Next Article in Journal
Epidemiology and Genetic Variability of Circulating Influenza B Viruses in Uruguay, 2012–2019
Next Article in Special Issue
Thymol Protects Channel Catfish from Aeromonas hydrophila Infection by Inhibiting Aerolysin Expression and Biofilm Formation
Previous Article in Journal
Autochthonous Cases of Mucosal Leishmaniasis in Northeastern Italy: Clinical Management and Novel Treatment Approaches
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pinocembrin-7-Glucoside (P7G) Reduced Postharvest Blue Mold of Navel Orange by Suppressing Penicillium italicum Growth
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 8
Issue 4
10.3390/microorganisms8040590
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Forest Tree Associated Bacterial Diffusible and Volatile Organic Compounds against Various Phytopathogenic Fungi

by
Wei-Liang Kong
1,2,
Pu-Sheng Li
1,2,
Xiao-Qin Wu
1,2,*,
Tian-Yu Wu
1,2 and
Xiao-Rui Sun
1,2
1
Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
2
Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Prevention and Management of Invasive Species, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2020, 8(4), 590; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms8040590
Submission received: 23 March 2020 / Revised: 14 April 2020 / Accepted: 16 April 2020 / Published: 18 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Antimicrobial Compounds)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) can potentially be used as an alternative strategy to control plant diseases. In this study, strain ST–TJ4 isolated from the rhizosphere soil of a healthy poplar was found to have a strong antifungal activity against 11 phytopathogenic fungi in agriculture and forestry. Strain ST–TJ4 was identified as Pseudomonas sp. based on 16S rRNA-encoding gene sequences. The bacterium can produce siderophores, cellulase, and protease, and has genes involved in the synthesis of phenazine, 1–phenazinecarboxylic acid, pyrrolnitrin, and hydrogen cyanide. Additionally, the volatile compounds released by strain ST–TJ4 can inhibit the mycelial growth of plant pathogenic fungi more than diffusible substances can. Based on volatile compound profiles of strain ST–TJ4 obtained from headspace collection and GC–MS/MS analysis, 1-undecene was identified. In summary, the results suggested that Pseudomonas sp. ST–TJ4 can be used as a biocontrol agent for various plant diseases caused by phytopathogenic fungi.

1. Introduction

Severe crop loss remains inevitable due to plant diseases, particularly those caused by pathogenic fungi, which are responsible for an estimated 70–80% of plant diseases [1]. Phytopathogenic fungi reduce both crop yield and quality. They are major restraints to sustainable agriculture production, especially in intensive cropping systems [2]. Synthetic fungicides have been used extensively to control diseases caused by these pathogens [3]. However, these chemicals may lead to toxic residues in treated products [4,5]. Synthetic pesticides can also pollute the environment due to their slow biodegradation and can induce resistance or reduce the susceptibility of pathogenic fungi. Furthermore, that the species and numbers of fungal phytopathogens in the rhizosphere change with environmental conditions and evolution increases the difficulty of controlling plant diseases [6]. Facing the severe threat to global crop security caused by plant diseases, it is important to develop environmentally friendly and highly effective fungicides against plant pathogens.
Compared with application of synthetic chemical fungicides, the use of microorganisms and their metabolites is a promising and environmentally friendly alternative for the prevention and control of plant diseases [7]. Biological control agents, such as Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Burkholderia, and Paenibacillus spp. play important roles in inhibiting pathogens [8,9,10,11]. Bacteriocin, lipopeptide and polyketide are active substances produced by Bacillus species against pathogens [12]. The siderophore-mediated competition for iron gives beneficial microbes a competitive advantage in suppressing the proliferation and root colonization of plant pathogens [13].
In addition, microbial volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have attracted more attention because they can spread over long distances, mediating indirect contact interactions between organisms. VOCs at low concentrations can be sensed, so they can directly inhibit the growth of pathogenic fungi and induce systemic resistance in plants [14,15]. The VOCs produced by Bacillus can inhibit mycelial growth of Alternaria solani and Botrytis cinerea, which cause early blight of potatoes and grey mold of a broad range of hosts, respectively [16]. They can also control Ceratocystis fimbriata in postharvest sweet potatoes [17]. It is suggested that the application of microbial volatiles has a great potential in plant diseases.
Current research on biocontrol bacteria is mainly focused on crop applications and rarely on forest diseases. In preliminary analyses prior to this study, we screened a bacterial strain with high siderophore production from the poplar rhizosphere; however, it remains unclear whether this strain has antagonistic effects on fungi causing forest diseases or produces additional antagonistic substances. Therefore, in this study, we identified diffusible substances and VOCs produced by this strain to determine whether they may be applied as antagonistic substances. We also determined the taxonomic placement of this strain via morphological identification and molecular biology. The results of this study may provide a new and effective antagonistic bacterial strain for the biological control of forest fungal diseases, and lay a foundation for molecular analyses of the bacteriostatic mechanism of this strain.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial and Fungal Strains

In this study, bacterial strain ST–TJ4 was isolated from poplar rhizosphere soil in 2018 at Tianjin, China. Strain ST–TJ4 was stored at −80 °C in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium with 50% (v/v) glycerol for long–term use. The fungal plant pathogens studied in this study were Botryosphaeria berengeriana (causes apple ring rot); Colletotrichum tropicale (causes Ficus binnendijkii var. variegate anthracnose); Cytospora chrysosperma, Fusicoccus aesculi, and Phomopsis ricinella (cause poplar canker); Fusarium oxysporum (causes cotton wilt); Fusarium graminearum (causes wheat head blight); Phytophthora cinnamomi (causes cedar root rot); Pestalotiopsis versicolor (causes tea round spot); Rhizoctonia solani (causes pine seedling damping-off) and Sphaeropsis sapinea (causes pine shoot blight). These fungal plant pathogens were preserved in the Forest Pathology Laboratory of Nanjing Forestry University. The isolates were maintained on Potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates at 25 °C.

2.2. In Vitro Antifungal Activity

According to the method of Lim et al. [18], we used a 0.6 cm hole punch to take the plugs containing mycelia from the aforementioned 11 phytopathogenic fungi cultured for 7 days and put the plugs in the center of PDA culture medium individually. Then, we dipped a sterile loop into the overnight culture of ST–TJ4 bacterial suspension, and streaked 2.5 cm from one side of the plug. After 5–7 days, the width of the inhibition zone between the bacterial colony and fungal pathogen was measured. Fungi that were not inoculated with bacteria served as a control. The plant pathogenic fungus inhibition rate was calculated as inhibition rate (%) = (Cd – Td) × 100%/Cd, where Cd is the radial mycelial growth in control, and Td is the radial growth of the fungal pathogens in treatment (dual culture). Each treatment had four replicates. The experiment was also repeated twice.

2.3. Analysis of the Antagonistic Substances In Vitro

According to the previous methods [19,20,21,22], Chrome Azurol S (CAS) agar plates, carboxyl methyl cellulose (CMC) agar plates, skim milk powder (SMP) agar plates, colloidal chitin agar plates, and Pachyman solid medium were made to detect the production of siderophore, cellulase, protease, chitinase, and β–1,3 glucanase, respectively. The single colony of ST–TJ4 picked with a toothpick was used to inoculate the aforementioned media, which were incubated in the dark at 28 °C. After three days, the transparent circle around the colony was observed.

2.4. Detection of Genes Encoding Antibiotics and HCN in ST–TJ4

Total DNA was isolated from ST–TJ4 cells by the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method [23]. Then, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays were used to detect the phzCD, phz, and prnC genes according to protocols described in Raaijmakers et al. [24] and Hu et al. [25]. The hcnAB gene was detected as previously described [26]. The primers used in the experiment are listed in Table 1.

2.5. Antifungal Activity of VOCs of Strain ST–TJ4

The method using two sealed base plates was employed to test the antifungal activity of VOCs from strain ST–TJ4 [16]. One base plate contained 20 mL LB, and the other contained 20 mL PDA. The LB medium was coated with 100 μL of ST–TJ4 suspension, and a 0.6 cm-diameter plug of phytopathogenic fungi was placed in the center of PDA plates. Next, the two base plates were sealed with Parafilm and cultured in a fungal incubator for 5–7 d at 25 °C. Every experiment was repeated three times. The inhibition rate of each plant pathogenic fungus was calculated as inhibition rate (%) = (Cd – Td) × 100%/Cd, where Cd is the fungal colony diameter on the control PDA base plate, and Td is the fungal colony diameter on the treatment PDA base plate.

2.6. Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)

Volatile organic compounds from LB liquid medium inoculated with strain ST–TJ4 were analyzed using solid phase microextraction–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (SPME–GC–MS/MS) with a SPME fiber assembly (CAR/PDMS; Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA). The single colony was inserted into a 200 mL flask containing 50 mL liquid LB medium and fermented on a shaker at 180 rpm at 28 °C for 2 days. To prevent volatile organic compounds from escaping, the flask was sealed with tin foil. The LB liquid medium without inoculation of bacterium was used as the control.
In this experiment, the 65 µm Polydimethylsiloxane/Divinylbenzene (PDMS/DVB) fiber was selected for the determination of bacterial VOCs. The extraction head must be aged when it is used for the first time. In this experiment, the aging temperature of the extraction head was 250 °C, and the time was 30 min. The extraction fiber was put into the SPME holder, the SPME needle was inserted into the gasification chamber of gas chromatography, and the plunger was pressed to push the fiber out the fiber attachment tubing (needle) for aging. At the end of aging, the fiber was retracted into the fiber attachment tubing and then the SPME needle was pulled out. The cultured bacterial sample was shaken and put in a water bath at 40 °C for the volatilization of the gas. The needle of the aged SPME was inserted through the tin foil to press down the plunger to make the fiber protrude the tubing so that the fiber was exposed to the upper air of the bacterial fermentation broth to absorb and extract VOCs for 30 min, during which the flask was shaken by hand every five minutes, so that the gas can be more easily released from the liquid surface, but the shaking should be gentle to avoid the fermentation liquid contacting the fiber, contaminating the fiber and affecting the extraction effect. After the extraction, the fiber was quickly retracted and the needle was pulled out, and immediately inserted into the gasification chamber of gas chromatography (Agilent 7000B, Palo Alto, CA, USA), the fiber was pushed out, and the sample was analyzed at high temperature in the gasification chamber for 3 min, then the fiber was retracted to the stainless steel casing and pulled out for collecting next sample.
GC–MS settings: using Rtx–5 quartz capillary column, carrier gas was He; injector port temperature 230 °C; initial temperature was 40 °C, which was maintained for 3 min, heating up to 95 °C at 10 °C /min, then to 230 °C at 3 ℃/min , and 230 °C was maintained for 5 min; ion source—EI source; electron energy—70eV; spectrum retrieval carried out using Nist 05 and Nist 05s spectrum library.

2.7. Identification of Strain ST-TJ4

The colony morphology and physiological and biochemical characteristics were analyzed according to the Handbook of Common bacterial Identification. Molecular identification: CTAB method was used to extract and purify bacterial genomic DNA, and universal primers were 27F (5’–AGAGTTGATCATGGCTCAG–3’) and 1492R (5’–TACGGYTACCTTGTACGACTT–3’) to amplify 16S rRNA–encoding gene [23]. After PCR products were ligated and transformed, the positive clones were selected and sent to Jie Li Biotechnology Co., Ltd. for sequencing, and the sequence data of Blast and GenBank were compared and analyzed. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by screening and choosing the sequences of closely related species using MEGA 7.0 software [27].

2.8. Statistical Analysis

The data were performed by analysis of variance and Duncan multiple comparison with SPSS 21.0 software (IBM Inc., Armonk, NY, USA), and the standard errors of all mean values were calculated (p < 0.01). Graphs were drawn using GraphPad Prism 8.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Antagonistic Effects of Diffusible Substances Produced by ST–TJ4

Strain ST–TJ4 inhibited the mycelial growth of all fungal pathogens tested to different degrees. ST–TJ4 significantly inhibited the mycelial growth of B. berengeriana, F. graminearum, F. aesculi, F. oxysporum, Pe. versicolor, Ph. cinnamomi, P. ricinella and S. sapinea, but only weakly affected that of C. chrysosperma, Co. tropicale and R. solani (Figure 1; Table 2).

3.2. Siderophore and cell wall Degradation Enzyme Activities of ST–TJ4

To examine the antimicrobial substances produced by ST–TJ4, including cellulase, chitinase, protease, and glucanase, ST–TJ4 was inoculated on PDA plates containing cellulose, colloidal chitin, SMP, or β–glucan. After 3 days, an obvious hydrolysis zone appeared on the plates containing cellulose and SMP, but not on those containing chitin or β–glucan (Figure 2). These results indicated that ST–TJ4 has strong siderophores, cellulase, and proteolytic activities, but no chitinolytic or glucanolytic activities.

3.3. Detection of Antibiotic and HCN Encoding Genes in ST-TJ4

We tested strain ST–TJ4 for the presence of operons for the biosynthesis of the antibiotics, phenazine–1–carboxylic acid (PCA), phenazine (PHZ), pyrrolnitrin (PRN), and hydrogen cyanide (HCN) by PCR using specific primers. A fragment of the predicted size for each of these compounds was observed from the DNA of the reference Pseudomonas strains, which produces these compounds. Fragments of the predicted sizes for PCA (~1150 bp), PHZ (~1408 bp), PRN (~786 bp), and HCN (~570 bp) were amplified from strain ST–TJ4 DNA (Figure 3).

3.4. The Antifungal Spectrum of ST-TJ4 VOCs

The two–sealed–base–plates method was used to determine the antifungal spectrum of ST–TJ4 VOCs (Figure S1). Strain ST–TJ4 VOCs showed significant antifungal activities against 11 plant pathogenic fungi. Although the effects against Pe. versicolor, F. graminearum, and F. oxysporum were weak, the mycelial growth and pigment secretion of the other 8 pathogens were significantly inhibited by 40.4–91.4% (Figure 4; Table 2). Moreover, comparing the antagonistic effects of VOCs and diffusible substances, the inhibitory effect of VOCs on all pathogens exceeded those of diffusible substances, suggesting that volatile compounds predominate in biological control by ST–TJ4.

3.5. GC-MS/MS Analysis of VOCs Produced by ST–TJ4

Volatiles from strain ST–TJ4 were collected in a SPME syringe and analyzed with a GC–MS/MS system. The same volatiles in the LB medium and substances with relative contents less than 0.5% were filtered out. This revealed very clear separation between the control and strain ST–TJ4, as indicated in Figure 5. Five different VOCs emitted by strain ST–TJ4 were identified. The most abundant volatile produced by strain ST–TJ4 was 1–undecene, which had a large peak (75.97%) at a retention time (RT) of 8.65 minutes (Table 3). The other compounds were l–Ala–l–Ala–l–Ala (1.42%), octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (1.14%), 4-hydroxybenzoic acid (1.06%), and phosphonoacetic acid (0.54%).

3.6. Identification of Strain ST–TJ4

Colonies of ST–TJ4 on LB plates appeared thin, flat, orange, opaque, round with smooth edges, and approximately 1.2–3 mm in diameter (Figure 6A). The oxygen demand test showed that ST–TJ4 is an aerobic bacterium. It grows well outside the cover glass, but hardly grows under the cover glass (Figure 6B). Gram staining showed that ST–TJ4 is a Gram-negative bacterium (Figure 6C). Analysis of 16S rRNA–encoding gene sequence showed that strain ST–TJ4 formed a monophyletic group with Pseudomonas species, sharing 99% sequence similarity (Figure 7). Based on the morphological characteristics and phylogenetic analysis, strain ST-TJ4 was identified as Pseudomonas sp.

4. Discussion

It is an urgent problem to develop environment-friendly products instead of chemicals to control plant diseases [28]. Plant pathologists and microbiologists believe that the use of beneficial microorganisms and their metabolites in the future crop production practice is safe, reasonable and one of the most promising methods [29]. Therefore, we tried to isolate biocontrol bacteria with strong spectral antagonistic activities against plant pathogenic fungi. We found that strain ST–TJ4 had strong inhibitory effect on 11 pathogenic fungi and oomycetes from branches, leaves and roots of forest trees. This suggested that strain ST–TJ4 has a wide fungicide spectrum and could produce antifungals. Through morphological observation, physiological and biochemical experiments as well as molecular biological identification, the strain ST–TJ4 was identified as Pseudomonas sp.
Iron is one of the indispensable nutrients in all organisms. Although total iron is rich in the most soils, most iron exists either in chemical forms that cannot be used by microorganisms or imbedded deeply in mineral particles. Pathogens need to compete with other members of a microbial community for scarcely available iron before the host plant is infected. Therefore, iron acquisition is the basis of the complete virulence of many plant pathogens [30]. Many PGPR can produce siderophores that can specifically chelate Fe3+ under the condition of iron deficiency. Studies have shown that these siderophores can inhibit the growth of pathogens by depriving iron, so as to achieve the purpose of controlling plant diseases. Tortora et al. [31] have achieved good results in using catechol iron carriers produced by Azospirillum brasiliensis to control strawberry anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum cuspidatum. The siderophores produced by Pseudomonas clove BAF1 has a great effect on the spore germination and mycelial morphology of Fusarium oxysporum [32]. Strain ST–TJ4 was screened by siderophile production, and its strong chelating ability of Fe3+ is also expected to be one of the reasons for its inhibition of pathogen growth.
Biocontrol bacteria can inhibit the growth of other microorganisms by producing cell wall degrading enzymes and secondary metabolites. It is well known that fungal cell walls play an extremely important role in cell division, maintaining the normal growth of hyphae and coping with environmental stress [33,34]. Moreover, maintaining the integrity of fungal cell wall is the key to host infection [35]. The cell wall of true fungi is mainly composed of chitin, glucan and protein [36,37,38]. Once these components are destroyed, the mycelial morphology and biological function of fungi will be threatened. In this study, ST–TJ4 showed strong cellulase and protease hydrolysis activity and could degrade the cell wall of oomycetes.
Antibiotics produced by beneficial microorganisms have direct contact killing effect on pathogenic bacteria [39,40]. Therefore, antibiotics are not only one of the most studied mechanisms of biological control, but also a character to be considered when screening potential biocontrol agents (BCAs) [41,42]. Strain ST–TJ4 could change the color of the whole culture medium to orange after three days in LB culture, and the production of pigment suggested that the strain might produce metabolites. In order to test our hypothesis, we examined the antibiotic-related genes in ST–TJ4 with reference to the results of previous studies on Pseudomonas antibiotics. The PCR results suggested that ST–TJ4 contains genes for the biosynthesis of PCA and PRN. Phenazine type of antibiotics, such as PCA, are particularly active against oomycetes [43,44]. Park et al. [45] demonstrated that PRN produced by P. chlororaphis O6 plays a pivotal role in inhibiting Phytophthora infestans, which causes tomato late blight disease. In addition, genes related to the biosynthesis of HCN were also detected in strain ST–TJ4, and several recent studies reported that HCN may be involved in the effective control of wheat sheath blight by several Pseudomonas spp [46].
The volatile gas produced by biocontrol bacteria can inhibit the spore germination and mycelial growth of plant pathogens, and it has attracted wide attention [47]. Compared with non-volatile antimicrobial substances, volatile fungistatic substances have smaller molecules, are easier to permeate and spread in soil and atmosphere, and can kill pathogens in the environment more comprehensively [16]. Our study analyzed the VOCs produced by strain ST–TJ4 using SPME–GC–MS/MS and detected five compounds. Hunziker et al. [48] and Guevara-Avendaño et al. [49] reported that 1-undecene, which has strong antifungal activities, was the main active compound released by Pseudomonas fluorescens. Similarly, in our analysis, 1–undecene was the most abundant volatile in strain ST–TJ4. The antifungal activity of 1–undecene against R. solani AG–1(IA), which causes banded leaf and sheath blight (BLSB) of maize, has been reported [50]. The volatile methyl siloxane octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4) has been reported to have antibacterial and antifungal activities [51] and was found in the present study. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the emission of 1–undecene and octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane by Pseudomonas sp., which has a broad fungistatic spectrum.
Interestingly, the diffusible substances produced by ST–TJ4 showed weak antagonistic effects against C. chrysosperma, R. solani, and Co. tropicale, whereas its volatiles almost completely inhibited the growth of these three pathogenic fungi. Because we used LB medium to culture bacteria in the two–sealed–base–plates method, while strain ST–TJ4 was streaked onto PDA plates in the dual–culture experiment. It is possible that the inoculation strategy led to different antagonistic effects; that is, the inhibition rate of spreading small cells may not have been as great as that of the spread cells exposed to larger surfaces of the medium, which would allow the single cells to obtain more nutrients and facilitate their rapid reproduction [52]. The results of Valentina et al. [53]. support our speculation. Only when a variety of biocontrol mechanisms are combined and complement each other can microorganisms play the greatest role in biological control.
To conclude, our results suggest that Pseudomonas sp. ST–TJ4 is a good biocontrol agent candidate, although it is unclear how effective this antagonist would be under the field conditions. Diffusible and volatile compounds produced by ST–TJ4 have the potential to be used in agriculture and forestry as direct contact biofungicides and biofumigants.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/2076-2607/8/4/590/s1.

Author Contributions

W.-L.K. completed the data analysis and the first draft of the paper; W.-L.K. and P.-S.L. were the finishers of the experimental research; T.-Y.W. participated in the experimental result analysis; X.-R.S. directed the experimental design and result analysis; X.-Q.W. directed experimental design, data analysis, paper writing and revision. All authors have read and agree to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFD0600104) and the Priority Academic Program Development of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Acknowledgments

We thank Xiao-Liang Shan of Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry for taking soil samples from Tianjin. We are grateful to De-Wei Li of the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, USA for reviewing the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Berendsen, R.L.; Pieterse, C.M.J.; Bakker, P.A.H.M. The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 478–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Li, K. Antagonistic activity and mechanism of an isolated Streptomyces corchorusii stain AUH-1 against phytopathogenic fungi. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 35, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fletcher, J.; Bender, C.; Budowle, B. Plant pathogen forensics: Capabilities, needs, and recommendations. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2006, 70, 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Davies, J.E.; Peterson, J.C. Surveillance of occupational, accidental, and incidental exposure to organophosphate pesticides using urine alkyl phosphate and phenolic metabolite measurements. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1997, 837, 257–268. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, S.-L.; Yieh, T.-C.; Shih, I.-L. Production of antifungal compounds by Pseudomonas aeruginosa K-187 using shrimp and crab shell powder as a carbon source. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 1999, 25, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pieterse, C.M.J.; de Jonge, R.; Berendsen, R.L. The Soil-Borne Supremacy. Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 171–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sahni, S.; Sarma, B.K.; Singh, K.P. Management of Sclerotium rolfsii with integration of non-conventional chemicals, vermicompost and Pseudomonas syringae. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 24, 517–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, Y.; Wu, C.F.; Xing, Z.; Gao, B.L.; Zhang, L.Q. Engineering the bacterial endophyte Burkholderia pyrrocinia JK-SH007 for the control of lepidoptera larvae by introducing the cry218 genes of Bacillus thuringiensis. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2017, 31, 1167–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Fan, B.; Wang, C.; Song, X.F.; Ding, X.L.; Wu, L.M.; Wu, H.J.; Gao, X.W.; Borriss, R. Bacillus velezensis FZB42 in 2018: The gram-positive model strain for plant growth promotion and biocontrol. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Zhang, Y.; Li, T.; Liu, Y. Volatile organic compounds produced by Pseudomonas chlororaphis subsp. aureofaciens SPS-41 as biological fumigants to control Ceratocystis fimbriata in postharvest sweet potatoes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 3702–3710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, X.; Li, Q.; Sui, J. Isolation and characterization of antagonistic bacteria Paenibacillus jamilae HS-26 and their effects on plant growth. Biomed. Res. Int. 2019, 3638926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Frikha-Gargouri, O.; Ben Abdallah, D.; Ghorbel, I.; Charfeddine, I.; Jlaiel, L.; Triki, M.A.; Tounsi, S. Lipopeptides from a novel Bacillus methylotrophicus 39b strain suppress Agrobacterium crown gall tumours on tomato plants. Pest Manag. Sci. 2017, 73, 568–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Maindad, D.V.; Kasture, V.M.; Chaudhari, H.; Dhavale, D.D.; Chopade, B.A.; Sachdev, D.P. Characterization and fungal inhibition activity of siderophore from wheat rhizosphere associated Acinetobacter calcoaceticus strain HIRFA32. Indian J. Microbiol. 2014, 54, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Cordero, P.; Principe, A.; Jofre, E.; Mori, G.; Fischer, S. Inhibition of the phytopathogenic fungus Fusarium proliferatum by volatile compounds produced by Pseudomonas. Arch. Microbiol. 2014, 196, 803–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Velivelli, S.L.S.; Kromann, P.; Lojan, P. Identification of mVOCs from andean rhizobacteria and field evaluation of bacterial and mycorrhizal inoculants on growth of potato in its center of origin. Microb. Ecol. 2015, 69, 652–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gao, Z.; Zhang, B.; Liu, H.; Han, J.; Zhang, Y. Identification of endophytic Bacillus velezensis ZSY-1 strain and antifungal activity of its volatile compounds against Alternaria solani and Botrytis cinerea. Biol. Control. 2017, 105, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, H.; Liu, K.; Zhang, X. A two-component histidine kinase, MoSLN1, is required for cell wall integrity and pathogenicity of the rice blast fungus, Magnaporthe oryzae. Curr. Genet. 2010, 56, 517–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lim, S.M.; Yoon, M.; Choi, G.J. Diffusible and volatile antifungal compounds produced by an antagonistic Bacillus velezensis G341 against various phytopathogenic fungi. Plant Pathol. J. 2017, 33, 488–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Schwyn, B.; Neilands, J.B. Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Anal. Biochem. 1987, 160, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Han, J.; Shim, H.; Shin, J.; Kim, K.S. Antagonistic activities of Bacillus spp. strains isolated from Tidal Flat Sediment towards anthracnose pathogens Colletotrichum acutatum and C. gloeosporioides in South Korea. Plant Pathol. J. 2015, 31, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Suryadi, Y.; Susilowati, D.; Lestari, P.; Priyatno, T.; Samudra, I.; Hikmawati, N.; Mubarik, N. Characterization of bacterial isolates producing chitinase and glucanase for biocontrol of plant fungal pathogens. J. Agric. Technol. 2014, 10, 983–999. [Google Scholar]
  22. Huang, L.; Li, Q.; Hou, Y. Bacillus velezensis strain HYEB5-6 as a potential biocontrol agent against anthracnose on Euonymus japonicus. Biocontrol Sci Technol. 2017, 27, 636–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ausubel, F.M.; Brent, R.; Kingston, R.E.; Moore, D.D.; Seidman, J.G.; Smith, J.A.; Struhl, K. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  24. Raaijmakers, J.M.; Weller, D.M.; Thomashow, L.S. Frequency of antibiotic-producing Pseudomonas spp. in natural environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63, 881–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Hu, W.; Gao, Q.; Hamada, M.S. Potential of Pseudomonas chlororaphis subsp aurantiaca Strain Pcho10 as a biocontrol agent against Fusarium graminearum. Phytopathology 2014, 104, 1289–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Svercel, M.; Duffy, B.; Defago, G. PCR amplification of hydrogen cyanide biosynthetic locus hcnAB in Pseudomonas spp. J. Microbiol. Methods 2007, 70, 209–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Peterson, D.; Filipski, A.; Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 2725–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Roquigny, R.; Novinscak, A.; Arseneault, T.; Joly, D.L.; Filion, M. Transcriptome alteration in Phytophthora infestans in response to phenazine-1-carboxylic acid production by Pseudomonas fluorescens strain LBUM223. BMC Genomics 2018, 19, 474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ongena, M.; Jacques, P. Bacillus lipopeptides: Versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol. Trends Microbiol. 2008, 16, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kong, W.L.; Wu, X.Q.; Zhao, Y.J. Effects of Rahnella aquatilis JZ-GX1 on treat chlorosis induced by iron deficiency in Cinnamomum camphora. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tortora, M.L.; Díaz-Ricci, J.C.; Pedraza, R.O. Azospirillum brasilense siderophores with antifungal activity against Colletotrichum acutatum. Arch. Microbiol. 2011, 193, 275–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yu, S.; Teng, C.; Liang, J.; Song, T.; Dong, L.; Bai, X.; Jin, Y.; Qu, J. Characterization of siderophore produced by Pseudomonas syringae BAF.1 and its inhibitory effects on spore germination and mycelium morphology of Fusarium oxysporum. J. Microbiol. 2017, 55, 877–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Adams, D.J. Fungal cell wall chitinases and glucanases. Microbiol. SGM 2004, 150, 2029–2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Cabib, E.; Roh, D.H.; Schmidt, M.; Crotti, L.B.; Varma, A. The yeast cell wall and septum as paradigms of cell growth and morphogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 19679–19682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Jeon, J.; Goh, J.; Yoo, S. A putative MAP kinase, MCK1, is required for cell wall integrity and pathogenicity of the rice blast fungus, Magnaporthe oryzae. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2008, 21, 525–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Webster, J.; Weber, R. Introduction to Fungi, 3rd ed.; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  37. Lenardon, M.D.; Munro, C.A.; Gow, N.A.R. Chitin synthesis and fungal pathogenesis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2010, 13, 416–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Pareek, S.S.; Ravi, I.; Sharma, V. Induction of beta-1,3-glucanase and chitinase in Vigna aconitifolia inoculated with Macrophomina phaseolina. J. Plant Interact. 2014, 9, 434–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Rovera, M.; Pastor, N.; Niederhauser, M.; Rosas, S.B. Evaluation of Pseudomonas chlororaphis subsp aurantiaca SR1 for growth promotion of soybean and for control of Macrophomina phaseolina. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2014, 24, 1012–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, Y.; Wang, J.; Yang, N. Wheat microbiome bacteria can reduce virulence of a plant pathogenic fungus by altering histone acetylation. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Raio, A.; Puopolo, G.; Cimmino, A.; Danti, R.; Della Rocca, G.; Evidente, A. Biocontrol of cypress canker by the phenazine producer Pseudomonas chlororaphis subsp aureofaciens strain M71. Biol. Control. 2011, 58, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Filion, M.; Roquigny, R.; Novinscak, A.; Joly, D.L. Transcriptome alteration in Phytophthora infestans in response to phenazine-1-carboxylic acid production by Pseudomonas fluorescens LBUM223. Phytopathology 2018, 108S, 5–6. [Google Scholar]
  43. Fang, R.; Lin, J.; Yao, S. Promotion of plant growth, biological control and induced systemic resistance in maize by Pseudomonas aurantiaca JD37. Ann. Microbiol. 2013, 63, 1177–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sharma, P.K.; Munir, R.I.; Plouffe, J.; Shah, N.; de Kievit, T.; Levin, D.B. Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) polymer accumulation and pha gene expression in phenazine (phz(-)) and pyrrolnitrin (prn(-)) defective mutants of Pseudomonas chlororaphis PA23. Polymers 2018, 10, 1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Park, J.Y.; Oh, S.A.; Anderson, A.J.; Neiswender, J.; Kim, J.C.; Kim, Y.C. Production of the antifungal compounds phenazine and pyrrolnitrin from Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6 is differentially regulated by glucose. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2011, 52, 532–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Jiao, Z.; Wu, N.; Hale, L.; Wu, W.; Wu, D.; Guo, Y. Characterisation of Pseudomonas chlororaphis subsp aurantiaca strain Pa40 with the ability to control wheat sharp eyespot disease. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2013, 163, 444–453. [Google Scholar]
  47. Gong, A.; Dong, F.; Hu, M. Antifungal activity of volatile emitted from Enterobacter asburiae Vt-7 against Aspergillus flavus and aflatoxins in peanuts during storage. Food Control 2019, 106, 106718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hunziker, L.; Boenisch, D.; Groenhagen, U.; Bailly, A.; Schulz, S.; Weisskopf, L. Pseudomonas Strains naturally associated with potato plants produce volatiles with high potential for inhibition of Phytophthora infestans. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2015, 81, 821–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Guevara-Avendano, E.; Adriana Bejarano-Bolivar, A.; Kiel-Martinez, A. Avocado rhizobacteria emit volatile organic compounds with antifungal activity against Fusarium solani, Fusarium sp. associated with Kuroshio shot hole borer, and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Microbiol. Res. 2019, 219, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tagele, S.B.; Lee, H.G.; Kim, S.W.; Lee, Y.S. Phenazine and 1-Undecene producing Pseudomonas chlororaphis subsp. aurantiaca Strain KNU17Pc1 for growth promotion and disease suppression in Korean maize cultivars. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 29, 66–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Lin, Y.; Liu, Q.; Cheng, L.; Lei, Y.; Zhang, A. Synthesis and antimicrobial activities of polysiloxane-containing quaternary ammonium salts on bacteria and phytopathogenic fungi. React. Funct. Polym. 2014, 85, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rajer, F.U.; Wu, H.; Xie, Y.; Xie, S.; Raza, W.; Tahir HA, S.; Gao, X. Volatile organic compounds produced by a soil-isolate, Bacillus subtilis FA26 induce adverse ultra-structural changes to the cells of Clavibacter michiganensis ssp. sepedonicus the causal agent of bacterial ring rot of potato. Microbiology 2017, 163, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lazazzara, V.; Perazzolli, M.; Pertot, I.; Biasioli, F.; Puopolo, G.; Cappellin, L. Growth media affect the volatilome and antimicrobial activity against Phytophthora infestans in four Lysobacter type strains. Microbiol. Res. 2017, 201, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Microorganisms 08 00590 g001 550
Figure 1. In vitro antifungal activity of ST-TJ4 against 11 phytopathogenic fungi in dual-culture assays. (A) Pestalotiopsis versicolor; (B) Cytospora chrysosperma; (C) Rhizoctonia solani; (D) Fusarium graminearum; (E) Phomopsis ricinella; (F) Botryosphaeria berengeriana; (G) Fusicoccus aesculin; (H) Colletotrichum tropicale; (I) Sphaeropsis sapinea; (J) Fusarium oxysporum and (K) Phomopsis ricinella.
Figure 1. In vitro antifungal activity of ST-TJ4 against 11 phytopathogenic fungi in dual-culture assays. (A) Pestalotiopsis versicolor; (B) Cytospora chrysosperma; (C) Rhizoctonia solani; (D) Fusarium graminearum; (E) Phomopsis ricinella; (F) Botryosphaeria berengeriana; (G) Fusicoccus aesculin; (H) Colletotrichum tropicale; (I) Sphaeropsis sapinea; (J) Fusarium oxysporum and (K) Phomopsis ricinella.
Microorganisms 08 00590 g001
Microorganisms 08 00590 g002 550
Figure 2. Fungal cell-wall-degrading enzymes produced by ST-TJ4 cells. (A) Siderophores on CAS plates; (B) cellulase activity on carboxyl methyl cellulose (CMC) plates; (C) protease activity on SMP plates; (D) chitinase activity on colloidal chitin agar plates and (E) glucanase activity on Pachyman solid medium supplemented with 6% aniline blue.
Figure 2. Fungal cell-wall-degrading enzymes produced by ST-TJ4 cells. (A) Siderophores on CAS plates; (B) cellulase activity on carboxyl methyl cellulose (CMC) plates; (C) protease activity on SMP plates; (D) chitinase activity on colloidal chitin agar plates and (E) glucanase activity on Pachyman solid medium supplemented with 6% aniline blue.
Microorganisms 08 00590 g002
Microorganisms 08 00590 g003 550
Figure 3. Detection of antibiotic genes in ST–TJ4 by PCR amplification (lane M, DNA marker; 1, PCA; 2, PHZ; 3, PRN; 4, PM).
Figure 3. Detection of antibiotic genes in ST–TJ4 by PCR amplification (lane M, DNA marker; 1, PCA; 2, PHZ; 3, PRN; 4, PM).
Microorganisms 08 00590 g003
Microorganisms 08 00590 g004 550
Figure 4. The antifungal spectrum of strain ST–TJ4 VOCs. Plate on the right treated with VOCs, plate on the left untreated. (A) Pestalotiopsis versicolor; (B) Rhizoctonia solani; (C) Fusicoccus aesculi; (D) Cytospora chrysosperma; (E) Fusarium graminearum; (F) Colletotrichum tropicale; (G) Phomopsis ricinella; (H) Botryosphaeria berengeriana; (I) Sphaeropsis sapinea; (J) Fusarium oxysporum and (K) Phytophthora cinnamomi.
Figure 4. The antifungal spectrum of strain ST–TJ4 VOCs. Plate on the right treated with VOCs, plate on the left untreated. (A) Pestalotiopsis versicolor; (B) Rhizoctonia solani; (C) Fusicoccus aesculi; (D) Cytospora chrysosperma; (E) Fusarium graminearum; (F) Colletotrichum tropicale; (G) Phomopsis ricinella; (H) Botryosphaeria berengeriana; (I) Sphaeropsis sapinea; (J) Fusarium oxysporum and (K) Phytophthora cinnamomi.
Microorganisms 08 00590 g004
Microorganisms 08 00590 g005 550
Figure 5. Chromatographic profiles of the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) of (A) strain ST–TJ4 incubated for 48 h in LB medium and (B) uninoculated LB medium.
Figure 5. Chromatographic profiles of the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) of (A) strain ST–TJ4 incubated for 48 h in LB medium and (B) uninoculated LB medium.
Microorganisms 08 00590 g005
Microorganisms 08 00590 g006 550
Figure 6. Morphological identification: colony morphology (A), oxygen demand test results (B), and Gram staining (C) of Pseudomonas sp. ST–TJ4.
Figure 6. Morphological identification: colony morphology (A), oxygen demand test results (B), and Gram staining (C) of Pseudomonas sp. ST–TJ4.
Microorganisms 08 00590 g006
Microorganisms 08 00590 g007 550
Figure 7. Phylogenetic tree derived from the 16S rRNA-encoding gene sequences of strain ST–TJ4 and related taxa of Pseudomonas. The tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method using MEGA 7.0. The bootstrap test was conducted with 1000 replicates. Bootstrap values >50% were indicated at the nodes. The scale bar represents substitutions per nucleotide position.
Figure 7. Phylogenetic tree derived from the 16S rRNA-encoding gene sequences of strain ST–TJ4 and related taxa of Pseudomonas. The tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method using MEGA 7.0. The bootstrap test was conducted with 1000 replicates. Bootstrap values >50% were indicated at the nodes. The scale bar represents substitutions per nucleotide position.
Microorganisms 08 00590 g007
Table
Table 1. Oligonucleotide primers used in this study.
Table 1. Oligonucleotide primers used in this study.
PrimerSequenceTargetAntibiotic or Related PathwaysSize
(bp)
pca2aTTGCCAAGCCTCGCTCCAACphzCD1-Phenazinecarboxylic acid1150
pca3bCCGCGTTGTTCCTCGTTCAT
PHZ1GGCGACATGGTCAACGGphzPhenazine biosynthesis1408
PHZ2CGGCTGGCGGCGTATTC
PRNCFCCACAAGCCCGGCCAGGAGCprnCPyrrolnitrin786
PRNCRGAGAAGAGCGGGTCGATGAAGCC
PM1TGCGGCATGGGCGTGTGCCATTGCTGCCTGGhcnABHydrogen cyanide570
PM2CCGCTCTTGATCTGCAATTGCAGGCC
Table
Table 2. Mycelia growth of phytopathogenic fungi inhibited by strain ST-TJ4.
Table 2. Mycelia growth of phytopathogenic fungi inhibited by strain ST-TJ4.
Target PathogensPercent Inhibition (%)Mean ± SE
DiffusibleVolatile
Botryosphaeria berengeriana53.49 ± 4.8 cd73.76 ± 1.7 bcd
Colletotrichum tropicale21.46 ± 2.0 a86.25 ± 5.1 cd
Cytospora chrysosperma23.18 ± 6.9 ab82.79 ± 0.5 cd
Fusarium graminearum28.04 ± 8.4 ab55.62 ± 7.1 ab
Fusarium oxysporum41.11 ± 5.3 bcd40.4 ± 5.5 a
Fusicoccus aesculi35.98 ± 9.9 abc72.95 ± 13.38 bcd
Pestalotiopsis versicolor49.00 ± 4.9 cd62.31 ± 15.6 abc
Phomopsis ricinella59.91 ± 3.9 d73.03 ± 7.4 bcd
Phytophthora cinnamomi50.58 ± 5.2 cd91.35 ± 1.1 d
Rhizoctonia solani19.87 ± 4.4 a90.63 ± 0.4 d
Sphaeropsis sapinea56.73 ± 2.6 d71.97 ± 3.6 bcd
In the same row data followed by the different, same, and overlapping lower-case letters means significantly different, and no significantly different of their overlapping to Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.01. Each result presents the mean ± standard derivation from three replicates.
Table
Table 3. GC-MS/MS volatile profile of strain ST-TJ4.
Table 3. GC-MS/MS volatile profile of strain ST-TJ4.
Retention Time (min)Relative Peak Area (%)CAS#Compound
2.041.425874-90-8l-Ala-l-Ala-l-Ala
6.851.14541-05-9octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane
8.6575.97821-95-41-undecene
8.951.062078-13-94-hydroxybenzoic acid
12.040.5453044-27-2phosphonoacetic acid

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kong, W.-L.; Li, P.-S.; Wu, X.-Q.; Wu, T.-Y.; Sun, X.-R. Forest Tree Associated Bacterial Diffusible and Volatile Organic Compounds against Various Phytopathogenic Fungi. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 590. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms8040590

AMA Style

Kong W-L, Li P-S, Wu X-Q, Wu T-Y, Sun X-R. Forest Tree Associated Bacterial Diffusible and Volatile Organic Compounds against Various Phytopathogenic Fungi. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(4):590. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms8040590

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kong, Wei-Liang, Pu-Sheng Li, Xiao-Qin Wu, Tian-Yu Wu, and Xiao-Rui Sun. 2020. "Forest Tree Associated Bacterial Diffusible and Volatile Organic Compounds against Various Phytopathogenic Fungi" Microorganisms 8, no. 4: 590. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms8040590

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop