Next Article in Journal
Single Puncture TIPS—A 3D Fusion Image-Guided Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS): An Experimental Study
Previous Article in Journal
Elastic Reverse Time Migration for Weakly Illuminated Structure
Previous Article in Special Issue
Theoretical Investigation for Angle Measurement Based on Femtosecond Maker Fringe
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Measurement of the Machined Surface Diameter by a Laser Triangulation Sensor and Optimalization of Turning Conditions Based on the Diameter Deviation and Tool Wear by GRA and ANOVA

1
Department of Industrial Engineering and Informatics, Faculty of Manufacturing Technologies, Technical University of Košice, Bayerova 1, 08001 Prešov, Slovakia
2
Department of Automotive and Manufacturing Technologies, Faculty of Manufacturing Technologies, Technical University of Košice, Štúrova 31, 08001 Prešov, Slovakia
3
Department of Quantitative Methods and Managerial Informatics, University of Prešov, UNIPO, Konštantínová 16, 08001 Prešov, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 25 April 2022 / Revised: 17 May 2022 / Accepted: 20 May 2022 / Published: 23 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends in Manufacturing Metrology)

Abstract

:
One of the most important operations in the technological production process is the inspection of the manufactured product. The gradual wear of the tool affects the achievement of the required quality of the functional surfaces. In this research, we present the results of measuring the diameter deviation with a new generation laser triangulation sensor (LTS). At the same time, we have performed parametric optimization of several multi-responses, such as insert wear on the VBB flank side of cutting edge and diameter deviation Δd for a C45 steel sample during dry turning and using a sintered carbide insert, using the method of grey relational analysis (GRA) in combination with the Taguchi L16 orthogonal array. The optimal setting of input factors for multi-response parameters is ap 4-f 4-vc 1 i.e., depth of cut 0.5 mm, feed 0.4 mm per revolution, and a cutting speed of 70 m/min. At the same time, we present an evaluation of the significance of input factors using the method ANOVA.

1. Introduction

The direct contact of the measuring contacts with the machined surface is one of the negative phenomena in measurement. One of the ways to solve this negative phenomenon is to use non-contact methods of measuring the parameters of machined surfaces.
This article describes the suitability and new use of a laser triangulation sensor for measuring the deviation of the cylindrical surface diameter in the context of evaluating tool wear when turning C45 steel and optimizing cutting conditions. In this article, we present a new method for intermediate and final control of the measurement of quality parameters of the machined surface without removing the workpiece from the working area of the machine. In this way, it is possible to eliminate several errors in the inspection of products after machining. Currently, there are several companies in our region that produce various C45 steel shafts for agricultural and garden machinery.
Several authors have used laser scanners in their research. These technologies can be used in different industries and in different applications [1]. Javaid et al. states that laser technology is one of the most advanced technologies and laser scanners are immediately used in industry [2]. Li et al. proposes a pneumatic for laser measurement system [3]. Schmitt et al. state that sensors as information sources determine the quality level of information measurement and control systems [4]. According to Balestrieri et al. advanced systems for measuring parameters are important in terms of their various properties [5].
In selected studies, the authors have used LTS in machining, focusing mainly on the surface roughness parameter and surface defects. Yang et al. describe the use of the laser triangulation method as one of the most modern methods for measuring product diameters [6]. Giganto et al. found that optical measurement systems are suitable for surface roughness evaluation [7]. In their research, Garcia et al. used laser deviation sensors in the evaluated real-time surface quality control based on cutting force, vibration, and acoustic emission signals [8]. The influence of the dynamic aspect of the cutting process on the machined surfaces was analyzed by Kiss et al. in their research [9]. Yuan et al. presented evaluation of surface roughness based on machining process [10]. Syed et al. dealt with the optimization of parameters to predict defects in the manufacturing process [11]. Bose et al. investigated the use of optical systems to identify defects in the production process [12].
Some authors have focused on solving positional accuracy of tools with LTS. Authors such as Chen and Selami et al. dealt with design of algorithms for determining the position of tools with the application of a triangulation sensor [13,14]. Montavon et al. presented deviation measuring between the defined tool comparison position and the actual tool tip position [15]. Miklós et al. proposed a measurement method to determine linear stability for different real spindle speeds and virtual depths of cut using deviation sensors [16]. Ji-Hwan You et al. present that laser sensors are widely used in automotive industry for position measurement [17]. Frommknecht et al. present a 6D multisensor measurement system for drilling robots in their paper [18]. Takushima et al. designed an optical system for measuring the position of tools during drilling [19].
Other authors also dealt with the use of LTS for vibration research and its effects on tool damage during machining. Wojciechowski et al. proposed a new experimental method for estimating the vibrations of the milling cutter with a laser sensor [20]. Bombiński et al. described and proposed an innovative algorithm for early detection of tool damage [21]. In the research, Kossakowska et al. analyzed various signal functions that affect the wear of a tool, filtering out unwanted signals [22]. Wang et al. investigated the possibilities of using sensors to evaluate roundness deviations [23].
By designing the material used and the uncoated cutting insert, we aimed to minimize the effects of degraded machinability of the various materials and the effects of the properties of the cutting insert structures. Zlamal and Peterka et al. point out the effects of cutting the cutting edge of a sintered carbide tool when milling steel C45 to eliminate tool wear and achieve the required surface quality [24,25].
Is the application of a laser beam suitable for checking the quality parameters of the machined surface of products (e.g., diameter deviation) after the end of the cutting process? Based on the experience of machining different materials, we have chosen C45 steel specimens and sintered carbide inserts for dry turning and under the important condition that the vibrations of the machine tool comply with the values certified for the machine tool.
Therefore, in order to eliminate negative phenomena in product control, we proposed to review the application of the new generation LTS to measure the deviation of cylindrical surface diameter (Δd) and evaluate the effects of flank wear (VBB value according to ISO 3685) of the sintered carbide insert on this parameter under different cutting conditions.

2. Optimization of Input Factors Using the GRA Method and Analysis of the Significance of Factors According to ANOVA

When processing data from technological processes with different response parameters, the mutual relationships are complex and very often incomprehensible. We refer to this relationship as grey. For processing selected results from our research, we proposed a method based on GRA [26]. When optimizing with the method GRA we followed Lin [27]. The following values and parameters must be calculated as part of the procedure.
Calculation of the data for the methodology and the smaller the better according to Equation (1):
x i ( k ) = m a x   x i 0 ( k ) x i 0 ( k ) m a x   x i 0 ( k ) m i n   x i 0 ( k )
where:
i = 1,…, m k = 1,…, n,
mis the number of experimental data,
nis the number of response characteristics,
x i 0 ( k ) indicates the original sequence,
x i ( k ) indicates a sequence after data processing,
m a x   x i 0 ( k ) highest value of x i 0 ( k ) ,
m i n   x i 0 ( k ) lowest value of x i 0 ( k ) ,
x i 0 is the required value of x i 0 ( k ) .
GRC ξ i ( k ) according to Equation (2):
ξ i ( k ) = Δ min + ξ . Δ max Δ o i ( k ) + ξ . Δ max Δ o i ( k ) = | x o ( k ) x i ( k ) | Δ m a x = 1.00 Δ m i n = 0.00
where:
Δ o i ( k ) is the sequence deviation of the reference sequence and the comparison sequence x i ( k ) ,
Δ m i n ,   Δ m a x are the minimum and maximum values of the absolute differences ( Δ o i ),
ξ is an identification coefficient, and is defined in scope 0 ξ 1 and depends on the needs of the system. Usually, the value of ( ξ ) is 0.5.
GRG calculation according to Equation (3):
γ i = 1 n k = 1 n ξ i ( k )
where:
  • γ i is the GRG required for the i experiment,
  • n number of response characteristics.
Calculation of the expected value of the optimal GRG level according to Equation (4).
γ ^ = γ m + i = 1 s ( γ ¯ i γ m )
where:
  • γ m is the total mean of GRG,
  • γ ¯ i is the mean of GRG at the optimal level of each factor,
  • s is the number of significant process factors.
Many authors have used the GRA method, the Taguchi method, and the ANOVA method to present the results of their research. Sivalingam et al. and Pervez et al. optimized the process factors in their study and used the Taguchi L27 orthogonal array [28,29]. Mufarrih et al. and Li et al. solved the optimization of parameters in the machining process, using the Taguchi method—GRA [30,31]. Sharma et al. applied the GRA method and Taguchi L18 orthogonal array method to optimize the cutting parameters in drilling AA6082 and analyzed the results using ANOVA [32]. Chelladurai et al. used Taguchi method and GRA method to study the milling parameters in CNC machining of Al-6063 aluminum alloy [33]. Tamizharasan, Sylajakumari, and Puh et al. investigated the influence of turning parameters on chip formation to achieve the required surface quality when machining aluminum composite. Taguchi method was proposed for the design of L9 orthogonal array fields and ANOVA for the experiments [34,35,36].
In an experimental study, Kilickap et al. investigated the influence of various cutting parameters on cutting force, surface roughness, and tool wear during milling of the alloy Ti-6242S [37].
After analyzing the design of the optimal combination, we perform analysis of variance (ANOVA) to evaluate the significance of the factors affecting multiple responses at 95% confidence level and recommend significant information on the experimental data. To evaluate the significance of the response parameter, the p value (probability of significance) is analyzed. After determining the optimal combination of process factors, the confirmation test must be performed.

2.1. Experimental Design—Technological System

Two technological systems TS-A and TS-B (according to Table 1) were designed for the experiments, which are shown in Figure 1 and described by the following model.
TS = M + T (TH + CI) + W + F (FT + FW)
where:
  • M is (machine),
  • T is cutting tool (consisting of tool holder—TH and cutting insert—CI),
  • W is workpiece,
  • F is fixture (consisting of fixture for cutting tool—FT, and fixture for workpiece—FW).
In the case of TS-A, the lathe TU 2807 was used. This lathe has a certified hardened spindle surface (DIN 55021 standard) with a concentricity of less than 0.009 mm. The cutting tool used was an uncoated cemented carbide cutting insert with a geometry corner angle εr = 90°, main cutting edge setting angle κr = 45°, clearance angle major αo = 7°, corner radius rε = 0.8 mm. TS-B consisted of machining lathe center Viper VT-28BL-1500s. This lathe has a certified maximum radial runout of 0.035 mm and a maximum axial runout of 0.025 mm. The cutting tool used was the same insert as in TS-A.

2.2. Experimental Design—Measuring System LTS

In this experiment, the LTS IL100 (Keyence) was used. Its technical characteristics are measuring range 70–130 mm, measuring spot diameter (0.400 × 1.350 mm) depending on the distance to the workpiece, linearity ±0.03 mm, repeatability 0.004 mm and accuracy of 0.001 mm. For the experiment, we developed a measurement system, the schematic of which is shown in Figure 2 and which contains these elements as shown in Figure 3.
The measurement system also consists of a communication unit (DL-PN1 type DIN rail mount) with an amplifier (IL-1000, type for communication speed 500 kbps). The switch (Siemens-XB005) is used to connect the PLC via ethernet to a PC with software.
For the PLC device, software was developed in the TIA portal program. As reported by Filipescu et al. TIA Portal is also intended for the development of operator interfaces for machines and plants with operator panels (HMI) and for dispatching systems [38]. Profinet communication has been configured in Siemens TIA Portal (Figure 4).
It is very important that the data transfer from the PLC to PC is done via TCP communication with the TCP server and the client. The principle of data transfer is shown in Figure 5 also with the TCP communication part for data transfer from PLC to C#.
An example of the main loop of the algorithm with an explanation of the basic principle can be found in Figure 6. The measurement data from the measurement process is stored in a PC as structured data in CSV format same as in articles by Židek et al. [39,40].
Based on the design of the software for transformation and data processing, we can recommend the use of LTS directly in the manufacture of products on CNC machines. Part of the research was the design of the holder for LTS, its production on a 3D printer (as seen in Figure 7.)

3. Description, Implementation and Results of Experiments

An input experiment to test the LTS application for parameter measurement was conducted for cylindrical surface turning. For the experiment, we selected steel C45 with a specimen of 40 mm diameter and 150 mm length, shown as Table 2.
After verification of the selected LTS on TS-A, the experiments could be continued, as it was shown that this LTS is suitable for measuring the deviation of geometrical parameters of the machined surface. In the next step, the experiments were performed on TS-B according to Table 1, and the results of the experiments are reported in this section. The deviation of the diameter Δd and the wear of the flank side of the cutting insert (VBB) were measured after each experiment. Each value of the diameter deviation and the value of the wear of the flank side of the cutting insert is a value obtained from eight repetitions (with two cutting insert). The diameter deviation was measured directly in the working zone of the machine tool with LTS, i.e., after machining the surface of the workpiece without switching it off. The measurement system for the LTS is shown in Figure 2. The surface wear of the cutting insert was measured and analyzed using a Carl Zeiss Primotech D/A ESD microscope, as shown in Figure 8.
In all experiments, regular wear was observed on the flank side of cutting insert, so VBB values were measured according to ISO 3685. This parameter was important for the analysis of the impact on the next studied parameter diameter deviation for steel C45. An example of a VBB measurement is shown in Figure 9.
The experiments were planned according to the Taguchi L16 orthogonal array for three input factors such as depth of cut (ap), feed (f), and cutting speed (vc) in four levels, as shown in Table 3. The Taguchi L16 orthogonal array represents 16 experiments, which were always turned with a new cutting edge on a 210 mm long experimental piece (3 cuts with a length of 70 mm). After turning, the machined area was measured with the LTS. The diameter deviation was measured for a defined start and reference point (with a diameter deviation value of 0 mm), which was defined in the specimen axis.
The experimental results of the wear of the flank side and the diameter deviation are listed in Table 4.
The results of the experiments and the diagrams of the main effects are presented in Figure 10d and VBB), showing that the resulting parameter VBB wear of flank gradually increases with increasing depth of cut, feed, and cutting speed.
The greatest influence of the input factors was found in the order of cutting speed, depth of cut, and feed. The deviation of the diameter increases significantly when the depth of cut changes from level 1 to 2 of the depth of cut, but it is also reversed from level 2 to 3 of the depth of cut and increases gradually from level 3 to 4 of the depth of cut. The lowest value was displayed at a depth of cut of level 1. During the feed, lower values were measured from level 3 to 4. The lowest value of diameter deviation was measured at a feed of 0.4 mm. The influence of the cutting speed is significant to obtaining lower deviations of the average from level 1 to 2 of the cutting speed.
The lowest average value of diameter deviation was measured at a cutting speed of 70 m/min, namely 0.0046 mm, the highest average value of the diameter deviation was measured at a cutting speed of 220 m/min (0.0877 mm). The main effect graphs show the uncertainty of the process parameter levels to be developed for turning steel C45 as a steel group standard, and they also show that for certain lower parameter levels the flank wear is lower, but at the same time a change in the size deviation of the diameter occurs. The measurement results show that level 3 of cutting depth, level 4 of feed, and level 1 of cutting speed are factors for achieving the smallest diameter deviation. The dependence is important for the defined initial parameters, because the wear of the flank side of the cutting insert influences the deviation of the diameter. Therefore, the study of this dependence and the development of optimal input factors is important, also with regard to the use of LTS in the measurement of qualitative parameters.

Application Results of GRA and ANOVA Methods

The experimental data were normalized for the response parameters of flank wear and diameter deviation according to Equation (1) and are shown in Table 4. From the normalized data set in Table 5 the GRC relation coefficients using Equation (2) was calculated. We chose the value of the identification coefficient 0.5 because equal weight was given to response parameters. The statement is based on experience from various tests. The lower the wear value of the cutting part of the tool, the better the quality of the response parameter of the machined surface. The results are shown in Table 4. Next, the GRG was determined using Equation (3) and the GRC results. The GRG result is shown in Table 5.
This result is used to optimize the factors when they are converted to a degree. The influence of GRG for the defined experimental conditions is shown in Figure 11. From the figure, we can define experiment No. 13 for the input factors ap 4-f 1-vc 4 as the input experiment. For the calculated GRG values, the effects of each process factor at the different levels are shown in Figure 12.
The optimal combination of input factors is selected based on higher mean GRG values according to Table 6. A higher GRG value expresses stronger correlation with the reference sequence, i.e., the optimal factor setting for several output parameters is the combination of factors ap 4-f 4-vc 1, i.e., cutting depth 0.5 mm, feed 0.4 mm per revolution, and cutting speed 70 m/min.
The higher values of the average GRG (according to Figure 12) express the minimum values of the wear of the flank side of the cutting insert VBB and the deviation of the diameter Δd. Table 6 shows the GRG values as differences between the maximum and minimum values of the four levels for each factor. This result can be interpreted to mean that cutting speed (0.3321) has the greatest influence on several output parameters compared to depth of cut (0.1276) and feed (0.1216) according to Table 6, when turning steel C45. The significance of each process input factor on the response parameters can be stated in the order of cutting speed > depth of cut > feed. Table 7 formulates the analysis of variance in terms of GRG. This table shows the significance of the process factors on several output parameters. Table 7 shows that cutting speed is a significant process factor affecting several output parameters, as its p-value is less than 0.05 at 95% confidence level. No significance was demonstrated for the feed and depth of cut factors with respect to multiple parameters simultaneously.
At the end of the applied methods, confirmatory tests must be performed to determine the improvement in GRG from the initial setting of input factors to the optimum factors obtained when turning steel C45 while measuring the machined surface with LTS. The predicted GRG can be calculated using Equation (4). For the optimal setting of the input factors ap 4-f 4-vc 1, GRG has a value of 0.7473, which is very close to the expected value, i.e., 0.8855. To validate the test result, we repeated the experiment for the optimal setting of the input factors ap 4-f 4-vc 1. The results of the validation test were produced with repeatability 8 for the optimal level of input factors as shown in Table 8.
From the confirmation experiment Table 8, GRG for several response parameters, such as flank wear and diameter deviation, was significantly improved (by 0.3858) by setting the optimal parameter combination. These results confirm the resulting response parameters, diameter deviation, and flank wear, performed under operating conditions on a CNC machine. Based on the above analysis, the input factors for the minimum values of flank wear and diameter deviation studied in the turning of steel C45 by GRA based on the Taguchi method are investigated.
Some positive and negative experiences in the study of the application of a laser triangulation sensor to measure the diameter deviation after turning steel C45 standard:
  • Ensure compliance with the certified deviations of some dynamic modules of CNC machines (e.g., spindle);
  • Limit the use of process media or provide suitable constructive protection of the sensor in the working area of the machine;
  • The results may be distorted by red light: this did not affect the results in the experiments;
  • Non-contact measurement method and speed of acquired data: high efficiency;
  • Can be used for static and dynamic measurements;
  • Since we always work with an electrical output signal of the sensor, it is necessary to solve the problem of interference of the sensor by electric or magnetic fields;
  • Program can process, analyze, filter the acquired data according to Figure 13 and decide about the product, whether it was manufactured according to the specified technical requirements.
The defects on the machined surface documented according to Figure 14 were imaged using a Carl Zeiss Primotech D/A ESD microscope.

4. Discussion

In this paper, the suitability of using a laser triangulation sensor for evaluating the quality of the machined surface, in particular, measuring the accuracy of the diameter of the cylindrical surface, was demonstrated. The integration of the initial parameters, namely the data from the measurement of the deviation of the diameter of the cylindrical surface and their harmonization with the data of the wear of the back surface of the cutting insert, proved to be complicated and often very incomprehensible. The use of the GRG characteristic curve according to the method GRA is a suitable parameter to solve this problematic relationship. The method GRA was also used to optimize the conditions for turning steel C45 (as a reference material for the group of steel materials) in terms of two problematic response parameters (Δd and VBB). The experimental conditions were chosen to improve the quality of the machined surface. The average GRG values were found for the GR coefficients of the parameters, as shown in Table 4. These values are the recommended values for determining the rotation factors. The order of the factors according to GRG is as follows (cutting speed, depth of cut and feed). This paper presents the optimization of input factors in dry turning of steel C45 and the measurement of wear parameters of the cutting surface of the insert with a microscope, and the measurement of the deviation of the cylindrical surface diameter with a new generation Keyence laser triangulation sensor IL100 using Taguchi L16 orthogonal array and method GRA. The measurement system was designed for laboratory and operational conditions, a device for clamping the sensor and its production on a 3D printer with verification on a CNC machine was designed. Creation and verification of a program whose task is to communicate the PLC in the measurement system with the software for recording the data obtained from the laser triangulation sensor.

5. Conclusions

The following conclusions of this article are drawn from the research analysis. We can clearly answer the questions we mentioned in the content of the article. Yes, this type of sensor is suitable for measuring the diameter deviation parameter for the machined surface. The information obtained for steel C45 can be used in further research by a comparative method for checking other types of steel. The values of the deviation of the diameter on the cylindrical surface were measured and evaluated in intervals (0.002–0.2 mm) with LTS. The limit (specified by the manufacturers) for a diameter deviation of up to 0.15 mm was observed, although the 0.3 mm criterion (according to ISO 3685) was not exceeded in the wear of the back side of the VBB cutting plate in all tests. Creation and verification of a program whose task is to communicate the PLC in the measuring system with the software for recording the data obtained from the laser triangulation sensor. The optimal setting of the input factors for multi-responses is ap 4-f 4-vc 1. Depth of cut 0.5 mm, feed 0.4 mm per revolution, and cutting speed 70 m/min. The meaning of the input factors of each process for multi-responses can be given in the order cutting speed > depth of cut > feed, which follows from the table for GRG. The table ANOVA shows that cutting speed is an important factor influencing multi-responses with 95% confidence, in turning steel C45 as a case study of the effect of cutting insert flank wear on average diameter deviation studied by LTS for use in CNC machine tools. Other input factors showed less significance for multiple responses by both GRG and ANOVA. The GRG degree is significantly improved by setting the optimal combination of factors (0.3858). Therefore, the results of optimization of input factors for turning technology can be used in production plants to reduce production costs in the production process and product control. The proposed GRA methodology using the Taguchi L16 orthogonal array has proven to be effective in studying the relationship between the input factors of the process and the various response parameters, such as in the case study of turning. At the end of the paper, some negative and positive experiences with the application of a new generation laser triangulation sensor are presented, the verification of which will be presented in future publications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.J.; data curation, J.J., V.H., P.M. and I.P.; Methodology, P.M.; resources, M.M.-P., V.H. and P.M.; software, P.L. and I.P.; supervision, J.J.; writing—original draft, M.M.-P.; writing—review & editing, M.M.-P.; project administration, J.J.; funding acquisition, J.J. and M.M.-P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract No. APVV-19-0590 granted by the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

As the authors of the article, we would like to thank the research team of progressive production technologies for the support of research works of the grant agency APVV-19-0590 and also by the projects VEGA 1/0700/20, KEGA 055TUKE-4/2020, VEGA 1/0440/18 project and VEGA 1/0268/22, granted by the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Phuyal, S.; Bista, D.; Bista, R. Challenges, Opportunities and Future Directions of Smart Manufacturing: A State of Art Review. Sustain. Future 2020, 2, 100023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Javaid, M.; Haleem, A.; Singh, R.P.; Rab, S.; Suman, R. Significance of sensors for industry 4.0: Roles, capabilities, and applications. Sens. Int. 2021, 2, 100110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, X.-Q.; Wang, Z.; Fu, L.-H. A Laser-Based Measuring System for Online Quality Control of Car Engine Block. Sensors 2016, 16, 1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Schmitt, J.; Bönig, J.; Borggräfe, T.; Beitinger, G.; Deuse, J. Predictive model-based quality inspection using Machine Learning and Edge Cloud Computing. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2020, 45, 101101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Balestrieri, E.; Daponte, P.; De Vito, L.; Lamonaca, F. Sensors and Measurements for Unmanned Systems: An Overview. Sensors 2021, 21, 1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yang, T.; Wang, Z.; Wu, Z.; Li, X.; Wang, L.; Liu, C. Calibration of Laser Beam Direction for Inner Diameter Measuring Device. Sensors 2017, 17, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Giganto, S.; Martínez-Pellitero, S.; Cuesta, E.; Meana, V.M.; Barreiro, J. Analysis of Modern Optical Inspection Systems for Parts Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting. Sensors 2020, 20, 3202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Plaza, E.G.; López, P.J.N.; González, E.M.B. Multi-Sensor Data Fusion for Real-Time Surface Quality Control in Automated Machining Systems. Sensors 2018, 18, 4381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kiss, A.K.; Bachrathy, D.; Stepan, G. Laser scanned patterns of machined surfaces. Procedia CIRP 2018, 77, 355–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yuan, Y.; Jing, X.; Ehmann, K.F.; Zhang, D. Surface roughness modeling in micro end-milling. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 95, 1655–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tofail, S.A.; Koumoulos, E.P.; Bandyopadhyay, A.; Bose, S.; O’Donoghue, L.; Charitidis, C. Additive manufacturing: Scientific and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities. Mater. Today 2018, 21, 22–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bose, S.; Ke, D.; Sahasrabudhe, H.; Bandyopadhyay, A. Additive manufacturing of biomaterials. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2017, 93, 45–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, L.; Liu, C.; Li, Z.; Kang, Z. A New Triangulation Algorithm for Positioning Space Debris. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 4878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Selami, Y.; Tao, W.; Gao, Q.; Yang, H.; Zhao, H. A Scheme for Enhancing Precision in 3-Dimensional Positioning for Non-Contact Measurement Systems Based on Laser Triangulation. Sensors 2018, 18, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Montavon, B.; Dahlem, P.; Peterek, M.; Ohlenforst, M.; Schmitt, R.H. Modelling Machine Tools using Structure Integrated Sensors for Fast Calibration. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2018, 2, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Miklós, A.; Bachrathy, D.; Wohlfart, R.; Takács, D.; Porempovics, G.; Tóth, A.; Stépán, G. Hardware-in-the-loop experiment of turning. Procedia CIRP 2018, 77, 675–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. You, J.-H.; Oh, S.; Park, J.-E.; Song, H.; Kim, Y.-K. A novel LiDAR sensor alignment inspection system for automobile productions using 1-D photodetector arrays. Measurement 2021, 183, 109817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Frommknecht, A.; Kuehnle, J.; Effenberger, I.; Pidan, S. Multi-sensor measurement system for robotic drilling. Robot. Comput. Manuf. 2017, 47, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Takushima, S.; Kawano, H.; Nakahara, H.; Kurokawa, T. On-machine multi-directional laser displacement sensor using scanning exposure method for high-precision measurement of metal-works. Precis. Eng. 2018, 51, 437–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wojciechowski, S.; Wiackiewicz, M.; Krolczyk, G. Study on metrological relations between instant tool displacements and surface roughness during precise ball end milling. Measurement 2018, 129, 686–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bombiński, S.; Kossakowska, J.; Jemielniak, K. Detection of accelerated tool wear in turning. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2021, 162, 108021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kossakowska, J.; Bombiński, S.; Ejsmont, K. Analysis of the Suitability of Signal Features for Individual Sensor Types in the Diagnosis of Gradual Tool Wear in Turning. Energies 2021, 14, 6489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, Y.; Bai, J.; Huang, G.; Zhou, Q.; Wang, X.; Li, X. High precision roundness measurement with two chromatic confocal sensors. In Optical Metrology and Inspection for Industrial Applications VIII; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2021; pp. 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zlámal, T.; Mrkvica, I.; Szotkowski, T.; Malotová, Š. The influence of surface treatment of PVD coating on its quality and wear resistant. Coatings 2019, 9, 439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Peterka, J.; Pokorny, P.; Vaclav, S.; Patoprsty, B.; Vozar, M. Modification of Cutting Tools by Drag Finishing. MM Sci. J. 2020, 2020, 3822–3825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Deng, J. Control problems of grey systems. Syst. Control Lett. 1982, 1, 288–294. Available online: https://0-www-sciencedirect-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/science/article/pii/S016769118280025X (accessed on 2 June 2021).
  27. Lin, C.L. Use of the Taguchi Method and Grey Relational Analysis to Optimize Turning Operations with Multiple Performance Characteristics. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2004, 19, 209–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sivalingam, V.; Sun, J.; Mahalingam, S.K.; Nagarajan, L.; Natarajan, Y.; Salunkhe, S.; Nasr, E.A.; Davim, J.P.; Hussein, H.M.A.M. Optimization of Process Parameters for Turning Hastelloy X under Different Machining Environments Using Evolutionary Algorithms: A Comparative Study. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 9725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pervez, M.N.; Shafiq, F.; Sarwar, Z.; Jilani, M.M.; Cai, Y. Multi-Response Optimization of Resin Finishing by Using a Taguchi-Based Grey Relational Analysis. Materials 2018, 11, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Mufarrih, A.; Istiqlaliyah, H.; Ilha, M.M. Optimization of Roundness, MRR and Surface Roughness on Turning Process using Taguchi-GRA. J. Physics Conf. Ser. 2019, 1179, 012099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, N.; Chen, Y.-J.; Kong, D.-D. Multi-response optimization of Ti-6Al-4V turning operations using Taguchi-based grey relational analysis coupled with kernel principal component analysis. Adv. Manuf. 2019, 7, 142–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Chelladurai, S.J.S.; Suresh Sharma, K.; Kumar, G.; Kumar, M. Application of taguchi method coupled with GRA for optimization of drilling process parameters. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Futuristic Trends in Materials and Manufacturing (ICFTMM 2020), Greater Noida, India, 7–8 April 2021; IOP Publishing Ltd.: Bristol, UK, 2021; Volume 1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kumar, R.S.; Kumar, S.S.; Murugan, K.; Hailegiorgis, S.M. Green Machining Characteristics Study of Al-6063 in CNC Milling Using Taguchi Method and Grey Relational Analysis. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 2021, 4420250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tamizharasan, T.; Senthilkumar, N.; Selvakumar, V.; Dinesh, S. Taguchi’s methodology of optimizing turning parameters over chip thickness ratio in machining P/M AMMC. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Sylajakumari, P.A.; Ramakrishnasamy, R.; Palaniappan, G. Taguchi Grey Relational Analysis for Multi-Response Optimization of Wear in Co-Continuous Composite. Materials 2018, 11, 1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Puh, F.; Jurkovic, Z.; Perinić, M.; Brezocnik, M.; Buljan, S. Optimization of machining parameters for turning operation with multiple quality characteristics using Grey relational analysis. Teh. Vjesn. Tech. Gaz. 2016, 23, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kilickap, E.; Yardimeden, A.; Çelik, Y.H. Mathematical Modelling and Optimization of Cutting Force, Tool Wear and Surface Roughness by Using Artificial Neural Network and Response Surface Methodology in Milling of Ti-6242S. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Filipescu, A.; Ionescu, D.; Filipescu, A.; Mincă, E.; Simion, G. Multifunctional Technology of Flexible Manufacturing on a Mechatronics Line with IRM and CAS, Ready for Industry 4.0. Processes 2021, 9, 864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Židek, K.; Hošovský, A. Wireless Device Based on MEMS Sensors and Bluetooth Low Energy (LE/Smart) Technology for Diagnostics of Mechatronic Systems. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2013, 460, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Židek, K.; Pitel, J. Smart 3D Pointing Device Based on MEMS Sensor and Bluetooth Low Energy. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI), Singapore, 17 October 2013; pp. 165–168. [Google Scholar]
  41. Kuruc, M.; Vopát, T.; Peterka, J.; Necpal, M.; Šimna, V.; Milde, J.; Jurina, F. The Influence of Cutting Parameters on Plastic Deformation and Chip Compression during the Turning of C45 Medium Carbon Steel and 62SiMnCr4 Tool Steel. Materials 2022, 15, 585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Working zone and general view of the Optimum TU 2807 machine; (b) working zone and general view of the Viper VT-28BL-1500s with FANUC Series 21i—TB control system.
Figure 1. (a) Working zone and general view of the Optimum TU 2807 machine; (b) working zone and general view of the Viper VT-28BL-1500s with FANUC Series 21i—TB control system.
Applsci 12 05266 g001
Figure 2. Measuring system LTS (Keyence—IL 100).
Figure 2. Measuring system LTS (Keyence—IL 100).
Applsci 12 05266 g002
Figure 3. Measuring scheme of LTS, containing amplifier IL-1000, profinet module DL-PN1, PLC module Siemens 1511C.
Figure 3. Measuring scheme of LTS, containing amplifier IL-1000, profinet module DL-PN1, PLC module Siemens 1511C.
Applsci 12 05266 g003
Figure 4. TIA portal configuration and graph for experimental setup for stable pulses generation.
Figure 4. TIA portal configuration and graph for experimental setup for stable pulses generation.
Applsci 12 05266 g004
Figure 5. Client communication in PLC system.
Figure 5. Client communication in PLC system.
Applsci 12 05266 g005
Figure 6. Main loop example for data transfer to value in mm.
Figure 6. Main loop example for data transfer to value in mm.
Applsci 12 05266 g006
Figure 7. LTS with 3D-printed sensor holder.
Figure 7. LTS with 3D-printed sensor holder.
Applsci 12 05266 g007
Figure 8. Measurement and analysis of flank wear on the cutting insert by Carl Zeiss Primotech D/A ESD microscope.
Figure 8. Measurement and analysis of flank wear on the cutting insert by Carl Zeiss Primotech D/A ESD microscope.
Applsci 12 05266 g008
Figure 9. (a) Cutting insert wear, VBB—flank wear 163.8 µm; (b) another view from face part of the damage on cutting insert.
Figure 9. (a) Cutting insert wear, VBB—flank wear 163.8 µm; (b) another view from face part of the damage on cutting insert.
Applsci 12 05266 g009
Figure 10. Main effect plot of diameter deviation Δd and flank wear VBB.
Figure 10. Main effect plot of diameter deviation Δd and flank wear VBB.
Applsci 12 05266 g010
Figure 11. Grade relational grades for response parameters of cutting insert flank wear surface and diameter deviation.
Figure 11. Grade relational grades for response parameters of cutting insert flank wear surface and diameter deviation.
Applsci 12 05266 g011
Figure 12. Main effect plot of mean grey relational grade.
Figure 12. Main effect plot of mean grey relational grade.
Applsci 12 05266 g012
Figure 13. Recording of the measurement of the diameter deviation with a laser triangulation sensor.
Figure 13. Recording of the measurement of the diameter deviation with a laser triangulation sensor.
Applsci 12 05266 g013
Figure 14. Examples of negative phenomena on the machined surface after turning steel C45 at a feed of f = 0.1 mm per revolution. a: f = 0.3 mm per revolution (a: spreading of material on the machined surface, b: surface after breakage of the material element, c: crack on the machined surface).
Figure 14. Examples of negative phenomena on the machined surface after turning steel C45 at a feed of f = 0.1 mm per revolution. a: f = 0.3 mm per revolution (a: spreading of material on the machined surface, b: surface after breakage of the material element, c: crack on the machined surface).
Applsci 12 05266 g014
Table 1. Description of technological systems (TS-A-laboratory conditions, TS-B-practical conditions).
Table 1. Description of technological systems (TS-A-laboratory conditions, TS-B-practical conditions).
ComponentsTS—ATS—B
M Optimum TU 2807Viper VT-28BL-1500s
W Steel C45 EN 10083-2-91Steel C45 EN 10083-2-91
CI SCMT09T308 TTR SCMT09T308 TTR
TH SSDCN1212K12 M-ASSDCN1212K12 M-A
FT Tool holderTool holder
FwWorkpiece holder (chuck)Workpiece holder (chuck)
LTSLaser triangulation sensorLaser triangulation sensor
Table 2. Chemical composition of steel C45 [41].
Table 2. Chemical composition of steel C45 [41].
Steel C45%
C0.48
Mn0.70
Si0.20
Crmax 0.25
Nimax 0.30
P0.040
S0.040
Table 3. Cutting process conditions for Taguchi L16 orthogonal array.
Table 3. Cutting process conditions for Taguchi L16 orthogonal array.
Factor Levelap
Depth of Cut
(mm)
f
Feed
(mm per Rev.)
vc
Cutting Speed
(m/min)
1.0.010.170
2.0.050.2120
3.0.10.3170
4.0.50.4220
Table 4. Experimental results for parameters—flank wear (VBB) and diameter deviation (Δd) according to Taguchi L16 orthogonal array.
Table 4. Experimental results for parameters—flank wear (VBB) and diameter deviation (Δd) according to Taguchi L16 orthogonal array.
Number
of Experiment
apfvcVBB
(mm)
Δd
(mm)
10.010.1700.06010.0526
20.010.21200.12540.0020
30.010.31700.05180.1460
40.010.42200.12390.0627
50.050.11200.11410.0589
60.050.2700.02600.0923
70.050.32200.16380.0704
80.050.41700.11810.0614
90.100.11700.18430.0476
100.100.22200.18390.1062
110.100.3700.06980.0344
120.100.41200.11360.0662
130.500.12200.19900.1148
140.500.21700.13010.0792
150.500.31200.10730.0589
160.500.4700.02840.0036
Table 5. Grey relational values.
Table 5. Grey relational values.
Number of ExperimentGrey Relational
Generation
Values
Deviation
Sequence
GRCGRGRank
Ideal
sequence
VBBΔdVBBΔdVBBΔd
1111
1.0.80290.64860.19710.35140.71720.58730.65235
2.0.42541.00000.57460.00000.46531.00000.73272
3.0.85090.00000.14911.00000.77030.33330.55186
4.0.43410.57850.56590.42150.46910.54260.505811
5.0.49080.60490.50920.39510.49540.55860.52708
6.1.00000.37290.00000.62711.00000.44360.72183
7.0.20350.52500.79650.47500.38560.51280.449214
8.0.46760.58750.53240.41250.48430.54790.51619
9.0.08500.68330.91500.31670.35330.61220.482812
10.0.08730.27640.91270.72360.35390.40860.381315
11.0.74680.77500.25320.22500.66390.68970.67684
12.0.49360.55420.50640.44580.49680.52860.512710
13.0.00000.21671.00000.78330.33330.38960.361516
14.0.39830.46390.60170.53610.45380.48260.468213
15.0.53010.60490.46990.39510.51550.55860.53707
16.0.98610.98890.01390.01110.97300.97830.97561
Table 6. Main effect on mean grey relational grade (total mean 0.5677).
Table 6. Main effect on mean grey relational grade (total mean 0.5677).
FactorsMean Grey Relational GradeMax-MinRank
Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4
ap0.61070.55360.48310.63670.12762
f0.50600.57600.55370.62760.12163
vc0.75660.57740.50480.42450.33211
Table 7. Results of ANOVA on grey relational grade.
Table 7. Results of ANOVA on grey relational grade.
SourceDFSeq SSAdj SSAdj MSF-Valuep-ValueRemarks
ap30.02050.02050.00680.6286 0.6231Insignificant
f30.03290.03290.01101.0075 0.4521Insignificant
vc30.24630.24630.08217.5460 0.0181Significant
Error60.06530.06530.0109
Total150.3650
Table 8. Confirmation experiment (improvement in GRG = 0.3858).
Table 8. Confirmation experiment (improvement in GRG = 0.3858).
Initial Factor SettingsOptimal Cutting Factors
PredictionExperiment
Levelap 4-f 1-vc 4ap 4-f 4-vc 1ap 4-f 4-vc 1
VBB0.1990 0.0983
Δd 0.1148 0.0058
GRG0.36150.88550.7473
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jurko, J.; Miškiv-Pavlík, M.; Hladký, V.; Lazorík, P.; Michalík, P.; Petruška, I. Measurement of the Machined Surface Diameter by a Laser Triangulation Sensor and Optimalization of Turning Conditions Based on the Diameter Deviation and Tool Wear by GRA and ANOVA. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 5266. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app12105266

AMA Style

Jurko J, Miškiv-Pavlík M, Hladký V, Lazorík P, Michalík P, Petruška I. Measurement of the Machined Surface Diameter by a Laser Triangulation Sensor and Optimalization of Turning Conditions Based on the Diameter Deviation and Tool Wear by GRA and ANOVA. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(10):5266. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app12105266

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jurko, Jozef, Martin Miškiv-Pavlík, Vratislav Hladký, Peter Lazorík, Peter Michalík, and Igor Petruška. 2022. "Measurement of the Machined Surface Diameter by a Laser Triangulation Sensor and Optimalization of Turning Conditions Based on the Diameter Deviation and Tool Wear by GRA and ANOVA" Applied Sciences 12, no. 10: 5266. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app12105266

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop