Next Article in Journal
On the Relationship between Generalization and Robustness to Adversarial Examples
Next Article in Special Issue
Generation of Geometric Extra Phase and Accompanying Temporal Effects in Asymmetric Optically Compensated IPS-LCDs and FFS-LCDs
Previous Article in Journal
Copulaesque Versions of the Skew-Normal and Skew-Student Distributions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhancement of Polymer Structural Ordering in Polymer-Stabilised Blue Phases for Improved Electro-Optical Properties
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Novel Technique for Determination of Residual Direct-Current Voltage of Liquid Crystal Cells with Vertical and In-Plane Electric Fields

by
Msanobu Mizusaki
1,* and
Shoichi Ishihara
2
1
Development Group, Sharp Display Technology Corporation, Tenri 632-8567, Japan
2
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka Institute of Technology, Osaka 535-8585, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 5 April 2021 / Revised: 23 April 2021 / Accepted: 29 April 2021 / Published: 7 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Symmetry and Liquid Crystals)

Abstract

:
Generation of residual direct-current (DC) voltage (VrDC) induces serious image sticking of liquid crystal displays (LCDs). In this study, a novel technique to determine the VrDC of LC cells is proposed. We found that the VrDC could be determined from a current-voltage (I-V) curve obtained by the application of triangular voltage. In the case of a vertically aligned twisted nematic (VTN) mode LC cell, where a vertical electric field is applied, the I-V curve shows maximum and minimum current peaks owing to rotation of an LC director, and the VrDC is able to be determined from an average value of the two peaks. On the other hand, in the case of a fringe field switching (FFS) mode LC cell, where an in-plane (lateral) electric field is applied from comb electrodes, the current peaks derived from the rotation of the LC director do not appear. Therefore, we could not adopt the same way with that of the VTN mode LC cell. However, we found that there were two minimum current peaks derived from minimum capacitances of the FFS mode LC cell, and could determine the VrDC by using these two current peaks. The proposed technique would be useful for the evaluation of the VrDC of the LCDs, where the electric field is applied both vertically and laterally.

1. Introduction

In recent years, the progress for the display performance of liquid crystal displays (LCDs) is remarkable with high contrast ratio, wide viewing angle, and fast response owing to significant advancement of liquid crystal (LC) alignment control technology [1,2,3,4,5]. Therefore, the application of the LCDs extends to many fields: smartphone, watch, tablet, television, automobile display, and so on. With the significant progress of the above image quality, there is a possibility that quite a small level of image defect becomes observable [6,7,8,9,10]. Image sticking is a particularly serious problem because the human eye generally distinguishes quite a small level of image sticking. Hence, a solution to this problem is necessary. It is known that image sticking is the phenomenon in which the previous pattern is visible whilst the next pattern is addressing [11]. One of the reasons for the image sticking of the LCDs is the generation of residual direct-current voltage (VrDC) [12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. The VrDC is the internal voltage being generated in the LC cell and is estimated to be derived from the following mechanisms [14,15,16,17,18]. One of the mechanisms is that an impurity ion in an LC layer of an LC cell adsorbs on a surface of an alignment layer under application of external DC offset voltage, and then the adsorbed ion does not desorb from the surface for a long period even after the DC offset voltage is removed [14,15,16,17]. Hence, the adsorbed ion on the surface of the alignment layer is one of the roots of the VrDC. The other mechanism of the VrDC is the generation of charged voltage in the LC cell, as depicted in Figure 1 [18]. The LC cell generates the charged voltage by the application of the DC voltage because both the LC layer and the alignment layer are composed of dielectric compounds. During the open circuit period after a period of discharge, the charged voltages generated both in the LC layer and the alignment layer relax. However, the relaxation time for the charged voltage of the alignment layer is generally long because the resistance of the alignment layer is relatively high. Thus, the residual charged voltage in the LC cell is another root of the VrDC [18].
So far, several measurement techniques have been proposed for the evaluation of VrDC, as listed in Table 1. One is the capacitance-voltage (C-V) hysteresis technique: the VrDC is determined by the C-V curve shift after applying the DC voltage [19,20]. In this technique, square wave voltage is applied to the LC cells [19]. The second technique is the flicker minimization technique: the VrDC is determined by minimizing an optical flicker by optimizing the DC offset voltage [16,21]. The last one is the dielectric absorption technique: the VrDC is determined by the residual charged voltage after application of the DC voltage and its discharged process [18]. In these techniques, we usually used the flicker minimization technique for evaluation of the VrDC of the LC cells such as twisted nematic (TN), electrically controlled birefringence (ECB), vertically aligned (VA), and VA-TN (VTN) mode cells because this optical evaluation technique was empirically coincidence with the image sticking of the LCDs. Figure 2a shows an example of the flicker generation due to the VrDC. Though the LC cell is applied AC voltage without the DC offset, the existence of the VrDC induces frequently different voltage applications to the LC layer. Therefore, the transmittance changes frequently, inducing the flicker. However, the flicker is not detected when the VrDC is 0 V, as shown in Figure 2b. Regarding this technique, there is a problem that it is not easy to determine the accurate VrDC because the flicker is gradually shifted during the adjustment of the flicker minimum point. In particular, it is extremely difficult to determine the VrDC by this technique for the LC cell with the lateral electric field such as in-plane switching (IPS) or fringe-field switching (FFS) modes because the generation of the flicker is derived not only from the VrDC but also from a flexoelectric field [22,23,24,25,26,27]. In this study, we will focus on the VrDC, and the purpose is to propose an alternate technique to determine the VrDC of the LC cell especially with the lateral electric field more accurately. In particular, we will focus on the FFS mode because most of the LCDs adopted in various applications are the FFS mode. The proposed technique is the current-voltage (I-V) curve shift technique by the application of a triangular voltage to the LC cells. By applying the triangular voltage to the LC cell, the current shift can be monitored owing to capacitance shift, resistance originated from Ohm’s law, and motion of the LC directors [18]. Therefore, the I-V curve obtained by the application of the triangular voltage gives us various properties of the LC cell.

2. Two Types of the LC Cells

We selected two types of LC cells; one is the VTN mode cell where the electric field is applied vertically, and the other is the FFS mode cell where the electric field is applied laterally on one substrate with electrodes. These are shown in Figure 3a,b, respectively.
In the case of the VTN mode LC cell, LC directors inside the LC layer rotate vertically and uniformly due to the application of voltage (Figure 3a). On the other hand, the FFS mode LC cell shows the lateral rotation of the LC directors only in the neighborhood area of the electrodes under application of the voltage (Figure 3b) [5,28]. The different behaviors of the LC directors in two LC modes are explained in the following. In the case of the VTN mode, the electric field appears uniformly and symmetrically in the LC layer as the simulation result is shown in Figure 4a,b. The physical properties of the LC material used for this simulation are listed in Table 2, and the layer thickness and pretilt angle of the LC materials are 4.0 μm and 88.5°, respectively. In contrast, the electric field appears non-uniformly for the FFS mode, and then the distribution of the LC director under application of the voltage is non-uniform in the in-plane area, as shown in Figure 5a,b. The simulation was performed under the line/space = 3.5 μm/4.5 μm, the dielectric constant of the passivation layer is 7, and its thickness is 200 nm. In this simulation, the same LC material as that of the VTN mode is used, and the pretilt angle is 0.1°. The density of the electric field in the neighborhood area of the electrodes is high, and that of the electric field around the opposite substrate is low. In other words, the electric field of the LC cell with the comb electrodes shows non-uniform and asymmetry.
Figure 6 indicates the simulation result for rates of change of dC/dV as a function of the applied voltage in the VTN and FFS modes. The VTN mode shows a sharp and large peak at around 2.5 V, whereas the FFS mode shows only a small peak at around 1 V. This indicates that, in the VTN mode, the sharp increase for the capacitance of the LC cell appears due to response of the LC director under application of the voltage. On the other hand, in the FFS mode, only the slight increase for the capacitance of the LC cell appears probably due to the non-uniform electric field.

3. Preparation of LC Cells

The fabrication procedure of the VTN-LC cell is in the following. First, the polyimide material for the VA mode, purchased from JSR Corporation, was coated on a pair of glass substrates carrying transparent indium-tin-oxide (ITO) electrodes on the whole area. Then, linearly-polarized UV of 20 mJ/cm2 was irradiated at a 30 °C atmosphere from an oblique direction for obtaining a slightly inclined pretilt angle [29,30]. Two glass substrates were assembled together for showing π/2 twist configuration of the LC directors with seal adhesive. The cell gap was maintained at 4.0 μm with glass fiber, and the LC material with negative dielectric anisotropy (nega-LC; Table 2) was injected into the empty cell by vacuum filling method, being obtained the VTN-LC cell.
In the case of the FFS-LC cell, horizontal alignment material purchased from JNC Corporation was coated on the pair of the substrates for the FFS mode. One side of the substrates carries the comb ITO electrode and a passivation layer, and the other substrate does not carry any electrode. The line and space of the electrodes were 3.5 μm and 4.5 μm, respectively. The thickness and dielectric constant of the passivation layer were 200 nm and 7.5, respectively. The linearly-polarized UV of 5 J/cm2 was then irradiated from the normal direction to the substrates. Two glass substrates were assembled together with the seal adhesive. The cell gap was maintained at 4.0 μm, and the nega-LC material, whose physical properties are shown in Table 2, was injected into the empty cell by the same method described above. Finally, we obtained the FFS-LC cell. The parameters of the LC cells are listed in Table 3. Specific capacitance (“C”) and resistance (“R”) of the LC cells were determined by the current-voltage (I-V) curve by the application of 30 Hz triangular voltage from −10 V to +10 V at 25 °C. Voltage holding ratios (VHRs) were determined during an open-circuit of 16.61 ms after application of ±5 V for 60 μs, at 70 °C, with a 6254 type VHR meter developed by Toyo Corporation [18]. The specific capacitance of the VTN-LC cell is five times larger than that of the FFS-LC cell. On the other hand, the specific resistance of the VTN-LC cell is between 1/4 and 1/5 compared with that of the FFS-LC cell. This is probably due to the difference in the average distance of the electrodes between the VTN-LC and FFS-LC cells. The VHRs for both LC cells were almost equal, assuming that the amount of impurity ion in the LC layers of both LC cells are almost equal, as presented in Table 3.

4. Measurement of VA-LC Cell

4.1. I-V Curve

Figure 7 indicates the I-V curve of the VTN-LC cell obtained by the application of the 30 Hz triangular voltage from −10 V to +10 V at 25 °C. The slope of the I-V curve indicates an inverse of the resistance between the electrodes [18]. Generally, the slope of the I-V curve becomes small with increasing the resistance of the LC cell. The distance between the positive and negative current sides is attributed to the capacitance of the LC cell [18]. This increases with increasing the absolute value of applied voltage because the LC material shows the anisotropy of the dielectric constant [18]. Moreover, one can observe the maximum current peak in the range from +4 V to +7 V, and the minimum current peak in the range from −7 V to −4 V. These two peaks are attributed to a rotation of the LC director due to the anisotropy of the dielectric constant [18].

4.2. Determination of VrDC

For the determination of the VrDC from the I-V curve, the maximum and minimum current peaks derived from the rotation of the LC director are used. Before the application of DC offset voltage for stress, we can estimate that the VrDC does not generate (VrDC = 0 V). Figure 8a shows the I-V curve of the VTN-LC cell before application of the DC offset voltage, and we can observe the maximum and minimum current peaks at +5.38 V and −5.38 V, respectively. By using these two current peaks, the VrDC can be determined from the average value, which is 0.00 V. In the next step, the DC offset voltage of +5 V for 180 min (3 h) was applied to the cell for the stress, and then the I-V curve was measured, which is shown in Figure 8b. The voltages of the maximum and minimum current peaks are +5.69 V and −5.25 V, respectively. The result that two current peaks are shifted indicates that the VrDC is generated by the application of the DC offset voltage. We determined that the VrDC was 0.22 V from the average voltage of the two current peaks. The determination of the VrDC by using this method would be reasonable because the rotation of the LC director is induced by the application of the voltage to the LC layer. In the case that the internal DC voltage is generated in the LC layer, the application voltage to the cell would be shifted. We decide to call the method the “I-V curve shift” technique.

4.3. Comparison of VrDC Determined by I-V Curve and Flicker Minimization

The comparison of the VrDC determined from the I-V curve shift technique proposed in this report and the flicker minimization was carried out under application of the DC offset voltage as the stress. Figure 9 presents the time profile t of the application voltage to the LC cell for the stress test. The DC voltage applied to the LC cell was fixed at +5 V, and the alternate current (AC) voltage was 3.3 V at 30 Hz, which is the AC voltage showing the 50% transmittance [14,15,16]. The I-V curves obtained by the application of the triangular voltage before and after application of the DC offset voltage are presented in Figure 10. The current maximum and minimum peaks are gradually shifted toward high voltage, indicating that the VrDC is generated under application of the DC offset voltage to the VTN-LC cell and that the VrDC is gradually increased with increasing the period of the stress.
In Figure 11, the VrDC values determined both from the I-V curve shift and flicker minimization are plotted as a function of time t. The time dependence of the VrDC determined from the I-V curve shift is nearly coincident with the VrDC determined from the flicker minimization. Therefore, the proposed technique, the I-V curve shift technique, is useful for the evaluation of the VrDC of the LCDs. Furthermore, we are convinced that the proposed technique would be more convenient than the flicker minimization because the measurements of the I-V curve are automatically performed by using the instrumental setup developed by the Toyo Corporation [18].

5. Measurement of FFS-LC Cell

5.1. I-V Curve

Figure 12 indicates the I-V curve of the FFS-LC cell obtained by the application of the 30 Hz triangular voltage at 25 °C. The applied voltage is swept between −10 V to +10 V. The behavior of the FFS-LC cell is different from that of the VTN-LC cell. The I-V curve of the FFS-LC cell does not show any specific maximum and/or minimum current peaks. We consider that the current value derived from the rotation of the LC director is so small that no current peak is observed. The rotation of the LC director seems to be slight and limited to the narrow area of the electric field because the electric field concentrates only around the electrodes, as shown in Figure 4. Though we cannot observe maximum and minimum current peaks, a slight shift of the current derived from the anisotropy of the dielectric constant is observed in Figure 12 and Figure 13.

5.2. Determination of VrDC

Regarding the FFS-LC cell, the maximum and minimum current peaks did not appear, as described previously. Thus, we considered another method for determining the VrDC from the I-V curve. As shown in Figure 13, two slight minimum current peaks were observed for the positive and negative sides. In Figure 13a, two minimum current peaks for the positive and negative sides are +0.72 V and −0.74 V, respectively. The average value of these two voltages is −0.01 V, which is the VrDC before application of the DC offset voltage. Then, the DC offset voltage of +5 V for 180 min was applied to the cell, and the I-V curve was measured, as shown in Figure 13b. Two minimum current peaks were also observed, which are +1.94 V and +0.06 V, respectively. Therefore, the average voltage, which indicates the VrDC, becomes 1.00 V. The result indicates that the VrDC of the LC cell with the in-plane electric field can be determined by the method of the I-V curve obtained by the application of the triangular voltage.

5.3. VrDC as a Function of Stress Time Measured by I-V Curve

The stress test was performed under application of the +5 V DC offset voltage for 180 min, using the FFS-LC cell. The time profile of the stress test is the same as that of Figure 9. The I-V curves before and after application of the DC offset voltage are presented in Figure 14. In the case of the FFS-LC cell, the current minimum peaks are gradually shifted toward high voltage, indicating that the VrDC is gradually increased with increasing the stress time. Figure 15 indicates that the VrDC is a function of the stress time, t. The result indicates that the VrDC of the FFS-LC cell is gradually increased with increasing the stress time. This is the same tendency with the result of the VTN-LC cell, implying that the VrDC of the FFS mode cell can also be determined by using the I-V curve method though it was difficult to determine by the flicker minimization. In the case of the VTN-LC cell, the VrDC determined from the I-V curve shift was coincident with the VrDC determined from the flicker minimization technique. Moreover, the VrDC could also be determined for both the VTN- and the FFS-LC cells by the I-V curve shift. These results intimate that the VrDC determined from the I-V curve shift reflects the internal voltage generated from the adsorption of the ion on the surface of the alignment layer.

6. Characteristics of the I-V Curve Shift Technique by the Triangular Voltage Application for Determination of the VrDC

In this study, we proposed a novel technique to determine the VrDC. This is the method to evaluate the I-V curves by the application of the triangular voltage after application of the DC offset voltage as the stress. The technique is especially useful for the determination of the VrDC because we can not only perform it automatically but also evaluate the VrDC of the FFS mode LC cell, having the lateral electric field. The following table (Table 4) lists the characteristics of the newly proposed technique for the measurement of the VrDC.

7. Conclusions

The VrDC could be determined by the I-V curve obtained by the application of the triangular voltage. In the case of the LC cell with the vertical electric field such as the VTN mode, the I-V curve shows the maximum and minimum current peaks for the positive and negative sides due to the rotation of the LC director. Therefore, we can determine the VrDC as the average value of these two current peaks. The result of the VrDC evaluated by the proposed method is fairly coincident with the VrDC evaluated by the flicker minimization, which is the optical method. In addition, the proposed method could be applied to the LC cell with the lateral electric field such as the FFS mode though the VrDC could not be determined by the flicker minimization for the FFS mode LC cell. In the case of the FFS mode LC cell, the I-V curve shows two minimum current values due to the minimum capacitances of the positive and negative sides. Thus, the VrDC can be determined by using these two minimum current values in a similar manner to the VTN mode LC cell. By using the flicker minimization to the FFS mode LC cell, the VrDC could not be determined because the flicker is generated by not only the generation of VrDC but also the flexoelectric effect. Thus, our proposed technique would be particularly useful for the LC cell with the lateral electric field. Furthermore, the I-V curve shift technique has superior characteristics to conventional techniques as shown in Table 4. We believe that the proposed technique is significantly useful for the evaluation of the image sticking of the LCDs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M.; Methodology, M.M. and S.I.; Evaluation, M.M.; Simulation, S.I.; Writing-original draft preparation, M.M.; Writing-review and editing, M.M. and S.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ishihara, S.; Mizusaki, M. Alignment control technology of liquid crystal molecules. J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 2020, 28, 44–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Schadt, M. Nematic liquid crystals and twisted-nematic LCDs. Liq. Cryst. 2015, 42, 646–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Takeda, A.; Kataoka, S.; Sasaki, T.; Chida, H.; Tsuda, H.; Ohmuro, K.; Koike, Y.; Sasabayashi, T.; Okamoto, K. A super-high image-quality multi-domain vertical alignment LCD by new rubbing-less technology. SID Int. Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 1998, 29, 1077–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Oh-e, M.; Kondo, K. Electro-optical characteristics and switching behavior of the in-plane switching mode. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1995, 67, 3895–3897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lee, S.H.; Lee, S.L.; Kim, H.Y. Electro-optic characteristics and switching principle of a nematic liquid crystal cell controlled by fringe-field switching. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1998, 73, 2881–2883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Naemura, S. Liquid-crystal-material technologies for advanced display applications. J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 2000, 8, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huang, K.T.; Chao, A.; Yu, C.H. Image sticking analysis of different Q-time LC cell by machine vision. SID Int. Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 2007, 38, 665–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. You, J.; Jung, J.; Choi, N.; Rhie, K.; Shin, S. The study of the correlation between surface anchoring energy and activation energy on patterned vertical alignment (PVA) mode. SID Int. Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 2007, 38, 673–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, Y.-C.; Liu, P.-M.; Liao, C.-H.; Ting, T.-L.; Chang, T.-J.; Liao, W.-L.; Lien, A. Releasing behavior of image sticking. SID Int. Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 2008, 39, 1798–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kamoto, R. Analysis of image sticking on a real MVA cell. J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 2008, 16, 451–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Park, Y.; Kim, S.; Lee, E. A study on reducing image-sticking artifacts in wide-screen TFT-LCD monitors. J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 2007, 15, 969–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Seiberle, H.; Schadt, M. Influence of charge carriers and display parameters on the performance of passively and actively addressed LCDs. SID Int. Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 1992, 23, 25–28. [Google Scholar]
  13. Tanaka, Y.; Goto, Y.; Iimura, Y. Mechanism of DC offset voltage generation in hybrid-aligned nematic liquid crystal displays. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1999, 38 Pt 2, L1115–L1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mizusaki, M.; Miyashita, T.; Uchida, T.; Yamada, Y.; Ishii, Y.; Mizushima, S. Generation mechanism of residual direct current voltage in a liquid crystal display and its evaluation parameters related to liquid crystal and alignment layer materials. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 102, 014904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mizusaki, M.; Miyashita, T.; Uchida, T. Behavior of ion affecting image sticking on liquid crystal displays under application of direct current voltage. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 108, 104903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mizusaki, M.; Miyashita, T.; Uchida, T. Kinetic analysis of image sticking with adsorption and desorption of ions to a surface of an alignment layer. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 112, 044510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xu, D.; Peng, F.; Chen, H.; Yuan, J.; Wu, S.-T.; Li, M.-C.; Lee, S.-L.; Tsai, W.-C. Image sticking in liquid crystal displays with lateral electric field. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 116, 193102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Inoue, M. Review of various measurement methodologies of migration ion influence on LCD image quality and new measurement proposal beyond LCD materials. J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 2020, 28, 92–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nishikawa, M.; Suganuma, T.; Tsuda, Y.; Bessho, N.; Iimura, Y.; Kobayashi, S. Properties of voltage holding ratios of liquid crystal cells using organic-solvent-soluble polyimide alignment films. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1994, 33 Pt 2, L1113–L1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mada, H.; Suzuki, H. Reverse hysteresis loop of nematic liquid crystals in C-V characteristic due to static electric field. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1987, 26, L1092–L1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Takahashi, S. The investigation of a dc induced transient optical 30-Hz element in twisted nematic liquid-crystal displays. J. Appl. Phys. 1991, 70, 5346–5350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Huang, K.-T.; Huang, Y.-W.; Fang, R.-W.; Chao, Y.-T.; Lee, C.; Lin, S.-C.; Yu, C.-H.; Kao, C.; Jen, T.-S. A turning method to minimizing flicker shift phenomenon in positive FFS mode LCD panel and improve DC image sticking. SID Int. Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 2018, 49, 1711–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tsuruma, T.; Goto, Y.; Higashi, A.; Watanabe, M.; Yamaguchi, H.; Tomooka, T.; Kikkawa, H. Novel image sticking model in the fringe field switching mode based on the flexoelectric effect. In 31st International Display Research Conference 2011 (EuroDisplay 2011), Arcachon, France, 19–22 September 2011; Curran Associates, Inc.: Red Hook, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 15–18. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hatsumi, R.; Fukai, S.; Kubota, Y.; Yamashita, A.; Jikumaru, M.; Baba, H.; Moriya, K.; Kubota, D.; Kusunoki, K.; Hirakata, Y.; et al. FFS-mode OS-LCD for reducing eye strain. J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 2013, 21, 442–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jeong, I.H.; Jang, I.W.; Kim, D.H.; Han, J.S.; Kumar, B.V.; Lee, S.H.; Ahn, S.H.; Cho, S.H.; Yi, C. Investigation on flexoelectric effect in the fringe field switching mode. SID Int. Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 2013, 44, 1368–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lee, D.-J.; Shim, G.-Y.; Choi, J.-C.; Park, J.-S.; Lee, J.-H.; Baek, J.-H.; Choi, H.C.; Ha, Y.M.; Ranjkesh, A.; Kim, H.-R. Transient flickering behavior in fringe-field switching liquid crystal mode analyzed by positional asymmetric flexoelectric dynamics. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 34055–34070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kim, M.S.; Bos, P.J.; Kim, D.-W.; Yang, D.-K.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, S.H. Flexoelectric effect in an in-plane switching (IPS) liquid crystal cell for low-power consumption display devices. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lee, S.H.; Lee, S.M.; Kim, H.Y.; Kim, J.M.; Hong, S.H.; Jeong, Y.H.; Park, C.H.; Choi, Y.J.; Lee, J.Y.; Koh, J.W.; et al. 18.1” ultra-FFS TFT-LCD with super image quality and fast response time. SID Int. Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 2001, 32, 484–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Miyachi, K.; Kobayashi, K.; Yamada, Y.; Mizushima, S. The world’s first photo alignment LCD technology applied to generation ten factory. SID Int. Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 2010, 41, 579–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Terashita, S.; Watanabe, K.; Shimoshikiryoh, F. Novel liquid crystal display mode “UV2AII” with photo alignment technology for a large-screen 8K display. SID Int. Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 2019, 50, 62–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Shift of the charged voltage of the LC cell during the periods of the DC voltage application, discharge, and open circuit [18].
Figure 1. Shift of the charged voltage of the LC cell during the periods of the DC voltage application, discharge, and open circuit [18].
Symmetry 13 00816 g001
Figure 2. Schematic illustrations for (a) the generation of the flicker due to generation of VrDC, and (b) the minimization of the flicker.
Figure 2. Schematic illustrations for (a) the generation of the flicker due to generation of VrDC, and (b) the minimization of the flicker.
Symmetry 13 00816 g002
Figure 3. (a) The LC cell with vertical electric field owing to the upper/lower electrodes, and (b) the LC cell with the in-plane electric field owing to the comb electrodes on one side of the pair of the substrates.
Figure 3. (a) The LC cell with vertical electric field owing to the upper/lower electrodes, and (b) the LC cell with the in-plane electric field owing to the comb electrodes on one side of the pair of the substrates.
Symmetry 13 00816 g003
Figure 4. (a) The electric field distribution of the LC cell with the upper/lower electrodes, and (b) the LC director distribution of the VTN mode.
Figure 4. (a) The electric field distribution of the LC cell with the upper/lower electrodes, and (b) the LC director distribution of the VTN mode.
Symmetry 13 00816 g004
Figure 5. (a) The electric field distribution of the LC cell with the comb electrodes, and (b) the LC director distribution of the FFS mode. (Red lines mean equipotential lines.).
Figure 5. (a) The electric field distribution of the LC cell with the comb electrodes, and (b) the LC director distribution of the FFS mode. (Red lines mean equipotential lines.).
Symmetry 13 00816 g005
Figure 6. Simulation result for the rates of change of dC/dV in VTN and FFS modes as a function of applied voltage (C0 is a capacitance of the cell with no applied voltage).
Figure 6. Simulation result for the rates of change of dC/dV in VTN and FFS modes as a function of applied voltage (C0 is a capacitance of the cell with no applied voltage).
Symmetry 13 00816 g006
Figure 7. I-V curve for the VTN-LC cell and illustration of capacitance s (C and C), resistance (R), and maximum and minimum current peaks; the triangular voltage from −10 V to +10 V was applied with 30 Hz at 25 °C.
Figure 7. I-V curve for the VTN-LC cell and illustration of capacitance s (C and C), resistance (R), and maximum and minimum current peaks; the triangular voltage from −10 V to +10 V was applied with 30 Hz at 25 °C.
Symmetry 13 00816 g007
Figure 8. I-V curves for the VTN-LC cell (a) before and (b) after application of the +5 V DC offset voltage for 3 h (180 min) as the stress test; (condition of the measurement) the triangular voltage from −10 V to +10 V was applied with 30 Hz at 25 °C.
Figure 8. I-V curves for the VTN-LC cell (a) before and (b) after application of the +5 V DC offset voltage for 3 h (180 min) as the stress test; (condition of the measurement) the triangular voltage from −10 V to +10 V was applied with 30 Hz at 25 °C.
Symmetry 13 00816 g008
Figure 9. Square waveform of the applied DC offset voltage to the LC cell as the stress test.
Figure 9. Square waveform of the applied DC offset voltage to the LC cell as the stress test.
Symmetry 13 00816 g009
Figure 10. I-V curve shift of the VTN-LC cell with a parameter of time t applying +5 V DC offset voltage as the stress test; the triangular voltage in the range from −10 V to +10 V was applied with 30 Hz at 25 °C.
Figure 10. I-V curve shift of the VTN-LC cell with a parameter of time t applying +5 V DC offset voltage as the stress test; the triangular voltage in the range from −10 V to +10 V was applied with 30 Hz at 25 °C.
Symmetry 13 00816 g010
Figure 11. VrDC of the VTN-LC cell as a function of time t applying +5 V DC offset voltage as the stress test; (●) the VrDC determined from the I-V curve shift, and (△) the VrDC determined from the flicker minimization.
Figure 11. VrDC of the VTN-LC cell as a function of time t applying +5 V DC offset voltage as the stress test; (●) the VrDC determined from the I-V curve shift, and (△) the VrDC determined from the flicker minimization.
Symmetry 13 00816 g011
Figure 12. Typical I-V curve for the FFS-LC cell; the triangular voltage from −10 V to +10 V was applied with 30 Hz at 25 °C.
Figure 12. Typical I-V curve for the FFS-LC cell; the triangular voltage from −10 V to +10 V was applied with 30 Hz at 25 °C.
Symmetry 13 00816 g012
Figure 13. I-V curves for the FFS-LC cell (a) before and (b) after application of the +5 V DC offset voltage for 3 h (180 min) as the stress test; (condition of the measurement) the triangular voltage from −10 V to +10 V was applied with 30 Hz at 25 °C.
Figure 13. I-V curves for the FFS-LC cell (a) before and (b) after application of the +5 V DC offset voltage for 3 h (180 min) as the stress test; (condition of the measurement) the triangular voltage from −10 V to +10 V was applied with 30 Hz at 25 °C.
Symmetry 13 00816 g013aSymmetry 13 00816 g013b
Figure 14. I-V curve shift of the FFS-LC cell with a parameter of time t applying +5 V DC offset voltage as the stress test; the triangular voltage in the range from −10 V to +10 V was applied with 30 Hz at 25 °C.
Figure 14. I-V curve shift of the FFS-LC cell with a parameter of time t applying +5 V DC offset voltage as the stress test; the triangular voltage in the range from −10 V to +10 V was applied with 30 Hz at 25 °C.
Symmetry 13 00816 g014
Figure 15. VrDC of the FFS-LC cell as a function of stress time t applying +5 V DC offset voltage.
Figure 15. VrDC of the FFS-LC cell as a function of stress time t applying +5 V DC offset voltage.
Symmetry 13 00816 g015
Table 1. Conventional evaluation techniques for VrDC.
Table 1. Conventional evaluation techniques for VrDC.
C-V Hysteresis [19,20]Flicker Minimization [16,21]Dielectric Absorption [18]
(Refer to Figure 1)
Measuring methodElectricalOpticalElectrical
Measurement itemShift of C-V curveOffset voltage to
minimize optical flicker
Change of
electrical potential
Correlation with the image stickingHighHighMiddle
Convenience for measurementEasyDifficultEasy
Adaptivity to the LC cells
with vertical electric field
(TN, ECB, VA, VTN modes)
ApplicableApplicableApplicable
Adaptivity to the LC cells
with in-plane electric field
(IPS and FFS modes)
No DataDifficultApplicable
Table 2. Physical properties of the nega-LC material used in this study.
Table 2. Physical properties of the nega-LC material used in this study.
Nega-LC
TNI (°C)90
ε3.6
ε7.8
Δε−4.2
Δn0.083
ρ (Ωcm)1.8 × 1013
Table 3. Parameters of the LC cells (VTN-LC cell * 1 and FFS-LC cell * 1) used in this study.
Table 3. Parameters of the LC cells (VTN-LC cell * 1 and FFS-LC cell * 1) used in this study.
VTN-LC CellFFS-LC Cell
d (μm)4.04.0
C * 2 (nF) * 2 /25 °C1.30.28
R (GΩ) * 3 /25 °C 0.763.68
VHR/70 °C98.498.1
* 1 Electrode area is 1 cm2. * 2 Capacitance “C” is determined by the average capacitance value when +10 V is applied and −10 V is applied. * 3 Resistance “R” is determined from the average slopes of positive and negative sides when −10 V and + 10 V are applied.
Table 4. Proposed evaluation techniques for VrDC.
Table 4. Proposed evaluation techniques for VrDC.
I-V Curve Shift
Measuring methodElectrical
Measurement itemShift of current maximum and/or minimum peaks
Correlation with the image stickingHigh
Convenience for measurementConvenient and easy
Advantage compared with the other techniquesCould be evaluated for both the LC cells with vertically- and in-plane electric fields
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mizusaki, M.; Ishihara, S. A Novel Technique for Determination of Residual Direct-Current Voltage of Liquid Crystal Cells with Vertical and In-Plane Electric Fields. Symmetry 2021, 13, 816. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/sym13050816

AMA Style

Mizusaki M, Ishihara S. A Novel Technique for Determination of Residual Direct-Current Voltage of Liquid Crystal Cells with Vertical and In-Plane Electric Fields. Symmetry. 2021; 13(5):816. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/sym13050816

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mizusaki, Msanobu, and Shoichi Ishihara. 2021. "A Novel Technique for Determination of Residual Direct-Current Voltage of Liquid Crystal Cells with Vertical and In-Plane Electric Fields" Symmetry 13, no. 5: 816. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/sym13050816

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop