Next Article in Journal
Impact of Isoorientin on Metabolic Activity and Lipid Accumulation in Differentiated Adipocytes
Next Article in Special Issue
Base-Promoted Annulation of Amidoximes with Alkynes: Simple Access to 2,4-Disubstituted Imidazoles
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction Using Response Surface Methodology for Simultaneous Quantitation of Six Flavonoids in Flos Sophorae Immaturus and Antioxidant Activity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Unsymmetrically Substituted Dibenzo[b,f][1,5]-diazocine-6,12(5H,11H)dione—A Convenient Scaffold for Bioactive Molecule Design
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis and Antibacterial Evaluation of N-phenylacetamide Derivatives Containing 4-Arylthiazole Moieties

State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Green Pesticide and Agricultural Bioengineering, Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide and Agricultural Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, Guizhou University, Huaxi District, Guiyang 550025, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 4 April 2020 / Accepted: 10 April 2020 / Published: 12 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Synthesis of Heterocyclic Compounds)

Abstract

:
A series of new N-phenylacetamide derivatives containing 4-arylthiazole moieties was designed and synthesized by introducing the thiazole moiety into the amide scaffold. The structures of the target compounds were confirmed by 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR and HRMS. Their in vitro antibacterial activities were evaluated against three kinds of bacteria—Xanthomonas oryzae pv. Oryzae (Xoo), Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. Citri (Xac) and X.oryzae pv. oryzicola (Xoc)—showing promising results. The minimum 50% effective concentration (EC50) value of N-(4-((4-(4-fluoro-phenyl)thiazol-2-yl)amino)phenyl)acetamide (A1) is 156.7 µM, which is superior to bismerthiazol (230.5 µM) and thiodiazole copper (545.2 µM). A scanning electron microscopy (SEM) investigation has confirmed that compound A1 could cause cell membrane rupture of Xoo. In addition, the nematicidal activity of the compounds against Meloidogyne incognita (M. incognita) was also tested, and compound A23 displayed excellent nematicidal activity, with mortality of 100% and 53.2% at 500 μg/mL and 100 μg/mL after 24 h of treatment, respectively. The preliminary structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies of these compounds are also briefly described. These results demonstrated that phenylacetamide derivatives may be considered as potential leads in the design of antibacterial agents.

1. Introduction

Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae and Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola parasitizing rice can cause serious degradation of rice quality and yield [1]. Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri mainly harms citrus fruits while causing a plant bacterial disease, citrus canker [2]. In recent decades, the long-term use of traditional bactericides has resulted in their large accumulation in the soil and resistance of pathogenic bacteria, reducing control capability. For example, bismerthiazol, one of the most widely used bactericides, has indicated low efficiency of 25.5% at a high dosage of 200 μg/mL [3]. Therefore, it is necessary to develop highly efficient and environmentally friendly bactericides to protect crops. Thiazole-containing aromatic heterocycles are reported to bind to certain proteins and receptors of bacteria and exhibit a wide range of biological activities such as insecticidal [4,5], bactericidal [6,7,8], herbicidal [9], antiviral [10] and fungicidal ones [11,12]. In addition, compounds with an amide structure have revealed various activities as antimicrobial [13,14,15] and nematicidal [16,17] agents. Based on the reported good performance of derivatives containing thiazole or amide groups, splicing them to get new antibacterial structures was presumed to be a reasonable and promising approach.
Attracted by these facts, we have carried out the preparation of a series of novel N-phenylacetamide derivatives A1A36 and the subsequent evaluation of their biological activities against Xoo, Xac and Xoc. Their preliminary structure-activity relationships are discussed. Additionally, the nematicidal activity of all target compounds against M. incognita were also checked.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

As shown, compounds N-substituted-2-amino-4-arylthiazoles A1A36 were synthesized following Scheme 1. Starting from p-phenylenediamine (PPD), the synthesis involves firstly aniline protection, amide formation and deprotection to afford the 4-amino-N-phenylacetamide intermediates 2 which were then turned into isothiocyanates 3 and converted to thioureas 4. Finally, 4 were condensed with different α-halocarbonyl compounds to give the target derivatives. The steps for each reaction described in Scheme 1 were elaborated as follows.
Specifically, the protection of PPD in first step utilized a N-tert-butyloxycarbonylation strategy [18,19,20]. By reacting with 0.5 equiv. of di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (BOC2O) in dichloromethane (DCM), PPD was converted into the corresponding N-BOC-amine [20]. The mono-N-BOC protected derivative (NH2-Ph-NH-BOC) 1 was purified by column chromatography to remove the di-N-BOC (BOC-NH-Ph-NH-BOC) side product. Then 1 was reacted with an acyl chloride (RCOCl) to produce the corresponding amide RCONH-Ph-NH-BOC, which was then acidified to produce the 4-amino-N-phenylacetamides 2. Thereafter, 2 were converted to the corresponding isothiocyanates 3 via dithiocarbamates (generated by adding CS2 to Et3N) promoted by BOC2O and a catalytic amount of 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) [21]. BOC2O here, as reported, may desulfurize the corresponding dithiocarbamates during the isothiocyanate formation [21,22]. Then, various aryl thioureas 4 were prepared from isothiocyanates 3 upon reaction with ammonia [23,24]. Finally, thioureas 4 were condensed with diverse α-bromophenylethanones [24,25], synthesized separately via reaction of acetophenones with Br2 in DCM [24], to afford the 2-amino-1,3-thiazole heterocyclic skeleton, and the targeted compound N-phenylacetamide derivatives containing thiazole moieties were thus obtained. The structures of all target compounds were confirmed by 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR and HRMS. Among them, it was unexpectedly found that compounds A4, A7, A11, A12 have been previously reported [25].

2.2. In Vitro Antibacterial Activity

The in vitro antibacterial activities of the target compounds against three phytopathogenic bacterial (Xoo, Xac and Xoc) were initially evaluated at the concentrations of 200 μg/mL and 100 μg/mL, respectively. As a comparison, the commercial bactericides bismerthiazol and thiodiazole copper served as positive controls (see preliminary screening results in the Supplementary Materials).
Compounds that performed well in the initial tests were further tested to determine their EC50 values, with the results shown in Table 1. The EC50 values of compounds A1, A4, A6 against Xoo are 156.7, 179.2, 144.7 µM, which were significantly better than that of thiodiazole copper (545.2 µM). Moreover, compound A4 had the best inhibitory effect on Xoc with an EC50 value of 194.9 µM, which was slightly better than that of bismerthiazol (254.96 µM) and thiodiazole copper (607.5 µM). Compound A4 (281.2 µM) showed the best antibacterial activity against Xac, which was better than that of the commercial bactericide thiodiazole copper (476.52 µM).

2.3. Structure-Activity Relationship Analyses

With the results indicated in Table 1, a preliminary structure-activity relationship of the target compounds can be discussed. It can be observed that the type and position of the substituent R on the benzene ring had an important effect on the bactericidal activity of the target compounds. First of all, the type and position of F, Cl, Br, and CF3 at the 4-position of the benzene ring can increase the bactericidal activity of the compound, and the 3-position is not conducive to improving the bactericidal activity. For example, the order of the inhibitory effect of the target compound on Xoo bacteria follows the order A1 > A2, A4 > A5, confirming the above conclusion. In addition, the activity trend A1 (4-F) > A4 (4-Cl) > A7 (4-Br) reveals that a 4-F substituted benzene ring is the most helpful for conferring antibacterial activity. Secondly, comparing different types of groups at the same position on the benzene ring, the corresponding compounds with 4-R electron-withdrawing substituents have a higher bactericidal activity against Xoo, Xac and Xoc than 4-R electron-donating substituents such as A1 (4-F) > A4 (4-Cl) > A11 (4-CH3). The type of amide-linked sidechain could also have a significant impact on the bactericidal activity of the corresponding target compounds.

2.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy Studies

Due to its outstanding activity shown in Table 1, compounds A1 was further examined by SEM analysis to study the effect on Xoo. It can be observed that the cell membrane was damaged by the compound and the normal physiological functions of the cell would thus be affected. More importantly, this adverse effect becomes more severe with increasing compound concentration. For example, the surface of cells without compound treatment is smooth and the cell membrane is intact (Figure 1A). At the concentration of 100 μg/mL, a small part of the cell morphology appears abnormal (Figure 1B). When the concentration was increased to 200 μg/mL, most of the cell surfaces were deformed, with few surviving cells (Figure 1C). In summary, the inhibitory effect of compound A1 on Xoo was further clarified by the SEM images.

2.5. Nematicidal Biological Activities

The nematicidal activity results of the target compounds are summarized in Table 2. Unfortunately, most of the compounds showed poor activities against M. incognita, although compound A23, with its mortality rates of 100% at 500 μg/mL and 51.3% at 100 μg/mL which are comparable to the commercial nematicide avermectin (100% at 500 μg/mL and 71.8% at 100 μg/mL) in 24 h after treatment stuck out.

3. Experimental

3.1. Chemicals and Instruments

All reagents used for reactions were purchased from a commercial source (Aladdin Chemistry Co., Shanghai, China) and were of analytical grade with no further purification. Basic alumina oxide (200 to 300 mesh, Aladdin Chemistry Co.) was applied for purification of target compounds by column chromatography. Melting points of the target compounds were recorded on an XT-4B binocular microscope (Beijing Tech Instrument Co., Beijing, China). NMR spectra were obtained on a 400 MHz spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin AG, Fällanden, Switzerland) using TMS as internal standard and DMSO-d6 as solvent. HRMS data were recorded on a Thermo Scientific Q Exactive system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Single crystal structure data were collected using a single crystal diffractometer (Gemini E, Oxford Instruments, Oxford, UK). SEM analysis was carried out with a FEI Nova NanoSEM 450 (FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA).

3.2. General Synthetic Procedure for the Target Compounds

3.2.1. Synthesis of Intermediate 1

p-Phenylenediamine (PPD, 9.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) was dissolved in dry dichloromethane (50mL), degassed under N2 (g) and cooled in an ice bath. BOC2O (4.62 mmol, 0.50 equiv.) was added dropwise to the p-phenylenediamine solution using a disposable syringe. After the addition, the mixture was reacted at room temperature (R.T.) for 5 h, monitored by thin layer chromatography (TLC). After the reaction was complete, the mixture was purified by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether:ethyl acetate, 3:1) to obtain yellow solid compound intermediate 1 in a yield of 63%.

3.2.2. Synthesis of Intermediates 2

A mixture of 1 (1.0 equiv.) and an acid chloride (1.10 equiv.) in DCM (40mL) was stirred at 0 °C for 1 h. Then, excess 4 M HCl was added and stirred at R.T. for 10 min. The reaction progress was monitored by TLC. After completion of the reaction, a saturated Na2CO3 solution was added to adjust to 7.0 the pH of mixture which was then extracted with DCM (50 mL × 3). The organic phase was concentrated to give intermediate 2 as white solids in yields of 69–75%.

3.2.3. Synthesis of Intermediates 3

A mixture of intermediate 2 (12.64 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), triethylamine (Et3N, 13.87 mmol, 1.10 equiv.) and carbon disulfide (CS2, 126.40 mmol, 10.0 equiv) in ethanol (50 mL) was stirred at R.T. for 2 h, then cooled down to 0 °C to add DMAP (0.38 mmol, 0.03 equiv.) and BOC2O (12.51 mmol, 0.99 equiv.). The mixture was stirred for about 2 h at room temperature till the reactants were completely consumed. The mixture was cooled to −10 °C overnight then filtered to give the isothiocyanates 3 in yields of 75–81%.

3.2.4. Synthesis of the Intermediates 4

The mixture of 3 (12.64 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) with excess ammonia solution in ethanol (30 mL) was stirred at R.T. The reaction was monitored by TLC using petroleum ether:ethyl acetate (1:1). The mixture was filtered through a Celite pad to afford the thioureas 4 in approximately 100% yield.

3.2.5. Synthesis of the α-Bromophenylethanone Intermediates

Br2 (2.2 mmol, 1.10 equiv.) was added slowly to a DCM solution of substituted acetophenone (2.0 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) and the mixture was stirred at R.T. for 5 h, after which the reaction mixture was tpoured into distilled water and extracted with DCM three times. The organic phases were combined and the solvent removed under reduced pressure to obtain the α-bromophenylethanones in yields of 65–83%.

3.2.6. Synthesis of the Target Compounds A

A mixture of α-bromophenylethanone (2.05 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) and intermediate 4 (2.25 mmol, 1.10 equiv.) was dissolved in ethanol (20 mL) and then heated at reflux for 5 h. Upon completion of the reaction the liquid was filtered and the solid formed was washed with saturated potassium carbonate solution. The crude product was purified by column chromatography on basic alumina to give the various target compounds in yields ranging from 55% to 94%, respectively.
N-(4-((4-(4-Fluorophenyl)thiazol-2-yl)amino)phenyl)acetamide (A1): yellow solid; yield 57%; mp: 201.0–202.0 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.19 (s, 1H), 9.85 (s, 1H), 7.96 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.63 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.54 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.27 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.24 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 2.03 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 168.29, 163.84, 163.28, 160.85, 149.48, 137.11, 133.80, 131.65 (d, J = 2.9 Hz), 128.14 (d, J = 8.1 Hz), 120.35, 117.76, 116.05, 115.83, 102.72, 24.35. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C17H15FN3OS: 328.09144; found: 328.09097.
N-(4-((4-(3-Fluorophenyl)thiazol-2-yl)amino)phenyl)acetamide (A2): yellow solid; yield 82%; mp: 162.4–163.2 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.16 (s, 1H, NH), 9.81 (s, 1H,NH), 7.91 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.59 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.51 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.45 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.33 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 1.99 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 168.26, 163.65, 150.60, 137.22 (d, J = 4.8 Hz), 133.71, 132.41, 129.67, 126.10, 120.35, 117.70, 102.07, 24.35, 21.33. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C17H15FN3OS: 328.09144; found: 328.09094.
N-(4-(4-(3,4-Difluorophenyl)thiazol-2-ylamino)phenyl)acetamide (A3): yellow solid; yield 81%; mp: 228.8–229.3 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.21 (s, 1H), 9.85 (s, 1H), 7.91–7.87 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 7.77–7.72 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 7.59 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.52 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.45 (d, J = 10.6 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.36 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 2.00 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 168.2, 163.98, 148.82, 137.29, 136.99, 133.94, 131.35, 130.62, 128.56, 125.16, 122.56, 120.37, 117.91, 104.64, 24.35. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C17H14F2N3OS: 346.08202; found: 346.08136.
N-(4-(4-(4-Chlorophenyl)thiazol-2-ylamino)phenyl)acetamide (A4): yellow solid; yield 87%; mp: 210.5–211.2 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.16 (s, 1H, NH), 9.81 (s, 1H, NH), 7.93–7.88 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.59 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.51 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.45 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.33 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 1.99 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 168.34, 163.98, 149.37, 137.12, 133.94, 132.43, 129.19, 127.93, 120.41, 117.89, 103.90, 24.42. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C17H15ClN3OS: 344.06189; found: 344.06134.
N-(4-(3-(4-Chlorophenyl)thiazol-2-ylamino)phenyl)acetamide (A5): yellow solid; yield 88%; mp: 179.7–180.3 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.22 (s, 1H, NH), 9.86 (s, 1H, NH), 7.78 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.71 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.65–7.59 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.55 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.48 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.44 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 7.14 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 2.03 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 168.35, 163.90, 148.71, 137.31, 137.03, 133.93, 131.37, 130.58, 128.51, 125.15, 122.55, 120.28, 117.79, 104.70, 24.34. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C17H15ClN3OS: 344.06189; found: 344.06140.
N-(4-((4-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)thiazol-2-yl)amino)phenyl)acetamide (A6): yellow solid; yield 93%; mp: 179.3–181.7 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.55 (s, 1H, NH), 10.15 (s, 1H, NH), 8.14 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.93 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 7.70 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.67 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.61 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.54 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 2.06 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 168.37, 164.00, 147.82, 136.97, 135.60, 133.99, 131.86, 131.37, 130.05, 127.58, 126.30, 120.26, 117.80, 105.37, 24.34. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C17H14Cl2N3OS: 378.02291; found: 378.02249.
N-(4-((4-(4-Bromophenyl)thiazol-2-yl)amino)phenyl)acetamide (A7): white solid; yield 75%; mp: 209.6–210.4 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.19 (s, 1H, NH), 9.83 (s, 1H, NH), 7.84 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.60 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.58 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.52 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.33 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 2.00 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 168.36, 163.96, 149.40, 137.11, 134.27, 133.91, 132.10, 128.24, 121.04, 120.40, 117.87, 103.98, 24.43. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C17H15BrN3OS: 388.01137; found: 388.01102.
N-(4-((4-(3-Bromophenyl)thiazol-2-yl)amino)phenyl)acetamide (A8): yellow solid; yield 85%; mp: 202.8–203.9 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.38 (s, 1H, NH), 10.01 (s, 1H, NH), 8.04 (t, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.90 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.62-7.57 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.56-7.52 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.46 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.42 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 7.36 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 2.00 (s, 3H,CH3). 13C-NMR δ 168.29, 163.98, 148.82, 137.29, 136.99, 133.94, 131.35, 130.62, 128.56, 125.16, 122.56, 120.37, 117.91, 104.64, 24.35. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C17H15BrN3OS: 388.01137; found: 388.01102.
N-(4-(4-(4-(Trifluoromethyl)phenyl)thiazol-2-ylamino)phenyl)acetamide (A9): yellow solid; yield 69%; mp: 253.2–254.2 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.29 (s, 1H, NH), 9.89 (s, 1H, NH), 8.14 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.73-7.79 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.65 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.58 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.56 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 2.04 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 168.30, 164.01, 148.99, 138.67, 136.97, 133.93, 128.14, 127.82, 126.87, 126.38 (d, J = 59.5 Hz), 123.50, 120.30, 117.85, 105.87, 24.36. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C18H15F3N3OS: 378.08824; found: 378.08765.
N-(4-((4-(3-(Trifluoromethyl)phenyl)thiazol-2-yl)amino)phenyl)acetamide (A10): yellow solid; yield 87%; mp: 179.3–180.7 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.31 (s, 1H, NH), 9.93 (s, 1H,NH), 8.26 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.69 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.67–7.62 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.60 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.58 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 2.07 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 168.39, 164.18, 148.81, 136.98, 135.88, 133.98, 130.06 (d, J = 33.3Hz), 129.52, 128.79, 126.09, 124.38 (d, J = 3.6 Hz), 123.38, 122.35 (d, J = 3.7 Hz), 120.38, 117.97, 104.95, 24.32. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C17H15F3N3OS: 378.08824; found: 378.08765.
N-(4-(4-p-Tolylthiazol-2-ylamino)phenyl)acetamide (A11): yellow solid; yield 89%; mp: 207.2–208.1 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.15 (s, 1H, NH), 9.85 (s, 1H, NH), 7.81 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.63 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.54 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.23 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.21 (s, 1H), 2.33 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.03 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 168.26, 163.66, 150.61, 137.23, 133.72, 132.41, 129.67, 126.10, 120.36, 117.71, 102.06, 24.35, 21.32; HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C18H18N3OS: 324.11651; found: 324.11597.
N-(4-((4-Phenylthiazol-2-yl)amino)phenyl)acetamide (A12): yellow solid; yield 71%; mp: 174.7–175.2 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.19 (s, 1H, NH), 9.88 (s, 1H, NH), 7.9–7.86 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.66 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.57 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.43 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.31 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.27 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 2.04 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 168.38, 163.79, 150.57, 137.22, 135.03, 133.74, 129.11, 128.01, 126.15, 120.44, 117.76, 102.97, 24.32. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C17H16N3OS: 310.10086; found: 310.10034.
N-(4-((4-(4-Fluorophenyl)thiazol-2-yl)amino)phenyl)propionamide (A13): white solid; yield 85%; mp: 186.5–187.4 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.24 (s, 1H, NH), 9.80 (s, 1H, NH), 7.95 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 7.93–7.87 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 7.64–7.60 (m, 2H, Ar-H),7.60–7.54 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.50–7.41 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.37 (dd, J = 5.9, 0.9 Hz, 1H), 2.31 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, CH2), 1.10 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 172.03, 164.03, 148.82, 137.30, 136.93, 134.00, 131.34, 130.62, 128.58, 125.14, 122.55, 120.41, 117.95, 104.62, 29.91, 10.25. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C18H17FN3OS: 342.10709; found: 342.10617.
N-(4-((4-(3-Fluorophenyl)thiazol-2-yl)amino)phenyl)propionamide (A14): white solid; yield 83%; mp: 230.2–231.1 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.18 (s, 1H, NH), 9.76 (s, 1H, NH), 7.74 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.67 (d, J = 10.6 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.59 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.54 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H,Ar-H), 7.44 (dd, J = 14.3, 7.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.39 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 7.11 (dd, J = 11.7, 5.4 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 2.27 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, CH2), 1.06 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 172.04, 164.21, 163.89, 161.80, 149.24, 137.40, 136.95, 133.91, 131.13, 122.23, 120.41, 117.86, 114.77, 112.48, 104.53, 29.90, 10.27. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C18H17FN3OS: 342.10709; found: 342.10617.
N-(4-((4-(3,4-Difluorophenyl)thiazol-2-yl)amino)phenyl)propionamide (A15): white solid; yield 69%; mp: 230.4–230.8 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.18 (s, 1H, NH), 9.75 (s, 1H, NH), 7.92-7.87 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 7.75 (dd, 1H, J = 8.6, 4.3 Hz, Ar-H), 7.61-7.56 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.53 (dd, J = 9.2, 2.3 Hz, 2H, Ar- H), 7.46 (d, J = 10.6, 1H, Ar-H), 7.37 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 2.27 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, CH2), 1.05 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 172.00, 164.00, 148.37, 136.89, 133.96, 122.92, 120.39, 118.24 (d, J = 17.2 Hz), 117.89, 114.87 (d, J = 18.4 Hz), 104.16, 29.90, 10.27. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C18H16F2N3OS: 360.09767; found: 360.09653.
N-(4-((4-(4-Chlorophenyl)thiazol-2-yl)amino)phenyl)propionamide (A16): white solid; yield 90%; mp: 269.3–270.1 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.24 (s, 1H, NH), 9.80 (s, 1H, NH), 7.97–7.84 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.62 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.58 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.50–7.42 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.33 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 2.21 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, CH2), 1.05 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 172.07, 163.93, 149.32, 137.03, 133.94, 132.41, 129.20, 127.92, 120.38, 117.84, 103.90, 29.96, 10.36. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C18H17ClN3OS: 358.07754; found: 358.07639.
N-(4-((4-(3-Chlorophenyl)thiazol-2-yl)amino)phenyl)propionamide (A17): white solid; yield 82%; mp: 223.5–224.6 °C; 1H-NMR) δ 10.24 (s, 1H, NH), 9.80 (s, 1H, NH), 7.95 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 7.90 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.62 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.58 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.52–7.42 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.37 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.1 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 2.31 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, CH2), 1.10 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 172.08, 164.05, 149.00, 137.05, 134.02, 131.13, 127.80, 125.74, 124.84, 120.46, 117.97, 104.70, 29.97, 10.34. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C18H17ClN3OS: 358.07754; found: 358.07639.
N-(4-((4-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)thiazol-2-yl)amino)phenyl)propionamide (A18): white solid; yield 77%; mp: 258.1–259.0 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.27 (s, 1H, NH), 9.80 (s, 1H, NH), 8.10 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.88 (dd, J = 8.4, 2.1 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.66 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.57 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.54 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.50 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 2.27 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, CH2), 1.05 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 172.12, 164.15, 147.98, 136.92, 135.65, 134.11, 131.95, 131.44, 130.17, 127.68, 126.36, 120.41, 118.01, 105.37, 29.96, 10.34. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C18H16Cl2N3OS: 392.03856; found: 392.03856 392.03784.
N-(4-(4-(4-Bromophenyl)thiazol-2-ylamino)phenyl)propionamide (A19): white solid; yield 65%; mp: 219.5–220.8 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.17 (s, 1H, NH), 9.75 (s, 1H, NH), 7.84 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H,), 7.61–7.58 (m, 2H), 7.58 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.53 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.34 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 2.27 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, CH2), 1.05 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 172.07, 163.99, 149.39, 137.03, 134.28, 133.97, 132.10, 128.24, 121.03, 120.41, 117.89, 103.98, 29.97, 10.34. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C18H17BrN3OS: 402.02702; found: 402.02594.
N-(4-(4-(3-Bromophenyl)thiazol-2-ylamino)phenyl)propionamide (A20): white solid; yield 94%; mp: 238.4–239.1 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.21 (s, 1H, NH), 9.79 (s, 1H, NH), 8.08 (t, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.93 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.61 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.57 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.50 (dd, J = 8.0, 0.9 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.45 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 7.40 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 2.31 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, CH2), 1.09 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 172.06, 164.02, 148.81, 137.29, 136.93, 133.98, 131.35, 130.62, 128.57, 125.13, 122.56, 120.41, 117.94, 104.62, 40.58, 40.37, 40.16, 39.95, 39.75, 39.54, 39.33, 29.91, 10.26. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C18H17BrN3OS: 402.02702; found: 402.02606.
N-(4-((4-(4-(Trifluoromethyl)phenyl)thiazol-2-yl)amino)phenyl)propionamide (A21): white solid; yield 82%; mp: 242.1–243.0 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.23 (s, 1H, NH), 9.76 (s, 1H, NH), 8.22–8.16 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.64 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.60-7.55 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.54 (d, J = 2.9 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.53 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 2.27 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, CH2), 1.05 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 172.02, 164.18, 148.80, 136.87, 135.90, 134.07, 130.07 (d, 17.6 Hz), 126.10, 124.37, 123.39, 122.35, 120.3, 117.98, 104.97, 29.90, 10.25. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C19H17F3N3OS: 392.10389; found: 392.10281.
N-(4-((4-(3-(Trifluoromethyl)phenyl)thiazol-2-yl)amino)phenyl)isobutyramide (A22): yellow solid; yield 86%; mp: 168.2–168.9 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.24 (s, 1H, NH), 9.77 (s, 1H, NH), 8.21-8.17 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.64 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 7.58 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.55 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.53 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 2.27 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, CH2), 1.05 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 172.02, 164.18, 148.80, 136.87, 135.90, 134.07, 130.33, 129.97, 126.10, 124.37, 123.39, 122.35, 120.35, 117.98, 104.97, 29.90, 10.25. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C19H16F3N3OS: 392.10389; found: 392.10266.
N-(4-((4-(p-Tolyl)thiazol-2-yl)amino)phenyl)propionamide (A23): white solid; yield 79%; mp: 286.4–287.5 °C; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.23 (s, 1H, NH), 9.85 (s, 1H, NH), 7.81 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.66 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.59 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.24 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.21 (s, 1H, Thiazole-H), 2.34 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 3H, CH3), 2.30 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, CH2), 1.10 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H, CH3). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.01, 163.67, 150.59, 137.19, 133.78, 132.42, 129.67, 126.09, 120.36, 117.70, 102.04, 29.91, 21.32, 10.30. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C19H20N3OS: 338.13216; found: 338.13129.
N-(4-((4-Phenylthiazol-2-yl)amino)phenyl)propionamide (A24): white solid; yield 87%; mp: 187.5–187.9 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.16 (s, 1H, NH), 9.76 (s, 1H, NH), 7.89 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.1 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.61 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.54 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.39 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.28 (dd, J = 10.5, 4.3 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.26 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 2.28 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, CH2), 1.06 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 171.99, 163.78, 150.55, 137.11, 135.04, 133.82, 129.11, 128.00, 126.15, 120.39, 117.76, 102.98, 29.91, 10.28. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C18H20N3OS: 324.11651; found: 324.11514.
N-(4-(4-(4-Fluorophenyl)thiazol-2-ylamino)phenyl)isobutyramide (A25): yellow solid; yield 74%; mp: 172.4–173.9 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.16 (s, 1H, NH), 9.72 (s, 1H, NH), 7.92 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.62–7.57 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.56–7.51 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.23 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.20 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 2.59–2.50 (m, 1H), 1.07 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 6H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 175.27, 163.94, 163.29, 160.86, 149.50, 137.08, 133.91, 131.67 (d, J = 3.1 Hz), 128.13 (d, J = 8.0 Hz), 120.53, 117.81, 116.03, 115.81, 102.70, 56.51, 35.30, 20.04. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C19H19FN3OS: 356.12274; found: 356.12180.
N-(4-((4-(3-Fluorophenyl)thiazol-2-yl)amino)phenyl)isobutyramide (A26): yellow solid; yield 58%; mp: 230.9–232.0 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.18 (s, 1H, NH), 9.72 (s, 1H, NH), 7.74 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.67 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 1H, Ar -H), 7.62–7.56 (m, 2H, Ar -H), 7.57–7.52 (m, 2H, Ar -H),, 7.44 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 7.40 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 7.10 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 2.54 (m, 1H, CH), 1.07 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 6H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 175.24, 164.21, 163.91, 161.81, 149.25 (d, J = 2.8 Hz), 137.41 (d, J = 8.2 Hz), 136.98, 133.98, 131.13 (d, J = 8.5 Hz), 122.23, 120.54, 117.87, 114.66 (d, J = 21.3 Hz), 112.72, 112.49, 104.52, 35.29, 20.05. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C19H19FN3OS: 356. 12274; found: 356 12149.
N-(4-((4-(3,4-Difluorophenyl)thiazol-2-yl)amino)phenyl)isobutyramide (A27): yellow solid; yield 69%; mp: 190.6–191.6 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.22 (s, 1H, NH), 9.76 (s, 1H, NH), 7.93 (dd, J = 11.2, 6.9 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.78 (dd, J = 8.7, 4.3 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.61 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.57 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.50 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.41 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 2.59 (m, 1H, CH), 1.10 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 6H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 175.31, 164.06, 151.24, 150.45, 148.87 (d, J = 12.7 Hz), 148.36, 148.06 (d, J = 12.7 Hz), 136.95, 133.99, 132.71, 122.89, 120.57, 118.22 (d, J = 17.1 Hz), 117.92, 114.86 (d, J = 18.3 Hz), 104.13, 35.29, 20.03. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C19H18N3OF2S: 374.11332; found: 374.11191.
N-(4-((4-(4-Chlorophenyl)thiazol-2-yl)amino)phenyl)isobutyramide (A28): yellow solid; yield 91%; mp: 264.5–265.7 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.15 (s, 1H, NH), 9.72 (s,1H, NH), 7.88 (m, 2H, Ar-H) 7.65-7.57 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.57–7.52 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.40 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.28 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.26 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 2.60–2.49 (m, 1H, CH), 1.11 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 6H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 175.28, 163.92, 149.22, 137.04, 133.92, 132.33, 129.12, 127.84, 120.43, 117.77, 103.83, 35.30, 20.07. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C19H19ClN3OS: 372.09319; found: 372.09207.
N-(4-((4-(3-Chlorophenyl)thiazol-2-yl)amino)phenyl)isobutyramide (A29): yellow solid; yield 91%; mp: 234.4–235.7 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.20 (s, 1H, NH), 9.73 (s, 1H, NH), 7.91 (t, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.86 (dd, J = 7.8, 0.9 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.61–7.56 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.56–7.52 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.46–7.39 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.33 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.1 Hz, 1H, thiazole-H), 2.55 (m, 1H,CH), 1.07 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 6H,CH3). 13C-NMR δ 175.25, 163.99, 148.93, 136.99, 133.98, 131.05, 127.73, 125.69, 124.76, 120.51, 117.90, 104.64, 35.30, 20.06. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C19H19ClN3OS: 372.09319; found: 372.09204.
N-(4-((4-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)thiazol-2-yl)amino)phenyl)isobutyramide (A30): yellow solid; yield 71%; mp: 251.4–252.7 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.21 (s, 1H, NH), 9.72 (s, 1H, NH), 8.10 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.88 (m,1H, Ar-H), 7.65 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 7.55 (d, J = 9.7 Hz, Ar-H), 7.55–7.51 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.49 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 2.54 (m, 1H, CH), 1.07 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 6H). 13C-NMR δ 175.25, 164.11, 147.93, 136.84, 135.57, 134.09, 131.89, 131.39, 130.13, 127.63, 126.30, 120.49, 117.96, 105.31, 35.29, 20.05. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C19H18Cl2N3OS: 406.05421; found: 406.05307.
N-(4-(4-(4-Bromophenyl)thiazol-2-ylamino)phenyl)isobutyramide (A31): white solid; yield 87%; mp: 190.6–191.6 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.19 (s, 1H, NH), 9.73 (s, 1H, NH), 7.92–7.82 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.66–7.60 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 7.57 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.37 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 2.65–2.53 (m, 1H, CH), 1.11 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 6H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 175.24, 163.98, 149.34, 137.00, 134.23, 133.97, 132.03, 128.17, 120.97, 120.50, 117.86, 103.91, 35.30, 20.05. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C19H19BrN3OS: 416.04267; found: 416.04153.
N-(4-(4-(3-Bromophenyl)thiazol-2-ylamino)phenyl)isobutyramide (A32): white solid; yield 55%; mp: 238.2–239.0 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.17 (s, 1H, NH), 9.70 (s, 1H, NH), 8.05 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.90 (dd, J = 6.6, 1.2 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.56 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.54 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.53–7.44 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 7.42 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 7.36 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 2.60–2.50 (m, 1H,CH), 1.07 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 6H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 175.25, 164.03, 148.81, 137.30, 136.94, 134.05, 131.35, 130.62, 128.58, 125.13, 122.56, 120.52, 117.94, 104.63, 35.30, 20.04. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C19H19BrN3OS: 416.04267; found: 416.04153.
N-(4-((4-(4-(Trifluoromethyl)phenyl)thiazol-2-yl)amino)phenyl)isobutyramide (A33): white solid; yield 71%; mp: 198.8–199.5 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.23 (s, 1H, NH), 9.73 (s, 1H, NH), 8.24–8.13 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.67–7.61 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.60–7.56 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.55 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.54 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 2.58–2.50 (m, 1H, CH), 1.07 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 6H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 175.32, 164.27, 148.86, 136.96, 135.97, 134.18, 130.40, 130.03, 125.89, 124.45, 122.46, 120.55, 118.04, 105.04, 35.37, 20.11. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C20H19F3N3OS: 406.11954; found: 406.11868.
N-(4-(4-(3-(Trifluoromethyl)phenyl)thiazol-2-ylamino)phenyl)isobutyramide (A34): yellow solid; yield 81%; mp: 198.8–199.5 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.21 (s, 1H), 9.71 (s, 1H), 8.19 (s, 2H, Ar-H), 7.64 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.58 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.53 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 2.59–2.50 (m, 1H, CH), 1.07 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 6H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 175.32, 164.30, 148.88, 136.98, 135.99, 134.20, 130.38, 130.19, 129.98, 125.90, 124.45, 123.73, 122.45, 120.58, 118.07, 105.02, 35.37, 20.10. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C20H19F3N3OS: 406.11954; found: 406.11826.
N-(4-((4-(p-Tolyl)thiazol-2-yl)amino)phenyl)isobutyramide (A35): yellow solid; yield 73%; mp: 245.2–246.4 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.12 (s, 1H, NH), 9.71 (s, 1H, NH), 7.77 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.58 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.53 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.20 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.18 (s, 1H, thiazole-H), 2.62–2.50 (m, 1H, CH), 2.29 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.07 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 6H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 175.20, 163.70, 150.60, 137.20, 133.82, 132.41, 129.67, 126.09, 120.49, 117.72, 102.06, 35.28, 21.32, 20.07. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C20H22N3OS: 352.14781; found: 352.14685.
N-(4-((4-Phenylthiazol-2-yl)amino)phenyl)isobutyramide (A36): white solid; yield 84%; mp: 239.6–241.0 °C; 1H-NMR δ 10.15 (s, 1H, NH), 9.72 (s, 1H, NH), 7.88 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.60 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.55 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.39 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.28 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.26 (s, 1H, Thiazole-H), 2.59–2.50 (m, 1H), 1.07 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 6H, CH3). 13C-NMR δ 175.23, 150.54, 137.13, 135.04, 133.87, 129.11, 128.00, 126.15, 120.51, 117.76, 102.98, 35.29, 20.06. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C19H20N3OS: 338.13216; found: 338.13101.

3.3. X-ray Diffraction Analysis

To further confirm the three-dimensional structure of the target compounds, crystals (1.9 mm × 0.5 mm × 1.6 mm) of A4 (Figure 2) were obtained by slow evaporation and analyzed by X-ray diffraction. Cell dimensions and intensities were measured at 298 K on a Bruker Smart Apex CCD diffractometer with MoKα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å). The structure was solved by direct method with the SHELXS-97 program. The results show that crystals of A4 is monoclinic system, which is characterized by no higher-order symmetry axis. A total of 2709 reflections were measured, of which 1714 were unique in the range of 2.19 < θ < 25.02° (h, −14 to 19; k, −6 to 5; l, −22 to 21). The two benzene rings in the molecule are almost in the same plane. All of the non-H atoms were refined anisotropically by full-matrix least-squares to give the final R = 0.0732 and WR = 0.1820. The completeness of the crystal data is 99.9%. The crystal data of the compound A4 have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center under code CCDC 1,975,217 that contains all the above data.

3.4. In Vitro Antibacterial Activity Bioassays

The in vitro antibacterial activity of target compounds against Xoo, Xac and Xoc was evaluated using a turbidimeter test [26,27]. For comparison, the commercial antibacterial agents bismerthiazol and thiodiazole copper was used as positive controls. DMSO in sterile water served as negative control. Nutrient broth medium (NB, 1 g of yeast powder, 3 g of beef extract, 10 g of glucose, 5 g of peptone and 1 L of distilled water, pH 7.0 to 7.2) in tubes was sterilized under high temperature and pressure. The tested compounds were dissolved in 120 μL DMSO then diluted with 0.1% Tween-20 solution, and finally working solution concentrations of 200 and 100 μg/mL were obtained. 1 mL of the solution containing compounds, bismerthiazol and thiadiazole copper was transferred into tubes (15 × 150 mm) containing 4 mL nutrient broth (NB) medium. Approximately 40 μL of activated bacteria was introduced into each tube. Finally, the test tubes were incubated at 28 ± 1 °C with continuous shaking at 180 rpm for 24–48h. The density value (OD595) of the solution in the tube was monitored on the microplates when the OD595 of the negative control group was 0.6 to 0.8. The inhibition rate was calculated using the following equation:
Inhibitory Rate (%) = (CK − T)/CK × 100%.
where “CK” represents the density value (OD595) of negative control group, and “T” implies the density value (OD595) of the treated NB medium. The EC50 values against Xoo, Xac and Xoc of the target compounds were tested at five gradient concentrations and computed from analysis using the SPSS 17.0 software (IBM, New York, NY, USA). The experiments were repeated three times for each compound.

3.5. Scanning Electron Microscopy

The cell surface was observed as previously described [28]. Xoo culture (OD595 = 1.0) was centrifuged and washed with PBS (pH = 7.2), then resuspended in 1.0 mL of PBS buffer. Then, the cells were treated with compound A1 for 10 h at 28 °C at concentrations of 50 μg/mL and 100 μg/mL. The untreated sample served as a negative control. Next, the compound solution was removed by washing three times with PBS buffer. The Xoo cells were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde at 4 °C overnight and then dehydrated with 70%, and 90% ethanol, respectively.

3.6. Nematicidal Biological Activity In Vitro

The nematicidal activities of the compounds A1A36 against M. incognita were tested by a typical assay [29,30]. The tested compounds were dissolved with DMSO and then diluted with 1% Tween-80 solution to prepare 500 and 100 μg/mL solutions. Approximately 200 μL of test solution was added into a 48 well plate. Then a suspension that included approximately 200 living nematodes was added into the above solution. Avermectin was used as positive control. The solution without compound was used as a negative control. All experiments were repeated three times. The mortality of the nematodes was seen under a stereoscopic binocular microscope after 24 and 72 h. The corrected mortality of nematicide was calculated using the following equation:
Corrected Mortality (%) = (Mortality of Treatment − Mortality of Control)/(1 − Mortality of Control) × 100%

4. Conclusions

In summary, a series of new N-phenylacetamide derivatives containing 4-arylthiazole moieties was designed and synthesized by introducing the thiazole moiety into the scaffolds of N-phenylacetamides. The target compounds were evaluated for their in vitro antibacterial activities against Xoo, Xac and Xoc. The bactericidal activity data show that most of the target compounds have moderate inhibitory activities against the above pathogens, among which compounds A1 and A3 have good inhibitory effects on Xoo and Xoc. The cell-rupturing effect of compound A1 on Xoo was studied through SEM analysis. In addition their nematocidal activity was also determined and the compound A23 exhibited strong toxicity against M. incognita, comparable to that of avermectin.

Supplementary Materials

1H-NMR, 13C-NMR and HRMS spectra for the target compounds are available online.

Author Contributions

Funding acquisition, L.J. and X.Z.; Investigation, H.L. and L.W.; Project administration and supervision, X.Z.; Writing-original draft, H.L., manuscript review and edit, X.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China NSFC 21967006, and by The Excellent Young Science and Technology Talent Cultivation Plan 201122, and by International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of Guizhou province 2009700112.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Spago, F.R.; Ishii Mauro, C.S.; Oliveira, A.G.; Beranger, J.P.O.; Cely, M.V.T.; Stanganelli, M.M.; Simionato, A.S.; San Martin, J.A.B.; Andrade, C.G.T.J.; Mello, J.C.P.; et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa produces secondary metabolites that have biological activity against plant pathogenic Xanthomonas species. Crop. Prot. 2014, 62, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, P.; Tian, P.Y.; Song, X.; Xue, W.; Jin, L.H.; Hu, D.Y.; Yang, S.; Song, B.A. Novel bisthioether derivatives containing a 1,3,4-oxadiazole moiety: Design, synthesis, antibacterial and nematocidal activities. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2018, 74, 844–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wang, P.Y.; Zhou, L.; Zhou, J.; Wu, Z.; Xue, W.; Song, B.A.; Yang, S. Synthesis and antibacterial activity of pyridinium-tailored 2,5-substituted-1,3,4-oxadiazole thioether/sulfoxide/sulfone derivatives. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016, 26, 1214–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Iihama, T.; Miyazawa, M.; Miyahara, O.; Marumo, S.; Sano, S.; Hamamura, H.; Yokota, C.; Kawaguchi, M.; Takahashi, H.; Takkagi, M. Preparation of Thiazole Compounds as Pest Control Agents and Fungicides. JP Patent WO9940076, 12 August 1999. [Google Scholar]
  5. Huang, D.L.; Liu, A.P.; Liu, W.D.; Liu, A.P.; Liu, W.D.; Liu, X.P.; Chen, X.Y.; Pei, H.; Sun, J.; Yin, D.L. Synthesis and biological evaluation of 1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide derivatives as potential fungicidal and insecticidal agents. Synth. Commun. 2017, 47, 455–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liao, G.P.; Zhou, X.; Xiao, W.; Xie, Y.; Jin, L.H. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of novel 2-substituted phenoxy-N-(4-substituted phenyl-5-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl) thiazol-2-yl) acetamide derivatives. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2016, 52, 1506–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bharti, S.K.; Nath, G.; Tilak, R.; Singh, S.K. Synthesis, antibacterial and antifungal activities of some novel Schiff bases containing 2,4-disubstituted thiazole ring. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 651–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, M.W.; Zhu, H.H.; Wang, P.Y.; Zeng, D.; Wu, Y.Y.; Liu, L.W.; Wu, Z.B.; Li, Z.; Yang, S. Synthesis of thiazolium-labeled 1,3,4-oxadiazole thioethers as prospective antimicrobials: In vitro and in vivo bioactivity and mechanism of action. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 12696–12708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, T.T.; Bing, G.F.; Zhang, X.; Qin, Z.; Yu, H.; Qin, X.; Dai, H.; Miao, W.; Wu, S.; Fang, J. Synthesis and herbicidal activities of 2-cyano-3-benzylaminoacrylates containing thiazole moiety. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 3348–3351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Guo, J.C.; Hao, Y.N.; Wang, X.F.; Liu, Y.; Ma, D.; Li, Y.; Pang, H.; Ni, J.; Wang, Q. Optimization, structure-activity relationship, and mode of action of nortopsentin analogues containing thiazole and oxazole moieties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 10018–10031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, L.; Zhao, B.; Fan, Z.J.; Hu, M.; Li, Q.; Hu, W.; Li, J.; Zhang, J. Discovery of novel isothiazole 1,2,3-thiadiazole and thiazole-based cinnamamides as fungicidal candidates. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 12357–12365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Liu, J.B.; Dai, H.; Fang, J.X. Synthesis and biological activities evaluation of new 4-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-N-aryl-5-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)thiazol-2-amine. Communications 2011, 41, 3197–3206. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wei, Q.Y.; Wang, X.M.; Cheng, J.H.; Zeng, G.; Sun, D.W. Synthesis and antimicrobial activities of novel sorbic and benzoic acid amide derivatives. Food Chem. 2018, 268, 220–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cui, Y.J.; Rao, X.P.; Shang, S.B.; Song, Z.; Shen, M.; Liu, H. Synthesis, structure analysis and antibacterial activity of N-[5-dehydroabietyl-[1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl]-aromatic amide derivatives. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2017, 21, S258–S263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Wang, Z.J.; Gao, Y.; Hou, Y.L.; Zhang, C.; Yu, S.J.; Bian, Q.; Li, Z.M.; Zhao, W.G. Design, synthesis, and fungicidal evaluation of a series of novel 5- methyl-1H-1,2,3-trizole-4-carboxyl amide and ester analogues. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 86, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, J.X.; Yi, C.F.; Wang, S.B.; Wu, S.; Li, S.; Hu, D.; Song, B. Novel amide derivatives containing 1,3,4-thiadiazole moiety: Design, synthesis, nematocidal and antibacterial activities. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2019, 29, 1203–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Che, Z.; Zhang, S.; Shao, Y.; Fan, L.; Xu, H.; Yu, X.; Zhi, X.; Yao, X.; Zhang, R. Synthesis and quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) study of novel N-arylsulfonyl-3-acylindole arylcarbonyl hydrazone derivatives as nematicidal agents. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 5696–5705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chankeswara, S.V.; Chakraborti, A.K. Catalyst-free chemoselective N-tert-butyloxycarbonylation of amines in water. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3259–3262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Basel, Y.; Hassner, A. Di-tert-butyl dicarbonate and 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine revisited. Their reactions with amines and alcohols. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 6368–6380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lee, L.; Leroux, Y.R.; Hapiot, P.; Downard, A.J. Amine-terminated monolayers on carbon: Preparation, characterization, and coupling Reactions. Langmuir 2015, 31, 5071–5077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Henrik, M.; Jon, S.H.; Michael, P. A new efficient synthesis of isothiocyanates from amines using di-tert-butyl dicarbonate. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 3117–3119. [Google Scholar]
  22. Stephensen, H.; Zaragoza, F. Resin-bound isothiocyanates and their synthetic equivalents as intermediates for the solid-phase synthesis of substituted thiophenes. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 6096–6097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Seelam, M.; Shaikh, B.V.; Tamminana, R.; Kammela, P. An efficient methodology for the synthesis of thioureas from amine mediated by a cobalt source. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016, 57, 5297–5300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Baek, S.H.; Kim, N.J.; Kim, S.H.; Park, K.-H. Inhibitory effect of 4-aryl 2-substituted aniline-thiazole analogs on growth of human prostate cancer LNCap cell. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2012, 33, 111–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Jeong, K.; Lee, J.H.; Park, S.M.; Choi, J.H.; Jeong, D.Y.; Choi, D.H.; Nam, Y.; Park, J.H.; Lee, K.N.; Kim, S.M.; et al. Synthesis and in-vitro evaluation of 2-amino-4-arylthiazole as inhibitor of 3D polymerase against foot-and-mouth disease (FMD). Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 387–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Su, S.H.; Zhou, X.; Liao, G.P.; Qi, P.Y.; Jin, L.H. Synthesis and antibacterial evaluation of new sulfone derivatives containing 2-aroxymethyl-1,3,4-oxadiazole/thiadiazole moiety. Molecules 2017, 22, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Zhou, J.; Tao, Q.Q.; Wang, P.Y.; Shao, W.B.; Wu, Z.B.; Li, Z.; Yang, S. Antimicrobial evaluation and action mechanism of pyridinium-decorated 1,4-pentadien-3-one derivatives. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2018, 28, 1742–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Montasser, S.A.; Abd El-Wahab, A.E.; Abd-Elgawad, M.M.M.; Abd-El-Khair, H.; Faika, F.H.K.; Hammam, M.M.A. Effects of some fungi and bacteria as bio-control agents against citrus nematode Tylenchulus semipenetrans Cobb. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 2012, 8, 5436–5444. [Google Scholar]
  29. Cheng, W.L.; Yang, J.Y.; Nie, Q.Y.; Huang, D.; Yu, C.; Zheng, L.; Cai, M.; Thomashow, L.S.; Weller, D.M.; Yu, Z.; et al. Volatile organic compounds from paenibacillus polymyxa KM2501-1 control meloidogyne incognita by multiple strategies. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, J.X.; Chen, Y.Z.; Gan, X.H.; Song, B.J.; Hu, D.Y.; Song, B.A. Synthesis, nematicidal evaluation, and 3D-QSAR analysis of novel 1,3,4-oxadiazole-cinnamic acid hybrids. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 9616–9623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds A1A36 are available from the authors.
Scheme 1. Synthetic routes for the target compounds A1A36.
Scheme 1. Synthetic routes for the target compounds A1A36.
Molecules 25 01772 sch001
Figure 1. SEM images for Xoo after incubated using different concentrations of compound A1, (A) 0 μg/mL; (B) 50 μg/mL and (C) 100 μg/mL. Scale for A, B and C is 5 μm.
Figure 1. SEM images for Xoo after incubated using different concentrations of compound A1, (A) 0 μg/mL; (B) 50 μg/mL and (C) 100 μg/mL. Scale for A, B and C is 5 μm.
Molecules 25 01772 g001
Figure 2. Crystal structure of compound A4.
Figure 2. Crystal structure of compound A4.
Molecules 25 01772 g002
Table 1. EC50 (µM) values of some target compounds against Xoo, Xac and Xoc a.
Table 1. EC50 (µM) values of some target compounds against Xoo, Xac and Xoc a.
CompoundEC50 (µM) c
XooXacXoc
A1156.7±7.4152.0±7.8250.7±8.0
A3260.9±9.0561.6±6.8361.4±9.3
A4179.2±6.2281.2±9.4194.9±8.0
A6144.7±3.2347.3±5.6248.5±12.1
A11512.1±13.4812.3±11.0280.6±16.4
A13541.4±15.3660.4±10.1392.8±6.3
A25918.8±19.01186±11.9716.5±19.0
Bismerthiazolb230.5±7.5162.7±3.9254.9±8.2
Thiodiazole copperb545.2±13.7476.5±19.9607.5±3.78
a The statistic analysis was conducted by the ANOVA method under conditions of assumed equal variances (p > 0.05) and not assumed equal variances (p < 0.05). b The commercial antibacterial agents bismerthiazol and thiodiazole-copper were used as positive controls. c The corresponding regression equation and R value for this EC50 are provided in the Supplementary Materials.
Table 2. Mortality (%) of the target compounds against M. incognita a.
Table 2. Mortality (%) of the target compounds against M. incognita a.
CompoundR’/R500 μg/mL100 μg/mL
24 h72 h24 h72 h
A14-F/CH326.626.99.39.9
A23-F/CH311.913.105.4
A33,4-diF/CH320.223.76.49.0
A44-Cl/CH314.721.85.15.1
A53-Cl/CH38.717.300
A63,4-diCl/CH311.920.54.87.1
A74-Br/CH314.121.25.88
A83-Br/CH311.914.47.18.3
A94- CF3/CH323.729.214.117.3
A103-CF3/CH311.517.688.7
A114-CH3/CH314.721.85.15.1
A12H/CH321.223.43.55.4
A134-F/CH2CH36.111.50.62.6
A143-F/CH2CH36.79.91.03.2
A153,4-diF/CH2CH315.114.12.62.9
A164-Cl/CH2CH37.414.43.86.7
A173-Cl/CH2CH37.410.01.02.3
A183,4-diCl/CH2CH321.523.13.84.8
A194-Br/CH2CH35.12.900
A203-Br/CH2CH315.416.71.31.9
A214- CF3/CH2CH317.318.34.25.3
A223- CF3/CH2CH3‘13.115.43.87.1
A234-CH3/CH2CH310010051.353.2
A24H/CH2CH329.530.17.79.3
A254-F/CH(CH3)26.111.50.62.6
A263-F/CH(CH3)26.710.01.05.2
A273,4-diF/CH(CH3)215.421.25.47.7
A284-Cl/CH(CH3)219.920.85.86.1
A293-Cl/CH(CH3)27.415.500
A304-CF3/CH(CH3)222.12610.312.8
A313-CF3/CH(CH3)217.617.600
A323,4-diCl/CH(CH3)217.017.300
A334-Br/CH(CH3)216.024.77.48.3
A343-Br/CH(CH3)229.830.49.910.9
A354-CH3/CH(CH3)219.620.889.3
A36H/CH(CH3)218.619.98.79.3
Avermectinb10010071.879.3
CKc0000
a Averages of three replicates. b The commercial nematicide avermectin was used for a comparison of activity. c Control sample.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lu, H.; Zhou, X.; Wang, L.; Jin, L. Synthesis and Antibacterial Evaluation of N-phenylacetamide Derivatives Containing 4-Arylthiazole Moieties. Molecules 2020, 25, 1772. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules25081772

AMA Style

Lu H, Zhou X, Wang L, Jin L. Synthesis and Antibacterial Evaluation of N-phenylacetamide Derivatives Containing 4-Arylthiazole Moieties. Molecules. 2020; 25(8):1772. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules25081772

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lu, Hui, Xia Zhou, Lei Wang, and Linhong Jin. 2020. "Synthesis and Antibacterial Evaluation of N-phenylacetamide Derivatives Containing 4-Arylthiazole Moieties" Molecules 25, no. 8: 1772. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules25081772

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop