Next Article in Journal
Molecular Epidemiology and Evolutionary Dynamics of Human Influenza Type-A Viruses in Africa: A Systematic Review
Next Article in Special Issue
The Parasite Load of Trypanosoma cruzi Modulates Feeding and Defecation Patterns of the Chagas Disease Vector Triatoma infestans
Previous Article in Journal
First Report of Lumpy Skin Disease in Myanmar and Molecular Analysis of the Field Virus Isolates
Previous Article in Special Issue
Avian Louse Flies and Their Trypanosomes: New Vectors, New Lineages and Host–Parasite Associations
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 10
Issue 5
10.3390/microorganisms10050898
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Culicoides segnis and Culicoides pictipennis Biting Midges (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae), New Reported Vectors of Haemoproteus Parasites

by
Rita Žiegytė
*,
Rasa Bernotienė
and
Vaidas Palinauskas
*
Nature Research Centre, Akademijos 2, 08412 Vilnius, Lithuania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(5), 898; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms10050898
Submission received: 30 March 2022 / Revised: 22 April 2022 / Accepted: 23 April 2022 / Published: 25 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vector-Parasite Relationships)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
As bloodsuckers of birds, Culicoides biting midges (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae) play an important role in the transmission of avian haemosporidian (Haemoproteus) parasites, which are prevalent in many bird populations and cause disease, pathology, or even mortality in their hosts. Information about the role of the various Culicoides species in the transmission of Haemoproteus parasites remains insufficient. This presents an obstacle for the better understanding of the epizootiology of haemoproteosis. The aim of this study was to determine new Culicoides species involved in the transmission of Haemoproteus parasites in the wild. Biting midges were collected using UV traps on the Curonian Spit, Lithuania. Only parous Culicoides females were investigated: they were identified and were diagnosed for the presence of Haemoproteus parasites using both microscopy and PCR-based methods. We collected and dissected 420 parous Culicoides females. PCR-based screening showed that 28 parous Culicoides biting midges were infected with avian Haemoproteus parasites. Haemoproteid DNA was detected in Culicoides kibunensis, Culicoides pictipennis, Culicoides festivipennis, Culicoides segnis, Culicoides pallidicornis, and Culicoides obsoletus biting midges. The DNA of Haemoproteus palloris, genetic lineage hWW1, was found for the first time in C. pallidicornis. Haemoproteus sporozoites were detected in the salivary glands of two Culicoides segnis biting midges. According to the PCR results, one female contained Haemoproteus tartakovskyi (genetic lineage hHAWF1) DNA and another Haemoproteus majoris (genetic lineage hCCF5) DNA. The sporozoites of Haemoproteus parasites were also detected in the salivary glands of four C. pictipennis biting midges using microscopy, and this finding was confirmed by PCR as Haemoproteus parabelopolskyi DNA (genetic lineage hSYAT02) was detected in three out of the four biting midges. The obtained results supplement existing information about Culicoides biting midges as natural vectors of Haemoproteus spp. and add two new Culicoides species to the vector list, showing the low specificity of these parasites for the invertebrate hosts.

1. Introduction

Culicoides biting midges (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae) are widespread across almost all the world [1,2,3]. These blood sucking insects are known as vectors of avian haemosporidian parasites belonging to the genus Haemoproteus (Haemosporida, Haemoproteidae) [4,5,6,7,8,9]. The asexual reproduction of these parasites occurs in birds, which are intermediate hosts, while sexual reproduction takes place in biting midges [5,10]. Haemoproteus parasites can cause disease and even lethal pathology in vertebrate hosts, especially in non-adapted birds [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Haemoproteus infections are also virulent to some blood-sucking dipterans and can even kill the insects [19,20]. In order to understand the epizootiology and peculiarities of the transmission of these harmful parasites in the wild, it is of great importance to know the natural vectors of haemoproteids. From around 1400 described Culicoides species [3], only four species have been identified as natural vectors of haemoproteids in Europe [9,21], and ten more Culicoides species are known as vectors of Haemoproteus spp. worldwide [6]. In recent years, molecular methods have mostly been applied to test for infections of blood-sucking insects with Haemoproteus spp. [9]. However, it has been shown that avian haemosporidians can persist both in competent vectors and in resistant blood-sucking insects for several weeks after the initial infected blood meals [22]. PCR-based diagnostics cannot distinguish between sporozoites (the infective stage to vertebrate hosts) and non-infective sporogonic stages; therefore, this method alone cannot be used for detecting vectors of haemosporidian parasites. However, the presence of haemosporidian parasite DNA in blood-sucking insects, detected using solely PCR-based methods, provides new information on the feeding preference of biting midges, as these parasites can be gained only while feeding on birds [23] and also allows the identification of potential vectors of haemosporidian parasites. It is necessary to emphasize that microscopy and the detection of sporozoites is an important part in the detection of haemosporidian parasite vectors.
The aim of our study was to identify Culicoides species as vectors of Haemoproteus spp. in the wild and expand existing knowledge regarding the transmission of these parasites. We collected biting midges using UV traps, identifying them, dissecting individually each parous female for salivary gland preparations, and applying PCR-based analysis in order to determine if the insect had been infected with Haemoproteus parasites. The results of this study supplemented the list of Culicoides species known as vectors of haemoproteids in Europe by two Culicoides species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site, Collection of Biting Midges, and Preparation of Specimens for Microscopic Examination

Biting midges were collected in June 2020 using an Onderstepoort 220 V UV trap close to Juodkrantė village (55.55676 N, 21.12398 E) on the Curonian Spit located by the Baltic Sea, Lithuania. The trap was hung in a swampy old forest dominated by spruce and alder; it was turned on 1–2 h before sunset and was turned off 2–3 h after sunrise (Figure 1A). Insects were collected in a water container supplemented with a drop of liquid soap as described by Bernotienė et al. [24]. Collected insects were transported to the laboratory of the Biological Station of the Nature Research Centre (Juodkrantė). Parous biting midge females were sorted by the burgundy pigment on their abdomens (Figure 1B) as reported by Dyce [25] and identified by their wing coloration and other morphological features [26,27,28]. The material was studied under binocular stereoscopic microscopes.

2.2. Microscopic Examination and Morphometric Analysis of Sporozoites

Details of the dissection of parous biting midges and staining methods were described by Valkiūnas [5] and Žiegytė et al. [29,30]. In brief, preparations of sporozoites were made after the extraction of the salivary glands from parous midges. The salivary glands were gently pressed out from the thorax, crushed using a needle and mixed with a tiny drop of saline. Preparations were dried in the air, fixed with absolute methanol, and stained with a 4% Giemsa stain. All residual parts of the midges were placed in 96% ethanol for PCR-based confirmation of parasite genetic lineages and insect species (as described below). To eliminate contamination of samples, we used a new dissecting needle for each dissected biting midge. Representative preparations of the sporozoites (49404–49408NS) were deposited in the Nature Research Centre, Vilnius, Lithuania. The statistical analyses of the parasite sporogonic stages were carried out using the “Statistica 7” package. Student’s t-test for independent samples was used to determine statistical significance between mean parameters of sporozoite features. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

2.3. Molecular Analysis

DNA from the remnants of each individual parous Culicoides female was extracted using an ammonium acetate DNA extraction method [31]. For the detection of avian haemosporidian parasites within insects, we used the nested PCR protocol described by [32,33,34] with outer primers HaemNFI/HaemNR3 and inner primers HaemF/HaemR2. A fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome b (cyt b) gene (479 bp) of Haemoproteus and/or Plasmodium spp. was amplified. In order to detect false positives, we used a negative control (H2O instead of the target DNA) every 24 samples. To confirm the morphological identification of the Culicoides midges that contained haemospordian parasites, molecular analysis of the standard mitochondrial DNA cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) with primers LCO1490 and HCO2198 was applied [35]. DNA fragments of all samples were visualized on 2% agarose gel using MidoriGreen dye (NIPPON Genetics Europe, Germany). All positive samples were sequenced using forward and reverse primers. Sequences were edited and aligned using BioEdit software [36]. Genetic lineages of parasites were identified using the ‘Basic Local Alignment Search Tool’ (megablast algorithm) (NCBI BLAST, 2019 https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 1 March 2022), and their identification was double checked using the MalAvi database BLAST function (http://mbio-serv2.mbioekol.lu.se/Malavi, accessed on 1 March 2022).

3. Results

We collected 420 parous Culicoides females belonging to 10 species. The morphological identification was consistent with PCR-based identification of biting midges, obtained sequences matched corresponding sequences from GenBank 99–100%. Culicoides kibunensis was the dominant species and accounted for 30.4% of all collected parous biting midges (Table 1). DNA of Haemoproteus parasites of eight genetic lineages (haplotypes of the mitochondrial cyt b gene fragment) was detected in 28 Culicoides biting midges using PCR-based methods with the prevalence ranging from 0 to 20.8% for different Culicoides species (Table 1). The females of six Culicoides species were found to contain haemoproteid DNA: C. kibunensis, C. pictipennis, C. festivipennis, C. segnis, C. obsoletus, and C. pallidicornis (Table 1). The DNA of Haemoproteus was found for the first time in C. pallidicornis biting midges.
Haemoproteus sporozoites were detected in two salivary gland preparations of C. segnis biting midges, and PCR confirmed these parasites as being H. majoris (hCCF5) (Figure 2A) and H. tartakovskyi (hHAWF1) (Figure 2B). The sporozoites of Haemoproteus parasites were also detected in the salivary gland preparations of four C. pictipennis biting midges using microscopy. Three out of four midges were confirmed by PCR to be infected with H. parabelopolskyi, genetic lineage hSYAT02 (Figure 2C), while PCR failed to detect the parasite in one female insect (Figure 2D).
The results of the morphometrical analysis (Table 2) revealed that the length of H. tartakovskyi sporozoites differed statistically from the sporozoites of H. majoris (t = 2.41, p = 0.02) and H. parabeloposkyi (t = 4.99, p = 0.00), while the sporozoite width did not differ between different parasite species (p > 0.05).

4. Discussion

Ten Culicoides species were identified from 420 investigated parous biting midge females, and Culicoides kibunensis was found to be the dominant species at the study site (Table 1). This species is also known to be among the dominant Culicoides species at other localities in Lithuania in June [21,37]. The composition of the Culicoides species on the Curonian Spit has been investigated by different authors in the southern part of the spit, which belongs to Russia [21,27,38,39]; however, this is the first study of Culicoides biting midges from the northern part of the Curonian spit, and it shows that the composition of the Culicoides species in different parts of the Curonian spit is similar. However, two new species for the Curonian spit (C. chiopterus and C. fagineus) were detected.
According to PCR-based data, 12 Culicoides species are known to harbor Haemoproteus parasite DNA in Europe, showing that biting midges of these species naturally feed on bird blood: Culicoides alazanicus [40], C. circumscriptus [41], C. festivipennis [24,40,42], C. impunctatus [23,24], C. kibunensis [21,24,43,44], C. obsoletus [24], C. pictipennis [21,24,40,44], C. punctatus [21,23,24], C. segnis [21,43], C. scoticus [24,44], C. paolae [41], and C. reconditus [21]. We have added C. pallidicornis to the list of Culicoides midges that feed naturally on birds and can be a potential vector of avian blood parasites. Previously, C. pallidicornis was attributed to mammalophilic species, as it preferentially feeds on cows, sheep [45], and/or rabbits [46].
The detection of haemosporidian DNA in biting midges is helpful in determining the host preference of the insects, as these parasites can be gained only during a bloodmeal on birds [23]. Culicoides kibunensis and C. pictipennis biting midges have been reported to feed preferentially on birds [46,47], and our results obtained using PCR have shown that the prevalence of haemoproteids in the examined Culicoides females of these species was relatively high (Table 1), showing that the ornithophily of C. kibunensis, C. pictipennis, and C. segnis is not a coincidence but a pattern. Culicoides kibunensis is known as a vector of Haemoproteus pallidus (hPFC1), H. minutus (hTURDUS2), and H. asymmetricus (hTUPHI01) [21,24]. Our study shows that the ornithophilic species C. pictipennis and C. segnis are also vectors of avian Haemoproteus parasites.
To date, only sporadic cases of ornithophily of some other biting midges have been reported [45,48]. Currently, C. punctatus and C. chiopterus are known to feed on mammals [45,47,48,49], and we did not detect haemosporidian DNA in these biting midges during this study (Table 1), even though biting midges of these species accounted for more than 7% of all tested parous Culicoides females. Culicoides impunctatus is one of the most abundant Culicoides species in North Europe [1,38]: it was also abundant at our study site, accounting for 11% of all tested insects. It is known as being a mainly mammalophilic species. However, it was proved experimentally [30] that C. impunctatus can serve as a vector of 12 species of Haemoproteus parasites and can even be an opportunistic feeder on birds; thus, due to its high abundance, it can play an important role as a vector of haemoproteids.
The most important result of this study was that H. majoris (hCCF5) (Figure 2A) and H. tartakovskyi (hHAWF1) (Figure 2B) completed sporogony in C. segnis, and H. parabelopolskyi (hSYAT02) (Figure 2C) completed sporogony in C. pictipennis biting midges, showing that these blood-sucking insects are natural vectors of these haemosporidian parasites. The detection of both sporozoites and the PCR identification of the parasite in the same individual insect allowed us to indicate vectors of avian haemosporidian parasites in the wild and to obtain information about the specific genetic lineages of the detected parasites. It is known that sporogony of different Haemoproteus species with recorded sporozoite stages in salivary glands can be completed in four European Culicoides species: C. impunctatus, C. nubeculosus, C. kibunensis, and C. sphagnumensis [5,6,21,24,50]. We have added two new species, C. segnis and C. pictipennis, to the list of haemoproteid vectors.
Haemoproteus parabelopolskyi completed sporogony in two biting midge species: C. impunctatus [5,51,52] and C. pictipennis (this study). Valkiūnas et al. [51] recorded the complete sporogony of this parasite in C. impunctatus without determining the genetic lineage of the parasite. Haemoproteus parabelopolskyi is widespread and prevalent in warblers belonging to the Sylviidae, and this is the first species of hemosporidian parasite that has been described by linking molecular data and parasite morphology [52]. We revealed that the hSYAT02 lineage of H. parabelopolskyi completed its development in C. pictipennis. According to the available data, H. tartakovskyi completed sporogony and produced sporozoites in three species of biting midges: C. impunctatus [53], C. nubeculosus [48], and C. segnis (this study). Two previous studies showed the development of sporozoites after experimental infection of insects, while our study proved C. segnis as a vector of H. tartakovskyi in the wild. Haemoproteus tartakovskyi (hHAWF1) has been detected in wild caught biting midges for the first time. This parasite is widespread in passerine birds in the Palearctic with the common crossbill Loxia curvirostra as the type vertebrate host [5]. Additional vertebrate hosts of H. tartakovskyi are hawfinch Coccothraustes and Eurasian siskin Spinus. Heavy parasitemia of this parasite causes mortality in blood-sucking mosquitoes [19]. The sporozoites of H. majoris were detected in C. impunctatus after experimental infection of the insects [30]. Our study showed that C. segnis serves as a natural vector of H. majoris at the study site. Haemoproteus majoris is a widespread and prevalent parasite of different species, especially belonging to the families Paridae, Phylloscopidae, Fringillidae, and Muscicapidae [54].
It is necessary to emphasize that in some cases PCR-based methods may not detect the DNA of the parasite in insects, as was the case in this study (Figure 2D). The issue might be related to the low concentration of parasite DNA or to the specificity of the primers [55]. Therefore, in studies of haemosporidian vectors, it is important to use both methods, PCR and microscopy, in parallel.
Morphometric measurements of the length and width of the H. tartakovskyi sporozoites obtained from C. segnis (this study) and those provided by Žiegytė et al. [48] from experimentally infected C. nubeculosus did not differ significantly. Bukauskaite et al. [56] also stated that sporozoite measurements of the same parasite species (H. noctue) found in females of different Culicoides species did not differ significantly. However, the Haemoproteus majoris sporozoites detected in C. segnis during this study were shorter than those found in experimentally infected C. impunctatus biting midges (8.1 ± 0.5 and 9.5 ± 1.5 respectively, t = 4.09, p = 0.00) as described in Žiegytė et al. [30]. More comparative studies on the morphometric measurements of sporozoites obtained from different vectors are needed.
The diversity of Culicoides midges in Europe is high with more than 100 recorded species [3]. At the same time, more than 100 Haemoproteus species have been detected in birds. However, our knowledge about the transmission of Haemoproteus parasites is limited to a few Culicoides species that serve as vectors. This study adds to the knowledge of the epizootiology of haemoproteosis by revealing Culicoides species that are responsible for the transmission of haemoproteids in Europe and emphasizes obstacles in vector research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, R.Ž., R.B. and V.P.; insect identification, R.B.; microscopy, R.Ž.; writing and editing, R.Ž., R.B. and V.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a grant (No. S-MIP-20-25, Rita Žiegytė) from the Research Council of Lithuania.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon email inquiry.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Margarita Kazak for the help in molecular investigation of the collected material and Ravinder Sehgal and Jonathan Robert Stratford for advice and correcting English in the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Carpenter, S.; Groschup, M.H.; Garros, C.; Felippe-Bauer, M.L.; Purse, B. Culicoides biting midges, arboviruses and public health in Europe. Antivir. Res. 2013, 100, 102–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Borkent, A. World Species of Biting Midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). Available online: https://digitallibrary.amnh.org/handle/2246/1622 (accessed on 12 November 2019).
  3. Borkent, A.; Dominiak, P. Catalog of the Biting Midges of the World (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). Zootaxa 2020, 4787, 001–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wirth, W. A Review of the Pathogens and Parasites of the Biting Midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 1977, 67, 60–75. [Google Scholar]
  5. Valkiūnas, G. Avian Malaria Parasites and Other Haemosporidia; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005; ISBN 978-0415300971. [Google Scholar]
  6. Atkinson, C.T.; Thomas, N.J.; Hunter, D.B. Parasitic Diseases of Wild Birds; Wiley Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008; ISBN 978-0-813-82081-1. [Google Scholar]
  7. Atkinson, C.T. Vectors, epizootiology, and pathogenicity of avian species of Haemoproteus (Haemosporina: Haemoproteidae). Bull. Soc. Vector Ecol. 1991, 16, 109–126. [Google Scholar]
  8. Santiago-Alarcon, D.; Palinauskas, V.; Schaefer, H.M. Diptera vectors of avian haemosporidian parasites: Untangling parasite life cycles and their taxonomy. Biol. Rev. 2012, 87, 928–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Santiago-Alarcon, D.; Marzal, A. (Eds.) Avian Malaria and Related Parasites in the Tropics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Garnham, P.C.C. Malaria Parasites and Other Haemosproridia; Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford, UK, 1966. [Google Scholar]
  11. Atkinson, C.T.; Forrester, D.J.; Greiner, E.C. Pathogenicity of Haemoproteus meleagridis (Haemosporina: Haemoproteidae) in experimentally infected domestic turkeys. J. Parasitol. 1988, 74, 228–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Earleé, R.A.; Bastianello, S.S.; Bennett, G.F.; Krecek, R.C. Histopathology and morphology of the tissue stages of Haemoproteus columbae causing mortality in Columbiformes. Avian Pathol. 1993, 22, 67–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Donovan, T.A.; Schrenzel, M.; Tucker, T.A.; Pessier, A.P.; Stalis, I.H. Hepatic hemorrhage, hemocoelom, and sudden death due to Haemoproteus infection in passerine birds: Eleven cases. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2008, 20, 304–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Olias, P.M.; Wegelin, W.; Zenker, S.; Freter, A.; Gruber, D.; Klopfleisch, R. Avian malaria deaths in parrots. Eur. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2011, 17, 950–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cannell, B.L.; Krasnec, K.V.; Campbell, K.; Jones, H.I.; Miller, R.D.; Stephens, N. The pathology and pathogenicity of a novel Haemoproteus spp. infection in wild little penguins (Eudyptula minor). Vet. Parasitol. 2013, 197, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Tostes, R.; Martinele, I.; Vashist, U.; Castanñon, M.C.; Pinto, P.F.; Daemon, E.; D’Agosto, M. Molecular characterization and biochemical and histopathological aspects of the parasitism of Haemoproteus spp. in southern caracaras (Caracara plancus). J. Parasitol. 2015, 101, 687–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ortiz-Catedral, L.; Brunton, D.; Stidworth, M.F.; Elsheikha, H.M.; Pennycott, T.; Schulze, C.; Braun, M.; Wink, M.; Gerlach, H.; Pendl, H.; et al. Haemoproteus minutus is highly virulent for Australasian and South American parrots. Parasit. Vectors 2019, 12, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hernández-Lara, C.; Duc, M.; Ilgūnas, M.; Valkiūnas, G. Massive Infection of Lungs with Exo-Erythrocytic Meronts in European Robin Erithacus rubecula during Natural Haemoproteus attenuatus Haemoproteosis. Animals 2021, 11, 3273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Valkiūnas, G.; Kazlauskienė, R.; Bernotienė, R.; Bukauskaitė, D.; Palinauskas, V.; Ježova, T. Haemoproteus infections (Haemosporida, Haemoproteidae) kill bird-biting mosquitoes. Parasitol. Res. 2014, 113, 1011–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bukauskaitė, D.; Bernotienė, R.; Iezhova, T.A.; Valkiūnas, G. Mechanisms of mortality in Culicoides biting midges due to Haemoproteus infection. Parasitology 2016, 143, 1748–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Žiegytė, R.; Platonova, E.; Kinderis, E.; Mukhin, A.; Palinauskas, V.; Bernotienė, R. Culicoides biting midges involved in transmission of haemoproteids. Parasit. Vectors 2021, 14, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Valkiūnas, G.; Kazlauskienė, R.; Bernotienė, R.; Palinauskas, V.; Iezhova, T.A. Abortive long-lasting sporogony of two Haemoproteus species (Haemosporida, Haemoproteidae) in the mosquito Ochlerotatus cantans, with perspectives on haemosporidian vector research. Parasitol. Res. 2013, 112, 2159–2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bernotienė, R.; Valkiūnas, G. PCR detection of malaria parasites and related haemosporidians: The sensitive methodology in determining bird-biting insects. Malar. J. 2016, 15, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Bernotienė, R.; Žiegytė, R.; Vaitkutė, G.; Valkiūnas, G. Identification of a new vector species of avian haemoproteids, with a description of methodology for the determination of natural vectors of haemosporidian parasites. Parasit. Vectors 2019, 12, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dyce, A.L. The recognition of nulliparous and parous Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) without dissection. Aust. J. Entomol. 1969, 8, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gutsevich, A.V. Blood-sucking midges (Ceratopogonidae). In Fauna of the USSR, 1st ed.; Nauka Press: Leningrad, Russia, 1973; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
  27. Glukhova, V.M. Blood-sucking midges of the genera Culicoides and Forcipomyia (Ceratopogonidae). In Fauna of the USSR. Dipteran Insects; Nauka: Leningradskoe Otdelenie: Leningrad, Russia, 1989; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mathieu, B.; Ceêtre-Sossah, C.; Garros, C.; Chavernac, D.; Balenghien, T.; Carpenter, S.; Setier-Rio, M.L.; Vignes-Lebbe, R.; Ung, V.; Candolfi, E.; et al. Development and validation of IIKC: An interactive identification key for Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) females from the Western Palaearctic region. Parasit. Vectors 2012, 5, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Žiegyteė, R.; Palinauskas, V.; Bernotienė, R.; Iezhova, T.A.; Valkiūnas, G. Haemoproteus minutus and Haemoproteus belopolskyi (Haemoproteidae): Complete sporogony in the biting midge Culicoides impunctatus (Ceratopogonidae), with implications on epidemiology of Haemoproteosis. Exp. Parasitol. 2014, 145, 74–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Žiegytė, R.; Markovets, M.Y.; Bernotienė, R.; Mukhin, A.; Iezhova, T.A.; Valkiūnas, G.; Palinauskas, V. The widespread biting midge Culicoides impunctatus (Ceratopogonidae) is susceptible to infection with numerous Haemoproteus (Haemoproteidae) species. Parasit. Vectors 2017, 10, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Richardson, D.S.; Jury, F.L.; Blaakmeer, K.; Komdeur, J.; Burke, T. Parentage assignment and extra group paternity in a cooperative breeder: The Seychelles warbler (Acrocephalus sechellensis). Mol. Ecol. 2001, 10, 2263–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bensch, S.; Stjenman, M.; Hasselquist, D.; Ostman, O.; Hansson, B.; Westerdahl, H.; Pinheiro, R.T. Host specificity in avian blood parasites: A study of Plasmodium and Haemoproteus mitochondrial DNA amplified from birds. Proc. R. Soc. 2000, 276, 1583–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Hellgren, O.; Waldenstrom, J.; Bensch, S. A new PCR assay for simultaneous studies of Leucocytozoon, Plasmodium, and Haemoproteus from avian blood. J. Parasitol. 2004, 90, 797–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hellgren, O.; Bensch, S.; Malmqvist, B. Bird hosts, blood parasites and their vectors-associations uncovered by molecular analyses of blackfly blood meals. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17, 1605–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Folmer, O.; Black, M.; Hoeh, W.; Lutz, R.; Vrijenhoek, R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 1994, 3, 294–299. [Google Scholar]
  36. Hall, T.A. A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 98/98/NT. Nucleic. Acid. Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  37. Bernotienė, R.; Bartkevičienė, G.; Bukauskaitė, D. The flying activity of biting midges (Ceratopogonidae: Culicoides) in Verkiai Regional Park, southeastern Lithuania. Parasitol. Res. 2021, 120, 2323–2332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Glukhova, V.M.; Valkiūnas, G. On the fauna and ecology of biting midges (Ceratopogonidae: Culicoides) in the Curonian spit, the methods of their collection from the birds and experimental infection with haemoproteids (Haemosporidia: Haemoproteidae). Ekologija 1993, 2, 68–73. [Google Scholar]
  39. Trukhan, M.N.; Tereshkina, N.V.; Liutkevičius, G. Peculiarities of the range of species and the ecology of midges (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae) on the Curonian spit. Vesci Nacyanalnaj Akad. Navuk Belarusi 2003, 2, 88–91. [Google Scholar]
  40. Bobeva, A.; Zehtindjiev, P.; Bensch, S.; Radrova, J. A survey of biting midges of the genus Culicoides Latreille, 1809 (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) in NE Bulgaria, with respect to transmission of avian haemosporidians. Acta Parasitol. 2013, 58, 585–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Veiga, J.; Martinez-de la Pueante, J.; Vaclav, R.; Figuerola, J.; Valera, F. Culicoides paolae and C. circumscriptus as potential vectors of avian haemosporidians in an arid ecosystem. Parasit. Vectors 2018, 11, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bobeva, A.; Ilieva, M.; Dimitrov, D.; Zehtindjiev, P. Degree of associations among vectors of the genus Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) and host bird species with respect to haemosporidian parasites in NE Bulgaria. Parasitol. Res. 2014, 113, 4505–4511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Synek, P.; Munclinger, P.; Albrecht, T.; Votýpka, J. Avian haematophagous insects in the Czech Republic. Parasitol. Res. 2013, 112, 839–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Santiago-Alarcόn, D.; Havelka, P.; Pineda, E.; Segelbacher, G.; Schaefer, H.M. Urban forests as hubs for novel zoonosis: Blood meal analysis, seasonal variation in Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) vectors, and avian haemosporidians. Parasitology 2013, 140, 1799–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Aylloón, T.; Nijhof, A.M.; Weiher, W.; Bauer, B.; Alleène, X.; Clausen, P.H. Feeding behaviour of Culicoides spp. (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) on cattle and sheep in northeast Germany. Parasit. Vectors 2014, 7, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Ninio, C.; Augot, D.; Delecolle, J.C.; Dufour, B.; Depaquit, J. Contribution to the knowledge of Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) host preferences in France. Parasitol. Res. 2010, 108, 657–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Miltgen, F.; Landau, I.; Ratanaworabhan, N.; Yenbutra, S. Parahaemoproteus desseri n. sp.; Gametogonie et shizogonie chez I’hote naturel: Psittacula roseate de Thailande, et sporogonie experimentale chez Culicoides nubeculosus. Ann. Parasitol. Hum. Comp. 1981, 56, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Žiegytė, R.; Bernotienė, R.; Palinauskas, V.; Valkiūnas, G. Haemoproteus tartakovskyi (Haemoproteidae): Complete sporogony in Culicoides nubeculosus (Ceratopogonidae), with implications for avian haemoproteid experimental research. Exp. Parasitol. 2016, 160, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Lassen, S.B.; Nielsen, S.A.; Skovgård, H.; Kristensen, M. Molecular identification of bloodmeals from biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae: Culicoides Latreille) in Denmark. Parasitol. Res. 2011, 108, 823–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Bukauskaitė, D.; Iezhova, T.A.; Ilgūnas, M.; Valkiūnas, G. High susceptibility of the laboratory-reared biting midges Culicoides nubeculosus to Haemoproteus infections, with review on Culicoides species that transmit avian haemoproteids. Parasitology 2019, 146, 333–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Valkiūnas, G.; Iezhova, T.A. Detrimental effects of Haemoproteus infections on the survival of biting midge Culicoides impunctatus (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). J. Parasitol. 2004, 90, 194–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Valkiūnas, G.; Križanauskienė, A.; Iezhova, T.A.; Hellgren, O.; Bensch, S. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Circumnuclear hemoproteids (Haemosporida: Haemoproteidae) of sylviid birds, with a description of Haemoproteus parabelopolskyi sp. Nov. Parasitol. 2007, 93, 680–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Valkiūnas, G.; Liutkevičius, G.; Iezhova, T.A. Complete development of three species of Haemoproteus (Haemosporida, Haemoproteidae) in the biting midge Culicoides impunctatus (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae). J. Parasitol. 2002, 88, 864–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bensch, S.; Hellgren, O.; Pérez-Tris, J. MalAvi: A public database of malaria parasites and related haemosporidians in avian hosts based on mitochondrial cytochrome b lineages. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2009, 9, 1353–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Harl, J.; Himmel, T.; Valkiūnas, G.; Ilgūnas, M.; Nedorost, N.; Matt, J.; Kubber-Heiss, A.; Alic, A.; Konicek, C.; Weissenbock, H. Avian haemosporidian parasites of accipitriform raptors. Malar. J. 2022, 21, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bukauskaitė, D.; Žiegytė, R.; Palinauskas, V.; Iezhova, T.A.; Dimitrov, D.; Ilgūnas, M.; Bernotienė, R.; Markovets, M.Y.; Valkiūnas, G. Biting midges (Culicoides, Diptera) transmit Haemoproteus parasites of owls: Evidence from sporogony and molecular phylogeny. Parasit. Vectors 2015, 8, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Microorganisms 10 00898 g001 550
Figure 1. The UV trap in the forest for the catching of biting midges (A); parous (arrow) and nulliparous females based on the pigment coloration on the abdomen (B).
Figure 1. The UV trap in the forest for the catching of biting midges (A); parous (arrow) and nulliparous females based on the pigment coloration on the abdomen (B).
Microorganisms 10 00898 g001
Microorganisms 10 00898 g002 550
Figure 2. Sporozoites of Haemoproteus majoris (A) and Haemoproteus tartakovskyi (B) in salivary gland preparations of Culicoides segnis, and sporozoites of Haemoproteus parabelopolskyi (C) and Haemoproteus sp. (D) in salivary gland preparations of Culicoides pictipennis. Arrows indicate nuclei of the parasites. Scale-bar: 10 μm.
Figure 2. Sporozoites of Haemoproteus majoris (A) and Haemoproteus tartakovskyi (B) in salivary gland preparations of Culicoides segnis, and sporozoites of Haemoproteus parabelopolskyi (C) and Haemoproteus sp. (D) in salivary gland preparations of Culicoides pictipennis. Arrows indicate nuclei of the parasites. Scale-bar: 10 μm.
Microorganisms 10 00898 g002
Table
Table 1. Species list of collected and studied Culicoides females and detected haemoproteids.
Table 1. Species list of collected and studied Culicoides females and detected haemoproteids.
Culicoides
Species		No. of Investigated Parous Biting Midges Prevalence
(%) 		Genetic Lineage of ParasiteParasite Species (no. of Infected Individuals)
C. kibunensis1287.8hWW1Haemoproteus palloris (7)
hWW2Haemoproteus majoris (2)
hPHYBOR04Haemoproteus majoris (1)
C. festivipennis583.5hSYAT02Haemoproteus parabelopolskyi (1)
hHAWF1Haemoproteus tartakovskyi (1)
C. obsoletus506.0hHAWF1Haemoproteus tartakovskyi (2)
hTUPHI01Haemoproteus asymmetricus (1)
C. impunctatus460
C. pictipennis3718.9hPARUS1Haemoproteus majoris (1)
hTUPHI01Haemoproteus asymmetricus (3)
hSYAT02Haemoproteus parabelopolskyi (3)
C. punctatus360
C. chiopterus300
C. segnis2420.8hTUPHI01Haemoproteus asymmetricus (1)
hCCF5Haemoproteus majoris (2)
hHAWF1Haemoproteus tartakovskyi (2)
C. pallidicornis911.1hWW1Haemoproteus palloris (1)
C. fagineus20
Haemoproteus species of which sporozoites were detected in salivary glands are in bold.
Table
Table 2. Morphometric parameters of sporozoites of three Haemoproteus species.
Table 2. Morphometric parameters of sporozoites of three Haemoproteus species.
Haemoproteus Species
(no. of Examined Sporozoites)		Length (min–max)Width (min–max)Area (min–max)
H. parabeloposkyi * (21)7.2 ± 1.01 (5.5–8.8)1.1 ± 0.09 (0.9–1.2)6.3 ± 0.9 (4.5–7.9)
H. majoris ** (21)8.1 ± 0.47 (7.2–9.0)1.1 ± 0.15 (0.9–1.4)7.2 ± 0.69 (5.2–8.5)
H. tartakovskyi ** (21)8.5 ± 0.55 (7.8–9.5)1.1 ± 0.16 (0.8–1.5)7.1 ± 0.89 (5.5–8.8)
Haemoproteus parasites detected in C. pictipennis (*), and in C. segnis (**). Measurements are given in micrometers. Arithmetic mean and standard deviation are provided, followed in parentheses by minimum and maximum values.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Žiegytė, R.; Bernotienė, R.; Palinauskas, V. Culicoides segnis and Culicoides pictipennis Biting Midges (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae), New Reported Vectors of Haemoproteus Parasites. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 898. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms10050898

AMA Style

Žiegytė R, Bernotienė R, Palinauskas V. Culicoides segnis and Culicoides pictipennis Biting Midges (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae), New Reported Vectors of Haemoproteus Parasites. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(5):898. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms10050898

Chicago/Turabian Style

Žiegytė, Rita, Rasa Bernotienė, and Vaidas Palinauskas. 2022. "Culicoides segnis and Culicoides pictipennis Biting Midges (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae), New Reported Vectors of Haemoproteus Parasites" Microorganisms 10, no. 5: 898. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms10050898

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop