Next Article in Journal
Novel Resorbable and Osteoconductive Calcium Silicophosphate Scaffold Induced Bone Formation
Previous Article in Journal
Simple Synthesis of Molybdenum Disulfide/Reduced Graphene Oxide Composite Hollow Microspheres as Supercapacitor Electrode Material
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimization of Injection Molding Parameters for HDPE/TiO2 Nanocomposites Fabrication with Multiple Performance Characteristics Using the Taguchi Method and Grey Relational Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Deformation Behavior of Recycled Concrete Aggregate during Cyclic and Dynamic Loading Laboratory Tests

1
Water Centre—Laboratory, Faculty of Civil- and Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Warsaw 02-787, Poland
2
Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Faculty of Civil- and Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Warsaw 02-787, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 29 July 2016 / Revised: 6 September 2016 / Accepted: 8 September 2016 / Published: 20 September 2016

Abstract

:
Recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) is a relatively new construction material, whose applications can replace natural aggregates. To do so, extensive studies on its mechanical behavior and deformation characteristics are still necessary. RCA is currently used as a subbase material in the construction of roads, which are subject to high settlements due to traffic loading. The deformation characteristics of RCA must, therefore, be established to find the possible fatigue and damage behavior for this new material. In this article, a series of triaxial cyclic loading and resonant column tests is used to characterize fatigue in RCA as a function of applied deviator stress after long-term cyclic loading. A description of the shakedown phenomenon occurring in the RCA and calculations of its resilient modulus (Mr) as a function of fatigue are also presented. Test result analysis with the stress-life method on the Wohler S-N diagram shows the RCA behavior in accordance with the Basquin law.

1. Introduction

The settlement of pavement is a key factor when analyzing the quality of a road. It is important to investigate not only the bearing capacity of the road construction, but also its cyclic-load counterpart [1]. The literature concerning the latter in cohesionless soils explains how natural aggregates behave [2,3,4]. However, most of the studies to date are carried out for short-term cyclical loadings (usually with a number of cycles below 1000) [5,6]. The purpose of conducting longer-term studies is to establish the fatigue behavior of the materials, which plays important roles when designing constructions subjected to cyclical loading [6,7,8,9].
Studies on cyclical loading of unbound soils and granular materials have been conducted previously [3,4,5]. However, research concerning recycled concrete aggregate (RCA), among other artificial aggregates, is still rare. Improvement of knowledge about the performance of RCA when subjected to cyclical loading can be essential for its successful application in road and foundation engineering.
The degradation mechanisms of soil are observed during triaxial undrained cyclic loading when the deviator stress q is high and leads to the occurrence of a liquefaction phenomenon [10]. When the deviator stress is lower and pore pressure is generated with lower velocity, liquefaction can remain unobserved.
The serviceability limit state is lower than the bearing capacity limit state, which is observed as a liquefaction or incremental collapse [11]. The fatigue phenomenon is observed in the cyclically-loaded soil after the hardening process. Plastic hardening in a repeated loading case can occur and results in a shakedown response of the soil skeleton. Such a mechanism can be observed when changes in effective stress p’ and pore pressure u are low [12]. During repeated loading, soil responds in three possible ways: adaptation, accommodation and ratcheting [13,14,15,16].
The adaptation response is observed when cyclic stress paths return to a new elastic state. In this case, the initially accumulated plastic strains are dissipated, and the path becomes linear. This phenomenon is exclusively observed in strain states lower than 10−3%. In the accommodation response, also known as “plastic shakedown”, the plastic strains also dissipate, but the steady state is observed as a closed hysteresis loop. In the ratcheting state, the soil accumulates plastic strains in each cycle. This leads to exceeding the soil’s serviceability limit and, eventually, causing its collapse.
During ratcheting, the soil stiffness changes during the cyclical loading. This is observed as a change of the modulus on stress-strain plots [17,18]. If the change is negative ( γ decreases), the phenomenon is called ‘cyclic softening’. If γ increases, it is called ‘cyclic hardening’. Previous studies on construction and demolition materials (C&D) lead to the conclusion that these materials exhibit a different response to loads than natural aggregates (NA) [19,20].
C&D debris consists mostly of concrete rubble, bricks, sand, timber and metal. RCAs are produced by separating and crushing C&Ds [21]. Despite inconsistencies during tests, RCAs generally present good performances in key factors, such as bearing capacity and shear strength, making them viable candidates for pavement sub-bases [22,23]. As artificial aggregates, RCAs have intrinsically different structure compositions than NAs. RCAs are partially composed by cement matrixes made of anhydrous cement and hydration products, which form a porous microstructure. This results in high water absorption (especially in the outer layers of RCAs, called ‘attached mortar’), which is conjectured to be the reason for their lower mechanical properties when compared to NAs [24,25].
The geotechnical parameters or RCAs, such as friction angle, apparent cohesion, California Bearing Ratio (CBR) value and permeability properties, have been previously tested [26,27,28]. However, a careful characterization of strain development during cyclic or dynamic loading in RCAs remains a challenge. To tackle this problem, in this article, the results of long-term cyclic triaxial and torsional shear tests are presented. The experiments were performed in order to the estimate resilient modulus value Mr, which is part of the design process in the Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design Guide [29,30,31,32]. The main aim of the present study is to characterize the permanent strain behavior and fatigue of RCAs by analyzing their moduli change.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Material and Sample Preparation

The RCA used in this work was obtained from the crushed concrete floor of an industrial building. The strength class of concrete was estimated at B20 (C16/20). The RCA consisted of 100% crushed concrete (Σ(Rb, Rg, X) ≤ 1% m/m), in accordance with European Union standards (EN 933-11:2009, 33).

2.2. Physical Properties Analysis

In order to estimate the physical properties, the sieve analysis was done during the first stage of the physical tests. The tests were performed according to Polish technical norm PKN-CEN ISO/TS 17892-4:2009.
A 3-layer Proctor test was performed, with 55 blows to each layer, in accordance to the Polish national standard PN-88/B-04481. The selected method is characterized by the use of a 2.5-kg hammer and a 2.2-dm3 mold. This procedure creates constant energy of compaction, whose level is equal to 0.59 J/cm3.

2.3. The Static Tests

Laboratory bearing capacity analysis was conducted in order to determine the engineering properties of the RCA used in road applications. This was done by performing the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) (ASTM D1883-87, 34) and direct shear tests.
CBR tests were performed with the Proctor method. Preliminary results highlighted the maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of the samples. The experiments were repeated three times for each optimum moisture content level.
The direct shear tests (DST) were conducted in a cubic shear of a side of 250 mm. The shear box consisted of two parts a stationary bottom and a moveable top. Fully self-contained hydraulic pressure cylinders with changeable speeds (ranging from 0.01 mm/min to 1.0 mm/min) generated normal and shear forces on the top part. During the tests with RCA, the velocity applied to the top of the shear box was of 0.01 mm/min in order to avoid missing peak stress values.
The compaction of the RCA was conducted for the material with moisture contents close to its optimal value. The process was carried out in a shear box with 0.59 J·cm−3 compaction energy. This was done in order to prevent grain crushing and, therefore, changes in particle size distribution. Standard stress values were loaded on top of the shear box. The tests were conducted subsequently after vertical displacements reached a constant value. On top of the sample, a linear variable differential transformer (LVDT, GDS, Hampshire, UK) was installed. When the LVDT records showed no further changes in the sample height, the DSTs were performed. The experiments were terminated once the horizontal shear strains reached 9% or a visible peak and residual values in shear strength were recorded.

2.4. Torsional Shear Test

Torsional shear (TS) tests were performed in a resonant column apparatus (RC, GDS, Hampshire, UK). The RC and TS apparatuses used in this work were a Stokoe apparatus (GDS, Hampshire, UK) for a fixed-free configuration provided by GDS instruments [32]. After the samples reached the saturation stage, isotropic consolidation with a radial stress of 45 kPa was performed. During TS tests, the sample was subjected to small cyclical torsional motion due to a coil-magnet system at the RC. The shear stress was calculated by the torque generated this way. The shear strain levels were determined from the twist angle of the soil sample, as measured by a proximitor. The shear strain was controlled by applying a voltage between 0.004 V and 1 V to the coils, which generated a shear strains between 0.0001% and 0.003%.
The TS tests were conducted with the application of a sinusoidal load wave with frequencies of 0.1, 1 and 10 Hz. The shear modulus G and damping ratio D were estimated for all three frequencies. For measurements at 0.1 Hz and 1 Hz, ten cycles were taken into account for G and D calculations. For the 10-Hz frequency, 100 cycles were used. The range of the tested amplitudes varied between 0.005 V and 0.6 V.

2.5. Static and Long-Term Cyclic Triaxial Tests

Triaxial tests were carried out with a triaxial apparatus from GDS instruments (GDS, Hampshire, UK). The device was designed for cylindrical soil specimens of 7 cm in diameter and 14 cm in height. Samples were fully saturated, and a B-value greater than 0.90 was assured at each measurement. Samples were then subjected to isotropic effective confining pressures of 45 kPa and 90 kPa (and 225 kPa for the static test) and consolidated. The static triaxial tests were conducted under a strain-controlled regime. The cyclic-test procedure consisted of applying an average deviator stress value qm superimposed to a forward-moving pulsating sine wave with constant stress amplitude qa. The parameters of the S-N curves (S stands for stress—repetitive load and N stands for number of cycles to failure) are presented in Figure 1. Details of the applied loading are shown in Table 1. Repeated loading triaxial tests were conducted in the consolidated-undrained (CU) conditions. The frequency used during the test was 1.0 Hz. The cyclic stresses and initial confining pressure levels shown were used to define the effects of cyclic loading on soil behavior.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Results of Physical Tests

Sieve test results for the RCA are shown in Figure 2a. According to [33], they account for the material being classified as a sandy gravel (saGr). The distribution of particles from 0.06 mm to 10 mm conforms to the standard for soils used in the support structures. The extracted coefficients of uniformity (Cu) and of curvature (Cc) amounted to 9.1 and 2.6, respectively, which classifies the RCA as a medium-graded material [34].
Results of the Proctor test are presented in Figure 2b. The optimum moisture content was found at 9.6%, and the maximal dry density under these conditions was 1.94 g/cm3. The optimal moisture content and energy of compaction were rescaled at each test stage to obtain uniform boundary conditions for the material properties.

3.2. Results of Static Tests

As a material with potential application in pavement engineering, RCAs are expected to have high CBR values. The Polish technical standards for motorways state that the CBR value for subgrade constructed from unbound aggregates should be greater than 80%. The CBR tests performed on the RCA during this study are presented in Figure 3a. Experiments were carried out in samples with optimal moisture content. Results for plunger penetrations of 2.5 mm and 5 mm were calculated, ranging from 71.7% to 101.5% for 2.5 mm and 91.3% to 100.4% for 5 mm. Such range differences are attributed to grain crushing and a proper contact zone between the plunger and sample surface. Natural sandy gravels are characterized by CBR values equal to 71%, which places the RCA studied here in the lowest result range for subbase material [31,35].
The DST test were carried out trice under normal stress conditions of 51.5 kPa, 70.2 kPa and 83.5 kPa. The maximal shear stresses obtained under such conditions were equal to 42.6 kPa, 57.7 kPa and 69.0 kPa, respectively. Results are shown in Figure 3b. The estimated friction angle ϕ, obtained from the slope in the graphic (see Figure 3b), was estimated at ϕ = 39.5°. The tests did not allow one to obtain the cohesion parameter c. Friction angles and cohesion coefficients of natural aggregates with CU = 6.6 and a grain size distribution similar to the RCAs studied here were previously found to be around ϕ = 39.6° and c = 0 (see [36,37]). Studies on sandy gravel subjected to triaxial compression led to the estimation of the friction angles in the range 39° < ϕ < 48° to NAs, depending on the relative density changes during the consolidation step [38].
Static triaxial test results are presented in Figure 4. Stress-strain curves are plotted in Figure 4a and show similar behavior under different confining pressures. The deviator stresses reach maximal values at axial strains of, approximately, 2.9%, 3.4% and 4.3% for confining pressures of 45 kPa, 90 kPa and 225 kPa, respectively. These maximal values are defined as drained shear strength and are presented in Table 2. It is seen in Figure 4b that effective stress paths in drained conditions form a critical state line, which is characterized by a slope M (M = qmax/p’ where p’ = 1/3(σ’1 + 2σ3’) and qmax = (σ’1maxσ3’)). Such a slope relates to the effective friction angle ϕ’ according to M = ( 6 sin ϕ ) / ( 3 sin ϕ ) . The slope of the critical state lines in Figure 4b amount to 2.17, which corresponds to a friction angle of 53°.
Coulomb–Mohr plots are presented in Figure 4c. The analysis of these static triaxial tests allows independent estimation of the friction angles and apparent cohesion parameters at ϕ’ = 42° and c = 45 kPa, in accordance with previous studies [38]. The differences between the results arising from the effective stress plot (Figure 3b) and the Coulomb–Mohr analysis (Figure 4c) happen due to the nonlinear results of triaxial tests. The RCA structure, which involves high roughness of the grain surface, undergoes higher friction forces at lower confining pressures. On the other hand, the soil density after consolidation increases together with the effective stress. A higher effective stress results in a lower impact of grain surface roughness, which creates uncertainties in the estimation of the sample’s mechanical parameters.

3.3. Results of Torsional Shear Tests

TS tests were performed in order to estimate characteristic values of the shear modulus G and damping ratio D. The tested frequencies ranged from dynamical (10 Hz) to quasi-static loadings (0.1 Hz). Results are presented in Table 3.
The normalized shear modulus (G/Gmax) and normalized damping ratio (D/Dmin) at different frequencies f are shown as a function of γ in Figure 5 and Figure 6. The results show the low dependence of G/Gmax and D/Dmin on the frequency value. The values of the low-amplitude shear modulus (Gmax) and damping ratio (Dmin) are lower than the shear modulus and damping ratio at higher frequencies (see Table 3). With increasing f, Gmax values rise between 9% (for f = 1 Hz) and 2% (for f = 10 Hz) with respect to the Gmax value for f = 0.1 Hz. The Gmax and Dmin values characterize the low dispersion of points, and that suggests that their increase is linear in f.

3.4. Cyclic Triaxial Test Results

The cyclic triaxial tests were performed under a deviator stress qmax = 38.8 kPa. DST results showed a friction angle ϕ = 39.5°. Maximal deviator stresses qmax were calculated from:
σ 1 = σ 3 · t a n 2 ( 45 + ϕ 2 ) ,
where σ 1 = q + σ 3 is the effective major axial stress and σ 3 corresponds to the effective minor axial stress value; in order to do so, Formula (1) can be rewritten to: q m a x = σ 3 ( tan 2 ( 45 + ϕ 2 ) 1 ) . The values obtained this way for q were q = 257.3 kPa (for p’0 = 45 kPa) and q = 314.6 kPa (for p’0 = 90 kPa). The applied deviator stresses during cyclic loading tests were, therefore, a fraction of qmax.
During the first test stage, which occurred for effective stress p’0 = 45 kPa, the maximal deviator stresses qmax were equal to 38.8 kPa, 142.9 kPa and 193.61 kPa. These values correspond to 15%, 55% and 75% of q (p’0 = 45 kPa), respectively. In the second loading stage, p’0 = 90 kPa, the maximal deviator stress qmax was equal to 28.84 kPa, 64.70 kPa and 178.79 kPa, corresponding to 10%, 20% and 57% of q (p’0 = 90 kPa), respectively.
Figure 7 shows the effective p’ stress paths obtained during each test. These plots clearly show different mean effective stress paths during cycling, providing a tool to analyze the stress-path evolution. Such evolution happens as a result of pore pressure generation, with particle crushing after numerous cycles causing a steady decrease of the excess pore pressure. This is observed as a slower increase of the effective stress path. In addition, the figures show that the maximal stress qmax and the stress amplitude qa are greatly affected by changes in p’0.
The experiments performed in undrained conditions lead to pore pressure generation. The pore pressure generation develops in the same scenario. At the beginning of each test, the excess pore water pressure rose, reaching stabilized values after approximately 100 cycles. After ca. 1000 cycles, the generation of pore pressure was constantly at low levels, in comparison with previous precedent runs. During undrained tests, the pore pressure was not expected to dissipate due to leakage. This happened because drainage was kept steady by pressure and volume controllers. However, experiments have shown otherwise (see Figure 8). The observed dissipation may be attributed to grain breakage or, at the early stages of cyclic loading, to the typical internal porosity and high water adsorption of the material characteristics for RCAs. When high stress deviators and stress amplitudes were applied, the pore pressure evolved in a different manner. The first few cycles lead to high pore pressure generation, which remained constant. This is seen in Figure 8.
In particular, for the test with p’0 = 45 kPa and qmax = 38.8 kPa, the excess pore pressure rose slowly and stabilized after the 10th cycle. The same was observed for Test 2.1 (see Table 1 and Figure 8). During Tests 1.2 and 2.2, the pore pressure rose in two stages, as it did during Tests 1.1 and 2.1 (the former after the 10th cycle and the latter after the 100th cycle). However, after the 100th cycle, the velocity of pore pressure decreased slower in these tests. This can be caused by the existence of a threshold deviator stress, under which the pore pressure stabilizes itself. Nevertheless, indirect conclusions can be drawn from the analysis of the accumulation of plastic strains, which are presented in Figure 9.
The permanent strain accumulation in Tests 1.1, 2.1 and 2.2 follows the same pattern after the 100th repetition. This allows the conclusion that plastic strains are lower for smaller deviator stress amplitudes qa. The first 100 cycles, which correspond to a process of compaction and grain movement, present a different pattern of plastic strain generation. A possible explanation for this fact lies in how the consolidation process was conducted. Although anisotropic consolidation, which represents a natural sedimentation environment, represents conditions found in nature, the artificial grains in RCAs may be acting differently when compared to natural aggregates.
In order to show the development of plastic strain during cyclical loading, selected cycles of the strain-stress chart are plotted in Figure 10. The effects of degradation in the soil properties are more evident in Figure 10a. For subsequent cycles, the stress-strain hysteresis inclination (the slope of the line connecting both ends of the hysteresis loop) is reduced. This means a decrease of sample stiffness. The degradation process starts after the plastic hardening. The plastic hardening stops when no further plastic strains are observed in one cycle. During the test, the area of the hysteresis loop was also quantified. Its increase demonstrates the occurrence of degradation (see Figure 10e).
In Figure 10b, the high plastic strain accumulation in the first few cycles is shown. These strains are observed even after the development of the unloading phase. However, after 105 cycles, the plastic strains during cycling vanished. In the absence of plastic strains, the excess pore pressure generation also stops. This suggests that, in undrained conditions, the development of plastic axial strain is greatly influenced by the excess pore water pressure. The strain stress plots show that axial strain curves have similar shapes for the tests presented in Figure 10c–f.
The lower value for the deviator amplitude qa during Test 1.1 resulted in lower residual values of axial strain in comparison with Tests 1.2 and 1.3. For example, the values of permanent axial strain during the 1000th cycle (Figure 10e) were, approximately, 2.0- and 1.4-times smaller in Test 1.1 when compared to Tests 1.3 and 1.2, respectively. The effect of confining pressures is also clear from the results, with confining pressures conditioning the RCA sample to a much stiffer response to cyclical loading.
Total strains showed overall lower values for higher maximal deviator stresses qmax. Deviator stress amplitude qa also has an impact on the RCA sample behavior, with lower qa values accounting for lower total axial strains. However, the impact of qa on plastic strain development seems to be insensitive to effective stress p’0 and maximal axial stress qmax. This can be clearly observed in Figure 9 and when comparing Figure 10b with Figure 10d and Figure 10c with Figure 10f.
The resilient modulus Mr, which describes the elastic (or resilient) strain during the unloading phase in one cycle of the loading test, was calculated, for all three tests, according to:
M r = Δ q ε r .
In Equation (3), Δ q stands for the stress difference of cyclic stress (Δq = qmaxqmin) and ε r for the resilient strain.
Calculated values for Mr are presented in Figure 11 and included in Table 4. In it, the maximal value obtained for Mr was max(Mr) = 1715 kPa. The decrease of Mr is characterized by the reduction of the slope in stress-strain (q( ε )) charts. The occurrence of stiffness degradation can be observed by using the Mr development plot over the number of cycles. The decrease of the resilient modulus stands for inclination growth towards the X axis on the stress-strain chart. This statement is only valid when no plastic strains occurs. The phenomena of plastic strain abation can be observed after the plastic hardening process. The decrease of Mr after plastic hardening (approximately 102 to 103 cycles) happens due the degradation of the RCA stiffness. This was observed in all tests, except for 2.1. In the latter case (Figure 11, green dashed line), hardening still occurs after 3 × 104 cycles. This process leads to RCA compaction, resulting in the increase of Mr. It is expected that, for a large enough number of cycles, maximal compaction will occur akin to the remaining curves shown here. At this point, Mr is expected to reach its highest value, after which the degradation phenomena should take place.
Calculations on the plastic strain accumulation ε p led to the estimation of the function describing the permanent strain growth as a function of the number of cycles. The function was of the type:
ε p = A · l n ( N ) b ,
where A and b are constants of the function estimated on the basis of the 100th cycle, during which no excessive plastic strain was observed, while N stands for the number of cycles. The details concerning constants A and b are presented in Table 5.
The plastic strain development depends on the maximal deviator stress at failure qf max (see Table 2). The coefficients A and b can be calculated from qf max (obtained from the static triaxial tests), stress characteristic parameters and confining pressures.
The relation between A and qf max is governed by the Af parameter, which is given by:
A f = q f   m a x · A .
The right-hand side for Equation (4) can be expanded as:
ln A f = x 1 + x 2 ln σ 3 + x 3 · q m a x + x 4 · q m a x 2 + x 5 · q m a x 2 · ln q m a x ,
where the coefficients x 1 to x 5 are free parameters: x 1 = 6.349408224; x 2 = −15.0083947; x 3 = −0.06046039; x 4 = 0.002098017; and x 5 = −0.00033319. The R2 value for Equation (5) equals 0.999. A plot of Equation (5) with its corresponding experimental data is shown in Figure 12a.
The parameter bf relates to q f   m a x , q a and q m according to:
b f = q f   m a x · b q a · q m ,
with bf given by:
b f = y 1 + y 2 σ 3 + y 3 σ 3 2 + y 4 q m a x + y 5 q m a x 2 .
In Equation (7), y 1 to y 5 are constants: y 1 = 0.005293425; y 2   = −0.4813725; y 3 = 12.19047619; y 4 = −0.17492899; and y 5 = −3.099584519. The R2 value for Equation (5) equals 0.747. A plot of Equation (7) with its corresponding experimental data is shown in Figure 12b.
The functions describing ε p presented R2 higher than 0.98 for all corresponding experiments (see Table 5). The calculations of plastic strain were later employed to calculate the number of cycles until the failure (Nf), which represents the largest strain predicted to occur in a designed structure. These results formed the basis of the stress-life method in the Wohler S-N diagram. The S-N diagram shows the stress amplitude Sa as a function of the number of cycles, until the occurrence of the failure at Nf. Results are presented in Figure 13.
The plot of the S-N relationship in a log-log scale clearly indicates the power relationship of this characteristic, which can be observed as a straight line in Figure 13. This phenomenon refers to the Basquin proposition of the log-log strain line in the S-N relationship, confirming this phenomenon.
The S-N relation is well described by:
l o g ( S a ) = C · N f d ,
with C and d adjustable free parameters. Their values for all tests are shown in Table 6.
The results of the calculations show that the increase of the allowed design strains also raises the number of fatigue cycles. During the first phases of loading, plastic strain accumulations become more prominent. This results in earlier cycles having greater impact on the fatigue criterion. Therefore, the RCA material should be preloaded numerous times by the maximal designed stress during the project-building phase. This should prevent major plastic strains at the beginning of the exploitation phase of the construction. The RCA behaves in accordance with the Basquin law. The characteristic ‘knee’, which can be observed in other materials, was not observed during the RCA tests.

4. Conclusions

In the present article, a series of tests on recycled concrete aggregate were conducted. The results of this study lead to the following conclusions:
  • CBR test results ranged between 71.7% and 101.5% for a 2.5-mm plunger depth and between 91.3% and 100.4% for 5.00 mm. These results fulfill the standards necessary to classify RCAs as a subbase layer application.
  • DSTs allowed an estimation of the friction angle ϕ = 39.5°, while not allowing a proper observation of the cohesion c. Static triaxial test results provided effective friction angle ϕ’ = 42° and apparent cohesion c = 45 kPa. The differences are caused by the RCA structure, which involves high roughness of the grain surface.
  • Torsional shear tests allowed establishing the value of the shear modulus Gmax and damping ratio Dmin for f = 1 Hz at approximately Gmax = 60 MPa and Dmin = 1.83%.
  • During the tests, excessive pore water pressures were observed. They started to stabilize after ca. 100 cycles, reaching steady low levels after approximately 1000 cycles.
  • During the experiments, a change of the area of the hysteresis loops qx ε was observed. This was clearly observed during Test 1.1. The resilient modulus Mr also presented a decrease during the test. The decrease of Mr after the plastic hardening process (approximately 102 to 103 cycles) is interpreted as a consequence of the degradation of RCA stiffness. This phenomena was observed in all tests, except Test 2.1. In the latter, the RCA showed hardening even after 3 × 104. The overall maximal obtained Mr was equal to 1715 kPa.
  • An empirical formulas (Equations (4)–(7)) for permanent strain development as a function of N, σ'3, qmax and qf max has been established. Predicted permanent strains based on these formulas agree well with the test results.
  • Results were interpreted based on the stress-life method in the Wohler S-N diagram. The S-N diagram plots the stress amplitude qa versus cycles until the occurrence of the failure Nf. The RCA exhibits behavior in accordance to the Basquin law. The characteristic “knee”, which can be observed in the case of other materials, was not observed during the tests for the RCA.
  • Results suggest that the pore pressure development at early stages of cyclic loading is impacted by internal porosity and high water adsorption, which is characteristic for RCAs.

Acknowledgments

The discussion about the results obtained was carried out with the valuable support of Bruno Cury Camargo (LNCMI (Laboratoire National des Champs Magnetiques Intenses), Toulouse, France).

Author Contributions

Wojciech Sas and Andrzej Głuchowski prepared the manuscript and performed the cyclic triaxial tests. Emil Soból and Katrzyna Gabryś performed the TS tests. Emil Soból and Andrzej Głuchowski performed the physical and DST tests. Katarzyna Gabryś and Alojzy Szymański consulted the research program and proofread the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shajarati, A.; Sørensen, K.W.; Nielsen, S.K.; Ibsen, L.B. Behaviour of Cohesionless Soils During Cyclic Loading; DCE Technical Memorandum: Aalborg, Denmark, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ishihara, K.; Towhata, I. Cyclic behavior of sand during rotation of principal stress axes. In Mechanics of Granular Material: New Models and Constitutive Equations; Jenkins, J.T., Satake, M., Eds.; Elsevier Science Ltd.: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1983; pp. 53–73. [Google Scholar]
  3. Tokimatsu, K.; Yamazaki, T.; Yoshimi, Y. Soil liquefaction evaluations by elastic shear moduli. Soils Found. 1986, 26, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Teachavorasinskun, S.; Tatsuoka, F.; Lo Presti, D.C.F. Effects of the cyclic prestraining on dilatancy characteristics and liquefaction strength of sand. In Proceedings of the Pre-failure Deformation of Geomaterials, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 12–14 September 1994; pp. 75–80.
  5. Wichtmann, T.; Niemunis, A.; Triantafyllidis, T. Strain accumulation in sand due to cyclic loading: Drained triaxial tests. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2005, 25, 967–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. AnhDan, L.Q.; Koseki, J. Effects of large number of cyclic loading on deformation characteristics of dense granular materials. Soils Found. 2004, 44, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gavin, K.G.; O’Kelly, B.C. Effect of friction fatigue on pile capacity in dense sand. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2007, 133, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Di Benedetto, H.; de La Roche, C.; Baaj, H.; Pronk, A.; Lundstrom, R. Fatigue of bituminous mixtures. Mater. Struct. 2004, 37, 202–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Głuchowski, A. Permanent strain behavior of cyclically loaded cohesive soil in undrained conditions. In Proceedings of the 25th European Young Geotechnical Engineers Conference, Bucharest, Romania, 15–24 June 2016; pp. 53–60.
  10. Vucetic, M.; Mortezaie, A. Cyclic secant shear modulus versus pore water pressure in sands at small cyclic strains. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2015, 70, 60–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Brown, S.F.; Yu, H.S.; Juspi, S.; Wang, J. Validation experiments for lower-bound shakedown theory applied to layered pavement systems. Géotechnique 2012, 62, 923–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Głuchowski, A.; Szymański, A.; Sas, W. Repeated Loading of cohesive soil-shakedown theory in undrained conditions. Stud. Geotech. Mech. 2015, 37, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tao, M.; Mohammad, L.N.; Nazzal, M.D.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, Z. Application of shakedown theory in characterizing traditional and recycled pavement base materials. J. Transp. Eng. 2010, 136, 214–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Werkmeister, S. Shakedown analysis of unbound granular materials using accelerated pavement test results from New Zealand’s CAPTIF facility. Geotech. Spec. Publ. 2006, 154, 220–228. [Google Scholar]
  15. Cerfontaine, B.; Collin, F.; Charlier, R. Numerical modelling of transient cyclic vertical loading of suction caissons in sand. Geotechnique 2015, 65. in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sas, W.; Głuchowski, A.; Soból, E.; Bąkowski, J.; Szymański, A. Analysis of the multistage cyclic loading test on resilient modulus value. Ann. Wars. Univ. Life Sci.–SGGW-Land Reclam. 2016, 48, 53–65. [Google Scholar]
  17. Soltani-Jigheh, H.; Soroush, A. Cyclic behavior of mixed clayey soils. Int. J. Civ. Eng. 2010, 8, 99–106. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee, C.J.; Sheu, S.F. The stiffness degradation and damping ratio evolution of Taipei Silty Clay under cyclic straining. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2007, 27, 730–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rahman, M.A.; Imteaz, M.; Arulrajah, A.; Disfani, M.M. Suitability of recycled construction and demolition aggregates as alternative backfilling materials. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 66, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Arulrajah, A.; Piratheepan, J.; Ali, M.M.Y.; Bo, M.W. Geotechnical properties of recycled concrete aggregate in pavement sub-base applications. Geotech. Test. J. 2012, 35, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Safiuddin, M.; Jumaat, M.Z.; Salam, M.A.; Islam, M.S.; Hashim, R. Utilization of solid wastes in construction materials. Int. J. Phys. Sci. 2010, 5, 1952–1963. [Google Scholar]
  22. Arulrajah, A.; Disfani, M.M.; Horpibulsuk, S.; Suksiripattanapong, C.; Prongmanee, N. Physical properties and shear strength responses of recycled construction and demolition materials in unbound pavement base/subbase applications. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 58, 245–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sas, W.; Głuchowski, A.; Szymański, A. Behavior of recycled concrete aggregate improved with lime addition during cyclic loading. Int. J. Geomate 2016, 10, 1662–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Koenders, E.A.; Pepe, M.; Martinelli, E. Compressive strength and hydration processes of concrete with recycled aggregates. Cem. Concr. Res. 2014, 56, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pepe, M.; Toledo Filho, R.D.; Koenders, E.A.; Martinelli, E. Alternative processing procedures for recycled aggregates in structural concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 69, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nataatmadja, A.; Tan, Y.L. Resilient response of recycled concrete road aggregates. J. Transp. Eng. 2001, 127, 450–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Poon, C.S.; Qiao, X.C.; Chan, D. The cause and influence of self-cementing properties of fine recycled concrete aggregates on the properties of unbound sub-base. Waste Manag. 2006, 26, 1166–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Arulrajah, A.; Rahman, M.A.; Piratheepan, J.; Bo, M.W.; Imteaz, M.A. Evaluation of interface shear strength properties of geogrid-reinforced construction and demolition materials using a modified large-scale direct shear testing apparatus. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2013, 26, 974–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Van Niekerk, A.A.; Houben, L.J.M.; Molenaar, A.A.A. Estimation of mechanical behavior of unbound road building materials from physical material properties. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on the Bearing Capacity of Roads and Airfields, Trondheim, Norway, 6–8 May 1998; pp. 1221–1233.
  30. Lekarp, F.; Isacsson, U.; Dawson, A. State of the art.II: Premanent strain response of unbound aggregates. J. Transp. Eng. 2000, 126, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bozyurt, O.; Tinjum, J.M.; Son, Y.H.; Edil, T.B.; Benson, C.H. Resilient modulus of recycled asphalt pavement and recycled concrete aggregate. In Proceedings of the GeoCongress 2012, Oakland, CA, USA, 25–29 March 2012; pp. 3901–3910.
  32. Stokoe, K.H., II; Isenhower, W.M.; Hsu, J.R. Dynamic properties of offshore silty samples. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, USA, 4–7 May 1980; p. 3771.
  33. Eurokod 7 Projektowanie Geotechniczne Część 2: Rozpoznawanie i Badanie Podłoża Gruntowego; PN-EN 1997-2:2009; Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 2009.
  34. Badania Geotechniczne-Badania Laboratoryjne Gruntów-Część 4: Oznaczanie Składu Granulometrycznego; Standards PKN-CEN ISO/TS 17892-4:2009; Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 2009.
  35. Adams, C.A.; Apraku, E.; Opoku-Boahen, R. Effect of triaxial geogrid reinforcement on CBR strength of natural gravel soil for road pavements. J. Civ. Eng. Res. 2015, 5, 45–51. [Google Scholar]
  36. Flora, A.; Lirer, S. Small strain shear modulus of undisturbed gravelly soils during undrained cyclic triaxial tests. Geotechn.Geolog. Eng. 2013, 31, 1107–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Flora, A.; Lirer, S.; Silvestri, F. Undrained cyclic resistance of undisturbed gravelly soils. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2012, 43, 366–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Strahler, A.; Stuedlein, A.W.; Arduino, P.W. Stress-strain response and dilatancy of sandy gravel in triaxial compression and plane strain. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2015, 142, 04015098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Stress parameters for a constant amplitude of loading for the tested recycled concrete aggregate (RCA). qa, stress amplitude; qm, average stress; Δq, stress difference; qmax, maximal stress; qmin, minimal stress.
Figure 1. Stress parameters for a constant amplitude of loading for the tested recycled concrete aggregate (RCA). qa, stress amplitude; qm, average stress; Δq, stress difference; qmax, maximal stress; qmin, minimal stress.
Materials 09 00780 g001
Figure 2. Results for the (a) soil gradation curve and (b) Proctor test for the experimented RCA.
Figure 2. Results for the (a) soil gradation curve and (b) Proctor test for the experimented RCA.
Materials 09 00780 g002
Figure 3. Results of static tests on RCA: (a) the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test results and (b) the direct shear test (DST) results.
Figure 3. Results of static tests on RCA: (a) the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test results and (b) the direct shear test (DST) results.
Materials 09 00780 g003
Figure 4. Results of static triaxial tests on RCA: (a) stress-strain curves; (b) effective stress paths and (c) Mohr–Coulomb effective failure envelope.
Figure 4. Results of static triaxial tests on RCA: (a) stress-strain curves; (b) effective stress paths and (c) Mohr–Coulomb effective failure envelope.
Materials 09 00780 g004aMaterials 09 00780 g004b
Figure 5. Normalized shear modulus G/Gmax versus shear strain amplitude for isotropically-consolidated RCA (σ3 = 45 kPa) for various test frequencies.
Figure 5. Normalized shear modulus G/Gmax versus shear strain amplitude for isotropically-consolidated RCA (σ3 = 45 kPa) for various test frequencies.
Materials 09 00780 g005
Figure 6. Normalized damping ratio D/Dmin versus shear strain amplitude for isotropically-consolidated RCA (σ3 = 45 kPa) for various test frequencies.
Figure 6. Normalized damping ratio D/Dmin versus shear strain amplitude for isotropically-consolidated RCA (σ3 = 45 kPa) for various test frequencies.
Materials 09 00780 g006
Figure 7. Stress paths for different test conditions: (a) 1.1; (b) 1.2; (c) 1.3; (d) 2.1; (e) 2.2 and (f) 2.3; as defined in Table 1.
Figure 7. Stress paths for different test conditions: (a) 1.1; (b) 1.2; (c) 1.3; (d) 2.1; (e) 2.2 and (f) 2.3; as defined in Table 1.
Materials 09 00780 g007
Figure 8. Excess pore pressure generation during the three tests for the RCA sample.
Figure 8. Excess pore pressure generation during the three tests for the RCA sample.
Materials 09 00780 g008
Figure 9. The accumulation of plastic strains during the three tests for the RCA sample.
Figure 9. The accumulation of plastic strains during the three tests for the RCA sample.
Materials 09 00780 g009
Figure 10. Stress-strain plot during three test levels on an RCA sample under different effective stresses p’0, as indicated in the figures (different lines correspond to different loading cycles). The panels correspond to: (a) Test 1.1; (b) Test 2.1; (c) 1.2; (d) Test 2.2; (e) Test 1.3; (f) Test 2.3.
Figure 10. Stress-strain plot during three test levels on an RCA sample under different effective stresses p’0, as indicated in the figures (different lines correspond to different loading cycles). The panels correspond to: (a) Test 1.1; (b) Test 2.1; (c) 1.2; (d) Test 2.2; (e) Test 1.3; (f) Test 2.3.
Materials 09 00780 g010
Figure 11. Resilient modulus change during the tests.
Figure 11. Resilient modulus change during the tests.
Materials 09 00780 g011
Figure 12. 3D view of (a) Af and (b) bf parameter change in various confining pressure σ'3 and maximal deviator stress during cyclic loading for qmax values (black points stand for test results).
Figure 12. 3D view of (a) Af and (b) bf parameter change in various confining pressure σ'3 and maximal deviator stress during cyclic loading for qmax values (black points stand for test results).
Materials 09 00780 g012
Figure 13. S-N plots for the RCA in various strain to failure conditions at effective stresses of (a) p’0 = 45 kPa and (b) p’0 = 90 kPa.
Figure 13. S-N plots for the RCA in various strain to failure conditions at effective stresses of (a) p’0 = 45 kPa and (b) p’0 = 90 kPa.
Materials 09 00780 g013
Table 1. The stress parameters for the S-N curve for the tested RCA.
Table 1. The stress parameters for the S-N curve for the tested RCA.
CaptionΔq (kPa)qm (kPa)qmin (kPa)qmax (kPa)qa (kPa)
Test 1.125.8525.8712.9538.812.93
Test 1.2129.3978.2113.51142.964.7
Test 1.3178.54104.3415.07193.6189.27
Test 2.15.4626.1123.3828.842.73
Test 2.225.7251.9438.9864.712.96
Test 2.399.78128.9179.01178.7949.9
Table 2. The test results of the drained static triaxial tests.
Table 2. The test results of the drained static triaxial tests.
Test No.σ3 Effective Minor Axial Stress Value (kPa)Deviator Stress at Failure (kPa)
S.145.0251.0
S.290.0661.0
S.3225.01346.0
Table 3. Shear modulus and damping ratio of the tested material.
Table 3. Shear modulus and damping ratio of the tested material.
Freq. (Hz)Dmin (%)Gmax (MPa)
0.11.6155
11.8360
103.156
Table 4. Resilient modulus Mr (in kPa) for selected cycles of the tested RCA.
Table 4. Resilient modulus Mr (in kPa) for selected cycles of the tested RCA.
No. of Test/No. of Cycle101102103104105
1.1790812744670633
1.2808823758--
1.3618652621--
2.1450483562730-
2.21436138714101422-
2.31654168917151710-
Table 5. A and b coefficients of plastic strain growth.
Table 5. A and b coefficients of plastic strain growth.
Test No.AbR2
1.10.0170−0.78900.992
1.20.0686−0.32310.997
1.30.1425−0.66490.997
2.10.0120−0.04890.982
2.20.0119−0.05860.997
2.30.0854−0.39230.987
Table 6. Coefficients C and d of the Basquin proposition of the strain line in the S-N relationship.
Table 6. Coefficients C and d of the Basquin proposition of the strain line in the S-N relationship.
Caption45 kPa90 kPa
CdCd
ε = 0.5%1.917−0.0122.0537−0.008
ε = 0.75%1.8849−0.0082.051−0.007
ε = 1.0%1.864−0.0062.0518−0.006

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sas, W.; Głuchowski, A.; Gabryś, K.; Soból, E.; Szymański, A. Deformation Behavior of Recycled Concrete Aggregate during Cyclic and Dynamic Loading Laboratory Tests. Materials 2016, 9, 780. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma9090780

AMA Style

Sas W, Głuchowski A, Gabryś K, Soból E, Szymański A. Deformation Behavior of Recycled Concrete Aggregate during Cyclic and Dynamic Loading Laboratory Tests. Materials. 2016; 9(9):780. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma9090780

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sas, Wojciech, Andrzej Głuchowski, Katarzyna Gabryś, Emil Soból, and Alojzy Szymański. 2016. "Deformation Behavior of Recycled Concrete Aggregate during Cyclic and Dynamic Loading Laboratory Tests" Materials 9, no. 9: 780. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma9090780

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop