Next Article in Journal
Mechanical and Physicochemical Properties of 3D-Printed Agave Fibers/Poly(lactic) Acid Biocomposites
Next Article in Special Issue
Activated Bio-Carbons Prepared from the Residue of Supercritical Extraction of Raw Plants and Their Application for Removal of Nitrogen Dioxide and Hydrogen Sulfide from the Gas Phase
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanical and Microstructural Characterization of Friction Stir Welded SiC and B4C Reinforced Aluminium Alloy AA6061 Metal Matrix Composites
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Physicochemical Properties of Fly Ash Precursor, Na-P1(C) Zeolite–Carbon Composite and Na-P1 Zeolite—Adsorption Affinity to Divalent Pb and Zn Cations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Highly Effective Adsorption Process of Ni(II) Ions with the Use of Sewage Sludge Fly Ash Generated by Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustion (CFBC) Technology

by
Tomasz Kalak
1,*,
Kinga Marciszewicz
1 and
Joanna Piepiórka-Stepuk
2
1
Department of Industrial Products and Packaging Quality, Institute of Quality Science, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Niepodległości 10, 61-875 Poznań, Poland
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Division of Food Industry Processes and Facilities, Koszalin University of Technology, Racławicka 15-17, 75-620 Koszalin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 20 April 2021 / Revised: 28 May 2021 / Accepted: 2 June 2021 / Published: 5 June 2021

Abstract

:
Recently, more and more attention has been paid to the removal of nickel ions due to their negative effects on the environment and human health. In this research, fly ash obtained as a result of incineration of municipal sewage sludge with the use of circulating fluidized bed combustion (CFBC) technology was used to analyze the possibility of removing Ni(II) ions in adsorption processes. The properties of the material were determined using analytical methods, such as SEM-EDS, XRD, BET, BJH, thermogravimetry, zeta potential, SEM, and FT-IR. Several factors were analyzed, such as adsorbent dose, initial pH, initial concentration, and contact time. As a result of the conducted research, the maximum sorption efficiency was obtained at the level of 99.9%. The kinetics analysis and isotherms showed that the pseudo-second order equation model and the Freundlich isotherm model best suited this process. In conclusion, sewage sludge fly ash may be a suitable material for the effective removal of nickel from wastewater and the improvement of water quality. This research is in line with current trends in the concepts of circular economy and sustainable development.

1. Introduction

The last decades of human activity have generated many environmental problems, such as water pollution (rivers, lakes, etc.), water waste, pollution of seas and oceans with industrial and consumer waste, and pollution with heavy metals and other toxic substances. The frequency of these phenomena is increasing, and despite taking many corrective and preventive measures, it still seems that the processes of environmental pollution are not stopping. It is necessary to take steps globally on many levels, from legal regulations to the appropriate, responsible attitude of every human being. Heavy metals are particularly dangerous to the environment and humans. They are not biodegradable, and they are able to accumulate in the ecosystem through the food chain and accumulate in living organisms. Even in low concentrations, they are carcinogenic, cause diseases of various systems and organs, and can also cause loss of life [1].
Nickel is one of toxic heavy metals that naturally occur in the environment and wastewaters. Nickel compounds are used in various industries (e.g., metal electroplating, silver refineries, storage battery industries, zinc base casting, etc.) that discharge their significant amounts into the environment in various forms, and their concentrations in industrial wastewater range from 3.40 to 900 mg/L [2]. The maximum nickel concentration limit in bottled water was set at 50 mg/L by the European Economic Community [3]. According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Indian Standards Institution (ISI), and World Health Organization (WHO), the permissible limits of nickel in drinking water are 0.1, 0.05, and 0.02 mg/L, respectively [4,5]. Nickel is one of the ubiquitous elements found in soil, water, atmospheric air, and the biosphere. Nickel enters into the soil via wind and during rainfall. Another source is the combustion of solid fuel (coal, oil) and waste, as well as industrial processes. An excessive amount of metal in plants may result in the appearance of phytotoxic symptoms, such as reduced photosynthesis, growth inhibition, and changes in enzyme activity. In addition, it can cause biochemical and physiological stress in plants, accompanied by the formation of hydrogen peroxide. This compound prevents the cells from working properly. Plant stress is a reaction to unfavorable environmental conditions. It is possible to develop a disease called chlorosis, during which the process of producing chlorophyll is disturbed, and diseased plants turn yellow. The growth of roots is inhibited, and they turn brown and thicken. In addition, nickel in green parts of plants disturbs the cation–anionic balance, which is responsible for good plant growth and development. In extreme conditions, it can cause plants to die [6].
Nickel exposure occurs mainly through the inhalation of dust and vapor particles. An excess of an element in the human body can accumulate in the lymph nodes, causing changes in the bone marrow and chromosomes. The high concentration of nickel sulphide they contain can cause serious damage to lungs and kidneys. On the other hand, prolonged exposure to dust in the worst cases leads to asthma, bronchitis, and pneumoconiosis. The most toxic nickel-containing compound is nickel carbonyl. Its excess in the human body can lead to pain, dizziness, insomnia, or vomiting. The respiratory system and most organs such as kidneys, liver, spleen, and brain are damaged. High levels of nickel in the human body can cause lung and bone cancer [7].
In everyday life, the widespread use of items containing nickel poses a great risk of contact allergy. This highly sensitizing metal can lead to irritation or contact eczema accompanied by burning and itchy skin. The metal is the most common allergen. Hypersensitivity can appear at any age. Everyday items are not the only source of allergies. Nickel found in food, tap water, and groundwater causes contact eczema and other chronic skin diseases (e.g., dermatopathy). The symptoms are very similar to those caused by food allergies [7].
Many advanced technologies are used to treat wastewater from heavy metals, such as ion exchange, ultrafiltration, reverse osmosis, chemical precipitation, electrolysis, and more [8,9]. Due to high material and operating costs, other alternative technologies are sought, as well as cheaper solutions and materials. These include adsorption processes, which have become more and more popular in recent years. They are characterized by low operating and equipment costs, ease of use, and the possibility of application to various types of contamination. The advantages include the possibility of using cheap industrial wastes as adsorbents, including fly ash obtained from the incineration of various wastes and materials, including municipal sewage sludge [10,11,12,13,14].
One of the most effective techniques for neutralizing municipal sewage sludge is thermal treatment, which brings many economic, energy, and environmental benefits and is recommended by European Union legislation. The quantity and quality of fly ash (FA) is dependent on the chemical composition of sludge, incineration, and exhaust gas treatment technologies [15]. The calorific value of average sewage sludge with 80% hydration is about 0.5 MJ/kg. The calorific value of dust with a moisture content below 20% is between 12 and 18 MJ/kg, and the bulk density is approx. 700 kg/m3 [16]. In addition, this material is odorless, stable, safe in terms of sanitation, free from pathogenic organisms, non-biodegradable, and not harmful to human health and the environment. Fly ash resulting from fluidization combustion usually contains elements such as Ca, Cu, Mg, Mn, K, P, Zn, B, Mo, and Fe, which are useful, for example, for plant growth. Fly ash can be a potential raw material for many industrial applications where there is a need for its binding properties and favorable chemical and physical properties. Important characteristics such as particle size, porosity, bulk density, water holding capacity, and surface area make FA suitable for the use as an adsorbent for many metal ions and organic and inorganic compounds. Some of the physicochemical properties of FA are changed as a result of frequent changes in the composition of municipal wastewater subjected to combustion processes. As a result, its industrial application may also change [17,18].
Most modern technologies of thermal treatment of municipal sewage sludge include circulating fluidized bed combustion (CFBC) technology. The main advantages of the technology are as follows: compatibility with many types of fuels, low emission of pollutants, high process efficiency, ease of maintenance, and the possibility of simultaneous combustion of dehydrated, dried, and fermented sludge. Many processes are involved in sewage sludge combustion, such as sewage sludge drying, combustion in the circulating fluidized bed furnace at a high temperature of 650 °C that produces waste gases and slag, cooling of gases, purification of gases in semi-dry and dry reactors using lime milk, active carbon, hydrated lime and ammonia, final purification of gases using bag filters, and the obtaining of fly ash.
About 20–25% of municipal solid waste produced in the European Union (EU) is treated by incineration. In 2020, the total amount of sewage sludge production was estimated at about 13 million tons, and there were 3664 large combustion plants in the EU (EU-28, including Great Britain before leaving the EU). Germany (1794.443 thousand tonnes in 2016), Spain (1174.4 thousand tonnes in 2016), France (1174 thousand tonnes in 2017), Poland (583.07 thousand tonnes in 2018), Turkey (318.503 thousand tonnes in 2018), and Romania (247.76 thousand tonnes in 2018) are the greatest producers of sewage sludge in the EU. The average mass of municipal solid waste incinerated is just under 200,000 tonnes per year. In Poland, there are several mono-incineration plants located in such cities as Warsaw, Kraków, Gdańsk, Gdynia, Bydgoszcz, Łódź, Olsztyn, Szczecin, Kielce, Łomża, and Zielona Góra [19,20,21,22].
This huge amount of produced sewage sludge should be disposed of, and an alternative may be incineration to reduce weight of waste and generate FA. One of the potential applications of FA from sewage sludge incineration may be in adsorption processes to remove metal ions from wastewater and to improve the purity of aquatic environment and water quality.
The goal of this investigation was to examine the adsorption process of Ni(II) ions in aqueous solutions using fly ash generated from the combustion of municipal sewage sludge in the circulating fluidized bed combustion (CFBC) technology under different conditions of initial and equilibrium pH, adsorbent dosage, initial concentration, and contact time. Furthermore, the aim was to determine properties of the adsorbent material and to estimate the process kinetics, equilibrium, and isotherms.

2. Experimental Procedure

2.1. Materials and Methods

2.1.1. Sewage Sludge Fly Ash Preparation

The sewage sludge fly ash (SS-FA) used in these studies was generated in one of the plants located in Poland (Greater Poland voivodeship) in the process of burning municipal sewage sludge in the Sludge Thermal Transformation Installation using CFBC technology (Bydgoszcz, Poland). Four samples of fly ash were collected from different places in the ash container (silo) after all stages of purification processes in the CFBC installation, and next combined into one sample and mixed. Then fly ash was sieved to separate different grain fractions, and particles of less than 0.212 mm were used in the experiments. Samples were dried at 105 °C to constant weight, and finally the moisture content was less than 0.2%. In these studies, all chemicals were analytically pure, and distilled water was used.

2.1.2. Sewage Sludge Fly Ash Characterization

In the first stage, the sewage sludge fly ash (SS-FA) was analyzed for its physicochemical properties with the use of various techniques: bulk density, granulation analysis, SEM-EDS analysis, XRD, pore volume and specific surface area (BET, BJH), zeta potential, TGA analysis, SEM morphology, and FT-IR. The research methods and apparatus used were described in detail and included as Supplementary Material (Methods).

2.1.3. Nickel(II) Adsorption Process

The adsorption experiments of Ni(II) ions in aqueous solutions were carried out at room temperature (23 ± 1 °C) and under normal pressure conditions. The solutions of Ni(II) (nickel standard for AAS in nitric acid (HNO3), pure for analysis) were used. The SS-FA samples (weight from 2.5 to 500 mg/L) and Ni(NO3)2 solution (20 mL, initial concentration 20–100 mg/L) were mechanically shaken in conical flasks at 200 rpm (1 h). The pH of Ni(II) initial solutions was set with 0.1 M NaOH and HNO3. Subsequently, the SS-FA and solutions after adsorption processes were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for phase separation. Next, the concentration of Ni(II) ions (mg/L) was determined with the use of SpectrAA 800 spectrophotometer (F-AAS, wavelength λ = 232 nm for nickel Ni, Varian, Palo Alto, USA). The measurements were repeated three times, and calculated arithmetic mean values were finally shown in the results.
The adsorption efficiency A (%) and adsorption capacity qe (mg/g) were estimated based on Formulas (1) and (2), respectively:
A = [ C 0 C e C 0 ] × 100 %
q e = ( C 0 C e ) × V m
where C0 and Ce (mg/L) are initial and equilibrium Ni(II) ion concentrations, respectively; V (L)—volume of solution, m (g)—mass of SS-FA.
Pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order kinetic models, and Langmuir and Freundlich adsorption models were estimated based on Formulas (3)–(6), respectively:
q t = q e ( 1 e k 1 t )
q t = q e 2 k 2 t 1 + q e k 2 t
q e = q m a x K L C e 1 + K L C e
q e = K F C e 1 n
where qe (mg/g)—the maximum amount of Ni(II) ions adsorbed per mass of SS-FA at equilibrium; k1 (1/min)—the rate constant of pseudo-first-order adsorption; k2 (g/(mg·min.))—the rate constant of pseudo-second-order adsorption, KL—the Langmuir constant; qmax (mg/g)—the maximum adsorption capacity; Ce (mg/L)—the equilibrium concentration after the adsorption process; 1/n—the intensity of adsorption; KF—the Freundlich constant, qt (mg/g)—the amount of Ni(II) ions adsorbed at any time t (min).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of the SS-FA Adsorptive Material

Fly ash resulting from the combustion of municipal sewage sludge was characterized by many methods. Firstly, the granulation analysis showed the following grain fractions: < 0.212 mm (90.75 ± 1.3%), 0.212–0.5 mm (8.45 ± 1.2%), 0.5–0.71 mm (0.49 ± 0.07%), 0.71–1.0 mm (0.31 ± 0.06%), 1.0–1.7 mm (0%), >1.7 mm (0%). Many researchers indicated in the literature that smaller FA particle sizes resulted in higher metal ion removal efficiency. This is due to the presence of larger specific surface area and the number of active centers capable of adsorbing metal ions [23]. Hence, following the literature analyses and research results, it can be concluded that it is appropriate to use SS-FA particles with the smallest particle size range to carry out Ni(II) adsorption experiments [24,25,26,27].
The SS-FA particles are irregular in shape and size, and often form various agglomerates, which affects the density of the bulk material. Therefore, bulk density of the SS-FA loose grains was first determined and was equal to 0.83 ± 0.03 g/cm3. Then, the material sample was compacted on a vibrating table, and the following density was obtained: 1.56 ± 0.04 g/cm3. Similar results were reported in the literature [28,29]. These analysis results may be relevant for the possible use of SS-FA as an additive to ceramic, construction, or building products.
X-ray diffraction analysis of SS-FA was carried out, and the spectrum is presented in Figure 1. The following chemical compounds have been shown to be the main crystalline phases of SS-FA: calcium sulfate (CaSO4, 6%), maghemite (synFe2O3, 6.38%), magnesium phosphate (Zn2Mg(PO4)2, 6.75%), calcite (CaCO3, 9.25%), portlandite (Ca(OH)2, 11.4%), quartz (synSiO2,13.16%), whitlockite (Ca2.59 MgO 41 (PO4)2, 16.83%), and stanfieldite (synMg3Ca3(PO4)4, 30.23%). It should be noted here that SS-FA is a heterogeneous multi-component product of the combustion process. Therefore, depending on the place of sampling in the silo tank, the quantitative compositions may slightly differ. However, X-ray diffraction analysis should reveal the same crystalline phases of the substances. Similar results of XRD analysis have been found in the literature [30,31,32].
Measurements of particle size distribution were carried out, and the results are attached as Supplementary Material (Figure S1). It should be mentioned that during the analysis the larger and heavier SS-FA particles fell to the bottom of the suspension, and the apparatus measured the smaller and lighter particles that remained in suspension. Therefore, as a result of the measurement, one peak was observed with a particle size of 1205 nm. Other authors obtained similar results on different fly ash samples [33,34]. According to the literature, smaller particles have the ability to dissolve or suspend in solutions more quickly and form a more stable suspension compared to larger ones. Additionally, smaller particles obtain higher adsorption in metal ion binding processes [24,35].
Thermogravimetric analysis was performed, and the results are presented in Figure 2. Generally speaking, a weight loss of the sample was observed with increasing temperature up to 1000 °C. The TGA curve represents the change in weight loss, and the DTG curve represents a derivative weight loss dw/dt (mg/min) as a function of temperature. Initial weight loss up to 400 °C may be due to evaporation of moisture, volatile organic compounds, and removal of carbon monoxide. Significant weight loss was observed at 400–450 °C (an endothermic peak), which may result from the dehydroxylation reaction of calcium hydroxide [36,37]. A further increase in temperature causes another loss of SS-FA mass at 750 °C. This phenomenon may be a consequence of the degradation of the grain wall surfaces caused by the release of gaseous products (CO2) from their interior according to reaction Equation (7) [35,38,39]. Based on the literature, the presence of such CaCO3 polymorphs as aragonite, vaterite, and calcite can be assumed [40]. In these studies, the XRD analysis confirmed the presence of calcite (9.25%). Other possible gases may be CO, H2, and CH4 as a result of decomposition of fly ash particles [41].
CaCO3 → CaO + CO2
The analysis of the electrokinetic zeta potential was carried out on the SS-FA before and after rinsing with distilled water (Figure 3). The zeta potential is an important parameter in determining the stability of a solution and indicates the variability of surface potential for a specific material. It was found out that the surface charge of SS-FA varies with the pH of the solution and decreases from 21.2 mV (pH 2.6) to 1.3 mV (pH 4.3) and then increases to 9.3 (pH 7). In the range of pH 2.0–2.7, low stability is a feature of this system. The charge does not reach the isoelectric point (IEP), which means that the surface charge was positive. This non-monotonic variation in fly ash as a function of pH is reported due to the possible dipolar interaction. An increase in pH can reduce the mobility of bridging protons, thus increasing the number of acid sites. This may be associated with the formation of Brønsted acid sites in aluminosilicates. Acid sites are formed with hydroxyl groups located between aluminum and silicon occupied by oxygen tetrahedra. The Si/Al ratio influences the acidity of aluminosilicates in such a way that the total number of acid sites increases as the Si/Al ratio decreases. Replacing Si atoms with Al atoms in the material structure causes a loss of electric charge, which can be neutralized by the presence of an additional cation in the pore structure. Another explanation of non-monotonic behavior may also be due to morphological parameters such as size and shape of aggregates as well as chains formed in SS-FA particles. Additionally, the particle and pore size as well as SBET value affect the amount of bound water with less activity acting as a solvent. In turn, water can affect the mobility of protons and the structure of the electrical double layer (EDL). The EDL should be different with the same surface structure in pores of the adsorbent and on its surface of micro- and nanoparticles. Parameters such as pH, temperature, and solution composition can have impacts on the structure of the EDL on the particle surface and in pores of different sizes [42,43,44,45,46,47]. In the next step, the SS-FA was rinsed with distilled water in order to obtain a pH of 7 of the dispersion system. This procedure changed the value of the surface charge from positive (16.0 mV, pH 2.2) to negative (–11.2 mV, pH 7). The isoelectric point (IEP) was reached at pH 4.07, which represents the achieved unstable suspension and equilibrium between negative and positive charges. At the IEP point, the SS-FA particles may have the lowest osmotic pressure, viscosity, and solubility.
The SEM-EDS analysis was performed, and the results are presented in Figure 4 and Table 1. The plot shows the peaks corresponding to individual elements and oxides, the dominant of which were as follows: O, Ca, P, Al, Si, Fe, Mg and P2O5, CaO, Al2O3, SiO2, Fe2O3, and CO2, respectively. Other elements and oxides were present in smaller amounts. Table 1 compares the elemental composition with other research results published in the literature. Similar content was observed for Fe2O3, MnO, Na2O, K2O, and TiO2. The concentrations of other oxides (CaO, SiO2, P2O5, MgO, Al2O3, SO3) were slightly different. Differences may be due to differences in chemical composition, different combustion parameters of the samples, or different analytical techniques.
As a result of BET analysis, adsorption and desorption surface parameters, including specific surface area (SBET), pore volume of 0.114 cm3/g, and average pore diameter (Apd), were determined and are presented in Table 2 and Supplementary Material (Figures S2–S4). The shapes of the adsorption isotherms are characteristic of type III isotherms, which are convex towards the pressure axis. The type III isotherm refers to a situation where the adsorbed molecules occur at the most advantageous locations on the surface of a non-porous or macroporous adsorbent. This shape speaks to the so-called cooperative adsorption, which informs that previously adsorbed molecules increase the adsorption of other particles. In the case of low relative pressure, weak interactions between the adsorbate and the adsorbent cause adsorption with low efficiency. When the molecule is adsorbed once, the adsorbate–adsorbate interaction promotes the sorption of more molecules in the adsorption system, as a result of which the isotherm becomes convex towards the pressure axis [54].
The SEM analysis of SS-FA particles was performed using a scanning electron microscope, and the images are presented in Figure 5. As is seen, SS-FA is not homogeneous, and particles of different diameters and shapes are dominant. Larger particles have a more elongated, irregular shape with jagged ends. Smaller diameter particles are formed more regularly, more abundantly and have smooth tips. Spherical grains are also visible in the SS-FA. The surface of all particles is porous. Clear clusters of particles (lumps) appear in large numbers. Particle shape irregularities are the result of various parameters of the fluidizing combustion process, such as combustion duration and temperature. With the extension of the process, the obtained particles take on more spherical shapes or take a crystalline form. Similar observations could be observed in the literature [55,56,57,58]. According to the literature, the surface morphology and the specific surface area of FA particles affect the surface energy of the particles, which is responsible for the initiation of processes at the liquid–adsorbent interface. FA particles are characterized by higher surface energy and higher surface activity for a finer specific surface area. The ash porosity depends on the microporosity, the grain shape, and the extent of the grain distribution [57]. In the present study, based on the particle size distribution analysis, the SS-FA particle size was shown to be 1205 nm, the BET adsorption specific surface area was 9.105 m2/g, and the granulation analysis showed that the largest particle size was in the fraction with a particle size less than 0.212 μm.

3.2. Adsorption Analysis of Ni(II) Ions

3.2.1. Analysis of pH Profile

In the solution, pH parameter plays an important role in the adsorption process. Therefore, the influence of this factor on the efficiency of the process was investigated, and the results are presented in Figure 6a,b. The applied conditions of the experiments were as follows: the initial concentration of Ni(II) ions: 99.1 mg/L (pH 2), 105 mg/L (pH 3), 94.96 mg/L (pH 4), 88.2 mg/L (pH 5), SS-FA dosage 0.3–50 g/L, pH range of 2–5, contact time 60 min, rotation speed 200 rpm, T = 23 ± 1 °C. After analysis of the results, it was found out that the best performance was obtained at initial pH 4.0 for the adsorbent doses of 10 g/L (98.2%), 30 g/L (99.89%), 50 g/L (99.89%). In all cases an increase in adsorption was demonstrated. At initial pH 2.0, the lowest efficiency was revealed from 0.25 g/L up to 30.0 g/L, where 96.4% was achieved. To explain the effect of the initial pH of the solution on adsorption, the FA surface charge and the degree of its speciation can be taken into account. Most likely, the ion exchange mechanism was responsible for binding nickel ions. In Figure 7a,b, the relationship between equilibrium pH and removal efficiency and adsorption capacity is presented. As it is shown, any amount of SS-FA (from 0.3 to 50 g/L) increases pH up to 8.7, which is due to the alkaline nature of the adsorbent. Based on the XRD analysis, anions such as SiO32, CO32−, SO42−, PO43, and OH were revealed in the adsorbent mass. At higher alkaline pH, they could take part in the possible precipitation of Ni(II) ions. The SS-FA contained a lot of metal oxides, the electrostatic charge of which was affected by the pH of the solution. Hence, ion exchange and complexation processes, by binding with oxygen groups, could possibly occur. Equations (8)–(10) can represent possible general mechanism of the processes.
XOH +   H 3 O + XOH 2 + +   H 2 O
XOH +   OH XO +   H 2 O
2 ( XO ) +   Ni 2 + ( XO ) 2 Ni
where X can represent Ca, Al, K, Si, etc. In these studies, no appropriate experiments were carried out to confirm the possible mechanisms [13,59].
The surface of the SS-FA (hydrous oxide surface) was protonated by a significant amount of hydrogen ions (MOH + H+ M(OH)2+), which resulted in an increase in the number of positively charged active centers and a decrease in the number of negatively charged centers. In an alkaline environment, hydrous oxides react with hydroxide ions to form deprotonated ions (MOH + OH → MO + H2O). In acidic solutions (initial pH < 5), nickel exists in the ionic form of Ni2+. Thus, it competes with H+ ions, which, due to electrostatic repulsion, do not favor the adsorption of positively charged nickel ions. As a result, lower adsorption was observed. When the initial pH value was adjusted to 3–4, the surface became more negatively electrostatically charged, ion exchange took place, and the appropriate groups were deprotonated, which made it possible to adsorb Ni2+ ions in greater amounts. The increase in adsorption with an increase in initial pH of the solution can also be explained by the presence of increased dissociation of surface hydroxyl groups from the SS-FA surface (at adsorbent dosages 30–50 g/L). At the same time, the formation of poorly soluble ions, such as NiOH+ and Ni(OH)2 may partially contribute to the maximum removal of nickel ions.
The zeta potential analysis revealed that the isoelectric point (IEP) was reached at an initial pH of 4.07. Above the value, the surface of fly ash seemed to be negatively charged. The adsorption experiments indicated that under optimal conditions at initial pH 4, the adsorption efficiency was the highest. At initial pH 5, the adsorption began to decrease. The phenomenon can be explained in this way: that repulsive electrostatic forces started to be dominant in the solution. Three different mechanisms can be proposed for the impact of the surface charge. At initial pH < 5, competitive adsorption of Ni2+ with H+ and H3O+ ions on SS-FA surface probably occurred. At initial pH range 5–6, partial adsorption and surface precipitation of NiO and Ni(OH)2 took place. At initial pH > 6, precipitation of nickel hydroxides predominated. The neutral NiO and Ni(OH)2 particles were no longer attracted by the adsorbent particles, and electrostatic repulsive forces were acting [60,61].

3.2.2. Effect of Adsorbent Dosage

The effect of SS-FA dosage on the adsorption efficiency of Ni(II) ions was studied and the results are summarized in Figure 8a,b. The experiments were conducted under the following conditions: the initial concentration of Ni(II) ions: 99.1 mg/L (pH 2), 105 mg/L (pH 3), 94.96 mg/L (pH 4), 88.2 mg/L (pH 5), pH ranging from 2 to 5, rotation speed 200 rpm, T = 23 ± 1 °C, contact time 60 min, SS-FA dosage 0.25–50 g/L. Generally speaking, an increase in the removal efficiency with increasing dosage up to 50 g/L was observed. As it is seen, the dose range of 4–50 g/L could be considered optimal due to the highest efficiency in the tested pH range, and the maximum sorption results were as follows: 99.73% (pH 2, 50 g/L), 94.35% (pH 3, 50 g/L), 99.89% (pH 4, 30–50 g/L), and 99.89% (pH 5, 50 g/L). It was not necessary to increase the amount of SS-FA, as no significant changes were observed in the adsorption process under the tested conditions. Moreover, a reduction in adsorption capacity was observed starting from 161.9 mg/g (dose 1 g/L, pH 4) and ending with 3.52 mg/g (dose 50 g/L, pH 5). It was highly likely that active sites were fully occupied by Ni(II) ions when interacting with SS-FA adsorbent at their lower doses and were not fully utilized at higher doses. The decrease in sorption capacity is the result of an increase in the mass of the adsorbent, which resulted in an increase in the number of available metal ion binding sites.

3.2.3. Effect of Initial Concentration of Ni(II) Ions

Adsorption behavior under different initial concentration of Ni(II) ions was studied, and the results are presented in Figure 9. After analyzing the previous research results, it was decided to apply the following experimental conditions: initial concentration of Ni(II) ions (2.5–100 mg/L), adsorbent dosages 2.5–50 g/L, initial pH 4, contact time 60 min, rotation speed 200 rpm, T = 23 ± 1 °C. Generally speaking, an increase in adsorption efficiency was observed. The highest removal equal to 99.9% was achieved for the SS-FA dosage of 50 g/L and initial concentrations of 50 and 100 mg/L. Furthermore, a constant increase in the adsorption capacity ranging from the minimum values (0.09–3.99 mg/g) to the maximum value of 71.6 mg/g was observed.
Based on this analysis of the adsorption process, it was found out that the initial concentration of nickel ions influences the saturation of the SS-FA surface. As shown in Figure 9, the initial Ni(II) concentration was sufficient to initiate ion exchange at the interface between the aqueous and solid phase. Higher metal ion removal efficiency is proportional to greater driving force of mass transfer and lower resistance to metal sorption. Based on the literature, Ni(II) ions have an ionic radius equal to 70 pm. Many studies show that at the molecular level, the smaller the ionic radius of a metal, the greater its propensity to hydrolyze in aqueous solutions. Hydrolyzed molecules have a lower ability of adsorption, which translates into a decrease in the efficiency of the adsorption process [13,62,63].

3.2.4. Kinetics Analysis

Studies of Contact Time

The influence of contact time on adsorption was investigated, and the results are presented in Figure 10. This parameter is important for the effective use of adsorbents in industry. Determination of the optimal contact time in the process can be successfully used to determine the amount of solutions in adsorption processes, to design them, and also to effectively reduce the costs of the process. Our previous research has helped to establish the following optimal experimental conditions: initial concentration of Ni(II) 100 mg/L, initial pH 4.0, SS-FA dosage 30 g/L, rotation speed 200 rpm, T = 23 ± 1 °C. The maximum sorption (99.71%) was obtained within the first 30 min of the process, and there were no significant changes until 60 min. The rapid initial increase in adsorption could have been caused by the use of optimal process conditions, but also by the high concentration of Ni(II) ions at the interface and the availability of more free active sites on the surface of the material. The mechanism of the ion exchange reaction can take many forms, but the equilibrium of the process was achieved gradually by the occupation of active centers by cations.

Pseudo-First-Order and Pseudo-Second-Order Kinetic Models

Kinetics of the sorption of Ni(II) ions on the SS-FA was analyzed. Hence, pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order models were used (Figure 11 and Figure 12), and the determined kinetic parameters are shown in Table 3. On the basis of the calculated values, it was found that a higher correlation coefficient R2 was obtained for the pseudo-second-order model. Hence, the result suggests that this model is a better fit for the description of the kinetics of the adsorption process. This means a greater degree of correlation between the experimental qe and calculated qt values. Therefore, the sorption process took place by diffusion and could probably take the form of chemisorption. Nickel ions could form chemical bonds and have an affinity for active sites that increased their coordination number with the surface, as a result of which adhesion to the sorbent surface occurred. The research showed that the particles were less likely to collide with each other under the conditions of a lower concentration of nickel ions in the aqueous solution. An additional effect was faster binding of Ni(II) ions with active centers on the surface of the material.

3.2.5. Isothermal Analysis

In these studies, the adsorption process was analyzed using Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms models, and the figures are presented in the Supplementary Material (Figures S5 and S6). Based on the calculated parameters, it was found that the adsorption data was better suited to the Freundlich model (Table 4). According to the equation, KL constant describes the spontaneity of adsorption and relates to the sorbent and binding energy of the solute. The spontaneity of the adsorption reaction increases proportionally with the increase in the KL value. This dependence translates into the presence of a more stable adsorbent and greater efficiency of the process. Nevertheless, the Freundlich isotherm describes the relationship between the concentration of metal ions dissolved in a liquid at equilibrium (Ce) and the concentration of dissolved ions on the surface of an adsorbent (qe). A comparison of maximum adsorption capacity with other selected adsorbents is shown in Table 5.

3.3. FT-IR Studies

The FT-IR analysis of SS-FA before and after the removal process was conducted, and the spectra are presented in Figure 13. To this purpose, the samples were analyzed under the following experimental conditions: SS-FA dose 30 g/L, initial concentration of Ni(II) ions 10 mg/L, initial pH 4, T = 23 ± 1 °C, contact time 60 min. The explanation of the most essential FT-IR peaks is presented in Table 6. The spectra were analyzed before and after the adsorption process in terms of differences in shape, intensity of bands, frequency, and possible interaction of functional groups with Ni(II) ions. Figure 13 shows that after the sorption process, the intensity of the bands shifted towards higher transmittance values, and their location remained at the same wavelengths or was slightly shifted. These changes can be identified as follows: 3278.88 (shift to 3279.15 cm−1), 1410.18 (shift to 1410.76 cm−1), 1026.64 (shift to 1025.89 cm−1), 873.87 (shift to 874.02 cm−1), 712.45 (shift to 712.8 cm−1), 595.08 (shift to 595.96 cm−1), 553.24 (shift to 555.27 cm−1). Bands at similar wavelengths are reported in the literature: bending O–Si–O (467 cm−1, silica glass and quartz), symmetric stretching Al–Si–O (571 cm−1), symmetric stretching Si–O–Si (796 cm−1), asymmetric stretching Si–O (1110 cm−1, 1044 cm−1) [84].

4. Conclusions

Fly ash generated from the combustion of municipal sewage sludge in the circulating fluidized bed combustion (CFBC) technology was examined for the possibility of removing Ni(II) ions from aqueous solutions. The selected analytical methods were used to evaluate the physicochemical properties of the material. The efficiency of the adsorption process depends on such parameters as the dose of the sorbent, initial pH, initial concentration, and contact time; therefore, the influence of these parameters on the process was analyzed in subsequent experiments. The conducted research showed that the maximum adsorption efficiency was 99.9% under the following conditions: initial pH 4.0, SS-FA dosage 50 g/L, initial concentration range 94.9 g/L, contact time 60 min, rotation speed 200 rpm, T = 23 ± 1 °C. Overall, however, it can be seen that the process yield was above 90% under many experimental conditions. The SS-FA material was characterized before and after adsorption by FT-IR analysis. Changes in intensity of bands and slight shifts of the peaks were observed. Additionally, the kinetics of the process was analyzed, and isotherms were determined. The analysis showed that the performed adsorption process is best described by the pseudo-second order kinetic model and the Freundlich model. The maximum adsorption capacity qmax calculated on the basis of the Langmuir equation was 130.03 mg/g for an SS-FA dosage of 50 g/L.
In conclusion, as a result of the research, it was unequivocally found that post-production SS-FA waste is capable of removing Ni(II) ions with a very high process efficiency due to the content of appropriate functional groups in the material composition and favorable physicochemical properties. Promising research results are worth continuing experiments on the adsorption of other heavy metal ions. Most importantly, an essential conclusion is the real possibility of industrial use of SS-FA in order to improve water quality by removing heavy metal ions, which is in line with current global trends in sustainable development, circular economy, and climate neutrality.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/ma14113106/s1, Figure S1. Particle size distribution of fly ash (SS-FA) determined by laser diffraction; Figure S2. The low temperature BET adsorption and desorption isotherm; Figure S3. Linear form of BET adsorption isotherm; Figure S4. Pore volume distribution (the BJH method); Figure S5. Langmuir isotherms for adsorption of Ni(II) ions with SS-FA; Figure S6. Freundlich isotherms for adsorption of Ni(II) ions with SS-FA.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.K.; methodology, T.K.; validation, T.K.; formal analysis, T.K.; investigation, T.K. and K.M.; resources, T.K. and J.P.-S.; data curation, T.K.; writing—original draft preparation, T.K.; writing—review and editing, T.K. and J.P.-S.; visualization, T.K.; supervision, T.K.; project administration, T.K.; funding acquisition, T.K. and J.P.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research did not receive a specific grant from any a funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kalak, T.; Cierpiszewski, R.; Ulewicz, M. High Efficiency of the Removal Process of Pb(II) and Cu(II) Ions with the Use of Fly Ash from Incineration of Sunflower and Wood Waste Using the CFBC Technology. Energies 2021, 14, 1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Erdoğan, S.; Önal, Y.; Akmil-Başar, C.; Bilmez-Erdemoğlu, S.; Sarıcı-Özdemir, Ç.; Köseoğlu, E.; İçduygu, G. Optimization of nickel adsorption from aqueous solution by using activated carbon prepared from waste apricot by chemical activation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2005, 252, 1324–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Demirbaş, E.; Kobya, M.; Öncel, S.; Şencan, S. Removal of Ni(II) from aqueous solution by adsorptiononto hazelnut shell activated carbon: Equilibrium studies. Bioresour. Technol. 2002, 84, 291–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Raji, M.; Ibrahim, Y.; Ehinmidu, J. Physico-chemical characteristics and Heavy metal levels in Drinking Water sources in Sokoto metropolis in North-western Nigeria. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manag. 2010, 14, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Gautam, P.K.; Gautam, R.K.; Banerjee, S.; Chattopadhyaya, M.C.; Pandey, J.D. Heavy metals in the environment: Fate, transport, toxicity and remediation technologies. Heavy Met. 2016, 4, 1–29. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bhalerao, S.A.; Sharma, A.S.; Poojari, A.C. Toxicity of Nickel in Plants. Int. J. Pure App. Biosci. 2015, 3, 345–355. [Google Scholar]
  7. Tchounwou, P.B.; Yedjou, C.G.; Patlolla, A.K.; Sutton, D.J. Heavy metal toxicity and the environment. Exp. Suppl. 2012, 101, 133–164. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Maarof, H.; Daud, W.; Aroua, M. Recent trends in removal and recovery of heavy metals from wastewater by electrochemical technologies. Rev. Chem. Eng. 2017, 33, 359–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bazrafshan, E.; Mohammadi, L.; Ansari-Moghaddam, A.; Mahvi, A.H. Heavy metals removal from aqueous environments by electrocoagulation process—A systematic review. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2015, 13, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Park, J.-H.; Eom, J.-H.; Lee, S.-L.; Hwang, S.-W.; Kim, S.-H.; Kang, S.-W.; Yun, J.-J.; Cho, J.-S.; Lee, Y.-H.; Seo, D.-C. Exploration of the potential capacity of fly ash and bottom ash derived from wood pellet-based thermal power plant for heavy metal removal. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 740, 140205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Qiu, R.; Cheng, F.; Huang, H. Removal of Cd2+ from aqueous solution using hydrothermally modified circulating fluidized bed fly ash resulting from coal gangue power plant. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 1918–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ahmaruzzaman, M. Industrial wastes as low-cost potential adsorbents for the treatment of wastewater laden with heavy metals. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 166, 36–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kalak, T.; Kłopotek, A.; Cierpiszewski, R. Effective adsorption of lead ions using fly ash obtained in the novel circulating fluidized bed combustion technology. Microchem. J. 2019, 145, 1011–1025. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kalak, T.; Cierpiszewski, R. Comparative studies on the adsorption of Pb(II) ions by fly ash and slag obtained from CFBC technology. Pol. J. Chem. Technol. 2019, 21, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Fytili, D.; Zabaniotou, A. Utilization of sewage sludge in EU application of old and new methods—A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2008, 12, 116–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kalisz, M. Prognozy zmian w gospodarce osadami ściekowymi. Wodociągi Kanalizacja 2007, 3, 30–31. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ahmaruzzaman, M. A review on the utilization of fly ash. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2010, 36, 327–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Malik, A.; Thapliyal, A. Eco-friendly Fly Ash Utilization: Potential for Land Application. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 39, 333–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. European Environment Agency. Large Combustion Plants Operating in Europe. Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/large-combustion-plants-operating-in-europe-3/assessment (accessed on 17 April 2021).
  20. Wójtowicz, A. Kierunki zagospodarowania komunalnych osadów ściekowych w świetle zmian prawa. In Proceedings of the Conference—Urząd Marszałkowski Województwa Pomorskiego, Gdańsk, Poland, 11 May 2012. [Google Scholar]
  21. Werle, S.; Dudziak, M. Gasification of sewage sludge. In Industrial and Municipal Sludge; Industrial and Municipal Sludge: Oxford, UK, 2019; pp. 575–593. [Google Scholar]
  22. Eurostat. Sewage Sludge Production and Disposal. Available online: http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=env_ww_spd&lang=en (accessed on 17 April 2021).
  23. Shim, Y.-S.; Kim, Y.-K.; Kong, S.-H.; Rhee, S.-W.; Lee, W.-K. The adsorption characteristics of heavy metals by various particle sizes of MSWI bottom ash. Waste Manag. 2003, 23, 851–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Police, S.; Maity, S.; Chaudhary, D.K.; Dusane, C.K.; Sahu, S.K.; Kumar, A.V. Effect of coal fly ash’s particle size on U adsorption in water samples and thermodynamic study on adsorption. Environ. Chem. Ecotoxicol. 2020, 2, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Itskos, G.; Koukouzas, N.; Vasilatos, C.; Megremi, I.; Moutsatsou, A. Comparative uptake study of toxic elements from aqueous media by the different particle-size-fractions of fly ash. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 183, 787–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lanzerstorfer, C. Fly ash from coal combustion: Dependence of the concentration of various elements on the particle size. Fuel 2018, 228, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kara, S.; Aydiner, C.; Demirbas, E.; Kobya, M.; Dizge, N. Modeling the effects of adsorbent dose and particle size on the adsorption of reactive textile dyes by fly ash. Desalination 2007, 212, 282–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Feng, S.; Li, Y. Study on coal fly ash classified by bulk density. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1732, 012127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nawaz, I. Disposal and Utilization of Fly Ash to Protectthe Environment. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2013, 2, 5259–5266. [Google Scholar]
  30. Mahieux, P.-Y.; Aubert, J.-E.; Cyr, M.; Coutand, M.; Husson, B. Quantitative mineralogical composition of complex mineral wastes—Contribution of the Rietveld method. Waste Manag. 2009, 30, 378–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Coutand, M.; Cyr, M.; Clastres, P. Use of sewage sludge ash as mineral admixture in mortars. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. Constr. Mater. 2006, 159, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhou, Y.-F.; Li, J.-S.; Lu, J.-X.; Cheeseman, C.; Poon, C.S. Sewage sludge ash: A comparative evaluation with fly ash for potential use as lime-pozzolan binders. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 242, 118160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, H.L.; Liu, G.L.; Cao, Y. Content and Distribution of Trace Elements and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Fly Ash from a Coal-Fired CHP Plant. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2014, 14, 1179–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xiong, L.; Wan, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, F.; Wang, J.; Kang, Y. Fly Ash Particle Size Effect on Pore Structure and Strength of Fly Ash Foamed Geopolymer. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2019, 1098027, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Dos Santos, R.P.; Martins, J.; Gadelha, C.; Cavada, B.; Albertini, A.V.; Arruda, F.; Vasconcelos, M.; Teixeira, E.; Alves, F.; Lima Filho, J.; et al. Coal fly ash ceramics: Preparation, characterization, and use in the hydrolysis of sucrose. Sci. World J. 2014, 154651, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Paya, J.; Monzo, J.; Borrachero, M.V.; Perris, E.; Amahjour, F. Thermogravimetric methods for determinig carbon content in fly ashes. Cem. Concr. Res. 1998, 28, 675–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Khan, A.A.; de Jong, W.; Jansens, P.J.; Spliethoff, H. Biomass combustion in fluidized bed boilers: Potential problems and remedies. Fuel Process. Technol. 2009, 90, 21–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yue, Y.; Wang, J.J.; Basheer, P.; Bai, Y. Establishing the Carbonation Profile with Raman Spectroscopy: Effects of Fly Ash and Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag. Materials 2021, 14, 1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Du, B.; Li, J.; Fang, W.; Liu, Y.; Yu, S.; Li, Y.; Liu, J. Characterization of naturally aged cement-solidified MSWI fly ash. Waste Manag. 2018, 80, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Villain, G.; Thiery, M.; Platret, G. Measurement methods of carbonation profiles in concrete: Thermogravimetry, chemical analysis and gammadensimetry. Cem. Concr. Res. 2007, 37, 1182–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Magdziarz, A.; Werle, S. Analysis of the combustion and pyrolysis of dried sewage sludge by TGA and MS. Waste Manag. 2014, 34, 174–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, X.; Mäki-Arvela, P.; Aho, A.; Vajglova, Z.; Gun’ko, V.M.; Heinmaa, I.; Kumar, N.; Eränen, K.; Salmi, T.; Murzin, D.Y. Zeta Potential of Beta Zeolites: Influence of Structure, Acidity, pH, Temperature and Concentration. Molecules 2018, 23, 946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Liberto, T.; Barentin, C.; Colombani, J.; Costa, A.; Gardini, D.; Bellotto, M.; Le Merrer, M. Simple ions control the elasticity of calcite gels via interparticle forces. J. Colloid Inter. Sci. 2019, 553, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Hadadian, Y.; Ramos, A.P.; Pavan, T.Z. Role of zinc substitution in magnetic hyperthermia properties of magnetite nanoparticles: Interplay between intrinsic properties and dipolar interactions. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 18048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Dedecek, J.; Balgová, V.; Pashkova, V.; Klein, P.; Wichterlová, B. Synthesis of ZSM-5 Zeolites with Defined Distribution of Al Atoms in the Framework and Multinuclear MAS NMR Analysis of the Control of Al Distribution. Chem. Mater. 2012, 24, 3231–3239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hensen, E.J.M.; Poduval, D.G.; Ligthart, D.A.J.M.; van Veen, J.A.R.; Rigutto, M.S. Quantification of Strong Brønsted Acid Sites in Aluminosilicates. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 8363–8374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ronson, T.O.; Carney, J.R.; Whitwood, A.C.; Taylor, R.J.K.; Fairlamb, I.J.S. AsCat and FurCat: New Pd catalysts for selective room-temperature Stille cross-couplings of benzyl chlorides with organostannanes. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 3466–3469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kong, D.L.Y.; Sanjayan, J.G.; Sagoe-Crentsil, K. Comparative performance of geopolymers made with metakaolin and fly ash after exposure to elevated temperatures. Cem. Concr. Res. 2007, 37, 1583–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hardjito, D.; Wallah, S.E.; Sumajouw, D.M.J.; Rangan, B.V. Fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Aust. J. Struct. Eng. 2005, 6, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Alinnor, I.J. Adsorption of heavy metal ions from aqueous solution by fly ash. Fuel 2007, 86, 853–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Temuujin, J.; Riessen, A.V. Effect of fly ash preliminary calcination on the properties of geopolymer. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 164, 634–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mustafa, A.M.; Kamarudin, H.; Omar Karem, A.K.A.; Ruzaidi, C.M.; Rafiza, A.R.; Norazian, M.N. Optimization of Alkaline Activator/Fly Ash Ratio on The Compressive Strength of Manufacturing Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2011, 110–116, 734–739. [Google Scholar]
  53. Thokchom, S.; Ghosh, P.; Ghosh, S. Resistance of Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Mortars in Sulfuric Acid. ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2009, 4, 65–70. [Google Scholar]
  54. Bansal, R.C.; Goyal, M. Activated Carbon Adsorption; CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, LLC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  55. Magdziarz, A.; Kosowska-Golachowska, M.; Kijo-Kleczkowska, A.; Musiał, T.; Środa, K.; Wolski, K.; Richter, D. Analysis of sewage sludge ashes from air and oxy-fuel combustion in a circulating fluidized-bed. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on the Sustainable Energy and Environment Development (SEED 2016), Krakow, Poland, 14–17 November 2017; Volume 10, p. 00054. [Google Scholar]
  56. Gao, N.; Kamran, K.; Quan, C.; Williams, P.T. Thermochemical conversion of sewage sludge: A critical review. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2020, 79, 100843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gao, J.; Wang, T.; Zhao, J.; Hu, X.; Dong, C. An Experimental Study on the Melting Solidification of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Fly Ash. Sustainability 2021, 13, 535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chen, C.-H.; Chiou, I.-J.; Wang, K.-S. Sintering effect on cement bonded sewage sludge ash. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2006, 28, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cui, X.; Fang, S.; Yao, Y.; Li, T.; Ni, Q.; Yang, X.; He, Z. Potential mechanisms of cadmium removal from aqueous solution by Canna indica derived biochar. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 562, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Erdemoğlu, M.; Sarikaya, M. Effects of heavy metals and oxalate on the zeta potential of magnetite. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2006, 300, 795–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Huang, L.-F.; Hutchison, M.J.; Santucci, R.J., Jr.; Scully, J.R.; Rondinelli, J.M. Improved Electrochemical Phase Diagrams from Theory and Experiment: The Ni–Water System and Its Complex Compounds. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 9782–9789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mînzatu, V.; Davidescu, C.-M.; Negrea, P.; Ciopec, M.; Muntean, C.; Hulka, I.; Paul, C.; Negrea, A.; Duteanu, N. Synthesis, Characterization and Adsorptive Performances of a Composite Material Based on Carbon and Iron Oxide Particles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Langeroodi, N.S.; Farhadravesh, Z.; Khalaji, A.D. Optimization of adsorption parameters for Fe (III) ions removal from aqueous solutions by transition metal oxide nanocomposite. Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 2018, 11, 404–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Onundi, Y.B.; Mamun, A.A.; Khatib, M.F.A.; Al Saadi, M.A.; Suleyman, A.M. Heavy metals removal from synthetic wastewater by a novel nano-size composite adsorbent. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 8, 799–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Zamani, S.; Salahi, E.; Mobasherpour, I. Removal of Nickel from Aqueous Solution by Nano Hydroxyapatite Originated from Persian Gulf Corals. Can. Chem. Trans. 2013, 1, 173–190. [Google Scholar]
  66. Ren, Y.; Yan, N.; Wen, Q.; Fan, Z.; Wei, T.; Zhang, M.; Ma, J. Graphene/δ-MnO2 composite as adsorbent for the removal of nickel ions from wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 175, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Liew, Y.M.; Heah, C.Y.; Kamarudin, H. Structure and properties of clay-based geopolymer cements: A review. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2016, 83, 595–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mobasherpour, I.; Salahi, E.; Ebrahimi, M. Removal of divalent nickel cations from aqueous solution by multi-walled carbon nano tubes: Equilibrium and kinetic processes. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2012, 38, 2205–2222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chen, X.; Guo, Y.; Ding, S.; Zhang, H.; Xia, F.; Wang, J.; Zhou, M. Utilization of red mud in geopolymer-based pervious concrete with the function of adsorption of heavy metal ions. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 207, 789–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kara, I.; Tunc, D.; Sayin, F.; Akar, S.T. Study on the performance of metakaolin based geopolymer for Mn(II) and Co(II) removal. Appl. Clay Sci. 2018, 161, 184–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Mondal, M.; Dutta, M.; De, S. A novel ultrafiltration grade nickel iron oxide doped hollow fiber mixed matrix membrane: Spinning, characterization and application in heavy metal removal. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2017, 188, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Sun, Z.; Ma, J.; Wu, T.; Xing, F.; Gao, J. Porous graphene oxide/carboxymethyl cellulose monoliths, with high metal ion adsorption. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 101, 392–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Rahmani, A.; Zavvar Mousavi, H.; Fazli, M. Effect of nanostructure alumina on adsorption of heavy metals. Desalination 2010, 253, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhou, Z.; Kong, D.; Zhu, H.; Wang, N.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Liu, W.; Li, Q.; Zhang, W.; Zhongqi Ren, Z. Preparation and adsorption characteristics of an ion-imprinted polymer for fast removal of Ni(II) ions from aqueous solution. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 341, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Li, P.; Liu, C.; Zhang, L.; Zheng, S.; Zhang, Y. Enhanced boron adsorption onto synthesized MgO nanosheets by ultrasonic method. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2017, 34, 938–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. El-Bahy, S.M.; El-Bahy, Z.M. Synthesis and characterization of polyamidoxime chelating resin for adsorption of Cu(II), Mn(II) and Ni(II) by batch and column study. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 276–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Shirkhanloo, H.; Khaligh, A.; Mousavi, H.Z.; Rashidi, A. Graphene oxide-packed micro-column solid-phase extraction combined with flame atomic absorption spectrometry for determination of lead (II) and nickel (II) in water samples. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2015, 95, 16–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zare-Dorabei, R.; Ferdowsi, S.M.; Barzin, A.; Tadjarodi, A. Highly efficient simultaneous ultrasonic-assisted adsorption of Pb(II), Cd(II), Ni(II) and Cu (II) ions from aqueous solutions by graphene oxide modified with 2,2′-dipyridylamine: Central composite design optimization. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2016, 32, 265–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Bai, Z.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, Z. One-pot synthesis of highly efficient MgO for the removal of Congo red in aqueous solution. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 6630–6637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Mužek, M.N.; Svilović, S.; Zelić, J. Kinetic studies of cobalt ion removal from aqueous solutions using fly ash-based geopolymer and zeolite NaX as sorbents. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2016, 51, 2868–2875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wang, H.; Wang, W.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, Z.; Chen, L.; Zhao, L.; Tian, X.; Sun, W. Superior Adsorption of 3D Nanoporous Architectures for Ni(II) Ions Adsorption Using Polyvinyl Alcohol as Cross-Linking Agent and Adsorption Conveyor. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 7899–7903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Panda, L.; Rath, S.S.; Rao, D.S.; Nayak, B.B.; Das, B.; Misra, P.K. Thorough understanding of the kinetics and mechanism of heavy metal adsorption onto a pyrophyllite mine waste-based geopolymer. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 263, 428–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ghani, U.; Hussain, S.; Noor-ul-Amin; Imtiaz, M.; Khan, S. Laterite clay-based geopolymer as a potential adsorbent for the heavy metals removal from aqueous solutions. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2020, 24, 874–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kalembkiewicz, J.; Galas, D.; Sitarz-Palczak, E. The Physicochemical Properties and Composition of Biomass Ash and Evaluating Directions of its Applications. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2018, 27, 2593–2603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction spectrum of SS-FA.
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction spectrum of SS-FA.
Materials 14 03106 g001
Figure 2. Thermogravimetric curves of SS-FA.
Figure 2. Thermogravimetric curves of SS-FA.
Materials 14 03106 g002
Figure 3. Plots of zeta potential vs. equilibrium pH.
Figure 3. Plots of zeta potential vs. equilibrium pH.
Materials 14 03106 g003
Figure 4. EDS spectrum of SS-FA (magn. x200).
Figure 4. EDS spectrum of SS-FA (magn. x200).
Materials 14 03106 g004
Figure 5. SEM images of SS-FA, scale bar: (a) 2 μm, (b) 20 μm.
Figure 5. SEM images of SS-FA, scale bar: (a) 2 μm, (b) 20 μm.
Materials 14 03106 g005
Figure 6. The effect of initial pH on removal efficiency (a) and adsorption capacity (b) of Ni(II) ions with SS-FA.
Figure 6. The effect of initial pH on removal efficiency (a) and adsorption capacity (b) of Ni(II) ions with SS-FA.
Materials 14 03106 g006
Figure 7. The relationship between equilibrium pH and removal efficiency (a) and adsorption capacity (b) of Ni(II) ions with SS-FA.
Figure 7. The relationship between equilibrium pH and removal efficiency (a) and adsorption capacity (b) of Ni(II) ions with SS-FA.
Materials 14 03106 g007
Figure 8. The effect of SS-FA dosage on adsorption efficiency (a) and adsorption capacity (b) of Ni(II) ions.
Figure 8. The effect of SS-FA dosage on adsorption efficiency (a) and adsorption capacity (b) of Ni(II) ions.
Materials 14 03106 g008
Figure 9. The effect of initial concentration of Ni(II) ions on SS-FA removal efficiency (a) and adsorption capacity (b).
Figure 9. The effect of initial concentration of Ni(II) ions on SS-FA removal efficiency (a) and adsorption capacity (b).
Materials 14 03106 g009
Figure 10. The effect of contact time on the Ni(II) ion removal efficiency.
Figure 10. The effect of contact time on the Ni(II) ion removal efficiency.
Materials 14 03106 g010
Figure 11. The pseudo first-order kinetic plot for the adsorption of Ni(II).
Figure 11. The pseudo first-order kinetic plot for the adsorption of Ni(II).
Materials 14 03106 g011
Figure 12. The pseudo second-order kinetic plot for the adsorption of Ni(II).
Figure 12. The pseudo second-order kinetic plot for the adsorption of Ni(II).
Materials 14 03106 g012
Figure 13. FT-IR spectrum of SS-FA before and after Ni(II) adsorption.
Figure 13. FT-IR spectrum of SS-FA before and after Ni(II) adsorption.
Materials 14 03106 g013
Table 1. Elemental composition of SS-FA (EDS microanalyzer) and comparison with the literature.
Table 1. Elemental composition of SS-FA (EDS microanalyzer) and comparison with the literature.
ElementsCONaMgAlSiPSKCaTiMnFeZn
Weight (%)1.85 ± 0.0644.79 ± 0.30.54 ± 0.033.28 ± 0.16.41 ± 0.35.51 ± 0.211.35 ± 0.40.41 ± 0.091.11 ± 0.117.68 ± 0.20.54 ± 0.030.23 ± 0.025.43 ± 0.30.87 ± 0.09
Atomic (%)3.41 ± 0.261.93 ± 0.60.52 ± 0.032.99 ± 0.095.25 ± 0.24.34 ± 0.38.11 ± 0.30.28 ± 0.030.63 ± 0.059.76 ± 0.50.25 ± 0.020.09 ± 0.012.15 ± 0.20.29 ± 0.02
Content of oxides (wt. %)
ReferencesCO2Na2OMgOAl2O3SiO2P2O5SO3K2OCaOTiO2MnOFe2O3ZnO
This research6.97 ± 0.30.73 ± 0.045.44 ± 0.212.11 ± 0.611.78 ± 0.626.02 ± 0.81.02 ± 0.11.33 ± 0.124.74 ± 0.80.89 ± 0.030.29 ± 0.017.77 ± 0.31.08 ± 0.08
[48]0.371.427.048.81.20.220.856.21.30.1510.2
[49]0.370.7726.4953.361.430.200.801.341.4710.86
[50]0.9722.0357.250.760.522.970.688.36
[51]0.381.223.631.310.280.841.741.320.1315.3
[52]0.420.7823.5952.111.310.490.802.610.880.037.39
[53]0.610.329.856.010.440.732.361.753.58
Table 2. Adsorption and desorption surface parameters of SS-FA.
Table 2. Adsorption and desorption surface parameters of SS-FA.
ParametersValues
BET adsorption cumulative surface area (SBET) (m2/g)9.105
BET desorption cumulative surface area (SBET) (m2/g)12.368
BJH adsorption cumulative volume of pores (Vpa) (cm3/g)0.032417
BJH desorption cumulative volume of pores (Vpd) (cm3/g)0.03302
BJH adsorption average pore diameter (Apda) (nm)14.2408
BJH desorption average pore diameter (Apdd) (nm)10.6791
Table 3. Adsorption parameters of pseudo-first-order and the pseudo-second-order rate equations.
Table 3. Adsorption parameters of pseudo-first-order and the pseudo-second-order rate equations.
Metal IonAdsorbent Dosage [g/L]Pseudo-First-Order Kinetic ModelPseudo-Second-Order Kinetic Model
kad
[min−1]
qe
[mg/g]
R2k
[g/mg min]
qe
[mg/g]
R2
Ni(II)300.0300.0230.9402441.910.0440.989
Table 4. Isotherm model parameters for adsorption of Ni(II) using SS-FA.
Table 4. Isotherm model parameters for adsorption of Ni(II) using SS-FA.
Metal IonAdsorbent Dosage (g/L)Langmuir IsothermFreundlich Isotherm
Calculated qm (mg/g)KL (L/mg)R2Kf
(mg/g) (L/mg)(1/n)
nR2
Ni(II)2.594.720.02970.9512.4890.8270.974
596.80.02080.9461.9540.7450.958
1081.810.0340.9773.1520.8690.980
25126.320.11660.99221.1690.9020.995
50130.030.04350.98311.2420.8200.984
Table 5. Comparison of maximum adsorption capacity of SS-FA with different adsorbents.
Table 5. Comparison of maximum adsorption capacity of SS-FA with different adsorbents.
AdsorbentsAdsorption Capacity (mg/g)Ref.
Carbon nanotubes–granular activated carbon (CNT–GAC)0.07[64]
Nano crystalline hydroxyapatite (nano HAp)2.28[65]
Graphene10.8[66]
LD slag15[67]
Multi-walled carbon nano tubes (MWCNT)17.86[68]
Graphene/MnO246.55[66]
Dolochar ash geopolymer48[69]
Pyrophyllite-based geopolymer49[70]
Hollow fibers62.51[71]
Graphene oxide/carboxy methyl cellulose72.04[72]
Nanostructured Al2O383.33[73]
Ion-imprinted polymer86.3[74]
MgO nanosheets (ultrasonic method)87[75]
Polyamidoxime chelating resin (PAO-AN)
three dimensional
130[76]
Sewage sludge fly ash (SS-FA)130.03This study
Graphene oxide (GO)178[77]
Graphene oxide modified with 2,20-dipyridylamine (GO-DPA)180.89[78]
MgO nanosheets (precursor calcination)185.5[79]
Activated carbon derived from Xanthoceras188[80]
Polyvinyl alcohol/CNTs nanoporous architectures (3DPCA)225.6[81]
Slag based geopolymer414[82]
Sieved geopolymer sample (SGS)520[83]
Table 6. FT-IR peaks of SS-FA.
Table 6. FT-IR peaks of SS-FA.
FT-IR Band (cm−1)Assignment (Vibrations, Species)
3278.88stretching vibrations O–H
1410.76, 1410.1valence vibration of carbonate ions
1025.89, 1026.64asymmetric stretching vibrations of silica Si–O–Si
873.87, 874.02symmetric stretching of Al–O–M, vibration of carbonates (calcite)
712.45symmetric stretching of Si–O–Si and Al–O–Si
595.96, 595.08stretching vibrations Al–O, Si–O–M
553.24, 555.27O–P–O, O=P–O bending vibration (probably P2O5)
380–440bond bending vibrations Si–O–Si
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kalak, T.; Marciszewicz, K.; Piepiórka-Stepuk, J. Highly Effective Adsorption Process of Ni(II) Ions with the Use of Sewage Sludge Fly Ash Generated by Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustion (CFBC) Technology. Materials 2021, 14, 3106. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma14113106

AMA Style

Kalak T, Marciszewicz K, Piepiórka-Stepuk J. Highly Effective Adsorption Process of Ni(II) Ions with the Use of Sewage Sludge Fly Ash Generated by Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustion (CFBC) Technology. Materials. 2021; 14(11):3106. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma14113106

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kalak, Tomasz, Kinga Marciszewicz, and Joanna Piepiórka-Stepuk. 2021. "Highly Effective Adsorption Process of Ni(II) Ions with the Use of Sewage Sludge Fly Ash Generated by Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustion (CFBC) Technology" Materials 14, no. 11: 3106. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma14113106

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop