Next Article in Journal
Fatal Myocarditis and Rhabdomyositis in a Patient with Stage Iv Melanoma Treated with Combined Ipilimumab and Nivolumab
Previous Article in Journal
Framing of the Opioid Problem in Cancer Pain Management in Canada
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Short Communication

Gaps and Delays in Survivorship Care in the Return-to-Work Pathway for Survivors of Breast Cancer—A Qualitative Study

by
K. Bilodeau
1,2,*,
D. Tremblay
2,3 and
M. J. Durand
2,3,4
1
Faculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
2
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, QC, Canada
3
Hôpital Charles-LeMoyne Research Centre, Longueuil, QC, Canada
4
Centre for Action in Work Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Longueuil, QC, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2019, 26(3), 414-417; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3747/co.26.4787
Submission received: 6 March 2019 / Revised: 9 April 2019 / Accepted: 10 May 2019 / Published: 1 June 2019

Abstract

Introduction: The number of survivors of breast cancer (bca) in Canada has steadily increased thanks to major advances in cancer care. But the resulting clientele face new challenges related to survivorship. The lack of continuity of care and the side effects of treatment affect the resumption of active life by survivors of bca, including return to work (rtw). The goal of the present article was to outline gaps and delay in survivorship care in the rtw pathway of survivors of bca. Methods: This qualitative interpretative descriptive study recruited 9 survivors of bca in the province of Quebec. Interviews were conducted at the end of cancer treatments (n = 9), 1 month before rtw (n = 9), and after rtw (n = 5). In an iterative process, a content analysis was performed. Results: The interviews highlighted gaps in survivorship care and the paucity of dedicated resources for cancer survivors. Participants received neither a survivorship care plan nor information about cancer survivorship (for example, transition to a new normal, side effects, rtw). Conclusions: Support for survivors of bca resuming their active lives has to be optimized. We suggest that health professionals have to intervene at 1, 3, and 6 months after cancer treatment. At those points, survivors of bca need support for side-effects management, the rtw decision, resource navigation, and reintegration of daily activities. Also, delay in clinical pathways seems to be longer, and much attention is needed to accompany the transition to a “normal life” after cancer.
Keywords: survivorship; health care services; return to work survivorship; health care services; return to work

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bilodeau, K.; Tremblay, D.; Durand, M.J. Gaps and Delays in Survivorship Care in the Return-to-Work Pathway for Survivors of Breast Cancer—A Qualitative Study. Curr. Oncol. 2019, 26, 414-417. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3747/co.26.4787

AMA Style

Bilodeau K, Tremblay D, Durand MJ. Gaps and Delays in Survivorship Care in the Return-to-Work Pathway for Survivors of Breast Cancer—A Qualitative Study. Current Oncology. 2019; 26(3):414-417. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3747/co.26.4787

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bilodeau, K., D. Tremblay, and M. J. Durand. 2019. "Gaps and Delays in Survivorship Care in the Return-to-Work Pathway for Survivors of Breast Cancer—A Qualitative Study" Current Oncology 26, no. 3: 414-417. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3747/co.26.4787

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop