold change in the contents of primary and secondary metabolites of Thymus vulgare grown under the effect of eCO2 (620 ppm), AMF or their combination (AMF-eCO2). Asterisks indicate significant (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01) increased fold changes compared to control (untreated plants), as revealed by Student’s t-test. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences (a p < 0.05; b p < 0.01) between AMF alone and the combined AMF+eCO2 treatment.
Jof 06 00168 g002
Table 1. Mycorrhizal colonization and growth parameters in roots of Thymus vulgare grown under normal conditions (control) or the effect of eCO2 (620 ppm), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) or their combination (AMF-eCO2). Values are mean ± standard error of five independent replicates. Asterisks indicate significant changes (*** p < 0.001) between AMF alone and the combined AMF+eCO2 treatment.
Table 1. Mycorrhizal colonization and growth parameters in roots of Thymus vulgare grown under normal conditions (control) or the effect of eCO2 (620 ppm), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) or their combination (AMF-eCO2). Values are mean ± standard error of five independent replicates. Asterisks indicate significant changes (*** p < 0.001) between AMF alone and the combined AMF+eCO2 treatment.
MetaboliteControleCO2AMFAMF + eCO2
Colonization
(% root)
ndnd33.06 ± 2.3954.04 ± 1.11 ***
Hyphal length
(cm g−1 soil)
ndnd12.94 ± 5.8219.10 ± 9.74 b ***
Number of arbuscules
(no. cm−1 root)
ndnd4.78±0.275.03 ± 0.18
nd = not detected.
Table 2. Levels of primary metabolites (mg g−1 dry weight) in Thymus vulgare grown under normal conditions (control) or the effect of eCO2 (620 ppm), AMF or their combination (AMF-eCO2). Values are mean ± standard error of five independent replicates. Asterisks indicate significant changes (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01) compared to control, as revealed by the Student’s t-test. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences (a p < 0.05; b p < 0.01) between AMF alone and the combined AMF+eCO2 treatment.
Table 2. Levels of primary metabolites (mg g−1 dry weight) in Thymus vulgare grown under normal conditions (control) or the effect of eCO2 (620 ppm), AMF or their combination (AMF-eCO2). Values are mean ± standard error of five independent replicates. Asterisks indicate significant changes (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01) compared to control, as revealed by the Student’s t-test. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences (a p < 0.05; b p < 0.01) between AMF alone and the combined AMF+eCO2 treatment.
ControleCO2AMFAMF + eCO2
Sugars
Glucose1.34 ± 0.072.18 ± 0.12 **1.32 ± 0.072.14 ± 0.01 b
Fructose0.34 ± 0.050.45 ± 0.020.4 ± 0.020.76 ± 0.06 b
Sucrose1.67 ± 0.152.07 ± 0.152.19 ± 0.04 *2.85 ± 0.1 b
Soluble sugars6.09 ± 0.3110.29 ± 0.3 **9.46 ± 0.35 **11.44 ± 0.8
Starch62.06 ± 1.8979.26 ± 4.63 *60.1 ± 1.785.22 ± 1.68 b
Total carbohydrates105.38 ± 3.08137.1 ± 6.75 *105.62 ± 6.31147.79 ± 2.01 b
Organic acids
Oxalic3.84 ± 0.332.97 ± 0.065.7 ± 0.34 *7.75 ± 0.29 b
Malic6.88 ± 0.36.25 ± 0.346.36 ± 0.297.38 ± 0.36
Isobutyric3.46 ± 0.332.89 ± 0.466.34 ± 0.67 *7.67 ± 0.53
Fumaric0.93 ± 0.010.96 ± 0.080.67 ± 0.04 **1.14 ± 0.07 b
Succinic3.07 ± 0.334.21 ± 0.295.08 ± 0.39 *6.31 ± 0.58
Citric2.88 ± 0.335.32 ± 0.28 **4.17 ± 0.545.9 ± 0.2 a
Essential amino acids (EAAs)
Histidine2.49 ± 0.192.75 ± 0.33.19 ± 0.232.95 ± 0.38
Isoleucine0.15 ± 0.020.26 ± 0.03 *0.28 ± 0.03 *0.34 ± 0.01
Leucine0.02 ± 00.03 ± 00.03 ± 0 *0.04 ± 0
Lysine4.2 ± 0.214.55 ± 0.294.97 ± 0.256.67 ± 0.5 a
Methionine0.02 ± 00.02 ± 0 *0.03 ± 0 *0.03 ± 0
Phenylalanine0.33 ± 0.040.68 ± 0.03 **0.76 ± 0.1 *1.31 ± 0.08 a
Valine0.48 ± 0.050.58 ± 0.060.78 ± 0.08 *1.72 ± 0.07 b
Threonine0.11 ± 0.010.16 ± 0.020.19 ± 0.02 *0.21 ± 0.01
Arginine1.86 ± 0.132.35 ± 0.253.14 ± 0.34 *3.76 ± 0.17
Total EAAs9.6611.3813.3717.03
Non-essential amino acids (NEAAs)
Aspartate0.03 ± 00.05 ± 00.06 ± 0.01 *1.51 ± 0.1 b
Cystine0.03 ± 00.2 ± 0.02 **0.12 ± 0.01 **0.62 ± 0.06 b
GlutamIic acid77.02 ± 5.2197.05 ± 3.71 *82.21 ± 5.27132.44 ± 6.78 b
Glutamine96.66 ± 6.05106.65 ± 0.98159.99 ± 6.47 **180.39 ± 9.12
Asparagine1.23 ± 0.121.8 ± 0.191.84 ± 0.13 *2.05 ± 0.09
Glycine1.18 ± 0.132.03 ± 0.22 *2.2 ± 0.24 *2.67 ± 0.29
Ornithine0.18 ± 0.030.21 ± 0.020.27 ± 0.040.32 ± 0.02
Proline1.25 ± 0.062.24 ± 0.08 **2.79 ± 0.15 **3.52 ± 0.19 a
Serine0.35 ± 0.040.59 ± 0.06 *0.64 ± 0.07 *0.78 ± 0.08
Tyrosine0.99 ± 0.111.3 ± 0.02 *1.64 ± 0.06 **1.41 ± 0.09
Alanine18.65 ± 0.9722.22 ± 0.76 *25.09 ± 0.67 **28.06 ± 0.53 a
Total NEAAs197.57234.34276.85353.77
Saturated fatty acids (SFA)
Lauric (C12:0)1.42 ± 0.171.6 ± 0.151.31 ± 0.262.24 ± 0.19 a
Tetradecanoic (C14:0)1.7 ± 0.152.6 ± 0.12 **2.44 ± 0.14 *3.05 ± 0.18
Hexadecanoic (C16:0)10.18 ± 0.8713.08 ± 0.7313.38 ± 0.55 *19.8 ± 1.14 b
Heptadecanoic (C17:0)0.62 ± 0.060.81 ± 0.090.95 ± 0.09 *1.62 ± 0.09 b
Octadecanoic (C18:0)2.26 ± 0.212.96 ± 0.333.46 ± 0.34 *5.9 ± 0.33 b
Eicosanoic (C20:0)2 ± 0.192.16 ± 0.192.9 ± 0.14 *4.06 ± 0.4
Total SFA18.18 ± 1.1523.2 ± 0.68 *24.43 ± 0.94 *36.68 ± 0.38 b
Unsaturated fatty acids
Myristoleic (C14:1)0.61 ± 0.060.8 ± 0.090.94 ± 0.09 *1.6 ± 0.09 b
Palmitoleic (C16:1n-7)1.61 ± 0.082.02 ± 0.1 *1.48 ± 0.163.47 ± 0.19 b
Octadecenoic (C18:1)7.45 ± 0.711.29 ± 0.35 **10.51 ± 0.24 *15.82 ± 0.23 b
Erucic acid (C22: 1)12.19 ± 0.739.22 ± 0.28 *12.93 ± 2.3112.2 ± 0.54
Octadecadienoic (C18:2)16.68 ± 1.5724.65 ± 2.14 *25.5 ± 1.48*40.43 ± 0.78 b
Octadecatrienoic (C18:3)5.36 ± 0.57.01 ± 0.28 *6.1 ± 0.288.97 ± 0.28 b
USFA43.9 ± 2.255 ± 2.55 *57.46 ± 0.63 **82.48 ± 0.68 b
SFA/USFA0.350.340.350.35
Table 3. Levels of phenolic compounds and volatile oils (mg g−1 dry weight) and biological activities in Thymus vulgare grown under normal conditions (control) or the effect of eCO2 (620 ppm), AMF or their combination (AMF-eCO2). Values are mean ± standard error of five independent replicates. Asterisks indicate significant changes (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01) compared to control, as revealed by Student’s t-test. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences (a p < 0.05; b p < 0.01) between AMF alone and the combined AMF+eCO2 treatment.
Table 3. Levels of phenolic compounds and volatile oils (mg g−1 dry weight) and biological activities in Thymus vulgare grown under normal conditions (control) or the effect of eCO2 (620 ppm), AMF or their combination (AMF-eCO2). Values are mean ± standard error of five independent replicates. Asterisks indicate significant changes (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01) compared to control, as revealed by Student’s t-test. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences (a p < 0.05; b p < 0.01) between AMF alone and the combined AMF+eCO2 treatment.
MetaboliteControleCO2AMFAMF + eCO2
Phenolic acids
Caffeic acid0.46 ± 0.040.71 ± 0.04 *0.66 ± 0.03 *0.73 ± 0.03
Chlorogenic acid0.01 ± 00.01 ± 00.01 ± 00.01 ± 0 a
Protocatechuic acid4.11 ± 0.324.47 ± 0.354.38 ± 0.456.42 ± 0.6
Gallic acid0.34 ± 0.020.48 ± 0.060.39 ± 0.030.5 ± 0.02 a
p-Coumaric acid2.66 ± 0.222.82 ± 0.352.32 ± 0.263.76 ± 0.36 a
Chicoric acid1.28 ± 0.131.44 ± 0.151.23 ± 0.151.87 ± 0.16 a
Rosmarinic acid1.72 ± 0.21.89 ± 0.11.59 ± 0.12.5 ± 0.11 b
Flavonoids
Quercetin0.07 ± 00.07 ± 00.08 ± 0.010.08 ± 0.01
Naringenin0.05 ± 00.06 ± 00.05 ± 0.010.06 ± 0.01
Kaempferol0.08 ± 00.1 ± 0.01 *0.08 ± 00.13 ± 0.01 b
Luteolin0.07 ± 00.1 ± 0.01 *0.06 ± 00.13 ± 0.01 b
Apigenin0.11 ± 0.020.13 ± 00.14 ± 0.010.17 ± 0.01 a
Rutin0.01 ± 00.01 ± 00.01 ± 00.01 ± 0
Volatile oils
alpha-pineno1.62 ± 0.212.1 ± 0.082 ± 0.032.97 ± 0.1 a,b
Beta-pineno2.79 ± 0.363.57 ± 0.273.29 ± 0.435.13 ± 0.23 a
p-cymene4.45 ± 0.325.94 ± 0.485.85 ± 0.518.31 ± 0.37 a
limonene0.1 ± 0.030.08 ± 0.010.1 ± 00.12 ± 0.02
1,8-cineol8.23 ± 1.048.54 ± 1.199.61 ± 1.348.51 ± 0.73
linalol3.42 ± 0.443.54 ± 0.493.19 ± 0.73.96 ± 0.23
Camphor0.64 ± 0.080.82 ± 0.090.76 ± 0.11.18 ± 0.09 a
Borneol0.39 ± 0.050.4 ± 0.060.36 ± 0.080.45 ± 0.09
Thymol1.5 ± 0.195.66 ± 0.48 **2.47 ± 0.28 *6.55 ± 0.48 b
Carvacrol4.97 ± 0.636.35 ± 0.685.85 ± 0.769.13 ± 0.15 a
alpha-Phellandrene2.16 ± 0.213.15 ± 0.342.9 ± 0.382.86 ± 0.17
beta-Phellandrene0.25 ± 0.030.26 ± 0.030.26 ± 0.040.32 ± 0.04
Humuline0.14 ± 0.010.17 ± 0.011.06 ± 0.05 **0.7 ± 0.04 b
Myrcene1.84 ± 0.122 ± 0.44.07 ± 0.41 **2.64 ± 0.12 a
alpha-thyjone1.1 ± 0.051.1 ± 0.041.09 ± 0.081.04 ± 0.03
Tricyclene0.3 ± 0.020.66 ± 0.04 **0.65 ± 0.07 *1.21 ± 0.14 a
Antioxidant capacity (FRAP)17.08 ± 1.827.57 ± 1 **22.85 ± 1.1335.91 ± 0.91 b
Oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC)743.41 ± 33.191034.6 ± 108.25983.99 ± 35.17 **1680.57 ± 81.71 b
% inhibition of LDL oxidation
TBARS)14.08 ± 0.9926.56 ± 0.76 **24.55 ± 0.98 **35.32 ± 2.25 a
conjugated dienes17.7 ± 2.132.56 ± 0.51 **28.51 ± 1.16 *43.53 ± 1.29 b
% inhibition of hemolysis13.4 ± 0.8322.02 ± 1.97 *16.45 ± 1.0528.28 ± 1.08 b

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Habeeb, T.H.; Abdel-Mawgoud, M.; Yehia, R.S.; Khalil, A.M.A.; Saleh, A.M.; AbdElgawad, H. Interactive Impact of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Elevated CO2 on Growth and Functional Food Value of Thymus vulgare. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 168. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jof6030168

AMA Style

Habeeb TH, Abdel-Mawgoud M, Yehia RS, Khalil AMA, Saleh AM, AbdElgawad H. Interactive Impact of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Elevated CO2 on Growth and Functional Food Value of Thymus vulgare. Journal of Fungi. 2020; 6(3):168. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jof6030168

Chicago/Turabian Style

Habeeb, Talaat H., Mohamed Abdel-Mawgoud, Ramy S. Yehia, Ahmed Mohamed Ali Khalil, Ahmed M. Saleh, and Hamada AbdElgawad. 2020. "Interactive Impact of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Elevated CO2 on Growth and Functional Food Value of Thymus vulgare" Journal of Fungi 6, no. 3: 168. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jof6030168

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop