Next Article in Journal
Structural Refolding and Thermal Stability of Myoglobin in the Presence of Mixture of Crowders: Importance of Various Interactions for Protein Stabilization in Crowded Conditions
Next Article in Special Issue
Practical High-Throughput Method to Screen Compounds for Anthelmintic Activity against Caenorhabditis elegans
Previous Article in Journal
Translating Analytical Techniques in Geochemistry to Environmental Health
Previous Article in Special Issue
RNA-Targeting Splicing Modifiers: Drug Development and Screening Assays
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 26
Issue 9
10.3390/molecules26092819
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Three Small Molecule Entities (MPK18, MPK334 and YAK308) with Activity against Haemonchus contortus In Vitro

by
Aya C. Taki
1,
Abdul Jabbar
1,
Thomas Kurz
2,
Beate Lungerich
2,
Guangxu Ma
1,
Joseph J. Byrne
1,
Marc Pflieger
2,
Yodita Asfaha
2,
Fabian Fischer
2,
Bill C. H. Chang
1,
Brad E. Sleebs
1,3,4 and
Robin B. Gasser
1,*
1
Department of Biosciences, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Victoria, Australia
2
Institute of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
3
Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia
4
Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Victoria, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(9), 2819; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules26092819
Submission received: 24 March 2021 / Revised: 3 May 2021 / Accepted: 4 May 2021 / Published: 10 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phenotypic Screening)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Due to widespread multi-drug resistance in parasitic nematodes of livestock animals, there is an urgent need to discover new anthelmintics with distinct mechanisms of action. Extending previous work, here we screened a panel of 245 chemically-diverse small molecules for anti-parasitic activity against Haemonchus contortus—an economically important parasitic nematode of livestock. This panel was screened in vitro against exsheathed third-stage larvae (xL3) of H. contortus using an established phenotypic assay, and the potency of select compounds to inhibit larval motility and development assessed in dose-response assays. Of the 245 compounds screened, three—designated MPK18, MPK334 and YAK308—induced non-wildtype larval phenotypes and repeatedly inhibited xL3-motility, with IC50 values of 45.2 µM, 17.1 µM and 52.7 µM, respectively; two also inhibited larval development, with IC50 values of 12.3 µM (MPK334) and 6.5 µM (YAK308), and none of the three was toxic to human liver cells (HepG2). These findings suggest that these compounds deserve further evaluation as nematocidal candidates. Future work should focus on structure–activity relationship (SAR) studies of these chemical scaffolds, and assess the in vitro and in vivo efficacies and safety of optimised compounds against adults of H. contortus.

1. Introduction

Parasitic nematodes (order Strongylida) cause substantial mortality and morbidity in livestock animals worldwide, leading to major losses to the global food production annually. Gastrointestinal nematodes, such as species of Haemonchus, Ostertagia, Teladorsagia, Trichostrongylus, Cooperia, Nematodirus and Oesophagostomum, cause some of the most important diseases, affecting the health of hundreds of millions of animals (including sheep, goats, cattle and pigs), with very substantial economic losses every year [1,2,3]. These parasites cause gastroenteritis, anaemia and/or reduced feed conversion, weight gain and growth as well as weight loss, and death in severely affected animals [1].
The control of strongylid nematodes is mostly achieved through a suppressive or strategic use of anthelmintic drugs [4,5]. However, the excessive and relatively uncontrolled use of these drugs has led to resistance to one or more of the major compound classes, including benzimidazoles, imidazothiazoles, macrocyclic lactones, aminoacetonitrile derivatives, tetrahydropyrimidines, salicylanilides and organophosphates, and is now widespread [6]. As no vaccines are available to prevent most diseases caused by these worms, with the exception of haemonchosis caused by Haemonchus contortus (barber’s pole worm) (Barbervax; cf. [7]), there is a need to discover and develop new drugs to ensure effective and sustained control in the immediate future. Although, between 2008 and 2010, an aminoacetonitrile derivative (monepantel) and a spiroindole (derquantel) provided renewed hope for the development of new classes of synthetic or semi-synthetic nematocides [8,9,10], subsequent success in discovering compounds that kill a spectrum of key gastrointestinal nematode species of livestock has been very limited. Thus, there is continued need to discover new anthelmintic compounds with distinct mechanisms of action.
In the search for new anthelmintic candidates, our research group has developed industry-linked collaborations focused on the screening of synthetic and natural compound libraries [11,12,13] for activity and potency against H. contortus—a key representative of the Strongylida—in a semi-automated platform [14]. To date, this program has identified a panel of 35 compounds, including kinase inhibitors, tolfenpyrad (an approved pesticide), and α-pyrones, which have been critically assessed for their potential as anthelmintic candidates (reviewed by [12,13]). Here, we extend this work to evaluate a panel of a chemically diverse group of compounds (including tribenzylamine, quinoline, hydroxamic acid and hydrazonamide histone deacetylase inhibitors) which had been synthesised or designed with a focus on developing anti-infectives (against parasitic protists), anti-cancer (against glioblastoma or neuroblastoma) or blood pressure-reducing drug candidates (e.g., [15,16]). We evaluated the potency of active (“hit”) compounds against larvae of H. contortus to inhibit motility and development, as a basis for future structure-activity-relationship (SAR) studies.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Three Compounds Induced a Phenotypic Alteration in the Primary Screen

The primary screening of 245 compounds identified three active “hits”. These compounds were 3-(p-tolyl)acrylamide (designated MPK18), a chalcone (MPK334) and 2-amino-4-phenylthiazole (YAK308), and all three compounds altered the phenotypes (morphology) of a proportion of xL3s after 72 h of exposure to each of compounds at 20 µM. A “coiled” phenotype was exhibited by ~50% of MPK18– and MPK334–treated xL3s based on a visual inspection of video recordings (Figure 1); this phenotype was similar to that of xL3s exposed to monepantel (positive control) over 72 h. The coiled xL3s were immotile and appeared to be dead; this deleterious effect was consistent with observations made for previously identified active compounds [17,18]. YAK308 induced a “curved” phenotype in ~90% of xL3s (Figure 1), distinct to phenotypes in all control wells (0.5% DMSO, monepantel and moxidectin). Although the curved phenotype seemed to be unique, a similar phenotype was observed previously in xL3s and L4s of H. contortus exposed in vitro to compound HBK4—an active benzimidazole-derivative from a previous chemical collection from the Kurz-laboratory [19].

2.2. Inhibitory Effects of Active Compounds on Larval Motility and Development

The three active compounds (MPK18, MPK334 and YAK308) were subsequently assessed for their potencies in a dose-response assay by measuring the inhibition level on larval motility at 72 h and larval development after seven days. MPK334 was the most potent compound at inhibiting xL3 motility after 72 h, with an IC50 value of 17.1 ± 4.2 µM (Table 1). MPK18 and YAK308 also inhibited xL3 motility, but less than MPK334 (IC50 = 45.2 ± 4.6 µM and IC50 = 52.7 ± 6.7 µM; Table 1, respectively). MPK18 and YAK308 followed the same inhibitory trend, despite belonging to different chemotypes (Figure 2). Furthermore, all three compounds inhibited larval development over the seven-day incubation period, with YAK308 being most potent (IC50 = 6.5 ± 1.6 µM; Table 1), followed by MPK334 (IC50 = 12.3 ± 2.3 µM; Table 1) and MPK18 (IC50 not determined; active at >25 µM; Figure 2). Interestingly, MPK334 induced a curved phenotype at 100 µM in 100% of xL3s (Figure 3), even though a coiled phenotype was observed at 20 µM in the primary screen. Similarly, YAK308 induced an “evisceration” phenotype at 100 µM in 22% of xL3s and L4s (Figure 3), while it induced a curved phenotype in the primary screen. This alteration in phenotype was not observed for MPK18, despite its effect on xL3s in the primary screen.
Compound MPK334, representing a chalcone scaffold (1,3-diaryl-2-propen-1-one), was the most potent hit identified in this collection. It was the only compound to inhibit both larval motility and development at low micromolar concentrations, with the level of larval development being similar to the positive–control, moxidectin. The elucidation of the molecular mechanism(s) causing the coiled and curved phenotypes observed in the MPK334-treated xL3s could help understand the mode(s) of action of chalcones against H. contortus. The chalcones are known to exert adverse effects on parasitic helminths, including schistosomes and plant nematodes [20,21,22] as well as protists such as Plasmodium [23], Giardia and Leishmania [24,25,26]; however, the exact mode(s) of action in parasites is unknown. The chalcone is proposed to induce pathological changes in musculature in H. contortus xL3s by causing cell dysfunction via the inhibition of tyrosine kinase and/or microtubule formation [27], although such effects have only been observed in mammalian systems—in vitro (mammalian cells) and in vivo (murine models) [28]. Some of the unique biological activities of known chalcones are associated with their Michael acceptor features [28,29,30]. This aspect warrants further investigation.
The thiazole–derivative, YAK308 (2-amino-4-phenylthiazole), was potent against H. contortus, having a remarkable inhibition of larval development at lower concentrations than for moxidectin. YAK308 induced a lethal evisceration phenotype with a protrusion of the alimentary tract and surrounding tissues through the excretory pore, mainly in the L4 stage at 100 µM, and a curved phenotype at 20 µM in xL3s. Light microscopic examination of L4s at high magnification confirmed the location of visceral extrusion and suggesting that this phenotype relates to a dysfunctional excretory/secretory system and/or cuticle shedding process required for ecdysis (cf. [31,32]), which is crucial for developmental transition. Previously, selected thiazole–derivatives have shown some potential as anthelmintics [33], but this particular 2-amino-4-phenylthiazole, with two methoxy groups, is unique and had not been tested before against a parasitic nematode. Thus, given its potency, further exploration of this scaffold is warranted.
A chalcone, designated MPK318 (Supplementary Table S1)—a close analogue of MPK334 with no 4-bromo substituent—was inactive against xL3s, despite sharing the same reactivity (Michael acceptors). Although not a chalcone, MPK18 is also a Michael acceptor, but it is less potent than MPK334 and it also lacks a 4-bromo substituent. Thus, the 4-substitution might relate to potency. Similarly, compounds BLK133, BLK136 and BLK155 (Supplementary Table S1), which are structurally akin to YAK308 with 5-carbonyl or 5-methyl hydroxy substitution, did not show activity in the primary screen on xL3s. This information suggests that the carbonyl at 5-position may be detrimental to activity of the thiazole structural class.
Initial assessments on HepG2 human hepatoma cells did not reveal toxicity of any of the three hit compounds at concentrations of ≤100 µM, which agrees with previous findings indicating that chalcones and thiazole–derivatives are typically well-tolerated by mammals [29]. The selectivity indices of three hit compounds ranged from 1.9 to 16.1 (Table 1); the highest selectivity index was observed for YAK308 for developmental inhibition of the L4 stage. Cell viability was 100% for 100 µM, suggesting that the true selectivity index might be even greater. Thus, these compounds/scaffolds could have potential for optimisation to achieve potencies in the sub-micromolar range. Further modifications of MPK334, such as synthetic hybrids with a benzimidazolyl group, could potentially increase its anthelmintic activity [34]. Conjugation of an additional moiety on YAK308 may increase potency, as has been demonstrated for other anti-parasitic (e.g., aryl-thiazole derivatives) [33] and anti-inflammatory drugs (e.g., benzimidazole-thiazole hybrids) [35]. The newly synthesised analogues would need to be re-tested in vitro against larvae and then on H. contortus adults—which are responsible for haemonchosis in ruminant hosts and are the target for treatment in the stomach (i.e., abomasum).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Compound Preparation for Screening

A library containing 245 compounds (Supplementary Table S1) was curated by the authors (T.K. and B.L.) at the Institute of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Germany. Individual compounds were dissolved in 100% high-performance liquid chromatography-grade dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Merck, USA) to achieve stock concentrations of 20 mM. For screening, individual compounds were diluted further to the final concentration of 20 µM in Luria Bertani broth (LB) supplemented with 100 U/mL of penicillin, 100 μg/mL of streptomycin and 0.25 μg/mL of amphotericin B (designated LB*), and tested for activity in vitro against H. contortus.

3.2. Procurement and Preparation of Parasite Larvae

Haemonchus contortus (Haecon-5 strain) was maintained in experimental sheep [36], in accordance with institutional animal ethics approval (permit no. 1714374; The University of Melbourne). Helminth-free Merino sheep (male; eight months of age) were inoculated orally with 7000 third-stage larvae (L3s) of H. contortus. Faecal samples containing H. contortus eggs were collected every day from 21 days following inoculation. These samples were incubated at 27 °C for one week to produce L3s [14], which were harvested and sieved through two layers of nylon mesh (20 μM pore size; Rowe Scientific, Australia) to remove debris and dead larvae, and then stored at 11 °C for up to 6 months until use. To produce exsheathed third-stage larvae (xL3s) for in vitro assays, L3s were incubated in 0.15% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite for 20 min at 37 °C followed by five washes in 0.9% sterile saline by centrifugation at 600× g (5 min) at room temperature (22–24 °C) [14].

3.3. Screening of Compounds on H. contortus xL3s

Compounds were screened at 20 μM on H. contortus xL3s using an established assay [14]. In brief, diluted test-compounds, negative controls (LB* + 0.5% DMSO) and two positive controls [20 μM of monepantel (Zolvix, Novartis Animal Health, Switzerland) and 20 μM of moxidectin (Cydectin, Virbac, France)] were added to wells of the 96-well microtiter plates (Corning, USA), and xL3s were dispensed at ~300/well to a final volume of 100 µL. Following a 72 h-incubation at 38 °C and 10% (v/v) CO2 at >90% humidity, a video recording (5 s) was taken of each well of the 96-well microtitre plate containing xL3s using a gray–scale camera (Rolera Bolt Scientific CMOS, Teledyne QImaging, Tucson, AZ, USA) and a motorised X–Y axis stage (BioPoint 2, Ludl Electronics Products, Hawthorne, CA, USA) attached to a stereomicroscope (SZ61, Olympus, Shinjuku, Japan). Primary screening was performed in duplicate. A compound was recorded as having activity if it altered worm morphology (phenotype) after 72 h of incubation.

3.4. Assessing Inhibitory Activity on Larval Motility

Three compounds (designated MPK18, MPK334 and YAK308) shown to have activity against H. contortus in the primary screen were evaluated for their potency by estimating their half maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50), calculated in a dose-response assay. In brief, compounds were titrated (18-points, 2-fold serial dilution in 50 μL of LB*, 100 µM down to 0.76 nM), in 96-well microtitre plates and xL3s were dispensed in 50 µL at a density of ~300 per well. All plates were incubated at 38 °C and 10% (v/v) CO2 with >90% humidity. After 72 h of incubation, a video recording (5 s) was taken of each well in the same camera settings as the primary screen (see Section 3.3), and larval motility measured. The motility index (Mi) was calculated from video data using the unique algorithm written in a custom macro, and analysed through the program ImageJ (v.2.0.0, Fiji) [14]. Mi data were normalised to a percentage compared with negative control (LB* + 0.5% DMSO). Monepantel and moxidectin were diluted in the same manner, and used as positive control compounds. Assays were performed in triplicate, three times, on separate days. To establish IC50 values, compound concentrations were log10-transformed, fitted using a variable slope four-parameter equation, constraining the maximum value to 100% using a least squares (ordinary) fit model employing GraphPad Prism (v. 9.0.2) software.

3.5. Evaluating Inhibitory Activity on Larval Development

Following the measurement of larval motility at 72 h, plates containing xL3s were incubated for four more days at 38 °C [10% (v/v) CO2 and >90% relative humidity] to test the active compounds (MPK18, MPK334 and YAK308) for their effect on the larval development over 7 days. Subsequently, worms were fixed in 1% iodine, and the rate of larval development was assessed microscopically appraising the presence (L4) or absence (xL3) of mouth and pharynx [37], and direct comparison with negative (untreated) controls (LB* + 0.5% DMSO). Thirty worms from each well were examined at 50-times magnification, and the number of L4s was expressed as a percentage of the total number. Assays were performed in triplicate, three times, on separate days. To establish IC50 values, compound concentrations were log10-transformed, fitted using a variable slope four-parameter equation with constraining the top value to 100% using a least squares (ordinary) fit model using GraphPad Prism (v. 9.0.2) software.

3.6. Evaluation of Toxicity of Active Compounds on HepG2 Cells

HepG2 human hepatoma cells were seeded into wells of a 96-well microtitre plate in 80 µL of Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM), supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum, 100 U/mL of penicillin, 100 µg/mL of streptomycin and 0.25 µg/mL of amphotericin B (DMEM*) at a density of 1 × 105 cells per well. Cells were allowed to adhere for 16 h at 37 °C and 5% (v/v) CO2 at >90% humidity, and incubated with individual, serially-diluted compounds (7-points, 2-fold dilution in DMEM*, from 100 µM to 1.56 µM) in a final volume of 100 µL. Doxorubicin (10 µM) and DMEM* + 0.25% DMSO (vehicle), serving as positive and negative controls, respectively, were added to the individual 96-well plates. Monepantel and moxidectin were also serially diluted—prepared in the same manner as active compounds—and used as ‘negative’ reference controls. After 48 h of incubation, cellular viability was determined by the crystal violet staining assay [38]. The absorbance at 595 nm of treated cells was compared with that of the controls (exposed only to the vehicle, with 100% viability). Compounds and controls were tested in triplicate. To determine the half cytotoxic concentration (CC50) values, compound concentrations were log10-transformed, fitted using a variable slope four-parameter equation with a least squares (ordinary) fit model employing GraphPad Prism (v. 9.0.2) software.

4. Conclusions

The findings for the three new chemical entities with in vitro-anthelmintic activities against H. contortus larvae encourage future SAR studies of analogues of MPK18, MPK334 and YAK308, with a future focus on developing an anthelmintic against strongylid nematodes of animals.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online, Table S1: The 245 synthetic compounds from the Kurz collection screened in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.B.G., A.C.T. and T.K.; methodology, A.C.T., R.B.G. and T.K.; validation, R.B.G., A.C.T., T.K. and B.E.S.; formal analysis, A.C.T., M.P., Y.A. and F.F.; investigation, R.B.G. and A.C.T.; resources, R.B.G., A.C.T., T.K., B.L., M.P., Y.A. and F.F.; data curation, A.C.T., G.M. and J.J.B.; writing—original draft preparation, A.C.T. and R.B.G.; writing—review and editing, A.C.T., A.J., T.K., B.L., G.M., J.J.B., M.P., Y.A., F.F., B.C.H.C., B.E.S. and R.B.G.; visualization, A.C.T.; supervision, R.B.G. and T.K.; project administration, R.B.G.; funding acquisition, R.B.G., A.J. and T.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Australian Research Council (ARC), Yourgene Health Singapore Pte Ltd. (R.B.G.), and the German Research Foundation (DFG) Research Training Group GRK 2158 (270650915) (T.K.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of The University of Melbourne, Australia (permit no. 1714374).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Funding bodies played no role in the design of the study, collection, analysis or interpretation of data, or in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Roeber, F.; Jex, A.R.; Gasser, R.B. Impact of gastrointestinal parasitic nematodes of sheep, and the role of advanced molecular tools for exploring epidemiology and drug resistance—An Australian perspective. Parasit. Vectors 2013, 6, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Lane, J.; Jubb, T.; Shepherd, R.; Webb-Ware, J.; Fordyce, G. Priority List of Endemic Diseases for the Red Meat Industries. Final Report (B.AHE.0010); Meat & Livestock Australia Ltd.: North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2015; ISBN -9781741918946. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gasser, R.B.; von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G. Haemonchus contortus and Haemonchosis—Past, Present and Future Trends. In Advances in Parasitology; Academic Press: London, UK, 2016; Volume 111, ISBN 978-0-128-10395-1. [Google Scholar]
  4. Besier, R.B.; Kahn, L.P.; Sargison, N.D.; Van Wyk, J.A. Diagnosis, treatment and management of Haemonchus contortus in small ruminants. Adv. Parasitol. 2016, 93, 181–238. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sepúlveda-Crespo, D.; Reguera, R.M.; Rojo-Vázquez, F.; Balaña-Fouce, R.; Martínez-Valladares, M. Drug discovery technologies: Caenorhabditis elegans as a model for anthelmintic therapeutics. Med. Res. Rev. 2020, 40, 1715–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kotze, A.C.; Prichard, R.K. Anthelmintic resistance in Haemonchus contortus: History, mechanisms and diagnosis. Adv. Parasitol. 2016, 93, 397–428. [Google Scholar]
  7. Nisbet, A.J.; Meeusen, E.N.; González, J.F.; Piedrafita, D.M. Immunity to Haemonchus contortus and vaccine development. Adv. Parasitol. 2016, 93, 353–396. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Kaminsky, R.; Gauvry, N.; Weber, S.S.; Skripsky, T.; Bouvier, J.; Wenger, A.; Schroeder, F.; Desaules, Y.; Hotz, R.; Goebel, T.; et al. Identification of the amino-acetonitrile derivative monepantel (AAD 1566) as a new anthelmintic drug development candidate. Parasitol. Res. 2008, 103, 931–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Prichard, R.K.; Geary, T.G. Fresh hope to can the worms. Nature 2008, 452, 157–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Little, P.; Hodge, A.; Watson, T.; Seed, J.; Maeder, S. Field efficacy and safety of an oral formulation of the novel combination anthelmintic, derquantel-abamectin, in sheep in New Zealand. N. Z. Vet. J. 2010, 58, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Preston, S.; Gasser, R.B. Working towards new drugs against parasitic worms in a public-development partnership. Trends Parasitol. 2018, 34, 4–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jiao, Y.; Preston, S.; Hofmann, A.; Taki, A.; Baell, J.; Chang, B.C.H.; Jabbar, A.; Gasser, R.B. A perspective on the discovery of selected compounds with anthelmintic activity against the barber’s pole worm-Where to from here? Adv. Parasitol. 2020, 108, 1–45. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Herath, H.M.P.D.; Taki, A.C.; Sleebs, B.E.; Nguyen, N.; Hofmann, A.; Jabbar, A.; Davis, D.A.; Gasser, R.B. Advances in the discovery and development of anthelmintics by harnessing natural product scaffolds. Adv. Parasitol. 2021, 111, 203–251. [Google Scholar]
  14. Preston, S.; Jabbar, A.; Nowell, C.; Joachim, A.; Ruttkowski, B.; Baell, J.; Cardno, T.; Korhonen, P.K.; Piedrafita, D.; Ansell, B.R.E.; et al. Low cost whole-organism screening of compounds for anthelmintic activity. Int. J. Parasitol. 2015, 45, 333–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Asfaha, Y.; Schrenk, C.; Avelar, L.A.A.; Lange, F.; Wang, C.; Bandolik, J.J.; Hamacher, A.; Kassack, M.U.; Kurz, T. Novel alkoxyamide-based histone deacetylase inhibitors reverse cisplatin resistance in chemoresistant cancer cells. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2019, 28, 115108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lee, H.-A.; Park, S.-M.; Chu, K.-B.; Quan, F.-S.; Kurz, T.; Pflieger, M.; Moon, E.-K. Application of histone deacetylase inhibitors MPK472 and KSK64 as a potential treatment option for Acanthamoeba keratitis. Antimicrobiol. Agents 2020, 64, e01506-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jiao, Y.; Preston, S.; Koehler, A.V.; Stroehlein, A.J.; Chang, B.C.H.; Simpson, K.J.; Cowley, K.J.; Palmer, M.J.; Laleu, B.; Wells, T.N.C.; et al. Screening of the ‘Stasis Box’ identifies two kinase inhibitors under pharmaceutical development with activity against Haemonchus contortus. Parasit. Vectors 2017, 10, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Preston, S.; Jiao, Y.; Baell, J.B.; Keiser, J.; Crawford, S.; Koehler, A.V.; Wang, T.; Simpson, M.M.; Kaplan, R.M.; Cowley, K.J.; et al. Screening of the ‘Open Scaffolds’ collection from Compounds Australia identifies a new chemical entity with anthelmintic activities against different developmental stages of the barber’s pole worm and other parasitic nematodes. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist. 2017, 7, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Nguyen, L.T.; Kurz, T.; Preston, S.; Brueckmann, H.; Lungerich, B.; Herath, H.M.P.D.; Koehler, A.V.; Wang, T.; Skálová, L.; Jabbar, A.; et al. Phenotypic screening of the ‘Kurz-box’ of chemicals identifies two compounds (BLK127 and HBK4) with anthelmintic activity in vitro against parasitic larval stages of Haemonchus contortus. Parasit. Vectors 2019, 12, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. de Castro, C.C.B.; Costa, P.S.; Laktin, G.T.; de Carvalho, P.H.D.; Geraldo, R.B.; de Moraes, J.; Pinto, P.L.S.; Couri, M.R.C.; Pinto, P. de F.; Da Silva Filho, A.A. Cardamonin, a schistosomicidal chalcone from Piper aduncum L. (Piperaceae) that inhibits Schistosoma mansoni ATP diphosphohydrolase. Phytomedicine 2015, 22, 921–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Caboni, P.; Aissani, N.; Demurtas, M.; Ntalli, N.; Onnis, V. Nematicidal activity of acetophenones and chalcones against Meloidogyne incognita and structure–activity considerations. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2016, 72, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Silva, F.J.; Campos, V.P.; Oliveira, D.F.; Gomes, V.A.; Barros, A.F.; Din, Z.U.; Rodrigues-Filho, E. Chalcone analogues: Synthesis, activity against Meloidogyne incognita, and in silico interaction with cytochrome P450. J. Phytopathol. 2019, 167, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sinha, S.; Batovska, D.I.; Medhi, B.; Radotra, B.D.; Bhalla, A.; Markova, N.; Sehgal, R. In vitro anti-malarial efficacy of chalcones: Cytotoxicity profile, mechanism of action and their effect on erythrocytes. Malaria J. 2019, 18, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ochoa, R.; García, E.; Robledo, S.M.; G., W.C. Virtual and experimental screening of phenylfuranchalcones as potential anti-Leishmania candidates. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2019, 91, 164–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chacon-Vargas, K.F.; Domínguez-Méndez, V.G.; Nogueda-Torres, B.; Chávez-Flores, D.; Camacho-Dávila, A.A.; Sánchez-Torres, L.E.; Espinoza-Hicks, J.C. O-geranylchalcones: Synthesis and metabolic inhibition against Leishmania mexicana and Trypanosoma cruzi. Med. Chem. Res. 2020, 29, 156–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cáceres-Castillo, D.; Carballo, R.M.; Quijano-Quiñones, R.; Mirón-López, G.; Graniel-Sabido, M.; Moo-Puc, R.E.; Mena-Rejón, G.J. Synthesis, in vitro antigiardial activity, SAR analysis and docking study of substituted chalcones. Med. Chem. Res. 2020, 29, 431–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vázquez-Bravo, J.; Aguilar-Marcelino, L.; Castañeda-Ramírez, G.S.; De los Santos-Pérez, I.; Arroyo-Carmona, R.E.; Bernès, S.; Hernández-Pareja, U.; Gómez-Rodríguez, O.; Rosas-Saito, G.H. In vitro nematicidal activity of two ferrocenyl chalcones against larvae of Haemonchus contortus (L3) and Nacobbus aberrans (J2). J. Helminthol. 2020, 94, e190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhuang, C.; Zhang, W.; Sheng, C.; Zhang, W.; Xing, C.; Miao, Z. Chalcone: A privileged structure in medicinal chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 7762–7810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Gaonkar, S.L.; Vignesh, U.N. Synthesis and pharmacological properties of chalcones: A review. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2017, 43, 6043–6077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gomes, M.N.; Muratov, E.N.; Pereira, M.; Peixoto, J.C.; Rosseto, L.P.; Cravo, P.V.L.; Andrade, C.H.; Neves, B.J. Chalcone derivatives: Promising starting points for drug design. Molecules 2017, 22, 1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Page, A.P.; Stepek, G.; Winter, A.D.; Pertab, D. Enzymology of the nematode cuticle: A potential drug target? Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist. 2014, 4, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Jiao, Y.; Preston, S.; Garcia-Bustos, J.F.; Baell, J.B.; Ventura, S.; Le, T.; McNamara, N.; Nguyen, N.; Botteon, A.; Skinner, C.; et al. Tetrahydroquinoxalines induce a lethal evisceration phenotype in Haemonchus contortus in vitro. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist. 2018, 9, 59–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pereira, A.S.A.; Silveira, G.O.; Amaral, M.S.; Almeida, S.M.V.; Oliveira, J.F.; Lima, M.C.A.; Verjovski-Almeida, S. In vitro activity of aryl-thiazole derivatives against Schistosoma mansoni schistosomula and adult worms. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0225425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ouattara, M.; Sissouma, D.; Koné, M.; Menan, H.; Touré, S.; Ouattara, L. Synthesis and anthelmintic activity of some hybrid benzimidazolyl-chalcone derivatives. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2011, 10, 767–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Maghraby, M.T.-E.; Abou-Ghadir, O.M.F.; Abdel-Moty, S.G.; Ali, A.Y.; Salem, O.I.A. Novel class of benzimidazole-thiazole hybrids: The privileged scaffolds of potent anti-inflammatory activity with dual inhibition of cyclooxygenase and 15-lipoxygenase enzymes. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2020, 28, 115403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Schwarz, E.M.; Korhonen, P.K.; Campbell, B.E.; Young, N.D.; Jex, A.R.; Jabbar, A.; Hall, R.S.; Mondal, A.; Howe, A.C.; Pell, J.; et al. The genome and developmental transcriptome of the strongylid nematode Haemonchus contortus. Genome Biol. 2013, 14, R89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Sommerville, R.I. The development of Haemonchus contortus to the fourth stage in vitro. J. Parasitol. 1966, 52, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Śliwka, L.; Wiktorska, K.; Suchocki, P.; Milczarek, M.; Mielczarek, S.; Lubelska, K.; Cierpiał, T.; Łyżwa, P.; Kiełbasiński, P.; Jaromin, A. The comparison of MTT and CVS assays for the assessment of anticancer agent interactions. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0155772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Molecules 26 02819 g001 550
Figure 1. Three compounds identified to induce abnormal phenotypes in exsheathed third-stage larvae (xL3) of Haemonchus contortus in the primary screen. The representative single-frame images (25-times magnification) of short video (5 s) of xL3s captured in primary screen displaying non-wildtype phenotypes (“coiled” or “curved”) induced by each of the three hit compounds (MPK18, MPK334 and YAK304) at 20 µM after 72 h of exposure. The structures of three compounds are presented with their respective molecular mass (Mw). Two control compounds (monepantel and moxidectin) at 20 µM, and no compound control (0.5% DMSO), were used as references to the non-wildtype (“coiled” for monepantel) and wild-type phenotypes, respectively. MPK18- and MPK334-treated xL3s exhibited a “coiled” phenotype, similar to xL3s exposed to that of monepantel. YAK304-treated xL3 showed a “curved” phenotype, which was distinct from all controls.
Figure 1. Three compounds identified to induce abnormal phenotypes in exsheathed third-stage larvae (xL3) of Haemonchus contortus in the primary screen. The representative single-frame images (25-times magnification) of short video (5 s) of xL3s captured in primary screen displaying non-wildtype phenotypes (“coiled” or “curved”) induced by each of the three hit compounds (MPK18, MPK334 and YAK304) at 20 µM after 72 h of exposure. The structures of three compounds are presented with their respective molecular mass (Mw). Two control compounds (monepantel and moxidectin) at 20 µM, and no compound control (0.5% DMSO), were used as references to the non-wildtype (“coiled” for monepantel) and wild-type phenotypes, respectively. MPK18- and MPK334-treated xL3s exhibited a “coiled” phenotype, similar to xL3s exposed to that of monepantel. YAK304-treated xL3 showed a “curved” phenotype, which was distinct from all controls.
Molecules 26 02819 g001
Molecules 26 02819 g002 550
Figure 2. In vitro-activity of three active compounds against exsheathed third-stage larvae (xL3) of Haemonchus contortus. Dose-response curves of the individual compounds (MPK18, MPK334 and YAK308) and two control compounds (monepantel and moxidectin) assessing the inhibition of xL3-motility at 72 h (panel A) and larval development over seven days (panel B). Data points represent three independent experiments conducted in triplicates; the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
Figure 2. In vitro-activity of three active compounds against exsheathed third-stage larvae (xL3) of Haemonchus contortus. Dose-response curves of the individual compounds (MPK18, MPK334 and YAK308) and two control compounds (monepantel and moxidectin) assessing the inhibition of xL3-motility at 72 h (panel A) and larval development over seven days (panel B). Data points represent three independent experiments conducted in triplicates; the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
Molecules 26 02819 g002
Molecules 26 02819 g003 550
Figure 3. Micrographs of exsheathed third-stage larvae (xL3s) or fourth-stage larvae (L4s) of Haemonchus contortus exhibiting different phenotypes after exposure for 7 days to compounds (MPK18, MPK334 or YAK308) or negative control (DMSO). The representative larvae were imaged following the exposure to each of compounds at 100 µM over seven days. A section of each micrograph (blue dashed-box) under 20-times magnification (left panels) were viewed under a higher magnification (100-times magnification; right panels) for the detailed anterior region of individual larva. The L4s have a developed mouth (red arrow).
Figure 3. Micrographs of exsheathed third-stage larvae (xL3s) or fourth-stage larvae (L4s) of Haemonchus contortus exhibiting different phenotypes after exposure for 7 days to compounds (MPK18, MPK334 or YAK308) or negative control (DMSO). The representative larvae were imaged following the exposure to each of compounds at 100 µM over seven days. A section of each micrograph (blue dashed-box) under 20-times magnification (left panels) were viewed under a higher magnification (100-times magnification; right panels) for the detailed anterior region of individual larva. The L4s have a developed mouth (red arrow).
Molecules 26 02819 g003
Table
Table 1. In vitro-activities of three hit compounds (MPK18, MPK334 and YAK308) against exsheathed third-stage larvae (xL3) of Haemonchus contortus. Half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of each compound on the larval motility after 72 h incubation and the larval development into fourth-stage larvae (L4) after seven days are presented in reference to the values of two control compounds (monepantel and moxidectin) obtained in the same assay condition. Half cytotoxic concentration (CC50) values against HepG2 human hepatoma at 48 h are presented for five test and control compounds. The selectivity indices (SI) were calculated for five compounds based on their IC50 and CC50 values. The IC50 values presented are the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Three independent experiments were conducted in triplicates.
Table 1. In vitro-activities of three hit compounds (MPK18, MPK334 and YAK308) against exsheathed third-stage larvae (xL3) of Haemonchus contortus. Half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of each compound on the larval motility after 72 h incubation and the larval development into fourth-stage larvae (L4) after seven days are presented in reference to the values of two control compounds (monepantel and moxidectin) obtained in the same assay condition. Half cytotoxic concentration (CC50) values against HepG2 human hepatoma at 48 h are presented for five test and control compounds. The selectivity indices (SI) were calculated for five compounds based on their IC50 and CC50 values. The IC50 values presented are the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Three independent experiments were conducted in triplicates.
CompoundxL3 Motility
(72 h)
IC50 ± SEM (µM)		xL3 Motility
(72 h)
Inhibition (%)		L4 Development
(7 days)
IC50 ± SEM (µM)		HepG2 Cells
(48 h)
CC50 (µM)		SI
xL3 Motility/L4 Development
MPK1845.2 ± 4.630.0nd>100>1.0/nd
MPK33417.1 ± 4.274.212.3 ± 2.3>1005.8/8.1
YAK30852.7 ± 6.734.66.5 ± 1.6>100>1.0/16.1
Monepantel0.6 ± 0.190.30.4 ± 0.05>100166/250
Moxidectin0.8 ± 0.285.112.4 ± 0.1>100125/8.1
Not determined (nd).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Taki, A.C.; Jabbar, A.; Kurz, T.; Lungerich, B.; Ma, G.; Byrne, J.J.; Pflieger, M.; Asfaha, Y.; Fischer, F.; Chang, B.C.H.; et al. Three Small Molecule Entities (MPK18, MPK334 and YAK308) with Activity against Haemonchus contortus In Vitro. Molecules 2021, 26, 2819. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules26092819

AMA Style

Taki AC, Jabbar A, Kurz T, Lungerich B, Ma G, Byrne JJ, Pflieger M, Asfaha Y, Fischer F, Chang BCH, et al. Three Small Molecule Entities (MPK18, MPK334 and YAK308) with Activity against Haemonchus contortus In Vitro. Molecules. 2021; 26(9):2819. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules26092819

Chicago/Turabian Style

Taki, Aya C., Abdul Jabbar, Thomas Kurz, Beate Lungerich, Guangxu Ma, Joseph J. Byrne, Marc Pflieger, Yodita Asfaha, Fabian Fischer, Bill C. H. Chang, and et al. 2021. "Three Small Molecule Entities (MPK18, MPK334 and YAK308) with Activity against Haemonchus contortus In Vitro" Molecules 26, no. 9: 2819. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules26092819

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop