Next Article in Journal
The Design and Implementation of the ECOVIR Project: A Primary Health Care Surveillance System to Strengthen Co-Detection of Respiratory Viruses in Normandy
Previous Article in Journal
Studying miRNA–mRNA Interactions: An Optimized CLIP-Protocol for Endogenous Ago2-Protein
Previous Article in Special Issue
Predictive Analysis of Maxillary Canine Impaction through Sella Turcica Bridging, Ponticulus Posticus Calcification, and Lateral Incisor Anomalies: A Retrospective Observational Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Relationship between Posterior Permanent Dentition Pattern and Radiographic Changes of the Mandibular Condyle

1
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine, School of Dentistry, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin 4199-15315, Iran
2
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental Caries Prevention Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin 4199-15315, Iran
3
Student Research Committee, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin 4199-15315, Iran
4
Department of Orthodontics, Dental Caries Prevention Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin 4199-15315, Iran
5
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz 51666-14713, Iran
6
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University (University of Rome), 00161 Rome, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 27 September 2022 / Revised: 18 November 2022 / Accepted: 30 November 2022 / Published: 4 December 2022

Abstract

:
This study assessed the relationship between posterior permanent dentition and radiographic changes of the mandibular condyle. This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted on 300 panoramic radiographs of patients over 40 years of age (188 females and 112 males). Panoramic radiographs were evaluated for condylar changes such as flattening, subcortical sclerosis, subcortical cyst, erosion, osteophytes, and generalized sclerosis. Presence of muscle pain and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain and sounds, and history of TMJ trauma were also assessed. The occlusal scheme of posterior teeth was analyzed according to the Eichner’s index. The frequency of condylar changes was calculated in the right and left sides, and their association with posterior permanent dentition was analyzed by the Chi-square test (alpha = 0.05). The frequency of flattening, muscle pain, TMJ sounds, and erosion was 11.7%, 9.7%, 5.7%, and 3.7% in the right side, respectively. The frequency of flattening, muscle pain, erosion, and subcortical cyst was 12%, 9.3%, 5%, and 5% in the left side, respectively. The frequency of bilateral muscle pain, flattening, TMJ sounds, and TMJ pain was 18%, 16.7%, 11.7%, and 9.3%, respectively. Cases with TMJ trauma, generalized sclerosis, and osteophytes were few. According to the Eichner’s index, most patients with condylar changes had classes A and B, and a smaller percentage had class C. No significant difference was noted between healthy individuals and those with condylar changes regarding dentition patterns. No relationship existed between condylar changes and posterior permanent dentition pattern.

1. Introduction

The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is a diarthrosis, better defined as a ginglymoarthrodial joint [1]. It has high adaptation capacity in normal function and also in response to functional stimuli [2]. The TMJ undergoes significant developmental changes from infancy until skeletal maturity. These changes continuously occur since birth and during the eruption process of primary and permanent teeth until skeletal maturation. On the other hand, the bone remodeling process normally continues after skeletal maturation and termination of development. Consequently, the skeletal structure of the joints acceptably adapts to the functional needs [3].
The mandibular condyle is part of the mandibular bone that also participates in the structure of the TMJ. It also serves as an area for regional adaptive growth while preserving its cartilage [4,5]. The condylar shape is categorized into several groups of flat, angled, round, convex, and concave. The morphological changes of the condyle occur due to remodeling, diseases, trauma, hormonal disorders, and radiotherapy [6]. Genetic factors and age also play a role in the shape and size of the condyles [7]. Condylar remodeling is a physiological process aiming to enhance the adaptation of the TMJ structure to meet the functional needs. This process is based on the correlation between the mechanical loads applied to the TMJ and adaptive capabilities of the condyle. The primary remodeling changes appear to be progressive and start with thickening of the soft articular tissue. These changes mainly occur on the surface of the condyle, and the TMJ articular surface and disc often remain unchanged or experience small changes [8]. The condylar cartilage adaptive remodeling occurs through a biomolecular pathway which starts by chondrogenesis and is finalized by osteogenesis. In the process of condylar adaptation, external stimuli such as condylar repositioning activate chondrogenesis. Such stimuli induce the differentiation of mesenchymal cells present in the articular layer of cartilage to chondrocytes that proliferate and turn into hypertrophic cells. The regulatory growth factors that adjust and monitor the phenotypic conversion of chondrocytes in the process of chondrogenesis are upregulated during the adaptive remodeling process to facilitate the transition of chondrogenesis to osteogenesis. In this process, hypertrophic chondrocytes and matrices are degraded and replaced with bone. This transition is sustained by an increase in neovascularization, which attracts osteoblasts and leads to subsequent new bone formation beneath the degraded cartilage [9].
In hard articular tissue, the primary bone is gradually replaced with the secondary bone in response to changes in articular function. In some cases, bone remodeling occurs in the outer surface along with changes in the shape and dimensions of the joint (mainly in the condylar head), which is also detectable on radiographs [10,11]. Condylar changes can occur in the form of flattening, osteophytes, concavity, erosion, sclerosis, and subcortical cyst, and can be easily detected on panoramic radiographs [12] (Figure 1).
In such cases, since patients do not have any clinical symptoms, they do not seek any treatment. Additionally, the condyle has high potential for regeneration, which is helpful in orthodontic and surgical treatments.
A correlation has been documented between some clinical problems of the TMJ and radiographic findings [13]. Diagnostic imaging modalities for the TMJ include arthrography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and plain radiography. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a 3D imaging modality with high diagnostic value for evaluation of bony structures of the TMJ [14]. However, CBCT has shortcomings such as higher image noise, and higher patient radiation than conventional radiography. CBCT, with a large field of view, has a seven times higher patient radiation dose than panoramic radiography [15]. In general, conventional radiographic modalities are always considered as a safer and more appropriate diagnostic tool for initial evaluation of patients. CBCT can serve as a suitable secondary option when a conventional radiograph is not sufficient for precise assessment of the main concern [16]. Low patient radiation dose, TMJ imaging, observation of both condyles on one radiograph, and providing valuable information about all teeth and other parts of the jaw are among the advantages of panoramic radiography. It is also one of the most commonly used imaging techniques by dental clinicians [17,18]. However, it may cause condylar distortion [19].
Assessment of the correlation of radiographic changes of the condyle and the occlusal scheme is important to find the related factors and strategies to prevent or treat them. Accordingly, this study aimed to assess the relationship between posterior permanent dentition and radiographic changes of the condyle.

2. Materials and Methods

This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on panoramic radiographs of patients over 40 years of age presenting to an oral and maxillofacial radiology clinic. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences (IR.QUMS.REC.1399.189).
The sample size was calculated to be 240 panoramic radiographs according to a study by Nah [20] assuming alpha = 0.05, and d = 0.06. To increase the accuracy of the results, the sample size was increased to 300 radiographs. Panoramic radiographs obtained for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes not related to this study were selected by convenience sampling.
The inclusion criteria were panoramic radiographs of dentate patients with no history of orthodontic treatment, craniofacial deformities, complete oral rehabilitation, trauma, maxillofacial surgery, TMJ ankylosis, or polyarthritis. Additionally, complete clinical information of patients was available in their records. Poor-quality radiographs, and patients with a history of TMJ pathologies, generalized arthritis, or continuous use of steroids or anti-inflammatory drugs as mentioned in patient records were excluded.
After obtaining written informed consent from the patients, they were questioned about any problem or pain in mastication, pain in the periauricular area, articular sounds, and mouth opening limitation. The radiographs were evaluated by two oral and maxillofacial radiologists, and radiographic changes of the condyles were evaluated according to the following criteria:
Articular surface flattening: Flattening of the round superficial contour of the condyle (flattening of the convexity and concavity in the outer articular borders).
Subcortical sclerosis: Increased thickness of cortical plate in areas under loading compared with unloaded adjacent areas.
Subcortical cyst: Presence of a cavity (radiolucency) beneath the articular surface which does not follow the normal pattern of the brain.
Surface erosion: Absence of integrity in the articular cortex due to resorption of the cortical plate of the articular surface.
Osteophytes: Marginal hypertrophy along with sclerotic borders and formation of superficial exophytic bony lesions.
Generalized sclerosis: Absence of a specific trabecular direction and inability to differentiate between the cortical plate and trabecular bone that has progressed towards the condylar head.
Loose joint body: Presence of specific calcified structures incompatible with the structure of the disc or bony structures of the joint.
The frequency of different condylar changes and TMJ disorders, and the pattern of posterior dentition according to the index described by Eichner et al. [21], were determined and recorded based on panoramic radiographic observations (Table 1).
Data were analyzed by SPSS version 25. The correlation between condylar changes and TMJ disorders with different patterns of posterior dentition was analyzed by the Chi-square test. Level of significance was set at 0.05.

3. Results

A total of 300 panoramic radiographs of 112 males (37.7%) and 188 females (62.7%) were evaluated in this study. Table 2 presents the frequency of condylar changes detected on panoramic radiographs according to the Eichner’s index [21].
No significant difference was noted between male and female patients or different age groups regarding the frequency of radiographic changes of the condyle and pattern of posterior dentition according to the Eichner’s index (p > 0.05).

4. Discussion

The TMJ is a synovial joint with unique properties in responding to environmental stimuli, surgical procedures, and trauma from occlusion. This joint undergoes adaptive changes since birth which continue after complete skeletal maturity. In skeletal part of the joint, remodeling occurs by gradual replacement of the primary bone with secondary bone in response to changes in function of the joint [22]. Morphological changes of the TMJ often include flattening, Ely cyst, osteophytes, sclerosis, and erosion, which can be easily detected on panoramic radiographs [23]. Accordingly, this study aimed to assess the relationship between posterior permanent dentition and radiographic changes of the condyle. This study used panoramic radiographs of patients due to their easier availability and according to studies by Mathew et al. [23] and Nelke et al. [24].
The frequency of flattening, muscle pain, TMJ sounds, and erosion was 11.7%, 9.7%, 5.7%, and 3.7% in the right side, respectively. The frequency of flattening, muscle pain, erosion, and subcortical cyst was 12%, 9.3%, 5%, and 5% in the left side, respectively. The frequency of bilateral muscle pain, flattening, TMJ sounds, and TMJ pain was 18%, 16.7%, 11.7%, and 9.3%, respectively. Cases with TMJ trauma, generalized sclerosis, and osteophytes were few. In the present study, no significant difference was noted between male and female patients or different age groups regarding the frequency of skeletal changes of the condyle and pattern of posterior dentition according to the Eichner’s index (p > 0.05).
Görürgöz et al. [25] analyzed the relationship between the articular eminence inclination, height, and shape, and degenerative condylar changes using CBCT. They found significant correlations between gender and age with degenerative condylar changes, which was different from the present results, and may be due to differences in the type of radiographic modality used for the assessment of joint changes.
Merigue et al. [26] performed tomographic evaluation of the TMJ in patients with malocclusion. They investigated condylar concentricity and morphology, and their association with Angle’s class I and II malocclusions. They did not find any significant association between the groups and condylar characteristics.
In a previous study on the effect of parafunctional habits on the condyles, it was observed that all patients with parafunctional habits had dissimilar condyles. The design of the present study did not allow for this factor to be assessed [27].
In a study by Jalalian and Alaei [28], Ely cyst was reported in 0.5%, and flattening was noted in 49.5% of the patients. Additionally, the prevalence of erosion, osteophytes, and sclerosis was 16.2%, 10.1%, and 10.0%, respectively. Their results were somewhat in line with the present findings. Nah et al. [20] evaluated the CBCT scans of 440 TMJs of 220 patients and reported that changes in posterior position of the condyle in the sagittal plane (68%), sclerosis (30.2%), articular surface flattening (25.5%), articular osteophytes (8%), and subcortical cysts (5.5%) were the most common findings. They also showed that 27% of the joints had signs of skeletal remodeling changes of the condyle. Their observations were different from the present findings, which may be due to the use of CBCT. Dos Anjos Pontual et al. [29] used CBCT and reported that flattening and osteophytes were the most common changes. The same results were reported by Guler et al. [30] using magnetic resonance imaging. Alexiou et al. [7] used CBCT to assess age-related changes of the condyle and reported that erosion, flattening, and osteophytes were the most common radiographic findings. Campos et al. [31] used magnetic resonance imaging and reported that osteophytes and erosion were the most common radiographic findings. Additionally, Talaat et al. [32] reported that osteophytes and flattening of the condylar surface were the most common skeletal changes of the TMJ. Their results were somehow in line with the present results. High prevalence of flattening in their study may be due to the fact that flattening is a type of adaptive change [33]. It may be a primary change in response to a progressive disease [34], or a secondary degenerative change in response to internal derangements [35]. Additionally, flattening is a degenerative change due to excessive loading of the TMJ and may be related to involvement of the masseter and temporalis muscles [36,37]. On the other hand, osteophytes occur in advanced degenerative changes and when the condyle wants to adapt to articular changes. Osteophytes appear to stabilize and widen the surface to neutralize the effects of excessive loading on newly formed cartilaginous areas. Erosion is the primary phase of degenerative changes of bone, and its presence indicates that the TMJ is not stable, and the skeletal surface alterations would probably change the occlusion [37,38,39].
De Melo et al. [40] evaluated skeletal changes in symptomatic young patients and reported condylar hypoplasia in 23.52%, condylar erosion in 16.66%, and osteophytes in 8.82% of the patients. Variations in the prevalence rates of abnormal radiographic findings reported in the literature may be due to selection of different age ranges of patients, sample size, radiographic modalities, and interpretation of radiographs. Additionally, it should be noted that temporomandibular disorders and condylar changes are multifactorial, and a number of psychological factors including stress play a role in their development [41]. The possible correlation between psychological conditions and temporomandibular disorders should be investigated in future studies.
In the present study, the majority of patients showing condylar changes had Eichner’s classes A (3, 2 or 1 occlusal contacts in 4 supporting zones) and B (3, 2 or 1 supporting zones in anterior teeth), and a smaller percentage had class C (no supporting zone in the remaining teeth) [21]. However, no significant difference was noted in dentition patterns between healthy individuals and those with condylar changes in the right, left, or both sides. In the study by Jalalian and Alaei [28], mandibular condylar changes in group A had a lower frequency than groups B and C. They added that temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) had no significant effect on condylar remodeling changes, and occlusion and edentulism had no direct correlation with remodeling changes either, which were similar to the present findings. Hiltunen et al. [42] found no association between occlusal interferences and condylar changes, which was in line with the present findings. However, some other studies showed significant correlations between condylar remodeling changes and dentition status according to Eichner’s patterns [7,43,44,45,46].
The main limitation of this study was using panoramic radiographs instead of CBCT scans. Panoramic radiographs are routinely requested by dental clinicians and since the aim of this study was to assess the correlation of posterior permanent dentition and condylar changes, an adequate number of CBCT scans was required for each dentition group; however, eligible CBCT scans visualizing both condyles and different types of posterior dentition were hard to find. Since selection of an appropriate size of field of view is critical to eliminate unwanted exposure [47], many available CBCT scans do not image both condyles. The selection of panoramic radiographs of TMD patients and healthy controls from one single center was another limitation of this study, which limits the generalizability of the results. Additionally, due to the cross-sectional design of the study and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, recall of patients and their clinical examination could not be performed, which was another limitation. Future studies are required using more advanced modalities such as CBCT. Additionally, systematic reviews for assessment of the prevalence of condylar changes in TMD patients and healthy controls with different classes of malocclusion can provide valuable information.

5. Conclusions

Flattening and muscle pain had the highest frequency in our study population. No relationship was found between condylar changes and permanent posterior dentition pattern. According to the Eichner’s index, most patients with condylar changes had classes A and B. No significant difference was noted between male and female patients or different age groups regarding the frequency of skeletal changes of the condyle and pattern of posterior dentition according to the Eichner’s index.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.E. and M.T.; methodology, M.T. and H.R.; software, S.K.; validation, M.E., N.P., S.R. and R.R.; formal analysis, H.R.; investigation, M.T. and F.P.; resources, N.P.; data curation, S.R. and F.P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.E. and M.T.; writing—review and editing, S.K. and R.R.; visualization, L.T.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences (IR.QUMS.REC.1399.189).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Mojdeh Kalantar Motamedi for her assistance in writing this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bender, M.E.; Lipin, R.B.; Goudy, S.L. Development of the Pediatric Temporomandibular Joint. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. North Am. 2018, 30, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. White, S.C.; Pharoah, M.J. Oral radiology-E-Book: Principles and interpretation. In Elsevier Health Sciences; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lery, B.M. Emberiological Development of TMJ, 2nd ed.; Mobsy: St. Louis, MA, USA, 1974; pp. 235–240. [Google Scholar]
  4. Liu, Z.J.; King, G.J.; Herring, S.W. Alterations of morphology and microdensity in the condyle after mandibular osteodistraction in the rat. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2003, 61, 918–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rafferty, K.L.; Sun, Z.; Egbert, M.; Bakko, D.W.; Herring, S.W. Changes in growth and morphology of the condyle following mandibular distraction in minipigs: Overloading or underloading? Arch. Oral Biol. 2007, 52, 967–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Alomar, X.; Medrano, J.; Cabratosa, J.; Clavero, J.A.; Lorente, M.; Serra, I.; Monill, J.M.; Salvador, A. Anatomy of the temporomandibular joint. In Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  7. Alexiou, K.; Stamatakis, H.; Tsiklakis, K. Evaluation of the severity of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritic changes related to age using cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2009, 38, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Enlow, O.H. Handbook of Facial Growth, 2nd ed.WB. Saunders: Edinburgh, London, 1992; pp. 90–98,108–110,123–125. [Google Scholar]
  9. Shen, G.; Darendeliler, M.A. The Adaptive Remodeling of Condylar Cartilage— A Transition from Chondrogenesis to Osteogenesis. J. Dent. Res. 2005, 84, 691–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ćelić, R.; Jerolimov, V.; Filipović-Zore, I.; Knezović-Zlatarić, D. The Prevalence of Temporomandibular Disorders in a Non-Patient Population. Acta Stomatol. Croat. Int. J. Oral Sci. Dent. Med. 2001, 35, 319–325. [Google Scholar]
  11. Farsi, N.M.A. Symptoms and signs of temporomandibular disorders and oral parafunctions among Saudi children. J. Oral Rehabil. 2003, 30, 1200–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Metin, M.; Keskin, A.; Gven, O. Remodelling in young sheep: A histological study of experimentally produced defects in TMJ. Swiss Med. Wkly. 2003, 133, 2930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Arayasantiparb, R.; Mitrirattanakul, S.; Kunasarapun, P.; Chutimataewin, H.; Netnoparat, P.; Sae-Heng, W. Association of radiographic and clinical findings in patients with temporomandibular joints osseous alteration. Clin. Oral Investig. 2020, 24, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Derwich, M.; Mitus-Kenig, M.; Pawlowska, E. Morphology of the temporomandibular joints regarding the presence of osteoarthritic changes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Dief, S.; Veitz-Keenan, A.; Amintavakoli, N.; McGowan, R. A systematic review on incidental findings in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2019, 48, 20180396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. A Pette, G.; Norkin, F.J.; Ganeles, J.; Hardigan, P.; Lask, E.; Zfaz, S.; Parker, W. Incidental findings from a retrospective study of 318 cone beam computed tomography consultation reports. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2012, 27, 595–603. [Google Scholar]
  17. Magnusson, T.; Karlsson, C. Clinical impact of radiological examinations of patients with suspected temporomandibular disorders. Swed. Dent. J. 2002, 26, 67–74. [Google Scholar]
  18. Singh, B.; Kumar, N.R.; Balan, A.; Nishan, M.; Haris, P.S.; Jinisha, M.; Denny, C.D. Evaluation of Normal Morphology of Mandibular Condyle: A Radiographic Survey. J. Clin. Imaging Sci. 2020, 10, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mawani, F.; Lam, E.W.; Heo, G.; McKee, I.; Raboud, D.W.; Major, P.W. Condylar shape analysis using panoramic radiography units and conventional tomography. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endodontol. 2005, 99, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Nah, K.-S. Condylar bony changes in patients with temporomandibular disorders: A CBCT study. Imaging Sci. Dent. 2012, 42, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Eichner, K. Uber eine Gruppeneinteilung der Lunckengebisse fur die Prothetic. Dtsch. Zahnarztl. Z 1955, 10, 1831–1834. [Google Scholar]
  22. Paulsen, H.U. Morphological changes of the TMJ condyles of 100 patients treated with the Herbst appliance in the period of puberty to adulthood: A long-term radiographic study. Eur. J. Orthod. 1997, 19, 657–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mathew, A.L.; Sholapurkar, A.A.; Pai, K.M. Condylar Changes and Its Association with Age, TMD, and Dentition Status: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Dent. 2011, 2011, 413639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nelke, K.; Łuczak, K.; Janeczek, M.; Pasicka, E.; Barnaś, S.; Dobrzyński, M. What Features on Routine Panoramic Radiographs Could Help Orthodontists to Estimate the Occurrence of Condylar Hyperplasia from Other Mandibular Asymmetries—Retrospective Analysis Study. Symmetry 2022, 14, 1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Görürgöz, C.; Hakan, K.; Şeker, Ç.; Murat, İ.; Aksoys, S.; Orhan, K. Relationship between the Degenerative Changes in the Mandibular Condyle and Articular Eminence Inclination, Height, and Shape: A Cbct Study. Cumhur. Dent. J. 2022, 24, 403–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Merigue, L.F.; Conti, A.C.d.C.F.; Oltramari-Navarro, P.V.P.; Navarro, R.d.L.; Almeida, M.R.D. Tomographic evaluation of the temporomandibular joint in malocclusion subjects: Condylar morphology and position. Braz. Oral Res. 2016, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Tao, J.; Wu, J.; Zhang, X. Mandibular condylar morphology for bruxers with different grinding patterns. CRANIO® 2016, 34, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Jalalian, E.; Alaei, M.M. Evaluation of Radiographic Changes of Mandibular Condyle and its Relationship with Age, Joint Disorders and Eichner’s Model. J. Isf. Fac. Dent. 1398, 15, 365–375. [Google Scholar]
  29. dos Anjos Pontual, M.; Freire, J.; Barbosa, J.; Frazão, M.; dos Anjos Pontual, A.; Fonseca da Silveira, M. Evaluation of bone changes in the temporomandibular joint using cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2012, 41, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Güler, N.I.; Yatmaz, P.; Ataoglu, H.; Emlik, D.; Uckan, S. Temporomandibular internal derangement: Correlation of MRI findings with clinical symptoms of pain and joint sounds in patients with bruxing behaviour. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2003, 32, 304–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Campos, M.; Campos, P.; Cangussu, M.; Guimarães, R.; Line, S.R.P. Analysis of magnetic resonance imaging characteristics and pain in temporomandibular joints with and without degenerative changes of the condyle. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2008, 37, 529–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Talaat, W.; Al Bayatti, S.; Al Kawas, S. CBCT analysis of bony changes associated with temporomandibular disorders. CRANIO® 2016, 34, 88–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Palacios-Moreno, A.; Chilvarquer, I.; Luz, J. Radiographic findings, signs and symptoms in temporomandibular joint dysfunctions. Rev. Odontol. Univ. Paulo 1997, 11, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Katzberg, R.W. Temporomandibular joint imaging. Radiology 1989, 170, 297–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Kurita, H.; Ohtsuka, A.; Kobayashi, H.; Kurashina, K. Flattening of the articular eminence correlates with progressive internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2000, 29, 277–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Honda, K.; A Larheim, T.; Maruhashi, K.; Matsumoto, K.; Iwai, K. Osseous abnormalities of the mandibular condyle: Diagnostic reliability of cone beam computed tomography compared with helical computed tomography based on an autopsy material. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2006, 35, 152–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hussain, A.; Packota, G.; Major, P.; Flores-Mir, C. Role of different imaging modalities in assessment of temporomandibular joint erosions and osteophytes: A systematic review. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2008, 37, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Perrotti, G.; Baccaglione, G.; Clauser, T.; Scaini, R.; Grassi, R.; Testarelli, L.; Reda, R.; Testori, T.; Del Fabbro, M. Total Face Approach (TFA) 3D Cephalometry and Superimposition in Orthognathic Surgery: Evaluation of the Vertical Dimensions in a Consecutive Series. Methods Protoc. 2021, 18, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Alhammadi, M.; Al-Mashraqi, A.; Alnami, R.; Ashqar, N.; Alamir, O.; Halboub, E.; Reda, R.; Testarelli, L.; Patil, S. Accuracy and Reproducibility of Facial Measurements of Digital Photographs and Wrapped Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Photographs. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. De Melo, D.P.; Melo, S.L.S.; Oliveira, L.S.D.A.F.; de Moraes Ramos-Perez, F.M.; Campos, P.S.F. Evaluation of temporomandibular joint disk displacement and its correlation with pain and osseous abnormalities in symptomatic young patients with magnetic resonance imaging. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 2015, 119, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. List, T.; Wahlund, K.; Larsson, B. Psychosocial functioning and dental factors in adolescents with temporomandibular disorders: A case-control study. J. Orofac. Pain 2001, 15, 218–227. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Hiltunen, K.; Vehkalahti, M.M.; Peltola, J.S.; Ainamo, A. A 5-year follow-up of occlusal status and radiographic findings in mandibular condyles of the elderly. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2002, 15, 539–543. [Google Scholar]
  43. Nakai, M.; Abe, M.; Miyazaki, A.; Fujimiya, M.; Hiratsuka, H. Macroscopic and microscopic features of the mandibular condyle in autopsied elderly individuals. Clin. Anat. 2012, 27, 399–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kasimoglu, Y.; Tuna, E.B.; Rahimi, B.; Marşan, G.; Gencay, K. Condylar asymmetry in different occlusion types. CRANIO® 2014, 33, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sekine, J.; Sano, K.; Inokuchi, T. Effect of aging on the rat condylar fracture model evaluated by bromodeoxyuridine immunohistochemistry. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 1995, 53, 1317–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Takayama, Y.; Miura, E.; Yuasa, M.; Kobayashi, K.; Hosoi, T. Comparison of occlusal condition and prevalence of bone change in the condyle of patients with and without temporomandibular disorders. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endodontol. 2008, 105, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Theodorakou, C.; Walker, A.; Horner, K.; Pauwels, R.; Bogaerts, R.; Dds, R.J. The SEDENTEXCT Project Consortium Estimation of paediatric organ and effective doses from dental cone beam CT using anthropomorphic phantoms. Br. J. Radiol. 2012, 85, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Condylar changes. (a) Normal condyle. (b) Subcortical cyst. (c) Erosion. (d) Sclerosis. (e) Flattening. (f) Osteophytes.
Figure 1. Condylar changes. (a) Normal condyle. (b) Subcortical cyst. (c) Erosion. (d) Sclerosis. (e) Flattening. (f) Osteophytes.
Mps 05 00097 g001
Table 1. Pattern of posterior dentition according to the Eichner’s index.
Table 1. Pattern of posterior dentition according to the Eichner’s index.
CodeDefinition
A14 occlusal supporting zones in presence of all teeth
A24 occlusal supporting zones despite some missing teeth in one dental arch
A34 occlusal supporting zones despite some missing teeth in both dental arches
B13 occlusal supporting zones
B22 occlusal supporting zones
B31 occlusal supporting zone
B4Opposing contact in anterior teeth with no supporting zone
C10 supporting zone. Teeth in both arches are not in contact
C20 supporting zone. One arch is edentulous
C30 supporting zone. Both arches are edentulous
Table 2. Frequency of condylar changes detected on panoramic radiographs based on the Eichner’s class.
Table 2. Frequency of condylar changes detected on panoramic radiographs based on the Eichner’s class.
Skeletal ChangesGroupingNumberHighest FrequencyPercentage
Muscle painSound 189 A119.6%
Right side 29 A1–A324.2%
Left side 28 B121.4%
Both sides 54 B122.2%
Joint soundsSound 236 A117.8%
Right side 17 A329.4%
Left side 12 B125.0%
Both sides 35 A222.9%
Joint painSound 257 A117.1%
Right side 10 A1–A330%–30%
Left side 5 B140%
Both sides 28 A328.6%
Joint traumaSound 297 A118.2%
Right side 0 0 0
Left side 2 A2–B450%–50%
Both sides 1 A2100%
Generalized sclerosisSound 299 A117.7%
Right side 1 A1100%
Left side 0 0 0
Both sides 0 0 0
OsteophytesSound 296 A118.2%
Right side 2 A3–B150%–50%
Left side 1 A3100%
Both sides 1 A3100%
ErosionSound 270 A117.8%
Right side 11 B1–B227.3%–27.3%
Left side 15 A126.7%
Both sides 4 B175%
Subcortical cystSound 262 A1–B117.2%
Right side 6 B483.3%
Left side 15 B126.7%
Both sides 17 A135.3%
Subcortical sclerosisSound 285 A118.2%
Right side 6 A2–B2–B433.3%
Left side 4 B1–B2–C2–C325%
Both sides 5 A140%
FlatteningSound 179 A119%
Right side 35 A134.3%
Left side 36 B225%
Both sides 50 A220%
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Esfehani, M.; Tofangchiha, M.; Poorsayyah, N.; Rahimi, H.; Kholafazadeh, S.; Radfar, S.; Pagnoni, F.; Reda, R.; Testarelli, L. Relationship between Posterior Permanent Dentition Pattern and Radiographic Changes of the Mandibular Condyle. Methods Protoc. 2022, 5, 97. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/mps5060097

AMA Style

Esfehani M, Tofangchiha M, Poorsayyah N, Rahimi H, Kholafazadeh S, Radfar S, Pagnoni F, Reda R, Testarelli L. Relationship between Posterior Permanent Dentition Pattern and Radiographic Changes of the Mandibular Condyle. Methods and Protocols. 2022; 5(6):97. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/mps5060097

Chicago/Turabian Style

Esfehani, Mahsa, Marayam Tofangchiha, Neda Poorsayyah, Haniyeh Rahimi, Sarvin Kholafazadeh, Sina Radfar, Francesco Pagnoni, Rodolfo Reda, and Luca Testarelli. 2022. "Relationship between Posterior Permanent Dentition Pattern and Radiographic Changes of the Mandibular Condyle" Methods and Protocols 5, no. 6: 97. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/mps5060097

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop