Next Article in Journal
Biochar Mitigates Combined Effects of Drought and Salinity Stress in Quinoa
Next Article in Special Issue
Organic Plant Biostimulants and Fruit Quality—A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Morphological and Chemical Traits as Quality Determinants of Common Thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.), on the Example of ‘Standard Winter’ Cultivar
Previous Article in Special Issue
Contribution of Root Anatomical Characteristics in Fruit Profile of Pomegranate Genotypes to Expand Production Area in Pakistan
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biostimulatory Action of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Enhances Productivity, Functional and Sensory Quality in ‘Piennolo del Vesuvio’ Cherry Tomato Landraces

by
Petronia Carillo
1,
Angelos Kyratzis
2,
Marios C. Kyriacou
2,*,
Emilia Dell’Aversana
1,
Giovanna Marta Fusco
1,
Giandomenico Corrado
3 and
Youssef Rouphael
3,*
1
Department of Environmental, Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via Vivaldi 43, 81100 Caserta, Italy
2
Department of Vegetable Crops, Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia 1516, Cyprus
3
Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 1 June 2020 / Revised: 17 June 2020 / Accepted: 18 June 2020 / Published: 25 June 2020

Abstract

:
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are a promising tool to improve plant nutrient use efficiency (NUE) and tolerance against abiotic stresses. Moreover, AMF can potentially increase plant productivity and reduce the negative externalities of the agricultural sector. Our study aimed to elucidate whether AMF (containing Rhizoglomus irregulare and Funneliformis mosseae) could positively affect not only tomato growth and productivity but also the nutritional and nutraceutical quality of yellow-pigmented type (‘Giagiù’) and red-pigmented type (‘Lucariello’) tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.). These cherry tomatoes are landraces of the Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) ‘Pomodorino del Piennolo del Vesuvio’ (PPV), one of the most typical agricultural products of the Campania region (Southern Italy). AMF rose fruit yield by increasing the number of fruits per plant (+49% and +29% in ‘Giagiù’ and ‘Lucariello’, respectively) but not of the fruit mean mass. AMF increased lycopene (+40%), total ascorbic acid (TAA; +41%), alanine (+162%), gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA; +101%) and branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs; +53%) in ‘Lucariello’. In ‘Giagiù’, AMF increased calcium (+63%), zinc (+45%), ASP (+70%), GABA (+53%) and the essential amino acids arginine (+58%) and lysine (+45%), also indicating a genotype-specific response. In both landraces, AMF improved nutrient uptake and biosynthesis of important molecules involved in the control the oxidative stress and cellular pH. In addition to the beneficial effects of human health, the molecules influenced by the AMF treatment are expected to extend the shelf life of tomato fruits, thus further promoting the useful agronomic application of AMF for premium tomatoes marketed fresh or in pendulums (‘piennoli’).

1. Introduction

Growth in population and income, shifts in taste and needs, as well as limited availability of land, have ushered to the perception of crop production as an economic sector different from nature or the environment, thus downplaying the negative externalities of agriculture [1]. Particularly, intensive use of land associated with overuse of chemical fertilizers has precipitated environmental degradation, pollution and reduction of arable land [2]. Habitat destruction, as a consequence of increasing pressure from agriculture, and wild-life depredation are among the underlying causes of the recent outbreaks of zoonoses like avian influenza, SARS-CoV-1 and the pandemic SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) [3,4]. In this view, increasing crop production per unit of land while reducing the use of external inputs, using resource-poor and marginal lands and developing and/or recovering crop varieties with improved yield, palatability and nutritional traits are among the best strategies for sustainable intensification of agricultural systems [5,6]. A promising and environmentally friendly innovation for the realization of such a paradigm could be the use of natural plant biostimulants (PBs) like arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). They constitute the most common symbiotic association between plants and microbes. AMF are present in most natural habitats and their action is essential to improve the nutrient use efficiency (NUE), as well as confer resistance and tolerance to stresses [7]. In fact, AMF improve plant uptake and translocation of mineral nutrients by extending their external hyphae from root surfaces to soil areas beyond the mineral resources depletion zone [8]. Inoculation with AMF can boost the adaptability of host plants, including horticultural herbaceous crops [9,10], to changing environment by up-regulating tolerance mechanisms against abiotic stresses like drought, salinity and extreme temperatures [7]. AMF interfere with the plant defense system, increasing not only the activity of antioxidant enzymes like catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POD), but also the number of antioxidant metabolites like phenolic acids, anthocyanins and flavonoids [11,12,13], in addition to phytohormones related to defense signaling [10,14]. AMF beneficial effects are mainly exerted through a synergistic tripartite association among host plants, mycorrhizal symbionts and bacterial communities living in the mycorrhizosphere, which carry out nitrogen fixation, P solubilization, in addition to the synthesis of phytohormones, siderophores and antibiotics [15]. The induced changes in secondary metabolism exerted by AMF are also responsible for the increase in phytochemicals in host plants that improve plant growth and resilience but do not always improve commercial quality [8]. Indeed, different plant species respond to AMF inoculation with activation of different secondary metabolic pathways, and most plants undergo activation of these pathways only in the roots and not in above-ground plant organs including edible ones [6]. These drawbacks do not predispose the use of AMF for enhancing the nutritional content and/or the functional quality of crops in a targeted manner. However, it would be insightful to apply these PBs on uniform genetic material presenting limited variation in response to stresses in order to understand the underlying mechanism of action on quality. This is the case with two ‘Pomodorino del Piennolo del Vesuvio’ (PPV) tomato landraces that differ in their capacity of producing lycopene, the main antioxidant metabolite present in tomatoes. PPV are a signature product of Campania (Italy) endangered by genetic erosion [16]. These extensive shelf life PPV landraces undergo rainfed cultivation in a semiarid environment—the lava present on the slopes of the volcano—that enhances the synthesis and accumulation of antioxidant metabolites (e.g., polyphenols and carotenoids), and at the same time the nutraceutical properties of the produce [16]. However, an AMF-triggered increase in protective metabolites could not only enhance the nutraceutical components of the PPVs, and therefore their premium quality, but also function as an instrumental phytochemical tool to attune plant resilience to stress conditions and improve fruit postharvest performance and shelf life [16,17,18].
Therefore, the aim of the present work was to assess the putative effects of AMF on the yellow-pigmented type (‘Giagiù’) and red-pigmented type (‘Lucariello’) landraces of PPV in terms of quality, growth and marketability; moreover, to provide knowledge on the regulatory mechanisms elicited by these PBs involved in the control of plant metabolism, which constitutes a prerequisite for the standardization of quality in AMF-improved horticultural products.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Growth Conditions, Tomato Landraces, Experimental Design and Cultural Practices

A field experiment was carried out in the spring/summer 2019, from 13 April to 29 July, at the experimental station ‘Ambrosio’ situated at San Giuseppe Vesuviano, Naples, South Italy (Lat: 40.83°, Lon: 14.51°, Alt: 101 a.s.l). The soil was sandy (89% sand, 7% silt and 4% clay), with an organic matter of 4.0% (w/w), pH of 6.6, total N at 0.13%, carbonates at 1.3%, available P at 151 mg kg−1 and exchangeable K at 388 mg kg−1. Figure 1 presents the rainfall distribution patterns during the cultural cycle as well as the minimum, mean and maximum air temperatures.
Two ‘Pomodorino del Piennolo del Vesuvio’ (PPV) long-shelf-life cherry tomatoes (Solanum Lycopersicum L.) landraces were tested in the current experiment: ‘Giagiù’ and ‘Lucariello’. The ‘Giagiù’ landrace originated from Sant’Anastasia (Naples) is a yellow-pigmented tomato type, while ‘Lucariello’ originated from Ercolano (Naples) is a red-pigmented tomato type. The two landraces were selected as the most representative long-shelf-life cherry tomatoes cultivated in the Campania region under rainfed conditions differing in their capacity of producing lycopene [16].
Prior to transplanting, organic fertilizer BIOREX manufactured by Italpollina S.p.A (Verona, Italy) was broadcast at a rate of 750 kg ha−1. The composition of the organic fertilizer was as follows: N (2.8%), P2O5 (2.5%), K2O (3.0%), organic matter and carbon (65% and 38%, respectively), C/N (13) and a pH of 6.0. Seedlings of ‘Giagiù’ and ‘Lucariello’ cherry tomato landraces were transplanted manually at the three-leaf stage on April 13, at a plant density of 40,000 plants per hectare.
The experiment was arranged according to a Split Plot Design with three replications, AMF application being the main plot and landrace the subplot. Each block consisted of the two landraces and the microbial biostimulant treatment containing two strains of mycorrhizae (+AMF; arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi) and the control (−AMF). Each experimental plot covered 20 m2 and contained 80 plants. Mycorrhization was performed by placing 2 g in the planting hole just before transplanting of a commercial microgranular inoculum (Aegis Migrogranule—Italpollina S.p.A) carrying 25 spores g−1 of Rhizoglomus irregulare BEG72 (ex. Glomus intraradices BEG72) and 25 spores g−1 of Funneliformis mosseae BEG234 (ex. Glomus mossae 234). During the cultural cycle, aphids were controlled by a foliar treatment of Acetameprid (KESTREL, Adama Italia, Grassobbio, Italy), whereas Tuta absoluta was controlled by three applications of a commercial formulation containing Bacillus thuringensis var. kurstaki (Sequra WG, Sipcam Italia, Rho, Italy). For the containment of the most common fungal and bacterial diseases, a copper-based covering product (Cuproxat SDI, Nufarm, Melbourne, Australia) was used to avoid any negative interference with the mycorrhization.

2.2. Yield Measurements, Fruit Quality Sampling and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Root Colonization

Harvesting of fully ripe tomato fruits initiated at 95 days after transplanting (16 July; first truss harvest) and terminated 108 days after transplanting (29 July; third truss harvest). The marketable tomato fruit mean weight and number, together with fresh yield were determined for each experimental replicate plot. Tomato fruits of the second harvest truss were used for quality analyses. A subsample of fresh tomato was used for the determination of total soluble solids and fruit dry matter contents, whereas the remaining subsample was frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for further analyses: lipophilic and hydrophilic antioxidant activities, starch, total ascorbic acid, lycopene, sucrose, macro and microelements, amino acids profile including essential and branched-chain amino acids.
At the end of the experiment (29 July; 108 days after transplanting), tomato roots from 4 plants per replicate (i.e., experimental plot) were rinsed from soil, and subsamples were saved for assessment of AMF root colonization. Root samples were cleared with potassium hydroxide (10%), stained with trypan blue (0.05%) in lactophenol as described by Phillips and Hayman [19], and microscopically assessed for AMF colonization by determining the percentage of colonized root segments using a gridline intercept method [20].

2.3. Total Soluble Solids and Fruit Dry Matter Content

The filtrated tomato juice was used to measure the total soluble solids (TSS) content on a digital refractometer (Atago N1 model, Atago Company Ltd.; Tokyo Japan). A subsample of tomato juice was also used to determine the fruit dry matter content (DM) by desiccation to constant weight in a forced air oven at 70 °C for 3 days. The DM was calculated using the following formula: DM (%) = 100 × fruit dry weight/fruit fresh weight. The dry weight fruit tissue material was stored and used for macro and micro mineral analysis.

2.4. Macro and Micro Mineral Content Analysis

An inductively coupled plasma (ICP) mass spectrometer (ICP-OES Spectroblue, Spectro Ametek, Berwyn, PA, USA) was used to assess the macro (phosphorus, potassium, calcium and magnesium) and micro (sodium, iron, copper, manganese and zinc) mineral content of cherry tomato fruits, based on the method described by Volpe et al. [21]. Briefly, 1 g of oven-dried tomato samples were digested in a microwave digestion system after the addition of nitric acid (65%) and hydrochloric acid (37%). The detected elements were quantified against two different calibration curves, one for nonalkaline elements ranging from 1 to 100 µg L−1 and another for alkaline elements ranging from 100 µg L−1 to 100 mg L−1. Macro and microelements were expressed as mg and µg g−1 dry weight (dw), respectively.

2.5. Antioxidant Activity and Bioactive Compounds Analysis

The antioxidant capacity and lycopene content of lipophilic (LAA) and hydrophilic (HAA) fractions were determined on freeze-dried tomato samples, whereas the total ascorbic acid (TAA) was determined on fresh tomato material and quantified on a Hach DR 2000 spectrophotometer (Hach Co., Loveland, CO, USA), according to [22,23,24,25]. Solution absorbances of the two antioxidant activities (LAA and HAA) and the two bioactive compounds (lycopene and TAA) were assessed at 505,734,472 and 765 nm, respectively.

2.6. Starch and Sucrose Analysis

Sucrose (µmol g−1 dw) was estimated in the supernatant of ethanolic extracts of lyophilized tomato samples by an enzymatic coupled assay based on the spectrophotometric determination of NADH at 340 nm recorded by a Synergy HT spectrophotometer (BioTEK Instruments, Bad Friedrichshall, Germany) [16]. Starch was quantified with the same enzymatic coupled assay in the pellets of the ethanolic extracts after hydrolysis to glucose. Starch was expressed as glucose equivalents [26].

2.7. Amino Acids Analysis

Primary amino acids and proline (µmol g−1 dw) were extracted from 15 mg of lyophilized fruit samples in 1 mL ethanol/water (40:60 v/v) overnight at 4 °C, and estimated by HPLC after precolumn derivatization with o-phthaldialdehyde (OPA) according to Carillo et al. [16]. Proline was determined in the same ethanolic extract by using an acid ninhydrin method according to Woodrow et al. [27].

2.8. Statistics

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted for all traits. Hierarchical cluster analysis was employed to assess the effect of AMF application on the overall performance of the two landraces. In multivariate analysis, all variables included in the model had an equal contribution. Therefore, due to the high number of amino acids examined, two separate hierarchical analyses were conducted. In the first analysis, only the amino acids were included. In the second analysis, all the other variables were included plus total amino acid content. Squared Euclidean distances were estimated on standardized Z values, with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. Clustering was performed using the ‘WARD’ method. All analyses were carried out using SPSS (IBM, SPSS ver. 26).

3. Results

3.1. Fungal Concentrations in the Rhizo-Soil and Yield Responses of Two Tomato Landraces as Affected by AMF Inoculation

The percentage of mycorrhizal root colonization 108 days after transplanting was significantly higher in the microbial inoculation treatment (avg. 24.2%) than the noninoculated control (4.6%), with no significant differences recorded between the two cherry tomato landraces ‘Giagiù’ and ‘Lucariello’ (data not shown). Concerning the effects of microbial inoculation on crop productivity, our results showed significant differences between the two long-shelf-life cherry tomato landraces, irrespective of AMF treatment with the highest apparent values recorded in the red-pigmented type (‘Lucariello’) compared to the yellow-pigmented one (‘Giagiù’) (Table 1). However, the inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi caused a significant increase in the fruit yield of both landraces without significant interaction. Interestingly, the higher production observed in cherry tomato landraces inoculated AMF biostimulant was attributed to an increase in fruit number per plant (+38.7%) and not to an increase in fruit mean mass (Table 1). Overall, the microbial-based biostimulant significantly improved the cumulative yield by 30.9%, compared to the noninoculated cherry tomato plants (Table 1).

3.2. Mineral Profile of Two Tomato Landraces as Affected by AMF Inoculation

Among the macro minerals analyzed potassium was by far the most abundant in the four tested combinations followed by phosphorus, calcium and magnesium, while iron was the most abundant micro mineral followed by zinc, copper, sodium and finally manganese (Table 2). Neither landrace nor AMF inoculation had a significant effect on K (avg. 32.1 mg g−1 dw), Fe (avg. 43.1 µg g−1 dw) and Mn (avg 7.7 µg g−1 dw) concentrations in tomato fruits (Table 2). The effect of AMF inoculation was significant for P, Ca, Mg, Na, Cu and Zn and the effect of landrace was significant for Ca, Na, Cu and Zn. The concentrations of Ca and Na in tomato fruits were also significantly affected by the interaction of the two tested factors (landrace and microbial-based biostimulant) (Table 2). The highest Ca and Na concentrations in tomato fruits were recorded in ‘Giagiù’ with (+AMF) and without (−AMF) inoculation, respectively (data not shown). Moreover, when averaged over AMF inoculation, ‘Lucariello’ was characterized by a higher Cu content compared to ‘Giagiù’, whereas an opposite trend was observed for Ca, Na and Zn (Table 2). Interestingly, the AMF inoculation averaged over landrace affected positively the mineral status in particular P, Ca, Mg, Cu and Zn concentrations in fruit tissue which were higher by 24.7%, 28.2%, 3.7%, 9.8% and 34.2% than in noninoculated tomato plants (Table 2).

3.3. Fruit Soluble Solids, Dry Matter, Sucrose, Starch, Antioxidant Activity and Bioactive Compounds of Two Tomato Landraces as Affected by AMF Inoculation

The AMF application significantly affected all traits, whereas the effect of landrace was significant only for LAA, HAA, lycopene and sucrose (Table 3). A significant interaction between microbial-based biostimulant and cherry tomato landrace was observed for sucrose and total ascorbic acid (TAA). Interestingly, inoculation with endophytic fungi enhanced TAA by 14.7% and 29.0% for ‘Giagiù’ and ‘Lucariello’, respectively (Figure 2). Moreover, when averaged over AMF inoculation, ‘Giagiù’ was characterized by higher LAA compared to ‘Lucariello’, whereas an opposite trend was observed for HAA, lycopene and sucrose (Table 3). Finally, the AMF inoculation averaged over landrace affected positively the TSS content, fruit DM percentage, LAA, HAA, starch, TAA and lycopene in fruit tissue which were higher by 9.7%, 9.7%, 12.0%, 8.6%, 31.4%, 28.4% and 46.7% than in noninoculated tomato plants (Table 3).

3.4. Amino Acids Profiling of Two Tomato Landraces as Affected by AMF Inoculation

The HPLC analysis showed that the average total amino acids content differed significantly between the two PPV landraces as it ranged from 602.53 µmol g−1 dw in ‘Giagiù’ to 954.3 µmol g−1 dw in ‘Lucariello’ (+58.3%) (Table 4). The effect of AMF was also significant as the total amino acid content increased, on average, from 672.1 to 884.7 µmol g−1 dw (+31.6%) with the application. The effect of mycorrhiza and landrace was significant on nearly all amino acids. In all cases, amino acid concentration was higher with AMF application and with landrace ‘Lucariello’. The application of AMF increased the total amino acid content of both ‘Giagiù’ and ‘Lucariello’ by 27.3% and 34.4%, respectively. Alanine, GABA, Ile, Leu, Met, Ser, Trp, Val and branched-chain amino acids (leucine, isoleucine and valine; BCAAs) were significantly influenced by Landrace × AMF inoculation interaction (Table 4). Of the mean total amino acid content of both landraces, it was observed that Glu, Gln, GABA and Asn accounted on average for 25.5%, 17.3%, 16.1% and 12.7%, respectively (Table 4). Correspondingly, the essential amino acids (the sum of Arg, His, Ile, Leu, Lis, Met, Phe, Thr, Trp and Val) accounted for 11.4% of total amino acids (Table 4; Figure 3E). The highest values of Ala, GABA, Ile, Leu, Met, Ser, Trp, Val and BCAAs were recorded in ‘Lucariello’ tomato fruit inoculated with AMF (Table 4, Figure 3). In fact, the AMF treatment on ‘Lucariello’ enhanced Ala (+162%), GABA (+100.1%), MEA (+61.8%) and essential amino acids (+36.2%), of which in particular tryptophan (+106.3%), methionine (+67.4%) and BCAAs (+52.6%; Table 4; Figure 3). By contrast, the beneficial effect of microbial inoculant on ‘Giagiù’ amino acids was only observed on Asp (+69.6%), GABA (+53.1%) and essential amino acids (+33.4%), of which in particular Arg (+57.7%) and Lys (+45.3%).

3.5. Hierarchical Cluster Analysis

The hierarchical cluster analysis of amino acids accounted for in Table 4 is presented in Figure 4 and clearly shows landrace differences in amino acid concentrations. The application of AMF had a stronger effect on ‘Lucariello’ than on ‘Giagiù’. In particular, AMF not only enhanced the concentration of total amino acids, but it also reshaped their profiles as evidenced in Section 3.4 and summarized in the pathway map shown in Figure 5, which includes also the metabolites presented in Table 3. The different response of the two landraces explains the observed interactions.
Cluster analysis based on the traits listed in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3 and total amino acid content clearly shows a strong effect of AMF application on the overall performance of both landraces (Figure 4). Despite that, the absence of significance in the M × L interactions for most traits, overall, the two landraces differed in their response to the AMF application, as shown by the widely differing distance between their +AMF and −AMF clusters (Figure 6). Therefore, the discrimination of the two landraces based on morpho-physiological and metabolic parameters is accentuated by the AMF application.

4. Discussion

The use of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides together with irrigation has certainly provided farmers with great flexibility in the management of agricultural cropping systems and a potential for boosting yield and productivity, particularly in the horticultural industry [28]. However, intensive agriculture has posed serious threats to the environment and the different comparts of the agroecosystem, leading to water, soil and air pollution and ultimately causing a decline in crop productivity while aggravating risks to human health [29]. Therefore, the upcoming challenge facing agriculture is that of identifying alternative strategies and/or tools that can assist in increasing plant NUE and yield in order to feed the growing world population, while sustainably reducing conventional inputs and pollution [30,31,32]. Indeed, beneficial microbes could be used as PBs to achieve this multifaceted goal [8,33,34]. According to this view, the present study appraised the application of AMF on the yellow-pigmented type (‘Giagiù’) and red-pigmented type (‘Lucariello’) PPV landraces in order to determine if it could positively affect tomato growth and marketability, while also furthering our understanding of the effects of AMF on nutritional and nutraceutical quality of these horticultural products.
Our findings indicate that mycorrhization elicited systemic effects expressed on tomato fruits from PPV plants by inducing phenological, physiological and metabolic variations mainly evident in ‘Lucariello’, but also in ‘Giagiù’. In fact, AMF was able to colonize both cherry tomato landraces, increasing the fruit number per plant but not the fruit mean mass, yet resulting in a significant increase in fruit yield. AMF also enhanced in both landraces the capacity to accumulate starch, which constitutes a feature of increased photosynthetic efficiency, and free amino acids [31]. The beneficial effect of AMF on tomato plants has been previously reported [6,35,36,37], and often linked to the higher efficiency of mycorrhizal plants in taking up soil nutrients, phosphorus in particular [35,37]. However, in our case, phosphorus was not the only ion significantly increased under AMF treatment. Magnesium and copper increased and sodium decreased in both landraces; whereas, in ‘Giagiù’ only, calcium and zinc also were strongly increased.
Calcium has a key role in plant membrane stability, the functional integrity of cell wall and osmoregulation, and acts as second messenger allowing plants to respond to environmental stimuli, regulating and adapting developmental processes accordingly [38]. Therefore, calcium low levels can negatively affect plant growth and yield [39]. Moreover, low calcium plant tissues and in particular fleshy fruits like tomatoes are more susceptible to biotic stresses (e.g., parasitic diseases) and rapid loss of quality during storage [40]. Studies aimed to increase the content of calcium in tomatoes for coping with osteoporosis in women have led to the discovery that the constitutive expression of the vacuolar Ca2+/H+ antiporter AtCAX1 in transgenic tomatoes by removal of its autoinhibitory region, is able to increase calcium vacuolar transport and its fruit concentration [40]. However, the modification of AtCAX1 expression causes also the depletion of calcium in apoplast and cytosol, facilitating membrane leakage and increasing plant susceptibility to blossom end rot [40,41]. Indeed, genetic alteration of calcium transporters affects calcium nutrition and signaling pathways, causing still unknown consequences on fruit development and ripening [42]. According to these data, the AMF related higher calcium concentration in ‘Giagiù’ is particularly relevant because it does not cause negative consequences on fruit tissues, and on the contrary, it contributes to the increase in fruit number and yield. Moreover, the increase in calcium contributes to maintaining the turgor and firmness of fruit tissues, to extending fruit shelf life and, moreover, to reducing the risk of osteoporosis in humans [40]. The comprehension of the mechanisms by which AMF can increase calcium content in ‘Giagiù’ without creating physiological imbalances in the plant is of pivotal importance toward establishing in practice the use of this PB for naturally increasing calcium content in tomatoes but also in other types of fruit or vegetables.
Zinc too was strongly increased by AMF in ‘Giagiù’ fruits. This ion is essential for the synthesis and configuration of proteins and for starch synthesis [43]. It acts as an essential cofactor for thousands of proteins having structural, regulatory and functional roles in plant cells [44]. Zinc is involved in the scavenging of superoxide radicals, and contributes to membrane integrity as well as the synthesis of proteins and the plant hormone auxin [45]. It enters the structure of zinc finger transcription factors, regulating the expression of genes involved in cell expansion thus playing a key role in the correct development of tomato fruits [46]. In addition, the application of zinc to tomato fruits may reduce their rate of respiration and transpiration, decrease ethylene production and extend their shelf life [47]. Zinc is also essential for human nutrition since it plays a central role in cellular growth, differentiation and metabolism [48]. In particular, zinc is important during the prenatal and infancy stages of rapid growth [48,49]. Furthermore, it is essential in tissues with rapid cell turnover, such as the immune system and the gastrointestinal tract. Thus nutritional deficiencies of zinc can affect the outcome of pregnancy, physical growth, susceptibility to infections and neurobehavioral development [50].
Nitrogen is another key element for plants whose uptake is enhanced by AMF, as evidenced by the strong increase in free amino acids in the two PPVs. Govindarajulu, et al. [51] demonstrated through stable isotope labeling experiments that the nitrogen absorbed by AMF extraradical mycelium is immediately assimilated into amino acids, mainly Arg, then transferred to the intraradical mycelium, where it is, for the most part, converted into different low-carbon containing nitrogen forms, probably ureides, made available to the host plants [37]. Besides, Arg content significantly increased in tomato fruits, particularly of ‘Giagiù’, suggesting that not all Arg was broken down and transformed to different compounds released from the mycelium to the host plant. It has also been suggested that amides (glutamine and asparagine) could be the low-carbon forms by which N is exported from AMF mycelium and then accumulated in tomato fruits [52]. However, the fruits of the two PPVs did not show any significant increase in the content of the two amides.
Whatever the carbon form used for the export of nitrogen from intraradical mycelium to the plant, it is interesting that the surplus of this nutrient acquired by means of AMF was mainly used to synthesize and accumulate amino acids with antioxidant properties. The AMF-dependent increase of free amino acids was manifested in both landraces, even if the effect on ‘Lucariello’ was more evident for the higher constitutive content of these metabolites in the untreated control. The impact of AMF on amino acids profiling has been previously reported by Salvioli et al. [37] as an either direct or indirect mechanism. The direct effect may depend on the systemic modulation of the transcription exerted by some tomato leaf microRNAs induced by the AMF symbiont [53]; while the indirect effect could depend on the beneficial effect of symbiosis on nutrient availability, since AMF can directly solubilize plant nutrients in the soil rhizosphere (e.g., rock P, Fe, Cu and divalent ions) or produce siderophores, making nutrients directly available to the plant [7].
The AMF treatment allowed a strong increase in Asp content of both landraces, while maintaining a high unchanged Glu value, independent of landraces and treatments. Since umami taste is elicited by many small molecules, including Glu and Asp in addition to nucleotides (inosine 5′-monophosphate and guanosine-5′-monophosphate), the concentrations of Asp and Glu improve tomato flavor and fruit palatability [16,54]. Moreover, Asp is very important in plant metabolism because from this amino acid starts the pathway that leads to the synthesis of the four essential amino acids Ile, Lys, Met and Thr [55]. Accordingly, an increase in these latter amino acids was also elicited, with the exception of Thr in ‘Giagiù’. The increase of Lys was the most relevant result because it is considered nutritionally as the most important essential amino acid because its concentration is low in cereal grains, which are the main source of staple plant foods and feeds worldwide [55]. The attempts to increase its synthesis and accumulation or reduce its catabolism by metabolic engineering have failed because this approach has the drawback of decreasing tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle metabolites which reduce cellular energy and delay seed germination [55]. AMF action increased this amino acid in both landraces without consequences on plant physiology and metabolism.
‘Lucariello’ differed from ‘Giagiù’ also in that it underwent a strong increase of BCAAs. These amino acids are used by plants both as osmolytes to counteract the effects of water stress and as alternative electron donors for the mitochondrial electron transport chain [16]. BCAAs have been found to play also a ROS scavenging role in rats and mice through a still unknown underlying mechanism [27].
Serine almost doubled in ‘Lucariello’, while it remained unvaried in ‘Giagiù’. The increase of Ser, in agreement with the findings of Salvioli et al. [37] in mycorrhizal plants, could be due to an increase of photorespiration. However, this event must not be seen as negative because, on the one hand, AMF are able to alter stomatal morphology and stomatal density enhancing stomatal conductance and transpiration to increase xylem nutrients uptake and fluxes during active growth, as found in mycorrhizal wheat leaves [56]; on the other hand, AMF allow whenever necessary a strict stomatal control that has as consequence the increase of photorespiration but also the synthesis of specific metabolites for alleviating its negative effects. Certainly, the reason why this is manifested in ‘Lucariello’ but not in ‘Giagiù’ should be further investigated. In fact, the strong increase of serine is accompanied by an equally sharp increase of alanine and the nonprotein amino acid GABA in the same landrace. Their syntheses, starting from the decarboxylation of malate to pyruvate as a result of malic enzyme activity for alanine and decarboxylation of glutamate to GABA, are proton-consuming reactions, useful for buffering cytosolic acidosis during photorespiration [31,57,58]. Alanine after transamination to pyruvate can be converted to acetyl-Coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA) in the mitochondria, while the GABA shunt can supply succinate to the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and NADH directly to respiratory electron chain to increase the production of ATP [59,60]. The synthesis of GABA, catalyzed by the enzyme glutamate decarboxylase (GAD), releases also stoichiometric amounts of CO2, which can be used by RUBISCO to reactivate the Calvin cycle reducing the pressure on the photosynthetic electron chain, and decreasing photo-oxidative stress and photodamage in plant tissues when stomata are closed [60,61]. Moreover, GABA is also a compatible osmolyte able to balance the decrease in water potential during cellular dehydration due to drought stress, and acting also as an antioxidant for stabilizing and protecting membranes and macromolecules [32]. Nonetheless, GABA can exert beneficial effects on human health; in fact, it can act as a hypotensive and enhancer of the immune system under stress, and can contribute to cancer and diabetes prevention and the control of blood cholesterol levels [62,63].
‘Lucariello’ under AMF treatments showed also the highest contents of lycopene and TAA. Lycopene is the main lipophilic antioxidant generally present in tomatoes [64], with the exception of yellow-fleshed genotypes like ‘Giagiù’. It is able to scavenge hydroxyl radicals and activate enzymes like superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase and glutathione reductase, preventing the formation of ROS, and therefore protecting membranes and macromolecules in plant tissues [65]. Lycopene present in tomato products can play an important role in protecting against chronic disorders such as cardiovascular disease, and respiratory and digestive epithelial cancers [64]. It seems to exert cardiovascular protection by decreasing HDL-associated inflammation and modulating HDL functionality [66]. Lycopene has been recognized as a safe food supplement by the US Food and Drug Administration [67]. Lucarini et al. [68] reported that the average per capita intake of this carotenoid in Italy is 7.4 mg/d, greater than in other European countries except for Poland (7–7.5 mg/d). Clinical studies aimed to evaluate the beneficial effects of lycopene rarely exceed doses of 10 mg/d, even if it has been demonstrated that in cancer patients daily doses of up to 75 mg lycopene contribute to reducing a further progression of the disease [69]. ‘Lucariello’ under control and AMF treatments show a content of lycopene 18% and 85% higher than that of other commercial tomato varieties (4.7 and 7.4 mg/100 g fw, respectively) [70]. This means that eating 160 or 100 g of control or AMF treated ‘Lucariello’ tomatoes per day could be sufficient for getting the suggested amount of lycopene per day. However, this carotenoid is not the only antioxidant present in these tomatoes. In fact, these landraces contain also very high concentrations of AA (vitamin C) (on average 110 and 140 mg 100 g−1 fw in control and AMF PPVs, respectively), which is considered to be one of the most abundant antioxidants found in plant tissues [71]. According to the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA), the intake of AA should be of 90 mg/d for adult men and 75 mg/d for adult women. Therefore, for an adult man it would be sufficient to eat only 82 g or 64 g of tomato fruits from control or AMF treated PVVs, respectively, to get the RDA for AA. This vitamin is a multifunctional molecule necessary for both plants and animals. It plays primary roles as redox buffer and cofactor for enzymes involved in multiple cell processes, among which hormone biosynthesis, photosynthesis, respiration and regeneration of other different antioxidants. Moreover, it has a role in signal transduction and is involved in cell cycle progression and plant growth [72]. Lycopene together with the high levels of TAA observed under AMF treatment can also protect fruit tissues from oxidative stress and extend the postharvest conservation of ‘Lucariello’ tomatoes [16,17].

5. Conclusions

Biostimulation through AMF application represents a promising strategy for improving yield and quality of horticultural products, such PPV tomatoes, moreover it constitutes a sustainable approach toward achieving these goals. This microbial biostimulant was able to increase the content of both PPV landraces in ions and/or metabolites that contribute not only to shelf life extension but also to nutritional and nutraceutical quality rendering them desirable from a palatability and healthiness point of view. In addition, it is important to underline that while the main changes caused by AMF were more readily manifested in ‘Lucariello’, this microbial PB was also able to confer great improvement to the quality of ‘Giagiù’, exalting its taste and nutritional quality. In fact, the AMF treatment not only enhances the place of ‘Giagiù’ in the niche market of haute cuisine, in which it is already entrenched, but also opens up a new market for it, which is that of premium products that are nonallergenic but highly palatable, due to the high contents of umami-linked Glu and Asp, and also health-promoting due to the high contents of Ca, Zn, GABA, Arg and Lys. In fact, thanks to its very low lycopene content ‘Giagiù’ is also suitable for people suffering from intolerance or allergic reaction to dietary lycopene, which may trigger serious disorders like diarrhea, nausea, stomach pain or cramps, gas, vomiting, and loss of appetite [73].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.R.; methodology, P.C., M.C.K. and Y.R.; software, A.K.; validation, E.D., G.M.F. and A.K.; formal analysis, A.K. and M.C.K.; investigation, P.C. and Y.R.; resources, M.K.; data curation, A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, P.C., A.K., M.C.K., G.C. and Y.R.; writing—review and editing, P.C., A.K., M.C.K., G.C. and Y.R.; visualization, P.C., A.K., M.C.K., E.D., G.M.F., G.C. and Y.R.; supervision, M.C.K. and Y.R.; project administration, Y.R.; funding acquisition, M.C.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli (grant number VALERE: VAnviteLli pEr la RicErca).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank: Michelangelo Ambrosio, Michele Ciriello, Christophe El-Nakhel and Antonio Pannico for the technical assistance as well as to Maria Giordano for quality parameters analysis. We would like also to thank Aramando Zarrelli for providing the access to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer facilities and analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Chakravorty, U.; Fisher, D.K.; Umetsu, C. Environmental effects of intensification of agriculture: Livestock production and regulation. Environ. Econ. Policy Stud. 2007, 8, 315–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Van Oosten, M.J.; Dell’Aversana, E.; Ruggiero, A.; Cirillo, V.; Gibon, Y.; Woodrow, P.; Maggio, A.; Carillo, P. Omeprazole Treatment Enhances Nitrogen Use Efficiency Through Increased Nitrogen Uptake and Assimilation in Corn. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Quammen, D. Spillover: Animal Infections and the Next Human Pandemic; W.W. Norton & Co.: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gosalvez, E. How Habitat Destruction Enables the Spread of Diseases Like COVID-19. Available online: https://cnr.ncsu.edu/news/2020/04/habitat-destruction-covid19/ (accessed on 22 April 2020).
  5. Pretty, J.; Bharucha, Z.P. Sustainable intensification in agricultural systems. Ann. Bot. 2014, 114, 1571–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Avio, L.; Turrini, A.; Giovannetti, M.; Sbrana, C. Designing the Ideotype Mycorrhizal Symbionts for the Production of Healthy Food. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Begum, N.; Qin, C.; Ahanger, M.A.; Raza, S.; Khan, M.I.; Ashraf, M.; Ahmed, N.; Zhang, L. Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Plant Growth Regulation: Implications in Abiotic Stress Tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Rouphael, Y.; Franken, P.; Schneider, C.; Schwarz, D.; Giovannetti, M.; Agnolucci, M.; Pascale, S.D.; Bonini, P.; Colla, G. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi act as biostimulants in horticultural crops. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 196, 91–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, M.; Arato, M.; Borghi, L.; Nouri, E.; Reinhardt, D. Beneficial Services of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi—From Ecology to Application. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rouphael, Y.; Kyriacou, M.C.; Petropoulos, S.A.; De Pascale, S.; Colla, G. Improving vegetable quality in controlled environments. Sci. Hortic. 2018, 234, 275–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Castellanos-Morales, V.; Villegas, J.; Wendelin, S.; Vierheilig, H.; Eder, R.; Cárdenas-Navarro, R. Root colonisation by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices alters the quality of strawberry fruits (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) at different nitrogen levels. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2010, 90, 1774–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mollavali, M.; Bolandnazar, S.A.; Schwarz, D.; Rohn, S.; Riehle, P.; Zaare Nahandi, F. Flavonol Glucoside and Antioxidant Enzyme Biosynthesis Affected by Mycorrhizal Fungi in Various Cultivars of Onion (Allium cepa L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ahmad, H.; Hayat, S.; Ali, M.; Liu, T.; Cheng, Z. The combination of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation (Glomus versiforme) and 28-homobrassinolide spraying intervals improves growth by enhancing photosynthesis, nutrient absorption, and antioxidant system in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) under salinity. Ecol. Evol. 2018, 8, 5724–5740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fernández, I.; Merlos, M.; López-Ráez, J.A.; Martínez-Medina, A.; Ferrol, N.; Azcón, C.; Bonfante, P.; Flors, V.; Pozo, M.J. Defense Related Phytohormones Regulation in Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbioses Depends on the Partner Genotypes. J. Chem. Ecol. 2014, 40, 791–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Giovannini, L.; Palla, M.; Agnolucci, M.; Avio, L.; Sbrana, C.; Turrini, A.; Giovannetti, M. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Associated Microbiota as Plant Biostimulants: Research Strategies for the Selection of the Best Performing Inocula. Agronomy 2020, 10, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Carillo, P.; Kyriacou, M.C.; El-Nakhel, C.; Pannico, A.; dell’Aversana, E.; D’Amelia, L.; Colla, G.; Caruso, G.; De Pascale, S.; Rouphael, Y. Sensory and functional quality characterization of protected designation of origin ‘Piennolo del Vesuvio’ cherry tomato landraces from Campania-Italy. Food Chem. 2019, 292, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Frusciante, L.; Carli, P.; Ercolano, M.R.; Pernice, R.; Di Matteo, A.; Fogliano, V.; Pellegrini, N. Antioxidant nutritional quality of tomato. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2007, 51, 609–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kyriacou, M.C.; Rouphael, Y. Towards a new definition of quality for fresh fruits and vegetables. Sci. Hortic. 2018, 234, 463–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Phillips, J.M.; Hayman, D.S. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1970, 55, 158-IN118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Giovannetti, M.; Mosse, B. An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New Phytol. 1980, 84, 489–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Volpe, M.G.; Nazzaro, M.; Di Stasio, M.; Siano, F.; Coppola, R.; De Marco, A. Content of micronutrients, mineral and trace elements in some Mediterranean spontaneous edible herbs. Chem. Cent. J. 2015, 9, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Re, R.; Pellegrini, N.; Proteggente, A.; Pannala, A.; Yang, M.; Rice-Evans, C. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic Biol. Med. 1999, 26, 1231–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fogliano, V.; Verde, V.; Randazzo, G.; Ritieni, A. Method for measuring antioxidant activity and its application to monitoring the antioxidant capacity of wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 1035–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sadler, G.; Davis, J.; Dezman, D. Rapid Extraction of Lycopene and β-Carotene from Reconstituted Tomato Paste and Pink Grapefruit Homogenates. J. Food Sci. 1990, 55, 1460–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kampfenkel, K.; Van Montagu, M.; Inzé, D. Extraction and determination of ascorbate and dehydroascorbate from plant tissue. Anal. Biochem. 1995, 225, 165–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Carillo, P.; Cacace, D.; De Rosa, M.; De Martino, E.; Cozzolino, C.; Nacca, F.; D’Antonio, R.; Fuggi, A. Process optimisation and physicochemical characterisation of potato powder. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 44, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Woodrow, P.; Ciarmiello, L.; Annunziata, M.G.; Pacifico, S.; Iannuzzi, F.; Mirto, A.; D’Amelia, L.; Dell’Aversana, E.; Piccolella, S.; Fuggi, A.; et al. Durum wheat seedling responses to simultaneous high light and salinity involve a fine reconfiguration of amino acids and carbohydrate metabolism. Physiol. Plant. 2017, 159, 290–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Newbould, P. The use of nitrogen fertiliser in agriculture. Where do we go practically and ecologically? Plant Soil 1989, 115, 297–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tilman, D.; Balzer, C.; Hill, J.; Befort, B.L. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 20260–20264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Rouphael, Y.; Colla, G. Editorial: Biostimulants in Agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Carillo, P.; Colla, G.; El-Nakhel, C.; Bonini, P.; D’Amelia, L.; Dell’Aversana, E.; Pannico, A.; Giordano, M.; Sifola, M.I.; Kyriacou, M.C.; et al. Biostimulant Application with a Tropical Plant Extract Enhances Corchorus olitorius Adaptation to Sub-Optimal Nutrient Regimens by Improving Physiological Parameters. Agronomy 2019, 9, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Carillo, P.; Colla, G.; Fusco, G.M.; Dell’Aversana, E.; El-Nakhel, C.; Giordano, M.; Pannico, A.; Cozzolino, E.; Mori, M.; Reynaud, H.; et al. Morphological and Physiological Responses Induced by Protein Hydrolysate-Based Biostimulant and Nitrogen Rates in Greenhouse Spinach. Agronomy 2019, 9, 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Rouphael, Y.; Colla, G. Synergistic Biostimulatory Action: Designing the Next Generation of Plant Biostimulants for Sustainable Agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Rouphael, Y.; Cardarelli, M.; Colla, G. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in alleviating the adverse effects of acidity and aluminium toxicity in zucchini squash. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 188, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Subramanian, K.S.; Santhanakrishnan, P.; Balasubramanian, P. Responses of field grown tomato plants to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal colonization under varying intensities of drought stress. Sci. Hortic. 2006, 107, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dasgan, H.; Kusvuran, S.; Ortas, I. Responses of soilless grown tomato plants to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (Glomus fasciculatum) colonization in re-cycling and open systems. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2008, 7, 3606–3613. [Google Scholar]
  37. Salvioli, A.; Zouari, I.; Chalot, M.; Bonfante, P. The arbuscular mycorrhizal status has an impact on the transcriptome profile and amino acid composition of tomato fruit. BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 12, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Hawkesford, M.; Horst, W.; Kichey, T.; Lambers, H.; Schjoerring, J.; Møller, I.S.; White, P. Chapter 6—Functions of Macronutrients. In Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 3rd ed.; Marschner, P., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2012; pp. 135–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hirschi, K.D. The calcium conundrum. Both versatile nutrient and specific signal. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136, 2438–2442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Park, S.; Cheng, N.H.; Pittman, J.K.; Yoo, K.S.; Park, J.; Smith, R.H.; Hirschi, K.D. Increased calcium levels and prolonged shelf life in tomatoes expressing Arabidopsis H+/Ca2+ transporters. Plant Physiol. 2005, 139, 1194–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. de Freitas, S.T.; Padda, M.; Wu, Q.; Park, S.; Mitcham, E.J. Dynamic Alternations in Cellular and Molecular Components during Blossom-End Rot Development in Tomatoes Expressing sCAX1, a Constitutively Active Ca2+/H+ Antiporter from Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 844–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Hocking, B.; Tyerman, S.D.; Burton, R.A.; Gilliham, M. Fruit Calcium: Transport and Physiology. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Sharma, A.; Patni, B.; Shankhdhar, D.; Shankhdhar, S.C. Zinc—An indispensable micronutrient. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2013, 19, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Broadley, M.R.; White, P.J.; Hammond, J.P.; Zelko, I.; Lux, A. Zinc in plants. New Phytol. 2007, 173, 677–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Broadley, M.; Brown, P.; Cakmak, I.; Rengel, Z.; Zhao, F. Chapter 7—Function of Nutrients: Micronutrients. In Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 3rd ed.; Marschner, P., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2012; pp. 191–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Quinet, M.; Angosto, T.; Yuste-Lisbona, F.J.; Blanchard-Gros, R.; Bigot, S.; Martinez, J.-P.; Lutts, S. Tomato Fruit Development and Metabolism. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Kazemi, M. Effects of Zn, Fe and their Combination Treatments on the growth and yield of tomato. Bull. Environ. Pharmacol. Life Sci. 2013, 3, 109–114. [Google Scholar]
  48. Ronaghy, H.A. The role of zinc in human nutrition. World Rev. Nutr. Diet. 1987, 54, 237–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Roohani, N.; Hurrell, R.; Kelishadi, R.; Schulin, R. Zinc and its importance for human health: An integrative review. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2013, 18, 144–157. [Google Scholar]
  50. Brown, K.; Wuehler, S.; Peerson, J. The Importance of Zinc in Human Nutrition and Estimation of the Global Prevalence of Zinc Deficiency. Food Nutr. Bull. 2001, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Govindarajulu, M.; Pfeffer, P.E.; Jin, H.; Abubaker, J.; Douds, D.D.; Allen, J.W.; Bücking, H.; Lammers, P.J.; Shachar-Hill, Y. Nitrogen transfer in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Nature 2005, 435, 819–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ruzicka, D.R.; Hausmann, N.T.; Barrios-Masias, F.H.; Jackson, L.E.; Schachtman, D.P. Transcriptomic and metabolic responses of mycorrhizal roots to nitrogen patches under field conditions. Plant Soil 2012, 350, 145–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gu, M.; Xu, K.; Chen, A.; Zhu, Y.; Tang, G.; Xu, G. Expression analysis suggests potential roles of microRNAs for phosphate and arbuscular mycorrhizal signaling in Solanum lycopersicum. Physiol. Plant. 2010, 138, 226–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chaudhari, N.; Pereira, E.; Roper, S.D. Taste receptors for umami: The case for multiple receptors. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 90, 738S–742S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Galili, G. The aspartate-family pathway of plants: Linking production of essential amino acids with energy and stress regulation. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 192–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Zhu, X.; Cao, Q.; Sun, L.; Yang, X.; Yang, W.; Zhang, H. Stomatal Conductance and Morphology of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Wheat Plants Response to Elevated CO(2) and NaCl Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Gout, E.; Bligny, R.; Douce, R. Regulation of intracellular pH values in higher plant cells. Carbon-13 and phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance studies. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 13903–13909. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Limami, A.M.; Glévarec, G.; Ricoult, C.; Cliquet, J.B.; Planchet, E. Concerted modulation of alanine and glutamate metabolism in young Medicago truncatula seedlings under hypoxic stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 2325–2335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Bouché, N.; Fromm, H. GABA in plants: Just a metabolite? Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Carillo, P. GABA Shunt in Durum Wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Annunziata, M.G.; Ciarmiello, L.F.; Woodrow, P.; Dell’Aversana, E.; Carillo, P. Spatial and Temporal Profile of Glycine Betaine Accumulation in Plants Under Abiotic Stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Ramos-Ruiz, R.; Poirot, E.; Flores-Mosquera, M. GABA, a non-protein amino acid ubiquitous in food matrices. Cogent Food Agric. 2018, 4, 1534323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ngo, D.-H.; Vo, T.S. An Updated Review on Pharmaceutical Properties of Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid. Molecules 2019, 24, 2678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Pennathur, S.; Maitra, D.; Byun, J.; Sliskovic, I.; Abdulhamid, I.; Saed, G.M.; Diamond, M.P.; Abu-Soud, H.M. Potent antioxidative activity of lycopene: A potential role in scavenging hypochlorous acid. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2010, 49, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Sipos, L.; Orbán, C.; Bálint, I.; Csambalik, L.; Divéky-Ertsey, A.; Gere, A. Colour parameters as indicators of lycopene and antioxidant activity traits of cherry tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2017, 243, 1533–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Thies, F.; Mills, L.M.; Moir, S.; Masson, L.F. Cardiovascular benefits of lycopene: Fantasy or reality? Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2016, 76, 122–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Rao, A.V.; Ray, M.R.; Rao, L.G. Lycopene. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2006, 51, 99–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lucarini, M.; Lanzi, S.; D’Evoli, L.; Aguizzi, A.; Lombardi-Boccia, G. Intake of vitamin A and carotenoids from the Italian population—Results of an Italian total diet study. Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 2006, 76, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Przybylska, S. Lycopene—A bioactive carotenoid offering multiple health benefits: A review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 55, 11–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Martínez-Valverde, I.; Periago, M.J.; Provan, G.; Chesson, A. Phenolic compounds, lycopene and antioxidant activity in commercial varieties of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum). J. Sci. Food Agric. 2002, 82, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Mirto, A.; Iannuzzi, F.; Carillo, P.; Ciarmiello, L.F.; Woodrow, P.; Fuggi, A. Metabolic characterization and antioxidant activity in sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) Campania accessions: Metabolic characterization of sweet cherry accessions. Food Chem. 2018, 240, 559–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ortiz-Espín, A.; Sánchez-Guerrero, A.; Sevilla, F.; Jiménez, A. The Role of Ascorbate in Plant Growth and Development. In Ascorbic Acid in Plant Growth, Development and Stress Tolerance; Hossain, M.A., Munné-Bosch, S., Burritt, D.J., Diaz-Vivancos, P., Fujita, M., Lorence, A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 25–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Gulati, K.; Anand, R.; Ray, A. Chapter 16—Nutraceuticals as Adaptogens: Their Role in Health and Disease. In Nutraceuticals; Gupta, R.C., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2016; pp. 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Minimum, mean and maximum air temperature and rainfall during the 2019 growing season.
Figure 1. Minimum, mean and maximum air temperature and rainfall during the 2019 growing season.
Agronomy 10 00911 g001
Figure 2. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on total ascorbic acid (TAA) of yellow-pigmented type (‘Giagiù’) and red-pigmented type (‘Lucariello’) landraces of ‘Pomodorino del Piennolo del Vesuvio’ (PPV) cultivated in Campania region under rainfed conditions. Values are the means of three replicates ± SD. Different letters indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s test (p = 0.05).
Figure 2. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on total ascorbic acid (TAA) of yellow-pigmented type (‘Giagiù’) and red-pigmented type (‘Lucariello’) landraces of ‘Pomodorino del Piennolo del Vesuvio’ (PPV) cultivated in Campania region under rainfed conditions. Values are the means of three replicates ± SD. Different letters indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s test (p = 0.05).
Agronomy 10 00911 g002
Figure 3. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on alanine (A), aspartate (B), GABA (C), serine (D), essential amino acids (E) and branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) (F) of yellow-pigmented type (‘Giagiù’) and red-pigmented type (‘Lucariello’) landraces of ‘Pomodorino del Piennolo del Vesuvio’ (PPV) cultivated in the Campania region under rainfed conditions. Values are the means of three replicates ± SD. Different letters indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s test (p = 0.05).
Figure 3. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on alanine (A), aspartate (B), GABA (C), serine (D), essential amino acids (E) and branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) (F) of yellow-pigmented type (‘Giagiù’) and red-pigmented type (‘Lucariello’) landraces of ‘Pomodorino del Piennolo del Vesuvio’ (PPV) cultivated in the Campania region under rainfed conditions. Values are the means of three replicates ± SD. Different letters indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s test (p = 0.05).
Agronomy 10 00911 g003
Figure 4. Hierarchical cluster analysis based on free amino acids profile and total amino acids content.
Figure 4. Hierarchical cluster analysis based on free amino acids profile and total amino acids content.
Agronomy 10 00911 g004
Figure 5. Pathway map summarizing the effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on starch, sucrose, total ascorbic acid (TAA) and free amino acids, including branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs), and methyl ethanolamine (MEA) of yellow-pigmented type (‘Giagiù’) and red-pigmented type (Lucar.) landraces of Pomodorino del Piennolo del Vesuvio (PPV) cultivated in Campania region under rainfed conditions. The heat map results were calculated as Logarithm base 1.5 (Log1.5) of AMF/Control values and visualized using a false-color scale, with red indicating an increase and blue a decrease of values.
Figure 5. Pathway map summarizing the effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on starch, sucrose, total ascorbic acid (TAA) and free amino acids, including branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs), and methyl ethanolamine (MEA) of yellow-pigmented type (‘Giagiù’) and red-pigmented type (Lucar.) landraces of Pomodorino del Piennolo del Vesuvio (PPV) cultivated in Campania region under rainfed conditions. The heat map results were calculated as Logarithm base 1.5 (Log1.5) of AMF/Control values and visualized using a false-color scale, with red indicating an increase and blue a decrease of values.
Agronomy 10 00911 g005
Figure 6. Hierarchical cluster analysis based on total yield, number of fruits, fruit mean weight, total soluble solids (TSS) content, dry matter, lipophilic and hydrophilic (LAA and HAA), starch, lycopene, sucrose, macro (phosphorus, potassium, calcium and magnesium) and micro (sodium, iron, copper, manganese and zinc) mineral content and total amino acids content.
Figure 6. Hierarchical cluster analysis based on total yield, number of fruits, fruit mean weight, total soluble solids (TSS) content, dry matter, lipophilic and hydrophilic (LAA and HAA), starch, lycopene, sucrose, macro (phosphorus, potassium, calcium and magnesium) and micro (sodium, iron, copper, manganese and zinc) mineral content and total amino acids content.
Agronomy 10 00911 g006
Table 1. Significance of the main effects and their interactions on total yield, number of fruits and fruit mean weight. Values represent means of three replicates.
Table 1. Significance of the main effects and their interactions on total yield, number of fruits and fruit mean weight. Values represent means of three replicates.
Source of VariationYieldNumber of FruitsFruit Mean Weight
(g m−2)(no. m−2)(g fruit−1)
Mycorrhiza (M)******
Landraces (L)**ns**
M × Lnsnsns
Main effect—AMF
−AMF72867.9710.66
+AMF95394.3310.16
Main effect—Landrace
‘Giagiù’73081.758.96
‘Lucariello’95180.5511.86
ns, *, **, *** Nonsignificant or significant at p ≤ 0.05, 0.01 and 0.001, respectively. AMF: Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.
Table 2. Significance of the main effects and the interactions on the macro (phosphorus, potassium, calcium and magnesium) and micro (sodium, iron, copper, manganese and zinc) mineral content. Values represent means of three replicates.
Table 2. Significance of the main effects and the interactions on the macro (phosphorus, potassium, calcium and magnesium) and micro (sodium, iron, copper, manganese and zinc) mineral content. Values represent means of three replicates.
Source of VariationPKCaMgNaFeCuMnZn
(mg g−1 dw)(mg g−1 dw)(mg g−1 dw)(mg g−1 dw)(mg g−1 dw)(μg g−1 dw)(μg g−1 dw)(μg g−1 dw)(μg g−1 dw)
Mycorrhiza (M)*ns******ns*ns**
Landraces (L)nsns**ns***ns*ns*
M × Lnsns**ns**nsnsnsns
Main effect—AMF
−AMF2.8331.861.101.090.0241.4812.587.5519.95
+AMF3.5332.321.411.130.0144.6613.817.8826.78
Main effect—Landrace
‘Giagiù’3.2432.401.431.130.0342.7712.527.9026.09
‘Lucariello’3.1231.781.081.090.0143.3713.877.5320.64
ns, *, **, *** Nonsignificant or significant at p ≤ 0.05, 0.01 and 0.001, respectively.
Table 3. Significance of the main effects and the interactions on total soluble solids (TSS) content, dry matter, lipophilic and hydrophilic (LAA and HAA), starch, lycopene and sucrose. Values represent means of three replicates.
Table 3. Significance of the main effects and the interactions on total soluble solids (TSS) content, dry matter, lipophilic and hydrophilic (LAA and HAA), starch, lycopene and sucrose. Values represent means of three replicates.
Source of VariationTSSDMLAAHAAStarchTAALycopeneSucrose
(°Brix)(%)(mmol Trolox 100 g−1 dw)(mmol AA 100 g−1 dw)(µmol g−1 dw)(mg 100 g−1 fw)(mg 100 g−1 dw)(µmol g−1 dw)
Mycorrhiza (M)*************
Landraces (L)nsns***nsns*****
M × Lnsnsnsnsns**ns*
Main effect—AMF
−AMF8.169.8317.2410.4315.60110.226.2313.52
+AMF8.9510.7819.3111.3320.50141.538.4811.56
Main effect—Landrace
‘Giagiù’8.6710.3719.7510.6718.22127.05.8911.59
‘Lucariello’8.4510.2316.7911.0817.88124.758.8213.49
ns, *, **, *** Nonsignificant or significant at p ≤ 0.05, 0.01 and 0.001, respectively. TAA: total ascorbic acid.
Table 4. Significance of the main effects and their interactions on free amino acids profile and total amino acids content. Values represent means of three replicates.
Table 4. Significance of the main effects and their interactions on free amino acids profile and total amino acids content. Values represent means of three replicates.
Amino Acids
(µmol g−1 dw)
Main Effect MycorrhizaMain Effect LandracesSignificance
−AMF+AMF‘Giagiù’‘Lucariello’Mycorrhiza (M)Landraces (L)M × L
Ala29.8652.2229.8052.27*********
Arg26.1036.8224.8638.06*****ns
Asn89.5491.3758.75122.16ns**ns
Asp38.6159.3643.5054.47****ns
GABA106.4191.4116.8181.0******
Gln117.6118.787.08149.3ns**ns
Glu169.9213.4157.7225.6ns*ns
Gly12.0012.669.9314.73ns*ns
His8.0611.158.0411.18***ns
Ile7.3210.277.1210.47******
Leu5.918.335.398.84********
Lys11.8216.869.1919.49***ns
MEA3.895.824.485.23*nsns
Met1.061.580.781.85*******
Orn2.383.022.023.39***ns
Phe6.024.733.627.13***ns
Pro13.3217.1515.1815.30*nsns
Ser7.0110.855.8112.04********
Thr3.424.112.744.78ns*ns
Trp2.454.112.224.33******
Tyr4.794.933.186.55ns*ns
Val4.615.794.286.11*****
Essential AA76.77103.768.26112.3******ns
BCAAs17.8424.3816.8025.42********
Total AA672.1884.7602.53954.3*****ns
ns, *, **, *** Nonsignificant or significant at p ≤ 0.05, 0.01 and 0.001, respectively.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Carillo, P.; Kyratzis, A.; Kyriacou, M.C.; Dell’Aversana, E.; Fusco, G.M.; Corrado, G.; Rouphael, Y. Biostimulatory Action of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Enhances Productivity, Functional and Sensory Quality in ‘Piennolo del Vesuvio’ Cherry Tomato Landraces. Agronomy 2020, 10, 911. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agronomy10060911

AMA Style

Carillo P, Kyratzis A, Kyriacou MC, Dell’Aversana E, Fusco GM, Corrado G, Rouphael Y. Biostimulatory Action of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Enhances Productivity, Functional and Sensory Quality in ‘Piennolo del Vesuvio’ Cherry Tomato Landraces. Agronomy. 2020; 10(6):911. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agronomy10060911

Chicago/Turabian Style

Carillo, Petronia, Angelos Kyratzis, Marios C. Kyriacou, Emilia Dell’Aversana, Giovanna Marta Fusco, Giandomenico Corrado, and Youssef Rouphael. 2020. "Biostimulatory Action of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Enhances Productivity, Functional and Sensory Quality in ‘Piennolo del Vesuvio’ Cherry Tomato Landraces" Agronomy 10, no. 6: 911. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agronomy10060911

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop