Degradation of 5-Dialkylamino-Substituted Chlorsulfuron Derivatives in Alkaline Soil
1
State Key Laboratory of Elemento-Organic Chemistry, College of Chemistry, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
2
Syngenta Jealott’s Hill International Research Centre, Bracknell, Berkshire RG42 6EY, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(5), 1486; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules27051486
Submission received: 23 December 2021
/
Revised: 9 February 2022
/
Accepted: 9 February 2022
/
Published: 23 February 2022
Abstract
:Sulfonylurea herbicides are widely used as acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitors due to their super-efficient activity. However, some sulfonylurea herbicides show toxicity under crop rotation due to their long degradation time, for example, chlorsulfuron. Our research goal is to obtain chlorsulfuron-derived herbicides with controllable degradation time, good crop safety and high herbicidal activities. Based on our previously reported results in acidic soil, we studied the degradation behaviors of 5-dialkylamino-substituted chlorsulfuron derivatives (NL101–NL108) in alkaline soil (pH 8.39). The experimental data indicate that addition of the 5-dialkylamino groups on the benzene ring of chlorsulfuron greatly accelerated degradation in alkaline soil. These chlorsulfuron derivatives degrade 10.8 to 51.8 times faster than chlorsulfuron and exhibit excellent crop safety on wheat and corn (through pre-emergence treatment). With a comprehensive consideration of structures, bioassay activities, soil degradation and crop safety, it could be concluded that 5-dialkylamino-substituted chlorsulfuron derivatives are potential green sulfonylurea herbicides for pre-emergence treatment on both wheat and corn. The study also provides valuable information for the discovery of new sulfonylurea herbicides for crop rotation.
1. Introduction
Sulfonylureas were found to have super herbicidal activities in 1987 and have been used worldwide due to their high activity and low toxicity to mammals [1]. They are acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitors and can block the first reaction in the pathway of branched-chain amino acid biosynthesis in weeds [2].
In order to meet the large demand of food for the growing population, crop rotation mode has been implemented in some countries, including China [3]. For example, the wheat–corn rotation mode is widely used in northern China. However, different sulfonylurea herbicides show different toxicities on different crop varieties. Especially, the widely used chlorsulfuron exhibits good safety on wheat through pre-emergence treatment, but the residue in soil causes a certain degree of damage to the subsequent corn. The large-scale use of sulfonylurea herbicides has caused serious economic losses [3,4,5]; thus, in 2014, the Ministry of Agriculture of China suspended the field application of chlorsulfuron [6].
Previous studies have demonstrated that the soil degradation of sulfonylurea herbicides is pH dependent [7,8,9,10]. Fredrickson et al. reported that the DT50 (half-life of degradation) of chlorsulfuron was 12.5 weeks in soil with pH 8.0 and 1.9 weeks at pH 5.6 [8]. Thirunarayanan et al. reported that the DT50 of chlorsulfuron was 88.5 days in soil with pH 6.2 at 20 °C and 144 days at pH 8.1 [9]. Walker et al. also reported that the DT50 of chlorsulfuron was 22 days in soil with pH 5.6 and 124 days at pH 7.4 [10]. The results show a strong negative correlation between DT50 and pH [10]. In addition, sulfonylurea herbicides have a long residual period in alkaline soils.
From the point of view of “ecology-friendly pesticides”, the development of herbicides with controllable degradation is quite important.
In our previous study, we found that 5-substituents on the benzene ring of chlorsulfuron had a critical influence on their degradation rates in soils. In 2016, Li firstly concluded that electron-donating substituents accelerated the degradation, while the electron-withdrawing ones prolonged the degradation time in acidic soil [11,12]. In order to further study the substitute-degradation relationship, Ma and Li introduced various N-methylamido and dialkylamino substituents on the 5-position of the benzene ring in chlorsulfuron and studied the structure-DT50 relationship in soil with pH 5.52 [13].
The soil in most of northern China is alkaline (pH 7.5–8.5), and sulfonylureas degrade slowly and will cause harm to other subsequent crops [10]. In 2018, Li studied the degradation of dimethylamino- and diethylamino-substituted chlorsulfuron derivatives NL101 and NL106 in alkaline soil (pH 8.46) and showed that the degradation rate of NL101 and NL106 was nearly 15–30 times faster than that of chlorsulfuron, which was too fast for practical use [14].
It was found that most 5-dialkylamino-substituted chlorsulfuron derivatives maintained high herbicidal activities against both dicotyledons and monocotyledons through pre- and post-emergence treatment (Figure 1) [13]. However, their alkaline soil degradation and crop safety on wheat and corn have not been studied systematically.
In order to obtain sulfonylurea herbicides with good crop safety and a controllable degradation time for wheat–corn rotation in alkaline soil, 5-dialkylamino-substituted chlorsulfuron derivatives that maintain high herbicidal activities were selected and systematically studied under alkaline conditions.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Instruments and Materials
All reagents for high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) were chromatographic grade, reaction reagents were analytical grade and the water phase was double-distilled water. TU-1810 ultraviolet–visible spectrophotometer (Persee General Analysis Co., Beijing, China) was used to detect wavelength. HPLC data were obtained on a SHIMADZU LC-20AT (SHIMADZU Co., Kyoto, Japan), equipped with a binary pump (Shimadzu, LC-20AT), a UV–vis detector (Shimadzu, SPD-20A), an auto sampler (Shimadzu, SIL-20A), a Shimadzu shim-pack VP-ODS column (5 μm, 250 × 4.6 mm, C18 reversed phase chromatography) connected to a Shimadzu shim-pack GVP-ODS (10 × 4.6 mm) guard column, a column oven (Shimadzu, CTO-20AC) and a computer (model Dell) for carrying out the experimental data analysis. Column chromatography purification was carried out using silica gel (200–300 mesh). A SHZ-88 thermostatic oscillator (Jintan Medical Instrument Factory, Changzhou, China), Thermo Scientific Legend Mach 1.6 R centrifuge (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc, Waltham, MA USA) and SPX-150B-Z biochemical incubator (Boxun Industrial Co., Shanghai, China) were used in the degradation experiment.
2.2. Compounds NL101-NL108
The structure of 5-substituted chlorsulfuron compounds is shown in Figure 2.
2.3. Soil Degradation Assay
The methods for the analysis of soil degradation were reported in previous studies [13,14,15,16]. The detailed experimental procedure, including soil selection, HPLC conditions, the establishment of standard curve, measurement of the recovery rate and the cultivation of samples, can be found in the Supplementary Materials.
Soil degradation steps are briefly described here. Soil with pH 8.39 was selected from Cangzhou, Hebei Province, to develop degradation studies [15]. Additionally, the properties of tested alkaline soil are listed in Table 1. For the analysis of target compounds by HPLC, chromatographically pure methanol, acetonitrile and ultrapure water (pH 3.0) were used as the mobile phase. The standard curves were established at 20 °C with a concentration range between 200 and 0.025 ug·mL−1. In addition, the retention time was no more than 20 min. The concentrations of the test compounds in the conical flask were 0.5, 2 and 5 mg·kg−1 (in acetonitrile) for 20 g of soil. Each concentration of sample was repeated 5 times. The recovery rates remained between 70 and 110% with a coefficient of variation less than 5%. For cultivation of samples, 3.5 mL of water was added to adjust 60% of the holding capacity of the sample. The concentration of each sample was 5 mg·kg−1 in soil and the samples were cultivated in the dark with 80% humidity at 25 ± 1 °C by a biochemical incubator. Soil samples of three replicates were collected at six different times. Finally, DT50 values were calculated according to the formula: DT50 = ln2/k. The analytical data for alkaline soil degradation are listed in Table 2 and Table 3.
The analytical data for verification of recovery rates in various concentrations are listed in Table 2.
2.4. Crop Safety Assay
Chlorsulfuron is a crop-selective sulfonylurea herbicide for wheat fields, but its soil residue seriously affects the growth of seedlings to the subsequent crops. We selected corn as the subsequently planted crop after wheat and studied the safety of synthesized compounds on wheat (Xinong 529) and corn (Xindan 66). The culture method was consistent with previous reports [13,16].
Methods of plant cultivation: Artificially mixed soil (loam, vermiculite and fertilizer soil (v/v/v = 1:1:1)) was packed into paper cups (250 mL) with a diameter of 7.0 cm. The crop seeds (0.6 cm deep) were planted in the mixed soil. The cups were covered with plastic wrap to keep them moist until the plants sprouted, and plants were grown at 25 ± 1 °C in the green house. Plants were watered regularly to ensure the normal growth of the crops.
Wheat safety assay: The wheat was tested with the target compound through pre- and post-emergence treatment via pot trials at the concentration of 30 and 60 g·ha−1. The fresh weight of the cover crops was measured after 22 days for pre-emergence treatment. For post-emergence treatment, the safety assay began when the wheat grew to the 4-leaf stage. After spraying the compounds, the fresh weight of the cover crops was measured after 28 days for post-emergence treatment.
In the case of corn, the detailed crop safety assay was consistent with wheat. The fresh weight of the cover crops was measured after 16 days for pre-emergence treatment. For post-emergence treatment, the safety assay began when the wheat grew to the 3-leaf stage. After spraying the compounds, the fresh weight of the cover crops was measured after 23 days for post-emergence treatment.
The fresh weight of the cover crops was measured after several days, and the inhibition rates of fresh weight were used to represent the safety of crops. The data were analyzed through Duncan multiple comparison by SPSS 22.0.
3. Results
3.1. Soil Degradation Results
The degradation of compounds was firstly examined in alkaline soil (pH 8.39) with chlorsulfuron as the control. The degradation curves of the first-order kinetic equation of tested compounds were established according to the data from six samplings. The DT50 of the test compounds was calculated, as shown in Table 3.
As shown in Table 3, the degradation data from alkaline soil (pH 8.39) indicate that the DT50 of NL101–NL108 was reduced to 3.03–14.6 days, while the DT50 of chlorsulfuron was 158 days (Figure 4).
The degradation time of NL101–NL108 was 10.8–51.8 times faster than that of chlorsulfuron. The DT50 of NL101 was 3.03 days, which was 51.8 times faster than that of chlorsulfuron. For the other compounds, DT50 of NL102 was 5.66 days (27.9 times faster), DT50 of NL103 was 7.74 days (20.4 times faster), DT50 of NL104 was 14.6 days (10.8 times faster), DT50 of NL105 was 6.38 days (24.8 times faster), DT50 of NL106 was 6.39 days (24.7 times faster), DT50 of NL107 was 8.20 days (19.3 times faster) and DT50 of NL108 was 13.6 days (11.6 times faster).
3.2. Crop Safety Results
As the data show, the crop safety was screened through pot experiments at 30 and 60 g·ha−1 with chlorsulfuron as the control. The inhibition rates of NL102, NL103, NL104 and NL106, presented in Table 4 and Table 5, indicate that these compounds were safe on wheat and corn through pre-emergence treatment.
4. Discussion
4.1. Soil Degradation Rates
In 1995, DuPont reported that flupyrsulfuron-methyl (DPX-KR-459) could accelerate degradation in alkaline soils [17]. Flupyrsulfuron-methyl degraded rapidly at 25 °C in pH 5–9 with a DT50 of 0.42–44 days [18]. Subsequently, iodosulfuron-methyl and foramsulfuron were also reported to exhibit faster degradation [19,20,21]. Tang et al. reported that the DT50 of iodosulfuron-methyl was 15.6 days in soil with pH 7.29 at 25 °C and 25.1 days at pH 9.42 [20]. Wu et al. reported that DT50 of foramsulfuron was 10.8 days in soil with pH 5.29 at 25 °C and 31.5 days at pH 7.86 [21]. Compared with chlorsulfuron, which has a longer degradation time, these sulfonylurea herbicides containing 5th substituents on the benzene ring exhibit faster degradation rates.
Chlorsulfuron degraded slowly in alkaline soil. Fredrickson et al. reported that the DT50 of chlorsulfuron in silty clay loam was 10 weeks at pH 7.5 and 12.5 weeks at pH 8.0 [8]. Thirunarayanan et al. reported that the DT50 of chlorsulfuron was 144 days in soil with pH 8.1 at 20 °C [9].
In this research, the degradation of NL101–NL108 in alkaline soil was 10.8–51.8 times faster than that of chlorsulfuron. For 5-dialkylamino-substituted chlorsulfuron derivatives, any changes on the amino moiety will affect their soil degradation rates. For symmetric saturated alkane-substituted compounds, the DT50 of NL101, NL106 and NL107 was 3.03, 6.39 and 8.20 days, respectively. It seemed that the degradation half-life of the target compounds increases as the number of carbon atoms on the nitrogen atom increases. Additionally, the DT50 of the target compounds increased as the volume of 5-dialkylamino groups on the benzene ring of chlorsulfuron increased (e.g., DT50 of NL101, NL102, NL106, NL107 and NL108 was 3.03, 5.66, 6.39, 8.20 and 13.6 days, respectively). NL102, NL103 and NL106 contained the same number of carbon atoms bonded to the nitrogen atom, while the DT50 of NL103 (7.74 days) was more than that of NL102 (5.66 days) and NL106 (6.39 days). It was speculated that saturated substituted structures might degrade faster than unsaturated substituted structures. Based on the alkaline soil degradation results, we could conclude that 5-dialkylamino-substituted chlorsulfuron derivatives could greatly accelerate the degradation in alkaline soil (with pH 8.39).
In 2020, Li reported that the DT50 of NL101-NL108 varied from 3.57 to 9.76 days in acidic soil (pH 5.52), which was 1.34–3.67 times faster than chlorsulfuron (13.1 days) [13].
A comparison of the degradation results of target compounds in acidic and alkaline soil is listed in Table 6.
Compared with the degradation rates in acidic soil, we found that 5-dialkylamino-substituted groups could greatly accelerate the degradation both in acidic and alkaline soil in comparison with chlorsulfuron. Moreover, the degradation speed in alkaline soil was faster than that in acidic soil.
4.2. Crop Safety
Chlorsulfuron is a popular sulfonylurea herbicide applied to wheat fields, but it causes a certain degree of damage to corn [22]. Iodosulfuron-methyl and foramsulfuron, kinds of sulfonylurea herbicides that contain 5th substituents on the benzene ring, are safe for the growth of crop seedlings in corn and grain fields [19,23,24]. It appears that 5th substituents on the benzene ring are potential herbicides to improve crop safety.
In 2018, Zhou reported that a dimethylamino-substituted chlorsulfuron derivative was less safe on wheat (Jima 22) but could improve safety on corn (Xindan 66) (Figure 5) [25].
In this research, 5-dialkylamino-substituted chlorsulfuron derivatives were tested for a crop safety assay on wheat and corn.
The inhibition rates of target compounds indicated that most compounds showed safety for wheat growth through pre-emergence treatment. At 30 g·ha−1, the inhibition rate of chlorsulfuron was 0%. For NL102, NL103 and NL104, the inhibition rates were 2.1, 4.5 and 0%, respectively. On the contrary, they exhibited poor safety for post-emergence treatment.
In the case of corn, it was noted that the inhibition rates were greatly reduced through pre-emergence treatment. For the pre-emergence treatment of corn, at 30 and 60 g·ha−1, the inhibition rates of chlorsulfuron were 32.6 and 61.5%, respectively. The inhibition rate of NL102 decreased from 32.6 and 61.5% to 0.4 and 5.6%, the inhibition rate of NL103 decreased to 0 and 8.7%, the inhibition rate of NL104 decreased to 0 and 0% and the inhibition rate of NL106 decreased to 0 and 4.7%, respectively. However, post-emergence treatment could seriously endanger the normal growth of the corn seedlings. It was speculated that 5-dialkylamino-substituted groups on the benzene ring could improve the crop safety of chlorsulfuron on corn through pre-emergence treatment.
Based on the above results, we believe that compounds such as NL102, NL103 and NL104 are potential green sulfonylurea herbicides for the pre-emergence treatment on wheat and corn.
5. Conclusions
Followed by our previously reported studies on herbicidal activities and acidic soil degradation, we systematically studied the degradation and crop safety of 5-dialkylamino-substituted chlorsulfuron derivatives in alkaline soil (pH 8.39) for the first time. We found that 5-dialkylamino-substituted groups on the benzene ring of chlorsulfuron could greatly accelerate the degradation both in acidic and alkaline soil in comparison with chlorsulfuron. Especially in alkaline soil, the degradation rate of the target compounds accelerated by 10.8–51.8 fold as compared with chlorsulfuron. Moreover, the DT50 of the target compounds increased as the number of carbon atoms bonded to the nitrogen atom increased. For crop safety, it was noted that 5-dialkylamino derivatives exhibited good crop safety through pre-emergence on wheat. Additionally, they could greatly improve the safety on corn compared with chlorsulfuron. We strongly believe that compounds such as NL104 are potential green sulfonylurea herbicides for the pre-emergence treatment on both wheat and corn and will exhibit advantages in rotation mode. It is a preliminary exploration in this new field. Further research will include the synthesis of new sulfonylurea derivatives and studies of their bioassay activities, controllable degradation and crop safety. We hope to find new sulfonylurea herbicides that can be used on a wider range of crops and in crop rotation mode.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online. Table S1. The herbicidal activity of 5-dialkylamino-substituted compounds against both dicotyledons and monocotyledons; Soil degradation assay.word; Crop safety assay.word; Herbicidal Activity of Compounds NL101-NL108.word; Report of soil analysis (in Chinese and English). pdf.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, L.W.; data curation, L.W.; formal analysis, L.W.; funding acquisition, Y.-C.G.; investigation, L.W., Y.-H.L. and Z.-M.L.; methodology, Y.-H.L. and F.-F.M.; project administration, S.Z. and Z.-M.L.; supervision, S.Z.; writing—original draft, L.W.; Writing—review & editing, Y.-C.G., S.Z. and Z.-M.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China, Nankai University (2021YFD1700103), and a Syngenta PhD Scholarship.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Material.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Sample Availability
Not applicable.
References
- Levitt, G. Discovery of the Sulfonylurea Herbicides. In Synthesis and Chemistry of Agrochemicals II; ACS: Washington, DC, USA, 1991; Volume 443, pp. 16–31. [Google Scholar]
- Brown, H.M.J. Mode of Action, Crop Selectivity, and Soil Relations of the Sulfonylurea Herbicides. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2010, 29, 263–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L. Analysis of China’s Grain Supply and Demand Balance. Master’s Thesis, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, China, 2009. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Qiu, J.; Tang, H.; Frolking, S.; Boles, S.; Qin, X. Mapping Single-, Double-, and Triple-Crop Agriculture in China at 0.5 × 0.5 by Combining County-Scale Census Data with a Remote Sensing-Derived Land Cover Map. Geocarto. Int. 2003, 18, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Q.; Xue, S.; Zhu, R.; Han, S.; Yang, C. Conservation Tillage Techniques for Two Crops within One Year in North China. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2007, 23, 32–39. [Google Scholar]
- Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China. Bulletin of the Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China; Ministry of Agriculture: Beijing, China, 2014; Announcement No. 2032.
- Anderson, R.L.; Barrett, M.R.J. Residual Phytotoxicity of Chlorsulfuron in Two Soils. J. Environ. Qual. 1985, 14, 111–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fredrickson, D.; Shea, P. Effect of Soil pH on Degradation, Movement, and Plant Uptake of Chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 1986, 34, 328–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thirunarayanan, K.; Zimdahl, R.; Smika, D. Chlorsulfuron Adsorption and Degradation in Soil. Weed Sci. 1985, 33, 558–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walker, A.; Cotterill, E.G.; Welch, S.J. Adsorption and Degradation of Chlorsulfuron and Metsulfuron-Methyl in Soils from Different Depths. Weed Res. 1989, 29, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hua, X.W.; Zhou, S.; Chen, M.G.; Wei, W.; Liu, M.; Lei, K.; Zhou, S.; Li, Y.H.; Wang, B.L.; Li, Z.M. Controllable Effect of Structural Modification of Sulfonylurea Herbicides on Soil Degradation. Chin. J. Chem. 2016, 34, 1135–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hua, X.W.; Chen, M.G.; Zhou, S.; Zhang, D.K.; Liu, M.; Zhou, S.; Liu, J.B.; Lei, K.; Song, H.B.; Li, Y.H.; et al. Research on Controllable Degradation of Sulfonylurea Herbicides. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 23038–23047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, F.F.; Wu, L.; Gu, Y.C.; Zhou, S.; Li, Y.H.; Chen, M.G.; Zhou, S.; Zhao, Y.Y.; Ma, Y.; Li, Z.M. Research on the Controllable Degradation of N-methylamido and Dialkylamino Substituted at the 5th Position of the Benzene Ring in Chlorsulfuron in Acidic Soil. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 17870–17880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, S.; Hua, X.W.; Wei, W.; Chen, M.G.; Gu, Y.C.; Zhou, S.; Song, H.B.; Li, Z.M. Research on Controllable Alkaline Soil Degradation of 5-Substituted Chlorsulfuron. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2018, 29, 945–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The Institute for the Control of Agrochemicals under the Ministry of Agriculture. Chinese National Standard GB/T 31270.1-2014; Test Guidelines on Environmental Safety Assessment for Chemical Pesticides—Part 1: Transformation in Soils. Ministry of Agriculture: Beijing, China, 2014.
- Zhou, S.; Meng, F.F.; Hua, X.W.; Li, Y.H.; Liu, B.; Wang, B.L.; Chen, J.; Chen, A.L.; Li, Z.M. Research on Controllable Degradation of Novel Sulfonylurea Herbicides in Acidic and Alkaline Soils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 3017–3025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Teaney, S.R.; Armstrong, L.; Bentley, K.; Cotterman, D.; Leep, D.; Liang, P.H.; Powley, C.; Summers, J.; Cranwell, S.; Lichtner, F. DPX-KE459—A New Sulfonylurea for Postemergence Grass and Broadleaf Weed Control in Cereals. In Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference–Weeds, Brighton, UK, 20–23 November 1995; Volume 1, pp. 49–56. [Google Scholar]
- Singles, S.K.; Dean, G.M.; Kirkpatrick, D.M.; Mayo, B.C.; Langford-Pollard, A.D.; Barefoot, A.C.; Bramble, F.Q. Fate and Behaviour of Flupyrsulfuron-Methyl in Soil and Aquatic Systems. Pest. Manag. Sci. 1999, 55, 288–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brigante, M.; Emmelin, C.; Previtera, L.; Baudot, R.; Chovelon, J.M. Abiotic Degradation of Iodosulfuron-Methyl-Ester in Aqueous Solution. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 5347–5352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tang, M.Z.; Guo, Z.Y.; Yuan, M.; Yang, R.B. Degradation Dynamics of Iodosulfuron-Methyl-Sodium in Soils. J. Agro-Environ. Sci. 2005, 24, 724–727. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, W.Z.; Kong, D.Y.; He, J.; Kong, X.J.; Shan, Z.J. Degradation of Foramsulfuron in the Simulated Environment. Environ. Chem. 2016, 35, 439–444. [Google Scholar]
- Rubin, B.; Casida, J.E. R-25788 Effects on Chlorsulfuron Injury and Acetohydroxyacid Synthase Activity. Weed Sci. 1985, 33, 462–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jovanovic, E.O.; Markovic, S.; Gavrilovic, Z.; Dakic, P. The Broadleaf Weeds in Corn of Crop on Area Southwestern Banat and Their Control. Banat. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 1, 52–55. [Google Scholar]
- Nurse, R.E.; Hamill, A.S.; Swanton, C.J.; Tardif, F.J.; Sikkema, P.H. Weed Control and Yield Response to Foramsulfuron in Corn. Weed Technol. 2007, 21, 453–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, S. The Research on Novel RyR Insecticides and Sulfonylurea Herbicides with Controllable Degradation. Ph.D. Thesis, Nankai University, Tianjin, China, 2018. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
Figure 1.
The herbicidal activity of 5-dialkylamino-substituted compounds against both dicotyledons and monocotyledons at 15 g·ha−1. (The full data can be found in Table S1).
Figure 1.
The herbicidal activity of 5-dialkylamino-substituted compounds against both dicotyledons and monocotyledons at 15 g·ha−1. (The full data can be found in Table S1).
Figure 2.
The Structure of 5-dialkylamino substituted compounds.
Figure 3.
The synthesis of 5-dialkylamino-substituted compounds. Reagents and conditions: (a) H2O, HCl, NaNO2→H2O, HCl, CuCl2, NaHSO3, −5 °C; (b) 28% NH3·H2O, THF, 0 °C→RT (room temperature), overnight; (c) Fe, HCl, C2H5OH, H2O, reflux; (d) DMF-DMA (N,N-dimethylformamide dimethyl acetal), CH2Cl2; (e) TFAA (trifluoroacetic anhydride), CH2Cl2, 0 °C; (f) ICH3, K2CO3, DMF, 50 °C; (g) Haloalkane, K2CO3, CH3CN, reflux; (h) Haloalkane, K2CO3, CH3CN, reflux; (i) 80% H2NNH2·H2O, C2H5OH; (j) 60% NaH, THF, 0 °C→RT; (k) DBU (1,8-Diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene), CH3CN.
Figure 3.
The synthesis of 5-dialkylamino-substituted compounds. Reagents and conditions: (a) H2O, HCl, NaNO2→H2O, HCl, CuCl2, NaHSO3, −5 °C; (b) 28% NH3·H2O, THF, 0 °C→RT (room temperature), overnight; (c) Fe, HCl, C2H5OH, H2O, reflux; (d) DMF-DMA (N,N-dimethylformamide dimethyl acetal), CH2Cl2; (e) TFAA (trifluoroacetic anhydride), CH2Cl2, 0 °C; (f) ICH3, K2CO3, DMF, 50 °C; (g) Haloalkane, K2CO3, CH3CN, reflux; (h) Haloalkane, K2CO3, CH3CN, reflux; (i) 80% H2NNH2·H2O, C2H5OH; (j) 60% NaH, THF, 0 °C→RT; (k) DBU (1,8-Diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene), CH3CN.
Figure 4.
Degradation curve of target compounds (alkaline soil, pH 8.39). (a–i): Chlorsulfuron, NL101-NL108.
Figure 4.
Degradation curve of target compounds (alkaline soil, pH 8.39). (a–i): Chlorsulfuron, NL101-NL108.
Figure 5.
Crop safety of NL101 on wheat (Jima 22) and corn (Xindan 66).
Table 1.
Analytical data of soils.
| Soils | Soil Texture | pH | Cation Exchange Capacity (cmol+·kg−1) | Organic Matter (g·kg−1) | Soil Separation (mm)/Mechanical Composition (%) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alkaline soils | loam | 8.39 | 7.30 | 19.4 | 1–2 | 0.5–1 | 0.025–0.5 | 0.05–0.02 | 0.02–0.002 | <0.002 | 0.25–0.05 | 2.0–0.05 | 0.05–0.002 |
| 0.795 | 2.46 | 2.33 | 7.90 | 28.6 | 28.2 | 29.7 | 35.3 | 36.5 | |||||
Table 2.
Analytical data on the recovery rates of three concentrations (in soil with pH 8.39).
| Compound | HPLC Analysis Condition (Wavelength, Flow Rate, Mobile Phase (v:v)) | Extraction Solvent (v:v) | Additive Concentration (mg·kg−1) | Average Recovery Rate (%) | Coefficient of Variation RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NL101 | 235 nm, 0.65 mL·min−1, CH3OH: H3PO4 (aq) (pH 3.0) = 60: 40 | CH3COCH3: CH2Cl2: THF: H3PO4 (aq) (pH 1.5) = 30: 10: 10: 10 | 5 | 82.42 | 2.39 |
| 2 | 72.52 | 1.94 | |||
| 0.5 | 73.51 | 1.41 | |||
| NL102 | 235 nm, 0.90 mL·min−1, CH3OH: H3PO4 (aq) (pH 3.0) = 78: 22 | CH3COCH3: CH2Cl2: H3PO4 (aq) (pH 1.5) = 40: 5: 5 | 5 | 86.87 | 1.27 |
| 2 | 84.24 | 2.34 | |||
| 0.5 | 81.43 | 2.89 | |||
| NL103 | 235 nm, 0.80 mL·min−1, CH3OH: H3PO4 (aq) (pH 3.0) = 75: 25 | CH3COCH3: CH2Cl2: H3PO4 (aq) (pH 1.5) = 40: 5: 5 | 5 | 88.74 | 0.74 |
| 2 | 87.24 | 0.83 | |||
| 0.5 | 97.58 | 2.05 | |||
| NL104 | 235 nm, 1.0 mL·min−1, CH3OH: H3PO4 (aq) (pH 3.0) = 77: 23 | CH3COCH3: CH2Cl2: H3PO4 (aq) (pH 1.5) = 40: 5: 5 | 5 | 81.41 | 2.46 |
| 2 | 89.43 | 1.93 | |||
| 0.5 | 86.03 | 2.08 | |||
| NL105 | 235 nm, 0.80 mL·min−1, CH3OH: H3PO4 (aq) (pH 3.0) = 78: 22 | CH3COCH3: CH2Cl2: H3PO4 (aq) (pH 1.5) = 40: 5: 5 | 5 | 95.94 | 0.71 |
| 2 | 99.87 | 1.14 | |||
| 0.5 | 105.60 | 1.19 | |||
| NL106 | 235 nm, 0.90 mL·min−1, CH3OH: H3PO4 (aq) (pH 3.0) = 77: 23 | CH3COCH3: CH2Cl2: H3PO4 (aq) (pH 1.5) = 40: 5: 5 | 5 | 82.55 | 1.39 |
| 2 | 85.47 | 2.19 | |||
| 0.5 | 89.19 | 2.84 | |||
| NL107 | 235 nm, 0.90 mL·min−1, CH3OH: H3PO4 (aq) (pH 3.0) = 80: 20 | CH3COCH3: CH2Cl2: H3PO4 (aq) (pH 1.5) = 40: 5: 5 | 5 | 95.07 | 1.32 |
| 2 | 90.97 | 1.31 | |||
| 0.5 | 92.90 | 1.19 | |||
| NL108 | 235 nm, 1.0 mL·min−1, CH3OH: H3PO4 (aq) (pH 3.0) = 82: 18 | CH3COCH3: CH2Cl2: H3PO4 (aq) (pH 1.5) = 40: 5: 5 | 5 | 91.53 | 0.88 |
| 2 | 91.39 | 0.89 | |||
| 0.5 | 96.42 | 1.63 | |||
| Chlorsulfuron | 235 nm, 0.70 mL·min−1, CH3OH: H3PO4 (aq) (pH 3.0) = 62: 38 | CH3COCH3: CH2Cl2: CH3OH: H3PO4 (aq) (pH 1.5): = 40: 5: 10: 10 | 5 | 73.54 | 1.09 |
| 2 | 73.53 | 2.40 | |||
| 0.5 | 81.09 | 1.16 |
Table 3.
Kinetic parameters for alkaline soil (pH 8.39) degradation.
| Compound | Kinetic Equations of Soil Degradation | Correlation Coefficient (R2) | DT50 (Days) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NL101 | Ct = 4.95e−0.229t | 0.969 | 3.03 |
| NL102 | Ct = 4.58e−0.123t | 0.990 | 5.66 |
| NL103 | Ct = 4.56e−0.0895t | 0.991 | 7.74 |
| NL104 | Ct = 3.88e−0.0476t | 0.994 | 14.6 |
| NL105 | Ct = 4.97e−0.109t | 0.999 | 6.38 |
| NL106 | Ct = 5.03e−0.108t | 0.973 | 6.39 |
| NL107 | Ct = 4.92e−0.0845t | 0.997 | 8.20 |
| NL108 | Ct = 5.10e−0.0509t | 0.991 | 13.6 |
| Chlorsulfuron | Ct = 4.30e−0.00440t | 0.990 | 158 |
Table 4.
Crop safety of target compounds on wheat.
| Compound | Concentration (g·ha−1) | Wheat (Xinong 529) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre. (22 Days after Treatment) | Post. (28 Days after Treatment) | |||||||||
| Fresh Weight g/10 Strains | Analysis of Variance a | Inhibition (%) | Fresh Weight g/10 Strains | Analysis of Variance a | Inhibition (%) | |||||
| 5% | 1% | 5% | 1% | |||||||
| 0 | 3.107 | ab | AB | - | 3.576 | a | A | - | ||
| Chlorsulfuron | 30 | 3.301 | ab | A | 0 | 3.323 | a | A | 7.1 | |
| 60 | 3.263 | ab | A | 0 | 2.152 | b | B | 39.8 | ||
| NL102 | 30 | 3.041 | ab | AB | 2.1 | 0.57 | def | CDE | 78.8 | |
| 60 | 2.952 | abc | AB | 5.0 | 0.463 | ef | DE | 87.0 | ||
| NL103 | 30 | 2.967 | ab | AB | 4.5 | 1.170 | cde | BCDE | 67.3 | |
| 60 | 2.786 | abc | ABC | 10.4 | 1.130 | cde | BCDE | 68.4 | ||
| NL104 | 30 | 3.357 | a | A | 0 | 1.700 | bc | BC | 52.5 | |
| 60 | 3.165 | ab | AB | 0 | 1.601 | bcd | BCD | 55.2 | ||
| NL106 | 30 | 2.095 | def | CD | 32.6 | 1.137 | cde | BCDE | 68.2 | |
| 60 | 2.025 | def | CD | 34.8 | 0.870 | cdef | CDE | 75.7 | ||
a Among the averages, the same letter indicates that there was no significant difference, and different letters indicate that there was a significant difference.
Table 5.
Crop safety of target compounds on corn.
| Compound | Concentration (g·ha−1) | Corn (Xindan 66) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre. (16 Days after Treatment) | Post. (23 Days after Treatment) | |||||||||
| Fresh Weight g/5 Strains | Analysis of Variance a | Inhibition (%) | Fresh Weight g/5 Strains | Analysis of Variance a | Inhibition (%) | |||||
| 5% | 1% | 5% | 1% | |||||||
| 0 | 11.599 | a | AB | 9.214 | a | A | - | |||
| Chlorsulfuron | 30 | 7.813 | b | BC | 32.6 | 5.928 | bc | BCD | 35.7 | |
| 60 | 4.463 | c | C | 61.5 | 4.771 | bcde | BCD | 48.2 | ||
| NL102 | 30 | 11.548 | a | AB | 0.4 | 5.146 | bcde | BCD | 44.1 | |
| 60 | 10.949 | ab | AB | 5.6 | 4.291 | cde | BCD | 53.4 | ||
| NL103 | 30 | 12.590 | a | A | 0 | 5.813 | bc | BCD | 36.9 | |
| 60 | 10.593 | ab | AB | 8.7 | 3.571 | de | CD | 61.2 | ||
| NL104 | 30 | 11.832 | a | AB | 0 | 6.517 | b | B | 29.3 | |
| 60 | 11.922 | a | AB | 0 | 5.620 | bcd | BCD | 39.0 | ||
| NL106 | 30 | 11.770 | a | AB | 0 | 5.915 | bc | BCD | 35.8 | |
| 60 | 11.058 | ab | AB | 4.7 | 5.428 | bcd | BCD | 41.1 | ||
a Among the averages, the same letter indicates that there was no significant difference, and different letters indicate that there was a significant difference.
Table 6.
Comparison of acidic and alkaline soil degradation results of target compounds.
| Compound | DT50 (days) | |
|---|---|---|
| Acidic Soil (pH = 5.52) | Alkaline Soil (pH = 8.39) | |
| NL101 | 3.57 | 3.03 |
| NL102 | 5.06 | 5.66 |
| NL103 | 5.78 | 7.74 |
| NL104 | 8.45 | 14.6 |
| NL105 | 9.00 | 6.38 |
| NL106 | 7.30 | 6.39 |
| NL107 | 9.76 | 8.20 |
| NL108 | 7.45 | 13.6 |
| Chlorsulfuron | 13.1 | 158 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Wu, L.; Gu, Y.-C.; Li, Y.-H.; Meng, F.-F.; Zhou, S.; Li, Z.-M. Degradation of 5-Dialkylamino-Substituted Chlorsulfuron Derivatives in Alkaline Soil. Molecules 2022, 27, 1486. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules27051486
AMA Style
Wu L, Gu Y-C, Li Y-H, Meng F-F, Zhou S, Li Z-M. Degradation of 5-Dialkylamino-Substituted Chlorsulfuron Derivatives in Alkaline Soil. Molecules. 2022; 27(5):1486. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules27051486
Chicago/Turabian StyleWu, Lei, Yu-Cheng Gu, Yong-Hong Li, Fan-Fei Meng, Sha Zhou, and Zheng-Ming Li. 2022. "Degradation of 5-Dialkylamino-Substituted Chlorsulfuron Derivatives in Alkaline Soil" Molecules 27, no. 5: 1486. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules27051486
