Next Article in Journal
Temperature Variation Characteristics and Model Optimization of Flocculation Sedimentation of Overflow Ultra-Fine Iron Tailings
Next Article in Special Issue
Protected Areas vs. Highway Construction—Problem of Environmental Pollution
Previous Article in Journal
Fluid Inclusion and Chemical Composition Characteristics of Emeralds from Rajasthan Area, India
Previous Article in Special Issue
Distribution of Heavy Metals in the Commune of Coronel, Chile
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Vanadium: A Review of Different Extraction Methods to Evaluate Bioavailability and Speciation

1
College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2
Engineering Research Center of Groundwater Pollution Control and Remediation, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100875, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 23 March 2022 / Revised: 7 May 2022 / Accepted: 10 May 2022 / Published: 20 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Concentration and Distribution of Heavy Metals in Soils)

Abstract

:
The excessive input of heavy metals such as vanadium (V) into the environment has been one of the consequences of global industrial development. Excessive exposure to V can pose a potential threat to ecological safety and human health. Due to the heterogeneous composition and reactivity of the various elements in soils and sediments, quantitative analysis of the chemical speciation of V in different environmental samples is very complicated. The analysis of V chemical speciation can further reveal the bioavailability of V and accurately quantify its ecotoxicity. This is essential for assessing for exposure and for controlling ecological risks of V. Although the current investigation technologies for the chemical speciation of V have grown rapidly, the lack of comprehensive comparisons and systematic analyses of these types of technologies impedes a more comprehensive understanding of ecosystem safety and human health risks. In this review, we studied the chemical and physical extraction methods for V from multiple perspectives, such as technological, principle-based, and efficiency-based, and their application to the evaluation of V bioavailability. By sorting out the advantages and disadvantages of the current technologies, the future demand for the in situ detection of trace heavy metals such as V can be met and the accuracy of heavy metal bioavailability prediction can be improved, which will be conducive to development in the fields of environmental protection policy and risk management.

1. Introduction

Vanadium (V) has many valuable physical, chemical, and mechanical properties; therefore, it is widely used in modern industrial technologies and is an important strategic material [1]. V is used as an additive and alloying element (at 80–85%) in the ferrous metallurgy industry to prepare a unique kind of steel. In the chemical industry, V compounds have been widely used as catalysts and cracking agents in the contact method sulfuric acid manufacturing industry and petroleum refining and organic synthesis industries [2,3]. A large number of studies have shown that excessive V is toxic and carcinogenic and must be treated at the same level as Pb, As, and Hg [4,5,6,7]. As early as the end of the 1980s, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) recommended that V be included in the list of environmentally hazardous elements as a substance of priority. Moreover, they jointly proposed with the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Agency for Chemical Substances Safety (IPCS): “On the basis of monitoring, research on the environmental behavior and biological toxicological characteristics of V should be strengthened” [8,9].
Early V was mainly stored in the mantle and was later released into the surface environment through the combustion of fossil fuels, mining, and the use of phosphate fertilizers [5]. V is chemically active and can form species with variable oxygen affinities. On entering the soil, V and its compounds undergo chemical migration via various reactions, such as dissolution, precipitation, aggregation, complexation and adsorption [10]. Both the cationic (V2+, V3+, VO2+, VO2+, V(OH)2+, and V(OH)4+) and anionic states (VO3, VO43−, HVO42−, H2VO4, VO2(OH), VO3(OH)2−, and V4O12) of V are toxic, and their toxicity also depends on the physical and chemical properties of the compounds they form [11,12,13]. In recent years, monitoring the total concentration of V has remained useful in many areas, but speciation research is of vital importance because the mobility, bioavailability, bioaccumulation, and toxicity of V depend on its chemical species [14,15,16]. The determination of the speciation of V in different environmental media, such as in river sediments, mining area soils, and tailings, has been widely reported [17,18,19,20,21]. Similar to other chemical poisons, V toxicity in different environmental media generally increases with increasing atomic valence state and solubility [22,23].
The main principle of the current extraction methods from soils is using different chemical reagents or solvents to separate and test V based on differences in the physical properties (such as particle size, solubility, etc.) or chemical properties (such as binding states, reactivity, etc.) of the different species of V [2,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. Due to the different extraction mechanisms, the extraction outcomes from soils using various extractants are quite different [34,35]. Correlations between the amount of V extracted by different methods from soils and the V absorbed by plants can reflect the bioavailability of V [16,24]. Good correlations could predict the amount of V absorbed by plants, thereby indicating its biological impact [36,37]. The amount of V species absorbed by the plant should be correlated with the amount of extracted V species by statistical analysis to establish the bioavailability of V species in the soil. At present, a comprehensive understanding of the selectivity of the extractants, their effect on the chemical speciation of V in different environmental media, and the evaluation of the bioavailability of V to plants is still lacking. Therefore, this review aims to summarize and discuss globally published studies from the past ten years on the extraction of specific chemical species of V. The objectives of this review are (1) to review and compare the most relevant and recently published extraction methods and extraction efficiencies of V from different environmental samples worldwide and (2) to summarize the use of extraction methods related to the various chemical species of V to assess the bioavailability of different V species on plants. This review will provide a more systematic and specific discussion of the accurate evaluation of the bioavailability and risks associated with V in the environment, which will further lay the foundation for revealing its geochemical behavior.

2. Sources and Human External Exposure Pathways

2.1. The Distribution of V Resources

V is widely distributed in nature, with an average content of 90 mg kg−1 and 0.0015% mass ratio in the Earth’s crust, a concentration higher than those of Cu, Ni, Zn, Ti, Co, Pb, and other metals [5,15]. The valence or oxidation state of V determines the properties of the compounds it forms. Common V oxides include VO, V2O3, VO2, and V2O5. Their oxidation states range from low (II) to high (V), their redox abilities also change from strongly reducing to strongly oxidizing, and their aqueous solutions gradually change from strongly alkaline to weakly acidic [13,38].
In nature, V mainly forms symbiotic or composite ores with other minerals. More than 70 kinds of V-bearing minerals have been discovered at present and few individual V deposits have high content or rich accumulation [39]. Most V deposits are associated with V-Ti magnetite, potash V uranium, and petroleum-associated minerals. Ninety-eight percent of the proven V resource reserves are contained in V-Ti magnetite and their V2O5 content is 1.8% [5]. The world’s total metal V resources are estimated to be approximately 41.3 million tons. In the order of reserves, at present, the main V-supplying countries of the world are Russia, South Africa, China, the United States, and Australia [40]. The V concentration values of some countries in the world are shown in the Table 1. The V concentration in some areas of Turkey, Spain, and other countries is close to the world average level by 90 mg·kg−1.
China is rich in V resources, and its average V soil content is 114 mg/kg, which is 27% higher than the worlds’ average [36,50]. China’s V resources are mainly distributed in seven provinces (>90%) (Table 2), of which the Sichuan Province ranks first in the country, accounting for 49% of the total reserves [22,51]. Among them, V-Ti magnetite is mainly distributed in the Panzhihua-Xichang region, Sichuan Province, and black shale-type V deposits are mainly distributed in the Hunan, Hubei, Anhui, and Jiangxi provinces [27,52]. There are two main forms of V ore resources in China: (1) those produced in magmatic rock-type V-Ti magnetite deposits as associated minerals and (2) independent deposits, mainly Cambrian black shale-type V ore. In addition, China also has abundant stone coal and V resources. Although stone coal V ore is a low-grade V-bearing resource, its V content is equivalent to the world’s total reserves of non-stone coal V ore resources.

2.2. V Contamination Sources in Soils

The smelting of V and its alloys are the main pollution sources associated with V in the environment. V is discharged into the environment during a series of processes, such as mining, crushing, sintering, and steelmaking from V-containing minerals such as V-Ti magnetite [18,19,36,53]. At present, the areas with severe V pollution are mainly concentrated in industrial areas, thermal power plants, V-Ti magnetite mines, smelters, etc., that use heavy oil and coal as fuel. Generally, V pollution is relatively serious near thermal power plants, which burn 20 to 30 tons of heavy oil per hour and discharge 20 kg of V pentoxide [71]. In winter and spring, 50% of the V pollution in the Russian Arctic is caused by V deposition from the atmosphere [72]. Part of the open-pit V mines also discharge into rivers and farmlands with surface runoff. At the same time, due to the recharge of V-containing wastewater and the application of V-containing pesticides, the V content in farmland soil far exceeds the background value of heavy metals in this area, thereby threatening human health [27,35,73,74]. The impact of V mining on the ecological environment is mainly reflected in topography, land occupation, soil erosion, and so on. Its biological effects are mainly manifested as the destruction of animal populations and vegetation. Societal impacts are mainly manifested as changes in land use patterns and landscape patterns. Panzhihua city and the Greater Western Hunan Region in China are rich in V ore resources, and a large number of V smelting projects have caused V contamination, which severely endangers the ecology of these areas [6,27,28,36,51,75].
Agricultural production, especially the excessive use of heavy metal-contaminated fertilizers, organic manures, urban waste and pesticides, and sewage irrigation in modern agricultural production processes, can cause heavy metal contamination in agricultural soils [36,76,77]. The long-term, improper application of fertilizers can not only lead to soil acidification and nutrient ratio imbalances but also promote the release of toxic and harmful pollutants [78]. Affected by the deposition processes of phosphate ores, phosphate fertilizers often contain a large quantity of heavy metals, and the heavy metal content depends on the choice of phosphate ore sedimentary facies and manufacturing processes used to prepare phosphate fertilizers [79,80]. Studies have shown that V is widely present in fertilizer products, its content in general pesticides can be as high as 45%, and the content of V in farm manure can reach 3–8 mg/kg [81,82]. Among these sources, the content of V in phosphate fertilizers is relatively high, mostly existing in the form of the soluble and most toxic pentavalent V salts, such as NH4VO3, which has potential environmental risks [79,80]. In addition, the livestock and poultry breeding industries in agricultural production are also important sources that cannot be ignored [78]. The excess V is applied to farmland soils in the form of organic fertilizers [80,83].
Studies have shown that the amount of V that enters the soil globally through fertilizers can be as high as 1500 tons per year, which poses a threat to farmland ecosystems [78]. In addition to the large proportion of lead, cadmium, arsenic, and other elements that exceed the standards in the soils of many grain-producing areas, the content of V has also been significantly higher than its background levels [22,28,84]. Once heavy metal pollution occurs in farmlands, it is very difficult to control due to the large areas involved. The V accumulated in the surface soils continuously enters the underground environment through irrigation and rainfall. Due to its refractory nature and biological toxicity, it poses a severe threat to human health and ecological safety.

2.3. V Speciation in Soil

V has a complex species in soil and can be combined with other metal ions and soil organic matter to form a variety of chemical species. V has various oxidation states (+2, +3, +4, +5), but in the natural environment it still exists mainly in the species of V(IV) and V(V) [5,85]. The morphology of V largely depends on the redox conditions of the environment, and different redox pairs (NO3/NH4+, Fe3+/Fe2+, MnO2/Mn2+ and SO42−/H2S) play important roles in the transformation of V species. Under oxidative and moderately reducing conditions, V(IV) and V(V) dominate [28]. V(IV) is stable under acidic conditions (pH < 5), but V(IV) is gradually oxidized to V(V) with increasing pH [10]; conversely, V(V) can also be reduced to relatively unstable V(IV) by humic substances, hydrogen sulfide, and other soil organic components (SOM) [26,85,86]. V(III) exists only in strictly anaerobic environments, such as some primary minerals, saturated soil, or peat, and is easily oxidized to V(IV) and V(V) [10]. Under normal circumstances, V(V) mostly exists in the species of anions (H2VO4 and HVO42−) with strong mobility, while oxides/hydroxides of iron, aluminum, and manganese in the soil can combine with it to reduce V(V) fluidity; while V(IV) usually appears in the species of VO2+, which can bind to organic ligands and is relatively stable under relatively reduced and low pH environments [87,88]. Soil pH also significantly affects the chemical species of heavy metals in soil solutions [29], and studies have reported that increasing soil pH may promote the migration and release of V in soil [89,90]. Changes in soil pH may also control the morphological changes, mobility, and bioavailability of V by affecting the solubility of SOM. Oxygen-containing functional groups undergo deprotonation with increasing pH, which in turn increases the solubility of SOM [10]. SOM can promote reducing conditions and help reduce V(V) to V(IV) [91]; on the other hand, SOM can also stimulate the proliferation of microorganisms, thereby promoting bioreduction [10,28]. Panichev (2006) analyzed V(IV) and V(V) in soil and plants of V-contaminated sites, and confirmed that V in soil and plants mainly exists in the species of +5 valence, which is potentially harmful [92]. V2O5 is more soluble and more toxic than V2O3 and VO2, so the valence of V is more meaningful than the total amount of V. In soil, V’s mobility, bioavailability and ecotoxicity in soil-plant systems are closely related to its chemical species. Residual V does not participate in a series of biochemical processes in the soil, but it can cause potential risks to the soil through reactions such as hydrolysis, oxidation, and reduction. Changes in soil redox potential, pH, organic matter content, metal oxide (hydroxide) content, and microbial activity all affect the morphological changes of V [28,38,93].

3. The Extraction Methods for V

3.1. Single Extraction Methods

Single extraction methods involve the mixing of one or several mixed reagents with soil in a specific ratio of soil to extractant liquid. Through one-step leaching, the content of a specific species of V in the solution is determined, and the extractable concentration of V has good correlations with its content in plants [25]. Because single extractions are relatively fast, inexpensive, and easy to conduct, various methods are widely used to assess V mobility in soils and sediments and to evaluate the short-term or medium-term hazards of heavy metals [11,26,36,94,95,96]. The extraction agents mainly use ion exchange, dissolution (acid or alkali), or chelation to extract various species of V from soil [11,26,96]. Commonly used leaching agents are as follows: (1) weak (dilute) acids (0.1 M HCl, 0.1 M HNO3, 0.5 M HOAc, etc.); (2) chelating agents (DTPA, EDTA, etc.); and (3) inorganic salt solutions, including valence cation salt solutions (NH4OAc, NH4NO3, NaNO3, etc.) and divalent cation salt solutions (CaCl2, BaCl2, etc.) [16,26,27,28,36,76,91,97].
Dilute acid solutions are mainly used for acidic soil, and dilute HCl is the most commonly used reagent. An intermediate concentration of HCl (0.5 M) has buffering capacity, mainly dissolving metals in carbonates, and has a limited impact on the metals in residual clays and sulfides [98]. The leaching capacity of hydrochloric acid for V is between that of the chelating agents and salt solutions [36,99]. The V extracted by HCl has a positive correlation with the V in plants [36]. Furthermore, the amount of HCl leaching V has a significant positive correlation with the initial concentration of HCl (5–30%) and the reaction temperature (80–110 °C) [27]. Nevertheless, the impacts of soil properties, including pH, CEC, and TOC, on V extractions with HCl are not obvious [36]. A complexing agent can form very stable, water-soluble, and well-defined complexes with metal ions and can simulate the activation of heavy metals by plant root exudates [100,101]. Among them, ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) (0.05–1 M) and diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) (0.005 M) are commonly used chelating agents [19,20,36,102,103,104]. Taking EDTA as an example, it is a nonselective reagent and can exhibit a strong capacity for complexing metals [19]. It can dissolve carbonates and form organometal complexes, which compete with the organic matter in soils. Additionally, complexes of EDTA with heavy metals such as Pb, Zn, Cd, Cu, and Ni are more stable than complexes between EDTA and V, which may result in a lower EDTA-extractable concentration of V when the aforementioned heavy metal concentrations are high [74]. Moreover, the complexing agent often forms a mixed solution with inorganic salts and dilute acids to improve the extraction efficiency.
Inorganic salt solutions mainly extract heavy metals in water-soluble and exchangeable states through ion exchange [105]. Among them, CaCl2 and NaNO3 are also often adopted as extractants for chemical speciation prediction [101]. Research has shown that NaNO3 (0.1 M) and CaCl2 (0.01 M) extraction methods are only suitable for exchangeable metals [16,19,50,100,101,106]. The ionic strength of NaNO3 is similar to that of the soil solution, so it cannot affect the equilibrium between soil solids and soil solutions [107]. In a previous study, EDTA, HCl, and NaNO3 were used as comparative extractants to evaluate V levels in the rhizospheric soil of alfalfa [16,50]. Out of the three extractants, HCl extracted the highest V concentrations (4.75–307.84 mg/kg) from soils where EDTA extracted 3.15–393.61 mg/kg V and NaNO3 extracted 0.004–23.94 mg/kg V from soils. Normally, NaNO3 exerts weak competition for the adsorption sites of oxide surfaces and organic matter [108]. Therefore, the weak leaching capacity of NaNO3 was the main reason for its lower extraction of V compared to the dilute acid and complexing agent.
In addition, CaCl2 is often used for the extraction of V because calcium is an important cation in soils and reflects the differences in solubility or binding strength between different soils [19,101,109,110]. The mobile V in the alluvial soils of Belgium in Europe was estimated by a single extraction with CaCl2 (0.01 M) [11]. According to calculations, the main V species encountered in the CaCl2 extracts is HVO42−, which means that V occurs as an anion that will have the tendency to be desorbed when the solution pH rises. V extraction was very low even in the most contaminated soil samples of this experiment, which indicated its low mobility. However, it is necessary to study the impact of changing environmental conditions such as fluctuating redox conditions and soil acidification [110].
Due to the different extraction mechanisms, the extraction outcomes of different extractants are quite different. Moreover, different leaching agents are suitable for soils in different environments [19]. Because soil pH has a substantial impact on the mobility of heavy metals, the use of different extractants for soils at different pH values can improve extraction efficiency. According to previous studies, the extractants that can better predict the migration characteristics of heavy metals in different kinds of soils are listed in Table 3. Among them, the heavy metals extractable by the DPTA, NaNO3, NaAc, and CaCl2 leaching methods correlated well with the content of V in plant roots for neutral and near-alkaline soils [25,109]. Positive correlations can be observed in acidic soil for the EDTA, HCl, CaCl2, NH4Ac, Ca(NO3)2, and NaH2PO4 leaching methods [37,100,101,111,112,113]

3.2. Sequential Extraction Methods

Sequential extraction (SE) methods are well-established approaches for analyzing the chemical speciation of V. SE is a process of classified extraction by determining one or a group of substances from the sample according to their physical properties (such as particle size, solubility, etc.) or chemical properties (such as binding states, reactivity, etc.). In recent years, many SE methods have been used to extract V, as summarized in Table 4. As early as 1979, Tessier et al. (1979), based on geochemical characteristics and simulated common environmental conditions, invented a five-step sequential extraction to divide the chemical speciation of elements in the soil into acid-soluble states (including water-soluble states), carbonates, Fe and Mn oxides, organic matter, and residual states [115]. Based on this method, many scholars have analyzed the chemical speciation of V in contaminated soils or sediments in China, the USA, Italy, Spain, Turkey, Poland and U.K. [99,116,117,118,119,120,121]. Most morphological analyses results indicate that V is mainly present in the soil as the residual fraction (70–85%), and present in lower quantities in Fe and Mn oxides (6.96–18.0%) or organic matter (2.48–13.2%) [20,116,118,119]. In contrast with these studies, significantly larger amounts of V were found in the Fe and Mn oxide fractions (22.4 and 78% of the total, respectively) in some other studies [117,121]. The residual fraction only contained 8 to 51.8%, while the organic matter fraction was of minor importance, accounting for 3–22.4% of the total V in the soil. The large specific surface area of oxide and hydroxide clay minerals in soils has more adsorption sites, and the different contents of iron, manganese, aluminum oxides, and hydroxides in different soils are important factors leading to the inconsistency of various species of soil V [121].
However, some problems were reported with earlier sequential extraction procedures, such as the non-specificity of the extracting agents and the reabsorption of metals before isolation for analysis [126,127,128]. It is also difficult to compare data obtained from different laboratories around the world that use different protocols. As a result, the BCR (now, the Standards, Measurement, and Testing Programme) established a BCR three-stage extraction method based on the Tessier method [129,130]. This method is operationally defined based on the extraction mechanism of the released metal rather than by discrete geochemical phases. At the same time, to strengthen the quality control of the analysis, the standard BCR601 for sediments was also developed. Moreover, the comparison results between 20 laboratories in eight EU countries also improved the accuracy and repeatability of the method. To standardize the sequential extraction scheme, the original BCR program has been modified [131] to divide the chemical species into acid-extractable, reducible, oxidizable, and residual fractions [132,133,134].
Based on the widely used Tessier or BCR methods, some other SE methods are also available with various combinations of leaching steps and sequences [24,53,125,135,136]. These methods were later modified and applied to soil or coal studies [136]. However, few of them were designed for the chemical speciation of V. Moreover, the few improvements that were made to the SE method were aimed at shortening the extraction time rather than improving metal recovery [35]. Unlike most other metal(loids) that generally exist either as anions or as cations in the soil, V geochemistry is very different. V may be present as both anions (VO2+, VO2+) and cations (HVO42−, H2VO4) [23]. Xu et al. established a new eight-step SE scheme that efficiently refined the V fraction bound to Mn, Fe, and Al (hydr)oxides and largely increased total extraction efficiency [24]. This was also the first study to enable the identification of visible amounts of geogenic V combined in the lattices of soil minerals.
SE can be used to provide an indication of the quantities of metals in various speciation, which is valuable for providing information on the mobility of V and other metals [15,28,29,137]. The existing research is mainly focused on assessing the potential risks of V in contaminated soils, such as identifying the amounts of anthropogenic V in contrast with V from natural origins [53,123,125], comparing the mobility of V in industrial or agricultural areas [27,28,35,51,73,91], and discussing the relationship between bioavailable V in soils and V contents in plants [23,25,36]. Recently, it has been found that SE methods using LMWOAs could reduce the mobilizable and bioavailable V in soils to achieve the effect of in-situ soil remediation [61,138].

3.3. Other Chemical Extraction Methods

Chemical methods are the most widely used methods for evaluating the bioavailability of metal pollutants and they are generally divided into two types, based on chemical extraction or mechanistic modeling [139]. In addition to common traditional single-step extractions and sequential extraction procedures, there are other effective chemical methods used to determine the bioavailability of elements in the environment in many cases [140,141].
Diffuse gradients in thin films (DGTs) are powerful in situ passive sampling techniques for performing analysis of metal species or speciation in soils, sediments, and waters [142,143]. DGT can be regarded as a passive sampler, mainly composed of a diffusion layer and a binding layer, which can extract targets from the environment [144]. Based on different binding gels, DGT can selectively accumulate different metal cations or oxyanions [143]. Four different DGT devices (Ferrihydrite, carbon, Chelex, and Purolite®) were used by Lucas et al. (2015) to determine the changes in the concentration of dissolved V and nine other elements (As, Au, Co, Cr, Cu, Co, Cr, U, Mo, As, Au, Zn, and Mn) in the water samples of an estuary [30]. Due to the formation of colloids or complexes bound to dissolve organic carbon (DOC), the DGT concentrations of V in the downstream site were lower than the total dissolved concentrations at the upstream site. In addition, changes in flow rates during different seasons can also affect the concentration of DOC, which in turn affects the DGT-dissolved V [31]. Metsorb-DGT and Ferrihydrite-DGT can be used to determine labile vanadates over a wide pH range and to accurately measure V(V) concentrations in seawater and freshwater [145,146]. An inverse trend was consistently observed between DGT-labile and dissolved V concentrations. The time of deployment, the concentrations of DOC, and the ionic strengths of the systems have subtle effects on either concentration [147].
Electrochemical techniques, such as scanned stripping chronopotentiometry (SSCP), absence of gradients and Nernstian equilibrium stripping (AGNES), anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV), and competitive ligand exchange or equilibration-cathodic stripping voltammetry (CLE-CSV) [34], are other powerful tools for metal speciation analysis. In the presence of high concentrations of added ligands, electrochemical techniques are very helpful in gaining insights into the cycling and potential bioavailability of various metals, such as Mn, Fe, V, Ti, and Cr, due to their low detection limits [148,149,150,151,152].

3.4. Physical Methods

Various anthropogenic and natural sources provide a gateway to release and introduce trace levels of V into the environment. Due to the carcinogenic and toxic effects of V, which might affect humans, plants and aquatic life, more efforts are need to determine low levels of V in natural waters and soil samples by using simple and easy methods [153]. V is usually present in trace quantities in different samples below the detection limit of most available instrumental systems. Thus, easy and simple sample preconcentration and separation technologies are necessary before screening out trace levels of V in different environmental samples [154,155,156,157]. Some physical separation techniques have consistently been reported to determine trace levels of V in different environmental samples.
Liquid-liquid microextraction (LLME) is one of the most appropriate extraction tools for separating toxic metals from complex samples [158]. Pekiner (2014) invented an in situ micropipette tip syringe system (μS-SHS) combined with ETAAS for separation, preconcentration and determination of V in food and water samples [155]. At pH = 6 and in the presence of interfering ions, high selectivity was shown for V in a surface aqueous solution with a vanadium concentration below 4.0 μg·L−1 [155]. Alkali and alkaline earth elements do not form stable complexes with complexing agents, and they have almost no effect on the selectivity of the method at high concentrations [155]. As a portable method, it is suitable to separate trace amounts of different organic and inorganic toxicants from different environmental samples [159].

3.5. Spectroscopic Methods

X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) is a powerful tool for determining the speciation of V present in sediments or soils [10]. In addition, X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) analyses can investigate the average valence state of numerous redox-active elements in solid samples and the species of V present in the soil in some cases [160,161]. Changes in the valence state of V from +3 to +5 result in corresponding shifts in pre-edge features and absorption edge positions. By fitting linear combinations of unknown species to a known reference, Larsson et al. (2017 a, b) calculated the average valence state of V in different mineral soils [162,163], and Burke et al. (2012) determined that V(V) dominated in red mud samples contaminated with As and Cr [164]. Through research on the V K-edge XANES spectra of highly weathered tropical soil samples and a range of reference compounds differing in V coordination chemistry or oxidation states, Wisawapipat and Kretzschmar (2017) also revealed that the majority of the V(IV)/V(V) is octahedral or tetrahedral. In limited cases, extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) analysis has been used to determine the average molecular coordination environment of V in soil components [160]. In addition, extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) measurements may be used to test the average molecular coordination environment of V in soil components [165,166,167]. By combining EXAFS analysis with ab initio molecular dynamics calculations, seminal studies were conducted on the binding of V(III, IV, and V) to gibbsite, goethite, ferrihydrite, and Fe(III)−natural organic matter complexes [160,162,168,169,170]. The use of V K-edge EXAFS spectroscopy is easily impeded by the Ba L2 edge, which strongly interferes with the V K-edge EXAFS region for sediments, slags, and soils [171,172]. Compared with other extraction methods, spectroscopic methods have a relatively high cost, and different methods are selected according to the actual situation [171]. Hence, EXAFS spectroscopy may have considerable limits as a tool for determining the average molecular coordination environment of V in many environmental materials, at least when using a conventional X-ray absorption setup.

3.6. Comparison of Different Extraction Methods of Vanadium

Conventional single extractant methods usually only have a good effect on one or two kinds of heavy metals, and it takes more time and cost to analyze the bioavailability of multiple heavy metals. At present, the development of analyses for multiple elemental states is growing; several single extraction n procedures can be applied to conduct extraction tests to optimize the extraction conditions of the extracting agents for multiple elemental states. In contrast to sequential extraction methods, single extraction methods suffer from the difficulty of discovering a single reagent that can quantitatively dissolve the residual species of metals without attacking the detrital species. Sequential extraction methods are too cumbersome for studying the bioavailability of heavy metals, and the definition of morphological classification and bioavailability is slightly different. Some scholars often use fast and effective single extraction methods to analyze the effectiveness of V. Yang (2015) showed that the correlation between sodium nitrate and alfalfa in the speciation extraction of V was better than that of the BVR method and EDTA method [25]. DGT technology is hardly affected by the basic properties of soil and can predict the availability of V in soil well, but DGT technology cannot fully simulate the plant growth environment [173]. The Tessier method of extractants lacks selectivity, and there are resorption and redistribution phenomena during the extraction process, a lack of validation, and low data accuracy [174]. On this basis, BCR strengthened the control of analytical quality and formulated reference material (Certified Reference Material, CRM 601) [132]. The three-step BCR method fully utilizes the selective extractant from weak to strong, minimizing phase channeling [175]. By analyzing the phase state of sludge from WWTPs, the effects of the BCR method and Tessier method were compared, and the results showed that BCR was more effective than Tessier in extracting oxidizable states [176].

4. V Bioavailability in Soils Based on Morphological Extraction

4.1. Plant-Available V in Soils

V acts as a growth-promoting factor, which could improve nitrogen assimilation and utilization, chlorophyll biosynthesis, and seed germination. Under V stress, Mo and B concentrations decrease in roots and increase in upper leaves [177,178,179]. Both of these metal concentrations closely correlate with nitrate reduction, which might be responsible for the increased nitrogen levels in the leaves of V-treated plants [180]. Furthermore, V also enhances the uptake of Fe and Mg, which are essential elements for chlorophyll biosynthesis [14,181]. Therefore, V can promote root length, plant height, and biomass production at low contents. However, high V levels may inhibit key enzymes that mediate ion transport, protein synthesis, energy production, and other important physiological processes and cause root and shoot abnormalities, growth retardation, and even mortality in plants [14,182,183]. V causes reductions in carotenoid content, potassium (K) uptake and transport, and other growth factors, which could reduce photosynthetic activity and transpiration [181,184,185].
V has a complex species in soil and has various oxidation states (+2, +3, +4, +5), but it exists mainly in the species of V(IV) and V(V) in soil [5,85]. Accumulation is the major response strategy of most plants to the soil toxicity of V. The available species of V that can be absorbed and utilized by plants in the soil include those that are acid-extractable, reducible, and oxidizable. Most of the V absorbed by plants is accumulated in the roots, and a small part is transferred from roots to the trunk and leaves. The process of V absorption by roots and transport in the plant is shown in Figure 1 [14]. V in the movable part of the soil is mainly pentavalent [85]. After entering the plant, the pentavalent V is gradually transformed into tetravalent V by the reduction of plant cells [186]. V is mainly concentrated in the roots, where V contents are approximately 2 to 1000 times higher than its levels in aerial parts of plants [23]. The amount of V in soil is the most important factor influencing V accumulation in roots below the threshold V levels of apparent toxicity to plants [7]. The half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) is a toxicological index that can be used to counter the relationship between heavy metals and acute toxicity. EC50 of V for plants grown under hydroponic conditions varied from 1 to 50 mg/L, while it varied from 18 to 510 mg/kg in soils. In many cases, a variety of plants exhibited strong tolerance to V, such as some legumes (crops of chickpea, soybean, green bean, alfalfa, etc.) and vegetables (Chinese green mustard, tomato, rice, lettuce, etc.) [7,23,25,38,184,187,188,189,190]. The greatest known V accumulation was detected in the tissues of Chinese green mustard, bunny cactus, and chickpea at over 8000 mg/kg [25,38,187,190]. As a result, these plants are suitable for V-contaminated soil remediation on a large scale. The bioavailable V in the soil enters the plant through the root system. However, through the food chain, this effect can be transmitted to people, which has an impact on human health. Soil V content associated with higher gastric and colorectal cancer mortality rates in humans (IPCS, 1998). In the presence of H2O2 at the site of inflammation, V activates mast cells at the late phase to amplify allergic responses [191]. V(IV) can oxidize a large number of biochemical substances, generate free radicals, and cause DNA damage [192].
Under conditions of high environmental V concentrations, Plants and root microorganisms secrete some organic substances to change the physical and chemical properties of the environment (pH, Eh etc.) to resist V [193,194]. In addition, Most of the V absorbed by plants from the environment forms coordination bonds with polysaccharides and hydroxyl groups in plant cell walls and cannot enter plants [180]. some plants have low absorption characteristics for V. Rape, watermelon, box-thorn, and Chinese cabbage accumulate only small amounts of V (0.56 mg/kg, 1.3 mg/kg, 2.73 mg/kg, 3.00 mg/kg, respectively) in their roots [183,193,195,196], revealing high-efficiency exclusion and elimination properties against high V contents. From the perspective of efficient land use and food safety, some plants have some resistance to V-contaminated soil, but whether there is any negative impact on health needs to be studied in more detail.

4.2. Bioavailability Evaluation Index or Method

There is general consensus on the bioavailability of heavy metals that can assist the risk assessment of these elements in the environment. However, professionals from different disciplines can have different understandings of and definitions for bioavailability. The International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) defines bioavailability as the bioavailable part of a chemical “able to be absorbed by living organisms”, which is also a function of biological properties and chemical speciation [197]. Bioavailability should be quantifiable in risk assessment, but there are no unified analysis methods to quantify it. In general, chemical methods and bioassays can be used to assess potential bioavailability in extracellular or intracellular matrices, respectively [198,199,200,201]. Among these methods, morphological extraction mainly uses singly coupled or sequential extraction reagents to simulate different redox environments to predict risks related to contaminant behavior under specific environmental conditions. Morphological leaching tests are relatively simple and reproducible methods that can be performed according to standardized protocols, so they are the most widely used methods for evaluating the bioavailability of heavy metals (e.g., US EPA, 1992; DIN, 1998; US NRC, 2002) [202,203,204].
Available V in the soil refers to the content of V that can be quickly absorbed and assimilated by plants. Pot experiments have showed that the growth of plants substantially reduces the concentrations of V(V) in the rhizosphere soil, but no such relationships were found for V(IV), suggesting that V(V) is actively related to the soil–root interaction of V [19,23,182]. The bioavailability of V(V) is affected by soil pH value, total organic carbon (TOC), plant species, and V concentration in soil [2]. V forms complex with carboxylic acid and glycooh groups, and exists in the species of VO2+ under strong acidic conditions [186]. V at neutral pH exists mainly in the species of tetravalent V cation (VO2+) and pentavalent vanadate anion (HVO42− or H2VO4) [205,206]. There was a poor correlation between plant biomass and soil V(V) at low concentrations in the soil, while these parameters showed a negative correlation at higher concentrations, reflecting the toxic effect of V [182]. The presence of carbonate plays an important role in vanadium mobility [15]. Therefore, these results indicate that V(V) concentrations might better reveal the toxicity of V in soils than total V or soil V(IV), which can be used as an indicator of V bioavailability [94]. Moreover, the self-protective function of plants might prevent the translocation of V from the root to the aboveground parts [193,207]. Thus, the roots always absorb more V than the other parts of the plant (e.g., stem, leaf, and seed) [23,182]. Furthermore, the contents of total V in roots are consistently proportional to the water-soluble or extractable V concentrations in the rhizosphere soil [208]. For this reason, these V fractions that are effective for plants can be used to indicate the bioavailability of V in the soil-plant system, to a certain extent.
From the perspective of soil chemistry, the bioavailability of V not only includes water-soluble, acid-soluble, chelated, and adsorbed states but also includes forms that can be released into plants in a short period, such as some easily decomposed organic states and weathered mineral states. Sequential extraction methods are usually used to quantify V fractions that can be mobilized in acidified, reduced, or oxidized environments. By the standardized Tessier five-step sequential extraction or modified BCR method, bioavailable V could be defined as the sum of the first few steps excluding the residual phases [25,36,50]. Many research results have shown that V sorbed by plants has a direct correlation with V in soils, especially for the sum of the first three fractions detected by BCR methods [16,23,25,209].
Single extraction methods can be used directly to predict V bioavailability in soils because they have good correlation with plant uptake, and are usually used to evaluate different hazardous species. Weak acids (e.g., 0.1 M HOAc, pH = 3.5) are expected to minimally influence the extraction of V and to predominantly release only the weakly adsorbed V fractions, which better reveal the readily bioavailable species in soils [182]. HCl and EDTA extractions seem to reflect long-term influences because they may decrease the adsorption affinity of V by dissolving amorphous soil minerals, especially Fe and Al (hydr)oxides, which are strong ligands for V complexation [210,211]. CaCl2 and NaNO3, which are regarded as soil background electrolyte solutions, could be adopted as extractants for V bioavailability prediction. Low-molecular-weight organic acids (LMWOAs) (e.g., citric, malic, acetic, lactic, and formic acids, etc.), which are produced in the rhizosphere environment, are secretions of fungi and bacteria [100,101]. They play an important role in transporting metals to roots and improving the uptake of metals by plants, so they are good indicators of the bioavailability of V operating at the soil-root interface [211,212,213]. Nevertheless, no single specific extractant can be used as a standard in a universal method for predicting bioavailability [214]. The extractability of V in soils varies with extraction reagents, which can be explained by different extraction mechanisms.

5. Conclusions and Perspectives

In summary, we briefly reviewed the distribution of global V-bearing minerals and the main sources of V pollution in the environment. Then, based on physical and chemical methods, different extraction technologies and their extraction efficiencies for V in the environment were discussed. The general conclusions of these comparisons follow: (i) Single extraction methods can be widely used to evaluate the short-term or medium-term hazards of V in soils and sediments because the extracted chemical species correlate well with V content in plants. (ii) SE, which is mainly used to assess the potential risk of V in contaminated soils, can be used to estimate the amounts of V in various “reservoirs,” but challenges remain with regard to the non-specificity of extracting agents, incomplete extraction between different phases, and reabsorption of metals before isolation for analysis. (iii) Electrochemical techniques, such as SSCP and ASV, are suitable for studying the circulation of heavy metals such as V and their potential bioavailability under high concentrations of ligand addition. (iv) Physical methods can be used for the separation, pre-concentration, and determination of trace amounts of V in food and water samples; these techniques have high selectivity for V in the presence of interfering ions. (v) XAS is also a powerful tool to determine the species of V in solids because XANES analysis can investigate the average valence of multiple redox active elements and ligand species of V(IV)/V(V), and EXAFS measurement results can be used to test the average molecular coordination environments of V in soil components.
Studies have shown that the chemical species of V and its bioavailability cannot be attributed to a single value that can be measured by a single chemical or even biological method. As with any process in nature, it is dynamic and changes with time and environmental conditions. Many efforts have been made recently to correlate bioavailability with chemical extractions results. To reliably assess and predict the long-term behavior of V in the environment, a complete set of detailed biological and chemical tests coupled with geochemical modeling and advanced spectroscopy techniques may be required. In addition, it is impractical to conduct extensive investigations on the chemical species of V in the field. A small set of tests can be collected for experimental verification to more accurately and conveniently predict changes in V bioavailability.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing—Original Draft, J.Y.; Writing—Original Draft, Software. Y.W.; Conceptualization, X.G.; Resources, Investigation, Data Curation, C.J.; Software, Supervision, R.Z.; Project administration, Supervision J.W.; Formal analysis, Supervision, L.S.; Writing—Review & Editing, Funding acquisition, Y.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is funded by [the National Natural Science Foundation of China] grant number (41403085), [the National Natural Science Foundation of China] grant number (41877355) and the National Key R&D Program of China] grant number (2018YFC1800901).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in insert article here.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate two anonymous reviewers for critical comments that further refine the quality of the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kumar, S.; Jain, A.; Ichikawa, T.; Kojima, Y.; Dey, G. Development of vanadium based hydrogen storage material: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 72, 791–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Imtiaz, M.; Rizwan, M.; Xiong, S.; Li, H.; Ashraf, M.; Shahzad, S.M.; Shahzad, M.; Tu, S. Vanadium, recent advancements and research prospects: A review. Environ. Int. 2015, 80, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhu, X.; Li, W.; Zhang, C. Extraction and removal of vanadium by adsorption with resin 201*7 from vanadium waste liquid. Environ. Res. 2019, 180, 108865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, D.; Jiang, J.; Li, T.; Wang, J. Soil heavy metal contamination related to roasted stone coal slag: A study based on geostatistical and multivariate analyses. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 14405–14413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Huang, J.-H.; Huang, F.; Evans, L.; Glasauer, S. Vanadium: Global (bio)geochemistry. Chem. Geol. 2015, 417, 68–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Aihemaiti, A.; Jiang, J.; Li, D.; Liu, N.; Yang, M.; Meng, Y.; Zou, Q. The interactions of metal concentrations and soil properties on toxic metal accumulation of native plants in vanadium mining area. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 222, 216–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, J.; Teng, Y.; Wu, J.; Chen, H.; Wang, G.; Song, L.; Yue, W.; Zuo, R.; Zhai, Y. Current status and associated human health risk of vanadium in soil in China. Chemosphere 2017, 171, 635–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. World Health Organization (WHO). Vanadium Environmental Health Criteria 81: Vanadium; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  9. Public Health Service USA (PHS). Toxicological Profile for Vanadium and Compounds; Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  10. Shaheen, S.M.; Alessi, D.; Tack, F.M.G.; Ok, Y.S.; Kim, K.-H.; Gustafsson, J.P.; Sparks, D.L.; Rinklebe, J. Redox chemistry of vanadium in soils and sediments: Interactions with colloidal materials, mobilization, speciation, and relevant environmental implications- A review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 265, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cappuyns, V.; Slabbinck, E. Occurrence of Vanadium in Belgian and European Alluvial Soils. Appl. Environ. Soil Sci. 2012, 2012, 979501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yang, J.; Teng, Y.; Wang, J.; Li, J. Vanadium Uptake by Alfalfa Grown in V–Cd-Contaminated Soil by Pot Experiment. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2010, 142, 787–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sergienko, V.S. Structural chemistry of oxoperoxo complexes of vanadium(V): A review. Crystallogr. Rep. 2004, 49, 401–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Aihemaiti, A.; Gao, Y.; Meng, Y.; Chen, X.; Liu, J.; Xiang, H.; Xu, Y.; Jiang, J. Review of plant-vanadium physiological interactions, bioaccumulation, and bioremediation of vanadium-contaminated sites. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 712, 135637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Poledniok, J. Speciation of vanadium in soil. Talanta 2003, 59, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Teng, Y.G.; Yang, J.; Song, L.T.; Wang, J.S. Fractionation and bioavailability of vanadium in alfalfa rhizosphere and bulk soils by greenhouse experiment. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2013, 22, 1837–1843. [Google Scholar]
  17. Cappuyns, V.; Swennen, R. Release of vanadium from oxidized sediments: Insights from different extraction and leaching procedures. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2013, 21, 2272–2282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, M.; Xiao, L.; Li, Q.; Wang, X.; Xiang, X. Leaching of vanadium from stone coal with sulfuric acid. Rare Met. 2009, 28, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, M.T.; Wei, C.; Zhou, X.J.; Qiu, S.; Deng, Z.G.; Li, X.B. Kinetics of vanadium leaching from black shale in non-oxidative conditions. Miner. Process. Extr. Met. 2012, 121, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, J.; Teng, Y.; Zuo, R.; Song, L. Comparison of bioavailable vanadium in alfalfa rhizosphere soil extracted by an improved BCR procedure and EDTA, HCl, and NaNO3 single extractions in a pot experiment with V–Cd treatments. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2013, 22, 8833–8842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, J.; Gao, X.; Li, J.; Zuo, R.; Wang, J.; Song, L. The distribution and speciation characteristics of vanadium in typical cultivated soils. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2021, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yang, J.; Wang, M.; Jia, Y.; Gou, M.; Zeyer, J. Toxicity of vanadium in soil on soybean at different growth stages. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 231, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, J.Y.; Yang, K.; Li, T.Q.; Tang, Y.; Huang, J.H. Determination of total V, V(V) and V(IV) in environmental samples: A review. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 2010, 19, 518–527. [Google Scholar]
  24. Xu, Y.-H.; Huang, J.-H.; Brandl, H. An optimised sequential extraction scheme for the evaluation of vanadium mobility in soils. J. Environ. Sci. 2017, 53, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Yang, J.Y.; Tang, Y. Accumulation and Biotransformation of Vanadium in Opuntia microdasys. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2015, 94, 448–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Liu, F.; Ning, P.-G.; Cao, H.-B.; Zhang, Y. Measurement and modeling for vanadium extraction from the (NaVO3+H2SO4+H2O) system by primary amine N1923. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2015, 80, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xiao, X.-Y.; Yang, M.; Guo, Z.-H.; Jiang, Z.-C.; Liu, Y.-N.; Cao, X. Soil vanadium pollution and microbial response characteristics from stone coal smelting district. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2015, 25, 1271–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, L.; Liu, J.-R.; Hu, W.-F.; Gao, J.; Yang, J.-Y. Vanadium in soil-plant system: Source, fate, toxicity, and bioremediation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 405, 124200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Reijonen, I.; Metzler, M.; Hartikainen, H. Impact of soil pH and organic matter on the chemical bioavailability of vanadium species: The underlying basis for risk assessment. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 210, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lucas, A.R.; Salmon, U.; Rate, A.W.; Larsen, S.; Kilminster, K. Spatial and temporal distribution of Au and other trace elements in an estuary using the diffusive gradients in thin films technique and grab sampling. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2015, 171, 156–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shi, Y.X.; Mangal, V.; Guéguen, C. Influence of dissolved organic matter on dissolved vanadium speciation in the Churchill River estuary (Manitoba, Canada). Chemosphere 2016, 154, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mampuru, L.A.; Panichev, N.; Ngobeni, P.; Mandiwana, K.L.; Kalumba, M.M. Determination of Leachable Vanadium (V) in sediment. S. Afr. J. Chem. 2015, 68, 57–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Naeemullah; Tuzen, M. A new portable switchable hydrophilicity microextraction method for determination of vanadium in microsampling micropipette tip syringe system couple with ETAAS. Talanta 2018, 194, 991–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Companys, E.; Galceran, J.; Pinheiro, J.; Puy, J.; Salaun, P. A review on electrochemical methods for trace metal speciation in environmental media. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2017, 3, 144–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Khan, S.; Kazi, T.G.; Kolachi, N.F.; Afridi, I.; Ullah, N. Sequential Extraction of Vanadium in Different Soil Samples Using Conventional and Ultrasonic Devices. J. AOAC Int. 2013, 96, 650–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Teng, Y.; Yang, J.; Sun, Z.; Wang, J.; Zuo, R.; Zheng, J. Environmental vanadium distribution, mobility and bioaccumulation in different land-use Districts in Panzhihua Region, SW China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2010, 176, 605–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, M.-K.; Liu, Z.-Y.; Wang, H. Use of Single Extraction Methods to Predict Bioavailability of Heavy Metals in Polluted Soils to Rice. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2010, 41, 820–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Imtiaz, M.; Tu, S.; Xie, Z.; Han, D.; Ashraf, M.; Rizwan, M.S. Growth, V uptake, and antioxidant enzymes responses of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes under vanadium stress. Plant Soil 2015, 390, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sergeeva, N.E.; Eremin, N.I.; Dergachev, A.L. Vanadium mineralization in ore of the Vihanti massive sulfide base-metal deposit, Finland. Dokl. Earth Sci. 2011, 436, 210–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Silin, I.; Gürsel, D.; Kremer, D.; Hahn, K.; Wotruba, H. Production of Vanadium Concentrate from a Small-Scale Lead Vanadate Deposit by Gravity Concentration: A Pilot Plant Study. Minerals 2020, 10, 957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dudka, S.; Markert, B. Base-line concentrations of AS, BA, BE, LI, NB, SR and V in surface soils of poland. Sci. Total Environ. 1992, 122, 279–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Manta, D.S.; Angelone, M.; Bellanca, A.; Neri, R.; Sprovieri, M. Heavy metals in urban soils: A case study from the city of Palermo (Sicily), Italy. Sci. Total Environ. 2002, 300, 229–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Óvári, M.; Csukás, M.; Záray, G. Speciation of beryllium, nickel, and vanadium in soil samples from Csepel Island, Hungary. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2001, 370, 768–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tume, P.; Bech, J.; Longan, L.; Tume, L.; Reverter, F.; Sepulveda, B. Trace elements in natural surface soils in Sant Climent (Catalonia, Spain). Ecol. Eng. 2006, 27, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Granero, S.; Domingo, J.L. Levels of metals in soils of Alcalá de Henares, Spain: Human health risks. Environ. Int. 2002, 28, 159–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Salonen, V.-P.; Korkka-Niemi, K. Influence of parent sediments on the concentration of heavy metals in urban and suburban soils in Turku, Finland. Appl. Geochem. 2007, 22, 906–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Salminen, R.; Gregorauskiene, V. Considerations regarding the definition of a geochemical baseline of elements in the surficial materials in areas differing in basic geology. Appl. Geochem. 2000, 15, 647–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Protasova, N.A.; Kopayeva, M.T. Trace and dispersed elements in soils of Russian Plateau. Pochvovedeniye 1985, 1, 29–37. [Google Scholar]
  49. Yay, O.D.; Alagha, O.; Tuncel, G. Multivariate statistics to investigate metal contamination in surface soil. J. Environ. Manag. 2008, 86, 581–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Teng, Y.; Yang, J.; Wang, J.; Song, L. Bioavailability of Vanadium Extracted by EDTA, HCl, HOAC, and NaNO3 in Topsoil in the Panzhihua Urban Park, Located in Southwest China. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2011, 144, 1394–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Cao, X.; Diao, M.; Zhang, B.; Liu, H.; Wang, S.; Yang, M. Spatial distribution of vanadium and microbial community responses in surface soil of Panzhihua mining and smelting area, China. Chemosphere 2017, 183, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chen, L.; Wang, K.-P.; Yang, J.-Y. Evaluate the Potential Bioavailability of Vanadium in Soil and Vanadium Titano-magnetite Tailing in A Mining Area Using BCR Sequential and Single Extraction: A Case Study in Panzhihua, China. Soil Sediment Contam. Int. J. 2019, 29, 232–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yang, J.; Teng, Y.; Song, L.; Zuo, R. Tracing Sources and Contamination Assessments of Heavy Metals in Road and Foliar Dusts in a Typical Mining City, China. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0168528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Liao, Y.; Yang, J. Remediation of vanadium contaminated soil by nano-hydroxyapatite. J. Soils Sediments 2019, 20, 1534–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, B.; Wang, S.; Diao, M.; Fu, J.; Xie, M.; Shi, J.; Liu, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Cao, X.; Borthwick, A.G.L. Microbial Community Responses to Vanadium Distributions in Mining Geological Environments and Bioremediation Assessment. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 2019, 124, 601–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Sun, X.; Qiu, L.; Kolton, M.; Häggblom, M.; Xu, R.; Kong, T.; Gao, P.; Li, B.; Jiang, C.; Sun, W. VV Reduction by Polaromonas spp. in Vanadium Mine Tailings. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 14442–14454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Liang, J.; Feng, C.; Zeng, G.; Gao, X.; Zhong, M.; Li, X.; Li, X.; He, X.; Fang, Y. Spatial distribution and source identification of heavy metals in surface soils in a typical coal mine city, Lianyuan, China. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 225, 681–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, C.; Qiao, Q.; Piper, J.D.; Huang, B. Assessment of heavy metal pollution from a Fe-smelting plant in urban river sediments using environmental magnetic and geochemical methods. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 3057–3070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dong, Y.B.; Chen, D.N.; Lin, H. Remediation effect of curing agent on compound contaminated soil by vanadium and chromium. Met. Mine 2021, 08, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, W.J.; Jiang, J.G.; Li, D.A.; Li, T.R.; Li, K.M.; Wang, J.M. Stabilization of V contaminated soils with adsorption materials. China Environ. Sci. 2016, 36, 1500–1505. [Google Scholar]
  61. Zou, Q.; Gao, Y.; Yi, S.; Jiang, J.; Aihemaiti, A.; Li, D.; Yang, M. Multi-step column leaching using low-molecular-weight organic acids for remediating vanadium- and chromium-contaminated soil. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 15406–15413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wu, J.; Zhang, C.; Pei, L.; Chen, G.; Zheng, X. Association between risk of birth defects occurring level and arsenic concentrations in soils of Lvliang, Shanxi province of China. Environ. Pollut. 2014, 191, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhao, Z.P.; Fu, J.; Yue, S.Y.; Wang, M.; Song, F.M.; Liu, Z.F.; Tang, B.; Tong, Y.A. Assessing producing environment and potential ecological risk of tea plantation in southern Shaanxi Province. J. Agro-Environ. Sci. 2020, 39, 1983–1992. [Google Scholar]
  64. Hussain, R.; Luo, K.; Liang, H.; Hong, X. Impact of the coal mining-contaminated soil on the food safety in Shaanxi, China. Environ. Geochem. Health 2019, 41, 1521–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Zhang, D.; Zhou, M.Z.; Xiong, K.N.; Gu, B.Q.; Yang, H.; Yao, C.B. Health risk assessment of V in the soils and crops around the Ni-Mo polymetallic mining area in Songlin, Zunyi, Guizhou. Environ. Pollut. Control 2019, 41, 824–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chen, X.; Lu, X.; Li, L.Y.; Yang, G. Spatial distribution and contamination assessment of heavy metals in urban topsoil from inside the Xi’an second ringroad, NW China. Environ. Earth Sci. 2012, 68, 1979–1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tang, Q.; Liu, G.; Zhou, C.; Zhang, H.; Sun, R. Distribution of environmentally sensitive elements in residential soils near a coal-fired power plant: Potential risks to ecology and children’s health. Chemosphere 2013, 93, 2473–2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, Q.; Zhang, F.; Huang, C. Heavy metal distribution in particle size fractions of floodplain soils from Dongchuan, Yunnan Province, Southwest China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2021, 193, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yuan, Z.; Yao, J.; Wang, F.; Guo, Z.; Dong, Z.; Chen, F.; Hu, Y.; Sunahara, G. Potentially toxic trace element contamination, sources, and pollution assessment in farmlands, Bijie City, southwestern China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2016, 189, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhang, S.; Wang, L.; Zhang, W.; Wang, L.; Shi, X.; Lu, X.; Li, X. Pollution Assessment and Source Apportionment of Trace Metals in Urban Topsoil of Xi’an City in Northwest China. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2019, 77, 575–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Pyrzyska, K. Determination of vanadium species in environmental samples. Talanta 2004, 64, 823–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Shevchenko, V.; Lisitzin, A.; Vinogradova, A.; Stein, R. Heavy metals in aerosols over the seas of the Russian Arctic. Sci. Total Environ. 2003, 306, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Orecchio, S.; Amorello, D.; Barreca, S.; Pettignano, A. Speciation of vanadium in urban, industrial and volcanic soils by a modified Tessier method. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 2016, 18, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Gäbler, H.-E.; Glüh, K.; Bahr, A.; Utermann, J. Quantification of vanadium adsorption by German soils. J. Geochem. Explor. 2009, 103, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Li, Y.; Zhang, B.; Liu, Z.; Wang, S.; Yao, J.; Borthwick, A.G. Vanadium contamination and associated health risk of farmland soil near smelters throughout China. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 263, 114540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wu, C.-Y.; Asano, M.; Hashimoto, Y.; Rinklebe, J.; Shaheen, S.M.; Wang, S.-L.; Hseu, Z.-Y. Evaluating vanadium bioavailability to cabbage in rural soils using geochemical and micro-spectroscopic techniques. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 258, 113699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Kelepertzis, E.; Paraskevopoulou, V.; Argyraki, A.; Fligos, G.; Chalkiadaki, O. Evaluation of single extraction procedures for the assessment of heavy metal extractability in citrus agricultural soil of a typical Mediterranean environment (Argolida, Greece). J. Soils Sediments 2015, 15, 2265–2275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Jiao, W.; Chen, W.; Chang, A.C.; Page, A.L. Environmental risks of trace elements associated with long-term phosphate fertilizers applications: A review. Environ. Pollut. 2012, 168, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Otero, N.; Vitòria, L.; Soler, A.; Canals, A. Fertiliser characterisation: Major, trace and rare earth elements. Appl. Geochem. 2005, 20, 1473–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Molina, M.; Aburto, F.; Calderón, R.; Cazanga, M.; Escudey, M. Trace Element Composition of Selected Fertilizers Used in Chile: Phosphorus Fertilizers as a Source of Long-Term Soil Contamination. Soil Sediment Contam. Int. J. 2009, 18, 497–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kabata-Pendias, H.A.; Mukherjee, A.B. Trace Elements from Soil to Human; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; ISBN 978-3-540-32714-1. [Google Scholar]
  82. Senesil, G.S.; Baldassarre, G.; Senesi, G.; Radina, B. Trace element inputs into soils by anthropogenic activities and implications for human health. Chemosphere 1999, 39, 343–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Jones, V.; Gardner, M.; Ellor, B. Concentrations of trace substances in sewage sludge from 28 wastewater treatment works in the UK. Chemosphere 2014, 111, 478–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Pereira, T.L.; Wallner-Kersanach, M.; Costa, L.D.F.; Costa, D.P.; Baisch, P.R.M. Nickel, vanadium, and lead as indicators of sediment contamination of marina, refinery, and shipyard areas. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 25, 1719–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Baken, S.; Larsson, M.A.; Gustafsson, J.P.; Cubadda, F.; Smolders, E. Ageing of vanadium in soils and consequences for bioavailability. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2012, 63, 839–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Lu, X.; Johnson, A.W.D.; Hook, J. Reaction of Vanadate with Aquatic Humic Substances: An ESR and 51V NMR Study. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32, 2257–2263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Gustafsson, J.P. Vanadium geochemistry in the biogeosphere –speciation, solid-solution interactions, and ecotoxicity. Appl. Geochem. 2019, 102, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Sadiq, M. Thermodynamic solubility relationships of inorganic vanadium in the marine environment. Mar. Chem. 1988, 23, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Blackmore, D.; Ellis, J.; Riley, P. Treatment of a vanadium-containing effluent by adsorption/coprecipitation with iron oxyhydroxide. Water Res. 1996, 30, 2512–2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Frohne, T.; Diaz-Bone, R.A.; Du Laing, G.; Rinklebe, J. Impact of systematic change of redox potential on the leaching of Ba, Cr, Sr, and V from a riverine soil into water. J. Soils Sediments 2014, 15, 623–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Shaheen, S.; Rinklebe, J. Vanadium in thirteen different soil profiles originating from Germany and Egypt: Geochemical fractionation and potential mobilization. Appl. Geochem. 2018, 88, 288–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Panichev, N.; Mandiwana, K.; Moema, D.; Molatlhegi, R.; Ngobeni, P. Distribution of vanadium(V) species between soil and plants in the vicinity of vanadium mine. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 137, 649–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Liu, Y.; Wu, Q.; Liu, L.; Manasa, P.; Kang, L.; Ran, F. Vanadium nitride for aqueous supercapacitors: A topic review. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 8218–8233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Mandiwana, K.L.; Panichev, N.; Molatlhegi, R. The leaching of V(V) with PO43−In the speciation analysis of soil. Anal. Chim. Acta 2005, 545, 239–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Li, M.-T.; Wei, C.; Fan, G.; Li, C.-X.; Deng, Z.-G.; Li, X.-B. Pressure acid leaching of black shale for extraction of vanadium. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2010, 20, s112–s117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Verdizade, N.A.; Magerramov, A.M.; Kuliev, K.A. Extraction-spectrophtometric determination of vanadium using 2,6-dithiol-4-tert-butylphenol and aminophenols. J. Anal. Chem. 2011, 66, 1159–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Li, Y.; Zhang, M.-K. A comparison of physiologically based extraction test (PBET) and single-extraction methods for release of Cu, Zn, and Pb from mildly acidic and alkali soils. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2012, 20, 3140–3148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Snape, I.; Scouller, R.; Stark, S.; Stark, J.; Riddle, M.; Gore, D. Characterisation of the dilute HCl extraction method for the identification of metal contamination in Antarctic marine sediments. Chemosphere 2004, 57, 491–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Yang, J.; Tang, Y.; Yang, K.; Rouff, A.; Elzinga, E.J.; Huang, J.-H. Leaching characteristics of vanadium in mine tailings and soils near a vanadium titanomagnetite mining site. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 264, 498–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Feng, M.-H.; Shan, X.-Q.; Zhang, S.-Z.; Wen, B. Comparison of a rhizosphere-based method with other one-step extraction methods for assessing the bioavailability of soil metals to wheat. Chemosphere 2005, 59, 939–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Feng, M.-H.; Shan, X.-Q.; Zhang, S.; Wen, B. A comparison of the rhizosphere-based method with DTPA, EDTA, CaCl2, and NaNO3 extraction methods for prediction of bioavailability of metals in soil to barley. Environ. Pollut. 2005, 137, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Soriano-Disla, J.M.; Speir, T.W.; Gómez, I.; Clucas, L.M.; McLaren, R.G.; Navarro-Pedreño, J. Evaluation of Different Extraction Methods for the Assessment of Heavy Metal Bioavailability in Various Soils. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2010, 213, 471–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Zhu, Q.; Huang, D.; Liu, S.; Luo, Z.; Zhu, H.; Zhou, B.; Lei, M.; Rao, Z.; Cao, X. Assessment of single extraction methods for evaluating the immobilization effect of amendments on cadmium in contaminated acidic paddy soil. Plant Soil Environ. 2012, 58, 98–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Udovic, M.; Lestan, D. EDTA and HCl leaching of calcareous and acidic soils polluted with potentially toxic metals: Remediation efficiency and soil impact. Chemosphere 2012, 88, 718–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Meers, E.; Samson, R.; Tack, F.; Ruttens, A.; Vandegehuchte, M.; Vangronsveld, J.; Verloo, M. Phytoavailability assessment of heavy metals in soils by single extractions and accumulation by Phaseolus vulgaris. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 60, 385–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Hammer, D.; Keller, C. Changes in the Rhizosphere of Metal-Accumulating Plants Evidenced by Chemical Extractants. J. Environ. Qual. 2002, 31, 1561–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Gupta, S.K.; Aten, C. Comparison and Evaluation of Extraction Media and Their Suitability in a Simple Model to Predict the Biological Relevance of Heavy Metal Concentrations in Contaminated Soils. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 1993, 51, 25–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Novozamsky, I.; Lexmond, T.M.; Houba, V.J.G. A Single Extraction Procedure of Soil for Evaluation of Uptake of Some Heavy Metals by Plants. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 1993, 51, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. McBride, M.B.; Nibarger, E.A.; Richards, B.K.; Steenhuis, T. Trace metal accumulation by red clover grown on sewage sludge-amended soils and correlation to Mehlich 3 and Calcium Chloride-extractable metals. Soil Sci. 2003, 168, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Menzies, N.; Donn, M.J.; Kopittke, P.M. Evaluation of extractants for estimation of the phytoavailable trace metals in soils. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 145, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Gupta, A.K.; Sinha, S. Chemical fractionation and heavy metal accumulation in the plant of Sesamum indicum (L.) var. T55 grown on soil amended with tannery sludge: Selection of single extractants. Chemosphere 2006, 64, 161–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Bakircioglu, D.; Kurtulus, Y.B.; Ibar, H. Comparison of Extraction Procedures for Assessing Soil Metal Bioavailability of to Wheat Grains. Clean–Soil Air Water 2011, 39, 728–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Black, A.; McLaren, R.G.; Reichman, S.M.; Speir, T.W.; Condron, L.M. Evaluation of soil metal bioavailability estimates using two plant species (L. perenne and T. aestivum) grown in a range of agricultural soils treated with biosolids and metal salts. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 1523–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Tsadilas, C.D.; Shaheen, S.M. Distribution of Total and Ammonium Bicarbonate-DTPA-Extractable Soil Vanadium from Greece and Egypt and Their Correlation to Soil Properties. Soil Sci. 2010, 175, 535–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Tessier, A.; Campbell, P.G.C.; Bisson, M. Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. Anal. Chem. 1979, 51, 844–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Abollino, O.; Giacomino, A.; Malandrino, M.; Mentasti, E.; Aceto, M.; Barberis, R. Assessment of Metal Availability in a Contaminated Soil by Sequential Extraction. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2006, 173, 315–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Castillo-Carrión, M.; Martín-Rubí, J.A.; De Quirós, E.O.B. The distribution and fixation of trace elements by the Vertisols of Malaga, southern Spain. Sci. Total Environ. 2007, 378, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Shi, H.; Witt, E.C.; Shu, S.; Su, T.; Wang, J.; Adams, C. Toxic trace element assessment for soils/sediments deposited during Hurricanes Katrina and Rita from southern Louisiana, USA: A sequential extraction analysis. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2010, 29, 1419–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Li, X.; Coles, B.J.; Ramsey, M.H.; Thornton, I. Sequential extraction of soils for multielement analysis by ICP-AES. Chem. Geol. 1995, 124, 109–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Güler, C.; Alpaslan, M.; Kurt, M.A.; Temel, A. Deciphering factors controlling trace element distribution in the soils of Karaduvar industrial-agricultural area (Mersin, SE Turkey). Environ. Earth Sci. 2009, 60, 203–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Agnieszka, J.; Barbara, G. Chromium, nickel and vanadium mobility in soils derived from fluvioglacial sands. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 237–238, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Wenzel, W.W.; Kirchbaumer, N.; Prohaska, T.; Stingeder, G.; Lombi, E.; Adriano, D.C. Arsenic fractionation in soils using an improved sequential extraction procedure. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 436, 309–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Abdallah, M.A.M. Chemical speciation and contamination assessment of Pb and V by sequential extraction in surface sediment off Nile Delta, Egypt. Arab. J. Chem. 2017, 10, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Aydin, F.; Saydut, A.; Gunduz, B.; Aydin, I.; Hamamci, C. Chemical Speciation of Vanadium in Coal Bottom Ash. Clean–Soil Air Water 2012, 40, 444–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Aydin, I.; Aydin, F.; Hamamci, C. Vanadium fractions determination in asphaltite combustion waste using sequential extraction with ICP-OES. Microchem. J. 2013, 108, 64–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Belzile, N.; Lecomte, P.; Tessier, A. Testing readsorption of trace elements during partial chemical extractions of bottom sediments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1989, 23, 1015–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Whalley, C.; Grant, A. Assessment of the phase selectivity of the European Community Bureau of Reference (BCR) sequential extraction procedure for metals in sediment. Anal. Chim. Acta 1994, 291, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Gómez-Ariza, J.; Giráldez, I.; Sánchez-Rodas, D.; Morales, E. Metal readsorption and redistribution during the analytical fractionation of trace elements in oxic estuarine sediments. Anal. Chim. Acta 1999, 399, 295–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Ure, A.M.; Quevauviller, P.; Muntau, H.; Griepink, B. Speciation of Heavy Metals in Soils and Sediments. An Account of the Improvement and Harmonization of Extraction Techniques Undertaken Under the Auspices of the BCR of the Commission of the European Communities. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 1993, 51, 135–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Quevauviller, P.; Rauret, G.; López-Sánchez, J.-F.; Rubio, R.; Ure, A.; Muntau, H. Certification of trace metal extractable contents in a sediment reference material (CRM 601) following a three-step sequential extraction procedure. Sci. Total Environ. 1997, 205, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Rauret, G.; López-Sánchez, J.F.; Sahuquillo, A.; Rubio, R.; Davidson, C.; Ure, A.; Quevauviller, P. Improvement of the BCR three step sequential extraction procedure prior to the certification of new sediment and soil reference materials. J. Environ. Monit. 1999, 1, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Quevauviller, P.; Rauret, G.; Griepink, B. Single and Sequential Extraction in Sediments and Soils. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 1993, 51, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. van Hullebusch, E.D.; Utomo, S.; Zandvoort, M.H.; Lens, P.N. Comparison of three sequential extraction procedures to describe metal fractionation in anaerobic granular sludges. Talanta 2005, 65, 549–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Oyeyiola, A.O.; Olayinka, K.O.; Alo, B.I. Comparison of three sequential extraction protocols for the fractionation of potentially toxic metals in coastal sediments. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2010, 172, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Fitamo, D.; Itana, F.; Olsson, M. Total Contents and Sequential Extraction of Heavy Metals in Soils Irrigated with Wastewater, Akaki, Ethiopia. Environ. Manag. 2006, 39, 178–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Liu, Y.; Liu, G.; Qi, C.; Cheng, S.; Sun, R. Chemical speciation and combustion behavior of chromium (Cr) and vanadium (V) in coals. Fuel 2016, 184, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Yuan, C.-G.; Shi, J.-B.; He, B.; Liu, J.-F.; Liang, L.-N.; Jiang, G.-B. Speciation of heavy metals in marine sediments from the East China Sea by ICP-MS with sequential extraction. Environ. Int. 2004, 30, 769–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Jiang, J.; Yang, M.; Gao, Y.; Wang, J.; Li, D.; Li, T. Removal of toxic metals from vanadium-contaminated soils using a washing method: Reagent selection and parameter optimization. Chemosphere 2017, 180, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Kim, R.-Y.; Yoon, J.-K.; Kim, T.-S.; Yang, J.E.; Owens, G.; Kim, K.-R. Bioavailability of heavy metals in soils: Definitions and practical implementation—a critical review. Environ. Geochem. Health 2015, 37, 1041–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Tandy, S.; Mundus, S.; Yngvesson, J.; de Bang, T.C.; Lombi, E.; Schjoerring, J.K.; Husted, S. The use of DGT for prediction of plant available copper, zinc and phosphorus in agricultural soils. Plant Soil 2011, 346, 167–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Zhang, H.; Davison, W. Use of diffusive gradients in thin-films for studies of chemical speciation and bioavailability. Environ. Chem. 2015, 12, 85–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Zhang, C.; Ding, S.; Xu, D.; Tang, Y.; Wong, M.H. Bioavailability assessment of phosphorus and metals in soils and sediments: A review of diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT). Environ. Monit. Assess. 2014, 186, 7367–7378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Gao, L.; Gao, B.; Xu, D.; Liu, L. DGT: A promising technology for in-situ measurement of metal speciation in the environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 715, 136810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Zhang, S.; Wang, Y.; Pervaiz, A.; Kong, L.; He, M. Comparison of diffusive gradients in thin-films (DGT) and chemical extraction methods for predicting bioavailability of antimony and arsenic to maize. Geoderma 2018, 332, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Panther, J.G.; Stewart, R.R.; Teasdale, P.R.; Bennett, W.; Welsh, D.; Zhao, H. Titanium dioxide-based DGT for measuring dissolved As(V), V(V), Sb(V), Mo(VI) and W(VI) in water. Talanta 2012, 105, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Österlund, H.; Chlot, S.; Faarinen, M.; Widerlund, A.; Rodushkin, I.; Ingri, J.; Baxter, D.C. Simultaneous measurements of As, Mo, Sb, V and W using a ferrihydrite diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) device. Anal. Chim. Acta 2010, 682, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Menegário, A.A.; Yabuki, L.N.M.; Luko, K.S.; Williams, P.; Blackburn, D. Use of diffusive gradient in thin films for in situ measurements: A review on the progress in chemical fractionation, speciation and bioavailability of metals in waters. Anal. Chim. Acta 2017, 983, 54–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  148. Schneider, A.B.; Nascimento, P.C.; Bohrer, D.; de Carvalho, L.M.; Guarda, A.; Krause, C.; Wiethan, B.A.; Koschinsky, A. Determination of Zirconium and Vanadium in Natural Waters by Adsorptive Stripping Voltammetry in the Presence of Cupferron, Oxalic Acid and 1,3-Diphenylguanidine. Electroanalysis 2015, 27, 1864–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Schneider, A.B.; Koschinsky, A.; Kiprotich, J.; Poehle, S.; Nascimento, P.C.D. An experimental study on the mixing behavior of Ti, Zr, V and Mo in the Elbe, Rhine and Weser estuaries. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2016, 170, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Monticelli, D.; Laglera, L.; Caprara, S. Miniaturization in voltammetry: Ultratrace element analysis and speciation with twenty-fold sample size reduction. Talanta 2014, 128, 273–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Rusinek, C.A.; Bange, A.; Warren, M.; Kang, W.; Nahan, K.; Papautsky, I.; Heineman, W.R. Bare and Polymer-Coated Indium Tin Oxide as Working Electrodes for Manganese Cathodic Stripping Voltammetry. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 4221–4228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Rojas-Romo, C.; Arancibia, V.; Costa, D.M.-D.; Tapia, R. Highly sensitive determination of vanadium (V) by catalytic adsorptive stripping voltammetry. Substituent effect on sensitivity III. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 224, 772–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Venkataraman, B.V.; Sudha, S. Vanadium toxicity. Asian J. Exp. Sci. 2005, 19, 127–134. [Google Scholar]
  154. Akl, M.A.; El-Asmy, A.A.; Yossef, W.M. Separation via Flotation, Spectrophotometric Speciation, and Determination of Vanadium(IV) in Wastes of Power Stations. Anal. Sci. 2005, 21, 1325–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  155. Pekiner, O.Z.; Naeemullah; Tüzen, M. Preconcentration and speciation of vanadium by three phases liquid–liquid microextraction prior to electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2013, 20, 1825–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Chen, Z.L.; Owens, G. Trends in speciation analysis of vanadium in environmental samples and biological fluids—A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2008, 607, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Ulery, A.L.; Drees, L.R. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 5—Mineralogical Methods; Soil Science Society of America: Madison, MI, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  158. Mirzaei, M.; Behzadi, M.; Abadi, N.M.; Beizaei, A. Simultaneous separation/preconcentration of ultra trace heavy metals in industrial wastewaters by dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic drop prior to determination by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 186, 1739–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Naeemullah; Tuzen, M.; Kazi, T.G. A new portable micropipette tip-syringe based solid phase microextraction for the determination of vanadium species in water and food samples. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2018, 57, 188–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Wisawapipat, W.; Kretzschmar, R. Solid Phase Speciation and Solubility of Vanadium in Highly Weathered Soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 8254–8262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Yi, J.; Nakatani, N.; Nomura, K. Solution XANES and EXAFS analysis of active species of titanium, vanadium complex catalysts in ethylene polymerisation/dimerisation and syndiospecific styrene polymerisation. Dalton Trans. 2020, 49, 8008–8028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Larsson, M.A.; Hadialhejazi, G.; Gustafsson, J.P. Vanadium sorption by mineral soils: Development of a predictive model. Chemosphere 2017, 168, 925–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  163. Larsson, M.A.; Persson, I.; Sjöstedt, C.; Gustafsson, J.P. Vanadate complexation to ferrihydrite: X-ray absorption spectroscopy and CD-MUSIC modelling. Environ. Chem. 2017, 14, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Burke, I.T.; Mayes, W.M.; Peacock, C.L.; Brown, A.P.; Jarvis, A.P.; Gruiz, K. Speciation of Arsenic, Chromium, and Vanadium in Red Mud Samples from the Ajka Spill Site, Hungary. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 3085–3092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Chaurand, P.; Rose, J.; Briois, V.; Salome, M.; Proux, O.; Nassif, V.; Olivi, L.; Susini, J.; Hazemann, J.-L.; Bottero, J.-Y. New Methodological Approach for the Vanadium K-Edge X-ray Absorption Near-Edge Structure Interpretation: Application to the Speciation of Vanadium in Oxide Phases from Steel Slag. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 5101–5110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Terzano, R.; Spagnuolo, M.; Vekemans, B.; De Nolf, W.; Janssens, K.; Falkenberg, G.; Fiore, S.; Ruggiero, P. Assessing the Origin and Fate of Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Pb, and V in Industrial Polluted Soil by Combined Microspectroscopic Techniques and Bulk Extraction Methods. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 6762–6769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Hector, A.L.; Jura, M.; Levason, W.; Reid, G.; Webster, M. Spectroscopic and Vanadium K-Edge EXAFS Studies on VO2Cl and the Crystal Structure of [{Cl2VO(O2PCl2)(POCl3)}2]. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2009, 635, 1200–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Peacock, C.; Sherman, D.M. Vanadium(V) adsorption onto goethite (α-FeOOH) at pH 1.5 to 12: A surface complexation model based on ab initio molecular geometries and EXAFS spectroscopy. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2004, 68, 1723–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Michel, F.M.; Barrón, V.; Torrent, J.; Morales, M.P.; Serna, C.J.; Boily, J.-F.; Liu, Q.; Ambrosini, A.; Cismasu, A.C.; Brown, G.E. Ordered ferrimagnetic form of ferrihydrite reveals links among structure, composition, and magnetism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 2787–2792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Hiemstra, T. Surface and mineral structure of ferrihydrite. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2012, 105, 316–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Huggins, F.E.; Huffman, G.P.; Robertson, J. Speciation of elements in NIST particulate matter SRMs 1648 and 1650. J. Hazard. Mater. 2000, 74, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Pan, Y.; Koopmans, G.F.; Bonten, L.T.; Song, J.; Luo, Y.; Temminghoff, E.J.; Comans, R.N. In-situ measurement of free trace metal concentrations in a flooded paddy soil using the Donnan Membrane Technique. Geoderma 2015, 241–242, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Degryse, F.; Smolders, E.; Zhang, H.; Davison, W. Predicting availability of mineral elements to plants with the DGT technique: A review of experimental data and interpretation by modelling. Environ. Chem. 2009, 6, 198–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  174. Davidson, C.M.; Ferreira, P.C.S.; Ure, A.M.; Ferreira, P. Some sources of variability in application of the three-stage sequential extraction procedure recommended by BCR to industrially-contaminated soil. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 1999, 363, 446–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Wang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Wang, S.; Xu, C.; Liu, M. Chemical speciation of elements in sediments and soils and their sequential extraction process. Geol. Bull. China 2005, 24, 728–734. [Google Scholar]
  176. Alborés, A.F.; Cid, B.P.; Gómez, E.F.; López, E.F. Comparison between sequential extraction procedures and single extractions for metal partitioning in sewage sludge samples. Analyst 2000, 125, 1353–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Malea, P.; Kevrekidis, T. Trace element (Al, As, B, Ba, Cr, Mo, Ni, Se, Sr, Tl, U and V) distribution and seasonality in compartments of the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 463–464, 611–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Favas, P.J.; Pratas, J.; Rodrigues, N.; D’Souza, R.; Varun, M.; Paul, M.S. Metal(loid) accumulation in aquatic plants of a mining area: Potential for water quality biomonitoring and biogeochemical prospecting. Chemosphere 2018, 194, 158–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Fargašová, A.; Bumbálová, A.; Havránek, E. Ecotoxicological effects and uptake of metals (Cu+, Cu2+, Mn2+, Mo6+, Ni2+, V5+) in freshwater alga Scenedesmus quadricauda. Chemosphere 1999, 38, 1165–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Hou, M.; Li, M.; Yang, X.; Pan, R. Responses of Nonprotein Thiols to Stress of Vanadium and Mercury in Maize (Zea mays L.) Seedlings. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2019, 102, 425–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. García-Jiménez, A.; Trejo-Téllez, L.I.; Guillén-Sánchez, D.; Gómez-Merino, F.C. Vanadium stimulates pepper plant growth and flowering, increases concentrations of amino acids, sugars and chlorophylls, and modifies nutrient concentrations. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0201908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  182. Tian, L.; Yang, J.; Alewell, C.; Huang, J.-H. Speciation of vanadium in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L.) and soils in response to different levels of vanadium in soils and cabbage growth. Chemosphere 2014, 111, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Hou, M.; Lu, C.; Wei, K. Accumulation and Speciation of Vanadium in Lycium Seedling. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2014, 159, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Gil, J.; Alvarez, C.; Martínez, M.; Perez, N. Effect of vanadium on lettuce growth, cationic nutrition, and yield. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A Environ. Sci. Eng. Toxicol. 1995, 30, 73–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  185. Barouchas, P.E.; Akoumianaki-Ioannidou, A.; Liopa-Tsakalidi, A.; Moustakas, N.K. Effects of Vanadium and Nickel on Morphological Characteristics and on Vanadium and Nickel Uptake by Shoots of Mojito (Mentha × villosa) and Lavender (Lavandula anqustifolia). Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2018, 47, 487–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  186. García, J.; González, J.C.; Frascaroli, M.I.; García, S.; Blanes, P.S.; Correia, I.; Pessoa, J.; Sala, L.F. Spectroscopic studies of vanadium biosorption on different types of carbohydrate biomass. Can. J. Chem. 2013, 91, 186–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Imtiaz, M.; Mushtaq, M.A.; Rizwan, M.; Arif, M.S.; Yousaf, B.; Ashraf, M.; Shuanglian, X.; Mehmood, S.; Tu, S. Comparison of antioxidant enzyme activities and DNA damage in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes exposed to vanadium. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 19787–19796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Saco, D.; Martín, S.; José, P. Vanadium distribution in roots and leaves of Phaseolus vulgaris: Morphological and ultrastructural effects. Biol. Plant. 2013, 57, 128–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Chongkid, B.; Vachirapattama, N.; Jirakiattikul, Y. Effects of vanadium on rice growth and vanadium accumulation in rice tissues. Kasetsart J. Nat. Sci. 2007, 41, 28–33. [Google Scholar]
  190. Vachirapatama, N.; Jirakiattikul, Y.; Dicinoski, G.; Townsend, A.T.; Haddad, P.R. Effect of vanadium on plant growth and its accumulation in plant tissues. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 2011, 33, 255–261. [Google Scholar]
  191. Kitani, S.; De Silva, N.R.; Morita, Y.; Teshima, R. Global environmental pollutant substance vanadium activates mast cells and basophils at the late phase in the presence of hydrogen peroxide. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 1998, 6, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Rojas, E.; A Herrera, L.; A Poirier, L.; Ostrosky-Wegman, P. Are metals dietary carcinogens? Mutat. Res. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 1999, 443, 157–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Hou, M.; Hu, C.; Xiong, L.; Lu, C. Tissue accumulation and subcellular distribution of vanadium in Brassica juncea and Brassica chinensis. Microchem. J. 2013, 110, 575–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Li, T.; Di, Z.; Islam, E.; Jiang, H.; Yang, X. Rhizosphere characteristics of zinc hyperaccumulator Sedum alfredii involved in zinc accumulation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 185, 818–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Tian, L.-Y.; Yang, J.-Y.; Huang, J.-H. Uptake and speciation of vanadium in the rhizosphere soils of rape (Brassica juncea L.). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 9215–9223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Nawaz, M.A.; Jiao, Y.; Chen, C.; Shireen, F.; Zheng, Z.; Imtiaz, M.; Bie, Z.; Huang, Y. Melatonin pretreatment improves vanadium stress tolerance of watermelon seedlings by reducing vanadium concentration in the leaves and regulating melatonin biosynthesis and antioxidant-related gene expression. J. Plant Physiol. 2018, 220, 115–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Zhu, X.; Yang, F.; Wei, C. Factors influencing the heavy metal bioaccessibility in soils were site dependent from different geographical locations. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 13939–13949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Alexander, M. Aging, Bioavailability, and Overestimation of Risk from Environmental Pollutants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34, 4259–4265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Ehlers, L.J.; Luthy, R.G. Peer Reviewed: Contaminant Bioavailability in Soil and Sediment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 295A–302A. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  200. Semple, K.T.; Doick, K.J.; Jones, K.C.; Burauel, P.; Craven, A.; Harms, H. Peer Reviewed: Defining Bioavailability and Bioaccessibility of Contaminated Soil and Sediment is Complicated. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 228A–231A. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  201. Kumpiene, J.; Giagnoni, L.; Marschner, B.; Denys, S.; Mench, M.; Adriaensen, K.; Vangronsveld, J.; Puschenreiter, M.; Renella, G. Assessment of Methods for Determining Bioavailability of Trace Elements in Soils: A Review. Pedosphere 2017, 27, 389–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Method 1311: Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure; USEPA: Washington, DC, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  203. Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN). DIN 19736: Soil Quality Derivation of Concentrations of Organic Pollutants in Soil Water; Deutsches Institut für Normung: Berlin, Germany, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  204. US National Research Council (US NRC). Bioavailability of Contaminants in Soils and Sediments: Processes, Tools, and Applications; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  205. Rehder, D. The Bioinorganic Chemistry of Vanadium. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 148–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Rehder, D. Structure and function of vanadium compounds in living organisms. BioMetals 1992, 5, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Beveridge, T.J. Structures of Gram-Negative Cell Walls and Their Derived Membrane Vesicles. J. Bacteriol. 1999, 181, 4725–4733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  208. Qian, Y.; Gallagher, F.J.; Feng, H.; Wu, M.; Zhu, Q. Vanadium uptake and translocation in dominant plant species on an urban coastal brownfield site. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 476–477, 696–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Tokalıoğlu, S.; Kartal, S. Comparison of Metal Fractionation Results Obtained from Single and BCR Sequential Extractions. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2005, 75, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Borggaard, O.K. Dissolution of Poorly Crystalline Iron Oxides in Soils by EDTA and Oxalate. Z. Pflanz. Bodenkd. 1992, 155, 431–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Li, X.S.; Glasauer, S.; Le, X.C. Erratum to “Speciation of vanadium in oilsand coke and bacterial culture by high performance liquid chromatography inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 2009, 648, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Shan, X.-Q.; Lian, J.; Wen, B. Effect of organic acids on adsorption and desorption of rare earth elements. Chemosphere 2002, 47, 701–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Shan, X.-Q.; Wang, Z.; Wang, W.; Zhang, S.; Wen, B. Labile rhizosphere soil solution fraction for prediction of bioavailability of heavy metals and rare earth elements to plants. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2003, 375, 400–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Sauvé, S.; Norvell, W.A.; McBride, M.; Hendershot, W. Speciation and Complexation of Cadmium in Extracted Soil Solutions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 34, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The absorption and transformation of V in plants.
Figure 1. The absorption and transformation of V in plants.
Minerals 12 00642 g001
Table 1. V concentrations in some countries of the world.
Table 1. V concentrations in some countries of the world.
RegionV Concentration in Soils (mg/kg)Data from Reference
Poland18.39[41]
Palermo, Italy58[42]
Cheppel Island, Hungary15.2–42.0[43]
Catalonia, Spain15.2–144.9[44]
Arcala de Enares, Spain6.01[45]
Turku, Finland47.5[46]
Lithuania38[47]
Russia79–91[48]
Ankara, Turkey74[49]
Table 2. V concentrations in contaminated soils of China.
Table 2. V concentrations in contaminated soils of China.
RegionV Concentration in Soils (mg/kg)Data from Reference
Chongqing39–4994.6[53]
Sichuan Province19.1–548.7[53]
Chengdu city, Sichuan Province66.69–73.25[54]
Panzhihua city, Sichuan Province149–4794[51]
167[52]
71.1–938.4[36]
105.57–189.12[50]
1120.3–1139.9[55]
Hunan Province4.5–1390.8[53]
62.81–152.77[55]
Chenxi county, Huaihua city, Hunan Province168–1538[27]
1500–2600[56]
Lianyuan city, Hunan Province38.97–618.90[57]
Loudi city, Hunan Province97–282[58]
Hubei Province17.6–836.2[53]
500[59]
1306[60]
931[4]
Shiyan city, Hubei Province1998.7–2031.5[61]
128–821[6]
Shaanxi Province26.6–1854[53]
85.98[62]
21.14–286.42[63]
Langao county, Ankang city, Shaanxi Province264–596[64]
Xi’an city, Shaanxi Province53.9–89.7[65]
85.2[66]
Anhui Province23.3–1746.6[53]
Huainan city, Anhui Province2.24–71.86[67]
41.15–81.13
Yunnan Province6.7–1546[53]
168[53]
Kunming city, Yunnan Province281.56[68]
Guizhou Province16–1685[53]
Bijie city, Guizhou Province206[69]
Zunyi city, Guizhou Province170–1369[70]
Table 3. Comparison of the V extracted by single-step extraction methods.
Table 3. Comparison of the V extracted by single-step extraction methods.
Extractant CategoryExtraction SolutionsExtraction Yield
(Extracted V/Total V)
SamplesData from Reference
Weak (dilute) acidsHCl2.73 ± 2.21%0.01 M HCl, soil samples collected from Zhujiabaobao mine located in the eastern part of Panzhihua mine area (n = 7, Vtotal = 67.43 ± 14.92 mg/kg)[25,28]
6.21–69.26%0.5 M HCl, soil used in pot experiment was collected from moist soil (0–20 cm) of forest land in an urban park in Panzhihua, southwest China (n = 75, Vtotal = 7.73–494.45 mg/kg)
HNO32.68 ± 1.65%0.43 M HNO3, soil samples collected from Zhujiabaobao mine located in the eastern part of Panzhihua mine area (n = 7, Vtotal = 67.43 ± 14.92 mg/kg)[28]
HOAc0.01–1.33%0.11 M HOAc, topsoil (0–10 cm) samples were collected from the Panzhihua, urban park (n = 23, Vtotal = 105.57–189.72 mg/kg)[36]
Citric acid (C6H8O7)2.39 ± 2.03%0.1 M C6H8O7, soil samples collected from Zhujiabaobao mine located in the eastern part of Panzhihua mine area (n = 7, Vtotal = 67.43 ± 14.92 mg/kg)[28]
Chelating agentsEDTA0.2–35%0.025 M Na2-EDTA, soil samples from different sites of the German long-term soil monitoring program (n = 30, Vtotal = 1.7–143.0 mg/kg)[25,36,74]
4.33–61.98%0.05 M EDTA, soil used in pot experiment was collected from moist soil (0–20 cm) of forest land in an urban park in Panzhihua, southwest China (n = 75, Vtotal = 7.73–494.45 mg/kg)
0.27–4.09%0.05 M EDTA, topsoil (0–10 cm) samples were collected from the Panzhihua, urban park (n = 23, Vtotal = 105.57–189.72 mg/kg)
DTPA0.6–7.7%1 M NH4HCO3 + 0.005 M DTPA, cultivated soils of Egypt and Greece (n = 21, Vtotal = 13–206 mg/kg)[91,114]
0.37–5.12%1 M NH4HCO3 + 0.005 M DTPA, different types of soil sampled from three different study areas in Germany (n = 6, Vtotal = 29.7–109.2 mg/kg)
Inorganic salt solutionNaNO30.005–4.84%0.1 M NaNO3, soil used in pot experiment was collected from moist soil (0–20 cm) of forest land in an urban park in Panzhihua, southwest China (n = 75, Vtotal = 7.73–494.45 mg/kg)[25]
CaCl2<4%0.01 M CaCl2, seventeen rural soil profiles for this study were selected to covera representative range of different parent materials in Taiwan (n = 94, Vtotal = 35.4–475 mg/kg)[76]
NaHCO3<4%0.5 M NaHCO3, seventeen rural soil profiles for this study were selected to covera representative range of different parent materials in Taiwan (n = 94, Vtotal = 35.4–475 mg/kg)[76]
Table 4. Comparison of the V extracted from different environment samples by sequential extraction methods.
Table 4. Comparison of the V extracted from different environment samples by sequential extraction methods.
SamplesLocationSequential Extraction Methods (SE)Target FractionExtraction SolutionsAverage Percentage of Each Fraction (%)Data from Reference
SoilAgricuture region, Panzhihua city, Sichuan province, China. Vtotal: 71.7–938 mg/kg, n = 55Wenzel schemeNon-specifically sorbed0.05 M (NH4)2SO4, 20 °C0.51[99]
Specifically sorbed0.05 M NH4H2PO4, 20 °C0.30
Amorphous hydrous Fe and Al oxide0.2 M NH4+-oxalate buffer, pH = 3.25, 20 °C5.52
Crystalline hydrous Fe and Al oxides0.2 M NH4+-oxalate buffer + Ac, pH = 3.25, 96 °C9.83
ResidualHNO3 + H2O2 (1:50)83.80
Five-steps SE of TessierExchangeable1 M MgCl2, pH = 7, 20 °C0[122]
Carbonates1 M HOAc + NaOAc, pH = 5, 20 °C0.14
Fe and Mn oxides20 mL 0.04 M NH2OH·HCl in 25% (v/v) HOAc, 96 °C6.96
Organic matter0.02 M HNO3 + 30% H2O2 (pH = 2), 85 °C13.20
3.2 mol/L NH4OAc in 20% HNO3
ResidualHF + HClO4 (5:1)79.70
Agricultural region, In South Finlandfrom bare arable land, Vtotal = 601 mg/kg, n = 1Modified on the basis of procedures used in the sequential frac-tionation of selenium (Se) and phos-phorus (P)Easily soluble V0.25 M KCl<11[29]
V bound by ligand exchange0.1 M KH2PO4 + K2HPO48~35
Organic V0.1 M NaOH30~68
Strong bound V0.25 M H2SO4<10
Agricultural region,
Eschikon, Switzerland. Vtotal = 61.2 mg/kg, n = 1
Sequential extraction of V in soils was performed based
on Wenzel et al. (2001) before soybean planting
Non-specifically sorbed0.05 M (NH4)2SO4, 20 °C15.70[20]
specifically-sorbed 0.05 M NH4H2PO4, 20 °C24.60
Amorphous and poorly crystalline hydrous oxides of Fe and Al0.2 M NH4+-oxalate buffer, pH = 3.25, 20 °C23.80
Well-crystallized hydrous oxides of Fe and Al0.2 M NH4+-oxalate buffer + AC, pH = 3.25, 96 °C3.80
Mining region, Panzhihua city, Sichuan province, China. Vtotal = 69.8–279.35 mg/kg, n = 7BCR SEAcid soluble0.11 M CH3COOH, 25 °C0.19–0.82[28]
Reducible0.5 M NH2OH·HCl + 0.05 M HNO3, 25 °C0.27–5.78
Oxidizable30% H2O2, pH = 2, 85 °C; 1 M NH4OAc, pH = 2, 25°C4.37–10.50
ResidualHNO3 + H2O2 (1:50)83.3–93.10
Mining region, Chenxi county, Hunan province, China. Vtotal = 168–1538 mg/kg, n = 7Modified BCR SEAcid extractable0.11 M HOAc0.32–1.88[27]
Reducible 0.5 M NH2OH·HCl, pH = 1.55.63–34.40
Oxidizable 8.8 mol/L H2O2; 1 M NH4OAc, pH = 20.81–22.90
Residual HNO3 + H2O2 (1:50)57.70–58.80
Industrial region, Milazzo area, Sicily, Vtotal = 0.072–0.24 g /kg, n = 23Modified Tessier’s SEExchangeable V1 M NaOAc2.19[73]
V bound to carbonatesCH3COONa/CH3COOH, pH =51.19
V bound to Fe and Mn oxides0.04 M NH3(OH)Cl + 25% CH3COOH (v/v), 96 °C0.88
V bound to organic matter and or sulfideHNO3 + 30% H2O292.31
SedimentNile Delta coast, Vtotal = 73.62–154.82 mg/kg, n = 11Modified BCR SEExchangeable1 M NH4CH3COO, pH = 77.20[123]
Acid-reducible0.25 M NH2OH·HCl, pH = 21.60
Oxidizable-organic30% H2O2, 1 M NH4CH3COO, pH = 227.40
Resistant65% NHO3 + 70% HCLO4 + HF63.80
In northern part of Belgium.Vtotal = 40–430 mg/kg, n = 14Modified BCR SEAcid soluble0.11 M CH3COOH0.14[17]
Reducible0.1 M NH2OH·HCl, pH = 1.521.16
Oxidizable8.8 M H2O2, 1.0 M NH4OOCH39.72
ResidualHCl + HNO3 + HF (2:1:1)52.93
Ore (coal)Industrial region, Anatolia, Turkey. Vtotal = 701, n = 1.Seven-step sequential extraction procedure of the coal bottom ashWater solubleDeionized water1.51[124]
Exchangeable fraction1 M MgCl2·6H2O, pH = 7 ± 0.11.28
Carbonate fraction1 M NaAc, pH = 5 ± 0.1, 90 °C12.13
Reducible fraction0.1 M NH2OH·HCl + 25% (v/v) CH3COOH, 90 °C25.11
Oxidizable fractionH2O2, pH = 2 ± 0.1, 100 °C7.13
Sulfide fractionAqua regia, 120 °C25.11
ResidualHF + HCl + HNO3 (5:1:5)25.76
Ore (asphaltite) Minging region, in SE Anatolia of Turkey. Vtotal = 546.15 mg/kg, n = 1.Seven-step sequential extraction procedure of asphaltite combustion wasteWater solubleDeionized water1.66[125]
Exchangeable fraction1 M MgCl2·6H2O, pH = 7 ± 0.12.61
Carbonate fraction1 M NaAc, pH = 5 ± 0.1, 90 °C6.00
Reducible fraction0.1 M NH2OH·HCl + 25% (v/v) CH3COOH, 90 °C11.75
Oxidizable fractionH2O2, pH = 2 ± 0.1, 100 °C15.78
Sulfide fractionHCl + HNO3 (3:1 v/v), 120 °C56.30
ResidualHF + HCl + HNO35.89
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, J.; Wang, Y.; Gao, X.; Zuo, R.; Song, L.; Jin, C.; Wang, J.; Teng, Y. Vanadium: A Review of Different Extraction Methods to Evaluate Bioavailability and Speciation. Minerals 2022, 12, 642. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/min12050642

AMA Style

Yang J, Wang Y, Gao X, Zuo R, Song L, Jin C, Wang J, Teng Y. Vanadium: A Review of Different Extraction Methods to Evaluate Bioavailability and Speciation. Minerals. 2022; 12(5):642. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/min12050642

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Jie, Yunlong Wang, Xiaohui Gao, Rui Zuo, Liuting Song, Chenhui Jin, Jinsheng Wang, and Yanguo Teng. 2022. "Vanadium: A Review of Different Extraction Methods to Evaluate Bioavailability and Speciation" Minerals 12, no. 5: 642. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/min12050642

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop