Next Article in Journal
Nutrition Practices among Adult Cancer Survivors Living on the Island of Ireland: A Cross-Sectional Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Diet-Induced Weight Loss on Plasma Markers for Cholesterol Absorption and Synthesis: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial in Abdominally Obese Men
Previous Article in Journal
Weight Loss and Short-Chain Fatty Acids Reduce Systemic Inflammation in Monocytes and Adipose Tissue Macrophages from Obese Subjects
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 14
Issue 4
10.3390/nu14040766
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Non-Cholesterol Sterols in Breast Milk and Risk of Allergic Outcomes in the First Two Years of Life

by
Lieve van Brakel
1,
Carel Thijs
2,
Ronald P. Mensink
1,
Dieter Lütjohann
3 and
Jogchum Plat
1,*
1
Department of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, NUTRIM School of Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
2
Department of Epidemiology, CaPHRI (Care and Public Health Research Institute), Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
3
Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2022, 14(4), 766; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nu14040766
Submission received: 18 January 2022 / Revised: 7 February 2022 / Accepted: 8 February 2022 / Published: 11 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue From Dietary Cholesterol to Blood Cholesterol)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study aimed to explore associations between non-cholesterol sterol concentrations in breast milk and allergic outcomes in children aged two. Data from the KOALA Birth Cohort Study, the Netherlands, were used. Non-cholesterol sterols were analyzed by gas–liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry in breast milk sampled one-month postpartum (N = 311). Sterols were selected for each allergic outcome, i.e., eczema, wheeze, and allergic sensitization, prior to analyses. Associations between the selected sterols with allergic outcomes were analyzed using multiple logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs). The odds of eczema in the first two years of life were lower with higher concentrations of cholestanol (OR (95%CI): 0.98 (0.95; 1.00), p = 0.04), lanosterol (0.97 (0.95; 1.00), p = 0.02), lathosterol (0.93 (0.87; 0.99), p = 0.02), and stigmasterol (0.51 (0.29; 0.91), p = 0.02) in breast milk sampled one-month postpartum. None of the sterols were associated with wheeze in the first two years of life. The odds of allergic sensitization at age two were lower with higher concentrations of campesterol in breast milk (OR (95%CI): 0.81 (0.70; 0.95), p = 0.01). In conclusion, our data suggest that exposure to higher non-cholesterol sterol concentrations in breast milk may indeed be associated with the prevention of allergic outcomes in the first two years of life.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Breastfeeding is the preferred nutrition for newborns and infants [1]. The World Health Organization therefore recommends exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life and to combine breastfeeding with complementary foods for children aged from six months to two years and beyond [2]. Breastfeeding has several health benefits for infants. For example, breastfeeding has been associated with a decreased risk of child mortality in the first two years of life [3]. In addition, probiotic bacteria in breast milk play an essential role in developing the gut microbiota in early life by seeding the infant gut [4]. Breastfeeding even has health benefits tracking into adulthood. Breastfeeding has been associated with a lower risk of several non-communicable diseases in adults, such as cardiovascular diseases [5,6], obesity [7,8], and type 2 diabetes [7,9]. Moreover, in recent years, there has been increasing interest in the potential role of breastfeeding for the prevention of allergic outcomes in newborns and infants [10,11,12,13,14,15].
Although results are inconclusive [10], breastfeeding has been associated with a reduced risk of developing asthma [11,12,13], eczema [13,14], and allergic diseases [15]. It is therefore important to identify compounds within breast milk that could be responsible for the supposed reduced risk of developing allergic diseases. However, identification of these compounds is difficult, since breast milk composition is highly variable, especially during the first month of breastfeeding [16]. Variability in composition is highest in the milk produced during the first three weeks postpartum: colostrum (produced in first 4–7 days) and transitional milk (produced approximately from day 7 to 21 postpartum) [17]. This variability may reflect the infant’s needs, e.g., for infant growth [18]. The composition of mature milk (produced from approximately day 21 postpartum onwards) is less variable and contains approximately 3–5% (w/w) fat, 6.9–7.2% carbohydrates, 0.8–0.9% protein, and 0.2% mineral constituents [17,19]. Lipids in breast milk are the most important energy source for infants [16]. The lipid fraction of breast milk mainly consists of triacylglycerol and for approximately 0.5% of cholesterol [20]. It also contains plant sterols, which surprisingly do not reflect the circulating plasma plant sterol concentrations of the mother [21]. In addition, mRNA expression for sterol transporters ABCG5/G8 was previously observed in bovine mammary glands [22]. When this is also the case in human mammary glands, it could explain the presence of the specific plant sterol concentrations in breast milk [21]. Altogether, these findings suggest a regulated transport process of plant sterols into breast milk.
Today, plant sterols are mainly recognized for their LDL-cholesterol-lowering effects [23]. However, in a paper published by our group, Plat and colleagues have suggested that plant sterols in breast milk may have a perinatal role, e.g., in growth and development of the child [21]. This rationale was, among others, based on that plant sterols have been shown to interact with immune cells [24]. In more detail, plant sterols and stanols (saturated derivatives of plant sterols) may affect T-helper cell behavior, potentially by interacting with regulatory T cells (Tregs) [25,26,27]. This effect of plant sterols and stanols could be relevant in conditions characterized by a disbalance between T-helper cell subsets Th1 and Th2. For instance, a disbalance in T-helper cell activity towards the Th2 profile has been related to increased immunoglobulin E (IgE) concentrations and allergic diseases, such as allergic asthma [28]. Brüll and colleagues studied the effects of plant stanols on immune cells of allergic asthma patients. Based on their in vitro and in vivo observations, they suggested that plant stanols stimulated Treg and Th1 cell activity, while inhibiting Th2 cell activity [25,26]. Furthermore, plant sterols share a structural similarity with cholesterol precursors, which are intermediates in the endogenous cholesterol synthesis pathways [21]. Previous research has shown that some of these compounds can also interact with immune cells, thereby affecting immune responses. For example, desmosterol was found to inhibit inflammatory cascades within macrophages [29]. Moreover, mevalonate, which is another intermediate in the cholesterol synthesis pathway, was found to be crucial to induce trained immunity [30]. As with plant sterols, cholesterol precursors are also present in breast milk [21]. Together, these sterol compounds can be grouped as non-cholesterol sterols. However, it is important to consider these non-cholesterol sterols in breast milk as nutrients and not as markers for intestinal cholesterol absorption and endogenous synthesis for which their serum concentrations have been validated [31].
It is unknown whether the suggested effects of non-cholesterol sterols on immune cell behavior translate in to a benefit for children when exposed to these compounds in early life. This raises the question whether the amount of non-cholesterol sterols in breast milk could influence immune maturation, alter T-helper cell behavior and immune responses in early life, and thereby prevent allergic diseases. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the association between non-cholesterol sterol concentrations in breast milk and allergic outcomes in breastfed children in the first two years of life.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

The cohort used in this study is part of the “Kind, Ouders en gezondheid: Aandacht voor Leefstijl en Aanleg” (KOALA) Birth Cohort Study, the Netherlands, which has been described in detail elsewhere [32]. Briefly, recruitment of pregnant women started in October 2000. Participants with a conventional (N = 2343) or an ‘alternative’ lifestyle (N = 491) with regard to, e.g., child rearing practices or diet (organic or vegetarian) were recruited and enrolled between the 14th and 18th week of gestation. Participants were followed during gestation and up to several years postpartum and completed relevant questionnaires during follow-up. From January 2002, we started collecting biosamples, such as maternal blood at 36 weeks of pregnancy. In this subcohort of the KOALA study (KOALA-SUB), other samples were also obtained, including a breast milk sample from the mother one-month postpartum and a venous blood sample from the child at age two. For this study, we used these two samples and the data collected from questionnaires until the age of two. The KOALA study was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (MEC 01-139 and 00-182) and the Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects, The Hague, the Netherlands (CCMO P01.1265L). Inclusion criteria for the present study were participation in KOALA-SUB and an available one-month postpartum breast milk sample. Exclusion criteria were prematurity (<37 weeks gestation) and diseases or disorders such as cystic fibrosis, Down’s syndrome, and arthritis. The current study included N = 311 children (N = 141 mothers with conventional lifestyle, N = 166 mothers with alternative lifestyle, and N = 4 mothers have missing data on lifestyle).

2.2. Study Outcomes

Allergic outcomes of interest were eczema and wheeze during the first two years of life, and allergic sensitization at age two. At that age, the immune system has had the opportunity to mature while being exposed to different concentrations of non-cholesterol sterols in breast milk [33]. The International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood Questionnaire (ISAAC) was used to determine the presence of eczema and wheeze at 3, 7, 12 and 24 months postpartum, as described previously [34]. In short, if parents ever reported symptoms of eczema (itchy rash that was coming and going) or wheeze (wheezing or whistling in the chest) in this questionnaire, the child was defined as a case of eczema or wheeze, respectively. Children who only had diaper rash, rash around the eyes, or scalp scaling were not considered to have eczema. Allergic sensitization against hen’s egg, cow’s milk, peanut, birch, grass pollen, cat, dog, or house dust mite was determined in a venous blood sample at age two. Allergic sensitization was defined as having specific serum IgE levels > 0.30 IU/mL against one of the allergens tested. As described earlier, IgE was measured with a detection limit of 0.10 IU/mL [35,36].

2.3. Breast Milk Sampling and Analysis of Non-Cholesterol Sterols

Methods for breast milk sampling and storage have been described elsewhere [37]. Briefly, breast milk was collected in the morning in sterile tubes (Greiner Bio-One, Kremsmuenster, Austria). A sample was collected from the contra-lateral breast since the last feeding, before breastfeeding the child. The milk samples were kept in the refrigerator (4 °C) and picked up by a researcher on the same day. During transport, the milk samples were stored in a cooler (Coleman Company, Inc., Breda, the Netherlands) on packed ice (4 °C) until processing on the same day at the Biobank Maastricht. After measuring the volume of the sample, it was mixed (gently shaking by hand) and five Eppendorf tubes (2 mL) were filled with whole milk for storage. Two Eppendorf tubes were filled for creamatocrit measurement. The remaining sample was centrifuged (400× g, 12 min, no brake, 4 °C) to separate the lipid and aqueous fraction. The lipid layer was trimmed off with a pipette and released in plastic storage vials (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) and stored at −80 °C in the Biobank Maastricht until further processing. Creamatocrit was determined as described previously [38,39]. In short, milk samples were centrifuged for 15 min at 12,000× g. The length of the total milk column and of the cream layer were measured directly after centrifuging. Creamatocrit was determined by calculating which percentage of the total length of the milk sample consisted of cream.
For cholesterol and non-cholesterol sterol analysis, the frozen breast milk samples were transported on dry ice and delivered on the same day at the Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology of the University Hospital Bonn, Germany. Concentrations of cholesterol were measured by gas-liquid chromatography flame ionization detection (GC-FID) on an HP6890 Series GC-System (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany), using 5α –cholestane (Serva Electrophoresis GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) as internal standard. Cholesterol and non-cholesterol standards were applied by Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, München, Germany. Plant sterol (sitosterol, campesterol, stigmasterol, brassicasterol), cholestanol and cholesterol precursor (lanosterol, lathosterol and desmosterol) concentrations in breast milk were analyzed by gas–liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry-selected ion monitoring (GC-MS-SIM) (Agilent Technologies 6890 Network GC coupled with an Agilent Technologies 5975B inert MSD, Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany), using epicoprostanol (sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, München, Germany) as internal standard [40]. Sterol concentrations were corrected for the lipid levels (creamatocrit) of the breast milk sample by dividing the sterol concentrations by creamatocrit expressed as fraction.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Two types of exploratory analyses were first conducted to determine which sterols could be associated with allergic outcomes. First, factor analysis was performed to determine correlations between sterol concentrations in breast milk. A varimax rotation was used to maximize between-subject variance and the minimal eigenvalue was set to 1. The obtained factors were then used in multiple logistic regression analysis to determine factors associated with the allergic outcomes, and to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs). Second, independent-sample t-tests were performed to determine differences in sterol concentrations between cases and controls for each allergic outcome. Based on these two exploratory analyses, sterols were selected for further analysis with p < 0.10 as selection threshold. Sterols were selected when they: (1) were present in factors that were associated with an allergic outcome in the multiple logistic regression analyses (trend [p < 0.10] or significant association [p < 0.05]), or (2) differed in concentration between cases and controls in the independent-sample t-tests (trend [p < 0.10] or significant association [p < 0.05]). Next, multiple logistic regression models were made for each selected sterol to determine which sterols were significantly associated with allergic outcomes (p < 0.05). ORs and corresponding 95%CIs were calculated. A priori, confounders to be used in these regression models were determined by drawing and analyzing causal diagrams (DAGs). Confounders that were tested in the models included study group, smoking, season of milk sampling, gestational age, prepregnancy BMI, maternal age, atopy of parents, maternal education, gender of child, gravidity, duration of breastfeeding, and birthweight. If confounders changed the regression coefficient β1 by at least 10%, they were added to regression models. Finally, Spearman correlations were used to explore relations between non-cholesterol sterol and cholesterol concentrations in breast milk.
A result was considered significantly different when p < 0.05. All analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0 (Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Characteristics and Flow Chart

The selection of participants from the KOALA study is shown in Figure 1. Of the total cohort (N = 2834), the women with an available breast milk sample were selected (N = 315). The 311 women who fulfilled the criteria for the current study were selected.
Characteristics of the study population are shown in Table 1. The mean (SD) maternal age and median BMI (IQR) of the 311 mothers at the start of pregnancy were 32.4 (3.9) years and 22.4 (20.6–24.5) kg/m2, respectively. In total, 91 children developed eczema and 79 children developed wheeze in the first two years of life, and 49 children were allergically sensitized against common allergens at age two. The baseline characteristics were comparable between the women with either a conventional or alternative lifestyle. Only sitosterol was higher in the alternative lifestyle group (Table 1).
Desmosterol was the non-cholesterol sterol with the highest concentration in breast milk (median (IQR): 52.2 (37.4–70.3) µmol/L), which was 25 to 1000 fold higher as compared to the other sterols. Stigmasterol was the sterol with the lowest concentration (0.05 (0.04–0.06) µmol/L). Overall, non-cholesterol concentrations in breast milk were similar in the women with a conventional lifestyle and an alternative lifestyle.

3.2. Selection Process of Sterols

3.2.1. Exploratory Factor Analysis

To explore which of the eight non-cholesterol sterols that were analyzed in breast milk were intercorrelated, exploratory factor analysis was performed. Two factors were found based on the sterol concentration in breast milk corrected for creamatocrit (Table 2). The two factors separated brassicasterol, stigmasterol, campesterol, and lathosterol (factor 1); and lanosterol and desmosterol (factor 2). Cholestanol and sitosterol loaded on both factors, although to a higher extent on factor 1 than on factor 2.

3.2.2. Multiple Logistic Regression Using the Factors

Multiple logistic regression was performed to explore relations between factors 1 and 2 with the allergic outcomes of interest (i.e., eczema and wheeze in the first two years of life, and allergic sensitization at age two) (Table 3). None of the factors were significantly associated with eczema, wheeze, or allergic sensitization. However, trends were observed for associations between factor 1 and eczema (OR (95%CI): 0.69 (0.46; 1.03), p = 0.07), factor 2 and eczema (0.69 (0.46; 1.04), p = 0.08), and factor 1 and allergic sensitization (0.52 (0.26; 1.07), p = 0.07).

3.2.3. Independent-Sample t-Tests

Independent-sample t-tests were performed to explore which of the individual sterols differed between cases and controls for each allergic outcome (Table 4). Lathosterol (p = 0.06) and stigmasterol (p = 0.08) concentrations in breast milk tended to be lower in eczema cases compared to controls. For wheeze, all sterol concentrations were similar in cases and controls. For allergic sensitization, campesterol concentrations in breast milk were significantly lower in cases compared to controls (p = 0.03).

3.3. Multiple Logistic Regression Using Selected Sterols

3.3.1. Eczema

Based on the multiple logistic regression analysis using the obtained factors (Table 3), all sterols included in factors 1 and 2 were selected for eczema. In addition, based on the independent-sample t-tests (Table 4), lathosterol and stigmasterol were selected for eczema. Thus, all eight sterols were included in the final multiple logistic regression analyses. Separate models were made for each individual sterol (Table 5). The odds of eczema in the first two years of life were significantly lower with higher concentrations of cholestanol (OR (95%CI): 0.98 (0.95; 1.00), p = 0.04), lanosterol (0.97 (0.95; 1.00), p = 0.02), lathosterol (0.93 (0.87; 0.99), p = 0.02), and stigmasterol (0.51 (0.29; 0.91), p = 0.02) in breast milk one-month postpartum. The other sterols did not affect the odds of eczema during the first two years of life.

3.3.2. Wheeze

None of the factors from exploratory factor analysis were associated with wheeze, nor were there differences in sterol concentrations in breast milk between cases and controls. Therefore, none of the sterols were evaluated in further analysis for wheeze.

3.3.3. Allergic Sensitization

Based on the multiple logistic regression analysis using the obtained factors (Table 3), the sterols included in factor 1 were selected for allergic sensitization. In addition, based on the independent-sample t-tests (Table 4), campesterol was selected for allergic sensitization. Thus, brassicasterol, campesterol, cholestanol, lathosterol, sitosterol, and stigmasterol were included in the final multiple logistic regression analyses. Separate models were made for each individual sterol (Table 6). The odds of allergic sensitization at age 2 were significantly lower with a higher concentration of campesterol in breast milk one-month postpartum (OR (95%CI): 0.81 (0.70; 0.95), p = 0.01). The other sterols did not affect the odds of allergic sensitization at age 2.

3.4. Cholesterol and Allergic Outcomes

Non-cholesterol sterol concentrations were significantly correlated to cholesterol concentrations (corrected for creamatocrit) in breast milk, except for lanosterol and lathosterol concentrations (Table 7). Therefore, relationships between cholesterol concentrations (corrected for creamatocrit) in breast milk and allergic outcomes were also considered. However, the odds of having eczema or wheeze in the first two years of life were not lower with higher cholesterol concentrations, nor were the odds for allergic sensitization at age two (data not shown). Hence, non-cholesterol sterols did not act as a marker for cholesterol. The reported associations can instead be attributed specifically to the non-cholesterol sterols.

4. Discussion

The aim of this study was to determine the association between non-cholesterol sterols in breast milk and allergic outcomes in breastfed children in the first two years of life. We found that the odds of eczema during the first two years of life were significantly lower with higher concentrations of cholestanol, lanosterol, lathosterol, and stigmasterol in breast milk one-month postpartum. We also showed that the odds of allergic sensitization at age 2 were significantly lower with a higher concentration of campesterol in breast milk. None of the sterols were associated with wheeze during the first two years of life. Study groups (women with a conventional or ‘alternative’ lifestyle with regard to, e.g., child rearing practices) were not further compared, since study group did not seem to influence the reported associations. A priori, we hypothesized that exposure of the immune system to non-cholesterol sterols through breastfeeding early in life influences the maturation of the immune system and thereby prevents allergic outcomes later in life. Our results presented here support this hypothesis and are in line with previous suggestions that non-cholesterol sterols may play a role in infant health [21].
Non-cholesterol sterols in serum are known for their relationship with cholesterol metabolism [21,23,24]. This group of sterols can be divided into two subgroups, i.e., some are diet derived and considered as markers for intestinal cholesterol absorption (brassicasterol, campesterol, cholestanol, sitosterol, stigmasterol), while others are endogenously synthesized and markers for cholesterol synthesis (desmosterol, lanosterol, lathosterol). However, these two subgroups were not identified when exploratory factor analysis was performed using concentrations of these non-cholesterol sterols in breast milk (with or without correction for creamatocrit). This finding is in line with our hypothesis that sterols provided by breast milk should be considered as nutrients (and not as markers for intestinal cholesterol absorption and endogenous synthesis), which may have specific effects in the body in early life, e.g., involvement in the maturation of the immune system. In addition, studies in adults have also reported effects of non-cholesterol sterols on the immune system. Brüll and colleagues [25] used antibody production to a hepatitis A vaccine as a measure for immune function in adult asthma patients that received either plant stanols or placebo. They reported that daily intake of 4 g of plant stanols increased antibody production by 22% compared to placebo [25]. In addition, changes in serum plant stanol concentrations were positively correlated to the Th1/Th2 cytokine balance towards more Th1 activity [25]. These results, together with our current findings, indicate that consuming plant sterols and stanols may not only affect cholesterol metabolism, but may also be related to developing and sustaining immune function throughout life.
Results of studies evaluating the effect of breastfeeding on allergic outcomes in children are inconclusive, and information on the maternal diet during breastfeeding is often missing [41]. Therefore, a clear recommendation for future studies is to include data about maternal diet composition during pregnancy and breastfeeding, and/or breast milk composition. Unfortunately, no studies have related non-cholesterol sterols in breast milk and infant feeding with allergic outcomes in children, which makes it difficult to compare our study results. However, results can be compared with studies evaluating the effect of children’s intake of diets or foods rich in these non-cholesterol sterols on allergic outcomes. Our results are in accordance with a review, which stated that plant-based diets and diets similar to the Mediterranean diet, which are generally rich in plant sterols, could reduce inflammation and asthma symptoms in children [42]. Another study reported a negative association between fruit and vegetable intake and allergic symptoms in children [43]. Moreover, the results of our study could be compared to studies evaluating the effects of non-cholesterol sterols on immune-related outcomes in other parts of the body, such as the gut. Van Gorp and colleagues found that intra amniotic administration of β-sitosterol and campesterol prevented gut inflammation in fetal lambs that were intra-amniotically infected with Ureaplasma parvum [44]. Plasma IL-6, influx of mucosal myeloperoxidase-positive cells, and intestinal damage were all lowered by the intra amniotic administration of plant sterols [44]. In addition, de Smet and colleagues showed that an acute intake of plant stanols down-regulated genes regulating T-cell functioning in the jejunum of healthy volunteers [45]. These two studies also indicate that non-cholesterol sterols are able to influence immune cell behavior, although the exact mechanisms remain unclear.
Considering our results and the studies described above, it is tempting to suggest that higher intakes of non-cholesterol sterols via breast milk would result in better health outcomes. Infant formulas sometimes also contain high concentrations of plant sterols, especially when produced with vegetable oil as fat source [46], while formula feeding has not been associated to better health outcomes compared to breastfeeding [47,48,49]. Claumarchirant and colleagues [46] reported that total plant sterol concentrations (sum of brassicasterol, campesterol, β-sitosterol, stigmasterol, and sitostanol) in various infant formulas ranged between 3.1–5.0 mg/100 mL (78.1–132.3 µmol/L). These concentrations are higher than those reported in our study, where the median total plant sterol concentration in breast milk (sum of brassicasterol, campesterol, sitosterol, and stigmasterol) was 1.3 µmol/L. However, desmosterol (0.2–0.4 mg/100 mL (6.2–11.1 µmol/L)) and cholesterol (1.6–5.1 mg/100 mL (0.04–0.1 mmol/L)) concentrations in infant formulas [46] were lower as compared to the concentrations we found in breast milk (desmosterol: 52.2 µmol/L; cholesterol 0.35 mmol/L). Hence, not only absolute concentrations, but also ratios between individual sterols differ between breast milk and infant formula. In more detail, the ratio between cholesterol and sitosterol concentrations in infant formula ranges from approximately 0.6 to 1.8 [46], whereas in our study the median cholesterol concentration was 500 times higher than the sitosterol concentration (350 µmol/L and 0.70 µmol/L, respectively). The lower concentration of cholesterol in infant formulas as compared to breast milk induces higher endogenous cholesterol synthesis in formula fed infants, whereas breastfed infants have a higher intestinal cholesterol absorption [50,51]. To the best of our knowledge, the bioavailability of non-cholesterol in breast milk and infant formula has not been studied. Therefore, it is currently not completely understood how serum non-cholesterol concentrations in children are affected by either breastfeeding or formula feeding.
Additionally, it is currently unknown whether the differences in sterol concentrations between breast milk and infant formula are associated with the difference in the immune responses of breastfed versus formula fed children. However, it should be kept in mind that breast milk and infant formula differ in many more aspects that could affect immune system development than solely non-cholesterol sterol and cholesterol concentrations. For example, breast milk contains human immune factors, which help forming the neonatal immune system [52]. Ultimately, the relation between early infant feeding and allergic outcomes is not fully understood. Future studies should further evaluate: (1) whether the reported effects of non-cholesterol sterols on allergic outcomes in our study can be attributed to their concentration in breast milk, (2) whether the ratio between the different sterols could also play a role, and (3) whether other components in breast milk are potentially involved in this association.
Although the associations between sterols in breast milk, eczema, and allergic sensitization were statistically significant, none of the sterols were significantly associated with wheeze in the first two years of life. There are several wheezing phenotypes, based on the age at which wheezing first occurs [53]. For example, phenotypes such as transient early wheeze and prolonged early wheeze are characterized by wheezing only in the first years of life, while wheezing disappears as the child gets older. Other phenotypes such as intermediate onset wheeze or late onset wheeze are characterized by wheezing occurring at a later age (18–42 months old). The phenotypes characterized by later onset wheeze are strongest associated with allergic outcomes later in life [53]. For this study, it means some of the children could have suffered from the phenotypes characterized by early onset wheeze, which could also be caused by viral infections [54]. It would be interesting to evaluate the association between non-cholesterol sterols in breast milk and wheezing or even asthma at a later age, and to take wheezing phenotypes into account. Unfortunately, the number of late onset wheeze and asthma cases in the subgroup with breast milk samples was insufficient to allow proper statistics. The associations between non-cholesterol sterols, wheeze, and asthma should therefore be evaluated in a larger study.
Another limitation of this study was the extensive selection of sterols and that multiple allergic outcomes were tested. The exploratory nature of this study may have increased the chance of type I errors. Therefore, data should be interpreted with care and additional studies are needed to confirm or refute our findings. In addition, future studies should consider whether there are optimal sterol concentrations in breast milk, whether ratios between different sterols in breast milk play a role in the prevention of allergic outcomes, and how breast milk composition fits into this association.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our data suggest that exposure to higher non-cholesterol sterol concentrations (corrected for creamatocrit) in breast milk may indeed contribute to the prevention of allergic outcomes, such as eczema and allergic sensitization at the age of two. Evidence regarding the elaborate role of sterols in human health rapidly grows and should be explored in further detail. Future studies should consider a role for breast milk composition and maternal diet during pregnancy and lactation in the association between breastfeeding and allergic outcomes in children. The effects of sterol intake via breastfeeding versus bottle feeding on allergic disease prevention should also be studied in more detail.

Author Contributions

C.T. collected the samples and data of the KOALA study. D.L. analyzed non-cholesterol sterol concentrations in breast milk samples. L.v.B. performed statistical analyses, supervised by C.T., L.v.B., C.T., R.P.M. and J.P., interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. D.L. reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The following organizations contributed to the funding of the KOALA study up to 2 years of follow-up: Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) project no. 2100.0090; Netherlands Asthma Foundation (grants 3.2.03.48 and 3.2.07.022); Royal Friesland Foods; Triodos Foundation; Phoenix Foundation; Raphaël Foundation; Iona Foundation; Foundation for the Advancement of Heilpedagogie (all in the Netherlands). The current collaboration project making these analyses possible is co-funded by the PPP Allowance made available by Health~Holland, Top Sector Life Sciences and Health, to stimulate public–private partnerships (project number LSHM18008).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The KOALA study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (MEC 01-139 and 00-182) and the Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects, The Hague, the Netherlands (CCMO P01.1265L).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the KOALA study.

Acknowledgments

We thank the parents and children who participated in the KOALA study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Victora, C.G.; Bahl, R.; Barros, A.J.D.; França, G.V.A.; Horton, S.; Krasevec, J.; Murch, S.; Sankar, M.J.; Walker, N.; Rollins, N.C.; et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: Epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet 2016, 387, 475–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Infant and Young Child Feeding Home Page. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infant-and-young-child-feeding (accessed on 31 March 2021).
  3. Sankar, M.J.; Sinha, B.; Chowdhury, R.; Bhandari, N.; Taneja, S.; Martines, J.C.; Bahl, R. Optimal breastfeeding practices and infant and child mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. 2015, 104, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pannaraj, P.S.; Li, F.; Cerini, C.; Bender, J.M.; Yang, S.; Rollie, A.; Adisetiyo, H.; Zabih, S.; Lincez, P.J.; Bittinger, K. Association between breast milk bacterial communities and establishment and development of the infant gut microbiome. JAMA Pediatrics 2017, 171, 647–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Parikh, N.I.; Hwang, S.-J.; Ingelsson, E.; Benjamin, E.J.; Fox, C.S.; Vasan, R.S.; Murabito, J.M. Breastfeeding in Infancy and Adult Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors. Am. J. Med. 2009, 122, 656–663.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Umer, A.; Hamilton, C.; Edwards, R.A.; Cottrell, L.; Giacobbi, P.; Innes, K.; John, C.; Kelley, G.A.; Neal, W.; Lilly, C. Association between breastfeeding and childhood cardiovascular disease risk factors. Matern. Child Health J. 2019, 23, 228–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Horta, B.L.; Loret De Mola, C.; Victora, C.G. Long-term consequences of breastfeeding on cholesterol, obesity, systolic blood pressure and type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. 2015, 104, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, L.; Collins, C.; Ratliff, M.; Xie, B.; Wang, Y. Breastfeeding Reduces Childhood Obesity Risks. Child. Obes. 2017, 13, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Temples, H.S. Breastfeeding reduces risk of Type 2 Diabetes in the (PETS). Nurs. Outlook 2019, 67, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Matheson, M.; Allen, K.; Tang, M. Understanding the evidence for and against the role of breastfeeding in allergy prevention. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2012, 42, 827–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dogaru, C.M.; Nyffenegger, D.; Pescatore, A.M.; Spycher, B.D.; Kuehni, C.E. Breastfeeding and Childhood Asthma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2014, 179, 1153–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Klopp, A.; Vehling, L.; Becker, A.B.; Subbarao, P.; Mandhane, P.J.; Turvey, S.; Lefebvre, D.L.; Sears, M.R.; Azad, M.B.; Daley, D.; et al. Modes of Infant Feeding and the Risk of Childhood Asthma: A Prospective Birth Cohort Study. J. Pediatr. 2017, 190, 192–199.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lodge, C.J.; Tan, D.J.; Lau, M.X.Z.; Dai, X.; Tham, R.; Lowe, A.J.; Bowatte, G.; Allen, K.J.; Dharmage, S.C. Breastfeeding and asthma and allergies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. 2015, 104, 38–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kull, I.; Böhme, M.; Wahlgren, C.-F.; Nordvall, L.; Pershagen, G.; Wickman, M. Breast-feeding reduces the risk for childhood eczema. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2005, 116, 657–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Van Odijk, J.; Kull, I.; Borres, M.P.; Brandtzaeg, P.; Edberg, U.; Hanson, L.Å.; Høst, A.; Kuitunen, M.; Olsen, S.F.; Skerfving, S.; et al. Breastfeeding and allergic disease: A multidisciplinary review of the literature (1966–2001) on the mode of early feeding in infancy and its impact on later atopic manifestations. Allergy 2003, 58, 833–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lyons, K.E.; Ryan, C.A.; Dempsey, E.M.; Ross, R.P.; Stanton, C. Breast milk, a source of beneficial microbes and asso-ciated benefits for infant health. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Nutritional Status During Pregnancy and Lactation. Nutrition During Lactation; (DC): National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  18. Prentice, P.; Ong, K.K.; Schoemaker, M.H.; Van Tol, E.A.F.; Vervoort, J.; Hughes, I.A.; Acerini, C.L.; Dunger, D.B. Breast milk nutrient content and infancy growth. Acta Paediatr. 2016, 105, 641–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Jenness, R. The composition of human milk. Semin. Perinatol. 1979, 3, 225–239. [Google Scholar]
  20. Albrecht, C.; Huang, X.; Ontsouka, E. Cholesterol transporters in lactating and nonlactating human mammary tissue. In Handbook of Dietary and Nutritional Aspects of Human Breast Milk; Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2013; p. e20895. [Google Scholar]
  21. Plat, J.; Baumgartner, S.; Vanmierlo, T.; Lütjohann, D.; Calkins, K.; Burrin, D.; Guthrie, G.; Thijs, C.; Velde, A.T.; Vreugdenhil, A.; et al. Plant-based sterols and stanols in health & disease: “Consequences of human development in a plant-based environment?”. Prog. Lipid Res. 2019, 74, 87–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Farke, C.; Viturro, E.; Meyer, H.H.D.; Albrecht, C. Identification of the bovine cholesterol efflux regulatory protein ABCA1 and its expression in various tissues1. J. Anim. Sci. 2006, 84, 2887–2894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ras, R.T.; Geleijnse, J.M.; Trautwein, E.A. LDL-cholesterol-lowering effect of plant sterols and stanols across different dose ranges: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled studies. Br. J. Nutr. 2014, 112, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. de Jong, A.; Plat, J.; Mensink, R.P. Metabolic effects of plant sterols and stanols. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2003, 14, 362–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Brüll, F.; De Smet, E.; Mensink, R.P.; Vreugdenhil, A.; Kerksiek, A.; Lütjohann, D.; Wesseling, G.; Plat, J. Dietary plant stanol ester consumption improves immune function in asthma patients: Results of a randomized, double-blind clinical trial1. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 103, 444–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Brüll, F.; Mensink, R.P.; Steinbusch, M.F.; Husche, C.; Lütjohann, D.; Wesseling, G.J.; Plat, J. Beneficial effects of sito-stanol on the attenuated immune function in asthma patients: Results of an in vitro approach. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e46895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Plat, J.; Baumgartner, S.; Mensink, R.P. Mechanisms Underlying the Health Benefits of Plant Sterol and Stanol Ester Consumption. J. AOAC Int. 2015, 98, 697–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kay, A.B. Allergy and allergic diseases. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001, 344, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Spann, N.J.; Garmire, L.X.; McDonald, J.G.; Myers, D.S.; Milne, S.B.; Shibata, N.; Reichart, D.; Fox, J.N.; Shaked, I.; Heudobler, D.; et al. Regulated Accumulation of Desmosterol Integrates Macrophage Lipid Metabolism and Inflammatory Responses. Cell 2012, 151, 138–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Bekkering, S.; Arts, R.; Novakovic, B.; Kourtzelis, I.; van der Heijden, C.; Li, Y.; Popa, C.; Ter Horst, R.; van Tuijl, J.; Netea-Maier, R.T.; et al. Metabolic Induction of Trained Immunity through the Mevalonate Pathway. Cell 2018, 172, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Miettinen, T.; Gylling, H.; Nissinen, M. The role of serum non-cholesterol sterols as surrogate markers of absolute cholesterol synthesis and absorption. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2011, 21, 765–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kummeling, I.; Thijs, C.; Penders, J.; Snijders, B.E.P.; Stelma, F.; Reimerink, J.; Koopmans, M.; Dagnelie, P.C.; Huber, M.; Jansen, M.C.J.F.; et al. Etiology of atopy in infancy: The KOALA Birth Cohort Study. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2005, 16, 679–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ygberg, S.; Nilsson, A. The developing immune system—From foetus to toddler. Acta Paediatr. 2012, 101, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Thijs, C.; Müller, A.; Rist, L.; Kummeling, I.; Snijders, B.; Huber, M.; Van Ree, R.; Simões-Wüst, A.; Dagnelie, P.; Van Den Brandt, P. Fatty acids in breast milk and development of atopic eczema and allergic sensitisation in infancy. Allergy 2011, 66, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Akkerdaas, J.H.; Wensing, M.; Asero, R.; Rivas, M.F.; Knulst, A.C.; Bolhaar, S.; Hefle, S.L.; Aalberse, R.C.; Van Ree, R. IgE Binding to Pepsin-Digested Food Extracts. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2005, 138, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kummeling, I.; Thijs, C.; Huber, M.; van de Vijver, L.P.L.; Snijders, B.E.P.; Penders, J.; Stelma, F.; van Ree, R.; Brandt, P.A.V.D.; Dagnelie, P.C. Consumption of organic foods and risk of atopic disease during the first 2 years of life in the Netherlands. Br. J. Nutr. 2008, 99, 598–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Rist, L.; Mueller, A.; Barthel, C.; Snijders, B.; Jansen, M.; Simões-Wüst, A.P.; Huber, M.; Kummeling, I.; von Mandach, U.; Steinhart, H.; et al. Influence of organic diet on the amount of conjugated linoleic acids in breast milk of lactating women in the Netherlands. Br. J. Nutr. 2007, 97, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Lucas, A.; A Gibbs, J.; Lyster, R.L.; Baum, J.D. Creamatocrit: Simple clinical technique for estimating fat concentration and energy value of human milk. BMJ 1978, 1, 1018–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Chan, M.K.; Huang, Y.C.; Varghese, Z.; Baillod, R.A.; Moorhead, J.F. Predicting plasma concentrations of common biochemical values from residual peritoneal fluid in patients on peritoneal dialysis. Br. Med. J. 1978, 1, 1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Thelen, K.M.; Laaksonen, R.; Päivä, H.; Lehtimäki, T.; Lütjohann, D. High-Dose Statin Treatment Does Not Alter Plasma Marker for Brain Cholesterol Metabolism in Patients with Moderately Elevated Plasma Cholesterol Levels. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2006, 46, 812–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ferrante, G.; Carta, M.; Montante, C.; Notarbartolo, V.; Corsello, G.; Giuffrè, M. Current Insights on Early Life Nutrition and Prevention of Allergy. Front. Pediatrics 2020, 8, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Alwarith, J.; Kahleova, H.; Crosby, L.; Brooks, A.; Brandon, L.; Levin, S.M.; Barnard, N.D. The role of nutrition in asthma prevention and treatment. Nutr. Rev. 2020, 78, 928–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Cepeda, A.M.; The ISAAC Phase III Latin America Group; Thawer, S.; Boyle, R.J.; Villalba, S.; Jaller, R.; Tapias, E.; Segura, A.M.; Villegas, R.; Larsen, V.G.; et al. Diet and Respiratory Health in Children from 11 Latin American Countries: Evidence from ISAAC Phase III. Lung 2017, 195, 683–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. van Gorp, C.; de Lange, I.H.; Spiller, O.B.; Dewez, F.; Cillero, P.B.; Heeren, R.; Kessels, L.; Kloosterboer, N.; van Gemert, W.G.; Beeton, M.L. Protection of the ovine fetal gut against ureaplasma-induced chorioamnionitis: A potential role for plant sterols. Nutrients 2019, 11, 968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. De Smet, E.; Mensink, R.P.; Boekschoten, M.V.; de Ridder, R.; Germeraad, W.T.; Wolfs, T.G.; Plat, J. An acute intake of plant stanol esters alters immune-related pathways in the jejunum of healthy volunteers. Br. J. Nutr. 2015, 113, 794–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Claumarchirant, L.; Matencio, E.; Sanchez-Siles, L.M.; Alegría, A.; Lagarda, M.J. Sterol composition in infant formulas and estimated intake. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 7245–7251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Greer, F.R.; Sicherer, S.H.; Burks, A.W.; Committee on Nutrition; Section on Allergy and Immunology. The Effects of Early Nutritional Interventions on the Development of Atopic Disease in Infants and Children: The Role of Maternal Dietary Restriction, Breastfeeding, Hydrolyzed Formulas, and Timing of Introduction of Allergenic Complementary Foods. Pediatrics 2019, 143, e20190281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Laubereau, B.; Brockow, I.; Zirngibl, A.; Koletzko, S.; Gruebl, A.; von Berg, A.; Filipiak-Pittroff, B.; Berdel, D.; Bauer, C.P.; Reinhardt, D. Effect of breast-feeding on the development of atopic dermatitis during the first 3 years of life—Results from the GINI-birth cohort study. J. Pediatrics 2004, 144, 602–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Friedman, N.J.; Zeiger, R. The role of breast-feeding in the development of allergies and asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2005, 115, 1238–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Woollett, L.A.; Heubi, J.E. Fetal and Neonatal Cholesterol Metabolism; MDText.com, Inc.: South Dartmouth, MA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  51. Delplanque, B.; Gibson, R.; Koletzko, B.; Lapillonne, A.; Strandvik, B. Lipid quality in infant nutrition: Current knowledge and future opportunities. J. Pediatric Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2015, 61, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Le Doare, K.; Holder, B.; Bassett, A.; Pannaraj, P.S. Mother’s milk: A purposeful contribution to the development of the infant microbiota and immunity. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Henderson, J.; Granell, R.; Heron, J.; Sherriff, A.; Simpson, A.; Woodcock, A.; Strachan, D.P.; Shaheen, S.O.; Sterne, J.A. Associations of wheezing phenotypes in the first 6 years of life with atopy, lung function and airway responsiveness in mid-childhood. Thorax 2008, 63, 974–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Granell, R.; Sterne, J.A.; Henderson, J. Associations of different phenotypes of wheezing illness in early childhood with environmental variables implicated in the aetiology of asthma. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e48359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Nutrients 14 00766 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow chart of participants included in this study. KOALA = “Kind, Ouders en gezondheid: Aandacht voor Leefstijl en Aanleg”; KOALA-SUB = subcohort of the KOALA study.
Figure 1. Flow chart of participants included in this study. KOALA = “Kind, Ouders en gezondheid: Aandacht voor Leefstijl en Aanleg”; KOALA-SUB = subcohort of the KOALA study.
Nutrients 14 00766 g001
Table
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the KOALA-SUB cohort selected for this study. Data are shown as the mean (SD) or the median (Q1–Q3), unless otherwise indicated.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the KOALA-SUB cohort selected for this study. Data are shown as the mean (SD) or the median (Q1–Q3), unless otherwise indicated.
Total
(N = 311)		Conventional Lifestyle 1
(N = 141)		Alternative Lifestyle 1
(N = 166)
Maternal age, years (SD)32.4 (3.9)31.5 (3.4)33.1 (4.2)
Prepregnancy BMI, kg/m2 (IQR)22.4 (20.6–24.5)23.0 (21.5–25.2)21.7 (20.1–24.0)
Smoking during pregnancy 2, N (%)5 (2%)4 (3%)1 (1%)
Atopic history parents 1, N (%)
None113 (37%)50 (36%)62 (38%)
Only father78 (25%)37 (26%)40 (24%)
Only mother64 (21%)31 (22%)32 (20%)
Both52 (17%)22 (16%)30 (18%)
Gender child female, N (%)161 (52%)74 (53%)83 (50%)
Duration breastfeeding, N (%)
1–3 months64 (21%)46 (33%)17 (10%)
4–6 months70 (23%)40 (28%)29 (18%)
7–9 months70 (23%)28 (20%)41 (25%)
10–12 months53 (17%)17 (12%)36 (22%)
≥13 months53 (17%)10 (7%)43 (26%)
Maternal education, N (%)
Lower12 (4%)7 (5%)5 (3%)
Middle96 (31%)53 (38%)41 (25%)
Higher vocational131 (42%)60 (43%)69 (42%)
Academic66 (21%)19 (14%)47 (28%)
Other6 (2%)2 (1%)4 (2%)
Season breast milk sampling 1, N (%)
December 2002–February 2003112 (37%)64 (45%)48 (29%)
March–May 2003120 (39%)59 (42%)61 (37%)
June–September 200375 (24%)18 (13%)57 (34%)
Gravidity, N (%)
1123 (40%)65 (46%)58 (34.9)
2110 (35%)51 (36%)57 (34.3)
≥378 (25%)25 (18%)51 (30.7)
Eczema in first two years 3, N (%)91 (30%)41 (30%)50 (31.1)
Wheeze in first two years 4, N (%)79 (26%)37 (27%)42 (26%)
Allergic sensitization at age 2 5, N (%)49 (24%)25 (28%)24 (22%)
Creamatocrit value 6, % (IQR)7 (5–9%)7 (5–9%)7 (5–9%)
Cholesterol concentration breast milk, mmol/L (IQR)0.35 (0.28–0.42)0.35 (0.27–0.43)0.36 (0.29–0.41)
Cholesterol concentration breast milk corrected for creamatocrit 7, mmol/Lf (IQR)4.81 (4.14–5.90)4.81 (4.17–5.93)4.83 (5.84–6.87)
Non-cholesterol sterol concentrations breast milk, µmol/L (IQR)
Brassicasterol0.23 (0.18–0.27)0.24 (0.19–0.29)0.22 (0.17–0.25)
Campesterol 70.32 (0.20–0.52)0.37 (0.21–0.60)0.28 (0.19–0.46)
Cholestanol1.51 (1.28–1.73)1.50 (1.26–1.75)1.52 (1.31–1.73)
Desmosterol52.2 (37.4–70.3)51.7 (36.3–68.3)54.3 (38.1–71.8)
Lanosterol2.03 (1.43–2.89)2.01 (1.31–2.85)2.04 (1.50–2.93)
Lathosterol0.62 (0.40–0.84)0.62 (0.38–0.87)0.62 (0.40–0.84)
Sitosterol0.70 (0.49–1.41)0.59 (0.45–0.87)0.82 (0.55–1.48)
Stigmasterol0.05 (0.04–0.06)0.05 (0.04–0.06)0.05 (0.04–0.06)
Non-cholesterol sterol concentrations breast milk corrected for creamatocrit, µmol/Lf (IQR)
Brassicasterol 73.18 (2.44–4.16)3.32 (2.53–4.25)2.95 (2.31–4.10)
Campesterol 84.90 (3.01–7.07)5.34 (3.50–7.87)4.27 (2.61–6.13)
Cholestanol 721.0 (17.2–27.7)22.5 (17.3–27.9)20.5 (17.0–27.9)
Desmosterol 7776.5 (592.7–997.9)716.1(561.6–957.0)807.2 (633.6–1026.5)
Lanosterol 729.1 (22.7–37.5)28.4 (22.8–37.3)29.7 (22.7–37.5)
Lathosterol 78.69 (6.25–11.9)8.80 (6.47–12.2)8.31 (5.99–11.6)
Sitosterol 710.3 (7.17–18.7)8.26 (6.60–12.6)13.7 (7.88–23.8)
Stigmasterol 70.68 (0.51–0.93)0.67 (0.51–0.93)0.69 (0.51–0.94)
BMI = body mass index; IQR = interquartile range; SD = standard deviation; mmol/Lf = mmol per liter milk fat; 1 Missing data N = 4; 2 Missing data N = 1; 3 Missing data N = 12; 4 Missing data N = 9; 5 Missing data N = 110; 6 Missing data N = 37; 7 Missing data N = 8; 8 Missing data N = 45.
Table
Table 2. Factor loadings after varimax rotation. Non-cholesterol sterol concentrations were corrected for creamatocrit.
Table 2. Factor loadings after varimax rotation. Non-cholesterol sterol concentrations were corrected for creamatocrit.
Non-Cholesterol Sterol (µmol/Lf)Factor 1Factor 2
Cholestanol0.880.34
Brassicasterol0.83
Stigmasterol0.78
Sitosterol0.650.31
Campesterol0.64
Lathosterol0.37
Lanosterol 0.93
Desmosterol 0.85
µmol/Lf = µmol per liter milk fat; only factor loadings ≥ 0.30 are shown; there were no factor loadings ≤ −0.30.
Table
Table 3. Results of the multiple logistic regression analyses to determine relations between the factors and allergic outcomes.
Table 3. Results of the multiple logistic regression analyses to determine relations between the factors and allergic outcomes.
Factor 1Factor 2
Outcome VariableOR95% CIp-ValueOR95% CIp-Value
Eczema (N = 256) 10.690.46; 1.030.07 *0.690.46; 1.040.08 *
Wheeze (N = 259) 21.040.77; 1.400.820.990.69; 1.420.95
Allergic sensitization (N = 171) 30.520.26; 1.070.07 *1.170.79; 1.730.43
OR: odds ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; 1: adjusted for season, atopy of parents, maternal education, and duration of breastfeeding; 2: adjusted for smoking, season, gestational age, prepregnancy BMI, atopy of parents, maternal education, gender of child, gravidity, and duration of breastfeeding; 3: adjusted for study group, smoking, season, prepregnancy BMI, atopy of parents, maternal education, gender of child, gravidity, duration of breastfeeding, and birthweight. * p < 0.10.
Table
Table 4. Results of the independent-sample t-tests to explore differences between non-cholesterol sterol concentrations in breast milk between cases and controls for eczema (N = 80 cases, N = 179 controls), wheeze (N = 67 cases, N = 195 controls), and allergic sensitization (N = 41 cases, N = 130 controls). Non-cholesterol sterol concentrations were adjusted for creamatocrit.
Table 4. Results of the independent-sample t-tests to explore differences between non-cholesterol sterol concentrations in breast milk between cases and controls for eczema (N = 80 cases, N = 179 controls), wheeze (N = 67 cases, N = 195 controls), and allergic sensitization (N = 41 cases, N = 130 controls). Non-cholesterol sterol concentrations were adjusted for creamatocrit.
EczemaWheezeAllergic Sensitization
Sterol (µmol/Lf)Mean Difference95% CIp-ValueMean Difference95% CIp-ValueMean Difference95% CIp-Value
Brassicasterol−0.11−0.76; 0.550.750.16−0.52; 0.840.64−0.25−1.06; 0.550.54
Campesterol−0.76−1.85; 0.320.170.11−1.03; 1.260.84−1.78−3.40; −0.160.03 **
Cholestanol−3.19−7.33; 0.940.130.3−4.08; 4.670.89−2.68−8.04; 2.680.33
Desmosterol 1−0.04−0.14; 0.060.440.01−0.11; 0.130.83−0.05−0.22; 0.120.57
Lanosterol−2.03−5.55; 1.480.26−0.36−4.82; 4.100.880.94−4.77; 6.650.75
Lathosterol−1.18−2.39; 0.030.06 *−0.93−2.23; 0.360.16−0.53−2.22; 1.160.54
Sitosterol−0.13−0.28; 0.030.11−0.1−0.26; 0.070.25−0.13−0.31; 0.040.14
Stigmasterol−0.01−0.02; 0.000.08 *0−0.01; 0.010.89−0.01−0.02; 0.010.36
95% CI: 95% confidence interval; µmol/Lf = micromoles per liter milk fat; 1 concentration in mmol/Lf; * p < 0.10; ** p < 0.05.
Table
Table 5. Results of the multiple logistic regression analyses using the selected sterols for eczema. Separate models were made for each individual sterol. Non-cholesterol sterol concentrations were adjusted for creamatocrit.
Table 5. Results of the multiple logistic regression analyses using the selected sterols for eczema. Separate models were made for each individual sterol. Non-cholesterol sterol concentrations were adjusted for creamatocrit.
Sterol (µmol/Lf)NOR95% CIp-Value
Brassicasterol 12640.950.87; 1.030.22
Campesterol 22590.950.88; 1.030.25
Cholestanol 32640.980.95; 1.000.04 *
Desmosterol a,12640.520.22; 1.220.13
Lanosterol 42670.970.95; 1.000.02 *
Lathosterol 52670.930.87; 0.990.02 *
Sitosterol 62640.980.95; 1.000.09
Stigmasterol 62640.510.29; 0.910.02 *
OR: odds ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; µmol/Lf = micromoles per liter milk fat; a: unit is mmol/Lf; 1: adjusted for season, atopy of parents, maternal education, duration of breastfeeding, and gravidity; 2: adjusted for season and maternal education; 3: adjusted for atopy of parents and maternal education; 4: adjusted for season, maternal education, and duration breastfeeding; 5: adjusted for maternal education; 6: adjusted for season, atopy of parents, and maternal education; * p < 0.05.
Table
Table 6. Results of the multiple logistic regression analysis using the selected sterols for allergic sensitization. Non-cholesterol sterol concentrations were adjusted for creamatocrit.
Table 6. Results of the multiple logistic regression analysis using the selected sterols for allergic sensitization. Non-cholesterol sterol concentrations were adjusted for creamatocrit.
Sterol (µmol/Lf)NOR95% CIp-Value
Brassicasterol 11760.930.78; 1.120.47
Campesterol 21710.810.70; 0.950.01 *
Cholestanol 31760.980.95; 1.010.26
Lathosterol 41760.990.91; 1.070.77
Sitosterol 51760.970.93; 1.010.13
Stigmasterol 51760.770.42; 1.400.38
OR: odds ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; µmol/Lf = micromoles per liter milk fat; 1: adjusted for study group, season, and duration breastfeeding; 2: adjusted for season and duration breastfeeding; 3: adjusted for smoking; 4: adjusted for smoking, season, and duration breastfeeding; 5: adjusted for smoking and season * p < 0.05.
Table
Table 7. Spearman correlations between cholesterol and non-cholesterol sterols, N = 311.
Table 7. Spearman correlations between cholesterol and non-cholesterol sterols, N = 311.
Sterol (µmol/Lf)Spearman’s ρ
Cholesterol (mmol/Lf)
Brassicasterol−0.42 **
Campesterol 10.40 **
Cholestanol−0.45 **
Desmosterol−0.13 *
Lanosterol−0.07
Lathosterol−0.04
Sitosterol−0.37 **
Stigmasterol−0.51 **
µmol/Lf = micromoles per liter milk fat; 1 N = 303; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.001.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

van Brakel, L.; Thijs, C.; Mensink, R.P.; Lütjohann, D.; Plat, J. Non-Cholesterol Sterols in Breast Milk and Risk of Allergic Outcomes in the First Two Years of Life. Nutrients 2022, 14, 766. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nu14040766

AMA Style

van Brakel L, Thijs C, Mensink RP, Lütjohann D, Plat J. Non-Cholesterol Sterols in Breast Milk and Risk of Allergic Outcomes in the First Two Years of Life. Nutrients. 2022; 14(4):766. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nu14040766

Chicago/Turabian Style

van Brakel, Lieve, Carel Thijs, Ronald P. Mensink, Dieter Lütjohann, and Jogchum Plat. 2022. "Non-Cholesterol Sterols in Breast Milk and Risk of Allergic Outcomes in the First Two Years of Life" Nutrients 14, no. 4: 766. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nu14040766

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop