Next Article in Journal
Durable Antimicrobial Behaviour from Silver-Graphene Coated Medical Textile Composites
Previous Article in Journal
Protection of Mild Steel by Waterborne Epoxy Coatings Incorporation of Polypyrrole Nanowires/Graphene Nanocomposites
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Gallic Acid and Quercetin as Intelligent and Active Ingredients in Poly(vinyl alcohol) Films for Food Packaging

1
Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, University of Perugia, Strada di Pentima 4, 05100 Terni, Italy
2
Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences (DAFNE), University of Tuscia, Via S. Camillo De Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 31 October 2019 / Revised: 28 November 2019 / Accepted: 1 December 2019 / Published: 3 December 2019

Abstract

:
Gallic acid (GA) and quercetin (QC) were used as active ingredients in poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) film formulations obtained by solvent casting process. The effect of two different percentages (5 and 10 % wt.) on morphological behavior, thermal stability, optical, mechanical, and release properties of PVA were investigated, while migration with food stimulants and antioxidant properties were tested taking into account the final application as food packaging systems. The results showed how different dispersability in PVA water solutions gave different results in term of deformability (mean value of ε PVA/5GA = 280% and ε PVA/5QC = 255%, with 190% for neat PVA), comparable values for antioxidant activity at the high contents (Radical Scavenging Activity, RSA(%) PVA/10GA = 95 and RSA(%) PVA/10QC = 91) and different coloring attitude of the polymeric films. It was proved that GA, even if it represents the best antioxidant ingredient to be used with PVA and can be easily dispersed in water, it gives more rigid films in comparison to QC, that indeed was more efficient in tuning the deformability of the PVA films, due the presence of sole hydroxyl groups carrying agent. The deviation of the film coloring towards greenish tones for GA films and redness for QC films after 7 and within 21 days in the simulated conditions confirmed the possibility of using easy processable PVA films as active and intelligent films in food packaging.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In the last few years, the use of pure phenolic compounds and phenolic extracts in active polymeric packaging has attracted a particular interest, since these compounds show potent antimicrobial and antioxidant activity in food systems and their intake can make a contribution to human health. Being the phenolic compounds able to interact with the environment and the product to extend shelf life, their addition to the package reduces the need to use synthetic antioxidants in the plastic, limiting the risk of potential toxicity by migration, and protects at the same time the package content. Equally, the extra protection of the food provided by the slow release of antioxidants from the package can make it possible to reduce the direct addition of chemicals to the food. Polyphenols belong to a wide category of plant derived natural compounds exhibiting many biological properties [1], including anticancer [2,3], anti-inflammatory [4,5], antimicrobial and antioxidant activity [6]. Among these compounds, gallic acid (3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid, GA) and quercetin (3,3′,4′,5,7-pentahydroxyflavone, QC) are two potent antioxidants, due both to their redox properties and structural features (Figure 1), that impart high antioxidant activity: the three hydroxyl groups for GA [7] and the four hydroxyl groups on the A and B ring in combination with the 2,3-double bond, the 4-keto group and the 3-hydroxyl group in the C ring for QC [8]. Both GA and QC are found in the plant kingdom and in plant derived food, and beverages [1]. GA is present in nuts, green tea, and red wine, but also in oak bark and gallnuts as catechin derivatives and hydrolyzable tannins [9]. QC is abundant in onions, apples, berries, cherries, broccoli, red grapevines, and tea. Both compounds are commonly used as additives in cosmetics and food to prevent the oxidative processes responsible for product deterioration [10,11].
Limiting the analysis to their use in poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) based films, the literature reports the incorporation of tannic acid [10], hydroxytyrosol and its derivatives [11,12,13], tea plant [14,15,16] and rosemary extracts, to produce antioxidant films potentially useful to increase the shelf life of food [17,18].
The same approach was used in PVA blends and nanocomposites, as in the case reported by Wu et al. [19] and Matos de Carvalho et al. [20], where the authors respectively demonstrated that PVA–starch films impregnated with 500–1000 ppm of catechins and PVA cast film with solid lipid nanoparticles entrapping α-tocopherol showed relevant antioxidant capacity and controlled release of the active ingredients, confirming the possibility of their use in food preservation.
It is also well known in the literature that dyes containing phenolic or conjugated substances, are useful for colorimetric determination of pH in an intelligent manner. Thus, presence of polyphenols in polymeric films can act as pH indicators and this use has been extensively investigated. In the specific case of PVA based films, Ma et al. [21] developed a pH indicator which consisted of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)-chitosan nanoparticles and mulberry extract and they found that change in color indicator from red to green was correlated with the presence of volatile nitrogenous compounds, which is characteristic of fish spoilage. Anthocyanins that were extracted from roselle immobilized onto starch-PVA-based film were also proposed by Zhai et al. [22] as visual colorimetric film for volatile nitrogenous compounds released in fish spoilage.
In addition, Liu et al. [23] developed an intelligent starch/poly-vinyl alcohol (PVA) capable of monitoring pH changes and inhibiting undesired microbial growth in pasteurized milk. The results suggested that the intelligent films reported here show good capability for both alerting and inhibiting food spoilage. A recent example of QC loaded PVA can be found in He at al. [24], where the authors prepared, via physically mixing QC aggregation-induced emission luminogens (AIEgens) as fluorescence sensors for detecting biogenic amines formed during the spoilage of seafood. Again, Ma et al. [25] prepared pH sensing film from tara gum-cellulose nanocrystal incorporated with natural dye (grape skin extract) to evaluate the pH changes of the milk at ambient temperature for 48 h. During the test, the color of indicator clearly changed from bright red (acidic) to dark green (alkaline), which can be correlated with microbial contamination and pH decrease. The authors suggested that the developed pH sensing film could be used as a visible color indicator and changes in color of the film provide information to monitor the packaged food freshness.
With the same aim, in parallel with morphological, thermal, and mechanical behavior of produced films, the antioxidant activity of PVA containing GA and QC at two different percentage (5 and 10% wt.) before and after release in food simulated solutions and their change in color were here investigated. The variations in terms of color for films was then correlated to swelling behavior of polymeric films in presence of the active ingredients, having in mind to use the produced films as indicators for safe food packaging applications.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

All chemicals, poly(vinyl alcohol) (average MW 124–146 kg mol−1, 99% hydrolyzed) including gallic acid, quercetin dehydrate, and solvents of analytical grade were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich® (Milan, Italy).

2.2. Preparation of PVA Based Formulations

PVA based formulations were prepared by solvent casting technique. The concentrations of active GA and QC were fixed at 5 and 10% wt., as previously reported [26]. Firstly, 0.5 g of PVA was dissolved in 10 mL of distilled water under magnetic stirring for 2 h at 80 °C. The polymeric solution was kept under magnetic stirring to reach room temperature (RT).
PVA based formulations were obtained mixing, under magnetic stirring, the polymeric solution with a specific amount of GA or QC, previously dispersed in distilled water (0.1 g of active ingredient in 10 mL of distilled water) for 1 h at RT. Uniform dispersion of QC or GA in aqueous solution was obtained applying a magnetic stirring and a sonication bath, both at RT for 1 h (Scheme 1).
The polymeric solutions of neat film and binary films were cast in a Teflon® mold and evaporated at RT. Films having thicknesses in the range 30–60 μm were obtained and equilibrated for 7 days at 53% RH (an oversaturated magnesium nitrate solution was used to control the RH) in desiccators, by using magnesium nitrate-6-hydrate oversaturated solution, after the processing and before the characterizations, in accordance to the literature [12,27].

2.3. Characterization of PVA Based Formulations

Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, Supra 25-Zeiss) was used to investigate morphologies of both GA and QC and fractured surface (surface obtained after the tensile test) morphology of PVA based formulations. The surfaces were gold sputtered in order to offer electric conductivity and the samples were observed using an accelerating voltage of 2.5 kV.
FTIR measurements for QC, GA, and PVA formulations were performed by using a Jasco FT-IR 615 spectrometer (Jasco Inc., Easton, MD, USA) in the 400–4000 cm−1 range in attenuated total reflection (ATR) mode.
Thermal characterization of active ingredients and PVA based formulations was carried out by both differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA).
DSC (DSC-TA Instrument, Q200) measurements were performed in the temperature range from −25 to 240 °C, at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1. Three samples were used to characterize each material.
The glass transition temperature (Tg), melting temperature (Tm), crystallization temperature (Tc), and relative enthalpies (ΔHm and ΔHc) were evaluated.
The crystallinity degree (melting crystallinity degree (Xm) and crystallinity degree at cooling scan (Xc)) was calculated according to the following Equation (1):
χ = 1 ( 1 m f ) [ Δ H Δ H 0 ] × 100
where ΔH is the enthalpy for melting or crystallization; ΔH0 is enthalpy of melting for a 100% crystalline PVA sample, taken as 161.6 J g−1 [28,29] and (1 − mf) is the weight fraction of PVA in the sample.
TGA (Seiko Exstar 6300) experiments were performed for each film from 30 to 600 °C at 10 °C min−1 under a nitrogen atmosphere (250 mL min−1) in order to evaluate the effect active ingredient (AI) addition on the thermal stability of PVA matrix.
The mechanical properties (tensile tests) of neat PVA and PVA/AI based systems were performed on rectangular probes as indicated in the EN ISO 527-5 standard, with a crosshead speed 5 mm min−1, a load cell 500 N by using a digital Lloyd testing machine (Lloyd Instrument LR 30K Segens worth West, Foreham, UK).
Average tensile strength (σB), elongation at break (εB), and Young’s modulus (E) were calculated from the resulting stress-strain curves. The measurements were done at room temperature and at least five samples for each formulation were tested.
The overall migration analysis of PVA based formulations was done in triplicate in simulant D (50% (v/v) ethanol/water solution) according to current legislation Commission Regulation (EU) No 10/2011. The analysis was performed to simulate the behavior of polymeric based films in contact with food simulant. Rectangular strips of 10 cm2 in 10 mL of food simulant were used (Commission Regulation, EU 10/2011). The samples were kept in a controlled chamber at 40 °C, removed after 10 days according to EN-1186 standard, and the simulant was evaporated in dishes and dried at 105 °C for 2 h in an oven. The residues were weighed with an analytical balance (Sartorius ATILON) with ±0.01 mg precision and the migration values in mg kg−1 of the/each simulant were determined.
Specific migration tests were performed into ethanol/water 50% (v/v) solution as food simulant according to European Standard EN 13130-2005 (UNE-EN 13130–1: 2005) and European Commission Regulation 10/2011 (Commission Regulation, EU 10/2011). Double-sided, total immersion migration tests were carried out with 12 cm2 of films and 20 mL of simulant (area-to-volume ratio around 6 dm2 L−1) in triplicate at 40 °C in an oven (J. P. Selecta, Barcelona, Spain). Samples were taken at 1, 3, 7, 10, 21 days in triplicate; a blank test for the simulant was also included. After the migration tests, each solution was recovered and stored at −4 °C before analysis.
The color variations of PVA films were investigated by means of a spectrophotometer (CM-2300d Konica Minolta, Japan). Data were acquired by using the SCI 10/D65 method whereas CIELAB color variables, as defined by the Commission Internationale de 1′Éclairage (CIE 1995), were used. Film specimens were placed on a white standard plate and L*, a*, and b*parameters were determined. L* value ranges from 0 (black) to 100 (white); a* value ranges from −80 (green) to 100 (red); and b* value ranges from −80 (blue) to 70 (yellow). Samples were analyzed in triplicate, and three measurements were taken at random locations on each of the studied films. The total color difference ΔE* and gloss values were calculated as indicated in Equation (2):
Δ E * = ( Δ L * ) 2 + ( Δ a * ) 2 + ( Δ b * ) 2

2.4. GA and QC Release Studies in Food Simulant (Specific Migration)

GA and QC released by PVA based formulations in food simulant for every contact time (1, 3, 7, 10, and 21 days) were analyzed by UV-2600 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Absorbance values were measured at 270 nm and at 375 nm for GA and QC, respectively. Standard curves for GA (range 4.0–20 μg mL−1) and QC (range 2.0–14 μg mL−1) have been used. Samples were analyzed in triplicate and results are the mean ± standard deviation (SD) and expressed as μg of antioxidant per mL of food simulant.

2.5. Antioxidant Activity of Films and Food Simulant Solutions

2.5.1. Antioxidant Activity of Films

Radical scavenging activity of PVA based films at initial and after the contact with food simulant (simulant D, 50 v/v% of ethanol) at different times (1, 3, 7, 10, and 21 days) was determined by using a spectroscopic method according to the procedure proposed in literature by Byun et al. [30]. The different PVA systems (0.1 g) were cut into small pieces and immersed in 2 mL of methanol for 24 h at RT. An aliquot of methanol extract (1 mL) was mixed with 1 mL of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl-hydrate (DPPH) in methanol (50 mg L−1). The mixture was allowed to stand at RT in the dark for 60 min. The absorbance was measured at 517 nm using a UV spectrometer (Lambda 35). The DPPH mixture solution of methanol extracted from neat PVA was used as control. DPPH radical scavenging activity (RSA) was measured according to the Equation (3):
R S A ( % ) = A C o n t r o l A S a m p l e A C o n t r o l × 100
where Asample is the absorbance of sample and Acontrol is the absorbance of the control.

2.5.2. Antioxidant Activity of Food Simulant Solutions

The antioxidant activity of the food simulant solutions was determined using the DPPH assay according to the literature already reported by us [11,12]. Briefly, 1.5 mL of DPPH solution (50 mg L−1) was mixed with 1.0 mL of samples and the optical density was recorded at 517 nm after 60 min of reaction in the dark. The DPPH radical scavenging activity was expressed as RSA% according to the Equation (3). The DPPH mixture solution of simulant from neat PVA films was used as control.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The experimental results were expressed as mean ±SD of three replicates. Statistical differences were calculated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) post hoc test.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. GA and QC Characterization

The thermal stability of QC and GA in inert atmosphere was determined by TGA tests, with a run from 30 to 700 °C under nitrogen at 10 °C/min. Figure 2a shows TG/DTG profiles for GA and QC. In the case of QC, that it is proved to be highly hygroscopic, the first loss was observed at 103 °C, due to the loss of H2O molecules from the crystal lattice of its hydrate form [31,32]. The dehydration is complete at 160 °C, no further mass loss was observed until 300 °C, which marks the onset of its thermal degradation [33]. After that, a sharp exothermic peak was observed in QC at 340 °C, due to decomposition of organic matter: we found that a significant amount of complex (38.6%) remains after heating the polymer to 700 °C, and this is attributed to the formation of new catechol-catechol bonds [34]. In the case of GA, the first low intensity degradation peak centered at 87 °C is due to the degradation of water and volatile compounds with low molecular weight, while a main peak centered at ca. 264 °C, that corresponds to the main chain scission, was detected [35]. Finally, minor and progressive degradation phenomena of lower intensity were observed at temperatures above 400 °C, which are related to the residual decomposition of GA at high temperature [36].
The FTIR spectra for QC and GA are shown in Figure 2b. In the case of QC, OH groups stretching were detected at 3403, 3321 (not shown), 1448, and 1014 cm−1 (the large presence of OH groups accounts for the solubility of the polymer in mix solvents such as ethanol/water), whereas OH bending of the phenol function was detectable at 1381 cm−1. The C=O aryl stretching absorption was evident at 1662 cm−1. Aromatic ring stretch bands for C=C were detected at 1610, 1561, and 1520 cm−1. The signal for ν(C–O) can be found at 1462 cm−1 [37], other bands associated with the vibrations of C–O bonds appear also at 1132 cm−1 (C–OH stretching). The in-plane bending band of C–H in aromatic hydrocarbon was detectable at 1318 cm−1, and out-of-plane bending bands were evident at 930, 822, 678, and 603 cm−1. Bands at 1262, 1198, and 1168 cm−1 are related, respectively, to the C–O stretching in the aryl ether ring, the C–O stretching in phenol, and the C–CO–C stretch and bending in ketone [38,39], other signals for C–OH deformation and –C–OH stretch vibration were found at 1214 cm−1 and 1091 cm−1. Minor signals attributable to substituted benzene can be found at 941, 864, 795, and 700 cm–1 [40].
FTIR spectrum for GA powder exhibits characteristic peaks at 3482 cm−1 and 3281 cm−1, which are due to stretching of the O–H groups (not shown), a sharp absorption band of carboxylic group –COOH at 1695 cm−1, absorption bands of –OH at 866 cm−1, as well as –C–OH at 1320 cm−1, 1375 cm−1 (Phenol (or) tertiary alcohol, OH bend), 1244 cm−1 (C–O stretch) and peak at 766, 1021, 1100, and 1614 cm−1, a C=C stretching vibration can be observed at 1539 cm−1 [41]. The peaks located at 1614, 1539, 1446 cm−1 represented the aromatic ring C=C stretching vibrations [42]. There are several peaks in 1300–1000 cm−1 region (1336, 1306, 1203 cm−1) that could be assigned to the stretching vibration of C–O bond and bending vibration of O–H [43]. Minor signals related to substituted benzene can be found at 985, 790, and 700 cm−1.
GA powder (appearance and chemical formula in Figure 3a) was characterized by crystals of small size and regular shape with an apparently smooth surface [44] (Figure 3c) while, after water dispersion/drying, appeared individualized with a fibrous structure, reduced diameters, and increased lengths. In details, FESEM image (Figure 3e) shows that GA was organized as long (10–100 µm) filaments with diameter of 500–550 nm.
In the case of poorly water soluble QC (appearance and chemical formula in Figure 3b), it has been found that, in its powdered form, it consists of irregular rod structures [45,46] (Figure 3d) while, after dispersion in water, reduced particle size was noted (Figure 3f): particle size uniformity was obtained and lack of larger needle-type crystalline structures was found [47,48], in analogy with a previous study where QC morphology in relationship to the interaction with water under room temperature conditions was analyzed [49].

3.2. Characterization of PVA Based Formulations

3.2.1. Morphological Properties

Figure 4, (Panel A) shows the microstructure of the fractured sections of PVA based formulations. PVA film is characterized by a homogeneous, uniform, and smooth fractured surface (Figure 4a) [29,50]. This behavior underlines the good processability and film-forming ability of PVA during solvent casting process. The addition of GA and QC affects the homogeneity and the uniformity of PVA films at both concentrations (5 and 10 wt. %). GA in polymer matrix processed by solvent casting results well dispersed, due to its high hydrophilicity and solubility in water solution [51]. The PVA/GA based films show a porous stretched fractured surface, due to the GA rearrangement during the evaporation phenomenon (Figure 4b,d). The FESEM images of PVA/QC based films (Figure 4c,e) show the presence of QC not properly solubilized in aqueous solution (see the arrows). As already observed by FESEM analysis for QC, after dispersion in water solution reduced particle size was noted (Figure 4d) [47]. In Figure 4, Panel B, images for surfaces of the same samples are reported: the results confirmed the presence of a flat and uniform morphology for the different materials, that was substantially unaffected by the presence of the active ingredients (only a limited roughness was found in the case of QC containing films).

3.2.2. Thermal Analysis

Thermal properties of PVA and PVA based films were evaluated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) under nitrogen atmosphere, with the goal of assessing the effect of both GA and QC at different weight contents on thermal stability of PVA matrix.
Table 1 summarizes the values of parameters related to glass transition, crystallization and melting phenomena of PVA and PVA based films, measured during the cooling and the second heating scans. In the cooling scan, a decrease in the Tg with the increase of active ingredients amount was noted, indicating that the mobility of the PVA chains, probably due to electrostatic interactions between the GA (or QC) and the PVA, diminished [52]. During the cooling, when the content was increased from 0 to 5% for both GA and QC, the crystallization enthalpy increased, manifesting that the crystallinity also increased. However, PVA/10GA and PVA/10QC showed a reduced crystallinity value: apparently, higher contents of active ingredients can hinder the chains packing and inhibit crystals growth, as already observed by Peng et al. [53]. Moreover, the analogous trend was found for the crystallization temperature Tc, that gradually decreased with the addition of GA and QC from 5 to 10% wt. [10].
During the second heating scan, neat PVA glass transition temperature occurred at 77 °C. With the addition of both GA and QC at the two different amounts, Tg gradually increased to a mean value of 85 °C when 10% wt. of both active ingredients was incorporated, whereas a notable enhancement of Tm values during the second heating scan, due to reduced mobility of PVA chains, was also registered [15]. In addition, PVA/GA and PVA/QC films exhibited narrower endothermic peaks than PVA alone (data not shown). Zhu et al. also observed that when polyphenol catechins are mixed with poly(ε-caprolactone) or poly(3-hydroxypropionate), only one Tg exists for all component ranges, and this value increases as the content of polyphenol in the system increases [54].
The effect of QC and GA on degradative behavior of PVA matrix was also investigated by TGA, mass loss and derivative weight loss curves are reported in Figure 5a. All the studied formulations were characterized by the presence of a multi-step degradation behavior: the first weight loss, at low temperature centered at around 80–110 °C, corresponds to the removal of weakly bound water or dehydration. The second and the third degradation temperatures correspond to the degradation of neat PVA [55]. In particular, the second/main degradation step of PVA film corresponds to the chain scissoring, with removal of residual acetate groups, due to the incomplete hydrolysis of PVA that remains in the chains, while the third degradation step is due to the cyclization reaction and continual elimination of residual acetate groups [13].
GA containing films displayed enhanced Tmax and decrease in the rate of degradation (indicated by the broadening of DTG curve), with the shift of the second degradation peak from 247 °C for neat PVA to 264 and 267 °C, respectively for PVA/5GA and PVA/10GA. It is considered that interactions between the terminal –OH groups of the biopolymer chain with –OH, –CO, and/or –COOH chemical groups of the GA components via hydrogen bonding are responsible for the observed thermal stability improvement [56,57]. QC containing films showed prominent effect on the thermal properties with huge improvement in the Tmax values, with the shift of the second degradation peak to 276 and 344 °C, respectively for PVA/5QC and PVA/10QC, confirming the observation of Dhand et al. [58], where it was found that strong covalent or non-covalent interactions between the −OH groups of PVA with −OH moieties of heteroaromatic catechol structures conferred a thermal shift, that was more evident in the case of complex polyphenols.

3.2.3. Mechanical Response

The mechanical response of the active ingredients based PVA films was here investigated taking into account the final application in the industrial sector for which the mechanical characteristics are critical issues. The performed tensile tests permitted to evaluate the influence of GA and QC on the PVA mechanical properties, experimental results are reported in Figure 5b and Table 2.
The elongation at break of PVA neat film was measured at 195 ± 45%, underlining the ductile nature of the selected polymer matrix, as already previously observed in the literature [12]. The addition of different amounts of GA and QC to PVA induced a modification in the plastic response of PVA matrix. In particular, the deformation at break for PVA/5GA increased to about 280% as a result of a plasticizing effect [59], while the value was maintained similar to unfilled system by adding 10% wt. of GA in the PVA matrix. It is reasonable to argue that the presence of phenolic compounds having hydrophilic properties might have contributed to increase the inter-chain interactions, reducing the flexibility of the PVA films [57,60].
In comparison with neat PVA, a limited decrease of strength values was also observed, that can be explained by the change of intramolecular bonding with the addition of GA and QC. PVA/5QC films showed tensile strength values higher than PVA/5GC, and this result can be related to the inter-molecular interactions between hydrophilic groups in PVA and polyhydroxyl groups of quercetin [61]. On the other hand, tensile strength of PVA/10QC was weaker than that of PVA. This was because the incorporation of excessive amount of hydrophobic quercetin made the inner structure of PVA film become discontinue [62]. In analogy with results from Yoon et al. [63], that reported the variation in flexibility and strength of PVA films containing additives having both hydroxyl and carboxyl groups (glycerol and succinic acid) and glycerol (only hydroxyl groups), in our case we observed that, when GA having both hydroxyl and carboxyl groups is added to PVA films, more rigid films were found than those with only hydroxyl group-containing agent (QC).

3.2.4. Overall Migration, Antioxidant Activity of PVA Formulations and Simulant Solutions at Different Times

Overall migration test is used to determine the limit value at which the substances that compose the polymeric base of specific films for food packaging applications can migrate into foods during the different phases, in particular during the transport and commercialization of foodstuffs [64]. In this research work, the analysis was performed by using one food simulant, ethanol 50% (v/v) (D1), utilized to established the behavior of polymeric films in contact with fatty foods. Table 3 summarizes the migrated levels for all the systems, all the values were lower than the migration limit for foodstuffs contact materials (60 mg kg−1 simulant). The obtained results demonstrate the potential applicability of the realized polymeric systems in contact with the food.
Generally, the migrated value increases with increase of QC (or GA) content in the matrix [26,65]. The presence of GA in PVA films induces a slight increase of migration levels in comparison with PVA/QC based films (PVA/5GA = (6.8 ± 0.1) mg kg−1 and PVA/10GA = (9.9 ± 0.5) mg kg−1 for GA, PVA/5QC = (6.6 ± 0.4) mg kg−1 and PVA/10QC = (9.5 ± 0.4) mg kg−1 for QC). This behavior can be related to the tendency of GA to better solubilize in aqueous solutions with respect of QC [66] (Table 3). Additionally, the oxidation of foodstuffs during transportation and storage leads to a series of negative changes in food, such as the sensory characteristics of the product (e.g., changes in aesthetic aspect and color, rancidity, and smell) [67,68].
According to this, the efficiency of the produced PVA/GA and PVA/QC based formulations as antioxidant packaging systems was also verified, by testing the reduction of stable free radical DPPH, the obtained data were expressed as RSA (%) and reported in Figure 5c and Table 4. The high antioxidant activity of GA and QC is related to the number and position of the free phenolic hydroxyl groups in the QC and GA molecule [69,70], that intercept free radical chain, inducing the formation of a stable end product, which does not initiate or propagate oxidation of lipids [70].
In Table 4, RSA values for PVA/GA and PVA/QC films evaluated at different times was also presented: no significant differences among the different formulations and among the same formulation at different times were noted (except for the time 0 that shows the lowest value of RSA). The radical scavenging activity reached a maximum reduction of DPPH radicals at 7 days in contact of food simulant (Table 4) (RSA (%): PVA/5GA = (95.0 ± 0.3)%, PVA/10GA = (95.1 ± 0.1)%, PVA/5QC = (96.3 ± 0.2)%, and PVA/10QC = (95.8 ± 0.1)%).
Furthermore, the residual antioxidant activity resulting from specific migration tests of GA and QC containing PVA films was determined (Figure 6a). The measurement of the radical scavenging ability of the food simulant solutions revealed a relevant antioxidant activity detected in all of the samples (RSA% = 56.11 for PVA/10GA, day 21 and RSA% = 40.39 for PVA/10QC, day 21) and even the solutions of films at the lowest concentrations (PVA/5GA and PVA/5QC) exhibited appreciable values of antioxidant capacity (RSA% = 17.39 for PVA/5GA, day 21 and RSA% = 25.65 for PVA/5QC, day 21). Indeed, all samples showed an antioxidant activity in line with the release studies, that will be further discussed.

3.2.5. Release Tests in Food Simulant

Release tests were done according to the European Standard EN 13130-200522 and European Commission Regulation 10/2011 [71], to define the release profile of GA and QC incorporated into the PVA matrix. Thus, PVA/GA and PVA/QC systems were immersed into the simulant used for fatty foods (ethanol 50% v/v) for 21 days. All samples were examined at 1, 3, 7, 10, and 21 days, measuring released GA and QC, by UV–vis spectrophotometry (Figure 6b). In all formulations, measured values for released QC and GA are correlated with their concentrations in the films. Indeed, the migration levels from PVA/10GA are increased respect to PVA/5GA, which have been measured, respectively, as 701.54 µg/mL (day 21) and 296.76 µg/mL (day 21). PVA/QC followed the same trend with 495.96 µg/mL (day 21) for PVA/10QC and 231.11 µg/mL (day 21) for PVA/5QC, respectively released from the PVA matrix.
In similar migration experiments, it has been reported that only 1.15% of the QC had been released after 48 h in 95% EtOH and that no more QC was released when the test time was extended to 72 h [24].
FTIR characterization for PVA films after the different release times was also performed, with the main aim of correlating the RSA/release tests information with the physical state of the PVA films containing GA and QC at the two different contents.
In Figure 7a, the spectra of the PVA films at the different times are reported. It can be commented that, in case of neat PVA, no substantial variations were observed, with exception of the peak at 1322 cm−1 (due to –CH bending), 1142 cm−1 (C–O stretching band), and 915 cm−1 (assigned to the CH2 rocking vibration) that were more intense, as reported by Zuo et al. [72], PVA membrane after immersion in aqueous ethanol solution showed variation in contact angle values for fully hydrolyzed PVA, attributed to the reorientation of hydroxyl groups at the surface of the membrane. In our case, when the PVA surface contacts the ethanol/water feed mixture, polar −OH groups reoriented at the surface, creating a more hydrophilic conformation (confirmed even by the more intense signal, for our PVA films, of –OH band centered at 3310 cm−1 from 0 to 21 days, levelled after 10 days, confirming the results of PVA 99% water contact angle already observed in [72], where ethanol molecules adsorb from solution onto a PVA film surface in an ordered and cooperative way governed by H-bonding, resulting in a more hydrophobic surface, when the hydrolysis degree of PVA is higher than 96%.
In the case of GA and QC containing films (Figure 7b), spectra analysis evidenced a relative intensity variation for the peaks at 1091 and 1142 cm−1, assigned to stretching vibrations of C=O in PVA. More intense peaks at 1375 cm−1 and 1237 cm−1, related to vibration of phenol alcohol in GA, were noted at 7 and 21 days, while a signal at 1040 cm−1 (C–O stretching) resulted less intense: these results are in line with the detected amount of GA in the ethanolic solutions at the same times. In the case of QC, the modified intensity of bands for aromatic C=C at 1611 and 1522 cm−1, in-plane bending band of C–H in aromatic hydrocarbon at 1320 cm−1, C–O and C–CO–C stretch stretching in the aryl ether ring at 1263 and 1168 cm−1 confirmed the evident release of the QC ingredient. On the other hand, it was observed, during the release tests, that the overall swelling degree of GA added films was higher than those of QC added films at 7 and 21 days, and it has been confirmed by analysis of the morphology for swelled fractured surfaces at time 7 and 21 days (Figure 8a): due to the more hydrophilic character of hydroxyl and carboxyl groups containing additive, GA containing films resulted more porous than both neat PVA and PVA/QC films, justifying the increased released amount in case of GA. Nevertheless, as previously observed by Luzi et al. in PVA/Hydroxytyrosol systems [12], the addition of an hydrophilic active ingredient generally enhances the water absorption, which in turn can be also correlated to the lower values of crystallinity degree measured for formulation at 10% wt. of GA, as reported in Table 1.
These interesting packaging materials indeed exhibit a coloration due to the addition of the two ingredients: color of such materials can be considered definitely useful in many applications, such as in the labeling of packaged food, since color of solutions/films can be not only tuned by using natural phytocompounds, but they could be employed as indicators of polymers ageing time when a pH variation is observed. According to this, color parameters for the produced films at time 0 and after different release times were measured. The initial deviation (time 0) of b value from 0.19 ± 0.02 to 5.66 ± 0.02 and increased value of ΔE (6.36 instead of 0.56) showed, for PVA/5GA sample, the tendency towards yellowing and total color changes of films compared to the control (PVA film), essentially due to the presence of well dispersed polyphenolic compounds. When higher amounts of GA was introduced, reduced tendency to yellowness was measured (b = 3.00 ± 0.02), probably related to a limited dispersion of the active ingredient, as already confirmed by mechanical and morphological analysis of PVA/10GA films.
After the release tests (values for 7 and 21 days are also included in Table 5) and immersion in the simulant solution, only the color of the PVA/5GA films deviated towards green (a = −3.64 ± 0.08 when compared with neat PVA (a = −0.17 ± 0.01)), while the a values turned to be less negative (a = −0.65 ± 0.09) in PVA/10GA, and the b remained substantially unvaried at 21 days. In the case of QC containing films, even the a value was greatly modified towards red, due to the initial color of the filler itself, with yellow basic color shifted to orange-like hues (Figure 8b). Since color change in intelligent films is largely due to the generation of organic acids during anaerobic respiration of anaerobic bacteria or facultative anaerobic bacteria under hypoxic or anaerobic condition, higher acidity values could indicate a time evolving inferior freshness [73]. According to these results, it could be reasonable to use these films as intelligent labels to detect acidity variations in the packages during relatively short food life.

4. Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that GA and QC as active ingredients in PVA films can be used to tune not only the antioxidant behavior, but also the deformability of the produced films. It was proved that high content of active ingredients (10% wt.) can be easily released in simulated ethanolic solution and can express high antioxidant activity. At the same time, the active ingredients can hinder the chains packing and inhibit the crystals growth, giving more rigid films, as detected in GA containing films. Nevertheless, QC, that was less dispersible in PVA solutions at the same conditions and showed reduced RSA activity in comparison with GA, can be indeed more efficient in tuning the deformability of the water cast PVA films, due the presence of sole hydroxyl groups carrying agent. The capability of both polyphenols of altering the color of the films after release at different specific times also confirmed the possibility of using these easy processable PVA films as active and intelligent films in food packaging when a specific shelf life (3–21 days) is required.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.B., L.S., J.M.K., and L.T., investigation, F.L., E.P.; writing—original draft preparation, F.L., E.P., and D.P.; writing—review and editing, D.P., R.B., L.S., and L.T.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Quideau, S.; Deffieux, D.; Douat-Casassus, C.; Pouységu, L. Plant Polyphenols: Chemical Properties, Biological Activities, and Synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 586–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bernini, R.; Gilardini Montani, M.S.; Merendino, N.; Romani, A.; Velotti, F. Hydroxytyrosol-Derived Compounds: A Basis for the Creation of New Pharmacological Agents for Cancer Prevention and Therapy. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 9089–9107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bernini, R.; Carastro, I.; Palmini, G.; Tanini, A.; Zonefrati, R.; Pinelli, P.; Brandi, M.L.; Romani, A. Lipophilization of Hydroxytyrosol-Enriched Fractions from Olea europaea L. Byproducts and Evaluation of the in Vitro Effects on a Model of Colorectal Cancer Cells. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 6506–6512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. D’Eliseo, D.; Pannucci, E.; Bernini, R.; Campo, M.; Romani, A.; Santi, L.; Velotti, F. In vitro studies on anti-inflammatory activities of kiwifruit peel extract in human THP-1 monocytes. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2019, 233, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Mastrogiovanni, F.; Mukhopadhya, A.; Lacetera, N.; Ryan, T.M.; Romani, A.; Bernini, R.; Sweeney, T. Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Pomegranate Peel Extracts on In Vitro Human Intestinal Caco-2 Cells and Ex Vivo Porcine Colonic Tissue Explants. Nutrients 2019, 11, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Pannucci, E.; Caracciolo, R.; Romani, A.; Cacciola, F.; Dugo, P.; Bernini, R.; Varvaro, L.; Santi, L. An hydroxytyrosol enriched extract from olive mill wastewaters exerts antioxidant activity and antimicrobial activity on Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi and Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Nat. Prod. Res. 2019, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Badhani, B.; Sharma, N.; Kakkar, R. Gallic acid: A versatile antioxidant with promising therapeutic and industrial applications. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 27540–27557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Heim, K.E.; Tagliaferro, A.R.; Bobilya, D.J. Flavonoid antioxidants: Chemistry, metabolism and structure-activity relationships. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2002, 13, 572–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Campo, M.; Pinelli, P.; Romani, A. Hydrolyzable Tannins from Sweet Chestnut Fractions Obtained by a Sustainable and Eco-friendly Industrial Process. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2016, 11, 1934578X1601100323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Guan, Y.; Shao, L.; Dong, D.; Wang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y. Bio-inspired natural polyphenol cross-linking poly (vinyl alcohol) films with strong integrated strength and toughness. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 69966–69972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Khan, M.K.; Paniwnyk, L.; Hassan, S. Polyphenols as Natural Antioxidants: Sources, Extraction and Applications in Food, Cosmetics and Drugs. In Plant Based “Green Chemistry 2.0”. Green Chemistry and Sustainable Technology; Li, Y., Chemat, F., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fortunati, E.; Luzi, F.; Fanali, C.; Dugo, L.; Belluomo, M.G.; Torre, L.; Kenny, J.M.; Santi, L.; Bernini, R. Hydroxytyrosol as Active Ingredient in Poly (vinyl alcohol) Films for Food Packaging Applications. J. Renew. Mater. 2016, 5, 81–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Luzi, F.; Fortunati, E.; Di Michele, A.; Pannucci, E.; Botticella, E.; Santi, L.; Kenny, J.M.; Torre, L.; Bernini, R. Nanostructured starch combined with hydroxytyrosol in poly(vinyl alcohol) based ternary films as active packaging system. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 193, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xu, X.-J.; Huang, S.-M.; Zhang, L.-H. Biodegradability, antibacterial properties, and ultraviolet protection of polyvinyl alcohol-natural polyphenol blends. Polym. Compos. 2009, 30, 1611–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, Y.; Wang, S.; Lan, W.; Qin, W. Development of ultrasound treated polyvinyl alcohol/tea polyphenol composite films and their physicochemical properties. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2019, 51, 386–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lan, W.; Zhang, R.; Ahmed, S.; Qin, W.; Liu, Y. Effects of various antimicrobial polyvinyl alcohol/tea polyphenol composite films on the shelf life of packaged strawberries. LWT 2019, 113, 108297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ottombrino, A.; Fratianni, F.; Nazzaro, F. Antibacterial properties of polyvinyl alcohol-rosemary polyphenol blends. In Microbes in Applied Research; WORLD SCIENTIFIC: Singapore, 2012; pp. 209–212. [Google Scholar]
  18. Estevez-Areco, S.; Guz, L.; Candal, R.; Goyanes, S. Release kinetics of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) polyphenols from polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) electrospun nanofibers in several food simulants. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2018, 18, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wu, J.-G.; Wang, P.-J.; Chen, S.C. Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Effectiveness of Catechin-Impregnated PVA–Starch Film on Red Meat. J. Food Qual. 2010, 33, 780–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. de Carvalho, S.M.; Noronha, C.M.; da Rosa, C.G.; Sganzerla, W.G.; Bellettini, I.C.; Nunes, M.R.; Bertoldi, F.C.; Manique Barreto, P.L. PVA antioxidant nanocomposite films functionalized with alpha-tocopherol loaded solid lipid nanoparticles. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 581, 123793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ma, Q.; Liang, T.; Cao, L.; Wang, L. Intelligent poly (vinyl alcohol)-chitosan nanoparticles-mulberry extracts films capable of monitoring pH variations. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 108, 576–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhai, X.; Shi, J.; Zou, X.; Wang, S.; Jiang, C.; Zhang, J.; Huang, X.; Zhang, W.; Holmes, M. Novel colorimetric films based on starch/polyvinyl alcohol incorporated with roselle anthocyanins for fish freshness monitoring. Food Hydrocoll. 2017, 69, 308–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Liu, B.; Xu, H.; Zhao, H.; Liu, W.; Zhao, L.; Li, Y. Preparation and characterization of intelligent starch/PVA films for simultaneous colorimetric indication and antimicrobial activity for food packaging applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 157, 842–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. He, T.; Wang, H.; Chen, Z.; Liu, S.; Li, J.; Li, S. Natural Quercetin AIEgen Composite Film with Antibacterial and Antioxidant Properties for in Situ Sensing of Al3+ Residues in Food, Detecting Food Spoilage, and Extending Food Storage Times. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2018, 1, 636–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ma, Q.; Wang, L. Preparation of a visual pH-sensing film based on tara gum incorporating cellulose and extracts from grape skins. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 235, 401–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Luzi, F.; Puglia, D.; Dominici, F.; Fortunati, E.; Giovanale, G.; Balestra, G.M.; Torre, L. Effect of gallic acid and umbelliferone on thermal, mechanical, antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of poly (vinyl alcohol-co-ethylene) films. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2018, 152, 162–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cano, A.I.; Cháfer, M.; Chiralt, A.; González-Martínez, C. Physical and microstructural properties of biodegradable films based on pea starch and PVA. J. Food Eng. 2015, 167, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Roohani, M.; Habibi, Y.; Belgacem, N.M.; Ebrahim, G.; Karimi, A.N.; Dufresne, A. Cellulose whiskers reinforced polyvinyl alcohol copolymers nanocomposites. Eur. Polym. J. 2008, 44, 2489–2498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Luzi, F.; Fortunati, E.; Giovanale, G.; Mazzaglia, A.; Torre, L.; Balestra, G.M. Cellulose nanocrystals from Actinidia deliciosa pruning residues combined with carvacrol in PVA_CH films with antioxidant/antimicrobial properties for packaging applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 104, 43–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Byun, Y.; Kim, Y.T.; Whiteside, S. Characterization of an antioxidant polylactic acid (PLA) film prepared with α-tocopherol, BHT and polyethylene glycol using film cast extruder. J. Food Eng. 2010, 100, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. da Costa, E.M.; Filho, J.M.B.; do Nascimento, T.G.; Macêdo, R.O. Thermal characterization of the quercetin and rutin flavonoids. Thermochim. Acta 2002, 392–393, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Borghetti, G.S.; Carini, J.P.; Honorato, S.B.; Ayala, A.P.; Moreira, J.C.F.; Bassani, V.L. Physicochemical properties and thermal stability of quercetin hydrates in the solid state. Thermochim. Acta 2012, 539, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Masek, A.; Chrzescijanska, E. Effect of UV-A irradiation and temperature on the antioxidant activity of quercetin studied using ABTS, DPPH and electrochemistry methods. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2015, 10, 5276–5290. [Google Scholar]
  34. Bruno, F.F.; Trotta, A.; Fossey, S.; Nagarajan, S.; Nagarajan, R.; Samuelson, L.A.; Kumar, J. Enzymatic Synthesis and Characterization of PolyQuercetin. J. Macromol. Sci. Part A 2010, 47, 1191–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Aydogdu, A.; Sumnu, G.; Sahin, S. Fabrication of gallic acid loaded Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose nanofibers by electrospinning technique as active packaging material. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 208, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Santos, N.A.; Cordeiro, A.M.T.M.; Damasceno, S.S.; Aguiar, R.T.; Rosenhaim, R.; Carvalho Filho, J.R.; Santos, I.M.G.; Maia, A.S.; Souza, A.G. Commercial antioxidants and thermal stability evaluations. Fuel 2012, 97, 638–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Woźnicka, E.; Pieniążek, E.; Zapała, L.; Byczyński, Ł.; Trojnar, I.; Kopacz, M. New sulfonic derivatives of quercetin as complexing reagents: Synthesis, spectral, and thermal characterization. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2015, 120, 351–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Pereira, A.B.; Silva, A.M.D.; Barroca, M.J.; Marques, M.P.M.; Braga, S.S. Physicochemical properties, antioxidant action and practical application in fresh cheese of the solid inclusion compound γ-cyclodextrin·quercetin, in comparison with β-cyclodextrin·quercetin. Arab. J. Chem. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Catauro, M.; Papale, F.; Bollino, F.; Piccolella, S.; Marciano, S.; Nocera, P.; Pacifico, S. Silica/quercetin sol–gel hybrids as antioxidant dental implant materials. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2015, 16, 035001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ali, H.; Dixit, S. Quercetin attenuates the development of 7, 12-dimethyl benz (a) anthracene (DMBA) and croton oil-induced skin cancer in mice. J. Biomed. Res. 2015, 29, 139. [Google Scholar]
  41. Sarria-Villa, R.A.; Gallo-Corredor, J.A.; Páez, M.I. Isolation of catechin and gallic acid from Colombian bark of Pinus patula. Chem. Sci. J. 2017, 8, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Omrani, Z.; Tehrani, A.D. New cyclodextrin-based supramolecular nanocapsule for codelivery of curcumin and gallic acid. Polym. Bull. 2019, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Naz, S.; Khaskheli, A.R.; Aljabour, A.; Kara, H.; Talpur, F.N.; Sherazi, S.T.H.; Khaskheli, A.A.; Jawaid, S. Synthesis of highly stable cobalt nanomaterial using gallic acid and its application in catalysis. Adv. Chem. 2014, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Liu, C.; Chen, C.; Ma, H.; Yuan, E.; Li, Q. Characterization and DPPH radical scavenging activity of gallic acid-lecithin complex. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2014, 13, 1333–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Kakran, M.; Shegokar, R.; Sahoo, N.G.; Gohla, S.; Li, L.; Müller, R.H. Long-term stability of quercetin nanocrystals prepared by different methods. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2012, 64, 1394–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yan, J.; Wu, Y.-H.; Yu, D.-G.; Williams, G.R.; Huang, S.-M.; Tao, W.; Sun, J.-Y. Electrospun acid–base pair solid dispersions of quercetin. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 58265–58271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Srinivas, K.; King, J.W.; Howard, L.R.; Monrad, J.K. Solubility and solution thermodynamic properties of quercetin and quercetin dihydrate in subcritical water. J. Food Eng. 2010, 100, 208–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Karadag, A.; Ozcelik, B.; Huang, Q. Quercetin Nanosuspensions Produced by High-Pressure Homogenization. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 1852–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pralhad, T.; Rajendrakumar, K. Study of freeze-dried quercetin–cyclodextrin binary systems by DSC, FT-IR, X-ray diffraction and SEM analysis. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2004, 34, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hajji, S.; Chaker, A.; Jridi, M.; Maalej, H.; Jellouli, K.; Boufi, S.; Nasri, M. Structural analysis, and antioxidant and antibacterial properties of chitosan-poly (vinyl alcohol) biodegradable films. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 15310–15320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Daneshfar, A.; Ghaziaskar, H.S.; Homayoun, N. Solubility of Gallic Acid in Methanol, Ethanol, Water, and Ethyl Acetate. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2008, 53, 776–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Oliveira, R.N.; McGuinness, G.B.; Rouze, R.; Quilty, B.; Cahill, P.; Soares, G.D.A.; Thiré, R.M.S.M. PVA hydrogels loaded with a Brazilian propolis for burn wound healing applications. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Peng, M.; Xiao, G.; Tang, X.; Zhou, Y. Hydrogen-Bonding Assembly of Rigid-Rod Poly(p-sulfophenylene terephthalamide) and Flexible-Chain Poly(vinyl alcohol) for Transparent, Strong, and Tough Molecular Composites. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 8411–8419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhu, B.; Li, J.; He, Y.; Yoshie, N.; Inoue, Y. Hydrogen-Bonding Interaction and Crystalline Morphology in the Binary Blends of Poly(ε-caprolactone) and Polyphenol Catechin. Macromol. Biosci. 2003, 3, 684–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Thomas, P.S.; Guerbois, J.P.; Russell, G.F.; Briscoe, B.J. FTIR study of the thermal degradation of poly (vinyl alcohol). J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2001, 64, 501–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Quiles-Carrillo, L.; Montanes, N.; Lagaron, J.M.; Balart, R.; Torres-Giner, S. Bioactive Multilayer Polylactide Films with Controlled Release Capacity of Gallic Acid Accomplished by Incorporating Electrospun Nanostructured Coatings and Interlayers. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Gaikwad, K.K.; Lee, J.Y.; Lee, Y.S. Development of polyvinyl alcohol and apple pomace bio-composite film with antioxidant properties for active food packaging application. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 1608–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Dhand, C.; Harini, S.; Venkatesh, M.; Dwivedi, N.; Ng, A.; Liu, S.; Verma, N.K.; Ramakrishna, S.; Beuerman, R.W.; Loh, X.J.; et al. Multifunctional Polyphenols- and Catecholamines-Based Self-Defensive Films for Health Care Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 1220–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Hager, A.-S.; Vallons, K.J.R.; Arendt, E.K. Influence of gallic acid and tannic acid on the mechanical and barrier properties of wheat gluten films. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 6157–6163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rababah, T.M.; Hettiarachchy, N.S.; Horax, R. Total Phenolics and Antioxidant Activities of Fenugreek, Green Tea, Black Tea, Grape Seed, Ginger, Rosemary, Gotu Kola, and Ginkgo Extracts, Vitamin E, and tert-Butylhydroquinone. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 5183–5186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rubilar, J.F.; Cruz, R.M.S.; Silva, H.D.; Vicente, A.A.; Khmelinskii, I.; Vieira, M.C. Physico-mechanical properties of chitosan films with carvacrol and grape seed extract. J. Food Eng. 2013, 115, 466–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Bai, R.; Zhang, X.; Yong, H.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Liu, J. Development and characterization of antioxidant active packaging and intelligent Al3+-sensing films based on carboxymethyl chitosan and quercetin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 126, 1074–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Yoon, S.-D.; Chough, S.-H.; Park, H.-R. Effects of additives with different functional groups on the physical properties of starch/PVA blend film. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 100, 3733–3740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Schmidt, B.; Katiyar, V.; Plackett, D.; Larsen, E.H.; Gerds, N.; Koch, C.B.; Petersen, J.H. Migration of nanosized layered double hydroxide platelets from polylactide nanocomposite films. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2011, 28, 956–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Fortunati, E.; Luzi, F.; Dugo, L.; Fanali, C.; Tripodo, G.; Santi, L.; Kenny, J.M.; Torre, L.; Bernini, R. Effect of hydroxytyrosol methyl carbonate on the thermal, migration and antioxidant properties of PVA-based films for active food packaging. Polym. Int. 2016, 65, 872–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Alvarez, V.A.; Ruseckaite, R.A.; Vázquez, A. Kinetic analysis of thermal degradation in poly(ethylene–vinyl alcohol) copolymers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 90, 3157–3163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Souza, M.P.; Vaz, A.F.M.; Silva, H.D.; Cerqueira, M.A.; Vicente, A.A.; Carneiro-da-Cunha, M.G. Development and Characterization of an Active Chitosan-Based Film Containing Quercetin. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2015, 8, 2183–2191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Braga, L.R.; Pérez, L.M.; Soazo, M.D.V.; Machado, F. Evaluation of the antimicrobial, antioxidant and physicochemical properties of Poly(Vinyl chloride) films containing quercetin and silver nanoparticles. LWT 2019, 101, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Cao, G.; Sofic, E.; Prior, R.L. Antioxidant and Prooxidant Behavior of Flavonoids: Structure-Activity Relationships. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1997, 22, 749–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Murthy, P.S.; Naidu, M.M. Recovery of Phenolic Antioxidants and Functional Compounds from Coffee Industry By-Products. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2012, 5, 897–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. European, C. Commission Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 of 14 January 2011 on plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with food. Off. J. Eur. Union 2011, 12, 1–89. [Google Scholar]
  72. Zuo, B.; Hu, Y.; Lu, X.; Zhang, S.; Fan, H.; Wang, X. Surface Properties of Poly(vinyl alcohol) Films Dominated by Spontaneous Adsorption of Ethanol and Governed by Hydrogen Bonding. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 3396–3406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zhai, X.; Li, Z.; Zhang, J.; Shi, J.; Zou, X.; Huang, X.; Zhang, D.; Sun, Y.; Yang, Z.; Holmes, M.; et al. Natural Biomaterial-Based Edible and pH-Sensitive Films Combined with Electrochemical Writing for Intelligent Food Packaging. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 12836–12846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Chemical structure of gallic acid (GA) and quercetin (QC).
Figure 1. Chemical structure of gallic acid (GA) and quercetin (QC).
Polymers 11 01999 g001
Scheme 1. Procedure for the preparation of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) formulations.
Scheme 1. Procedure for the preparation of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) formulations.
Polymers 11 01999 sch001
Figure 2. (a) TG and DTG curves and (b) FTIR spectra for gallic acid (GA) and quercetin (QC) powders.
Figure 2. (a) TG and DTG curves and (b) FTIR spectra for gallic acid (GA) and quercetin (QC) powders.
Polymers 11 01999 g002
Figure 3. Visual aspect and chemical formula for GA (a), FESEM image of powder before (c) and after (e) dispersion in water prior to sonication; visual aspect and chemical formula for QC (b), FESEM image of powder before (d) and after (f) dispersion in water.
Figure 3. Visual aspect and chemical formula for GA (a), FESEM image of powder before (c) and after (e) dispersion in water prior to sonication; visual aspect and chemical formula for QC (b), FESEM image of powder before (d) and after (f) dispersion in water.
Polymers 11 01999 g003
Figure 4. FESEM microstructure of fractured cross-sections (Panel A) and surfaces (Panel B) of PVA (a), PVA/5GA (b), PVA/5QC (c) PVA/10GA (d), and PVA/10QC (e) based formulations.
Figure 4. FESEM microstructure of fractured cross-sections (Panel A) and surfaces (Panel B) of PVA (a), PVA/5GA (b), PVA/5QC (c) PVA/10GA (d), and PVA/10QC (e) based formulations.
Polymers 11 01999 g004
Figure 5. Mass loss and derivative weight loss curves (nitrogen) for PVA/GA and PVA/QC formulations at 5 and 10% wt. (a); Stress-strain curves from tensile tests for PVA/GA and PVA/QC (b); reduction of stable free radical DPPH (Radical scavenging activity, RSA) for PVA/GA and PVA/QC based formulations (c).
Figure 5. Mass loss and derivative weight loss curves (nitrogen) for PVA/GA and PVA/QC formulations at 5 and 10% wt. (a); Stress-strain curves from tensile tests for PVA/GA and PVA/QC (b); reduction of stable free radical DPPH (Radical scavenging activity, RSA) for PVA/GA and PVA/QC based formulations (c).
Polymers 11 01999 g005
Figure 6. Antioxidant activity (RSA%) of food simulant solutions after specific migration tests from the PVA-based films, evaluated by DPPH assay (a) gallic acid (GA) and quercetin (QC) released (μM) from the PVA-based films in food simulant (b); Labels indicate significant statistical differences between different time tests for each formulation; where ANOVA was significant the Tukey’s (HSD) test was performed at p < 0.05 for the antioxidant activity and at p < 0.01 for the release test.
Figure 6. Antioxidant activity (RSA%) of food simulant solutions after specific migration tests from the PVA-based films, evaluated by DPPH assay (a) gallic acid (GA) and quercetin (QC) released (μM) from the PVA-based films in food simulant (b); Labels indicate significant statistical differences between different time tests for each formulation; where ANOVA was significant the Tukey’s (HSD) test was performed at p < 0.05 for the antioxidant activity and at p < 0.01 for the release test.
Polymers 11 01999 g006
Figure 7. FTIR spectra of neat PVA (a), PVA/10GA and PVA/10QC films at the different times of immersion in simulated release solutions (b).
Figure 7. FTIR spectra of neat PVA (a), PVA/10GA and PVA/10QC films at the different times of immersion in simulated release solutions (b).
Polymers 11 01999 g007
Figure 8. FESEM images of fractured surfaces for PVA based formulation after 7 and 21 days (a); visual observation of films of GA and QC based PVA formulations at 0, 1, 3, 7, 10, and 21 days (b).
Figure 8. FESEM images of fractured surfaces for PVA based formulation after 7 and 21 days (a); visual observation of films of GA and QC based PVA formulations at 0, 1, 3, 7, 10, and 21 days (b).
Polymers 11 01999 g008
Table 1. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis of PVA based films.
Table 1. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis of PVA based films.
Cooling
FormulationsTg (°C)ΔHc (J g−1)Tc (°C)Xc (%)
PVA73.1 ± 0.1 b48.5 ± 2.1 a,b188.9 ± 0.2 a30.0 ± 1.3 a,b
PVA/5GA71.9 ± 0.5 a,b54.0 ± 2.3 c201.1 ± 0.5 c33.4 ± 1.3 c
PVA/10GA71.6 ± 0.8 a,b48.09 ± 0.3 a,b198.0 ± 2.0 b29.8 ± 0.2 a,b
PVA/5QC71.5 ± 0.3 a52.0 ± 0.3 b,c200.9 ± 0.2 c32.2 ± 0.2 b,c
PVA/10QC71.1 ± 0.2 a45.3 ± 2.1 a191.5 ± 0.9 a28.1 ± 1.3 a
Second Heating
Tg (°C)ΔHm (J g−1)Tm (°C) Xm (%)
PVA76.6 ± 0.9 a38.0 ± 3.9 a217.3 ± 0.1 a23.5 ± 2.4 a
PVA/5GA82.6 ± 0.1 b56.7 ± 2.1 b227.5 ± 0.2 c35.1 ± 1.3 b
PVA/10GA83.8 ± 1.0 b,c53.9 ± 2.7 b223.7 ± 0.6 b33.3 ± 1.7 b
PVA/5QC84.9 ± 0.3 c50.9 ± 1.8 b227.9 ± 0.6 c31.5 ± 1.2 b
PVA/10QC84.5 ± 0.1 b,c58.0 ± 3.6 b224.6 ± 0.5 b32.281 ± 2.0 b
Tg—glass transition temperature; Tm—melting temperature; Tc—crystallization temperature; ΔHm—melting enthalpy; ΔHc—crystallization enthalpy; Xm—melting crystallinity degree (Xm); and Xc—crystallinity degree at cooling scan. (a–c) Different superscripts within the same column indicate significant differences among formulations regarding the same scan (p < 0.05).
Table 2. Tensile parameters for PVA based systems.
Table 2. Tensile parameters for PVA based systems.
FormulationsThickness (Mean Value, μm)σb (MPa)εb (%)E (MPa)
PVA45 ± 5 b67 ± 12 a,b195 ± 45 a,b300 ± 80 a
PVA/5GA40 ± 5 a75 ± 10 b280 ± 70 c750 ± 90 b
PVA/10GA50 ± 8 c55 ± 10 a190 ± 80 a,b2000 ± 325 c
PVA/5QC40 ± 7 a74 ± 10 b255 ± 35 b,c305 ± 50 a
PVA/10QC50 ± 7 c60 ± 10 a170 ± 10 a520 ± 110 a,b
(a–c) Different superscripts within the same column indicate significant differences among formulations (p < 0.05).
Table 3. Overall migration values for different formulations.
Table 3. Overall migration values for different formulations.
FormulationsOverall Migration in Ethanol 50% (v/v) (mg kg−1)
PVA4.1 ± 0.3 a
PVA/5GA6.8 ± 0.1 b
PVA/10GA9.9 ± 0.5 c
PVA/5QC6.6 ± 0.4 b
PVA/10QC9.5 ± 0.4 c
(a–c) Different superscripts within the same column indicate significant differences among formulations (p < 0.05).
Table 4. Radical scavenging activity (RSA) for PVA based systems.
Table 4. Radical scavenging activity (RSA) for PVA based systems.
FormulationsDPPH Scavenging Activity, RSA (%)
Time 0 DayTime 1 DayTime 3 DaysTime 7 DaysTime 10 DaysTime 21 Days
PVA/5GA90.7 ± 0.1 a94.3 ± 0.3 c93.8 ± 0.3 c95.0 ± 0.3 d94.1 ± 0.3 c92.7 ± 0.3 b
PVA/10GA95.3 ± 0.2 b95.6 ± 0.2 b95.0 ± 0.3 a,b95.1 ± 0.1 b95.6 ± 0.3 b94.5 ± 0.2 a
PVA/5QC89.0 ± 0.1 a95.3 ± 0.2 c96.6 ± 0.3 e96.3 ± 0.2 d,e95.7 ± 0.2 c,d94.3 ± 0.5 b
PVA/10QC91.3 ± 0.2 a95.5 ± 0.3 c95.9 ± 02 c95.8 ± 0.1 c95.4 ± 0.2c94.5 ± 0.3 b
(a–e) Different superscripts within the same line indicate significant differences among different times evaluated for the same formulation (p < 0.05).
Table 5. Color coordinates of PVA/GA/QC films.
Table 5. Color coordinates of PVA/GA/QC films.
FormulationsL *a *b *E *Gloss (°)
White Control99.47 ± 0.00−0.08 ± 0.01−0.08 ± 0.01-121 ± 0
PVA
Time 098.98 ± 0.09 c−0.09 ± 0.00 b0.19 ± 0.02 a0.56 ± 0.09 a252 ± 3 b
Time 7 days98.52 ± 0.01 b−0.17 ± 0.00 a0.46 ± 0.03 b1.09 ± 0.00 b219 ± 3 a
Time 21 days98.02 ± 0.08 a−0.17 ± 0.01 a0.59 ± 0.02 c1.60 ± 0.06 b219 ± 6 a
PVA/5GA
Time 096.77 ± 0.02 c−0.61 ± 0.00 c5.66 ± 0.02 a6.36 ± 0.01 a234 ± 2 b
Time 7 days91.64 ± 0.17 b−1.21 ± 0.08 b12.76 ± 0.15 b15.08 ± 0.21 b211 ± 9 b
Time 21 days85.77 ± 0.03 a−3.64 ± 0.08 a17.21 ± 0.18 c22.34 ± 0.17 c165 ± 7 a
PVA/10GA
Time 096.98 ± 0.04 c−0.41 ± 0.05 a3.00 ± 0.02 a3.97 ± 0.05 a164 ± 0 b
Time 7 day95.23 ± 0.01 b−0.64 ± 0.09 a6.24 ± 0.06 b7.63 ± 0.05 b138 ± 1 a
Time 21 days92.77 ± 0.62 a−0.65 ± 0.09 a12.70 ± 0.62 c14.44 ± 0.82 c156 ± 10 b
PVA/5QC
Time 090.84 ± 0.01 c−9.10 ± 0.13 a62.73 ± 0.02 b64.03 ± 0.01 b52 ± 4 b
Time 7 days83.18 ± 0.01 b3.23 ± 0.02 b63.32 ± 0.04 c65.54 ± 0.04 c93 ± 2 c
Time 21 days76.91 ± 0.06 a14.95 ± 0.03 c50.67 ± 0.23 a57.23 ± 0.24 a29 ± 1 a
PVA/10QC
Time 082.48 ± 0.43 b−0.29 ± 0.08 a69.39 ± 0.01 c71.51 ± 0.10 b75 ± 3 a
Time 7 days87.04 ± 0.32 c1.47 ± 0.05 b50.58 ± 0.92 a52.19 ± 0.97 a101 ± 1 c
Time 21 days71.87 ± 0.42 a20.04 ± 0.39 c64.30 ± 0.82 b72.88 ± 0.99 b95 ± 1 b
(a–c) Different superscripts within the same column indicate significant differences among formulations (p < 0.05).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Luzi, F.; Pannucci, E.; Santi, L.; Kenny, J.M.; Torre, L.; Bernini, R.; Puglia, D. Gallic Acid and Quercetin as Intelligent and Active Ingredients in Poly(vinyl alcohol) Films for Food Packaging. Polymers 2019, 11, 1999. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/polym11121999

AMA Style

Luzi F, Pannucci E, Santi L, Kenny JM, Torre L, Bernini R, Puglia D. Gallic Acid and Quercetin as Intelligent and Active Ingredients in Poly(vinyl alcohol) Films for Food Packaging. Polymers. 2019; 11(12):1999. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/polym11121999

Chicago/Turabian Style

Luzi, Francesca, Elisa Pannucci, Luca Santi, José Maria Kenny, Luigi Torre, Roberta Bernini, and Debora Puglia. 2019. "Gallic Acid and Quercetin as Intelligent and Active Ingredients in Poly(vinyl alcohol) Films for Food Packaging" Polymers 11, no. 12: 1999. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/polym11121999

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop