Next Article in Journal
Immunological Cross-Reactivity of an Ancestral and the Most Recent Pandemic Norovirus GII.4 Variant
Next Article in Special Issue
Subterranean Clover Stunt Virus Revisited: Detection of Two Missing Genome Components
Previous Article in Journal
Co-Infection with Three Mycoviruses Stimulates Growth of a Monilinia fructicola Isolate on Nutrient Medium, but Does Not Induce Hypervirulence in a Natural Host
Previous Article in Special Issue
Detection and Characterization of Cucumis melo Cryptic Virus, Cucumis melo Amalgavirus 1, and Melon Necrotic Spot Virus in Cucumis melo
 
 
Letter published on 7 March 2019, see Viruses 2019, 11(3), 230.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Double-Stranded RNA High-Throughput Sequencing Reveals a New Cytorhabdovirus in a Bean Golden Mosaic Virus-Resistant Common Bean Transgenic Line

by
Dione M. T. Alves-Freitas
1,
Bruna Pinheiro-Lima
1,2,
Josias C. Faria
3,
Cristiano Lacorte
1,
Simone G. Ribeiro
1,* and
Fernando L. Melo
2,4,*
1
Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília 70770-917, Brazil
2
Departamento de Biologia Celular, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil
3
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão, Goiânia 75375-000, Brazil
4
Departamento de Fitopatologia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 31 December 2018 / Revised: 17 January 2019 / Accepted: 18 January 2019 / Published: 21 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Virus Ecology and Biodiversity)

Abstract

:
Using double-strand RNA (dsRNA) high-throughput sequencing, we identified five RNA viruses in a bean golden mosaic virus (BGMV)-resistant common bean transgenic line with symptoms of viral infection. Four of the identified viruses had already been described as infecting common bean (cowpea mild mottle virus, bean rugose mosaic virus, Phaseolus vulgaris alphaendornavirus 1, and Phaseolus vulgaris alphaendornavirus 2) and one is a putative new plant rhabdovirus (genus Cytorhabdovirus), tentatively named bean-associated cytorhabdovirus (BaCV). The BaCV genome presented all five open reading frames (ORFs) found in most rhabdoviruses: nucleoprotein (N) (ORF1) (451 amino acids, aa), phosphoprotein (P) (ORF2) (445 aa), matrix (M) (ORF4) (287 aa), glycoprotein (G) (ORF5) (520 aa), and an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (L) (ORF6) (114 aa), as well as a putative movement protein (P3) (ORF3) (189 aa) and the hypothetical small protein P4. The predicted BaCV proteins were compared to homologous proteins from the closest cytorhabdoviruses, and a low level of sequence identity (15–39%) was observed. The phylogenetic analysis shows that BaCV clustered with yerba mate chlorosis-associated virus (YmCaV) and rice stripe mosaic virus (RSMV). Overall, our results provide strong evidence that BaCV is indeed a new virus species in the genus Cytorhabdovirus (family Rhabdoviridae), the first rhabdovirus to be identified infecting common bean.

1. Introduction

Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is an economically important leguminous crop grown worldwide. It is a staple food for human consumption and the most consumed legume worldwide. Brazil is the third largest producer and one of the major consumers of common beans in the world [1]. In Brazil, common bean is cultivated in farms with large areas using high technology as well as by small farm holders and as a subsistence crop by a large number of families. Therefore, it has both economic and social impact as a cash crop and as a source of protein and other nutrients for families relying on subsistence farming. Several factors, such as susceptibility to diseases and insect pests, may impact bean production and consequently reduce food security and farmer income [2].
Different viruses have been reported infecting common beans. Some of them are asymptomatic, such as the double-strand RNA (dsRNA) virus Phaseolus vulgaris alphaendornavirus 1 (PvEV-1; family Endornaviridae, genus Alphaendornavirus), a seed-borne virus [3]. Other viruses are quite severe, causing significant yield losses and reducing the productivity and crop quality. These include bean golden mosaic virus and bean golden yellow mosaic virus (BGMV and BGYMV, respectively; family Geminiviridae, genus Begomovirus) [4,5], bean common mosaic virus (BCMV; family Potyviridae, genus Potyvirus) [6], and cowpea mild mottle virus (CPMMV; family Betaflexiviridae, genus Carlavirus) [7].
Among bean-infecting viruses, BGMV is the primary limiting factor to bean production in Brazil and causes up to 100% crop losses [2,8]. To overcome the limitations imposed by the golden mosaic disease, a transgenic bean line has been generated with resistance to BGMV. The transgenic BGMV-resistant line developed by Bonfim et al. [9] relies on the RNA silencing mechanism to contain virus replication and accumulation in the plants. Under field conditions, homozygous transgenic plants displayed 100% immunity to BGMV infection [10].
Plant infection by multiple viruses is common in nature and is frequently reported [11,12]. During multiple infections, viruses can interact among themselves and depending on the virus, host plant, and temporal and spatial factors, the disease phenotype will reflect the type of interaction, which may range from synergism to antagonism [11,12,13].
It was already known that BGMV-resistant transgenic bean lines are susceptible to CPMMV [2]. However, the lack of the golden mosaic symptoms in the transgenic lines allowed the detection of symptoms of mild chlorosis, vein banding, and mottling, indicating that CPMMV is present in high incidences of up to 69% in these plants under field conditions [2].
More recently, transgenic lines in field experiments presented severe symptoms of mosaic, including leaf distortion, crinkling, and vein necrotic enations. These more severe symptoms could be the outcome of multiple virus infection in these plants. Diagnostic PCR tests were negative for the begomoviruses reported as infecting beans in Brazil (BGMV, Macroptilium yellow spot virus (MaYSV), and Sida micrantha mosaic virus (SiMMV)). Therefore, to test for the presence of viruses with RNA genomes in the BGMV-resistant common bean transgenic line CNFCT16207, we performed high-throughput sequencing (HTS) of enriched dsRNA samples. We were able to identify five viruses, including four known viruses from distinct genera (Alphaendornavirus, Carlavirus, and Comovirus) and one newly discovered virus in the genus Cytorhabdovirus (family Rhabdoviridae), herein named bean-associated cytorhabdovirus (BaCV).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

Leaves from four transgenic BGMV-resistant common bean breeding line CNFCT16207 plants showing severe symptoms of crinkling were collected from experimental fields at Embrapa Arroz e Feijão, located in Santo Antonio de Goiás, Goiás State, Brazil, in 2014. The leaves were separated into two samples and stored in a −80 °C freezer. A fraction of the fresh leaves was ground in inoculation buffer (0.1 M phosphate buffer with 0.1 % sodium sulfite) and the extract was used for the mechanical inoculation of four common bean cv. Jalo Precoce and four transgenic BGMV-resistant line CNFCT16207 seedlings. Plants were kept in a greenhouse with temperatures varying between 24 °C and 36 °C. The inoculated plants were observed for up to 50 days and regularly checked for symptom development. Leaves were collected for dsRNA extraction.

2.2. dsRNA Extraction

dsRNA extraction was done based on modified protocols of Valverde et al. [14] and Castillo et al. [15]. Frozen leaves from field samples and fresh leaves from inoculated bean plants (cv. Jalo Precoce and CNFCT16207 line) were used for dsRNA preparation. Two grams of foliar tissue was frozen in liquid nitrogen and pulverized in a mortar and pestle. Total nucleic acids were extracted with 1× STE buffer (0.1 M NaCl, 0.05 M Tris-base, 0.001 M EDTA, pH8), 1% of SDS, 1% of β-mercaptoethanol, and phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1). The aqueous phase volume was measured and absolute ethanol was added to a final concentration of 16%. The resulting mixture was loaded in a column containing one gram of cellulose (C6288-Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) equilibrated with wash buffer (0.1 M NaCl, 0.05 M Tris-base, 0.001 M EDTA, pH 8, 16% ethanol). The mixture was passed through the cellulose column twice. The column was washed twice with wash buffer. dsRNA was eluted with STE 1× and precipitated with 0.1 volume of 3 M sodium acetate and 2.5 volumes of ethanol at −20 °C overnight. The precipitate was dissolved in 100 µL of RNase free H2O and stored at −20 °C. The presence of dsRNA was determined by agarose gel electrophoresis.

2.3. High-Throughput Sequencing and Assembly

dsRNA from all samples (n = 12) was pooled in a single tube (200 ng in total) and sequenced using the MiSeq sequencing platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) at the Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB). Total dsRNA was converted to cDNA using random hexamers, fragmented into libraries using the transposon-based Nextera™ DNA Sample Prep Kit and sequenced using MiSeq Reagent Kits v2 (2 × 150 bp) (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The raw reads were quality trimmed and assembled de novo using CLC Genomics Workbench version 6.3. The resulting contigs were compared to the complete viral RefSeq database (release 89, July 9, 2018) using Blastx [16] implemented in Geneious version 9.1.2 [17]. All sequences with hits matching the viral database were then subjected to a Blastx search against the nr database to confirm true viral contigs and exclude false positives (e.g., as endogenous viral elements and cellular RNA-dependent RNA polymerases). To confirm the assembly results and further extend incomplete genomes, trimmed reads were mapped back to the viral contigs and reassembled, until genome completion or no further extension. The final sequences of the virus genomes were obtained from the majority consensus of the mapping assembly and annotated using Geneious version 9.1.2 [17].

2.4. Viral-Specific RT-PCR, Cloning, and Sequencing

Based on the assembled contigs, specific primers were designed for each virus identified (Table 1). Each sample was submitted to a virus-specific RT-PCR using the SuperScript® III One-Step RT-PCR kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The reaction mixes consisted of 1 to 2.5 µL of dsRNA, 6.3 µL of 2× reaction mix, 1 µL of each forward and reverse primers (10 μM), and 0.4 µL of SuperScript® III RT/Platinum® Taq mix in a final volume of 12.5 µL. The cycling conditions were 1 cycle for cDNA synthesis at 53 °C for 20 min; 1 cycle for denaturation at 94 °C for 2 min 30 s; 35 cycles for PCR amplification at 94 °C for 20 s, specific primer Tm °C (Table 1) for 35 s, and 68 °C for 1 min per kilobase; and a final extension step at 68 °C for 10 min. The presence of virus-derived PCR products was verified by gel electrophoresis. Single RT-PCR product of each specific virus genome was gel-purified and cloned into pCR™2.1-TOPO® vector (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Four clones for each virus-derived fragment were Sanger-sequenced at Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, Korea).

2.5. 5′/3′ Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends (RACE)

To determine the 5′- and 3′-terminal sequences of BaCV genome, rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) was performed according to the method described previously [18,19]. The 3′ end was confirmed by the addition of a poly-A tail to the total RNA using the Escherichia coli poly(A) polymerase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA); then, the cDNA was synthesized using an oligo(dT) primer with an anchor sequence, M10PacIT50VN (Table S1). PCR reactions were performed using the cDNA with genome-specific forward primers and the anchor reverse primer M10 (Table S1). The 5′ end was recovered with the commercial kit 5′ RACE System (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according the manufacturer’s instructions using the primers described in Table S1. The last amplified fragments (approximately 350 bp) were gel purified and cloned into pCR™2.1-TOPO® vector (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Four clones of each fragment were randomly selected and Sanger-sequenced at Macrogen Inc (Seoul, Korea)

2.6. Phylogenetic Analysis and Pairwise Comparison

The viral sequences identified were aligned with their corresponding homologs available in GenBank using MAFFT (Multiple Alignment using Fast Fourier Transform) [20]. Phylogenetic trees were inferred using the maximum likelihood method (ML) implemented in FastTree [21], under the generalized time-reversible (GTR) model of nucleotide evolution with gamma-distributed rates among sites (GTR+Γ) or Jones–Taylor–Thornton (JTT) + CAT model of amino acid evolution. Node support was determined using the Shimodaira–Hasegawa (SH) approximate likelihood ratio test (aLRT) [22], which is a nonparametric version of aLRT developed to compare multiple topologies. All trees were midpoint rooted and visualized in FigTree (v1.4.4) [23]. Pairwise identity scores were calculated using SDT version 1.2 [24].

3. Results and Discussion

High-throughput sequencing technology and bioinformatics tools have improved the discovery and detection of new viruses. Recently, HTS has been used to describe bean-infecting viruses, such as CPMMV, PvEV-1, PvEV-2, and a newly described Phaseolus vulgaris alphaendornavirus 3 (PvEV-3) [25,26]. Herein, we used HTS to investigate the RNA viruses present in a BGMV-resistant common bean transgenic line with severe symptoms of viral infection (Supplementary Figure S1). The dsRNA extracted (Supplementary Figure S2) from both field and mechanically inoculated samples was pooled and sequenced in MiSeq (Illumina). The raw reads (13,780,310 reads) were processed and assembled using CLC Genomics Workbench, and 27,897 contigs were obtained. Blastx comparisons against a viral RefSeq database revealed six contigs of viral origin ranging in size from 3.4 to 14.8 kb with identities to five different viruses (Table 2). The abundance (i.e., frequency) of each virus also varied from 0.01% to 8.2% of total reads within the pool (Table 2). Four of the identified viruses have already been described infecting common beans and one is a putative new plant rhabdovirus (genus Cytorhabdovirus).
The presence of these viruses was confirmed by RT-PCR (Figure S3) and Sanger sequencing. CPMMV, PvEV-1, PvEV-2, and BRMV were detected in the transgenic line CNFCT16207 collected in experimental fields and in the two genotypes of common bean plants mechanically inoculated in the greenhouse (cv. Jalo Precoce and line CNFCT16207). BaCV was amplified only from the plants collected at experimental field and no amplification was observed in the common bean plants mechanically inoculated, suggesting that BaCV is not mechanically transmissible. All virus-derived RT-PCR fragments were confirmed by Sanger sequencing and showed 100% identity with the contigs sequences obtained from the high-throughput sequencing data.

3.1. Identification and Genome Assembly of Known Bean-Infecting Viruses

A contig of 8194 nucleotides (nt) (∼20,000× coverage) was identified as CPMMV (family Betaflexiviridae, genus Carlavirus) and named CPMMV:BR:GO:14 (Table 2). The contig sequence covered the complete CPMMV genome, with six intact open reading frames (ORFs), the entire untranslated region (UTR), and the 3′ poly (A) tail. In the phylogenetic analysis (Figure 1), CPMMV:BR:GO:14 clustered together with the CPMMV:BR:GO:01:1, isolated in the same region of the country from a soybean plant (Glycine max) [27], and in a separate branch from other CPMMV isolates. Next, we carried out a pairwise nucleotide comparison of all complete genomes used in the phylogenetic analysis. When compared with other CPMMV sequences, CPMMV:BR:GO:14 exhibited identity levels ranging from 93% to 96% with six Brazilian CPMMV isolates from soybean [27], with an isolate from Desmodium tortuosum and a sequence from whitefly vector-enabled metagenomic (VEM) data from Florida (USA) [28]. CPMMV:BR:GO:14 is the first complete genome sequence of a CPMMV isolate naturally infecting common bean plants.
Two known members of the Alphaendornavirus genus (family Endornaviridae) were also identified in our analyses: PvEV-1, and PvEV-2 (Table 2). Their long dsRNA genomes were completely sequenced. The PvEV-1 contig is 14,072 nt long, and the PvEV-2 is 14,817 nt long (Table 2). The sequences were named PvEV-1 [Brazil] and PvEV-2 [Brazil]. Phylogenetic analysis grouped PvEV-1 [Brazil] and PvEV-2 [Brazil] with other members of the Alphaendornavirus genus (Figure 2). Sequence analysis showed 99% nt identity among PvEV-1 [Brazil] and PvEV-1 (AB719397) isolated from P. vulgaris cultivar Black Turtle Soup from Brazil [3], and 98% with PvEV-1 isolate SRF2 (MF281669) from Kenya. Comparing the PvEV-2 [Brazil] with other isolates, the nucleotide identity score was 97% with PvEV-2 (AB719398) also from Brazil and PvEV-2 isolate SRF2 (MF281671) from Kenya [26].
Two contigs, sequence of 5891 and 3735 nt (∼3500× and ∼7000× coverage, respectively), were identified as the bipartite bean rugose mosaic virus (BRMV; family Secoviridae, genus Comovirus) (Table 2). Both genome segments (RNA1 and RNA2) were nearly complete, lacking approximately 13 nucleotides from the UTR ends. Each segment presented an intact ORF encoding a polyprotein of 1856 amino acids (aa) and 1097 aa, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis with other comoviruses grouped BRMV-BR-GO with the BRMV-Paraná isolate (Figure 3). Pairwise sequence analysis showed that the BRMV- BR-GO contigs presented 93% and 92% nt sequence identity with BRMV-Paraná isolate RNA1 (KP404602) and RNA2 (KP404603), respectively, isolated from soybean in southern Brazil [29].

3.2. Discovery of a Novel Cytorhabdovirus

A contig sequence of 13,448 nt (∼26× coverage) showed low similarity (39% aa identity) with the northern cereal mosaic virus (NCMV) RdRP protein (NP_597914.1), a member of the genus Cytorhabdovirus. The contig presented the typical genomic organization of the viruses members of the family Rhabdoviridae, including a 3′ leader followed by seven open reading frames (ORFs) and a 5′ trailer sequence [30] (Figure 4A), and is tentatively named bean-associated cytorhabdovirus (BaCV) (Table 2). The 3′ and 5′ ends were obtained through RACE and the complete genome size is 13,467 nt long. As shown in Figure 4B, the terminal nucleotides (∼12 nt) from the leader (145 nt) and the trailer (58 nt) regions are partially complementary to each other (highlighted in grey), similarly to what is observed for other cytorhabdoviruses like barley yellow striate mosaic virus (BYSMV), colocasia bobone disease-associated virus (CBDaV), and NCMV. Each ORF is separated by a conserved gene junction (consensus 3′-AUUCUUUUUGRCCCUMG-5′), except for the 3′/N region and P3/P4 (Figure 4C). The putative 3′ poly-adenylation signal (the 3′ end of the mRNA) was completely conserved in all junctions (3’-AUUCUUUUU-5′), while the intergenic spacer (non-transcribed sequence) and the putative transcription initiation sequence (5′ end of each subsequent mRNA) presented minor variations (Figure 4C). The putative transcription initiation sequence for N mRNA was confirmed by RACE at the genomic sequence 3’-AUUCU-5’ (16 nt upstream the initiation codon).
The viral genome presented all five ORFs found in most rhabdoviruses: nucleoprotein (N) (ORF1) (451 aa), phosphoprotein (P) (ORF2) (445 aa), matrix (M) (ORF5) (287 aa), glycoprotein (G) (ORF6) (520 aa), and an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (L) (ORF7) (2114 aa), as well as a putative movement protein (P3) (ORF3) (189 aa) and a hypothetical protein P4 (ORF4, 78 aa) (Table 3), which is also present in the genome of other members of the genus Cytorhabdovirus [30]. The predicted ORFs 3 and 4 are not separated by the conserved gene junction described above. A putative homolog of this small protein (P4) was recently described in the genome of yerba mate chlorosis-associated virus (YmCaV) (P4 protein, ARA91089), which also does not have any conserved gene junction between P3 and P4 genes [31]. Consecutive ORFs, expressed from the same mRNA and separated by a short stretch of nucleotides, are common in several rhabdoviruses and depend on a conserved element upstream of the restart AUG called the termination upstream ribosome binding site (TURBS) [32]. No TURBS motif was found upstream the potential start codon of this predict small ORF of BaCV. Therefore, the bicistronic nature of ORF3 mRNA remains to be experimentally confirmed in the future.
Moreover, the predicted BaCV proteins were compared to homologous proteins from the closest cytorhabdoviruses, revealing a low level of sequence identity, ranging from 15% to 39% (Table 4). The nucleoprotein and RdRp were the most conserved proteins (Table 4), while P3 and M were the most divergent. Overall, the closest related virus varied according to the viral protein, suggesting that such low level of sequence identity may indeed misrepresent the actual distances between these viruses. Therefore, to investigate the evolutionary relationships of BaCV and other cytorhabdoviruses, a maximum likelihood phylogeny was inferred based on a multiple alignment of RdRp. The phylogenetic analysis shows that cytorhabdoviruses can be divided into two highly supported clades, one comprising viruses that predominantly infect dicots, like alfalfa dwarf virus (ADV) and lettuce yellow mottle virus (LYMoV), and the other containing viruses that infect monocots and dicots (Figure 4D), like NCMV, MYSV, CBDaV, and YmCaV. BaCV clustered within the latter and was mostly related to YmCaV and RSMV (Figure 4D). Crucially, the genome organization of BaCV, YmCaV and RSMV is similar, except that RSMV and YmCaV encode an additional protein in their genomes, P6 and P4 proteins, respectively. Overall, these results provide strong evidence that BaCV is indeed a new virus species in the genus Cytorhabdovirus (family Rhabdoviridae).
In summary, HTS was instrumental in uncovering RNA viruses infecting BGMV-resistant transgenic plants presenting severe symptoms in the field. Our findings extend the knowledge of bean-infecting viruses in Brazil and warrants further studies on the biology, insect transmission, and distribution of BaCV, the first cytorhabdovirus to be identified infecting common beans.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/1999-4915/11/1/90/s1, Figure S1. Symptoms displayed by bean transgenic line CNFCT16207 in the field (A) and mechanically inoculated plants in the greenhouse (B). Figure S2. Agarose gel electrophoresis of dsRNA extracted from: (1) Bean transgenic line CNFCT16207 collected in experimental fields; (2) mechanically inoculated common bean cv. Jalo Precoce and (M) 1 kb Plus DNA Ladder. Figure S3: RT-PCR detection of PvEV-1, PvEv-2, CPMMV, BRMV RNA-1 and RNA2, and BaCV using specific primers: Plant line CNFCT16207 collected in an experimental field (1 and 2), bean plants mechanically inoculated in the greenhouse cv. Jalo Precoce (3) and line CNFCT16207 (4); negative control (C-); 1 kb Plus DNA Ladder. Table S1: Primers sequences used for RACE.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.M.T.A.-F., S.G.R., and F.L.M.; Data curation, F.L.M.; Formal analysis, D.M.T.A.-F., S.G.R., and F.L.M.; Funding acquisition, S.G.R. and F.L.M.; Investigation, D.M.T.A.-F., B.P.-L., and C.L.; Project administration, S.G.R.; Resources, J.C.F.; Supervision, S.G.R. and F.L.M.; Visualization, F.L.M.; Writing—original draft, D.M.T.A.-F., S.G.R., and F.L.M.; Writing—review and editing, D.M.T.A.-F., B.P.-L., J.C.F., C.L., S.G.R., and F.L.M.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by grants from Embrapa, CNPq, and FAPDF. D.M.T.A.-F. was supported by a fellowship from CNPq. B.P.-L. was supported by scholarships from CNPq and CAPES.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations-Statistics Division. 2018. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home (accessed on 14 December 2018).
  2. Faria, J.C.; Aragão, F.J.L.; Souza, T.L.P.O.; Quintela, E.D.; Kitajima, E.W.; Ribeiro, S.G. Golden Mosaic of Common Beans in Brazil: Management with a Transgenic Approach. APS Features 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Okada, R.; Yong, C.K.; Valverde, R.A.; Sabanadzovic, S.; Aoki, N.; Hotate, S.; Kiyota, E.; Moriyama, H.; Fukuhara, T. Molecular characterization of two evolutionarily distinct endornaviruses co-infecting common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). J. Gen. Virol. 2013, 94, 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gilbertson, R.L.; Faria, J.C.; Ahlquist, P.; Maxwell, D.P. Genetic Diversity in Geminiviruses Causing Bean Golden Mosaic Disease: The Nucleotide-Sequence of the Infectious Cloned DNA Components of a Brazilian Isolate of Bean Golden Mosaic Geminivirus. Phytopathology 1993, 83, 709–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Faria, J.C.; Gilbertson, R.L.; Hanson, S.F.; Morales, F.J.; Ahlquist, P.; Loniello, A.O.; Maxwell, D.P. Bean golden mosaic geminivirus type II isolates from the Dominican Republic and Guatemala: Nucleotide sequences, infectious pseudorecombinants and phylogenetic relationships. Phytopathology 1994, 84, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Worrall, E.A.; Wamonje, F.O.; Mukeshimana, G.; Harvey, J.J.W.; Carr, J.P.; Mitter, N. Chapter One—Bean Common Mosaic Virus and Bean Common Mosaic Necrosis Virus: Relationships, Biology, and Prospects for Control. In Advances in Virus Research; Kielian, M., Maramorosch, K., Mettenleiter, T.C., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015; Volume 93, pp. 1–46. [Google Scholar]
  7. Marubayashi, J.M.; Yuki, V.A.; Wutke, E.B. Transmissão do Cowpea mild mottle virus pela mosca branca Bemisia tabaci biótipo B para plantas de feijão e soja. Summa Phytopathol. 2010, 36, 158–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Costa, A.S. Three whitefly-transmitted virus diseases of beans in São Paulo, Brazil. Plant Prot. Bull. FAO 1965, 13, 2–12. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bonfim, K.; Faria, J.C.; Nogueira, E.O.P.L.; Mendes, E.A.; Aragao, F.J.L. RNAi-Mediated Resistance to Bean golden mosaic virus in Genetically Engineered Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2007, 20, 717–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Aragao, F.J.; Faria, J.C. First transgenic geminivirus-resistant plant in the field. Nat. Biotechnol. 2009, 27, 1086–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Mascia, T.; Gallitelli, D. Synergies and antagonisms in virus interactions. Plant Sci. 2016, 252, 176–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Syller, J. Facilitative and antagonistic interactions between plant viruses in mixed infections. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012, 13, 204–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Melcher, U.; Ali, A. Virus–Virus Interactions in Plants. In Plant Viruses: Diversity, Interaction and Management; Gaur, R.K., SMP, K., Dorokhov, Y., Eds.; Taylor & Francis Group: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 249–266. [Google Scholar]
  14. Valverde, R.A.; Nameth, S.T.; Jordon, R.L. Analysis of Double-Stranded RNA for Plant Virus Diagnosis. Plant Dis. 1990, 74, 255–258. [Google Scholar]
  15. Castillo, A.; Cottet, L.; Castro, M.; Sepulveda, F. Rapid isolation of mycoviral double-stranded RNA from Botrytis cinerea and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Virol. J. 2011, 8, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Kearse, M.; Moir, R.; Wilson, A.; Stones-Havas, S.; Cheung, M.; Sturrock, S.; Buxton, S.; Cooper, A.; Markowitz, S.; Duran, C.; et al. Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 1647–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Frohman, M.A.; Dush, M.K.; Martin, G.R. Rapid production of full-length cDNAs from rare transcripts: Amplification using a single gene-specific oligonucleotide primer. Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 8998–9002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nicolini, C.; Pio-Ribeiro, G.; Andrade, G.P.; Melo, F.L.; Oliveira, V.C.; Guimaraes, F.C.; Resende, R.O.; Kitajima, E.W.; Rezende, J.A.; Nagata, T. A distinct tymovirus infecting Cassia hoffmannseggii in Brazil. Virus Genes 2012, 45, 190–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Price, M.N.; Dehal, P.S.; Arkin, A.P. FastTree 2--approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Shimodaira, H.; Hasegawa, M. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999, 16, 1114–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rambaut, A. FigTree v1.4.4. Available online: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ (accessed on 26 September 2018).
  24. Muhire, B.M.; Varsani, A.; Martin, D.P. SDT: A virus classification tool based on pairwise sequence alignment and identity calculation. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e108277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nordenstedt, N.; Marcenaro, D.; Chilagane, D.; Mwaipopo, B.; Rajamaki, M.L.; Nchimbi-Msolla, S.; Njau, P.J.R.; Mbanzibwa, D.R.; Valkonen, J.P.T. Pathogenic seedborne viruses are rare but Phaseolus vulgaris endornaviruses are common in bean varieties grown in Nicaragua and Tanzania. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0178242. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wainaina, J.M.; Ateka, E.; Makori, T.; Kehoe, M.A.; Boykin, L.M. Phylogenetic relationships of endornaviruses in common bean from the western highlands of Kenya and global sequences. PeerJ Preprints 2018, 6, e26904v1. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zanardo, L.G.; Silva, F.N.; Lima, A.T.; Milanesi, D.F.; Castilho-Urquiza, G.P.; Almeida, A.M.; Zerbini, F.M.; Carvalho, C.M. Molecular variability of cowpea mild mottle virus infecting soybean in Brazil. Arch. Virol. 2014, 159, 727–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Rosario, K.; Capobianco, H.; Ng, T.F.; Breitbart, M.; Polston, J.E. RNA viral metagenome of whiteflies leads to the discovery and characterization of a whitefly-transmitted carlavirus in North America. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e86748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Picoli, M.H.; Garcia, A.; Barboza, A.A.; de Souto, E.R.; Almeida, A.M. Complete genome sequence of bean rugose mosaic virus, genus Comovirus. Arch. Virol. 2016, 161, 1711–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Walker, P.J.; Blasdell, K.R.; Calisher, C.H.; Dietzgen, R.G.; Kondo, H.; Kurath, G.; Longdon, B.; Stone, D.M.; Tesh, R.B.; Tordo, N.; et al. ICTV Virus Taxonomy Profile: Rhabdoviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 2018, 99, 447–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Bejerman, N.; de Breuil, S.; Debat, H.; Miretti, M.; Badaracco, A.; Nome, C. Molecular characterization of yerba mate chlorosis-associated virus, a putative cytorhabdovirus infecting yerba mate (Ilex paraguariensis). Arch. Virol. 2017, 162, 2481–2484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Walker, P.J.; Firth, C.; Widen, S.G.; Blasdell, K.R.; Guzman, H.; Wood, T.G.; Paradkar, P.N.; Holmes, E.C.; Tesh, R.B.; Vasilakis, N. Evolution of genome size and complexity in the rhabdoviridae. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11, e1004664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Maximum likelihood tree of cowpea mild mottle virus (CPMMV) isolates. The tree was inferred using an alignment of the complete genomes of CPMMV available in GenBank. The tree is midpoint rooted for purposes of clarity, and the nodes indicated by a black dot have Shimodaira–Hasegawa-like branch test ≥0.9. The newly sequenced CPMMV (BR:GO:14) isolate is highlighted in red.
Figure 1. Maximum likelihood tree of cowpea mild mottle virus (CPMMV) isolates. The tree was inferred using an alignment of the complete genomes of CPMMV available in GenBank. The tree is midpoint rooted for purposes of clarity, and the nodes indicated by a black dot have Shimodaira–Hasegawa-like branch test ≥0.9. The newly sequenced CPMMV (BR:GO:14) isolate is highlighted in red.
Viruses 11 00090 g001
Figure 2. Maximum likelihood tree of alphaendornaviruses. The tree was inferred using an alignment of polyproteins from genomes of all members in the genus Alphaendornavirus available in GenBank. The tree is midpoint rooted for purposes of clarity, and the nodes indicated by a black dot have Shimodaira–Hasegawa-like branch test ≥0.9. The newly sequenced alphaendornaviruses are highlighted in red.
Figure 2. Maximum likelihood tree of alphaendornaviruses. The tree was inferred using an alignment of polyproteins from genomes of all members in the genus Alphaendornavirus available in GenBank. The tree is midpoint rooted for purposes of clarity, and the nodes indicated by a black dot have Shimodaira–Hasegawa-like branch test ≥0.9. The newly sequenced alphaendornaviruses are highlighted in red.
Viruses 11 00090 g002
Figure 3. Maximum likelihood trees of comoviruses. The trees were inferred using all available genomes (RNA 1 and RNA 2) of members in the genus Comovirus. The trees are midpoint rooted for purposes of clarity, and the nodes indicated by a black dot have Shimodaira–Hasegawa-like branch test ≥0.9. The bean rugose mosaic virus isolate sequenced here is highlighted in red.
Figure 3. Maximum likelihood trees of comoviruses. The trees were inferred using all available genomes (RNA 1 and RNA 2) of members in the genus Comovirus. The trees are midpoint rooted for purposes of clarity, and the nodes indicated by a black dot have Shimodaira–Hasegawa-like branch test ≥0.9. The bean rugose mosaic virus isolate sequenced here is highlighted in red.
Viruses 11 00090 g003
Figure 4. Genome organization and phylogeny of bean-associated cytorhabdovirus (BaCV). (A) BaCV genome structure showing the six open reading frames (ORFs) (N, P, P3, M, G, and L). (B) Complementary structure of the 5′ and 3′ ends in the BaCV, barley yellow striate mosaic virus (BYSMV), colocasia bobone disease-associated virus (CBDaV), and northern cereal mosaic virus (NCMC) genomes. (C) Conserved motif sequences in the intergenic regions. (D) Maximum likelihood tree inferred using an alignment of RdRp (L protein) from 17 available genomes of members in the genus Cytorhabdovirus. The tree was midpoint rooted for purposes of clarity, and the nodes indicate by a black dot have Shimodaira–Hasegawa-like branch test ≥0.9. BaCV is highlighted in red.
Figure 4. Genome organization and phylogeny of bean-associated cytorhabdovirus (BaCV). (A) BaCV genome structure showing the six open reading frames (ORFs) (N, P, P3, M, G, and L). (B) Complementary structure of the 5′ and 3′ ends in the BaCV, barley yellow striate mosaic virus (BYSMV), colocasia bobone disease-associated virus (CBDaV), and northern cereal mosaic virus (NCMC) genomes. (C) Conserved motif sequences in the intergenic regions. (D) Maximum likelihood tree inferred using an alignment of RdRp (L protein) from 17 available genomes of members in the genus Cytorhabdovirus. The tree was midpoint rooted for purposes of clarity, and the nodes indicate by a black dot have Shimodaira–Hasegawa-like branch test ≥0.9. BaCV is highlighted in red.
Viruses 11 00090 g004
Table 1. Virus-specific primers sequences used for RT-PCR.
Table 1. Virus-specific primers sequences used for RT-PCR.
GenusPrimer NameSequence 5′-3′Amplicon (bp)Tm (°C)
AlphaendornavirusPvEV-1 1 FGTAAACCAGGGAATTGGTGG 530360
PvEV-1 1 RGATTGATTGGGCTGTATAGTG 5
PvEV-2 1 FTGTTAGGCGTGTGTCCCCA 551956
PvEv-2 1 RGTTGCTGTATTGCTCGTGTC 5
ComovirusBRMV 2-RNA1-2550 FGACAATACAGCCTATGATGGGA99561
BRMV 2-RNA1-3545 RCACCAATGATCCACAATCCA
BRMV 2-RNA2-1704 FTCTGGTGATGGGTTATTTTCTCAGA183260
BRMV 2-RNA2-3536 RCTACTGATACATCCTATCCATTGCA
CarlavirusCPMMV 3-4000 FAACTTGGCCTTAGTGAACTCTACA50058
CPMMV 3-4500 RATTAGCTCTGTGCCTGGGGT
CytorhabdovirusBaCV 4-6491 FGAAGTCGCATAGCTCGTCGA68760
BaCV 4-7178 RGAGCGATAAGAACCTCCCCG
1 Phaseolus vulgaris alphaendornavirus 1 and 2, 2 bean rugose mosaic virus and, 3 cowpea mild mottle virus, 4 bean-associated cytorhabdovirus. 5 [3].
Table 2. Viral genomes found infecting the bean golden mosaic virus (BGMV)-resistant CNFCT16207 common bean transgenic line.
Table 2. Viral genomes found infecting the bean golden mosaic virus (BGMV)-resistant CNFCT16207 common bean transgenic line.
GenBank Accession NumberLength (nt)Mapped Reads% of Total ReadsCoverageClassification
GenusVirusIsolate
MK20258381941,131,9648.219,810×CarlavirusCPMMV 1CPMMV:BR:GO:14
KT45628714,07273,9960.5762×AlphaendornavirusPvEV-1 2PvEV-1 (Brazil)
KT45628814,817114,2560.81123×AlphaendornavirusPvEV-2 2PvEV-2 (Brazil)
KY7012585891151,7441.13500×ComovirusBRMV-RNA1 3BRMV- BR-GO
KY7012593735182,3311.37000×BRMV-RNA2 3BRMV- BR-GO
MK20258413,46724000.0126×CytorhabdovirusBaCV 4BacV-BR-GO
1 cowpea mild mottle virus, 2 Phaseolus vulgaris alphaendornavirus 1 and 2, 3 bean rugose mosaic virus and 4 bean-associated cytorhabdovirus.
Table 3. Features of the ORFs encoded by bean-associated cytorhabdovirus.
Table 3. Features of the ORFs encoded by bean-associated cytorhabdovirus.
ORFs 1Size (nt/aa)Putative ProductBlastp Hit (Organism) (Acession)
11356/451Nucleoprotein (N)Nucleocapsid protein (RSMV 3) (APR74648)
21338/445Phosphoprotein (P)Phosphoprotein (BYSMV 4) (AJW82843)
3570/189Movement protein (P3)Gene 3 protein (NCMV 5) (NP_057956)
4237/79Hypothetical protein (P4)No hit
5645/287Matrix protein (M)No hit
61560/520Glycoprotein (G)Glycoprotein (YmCaV 6) (ARA91090)
76342/2114RdRP 2 (L)RdRp 2 (BYSMV 4) (YP_009177231)
1 Open reading frame; 2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase; 3 rice stripe mosaic virus; 4 barley yellow striate mosaic virus; 5 northern cereal mosaic virus; 6 yerba mate chlorosis-associated virus.
Table 4. Amino acid sequence identities (%) of bean-associated cytorhabdovirus (BaCV) proteins compared with their homologs of other cytorhabdoviruses.
Table 4. Amino acid sequence identities (%) of bean-associated cytorhabdovirus (BaCV) proteins compared with their homologs of other cytorhabdoviruses.
GenBank Accession VirusNPP3MGL
KY366322YmCaV 1272025212333
KX525586RSMV 2302423172235
KT381973CBDaV 3262419182138
AB030277NCMV 4262323162439
KM213865BYSM 5262621182539
KY884303MYSV 6292219152339
1 yerba mate chlorosis-associated virus; 2 rice stripe mosaic virus; 3 colocasia bobone disease-associated virus; 4 northern cereal mosaic virus; 5 barley yellow striate mosaic virus; 6 maize yellow striate virus. Highest percent identities are in bold.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alves-Freitas, D.M.T.; Pinheiro-Lima, B.; Faria, J.C.; Lacorte, C.; Ribeiro, S.G.; Melo, F.L. Double-Stranded RNA High-Throughput Sequencing Reveals a New Cytorhabdovirus in a Bean Golden Mosaic Virus-Resistant Common Bean Transgenic Line. Viruses 2019, 11, 90. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v11010090

AMA Style

Alves-Freitas DMT, Pinheiro-Lima B, Faria JC, Lacorte C, Ribeiro SG, Melo FL. Double-Stranded RNA High-Throughput Sequencing Reveals a New Cytorhabdovirus in a Bean Golden Mosaic Virus-Resistant Common Bean Transgenic Line. Viruses. 2019; 11(1):90. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v11010090

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alves-Freitas, Dione M. T., Bruna Pinheiro-Lima, Josias C. Faria, Cristiano Lacorte, Simone G. Ribeiro, and Fernando L. Melo. 2019. "Double-Stranded RNA High-Throughput Sequencing Reveals a New Cytorhabdovirus in a Bean Golden Mosaic Virus-Resistant Common Bean Transgenic Line" Viruses 11, no. 1: 90. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v11010090

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop