Next Article in Journal
Monitoring Viability and Sustainability in Healthcare Organizations
Next Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Management and Successful Application of Constructed Wetlands: A Critical Review
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Effect of Nutrient Removal and Resource Recovery on Life Cycle Cost and Environmental Impacts of a Small Scale Water Resource Recovery Facility
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Sustainable Exploitation of Coffee Silverskin in Water Remediation

1
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, dell’Energia, dell’Ambiente e dei Materiali, Università “Mediterranea”, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy
2
Consorzio Interuniversitario per la Scienza e la Tecnologia dei Materiali (INSTM), 50121 Firenze, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(10), 3547; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su10103547
Submission received: 12 September 2018 / Revised: 27 September 2018 / Accepted: 1 October 2018 / Published: 3 October 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Wastewater Treatment Systems)

Abstract

:
Coffee silverskin (CS), the main solid waste produced from the coffee industry, has efficiently been used as adsorbent material to remove potential toxic metals (PTMs). In order to assess its suitability in water remediation, kinetic adsorption experiments of Cu2+, Zn2+, and Ni2+ ions from wastewater were carried out and the adsorption performance of the waste material was compared with that of another well-known waste from coffee industry, spent coffee grounds (SCG). By using CS as sorbent material, ion removal follows the order Cu2+ > Zn2+ > Ni2+ with the adsorption equilibrium occurring after about 20 min. The adsorption efficiency of Ni2+ ions is the same for both investigated materials, while Cu2+ and Zn2+ ions are removed to a lesser extent by using CS. Equilibrium-adsorption data were analyzed using two different isotherm models (Langmuir and Freundlich), demonstrating that monolayer-type adsorption occurs on both CS and SCG surfaces. The overall results support the use of coffee silverskin as a new inexpensive adsorbent material for PTMs from wastewater.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In the past few years, in the framework of environmental sustainability research, numerous attempts on the reuse and valorization of coffee byproducts and coffee wastewater have been developed [1].
Coffee is the most important food commodity worldwide, being the second-most traded product after oil [2]. Because of this extended market, the coffee industry produces huge volumes of waste. In fact, each stage of the coffee production process (i.e., coffee-cherries processing, dried-beans milling, green-coffee-beans roasting), as well as coffee consumption, each year produces a large volume of biowaste, which contributes to environmental pollution [3]. Among this biowaste, residues with coffee silverskin (CS) and spent coffee grounds (SCG) are the most significantly produced. Since sustainability development has to be prioritized, research devoted to valorizing and reusing this kind of waste should be strongly encouraged in a strategy for the treatment of end-of-life materials [4].
CS is a thin integument of the outer layer of green coffee beans that comes off during the roasting process [5]. Moreover, it is generally produced in high volumes, takes fire very easily, and its disposal requires the use of energy for the necessary compaction process.
SCG are also a well-known residual material obtained from instant-coffee preparation or coffee brewing. SCG are a residue obtained during the treatment of raw coffee powder with hot water or steam for instant-coffee preparation, characterized by fine particle size, high humidity, organic load, and acidity [6]. In order to reduce waste-disposal costs and avoid environmental pollution, coffee companies focus on possible alternative uses of SCG. Due to their composition, SCG possess functional properties, such as water-holding capacity, oil-holding capacity, emulsifing activity, and antioxidant potential, which make the material suitable for manifold applications (e.g., adsorbers, fillers, and additives for polymer composites, supplements in animal feed, soil fertilizers, etc.) [3,7]. Moreover, the suitability of spent coffee grounds as adsorbent for the removal of metal ions from aqueous solutions has been largely explored [6], whereas CS has not received, so far, the same attention. Currently, CS has no commercial value and is used only as fuel and soil fertilizer. Recently, some attempts were made to reuse it in different fields, for example, as a source of some bioactive compounds [7,8,9]. To this regard, the presence of undesirable products, such as ochratoxin, classified as a possible human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), strongly limits its use for food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical purposes [10]. Therefore, alternative applications are desirable. As far as we know, the only example of its possible use was reported by Lavecchia et al., who magnetically modified the CS by contact with an aqueous ferrofluid containing magnetite nanoparticles in order to obtain a magnetic material adsorbent for the removal of xenobiotics from wastewater [11].
Potential toxic metals (PTMs) are commonly distributed in the environment, and their pollution sources stem from numerous industrial activities. Among these, zinc, nickel, and copper are essential elements for life and are micronutrients in trace amounts [12]; however, their untreated and uncontrolled discharge is toxic to ecosystems [13,14]. This toxicity affects humans causing several diseases (e.g., Wilson, Alzheimer’s) and gastrointestinal problems [15,16]. Moreover, recent studies reported their negative effect on brain, liver, and carcinogenic diseases [17,18,19,20]. Therefore, the removal of Zn2+, Cu2+, and Ni2+ ions from wastewater streams is an important research task.
Despite various processes of PTMs elimination that are currently adopted (precipitation, electrocoagulation, membrane cementing or separation, solvent extraction, ion-resin exchange), adsorption is a cost-effective operation for the removal of potential toxic metals from diluted wastewater. Generally, commercially available zeolites or activated carbons are used as adsorbent materials [21]; however, owing to environmental sustainability problems, recent research has been oriented toward inexpensive and sustainable vegetable waste such as that deriving from tea [22], coffee [23], orange [24], and oil [25].
The present study aims to investigate the adsorption potential of selected metal ions (Zn2+, Cu2+, and Ni2+) using the coffee silverskin coming from a local coffee roaster (Caffè Mauro S.p.A). Moreover, the adsorption properties of CS were compared with those of SCG, previously studied for removing metal ions from wastewater.
Thus, this contribution is focused on: (i) exploring the suitability of coffee silverskin for the removal of Zn2+, Cu2+, and Ni2+ ions from aqueous solutions by studying the retention profile of the latter under different analytical parameters (contact time, analyte concentration, pH); (ii) comparison of the adsorption properties of CS and SCG; and (iii) predicting the kinetic and isotherm models of metal-ion uptake.

2. Materials and Methods

CS and SCG were obtained from a local coffee roaster (Caffè Mauro S.p.A). All chemicals were purchased from CARLO ERBA and used without further purification. The metal sources used were nickel nitrate hexahydrate (99.9% purity), copper nitrate hemi (pentahydrate) (99.9% purity), and zinc nitrate hexahydrate (98.0% purity).
In order to remove impurities, CS and SCG were washed several times with hot water until the washing solution was colorless. Solids were then rinsed and oven-dried at 80 °C for 24 h. Finally, CS and SCG were ground, sieved to <100 μm, dried again at 150 °C for 24 h, and stored at room temperature until use, as similarly reported elsewhere [26].
Different batch tests were carried out to remove metal ions by single, binary, or ternary aqueous solutions.
The amount of solids used for all experiments was 0.12 g and the volume of aqueous solution was 20 mL, with a metal concentration ranging between 20 and 100 ppm, as previously reported [27].
After contact with metal solutions for a fixed time, the concentrations of metal ions in the filtered suspensions were determined using the ICP-OES instrument (Perkin-Elmer Optima 800, Waltham, MA, USA). Each of the experiments was carried out three times and the average value, having a deviation standard lower than 3%, was considered.
Solution volume was kept constant and adsorption efficiency was evaluated as follows:
Adsorption   % = C 0 C t C 0 × 100
where C0 (mg/L) is the initial concentration in aqueous solution, and Ct (mg/L) is the concentration at time t.
In order to investigate the morphological features and elemental compositions of adsorbent materials, characterization with the SEM-EDX technique was carried out on a Phenom Pro-X scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX). EDX analysis was used in order to evaluate the content and the dispersion of metals, acquiring, for all samples, at least 20 points for 3 different magnifications.
X-ray spectra were recorded with a Bruker D2 Phaser, using Cu Kα radiation at 30 kV and 20 mA. The peaks attribution was made according to the more known databases. Diffraction angles 2θ were varied between 10° and 80° in steps of 0.02° and a count time of 5 s per step [28,29].
The effects of pH on the adsorption of PTMs were examined to find the adsorption mechanism. The pH value was measured using combined glass electrodes (inoLab pH/Cond 720, WTW, Weilheim Germany). The concentration of metal ions in solutions was in the range 20–200 μM, with a pH value equal to 4.0.
The Langmuir (valid for monolayer sorption onto a surface with a finite number of identical sites and uniform adsorption energies) and Freundlich (applied to ions adsorption on heterogeneous surfaces) isotherm models were applied to study the adsorption behavior and to determine metal-adsorption capacity on CS and SCG.
The Langmuir isotherm is given by Equation (2):
q e = q m a x   b   C e 1 + b   C e
where qmax is the amount of adsorption corresponding to the monolayer coverage, b is the Langmuir constant that is related to the energy of adsorption, and Ce is the equilibrium liquid-phase concentration. Equation (2) can be linearized to determine Langmuir parameters qmax and b.
1 q e = 1 q m a x   b   1 C e + 1 q m a x
The Freundlich equation allows calculating the parameters included in Equation (4) or, better, in linearized Equation (5):
q e = K f   C e n
l n   q e = l n   K f + n   l n   C e
where Kf (mg/g) is related to adsorption affinity, and 1/n is the heterogeneity factor related to the intensity of the adsorption.
Batch experiments on the adsorption of binary and ternary aqueous metal cation species in mixtures were carried out using the same initial total molar amount of cations.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Adsorption of Single Metals

The pH of the solution is a significant factor affecting the adsorption of metal ions since competitive adsorption between hydrogen/metal ions occurs. The investigated metal ions were present as Me2+-deriving species (Cu2+, Zn2+, Ni2+) forming, in water, coordinated aqueous complexes. Only at high pH values could hydroxyl species Me(OH)3 and Me(OH)4 2− be detected. Preliminary tests, carried out by varying the pH, indicate that in order to achieve the dominant species for all metals, aqueous Me2+ complexes, the solution’s pH value should be maintained in the range 4–5. In this range, no hydroxide precipitation occurs, as previously observed [30,31,32].
The adsorption isotherm of both materials used, CS and SCG, is shown in Figure 1. It is possible to notice that for both adsorbents the achievement of adsorption equilibrium occurs after about 20 min. To this regard, the adsorption efficiency of Ni2+ ions is the same for both materials, with a value of around 50%, whereas the CS adsorbent exhibits great efficiency in removing Cu2+ ions. On the other hand, SCG show higher efficiency, with respect to CS, in removing both Cu2+ and Zn2+ ions. The comparison of adsorption efficiencies, relative to both SCG and CS, may be better understood on the basis of the following consideration.
The first stems from the different morphological features related to the external surface of both adsorbents. In principle, in fact, the presence of fissures and holes contributes to metal-ion diffusion through the adsorption surface. From the SEM micrographs shown in Figure 2, it is possible to infer the relevant differences in the CS and SCG morphological surface. SCG exhibit three-dimensional morphology formed by agglomerated grains, having dimensions of about ten microns, whereas CS shows a lamellar structure typical of vegetable teguments with a high surface area, preferentially ordered in two dimensions. Therefore, the bidimensionality of CS can contribute minor adsorption efficiency in comparison to that of SCG.
Another aspect that affects the observed adsorption difference can derive from the different amounts of lignocellulosic components in both structures (Figure 3). In principle, the adsorption ability of materials can be ascribed to favorable electrostatic interactions between positively charged metal ions and the opposite charge of the adsorbing surface. It is worth to underline that lignocellulosic biomasses are characterized by negatively charged surface sites, including hydroxyl and carboxyl groups as well as etheric oxygen atoms [33]. These groups belong to those generally called hard bases in the well-known hard and soft acid-bases theory [34,35]. Therefore, the higher content of lignocellulosic components in the SCG with respect to the CS contributes to explaining the higher adsorption efficiency of the former.
It is worth to emphasize that the investigated adsorbing materials were not affected by any contact with metal-ion solutions (Figure 4): the morphologies of CS and SCG were preserved and the mapping of metal ions confirmed the uniform distribution on materials recovered after the batch tests. The retention of metals by CS was also confirmed by X-Ray analysis on the CS recovered after batch adsorption. In Figure 5, it is possible to notice the deposition of nitrate salt precipitated on the adsorbing surface and peaks corresponding to Zn2+ species. Similar patterns were also recorded in other metal experiments (not shown). The precipitation of potassium nitrate is due to the leaching of potassium from the CS in the stirred conditions of the experiments. The mineral composition of the CS in fact mainly consists of potassium 5%w/w per 100 g of CS, determined by EDX analysis.

3.2. Isotherm-Model Application

Adsorption data relative to our systems were fitted by applying the Langmuir equation, and the results are reported in Table 1. Fitting was excellent for all metal-adsorbent systems considered (Figure 6) and the correlation coefficients of the linear regression (r2) were found to be higher than 0.986 (Table 1).
The maximum adsorption amounts on CS, fitted and obtained by the Langmuir model, were 15.17, 9.58, and 1.43 mg/g, respectively, for Cu2+, Zn2+, and Ni2+ ions. Therefore, the adsorption affinity of CS gives the sequence Cu2+ > Zn2+ > Ni2+. A similar trend was observed for SCG.
From Langmuir isotherm coefficients, it is possible to also define dimensionless parameter RL:
R L = 1 ( 1 + b C 0 )
This can be considered a separation factor that can determine the type of isotherm [36].
Values of RL denote if the type of the Langmuir isotherm is irreversible (RL = 0), favorable (0 < RL < 1), linear (RL =1) or unfavorable (RL > 1); in all our cases, values of RL ranged between 0 and 1.
On the other hand, by applying the Freundlich isotherm models, adsorption affinity Kf values, relative to Cu2+, Zn2+, and Ni2+ ions on CS, were 7.06, 5.69, 1.30, respectively, indicating that Cu2+ and Zn2+ are preferably adsorbed. The n value indicates the degree of nonlinearity between solution concentrations and adsorption according to the following considerations: if n = 1, adsorption is linear; if n < 1, adsorption implies a chemical process; if n > 1, adsorption stems from a physical process. The n values on using the Freundlich equation for Cu2+ and Zn2+ adsorption, both on the CS and on the SCG, are lower than 3 (Table 1). The value of n > 1 is very common and it is generally ascribed to dispersed surface sites or to any factor that may generate a decrease in adsorbent–adsorbate interaction. Generally, the increase of surface density and of n values, within the range of 1–10, means that adsorption was good [37]. In the present study, with respect to Cu2+ and Zn2+ ion adsorption, since n lies between 1 and 10, it is possible to infer that the adsorption of metal ions onto CS and SCG is essentially physical. For nickel ions, the n value, greater than 10, indicates minor mobility and a higher retention of metals in the solid phase [38].
However, the results demonstrate that the fitting for all adsorbing materials is more suitable with the Langmuir model (r2 = 0.986–0.999) for PTM adsorption than with the Freundlich one (r2 = 0.827–0.987), so the adsorption characteristics were mainly of monolayer type.

3.3. Comparison of Metal Adsorption in Competitive Systems

In order to evaluate the affinity of metal ions towards the CS material, we also performed batch-experiment adsorption of binary and ternary aqueous metal cation species in mixtures Cu2+/Zn2+, Cu2+/Ni2+, Zn2+/Ni2+ and Cu2+/Zn2+/Ni2+ using the same initial total molar amount of cations.
Figure 7 shows the experimental data for binary and ternary mixtures and allows comparing the relative adsorption results with those obtained with separately using single metals.
In principle, in multicomponent system solutions, ions exhibit competitive adsorption. Therefore, the amount of cations adsorbed from binary solutions is lower than that obtained by using a single metal solution, and this is in agreement with other reports [30,39].
In particular, results suggest that the adsorption of metals on CS in a multicomponent system is, for all investigated metals, about 10%–15% lower than that detected in a single-component system.
However, total adsorption was higher than that observed in using a single component, in agreement with already observed results relative to other adsorbents [40,41]. The affinity order towards metals exploited by the CS material, both in the binary and ternary system, is the same as that found in the single one (Cu2+ > Zn2+ > Ni2+).
The affinity and adsorption capacity of different metals could suggest a correlation between different metal parameters (e.g., electronegativity, coordination-complex radius, and stability constants of the associated metal hydroxide or solvated species) [42]. Electronegativity is regarded as a contributing parameter to metal-ion uptake. In fact, when metal cations are adsorbed on a negatively charged surface, the attraction of a negative charge plays a significant role in the adsorption process. However, this is not a general rule, as verified by different works on adsorption processes [9]. In principle, adsorption of metal cations on hard-containing surface groups depends on an interplay of factors belonging to both ions and surface. Indeed Ni2+, Cu2+, and Zn2+ have d8, d9, and d10 external electronic structure, respectively, and the observed trend towards their relative adsorption mainly depends on the stability of the aqueous coordinated complexes. All of them form octahedral Me(OH2)62+ complexes, and no information on their stability may be obtained from the literature. Furthermore, all three cations are considered on the borderline of the hard and soft acid and base classification [34,35].

4. Sustainability Considerations/Conclusions

Global coffee production has been extending to include a large industrial system, with a total coffee consumption of 157,858 in thousand 60 kg bags during the 2016/2017 period [42].
Among the huge volume of coffee waste as a result of the coffee production and consumption process, CS is generally considered the most significantly produced and, at the same time, difficult to manage. Indeed, CS represents not only solid waste that contributes to environmental pollution, but it also has high impact on the economy of coffee-roaster companies. In fact, the storage of CS before its disposal in compost or landfill needs specific machinery for compaction and relative high-energy consumption. Furthermore, its biomass releases both CO2 and methane in landfills, with consequent environmental impact. Basically, the alternative to landfills is to bury or burn CS waste, with the unavoidable production of greenhouse gasses. According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [43], burning garbage constituted by biomass releases more carbon dioxide than burning coal. It is therefore clear that alternative solutions should be considered. Although a ‘zero-waste’ industry is not easily achievable in the near future, research must strive to be policy-aimed to achieve sustainable results in the reuse of byproduct materials [44].
The coffee waste used in this study derived from the roasting of green coffee beans. In order to perform the adsorption of potential toxic metals like Cu2+, Zn2+, and Ni2+ ions, no chemical modification or further treatment was used to obtain the adsorbing materials. This aspect is to be emphasized, since it is also necessary to ensure that waste treatment does not create any extra problems on the environment that could eventually undermine the beneficial effects of utilizing waste products such as CS or SCG [45].
Furthermore, CO2 emissions should decrease due to the reduced use of incinerators for these organic wastes. Meanwhile, recovery of natural resources can be simultaneously achieved from the viewpoint of waste management.
Accordingly, the results of this preliminary laboratory work provide a possible sustainable route to recover inexpensive biological waste for its use as adsorbent of PTMs from wastewater. Further works will be devoted to identifying the regeneration methods of coffee silverskin, the recovery of the adsorbate, and the subsequent regeneration and reuse of the adsorbent material. Finally, quantitative consideration of sustainability (Life-Cycle Assessment, LCA analysis) on the applicability of CS and SCG in water remediation should be carried out in order to validate the entire process from an economical and environmental point of view.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.F., L.B. and F.M.; Formal analysis, A.M., E.P.; Investigation, A.M., E.P., G.P.; Project administration, P.F., L.B., F.M. and G.P.; Supervision, P.F. and F.M.; Writing—original draft, P.F.; Writing—review & editing, P.F., A.M. and F.M.

Funding

This publication was supported by the Mediterranean University of Reggio Calabria.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Caffè Mauro S.p.A. for providing coffee silverskin and spent coffee grounds, Ing. Giuseppe Modafferi (Caffè Mauro S.p.A.) and Saverio Festa (Caffè Mauro S.p.A.) for fruitful discussions, and Ing. Letizia Buonsanti for kinetic adsorption experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Figueroa, G.A.; Homann, T.; Ravel, H.M. Coffee Production Wastes: Potentials and Perspective. Austin Food Sci. 2016, 1, 1014. [Google Scholar]
  2. Esquivel, P.; Jimenez, V.M. Functional Properties of coffee and coffee by-products. Food. Res. Int. 2012, 46, 488–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kovalcik, A.; Obruca, S.; Marova, I. Valorization of Spent Coffee Grounds: A review. Food Bioprod. Process. 2018, 110, 104–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Coppola, L.; Bellezze, T.; Belli, A.; Bignozzi, M.C.; Bolzoni, F.; Brenna, A.; Cabrini, M.; Candamano, S.; Cappai, M.; Caputo, D.; et al. Binders alternative to Portland cement and waste management for sustainable construction-part 1. J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. 2018, 16, 186–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Alves, R.C.; Rodrigues, F.; Antónia Nunes, M.; Vinha, A.F.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P. State of the art in coffee processing by-products. In Handbook of Coffee Processing by-Products, 1st ed.; Galanakis, C.M., Ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2017; pp. 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  6. Anastopoulos, I.; Karamesouti, M.; Mitropoulos, A.C.; Kyzas, G.Z. A review for coffee adsorbents. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 229, 555–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Castro, C.S.; Abreu, A.L.; Silva, C.L.; Guerreiro, M.C. Phenol adsorption by activated carbon produced from spent coffee grounds. Water Sci. Technol. 2011, 64, 2059–2065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Costa, A.S.; Alves, R.C.; Vinha, A.F.; Costa, E.; Costa, C.S.; Nunes, M.A.; Almeida, A.A.; Santos-Silva, A.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P. Nutritional, chemical and antioxidant/pro-oxidant profiles of silverskin, a coffee roasting by-product. Food Chem. 2018, 267, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Costa, A.S.; Alves, R.C.; Vinha, A.F.; Barreira, S.V.; Nunes, M.A.; Cunha, L.M.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P. Optimization of antioxidants extraction from coffee silverskin, a roasting by-product, having in view a sustainable process. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 53, 350–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Iriondo-DeHond, A.; Haza, A.I.; Ávalos, A.; del Castillo, M.D.; Morales, P. Validation of coffee silverskin extract as a food ingredient by the analysis of cytotoxicity and genotoxicity. Food Res. Int. 2017, 100, 791–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Di Battista, A.; Lavecchia, R. Magnetically modified coffee silverskin for the removal of xenobiotics from wastewater. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2013, 35, 1375–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Volesky, B. Detoxification of metal-bearing effluents: Biosorption for the next century. Hydrometallurgy 2001, 59, 203–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Meers, E.; Ruttens, A.; Hopgood, M.J.; Samson, D.; Tack, F.M.G. Comparison of EDTA and EDDS as potential soil amendments for enhanced phytoextraction of heavy metals. Chemosphere 2005, 58, 1011–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Race, M.; Ferraro, A.; Fabbricino, M.; La Marca, A.; Panico, A.; Spasiano, D.; Tognacchini, A.; Pirozzi, F. Ethylenediamine-N,N′-Disuccinic Acid (EDDS)—Enhanced Flushing Optimization for Contaminated Agricultural Soil Remediation and Assessment of Prospective Cu and Zn Transport. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bandmann, O.; Weiss, K.H.; Kaler, S.G. Wilson’s disease and other neurological copper disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2015, 14, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cho, C.H. Zinc: Absorption and role in gastrointestinal metabolism and disorders. Dig. Dis. 1991, 9, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Portbury, S.D.; Adlard, P.A. Zinc signal in brain diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Prystupa, A.; Błażewicz, A.; Kiciński, P.; Sak, J.J.; Niedziałek, J.; Załuska, W. Serum concentrations of selected heavy metals in patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis from the Lublin Region in Eastern Poland. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kim, H.S.; Yeo, J.K.; Young, R.S. An overview of carcinogenic heavy metal: Molecular toxicity mechanism and prevention. J. Cancer Prev. 2015, 20, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Pietropaolo, A.; Satriano, C.; Strano, G.; La Mendola, D.; Rizzarelli, E. Different zinc (II) complex species and binding modes at Aβ N-terminus drive distinct long range cross-talks in the Aβ monomers. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2015, 153, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ince, M.; Ince, O.K. An Overview of Adsorption Technique for Heavy Metal Removal from Water/Wastewater: A Critical Review. Int. J. Pure Appl. Sci. 2017, 3, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Amarasinghe, B.M.W.P.K.; Williams, R.A. Tea waste as low cost adsorbent for the removal of Cu and Pb from wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 2007, 132, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kaikake, K.; Hoaki, K.; Sunada, H.; Dhakal, R.P.; Baba, Y. Removal characteristics of metal ions using degreased coffee beans: Adsorption equilibrium of cadmium(II). Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 2787–2791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Perez-Marin, A.B.; Zapata, V.M.; Ortuno, J.F.; Aguilar, M.; Saez, J.; Lorens, M. Removal of cadmium from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto orange waste. J. Hazard. Mater. B 2007, 139, 122–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Fiol, N.; Villaescusa, I.; Martinez, M.; Miralles, N.; Poch, J.; Serarols, J. Sorption of Pb(II), Ni(II), Cu(II) and Cd(II) from aqueous solution by olive stone waste. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 50, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zuorro, A.; Lavecchia, R.; Natali, S. Magnetically modified agro-industrial wastes as efficient and easily recoverable adsorbents for water treatment. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2014, 38, 349–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chavan, A.A.; Pinto, J.; Liakos, I.; Bayer, I.S.; Lauciello, S.; Athanassiou, A.; Fragouli, D. Spent coffee bioelastomeric composite foams for the removal of Pb2+ and Hg2+ from water. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 5495–5502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mauriello, F.; Paone, E.; Pietropaolo, R.; Balu, A.M.; Luque, R. Catalytic Transfer Hydrogenolysis of Lignin-Derived Aromatic Ethers Promoted by Bimetallic Pd/Ni Systems. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 9269–9276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Frontera, P.; Malara, A.; Stelitano, S.; Fazio, E.; Neri, F.; Scarpino, L.; Antonucci, P.L.; Santangelo, S. A new approach to the synthesis of titania nano-powders enriched with very high contents of carbon nanotubes by electro-spinning. Mater Chem. Phys. 2015, 153, 338–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sud, D.; Mahajan, G.; Kaur, M.P. Agricultural waste material as potential adsorbent for sequestering heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions—A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 6017–6027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Sitko, R.; Turek, E.; Zawisza, E.; Malicka, E.; Talik, E.; Heimann, J.; Gagor, A.; Feist, B.; Wrzalik, R. Adsorption of divalent metal ions from aqueous solutions using graphene oxide. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 5682–5689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Azouaou, N.; Sadaoui, Z.; Djaafri, A.; Mokaddem, H. Adsorption of cadmium from aqueous solution onto untreated coffee grounds: Equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamics. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 184, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Demirbas, A. Heavy metal adsorption onto agro-based waste material: A review. J. Hazard. Mater 2008, 157, 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Huheey, J.E. Inorganic Chemistry: Principles of Structure and Reactivity; Harper International Edition; Harper & Row: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  35. Shiver, D.F.; Atkins, P.W.; Langford, G.H. Inorganic Chemistry, 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  36. Hall, K.R.; Eagleton, L.C.; Acrivos, A.; Vermevlem, T. Pore-and solid-diffusion kinetics in fixed-bed adsorption under constant-pattern conditions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 1966, 5, 212–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kumar, Y.P.; King, P.; Prasad, V.S.R.K. Adsorption of zinc from aqueous solution using marine green algae-Ulva fasciata sp. Chem. Eng. J. 2007, 129, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Reed, B.E.; Matsumoto, M.-R. Modeling cadmium adsorption by activated carbon using the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm expressions. Sep. Sci. Technol. 1993, 28, 2179–2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Morera, M.T.; Echeverria, J.C.; Mazkiaran, C.; Garrido, J.J. Isotherm and sequential extraction procedures for evaluating sorption and distribution of heavy metals in soils. Environ. Pollut. 2001, 113, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, X.S.; Li, Z.Z. Competitive Adsorption of Nickel and Copper Ions from Aqueous Solution Using Nonliving Biomass of the Marine Brown Alga Laminaria japonica. Clean 2009, 37, 663–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Futalan, C.M.; Kan, C.C.; Dalida, M.L.; Hsien, K.J.; Pascua, C.; Wan, M.W. Comparative and competitive adsorption of copper, lead, and nickel using chitosan immobilized on bentonite. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 83, 528–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Trade Statistics Tables: Looking for quick facts and figures on the global coffee trade? Available online: http://www.ico.org/trade_statistics.asp?section=Statistics (accessed on 1 October 2018).
  43. United States Environmental Protection Agency; Relative Risk Reduction Strategies Committee. Reducing Risk: Setting Priorities and Strategies for Environmental Protection: The Report of the Science Advisory Board, Relative Risk Reduction Strategies Committee, to William K. Reilly, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency; US Environmental Protection Agency, Science Advisory Board: Washington, DC, USA, 1990.
  44. Reh, L. Process engineering in circular economy. Particuology 2013, 11, 119–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mirabella, N.; Castellani, V.; Sala, S. Current options for the valorization of food manufacturing waste: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 65, 28–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Contact time versus adsorption on coffee silverkin (CS) and spent coffee grounds (SCG) (C0 = 100 ppm pH = 4 T = 25 °C).
Figure 1. Contact time versus adsorption on coffee silverkin (CS) and spent coffee grounds (SCG) (C0 = 100 ppm pH = 4 T = 25 °C).
Sustainability 10 03547 g001
Figure 2. Scanning elecron microscope (SEM) micrographs of (a) CS and (b) SCG.
Figure 2. Scanning elecron microscope (SEM) micrographs of (a) CS and (b) SCG.
Sustainability 10 03547 g002
Figure 3. Compound composition of CS and SCG.
Figure 3. Compound composition of CS and SCG.
Sustainability 10 03547 g003
Figure 4. SEM micrographs and energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) maps of CS and SCG.
Figure 4. SEM micrographs and energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) maps of CS and SCG.
Sustainability 10 03547 g004
Figure 5. X-ray spectra of (a) CS as made and (b) CS after Zn2+ ion removal.
Figure 5. X-ray spectra of (a) CS as made and (b) CS after Zn2+ ion removal.
Sustainability 10 03547 g005
Figure 6. Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms for adsorption of metal ions on CS and SCG.
Figure 6. Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms for adsorption of metal ions on CS and SCG.
Sustainability 10 03547 g006
Figure 7. Single and competitive adsorption of Cu2+, Zn2+, and Ni2+ on CS: amount of metal ions adsorbed on CS.
Figure 7. Single and competitive adsorption of Cu2+, Zn2+, and Ni2+ on CS: amount of metal ions adsorbed on CS.
Sustainability 10 03547 g007
Table 1. Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm parameters for Cu2+, Zn2+, and Ni2+ ions onto CS and SGC using a single-component solution.
Table 1. Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm parameters for Cu2+, Zn2+, and Ni2+ ions onto CS and SGC using a single-component solution.
PTMCoffee SilverskinSpent Coffee Grounds
LangmuirFreundlichLangmuirFreundlich
qmaxbr2Kfnr2qmaxbr2Kfnr2
Cu2+9.582.600.9967.062.060.94710.003.050.9868.632.060.903
Ni2+1.4315.050.9941.3013.000.8271.6720.220.9991.5813.000.981
Zn2+15.170.620.9895.691.370.9878.234.450.9916.691.370.990

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Malara, A.; Paone, E.; Frontera, P.; Bonaccorsi, L.; Panzera, G.; Mauriello, F. Sustainable Exploitation of Coffee Silverskin in Water Remediation. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3547. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su10103547

AMA Style

Malara A, Paone E, Frontera P, Bonaccorsi L, Panzera G, Mauriello F. Sustainable Exploitation of Coffee Silverskin in Water Remediation. Sustainability. 2018; 10(10):3547. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su10103547

Chicago/Turabian Style

Malara, Angela, Emilia Paone, Patrizia Frontera, Lucio Bonaccorsi, Giuseppe Panzera, and Francesco Mauriello. 2018. "Sustainable Exploitation of Coffee Silverskin in Water Remediation" Sustainability 10, no. 10: 3547. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su10103547

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop