Next Article in Journal
Quality Characteristics and Volatile Profile of Macarons Modified with Walnut Oilcake By-Product
Previous Article in Journal
Rational Design, Synthesis, Characterization and Evaluation of Iodinated 4,4′-Bipyridines as New Transthyretin Fibrillogenesis Inhibitors
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 25
Issue 9
10.3390/molecules25092216
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bimetallic Zr,Zr-Hydride Complexes in Zirconocene Catalyzed Alkene Dimerization

by
Lyudmila V. Parfenova
*,
Pavel V. Kovyazin
and
Almira Kh. Bikmeeva
Institute of Petrochemistry and Catalysis of Russian Academy of Sciences, 141, Prospekt Oktyabrya, 450075 Ufa, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(9), 2216; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules25092216
Submission received: 1 April 2020 / Revised: 23 April 2020 / Accepted: 7 May 2020 / Published: 8 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Organometallic Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Being valuable precursors in the production of adhesives, lubricants, and other high-performance synthetic compounds, alkene dimers and oligomers can be obtained using homogeneous zirconocene catalytic systems. Further advances in such systems require precise control of their activity and chemoselectivity, increasing both the purity and yield of the products. This relies on the process mechanism usually built around the consideration of the hydride complexes as active intermediates in the alkene di- and oligomerization; however, the majority of studies lack the direct evidence of their involvement. Parallel studies on a well-known Cp2ZrCl2-AlR3 or HAlBui2 and a novel [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlR2 (R = Me, Et, Bui) systems activated by methylaluminoxane (MMAO-12) have shown a deep similarity both in the catalytic performance and intermediate composition. As a result of the NMR studies, among all the intermediates considered, we proved that new Zr,Zr- hydride complexes having the type x[Cp2ZrH2∙Cp2ZrHCl∙ClAlR2]∙yMAO appear to be specifically responsible for the alkene dimerization with high yield.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Hydride metal complexes attract significant attention in the field of organometallic chemistry due to their ability to function as highly active reagents or catalytically active centers for various reactions. According to numerous studies, Ti subgroup complexes that contain M-H bond supposedly act as active species, for example, in di-, oligo-, and polymerization of alkenes [1,2,3,4,5], as well as in the reduction of unsaturated compounds [6,7,8]. With respect to the alkene di-, oligo-, and polymerization reactions catalyzed by both Ti subgroup metallocenes and methylaluminoxane (MAO), this assumption had been repeatedly proposed (Scheme 1); however, these studies lack direct evidence of the metal hydride complex action. Nevertheless, we note several indirect observations supporting this assumption:
(i) The presence of a terminal vinylidene group in the alkene di-, oligo- and polymerization products that appear due to the chain termination on β-H elimination stage which generates in situ intermediates having the M–H bond (Scheme 1) [9,10,11,12,13,14,15];
(ii) running the catalytic system in the presence of hydrogen activates “dormant” or deactivated catalytic sites and results in the acceleration of the polymerization reactions and improvement of the polymer properties [16,17,18,19];
(iii) introduction of AlBui3 into the catalytic systems zirconocene–(methylaluminoxane or boron activators) makes such systems more effective in alkene di-, oligo-, or polymerization [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28];
(iv) formation of bimetallic hydride complexes in the reactions of L2ZrCl2 with XAlBui2 (X = H, Cl, Bui) [29,30,31,32,33] which catalyze the alkene hydroalumination [29,30,31,32] and polymerization when the complexes are being transformed into the cationic species by [Ph3C][B(C6F5)4)] [34,35].
Moreover, Marks et al. showed that the zirconium hydride complexes modified with B(C6F5)3 are active in ethylene and propylene polymerization [37,38]. Collins et al. demonstrated significantly higher activity of the complexes (RCp)2ZrH3AlH2 (R = Bun, TMS) activated with MAO in ethylene polymerization than the corresponding zirconocene dichlorides [39]. Binuclear hydride clusters complexed with organoboron compounds [40,41,42] were found to be highly active initiators of isobutene homopolymerization and isobutene-isoprene copolymerization [42]. It is generally accepted that the activating effect of MAO or organoboron compounds on di-, oligo- and polymerization systems is connected with the formation of highly reactive cationic centers of type [L2M-H]+ [34,35,43].
Furthermore, quantum chemical modeling of the possible active sites governing the alkene polymerization also supports the proposed formation of the hydride intermediates and further participation in the reactions. For example, a DFT study of the initial stages of the methyl vinyl ether (MVE) polymerization which runs under the catalytic action of [Me2C(Cp)2Zr(Me)]+ and [Me2C(Cp)2Zr(H)]+ cations showed that it is the zirconium hydride which preferably initiates the polymer chain growth [44]. In Reference [43], devoted to the modeling of the propylene dimerization and oligomerization processes, the crucial role of the chlorine atom as a structural unit of the active Zr,Al- binuclear hydride intermediates was shown, and the efficiency of the molecular hydrogen as the activator that increases the rate and selectivity of the dimerization was revealed.
Our recent studies regarding the structure of the intermediates formed in the reaction of L2ZrCl2 with XAlBui2 (X = H, Cl, Bui) [32], as well as the complexes generated in zirconocene dihydride-ClAlR2 (R = Et, Bui)-methylaluminoxane (MMAO-12) systems [45], showed that both systems L2ZrCl2-XAlBui2 and [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlR2 exhibit almost the same set of Zr,Al-hydride complexes. However, in the reaction of [Cp2ZrH2]2 with ClAlR2 (R = Et, Bui), new bimetallic Zr,Zr-hydride complexes that can chemically bind to MAO were observed [45].
The goal of this research was to find the conditions for selective alkene dimerization in two catalytic systems: Cp2ZrCl2-(AlR3 or HAlBui2 (R = Me, Et, Bui))-MMAO-12, and [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlR2 (R = Me, Et, Bui)-MMAO-12, and to reveal the structure of the zirconium hydride intermediates that initiate the alkene transformations.

2. Results

2.1. Study of 1-Alkene Transformations in Catalytic Systems Cp2ZrY2 (Y = Cl, H)-OAC-MMAO-12

2.1.1. Activity and Chemoselectivity of System Cp2ZrCl2-(AlR3 or HAlBui2)-MMAO-12 with Respect to Alkenes

On the first step of the catalytic experiments, we studied the effect of MMAO-12 on the activity and chemoselectivity of systems Cp2ZrCl2-XAlBui2 (X = H, Bui) that hydroaluminate the terminal alkenes in the absence of the activator [7]. As shown elsewhere, the catalytic system based on HAlBui2 and zirconocene dichloride demonstrates low activity in the alkene hydroalumination (hydroalumination product (2)); this experiment was taken as a reference point (Scheme 2, Table 1 (entry 1)) [30,31,32]. Addition of 30–240 eq. of methylaluminoxane to the system does not affect notably the alkene conversion. For example, in the system L2ZrCl2-HAlBui2-MMAO-12-1-octene at the ratio [Zr]:[Al]:[MAO]:[1-alkene] = 1:60:240:50, the conversion of 1-octene does not exceed 20% in 3 h (Table 1, (entry 4)).
Unlike HAlBui2, triisobutylaluminium is an effective reagent for 1-alkene hydrometalation catalyzed by Cp2ZrCl2 [30,32,46]. As another reference, the hydroalumination products after 3 h of the reaction were obtained at 83% yield (Table 1, entry 2) [32]. The addition of MMAO-12 increases the conversion of 1-alkene up to 98% due to the generation of both hydroalumination (2) and dimerization (4) products (Table 1, entry 3). Meanwhile, minor product 3, the precursor of dimer 4, was observed in this system due to the formation of the metal alkyl, which appeared after incorporation of the second alkene molecule into hydrozirconation product (Scheme 1). Rising the MMAO-12 content from 30 to 240 eq. increases the yield of 1-octene dimers (4b) from 5% to 40% (Table 1, entry 5). Similarly to the case with HAlBui2, a decrease in the AlBui3 concentration leads to the selective formation of the alkene dimers (97%) within 20 min of the reaction at 20 °C (Table 1, entry 6). A further increase in the temperature accelerates the reaction and helps to reduce the concentration of the catalytic system components without loss of both the chemoselectivity and the main product yield (entries 8,9). These results are consistent with the data obtained for catalytic system L2ZrCl2-AlBui3-ClAlR2-MAO (1:20:(1–2):10, 0.05 mol% Zr, 60°C, 1–4 h), in which aluminum alkyl AlBui3 and aluminum chloride ClAlR2 (R = Me, Et) activate the system that produces dimers with a high yield up to 94% [5,24,43].
Moreover, the conditions that we proved to be effective for the selective 1-octene dimerization were extended to 1-hexene treatment (entries 10,11). These conditions also provide high substrate conversion; however, the product distribution slightly changes due to the appearance of the hydrometalation (2) and alkylation (6) products, and the dimer yield becomes 89%–91%.
Further, we studied the influence of different organoaluminum compounds (OAC) on the activity and chemoselectivity of the catalytic system; for this purpose, the isobutylalanes were replaced consequently by AlMe3 and AlEt3. The application of these OACs at 40 °C slightly reduces the alkene conversion to 91%–92% (entries 12,13). In the case of AlEt3, a decrease of the dimer yield to 68% was observed due to the increased fraction of the alkylated monomer 6 in the products (entry 13). The formation of 6 is possible through the alkene carbometalation product 5 which is generated by either methyl or ethyl zirconocenes formed during the stage of the alkyl-chloride exchange between Cp2ZrCl2 and either AlMe3 or AlEt3, respectively. It should be emphasized that for the systems like Cp2ZrCl2-AlMe3, these stages, finished by-product 6, are very important since they provide zirconocene hydrides which are the source of dimers 4. Rising of the temperature to 60 °C both increases the substrate conversion and narrows the selectivity towards the dimerization, regardless of the OAC nature (entries 14–21). Moreover, the amount of the substrate can be increased to 1000 eq. in the case of HAlBui2 without loss of the dimer yield (98%, entry 22).
As a result, we have established that the catalytic system based on HAlBui2 provides the most selective dimerization (entries 14,18,22).

2.1.2. Activity and Chemoselectivity of System [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlR2 (R = Me, Et, Bui)-MMAO-12 with Respect to Alkenes

On the second step of the catalytic experiments, we studied the performance of system II [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlR2-MMAO-12 (R = Me, Et, Bui) in the reaction with alkenes having various structures (1a–f). In all the experiments, the main product was dimer 4 (Scheme 2, Table 2).
Monitoring of the reaction for 3 h at the initial ratio of the reagents [Zr]:[Al]:[MAO]:[1-hexene] = 1:3:30:100 at 20 °C showed the presence of an induction period which duration significantly depends on the OAC structure. The longest induction period (60 min) was observed for ClAlMe2 (Figure S1a). For ClAlBui2, the induction period decreases to 15 min (Figure S1c), and the yield of dimer 4 rises to 97% (Table 2, entry 6). A reaction in the presence of dimethyl- or diethylaluminum chlorides is accompanied by the formation of hydro- and carboalumination products with a yield of 22%–23% (Table 2, entries 3,4). As a result, systems based on [Cp2ZrH2]2, MMAO-12, and ClAlBui2, compared to other ClAlR2, were found to be more active and selective. Diisobutylaluminum chloride also showed its effectiveness in the dimerization of other linear substrates: 1-octene and 1-decene. The yield of dimers 4b,c obtained within 3 h at a temperature of 20 °C was 72%–98% (entries 7–18).
When the temperature is elevated to 40 °C, the reaction accelerates, and the induction period vanishes. The yield of 1-hexene and 1-octene dimers reaches 73%–91% in 15 min (entries 19–24). It should be noted that, in this case, the dependency of the system activity on the OAC nature disappears. Moreover, under these conditions, the conversion of 4-methyl-1-pentene (1d) is over 97%, and the yield of the dimerization products is 95% (entry 25). The temperature increase to 60 °C selectively provides 1-hexene dimers at 91%–94% yield within 5 min of the reaction (lines 26–28). Increasing 1-alkene initial concentration to 500 equivalents does not affect the degree of its transformation at 60 °C, and the yield of the dimerization products remains sufficiently high (85%–90%) (entry 32). A significant reduction in the substrate conversion and dimer yield (65% and 57%, correspondingly) was observed only at 1000 equivalents of the alkene (entry 33).
Moreover, the relative amount of MMAO-12 in the catalytic system also affects the activity only up to a certain level. The increase in the MMAO-12 content to 60 eq. (at 20 °C) accelerates the reaction and provides the dimers with a yield of 86% (entries 34–36). Further increase of MMAO-12 content up to 120 eq. does not change both the catalytic activity and the dimerization product yield (entry 37).
It was established that aryl-substituted alkenes 1e and 1f can undergo the dimerization at an elevated temperature of 100 °C. Within 60 min, the dimers were obtained with yields of 61% and 58%, respectively. However, the proximity of the Ar group to the double bond leads to a loss of the reaction regioselectivity. The ratio of the regioisomers of the styrene dimer head-to-tail to tail-to-tail reaches 1.23:1 (entry 39).
Finally, the catalytic systems consisting of zirconocene dihydride, dialkylaluminum chlorides, and MMAO-12, work just as well as the systems based on zirconocene dichloride. Therefore, to identify the intermediates responsible for the alkene dimerization in both systems, we studied the structure and activity of the hydride complexes by the means of NMR spectroscopy.

2.2. NMR Study of Hydride Intermediate Structures in Systems Cp2ZrY2 (Y = Cl, H)-OAC-MMAO-12

Earlier, we showed that the system Cp2ZrCl2-XAlBui2 can generate certain bimetallic hydride complexes; among them, the most active species in the hydroalumination reaction are the ones which have an open Zr-H bond [32]. The NMR study showed that in the Cp2ZrCl2 reaction with AlBui3 (1:5), alkyl chloride complex 7 is produced and then transformed into complexes 8 and 10c, both undergoing intermolecular exchange via intermediate 9 [30,32] (Scheme 3, Figure 1). In this work, the introduction of MMAO-12 into the reaction mixture, in the 1H NMR spectra, gives rise to both a doublet at −1.22 ppm (J = 17.6 Hz) and a triplet at −6.40 ppm (J = 17.6 Hz) which appear to be correlated in the COSY HH spectrum (Figure S5). Moreover, those signals are connected with a singlet of the Cp-rings at 5.50 ppm. The ratio of the signal intensities 2 (Zr-H):1 (Zr-H):20 (Cp) indicates the presence of two ZrCp2 fragments in the molecule. With an increase in the MMAO-12 concentration, additional doublet at −1.23 ppm and triplet at −6.59 ppm are observed; also, binary Cp-ring signals appear in the downfield part of the spectrum at 5.46 and 5.48 ppm. Taking into account these data, as well as the results obtained earlier [45], the structure of these complexes was assigned as 12 and is presented in Scheme 3. As we have previously shown [45], this type of complexes is formed in the reaction of [Cp2ZrH2]2 with ClAlR2 (R = Et, Bui). In intermediates 12a–c, there is no intermolecular exchange with hydride atoms; this indicates higher stability of these structures compared to complexes 8 and 10c.
The reaction of Cp2ZrCl2 with HAlBui2 is accompanied by the formation of the known complexes 10c [29,30,32] and 11c [30,31]. With reduced HAlBui2 content down to 2–3 equivalents (when the initial Cp2ZrCl2 remains unreacted), complex 12c becomes observable; moreover, the complex is formed in this system even in the absence of MMAO-12 (Figures S7 and S8). Similar to the system with AlBui3, addition of MMAO-12 increases the relative amount of complex 12c, and a new set of signals similar to 12c appear in the NMR spectrum. This phenomenon is possible due to the exchange reaction with AlMe3 contained in MMAO-12, as we described earlier [45].
Zirconocene dihydride reacts with ClAlMe2 in a ratio of 1:3 providing a mixture of complexes: 10a, 12a, 13a, and Cp2ZrCl2 (Scheme 3, Figure 2a, Table 3). The structure of complex 10a was identified by analogy with 10b,c [45]. A pair of signals at −0.60 ppm (Zr-H-Al) and 5.75 ppm (Cp) having an intensity ratio of 2:10 were assigned to complex 13a [33]. The broadened nature of the signals belonging to the hydride atom and cyclopentadienyl rings indicates the participation of 13a in the intermolecular exchange; a possible reaction pathway is shown in Scheme 3. Complex 12a is characterized by both triplet and doublet signals at −6.64 ppm (J = 17.6 Hz) and −1.19 ppm (J = 17.6 Hz); these signals relate to that of Cp-rings at 5.52 ppm as 1:2:20. Probably, this complex is a result of the replacement of one hydride atom in the zirconocene dihydride dimer with chlorine. The dialkylaluminum hydride, produced as a result of the chloride-hydride exchange, reacts with Cp2ZrH2 and ClAlR2 and provides trihydride complexes 10a–c.
Assessment of the NOESY spectrum for 12b opened the possibility to clarify the structure of complexes 12a–c. The spectrum exhibits cross-peaks between the signals of Cp- ring protons and hydride atoms with a quartet signal of ethyl group protons at 0.19 ppm (Figure 3); the relative intensity of the signals indicate the presence of no more than one ClAlEt2 molecule in the structure of 12b.
After the addition of MMAO-12 to the Cp2ZrH2-ClAlMe2 system at a ratio [Zr]:[ClAlR2]:[MAO] = 1:3: (6–12), new upfield signals of the hydride atoms and protons of the cyclopentadienyl rings belonging to adducts of complexes 12a with MMAO-12 (Figure 4a) were observed. In the case of complex 12a, the 1H NMR spectrum exhibited both triplet and doublet signals at −6.56 and −1.08 ppm, respectively, as well as broadened signals at −6.94 and −1.43 ppm. These signals correspond to a broad peak of cyclopentadienyl rings at 5.11–5.33 ppm. Within a few minutes, the opacity of the homogeneous solution and separation of a heavy phase was detected. This corresponds to the previously observed effect for 12b,c [45]. As follows from the NOESY experiment (Figure S17), adducts 12a∙MAO show a negative NOE effect intrinsic to macromolecular compounds [47,48]. The signal broadening could be attributed to the high molecular weight of the particles. The substantial difference in diffusion coefficients between MMAO-12 derivatives (Figure S15) may indicate a large increase in the molecular weight and particle volume in the course of a heavy fraction formation. The latter is possible in the case of the intermolecular binding of MMAO-12 oligomers by the complexes. As a result, it was found that among a large set of bimetallic hydride complexes, only complexes 12a–c were able to bind chemically to MMAO-12.
Probably, the ability of the complexes to bind with the activator depends on the dynamic stability of the structures, and on the possibility to replace the organoaluminum fragment in the molecules. Moreover, the observation of adducts formed via covalent binding with methylaluminoxane suggests the presence of a considerable number of accessible three-coordinated Lewis-acidic aluminum centers in the activator. Since MMAO-12 acts similarly to trimethylaluminum or ClAlR2, which can substitute AOC in the complexes 12a–c, it can be assumed that there is a sufficient number of OAlMe2 groups in the methylaluminoxane structure [49,50,51,52].
Using the complexes obtained in the [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlBui2 system as an example, we showed that the addition of 1-hexene to a solution containing a mixture of complexes 10c–13c in the absence of MMAO-12 is accompanied with the appearance of hydrometalation products 2a: zirconocene alkyl chloride and aluminum alkyl (Scheme 4); their identification was carried out on the base of NMR data [30] and mass spectrometry of the deuterolysis products. For this reaction, complexes 10c and 11c interacted first, whereas 12c was no longer observed in the spectra only after 4 h of the process (Figure S19). As follows from Figure 5, in the presence of MMAO-12, when the system contains MAO-adducts along with the complexes 10c, 12c, 13c, complex 10 is consumed quickly, providing hydrometalation products 2a. The formation of the dimers is accompanied by the vanishing of the MAO- adducts of complex 12; especially their heavy fraction is consumed first.

3. Discussion

Our study of the catalytic system Cp2ZrCl2-OAC-MMAO-12 proved the ability of this type of system to dimerize 1-alkenes with high chemoselectivity to give head-to-tail products with a vinylidene moiety > C=CH2 [5,9,10,11,12,24,53]. The other Ti subgroup metal compounds, for example, postmetallocene Zr and Hf complexes with [ONNO]-type amine bis(phenolate) ligands, activated by B(C6F5)3, catalyze the 1-hexene oligomerization with the same regioselectivity [54]. Among these complexes, hafnium catalysts showed the best selectivity towards the dimers (up to 97%); moreover, the molecular weight distribution of the oligomers, obtained in Hf-catalyzed reactions, do not correspond to a typical Schulz−Flory regularity. Similar zirconium complexes with aryl-substituted [OSSO]-type bis(phenolate) ligands on the trans-cyclooctanediyl platform, activated by dried modified methylaluminoxane (dMMAO), catalyze 1,2-regioselective oligomerization of 1-hexene at relatively low catalyst loadings and produce preferably head-to-tail dimer. The use of other transition metal complexes leads, first of all, to changes in the reaction regioselectivity. For example, the systems based on Fe [55] and Co [56,57] complexes and Al- coactivators provide linear head-to-head dimers, whereas W catalysts [58] give predominantly methyl- and dimethyl-branched tail-to-tail products. In these studies, the participation of the transition metal hydride complexes as active centers is assumed as given.
However, in the literature, information regarding the direct evidence of the alkene dimerization under the action of metal hydrides is very limited [59,60]. For example, it was shown that the binuclear hydride complex [(Ind’)2Y(μ-H)]2 catalyzes regio- and stereoselective homodimerization of various α-olefins at 80 °C, as well as head-to-head codimerization of styrene with other α-olefins [59]. In this work, we show that the activity and chemoselectivity of the systems based on zirconocene dichloride and dihydride are comparable to each other; this outlines the zirconium hydrides as the probable precursors of active intermediates of the dimerization reaction.
As follows from the NMR study, Zr,Al-hydride clusters 10a–c, even in the presence of MMAO-12 activator, give only hydrometalation products, while the dimerization pathway is determined by biszirconium hydride complexes 12a–c. The comparison of the action of complexes 10 and 12 shows that the first stage of the reaction, as presented in Scheme 1, is the hydrometalation stage. Further, the process flow is possible in two directions: either transmetalation with the transfer of the alkyl fragment to aluminum or the introduction of a second alkene molecule into the hydrozirconation product with the formation of the dimer. Therefore, for the bimetallic Zr,Al- hydride complexes 10a–c, the processes of the alkene hydrometalation and subsequent transmetalation proceed in the most rapid manner. Indeed, as shown by quantum chemical modeling [61], the limiting stages of the reaction are either the stage of the alkene incorporation into zirconocene hydrochloride (ΔG≠ = 10.4 kcal/mol), or the stages of Zr−Cl and Zr−H bridge bond breaking in Zr,Al-bimetallic complexes (17.8 kcal/mol and 19.8 kcal/mol) before the alkene coordination. The transmetalation stages have insignificant or even no activation barriers. Complex 12 is also, apparently, like 10, capable for the alkene hydrometalation; however, its activation with methylaluminoxane gives active species which selectively provide dimers. Specifically, the stages of the consecutive incorporation of the two alkene molecules and the chain termination through β-H elimination proceed fast, and without the direct involvement of the organoaluminum fragment which, when located close to hydride atoms, would facilitate chain transfer to aluminum.
In broad understanding, this case can be considered as an example of biszirconium catalysis similar to the alkene polymerization in the presence of Group 4 bimetallic complexes [62,63,64]. Further development of this work into establishing the activation mechanism of the biszirconium hydride complexes can be fruitful in uncovering the reasons for the selective formation of alkene di- and oligomers.

4. Materials and Methods

1Н and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE-400 spectrometer (400.13 MHz (1H), 100.62 MHz (13C)) (Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany). As the solvents and the internal standards, C7D8 (toluene-d8) and CDCl3 were employed. 1D and 2D NMR spectra (COSY HH, HSQC, HMBC, NOESY) were recorded using standard Bruker pulse sequences. 1D and 2D DOSY spectra were obtained using ledbpgp2s pulse program (LED with bipolar gradient pulse pair, 2 spoil gradients). The experiments were carried out at 23–25 °C and temperature stabilization accuracy within 0.1 °C. The acquisition parameters for the diffusion experiments were δ = 1 ms, Δ = 0.1–0.2 s.
The yields of compounds 2–5 were determined from the yields of hydrolysis and deuterolysis products, which were calculated relative to the amount of the initial olefin. The products were analyzed using a gas chromatograph mass spectrometer GCMS-QP2010 Ultra (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with the GC-2010 Plus chromatograph (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan), TD-20 thermal desorber (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan), and an ultrafast quadrupole mass-selective detector (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan).

4.1. General Procedures

All operations for organometallic compounds were performed under argon according to the Schlenk technique. The zirconocene dichloride was prepared using the standard procedure from ZrCl4 (99.5%, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) [65]. The synthesis of [Cp2ZrH2]2 from Cp2ZrCl2 was performed as described previously [29,30,31]. The solvents (benzene, toluene) were distilled from AlBui3 immediately before use. Commercially available HAlBui2 (99%, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), ClAlEt2 (97%, Strem, Kehl, Germany), AlBui3 (95%, Strem, Kehl, Germany), AlEt3 (98%, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), AlMe3 (97%, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) MMAO-12 (7% Al in toluene, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were involved into the reactions. CAUTION: the pyrophoric nature of aluminum alkyl and hydride compounds require special safety precautions in their handling. Terminal alkenes 1-hexene (97%, Acros, Geel, Belgium), 1-octene (99%, Acros, Geel, Belgium), 1-decene (95%, Acros, Geel, Belgium), 4-methyl-1-pentene (97%, Acros, Geel, Belgium), allylbenzene (98%, Acros, Geel, Belgium), styrene (99%, Fisher, Hampton, NH, USA) were used as received. NMR data, mass spectra of the obtained dimers 4a–f correspond to the data, presented in Refs. [5,10,11,66].

4.2. Reaction of Cp2ZrCl2 with OAC, MMAO-12 and 1-Alkene

A flask with a magnetic stirrer was filled under argon with 0.0342 mmol (10 mg) of Cp2ZrCl2, 0.103–2.05 mmol of OAC (AlMe3, AlEt3, HAlBui2, AlBui3), 0.925–8.2 mmol of MMAO-12 and 1.71–34.3 mmol of 1-alkene. The reaction was carried out with stirring at different temperatures 20, 40 and 60 °C. After 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60 min, samples (0.1 mL) were syringed into tubes filled with argon, and the samples were decomposed with 10% HCl or DCl at 0 °C. Products were extracted with CH2Cl2, and the organic layer was dried over Na2SO4. The yield of products was determined by GC-MS.

4.3. Reaction of [Cp2ZrH2]2 with ClAlR2, MMAO-12 and 1-Alkene

A flask with a magnetic stirrer was filled under argon with 0.022 mmol (10 mg) of [Cp2ZrH2]2, 0.135 mmol of ClAlR2, 0.135–5.4 mmol of MMAO-12 and 4.5–45 mmol of 1-alkene. The reaction was carried out with stirring at different temperatures 20, 40 and 60 °C. After 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 240 and 360 min, samples (0.1 mL) were syringed into tubes filled with argon, and the samples were decomposed with 10% HCl or DCl at 0 °C. Products were extracted with CH2Cl2, and the organic layer was dried over Na2SO4. The yield of products was determined by GC-MS.

4.4. NMR Study of the Reaction of Cp2ZrCl2 with XAlBui2 (X = H, Bui) and MMAO-12

Method A. An NMR tube was charged with 0.034 mmol (10 mg) of Cp2ZrCl2 and 0.5 mL of C7D8 in an argon-filled glovebox. The tube was cooled to 10 °C and 0.051–0.185 mmol of XAlBui2 (X = H, Bui) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred and the formation of complexes 10–13 was monitored by NMR at room temperature. Further addition of 0.051–0.41 mmol of MMAO-12 provided a separation of the reaction media into two fractions. Method B. An NMR tube was charged with 0.051–0.41 mmol of MMAO-12, 0.5 mL of C7D8 and 0.051–0.185 mmol of XAlBui2 (X = H, Bui) in an argon-filled glovebox. The tube was cooled to 10 °C and 0.034 mmol of Cp2ZrCl2 was added. The mixture was stirred and the formation of complexes was monitored by NMR at room temperature.

4.5. NMR Study of the Reaction of [Cp2ZrH2]2 with ClAlR2 (R=Me, Et, Bui) and MMAO-12

Method A. An NMR tube was charged with 0.022 mmol (10 mg) of [Cp2ZrH2]2 and 0.5 mL of C7D8 in an argon-filled glovebox. The tube was cooled to 10 °C and 0.044–0.135 mmol of ClAlR2 was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred and the formation of complexes 10–13 was monitored by NMR at room temperature. Further addition of 0.067–0.54 mmol MMAO-12 provided a separation of the reaction media into two fractions. Method B. An NMR tube was charged with 0.067–0.54 mmol of MMAO-12, 0.044–0.135 mmol of ClAlEt2 and 0.5 mL of C7D8 in an argon-filled glovebox. The tube was cooled to 10 °C and 0.022 mmol (10 mg) of [Cp2ZrH2]2 was added. The mixture was stirred and the formation of complexes was monitored by NMR at room temperature.

5. Conclusions

In summary, our studies on the alkene transformations under the action of MAO-activated systems Cp2ZrCl2-(AlR3 or HAlBui2) and [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlR2 (R = Me, Et, Bui) show their capability to provide dimeric products with high yield and selectivity at the low content of the OAC and methylaluminoxane. Parallel studies on the systems have shown a deep similarity both in the catalytic performance and intermediate composition. As a result of the NMR studies, among all the intermediates considered, we proved for the first time that new Zr,Zr- hydride complexes having type x[Cp2ZrH2∙Cp2ZrHCl∙ClAlR2]∙yMAO appear to be specifically responsible for the alkene dimerization. Further study of the reaction mechanism will uncover the process of activation of biszirconium complexes by methylaluminoxane, and this will explain the unique selectivity of these intermediates in the dimerization pathway.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials are available online.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.V.P.; methodology, P.V.K.; validation, L.V.P., P.V.K. and A.K.B.; formal analysis, P.V.K.; investigation, P.V.K. and A.K.B.; data curation, L.V.P. and P.V.K.; writing—original draft preparation, P.V.K.; writing—review and editing, L.V.P.; visualization, L.V.P.; supervision, L.V.P.; project administration, P.V.K.; funding acquisition, P.V.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation, grant number 19-73-10122.

Acknowledgments

The structural studies of compounds were carried out at the Center for Collective Use “Agidel” at the Institute of Petrochemistry and Catalysis, Russian Academy of Sciences.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, E.Y.-X.; Marks, T.J. Cocatalysts for Metal-Catalyzed Olefin Polymerization:  Activators, Activation Processes, and Structure-Activity Relationships. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1391–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Resconi, L.; Cavallo, L.; Fait, A.; Piemontesi, F. Selectivity in Propene Polymerization with Metallocene Catalysts. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1253–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kaminsky, W. The discovery of metallocene catalysts and their present state of the art. J. Polym. Sci. Part. A Polym. Chem. 2004, 42, 3911–3921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Janiak, C. Metallocene and related catalysts for olefin, alkyne and silane dimerization and oligomerization. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006, 250, 66–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nifant’ev, I.; Ivchenko, P.; Tavtorkin, A.; Vinogradov, A.; Vinogradov, A. Non-traditional Ziegler-Natta catalysis in a-olefin transformations: Reaction mechanisms and product design. Pure Appl. Chem. 2017, 89, 1017–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Carr, D.B.; Schwartz, J. Preparation of organoaluminum compounds by hydrozirconation-transmetalation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 3521–3531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dzhemilev, U.M.; Ibragimov, A.G. Hydrometallation of Unsaturated Compounds. In Modern Reduction Methods; Andersson, P.G., Munslow, I.J., Eds.; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2008; pp. 447–489. [Google Scholar]
  8. Song, Z.; Takahashi, T. 8.23 Hydrozirconation of Alkenes and Alkynes. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis II, 2nd ed.; Knochel, P., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherland, 2014; pp. 838–876. [Google Scholar]
  9. Slaugh, L.H.; Schoenthal, G.W. Vinylidene Olefin Process. U.S. Patent 4,658,078, 14 April 1987. [Google Scholar]
  10. Christoffers, J.; Bergman, R.G. Catalytic Dimerization Reactions of α-Olefins and α,ω-Dienes with Cp2ZrCl2/Poly(methylalumoxane):  Formation of Dimers, Carbocycles, and Oligomers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 4715–4716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Christoffers, J.; Bergman, R.G. Zirconocene-alumoxane (1:1)—A catalyst for the selective dimerization of α-olefins. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1998, 270, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Janiak, C.; Lange, K.C.H.; Marquardt, P.; Krüger, R.-P.; Hanselmann, R. Analyses of Propene and 1-Hexene Oligomers from Zirconocene/MAO Catalysts-Mechanistic Implications by NMR, SEC, and MALDI-TOF MS. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2002, 203, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Janiak, C.; Blank, F. Metallocene Catalysts for Olefin Oligomerization. Macromol. Symp. 2006, 236, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Landis, C.R.; Christianson, M.D. Metallocene-catalyzed alkene polymerization and the observation of Zr-allyls. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 15349–15354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. O’Reilly, M.E.; Dutta, S.; Veige, A.S. β-Alkyl Elimination: Fundamental Principles and Some Applications. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 8105–8145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Pino, P.; Cioni, P.; Wei, J. Asymmetric hydrooligomerization of propylene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 6189–6191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yu, Y.; Busico, V.; Budzelaar, P.H.M.; Vittoria, A.; Cipullo, R. Of Poisons and Antidotes in Polypropylene Catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 8590–8594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Desert, X.; Proutiere, F.; Welle, A.; Den Dauw, K.; Vantomme, A.; Miserque, O.; Brusson, J.-M.; Carpentier, J.-F.; Kirillov, E. Zirconocene-Catalyzed Polymerization of α-Olefins: When Intrinsic Higher Activity Is Flawed by Rapid Deactivation. Organometallics 2019, 38, 2664–2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nifant’ev, I.E.; Vinogradov, A.A.; Vinogradov, A.A.; Churakov, A.V.; Bagrov, V.V.; Kashulin, I.A.; Roznyatovsky, V.A.; Grishin, Y.K.; Ivchenko, P.V. The catalytic behavior of heterocenes activated by TIBA and MMAO under a low Al/Zr ratios in 1-octene polymerization. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2019, 571, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Soga, K.; Kaminaka, M. Polymerization of propene with the heterogeneous catalyst system Et[IndH4]2ZrCl2/MAO/SiO2 combined with trialkylaluminium. Makromol. Chem. Rapid Commun. 1992, 13, 221–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Resconi, L.; Piemontesi, F.; Nifant’ev, I.E.; Ivchenko, P.V. Metallocene Compounds, Process for Their Preparation, and Their Use in Catalysts for the Polymerization of Olefins. U.S. Patent 6,051,728, 18 April 2000. [Google Scholar]
  22. Bravaya, N.M.; Khrushch, N.E.; Babkina, O.N.; Panin, A.N. Formation and catalytic properties of metallocene systems with combined cocatalyst of Al(i-Bu)3 perfluorophenyl borate. Ross. Khimicheskij Zhurnal 2001, 45, 56–68. [Google Scholar]
  23. Sacco, M.; Nifant’ev, I.; Ivchenko, P.; Bagrov, V.; Focante, F. Metallocene Compounds. U.S. Patent 7,803,887 B2, 28 September 2010. [Google Scholar]
  24. Nifant’ev, I.E.; Vinogradov, A.A.; Vinogradov, A.A.; Ivchenko, P.V. Zirconocene-catalyzed dimerization of 1-hexene: Two-stage activation and structure–catalytic performance relationship. Catal. Commun. 2016, 79, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nifant’ev, I.E.; Vinogradov, A.A.; Vinogradov, A.A.; Sedov, I.V.; Dorokhov, V.G.; Lyadov, A.S.; Ivchenko, P.V. Structurally uniform 1-hexene, 1-octene, and 1-decene oligomers: Zirconocene/MAO-catalyzed preparation, characterization, and prospects of their use as low-viscosity low-temperature oil base stocks. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2018, 549, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Becke, S.; Rosenthal, U. Aluminoxane Free Catalyst System, Useful for Polymerization of Alpha-Olefins, Comprises Fluorine Containing Metal Complex and Trialkyl or Triaryl Boron or Aluminum Compound. Patent DE 19,932,409A, 18 January 2001. [Google Scholar]
  27. Becke, S.; Rosenthal, U. Composition Based on Fluorine-Containing Metal Complexes. U.S. Patent 6,303,718 B1, 16 October 2001. [Google Scholar]
  28. Becke, S.; Rosenthal, U.; Baumann, W.; Arndt, P.; Spannenberg, A. Metallocyclocumulene Compounds Useful as Polymerization Catalysts Are New. Patent DE 10,110,227A1, 5 September 2002. [Google Scholar]
  29. Shoer, L.I.; Gell, K.I.; Schwartz, J. Mixed-metal hydride complexes containing Zr-H-Al bridges. synthesis and relation to transition-metal-catalyzed reactions of aluminum hydrides. J. Organomet. Chem. 1977, 136, c19–c22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Parfenova, L.V.; Pechatkina, S.V.; Khalilov, L.M.; Dzhemilev, U.M. Mechanism of Cp2ZrCl2-catalyzed olefin hydroalumination by alkylalanes. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2005, 54, 316–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Parfenova, L.V.; Vil’danova, R.F.; Pechatkina, S.V.; Khalilov, L.M.; Dzhemilev, U.M. New effective reagent [Cp2ZrH2·ClAlEt2]2 for alkene hydrometallation. J. Organomet. Chem. 2007, 692, 3424–3429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Parfenova, L.V.; Kovyazin, P.V.; Nifant’ev, I.E.; Khalilov, L.M.; Dzhemilev, U.M. Role of Zr,Al Hydride Intermediate Structure and Dynamics in Alkene Hydroalumination with XAlBui2 (X = H, Cl, Bui), Catalyzed by Zr η5-Complexes. Organometallics 2015, 34, 3559–3570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Baldwin, S.M.; Bercaw, J.E.; Brintzinger, H.H. Alkylaluminum-Complexed Zirconocene Hydrides: Identification of Hydride-Bridged Species by NMR Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 17423–17433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Baldwin, S.M.; Bercaw, J.E.; Brintzinger, H.H. Cationic Alkylaluminum-Complexed Zirconocene Hydrides as Participants in Olefin Polymerization Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 13969–13971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Baldwin, S.M.; Bercaw, J.E.; Henling, L.M.; Day, M.W.; Brintzinger, H.H. Cationic Alkylaluminum-Complexed Zirconocene Hydrides: NMR-Spectroscopic Identification, Crystallographic Structure Determination, and Interconversion with Other Zirconocene Cations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 1805–1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kovyazin, P.V.; Abdullin, I.g.N.; Parfenova, L.V. Diastereoselective synthesis of functionally substituted alkene dimers and oligomers, catalysed by chiral zirconocenes. Catal. Commun. 2019, 119, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yang, X.; Stern, C.L.; Marks, T.J. Cationic Metallocene Polymerization Catalysts. Synthesis and Properities of the First Base-Free Zirconocene Hydride. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1992, 31, 1375–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yang, X.; Stern, C.L.; Marks, T.J. Cationic Zirconocene Olefin Polymerization Catalysts Based on the Organo-Lewis Acid Tris(pentafluorophenyl)borane. A Synthetic, Structural, Solution Dynamic, and Polymerization Catalytic Study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 10015–10031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. González-Hernández, R.; Chai, J.; Charles, R.; Pérez-Camacho, O.; Kniajanski, S.; Collins, S. Catalytic System for Homogeneous Ethylene Polymerization Based on Aluminohydride-Zirconocene Complexes. Organometallics 2006, 25, 5366–5373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Arndt, P.; Baumann, W.; Spannenberg, A.; Rosenthal, U.; Burlakov, V.V.; Shur, V.B. Reactions of Titanium and Zirconium Derivatives of Bis(trimethylsilyl)acetylene with Tris(pentafluorophenyl)borane: A Titanium(III) Complex of an Alkynylboranate. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1414–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Arndt, P.; Jäger-Fiedler, U.; Klahn, M.; Baumann, W.; Spannenberg, A.; Burlakov, V.V.; Rosenthal, U. Formation of Zirconocene Fluoro Complexes: No Deactivation in the Polymerization of Olefins by the Contact-Ion-Pair Catalysts [Cp’2ZrR]+[RB(C6F5)3]−. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4195–4198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Carr, A.G.; Dawson, D.M.; Thornton-Pett, M.; Bochmann, M. Cationic Zirconocene Hydrides:  A New Type of Highly Effective Initiators for Carbocationic Polymerizations. Organometallics 1999, 18, 2933–2935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nifant’ev, I.; Vinogradov, A.; Vinogradov, A.; Karchevsky, S.; Ivchenko, P. Zirconocene-Catalyzed Dimerization of α-Olefins: DFT Modeling of the Zr-Al Binuclear Reaction Mechanism. Molecules 2019, 24, 3565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Hölscher, M.; Keul, H.; Höcker, H. Evaluation of the Potential of [{Me2C(Cp)2}Zr(Me)]+ and [{Me2C(Cp)2}Zr(H)]+ as Single-Site Catalysts for Controlled Methyl Vinyl Ether Polymerizations by Density Functional Calculations. Organometallics 2003, 22, 1055–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Parfenova, L.V.; Kovyazin, P.V.; Tyumkina, T.V.; Islamov, D.N.; Lyapina, A.R.; Karchevsky, S.G.; Ivchenko, P.V. Reactions of bimetallic Zr,Al- hydride complexes with methylaluminoxane: NMR and DFT study. J. Organomet. Chem. 2017, 851, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Negishi, E.-I.; Yoshida, T. A novel zirconium-catalyzed hydroalumination of olefins. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21, 1501–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Claridge, T.D.W. Chapter 8—Correlations through space: The nuclear Overhauser effect. In Tetrahedron Organic Chemistry Series; Claridge, T.D.W., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherland, 2009; Volume 27, pp. 247–302. [Google Scholar]
  48. Hassinen, A.; Martins, J.C.; Hens, Z. Solution NMR Toolbox for Colloidal Nanoparticles. In Nanoparticles: Workhorses of Nanoscience; de Mello Donegá, C., Ed.; Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 273–293. [Google Scholar]
  49. Ghiotto, F.; Pateraki, C.; Tanskanen, J.; Severn, J.R.; Luehmann, N.; Kusmin, A.; Stellbrink, J.; Linnolahti, M.; Bochmann, M. Probing the Structure of Methylalumoxane (MAO) by a Combined Chemical, Spectroscopic, Neutron Scattering, and Computational Approach. Organometallics 2013, 32, 3354–3362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zijlstra, H.S.; Joshi, A.; Linnolahti, M.; Collins, S.; McIndoe, J.S. Modifying methylalumoxane via alkyl exchange. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 17291–17298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Zaccaria, F.; Zuccaccia, C.; Cipullo, R.; Budzelaar, P.H.M.; Macchioni, A.; Busico, V.; Ehm, C. On the Nature of the Lewis Acidic Sites in “TMA-Free” Phenol-Modified Methylaluminoxane. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 2020, 1088–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Talsi, E.P.; Semikolenova, N.V.; Panchenko, V.N.; Sobolev, A.P.; Babushkin, D.E.; Shubin, A.A.; Zakharov, V.A. The metallocene/methylaluminoxane catalysts formation: EPR spin probe study of Lewis acidic sites of methylaluminoxane. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 1999, 139, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Boccia, A.C.; Costabile, C.; Pragliola, S.; Longo, P. Selective Dimerization of γ-Branched α-Olefins in the Presence of C2v Group-4 Metallocene-Based Catalysts. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2004, 205, 1320–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gunasekara, T.; Preston, A.Z.; Zeng, M.; Abu-Omar, M.M. Highly Regioselective α-Olefin Dimerization Using Zirconium and Hafnium Amine Bis(phenolate) Complexes. Organometallics 2017, 36, 2934–2939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Small, B.L.; Marcucci, A.J. Iron Catalysts for the Head-to-Head Dimerization of α-Olefins and Mechanistic Implications for the Production of Linear α-Olefins. Organometallics 2001, 20, 5738–5744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Small, B.L. Tridentate Cobalt Catalysts for Linear Dimerization and Isomerization of α-Olefins. Organometallics 2003, 22, 3178–3183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Broene, R.D.; Brookhart, M.; Lamanna, W.M.; Volpe, A.F. Cobalt-Catalyzed Dimerization of α-Olefins to Give Linear α-Olefin Products. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 17194–17195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hanton, M.J.; Daubney, L.; Lebl, T.; Polas, S.; Smith, D.M.; Willemse, A. Selective dimerisation of α-olefins using tungsten-based initiators. Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 7025–7037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kretschmer, W.P.; Troyanov, S.I.; Meetsma, A.; Hessen, B.; Teuben, J.H. Regioselective Homo- and Codimerization of α-Olefins Catalyzed by Bis(2,4,7-trimethylindenyl)yttrium Hydride. Organometallics 1998, 17, 284–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lee, D.W.; Yi, C.S. Chain-Selective and Regioselective Ethylene and Styrene Dimerization Reactions Catalyzed by a Well-Defined Cationic Ruthenium Hydride Complex: New Insights on the Styrene Dimerization Mechanism. Organometallics 2010, 29, 3413–3417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Pankratyev, E.Y.; Tyumkina, T.V.; Parfenova, L.V.; Khursan, S.L.; Khalilov, L.M.; Dzhemilev, U.M. DFT and Ab Initio Study on Mechanism of Olefin Hydroalumination by XAlBui2 in the Presence of Cp2ZrCl2 Catalyst. II. Olefin Interaction with Catalytically Active Centers. Organometallics 2011, 30, 6078–6089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Li, H.; Li, L.; Schwartz, D.J.; Metz, M.V.; Marks, T.J.; Liable-Sands, L.; Rheingold, A.L. Coordination Copolymerization of Severely Encumbered Isoalkenes with Ethylene:  Enhanced Enchainment Mediated by Binuclear Catalysts and Cocatalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 14756–14768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Li, H.; Marks, T.J. Nuclearity and cooperativity effects in binuclear catalysts and cocatalysts for olefin polymerization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 15295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Gao, Y.; Mouat, A.R.; Motta, A.; Macchioni, A.; Zuccaccia, C.; Delferro, M.; Marks, T.J. Pyridylamido Bi-Hafnium Olefin Polymerization Catalysis: Conformationally Supported Hf···Hf Enchainment Cooperativity. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 5272–5282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Freidlina, R.K.; Brainina, E.M.; Nesmeyanov, A.N. The synthesis of mixed pincerlike cyclopentadienyl compounds of zirconium. Dokl. Acad. Nauk SSSR 1961, 138, 1369–1372. [Google Scholar]
  66. Parkhurst, R.M.; Rodin, J.O.; Silverstein, R.M. Isolation, Identification, and Synthesis of Components of a “Styrene Dimer Fraction”. J. Org. Chem. 1963, 28, 120–123.s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Molecules 25 02216 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Metal hydride intermediates as active centers of alkene oligo- and polymerization [5,10,11,36].
Scheme 1. Metal hydride intermediates as active centers of alkene oligo- and polymerization [5,10,11,36].
Molecules 25 02216 sch001
Molecules 25 02216 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Alkene transformations in catalytic systems I or II.
Scheme 2. Alkene transformations in catalytic systems I or II.
Molecules 25 02216 sch002
Molecules 25 02216 sch003 550
Scheme 3. Reaction of Cp2ZrCl2 and [Cp2ZrH2]2 with OACs and MMAO-12.
Scheme 3. Reaction of Cp2ZrCl2 and [Cp2ZrH2]2 with OACs and MMAO-12.
Molecules 25 02216 sch003
Molecules 25 02216 g001 550
Figure 1. 1H NMR of system Cp2ZrCl2-AlBui3-MMAO-12 in C7D8 (T = 25 °C, intensity of upfield signals is increased): (a) [Zr]:[Al]:[MAO] = 1:5:0, T = −33 °C [32]; (b) [Zr]:[Al]:[MAO] = 1:5:0 [32]; (c) [Zr]:[Al]:[MAO] = 1:5:1.5; (d) [Zr]:[Al]:[MAO] = 1:5:5; (e) [Zr]:[Al]:[MAO] = 1:5:12.
Figure 1. 1H NMR of system Cp2ZrCl2-AlBui3-MMAO-12 in C7D8 (T = 25 °C, intensity of upfield signals is increased): (a) [Zr]:[Al]:[MAO] = 1:5:0, T = −33 °C [32]; (b) [Zr]:[Al]:[MAO] = 1:5:0 [32]; (c) [Zr]:[Al]:[MAO] = 1:5:1.5; (d) [Zr]:[Al]:[MAO] = 1:5:5; (e) [Zr]:[Al]:[MAO] = 1:5:12.
Molecules 25 02216 g001
Molecules 25 02216 g002 550
Figure 2. 1H NMR of systems [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlR2 in C7D8 (T = 26 °C, intensity of upfield signals is increased): (a) ClAlMe2; (b) ClAlEt2 [45]; (c) ClAlBui2 [45].
Figure 2. 1H NMR of systems [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlR2 in C7D8 (T = 26 °C, intensity of upfield signals is increased): (a) ClAlMe2; (b) ClAlEt2 [45]; (c) ClAlBui2 [45].
Molecules 25 02216 g002
Molecules 25 02216 g003 550
Figure 3. NOESY of [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlEt2 system (1:3) in C7D8.
Figure 3. NOESY of [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlEt2 system (1:3) in C7D8.
Molecules 25 02216 g003
Molecules 25 02216 g004 550
Figure 4. 1H NMR of systems [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlR2-MMAO-12 in C7D8 (T = 26 °C, intensity of upfield signals is increased): (a) ClAlMe2, [Zr]:[Al]:[MAO] = 1:1.5:3; (b) ClAlEt2, [Zr]:[Al]:[MAO] = 1:3:6 [45]; (c) ClAlBui2, [Zr]:[Al]:[MAO] = 1:3:8 [45].
Figure 4. 1H NMR of systems [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlR2-MMAO-12 in C7D8 (T = 26 °C, intensity of upfield signals is increased): (a) ClAlMe2, [Zr]:[Al]:[MAO] = 1:1.5:3; (b) ClAlEt2, [Zr]:[Al]:[MAO] = 1:3:6 [45]; (c) ClAlBui2, [Zr]:[Al]:[MAO] = 1:3:8 [45].
Molecules 25 02216 g004
Molecules 25 02216 sch004 550
Scheme 4. Reaction of complexes 10a–c and 12a–c∙MAO with 1-hexene.
Scheme 4. Reaction of complexes 10a–c and 12a–c∙MAO with 1-hexene.
Molecules 25 02216 sch004
Molecules 25 02216 g005 550
Figure 5. 1H NMR monitoring of 1-hexene transformation in the system [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlMe2-MMAO-12 in C7D8 (T = 26 °C, intensity of upfield signals is increased).
Figure 5. 1H NMR monitoring of 1-hexene transformation in the system [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlMe2-MMAO-12 in C7D8 (T = 26 °C, intensity of upfield signals is increased).
Molecules 25 02216 g005
Table
Table 1. Catalytic activity and chemoselectivity of system I Cp2ZrCl2-OAC-MMAO-12 in the reaction with 1-alkene.
Table 1. Catalytic activity and chemoselectivity of system I Cp2ZrCl2-OAC-MMAO-12 in the reaction with 1-alkene.
Entry1-AlkeneOAC[Zr]:[Al]:[MAO]:[1-alkene]T, °CTime, minAlkene Conversion, %Product yield, 1 %
2-D3-D45-D6
11-octene (1b)HAlBui2 [32]1:60:0:50201801111----
2AlBui3 [32]8383----
3AlBui31:60:30:5020180989125--
4HAlBui21:60:240:50201802020----
5AlBui39451340--
6AlBui31:3:30:502020991197--
71:3:30:100203099-<198-<1 (6′) 8
8HAlBui21:3:30:100401099-396--
9AlBui399-198--
101-hexene (1a)HAlBui21:3:30:1004015995191-2 (6′) 8
11AlBui3994189-3 (6′) 8
12AlMe391--872 (5′)2 (6′)
13AlEt3922368-6 (6′) 8
12 (6″)
14HAlBui21:3:30:250605981194-2 (6′) 8
15AlBui399 21188-4 (6′) 8
16AlMe399 31185-3 (6′)
17AlEt396 31185-1 (6′) 8
18HAlBui21:3:30:50060598--97--
19AlBui3981193-1 (6′) 8
20AlMe399 41187-5 (6′)
21AlEt3981196-<1 (6′) 8
22HAlBui21:3:30:1000601599--98--
233083 5--78--
246086 5,6<1-83-<1 (6′) 8
25AlBui31594 6--92-1 (6′) 8
26AlMe310922-84-6 (6′)
27AlEt36065 7--64-<1 (6″)
1 Determined by GC-MS of deuterolysis products. 2 Formation of trimers up to 5% is observed. 3 Trimers—8%. 4 Trimers—5%. 5 2000 eq. of 1-hexene were taken; trimers up to 5% are observed. 6 Trimers—1%. 7 10 eq. of AlEt3 were taken. 8 Product 6′ was formed due to the presence of residual AlMe3 in MMAO-12.
Table
Table 2. Catalytic activity and chemoselectivity of system II [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlR2-MMAO-12 in the reaction with terminal alkenes (all ratios are given with respect to monomeric Cp2ZrH2).
Table 2. Catalytic activity and chemoselectivity of system II [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlR2-MMAO-12 in the reaction with terminal alkenes (all ratios are given with respect to monomeric Cp2ZrH2).
Entry1-AlkeneClAlR2[Cp2ZrH2]: [Al]: [MAO]:[1-alkene]T, °CTime, minAlkene Conversion, %Product Yield, 1 %
2-D3-D45-D6
11-hexene (1a)ClAlMe21:3:30:10020 603227151 (5′) 7 (6′)
21809926802 (5′)9 (6′)
3ClAlEt260752447-22 (6″)
4180992569-23 (6″)
5ClAlBui260791573--
6180991297--
71-octene (1b)ClAlMe26025 21415-4 (6′)
8180>99 2410723 9 (6′)
9ClAlEt26073 221346-11 (6′) 4
10180>99 239762 (5′) 49 (6′) 4
11ClAlBui2608521260-10 (6′) 4
12180>99 239772 (5′) 48 (6′) 4
131-decene (1c)ClAlMe260<5-23--
14180>9936811 (5′)8 (6′)
15ClAlEt26068410285 (5″)21 (6″)
16180>9964762 (5′) 412 (6′) 4
17ClAlBui260734759-2 (6′) 4
18180>994787-2 (6′) 4
191-hexene (1a)ClAlMe24015964382-10 (6′)
20ClAlEt215982383-11 (6′) 4
21ClAlBui215>994286-9 (6′) 4
221-octene (1b)ClAlMe215834373-4 (6′)
23ClAlEt215894379-1 (6′) 4
2 (6″)
24ClAlBui215985-91-2 (6′) 4
254-methyl-1-pente-ne (1d)ClAlBui230>991195-2 (6′) 4
261-hexene (1a)ClAlMe2605991191-6 (6′)
27ClAlEt25991292-5 (6′) 4
28ClAlBui2599-294-3 (6′) 4
29ClAlMe21:3:30:250605941185-6 (6′)
30ClAlEt2598 31290-5 (6″)
31ClAlBui25981287-3 (6′) 4
32ClAlBui21:3:30:5006030951287-5 (6′) 4
33ClAlBui21:3:30:10006036065 21257-3 (6′) 4
34ClAlBui21:3:3:10020240412335--
35ClAlBui21:3:12:1002024099-1386--
36ClAlBui21:3:60:1002015>992<1812 (5′) 414 (6′) 4
37ClAlBui21:3:120:1002015>9912801 (5′) 415 (6′) 4
38Allylbenzene (1e)ClAlBui21:3:30:10010060946252 + 9 5-25 (6′) 4
39Styrene (1f)ClAlBui26079 38-32 + 26 5-6 (6′) 4
1 Determined by GC-MS of deuterolysis products. 2 Formation of trimers up to 1%–2% is observed. 3 Trimers—8%. 4 Products 5′ or 6′ were formed due to the presence of residual AlMe3 in MMAO-12. 5 The formation of two regioisomers head-to-tail and tail-to-tail occurs.
Table
Table 3. 1H and 13C NMR of complexes 10a, 12a, 13a, 12a∙MAO (δ, ppm, 400.13 MHz, C7D8, T = 27 °C).
Table 3. 1H and 13C NMR of complexes 10a, 12a, 13a, 12a∙MAO (δ, ppm, 400.13 MHz, C7D8, T = 27 °C).
ComplexδH CpδC CpδH Zr-H-ZrδH Zr-H-AlδH MAO
10a5.68 (s, 10H)104.74 −2.43 (d, 8.6 Hz, 2H)
−1.19 (t, 8.6 Hz, 1H)
11a5.72 (s, 10H)107.90 −2.55 (br.s, 1H)
−1.60 (br.s, 1H)
12а5.52 (s, 20H)108.00−6.64 (t, 17.6 Hz, 1H)
−1.19 (d, 17.6 Hz, 2H)
13a5.75 (br.s, 10H)108.29 (br.) −0.60 (br.s, 2H)
12a∙MAO5.42107.88−6.56 (t, 17.2 Hz, 1Н)
−1.08 (d, 17.2 Hz, 2Н)
−6.71 (t, 17.6 Hz, 1Н)
−1.27 (d, 17.6 Hz, 2Н)
12a∙MAO (heavy phase)5.11–5.33107.59 (br.)−6.92 (br.t, 2H)
−1.44 (br.d, 2H)		 −0.63 ÷ −0.08

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Parfenova, L.V.; Kovyazin, P.V.; Bikmeeva, A.K. Bimetallic Zr,Zr-Hydride Complexes in Zirconocene Catalyzed Alkene Dimerization. Molecules 2020, 25, 2216. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules25092216

AMA Style

Parfenova LV, Kovyazin PV, Bikmeeva AK. Bimetallic Zr,Zr-Hydride Complexes in Zirconocene Catalyzed Alkene Dimerization. Molecules. 2020; 25(9):2216. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules25092216

Chicago/Turabian Style

Parfenova, Lyudmila V., Pavel V. Kovyazin, and Almira Kh. Bikmeeva. 2020. "Bimetallic Zr,Zr-Hydride Complexes in Zirconocene Catalyzed Alkene Dimerization" Molecules 25, no. 9: 2216. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules25092216

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop