Next Article in Journal
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Targeted Therapy in Stages III and IV Head and Neck Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Medulloblastoma in Infants: The Critical Issues of the Dilemma
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Multimodality Breast Cancer Screening in Women with a Familial or Genetic Predisposition

Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 1 May 2010 / Revised: 3 May 2010 / Accepted: 6 May 2010 / Published: 1 June 2010

Abstract

Background: Women with a predisposition for breast cancer require a tailored screening program for early cancer detection. We evaluated the performance of mammography (MG), ultrasonography (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening in these women. Patients and Methods: In asymptomatic women either confirmed as BRCA1/2 carriers, or having a greater than 30% probability of being so as estimated by BRCAPRO [Berry D, Parmigiani G. Duke SPORE (Specialized Program of Research Excellence) in Breast Cancer. 1999], we conducted a prospective comparative trial consisting of annual MRI and MG, and biannual US and clinical breast examination. All evaluations were done within 30 days of one another. For each screening round, imaging tests were independently interpreted by three radiologists. Results: The study enrolled 184 women, and 387 screening rounds were performed, detecting 12 cancers (9 infiltrating, 3 in situ), for an overall cancer yield of 6.5%. At diagnosis, 7 infiltrating cancers were smaller than 2 cm (T1); only 1 woman presented with axillary nodal metastases. All tumours were negative for the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. Of the 12 cancers, MRI detected 10, and MG, 7; US did not identify any additional cancers. The overall recall rate after MRI was 21.8%, as compared with 11.4% for US and 16.1% for MG. Recall rates declined with successive screening rounds. In total, 45 biopsies were performed: 21 as a result of an US abnormality; 17, because of an MRI lesion; and 7, because of a MG anomaly. Interpretation: In high-risk women, MRI offers the best sensitivity for breast cancer screening. The combination of yearly MRI and MG reached a negative predictive value of 100%. The recall rate is greatest with MRI, but declines for all modalities with successive screening rounds.
Keywords: breast cancer; screening; high-risk; BRCA1; BRCA2; magnetic resonance imaging; mammography; ultrasonography breast cancer; screening; high-risk; BRCA1; BRCA2; magnetic resonance imaging; mammography; ultrasonography

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Trop, I.; Lalonde, L.; Mayrand, M.H.; David, J.; Larouche, N.; Provencher, D. Multimodality Breast Cancer Screening in Women with a Familial or Genetic Predisposition. Curr. Oncol. 2010, 17, 28-36. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3747/co.v17i3.494

AMA Style

Trop I, Lalonde L, Mayrand MH, David J, Larouche N, Provencher D. Multimodality Breast Cancer Screening in Women with a Familial or Genetic Predisposition. Current Oncology. 2010; 17(3):28-36. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3747/co.v17i3.494

Chicago/Turabian Style

Trop, I., L. Lalonde, M.H. Mayrand, J. David, N. Larouche, and D. Provencher. 2010. "Multimodality Breast Cancer Screening in Women with a Familial or Genetic Predisposition" Current Oncology 17, no. 3: 28-36. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3747/co.v17i3.494

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop