Next Article in Journal
LQR Chaos Synchronization for a Novel Memristor-Based Hyperchaotic Oscillator
Previous Article in Journal
Dependence Structure Analysis and Its Application in Human Microbiome
Previous Article in Special Issue
Coefficient Inequalities for Biholomorphic Mappings on the Unit Ball of a Complex Banach Space
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

On Coefficient Estimates for a Certain Class of Analytic Functions

Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Transilvania University of Braşov, Iuliu Maniu, 50, 50091 Braşov, Romania
Submission received: 20 November 2022 / Revised: 14 December 2022 / Accepted: 16 December 2022 / Published: 20 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends in Complex Analysis Researches)

Abstract

:
In this paper, we consider a subclass SQ of normalized analytic functions f satisfying f ( z ) > 1 / 2 . For the functions in the class SQ , we determine upper bounds for a number of coefficient estimates, among which are initial coefficients, the second Hankel determinant, and the Zalcman functional. Upper estimates for higher-order Schwarzian derivatives are also obtained.

1. Introduction

Let A be the family of all analytic and normalized functions
f ( z ) = z + n = 2 a n z n
defined on the open unit disk U = z C : | z | < 1 .
The class of Schwarz functions ω , which are analytic in U and satisfy | ω ( z ) | < 1 , ω ( 0 ) = 0 , is denoted by B . If ω B , then its power series expansion is given by
ω ( z ) = n = 1 c n z n .
For two functions f and g analytic in U , we say that f is subordinate to g, written f g , if ω B exists such that
f ( z ) = g ( ω ( z ) ) , z U .
If, in particular, g is univalent in U , then f g if and only if f ( 0 ) = g ( 0 ) and f ( U ) g ( U ) .
Let f A given by (1). The Hankel determinant H 2 ( 1 ) = a 3 a 2 2 is the well known Fekete-Szegö functional, which is also a particular case of the Zalcman functional a n + m 1 a n a m [1]. The second Hankel determinant is given by H 2 ( 2 ) = a 2 a 4 a 3 2 . For related results to upper bounds of the Hankel determinant and the Zalcman functional, see for example [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9].
The Schwarzian derivative for f A is defined by
S ( f ) ( z ) = f ( z ) f ( z ) 1 2 f ( z ) f ( z ) 2 , z U .
The higher-order Schwarzian derivatives are defined inductively (see [10,11]) as follows:
σ 3 ( f ) = S ( f )
σ n + 1 ( f ) = ( σ n ( f ) ) ( n 1 ) σ n ( f ) f f , n 4 .
Let S n = σ n ( f ) ( 0 ) . If f A is of the form (1), then
S 3 = 6 ( a 3 a 2 2 ) S 4 = 24 ( a 4 3 a 2 a 3 + 2 a 2 3 ) S 5 = 24 ( 5 a 5 20 a 2 a 4 9 a 3 2 + 48 a 3 a 2 2 24 a 2 4 ) .
The related results for higher-order Schwarzian derivatives may be found in [12,13].
Denote by SQ the class of analytic functions f satisfying
f ( z ) > 1 2 , z U
or in terms of subordination
f ( z ) 1 ( 1 z ) 2 , z U .
Recently, several authors have investigated various coefficient estimates for functions belonging to different subclasses of univalent functions (see, for example [14,15,16,17,18,19], to mention only a few).
Based on the results obtained in previous research, in this paper, we investigate the initial coefficient bounds, the Zalcman functional, and the second Hankel determinant for functions in the class SQ . Bounds for the higher-order Schwarzian derivatives for the class SQ are also obtained.
In order to prove our results, the next lemmas for Schwarz functions will be used.
Lemma 1 ([20]).
Let ω ( z ) = c 1 z + c 2 z 2 + be a Schwarz function. Then, for any real numbers α , β such that
( α , β ) | α | 1 2 , 1 β 1 1 2 | α | 2 , 4 27 ( | α | + 1 ) 3 ( | α | + 1 ) β 1
the following estimate holds:
| c 3 + α c 1 c 2 + β c 1 3 |   1 .
Lemma 2 ([21]).
Let ω ( z ) = c 1 z + c 2 z 2 + be a function in the class B . Then, the next estimates hold
| c 1 |     1 , | c 2 |     1     | c 1 | 2 | c 3 |     1     | c 1 | 2 | c 2 | 2 1   +   | c 1 | | c 4 |     1     | c 1 | 2 | c 2 | 2 .
The next result obtained by Efraimidis will be also needed.
Lemma 3 ([22]).
Let ω ( z ) = c 1 z + c 2 z 2 + be a Schwarz function. Then, for any complex number λ, the following estimates hold:
| c 2 + λ c 1 2 |   max 1 , | λ |
| c 4 + ( 1 + λ ) c 1 c 3 + c 2 2 + ( 1 + 2 λ ) c 1 2 c 2 + λ c 1 4 |   max 1 , | λ | .

2. Coefficient Estimates

In this section, we obtain sharp bounds for the first five Taylor coefficients for functions in the class SQ .
Theorem 1.
Let f SQ be of the form (1). Then, the first five initial coefficients of f are bounded by one. The estimates are sharp.
Proof. 
Assume that f is in SQ . Then, from (7), we obtain that there exists a Schwarz function ω of the form (2) such that
f ( z ) = 1 ( 1 ω ( z ) ) 2 , z U .
Making use of the series (1) and (2) into (10) and equating the coefficients, we obtain
a 2 = c 1 a 3 = 1 3 ( 2 c 2 + 3 c 1 2 ) a 4 = 1 2 ( c 3 + 3 c 1 c 2 + 2 c 1 3 ) a 5 = 1 5 ( 2 c 4 + 6 c 1 c 3 + 3 c 2 2 + 12 c 1 2 c 2 + 5 c 1 4 ) .
It is obvious that | a 2 |     1 . Since
a 3 = 2 3 ( c 2 + 3 2 c 1 ) .
the bound | a 3 |     1 follows easily from (8) with λ = 3 / 2 . For the fourth coefficient, we have
| a 4 | = 1 2 | ( c 3 + 2 c 1 c 2 + c 1 3 ) + ( c 1 c 2 + c 1 3 ) | 1 2 ( | c 3 + 2 c 1 c 2 + c 1 3 |   +   | c 1 c 2 + c 1 3 | ) .
The inequality | c 3 + 2 c 1 c 2 + c 1 3 |     1 follows from Lemma 1 with α = 2 and β = 1 . Applying (8) with λ = 1 , we obtain
| c 1 c 2 + c 1 3 |   =   | c 1 | | c 2 + c 1 2 |   1 .
Finally, we have | a 4 |     1 . Observe that
| a 5 |   = 2 5 ( c 4 + 3 c 1 c 3 + c 2 2 + 5 c 1 2 c 2 + 2 c 1 4 ) + 1 2 ( c 2 2 + 2 c 1 2 c 2 + c 1 4 )
2 5 | c 4 + 3 c 1 c 3 + c 2 2 + 5 c 1 2 c 2 + 2 c 1 4 |   +   1 5 | c 2 2 + 2 c 1 2 c 2 + c 1 4 | .
From (9) with λ = 2 , we immediately obtain | c 4 + 3 c 1 c 3 + c 2 2 + 5 c 1 2 c 2 + 2 c 1 4 |     2 . For the bound of the second term, the triangle inequality and the inequality of | c 2 | in Lemma 2 give
| c 2 2 + 2 c 1 2 c 2 + c 1 4 |     | c 2 | 2 + 2 | c 1 | 2 | c 2 |   +   | c 1 | 4 ( 1     | c 1 | 2 ) 2 + 2 | c 1 | 2 ( 1     | c 1 | 2 )   +   | c 1 | 4 = 1
and therefore | a 5 |     1 .
The estimates for all five coefficients are sharp for the function f ( z ) = z 1 z . □

3. Bounds for Hankel Determinant and Zalcman Functional

In this section, the bounds for Hankel determinants H 2 ( 1 ) , H 2 ( 2 ) , and the Zalcman functional a 4 a 2 a 3 and a 5 a 3 2 are obtained.
Theorem 2.
Let f SQ be of the form (1). Then,
| H 2 ( 1 ) | 2 3 and | H 2 ( 2 ) | 4 9 .
The bounds are sharp.
Proof. 
Suppose that f SQ has the form (1). The first inequality follows easily:
| H 2 ( 1 ) |   =   | a 3 a 2 2 |   = 2 3 | c 2 | 2 3 .
Making use of (11), we have
| H 2 ( 2 ) |   =   | a 2 a 4 a 3 2 |   = 1 18 | 9 c 1 c 3 + 3 c 1 2 c 2 8 c 2 2 | .
By triangle inequality, we obtain
| H 2 ( 2 ) | 1 18 ( 9 | c 1 | | c 3 | + 3 | c 1 | 2 | c 2 | + 8 | c 2 | 2 ) .
Applying the inequalities for | c 2 | and | c 3 | in Lemma 2, we receive
| H 2 ( 2 ) | 1 18 9 | c 1 | 1     | c 1 | 2 | c 2 | 2 1   +   | c 1 | + 3 | c 1 | 2 | c 2 |   +   8 | c 2 | 2
= 1 18 9 | c 1 | ( 1     | c 1 | 2 )   +   | c 2 | 2 8     | c 1 | 1   +   | c 1 | + 3 | c 1 | 2 | c 2 |
1 18 9 | c 1 | ( 1     | c 1 | 2 )   +   ( 1     | c 1 | 2 ) 2 8     | c 1 | 1   +   | c 1 | + 3 | c 1 | 2 ( 1     | c 1 | 2 )
= 2 9 ( | c 1 | 4     | c 1 | 2   +   2 ) 4 9 .
If c 2 = 1 and c k = 0 , k 2 , then a 2 = 0 , a 3 = 2 / 3 , and a 4 = 0 . This shows that the equality in the assertion of our theorem holds for the function given by (10) with ω ( z ) = z 2 . □
Theorem 3.
If f SQ is of the form (1), then the next inequalities hold
| a 4 a 2 a 3 |   8 3 27 and | a 5 a 3 2 | 0.7789
Proof. 
Assume that f SQ . From (11), we obtain
| a 4 a 2 a 3 |   = 1 6 | 3 c 3 + 5 c 1 c 2 | .
Then, by triangle inequality, we have
| a 4 a 2 a 3 |   1 6 ( 3 | c 3 |   +   5 | c 1 | | c 2 | ) .
In view of Lemma 2, we obtain
| a 4 a 2 a 3 |   1 6 3 1     | c 1 | 2 | c 2 | 2 1   +   | c 1 | + 5 | c 1 | | c 2 | = 1 6 3 3 | c 1 | 2 3 | c 2 | 2 1   +   | c 1 | + 5 | c 1 | | c 2 | .
Writing | c 1 |   = x and | c 2 |   = y in (12), we obtain
| a 4 a 2 a 3 |   g ( x , y )
where
g ( x , y ) = 1 6 3 3 x 2 3 y 2 1 + x + 5 x y .
Since | c 2 |   1 | c 1 | 2 , the region of variability of ( x , y ) coincides with
D = ( x , y ) : 0 x 1 , 0 y 1 x 2 .
Therefore, we need to find the maximum value of g ( x , y ) over the region D. The critical points of g ( x , y ) , given by the system
6 x + 3 y 2 ( 1 + x ) 2 + 5 y = 0 6 y 1 + x + 5 x = 0
are ( 0 , 0 ) and ( 22 75 , 1067 3375 ) . Elementary calculations show that ( 0 , 0 ) is a maximum point and g ( 0 , 0 ) = 1 / 2 . On the boundary of D, we have
g ( x , 0 ) = 1 6 ( 3 3 x 2 ) = 1 2 ( 1 x 2 ) 1 2 g ( 0 , y ) = 1 6 ( 3 3 y 2 ) = 1 2 ( 1 y 2 ) 1 2 g ( x , 1 x 2 ) = 4 3 ( x x 3 ) 8 3 27 = 0.5132 , for x = 1 3 .
From all these inequalities, we obtain
g ( x , y ) 8 3 27 , for all ( x , y ) D
which is the desired bound for | a 4 a 2 a 3 | . The Schwarz function
ω ( z ) = z z + c 1 1 + c 1 z = c 1 z + ( 1 c 1 2 ) z 2 c 1 ( 1 c 1 2 ) z 3 + ,
where c 1 = 1 3 , c 2 = 2 3 , and c 3 = 2 3 3 , which shows that this inequality is sharp.
Now, we continue with the estimate of | a 5 a 3 2 | . From (11), we obtain
| a 5 a 3 2 |   = 1 5 2 c 4 + 6 c 1 c 3 + 16 3 c 1 2 c 2 + 7 9 c 2 2 .
Using the triangle inequality and the inequalities for | c 4 | , | c 3 | in Lemma 2, we obtain
| a 5 a 3 2 |   1 5 2 ( 1     | c 1 | 2     | c 2 | 2 )   +   6 | c 1 | 1     | c 1 | 2 | c 2 | 2 1   +   | c 1 | + 16 3 | c 1 | 2 | c 2 |   +   7 9 | c 2 | 2 = 1 5 2 + 6 | c 1 |     2 | c 1 | 2 6 | c 1 | 3 6 | c 1 | | c 2 | 2 1 + | c 1 | 11 9 | c 2 | 2 + 16 3 | c 1 | 2 | c 2 | .
Writing | c 1 | = x and | c 2 | = y in (13), we have | a 5 a 3 2 |   h ( x , y ) , where
h ( x , y ) = 1 5 2 + 6 x 2 x 2 6 x 3 6 x y 2 1 + x 11 9 y 2 + 16 3 x 2 y .
Taking into account the inequality | c 2 | 1 | c 1 | 2 , the region of variability of ( x , y ) coincides with
D = ( x , y ) : 0 x 1 , 0 y 1 x 2 .
Thus, we we need to find the maximum value of h ( x , y ) over the region D. The solutions of the system
6 4 x 18 x 2 6 y 2 ( 1 + x ) 2 + 32 3 x y = 0 12 x y 1 + x 22 9 y + 16 3 x 2 = 0
are the critical points of h ( x , y ) . The maximum of h ( x , y ) is attained in ( 0.5285 , 0.2259 ) , and its value is h ( 0.5285 , 0.2259 ) = 0.7789 On the boundary of the region D, we have
h ( x , 0 ) = 1 5 ( 2 2 x 2 6 x 3 + 6 x ) 32 ( 10 + 7 7 ) 1215 = 0.7511 h ( 0 , y ) = 1 5 ( 2 11 9 y 2 ) 2 5 = 0.4 h ( x , 1 x 2 ) = 1 45 ( 7 + 106 x 2 113 x 4 ) 80 113 = 0.7079
It follows that h ( x , y ) 0.7789 for ( x , y ) D , which is the desired bound for | a 5 a 3 2 | . □

4. Bounds for Higher-Order Schwarzian Derivatives

In this section, we investigate the upper bounds of | S 3 | , | S 4 | , and | S 5 | , where S 3 , S 4 , S 5 are given by (5).
Theorem 4.
Let f SQ be given by (1). Then, the following estimates hold:
| S 3 |   4 , | S 4 |   12 , | S 5 |   73.176
Proof. 
Let f SQ . From (11), we have
| S 3 |   = 6 | a 3 a 2 2 |   = 4 | c 2 |   4
For c 2 = 1 and c k = 0 , c k 2 , we obtain a 2 = 0 and a 3 = 2 / 3 . This shows that the equality holds for the function given by (10) with ω ( z ) = z 2 . Further
| S 4 |   = 24 | a 4 3 a 2 a 3 + 2 a 2 3 |   = 12 | c 3 c 1 c 2 | .
The inequality | c 3 c 1 c 2 |   1 follows from Lemma 1 with α = 1 and β = 0 . Hence, | S 4 |   12 . If c 3 = 1 and c k = 0 , k 3 , then a 2 = 0 , a 3 = 0 and a 4 = 1 / 2 . This means that equality holds for the function given by (10) with ω ( z ) = z 3 .
We continue with the estimate for | S 5 | . Taking into account (11), we obtain
| S 5 |   = 24 | 2 c 4 4 c 1 c 3 c 2 2 + 2 c 1 2 c 2 | .
By the triangle inequality, we have
| S 5 |   24 ( 2 | c 4 | + 4 | c 1 | | c 3 | + | c 2 | 2 + 2 | c 1 | 2 | c 2 | ) .
Applying the inequalities for | c 3 | and | c 4 | in Lemma 2, we obtain
| S 5 |   24 2 ( 1     | c 1 | 2     | c 2 | 2 )   +   4 | c 1 | 1     | c 1 | 2     | c 2 | 2 1   +   | c 1 |   +   | c 2 | 2 + 2 | c 1 | 2 | c 2 | = 24 2 2 | c 1 | 2 + 4 | c 1 | 4 | c 1 | 3 | c 2 | 2     4 | c 1 | | c 2 | 2 1   +   | c 1 | + 2 | c 1 | 2 | c 2 | .
If we replace | c 1 | = x and | c 2 | = y in (14), then | S 5 |   k ( x , y ) where
k ( x , y ) = 24 2 4 x 3 2 x 2 + 4 x y 2 4 x y 2 1 + x + 2 x 2 y .
Since | c 2 |   1 | c 1 | 2 , the region of variability of ( x , y ) coincides with
D = ( x , y ) : 0 x 1 , 0 y 1 x 2 .
In order to obtain the upper bound of | S 5 | , we need to find the maximum value of k ( x , y ) over the region D. The critical points of k ( x , y ) are the solution of the system
1 x 3 x 2 y 2 ( 1 + x ) 2 + x y = 0 4 x y 1 + x y + x 2 = 0
The maximum value of k ( x , y ) is attained in ( 0.44402 , 0.088414 ) . In this case, k ( 0.44402 , 0.088414 ) = 73.176…Next, we verify the behaviour of the function k ( x , y ) on the boundary of D:
k ( x , 0 ) = 24 ( 2 2 x 2 4 x 3 + 4 x ) 8 ( 35 + 13 13 ) 9 = 72.7752 k ( 0 , y ) = 24 ( 2 y 2 ) 48 k ( x , 1 x 2 ) = 24 ( 1 + 6 x 2 7 x 4 ) 384 7 = 54.8571
In view of the above inequalities, we obtain k ( x , y ) 73.176 Finally, the proof of the theorem is completed. □

5. Conclusions

In this paper, we investigate a number of coefficient problems for the class SQ . The upper bounds for the initial coefficients, the second Hankel determinant, the Zalcman functional, and the higher-order Schwarzian derivatives have been derived. In our research, we have used the relationship between the coefficients of functions in the considered class SQ and the coefficients for the corresponding Schwarz functions. The results obtained in this note could be the subject of further investigation related with the Fekete–Szegö type functional such as a 3 μ a 2 2 , a 2 a 4 μ a 3 2 or a 4 μ a 2 a 3 .

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks the referees for their helpful suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brown, J.E.; Tsao, A. On the Zalcman conjecture for starlike and typically real functions. Math. Z. 1986, 191, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Allu, V.; Pandey, A. On the generalized Zalcman comjecture for the class of univalent functionsusing variational method. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2209.10595. [Google Scholar]
  3. Allu, V.; Arora, V.; Shaji, A. On the second Hankel determinant of logarithmic coefficients for certain univalent functions. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2112.03067. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ma, W. Generalized Zalcman conjecture for starlike and typically real functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1999, 234, 328–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Obradović, M.; Tuneski, N. On third order Hankel determinant for inverse functions of certain classes of univalent functions. Eur. J. Math. Appl. 2022, 2, 7. [Google Scholar]
  6. Obradović, M.; Tuneski, N. Zalcman and generalized Zalcman conjecture for a subclass of univalent functions. Novi Sad J. Math. 2022, 52, 185–190. [Google Scholar]
  7. Raducanu, D.R.; Zaprawa, P. Second Hankel determinant for close-to-convex functions. C. R. Math. 2017, 355, 1063–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sim, Y.J.; Thomas, D.K.; Zaprawa, P. The second Hankel determinant for starlike and convex functions of order α. Complex Var. Elliptic Equ. 2022, 67, 2433–2443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zaprawa, P.; Obradović, M.; Tuneski, N. Third Hankel determinant for univalent starlike functions. Rev. Real Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Ser. A Mat. 2021, 115, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dorff, M.; Szynal, J. Remark on the higher-order Schwarzian derivatives for convex univalent functions. Tr. Petrozavodsk. Gos. Univ. Ser. Mat. 2009, 15, 7–11. [Google Scholar]
  11. Schippers, E. Distortion theorems for higher-order Schwarzian derivatives of univalent functions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2000, 128, 3241–3249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Cho, N.E.; Kumar, V.; Ravichandran, V. Sharp bounds on the higher-order Schwarzian derivatives for Janowski classes. Symmetry 2018, 10, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Hu, Z.; Wang, X.; Fan, J. Estimate for Schwarzian derivative of certain close-to-convex functions. AIMS Math. 2021, 6, 10778–10788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Răducanu, D. Coefficient estimatesfor a subclass of starlike functions. Mathematics 2020, 8, 1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Obradović, M.; Tuneski, N. The third logarithmic coefficient for the class S. Turk. J. Math. 2020, 44, 1950–1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Obradović, M.; Tuneski, N. Coefficients of the inverse of functions for the subclass U(λ). J. Anal. 2022, 30, 399–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Srivastava, H.M.; Hussain, S.; Raziq, A.; Raza, M. The Fekete-Szegö functional for a subclass of analytic functions associated with quasi-subordination. Carpathian J. Math. 2018, 34, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lee, S.K.; Ravichandran, V.; Supramanian, S. Bounds for the second order Hankel determinant of certain univalent functions. J. Inequal. Appl. 2013, 2013, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Zaprawa, P. On coefficient problems for functions starlike with respect to symmetric points. Bol. Soc. Mat. Mex. 2022, 28, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Prokhorov, D.V.; Szynal, J. Inverse coefficients for (α,β)-convex functions. Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie Sklodowaka A 1981, 35, 125–143. [Google Scholar]
  21. Carlson, F. Sur les coefficients d’une fonction bornée dans le cercle unité. Ark. Mat. Astr. Fys. 1940, 27A, 8. [Google Scholar]
  22. Efraimidis, I. A generalization of Livingston’s coefficient inequalities for functions with positive real part. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2016, 435, 369–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Răducanu, D. On Coefficient Estimates for a Certain Class of Analytic Functions. Mathematics 2023, 11, 12. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/math11010012

AMA Style

Răducanu D. On Coefficient Estimates for a Certain Class of Analytic Functions. Mathematics. 2023; 11(1):12. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/math11010012

Chicago/Turabian Style

Răducanu, Dorina. 2023. "On Coefficient Estimates for a Certain Class of Analytic Functions" Mathematics 11, no. 1: 12. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/math11010012

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop