Next Article in Journal
Waterlogging Resistance Evaluation Index and Photosynthesis Characteristics Selection: Using Machine Learning Methods to Judge Poplar’s Waterlogging Resistance
Next Article in Special Issue
Acoustics of Fractal Porous Material and Fractional Calculus
Previous Article in Journal
Efficient Pre-Solve Algorithms for the Schwerin and Falkenauer_U Bin Packing Benchmark Problems for Getting Optimal Solutions with High Probability
Previous Article in Special Issue
ML-LME: A Plant Growth Situation Analysis Model Using the Hierarchical Effect of Fractal Dimension
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mathematical Modeling of Layered Nanocomposite of Fractal Structure

1
Department of Data Analysis and Machine Learning, Financial University under the Government of Russian Federation, Shcherbakovskaya Str., 38, 105187 Moscow, Russia
2
Department of Innovation Management, State University of Management, Ryazansky Pr., 99, 109542 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 21 May 2021 / Revised: 24 June 2021 / Accepted: 25 June 2021 / Published: 1 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fractals, Fractional Calculus and Applied Statistics)

Abstract

:
A model of a layered hierarchically constructed composite is presented, the structure of which demonstrates the properties of similarity at different scales. For the proposed model of the composite, fractal analysis was carried out, including an assessment of the permissible range of scales, calculation of fractal capacity, Hausdorff and Minkovsky dimensions, calculation of the Hurst exponent. The maximum and minimum sizes at which fractal properties are observed are investigated, and a quantitative assessment of the complexity of the proposed model is carried out. A software package is developed that allows calculating the fractal characteristics of hierarchically constructed composite media. A qualitative analysis of the calculated fractal characteristics is carried out.

1. Introduction

One of the modern trends in materials science is the design of surfaces and volumes with a repeating structure at arbitrary scales [1,2,3]. Sets that demonstrate similarity properties at different scales of resolution of their geometric structure, in a strict or approximate sense, are called fractals [4,5]. Many physical laws, applying to fractal objects, lose their universality, which are shown in [6,7,8]. Among the material world objects, self-similarity is very widely represented, including the problems of materials science. The same phenomena in Euclidean space and on fractal objects are different. Thus, fractal objects are of high interest for research due to their wide practical application and contribution to the solution of several urgent problems facing modern society. Fractal materials are used in many applied problems, for example, to reduce the size of device elements [9,10], increase the broadband parameters of radio equipment [11,12], develop new absorbing and reflective materials [13,14], develop biocompatible materials with desired properties [15,16], in devices for the physical provision of information security [17,18]. In addition, self-similarity is very widely represented among objects of the material world [19,20].
The analysis of scientific sources demonstrates that most of the works on the physics of fractals are devoted to computer modeling of the growth processes of fractal clusters under certain conditions. There is extensive literature on this topic [20,21,22]. However, it is important to analyze fractal models that can serve to describe the physical properties of real objects. The purpose of this study is to carry out a fractal analysis of a layered hierarchically constructed composite model. We will consider a hierarchically constructed nanocomposite based on silicon and aluminum (Si-Al). Such nanocomposites are of wide interest for various applications in modern optics and radiophysics [23,24,25]. Elements based on such hierarchically constructed nanocomposites are used in the creation of new innovative antenna designs [26,27], broadband and nonlinear radar devices [28,29], the creation of means for localization and tracing of mobile objects [30,31], the synthesis of selective and absorbing materials [32,33], as well as in the creation of intelligent applications for the physical protection of information [34,35].
However, the models developed in the course of this study are not limited to the use of specific materials and can be used to study the electrodynamic properties of a wide range of nanocomposite media. As a result of fractal analysis of the models, it can be said that layered nanocomposites with a hierarchical structure have electromagnetic properties (in particular, complex dielectric constant, electrical conductivity) that differ significantly from the properties of homogeneous materials.
The uniqueness of structural materials lies in the fact that it is possible to design such materials in advance in such a way as to give the product the properties necessary for solving a specific applied problem. The design of a material can be one of the key factors affecting its functional properties (for example, mechanical, electromagnetic, thermal).
As a result of research developed; frequency dependences of the real and imaginary parts of the complex dielectric elements based on such objects are used in the creation of new innovative designs of antennas, broadband, and nonlinear radar devices, the creation of means for localization and tracing of mobile objects, the synthesis of selective and absorbing materials, as well as in the creation of intelligent applications, in particular in the protection of information [36,37]. For the nanocomposite of the fractal structure considered in our study, we propose a new modeling technique based on fractal analysis, including assessing the allowable range of scales; calculation of fractal capacity; Hausdorff, and Minkowski dimensions; calculation of the Hurst exponent. The proposed technique makes it possible to simulate a fractal nanocomposite and obtain information about the material, which is difficult to obtain by traditional methods.

2. Materials and Methods

Currently, several methods for modeling nanocomposites have been proposed. An important role in modeling nanocomposites is played by the so-called effective medium model [38,39]. The essence of the model is that the set of clusters that make up the nanocomposite is considered as a kind of new medium with the same level of polarization. Thus, knowing the parameters of each of the components of the composite, their geometric shape, and concentration, it is possible to determine the characteristics of the resulting composite medium as a whole.
The advantage of this approach is that to analyze the propagation of radiation in a composite medium, there is no need to solve Maxwell’s equations at each point in space. The most widely used models of the effective medium are the models of Rayleigh, Maxwell, Maxwell-Garnett, Bruggeman, etc., [40,41].
Several restrictions are imposed on the effective medium model related to the size of inclusions and the distance between them in comparison with the length of the electromagnetic wave in the medium [42].
There is also a quantum mechanical method for modeling nanocomposites, which makes it possible to describe the physical characteristics of materials from the first principles [43]. However, for systems involving a large number of particles, high computational power is required to solve this equation.
In many cases, to simulate a nanocomposite medium, the method of equivalent circuits is used [44], in which the electrical, mechanical, and magnetic components of the composite are represented in the form of electrical equivalents and the classical equations of electrodynamics. The macroscopic approach to modeling the electrical properties of nanocomposites is reduced to solving the classical equations of Maxwell’s electrodynamics. However, restrictions are imposed on the use of the macro theory in modeling the interaction of an electromagnetic field with nanocomposites [45]. When the radiation wavelength becomes comparable to the size of the molecules, then the use of this theory is incorrect.
To quantify the complexity of the fractal model of the composite, the coefficient of change in the part with a change in scale is calculated. B. Mandelbrot in his work [46] calls such a coefficient the fractal dimension (capacity). In this paper, when speaking about fractal dimension, we will be guided by the specified definition. In addition, it should be noted that there are two fundamentally different approaches related to the concept of dimension. In the classical definition, dimension is the number of dimensions of a geometric figure [47] (for a line, the dimension is equal to one, for a plane—two, for a volume—three). Since this dimension is a topological invariant (that is, it is preserved under a one-to-one mapping that is continuous in both directions), it is called the topological dimension and is denoted by DT [48]. In this study, the dimension is considered from the point of view of a different approach, this is the number D, which expresses the relationship between the natural measure of a geometric figure (for example, length, area, or volume) with the value underlying the original metric system. If a metric standard of such a value, taken as a unit, is increased (decreased) by a factor of k, then the indicated measure will decrease (increase) by a factor of kD.
Methods of the fractal theory were used to describe the qualitative properties of the object under study, and regression analysis was carried out using the least-squares method. Calculations and calculations were performed in the software package Wolfram Mathematica 12.1, a 3D model of a composite of a fractal structure was developed in the SketchUp environment.

3. Results

The object of research is a model of a layered hierarchically constructed composite with fractional metric dimensions (Figure 1).
Since the developed models can serve to describe the physical properties of real objects, we are dealing with an object that has similar properties in a limited range of scales. The region of existence is superimposed on the fractal—max and min sizes, at which fractal properties are observed [49]. From above, this interval is limited by the size of the object. From below, as a limitation of the region of existence, in the case under consideration, the van der Waals radius is used, since when atoms approach at a distance less than the sum of their van der Waals radii, strong interatomic repulsion occurs, therefore it is the van der Waals radii that characterize minimum admissible contacts of atoms belonging to different molecules. Thus, the above fractal model of the composite has a physical meaning only under the conditions r d 2 ; d R V d V , where is r—object size, d—composite layer size, R V d V —the van der Waals radius of the chemical element that makes up the composite layer. As an example, the Si-Al composite is considered and the characteristics necessary to assess the limitations of the scale interval. Table 1 shows the geometric characteristics of elements Si and Al.
Let us estimate the permissible scale interval of the layered hierarchically constructed Si-Al composite (Figure 1). Let us take an object 2 cm in size, respectively d of one layer = 1 cm. With an increase in the level of fractality, the layer size will change according to Table 2.
Table 3 shows the results of calculations performed in the software package Wolfram Mathematica 12.1.
Thus, for fractal models (Figure 1), in the case of a Si-Al composite, the allowable scale interval, with an initial layer size of 1 cm, is limited from above by the 12th fractality level.
To quantitatively estimate the complexity of the fractal model of the composite, we calculate the fractal dimension (capacity). For the case of a compact set, the dimension will be determined by the expression proposed in the work [50]:
D = lim d 0   ln K ( d ) ln d ,
where K ( d ) —is the number of elements (segments, cells, cubes, etc.) with a geometric parameter (for example, linear size) d, which determines the approximation of the original set. Let us carry out calculations of the fractal dimension for the above model of a hierarchically constructed composite.
Since with an increase in the level of fractality, two materials that make up the composite evolve, the fractal dimension will have the form:
D = lim d 1 0   ln K 1 ( d 1 ) ln d 1 lim d 0   ln K 2 ( d 2 ) ln d 2 ,
If the cell size is d = 1/16, then the number of coating cells for the two materials is K 1 = K 2 = 8. At the next step, when the cells are reduced by 16 times, we get d = 1/256, K 1 = 64, K 2 = 192, and so on (Table 4).
Thus, the level of fractality is associated with the coverage of cells of size d = ( 1 16 ) n in quantity K ( d ) = 8 n for the first material, and d = ( 1 16 ) n , K ( d ) = 16 n 8 n respectively.
Applying Formula (2) we get:
D = lim n   ln 8 n ln 16 n lim n   ln ( 16 n 8 n ) ln 16 n
For the Si-Al composite considered as an example:
D = lim n 12   ln 8 n ln 16 n lim n 12   ln ( 16 n 8 n ) ln 16 n
The calculation results and the corresponding regression lines constructed using the least-squares method are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3.
The Hausdorff dimension is a quantitative measure of how densely a fractal set fills the surrounding Euclidean space [51,52]. Unlike the capacity calculated earlier, the Hausdorff dimension remains unchanged when passing to an arbitrary metric.
For self-similar sets, such as the hierarchically constructed composite under study, the Hausdorff dimension can be calculated explicitly. We split the set A into n parts with the coefficients m1, m2, m3,… mn (Figure 4).
The Hausdorff dimension H of the set A is a solution to the equation m 1 H + m 2 H + + m 2 H = 1 . For the object investigated in this paper, the Hausdorff dimension will be 8 · ( 1 4 ) H = 1 for z = 1 и 4 z + 1 ( 1 4 z ) H = 1 for z > 1 (similarity coefficient ¼), where z—fractality level. Let us carry out the calculations for the composite with z m a x = 12 . In this case, the Hausdorff dimension will be calculated by the following system of equations:
{ 8 · ( 1 4 ) H = 1 ; { 4 3 · ( 1 4 2 ) H = 1 ; 4 4 · ( 1 4 3 ) H = 1 ; 4 13 · ( 1 4 12 ) H = 1
The Minkowski dimension M (in some sources referred to as the “rough dimension”) of the set A is determined by the expression M = lim ε 0 ln ( N ε ) ln ( ε ) [53], where N ε —is the minimum number of sets of diameter ε that can cover the set A. In the case of an infinite set, the upper and lower limits are considered, and the concepts of upper and lower Minkowski dimensions are introduced, respectively. The Minkowski dimension is a close concept to the Hausdorff dimension and in many cases, they coincide, but there are sets for which these dimensions have different meanings [54]. For composites of morphologies (Figure 1) with the maximum level of fractality z m a x = 12, the Minkowski dimension will be M = lim ε 16 12 ln ( N ε ) ln ( ε ) .
To assess the dynamics of the fractal dimension values, we calculate the Hurst exponent. In terms of the asymptotic behavior of the scaled range of the function of a set of points of a series of dynamics, the Hurst exponent is determined by the expression:
R n S n = ( n / 2 ) χ ,   n ; χ = lim n ln R n S n ln n 2 ,
where R n —is the range of the first n values of the series, S n —is the standard deviation, n—is the number of points in the time series segment. If the limit exists, the equality χ = 2 − H.
Let us carry out calculations for a hierarchically constructed composite model with Z m a x = 12 . The calculation results are shown in Figure 5.

4. Discussion

From the calculations of the fractal capacity, it follows that the minimum deviation from the regression line for material 1 corresponds to the 7th level of fractality, for material 2—to the 6th and 7th levels. The use of the least-squares method makes it possible to calculate the expected values of the dependences of the size of the cells covering the object of study on their number for an arbitrary level of fractality.
In this study, the calculations of the Hurst exponent for a hierarchically constructed composite model are obtained for the first time. The results obtained make it possible to determine the probability of the appearance of such materials in nature.
Based on a large empirical material, it was found that the value of the Hurst exponent of natural processes is grouped near the values of 0.73 ± 0.09 [19], 0.72 ± 0.08 [55]. The question of why this so, remains open. For a random process with independent increments and finite variance, it was rigorously proved in [56] that the exponent χ is 0.5. Sequences for which χ > 0.5 are considered persistent—they retain the existing trend [57], that is, an increase in the past is more likely to lead to an increase in the future, and vice versa. At a value of 0.5, there is no clear tendency, and at lower values, the process is characterized by antipersistence—any tendency tends to be replaced by the opposite one [57].

5. Conclusions

In the present work, a hierarchically constructed composite model is investigated. The study found:
  • For composites of fractal morphologies, the Minkowski dimension does not coincide with the Hausdorff dimension.
  • The first and second levels of fractality of composites of morphologies xx demonstrate the presence of a finite variance of a random process, the absence of an obvious tendency to change several dynamics, the fractal properties of the object are weakly expressed.
  • The fourth level of fractality demonstrates the closest value to the Hurst exponent of natural processes. Thus, the likelihood of the appearance of such a fractal in nature is higher in comparison with composites of the indicated morphologies of other levels of fractality.
  • The hierarchically constructed composite of fractality level 3–12 has the property of persistence (the observed trend is supported).
Thus, it is shown that fractal analysis in the field of materials science is an effective tool for obtaining high-quality results and additional information about the object of research, which is difficult to obtain with traditional research methods.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.K.; Data curation, D.S.; Formal analysis, E.R.; Investigation, V.F.; Methodology, V.D.; Project administration, S.K.; Software, P.N.; Visualization, V.F.; Writing—review & editing, E.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tian, D.; Zhou, C.-J.; He, J.-H. Hall-Petch effect and inverse Hall–Petch effect: A fractal unification. Fractals 2018, 26, 1850083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wei, B.; Dong, F.; Yang, W.; Luo, C.; Dong, Q.; Zhou, Z.; Yang, Z.; Sheng, L. Synthesis of carbon-dots@SiO2@TiO2 nanoplatform for photothermal imaging induced multimodal synergistic antitumor. J. Adv. Res. 2020, 23, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jafari, F.K.; Asgari, M.S.; Pishkoo, A. The fractal calculus for fractal materials. Fractal Fract. 2019, 3, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Boeing, G. Visual analysis of nonlinear dynamical systems: Chaos, fractals, self-similarity and the limits of prediction. Systems 2016, 4, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Hutchinson, J.E. Fractals and self similarity. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 1981, 30, 713–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tupik, V.A.; Potapov, A.A.; Margolin, V.I. Some features of the interaction of electromagnetic radiation with complex fractal objects. In Proceedings of the Irreversible Processes in Nature and Technics, Moscow, Russia, 29–31 January 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mitic, V.V.; Lazovic, G.; Paunovic, V.; Cvetkovic, N.; Jovanovic, D.; Veljkovic, S.; Randjelovic, B.; Vlahovic, B. Fractal frontiers in microelectronic ceramic materials. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 9679–9685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Abramov, V.S. Supernonradiative states, neutrinos, and Higgs bosons in fractal quantum systems. Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys. 2020, 84, 284–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kaur, A.; Gupta, S. A complementary Sierpinski gasket fractal antenna array for wireless MIMO portable devices. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2019, 61, 436–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Potapov, A.A. Fractal electrodynamics: Numerical modeling of small fractal antenna devices and fractal 3D microwave resonators for modern ultra-wideband or multiband radio systems. J. Commun. Technol. Electron. 2019, 64, 629–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Goswami, P.K.; Goswami, G. Trident shape ultra-large band fractal slot EBG antenna for multipurpose IoT applications. Prog. Electromagn. Res. 2019, 96, 73–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Mondal, T.; Maity, S.; Ghatak, R.; Chaudhuri, S.R.B. Compact circularly polarized wide-beamwidth fern-fractal-shaped microstrip antenna for vehicular communication. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2018, 67, 5126–5134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, H.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, X.; Wang, H.; Shi, C.; He, F. Enhanced shielding performance of layered carbon fiber composites filled with carbonyl iron and carbon nanotubes in the Koch curve fractal method. Molecules 2020, 25, 969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Liu, H.-B.; Hu, C.-X.; Wang, Z.-L.; Zhang, H.-F.; Li, H.-M. An ultra-wideband terahertz metamaterial absorber based on the fractal structure. Plasmonics 2020, 16, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kiselev, V.M.; Golovanova, O.A.; Fedoseev, V.B. The fractal analysis method for the study of hydroxylapatite crystallization process. Appl. Solid State Chem. 2018, 3, 46–51. [Google Scholar]
  16. Solaymani, S.; Ghoranneviss, M.; Elahi, S.M.; Shafiekhani, A.; Kulesza, S.; Ţălu, Ş.; Bramowicz, M.; Hantehzadeh, M.; Nezafat, N.B. The relation between structural, rugometric and fractal characteristics of hard dental tissues at micro and nano levels. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2019, 82, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Khan, M.; Masood, F.; Alghafis, A. Secure image encryption scheme based on fractals key with Fibonacci series and discrete dynamical system. Neural Comput. Appl. 2019, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Zhou, Z.; Niu, Y. A chaos-based image encryption technique utilizing Hilbert curves and H-fractals. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 74734–74746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kim, J.J.; Parker, S.; Henderson, T.; Kirby, J.N. Physiological fractals: Visual and statistical evidence across timescales and experimental states. J. R. Soc. Interface 2020, 17, 20200334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Loveday, L. Fractals: The hidden beauty and potential therapeutic effect of the natural world. Holist. Healthc. 2019, 16, 52. Available online: https://bhma.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/JHH-16.1-SPRING-2019-FINAL-1.pdf#page=54 (accessed on 18 May 2021).
  21. Wang, Y.; Xue, N.; Li, R.; Wu, T.; Li, N.; Hou, S.; Wang, Y. Construction and properties of Sierpiński triangular fractals on surfaces. ChemPhysChem 2019, 20, 2262–2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Reichardt, K.; Timm, L.C. Dimensional analysis, scaling, and fractals. In Soil, Plant and Atmosphere; Reichardt, K., Timm, L.C., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2020; pp. 423–444. [Google Scholar]
  23. Onori, D.; Azaña, J. A broadly tunable noise radar transceiver on a silicon photonic chip. In Proceedings of the 2020 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC), San Diego, CA, USA, 8–12 March 2020; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  24. Eshkoli, A.; Nemirovsky, Y. A stochastic approach for optimizing the required number of sub-pixels in Silicon Photomultipiler (SiPM) for optical radar applications (LiDAR). In Proceedings of the International Conference on the Science of Electrical Engineering (ICSEE), Eilat, Israel, 16–18 November 2018; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  25. Cheng, Q.; Zheng, S.; Zhang, Q.; Ji, J.; Yu, H.; Zhang, X. An integrated optical beamforming network for two-dimensional phased array radar. Opt. Commun. 2021, 489, 126809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Huang, H.C.; Lu, J. Evolution of innovative 5G Millimeter-wave antenna designs integrating non-millimeter-wave antenna functions based on Antenna-in-Package (AiP) solution to cellular phones. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 72516–72523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sawant, V.G.; Aruna, V.; Anusha Iyer, D.P.; Deepthi, S. Design of high gain fractal antenna. Int. J. Res. Anal. Rev. 2019, 6, 22–28. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ilbegi, H.; Hayvaci, H.T.; Yetik, I.S. Distinguishing electronic devices using Fourier features derived from harmonic radar. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications (ICEAA), Verona, Italy, 11–15 September 2017; pp. 1502–1505. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mazzaro, G.J.; Martone, A.F.; Ranney, K.I.; Narayanan, R.M. Nonlinear radar for finding RF electronics: System design and recent advancements. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2017, 65, 1716–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. He, D.; Ai, B.; Guan, K.; Wang, L.; Zhong, Z.; Kürner, T. The design and applications of high-performance ray-tracing simulation platform for 5G and beyond wireless communications: A tutorial. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2018, 21, 10–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Spyridis, Y.; Lagkas, T.; Sarigiannidis, P.; Argyriou, V.; Sarigiannidis, A.; Eleftherakis, G.; Zhang, J. Towards 6G IoT: Tracing mobile sensor nodes with deep learning clustering in UAV networks. Sensors 2021, 21, 3936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nguyen, D.D.; Vu, C.M.; Vu, H.T.; Choi, H.J. Micron-size white bamboo fibril-based silane cellulose aerogel: Fabrication and oil absorbent characteristics. Materials 2019, 12, 1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Korchagin, S.A.; Klinaev, Y.V.; Serdechnyy, D.V.; Terin, D.V. Software and digital methods in the natural experiment for the research of dielectric permeability of nanocomposites. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Actual Problems of Electron Devices Engineering (APEDE), Saratov, Russia, 27–28 September 2018; pp. 262–265. [Google Scholar]
  34. Babaei, A.; Schiele, G. Physical unclonable functions in the internet of things: State of the art and open challenges. Sensors 2019, 19, 3208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Korchagin, S.A.; Klinaev, Y.V.; Serdechnyy, D.V.; Terin, D.V. Simulation of current-voltage characteristics of conglomerate of nonlinear semiconductor nanocomposites. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Actual Problems of Electron Devices Engineering (APEDE), Saratov, Russia, 27–28 September 2018; pp. 397–399. [Google Scholar]
  36. Yerznkyan, B.H.; Gataullin, T.M.; Gataullin, S.T. Solow models with linear labor function for industry and enterprise. Montenegrin J. Econ. 2021, 17, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Huang, B.; Ge, T.; Liu, G.; Luan, J.; He, Q.; Yuan, Q.; Huang, W.; Zhang, K.; Bai, H.; Shek, C.; et al. Density fluctuations with fractal order in metallic glasses detected by synchrotron X-ray nano-computed tomography. Acta Mater. 2018, 155, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nazarov, R.; Zhang, T.; Khodzitsky, M. Effective medium theory for multi-component materials based on iterative method. Photonics 2020, 7, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nadal, E.; Barros, N.; Glenat, H.; Kachakachi, H. Optical properties of complex plasmonic materials studied with extended effective medium theories combined with rigorous coupled wave analysis. Materials 2018, 11, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Zhou, H.; Zhou, X.-Z.; Zhang, J.; Zheng, J.-J. Effective medium method for chloride diffusion coefficient of mature fly ash cement paste. Materials 2019, 12, 811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Costa, J.S.; Zaman, Q.; da Costa, K.Q.; Dmitriev, V.; Pandoli, O.; Fontes, G.; Del Rosso, T. Limits of the effective medium theory in particle amplified surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy biosensors. Sensors 2019, 19, 584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Im, J.; Goo, T.; Kim, J.; Choi, S.; Hong, S.; Bahk, Y.-M. Detection of microplastic in salts using terahertz time-domain spectroscopy. Sensors 2021, 21, 3161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Friák, M.; Holec, D.; Šob, M. Quantum-mechanical study of nanocomposites with low and ultra-low interface energies. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Chaibi, Y.; Salhi, M.; El-Jouni, A.; Essadki, A. A new method to extract the equivalent circuit parameters of a photovoltaic panel. Sol. Energy 2018, 163, 376–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, X.; Lu, J.; Yuan, S.; Yang, J.; Zhou, X. A novel method for identification of lithium-ion battery equivalent circuit model parameters considering electrochemical properties. J. Power Sources 2017, 345, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mandelbrot, B. How long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension. Sci. New Ser. 1967, 156, 636–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Theiler, J. Estimating fractal dimension. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1990, 7, 1055–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Barnsley, M.F.; Devaney, R.L.; Mandelbrot, B.B.; Peitgen, H.-O.; Saupe, D.; Voss, R.F.; Fisher, Y.; McGuire, M. The Science of Fractal Images; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  49. Chen, D.Z.; Shi, C.; An, Q.; Zeng, Q.; Mao, W.L.; Goddard, W.A.; Greer, J.R. Fractal atomic-level percolation in metallic glasses. Science 2015, 349, 1306–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Kumar, S.; Boro, J.C.; Ray, D.; Mukherjee, A.; Dutta, J. Bionanocomposite films of agar incorporated with ZnO nanoparticles as an active packaging material for shelf-life extension of green grape. Heliyon 2019, 5, e01867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Bárány, B.; Hochman, M.; Rapaport, A. Hausdorff dimension of planar self-affine sets and measures. Invent. Math. 2019, 216, 601–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Bishop, C.J.; Jones, P.W. Hausdorff dimension and Kleinian groups. Acta Math. 1997, 179, 1–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rudyi, S.S.; Vovk, T.A.; Rozhdestvensky, Y.V. Signature identification by Minkowski dimension. Chaos Interdiscip. J. Nonlinear Sci. 2019, 29, 053110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Baccelli, F.; Haji-Mirsadeghi, M.O.; Khezeli, A. Unimodular Hausdorff and Minkowski dimensions. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1807.02980. [Google Scholar]
  55. Tan, A.J.; Roberts, E.; Smith, S.A.; Olvera, U.A.; Arteaga, J.; Fortini, S.; Mitchell, K.A.; Hirst, L.S. Topological chaos in active nematics. Nat. Phys. 2019, 15, 1033–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Kalush, Y.A.; Loginov, V.M. Hirst exponent and its hidden properties. Sib. J. Ind. Math. 2002, 5, 29–37. [Google Scholar]
  57. Garcin, M. Hurst exponents and delampertized fractional Brownian motions. Int. J. Theor. Appl. Financ. 2019, 22, 1950024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Model of a layered hierarchically constructed composite.
Figure 1. Model of a layered hierarchically constructed composite.
Mathematics 09 01541 g001
Figure 2. Dependence of the size of cells on their number for material 1.
Figure 2. Dependence of the size of cells on their number for material 1.
Mathematics 09 01541 g002
Figure 3. Dependence of the size of cells on their number for material 2.
Figure 3. Dependence of the size of cells on their number for material 2.
Mathematics 09 01541 g003
Figure 4. Dividing the composite model into parts.
Figure 4. Dividing the composite model into parts.
Mathematics 09 01541 g004
Figure 5. Dependences of Hausdorff and Minkowski dimensions and Hurst exponent on the level of fractality.
Figure 5. Dependences of Hausdorff and Minkowski dimensions and Hurst exponent on the level of fractality.
Mathematics 09 01541 g005
Table 1. Geometric characteristics of elements Si, Al.
Table 1. Geometric characteristics of elements Si, Al.
Item NameAtomic RadiusVan der Waals Radius
Si117.6 pm210 pm
Al143 pm210 pm
Table 2. Dependence of the layer size on the level of fractality.
Table 2. Dependence of the layer size on the level of fractality.
Layer Sizedd/4d/16d/64d/4k−1
Fractality Level1234k
Table 3. Calculation results.
Table 3. Calculation results.
Fractality LevelLayer Thickness, m
010−2
12.5·10−3
26.25·10−4
31.5625·10−4
43.90625·10−5
59.76563·10−6
62.44141·10−6
76.10352·10−7
81.52588·10−7
93.8147·10−8
109.53674·10−9
112.38419·10−9
12 (max)5.96046·10−10
131.49012·10−10 < 2.1 · 10 10 = R B д B ( Si , Al )
Table 4. Evolution of the hierarchically constructed composite model.
Table 4. Evolution of the hierarchically constructed composite model.
Fractality Level, n PictureMaterial 1Material 2
KdKd
1 Mathematics 09 01541 i00181/1681/16
2 Mathematics 09 01541 i002641/2561921/256
3 Mathematics 09 01541 i0035121/409635841/4096
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Korchagin, S.; Romanova, E.; Serdechnyy, D.; Nikitin, P.; Dolgov, V.; Feklin, V. Mathematical Modeling of Layered Nanocomposite of Fractal Structure. Mathematics 2021, 9, 1541. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/math9131541

AMA Style

Korchagin S, Romanova E, Serdechnyy D, Nikitin P, Dolgov V, Feklin V. Mathematical Modeling of Layered Nanocomposite of Fractal Structure. Mathematics. 2021; 9(13):1541. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/math9131541

Chicago/Turabian Style

Korchagin, Sergey, Ekaterina Romanova, Denis Serdechnyy, Petr Nikitin, Vitaliy Dolgov, and Vadim Feklin. 2021. "Mathematical Modeling of Layered Nanocomposite of Fractal Structure" Mathematics 9, no. 13: 1541. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/math9131541

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop