Next Article in Journal
Production and Characterization of Cross-Linked Aggregates of Geobacillus thermoleovorans CCR11 Thermoalkaliphilic Recombinant Lipase
Next Article in Special Issue
Novel Foaming-Agent Free Insulating Geopolymer Based on Industrial Fly Ash and Rice Husk
Previous Article in Journal
High-Resolution UPLC-MS Profiling of Anthocyanins and Flavonols of Red Cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata f. rubra DC.) Cultivated in Egypt and Evaluation of Their Biological Activity
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Redox, Hydrolysis and Dehydration Chemistry on the Structural and Magnetic Properties of Magnetoferritin Prepared in Variable Thermal Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Moisture Stability of Perovskite Solar Cells Processed in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide

Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 30 November 2021 / Revised: 9 December 2021 / Accepted: 12 December 2021 / Published: 14 December 2021

Abstract

:
Performance degradation under environmental conditions currently limits the practical utility of perovskite-based solar cells. The moisture stability of CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite films and solar cells was measured during exposure to three different levels of relative humidity. The films were crystallized at two different temperatures with and without simultaneous exposure to supercritical carbon dioxide. The film crystallinity, optical absorption, and device photoconversion efficiency was measured over time for three relative humidity levels and both crystallization methods. It was determined that film crystallization in supercritical CO2 resulted in significant improvement in moisture stability for films processed at 50 °C, but negligible improvement in stability for films processed at 100 °C.

1. Introduction

Perovskite-based solar cells have emerged as a potentially disruptive photovoltaic technology. Perovskite refers to the ABX3 crystal structure (usually A is organic ammonium such as methylammonium, B is a cation such as lead , and X is a halide such as chlorine, or mixed halides). Perovskites have been explored for application in light emitting diodes (LEDs) [1,2,3], low-power transistors [4,5,6], and highly efficient photodetectors [7,8,9]. Halide perovskite materials (inorganic, organic-inorganic) are of interest in the solar cell field due to their long charge carrier diffusion length, high light absorption coefficient, tunable bandgap, large extinction coefficient, relatively low material cost, solution-based processing, and excellent photoelectric conversion efficiency [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. These advantages make halide perovskites an ideal material in the field of photovoltaics and other optoelectronic devices. The power conversion efficiency (PCE) of perovskite is comparable with crystalline silicon solar cells and has increased from 3.8% in 2009 [20] to a certified record of 25.5% in 2019 [21].
The crystallinity of the perovskite thin film is paramount to achieve optimum device performance. High-quality crystalline perovskite films with large grains produce superior optoelectronic performance because of a lower recombination rate and longer carrier diffusion length. Post-deposition annealing is used to enable short-range interdiffusion of the perovskite precursor compounds on the substrate to facilitate conversion into photoactive perovskite crystals [22,23,24,25]. However, thermal annealing can produce impurities and intermediate phases at high temperatures, and is problematic when scaling to large device areas since temperature variations produce inhomogeneities in film crystallinity [26,27,28,29].
We recently introduced the use of supercritical fluids (SCF) for post-deposition annealing of perovskites [30,31,32]. Supercritical carbon dioxide was shown to be an anti-solvent to CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite and facilitated low-temperature crystallization by reducing the energy barrier for molecular diffusion. Supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2) has a low critical point (31.2 °C, 7.38 Mpa or 1070.4 psi), no surface tension, liquid-like density, gas-like viscosity, and diffusivity and negligible solubility to the perovskite films. Trace amounts (less than 2%) of organic co-solvents could be added to the scCO2 to modify the solubility and produce various film morphologies and crystal orientations [31]. We have also reported the photovoltaic performance of CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells where the photoactive layer was annealed in scCO2 at 50 °C and achieved a PCE of 17.22% [32].
Although the photovoltaic performance of PSCs is outstanding, its major challenge to commercialization remains the stability of the crystals [33,34] under environmental conditions. Poor stability of PSCs is primarily due to degradation of the perovskite crystals and can be caused by many factors such as exposure to atmospheric oxygen and humidity [35,36,37,38], high temperature [39], illumination [40,41], and ion migration [42,43]. However, degradation by humidity remains the dominant factor reducing the stability of the perovskite materials. Several approaches have been adopted to stabilize halide perovskites, including compositional tuning [44,45,46], low dimensional perovskites [47,48], additives [49,50], use of a surface blocking layer [41,51,52], and enhancing the grain size.
For hybrid organic-inorganic perovskites, instability is due to the organic component, where the CH3NH3PbI3 decomposes into a lead iodide (PbI2) and methylammonium iodide (CH3NH3I). CH3NH3I gives up a proton to water, forming H3O+ by breaking the bond between the A and B molecules of the ABX3 perovskite structure [53,54,55]. Frost et al. explained a possible water-facilitated decomposition path shown in Equations (1)–(4) [56]. Exposure of the perovskite to moisture results in the organic iodide forming HI acid, which dissolves in water. Trace amounts of water are adequate to deprotonate the organic component to cause degradation. In addition, the exposure of the film to trace amounts of H2O results in partial decomposition until the byproducts reach equilibrium.
CH 3 NH 3 Pb I 3 ( s )     CH 3 NH 3 I ( aq ) + Pb I 2 ( s )
CH 3 NH 3 I ( aq )     CH 3 NH 2 ( aq ) + HI ( aq )
4 HI ( aq ) + O 2     2 I 2 ( s ) + 2 H 2 O
2 HI ( aq )     H 2   +   I 2 ( s )
In our initial studies, we demonstrated that annealing CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite thin films at low temperature in scCO2 resulted in high-quality films and devices with corresponding high photovoltaic efficiencies. In this paper, we investigate the humidity degradation rate of films and photovoltaic devices processed in scCO2. The effect of three levels of relative humidity (RH) ( No exposure   ( < 5 %   RH ) , 40% RH, and 60% RH) on perovskite film optical absorption, crystallinity and resulting device photo conversion efficiency (PCE) was measured for films processed in scCO2 in comparison to films annealed without scCO2.

2. Methods

2.1. Device Fabrication

All film and device fabrication procedures were reported previously [32]. Fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) glass substrates (Ossila, TEC 15, Sheffield, UK) of size 25 mm by 25 mm were used. The substrate was cleaned as follows; ultrasonic bath in 2% Hellmanex solution, rinse with deionized water, ultrasonic bath in isopropanol for 15 min, ultrasonic bath in acetone for 15 min, rinse acetone and isopropanol, dry the isopropanol with dry air and plasma cleaned for 15 min.
The titanium dioxide (TiO2) blocking layer (bl-TiO2) was formed by spin coating 0.15 M titanium diisopropoxide dis(acetylacetonate) (Sigma-Aldrich, 75 wt% in isopropanol) in 1-butanol (anhydrous, Sigma-Aldrich, 99.8%) onto the FTO glass substrate at 700 rpm for 8 s, 1000 rpm for 10 s and 2000 rpm for 40 s, followed by drying at 125 °C for 5 min [32,57]. The mesoporous TiO_2 (mp-TiO2) layer was deposited on the bl-TiO2 by spin-coating a TiO2 colloidal solution containing 0.6 g of TiO2 paste (30NR-D, Greatcell Solar) diluted in 5 mL of anhydrous ethanol solution at 2000 rpm for 20 s, followed by annealing at 540 °C for 1 h. The substrate was further treated with 20 mM aqueous TiCl4 (>98%, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) solution at 90 °C for 10 min, cleaned with deionized water and then sintered at 500 °C for 30 min [32,57].
CH3NH3PbI3 was synthesized by mixing a 1:1:1 molar ratio of 2.385 g of methyl ammonium iodide (CH3NH3I) (98%, Sigma Aldrich), 6.915 g of lead (II) iodide (PbI2) (99.9985%, Alfa Aesar, Ward Hill, MA, USA), and 1.063 mL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (≥99.9%, anhydrous, Sigma Aldrich) in 9.484 mL of N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) (≥99.8%, anhydrous, Sigma Aldrich) and 0.3 mL of diethyl ether (≥99.8% anhydrous, Sigma Aldrich). The solution was stirred for 1 h at room temperature and filtered with 0.2 μm syringe filter (Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA). The solution was processed in an argon-filled glove box. The precursor solution was spin coated onto the substrate at 6000 rpm for 25 s. and 0.5 mL of diethyl ether was dripped onto the rotating surface 6 s into the spinning. For thermal annealed films, the substrate was placed on a hotplate at either 50 or 100 °C for 30 min. For scCO2 annealed films, the thin film was placed in a pressure vessel (Parr Instrument Pressure Reactor 4768) and a syringe pump (Teledyne ISCO Pump 260D) was used to pressurize the carbon dioxide at 1300 psi and 50 °C for 30 min. The substrates were then removed and blown with argon and dried in the glovebox [30,31,32].
A total of 65 µL of spiro-MeOTAD solution, which contained 72.3 mg spiro-MeOTAD (Sublimed, Ossila), 28.8 µL of 4-tert-butyl pyridine (Ossila), and 17.5 µL of lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (Li-TFSI) solution (520 mg Li-TSFI (Ossila) in 1 mL acetonitrile (Sigma–Aldrich, 99.8%) in 1 ml of chlorobenzene was spin-coated on the perovskite layer at 3000 rpm for 30 s [58,59]. Finally, the Silver (Ag) electrode was deposited using electron beam evaporation at a constant evaporation rate of 0.03 nm/s through a shadow mask resulting in an electrode thickness of approximately 100 nm. Home-made humidity chambers were used to expose the samples to the higher relative humidity levels (40 and 60%). For lower relative humidity (<5% RH), samples were placed in a dry desiccator kept in an argon filled glovebox.

2.2. Device Characterization

The crystallographic properties of the perovskite films were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements (PANalytical MPD X’pert Pro) using a Cu Kα (λ = 1.54 nm) radiation source that operated at 45 kV and 40 mA. The X-ray diffractograms were obtained at a scan rate of 0.01° s−1 for 2θ values between 10° and 60°. The surface coverage and grain size were obtained using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Hitachi SU-70 FE-SEM) at 20 kV, and analyzed using an ImageJ software package. Optical spectrometry (transmission, reflection, absorption) of the films was conducted using a spectral response measurement system (PerkinElmer Lambda 35 UV/VIS Spectrometer). The J-V curves were measured using a G2V optics small area Pico simulator at room temperature under AM 1.5 G illuminations (100 mW/cm2), and calibrated using a standard silicon solar cell device. An aperture mask of 0.09 cm2 was used to define the device area.

3. Results and Discussion

In our previous studies, we reported the effect of scCO2 annealing on the crystallinity and photovoltaic performance of perovskite devices [30,31,32]. The crystal structure was monitored using XRD and the diffraction peaks at 14.4°, 24.8°, 28.7°, and 32.2° correspond to the (110), (202), (220), and (310) planes of crystalline CH3NH3PbI3, respectively, with a tetragonal crystal structure [60,61,62,63]. The XRD pattern for PbI2 shows that, in general, thin film growth is oriented along the (001) direction at 12.73° irrespective of the spin parameters. This is typically due to the use of DMF, a less soluble, polar solvent containing electronegative oxygen atoms [64]. The presence of PbI2 typically indicates incomplete crystallization and/or degradation [65]. The effect of relative humidity on the CH3NH3PbI3 crystallinity was studied using XRD and UV-VIS.
Figure 1, part A, shows the normalized amplitude ratio of the dominant PbI2 peak at (001) versus that of CH3NH3PbI3 (110) over 25 days after thermal annealing alone at 50 °C. An increase in this ratio is used as a measure of film degradation. Negligible degradation was observed in samples kept in a low humidity environment due to less moisture interactions with the perovskite film. However, when the samples were exposed to a relative humidity of 40%, there is an exponential decay beginning on about day 15. Exposing the thin films to 60% RH also shows rapid exponential degradation but beginning on the first day of exposure. Therefore, we observe an extremely strong correlation between an increase in relative humidity with degradation of the perovskite film.
Figure 1, part B, shows the optical absorption spectra of the perovskite film annealed at 50 °C at three different days for each relative humidity level. The absorption data is presented over a range of wavelengths near the perovskite band edge to try to understand the impact of moisture exposure on band-to-band transitions. Moisture damage will result in a loss of crystallinity and corresponding band structure. We, therefore, focus our attention on the shape of the band edge rather than the absorption intensity since the latter includes other factors such as film thickness and surface roughness, which were not independently measured. The low humidity sample shows very little change over time. However, at 40% RH, the spectrum begins to change on day ten and shows very little band edge by day 25. At 60% RH, the band edge disappears immediately leading to a featureless absorption spectra and by day five, we see no absorption spectra response.
Figure 2, part A, shows the amplitude ratio of the PbI2 (001) peak to that of the CH3NH3PbI3 (110) peak versus time and at three different humidity levels for a sample annealed at 100 °C without scCO2. No degradation was observed for samples kept at low humidity. At 40%RH, no crystal degradation was observed until day 15, where the peak begins to increase slowly. At 60% RH, rapid, exponential degradation was observed beginning on day three. The slower degradation rate of films annealed at 100 °C compared to those annealed at 50 °C is likely due to the higher initial film quality and crystallinity in the films annealed at the higher temperature, as we reported previously.
Figure 2, part B, shows the optical absorption spectra of the perovskite film annealed at 100 °C without scCO2 at three different relative humidity levels. The absorption spectra for the dry sample remained unchanged after 25 days. At 40% RH, the absorption band edge is still clearly visible on day ten, but is significantly degraded by day 25. At 60% RH, the absorption band edge is almost entirely gone by day three and disappears entirely by day 5. This data confirms that traditional annealing at either 50 or 100 °C does not offer any significant protection against humidity degradation even though the films annealed at the higher temperature perform slightly better due to the superior initial crystallinity.
Figure 3, part A, is a plot of the relative peak amplitude versus time for the sample processed in scCO2 at 50 °C at three different humidity levels. Negligible degradation was observed at the low humidity level. At 40% RH, degradation begins on the 15th day and increases slowly. At 60% RH, rapid exponential degradation was observed beginning on the first day of exposure, indicating that film degradation began immediately at this higher humidity level. After day nine, the absorption ratio plateaus and then decreases. We attribute this behavior to the very high level of film degradation. That is, after day nine, the crystal structure has been severely compromised and the X-ray diffraction data has little value.
Figure 3, part B, shows the optical absorption spectra of perovskite films processed in scCO2 at 50 °C and at three different humidity levels. The absorption spectra for the dry samples remains unchanged through the 25th day. At 40% RH, the band edge begins to change by day ten and is not discernable by day 25. At 60% RH, the band edge disappears completely by day three with no visible structure in the absorption spectra.
Figure 4 compares the power conversion efficiency versus time for films thermally annealed at 50 °C with (B) and without (A) scCO2 at three different relative humidity levels. Multiple photovoltaic devices were produced from each sample using a pixelated shadow mask to deposit the silver contacts. PCE data was obtained from each device and the error bars presented in Figure 4 and Figure 5 represent the precision intervals of the data. On day one (no humidity exposure), the average PCE of devices where the perovskite layer was annealed with scCO2 was about twice that of devices where the perovskite layer was annealed without scCO2. Specifically, devices where the perovskite layer was annealed at 50 °C had a PCE of 6.29 ± 1.72%, 6.12 ± 1.77%, and 5.46 ± 0.87%. However, devices where the perovskite layer was annealed at the same temperature, but in scCO2, had a PCE of 14.27 ± 1.09%, 13.07 ± 0.90%, and 14.52 ± 1.32%, respectively. This shows that perovskite films annealed in the presence of scCO2 exhibit much better photovoltaic performance at these lower temperatures due to superior film quality.
When the devices are kept in a dry desiccator, the PCE remains relatively constant, as would be expected. Upon exposure to RH levels of 40 and 60%, both sets of devices show a decrease in PCE with time, but the devices annealed in scCO2 exhibit a slower rate of degradation. Thus, perovskite films annealed in the presence of scCO2 at low temperatures not only exhibit superior film quality (greater smoothness, larger grain) and higher crystallinity, but also higher photovoltaic efficiency and a slower degradation rate upon exposure to humidity compared to films thermally annealed in the absence of scCO2 [30,31,32].
Figure 5 compares the power conversion efficiency versus time of devices, where the perovskite layer was thermally annealed at 100 °C with and without scCO2 and at three different relative humidity levels. At this higher temperature, the initial PCE and degradation rate at each RH level was approximately the same for devices annealed in scCO2 and devices annealed without scCO2. Therefore, we see no significant benefit in using scCO2 for annealing perovskite films at higher temperatures.
Comparing the photoconversion efficiency data of Figure 4 and Figure 5 to the X-ray and optical absorption data of Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3 shows similar trends, but much different sensitivity. That is, the drop in observed device efficiency is consistent with the degradation in crystal structure and band structure, but is a much more sensitive indicator. For example, if we consider the films processed at 50 °C in supercritical CO2, the data of Figure 3, part A, at 40% RH shows the amplitude ratio increasing on day 14. However, the PCE data of Figure 4, part B, for devices constructed from these same films shows a sudden drop in PCE from 14% on day one to 9% on day two and down to 2% by day five. We conclude from this that device efficiency is a much more sensitive indicator of moisture degradation than either crystallographic or optical absorption measurements.

4. Conclusions

The influence of humidity on the rate of CH 3 NH 3 Pb I 3 perovskite film degradation was measured for films processed in supercritical CO2 at 50 and 100 °C in comparison to films annealed at the same temperatures but without supercritical CO2. The film quality over 25 days was measured for three different relative humidity levels using X-ray diffraction, optical absorption, and device photoconversion efficiency. For devices processed at 50 °C, it was determined that supercritical CO2 increases both the initial film quality as well as the resistance to humidity degradation and results in devices with higher photoconversion efficiency and a lower rate of performance degradation. For devices processed at 100 °C, no significant improvement in film quality, photoconversion efficiency or humidity resistance was observed for films processed in supercritical CO2.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.A. and G.T.; Methodology, G.A. and G.T.; Formal analysis, G.A. and G.T.; Investigation, G.A. and G.T.; Resources, G.T.; Data curation, G.A.; Writing—original draft preparation, G.A.; Writing—review and editing, G.T.; Supervision, G.T.; Project administration, G.T.; Funding acquisition, G.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from the VCU Innovation Gateway. The Nanomaterials Core Characterization Facility at VCU helped in all of the material characterizations.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds “perovskite films and devices” are available from the authors.

References

  1. Wong, A.; Lai, M.; Eaton, S.W.; Yu, Y.; Lin, E.; Dou, L.; Fu, A.; Yang, P. Growth and Anion Exchange Conversion of CH3NH3PbX3 Nanorod Arrays for Light-Emitting Diodes. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 5519–5524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Leyden, M.R.; Meng, L.; Jiang, Y.; Ono, L.K.; Qiu, L.; Juarez-Perez, E.J.; Qin, C.; Adachi, C.; Qi, Y. Methylammonium Lead Bromide Perovskite Light-Emitting Diodes by Chemical Vapor Deposition. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 3193–3198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Yuan, S.; Wang, Z.-K.; Zhuo, M.-P.; Tian, Q.-S.; Jin, Y.; Liao, L.-S. Self-Assembled High Quality CsPbBr3 Quantum Dot Films toward Highly Efficient Light-Emitting Diodes. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 9541–9548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Senanayak, S.P.; Yang, B.; Thomas, T.H.; Giesbrecht, N.; Huang, W.; Gann, E.; Nair, B.; Gödel, K.; Guha, S.; Moya, X.; et al. Understanding charge transport in lead iodide perovskite thin-film field-effect transistors. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1601935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Lin, Y.; Pattanasattayavong, P.; Anthopoulos, T.D. Metal-Halide Perovskite Transistors for Printed Electronics: Challenges and Opportunities. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1702838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Li, D.; Cheng, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, G.; Wu, H.; He, Q.; Huang, Y.; Duan, X. The Effect of Thermal Annealing on Charge Transport in Organolead Halide Perovskite Microplate Field-Effect Transistors. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1601959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hu, X.; Zhang, X.; Liang, L.; Bao, J.; Li, S.; Yang, W.; Xie, Y. High-Performance Flexible Broadband Photodetector Based on Organolead Halide Perovskite. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 7373–7380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lan, C.; Dong, R.; Zhou, Z.; Shu, L.; Li, D.; Yip, S.; Ho, J.C. Large-scale synthesis of freestanding layer-structured PbI2 and MAPbI3 nanosheets for high-performance photodetection. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1702759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ji, L.; Hsu, H.-Y.; Lee, J.C.; Bard, A.J.; Yu, E.T. High-Performance Photodetectors Based on Solution-Processed Epitaxial Grown Hybrid Halide Perovskites. Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 994–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Snaith, H.J. Perovskites: The Emergence of a New Era for Low-Cost, High-Efficiency Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 3623–3630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Stranks, S.D.; Eperon, G.E.; Grancini, G.; Menelaou, C.; Alcocer, M.J.P.; Leijtens, T.; Herz, L.M.; Petrozza, A.; Snaith, H.J. Electron-Hole Diffusion Lengths Exceeding 1 Micrometer in an Organometal Trihalide Perovskite Absorber. Science 2013, 342, 341–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. De Wolf, S.; Holovsky, J.; Moon, S.-J.; Löper, P.; Niesen, B.; Ledinsky, M.; Haug, F.-J.; Yum, J.-H.; Ballif, C. Organometallic Halide Perovskites: Sharp Optical Absorption Edge and Its Relation to Photovoltaic Performance. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 1035–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Unger, E.L.; Kegelmann, L.; Suchan, K.; Sörell, D.; Korte, L.; Albrecht, S. Correction: Roadmap and roadblocks for the band gap tunability of metal halide perovskites. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 15983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Sutton, R.J.; Eperon, G.E.; Miranda, L.; Parrott, E.S.; Kamino, B.A.; Patel, J.B.; Hörantner, M.T.; Johnston, M.B.; Haghighirad, A.A.; Moore, D.T.; et al. Bandgap-Tunable Cesium Lead Halide Perovskites with High Thermal Stability for Efficient Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1502458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shi, D.; Adinolfi, V.; Comin, R.; Yuan, M.; Alarousu, E.; Buin, A.; Chen, Y.; Hoogland, S.; Rothenberger, A.; Katsiev, K.; et al. Low trap-state density and long carrier diffusion in organolead trihalide perovskite single crystals. Science 2015, 347, 519–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Dong, Q.; Fang, Y.; Shao, Y.; Mulligan, P.; Qiu, J.; Cao, L.; Huang, J. Electron-hole diffusion lengths >175 μm in solution-grown CH3NH3PbI3 single crystals. Science 2015, 347, 967–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Chen, H.; Ye, F.; Tang, W.; He, J.; Yin, M.; Wang, Y.; Xie, F.; Bi, E.; Yang, X.; Grätzel, M.; et al. A solvent- and vacuum-free route to large-area perovskite films for efficient solar modules. Nature 2017, 550, 92–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, Z.; Dong, Q.; Liu, Y.; Bao, C.; Fang, Y.; Lin, Y.; Tang, S.; Wang, Q.; Xiao, X.; Bai, Y.; et al. Thin single crystal perovskite solar cells to harvest below-bandgap light absorption. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Ergen, O.; Gilbert, S.M.; Pham, T.; Turner, S.J.; Tan, M.T.Z.; Worsley, M.A.; Zettl, A. Graded bandgap perovskite solar cells. Nat. Mater. 2017, 16, 522–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kojima, A.; Teshima, K.; Shirai, Y.; Miyasaka, T. Organometal Halide Perovskites as Visible-Light Sensitizers for Photovoltaic Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6050–6051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Best Research-Cell Efficiency Chart. 2019. Available online: https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html (accessed on 11 December 2021).
  22. Xiao, Z.; Dong, Q.; Bi, C.; Shao, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Huang, J. Solvent Annealing of Perovskite-Induced Crystal Growth for Photovoltaic-Device Efficiency Enhancement. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 6503–6509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhang, W.; Pathak, S.; Sakai, N.; Stergiopoulos, T.; Nayak, P.K.; Noel, N.K.; Haghighirad, A.A.; Burlakov, V.M.; Dequilettes, D.W.; Sadhanala, A.; et al. Enhanced optoelectronic quality of perovskite thin films with hypophosphorous acid for planar heterojunction solar cells. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 10030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Wu, C.-G.; Chiang, C.-H.; Tseng, Z.-L.; Nazeeruddin, K.; Hagfeldt, A.; Grätzel, M. High efficiency stable inverted perovskite solar cells without current hysteresis. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 2725–2733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bi, C.; Wang, Q.; Shao, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Xiao, Z.; Huang, J. Non-wetting surface-driven high-aspect-ratio crystalline grain growth for efficient hybrid perovskite solar cells. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Eperon, G.E.; Burlakov, V.M.; Docampo, P.; Goriely, A.; Snaith, H.J. Morphological Control for High Performance, Solution-Processed Planar Heterojunction Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 24, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shi, S.; Li, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, H. Advancements in all-solid-state hybrid solar cells based on organometal halide perovskites. Mater. Horiz. 2015, 2, 378–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jiang, Y.; Wu, C.; Li, L.; Wang, K.; Tao, Z.; Gao, F.; Cheng, W.; Cheng, J.; Zhao, X.-Y.; Priya, S.; et al. All electrospray printed perovskite solar cells. Nano Energy 2018, 53, 440–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cao, Q.; Yang, S.; Gao, Q.; Lei, L.; Yu, Y.; Shao, J.; Liu, Y. Fast and Controllable Crystallization of Perovskite Films by Microwave Irradiation Process. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 7854–7861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Annohene, G.; Tepper, G.C. Low temperature formation of CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite films in supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2019, 154, 104604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Annohene, G.; Pascucci, J.; Pestov, D.; Tepper, G.C. Supercritical fluid-assisted crystallization of CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite films. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2020, 156, 104684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Annohene, G.; Tepper, G.C. Efficient perovskite solar cells processed in supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2021, 171, 105203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rong, Y.; Hu, Y.; Mei, A.; Tan, H.; Saidaminov, M.I.; Seok, S.I.; McGehee, M.D.; Sargent, E.H.; Han, H. Challenges for commercializing perovskite solar cells. Science 2018, 361, eaat8235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Kang, J.; Han, K.; Sun, X.; Zhang, L.; Huang, R.; Ismail, I.; Wang, Z.; Ding, C.; Zha, W.; Li, F.; et al. Suppression of Ag migration by low-temperature sol-gel zinc oxide in the Ag nanowires transparent electrode-based flexible perovskite solar cells. Org. Electron. 2020, 82, 105714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Song, Z.; Abate, A.; Watthage, S.C.; Liyanage, G.K.; Phillips, A.B.; Steiner, U.; Graetzel, M.; Heben, M.J. Perovskite Solar Cell Stability in Humid Air: Partially Reversible Phase Transitions in the PbI2-CH3 NH3I-H2O System. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1600846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yang, J.; Siempelkamp, B.D.; Liu, D.; Kelly, T.L. Investigation of CH3NH3PbI3 Degradation Rates and Mechanisms in Controlled Humidity Environments Using in Situ Techniques. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 1955–1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Bryant, D.; Aristidou, N.; Pont, S.; Sanchez-Molina, I.; Chotchunangatchaval, T.; Wheeler, S.; Durrant, J.R.; Haque, S.A. Light and oxygen induced degradation limits the operational stability of methylammonium lead triiodide perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 1655–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Yang, T.; Jeon, N.J.; Shin, H.; Shin, S.S.; Kim, Y.Y.; Seo, J. Achieving Long-Term Operational Stability of Perovskite Solar Cells with a Stabilized Efficiency Exceeding 20% after 1000 h. Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1900528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Conings, B.; Drijkoningen, J.; Gauquelin, N.; Babayigit, A.; D’Haen, J.; D’Olieslaeger, L.; Ethirajan, A.; Verbeeck, J.; Manca, J.; Mosconi, E.; et al. Intrinsic Thermal Instability of Methylammonium Lead Trihalide Perovskite. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1500477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Leijtens, T.; Eperon, G.; Pathak, S.; Abate, A.; Lee, M.M.; Snaith, H. Overcoming ultraviolet light instability of sensitized TiO2 with meso-superstructured organometal tri-halide perovskite solar cells. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shlenskaya, N.N.; Belich, N.A.; Grätzel, M.; Goodilin, E.A.; Tarasov, A.B. Light-induced reactivity of gold and hybrid perovskite as a new possible degradation mechanism in perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 1780–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhou, Y.; Yin, Y.; Zuo, X.; Wang, L.; Li, T.-D.; Zhou, Y.; Padture, N.P.; Yang, Z.; Guo, Y.; Xue, Y.; et al. Enhancing Chemical Stability and Suppressing Ion Migration in CH3NH3PbI3 Perovskite Solar Cells via Direct Backbone Attachment of Polyesters on Grain Boundaries. Chem. Mater. 2020, 32, 5104–5117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tan, S.; Yavuz, I.; De Marco, N.; Huang, T.; Lee, S.; Choi, C.S.; Wang, M.; Nuryyeva, S.; Wang, R.; Zhao, Y.; et al. Steric Impediment of Ion Migration Contributes to Improved Operational Stability of Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1906995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Noh, J.H.; Im, S.H.; Heo, J.H.; Mandal, T.N.; Seok, S.I. Chemical Management for Colorful, Efficient, and Stable Inorganic–Organic Hybrid Nanostructured Solar Cells. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 1764–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Li, Z.; Yang, M.; Park, J.-S.; Wei, S.-H.; Berry, J.J.; Zhu, K. Stabilizing Perovskite Structures by Tuning Tolerance Factor: Formation of Formamidinium and Cesium Lead Iodide Solid-State Alloys. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 284–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Saliba, M.; Matsui, T.; Seo, J.-Y.; Domanski, K.; Correa-Baena, J.-P.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Tress, W.; Abate, A.; Hagfeldt, A.; et al. Cesium-containing triple cation perovskite solar cells: Improved stability, reproducibility and high efficiency. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 1989–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Mao, L.; Stoumpos, C.; Kanatzidis, M.G. Two-Dimensional Hybrid Halide Perovskites: Principles and Promises. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 1171–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Yan, J.; Qiu, W.; Wu, G.; Heremans, P.; Chen, H. Recent progress in 2D/quasi-2D layered metal halide perovskites for solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 11063–11077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, Y.; Shi, J.; Zheng, J.; Bing, J.; Yuan, J.; Cho, Y.; Tang, S.; Zhang, M.; Yao, Y.; Lau, C.F.J.; et al. Acetic Acid Assisted Crystallization Strategy for High Efficiency and Long-Term Stable Perovskite Solar Cell. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 1903368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Han, T.-H.; Lee, J.-W.; Choi, C.; Tan, S.; Lee, C.; Zhao, Y.; Dai, Z.; De Marco, N.; Lee, S.-J.; Bae, S.-H.; et al. Perovskite-polymer composite cross-linker approach for highly-stable and efficient perovskite solar cells. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Ito, S.; Tanaka, S.; Manabe, K.; Nishino, H. Effects of Surface Blocking Layer of Sb2S3 on Nanocrystalline TiO2 for CH3NH3PbI3 Perovskite Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 16995–17000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Arora, N.; Dar, M.I.; Hinderhofer, A.; Pellet, N.; Schreiber, F.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Grätzel, M. Perovskite solar cells with CuSCN hole extraction layers yield stabilized efficiencies greater than 20%. Science 2017, 358, 768–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Aftab, A.; Ahmad, I. A review of stability and progress in tin halide perovskite solar cell. Sol. Energy 2021, 216, 26–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rao, M.K.; Sangeetha, D.; Selvakumar, M.; Sudhakar, Y.; Mahesha, M. Review on persistent challenges of perovskite solar cells’ stability. Sol. Energy 2021, 218, 469–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jeevaraj, M.; Sudhahar, S.; Kumar, M.K. Evolution of stability enhancement in organo-metallic halide perovskite photovoltaics-a review. Mater. Today Commun. 2021, 27, 102159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Frost, J.M.; Butler, K.T.; Brivio, F.; Hendon, C.H.; van Schilfgaarde, M.; Walsh, A. Atomistic Origins of High-Performance in Hybrid Halide Perovskite Solar Cells. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 2584–2590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Ahn, N.; Son, D.-Y.; Jang, I.-H.; Kang, S.M.; Choi, M.; Park, N.-G. Highly Reproducible Perovskite Solar Cells with Average Efficiency of 18.3% and Best Efficiency of 19.7% Fabricated via Lewis Base Adduct of Lead(II) Iodide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 8696–8699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Burschka, J.; Pellet, N.; Moon, S.-J.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Gao, P.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Grätzel, M. Sequential deposition as a route to high-performance perovskite-sensitized solar cells. Nature 2013, 499, 316–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Im, J.-H.; Jang, I.-H.; Pellet, N.; Grätzel, M.; Park, N.-G. Growth of CH3NH3PbI3 cuboids with controlled size for high-efficiency perovskite solar cells. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 927–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Luo, J.; Qiu, R.Z.; Yang, Z.S.; Wang, Y.X.; Zhang, Q.F. Mechanism and effect of γ-butyrolactone solvent vapor post-annealing on the performance of a mesoporous perovskite solar cell. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 724–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Oku, T. Crystal Structures of CH3NH3PbI3 and Related Perovskite Compounds Used for Solar Cells. In Solar Cells—New Approaches and Reviews; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2015; pp. 78–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Chen, Q.; Zhou, H.; Hong, Z.; Luo, S.; Duan, H.-S.; Wang, H.-H.; Liu, Y.; Li, G.; Yang, Y. Planar Heterojunction Perovskite Solar Cells via Vapor-Assisted Solution Process. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 136, 622–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Yang, G.; Wang, C.; Lei, H.; Zheng, X.; Qin, P.; Xiong, L.; Zhao, X.; Yan, Y.; Fang, G. Interface engineering in planar perovskite solar cells: Energy level alignment, perovskite morphology control and high performance achievement. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 5, 1658–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Acuña, D.; Krishnan, B.; Shaji, S.; Sepúlveda, S.; Menchaca, J.L. Growth and properties of lead iodide thin films by spin coating. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2016, 39, 1453–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Shen, D.; Yu, X.; Cai, X.; Peng, M.; Ma, Y.; Su, X.; Xiao, L.; Zou, D. Understanding the solvent-assisted crystallization mechanism inherent in efficient organic–inorganic halide perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 20454–20461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A)Amplitude ratio of relative intensity of the (001) and (110) planes of CH3NH3PbI3 of films thermally annealed at 50 °C without scCO2. (B) Optical absorption spectra of the film at different humidity parameters corresponding to (A).
Figure 1. (A)Amplitude ratio of relative intensity of the (001) and (110) planes of CH3NH3PbI3 of films thermally annealed at 50 °C without scCO2. (B) Optical absorption spectra of the film at different humidity parameters corresponding to (A).
Molecules 26 07570 g001
Figure 2. (A) Amplitude ratio of relative intensity of the (001) and (110) planes of CH3NH3PbI3 of films thermally annealed at 100 °C without scCO2 (B) Optical absorption spectra of the film at different humidity parameters corresponding to (A).
Figure 2. (A) Amplitude ratio of relative intensity of the (001) and (110) planes of CH3NH3PbI3 of films thermally annealed at 100 °C without scCO2 (B) Optical absorption spectra of the film at different humidity parameters corresponding to (A).
Molecules 26 07570 g002
Figure 3. (A) Amplitude ratio of relative intensity of the (001) and (110) planes of CH3NH3PbI3 of films annealing at 50 °C in scCO2. (B) Optical absorption spectra of the film at different humidity parameters corresponding to (A).
Figure 3. (A) Amplitude ratio of relative intensity of the (001) and (110) planes of CH3NH3PbI3 of films annealing at 50 °C in scCO2. (B) Optical absorption spectra of the film at different humidity parameters corresponding to (A).
Molecules 26 07570 g003
Figure 4. PCE versus time for perovskite films (A) annealed at 50 °C without scCO2 and (B) annealed at 50 °C in scCO2.
Figure 4. PCE versus time for perovskite films (A) annealed at 50 °C without scCO2 and (B) annealed at 50 °C in scCO2.
Molecules 26 07570 g004
Figure 5. PCE degradation rate of perovskite films after annealing (A) at 100 °C without scCO2 and (B) at 100 °C with scCO2.
Figure 5. PCE degradation rate of perovskite films after annealing (A) at 100 °C without scCO2 and (B) at 100 °C with scCO2.
Molecules 26 07570 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Annohene, G.; Tepper, G. Moisture Stability of Perovskite Solar Cells Processed in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. Molecules 2021, 26, 7570. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules26247570

AMA Style

Annohene G, Tepper G. Moisture Stability of Perovskite Solar Cells Processed in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. Molecules. 2021; 26(24):7570. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules26247570

Chicago/Turabian Style

Annohene, Gilbert, and Gary Tepper. 2021. "Moisture Stability of Perovskite Solar Cells Processed in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide" Molecules 26, no. 24: 7570. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules26247570

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop