Next Article in Journal
Insight into Physicochemical, Rheological, and Antibacterial Properties of Chitosan Extracted from Antarctic krill: A Comparative Study
Previous Article in Journal
Valorization of Sweet Lime Peel for the Extraction of Essential Oil by Solvent Free Microwave Extraction Enhanced with Ultrasound Pretreatment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Kaempferol as a Dietary Anti-Inflammatory Agent: Current Therapeutic Standing

1
Department of Pharmacy, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan 23200, Pakistan
2
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Government College University, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
3
Department of Nursing, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
4
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology “Vittorio Erspamer”, Sapienza University, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 19 July 2020 / Revised: 6 August 2020 / Accepted: 19 August 2020 / Published: 7 September 2020

Abstract

:
Inflammation is a physiological response to different pathological, cellular or vascular damages due to physical, chemical or mechanical trauma. It is characterized by pain, redness, heat and swelling. Current natural drugs are carefully chosen as a novel therapeutic strategy for the management of inflammatory diseases. Different phytochemical constituents are present in natural products. These phytochemicals have high efficacy both in vivo and in vitro. Among them, flavonoids occur in many foods, vegetables and herbal medicines and are considered as the most active constituent, having the ability to attenuate inflammation. Kaempferol is a polyphenol that is richly found in fruits, vegetables and herbal medicines. It is also found in plant-derived beverages. Kaempferol is used in the management of various ailments but there is no available review article that can summarize all the natural sources and biological activities specifically focusing on the anti-inflammatory effect of kaempferol. Therefore, this article is aimed at providing a brief updated review of the literature regarding the anti-inflammatory effect of kaempferol and its possible molecular mechanisms of action. Furthermore, the review provides the available updated literature regarding the natural sources, chemistry, biosynthesis, oral absorption, metabolism, bioavailability and therapeutic effect of kaempferol.

1. Introduction

Flavonoids are the secondary metabolites of plants which are characterized by polyphenolic structures. They are a class of natural products and are richly distributed in vegetables, fruits and some kinds of beverages. Flavonoids have biochemical, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and anti-mutagenic effects that are responsible for the management of various ailments like atherosclerosis, cancer and Alzheimer’s disease [1,2]. Flavonoids possess a wide range of health-promoting properties and are indispensable components in various pharmaceutical, cosmetics, nutraceutical and medicinal applications. This is due to the ability to modulate the functions of cellular key enzymes as well as the antioxidant effect, anti-carcinogenic and anti-inflammatory effect of flavonoids. Flavonoids inhibit different enzymes like lipo-oxygenase, cyclo-oxygenase, phosphoinositide 3-kinase and xanthine oxidase [1,3].
Flavonoids are chemicallylow-molecular weight products of natural plants and are extracted and isolated from the different parts. They are abundantly found in all parts of the plants, foods and some beverages of plant origin. Flavonoids are further divided into subgroups on the basis of the structure of their carbon rings and these divisions include flavanols, flavones, chalcones, flavnones, flavanonols and isoflavones. Flavonoids are major contributors to the color and fragrance of fruits and flowers which helps in pollination [4,5]. Flavonoids have been reported to have potent anti-inflammatory effects. It has been shown that flavonoids are involved in the inhibition of various enzymes which provoke the inflammation process [6,7,8]. Chemical mediators like prostaglandins and nitric oxide production are involved in the process of inflammation [9].
A wide range of flavonoids have been isolated from plants such as luteolin, nobiletin, tangeretin, apigenin, sinensetin, quercetin and kaempferol. Flavonols are the sub-group and building blocks of proanthocyanines and of flavonoids which possess a ketone group in their structures. Flavones have a hydroxyl group in their structure at carbon 3 of the central oxygen containing 6-member ring. The flavones include quercetin, fisetin, myricetin and kaempferol. They are abundantly found in plants and vegetables like lettuce, grapes, tomatoes, onion, berries, kale and also in wine and tea [10,11]. The aim of this review is to comprehensively summarize the sources, chemistry and pharmacological effects of kaempferol, majorly focusing on the anti-inflammatory effect.

2. Chemistry of Kaempferol

Kaempferol (3,5,7-trihydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one) is a polyphenol which is richly found in fruits and vegetables (Figure 1). It is also found in plant-derived beverages. Kaempferol is used in the management of various ailments but there is no available review article that can summarize all the natural sources and biological activities specifically focusing on the anti-inflammatory effects of kaempferol.

3. Natural Sources of Kaempferol

Kaempferol is widely distributed in foods, beverages and the plant kingdom. Kaempferol and its derivatives are synthesized in plants by different types of enzymes. Different dietary sources of kaempferol are summarized in Table 1. It has also been found that kaempferol is richly found in Magnoliophyta, Pinophyta, Pteridophyta, Aspidiaceae, Polypodiaceae and Aspleniaceae (Table S1).

4. Isolation of Kaempferol from Natural Sources

Phytochemical screening of different medicinal plants has confirmed the presence of flavonoids like kaempferol and its derivative compounds.
Further screening and fractionation were done to isolate kaempferol and its derivatives. Orhan and his coworkers performed successive column chromatography techniques for bioactive-guided fractionation of Calluna Vulgaris and isolated kaempferol galactoside [17].
Yang and his coworkers fractionated the dried roots of Neocheiropteris palmatopedata. They purified and separated kaempferol and its derivatives from the methanolic crude extract of N. palmatopedata by repeated column chromatography, using a Sephadex LH-20 column [18]. Liang and his co-researchers used high-speed countercurrent chromatography to isolate and purify kaempferol and its compounds from the leaf extract of Siraitiagrosvenori. They used 90 mg of the plant extract in a two-phase solvents system. Yang and his coauthors isolated kaempferol-3,7-O-a-L-dirhamnopyranoside from a plant extract and its structure was identified using 1H-NMR, MS and 13C-NMR [19].

5. Biosynthesis of Kaempferol

Kaempferol is structurally composed of diphenylpropane, which is prepared via condensation by the help of different enzymes (Figure 2). These enzymes are very common and abundantly found in plants. In the condensation process, three molecules of malonyl-CoA and one molecule of 4-coumaroyl-CoA are used. Chalcone synthase is responsible for the condensation process which results in the formation of the flavonoid naringenin chalcone. The enzyme chalcone isomerase further converts the naringenin chalcone into naringenin flavanone by closing the C3 ring. A hydroxyl group is added to the C3 ring of naringenin using the catalytic activity of theflavanone-3-dioxygenase enzyme and as a result, dihydrokaempferol is formed. In the last step, a double bond is introduced at C2–C3 of dihydrokaempferol by flavonol synthase [20,21,22].

6. Bioavailability, Oral Absorptionand Metabolism of Kaempferol

To establish the pharmacokinetic parameters of a newly isolated compound, both in vivo and in vitro studies are performed. Similarly, for kaempferol, numerous in vivo and in vitro studies were done to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters. As kaempferol is a dietary flavonoid and for its therapeutic effects, it is necessary for it to be absorbed, distributed, metabolized and eliminated properly. Kaempferol is usually ingested orally as high-polarity and low-polarity glycosides. The high-polarity glycosides show resistance while low-polarity glycosides are easily absorbed. Kaempferol is lipophilic in nature and like other flavonoids, kaempferol is also absorbed from the small intestine.
It has been reported that kaempferol is absorbed by passive diffusion, facilitated diffusion as well as by active transport due its lipophilicity. Kaempferol is metabolized by a glucuronide conjugation as well as by a sulfate conjugation in the liver [23,24,25]. Kaempferol is also metabolized in the small intestine by intestinal enzymes. The normal floras of the colon metabolizes the kaempferol glycoside into aglycones and further convert it into 4-methylphenol, 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid and phloroglucinol which are absorbed into the systemic circulation and then distributed to different tissues and finally excreted via feces or urine [26,27]. It has been reported that about 1.9% to 2.5% of the ingested kaempferol was excreted in urine [28,29].Cao and his co-researchers investigated the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of kaempferol in humans and found that the kaempferol plasma concentration was 57.86 nM upon intake of 14.97 mg/day. It was also concluded that a plasma concentration of 15 ng/ml kaempferol was detected from 27 mg kaempferol obtained from tea [29].
It has been concluded from several studies that the oral bioavailability of kaempferol is in the nano- or microgram per ml range but still it has wide therapeutic effects and is used for the management of different ailments. Thus, it might be assumed that the kaempferol is therapeutically active in minute doses or there might be some active metabolites produced upon the metabolism of kaempferol which will act as therapeutic agents.

7. Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Kaempferol

Inflammation is a physiological response to different pathological, cellular or vascular damages due to physical, chemical or mechanical trauma. Inflammation is a protective mechanism that protects the living organism against tissue injury. Redness, pain, loss of function and heat are the signs associated with inflammation [30,31,32]. Inflammation may be acute or chronic. Inflammation is caused due to the activation of the immune system. Inflammation activates numerous immune cells such as neutrophils, B-cells, T-cells and NK cells. The immune response and inflammatory process is initiated by different enzymes like cyclo-oxygenase, lipo-oxygenase, protein kinase, phospholipase A, Phosphodiesterase and tyrosine kinase [33,34]. These enzymes activate the endothelial cells and play a key role in inflammatory responses. Phosphorylation by protein kinases and nitric oxide which is formed by nitric oxide synthase plays a crucial role in the inflammatory process. Furthermore, cyclo-oxygenase activates the synthesis of prostaglandins and prostacyclin via the arachidonic acid pathway and activates the immune response in the inflammatory process [35,36,37]. It has been reported by different researchers that kaempferol has significant anti-inflammatory effects. Kaempferol exerts its anti-inflammatory effects via different mechanisms (Table 2) which are summarized below.

7.1. In Vitro Studies

The cyclooxygenase pathway produces prostaglandins which are mediators of inflammation. Nitric oxide synthase accelerates the synthesis of nitric oxide at the site of inflammation which further augments the synthesis of prostaglandins [42,43].Lipo-oxygenase is involved in the synthesis of leukotrienes that cause different diseases like inflammatory bowel disease, asthma and rheumatoid arthritis [44].
The in vitro studies have shown that kaempferol has a significant inhibitory effect on COX1 and COX2.The cyclooxygenase pathway is activated when a physical, chemical or mechanical trauma occurs at any site of the body. The phospholipids’ membranes are ruptured, and arachidonic acid is thus produced, which is further converted into prostaglandin analogues via cyclooxygenase enzymes, which causes inflammation. Thus, kaempferol inhibits cyclooxygenase enzymes and prevents the inflammatory process. Kaempferol and cytokines have been incubated with isolated human hepatocytes and it was noted that COX2 and iNOS levels were decreased [6,45]. Lee and his coworkers found that kaempferol inhibits the expression of COX2 and lipo-oxygenase (LOX). It has been found that nitric oxide is involved in different complications such as inflammation. It has been reported that nitric oxide along with different metals deactivate catalase enzymes which in turn causes toxicity due to H2O2 accumulation. It has also been reported that proinflammatory cytokines like tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) are also produced in response to nitric oxide [46,47,48]. Different researchers have reported that kaempferol is responsible for the inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis which was induced by the administration of LPS to J77 cells and RAW264.7 cells and resulted in the reduction of inflammation. It was also demonstrated that the levels of TNF-α, nitric oxide and IL-1B were reduced by the treatment of kaempferol in diabetic neuropathy patients [49,50].
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) are formed as a result of oxidative stress at the damaged cellular sites which causes damage to the cellular lipids, DNA and cellular proteins [51,52]. These reactive species which are produced as a result of the cellular damage and inflammation stimulate compensatory responses like the chemotaxis of neutrophils and macrophages to decrease the inflammation [53]. In vitro studies have shown that kaempferol is a good antioxidant agent. Different researchers have reported the free radical scavenging effect of kaempferol and also the inhibitory effect of kaempferol against lipid peroxidation [54,55]. Toxic chemicals inhibit or impair the function of nuclear factor (erythroid-derive 2)-like-2 (Nrf2) which further increases ROS that leads to oxidative damages. Saw and his coworkers reported that co-administration of kaempferol and H2O2 into HepG2-C8 cells resulted in the stimulation of Nrf2 and decreased ROS levels by the activation of heme oxygenase-1(HO-1) which prevented oxidative damage. It has also been reported that kaempferol is involved in the suppression of nitric oxide and iNOS levels which are the key mediators for oxidative stress leading to inflammation [36,56]. When studied in diabetic nephropathy, kaempferol produced marked suppression of inflammation via RhoA/Rho kinase regulation in NRK-52E (rat renal proximal tubular epithelial cells) and RPTEC (primary human renal proximal tubule epithelial cells) cells [57].

In Vivo Studies

Atherosclerosis is characterized by chronic arteriolar inflammation. The major risk factors responsible for atherosclerosis are increased oxidated LDL, an elevated cholesterol level and free radicals which may be due to diabetes, hypertension, infection or cigarette smoking. The inflammation associated with atherosclerosis is characterized by the long-term adhesion of monocytes to the arterial endothelium. The activation of endothelial monocytes stimulates the accumulation of leukocytes. The release of chemical mediators like growth factors and the proinflammatory cytokines like TNF-α and IL-1β stimulate the inflammatory process in atherosclerosis. These proinflammatory cytokines further initiate the release of adhesion molecules like E-selectin, P-selectin andICAM-1. It has been shown by earlier studies that E-selectin, P-selectin and ICAM-1 are upregulated in atherosclerotic patients. Nowadays, these adhesion molecules are considered as the clinical biomarkers for cardiovascular disease.
In vivo studies were conducted by Kong and his coworkers to explore the anti-inflammatory effect of kaempferol as an atherosclerosis remedy. They administered kaempferol for 10 weeks to rabbits. After the study, they found that the cholesterol level and arteriolar lesions of rabbits were markedly reduced. Kong and his coworkers found that the serum level of TNF-α, cytokines, leukocytes, IL-1β, Intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and E-selectin were significantly decreased after the treatment of kaempferol. Thus, they found kaempferol as a potential anti-atherogenic agent which prevents vascular inflammation [58]. Kim and his coworkers carried out a study on rats and demonstrated that kaempferol has a potential inhibitory effect on nuclear factor-kappa B activation which provides the cascade for the activation of RAGE and results in inflammation.
Free amino acids and carbohydrates interact to form advance glycation end-products (AGE). This process is stimulated by reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. AGE causes oxidative stress by damaging the cellular macromolecules. RAGE is the receptor for AGE. Upon stimulation of these receptors, it causes increased production of reactive oxygen species, reduction in antioxidant enzymes levels, activation of protein kinase C and synthesis of nitric oxide. It has also been reported that activation of RAGE results in oxidative stress via the stimulation of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-ĸB) and redox-sensitive transcription factors. NF-ĸB is linked with oxidative stress which further activates COX-2, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-8 and iNOS which are responsible for inflammation. Thus, it was discovered by Kim and his coauthors that the anti-inflammatory effect of kaempferol was due to the inactivation of NF-ĸB via inhibition of NADPH oxidase [59]. Similarly, kaempferol showed significant effects of decreasing skin fibrosis and downstream oxidative biomarkers [60]. When tested in male rats with knee osteoarthritis (OA) in a model of ACLT-induced OA, in combination with apigenin, it strongly improved the OA [61].

7.2. Clinical Studies

Both the in vivo and in vitro studies have shown that kaempferol is a potential therapeutic agent for the management of inflammation. To demonstrate the clinical prospects of kaempferol, some nutraceutical clinical trials were performed on diseased subjects to test for the anti-inflammatory effects of kaempferol.
Hosseinpour and his co-researchers carried out a nutritional clinical trial in Type-2 diabetic patients testing for inflammatory biomarkers. They administered two groups of patients with a legume-free isoenergetic diet and non-soya legume-based beans diet (beans contain 14 mg/kg kaempferol as mentioned in Table 1. They found that the kaempferol-rich bean diet significantly reduced the inflammatory biomarkers like C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-6 and TNF-α [62].
Navarro and his coauthors also performed a nutritional-based clinical trial on healthy adults. Cruciferous vegetables (cauliflower, broccoli and radish) were investigated in a clinical trial to detect inflammatory biomarkers. Different cruciferous diets (cauliflower contains 270 mg/kg kaempferol, broccoli 30–72 mg/kg and radish 38 mg/kg kaempferol) were given to the individuals and it was observed after 14 days that IL-6 and IL-8 were significantly lowered [63,64]. Various case–control and cohort studies were performed in healthy individuals and diabetic patients to investigate the relationship between a kaempferol-rich diet (dried broccoli) and inflammation. In another clinical study, male smokers were evaluated following the consumption of the kaempferol-rich diet containing broccoli (72 mg/kg of kaempferol) for inflammatory biomarkers. It was found that the male smokers who received the broccoli diet for 10 days showed a reduction in TNF-α and IL-6 which are inflammatory biomarkers (Table 3) [64].
New innovative techniques use nanotechnology for coating the surface of certain chemical compounds to enhance their bioavailability and systemic absorption. Kaempferol can be encapsulated using a coating of nanoparticles of poly (lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) and polyethylene oxide-poly propylene oxide-polyethylene oxide (PEO-PPO-PEO). It was noted that alone kaempferol had poor bioavailability due to its low solubility and had a low anti-inflammatory effect as compared to the encapsulated kaempferol. However, further clinical trials should be conducted to evaluate kaempferol as a drug for the management of different medical problems [65].

8. Toxicity Profile of Kaempferol

The safety and toxicological profile of kaempferol was evaluated by different researchers and there was a conflict in their conclusions. Some researchers found kaempferol as antimutagenic while some found it to be genotoxic [66,67,68,69]. However, it has been shown that kaempferol has antioxidant effects while sometimes it acts as a pro-oxidant which performs a key role in the genotoxic effect [70]. Flavonoids reduce free radicals and form a phenoxyl radical by donating a hydrogen atom. When a second radical reacts with the phenoxyl radical, it acts as an antioxidant, while if the phenoxyl radical reacts with the oxygen species, then it acts as a pro-oxidant [71]. The pro-oxidant further reduces copper and iron ions which play a vital role in lipid peroxidation and hydroxyl radical formation. Certain studies have shown that the changes in antioxidant and pro-oxidant activities and levels of different enzymes were mediated by the pro-oxidant effect of kaempferol [72,73]. It has been reported by numerous researchers that the mutagenic effect of kaempferol is due to the conversion of kaempferol into genotoxic quercetin by the action of the CYP 1A1 enzyme [74,75].
In vitro studies have shown that kaempferol is carcinogenic and toxic, while these effects were not reported in in vivo screenings. A study was conducted by Takanashi and his coworkers, in which kaempferol was administered orally for 540 days and it was concluded that there was no elevation in the incidence of tumor. It was assumed that the low oral bioavailability of kaempferol prevented the genotoxic effect [76]. It has been reported that kaempferol is contraindicated with folic acid-deficient and iron-deficient patients as it reduces their cellular uptake and bioavailability. Kaempferol is also contraindicated in cancer patients who are on etoposide therapy, as it interferes with its bioavailability [77,78,79].

9. Conclusions

While reviewing the different remarkable attributes of kaempferol, it was revealed that many reports showed that kaempferol possesses anti-inflammatory activity. It has been shown to be a safe and efficacious natural dietary anti-inflammatory agent in both in vivo and in vitro settings. Kaempferol improved markers of inflammation.
Unresolved inflammation is currently ranked amongst the leading medical issues. Modern therapies are available to resolve this issue but most pose high health risks. Though kaempferol has improved several aspects of inflammation while posing minimal health risks, why it is still not available in clinical practices for the management of inflammation is a question needing an answer. The issue of the poor bioavailability of kaempferol has been resolved by nanotechnology. Kaempferol, as a natural compound, may elicit great variability in its therapeutic results. Numerous in vitro, in vivo and some clinical trials have been performed to investigate the anti-inflammatory potential of kaempferol. However, still further clinical trials must be carried out to confirm the worth of kaempferol in clinical settings for the management of inflammation.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/1420-3049/25/18/4073/s1, Table S1: Botanical sources of kaempferol/glycosides.

Author Contributions

W.A. has written the initial article with the support from M.A.S. and O.C. L.S. has designed the overall structure of the review and checked the final draft, while H.K. designed, supervised and finalized it. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflict of interest is declared.

Abbreviations

CYP 1A1cytochrome 1A1
NK cellsNatural killer cells
COXCyclo-oxygenase
NOSNitric oxide synthase
LOXLipo oxygenase
TNF-αTumor necrotic factor alpha
LPSLipo polysaccharides
ROSReactive Oxygen Species
RNSReactive Nitrogen Species
PLAPhospholipase A
Nrf-2Nuclear factor (erythroid-derive 2) -like-2
NF-ĸBNuclear factor-kappa B
AGEAdvance glycation endproducts
TSLPThymic stromal lymphopoietin
ILInterleukin
MAOMono amine oxidase enzyme
MMPsMettaloproteases
AP-1Activator protein

References

  1. Panche, A.; Diwan, A.D.; Chandra, S.R. Flavonoids: An overview. J. Nutr. Sci. 2016, 5, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Burak, M.; Imen, Y. Flavonoids and their antioxidant properties. TürkiyeKlin Tip Bild. 1999, 19, 296–304. [Google Scholar]
  3. Metodiewa, D.; Kochman, A.; Karolczak, S. Evidence for antiradical and antioxidant properties of four biologically active N, N-Diethylaminoethyl ethers of flavaone oximes: A comparison with natural polyphenolic flavonoid rutin action. IUBMB Life 1997, 41, 1067–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Havsteen, B. The biochemistry and medical significance of the flavonoids. Pharmacol. Ther. 2002, 96, 67–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Samanta, A.; Das, G.; Das, S.K. Roles of flavonoids in plants. Carbon 2011, 100, 12–35. [Google Scholar]
  6. García-Mediavilla, M.V.; Crespo, I.; Collado, P.S.; Esteller, A.; Sánchez-Campos, S.; Tuñón, M.J.; González-Gallego, J. The anti-inflammatory flavones quercetin and kaempferol cause inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase, cyclooxygenase-2 and reactive C-protein, and down-regulation of the nuclear factor kappaB pathway in Chang Liver cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2007, 557, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kwon, K.H.; Murakami, A.; Tanaka, T.; Ohigashi, H. Dietary rutin, but not its aglycone quercetin, ameliorates dextran sulfate sodium-induced experimental colitis in mice: Attenuation of pro-inflammatory gene expression. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2005, 69, 395–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nair, M.P.N.; Mahajan, S.; Reynolds, J.L.; Aalinkeel, R.; Nair, H.; Schwartz, S.A.; Kandaswami, C. The Flavonoid Quercetin Inhibits Proinflammatory Cytokine (Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha) Gene Expression in Normal Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells via Modulation of the NF-κβ System. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2006, 13, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Raso, G.M.; Meli, R.; Di Carlo, G.; Pacilio, M.; Di Carlo, R. Inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase-2 expression by flavonoids in macrophage J774A.1. Life Sci. 2001, 68, 921–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Manach, C.; Scalbert, A.; Morand, C.; Rémésy, C.; Jiménez, L. Polyphenols: Food sources and bioavailability. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 79, 727–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Iwashina, T. Flavonoid properties of five families newly incorporated into the order Caryophyllales. Bull. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci. 2013, 39, 25–51. [Google Scholar]
  12. Häkkinen, S.H.; Kärenlampi, S.O.; Heinonen, I.M.; Mykkänen, H.M.; Törrönen, A.R. Content of the flavonols quercetin, myricetin, and kaempferol in 25 edible berries. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 2274–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Fieschi, M.; Codignola, A.; Mosca, A.L. Mutagenic flavonol aglycones in infusions and in fresh and pickled vegetables. J. Food Sci. 1989, 54, 1492–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Miean, K.H.; Mohamed, S.J. Flavonoid (myricetin, quercetin, kaempferol, luteolin, and apigenin) content of edible tropical plants. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 3106–3112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hertog, M.G.; Hollman, P.C.; Katan, M.B. Content of potentially anti-carcinogenic flavonoids of 28 vegetables and 9 fruits commonly consumed in The Netherlands. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1992, 40, 2379–2383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Herrmann, K. Flavonols and flavones in food plants: A review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 1976, 11, 433–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Orhan, I.; Küpeli, E.; Terzioglu, S.; Yesilada, E. Bioassay-guided isolation of kaempferol-3-O-β-d-galactoside with anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive activity from the aerial part of Calluna vulgaris L. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 114, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, J.-H.; Kondratyuk, T.P.; Marler, L.E.; Qiu, X.; Choi, Y.; Cao, H.; Yu, R.; Sturdy, M.; Pegan, S.; Liu, Y. Isolation and evaluation of kaempferol glycosides from the fern Neocheiropteris palmatopedata. Phytochemistry 2010, 71, 641–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Liang, Y.; Wei, L.; Zhu, Z.; Pan, Y.; Wang, H.; Liu, P. Isolation and purification of kaempferol-3, 7-O-α-L-dirhamnopyranoside from Siraitia grosvenori leaves by high-speed counter-current chromatograph and its free radical scavenging activity. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2011, 46, 1528–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Winkel, B.S. Flavonoid Biosynthesis. A Colorful Model for Genetics, Biochemistry, Cell Biology, and Biotechnology. Plant Physiol. 2001, 126, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Winkel, B.S. Biosynthesis of flavonoids and effects of stress. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2002, 5, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Calderón-Montaño, J.M.; Morón, E.B.; Pérez-Guerrero, C.; Lopez-Lazaro, M. A review on the dietary flavonoid kaempferol. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2011, 11, 298–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gee, J.M.; Johnson, I.T. Polyphenolic compounds: Interactions with the gut and implications for human health. Curr. Med. Chem. 2001, 8, 1245–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lehtonen, H.-M.; Lehtinen, O.; Suomela, J.-P.; Viitanen, M.; Kallio, H. Flavonol Glycosides of Sea Buckthorn (Hippophaerhamnoides ssp. sinensis) and Lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea) Are Bioavailable in Humans and Monoglucuronidated for Excretion. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 620–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Crespy, V.; Morand, C.; Besson, C.; Cotelle, N.; Vezin, H.; Demigné, C.; Rémésy, C. The splanchnic metabolism of flavonoids highly differed according to the nature of the compound. Am. J. Physiol. Liver Physiol. 2003, 284, G980–G988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Bokkenheuser, V.D.; Shackleton, C.H.; Winter, J. Hydrolysis of dietary flavonoid glycosides by strains of intestinal Bacteroides from humans. Biochem. J. 1987, 248, 953–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Schneider, H.; Blaut, M. Anaerobic degradation of flavonoids by Eubacteriumramulus. Arch. Microbiol. 2000, 173, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dupont, M.S.; Day, A.J.; Bennett, R.N.; Mellon, F.; Kroon, P. Absorption of kaempferol from endive, a source of kaempferol-3-glucuronide, in humans. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 58, 947–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. De Vries, J.H.; Hollman, P.C.; Meyboom, S.; Buysman, M.N.; Zock, P.L.; Van Staveren, W.A.; Katan, M.B. Plasma concentrations and urinary excretion of the antioxidant flavonols quercetin and kaempferol as biomarkers for dietary intake. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998, 68, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Medzhitov, R. Origin and physiological roles of inflammation. Nature 2008, 454, 428–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Folkerts, G.; Kloek, J.; Muijsers, R.B.; Nijkamp, F.P. Reactive nitrogen and oxygen species in airway inflammation. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2001, 429, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mourits, M.P.; Prummel, M.F.; Wiersinga, W.M.; Koornneef, L. Clinical activity score as a guide in the management of patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Clin. Endocrinol. 1997, 47, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Natella, F.; Nardini, M.; Virgili, F.; Scaccini, C. Role of dietary polyphenols in the platelet aggregation network—A review of the in vitro studies. Curr. Top. Nutraceutical Res. 2006, 4, 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  34. Rathee, P.; Chaudhary, H.; Rathee, S.; Rathee, D.; Kumar, V.; Kohli, K. Mechanism of action of flavonoids as anti-inflammatory agents: A review. Inflamm. Allergy Drug Targets 2009, 8, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Funk, C.D. Prostaglandins and Leukotrienes: Advances in Eicosanoid Biology. Science 2001, 294, 1871–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Guzik, T.J.; Korbut, R.; Adamek-Guzik, T. Nitric oxide and superoxide in inflammation and immune regulation. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2003, 54, 469–487. [Google Scholar]
  37. Moens, U.; Kostenko, S.; Sveinbjörnsson, B. The Role of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase-Activated Protein Kinases (MAPKAPKs) in Inflammation. Genes 2013, 4, 101–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, R.; Ai, X.; Duan, Y.; Xue, M.; He, W.; Wang, C.; Xu, T.; Xu, M.; Liu, B.; Li, C. Kaempferol ameliorates H9N2 swine influenza virus-induced acute lung injury by inactivation of TLR4/MyD88-mediated NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 89, 660–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tang, X.-L.; Liu, J.; Dong, W.; Li, P.; Li, L.; Hou, J.-C.; Zheng, Y.-Q.; Lin, C.-R.; Ren, J.-G. Protective Effect of Kaempferol on LPS plus ATP-Induced Inflammatory Response in Cardiac Fibroblasts. Inflammation 2015, 38, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Saw, C.L.L.; Guo, Y.; Yang, A.Y.; Paredes-Gonzalez, X.; Ramirez, C.; Pung, D.; Kong, A.-N.T. The berry constituents quercetin, kaempferol, and pterostilbene synergistically attenuate reactive oxygen species: Involvement of the Nrf2-ARE signaling pathway. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2014, 72, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nam, S.-Y.; Jeong, H.-J.; Kim, H.-M. Kaempferol impedes IL-32-induced monocyte-macrophage differentiation. Chem. Biol. Interactions 2017, 274, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ricciotti, E.; FitzGerald, G.A. Prostaglandins and inflammation. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2011, 31, 986–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Vane, J.R.; Mitchell, J.A.; Appleton, I.; Tomlinson, A.; Bishop-Bailey, D.; Croxtall, J.; Willoughby, D.A. Inducible isoforms of cyclooxygenase and nitric-oxide synthase in inflammation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 2046–2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Sharma, J.; Mohammed, L.A. The role of leukotrienes in the pathophysiology of inflammatory disorders: Is there a case for revisiting leukotrienes as therapeutic targets? Inflammopharmacology 2006, 14, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lee, J.-H.; Kim, G.H. Evaluation of Antioxidant and Inhibitory Activities for Different Subclasses Flavonoids on Enzymes for Rheumatoid Arthritis. J. Food Sci. 2010, 75, H212–H217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Davis, K.L.; Martin, E.; Turko, I.V.; Murad, F. Novel effects of nitric oxide. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2001, 41, 203–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Cleeter, M.; Cooper, J.; Darley-Usmar, V.; Moncada, S.; Schapira, A. Reversible inhibition of cytochrome c oxidase, the terminal enzyme of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, by nitric oxide: Implications for neurodegenerative diseases. FEBS Lett. 1994, 345, 50–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Tracey, K.J.; Beutler, B.; Lowry, S.F.; Merryweather, J.; Wolpe, S.; Milsark, I.W.; Hariri, R.J.; Fahey, T.J.; Zentella, A.; Albert, J.D.; et al. Shock and tissue injury induced by recombinant human cachectin. Science 1986, 234, 470–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rho, H.S.; Ghimeray, A.K.; Yoo, D.S.; Ahn, S.M.; Kwon, S.S.; Lee, K.H.; Cho, D.H.; Cho, J.Y. Kaempferol and Kaempferol Rhamnosides with Depigmenting and Anti-Inflammatory Properties. Molecules 2011, 16, 3338–3344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Abo-Salem, O.M. Kaempferol Attenuates the Development of Diabetic Neuropathic Pain in Mice: Possible Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Oxidant Mechanisms. Maced. J. Med. Sci. 2014, 2, 424–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Ďuračková, Z. Some current insights into oxidative stress. Physiol. Res. 2010, 59, 59. [Google Scholar]
  52. Gutteridge, J.M. Biological origin of free radicals, and mechanisms of antioxidant protection. Chem. Interact. 1994, 91, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fantone, J.C.; Ward, P.A. Role of oxygen-derived free radicals and metabolites in leukocyte-dependent inflammatory reactions. Am. J. Pathol. 1982, 107, 395–418. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Erben-Russ, M.; Bors, W.; Saran, M. Reactions of Linoleic Acid Peroxyl Radicals with Phenolic Antioxidants: A Pulse Radiolysis Study. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. Relat. Stud. Phys. Chem. Med. 1987, 52, 393–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hyun, S.K.; Jung, H.A.; Chung, H.Y.; Choi, J.S. In vitro peroxynitrite scavenging activity of 6-hydroxykynurenic acid and other flavonoids from Gingko biloba yellow leaves. Arch. Pharmacal Res. 2006, 29, 1074–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lin, C.-W.; Chen, P.-N.; Chen, M.-K.; Yang, W.-E.; Tang, C.-H.; Yang, S.-F.; Hsieh, Y.-S. Kaempferol reduces matrix metalloproteinase-2 expression by down-regulating ERK1/2 and the activator protein-1 signaling pathways in oral cancer cells. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e80883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Sharma, D.; Gondaliya, P.; Tiwari, V.; Kalia, K. Kaempferol attenuates diabetic nephropathy by inhibiting RhoA/Rho-kinase mediated inflammatory signalling. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 109, 1610–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kong, L.; Luo, C.; Li, X.; Zhou, Y.; He, H. The anti-inflammatory effect of kaempferol on early atherosclerosis in high cholesterol fed rabbits. Lipids Health Dis. 2013, 12, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Kim, J.M.; Lee, E.K.; Kim, D.H.; Yu, B.P.; Chung, H.Y. Kaempferol modulates pro-inflammatory NF-κB activation by suppressing advanced glycation endproducts-induced NADPH oxidase. Age 2010, 32, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Sekiguchi, A.; Motegi, S.-I.; Fujiwara, C.; Yamazaki, S.; Inoue, Y.; Uchiyama, A.; Akai, R.; Iwawaki, T.; Ishikawa, O. Inhibitory effect of kaempferol on skin fibrosis in systemic sclerosis by the suppression of oxidative stress. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2019, 96, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Estakhri, F.; Panjehshahin, M.R.; Tanideh, N.; Gheisari, R.; Mahmoodzadeh, A.; Azarpira, N.; Gholijani, N. The effect of kaempferol and apigenin on allogenic synovial membrane-derived stem cells therapy in knee osteoarthritic male rats. Knee 2020, 27, 817–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Hosseinpour-Niazi, S.; Mirmiran, P.; Fallah-Ghohroudi, A.; Azizi, F. Non-soya legume-based therapeutic lifestyle change diet reduces inflammatory status in diabetic patients: A randomised cross-over clinical trial. Br. J. Nutr. 2015, 114, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Navarro, S.L.; Schwarz, Y.; Song, X.; Wang, C.-Y.; Chen, C.; Trudo, S.P.; Kristal, A.R.; Kratz, M.; Eaton, D.L.; Lampe, J.W. Cruciferous Vegetables Have Variable Effects on Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation in a Randomized Controlled Trial in Healthy Young Adults. J. Nutr. 2014, 144, 1850–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Gutiérrez-del-Río, I.; Villar, C.J.; Lombó, F. Therapeutic uses of kaempferol: Anticancer and antiinflammatory activity. In Biosynthesis, Food Sources and Therapeutic Uses; Nova Science Publishers: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2016; Volume 71. [Google Scholar]
  65. Chen, A.Y.; Chen, Y.C. A review of the dietary flavonoid, kaempferol on human health and cancer chemoprevention. Food Chem. 2013, 138, 2099–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Francis, A.R.; Shetty, T.K.; Bhattacharya, R.K. Modulating effect of plant flavonoids on the mutagenicity of N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine. Carcinogenesis 1989, 10, 1953–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Francis, A.; Shetty, T.; Bhattacharya, R. Modifying role of dietary factors on the mutagenicity of aflatoxin B1: In vitro effect of plant flavonoids. Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. 1989, 222, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. MacGregor, J.T.; Jurd, L. Mutagenicity of plant flavonoids: Structural requirements for mutagenic activity in Salmonella typhimurium. Mutat. Res. Environ. Mutagenesis Relat. Subj. 1978, 54, 297–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Niering, P.; Michels, G.; Wätjen, W.; Ohler, S.; Steffan, B.; Chovolou, Y.; Kampkötter, A.; Proksch, P.; Kahl, R. Protective and detrimental effects of kaempferol in rat H4IIE cells: Implication of oxidative stress and apoptosis. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2005, 209, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mira, L.; Fernandez, M.T.; Santos, M.; Rocha, R.; Florêncio, M.H.; Jennings, K.R. Interactions of flavonoids with iron and copper ions: A mechanism for their antioxidant activity. Free. Radic. Res. 2002, 36, 1199–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Pietta, P.-G. Flavonoids as Antioxidants. J. Nat. Prod. 2000, 63, 1035–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Sahu, S.C.; Gray, G.C. Pro-oxidant activity of flavonoids: Effects on glutathione and glutathione S-transferase in isolated rat liver nuclei. Cancer Lett. 1996, 104, 193–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Galati, G.; Sabzevari, O.; Wilson, J.X.; O’Brien, P.J. Prooxidant activity and cellular effects of the phenoxyl radicals of dietary flavonoids and other polyphenolics. Toxicology 2002, 177, 91–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Silva, I.D.; Rodrigues, A.; Gaspar, J.; Mala, R.; Laires, A.; Rueff, J. Mutagenicity of kaempferol in V79 cells: The role of cytochromes P450. Teratog. Carcinog. Mutagenesis 1996, 16, 229–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Silva, I.D.; Rodrigues, A.; Gaspar, J.; Maia, R.; Laires, A.; Rueff, J. Involvement of rat cytochrome 1A1 in the biotransformation of kaempferol to quercetin: Relevance to the genotoxicity of kaempferol. Mutagenesis 1997, 12, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Takanashi, H.; Aiso, S.; Hirono, I.; Matsushima, T.; Sugimura, T. Carcinogenicity test of quercetin and kaempferol in rats by oral administration. J. Food Saf. 1983, 5, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hu, Y.; Cheng, Z.; Heller, L.I.; Krasnoff, S.B.; Glahn, R.P.; Welch, R.M. Kaempferol in Red and Pinto Bean Seed (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Coats Inhibits Iron Bioavailability Using an in Vitro Digestion/Human Caco-2 Cell Model. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 9254–9261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lemos, C.; Peters, G.J.; Jansen, G.; Martel, F.; Calhau, C. Modulation of folate uptake in cultured human colon adenocarcinoma Caco-2 cells by dietary compounds. Eur. J. Nutr. 2007, 46, 329–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Li, C.; Li, X.; Choi, J.-S. Enhanced bioavailability of etoposide after oral or intravenous administration of etoposide with kaempferol in rats. Arch. Pharmacal Res. 2009, 32, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Chemical structure of kaempferol.
Figure 1. Chemical structure of kaempferol.
Molecules 25 04073 g001
Figure 2. Biosynthesis of kaempferol.
Figure 2. Biosynthesis of kaempferol.
Molecules 25 04073 g002
Table 1. Edible and dietary sources of kaempferol.
Table 1. Edible and dietary sources of kaempferol.
Food/Plant BeveragesQuantityReferences
KaempferolStrawberry5–8 mg/kg[12]
Gooseberry yellow16 mg/kg[12]
Gooseberry red19 mg/kg[12]
Onion leaves832 mg/kg[13]
Black tea118 mg/kg[14]
Green chili39 mg/kg[14]
Papaya shoots453 mg/kg[14]
Brinjal80 mg/kg[14]
Pumpkin 371 mg/kg[14]
Carrot 140 mg/kg[14]
White radish38 mg/kg[14]
Beans14 mg/kg[15]
Broccoli72 mg/kg[15]
Broccoli30 mg/kg[16]
Cauliflower270 mg/kg [16]
Table 2. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of action of kaempferol as an anti-inflammatory agent.
Table 2. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of action of kaempferol as an anti-inflammatory agent.
Mechanism of ActionReferences
Anti-Inflammatory EffectInhibits the NF-κB binding activity of DNA and myeloid differentiation factor 88[38]
Suppresses the release of IL-6, IL-1β, IL-18 and TNF-α.[39]
Increases mRNA and protein expression of Nrf2-regulated genes[40]
Inhibits the toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)[41]
Table 3. Clinical trials showing the anti-inflammatory effect of kaempferol.
Table 3. Clinical trials showing the anti-inflammatory effect of kaempferol.
Clinical TrialsAnti-Inflammatory ResponseReferences
Type-2 diabetic patients with inflammation were treated with kaempferol-rich dietDecreased the levels of inflammatory biomarkers (C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-6 and TNF-α)[62]
Cruciferous diet (kaempferol-rich diet) was administered to patientsRecovered the inflammatory biomarkers like IL-6 and IL-8[63]
Male smokers with inflammation were treated with kaempferol-rich diet (broccoli) for 10 days.Reduced the TNF-α and IL-6 levels (inflammatory biomarkers)[64]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alam, W.; Khan, H.; Shah, M.A.; Cauli, O.; Saso, L. Kaempferol as a Dietary Anti-Inflammatory Agent: Current Therapeutic Standing. Molecules 2020, 25, 4073. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules25184073

AMA Style

Alam W, Khan H, Shah MA, Cauli O, Saso L. Kaempferol as a Dietary Anti-Inflammatory Agent: Current Therapeutic Standing. Molecules. 2020; 25(18):4073. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules25184073

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alam, Waqas, Haroon Khan, Muhammad Ajmal Shah, Omar Cauli, and Luciano Saso. 2020. "Kaempferol as a Dietary Anti-Inflammatory Agent: Current Therapeutic Standing" Molecules 25, no. 18: 4073. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules25184073

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop