Next Article in Journal
A Robust Variable Selection Method for Sparse Online Regression via the Elastic Net Penalty
Next Article in Special Issue
On New Matrix Version Extension of the Incomplete Wright Hypergeometric Functions and Their Fractional Calculus
Previous Article in Journal
Irreversibility Analysis in the Ethylene Glycol Based Hybrid Nanofluid Flow amongst Expanding/Contracting Walls When Quadratic Thermal Radiation and Arrhenius Activation Energy Are Significant
Previous Article in Special Issue
Extended Beta and Gamma Matrix Functions via 2-Parameter Mittag-Leffler Matrix Function
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Finite and Infinite Hypergeometric Sums Involving the Digamma Function

by
Juan Luis González-Santander
and
Fernando Sánchez Lasheras
*,†
Department of Mathematics, University of Oviedo, C/ Leopoldo Calvo Sotelo 18, 33007 Oviedo, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Submission received: 24 July 2022 / Revised: 10 August 2022 / Accepted: 12 August 2022 / Published: 18 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends in Special Functions and Applications)

Abstract

:
We calculate some finite and infinite sums containing the digamma function in closed form. For this purpose, we differentiate selected reduction formulas of the hypergeometric function with respect to the parameters applying some derivative formulas of the Pochhammer symbol. Additionally, we compare two different differentiation formulas of the generalized hypergeometric function with respect to the parameters. For some particular cases, we recover some results found in the literature. Finally, all the results have been numerically checked.

1. Introduction

A large number of finite sums and series involving the digamma function have been compiled by Hansen [1] and more recently by Brychov [2]. Some authors have contributed to enhance this compilation, such as Doelder [3], who calculated series containing ψ ( x ) ψ ( y ) and ( ψ ( x ) ψ ( y ) ) 2 for certain values of x and y; and Coffey [4], who considered summations over digamma and polygamma functions. More recently, we found Miller [5], who used reduction formulas of the Kampé de Fériet function; and Cvijović [6], who used the derivative of the Pochhammer symbol. Sums involving the digamma function occur in the expressions of the derivatives of the Mittag–Leffler function and the Wright function with respect to parameters [7,8]. Additionally, they occur in the derivation of asymptotic expansions for Mellin–Barnes integrals [9] or in the evaluation of Feynman amplitudes in quantum field theory [4].
The aim of this paper is the derivation of several apparently new results by using also the derivative of the Pochhammer symbol to known reduction formulas of the hypergeometric function. Nevertheless, for the last result given in this paper, we use another approach. For this purpose, we compare the expression of the first derivative of the generalized hypergeometric function with respect to the parameters given in [10] to the one given in [11]. As a consitency test, for many particular values of the results obtained, we recover expressions given in the literature. In adittion, we have checked all the derived expressions with the aid of MATHEMATICA since we sometimes found some erratums in the literature.
This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we present some basic properties of the Pochhammer symbol and the beta and the digamma functions. In addition, we set the notation we use throughout the paper. In Section 3 and Section 4, we derive some results for finite and infinite sums, respectively, involving the digamma function. Finally, we collect our conclusions in Section 5.

2. Preliminaries

The Pochhamer symbol is defined as [12] (Equation 18:12:1):
x n = Γ x + n Γ x ,
where Γ x denotes the gamma function. Additionally, the beta function, defined as [13] (Equation 1.5.3):
B x , y = 0 1 t x 1 1 t y 1 d t , Re x > 0 , Re y > 0 ,
satisfies the property [13] (Equation 1.5.5):
B x , y = Γ x Γ y Γ x + y .
For 0 z 1 , the incomplete beta function is defined as [12] (Equation 58:3:1):
B z x , y = 0 z t x 1 1 t y 1 d t .
Next, we state some properties of the Pochhammer symbol, i.e., the reflection formula [12] (Equation 18:5:1),
x n = 1 n x n + 1 n ,
the properties [12] (Equations 18:5:7 & 2:12:3),
x n + 1 = x x + 1 n ,
1 2 n = 2 n ! 4 n n ! ,
and the differentiation of the Pochhammer symbol [12] (Equation 18:10:1):
d d x x n = x n ψ x + n ψ x ,
thus:
d d x 1 x n = 1 x n ψ x ψ x + n ,
where ψ x denotes the digamma function [12] (Chapter 44):
ψ x = Γ x Γ x ,
with the following properties [13] (Equations 1.3.3–9):
ψ z + 1 = 1 z + ψ z ,
ψ 1 z ψ z = π cot π z ,
ψ z + ψ z + 1 2 + 2 log 2 = 2 ψ 2 z ,
ψ 1 = γ ,
ψ 1 2 = γ log 4 ,
ψ n + 1 = γ + H n ,
ψ n + 1 2 = γ log 4 + 2 H 2 n H n ,
where
H n = k = 1 n 1 k
is the n-th harmonic number.
Throughout the paper, we adopt the notation [14] (p. 797):
β z = 1 2 ψ z + 1 2 ψ z 2 .
Additionally, p F q z denotes the generalized hypergeometric function, usually defined by means of the hypergeometric series [15] (Section 16.2):
p F q a p b q z = p F q a 1 , , a p b 1 , , b q z = k = 0 a 1 k a p k b 1 k b q k z k k ! ,
whenever this series converge and elsewhere by analytic continuation. Finally, we use the notation:
a p k = a 1 k a p k .

3. Finite Sums Involving Digamma Function

Theorem 1.
The following summation formula holds true:
k = 0 n 1 k n k a k c k ψ a + k = c a n c n ψ a ψ c a + n + ψ c a .
Proof. 
The Chu–Vandermonde summation formula [16] (Corollary 2.2.3) is given by:
2 F 1 n , a c 1 = c a n c n , n N .
According to (1) and (3), we have:
2 F 1 n , a c 1 = k = 0 n k a k k ! c k = k = 0 1 k n k + 1 k a k k ! c k = k = 0 1 k Γ n + 1 a k k ! Γ n k + 1 c k = k = 0 n n k 1 k a k c k .
We apply (6) to differentiate (17) with respect to the parameter a. On the one hand, we have:
a c a n c n = c a n c n ψ c a + n ψ c a ,
and, on the other hand,
a 2 F 1 n , a c 1 = k = 0 n n k 1 k c k d a k d a = k = 0 n 1 k n k a k c k ψ a + k ψ a k = 0 n n k 1 k a k c k = k = 0 n 1 k n k a k c k ψ a + k ψ a c a n c n .
Equating (18) to (19), we obtain (16), as we wanted to prove. □
Corollary 1.
For a = 1 , taking into account (11), we obtain:
k = 0 n 1 k ψ k + 1 n k ! c k = c 1 n n ! c n γ ψ c 1 + n + ψ c 1 .
Theorem 2.
Similarly to (16), if we perform the derivative with respect to the c parameter and apply (7), we will obtain:
k = 0 n 1 k n k a k c k ψ c + k = c a n c n ψ c + n + ψ c a ψ c a + n .
Corollary 2.
For a = 1 , we get:
k = 0 n 1 k ψ c + k n k ! c k = c 1 n ! c 1 + n 1 c 1 + n + ψ c 1 .
Corollary 3.
Taking the limit c 1 in (20), and applying (8), we obtain:
k = 0 n 1 k + 1 n k ψ k + 1 = 1 n .
Theorem 3.
For n N , the following finite sum holds true:
k = 0 n 2 k a k 2 n k 1 ! k ! n k ! ψ a + k = 2 2 n 1 n 1 + a 2 n ψ 1 + a 2 + n + ψ a 2 + log 4 + a 2 n ψ a 2 + n + ψ 1 + a 2 + log 4 .
Proof. 
We apply the reflection formula (3) and the property (5) to the reduction formula [17]:
2 F 1 n , a 2 n + 1 2 = 1 1 2 n 1 + a 2 n + a 2 n , n N ,
to arrive at:
k = 0 n 2 k a k 2 n k 1 ! k ! n k ! = 2 2 n 1 n 1 + a 2 n + a 2 n .
We differentiate (22) with respect to parameter a, taking into account (10) to obtain (21), as we wanted to prove. □
Corollary 4.
For a = 1 , taking into account (5), (13), and (14), Equation (21) is reduced to:
k = 0 n 2 k 2 n k 1 ! n k ! ψ k + 1 = n 1 ! 4 4 n H n 2 γ + 2 n n 2 H 2 n H n 2 γ ,
or equivalently, reversing the sum order,
k = 0 n n + k 1 ! 2 k k ! ψ n + 1 k = n 1 ! 2 n + 2 4 n H n 2 γ + 2 n n 2 H 2 n H n 2 γ .

4. Infinite Sums Involving Digamma Function

Theorem 4.
For Re c a b > 0 , the following infinite series holds true:
k = 0 a k b k k ! c k ψ a + k = Γ c Γ c a b Γ c a Γ c b ψ c a ψ c a b + ψ a .
Proof. 
We differentiate the Gauss summation formula [16] (Theorem 2.2.2):
2 F 1 a , b c 1 = k = 0 a k b k k ! c k = Γ c Γ c a b Γ c a Γ c b , Re c a b > 0 ,
with respect to the parameter a. □
Remark 1.
In [1] (Addendum. Equation 55.4.5.2), we found an equivalent form, but with an erratum:
k = 0 b k c k k ! a k ψ c k ψ c Γ a Γ a b c Γ a b Γ a c ψ a c ψ a b c , Re c + b a < 1 ,
where we have to change in the sum ψ c k by ψ c + k . Additionally, the condition seems to be wrong.
Corollary 5.
For the particular case c = 2 and b = 1 / 2 , taking into account (8), (9), we recover the formula given in [2] (Equation 6.2.1(67)),
k = 0 a k 1 2 k k ! k + 1 ! ψ a + k = 2 Γ 3 2 a π Γ 2 a 1 1 a + π cot π a + 2 ψ a ψ 3 2 a , Re a < 1 .
However, from (23), we can extend the validity of (25) to Re a < 3 / 2 .
Corollary 6.
For b > 0 , the following expansion of the beta function holds true:
B a , b = k = 0 b k k ! ψ a + k .
Proof. 
We calculate the following limit, taking into account (8) and (11):
lim x 0 ψ x Γ x = lim x 0 1 Γ x ψ x + 1 1 x = lim x 0 1 Γ x + 1 = 1 .
Take c = a in (23) and apply (26) and (2) to obtain:
k = 0 b k k ! ψ a + k = lim c a Γ c Γ c a + b Γ c a Γ c + b ψ c a ψ c a + b + ψ a = Γ a Γ b Γ a + b = B a , b ,
Remark 2.
If we differentiate the Gauss summation Formula (24) with respect to parameter c, and if we apply (7), we will obtain for Re c a b > 0 ,
k = 0 a k b k k ! c k ψ c + k = Γ c Γ c a b Γ c a Γ c b ψ c a + ψ c b ψ c a b ,
which is equivalent to [1] (Addendum. Equation 55.4.5.1), but the condition Re a + b c < 1 seems to be wrong.
Theorem 5.
The following series holds true:
k = 0 a k 1 a k 2 k k ! b k ψ b + k = π Γ b 2 b Γ a + b 2 Γ b a + 1 2 ψ a + b 2 + ψ b a + 1 2 + log 4 .
Proof. 
We differentiate the summation formula [14] (Equation 7.3.7(8))
2 F 1 a , 1 a b 1 2 = k = 0 a k 1 a k 2 k k ! b k = 2 1 b π Γ b Γ a + b 2 Γ b a + 1 2 ,
with respect to parameter b. □
Corollary 7.
We take a = c and apply (12) to obtain:
k = 0 1 a k 2 k k ! ψ a + k = ψ a γ 2 a .
Theorem 6.
For z < 1 , the following series holds true:
k = 0 b k z k k + 1 ! ψ k + b = 1 z 1 b z 1 b 2 1 b log 1 z 1 1 z b 1 1 + 1 b ψ b .
Proof. 
We differentiate the reduction formula [14] (Equation 7.3.1(125)),
2 F 1 1 , b 2 z = k = 0 b k k + 1 ! z k = 1 z 1 b 1 z b 1 ,
with respect to the parameter b. □
Remark 3.
Taking the limit b 1 , we arrive at:
k = 0 z k k + 1 ψ k + 1 = log 1 z 2 z 2 γ + log 1 z , z < 1 ,
which is equivalent to [2] (Equation 6.2.1(2)).
Remark 4.
For b = 2 , and taking into account (13) for n = 1 , i.e., ψ 2 = 1 γ , we arrive at:
k = 1 z k ψ k + 1 = γ z + log 1 z z 1 , z < 1 ,
which is equivalent to [2] (Equation 6.2.1(1)).
Theorem 7.
For z < 1 , the following infinite sum holds true:
k = 0 z k a + 1 k b k k ! a k ψ k + b = ψ b log 1 z 1 1 b a z + z / a 1 z 1 + b .
Proof. 
We differentiate the following reduction formula [15] (Equation 15.4.19):
2 F 1 a + 1 , b a z = 1 1 b a z 1 z 1 b ,
with respect to parameter b. □
Corollary 8.
For the particular case b = a , we obtain:
k = 0 z k a + 1 k k ! ψ k + a = ψ a log 1 z + z / a 1 z 1 + a .
Corollary 9.
For the particular case b = 1 , we obtain:
k = 0 z k a + k ψ k + 1 = z γ + log 1 z a + 1 a z 1 z 2 .
Theorem 8.
The following series holds true:
k = 0 k + 1 ! b k 2 k ψ k + b = 2 b 1 ψ b 1 + 4 2 b 3 b 1 b 2 ψ b β b 1 + 4 b 1 b 2 β b 1 .
Proof. 
We differentiate the reduction formula [14] (Equation 7.3.7(18)):
2 F 1 1 , 2 b 1 2 = k = 0 k + 1 ! b k 2 k = 2 b 1 1 2 b 2 β b 1 ,
with respect to parameter b. □
Remark 5.
If we differentiate the reduction formula [14] (Equation 7.3.7(17)):
2 F 1 1 , 1 b 1 2 = k = 0 k ! b k 2 k = 2 b 1 β b 1 ,
with respect to parameter b, we will obtain [2] (Equation 6.2.1(64)):
k = 0 2 k k ! b k ψ k + b = 2 b 1 ψ b 1 β b 1 2 b 1 β b 1 .
Corollary 10.
Substracting (29) from (28), we arrive at:
k = 0 k k ! b k 2 k 1 ψ k + b = b 1 ψ b + 2 b 3 β b 1 + 4 b 5 b 1 2 b 3 ψ b β b 1 1 .
Theorem 9.
For z < 1 , the following infinite sum holds true:
k = 0 z k a + 1 k b k a k c k ψ c + k = ψ c 1 3 F 2 1 , a + 1 , b a , c z + 1 a 1 z 1 + b a + b a z c 1 3 F 2 b , c 1 , c 1 c , c z z 1 + b c 1 z c 2 z 1 3 F 2 b + 1 , c , c c + 1 , c + 1 z z 1 .
Proof. 
On the one hand, consider the reduction formula [14] (Equation 7.4.4(94)):
3 F 2 k , a , b a + , b + n 1 = k ! a b n 1 1 ! a k + 1 b a n 3 F 2 1 , a , 1 + a b n 1 + a + k , 1 + a b 1 + 1 n 1 ! b k + 1 a b 3 F 2 1 n , b , 1 + b a 1 + b + k , 1 + b a 1 ,
for the particular case = 1 , n = 1 , to obtain:
3 F 2 k , a , b a + 1 , b + 1 1 = k ! a b a k + 1 b k + 1 a k + 1 b k + 1 a b .
We take the limit a b and apply (6) as well as the property (4) to obtain:
3 F 2 k , b , b b + 1 , b + 1 1 = k ! b 2 b k + 1 2 lim a b a k + 1 b k + 1 a b = k ! b 2 b k + 1 2 d d x x k + 1 x = b = k ! b b + 1 k ψ b + 1 + k ψ b .
On the other hand, from (27), we have:
2 F 1 α + k + 2 , β + k + 1 α + k + 1 z = 1 + β α α + k + 1 z 1 z 2 β k .
Now, equate the results given in [10,11],
m b m p F q + 1 a p b , b q z = m ! 1 m a p 1 b m + 1 b q 1 k = 0 z k + 1 a p + 1 k k ! k + 1 ! b q + 1 k m + 2 F m + 1 k , b , , b b + 1 , , b + 1 1 = m ! 1 m z k = 0 z k a p k + 1 k ! k + 1 ! b q k + 1 k + b m + 1 p F q + 1 a p + k + 1 b q + k + 1 , k + 2 z ,
for the particular case m = 1 , a p = α + 1 , β , 1 and b q = α , to obtain:
= α + 1 β b 2 α k = 0 z k α + 2 k β + 1 k k ! α + 1 k 3 F 2 k , b , b b + 1 , b + 1 1 = k = 0 z k α + 1 k + 1 β k + 1 k ! α k + 1 k + b 2 2 F 1 α + k + 2 , β + k + 1 α + k + 1 z .
Next, insert (31) and (32) and simplify the result using (4) to arrive at:
k = 0 z k α + 2 k β + 1 k α + 1 k b + 1 k ψ b + 1 + k ψ b = 1 b α + 1 1 z 2 + β k = 0 β + 1 k b k 2 k ! b + 1 k 2 α + k + 1 + β α z z z 1 k .
Grouping the terms
k = 0 z k α + 2 k β + 1 k α + 1 k b + 1 k ψ b + 1 + k = ψ b k = 0 z k α + 2 k β + 1 k 1 k k ! α + 1 k b + 1 k + 1 b α + 1 1 z 2 + β α + 1 + β α z k = 0 β + 1 k b k 2 k ! b + 1 k 2 z z 1 k + β + 1 b 2 b + 1 2 z z 1 k = 0 β + 2 k b + 1 k 2 k ! b + 2 k 2 z z 1 k ,
and recasting the sums with hypergeometric functions (renaming the parameters), we finally arrive at (30), as we wanted to prove. □
Remark 6.
For the particular case a = b , and taking into account the reduction formula [14] (Equation 7.3.1(119)):
2 F 1 1 , a c z = z 1 c 1 z c a 1 c 1 B z c 1 , a c + 1 ,
we obtain for z < 1 :
k = 0 z k a k c k ψ c + k = ψ c 1 z 1 c 1 z c a 1 c 1 B z c 1 , a c + 1 + 1 1 z a 1 c 1 3 F 2 a 1 , c 1 , c 1 c , c z z 1 + c 1 z c 2 z 1 3 F 2 a , c , c c + 1 , c + 1 z z 1 ,
which is a non-trivial alternative form of the result given in [6]:
k = 0 z k a k c k ψ c + k ψ c = a z c 2 1 z a + 1 3 F 2 a + 1 , c , c c + 1 , c + 1 z z 1 , a C , z < 1 .

5. Conclusions

We have calculated some finite and infinite sums involving the digamma function differentiating some reduction formulas of the hypergeometric function with respect to the parameters and applying the differentiation formulas of the Pochhammer symbol given in (6) and (7). It is worth noting that this method can be applied to many other reduction formulas of hypergeometric and generalized hypergeometric functions. Here, we have only selected some interesting new cases, some of which have allowed us to detect errors in the literature. Additionally, as a consistency test, we have recovered some formulas found in the literature from some particular cases of the results obtained.
Nevertheless, in (30), we have applied another approach, wherein we have compared the differentiation formulas given in (33) for a particular case of the parameters. This approach is not as straightforward as the other one. However, note that the particular case given in (34) applying this method provides a non-trivial alternative form of the result (35) found in the literature.
Finally, we point out that all the sums presented in this paper have been numerically checked with MATHEMATICA, and they are available at https://bit.ly/3dCZFCJ (accessed on 11 August 2022).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.L.G.-S. and F.S.L.; methodology, J.L.G.-S.; software, J.L.G.-S.; validation, J.L.G.-S. and F.S.L.; formal analysis, J.L.G.-S.; investigation, J.L.G.-S.; resources, F.S.L.; data curation, F.S.L.; writing—original draft preparation, J.L.G.-S.; writing—review and editing, F.S.L.; project administration, F.S.L.; funding acquisition, F.S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hansen, E.R. A Table of Series and Products; Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  2. Brychkov, Y.A. Handbook of Special Functions: Derivatives Integrals Series and Other Formulas; Chapman and Hall: Boca Raton, FL, USA; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  3. De Doelder, P. On some series containing ψ(x) − ψ(y) and (ψ(x) − ψ(y))2 for certain values of x and y. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 1991, 37, 125–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Coffey, M.W. On one-dimensional digamma and polygamma series related to the evaluation of Feynman diagrams. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2005, 183, 84–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Miller, A.R. Summations for certain series containing the digamma function. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 2006, 39, 3011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cvijović, D. Closed-form summations of certain hypergeometric-type series containing the digamma function. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 2008, 41, 455205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Apelblat, A. Differentiation of the Mittag-Leffler functions with respect to parameters in the Laplace transform approach. Mathematics 2020, 8, 657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Apelblat, A.; González-Santander, J.L. The Integral Mittag-Leffler, Whittaker and Wright Functions. Mathematics 2021, 9, 3255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Paris, R.B.; Kaminski, D. Asymptotics and Mellin-Barnes Integrals; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2001; Volume 85. [Google Scholar]
  10. Fejzullahu, B.X. Parameter derivatives of the generalized hypergeometric function. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 2017, 28, 781–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sofotasios, P.; Brychkov, Y.A. On derivatives of hypergeometric functions and classical polynomials with respect to parameters. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 2018, 29, 852–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Oldham, K.B.; Myland, J.; Spanier, J. An Atlas of Functions: With Equator, the Atlas Function Calculator; Springer: Cham, Switzerand, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lebedev, N.N. Special Functions and Their Applications; Prentice-Hall Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1965. [Google Scholar]
  14. Prudnikov, A.P.; Brychkov, Y.A.; Marichev, O.I. Integrals and Series: More Special Functions; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1986; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
  15. Olver, F.W.; Lozier, D.W.; Boisvert, R.F.; Clark, C.W. NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  16. Andrews, G.E.; Askey, R.; Roy, R.; Roy, R. Special Functions; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1999; Volume 71. [Google Scholar]
  17. Qureshi, M.; Jabee, S.; Ahamad, D. Evaluation of some explicit summation formulae for truncated Gauss function and applications. TWMS J. Appl. Eng. Math. 2022, 12, 52. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

González-Santander, J.L.; Sánchez Lasheras, F. Finite and Infinite Hypergeometric Sums Involving the Digamma Function. Mathematics 2022, 10, 2990. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/math10162990

AMA Style

González-Santander JL, Sánchez Lasheras F. Finite and Infinite Hypergeometric Sums Involving the Digamma Function. Mathematics. 2022; 10(16):2990. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/math10162990

Chicago/Turabian Style

González-Santander, Juan Luis, and Fernando Sánchez Lasheras. 2022. "Finite and Infinite Hypergeometric Sums Involving the Digamma Function" Mathematics 10, no. 16: 2990. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/math10162990

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop