Next Article in Journal
Improvement of Computational Efficiency and Accuracy by Firefly Algorithm and Random Forest for Compressive Strength Modeling of Recycled Concrete
Previous Article in Journal
Application of an Architect-Friendly Digital Design Approach to the Wind Environment of Campus Dormitory Buildings
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Longitudinal Study on Sustainability Perceptions in Portugal
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploring Customer Behavior in Shopping Malls: A Study of Rest Areas in Dubai, United Arab Emirates

by
Chuloh Jung
1,* and
Naglaa Sami Abdelaziz Mahmoud
2,3
1
Department of Architecture, College of Architecture, Art and Design, Ajman University, Ajman 346, United Arab Emirates
2
Department of Interior Design, College of Architecture, Art and Design, Ajman University, Ajman 346, United Arab Emirates
3
Healthy and Sustainable Buildings Research Center, Ajman University, Ajman 346, United Arab Emirates
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(12), 9169; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su15129169
Submission received: 22 February 2023 / Revised: 28 May 2023 / Accepted: 2 June 2023 / Published: 6 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Consumer Behavior: Perspectives and Developments)

Abstract

:
The city of Dubai has a population of 3.34 million and boasts 65 shopping malls, with an additional 10 currently under construction. As a result of the oppressive climate, shopping malls have emerged as de facto community centers and public squares where Dubai residents can congregate, socialize, and participate in various events. This paper aims to examine the spatial features of indoor and outdoor rest areas within Dubai’s shopping malls and identify key factors that can enhance user satisfaction in each area. To achieve this, literature studies were conducted to extract evaluation factors, such as comfort, aesthetics, convenience, and accessibility for rest areas adjacent to the escalator, restroom, open corridor, and outdoor locations. An empirical study was then carried out, where field observations and user-satisfaction surveys were conducted in the indoor and outdoor rest areas of three prominent malls, namely the Dubai Mall, Dubai Festival City, and Mirdif City Center. The results of the study indicate that in open-corridor rest areas, easy access was highly rated in the satisfaction survey, while noise and privacy maintenance received lower ratings. Comparatively, outdoor rest areas scored higher on the satisfaction survey than indoor rest areas, such as the rest area next to the escalator, open-corridor rest area, and rest area next to the bathroom. This study’s findings can provide a foundation for future rest-area planning that better reflects the needs and desires of users.

1. Introduction

The current population of Dubai stands at 3.34 million, and the city boasts 65 shopping malls, with 10 more currently under construction [1,2]. Upon completion, Dubai Square in Dubai Creek Harbor will be the world’s largest shopping mall [3] (Figure 1). Due to the sweltering hot weather, Dubai residents spend more than 90% of their time indoors [4]. Especially during the long summer months from April through to October, temperatures can soar up to 48 °C with high humidity, making it unbearable to enjoy outdoor activities for more than a few minutes [5,6]. As a result, shopping malls have become de facto community centers and public squares where people gather, enjoy, and experience social events [7]. However, Dubai’s reliance on shopping malls is not solely due to the weather; the city is also shifting towards the hospitality industry and away from its reliance on oil [8,9]. Currently, Dubai is the fourth most visited city in the world, with 16.7 million visitors annually [10]. The Dubai Municipality aims to become the world’s most popular tourist destination by 2025 [11,12]. The Dubai Mall, which had an average of 20 million visitors annually over the past four years, is the most visited mall globally, according to EMAAR’s statistics [13].
In today’s diverse and complex global cities, consumers demand an active and pleasant environment [14]. Commercial architecture, such as that of shopping malls, plays a crucial role in selling and distributing products and mediating cultural and social activities [15]. Therefore, shopping malls are evolving into multi-functional spaces where people can enjoy life, culture, and leisure, and fulfill various life’s needs [16,17]. To meet consumers’ evolving needs, shopping-mall spaces are being adapted and having their image enhanced; the rest area is one such space. The rest area is a convenient facility that has an impact on the shopping mall’s perception, as it is a free, high-quality service facility accessible to all customers [18,19]. This space stimulates the desire to purchase by increasing user satisfaction beyond the simple pleasure of shopping [20,21]. For consumers, it serves as a place of communication, while, for companies, it increases profits and enhances the shopping mall’s appeal [22,23]. This study aims to investigate the spatial characteristics of indoor and outdoor rest areas in Dubai shopping malls and identify critical factors that enhance user satisfaction for each area. Through literature studies and empirical surveys conducted at the Dubai Mall (Figure 2), Dubai Festival City (Figure 3), and Mirdif City Center (Figure 4), the study identifies the essential elements of indoor and outdoor rest areas that can have an impact on user satisfaction. The study’s findings will provide valuable insights into rest-area planning that reflect user needs and preferences in the future.
Indoor rest areas are commonly found in shopping malls adjacent to escalators, restrooms, open corridors, or outdoor areas [24,25]. Moreover, as the demand for outdoor resting spaces, such as small parks in the city, is actively reflected, shopping malls increasingly provide outdoor or rooftop spaces as rest areas [26]. Hence, they are trying to offer indoor and outdoor rest areas with diverse functions and designs [27]. However, no comprehensive studies have investigated indoor and outdoor rest areas, and research that specifically analyzes the relationship between their characteristics and consumer satisfaction is insufficient [28]. Thus, this study aims to investigate the factors of indoor and outdoor rest areas in shopping malls and identify the essential characteristics of each rest area that can enhance user satisfaction.
To achieve this, this study used literature and empirical studies to analyze the characteristics of rest areas located inside and outside shopping malls, and to evaluate user satisfaction [29]. Firstly, a literature review was conducted to investigate the concept, function and role, classification, components, and characteristics of the rest area in shopping malls. Then, by setting the attributes of the rest area, evaluation factors and detailed evaluation contents were extracted and specified so that the characteristics of each indoor and outdoor rest area could be evaluated [30,31].
Secondly, in the empirical study, field and user-satisfaction surveys investigated the status of the shopping mall’s rest area. The empirical research scope focused on a shopping mall with indoor and outdoor rest areas. Three shopping malls that opened within the past 10 years—Dubai Mall, Dubai Festival City, and Mirdif City Center—were selected as examples [32].
By analyzing the relationship between the characteristics of the rest area and user satisfaction, the attributes of the rest area were proposed to enhance the satisfaction of shopping-mall users [33,34]. This primary data can be used for user-centered rest-area planning, with the aim of suggesting improvements to provide a pleasant and comfortable rest area to shopping-mall users [35].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. The Customer-Behavior Theory

The research is anchored in a solid theoretical foundation provided by Bitner’s Servicescape Model and the Stimulus–Organism–Response (S–O–R) Model, both of which are instrumental in examining customer behavior in relation to the physical environment and interior design of shopping malls. The Servicescape Model, central to the analysis and observation, allows the authors to systematically evaluate how various aspects of rest areas, such as ambient conditions, spatial layout, and design elements, can influence customer attitudes and behaviors [36].
Complementing this, the research engages with the S–O–R Model, a core concept in environmental psychology. It offers a valuable lens through which to understand how the environmental stimuli presented by rest areas provoke emotional states in consumers that, in turn, influence their behavior. The ‘stimulus’ includes all environmental cues present in rest areas, the ‘organism’ represents the internal emotional states of customers that are evoked by these stimuli, and the ‘response’ indicates the customers’ subsequent behaviors, such as their willingness to stay longer, revisit, or recommend the shopping mall [37].
By fusing these theories, the research aims to unveil the characteristics of rest areas that enhance user satisfaction, thereby providing a comprehensive theoretical backdrop for assessing the implications of rest-area design and atmosphere in shopping malls.

2.2. The Concept of Rest Area

A rest area is a customer-service facility that is established within the commercial sector with the primary purpose of organizing activities aimed at providing a means of rest to customers [38]. Serving as a convenience facility, the rest area offers ancillary benefits that cause shopping to be a more pleasant experience for customers. In addition, it provides emotional and psychological satisfaction to users [39]. Despite the small size of the rest areas in shopping malls, they offer a wide range of services to customers, making them a hub where people can interact with each other. On the other hand, a shopping mall is a space designed to enable customers to visit and rest while shopping easily [40]. It achieves this by providing a rest area, offering information on products in the store, and creating an atmosphere that naturally leads to purchases.

2.3. The Function and Role of the Rest Area

The rest area within a shopping mall is not solely a place for customers to rest, but it also serves as a space for social interaction and cultural experiences [41]. Given its importance, changes to the rest area within a shopping mall can significantly enhance customer satisfaction, the desire to purchase, and overall enjoyment of the shopping experience [42]. The rest area performs several critical functions that contribute to this outcome, including:
  • Rest and conversation: The rest area provides basic facilities, such as chairs and sofas where customers can sit and relax, increasing their comfort level and time spent in the store;
  • Meeting and waiting: The rest area provides a space where customers can wait for appointments and meetings with acquaintances;
  • Food and beverage: Depending on the customer’s preferences, the rest area can also serve as a place for simple meals or drinks;
  • Information exchange: The rest area functions as a space for brand communication and interaction between the customers and the brand, enabling the collection of customer information through electronic technology;
  • Events and play: The rest area also serves as a space for fashion shows and other events;
  • Appreciation: Customers who use the rest area do not just utilize the space but also appreciate and remember the design and atmosphere of the area. Hence, if the rest area is symbolically and impressively designed, it can enable customers to understand the idea behind the space;
In summary, the rest area within a shopping mall is a crucial aspect of customer service, providing various functions that increase customer satisfaction, desire to purchase, and overall enjoyment of the shopping experience.

2.4. The Characteristics of the Rest Area

Providing a rest area within a shopping mall can significantly enhance customer satisfaction by offering a space for relaxation and high-quality services [43]. Consequently, it is essential to investigate the current features of the rest area within shopping malls, the level of satisfaction among customers, and areas for potential improvement. Previous research analyzing the characteristics of rest areas in shopping malls has yielded valuable insights, summarized in Table 1 below.
The rest-area characteristics synthesized in each of the six selected studies were derived from previous research on rest-area features. These studies identified aesthetics, territoriality, accessibility, cognition, stability, comfort, connection, convenience, publicity, continuity, spatiality, openness, and symbolism as critical features of rest spaces [48,49]. This study specifically focused on four characteristics—comfort, aesthetics, convenience, and accessibility—which were identified with high frequency as significant factors. The meaning of each characteristic is summarized below.
  • Comfort: This characteristic considers the inflow of natural light, lighting, noise, and ventilation facilities essential for providing a pleasant atmosphere that can cause users to be physically and mentally comfortable;
  • Aesthetics: This characteristic involves creating a psychologically relaxed environment in the rest area by introducing natural elements, spatial structure, design, and color. Aesthetics can add the function of appreciation to the rest area;
  • Convenience: Convenience and ancillary facilities that meet users’ needs should be provided. The plan should consider the space’s area and width to ensure walking is not inconvenient and the furniture is arranged to be used conveniently and work comfortably, even for people with disabilities and elderly;
  • Accessibility: This characteristic emphasizes efficient access in a shopping mall, linkage with other surrounding spaces, easy user access, and installation of information boards to enable use and privacy protection.

2.5. Selection of Target Shopping Malls and Analysis Methods

This study evaluated the characteristics of rest areas by conducting on-site surveys of indoor and outdoor rest areas in shopping malls and investigating user satisfaction with these areas through a user survey [50,51]. The shopping malls selected for the field survey were Dubai Mall, Dubai Festival City, and Mirdif City Center, which opened within the last 10 years and had both indoor and outdoor rest areas [52]. Male and female users in their 20s to 50s who were using the rest areas in these malls were included in the survey, with a total of 160 participants (40 people × 4 age groups) interviewed.
To comprehensively understand the characteristics of the studied areas, an observational study was conducted based on the characteristics evaluation tool of indoor and outdoor rest areas [53]. A primary survey was carried out after the preliminary survey was revised and supplemented to ensure the general public could easily understand the survey [54]. Customers who were using the rest area during the survey were included in the primary survey, with users randomly selected from those who belonged to the designated age group and consented to participate in the study. A total of 160 copies were distributed and collected from July to December 2022 from Dubai Mall, Dubai Festival City, and Mirdif City Center, with 158 copies used for the final analysis after excluding two copies with insincere responses. The collected data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26 [55].
To evaluate the general spatial characteristics of the rest areas, a survey tool was developed through the following process, as shown in Figure 5.
To investigate the theoretical characteristics of the shopping-mall rest area, this study analyzed previous research and constructed an evaluation tool based on the contents of earlier studies that mentioned the features of the rest area. Four characteristics of comfort, aesthetics, convenience, and accessibility were identified, as shown in Table 2 [56,57].
The spatial characteristics of the rest area were further analyzed by dividing them into indoor and outdoor factors, and keywords were extracted from the above to reflect the items present in the rest area [58] (Table 3).
Regarding indoor-rest-area characteristics, comfort includes factors such as inflow of natural light, lighting that reduces eye fatigue, noise reduction, and ventilation facilities [59]. Aesthetics encompassed elements such as the use of natural components such as plants, stones, and water, design features that elevate the aesthetic quality of the space, and appropriate structure and color composition for the area [60]. Convenience was defined by factors such as the area and width of the space to prevent obstacles, installation of comfort and ancillary facilities, furniture arrangement suited for the space, and safe flooring material [61]. Accessibility was identified by factors such as privacy protection for maintaining personal space, easy access to rest areas, connections to surrounding areas such as retail spaces, circulation areas, and walkways, and installation of information and guidance signs in rest areas [62]. The outdoor rest area’s comfort was defined by factors such as natural light inflow, lighting that enables use at night, shade control suitable for rest, and exterior views. Additionally, aesthetics included introducing various natural elements, spectacles, and events for visual enjoyment using outdoor rest areas, sculptures, fountains or waterfalls, and natural colors. Convenience was determined by securing the size and width to avoid inconvenience for strollers and wheelchairs, installing convenient and ancillary facilities, arranging furniture suitable for the space, and ensuring floor safety. Accessibility included privacy protection for maintaining personal space, ease of access, connections with indoor spaces, identifying movement lines and directions, and installation of information boards.
The identified keywords defined specific evaluation contents for each characteristic, focusing on the essential contents for each indoor and outdoor rest area [63]. It was recognized that rest areas had different characteristics and visit purposes, and, thus, the evaluation tool was configured differently for each rest area. As shown in Table 4, it was determined that each rest-space plan required a different evaluation approach, resulting in the derivation of 64 detailed evaluation items across four evaluation categories (comfort, aesthetics, convenience, and accessibility) for four rest-space types (next to the escalator area, next to the bathroom area, open corridor, and outdoor) [64,65,66].

3. Results

A survey was conducted to evaluate and analyze the spatial characteristics of the shopping-mall rest area based on the detailed evaluation items derived from the previous stage. The questionnaire was constructed using a five-point Likert scale [67], and the validity and consistency of each item in the questionnaire collected through the survey were checked by calculating Cronbach’s α value [68] to verify the reliability of the measurement for each factor [69]. Generally, a reliability coefficient α value of 0.6 or higher is recognized as indicating no problem with the reliability of the measurement index. As the reliability coefficient for all items (α = 0.93) and each factor derived in this study is 0.6 or higher, the reliability level is deemed satisfactory [70,71,72].
The survey was conducted on 158 people, of whom 53 were from Dubai Mall (33.5%), 54 were from Dubai Festival City (34.2%), and 51 were from Mirdif City Center (32.3%). The survey respondents comprised 46.8% male and 53.2% female, with a slightly higher percentage of females (7%). In terms of age group, 40 respondents (25.3%) were in their 20s, 30s, and 40s, while 38 respondents (24.1%) were in their 50s (Table 5).

3.1. Evaluation of the Rest Area Being Next to the Escalator

The provision of natural light is crucial for creating a comfortable environment in escalator areas, as these spaces generally lack top lighting, such as open corridors. The research findings indicate that users’ satisfaction with the natural light in Dubai Mall was the highest at 3.04 (1.00) in the ECF-1 item, followed by Dubai Festival City 2.48 (0.84) and Mirdif City Center 2.67 (0.89) (p < 0.01). Despite the absence of windows, users reported that the lack of natural light in the escalator area was due to the secured space and lighting effect (Table 6).
Regarding aesthetics, introducing natural elements was found to require revision. The score for the opening of natural elements (EAE-1) was lowest in Dubai Mall, consistent with the absence of natural elements in the escalator area during the field survey (p < 0.001). However, the overall results were above average in the EAE-2 category related to installing decorative design elements. Compared to Dubai Mall and Mirdif City Center, Dubai Festival City was evaluated as relatively low, indicating a significant difference (p < 0.001). Wall frames, giant LED screens, and photo zones were used as decorative design elements in Dubai Mall and Mirdif City Center. In contrast, decorative design elements, except for natural elements, were not installed in the rest area of the escalator area in Dubai Festival City.
In terms of convenience, the provision of convenience facilities and ancillary facilities in the escalator area was rated the highest. All shopping malls received scores above average in the ECV-2 category. Trash cans and water dispensers were provided in all malls, and ATMs and customer centers were provided on some floors, considering the leading customer group. Dubai Festival City was evaluated as above average in the ECV-4 category for barrier-free design, while Dubai Mall and Mirdif City Center received a low score of three points (normal). However, all shopping malls were found to comply with the regulations of Dubai Municipality, and the result is considered a subjective design evaluation by users (p < 0.001).
Regarding accessibility, users highly evaluated the connection between other spaces and circulation. The review of the sign indicating the rest area was the lowest. The EAC-3 item, related to circulation to other spaces, received an above-average rating overall, with Dubai Mall receiving the highest score (p < 0.05). The movement line from the sales space to the elevator and from the escalator area rest area was found to be naturally connected (Figure 6). Regarding the EAC-4 item for rest-area information signs, Dubai Mall and Mirdif City Center received below-average scores. At the same time, Dubai Festival City was evaluated relatively well for installing information boards (p < 0.001). The field survey found that the rest-area signboard was the lowest among the accessibility items. Installing a sign indicating the rest area’s location in the escalator area is necessary. Most elevator signboards were well installed, but there is room for improvement in installing the rest-area signboard near the escalator area.

3.2. Evaluation of the Rest Area Being Next to the Bathroom

As shown in Table 7, in the context of comfort, the evaluation of natural light (BCF-1) was rated the lowest at 2.41, indicating that there was no natural light during the on-site survey. According to interviews with rest-area users, it was perceived as a closed space compared to other areas and did not receive the benefit of natural light. The rest areas adjacent to the bathrooms of Dubai Mall, Dubai Festival City, and Mirdif City Center were all rated low, scoring three points or fewer in the BCF-1 category. Dubai Festival City had the lowest satisfaction rating, showing a significant difference (p < 0.001). In the BCF-4 category of ventilation, Dubai Festival City had the best ventilation, whereas Mirdif City Center was evaluated relatively poorly (p < 0.05).
Regarding aesthetics, the satisfaction rating for color composition (BAE-4) was above three points, while the review of natural elements (BAE-1) was rated three points or fewer. Given that the rest area adjacent to the bathroom is relatively narrow compared to other areas, it may be challenging to introduce various natural elements. Overall, BAE-4, an item for color composition, was rated above average. In Dubai Mall, it was assessed that the color composition was designed to relieve fatigue by using low-saturation warm colors, showing a significant difference (p < 0.001). On the other hand, item BAE-2, regarding decorative design elements, was rated above average in Dubai Mall and Mirdif City Center but below average in Dubai Festival City. Despite the addition of decorative design elements, such as large LED screens in Dubai Mall and Mirdif City Center, no decorative details were added to the restroom area of Dubai Festival City, resulting in a significant difference (p < 0.001).
Regarding convenience, the BCV-1 item, which assesses the width and area of the passage, and the BCV-2 item, which evaluates convenience and ancillary facilities, both received a score of three or higher. In the BCV-1 item, Dubai Mall was rated the highest (Figure 7), whereas Mirdif City Center was considered the lowest (p < 0.001). With respect to BCV-2, diaper-changing tables were provided in women’s restrooms on most floors, but only a few men’s restrooms were equipped with such facilities. Overall, the BCV-4 item, which evaluates the use of non-slip finishing materials, was rated below average, showing a significant difference (p < 0.001). All three shopping malls had tiles that were easy to clean but lacked non-slip flooring. The evaluation of floor safety in the restroom indicates a need for thoughtful floor design.
Regarding accessibility, the item for easy access by users (BAC-3) received the highest rating, while the item for protecting users’ privacy during personal rest time received the lowest. Overall, BAC-2, the easy-access item, received an above-average rating with no significant difference. However, in the BAC-1 item, which evaluates privacy, Dubai Mall received the highest rating, whereas Mirdif City Center received the lowest, showing a significant difference (p < 0.001). Rest areas were situated in some restrooms in relatively narrow spaces in Dubai Festival City and Mirdif City Center. In contrast, Dubai Mall received higher ratings by providing separate rest areas.

3.3. Evaluation of the Open-Corridor Rest Area

The noise issue emerged as the most unsatisfactory factor in the comfort evaluation. According to the assessment of item CCF-3, the noise problem was found to be below average, with a significant difference (p < 0.01). The Mirdif City Center was rated the lowest among the three malls surveyed, in contrast to the Dubai Mall and Dubai Festival City. Thus, it is believed that Mirdif City Center, which has an atrium dispersed in multiple areas, is more susceptible to noise than the other malls surveyed (Table 8).
Regarding aesthetics, the open-corridor rest area received the lowest rating for introducing natural elements. Only Mirdif City Center received a rating of three points or more in the CAE-1 category regarding the introduction of natural elements (Figure 8). Dubai Festival City received the lowest rating, with a significant difference (p < 0.001). According to the field survey, the empty corridor bridge connecting the shopping space separated into two atriums in Dubai Festival City did not have natural elements, such as flowerpots or indoor landscaping, leading to a lower rating.
Concerning convenience, floor safety for the disabled (CCV-4) received the lowest rating, while securing a sitting distance for rest (CCV-1) was rated relatively high. Dubai Mall received a below-average rating in the CCV-1 category of passage width and area and was rated the lowest among the three malls surveyed. Mirdif City Center received the highest rating, with a significant difference (p < 0.001). Although the size of the open corridor did not differ, Dubai Mall’s multi-center plan and Mirdif City Center’s linear program influenced the perceptions of survey participants. In terms of convenience facilities (CCV-2), all malls received a below-average rating, but Mirdif City Center received a relatively high rating, with a significant difference (p < 0.01). The open-corridor rest area in Dubai Mall and Dubai Festival City only provided trash bins. In contrast, Mirdif City Center provided magazines and product information related to shopping, in addition to trash bins, making it more convenient for users of resting areas.
Accessibility was evaluated the most positively, as it was easy for users to access. However, it was assessed that it was challenging to comfortably have a personal rest time because it was located in an open space. The overall rating for the user’s ease of access (CAC-2) was above average, with Dubai Festival City receiving the highest rating of 4.35 (SD = 093), showing a significant difference (p < 0.001). The rest area is located in the main circulation space of the shopping mall, making it easily accessible and providing a space to take a break while moving. In terms of privacy (CAC-1), Dubai Festival City and Mirdif City Center received a below-average rating, while Dubai Mall received an above-average rating, showing a significant difference (p < 0.01). The rest areas were found to be exposed, making it difficult to maintain privacy in all three malls surveyed due to their location in easily accessible open spaces.

3.4. Evaluation of the Outdoor Rest Area

Regarding user satisfaction, comfort, natural light, and shade were evaluated as the most important factors in the outdoor rest areas. Specifically, the only outside rest area that could receive natural light received the highest satisfaction rating. Regarding shade, item OCF-3 was evaluated as above average overall, with Dubai Festival City receiving the highest score (p < 0.01). In the outdoor rest area of Dubai Festival City, shade space is provided by installing a shade film using the ceiling in some rooms. In contrast, no shade is provided in the outdoor rest areas of Dubai Mall and Mirdif City Center. Although some trees form shade in a small space, users reported that there was not enough shaded space for rest (Table 9).
Aesthetics were evaluated positively across all items, with a score of three (normal) or higher. Dubai Mall and Mirdif City Center scored higher than Dubai Festival City on OAE-1 regarding the introduction of various natural objects (p < 0.001). In contrast, Dubai Festival City scored higher on OAE-2 for sights and events, which is consistent with its theme of cartoon characters. Mirdif City Center scored highly on the garden theme, which was sufficiently introduced with natural features (Figure 9). However, its OAE-2 event item was rated lower than that of Dubai Festival City (p < 0.001). The results suggest that natural elements and event elements are closely related to the theme of the outdoor rest area.
In terms of convenience, the width and area of space received the highest satisfaction rating, while appropriate steps that do not interfere with walking received the lowest rating, with fewer than three points (normal). The Mirdif City Center outdoor rest area, consisting of gardens, received high scores on OCV-1 regarding the width and size of the space. On the other hand, the outdoor rest area of Dubai Festival City received lower scores than Mirdif City Center (p < 0.001). Given that the main customers of the outdoor rest area of Dubai Festival City are guardians with children, securing a space to enable strollers to pass conveniently is necessary. Privacy protection (OAC-1) received the lowest rating among accessibility items. The installation of information boards (OAC-4) was evaluated somewhat insignificantly, and the structure of information boards indicating where the outdoor rest area is located is required. Mirdif City Center received the lowest rating on OAC-3 for connection with indoor space.

3.5. User-Satisfaction Evaluation for Rest Area

A thorough evaluation of the satisfaction of users of the shopping-mall rest area with the overall space was conducted by dividing each area into surveys and analysis. The findings revealed that the rest area adjacent to the escalator garnered a satisfaction score of 3.50 (SD = 0.75), the rest area near the bathroom received a score of 2.80 (SD = 0.98), the open-corridor rest area scored 3.23 (SD = 0.85), while the outdoor rest area scored 4.04 (SD = 0.76) (Table 10).
Furthermore, the rest area adjacent to the bathroom was evaluated solely for Dubai Mall, which received a score of three or more points. Conversely, Dubai Festival City and Mirdif City Center had a significant difference of three or fewer points (p < 0.001). On the other hand, the rest area next to the escalator showed above-average overall satisfaction. The open-corridor rest area also garnered above-average overall satisfaction, with Mirdif City Center recording the highest level (p < 0.05).

4. Discussion

The paper discusses and builds on the existing literature about the evaluation of rest areas in three different shopping malls in Dubai under the lens of four characteristics: comfort, aesthetics, convenience, and accessibility. The results obtained reinforce, to a considerable extent, the findings of previous research that indicate that users’ satisfaction with the provision of natural light in escalator areas was the highest in Dubai Mall. However, the absence of natural elements in the escalator area was noted in Dubai Mall. The provision of convenience facilities and ancillary facilities in the escalator area was rated the highest. Regarding accessibility, users highly evaluated the connection between other spaces and circulation, with Dubai Mall receiving the highest score.
To begin with, the high user satisfaction with the provision of natural light in the escalator areas in the Dubai Mall aligns well with the findings of Kim and Runyan [35], who also emphasized the importance of authenticity, comfort, and convenience, aspects that the inclusion of natural light can augment. It is interesting to note that while there was high satisfaction with natural light, the lack of natural elements in the same area was observed. This echoes the notion raised about the composition of rest areas that should consider aesthetic elements for user satisfaction, with the study suggesting the inclusion of more natural elements for aesthetic enhancement [44].
Regarding convenience, the present study found high approval for facilities in the escalator areas. This speaks volumes about the importance of convenience, an attribute that was also underlined by Ortegón-Cortázar and Royo-Vela [41] and Calvo-Porral and Lévy-Mangín [47] in their works.
Accessibility, which emphasizes efficient access and connection with other spaces, also received high scores, particularly in the Dubai Mall. This finding correlates with the work of Rousseau and Venter [45] that underlined the significance of connectivity and accessibility in public spaces.
However, some discrepancies were noted between the findings of this study and earlier works. Notably, the low evaluation of natural light in rest areas adjacent to bathrooms contrasts sharply with the importance of comfort highlighted in previous studies [35,41,44,46,47]. This discrepancy points to potential areas for further improvements in mall design.
Moreover, the limited provision of diaper-changing tables in men’s restrooms stood out. This concern seems to tie in with the notion of accessibility and convenience, especially in terms of inclusivity and catering to diverse user needs. It may be interpreted as a call for more gender-inclusive facilities, thereby augmenting the user-satisfaction level.
In conclusion, while the results largely align with the literature, there are aspects that indicate the potential for improvement. Ensuring a balanced incorporation of natural light, natural elements, convenience facilities, and more inclusive amenities, such as diaper-changing tables in men’s restrooms, could lead to a more satisfying user experience in shopping-mall rest areas. Future research could delve into these elements to provide more insights into designing rest areas that meet the diverse needs of users.

5. Conclusions

In response to the evolving needs of contemporary society, individuality diversification, and changes in consumer behavior, shopping malls serve as virtual spaces for distribution, sales, and various cultural functions. As a result, careful planning is necessary to ensure that shopping-mall users can comfortably and conveniently use the rest area. This study conducts a literature review and empirical study to investigate the spatial characteristics of indoor and outdoor shopping malls and understand the essential features of each rest area by analyzing user satisfaction. The following are the results and conclusions of this study.
Firstly, through a review of related literature and previous studies, the concepts of indoor and outdoor rest areas of shopping malls were organized and reclassified. This study reclassified the shopping-mall rest area as a rest area next to the escalator, a rest area next to the bathroom, an open-corridor rest area, and an outdoor rest area.
Secondly, various spatial characteristics of the shopping-mall rest area were analyzed, organized, and extracted as four environmental characteristics: comfort, aesthetics, convenience, and accessibility. In addition, detailed evaluation items for each spatial characteristic factor were composed. A specific evaluation tool for each rest area consisting of 16 clear evaluation items for an indoor rest area and 16 detailed evaluation items for an outdoor rest area was constructed. By constructing a different spatial characteristic evaluation tool for each rest area, it is expected that more appropriate primary data for each rest-area plan can be presented.
Thirdly, rest-area user satisfaction was evaluated using the spatial characteristics evaluation tool of the shopping mall’s indoor and outdoor rest areas. The results showed that satisfaction with aesthetics and accessibility was relatively high, and satisfaction with convenience was the lowest. In particular, the evaluation of the rest area next to the bathroom was the lowest, indicating a need for more parts in the field survey. Dissatisfaction with the use of the open-corridor rest area appeared as the number of cases where sales tables were placed in the area and used as a sales space increased. To address this, adjusting the size of the sales stands considering the rest area and separating the sales and rest areas by visually and acoustically blocking them using plants and design elements could be considered.
Fourthly, multiple-regression analysis was performed on each rest area’s four characteristics and satisfaction to understand the spatial characteristics affecting the pleasure of using the shopping-mall rest area. It was found that accessibility is a spatial characteristic that influences all rest areas. Measures to increase accessibility should be considered, such as putting guide signs in an appropriate place to clarify the motion and direction and connecting indoor and outdoor spaces well. Sufficient convenience facilities and furniture should be arranged in each resting space, and the privacy of resting-space users should be maintained. Additionally, it is essential to ensure sufficient ventilation, provide appreciation elements, such as natural elements such as plants, sights, events, and fountain/waterfalls, and provide rest-area colors.
In conclusion, the importance of the shopping-mall rest area is increasing as a service space with various functions. To create a better shopping-mall rest area, a differentiated approach that avoids a uniform design and considers important spatial characteristics according to the type of rest area will be required. The results of this study can be used as primary data for rest-area planning that reflect user needs in the future.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to this study. C.J. and N.S.A.M. identified and secured the example buildings used in the study. The data acquisition system and sensors were designed and installed by C.J. and N.S.A.M. N.S.A.M. was responsible for data collection. C.J. performed data analysis The manuscript was compiled by C.J. and reviewed by N.S.A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Ajman University (protocol code A-H-F-28-Oct and 28 October 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

New data were created or analyzed in this study. Data will be shared upon request and consideration of the authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Ajman University for APC support and to the Healthy and Sustainable Buildings Research Center at the Ajman University for providing an excellent research environment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Business Insider. Dubai Has More than 65 Malls in a City of 3 Million People, and It’s Not Because They’re Obsessed with Shopping. Available online: https://www.businessinsider.com/why-dubai-has-so-many-malls-2018-11 (accessed on 2 July 2022).
  2. DSC. DSC: Dubai Population Is 3.4 Million and Hosts 4.4 Million Daily. Available online: https://www.dsc.gov.ae/en-us/DSC-News/Pages/Dubai-Population-is-3.4-Million-and-Hosts-4.4-Million-Daily.aspx (accessed on 8 July 2022).
  3. EMC. Dubai Square: The Future of Retail in Dubai Creek Harbour. Available online: https://www.ecm.ae/en/communities/dubai-creek-harbour/discover/whats-around/dubai-square/ (accessed on 14 August 2022).
  4. Yacobi, H.; Shechter, R. Rethinking cities in the Middle East: Political economy, planning, and the lived space. J. Archit. 2005, 10, 499–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Crompton, A. The architecture of multifaith spaces: God leaves the building. J. Archit. 2013, 18, 474–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Mahgoub, Y. Architecture and the expression of cultural identity in Kuwait. J. Archit. 2007, 12, 165–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Khaleej Times Dubai’s Malls Thrived during Summer Shopping Season. Available online: https://www.khaleejtimes.com/business/dubais-malls-thrived-during-summer-shopping-season (accessed on 22 August 2022).
  8. Acuto, M. High-rise Dubai urban entrepreneurialism and the technology of symbolic power. Cities 2010, 27, 272–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. De Jong, M.; Hoppe, T.; Noori, N. City Branding, Sustainable Urban Development and the Rentier State. How Do Qatar Abu Dhabi and Dubai Present Themselves in the Age of Post Oil and Global Warming? Energies 2019, 12, 1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Gulf News. Massive Influx of Tourists: Dubai Is Now the World’s Fourth Most Visited City. Available online: https://gulfnews.com/travel/massive-influx-of-tourists-dubai-is-now-the-worlds-fourth-most-visited-city-1.69202063 (accessed on 12 September 2022).
  11. Lee, C.C. Type and the developmental city: Housing Singapore. J. Archit. 2015, 20, 988–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. The National. Dubai Plans to Be World’s Most Popular Tourist Destination by 2025. Available online: https://www.thenationalnews.com/uae/dubai-plans-to-be-world-s-most-popular-tourist-destination-by-2025-1.776970 (accessed on 2 October 2022).
  13. Zaidan, E.A. Tourism shopping and new urban entertainment: A case study of Dubai. J. Vacat. Mark. 2016, 22, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ye, Z.; Kim, M.K. Predicting electricity consumption in a building using an optimized back-propagation and Levenberg–Marquardt back-propagation neural network: Case study of a shopping mall in China. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 42, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, J.; Lian, Z.; Zheng, Z.; Zhang, H. A method to evaluate building energy consumption based on energy use index of different functional sectors. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 53, 101893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gilboa, S.; Mitchell, V. The role of culture and purchasing power parity in shaping mall-shoppers’ profiles. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 52, 101951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xu, R.; Yang, G.; Qu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Liu, J.; Shang, L.; Chang, J. City components–area relationship and diversity pattern: Towards a better understanding of urban structure. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 60, 102272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Calise, F.; Fabozzi, S.; Vanoli, L.; Vicidomini, M. A sustainable mobility strategy based on electric vehicles and photovoltaic panels for shopping centers. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 70, 102891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Abutaleb, A.; McDougall, K.; Basson, M.; Hassan, R.; Mahmood, M.N. Towards a conceptual framework for understanding the attractiveness of rail transit-oriented shopping mall developments (TOSMDs). Urban Rail Transit 2019, 5, 225–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Gomes, R.M.; Paula, F. Shopping mall image: Systematic review of 40 years of research. Int. Rev. Retail. Distrib. Consum. Res. 2017, 27, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kim, J.W.; Lee, F.; Suh, Y.G. Satisfaction and loyalty from shopping mall experience and brand personality. Serv. Mark. Q. 2015, 36, 62–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jewell, N. The fall and rise of the British mall. J. Archit. 2001, 6, 317–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kotsi, F.; Balakrishnan, M.S.; Michael, I.; Ramsøy, T.Z. Place branding: Aligning multiple stakeholder perception of visual and auditory communication elements. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2018, 7, 112–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Afacan, Y. Achieving inclusion in public spaces: A shopping mall case study. In Designing Inclusive Systems; Springer: London, UK, 2012; pp. 85–92. [Google Scholar]
  25. Chiodelli, F.; Moroni, S. Do malls contribute to the privatisation of public space and the erosion of the public sphere? Reconsidering the role of shopping centres. City Cult. Soc. 2015, 6, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hami, A.; Moula, F.F.; Maulan, S.B. Public preferences toward shopping mall interior landscape design in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Urban For. Urban Green. 2018, 30, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, L.; Ng, E. Outdoor thermal comfort and outdoor activities: A review of research in the past decade. Cities 2012, 29, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Du, X.; Zhang, Y.; Lv, Z. Investigations and analysis of indoor environment quality of green and conventional shopping mall buildings based on customers’ perception. Build. Environ. 2020, 177, 106851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Karadağ, A.A. The effects of shopping malls on using urban parks: The case of Ankara, Turkey. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2013, 11, 765–770. [Google Scholar]
  30. Juwaheer, T.D.; Pudaruth, S.; Ramdin, P. Enhancing customer shopping experience in malls of emerging countries—The “Mauritius” experience. World J. Entrep. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2013, 9, 178–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Oğuz, D.; Çakci, I. Changes in leisure and recreational preferences: A case study of Ankara. Sci. Res. Essays 2010, 5, 721–729. [Google Scholar]
  32. Time Out. Dubai’s Best Malls: Here’s Where to Go Shopping in Dubai. Available online: https://www.timeoutdubai.com/shopping/shopping-news/453718-dubais-best-malls (accessed on 22 November 2022).
  33. Kursunluoglu, E. Shopping centre customer service: Creating customer satisfaction and loyalty. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2014, 32, 528–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Srivastava, M.; Kaul, D. Social interaction, convenience and customer satisfaction: The mediating effect of customer experience. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2014, 21, 1028–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Warnaby, G.; Medway, D. Marketplace icons: Shopping malls. Consum. Mark. Cult. 2018, 21, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rosenbaum, M.S.; Massiah, C. An expanded servicescape perspective. J. Serv. Manag. 2011, 22, 471–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mehrabian, A.; Russell, J.A. An Approach to Environmental Psychology; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  38. Calvo-Porral, C.; Lévy-Mangin, J.P. Profiling shopping mall customers during hard times. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 48, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Manfredini, M.; Jenner, R. The virtual public thing: De-re-territorialisations of public space through shopping in Auckland’s urban space. Interstices J. Archit. Relat. Arts 2015, 16, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shim, C.; Santos, C.A. Tourism, place and placelessness in the phenomenological experience of shopping malls in Seoul. Tour. Manag. 2014, 45, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Juhari, N.H.; Ali, H.M.; Khair, N. The shopping mall servicescape affects customer satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Business and Economic Research, Bandung, Indonesia, 12–13 March 2012; pp. 617–632. [Google Scholar]
  42. Beiró, M.G.; Bravo, L.; Caro, D.; Cattuto, C.; Ferres, L.; Graells-Garrido, E. Shopping mall attraction and social mixing at a city scale. EPJ Data Sci. 2018, 7, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sebastian, E.; Purwanegara, M. Influencing factors and attractiveness of shopping mall to mall behaviour of people in Jakarta. J. Bus. Manag. 2014, 3, 76–80. [Google Scholar]
  44. Calvo-Porral, C.; Lévy-Mangín, J.P. Pull factors of the shopping malls: An empirical study. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2018, 46, 110–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kim, J.H.; Runyan, R. Where did all the benches go? The effects of mall kiosks on perceived retail crowding. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2011, 39, 130–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rousseau, G.G.; Venter, D.J. Mall shopping preferences and patronage of mature shoppers. SA J. Ind. Psychol. 2014, 40, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Ortegón-Cortázar, L.; Royo-Vela, M. Attraction factors of shopping centers: Effects of design and eco-natural environment on intention to visit. Eur. J. Manag. Bus. Econ. 2017, 26, 199–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Wong, S.C.; Nair, P.B. Mall Patronage: Dimensions of Attractiveness in Urban Context. Int. J. Bus. Soc. 2018, 19, 281–294. [Google Scholar]
  49. Kushwaha, T.; Ubeja, S.; Chatterjee, A.S. Factors influencing selection of shopping malls: An exploratory study of consumer perception. Vision 2017, 21, 274–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pattarakitham, A. The influence of customer interaction, variety, and convenience on customer satisfaction and revisit intention: A study of shopping mall in Bangkok. J. Econ. Bus. Manag. 2015, 3, 1072–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. El Hedhli, K.; Chebat, J.C.; Sirgy, M.J. Shopping well-being at the mall: Construct, antecedents, and consequences. J. Bus. Res. 2013, 66, 856–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Peter, S.; Anandkumar, V. Travel motivation-based typology of tourists who visit a shopping festival: An empirical study on the Dubai shopping festival. J. Vacat. Mark. 2016, 22, 142–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Badar, M.S.; Irfan, M. Shopping Mall Services and Customer Purchase Intention along with Demographics. J. Mark. Focus. Manag. 2018. Available online: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01839613/ (accessed on 22 November 2022).
  54. Masarrat, G.; Jha, S. Assessing the impact of recession on consumer’s behaviour: An empirical study in Dubai. Res. World 2015, 6, 119. [Google Scholar]
  55. IBM. IBM SPSS Statistics. Available online: https://www.ibm.com/products/spss-statistics (accessed on 2 December 2022).
  56. Ferrer, S.; Ruiz, T.; Mars, L. A qualitative study on the role of the built environment for short walking trips. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2015, 33, 141–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Said, I.; Gambo, N.; Ismail, R. An evaluation into the architectural factors attracting customers to Malaysian shopping malls. J. Bus. Retail. Manag. Res. 2016, 11, 138–153. [Google Scholar]
  58. Marinic, G. Internal appropriations: Multiculturalism and the American shopping mall. J. Inter. Des. 2016, 41, 47–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Azila Azmi, A.; Mohammad Amin Ahmad, M.A.; Abdullah, A.; Shaw, G. Shopping in Malaysia: A Study of International Tourists’ Experience and Expectation. Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang. 2019, 8, 199–212. [Google Scholar]
  60. Yeo, A.C.M.; Ong, W.S.; Kwek, C.L. The antecedents influencing shoppers’ frequencies of visit and purchase intention in the shopping mall: A study on the pull factors. HOLISTICA–J. Bus. Public Adm. 2019, 10, 53–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Kumar, D.S.; Purani, K.; Viswanathan, S.A. The indirect experience of nature: Biomorphic design forms in servicescapes. J. Serv. Mark. 2020, 34, 847–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ronse, W.; Boussauw, K.; Lauwers, D. Shopping centre siting and modal choice in Belgium: A destination-based analysis. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2015, 23, 2275–2291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Wu, S.S.; Lo, S.M. Events as community function of shopping centers: A case study of Hong Kong. Cities 2018, 72, 130–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chebat, J.C.; Sirgy, M.J.; Grzeskowiak, S. How can shopping mall management best capture mall image? J. Bus. Res. 2010, 63, 735–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Massicotte, M.C.; Michon, R.; Chebat, J.C.; Sirgy, M.J.; Borges, A. Effects of mall atmosphere on mall evaluation: Teenage versus adult shoppers. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2011, 18, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Das, G.; Varshneya, G. Consumer emotions: Determinants and outcomes in a shopping mall. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2017, 38, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Joshi, A.; Kale, S.; Chandel, S.; Pal, D.K. Likert scale: Explored and explained. Br. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2015, 7, 396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Trizano-Hermosilla, I.; Alvarado, J.M. Best alternatives to Cronbach’s alpha reliability in realistic conditions: Congeneric and asymmetrical measurements. Front. Psychol. 2016, 7, 769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Bonett, D.G.; Wright, T.A. Cronbach’s alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning. J. Organ. Behav. 2015, 36, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Peterson, R.A.; Kim, Y. On the relationship between coefficient alpha and composite reliability. J. Appl. Psychol. 2013, 98, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kesari, B.; Atulkar, S. Satisfaction of mall shoppers: A study on perceived utilitarian and hedonic shopping values. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2016, 31, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. El-Adly, M.I.; Eid, R. An empirical study of the relationship between shopping environment, customer perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty in the UAE malls context. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2016, 31, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. “The Boulevard” at Dubai Square, currently under construction (source: Dubai Holdings).
Figure 1. “The Boulevard” at Dubai Square, currently under construction (source: Dubai Holdings).
Sustainability 15 09169 g001
Figure 2. The rest area in Dubai Mall (source: by the authors).
Figure 2. The rest area in Dubai Mall (source: by the authors).
Sustainability 15 09169 g002
Figure 3. The rest area in Dubai Festival City (source: by the authors).
Figure 3. The rest area in Dubai Festival City (source: by the authors).
Sustainability 15 09169 g003
Figure 4. The rest area in Mirdif City Center (source: by the authors).
Figure 4. The rest area in Mirdif City Center (source: by the authors).
Sustainability 15 09169 g004
Figure 5. The investigation-tool construction process (source: by the authors).
Figure 5. The investigation-tool construction process (source: by the authors).
Sustainability 15 09169 g005
Figure 6. The rest area next to the escalator in Dubai Mall (source: by the authors).
Figure 6. The rest area next to the escalator in Dubai Mall (source: by the authors).
Sustainability 15 09169 g006
Figure 7. The rest area next to the bathroom in Dubai Mall (source: by the authors).
Figure 7. The rest area next to the bathroom in Dubai Mall (source: by the authors).
Sustainability 15 09169 g007
Figure 8. The open-corridor rest area in Mirdif City Center (source: by the authors).
Figure 8. The open-corridor rest area in Mirdif City Center (source: by the authors).
Sustainability 15 09169 g008
Figure 9. The outdoor rest area in Mirdif City Center (source: by the authors).
Figure 9. The outdoor rest area in Mirdif City Center (source: by the authors).
Sustainability 15 09169 g009
Table 1. Previous research on the characteristics of rest areas in a commercial complex (source: by the authors).
Table 1. Previous research on the characteristics of rest areas in a commercial complex (source: by the authors).
ResearchersTopicsCharacteristics
Kim and Runyan, 2011 [35]Improvement of the rest area in a
shopping mall
Authenticity, comfort, and
convenience
Juhari et al.,
2012 [44]
Composition of the rest-area
environment considering user
satisfaction
Convenience, comfort, and
aesthetics
Rousseau and Venter,
2014 [45]
Characteristics of public-space
planning for the elderly
Publicity, continuity, accessibility, connection, and placeness
Ortegón-Cortázar and Royo-Vela,
2017 [41]
Effects of design and eco–natural
environment on intention to visit
Accessibility, comfort, awareness, openness, connectivity, and
symbolism
Warnaby and
Medway,
2018 [46]
Design components of a rest area
in a shopping mall
Aesthetics, accessibility, perception, stability, and comfort
Calvo-Porral and Lévy-Mangín,
2018 [47]
Satisfaction level of use of outdoor-
recreation areas
Pull factor
Connectivity, convenience,
accessibility, comfort, and aesthetics
Table 2. Contents of spatial characteristics of rest areas in previous studies (source: by the authors).
Table 2. Contents of spatial characteristics of rest areas in previous studies (source: by the authors).
Spatial CharacteristicsContents of Previous Studies
ComfortNatural lighting inflow
Introduction of natural light from ceilings and side windows
Blocking external noise with walls
Characteristics that sufficiently consider the sound-absorption effect
IAQ regarding ventilation facilities and finishing materials
Use of a light source with a warm lighting color similar to that of an incandescent lamp rather than a cold-colored fluorescent lamp
AestheticIndirect introduction of natural elements and digital video images of nature
Utilization of landscaping (plants, trees, and stones) elements in consideration of the environment, such as differentiated space structure, finishing materials, colors, lighting, decorations
(pictures, and picture frames)
Sightseeing/event elements, sculptures, and viewing elements, such as a waterfall and a fountain
Design elements, such as wall sculptures, super graphics, and landscaping elements, such as plants and water
Consideration of color combination of warm colors considering the psychological state of users
ConvenienceArrangement of various pieces of furniture
Securing seating distance/finishing materials considering the elderly and the disabled
Securing a location and sufficient area, and width
Barrier-free design that considers distance calculation, comfort, naturalness, or other environmental conditions for easy adaptation to the elderly and disabled
Provision of general convenience facilities, such as water purifiers and trash bins, as well as
convenient facilities, such as computers and ATMs
Easy access to entry and exit
AccessibilityProvide an easily accessible space without physical and visual obstacles
Space composition for the degree of movement and physical connection of two or more spaces
Placement of guide signs and guidance signs in appropriate places for passages and open spaces
Installation of the information desk and attached information board
The seating-arrangement pattern is structured in the direction of maintaining a smooth flow of
internal circulation and securing individual areas
Temporary wall-light boundary-frame composition at the boundary to maintain privacy
Table 3. Evaluation items for spatial characteristics of indoor and outdoor rest areas (source: by the authors).
Table 3. Evaluation items for spatial characteristics of indoor and outdoor rest areas (source: by the authors).
CharacteristicsEscalator Area
(E)
Bathroom
(B)
Corridor
(C)
Outdoor
(O)
Evaluation
Content
ComfortECF-1BCF-1CCF-1OCF-1Natural light inflow
ECF-2BCF-2CCF-2OCF-2Artificial lighting
ECF-3BCF-3CCF-3OCF-3Noise reduction
(Outdoor: shades)
ECF-4BCF-4CCF-4OCF-4Ventilation
(Outdoor: scenery)
AestheticEAE-1BAE-1CAE-1OAE-1Introduction of natural elements
EAE-2BAE-2CAE-2OAE-2Design elements
(Outdoor: events)
EAE-3BAE-3CAE-3OAE-3Spatial composition
(Outdoor: fountain/waterfall)
EAE-4BAE-4CAE-4OAE-4Color
ConvenienceECV-1BCV-1CCV-1OCV-1Area and width of space
ECV-2BCV-2CCV-2OCV-2Convenient facilities
ECV-3BCV-3CCV-3OCV-3Furniture arrangement
ECV-4BCV-4CCV-4OCV-4Safe floor material
AccessibilityEAC-1BAC-1CAC-1OAC-1Privacy protection
EAC-2BAC-2CAC-2OAC-2Easy access
EAC-3BAC-3CAC-3OAC-3Connection with surroundings
(Outdoor: circulation)
EAC-4BAC-4CAC-4OAC-4Installation of signage
Table 4. Evaluation items for spatial characteristics of four rest areas (source: by the authors).
Table 4. Evaluation items for spatial characteristics of four rest areas (source: by the authors).
CharacteristicsEvaluation Items
Escalator AreaComfortECF-1There is natural light.
ECF-2Relieves eye fatigue by using warm colors and incandescent lamps.
ECF-3There is a wall to separate the space from the sales space for noise reduction.
ECF-4A sound ventilation system maintains a pleasant air environment.
AestheticEAE-1The atmosphere is well created by introducing natural elements (plants, etc.).
EAE-2LED and picture frames are installed as a design element.
EAE-3A differentiated zone is designed for the characteristics of each zone.
EAE-4It is composed of colors considering the primary age group for each zone.
ConvenienceECV-1It is convenient for passage by securing sufficient area and width.
ECV-2Amenities such as water dispensers, trash cans, and ATMs are provided.
ECV-3It provides a convenient space with a suitable furniture arrangement.
ECV-4Barrier-free design is applied.
AccessibilityEAC-1The arrangement of furniture and sculptures maintains privacy.
EAC-2There are no physical or visual obstacles for easy accessibility.
EAC-3Other spaces (elevator, corridor, and sales space) are accessible.
EAC-4Escalator area signs are installed throughout the passage for easy way-finding.
BathroomComfortBCF-1There is natural light.
BCF-2Relieves eye fatigue by using warm colors and incandescent lamps.
BCF-3The noise is well insulated by maintaining a distance from other spaces.
BCF-4A sound ventilation system maintains a pleasant air environment.
AestheticBAE-1The atmosphere is well created by introducing natural elements (plants, etc.).
BAE-2LED and picture frames are installed as a design element.
BAE-3The rest facilities are suitable for the size of the shopping mall.
BAE-4Relieves visual fatigue with the warm color combination.
ConvenienceBCV-1It is convenient for passage by securing sufficient area and width.
BCV-2A diaper-changing table is provided in the bathroom.
BCV-3You can sit and relax with chairs and stools for a quick rest.
BCV-4The floor is rendered safe by using a non-slip finish.
AccessibilityBAC-1The arrangement of furniture and sculptures maintains privacy.
BAC-2There are no physical or visual obstacles for easy accessibility.
BAC-3Other spaces (elevator, corridor, and sales space) are accessible.
BAC-4Directional signs are located where anyone can easily see them.
Open
Corridor
ComfortCCF-1There is natural light.
CCF-2Reduces eye fatigue by using indirect lighting without glare.
CCF-3There is a wall to separate the space from the sales space for noise reduction.
CCF-4A sound ventilation system maintains a pleasant air environment.
AestheticCAE-1The atmosphere is well created by introducing natural elements (plants, etc.).
CAE-2LED and picture frames are installed as a design element.
CAE-3A differentiated zone is designed for the characteristics of each zone.
CAE-4It is composed of colors considering the primary age group for each zone.
ConvenienceCCV-1There is enough space to sit for rest.
CCV-2Amenities such as water dispensers, trash cans, and ATMs are provided.
CCV-3It provides a convenient space with a suitable furniture arrangement.
CCV-4Barrier-free design is applied.
AccessibilityCAC-1The arrangement of furniture and sculptures maintains privacy.
CAC-2The circulation is designed for easy access.
CAC-3Other spaces (elevator, corridor, and sales space) are accessible.
CAC-4Guide signs are installed in the corridor.
OutdoorComfortOCF-1There is sufficient natural light.
OCF-2It is well-lit, so it is convenient to use at night.
OCF-3Some of the ceilings are shaded and suitable for rest.
OCF-4It has lovely scenery with an open view.
AestheticOAE-1The atmosphere is well created by introducing natural elements (plants, etc.).
OAE-2There are enough outdoor-event elements.
OAE-3It provides visual and auditory pleasure with sculptures, fountains, and waterfalls.
OAE-4It is composed of natural colors that relieve fatigue.
ConvenienceOCV-1Sufficient space is secured for the passage of strollers, wheelchairs, etc.
OCV-2Amenities such as water dispensers, trash cans, and ATMs are provided.
OCV-3There is enough furniture to give you a rest.
OCV-4Appropriate steps are provided so that walking is not obstructed.
AccessibilityOAC-1Privacy is maintained by the arrangement of furniture to keep personal distance.
OAC-2The circulation is designed for easy access.
OAC-3It is well connected to the indoor space.
OAC-4Guide signs are installed in the outdoor space.
Table 5. General information of survey participants (source: by the authors).
Table 5. General information of survey participants (source: by the authors).
ClassificationShopping Malls
Dubai MallDubai Festival CityMirdif City CenterTotal
GenderMale22 (41.5%)26 (48.1%)23 (45.1%)71 (44.9%)
Female31 (56.5%)28 (51.9%)28 (54.9%)87 (55.1%)
Total53 (100%)54 (100%)51 (100%)158 (100%)
Age
Group
20–2916 (30.2%)12 (22.2%)12 (23.5%)40 (25.3%)
30–3912 (22.6%)15 (27.8%)13 (25.5%)40 (25.3%)
40–4912 (22.6%)15 (27.8%)13 (25.5%)40 (25.3%)
50–5913 (24.5%)12 (22.2%)13 (25.5%)38 (24.1%)
Total53 (100%)54 (100%)51 (100%)158 (100%)
Table 6. Evaluation of the rest area being next to the escalator (source: by the authors).
Table 6. Evaluation of the rest area being next to the escalator (source: by the authors).
Rest Area Next
to the Escalator
Dubai MallDubai Festival CityMirdif City CenterTotalF-Test
MeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
ComfortECF-13.041.002.480.842.670.892.730.945.151 **
ECF-23.450.873.040.893.181.033.220.942.752
ECF-33.410.883.470.773.530.763.470.800.364
ECF-43.280.913.890.913.610.893.580.926.035 **
AestheticEAE-12.850.773.780.903.250.843.300.9216.378 ***
EAE-23.640.823.020.853.840.913.490.9313.090 ***
EAE-33.570.753.630.813.690.863.630.800.207
EAE-43.530.743.780.763.450.903.490.812.368
ConvenienceECV-13.680.913.700.903.690.943.690.920.011
ECV-23.550.913.820.884.140.993.840.965.207 **
ECV-33.010.994.060.963.141.023.411.0917.846 ***
ECV-42.710.913.421.142.270.962.811.1117.272 ***
AccessibilityEAC-13.030.903.630.833.020.803.230.898.923 ***
EAC-23.260.923.850.943.450.943.530.965.512 **
EAC-33.810.773.380.793.570.873.590.833.213 *
EAC-42.850.823.390.882.630.932.960.9310.517 ***
Total3.270.873.540.873.330.913.380.88
S.D. (standard deviation), * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Table 7. Evaluation of the rest area being next to the bathroom (source: by the authors).
Table 7. Evaluation of the rest area being next to the bathroom (source: by the authors).
Rest Area Next
to the Bathroom
Dubai MallDubai Festival CityMirdif City CenterTotalF-Test
MeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
ComfortECF-12.900.951.920.992.330.952.410.9717.208 ***
ECF-23.810.652.620.962.941.123.120.9123.722 ***
ECF-33.730.783.480.823.450.903.560.831.842
ECF-43.580.793.890.863.351.103.610.924.400 *
AestheticEAE-12.841.032.410.792.450.902.560.913.439 *
EAE-23.640.732.310.903.630.833.190.8343.721 ***
EAE-33.710.662.491.003.201.003.130.8923.707 ***
EAE-43.680.723.070.993.140.893.300.877.494 ***
ConvenienceECV-13.570.903.040.882.611.003.070.9313.760 ***
ECV-23.780.993.180.763.161.043.400.936.274 **
ECV-33.280.982.300.922.511.062.700.9914.352 ***
ECV-42.750.802.280.782.180.922.400.847.056 ***
AccessibilityEAC-13.130.982.520.982.451.002.700.997.555 ***
EAC-23.260.943.591.023.410.693.420.911.757
EAC-33.280.793.410.943.080.993.260.911.725
EAC-43.120.892.950.892.640.922.900.923.502 *
Total3.320.842.780.902.850.962.980.90
S.D. (standard deviation), * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Table 8. Evaluation of the open-corridor rest area (source: by the authors).
Table 8. Evaluation of the open-corridor rest area (source: by the authors).
Open-Corridor
Rest Area
Dubai MallDubai Festival CityMirdif City CenterTotalF-Test
MeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
ComfortECF-13.040.872.440.812.860.832.780.846.927 ***
ECF-23.470.842.760.933.040.993.090.928.017 ***
ECF-32.611.032.261.102.011.052.291.074.419 **
ECF-43.290.963.800.973.470.923.520.953.674 **
AestheticEAE-12.980.902.480.843.460.912.980.8916.153 ***
EAE-22.920.873.121.113.390.983.140.992.888
EAE-33.310.883.200.873.400.903.300.880.632
EAE-43.120.733.090.833.470.863.230.813.578 **
ConvenienceECV-12.690.813.110.863.430.953.080.879.481 ***
ECV-22.411.062.410.762.830.932.550.923.582 **
ECV-32.400.852.830.793.160.962.800.875.103 **
ECV-42.720.922.570.962.141.012.480.965.014 **
AccessibilityEAC-13.120.982.510.992.680.982.780.994.292 **
EAC-23.700.894.350.933.880.883.980.907.435 ***
EAC-33.550.823.850.783.430.803.610.803.852 **
EAC-42.911.023.221.072.751.012.961.032.693
Total3.080.923.000.903.090.933.060.91
S.D. (standard deviation), ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Table 9. Evaluation of the outdoor rest area (source: by the authors).
Table 9. Evaluation of the outdoor rest area (source: by the authors).
Outdoor
Rest Area
Dubai MallDubai Festival CityMirdif City CenterTotalF-Test
MeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
ComfortECF-14.220.754.220.664.620.584.360.676.167 **
ECF-23.740.683.970.683.910.983.870.781.328
ECF-33.400.903.960.773.431.043.600.906.460 **
ECF-44.260.653.690.864.080.744.010.758.090 **
AestheticEAE-13.870.833.330.994.140.933.780.9210.373 ***
EAE-23.581.064.430.713.590.923.870.9015.113 ***
EAE-33.830.884.060.764.060.783.980.811.364
EAE-43.830.723.870.844.080.773.930.781.496
ConvenienceECV-13.890.673.740.624.330.703.990.6711.136 ***
ECV-22.810.962.940.782.710.962.820.900.913
ECV-33.190.903.770.563.470.883.480.787.336 ***
ECV-42.830.802.650.872.630.952.700.870.849
AccessibilityEAC-13.320.933.160.783.310.903.270.870.522
EAC-23.380.923.870.823.610.943.620.894.047 **
EAC-33.380.893.590.813.340.973.730.884.156 *
EAC-43.341.013.460.983.351.063.610.900.233
Total3.550.863.680.793.710.873.650.85
S.D. (standard deviation), * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Table 10. User-satisfaction level for rest areas (source: by the authors).
Table 10. User-satisfaction level for rest areas (source: by the authors).
ClassificationDubai MallDubai Festival CityMirdif City CenterTotalF-Test
MeanS.D.MeanS.D.MeanS.D.MeanS.D.
Rest Area next to the Escalator3.210.823.610.683.690.653.500.756.701 **
Rest Area next to the Bathroom3.250.872.540.862.611.062.800.989.230 ***
Open-Corridor Rest Area3.130.923.260.813.290.833.230.850.522
Outdoor Rest Area3.920.813.980.664.220.814.040.762.138 *
S.D. (standard deviation), * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jung, C.; Abdelaziz Mahmoud, N.S. Exploring Customer Behavior in Shopping Malls: A Study of Rest Areas in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Sustainability 2023, 15, 9169. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su15129169

AMA Style

Jung C, Abdelaziz Mahmoud NS. Exploring Customer Behavior in Shopping Malls: A Study of Rest Areas in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Sustainability. 2023; 15(12):9169. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su15129169

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jung, Chuloh, and Naglaa Sami Abdelaziz Mahmoud. 2023. "Exploring Customer Behavior in Shopping Malls: A Study of Rest Areas in Dubai, United Arab Emirates" Sustainability 15, no. 12: 9169. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su15129169

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop