Next Article in Journal
Haloferax profundi sp. nov. and Haloferax marisrubri sp. nov., Isolated from the Discovery Deep Brine-Seawater Interface in the Red Sea
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Different Stress Parameters on Growth and on Oleuropein-Degrading Abilities of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Strains Selected as Tailored Starter Cultures for Naturally Table Olives
Previous Article in Journal
To B or Not to B: Mechanisms of Protection Conferred by rVSV-EBOV-GP and the Roles of Innate and Adaptive Immunity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ultrasonic Modulation of the Technological and Functional Properties of Yeast Strains
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 8
Issue 10
10.3390/microorganisms8101474
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploring Beneficial Properties of the Bacteriocinogenic Enterococcus faecium ST10Bz Strain Isolated from Boza, a Bulgarian Cereal-Based Beverage

by
Samantha Joy D. Valledor
,
Jorge Enrique Vazquez Bucheli
,
Wilhelm H. Holzapfel
and
Svetoslav Dimitrov Todorov
*
ProBacLab, Advanced Green Energy and Environment Institute (AGEE), Handong Global University, Pohang, Gyeongbuk 791-708, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2020, 8(10), 1474; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms8101474
Submission received: 9 September 2020 / Revised: 22 September 2020 / Accepted: 22 September 2020 / Published: 25 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbial Populations of Fermented Foods)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The bacteriocin-producing strain Enterococcus faecium ST10Bz, isolated from boza, a Bulgarian cereal-based beverage, exhibited strong activity against Listeria strains, vancomycin-resistant and other Enterococcus strains, but not against most of the other lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains included in the test panel. Bacteriocin ST10Bz was proven as a stable antimicrobial, even after exposure to various environmental conditions, including varying pH values, temperatures, and commonly used chemicals in industry and laboratory practice. Bacteriocin activity against L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ was recorded at 25,600 AU/mL when the producer strain was cultured in MRS broth at 25 °C and 30 °C, and 19,200 AU/mL, when cultured at 37 °C. Additionally, bacteriocin ST10Bz exhibited bactericidal mode of action when added to actively growing cultures of L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ and Enterococcus faecalis 200A. E. faecium ST10Bz was susceptible to the antibiotics kanamycin, gentamycin, ampicillin, streptomycin, tylosin, chloramphenicol, clindamycin, tetracycline, and vancomycin; with no evidence for vanA, B, C, D, E, or G genes. PCR analysis of DNA from strain ST10Bz generated positive results for presence of some bacterial adhesion genes, including map, mub and ef-tu, as well as the gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) production-related gene, gad. Under simulated gastrointestinal conditions in single and co-culture with L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ and E. faecalis 200A, E. faecium ST10Bz showed a high survival rate and the ability to reduce the viable numbers of the two test strains.

1. Introduction

Several species belonging to the group of Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) [1], having different biotechnological applications such as in the food and feed fermentation processes, and can produce metabolites of commercial importance, including organic acids, antimicrobial and aromatic compounds, exopolysaccharides, vitamins, and bio-active peptides, that may contribute to the sensory, nutritional and safety properties of fermented food products [2]. Moreover, lactic acid, hydrogen peroxide, diacetyl, and bacteriocins are the most studied antimicrobials produced by different LAB strains [3]. Microbial metabolites, including the bioactive compounds produced during fermentation processes, as well as cell structures, are collectively termed as postbiotics [4]. These comprise all the non-viable structures and components of microbial cells. Antibiotics, described as of low-molecular weight and mostly non-proteinaceous, are among the most popular antimicrobial metabolites produced by microorganisms. These antimicrobial compounds were even used as growth promoters in animal farming, However, were eventually banned in several countries, as these were considered to selectively promote antibiotic resistance of bacterial populations [5]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the emergence and spread of resistance has worsened by allowing antibiotics to be bought over the counter [6]. Moreover, the lack of urgency in addressing this problem may lead to a post-antibiotic era where common microbial infections may become highly problematic, probably like the time before the discovery of antibiotics.
Taking into consideration the increasing concerns related to antibiotic resistance, the search for alternatives to antibiotics has become a prioritized trend in the scientific community. Antimicrobial peptides produced by different bacterial cultures, known as bacteriocins, became popular even before the term postbiotics was coined [7]. These antimicrobial peptides are characterized by either broad or narrow spectra of activity, making the exploration of this field considerable as the next frontier in combating pathogens [8]. Generally, bacteriocins are biologically active, small, ribosomally-synthesized polypeptides with a bactericidal mode of action and are mostly active against species closely related to the producer strain [9,10]. Aside from being potential alternatives to antibiotics, bacteriocins are already used as bio-preservative agents in food and feed industries, being significantly potent against other detrimental bacteria, including various pathogenic and even some antibiotic-resistant strains [10]. In most cases, the antimicrobial modes of action of bacteriocins are related to specific cell surface receptor recognition, and thus resistance to these polypeptides is not easily generated when compared with antibiotics [11].
In the medical field, listeriosis is a relatively rare but highly dangerous food-borne infection caused by Listeria monocytogenes [12]. Different countries, specifically in the European Union and the USA, maintain zero-tolerance for L. monocytogenes in ready-to-eat food, especially on dairy products [13]. Infection with L. monocytogenes is considered high risk for specific population groups, in particular for pregnant women, elderly, and immunocompromised individuals. Such infections may be established in the form of neuro-meningeal (meningitis or encephalitis) and maternal-neonatal (intrauterine infection, or spontaneous abortion) conditions; this could also include febrile gastroenteritis and may even lead to brain infection, sepsis, and death [9]. Moreover, pets may also harbor, get infected, and spread listeriosis [14,15].
On the other hand, several species in the genus Enterococcus, considered as commensals in the gastrointestinal tracts of animals and humans, are widely distributed in foods, soil, water, and plants [16], while some strains have been commercialized as safe probiotics [17]. However, some Enterococcus strains (mainly belonging to the species E. faecalis and E. faecium) have also been recognized as clinically significant pathogens in human and veterinary medicine. In addition, nosocomial enterococcal infections and the emergence of the multi-drug resistant strains, such as vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VREs), have become a rapidly emerging health issue. Specifically, VREs may obtain selective advantage over other organisms in an antibiotic-exposed environment, and eventually may transfer virulence genes to other microorganisms, particularly to pathogenic microorganisms [18].
Emergence of listerial and enterococcal infections, along with the incapacity of antibiotics to combat these infections, has prompted the scientific community to find alternative ways to combat these and related infections. Utilization of beneficial microorganisms and their metabolites against these pathogens is considered as a viable alternative for potential therapeutic treatment of these infections. In this study, isolation of antimicrobial metabolite-producing bacteria with strong activity against strains of Listeria and Enterococcus, including characterization of the produced antimicrobial/s and investigations on the potential safety and other beneficial properties of the isolated strains were performed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Isolation of Bacteriocinogenic Strains and their Inhibitory Activity

Isolation of antimicrobial-producing LAB from the Bulgarian cereal-based beverage, boza, was performed by a triple layer method according to dos Santos et al. [19]. Product samples were obtained from a medium scale producer in the region of Belogradchik, in the North-West of Bulgaria. Boza samples were serially diluted on 1X PBS (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland). Dilutions were spread plated on de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) agar (Becton, Dickinson and Company—BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), overlaid with 1% agar (m/v) (LPS Solution, Daejeon, South Korea), and incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 48 h. Plates containing distinguishable colonies were chosen and covered with Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) (BD) supplemented with 1% agar, inoculated with the test strains, L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ and E. faecalis 200A (HEM Inc., Pohang, South Korea), respectively, to a final concentration of 105 CFU/mL, and incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 24 h. Colonies with inhibition zones against the test strains were selected and sub-cultured in MRS broth at 37 °C for 24 h.
Based on the description of dos Santos et al. [19], the isolated strains were evaluated based on their ability to produce bacteriocins against the mentioned two test strains (L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ and E. faecalis 200A). Briefly, cell free supernatants (CFS) from overnight cultures of the selected isolates were obtained after centrifugation (10,000× g, 5 min, 20 °C). The CFSs were heat treated at 80 °C for 10 min to inactivate the possibly produced proteolytic enzymes and hydrogen peroxide. The heat-treated CFSs were tested against L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ and E. faecalis 200A by the agar spot test. All isolates of interest were evaluated, based on standard morphological, biochemical, and physiological tests as recommended in Bergey’s Manual [20], including Gram-staining, catalase test and production of CO2 from glucose.
Confirmation of the bacteriocinogenic nature of isolated strains was done as described by dos Santos et al. [19] with modifications. Heat-treated CFS at 80 °C for 10 min was prepared as described. Resulting CFS’s were filtrated using Minisart® 0.22 µm syringe filter (Sartorius AG, Goettingen, Germany). The bacteriocin activity titer was determined by serial two-fold dilutions of treated CFS with 0.1 M phosphate buffer (KH2PO4/K2HPO4; pH 6.5), evaluated against L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ and E. faecalis 200A by the agar spot test. The active units of bacteriocins were expressed as arbitrary units per milliliter (AU/mL), calculated as: AU/mL = (Dn × 1000)/p, where D is the type of dilution (two-fold), n is the first dilution with no inhibition zone, p is the volume of the CFS spotted in μL, and 1000 is the conversion factor between μL and mL.
The proteinaceous nature of the investigated antimicrobial/s was confirmed as described by dos Santos et al. [19] with addition of proteolytic enzymes comprising 100 μL/mL of Proteinase K (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and 0.1 mg/mL of pepsin and α-chymotrypsin, respectively (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) to the CFS. Incubation was at 37 °C for 1 h followed by heat treatment at 98 °C for 5 min to denature the added proteolytic enzymes. Antimicrobial activity was determined against L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ and E. faecalis 200A as described above. Original CFS, not treated with the enzymes, served as control.

2.2. Selection and Identification of Bacterial Isolates

Bacterial isolates exhibiting bacteriocinogenic potential were grown in MRS broth at 37 °C for 24 h. The total DNA was extracted using ZR Fungal/Bacterial DNA Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s manual. Concentrations of the extracted DNA were determined using nanodrop (Spectrostarnano, Ortenberg, Germany) and were subsequentially subjected to DNA fingerprinting by rep-PCR and RAPD-PCR on a Veriti™ 96-well thermal cycler (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Differentiation between the studied isolates was performed by rep-PCR (5′-(GTG)5 -3′) and RAPD-PCR (OPL-01: 5′-GGC ATG ACC T-3′; OPL-03: 5′-CCA GCA GCT T-3′; OPL-09: 5′-TGC GAG AGT C-3′; OPL-11: 5′-ACG ATG AGC C-3′) (all primers obtained from Macrogen Co., Ltd., Daejeon, Korea) following the conditions recommended by de Moraes et al. [21]. The obtained amplicons were separated via gel electrophoresis (GH-200 Genera Biosystems, Victoria, Australia; Elite 300 Plus Power Supply, Wealtec Bioscience Co., Ltd., Taiwan) and visualized using Omega Lum™ G gel documenter (Aplegen, Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA). The strain selected for future study was identified using 16S rRNA sequencing performed by Solgent Co., Ltd. (Daejeon, South Korea) as a commercial service.

2.3. Detection of Known Bacteriocin Genes in the Genome of the Studied Strain

The selected strain was investigated for the presence of already known bacteriocin genes using the primers related to enterocin A (EntA/F: 5′-GAG ATT TAT CTC CAT AAT CT-3′; EntA/R: 5′-GTA CCA CTC ATA GTG GAA-3′), Enterocin B (EntB/F: 5′-GAA AAT GAT CAC AGA ATG CCT A-3′; EntB/R: 5′-GTT GCA TTT AGA GTA TAC ATT TG-3′), enterocin P (EntP/F: 5′-ATG AGA AAA TTA TTT AGT TT-3′; EntP/R: 5′-TTA ATG TCC CAT ACC TGC CAA ACC-3′), enterocin L50B (EntL50B/F: 5′-ATG GGA GCA ATC GCA AAA TTA-3′; EntL50B/R: 5′-TAG CCA TTT TTC AAT TTG ATC-3′), nisin Q (nis/F: 5′-ATG AGT ACA AAA GAT TTCAAC TT-3′; nis/R: 5′-TTA TTT GCT TAC GTG AAC GC-3′) and pediocin PA1 (Pedpro/F: 5′-CAA GAT CGT TAA CCA GTT T-3′; Ped1041/R: 5′-CCG TTG TTC CCA TAG TCT AA-3′) according to Aymerich et al. [22], Du Toit et al. [23], Gutierrez et al. [24] and Todorov et al. [25]. Reactions were performed, profiled, and visualized as described above [23,24]. For verification of the identity of amplified genes, the generated amplicons were purified using QIAquick® PCR purification kit (Qiagen) and were submitted for sequencing to Macrogen Co., Ltd., as a commercial service. The sequences were compared and identified using BLAST (GenBank, National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD, USA).

2.4. Evaluation of Bacteriocin Production

2.4.1. Growth Production Experiment

The dynamics of bacterial growth, bacteriocin production and acidification of the cultural environment were observed by growing the strain at 37 °C in MRS broth for 24 h. Bacterial growth was determined by changes in the Optical Density (OD) measured at 600 nm in a spectrophotometer (Spectrostarnano), simultaneously with recording changes in the pH every hour using pHspear (Oakton Instruments, IL, USA), and bacteriocin production was evaluated against L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ and E. faecalis 200A every 3 h by titration, as mentioned above.

2.4.2. Stability of Antimicrobial Peptides

CFSs were exposed to a variety of environmental conditions, including different temperatures, pH values, and presence of selected chemicals, in order to evaluate the stability of the antimicrobial/s present. The methods described by dos Santos et al. [19] were applied. For the evaluation of the effect of temperature on the stability of antimicrobial peptide/s produced by the studied strain, its CFS was incubated at 5.4, 30, 37, 80, and 100 °C, for 1 and 2 h, as well as with autoclaving at 121 °C for 15 min. In a separate experiment, the effect of different pH-values was determined following adjustment of the CFS to pH 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, and 10.0 (with 1M NaOH or 1M HCl). Lastly, for evaluation of the effect of selected chemical exposure on the stability of antimicrobial/s, CFS was respectively supplemented with 10 mg/mL sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) (Junsei Chemical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), sodium chloride (NaCl) (Daejung Chemicals, Siheung, South Korea), Tween 20 (Daejung), Tween 80 (Duksan Company, Gyeonggi, South Korea), skim milk (BD), and glycerol (Junsei). All the preparations for pH and chemical experiments were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. After incubation, pH-values were corrected back to neutral (5.5–6.5), and the total antimicrobial activity evaluated using L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ and E. faecalis 200A as indicator strains as described above. Original, non-treated CFS served as control.
In addition to the previously described characteristics of the bacteriocin/s, the stability of the antimicrobial protein/s stored at −20 °C was evaluated over time. Briefly, CFS of E. faecium ST10Bz was obtained as described above and stored at −20 °C. After preparation, its antimicrobial activity against L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ was periodically evaluated over 11 months as described.

2.4.3. Optimization of Culture Condition for Bacteriocin Production

Bacteriocin production is dependent on the conditions of the culture medium. The optimal commercial medium for bacteriocin production was determined by growing the strain on different culture media, including MRS, BHI, BL (MBcell), Luria-Bertani (LB) (BD), M17 (BD) with 0.5% glucose, and 5% and 10% Skim Milk (BD) for 24 h at 37 °C. Subsequently, optimal production temperature, pH, and medium composition were evaluated. For the optimal incubation temperature, the bacteriocinogenic strain was grown in MRS broth at 25 °C, 30 °C, and 37 °C. For optimal pH of the culture medium, the strain was grown in MRS broth adjusted to pH 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, and 10.0 respectively (using either 1M NaOH or 1M HCl). For the optimal medium composition, the strain was grown in 19 differently designed variations of MRS broth, as listed in Table S1. All the cultures were incubated at 37 °C for 18 h, except for the setups for optimal incubation temperature. CFSs were prepared as described above, with the exception of skim milk cultures, centrifuged for 15 min. The varying pH values of the culture supernatants were adjusted to neutral (5.5–6.5). Lastly, all the CFSs were heat treated at 80 °C for 10 min. The activity of the produced bacteriocin against L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ was determined and expressed as AU/mL as described above.

2.4.4. Bacteriocin Mode of Action

The effect of the studied bacteriocin/s on the actively growing cultures of L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ and E. faecalis 200A was determined according to Favaro et al. [26]. For the purpose of the experiment, 50 mL BHI broth was inoculated with 1% (v/v) cultures of L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ or E. faecalis 200A and incubated at 37 °C. Changes in turbidity were monitored by spectrophotometer (Spectrostarnano) at OD600 nm and recorded every hour for 12 h. 20% filter-sterilized (0.22 μm, Sartorius AG) CFS was added to the cultures of E. faecalis 200A and L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ in the beginning of the exponential growing phase, specifically after 3 and 5 h from inoculation, respectively. Experimental controls represented the growth of L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ and E. faecalis 200A without the addition of CFS of the bacteriocinogenic strain.

2.4.5. Adsorption of Bacteriocin to Listeria monocytogenes ATCC®15313™

The initiation of interaction between bacteriocin and target cells was assessed as described by Todorov et al. [27]. Adsorption of bacteriocin to the test organisms was observed with varying external factors, including temperature, pH and presence of selected chemicals. Cells from an 18 h culture of L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ were obtained by centrifugation (10,000× g, 10 min, 20 °C) and were resuspended with the original volume in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (KH2PO4/K2HPO4; pH 6.5) for varying temperature and chemical tests, and in saline solution (0.85%, w/v NaCl) for the varying pH test. CFS of the evaluated bacteriocinogenic strain (6400 AU/mL) and suspension of L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ were mixed at a 1:1 proportion. For the evaluation of the effect of temperature on the adsorption of bacteriocin to the surface of L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™, mixtures (L. monocytogenes ATCC® 15313™ cell suspension with CFS) were incubated at 5.4, 27, 30, 37, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100 °C, respectively. For testing the effect of pH, mixtures were adjusted to pH values of 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, and 10.0. For the evaluation of the effect of different chemicals, 1% (w/v) of NaCl, K2HPO4, KH2PO4 (Daejung), MgCl2 (Junsei), SDS, β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich), and 80% ethanol (Merck, Kenilworth, NJ, USA) were added to the mixtures. All preparations for experiments on the effect of pH and chemicals were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. After exposure to different conditions, CFS was obtained by centrifugation (100,000× g, 5 min, 20°C), and the obtained supernatants were corrected to neutral pH (5.5–6.5; for the pH experimental setups), and all heat treated at 80 °C for 10 min. Activity of the remaining bacteriocin in the supernatant was evaluated in a similar manner, as described above. The percentage adsorption of bacteriocin to L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ was calculated using the formula: % adsorption = 100 – ((bacteriocin activity after treatment in AU/mL/bacteriocin activity before treatment in AU/mL) × 100).

2.4.6. Spectrum of Activity

In addition to L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313 and E. faecalis 200A, different strains from the culture collection of Handong Global University (Pohang, South Korea), HEM Inc., KCTC (Jeongeup, South Korea), KACC (Jeollabuk-do, South Korea) and ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA) were used as indicators for evaluation of bacteriocin activity. Growth origin and growth conditions for evaluated microorganisms in the determination of spectrum of activity are specified in Table S2. Evaluation of the activity of the bacteriocin against the mentioned pool of strains was performed as described above.

2.5. Safety Tests and Detection of Additional Beneficial Properties

2.5.1. Antibiotic Susceptibility Test

The antibiotic susceptibility test for E. faecium ST10Bz was performed using the agar diffusion method according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI; www.clsi.org) as suggested by Arellano et al. [28]. Two-fold serial dilutions of the antibiotics ampicillin, gentamycin, kanamycin, vancomycin, erythromycin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, clindamycin, streptomycin, and tylosin were mixed on Mueller-Hinton Agar (MBcell). Ten μL of the cell suspensions from the overnight cultures of E. faecium ST10Bz and a quality control (QC) strain, E. faecalis ATCC®29212™ (approximately 107 CFU/mL), were spot plated on the antibiotic test plates and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of each antibiotic was compared to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) breakpoint for E. faecium [29], while ranges of MIC for the QC strain, E. faecalis ATCC®29212™, were based on the CLSI manual [30] as listed in Table 1.
As additional antibiotic safety assessment the evaluated strain was tested for the presence of vancomycin resistance genes: vanA (VanAB/F: 5′-GTA GGC TGC GAT ATT CAA AGC-3′; VanA/R: 5′-CGA TTC AAT TGC GTA GTC CAA-3′), van B (VanAB/F: 5′-GTA GGC TGC GAT ATT CAA AGC-3′; VanB/R: 5′-GCC GAC AAT CAA ATC CTC-3′) [31], van C (VanC/F: 5′ – ATC CAA GCT ATT GAC CCG CT-3′; VanC/R: 5′-TGT GGC AGG ATC GTT TTC AT-3′) [32], van D (VanD/F: 5′-TGT GGG ATG CGA TAT TCA A-3′; VanD/R: 5′-TGC AGC CAA GTA TCC GGT AA-3′) [33], van E (VanE/F: 5′-TGT GGT ATC GGA GCT GCA G-3′; VanE/R: 5′-GTC GAT TCT CGC TAA TCC-3′) [34], and van G (VanG/F: 5′-GAA GAT GGT ACT TTG CAG GGC A-3′; VanG/R: 5′-AGC CGC TTC TTG TAT CCG TTT T-3′) [35]. Reactions were performed, profiled, and visualized as described above [31,32,33,34,35]. For verification of the identity of amplified genes, the generated amplicons were purified using QIAquick ® PCR purification kit (Qiagen) and submitted for sequencing to Macrogen Co., Ltd. as a commercial service. The sequences were compared and identified using BLAST (GenBank).

2.5.2. Hemolysis Test

The ability of the bacteriocinogenic strain E. faecium ST10Bz to lyse blood was assessed as described by Arellano et al. [28]. Briefly, overnight cultures of E. faecium ST10Bz and Bacillus cereus ATCC®27348™ (positive control for β-hemolysis) were streak plated on agar supplemented with 5% defibrinated sheep blood (Synergy Innovation Co. Ltd., Seongnam-si, South Korea). After incubation at 37 °C for 24 h, the hemolytic activity of each isolate was assessed and classified as total or β-hemolysis (clear halos around the colonies), partial or α-hemolysis (greenish halos around the colonies), or γ-hemolysis (absence of hemolysis) [28].

2.5.3. Biogenic Amine Production Test

Evaluation of E. faecium ST10Bz for production of biogenic amines (BA) was assayed as described by Arellano et al. [28]. E. faecium ST10Bz and Escherichia coli ATCC®25922™ (positive control) were streaked onto different media containing 1% of the amino acid precursors of histamine, tyramine, cadaverine, and putrescine, namely L-histidine (Daejung Chemicals), L-tyrosine (Samchun Chemicals, Seoul, South Korea), L-lysine (Samchun Chemicals), and L-ornithine (Sigma-Aldrich), respectively. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Purple discoloration of the media, primarily due to the increase in pH as decarboxylation of the amino acids occurs, was considered as qualitative evidence of BA production.

2.5.4. Detection of Adhesion and Gamma Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) Production Related Genes

The primers targeting amplification of genes MapA (Map/F: 5′-TGG ATT CTG CTT GAG GTA AG-3′; Map/R: 5′-GAC TAG TAA CGC GAC CG-3′) and Mub (Mub/F: 5′-GTA GTT ACT CAG TGA CGA TCA ATG-3′; Mub/R: 5′-TAA TTG TAA AGG TAT AAT CGG AGG-3′) (mucus adhesion genes), and EF-Tu (EfTu/F: 5′-TTC TGG TCG TAT CGA TCG TG-3′; EfTu/R: 5′-CCA CGT AAT AAC GCA CCA AC-3′) (adhesion-like factor), and prgB (prgB/F: 5′-GCC GTC GAC TCG AGG AGA ATG ATA CAT GAA T-3′; prgB/R: 5′-CCT GCG GCC GCG TCC TTC TTT TCG TCT TCA A-3′) (aggregation substance gene), EF2662 (EF2662/F: 5′-GGC GTC GAC CAC TTA AAC TGA TAG AGA GGA AT-3′; EF2662/R: 5′-CGC GCC GCA ATT AAT TAT TAA CTA GTT TCC-3′) (choline-binding protein gene), EF1249 (EF1249/F: 5′-GCG GTC GAC AAA CGA GGG ATT TAT G-3′; EF1249/R: 5′-CTG GCG GCC GCG TTT AAT ACA ATT AGG AAG CAG A-3′) (fibronectin-binding protein) and EF2380 (EF2380/F: 5′-GCG GTC GAC ATC TAT GAA AAC AAT-3′; EF2380/R: 5′-TCC GCG CCG CCT TAA ACT TTC TCC TT-3′) (membrane-associated zinc metalloprotease gene) were used to determine the presence of the mentioned genes on the genome of the selected strain. DNA from the strain was obtained and quantified as described above. PCR reactions were performed, profiled, and analyzed in the same manner as above, with PCR conditions following the recommendations of Todorov and Dicks [36] and de Castilho et al. [37].
The presence of genes related to the production of gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA), a neurotransmitter inhibitor claimed to have an immunomodulatory effect on the body, was evaluated according to Bajić et al. [38]. Briefly, amplification of the genes for glutamate decarboxylase (gad) production, an enzyme used to convert glutamate to GABA, was performed (using the primers CoreF: 5-CCT CGA GAA GCC GAT CGC TTA GTT CG-3′ and CoreR: 5′-TCA TAT TGA CCG GTA TAA GTG ATG CCC-3′). PCR reactions were profiled and analyzed in the same manner as described earlier [38].

2.5.5. Gastrointestinal Simulation

The survivability of the bacteriocinogenic E. faecium ST10Bz, E. faecalis 200A and L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ under the simulated gastrointestinal tract (GIT) conditions was determined by adaptation of the methods of dos Santos et al. [19]. E. faecium ST10Bz, E. faecalis 200A and L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ were cultured overnight in an appropriate culture liquid medium. CFU/mL was determined for all studied strains in order to determine the initial viable cell counts by plating serial dilutions on MRS or BHI and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. For simulating the gastric condition, 6 mL of a cell suspension were added to the gastric fluid formulation (6.2 g NaCl /L, 2.2 g KCl /L, 0.22 g CaCl2 /L, and 1.2 g NaHCO3 /L; pH 2.5) with 0.3% pepsin (2500 Units/mg, Sigma-Aldrich) and incubated anaerobically at 37 °C for 1 h with shaking at 150 rpm. After the initial incubation, the resulting viable cell count after 1 h [time 1 (T1)] was determined by plate counts, as described earlier. To simulate small intestinal condition in the next step, 2 mL of the remaining suspension from the gastric simulation were added to 8 mL of intestinal fluid (6.4 g NaHCO3 /L, 0.239 KCl g /L, 1.28 g NaCl /L; pH 7.2) with 0.5% bile salts and 0.1% pancreatin, and incubated anaerobically at 37 °C for 3 h with shaking at 150 rpm. The number of viable cells after 3 h [time 2 (T2)] was determined as described earlier. The experiments were performed in triplicate for each of the strains.
Subsequently, the survivability of a mixture of the bacteriocinogenic strain, E. faecium ST10Bz, and the test organisms, E faecalis 200A or L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™, was determined during the GIT simulation. The experiment was done in the same manner as described above, with slight modification. In the simulated gastric condition 3 mL of each strain, E. faecium ST10Bz, and either E. faecalis 200A or L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™, were added to the gastric fluid formulation with 0.3% pepsin and incubated anaerobically at 37 °C for 1 h and at 150 rpm rotation. The same methods were performed in the subsequent steps, as described for the individual strains. After the incubation for cell counting, the plates with distinguishable colonies were counted and pour plated with 1% BHI agar after inoculating with the same test strains, L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ or E. faecalis 200A and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The colonies observed with inhibition zones were considered as the bacteriocinogenic strain, E. faecium ST10Bz, while the colonies with inhibition zones were the test strains. The experiments were performed in duplicates.

2.5.6. Enzyme Profile

The enzymatic activity profile was determined using APIZYM strips (bioMeérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) and performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The 20 wells (1 control and 19 different substrates) from the APIZYM strips were inoculated with a 24 h-old culture of E. faecium ST10Bz grown on MRS agar (BD), and subsequently incubated at 37 °C for 4 h. The evaluation of the activity was recorded using the APIZYM color reaction chart according to the intensity of coloration and the manufacturer’s instructions.
All listed experiments in this study were performed at least in duplicate and on two independent occasions. Standard deviations were calculated. Appropriate statistical analyses were performed.

3. Results

3.1. Isolation and Molecular Characterization of the Bacteriocinogenic Strain

Application of the triple layer method in the selection of potential bacteriocinogenic strains from boza resulted in the selection of a total 71 strains exhibiting inhibitory activity against the applied test strains, L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ and E. faecalis 200A (results not shown). However, from all the isolates, only four were found to be of bacteriocinogenic nature. This property of the produced inhibitory substance was confirmed by treating CFS with proteolytic enzymes, and the loss of antimicrobial activity was considered as confirmation of the proteinaceous nature of the antimicrobial substance.
Based on initial characterization, all evaluated isolates were identified as Gram-positive, cocci, and catalase negative presumptive LAB. Differentiation of the four isolates using rep-PCR and RAPD-PCR indicated that the isolates can be considered as replica of the same strain. Consequently, according to the 16S rRNA sequencing, the isolate was identified as E. faecium designated the strain number ST10Bz.
The presence of genes related to the production of enterocins A, B, P, and L50B, as well as some other common bacteriocins including nisin and pediocin PA1 (the two commercially available food-grade bacteriocins), were evaluated from the total DNA extracted from E. faecium ST10Bz. Initially, enterocins A, B, and P, as well as pediocin PA-1 genes were observed coinciding with their expected sizes. However, when the PCR products were sequenced, the presence of enterocin A and the pediocin PA-1 related gene were invalidated. Based on the analysis of the sequences obtained when targeting enterocin A, only 68.2% similarity was aligned to the enterocin A immunity protein (GenBank: ELA64739.1). The obtained identity is not sufficient to be considered as evidence to the presence of enterocin A, as immunity proteins of different bacteriocin share similar sequences. Moreover, the sequences of the obtained amplicons for enterocins B and P were compared to sequences deposited in the database, as listed in Table 2.

3.2. Bacteriocin Production of the Strain

3.2.1. Growth Production

The bacteriocin production of E. faecium ST10Bz started during its early exponential growth phase, as early as the 3rd h after inoculation, with 1 600 AU/mL, as shown in Figure 1. It reached the maximum and the stationary phase of bacteriocin production starting on the 9th h of incubation, with 12 800 AU/mL, recorded against L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™. The cell density of E. faecium ST10Bz increased from 0.048 to 3.21 during the 24-h growth at 37 °C in MRS. The pH, on the other hand, decreased its value from 6.17 to 4.23.

3.2.2. Stability of Bacteriocins

The stability of the bacteriocin produced by E. faecium ST10Bz was examined by exposing the antimicrobial to varying temperatures, the presence of common chemicals used in the laboratory and in industry, and to varying pH values. Results showed that none of the evaluated temperatures, chemicals, and pH had any effect on the antimicrobial activity of bacteriocin ST10Bz when evaluated against L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ and E. faecalis 200A as indicator strains.
Moreover, after prolonged storage at −20 °C with 12,800 AU/mL initial activity against L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™, bacteriocins exhibited the same activity after nine months from initial preparation. A minimal decrease, corresponding to only a two-fold dilution difference from the initial 12,800 AU/mL after ten and eleven months, with 6400 AU/mL bacteriocin activity.

3.2.3. Optimization of Culture Medium

Different culture media were used to determine the optimal substrate for bacteriocin production. In Figure 2a the highest bacteriocin production was observed in the MRS broth, with 19,200 AU/mL, followed by 12,800 AU/mL in BL broth, 3200 AU/mL in M17 supplemented with 0.5% glucose, and only 200 AU/mL in BHI. Still, in this experiment MRS was considered the best medium for the bacteriocin production of E. faecium ST10Bz.
The optimal temperature condition for bacteriocin production was also evaluated. As shown in Figure 2b, elevated bacteriocin production was detected at 25 °C and 30 °C, with 25,600 AU/mL, while at 37 °C only an average of 19 200 AU/mL was observed. Though the yield of bacteriocin was better at low temperatures, a temperature of 37 °C was chosen for the subsequent experiments in order to mimic the normal temperature conditions of the human body, in view of its potential therapeutic application for humans.
When investigating optimal pH conditions for bacteriocin production of E. faecium ST10Bz a maximum yield of 12,800 AU/mL was detected when bacteriocin producing strain was cultured MRS broth with pH in the range of 6.0 to 8.0, and with a lower production level at MRS broth with pH 10.0 (6400 AU/mL). Neither growth nor bacteriocin production was observed in MRS broth with pH 2.0 and 4.0.
Finally, the composition of the commercial MRS medium was modified. As shown in Figure 2d, a higher yield of the E. faecium ST10Bz bacteriocin was achieved in medium 2 (0.5% glucose; 25 600 AU/mL) and also on medium 19 (2% sucrose; 19 200 AU/mL), as compared with its cultivation in the original MRS medium 3 (2% glucose; 12 800 AU/mL). In comparison with all the sugar modifications, medium 4 (with 5% glucose) sustained the lowest production of bacteriocin (1200 AU/mL).

3.2.4. Bacteriocin Mode of Action

The activity of the bacteriocin produced by E. faecium ST10Bz against actively growing E. faecalis 200A and L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ was evaluated. None of the test strains showed any growth up until the end of the observation period of 12 h, based on OD readings after addition of the CFS at the 3rd and 5th hour for the E. faecalis 200A and L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ cultures, respectively (Figure 3a,b). These results indicate strong inhibitory activity of the bacteriocin and thus, suggest a bactericidal mode of action against the test strains.

3.2.5. Spectrum of Activity

The range of the antimicrobial activity of the E. faecium ST10Bz bacteriocin was determined using a total of 127 different strains including several LAB and some pathogens. The CFS from E. faecium ST10Bz exhibited inhibitory activity against 41 out of the 44 tested Enterococcus strains, including 30 vancomycin-resistant clinical strains, while both Listeria innocua strains were inhibited. Lactobacillus, Leuconostoc, Pediococcus, Weissella, Staphylococcus, Bacillus, and Clostridium strains generally showed higher resistance to the bacteriocin (Table 3).

3.3. Safety Tests and Detection of Additional Beneficial Properties

3.3.1. Antibiotic Resistance, Hemolysis, and Biogenic Amine Production

Some microorganisms may develop certain defense mechanisms, allowing their survival even in the presence of antibiotics. The results in Table 1 show that the bacteriocinogenic E. faecium ST10Bz was susceptible to all antibiotics tested, except for erythromycin (8 µg/mL), where the MIC observed was two-fold higher than the breakpoint suggested by EFSA. In addition to the antibiotic susceptibility test, the presence of factors related to vancomycin resistance genes, van A, B, C, D, E, and G, was evaluated from the total DNA extracted from E. faecium ST10Bz. Initially, the vanA gene was observed, coinciding with the expected size of the amplicon. However, when the PCR product was sequenced, presence of the vanA gene was invalidated. On the other hand, hemolysis safety test results showed that E. faecium ST10Bz was either gamma- or non-hemolytic. Finally, E. faecium ST10Bz showed capability of producing only tyramine among the biogenic amines tested for (data not shown).
Antibiotic resistance in beneficial microorganisms is a delicate issue. On the one hand, possible spread via horizontal gene transfer of antibiotic resistance genes from beneficial to other inhabitants of GIT (other beneficial or pathogenic microorganisms) can result in serious health issues. But on the other hand, the presence of limited antibiotic resistance in beneficial strains can be considered as acceptable feature, as the organism may be applied in combination with a specific antibiotic and exhibit synergistic effect, which can be explored as potential alternative treatments of diseases in human and veterinary medical practices.

3.3.2. Detection of Adhesion and Gamma Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) Production Related Genes

Adhesion genes are important factors facilitating the adhesion of a probiotic strain to the intestinal mucosal layer and thereby supporting its colonization in the GIT. Based on the analysis of the generated amplicons, the mapA, mub, and ef-Tu genes were detected for E. faecium ST10Bz, yet prgB, EF1249, EF2380, and EF2662 were not found. In addition, the performed PCR targeting of the gad gene generated positive results for potential GABA production by E. faecium ST10Bz.

3.3.3. GIT Model

In vitro simulation of the GIT was used to evaluate the ability of the E. faecium ST10Bz to withstand the stressful conditions of the gastrointestinal environment. The bacteriocinogenic strain E. faecium ST10Bz and the test strains, L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ and E. faecalis 200A, were subjected to GIT stress, both individually and in mixed cultures. Under individual exposure to the simulated GIT conditions, E. faecium ST10Bz and E. faecalis 200A showed higher survivability after 3 h (T2) under the small-intestinal simulation, as compared to L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™. Co-cultures of E. faecium ST10Bz with either L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ (Figure 4b) or E. faecalis 200A (Figure 4c) showed higher survivability of E. faecium ST10Bz than that of the individual test strains. As compared to the percentage change in survival of the individual strains to the same strains in the mixed culture experiments, the test strains showed higher reduction rates. Therefore, the test strains were notably reduced in the presence of the bacteriocinogenic strain E. faecium ST10Bz.

3.3.4. Enzymes Production Profile

Using the APIZYM test enzymatic activities of E. faecium ST10Bz could be detected for esterase (C4), esterase lipase (C8), leucine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, cysteine arylamidase, α-chymotrypsin, acid phosphatase, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase and β-galactosidase.

4. Discussion

Over the years, boza has been intensively studied for its claimed benefits to consumer health, primarily based on its prebiotic and probiotic features [39]. Numerous bacteriocinogenic LAB strains were previously isolated from the beverage, including Lb. plantarum strains ST19BZ, ST414BZ, and ST664BZ, Lb. pentosus ST712BZ, Lb. rhamnosus ST461BZ and ST462BZ, and Lb. paracasei ST242BZ and ST284BZ [40], Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides KM432Bz [41], Lb. plantarum JW3BZ and JW6BBZ, Lb. fermentum JW11BZ and JW15BZ [42], and E. faecium YT52 [43]. In this study, the isolation of bacteriocinogenic E. faecium from boza can be considered as a further contribution towards a better characterization of its microbial consortium and its beneficial properties.
Bacteriocins, by definition, are ribosomally-synthesized antimicrobial peptides [10], while proteins and peptides are degraded by proteolytic enzymes into smaller units. Therefore, sensitivity of antimicrobial metabolite/s from E. faecium ST10Bz to proteolytic enzymes can serve as a key point in the characterization and differentiation (from other antimicrobial metabolites) of the extracted compound(s), thereby pointing to its proteinaceous nature [44].
Bacteriocin production is dependent on expression of the appropriate genes. Some bacteriocinogenic strains carry genetic determinants for more than one bacteriocin; however, expression of these genes simultaneously or individually depends either on environmental conditions or on induction by specific factors. This characteristic has been observed and described previously for strains of Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides QU 15, producing leucocins A-QU 15, Q, and N [45], for Lb. gasseri LM19, expressing three bacteriocins, including a novel bacteriocin, gassericin M [46], Lactococcus lactis LMG2081 with lactococcin and lacticin LMG [47], and E. faecium NKR-5-3 with enterocins NKR-5-3A, B, C, D, and Z [48]. In this study, genes for the production of enterocins B and P were detected for E. faecium ST10Bz. However, further purification and identification must be performed to finally verify the identity of these bacteriocins.
The production of bacteriocins was observed starting with the early exponential growth phase of the strain. The ability to produce the bacteriocin at the aforementioned time point indicates that the bacteriocin could be considered as a primary metabolite of this strain [49]. Similar kinetics were previously observed for the bacteriocinogenic enterococci E. faecalis AP45 [50], E. faecium B3L3 [51], E. faecium RZS C5 [52], and E. faecium ST311LD [53].
In this study, the stability of the bacteriocin(s) to varying environmental conditions was also checked in order to evaluate its potential as antimicrobial in the food industry and in research laboratory settings. The bacteriocin produced by E. faecium ST10Bz was tested for its stability to varying temperatures that may possibly be encountered in the food industry, as well as in laboratory settings, ranging from 5.4 °C–121 °C, representing storage, production and sterilization processes [54]. The molecular size of bacteriocins is generally smaller than 10 kDa [7], thus, relative to their structure these compounds are stable during thermal treatment. This may render them suitable for application in the production of different fermented food products where parts of the technological processes include rapid (pre-)heating to high temperatures, and considering laboratory sterilization processes at 121 °C for 15 min.
During the food production process and in the laboratory, food or laboratory samples are commonly exposed to different chemicals. Thus, it is important for an antimicrobial compound to retain its activity in the presence of specific contaminants and different chemicals. This characteristic was also reported for other enterocins, including EJ97 [55], bozacin B14 [56], and enterocins ST209GB, ST278GB, ST315GB, and ST711GB [26]. This implies the potential of such bacteriocins to be used together with common chemicals and still act as antimicrobials in the bio-preservation processes. This feature will also facilitate the planning and performing of different purification and identification procedures for the antimicrobial peptides.
Moreover, pH is an important technological characteristic, especially for fermented products with low acidity levels. The bacteriocin produced by E. faecium ST10Bz remained stable when exposed to different pH-values and maintained its activity against the test strains used in this study (Table 3). These results are in agreement with previous reports for other bacteriocins by Urso et al. [57], Todorov et al. [25] and Favaro et al. [26].
The stability of the bacteriocin at a storage temperature of −20 °C was evaluated over time to determine its shelf life. It was previously reported that some bacteriocins, especially those of Lb. acidophilus DSM 20079 [58] and Lb. plantarum C19 [59], retained their activity after 90 and 180 days of storage at −20 °C, respectively. In contrast, others like the bacteriocin from P. acidilactici kp10 could be affected by prolonged storage conditions, losing their inhibitory activity against L. monocytogenes, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus immediately after three and six months of storage at −20 °C, with 87% reduction [60]. Therefore, the bacteriocin/s produced by E. faecium ST10Bz in this study showed good retention of activity and could retain a stable inhibitory property even during prolonged storage.
In the determination of optimal conditions for the bacteriocin production of E. faecium ST10Bz, MRS was found to be the optimal medium, thus, the subsequent experiments were conducted using the same medium with some alterations in the temperature, pH, and composition of the medium. Previous studies showed that bacteriocin production is often dependent of or correlated with cell growth, and therefore the best bacteriocin yield would be expected at the optimal growth temperature of a strain [61], as was also observed for the production of plantaricin produced by Lb. plantarum ZJ316 [62], and enterocin 1146 [63]. In addition, Enterococcus spp. are well known for their acid tolerance and ability to grow both at high and low pH levels ranging from pH 4.5–10.0 [64]. Such characteristic of bacteriocinogenic E. faecium ST10Bz can be considered as a positive feature and may play an important role in the application of the strain as probiotic or starter culture in food fermentation processes. Moreover, humans and animals interact with different ecological environments with varying pH values, most specifically in the GIT. The ability of such potential probiotics to grow and produce bacteriocins over a wide pH range may thus support their probiotic potential and render them promising candidates for future application. Lastly, with alteration of the composition of the medium, the strain gave higher yield of bacteriocin in the medium with lower glucose concentration; this was also observed for E. faecium DPC1156 [65]. This phenomenon can be explained by substrate inhibition where a high substrate concentration decreases the rate of growth and bacteriocin production of the organism [65,66]. On the other hand, high bacteriocin production was also observed in MRS medium with 2% sucrose. The same activity was reported for nisin production by the strain Lc. lactis subsp. lactis NIZO 22186 [67]. According to Abbasiliasi et al. [68], the ability of a strain to produce higher bacteriocin levels in a medium when exchanging glucose with other sugars such as sucrose may be explained by the presence of a complex enzymatic system that could support the utilization of complex sugars. Therefore, a higher bacteriocin production with a low-priced complex sugar as carbon source may enable a cost-effective bacteriocin production.
In the evaluation of the mode of action of E. faecium ST10Bz against the two test strains, the retention of the OD level of the cultures after addition of the CFS, up to the 12th h, indicated a strong inhibitory activity of the bacteriocin, and thus suggests a bactericidal mode of action against the test strains. Similar observations were found for different bacteriocinogenic strains of E. faecium from Bulgarian feta cheese [26].
Adsorption or attachment of the bacteriocin to the test strain initiates the activity of the antimicrobial. From previous studies, E. mundtii CRL35 showed optimal adsorption to L. monocytogenes at pH 4.0 and temperatures ranging from 20–37 °C, with decreasing adsorption as the pH increases; for E. faecium ST88Ch the optimal adsorption conditions were at 37 °C and pH 4.0, and at 30–37 °C at pH 6.0 [69]. These results showed that the adsorption of bacteriocins vary with different environmental conditions. Moreover, all results can be used in the prediction of efficacy of a bacteriocin for possible application in food bio-preservation processes.
For the spectrum of activity of the bacteriocin(s) produced by E. faecium ST10Bz, the results support the hypothesis that the antimicrobials present in the CFS were bacteriocins with inhibitory activity against closely related species [10]. Specific activity against important pathogens such as L. monocytogenes and vancomycin resistant Enterococcus strains is an important characteristic of the bacteriocin produced by E. faecium ST10Bz. It is also of interest that most of the tested Lactobacillus strains were not affected by the bacteriocin; these strains included a well-known probiotic strain, Lb. rhamnosus LGG®, and other safe in-house isolates of the HEM culture collection. This characteristic suggests the potential of this bacteriocin for controlling listerial and enterococcal infections in combination with some probiotic strains.
Horizontal gene transfer of genetic material between bacteria has been identified as a major factor contributing to an increasing health risk posed by antibiotic resistance; this may serve to worsen the potential threat when pathogenic bacteria carry virulence factors [70]. Enterococcus strains were generally considered as “prepared” for the antibiotic era, as they usually carry resistance genes intrinsic to their genetic make-up, reducing their sensitivity to a wide range of antibiotics and biocides [71,72]. The emergence of a specific group of (mainly nosocomial) enterococcal strains known as vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), currently constitutes a serious health problem in medical (human and veterinary) practices [73].
Hemolysis, or the ability of bacteria to lyse red blood cells, strongly contributes to the virulence of potentially pathogenic strains against humans and animals [74]. On the other hand, biogenic amines (BAs) are primarily low-molecular weight organic compounds that may be formed by microbial decarboxylation of some amino acids in foods. Although supporting diverse physiological functions, deleterious effects such as nausea and headaches may be experienced at higher concentrations, especially by sensitive consumers. Histamine and tyramine are those BAs most frequently associated with intoxications such as “scombroid fish poisoning” and “cheese reaction”, respectively [75]. E. faecium ST10Bz shows the ability to produce tyramine, which, however, is a common physiological characteristic of the genus Enterococcus [76]. Its ability to produce tyramine might render it unsafe for people using monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) due to its interaction with tyramine that could cause a potentially fatal hypertensive crisis. The hypertensive crisis was described as having sudden but severe, pulsating headache, palpitations, diaphoresis, stiff neck, and nausea, which could also possibly lead to stroke [77]. On the other hand, the dynamics of tyramine production by (putative) probiotic enterococci has not been investigated yet. Further clarification of this issue is essential in view of potential BA production by some probiotic strains, and open questions regarding decarboxylation activity under (simulated) GIT conditions.
Adhesion genes are important in the production and expression of proteins mediating bacterial adherence to the intestinal epithelium. These functional factors support the colonization of the GIT, which can be considered as beneficial characteristics of the newly isolated strain in support of its evaluation as a probiotic. However, these genes do not always express as a positive feature that would contribute to the probiotic potential of the investigated LAB strain. Additional tests should be performed in order to determine whether these genes are fully expressed under environmental conditions specific to the human and animal GIT. Even if strains have successful adhesion to the GIT, additional beneficial properties need to be expressed by probiotic candidates, as part of additional experiments and evaluation. In this study, only the genes mapA, mub, and EF-Tu were detected, similar to that of E. faecium ST311LD [36]. Adhesion genes in a probiotic candidate strain may be regarded as a positive characteristic, especially for strains producing antimicrobials. Their ability to adhere to other strains may allow easier inhibitory activity of deleterious organisms. From another angle, this feature may be considered negative primarily due to the possible initiation of gene transfer. Therefore, further investigations need to be conducted to prove the safety of this strain.
In vitro simulation of the GIT was used to evaluate the ability of the E. faecium ST10Bz to withstand the stressful conditions of the gastrointestinal environment. The ability of the bacteriocinogenic strain to survive GIT conditions indicates its potential as probiotic and suggests beneficial properties such as its survival, growth, and performance in this ecosystem. Generally, Enterococcus spp. are capable of surviving even after drastic changes of the environmental conditions in the GIT, varying from acidic to basic, and the subsequent presence of bile salts [78]. In addition, the survivability of E. faecium ST10Bz, when mixed with the test strains, was higher. Thus, in general, E. faecium ST10Bz may possibly attenuate listerial and enterococcal infections under conditions of the upper GIT. Moreover, E. faecium ST10Bz was able to significantly reduce the levels of L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ and E. faecalis 200A; this may be considered as an example of superior competitiveness [79]. It could be speculated that under conditions mimicking GIT conditions bacteriocin/s are most probably produced and are able to inhibit the applied test organisms. An appropriate animal model should be used to prove this hypothesis.
Production of specific enzymes plays an important role not only in the normal metabolism of bacterial species, but also by potentially amplifying probiotic benefits of a specific LAB strain. Previously Park et al. [80] reported that different strains of Bacillus spp. isolated from Korean traditional fermented food products may have different expression levels of proteolytic enzymes, and, related to these specific characteristics, some strains have shown potential for application as anti-obesity probiotics. In industrial and biotechnological applications of beneficial microbial cultures, the ability to degrade amino acids into volatile molecules is related to the organoleptic complexity of fermented meat products. Montel et al. [81] showed that the aldehydes, alcohols, and acids, derived from the breakdown of leucine, valine, phenylalanine, and methionine, have minimal effects on the sensory quality, taste, and smell of the fermented products. Presence of β-galactosidase is considered as a beneficial property of LAB strains applied as probiotics, since this enzyme is directly involved in the breakdown of lactose and is considered as an essential for probiotics intended for lactose intolerant individuals [19]. Additionally, the glutamate decarboxylase (gad) gene encoding the enzyme responsible for the conversion of glutamate to GABA [82], was found in the genome of strain ST10Bz. GABA production is considered a beneficial property for a probiotic strain. According to Bajić et al. [38], GABA plays a protective role in different diseases, such as type 1 diabetes [83], autoimmune encephalomyelitis [84], arthritis [85,86], and contact dermatitis [87]. Therefore, the presence of the gad gene can be considered as an additional beneficial property of a putative probiotic strain.

5. Conclusions

Bacteriocin produced by E. faecium ST10Bz possesses a strong anti-listerial and anti-enterococcal activity, thus rendering the antimicrobial metabolite a potential therapeutic alternative to antibiotics for application against these opportunistic pathogens. Beneficial properties and safety of E. faecium ST10Bz were evaluated. These results suggest that E. faecium ST10Bz can be considered as a promising potential probiotic strain with a biotherapeutic potential.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/2076-2607/8/10/1474/s1, Table S1: Composition of the media in evaluation of the effect of MRS medium ingredients on the production of bacteriocin by Enterococcus faecium ST10Bz, Table S2: Spectrum of activity of bacteriocin produced by Enterococcus faecium ST10Bz.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.D.T. and W.H.H.; experiments performance, S.J.D.V. and S.D.T., vancomycin resistance genes concept, J.E.V.B., methodology, S.J.D.V. and S.D.T.; resources, W.H.H.; writing—original draft preparation, S.J.D.V. and S.D.T.; writing—review and editing, S.D.T. and W.H.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Korean National Research Foundation (NRF) of the Korean Ministry of Science and Technology (Nos. 2016M3A9A5923160, and 2018M3A9F3021964) and is gratefully acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Lahtinen, S.; Ouwehand, A.; Salminen, S.; Wright, A.V. Lactic Acid Bacteria: Microbiological and Functional aspects, 4th ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  2. Atanasova, J.; Dalgalarrondo, M.; Iliev, I.; Moncheva, P.; Todorov, S.D.; Ivanova, I.V. Formation of free amino acids and bioactive peptides during ripening of Bulgarian white brined cheeses. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sulistiani; Handayani, R. Application biopreservatives produced by lactic acid bacteria (LAB) for preservation boiled-salted (pindang) tuna (Euthynnusaffinis Cantor, 1849). AIP Conf. Proc. 2018, 2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wegh, C.A.M.; Geerlings, S.Y.; Knol, J.; Roeselers, G.; Belzer, C. Postbiotics and their potential applications in early life nutrition and beyond. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Gonzalez Ronquillo, M.; Angeles Hernandez, J.C. Antibiotic and synthetic growth promoters in animal diets: Review of impact and analytical methods. Food Control. 2017, 72, 255–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Antibiotic Resistance. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antibiotic-resistance (accessed on 15 June 2020).
  7. Todorov, S.; Franco, B.D.M.; Tagg, J. Bacteriocins of Gram-positive bacteria having activity spectra extending beyond closely-related species. Benef. Microbes 2019, 10, 315–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Jordan, K.; Leong, D.; Ordóñez, A.Á. Listeria monocytogenes in the Food Processing Environment; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lopetuso, L.; Giorgio, M.; Saviano, A.; Scaldaferri, F.; Gasbarrini, A.; Cammarota, G. Bacteriocins and bacteriophages: Therapeutic weapons for gastrointestinal diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Chikindas, M.L.; Weeks, R.; Drider, D.; Chistyakov, V.A.; Dicks, L.M.T. Functions and emerging applications of bacteriocins. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2018, 49, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Inglis, R.F.; Scanlan, P.; Buckling, A. Iron availability shapes the evolution of bacteriocin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. ISME J. 2016, 10, 2060–2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Listeriosis. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/listeriosis#targetText=It%20is%20a%20relatively%20rare,a%20significant%20public%20health%20concern (accessed on 15 June 2020).
  13. Roesel, K.; Grace, D. Food Safety and Informal Markets: Animal Products in Sub-Saharan Africa; Routledge: London, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  14. Listeria (Listeriosis). Available online: https://www.fda.gov/food/foodborne-pathogens/listeria-listeriosis (accessed on 15 June 2020).
  15. Camargo, A.C.; Moura, A.; Avillan, J.; Herman, N.; McFarland, A.P.; Sreevatsan, S.; Call, D.R.; Woodward, J.J.; Lecuit, M.; Nero, L.A. Whole-genome sequencing reveals Listeria monocytogenes diversity and allows identification of long-term persistent strains in Brazil. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 21, 4478–4487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Terzić-Vidojević, A.; Veljović, K.; Begović, J.; Filipić, B.; Popović, D.; Tolinački, M.; Miljković, M.; Kojić, M.; Golić, N. Diversity and antibiotic susceptibility of autochthonous dairy enterococci isolates: Are they safe candidates for autochthonous starter cultures? Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Hanchi, H.; Mottawea, W.; Sebei, K.; Hammami, R. The genus Enterococcus: Between probiotic potential and safety concerns—An update. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Cetinkaya, Y.; Falk, P.; Mayhall, C.G. Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2001, 13, 686–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dos Santos, K.M.O.; de Matos, C.R.; Salles, H.O.; Franco, B.D.G.M.; Arellano, K.; Holzapfel, W.H.; Todorov, S.D. Exploring beneficial/virulence properties of two dairy-related strains of Streptococcus infantarius subsp. infantarius. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. De Vos, P.; Garrity, G.M.; Jones, D.; Krieg, N.R.; Ludwig, W.; Rainey, F.A.; Schleifer, K.-H.; Whitman, W.B. Bergeys Manual of Systematic Bacteriology: The Firmicutes; Springer: London, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  21. De Moraes, G.M.D.; de Abreu, L.R.; do Egito, A.S.; Salles, H.O.; da Silva, L.M.F.; Nero, L.A.; Todorov, S.D.; dos Santos, K.M.O. Functional properties of Lactobacillus mucosae strains isolated from Brazilian goat milk. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2016, 9, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Aymerich, T.; Holo, H.; Havarstein, L.S.; Hugas, M.; Garriga, M.; Nes, I.F. Biochemical and genetic characterization of enterocin A from Enterococcus faecium, a new antilisterial bacteriocin in the pediocin family of bacteriocins. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996, 62, 1676–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Du Toit, M.; Franz, C.M.; Dicks, L.M.T.; Holzapfel, W.H. Preliminary characterization of bacteriocins produced by Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis isolated from pig faeces. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 88, 482–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gutierrez, J.; Criado, R.; Citti, R.; Martin, M.; Herranz, C.; Nes, I.F.; Cintas, L.M.; Hernandez, P.E. Cloning, production and functional expression of enterocin P, a sec-dependent bacteriocin produced by Enterococcus faecium P13, in Escherichia coli. Int. J. Food. Microbiol. 2005, 103, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Todorov, S.D.; Wachsman, M.; Tomé, E.; Dousset, X.; Destro, M.T.; Dicks, L.M.T.; Franco, B.D.G.M.; Vaz-Velho, M.; Drider, D. Characterisation of an antiviral pediocin-like bacteriocin produced by Enterococcus faecium. Food Microbiol. 2010, 27, 869–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Favaro, L.; Basaglia, M.; Casella, S.; Hue, I.; Dousset, X.; Franco, B.D.G.M.; Todorov, S.D. Bacteriocinogenic potential and safety evaluation of non-starter Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from homemade white brine cheese. Food Microbiol. 2014, 38, 228–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Todorov, S.D.; Dicks, L.M.T. Parameters affecting the adsorption of plantaricin 423, a bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum 423 isolated from sorghum beer. Biotechnol. J. 2006, 1, 405–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Arellano, K.; Vazquez, J.; Park, H.; Lim, J.; Ji, Y.; Kang, H.-J.; Cho, D.; Jeong, H.W.; Holzapfel, W.H. Safety evaluation and whole-genome annotation of Lactobacillus plantarum strains from different sources with special focus on isolates from green tea. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2019, 12, 1057–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. European Food Safety Authority. Guidance on the assessment of bacterial susceptibility to antimicrobials of human and veterinary importance. EFSA J. 2012, 10, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically, 11th ed.; CLSI: Wayne, PA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  31. Manson, J.M.; Keis, S.; Smith, J.M.B.; Cook, G.M. A Clonal Lineage of VanA-Type Enterococcus faecalis Predominates in Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci Isolated in New Zealand. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Iweriebor, B.C.; Obi, L.C.; Okoh, A.I. Virulence and antimicrobial resistance factors of Enterococcus spp. isolated from fecal samples from piggery farms in Eastern Cape, South Africa. BMC Microbiol. 2015, 15, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Depardieu, F.; Perichon, B.; Courvalin, P. Detection of the van Alphabet and Identification of Enterococci and Staphylococci at the Species Level by Multiplex PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 5857–5860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Morandi, S.; Silvetti, T.; Brasca, M. Biotechnological and safety characterization of Enterococcus lactis, a recently described species of dairy origin. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2012, 103, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Du, F.; Lv, X.; Duan, D.; Wang, L.; Huang, J. Characterization of a Linezolid- and Vancomycin-Resistant Streptococcus suis Isolate That Harbors optrA and vanG Operons. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Todorov, S.D.; Dicks, L.M.T. Evaluation of lactic acid bacteria from kefir, molasses and olive brine as possible probiotics based on physiological properties. Ann. Microbiol. 2008, 58, 661–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. De Castilho, N.P.A.; Colombo, M.; de Oliveira, L.L.; Todorov, S.D.; Nero, L.A. Lactobacillus curvatus UFV-NPAC1 and other lactic acid bacteria isolated from calabresa, a fermented meat product, present high bacteriocinogenic activity against Listeria monocytogenes. BMC Microbiol. 2019, 19, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Bajić, S.S.; Đokić, J.; Dinić, M.; Tomić, S.; Popović, N.; Brdarić, E.; Goli, N.; Tolinački, M. GABA potentiate the immunoregulatory effects of Lactobacillus brevis BGZLS10-17 via ATG5-dependent autophagy in vitro. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ray, R.C.; Montet, D. Fermented Foods, Part. II Technological Interventions; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  40. Todorov, S.D.; Dicks, L.M.T. Screening for bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria from boza, a traditional cereal beverage from Bulgaria. Process. Biochem. 2006, 41, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Makhloufi, K.M.; Carré-Mlouka, A.; Peduzzi, J.; Lombard, C.; van Reenen, C.A.; Dicks, L.M.T.; Rebuffat, S. Characterization of leucocin B-KM432Bz from Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides isolated from boza, and comparison of its efficiency to pediocin PA-1. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e70484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Von Mollendorff, J.W.; Todorov, S.D.; Dicks, L.M.T. Optimization of growth medium for production of bacteriocins produced by Lactobacillus plantarum JW3BZ and JW6BZ, and Lactobacillus fermentum JW11BZ and JW15BZ isolated from Boza. Trakia J. Sci. 2009, 7, 22–23. [Google Scholar]
  43. Charyyev, M.G.; Tuncer, B.Ö.; Kankaya, D.A.; Tuncer, Y. Bacteriocinogenic properties and safety evaluation of Enterococcus faecium YT52 isolated from boza, a traditional cereal based fermented beverage. J. Consum. Prot. Food Saf. 2019, 14, 41–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Barbosa, M.S.; Todorov, S.D.; Ivanova, I.; Chobert, J.-M.; Haertlé, T.; Franco, B.D.G.M. Improving safety of salami by application of bacteriocins produced by an autochthonous Lactobacillus curvatus isolate. Food Microbiol. 2015, 46, 254–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Sawa, N.; Okamura, K.; Zendo, T.; Himeno, K.; Nakayama, J.; Sonomoto, K. Identification and characterization of novel multiple bacteriocins produced by Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides QU 15. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 109, 282–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Garcia-Gutierrez, E.; O’Connor, P.M.; Colquhoun, I.J.; Vior, N.M.; Rodriguez, J.M.; Mayer, M.J.; Cotter, P.D.; Narbad, A. Production of multiple bacteriocins, including the novel bacteriocin gassericin M, by Lactobacillus gasseri LM19, a strain isolated from human milk. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 3869–3884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Mirkovic, N.; Polovic, N.; Vukotic, G.; Jovcic, B.; Miljkovic, M.; Radulovic, Z.; Diep, D.B.; Kojic, M. Lactococcus lactis LMG2081 produces two bacteriocins, a nonlantibiotic and a novel lantibiotic. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2016, 82, 2555–2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Himeno, K.; Fujita, K.; Zendo, T.; Wilaipun, P.; Ishibashi, N.; Masuda, Y.; Yoneyama, F.; Leelawatcharamas, V.; Nakayama, J.; Sonomoto, K. Identification of enterocin NKR-5-3C, a novel class IIa bacteriocin produced by a multiple bacteriocin producer, Enterococcus faecium NKR-5-3. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2012, 76, 1245–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Aguilar-Galvez, A.; Guillermo, S.; Dubois-Dauphin, R.; Campos, D.; Thonart, P. The influence of growth conditions on enterocin-like production by Enterococcus faecium CWBI-B1430 and Enterococcus mundtii CWBI-B1431 isolates from artisanal Peruvian cheeses. Ann. Microbiol. 2011, 61, 955–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Han, S.-K.; Shin, M.-S.; Park, H.-E.; Kim, S.-Y.; Lee, W.-K. Screening of bacteriocin-producing Enterococcus faecalis strains for antagonistic activities against Clostridium perfringens. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. 2014, 34, 614–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Yusuf, M.A.; Hamid, T.H.A.T.A. Optimization of temperature and pH for the growth and bacteriocin production of Enterococcus faecium. B3L3. IOSR J. Pharm. 2012, 2, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Leroy, F.; De Vuyst, L. Bacteriocin production by Enterococcus faecium RZS C5 is cell density limited and occurs in the very early growth phase. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2002, 72, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Todorov, S.D.; Dicks, L.M.T. Optimization of bacteriocin ST311LD production by Enterococcus faecium ST311LD, isolated from spoiled black olives. J. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 370–374. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. O’Beirne, D.; Francis, G.A. Reducing pathogen risks in MAP-prepared produce. In Novel Food Packaging Techniques; Woodhead Publishig: Cambridge, UK, 2003; pp. 231–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gaálvez, A.; Valdivia, E.; Abriouel, H. Isolation and characterisation of enterocin EJ97, a bacteriocin produced by Enterococcus faecalis EJ97. Arch. Microbiol. 1998, 171, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ivanova, I.; Kabadjova, P.; Pantev, A.; Danova, S.; Dousset, X. Detection, purification and partial characterization of a novel bacteriocin substance produced by Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis B14 isolated from boza-Bulgarian traditional cereal beverage. Biocatal-Vest. Moskov Univ. Kimia. 2000, 41, 47–53. [Google Scholar]
  57. Urso, R.; Rantsiou, K.; Cantoni, C.; Comi, G.; Cocolin, L. Technological characterization of a bacteriocin-producing Lactobacillus sakei and its use in fermented sausages production. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 110, 232–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Abdelsamei, H.; Ibrahim, E.; Saad, M.; Sohaimy, S.E. Effect of storage on the activity of the bacteriocin extracted from Lactobacillus acidophilus. Benha Vet. Med. J. 2015, 28, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Atrih, A.; Rekhif, N.; Moir, A.J.; Lebrihi, A.; Lefebvre, G. Mode of action, purification and amino acid sequence of plantaricin C19, an anti-Listeria bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum C19. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2001, 68, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sidek, N.L.M.; Halim, M.; Tan, J.S.; Abbasiliasi, S.; Mustafa, S.; Ariff, A.B. Stability of bacteriocin-like inhibitory substance (BLIS) produced by Pediococcus acidilactici kp10 at different extreme conditions. BioMed. Res. Int. 2018, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Sarika, A.R.; Lipton, A.P.; Aishwarya, M.S. Bacteriocin production by a new isolate of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GP1 under different culture conditions. Adv. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 2, 291–297. [Google Scholar]
  62. Li, J.; Song, D.; Gu, Q. Optimization of plantaricin production by Lactobacillus plantarum ZJ316. Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao 2008, 48, 818–823. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  63. Parente, E.; Ricciardi, A. Influence of pH on the production of enterocin 1146 during batch fermentation. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1994, 19, 12–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Fisher, K.; Phillips, C. The ecology, epidemiology and virulence of Enterococcus. Microbiology 2009, 155, 1749–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Parente, E.; Brienza, C.; Ricciardi, A.; Addario, G. Growth and bacteriocin production by Enterococcus faecium DPC1146 in batch and continuous culture. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1997, 18, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Liu, S. Bioprocess Engineering: Kinetics, Sustainability, and Reactor Design, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; pp. 629–697. [Google Scholar]
  67. Pongtharangkul, T.; Demirci, A. Evaluation of culture medium for nisin production in a repeated-batch biofilm reactor. Biotechnol. Prog. 2006, 22, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Abbasiliasi, S.; Tan, J.S.; Tengku Ibrahim, T.A.; Bashokouh, F.; Ramakrishnan, N.R.; Mustafa, S.; Ariff, A.B. Fermentation factors influencing the production of bacteriocins by lactic acid bacteria: A review. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 29395–29420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Pingitore, E.V.; Todorov, S.D.; Sesma, F.; Franco, B.D.G.M. Application of bacteriocinogenic Enterococcus mundtii CRL35 and Enterococcus faecium ST88Ch in the control of Listeria monocytogenes in fresh Minas cheese. Food Microbiol. 2012, 32, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ficoseco, C.A.; Mansilla, F.I.; Maldonado, N.C.; Miranda, H.; Nader-Macias, M.E.F.; Vignolo, G.M. Safety and growth optimization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from feedlot cattle for probiotic formula design. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Murray, B.E. The life and times of the Enterococcus. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1990, 3, 46–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hegstad, K.; Mikalsen, T.; Coque, T.; Werner, G.; Sundsfjord, A. Mobile genetic elements and their contribution to the emergence of antimicrobial resistant Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium. Clin. Microbiol. Infec. 2010, 16, 541–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Mühlberg, E.; Umstätter, F.; Kleist, C.; Domhan, C.; Mier, W.; Uhl, P. Renaissance of vancomycin: Approaches for breaking antibiotic resistance in multidrug-resistant bacteria. Can. J. Microbiol. 2019, 66, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Donnenberg, M.S. Escherichia coli: Virulence Mechanisms of a Versatile Pathogen; Academic Press: London, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  75. Barbieri, F.; Montanari, C.; Gardini, F.; Tabanelli, G. Biogenic amine production by lactic acid bacteria: A Review. Foods 2019, 8, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Bargossi, E.; Gardini, F.; Gatto, V.; Montanari, C.; Torriani, S.; Tabanelli, G. The capability of tyramine production and correlation between phenotypic and genetic characteristics of Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis strains. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Chakchouk-Mtibaa, A.; Sellem, I.; Kamoun, Y.; Smaoui, S.; Karray-Rebai, I.; Mellouli, L. Safety aspect of Enterococcus faecium FL31 strain and antibacterial mechanism of its hydroxylated bacteriocin BacFL31 against Listeria monocytogenes. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Todorov, S.D.; Rachman, C.; Fourrier, A.; Dicks, L.M.; van Reenen, C.A.; Prévost, H.; Dousset, X. Characterization of a bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus sakei R1333 isolated from smoked salmon. Anaerobe 2011, 17, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Stockwell, V.O.; Moore, L.W.; Loper, J.E. Fate of Agrobacterium radiobacter K84 in the environment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1993, 59, 2112–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Park, H.; Lee, M.; Ji, Y.; Todorov, S.D.; Holzapfel, W.H. Safety evaluation and in vivo strain-specific functionality of Bacillus strains isolated from Korean traditional fermented foods. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2020, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Montel, M.C.; Masson, F.; Talon, R. Bacterial role in flavour development. Meat Sci. 1998, 49, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Gagne, F. Biochemical Ecotoxicology: Principles and Method; Elsevier Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  83. Tian, J.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Chau, C.H.; Dang, H.N.; Kaufman, D.L. Gamma-aminobutyric acid inhibits T cell autoimmunity and the development of inflammatory responses in a mouse type 1 diabetes model. J. Immunol. 2004, 173, 5298–5304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Bhat, R.; Axtell, R.; Mitra, A.; Miranda, M.; Lock, C.; Tsien, R.W.; Steinman, L. Inhibitory role for GABA in autoimmune inflammation. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 2580–2585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Kelley, J.M.; Hughes, L.B.; Bridges, S.L., Jr. Does gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) influence the development of chronic inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis? J. Neuroinflamm. 2008, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Tian, J.; Yong, J.; Dang, H.; Kaufman, D.L. Oral GABA treatment downregulates inflammatory responses in a mouse model of rheumatoid arthritis. Autoimmunity 2011, 44, 465–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Nigam, R.; El-Nour, H.; Amatya, B.; Nordlind, K. GABA and GABA(A) receptor expression on immune cells in psoriasis: A pathophysiological role. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2010, 302, 507–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Microorganisms 08 01474 g001 550
Figure 1. Kinetics of bacterial growth, acidification and bacteriocin production by E. faecium ST10Bz. All data represent an average of three repeats. The OD and pH values recorded in each experiment did not differ by more than 5% variation, and standard deviation values were not presented. Identical levels of bacteriocin production (AU/mL) were recorded for all three repeats.
Figure 1. Kinetics of bacterial growth, acidification and bacteriocin production by E. faecium ST10Bz. All data represent an average of three repeats. The OD and pH values recorded in each experiment did not differ by more than 5% variation, and standard deviation values were not presented. Identical levels of bacteriocin production (AU/mL) were recorded for all three repeats.
Microorganisms 08 01474 g001
Microorganisms 08 01474 g002 550
Figure 2. Optimization of medium and environmental conditions for bacteriocin production of E. faecium ST10Bz evaluated against L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ as indicator strain. (a) With different commercial media, (b) at different temperatures, (c) different pH-values, and (d) different modifications of MRS medium (for information on medium composition see Table S1). In experiments where no differences in levels of bacteriocin production were observed, standard deviation values were not presented.
Figure 2. Optimization of medium and environmental conditions for bacteriocin production of E. faecium ST10Bz evaluated against L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™ as indicator strain. (a) With different commercial media, (b) at different temperatures, (c) different pH-values, and (d) different modifications of MRS medium (for information on medium composition see Table S1). In experiments where no differences in levels of bacteriocin production were observed, standard deviation values were not presented.
Microorganisms 08 01474 g002
Microorganisms 08 01474 g003 550
Figure 3. Bactericidal mode of action of the bacteriocin produced by E. faecium ST10Bz against (a) E. faecalis 200A, and (b) L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™; dotted lines represent the initial exposure to the bacteriocin. All data represent an average of three repeats. The OD values recorded in each experiment did not differ by more than 5% variation and standard deviation values were not presented.
Figure 3. Bactericidal mode of action of the bacteriocin produced by E. faecium ST10Bz against (a) E. faecalis 200A, and (b) L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™; dotted lines represent the initial exposure to the bacteriocin. All data represent an average of three repeats. The OD values recorded in each experiment did not differ by more than 5% variation and standard deviation values were not presented.
Microorganisms 08 01474 g003
Microorganisms 08 01474 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Survivability of the individual strains under gastrointestinal tract (GIT) conditions. Proportional presence of E. faecium ST10Bz and test organisms: (b) co-cultures of E. faecium ST1 and L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™, (c) co-cultures of E. faecium ST10Bz and E. faecalis 200A. Timepoints T1 and T2 represent exposure times of either 1 h or 3 h simulation of the stomach or small intestine, respectively. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences.
Figure 4. (a) Survivability of the individual strains under gastrointestinal tract (GIT) conditions. Proportional presence of E. faecium ST10Bz and test organisms: (b) co-cultures of E. faecium ST1 and L. monocytogenes ATCC®15313™, (c) co-cultures of E. faecium ST10Bz and E. faecalis 200A. Timepoints T1 and T2 represent exposure times of either 1 h or 3 h simulation of the stomach or small intestine, respectively. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences.
Microorganisms 08 01474 g004
Table
Table 1. Minimum inhibitory concentration of different antibiotics experimentally determined for Enterococcus faecium ST10Bz and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC®29212™ compared with the respective breakpoints proposed by European Food Safety Authority EFSA and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI).
Table 1. Minimum inhibitory concentration of different antibiotics experimentally determined for Enterococcus faecium ST10Bz and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC®29212™ compared with the respective breakpoints proposed by European Food Safety Authority EFSA and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI).
µg/mL
AmpicillinVancomycinGentamicinKanamycinStreptomycinErythromycinClindamycinTylosinTetracyclineChloramphenicol
Breakpoints for E. faecium according to EFSA24321024128444416
Experimental values for E. faecium ST10Bz0.50.5321283280.510.58
Quality control strain range for E. faecalis ATCC®29212TM according CLSI0.5–21–44–1616–64−1–44–16-8–324–16
Experimental values for E. faecalis ATCC®29212TM12816322161168
Table
Table 2. The putative protein sequences of enterocins B and P generated from the nucleotide sequence of the amplicons; results of the PCR targeting appropriate bacteriocin genes in the genome of E. faecium ST10Bz in comparison to that of known enterocins B and P. Differences in amino acids are indicated in bold and underlined.
Table 2. The putative protein sequences of enterocins B and P generated from the nucleotide sequence of the amplicons; results of the PCR targeting appropriate bacteriocin genes in the genome of E. faecium ST10Bz in comparison to that of known enterocins B and P. Differences in amino acids are indicated in bold and underlined.
Sequences
Enterocin B
E. faecium ST10BZCHINLFPTPVITFVCCFEN DHRMPNELNR PNNLSKGGAK CGAAIAGGLF GIPKGPLAWA AGLANVYS
GenBank: AAD28234.1MQNVKELSTKEMKQIIGGEN DHRMPNELNR PNNLSKGGAK CGAAIAGGLF GIPKGPLAWA AGLANVYSKCN
Enterocin P
E. faecium ST10BZMRKKLFSLTL IGKFGLVVTN FGTKVDAATR SYDNGIYCNN SKCWVNWGEA KENIAGIVIS GWASGLAGM
GenBank: ACU28817.1MRKKLFSLTL IGKFGLVVTN FGTKVDAATR SYDNGIYCNN SKCWVNWGEA KENIAGIVIS GWASGLAGM
Table
Table 3. Spectrum of activity of bacteriocin produced by E. faecium ST10Bz showing the number of sensitive strains out of the total tested for a specific species.
Table 3. Spectrum of activity of bacteriocin produced by E. faecium ST10Bz showing the number of sensitive strains out of the total tested for a specific species.
SpeciesTotal
Enterococcus avium1/3
Enterococcus faecium6/6
Enterococcus faecalis2/2
Enterococcus gallinarum0/1
Enterococcus thailandicus1/1
Enterococcus durans1/1
Vacomycin-resistant Enterococcus strains (VRE)30/30
Listeria monocytogenes1/1
Listeria innocua2/2
Bacillus cereus0/2
Bacillus subtilis0/1
Bacillus licheniformis0/1
Bacillus pumilus0/1
Clostridium butyricum0/1
Pediococcus acidilactici1/1
Pediococcus pentosaceus1/4
Weissella cibaria0/1
Leuconostoc mesenteroides0/6
Staphylococcus aureus0/1
Lactobacillus rhamnosus0/5
Lactobacillus paracasei0/5
Lactobacillus plantarum0/9
Lactobacillus sanikiri0/4
Lactobacillus brevis0/3
Lactobacillus salivarius0/3
Lactobacillus sakei1/4
Lactobacillus curvatus0/2
Lactobacillus fermentum0/2
Staphylococcus epidermidis0/1
Staphylococcus cohnii subsp. cohnii0/1
Staphylococcus warneri0/1
Staphylococcus simulans0/1
Staphylococcus capitis subsp. capitis0/1
Staphylococcus lentus0/1
Staphylococcus carnosus subsp. carnosus0/1
Staphylococcus auricularis0/1
Staphylococcus arlettae0/1
Sthaphylococcus delphini0/1
Streptococcus sanguinis0/1
Streptococcus mitis0/1
Streptococcus gordonii0/1
Streptococcus mutans0/1

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Valledor, S.J.D.; Bucheli, J.E.V.; Holzapfel, W.H.; Todorov, S.D. Exploring Beneficial Properties of the Bacteriocinogenic Enterococcus faecium ST10Bz Strain Isolated from Boza, a Bulgarian Cereal-Based Beverage. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1474. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms8101474

AMA Style

Valledor SJD, Bucheli JEV, Holzapfel WH, Todorov SD. Exploring Beneficial Properties of the Bacteriocinogenic Enterococcus faecium ST10Bz Strain Isolated from Boza, a Bulgarian Cereal-Based Beverage. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(10):1474. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms8101474

Chicago/Turabian Style

Valledor, Samantha Joy D., Jorge Enrique Vazquez Bucheli, Wilhelm H. Holzapfel, and Svetoslav Dimitrov Todorov. 2020. "Exploring Beneficial Properties of the Bacteriocinogenic Enterococcus faecium ST10Bz Strain Isolated from Boza, a Bulgarian Cereal-Based Beverage" Microorganisms 8, no. 10: 1474. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms8101474

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop