Next Article in Journal
Manganese and Graphene Included Titanium Dioxide Composite Nanowires: Fabrication, Characterization and Enhanced Photocatalytic Activities
Next Article in Special Issue
In Vivo Biodistribution of Respirable Solid Lipid Nanoparticles Surface-Decorated with a Mannose-Based Surfactant: A Promising Tool for Pulmonary Tuberculosis Treatment?
Previous Article in Journal
Graphene Oxide Nanofiltration Membranes Containing Silver Nanoparticles: Tuning Separation Efficiency via Nanoparticle Size
Previous Article in Special Issue
Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube-Assisted Antibiotic Delivery and Imaging in S. epidermidis Strains Addressing Antibiotic Resistance
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 10
Issue 3
10.3390/nano10030455
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Nanopharmaceutics: Part II—Production Scales and Clinically Compliant Production Methods

by
Eliana B. Souto
1,2,*,
Gabriela F. Silva
1,
João Dias-Ferreira
1,
Aleksandra Zielinska
1,
Fátima Ventura
3,
Alessandra Durazzo
4,
Massimo Lucarini
4,
Ettore Novellino
5 and
Antonello Santini
5,*
1
Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Pólo das Ciências da Saúde, Azinhaga de Santa Comba, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
2
CEB-Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
3
Department of Biochemistry and Human Biology, Faculty of Pharmacy of University of Lisbon, 1649-003 Lisbon, Portugal
4
CREA-Research Centre for Food and Nutrition, Via Ardeatina 546, 00178 Rome, Italy
5
Department of Pharmacy, University of Napoli Federico II, Via D. Montesano 49, 80131 Napoli, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2020, 10(3), 455; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nano10030455
Submission received: 21 January 2020 / Revised: 22 February 2020 / Accepted: 3 March 2020 / Published: 4 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanopharmaceutics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Due the implementation of nanotechnologies in the pharmaceutical industry over the last few decades, new type of cutting-edge formulations—nanopharmaceutics—have been proposed. These comprise pharmaceutical products at the nanoscale, developed from different types of materials with the purpose to, e.g., overcome solubility problems of poorly water-soluble drugs, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of known drugs but also of new biomolecules, to modify the release profile of loaded compounds, or to decrease the risk of toxicity by providing site-specific delivery reducing the systemic distribution and thus adverse side effects. To succeed with the development of a nanopharmaceutical formulation, it is first necessary to analyze the type of drug which is to be encapsulated, select the type matrix to load it (e.g., polymers, lipids, polysaccharides, proteins, metals), followed by the production procedure. Together these elements have to be compatible with the administration route. To be launched onto the market, the selected production method has to be scaled-up, and quality assurance implemented for the product to reach clinical trials, during which in vivo performance is evaluated. Regulatory issues concerning nanopharmaceutics still require expertise for harmonizing legislation and a clear understanding of clinically compliant production methods. The first part of this study addressing “Nanopharmaceutics: Part I—Clinical trials legislation and Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) of nanotherapeutics in the EU” has been published in Pharmaceutics. This second part complements the study with the discussion about the production scales and clinically compliant production methods of nanopharmaceutics.

1. Introduction

A number of emerging nanotechnologies are being exploited in medicine to improve the therapeutic outcome of several drugs and biomolecules and to address unmet medical needs. European Commission aims to lead innovation towards the development of these nanopharmaceutics by launching several funding opportunities within Member States, Associated Countries and Third Countries. The strategic plan for the next Horizon Europe framework programme has clearly set nanomedicines and advanced therapies as priorities. To succeed, the nanoproduct needs to be manufacturable at large scale and its quality assured in order to reach clinical trials. The topic is indeed of high scientific interest considering the number of scientific papers dealing with clinical trials and nanoparticles over the last twenty years (Figure 1).
The scientific category “Pharmacology Pharmacy” clearly dominates with 31.432% followed by the “Nanoscience Nanotechnology” with 17.925%. Regulating nanopharmaceutics is a challenge since the selection of the regulatory pathway is governed by the classification of the product which is defined by its type of action [1]. If the nanopharmaceutical product is defined as a product for advanced therapy, the procedure of marketing introduction authorization shall be submitted through a centralized procedure [2,3]. This implies harmonization and, thus, confidence in the quality and safety of the products.
To measure the maturity of the development of a product, Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) can be used (Figure 2). This system estimates the stage of technical development based on quality parameters and is ranked in nine levels. TRL1 and TRL2 are related to basic research and to a very low level of experimental work. According to the needs and if studies of analytical and laboratorial nature are employed with a parallel settling of a model of proof-of-concept, the TRL3 is achieved. When the demonstration of efficacy of the process is set in vivo, the process is defined as optimized and achieves TRL4. The next transition occurs after implementation of Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) which is realized by strict and precise tests undergone under a similar-to-reality milieu since there is a high probability of the nanopharmaceutical to get into the clinical trials phase (TRL5). TRL6 comprises the production of a batch according to GMP requirements to be available for Phase 1 of clinical trials [4]. In this case, an evaluation of some parameters as pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics is performed and the nanopharmaceutics are defined as a drug system model, being given the second proof-of-concept. Once entered the clinical trial phase, the model cannot be modified. Regarding TRL7, a scale-up process is needed to be structured according to GMP to be accepted in a Phase 2 of clinical trials related to safety evaluation [5,6]. TRL8 refers to Phase 3 of clinical trials and market introduction authorization, and TRL9 refers to actions after the approval. The product is officially on the market [7,8].

2. Production Scales of Clinically Compliant Nanopharmaceutics

The number of nanopharmaceutics currently on the market is still limited. This is mainly due to difficulties encountered during the processes of scaling-up which reflects on the quantity and even quality of products reaching clinical trials. The transition between the laboratory experimental production to the industry large-scale production is still a challenge in nanopharmaceutics.
The laboratory-scale batches produced at the early stage of the developmental process are of very small size (usually 100–1000-times less than the industrial scale), and commonly result from pre-formulation studies, help to define the qualitative and quantitative formulation, and set the production parameters for medium/large scale. Such small batches supply the pre-clinical and/or clinical studies. The pilot scale batches are larger than the laboratory batches and usually support stability studies, and help to optimize production parameters and appropriate equipment. Pilot batches may also supply clinical trials. Industrial scale batches are those produced over the course of the marketing process. The scale-up of nanopharmaceutics may be a little more tricky as the process may affect the properties of the particles which make them singular in comparison to their bulk counterparts, e.g., colloidal stability, the drug loading, the mean particle size, the morphology, and surface properties [9]. The control of these properties is instrumental to ensure that the industrial batch will have the same physicochemical, pharmacokinetic and biopharmaceutical properties as the laboratory-scale batch. As these properties are strongly dependent on the production process, any deviation is only noted when the volume of batches is amplified. Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) must be ensured over the course of the scaling-up [10] and the production process optimized to limit substantial differences between batches. The selection of the production process is governed by the type of nanomaterial, which is then dependent on the drug to be loaded and on the administration route. Besides, the low toxicological risk of the product must also be ensured before it gets into clinical trials [11].

3. Production Methods of Clinically Compliant Nanopharmaceutics

The production methods of nanopharmaceutics should ensure that the product has at least one dimension in the nanoscale—from 1 nanometer to 100 nanometers—to conform with the definition [9,12]. Regarding the breakthrough that nanomaterials represent to pharmaceutical industry, the investment in novel approaches to develop improved pharmaceuticals is considered of high value. The main types of nanoparticles with potential to reach clinical trials are those composed of polymers, lipids and metals. Figure 3 shows the publication trends on these types of nanoparticles over the last twenty years.
Lipid nanoparticles can be of different types (e.g., liposomes [13,14,15,16], nanoemulsions [14,17,18], solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) [19,20,21,22,23,24]), each produced from very different lipids (e.g., phospholipids, synthetic oils, essential oils from plants, fatty acids, di-, mono-, and triglycerides, cholesterol), commonly resembling those existing in the human body and also in food. Due to their lipid composition, these particles are usually referred to as biocompatible, biodegradable and are generally recognized as safe [25,26,27]. These particles are specifically tailored to load lipophilic drugs [28], but the number of examples of hydrophilic including peptides and proteins [29,30], and amphiphilic compounds loaded in lipid nanoparticles is impressive. SLN and NLC receive special attention as, due to their solid matrix, they usually show modified release profile [31,32,33,34], and can be surface-tailored for site-specific targeted delivery [35,36].
Polymeric nanoparticles can be obtained from natural, semi-synthetic or synthetic polymers (e.g., chitosan [37,38,39], polylactic acid (PLA), poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) [40,41,42,43]), which will then govern the way the drugs are encapsulated inside the matrix (dissolved or dispersed) or attached onto the nanoparticle’ surface (chemically bound or adsorbed), and how the drug is released [44]. Polymeric nanoparticles can be produced with a variety of sizes and shapes, with high drug payload for both hydrophilic and lipophilic molecules, can be surface-modified to increase the plasma half-life (e.g., PEGylation [45,46]) to have site-specific targeted delivery [47], and release the drug in a controlled fashion [48,49,50].
Metal nanoparticles are commonly employed in medical imaging and diagnostics, but also as a theragnostic approach (i.e., combination of therapy and diagnosis). Besides, some metal nanoparticles exhibit antimicrobial activity being commonly applied in coatings for wound treatment [51,52].
This section details the most commonly used methods for the production of each type of nanoparticles illustrated in Figure 4.

3.1. Lipid-Based Nanopharmaceutics

3.1.1. High-Pressure Homogenization

High-pressure homogenization (HPH) is a technique with recognized advantage for large-scale production of lipid nanoparticles. Hot homogenization or cold homogenization can be used [53]. In the hot homogenization process, first the lipid is melted (in which the drug is dissolved or dispersed) and then, under mechanical stirring, is added to an aqueous surfactant solution at identical temperature [54]. The obtained emulsion is poured into the high-pressure homogenizer at a certain pressure (usually 500–600 bar) for some minutes (c. 3–5 min) and homogenized at high temperature (usually 5–10 °C above the melting point of the solid lipid). The resulting oil/water (O/A) nanoemulsion is cooled down to room temperature in order to crystallize the liquid lipid to solid lipid and generate the lipid nanoparticles [55,56,57,58]. For thermo-sensitive or hydrophilic drugs, the cold homogenization process is usually recommended. In this approach, a first step to melt the lipid is also needed in order to disperse the drug followed the fast cooling of the mixture. The obtained solid mixture is then ground in a mortar mill to obtain lipid particles. These are dispersed in an aqueous surfactant solution at room or lower temperature to prepare a suspension, and then processed in the high-pressure homogenization using the same processing conditions as mentioned above but at room temperature. The cold process usually originates lipid nanoparticle dispersions with higher polydispersity than the hot process [33,59].

3.1.2. Membrane Contractor Method

The membrane contractor method also requires a first step of melting of the solid lipid in which the drug is dispersed or dissolved [60]. This organic phase is mixed by mechanical stirring in an aqueous surfactant solution to obtain a hot emulsion which is then pressed against the membrane applying the required pressure so that the inner oily droplets are sized down when crossing the membrane, forming very small droplets which recrystallize when in contact with a cold aqueous phase. This method generates monodispersed nanoparticles and can be scaled-up with some adaptations.

3.1.3. Microemulsion Method

The microemulsion method requires the preparation of a microemulsion by dispersing, under mechanical stirring, the melted lipid containing the drug in an aqueous surfactant solution heated up at the same temperature as the organic phase, followed by the dilution in a large volume of cold water (0–4 °C) under magnetic stirring. Lipid nanoparticles are result from the recrystallization of the lipid phase induced by the thermal shock. Although not particularly suited for large-scale production, the microemulsion method is simple, reproducible and suited for sensitive compounds [61]. To produce a stable microemulsion, a co-surfactant added to the inner lipid phase is usually needed. Some new adaptations, e.g., replacement of first heating step by microwave treatment to disperse the lipid in the aqueous phase, have been proposed [62].

3.1.4. Multiple Emulsion Method

Multiple emulsion or double method has been proposed for the loading of hydrophilic molecules into lipid matrices [63]. It requires the preparation of a water-in-oil (w/o) emulsion by dispersing the aqueous inner phase containing the drug into the organic phase obtained from the dissolution of the solid lipid in a suitable organic solvent, followed by the dispersion of this w/o emulsion into an aqueous surfactant solution to produce a water-in-oil-in-water (w/o/w) emulsion. By evaporation of the organic solvent under gentle mechanical stirring lipid nanoparticles are generated. This method is also not particularly suited for the production of large volumes of particles (with the additional limitation of usage of organic solvents), but it is reproducible and can be an interesting option for the production of small batches to feed pre-clinical and clinical studies.

3.1.5. Solvent Emulsification Diffusion

The solvent emulsification diffusion method has been firstly proposed for the production of polymeric nanoparticles [64], and then adapted to produce lipid nanoparticles. Briefly, it is based on the dispersion of an organic solution of the lipid in a polar protic or aprotic organic solvent (e.g., ethanol, acetone) in an aqueous surfactant solution. The diffusion of the organic solvent from the inner phase in contact with the water phase, under gentle stirring results in the formation of lipid nanoparticles. This approach is limited to small-sized batches, but it has the advantage of not requiring heat, and thus is interesting for sensitive compounds.

3.1.6. Solvent Emulsification Evaporation

This method is a variation of the solvent emulsification diffusion by replacing the polar protic or aprotic organic solvent by non-polar solvent (e.g., chloroform, dichloromethane). It is suited for the loading of lipophilic drugs into the lipid nanoparticles but with higher risk of toxicity due to the type of solvents involved.

3.1.7. Ultrasonication and High-Shear Homogenization

These methods commonly precede the high-pressure homogenization technique as they are used for the production of the pre-emulsion prior to high-pressure homogenization. If used isolated, they usually need extended times for the dispersion of the melted lipid phase into the hot aqueous surfactant solution for the production of the pre-emulsion, which upon cooling down generates lipid nanoparticles with a higher polydispersity, in comparison to the combination of ultrasound/high-shear homogenization with the high-pressure homogenization [65,66,67].

3.2. Polymeric-Based Nanopharmaceutics

3.2.1. Extrusion

The production of polymeric nanoparticles by extrusion method requires the use of polycarbonate membranes and is based on the induced precipitation of drug-loaded nanoparticles at the exit of the nanopores [68]. The method ensures a high reproducibility.

3.2.2. Ionic Gelation

Ionic gelation is commonly used in the production of nanoparticles from ionic polymers (e.g., chitosan and tripolyphosphate, alginate and dextran sulphate). Briefly, the method involves two mixed aqueous phases with a following transition from a liquid to a gel—a consequence of ionic interactions occurring at room temperature [69]. The generated nanoparticles usually have sizes below 500 nm being nevertheless governed by the type of polysaccharides used as particle matrix. This method also ensures high reproducibility.

3.2.3. Nanoprecipitation

The nanoprecipitation technique is a bottom-up method which generates nanoparticles instantaneously using two miscible solvents, one of which does not dissolve the polymer. Firstly, the drug and the polymer are dissolved in one of the solvents (i.e., the one dissolving the polymer). Nanoprecipitation of nanoparticles loaded with drug happen under gentle magnetic stirring by dropwise addition of the solvent in which the polymer is not soluble. This latter solvent is called non-solvent [70].

3.2.4. Salting-Out

The salting-out method is a variation of the nanoprecipitation method by replacing the non-solvent by an agent that induces the precipitation of the polymer entrapping the drug. Briefly, the organic solvent in which the polymer and drug are dissolved (usually acetone or ethanol) is added to an aqueous surfactant solution containing a high concentration of electrolyte as the salting-out agent (usually, magnesium chloride, calcium chloride, magnesium acetate) to produce an aqueous gel forming oil-in-water emulsion under high mechanical stirring [67]. The dilution of this emulsion in a volume of water appropriate for the diffusion of solvent into aqueous phase, decreasing the ionic strength in the electrolyte. The diffusion of the organic solvent induces the hardening (or nanoprecipitation) of the polymer which entraps the drug and generates nanoparticles. The organic solvent can further be removed by reduced pressure. In a nonelectrolyte system, sucrose can be used as salting agent.

3.2.5. Supercritical Fluid

The supercritical fluid method is based on the extraction of the organic solvent from the inner phase of an oil-in-water (o/w) emulsion using the supercritical carbon dioxide (CO2) [71]. This method has been reported to produce monodispersed nanoparticles with less residual organic solvent, and with high drug payload. The final material is reported to be a dried powder that facilitates the production of improved liquid or solid drug formulations, while the technique is described as environmentally friendly and with potential to be scaled-up. This method is also being adapted for the production of lipid nanoparticles [72].

3.3. Metal-Based Nanopharmaceuticals

Metal-based nanoparticles are produced from bottom-up techniques [9,73], either from chemical or from physical methods. In the chemical methods, the reduction of metal complexes in diluted solutions is preferred, whereas in physical methods a vast array of techniques has already been employed, e.g., gamma-ray beam, microwave radiation, laser pulses, supercritical fluids and deposition by chemical vapor [74].

4. Requirements for Clinically Accepted Nanopharmaceutical Batches

The scaling-up of a production process requires an absolute control or each and every technical parameter, in such a fashion that only slight differences can be found between different batches of the same nanoproduct. To assist on the development of clinically accepted nanopharmaceutical batches, the “guideline on the requirements to the chemical and pharmaceutical quality documentation concerning investigational medicinal products in clinical trials”, of the Eudralex, Volume X, is of instrumental value as it displays specifications about the development of IMP (Investigational Medicinal Products) [75]. Examples of currently ongoing or upcoming clinical trials involving the use of nanopharmaceuticals are listed in Table 1.
The nanoproduct to reach clinical trials needs to be carefully identified regarding the Annex 13 of IMP. Besides, the number of individuals enrolled in the clinical trial must be critically defined so that the tested batch size is aligned with the respective phase of the trial. In Phase I of clinical trials, the group size is usually between 10 and 100 [76]. Phases II and III require higher number of subjects to determine the parameters of safety and control of produced batches to prepare the Investigational Medical Product Dossier (IMPD).
Once the clinical trials are finished, the results are included in the IMPD to further submission for marketing introduction authorization [77]. In Europe, the Common Technical Documentation has a comparable format as the IMPD [78,79].

5. From Nanopharmaceutics to Nanonutraceutics: A Bet for the Future

Over the last decades, technological developments gave birth to a new class of products, the so-called nanopharmaceutics. These formulations represent a step forward to innovative personalized medicines with improved outcomes to patients and to public health systems. However, with innovation and modernization, come also other issues related to regulatory affairs requiring new legislation to shape them for human use, which should cover quality, efficacy and safety of the product before it reaches clinical trials. A positive benefit/risk relationship must be ensured.
The internationally available guidelines for clinical trials and the required IMPD are instrumental to ensure that the product submitted to an evaluation for a marketing introduction authorization is reliable. While the production of nanopharmaceutics are strongly tied to GMP, continuous scientific guidance is still required to ensure quality and safety. As the methods for production of nanopharmaceutics differ amongst the advantages and easiness to be scaled-up, the selection should also rely on the safety of the final product. Bioactives from natural sources with nutraceutical value (of vegetal or animal food matrices) are of focused interest and are being proposed as ingredients to be loaded into nanoparticles to obtain a new production—nanonutraceutics. The added value of several nutraceuticals in the prevention, treatment or delay the onset of a disease is very well documented [80,81,82,83,84], although much research is still needed as seen by the number of publications indexed in the Web of Knowledge dealing with nanonutraceutics and clinical trials (Figure 5).
Nutraceutics, which derive from food matrices of vegetal or animal matrices, are a novel toolbox not yet completely explored for its full potential in medicine. Current research is looking towards several nanotechnological approaches to be exploited for the formulation of nutraceuticals [84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93], and to build up the emerging area of the nanonutraceutics [9,94,95,96]. Nutraceutics, a portmanteau of the words ‘nutrition’ and ‘pharmaceutical’, have been recently defined as “the phytocomplex if they derive from a food of vegetal origin, and as the pool of the secondary metabolites if they derive from a food of animal origin, concentrated and administered in the more suitable pharmaceutical form” [84,97]. Nanonutraceutics could be an important tool useful among the strategies adopted in managing health conditions, particularly tailored to patients who are not eligible for a conventional pharmacological therapy. Studies on follow up, use, and compliance of pharmaceuticals reported in the area [98,99,100,101], as well as communication strategies and assessment [102], should be extended also to nutraceuticals and carried out in view of exploiting the field to different health conditions, e.g., the ones clustered in the so-called “metabolic syndrome”, which includes conditions ranging from obesity to dysmetabolism [103,104,105]. These latter are often related to the food intake/dietary habits of each person. The efficient encapsulation of nutraceuticals, their smart delivery and release from a nanoformulation are the emerging challenge of nanotechnology applied to food derived products. To address this issue, the principles of nanotechnology should be used for the proficient delivery of nutraceuticals with the objective to improve their bioavailability thereby increasing health benefits. To reach this end point, extensive research on encapsulation of nutraceuticals into biodegradable, environment friendly nanocarriers, is ongoing to increase their absorption and the therapeutic potential. This aspect is challenging and attracting growing interest for its perspective potential, even if further studies are needed to assess whether to a nano-level changes in physical and biochemical properties may occur. Nanonutraceutic products are a bet for the future. They should be assessed completely for retaining their nutraceutical properties at a nano level, guarantee safety and the maintenance of the GMP in the production processes, substantiating with scientific data their quality and stability, guarantee their safety and efficacy. Follow-up studies to evaluate possible unwanted effect, as it is needed also for both the nanopharmaceutics and nanonutraceutics [9,106,107,108].

6. Conclusions

Nanopharmaceutics emerged as a promising technology in pharmaceutical industry due to their unique properties resulting from the size, shape, morphology and surface properties, which are effective only if essential parameters such as quality, safety and efficacy are ensured over the course of the scale-up process. However, no standard methodology is available to control the quality of these nanoproducts in a scale-up process. Nanopharmaceutics triggered an entire revolution in pharmaceutical industry with significant impact also on nutraceutics, which are attracting growing interest for their beneficial health effects, resulting from improved delivery, enhanced bioavailability and biological effect. Although several tremendous investments from industrial stakeholders have already been made, future outcomes will positively accompany the modifications in the way these products are controlled, produced, and launched on the market, through safe and effective filtering out of the non-compliant products and preventing them going to the market, and facilitating the good products being made available to the public, as well as stimulating the developments of even newer, and improved products.

Author Contributions

E.B.S., G.F.S. and J.D.-F. have written, formatted, reviewed and edited the manuscript. E.B.S., A.Z., F.V., A.D., M.L., E.N. and A.S. have revised and structured the literature research. E.B.S., A.D. and A.S. have supervised the scientific research. All authors have made a substantial contribution to the work and approved it for publication. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The financial support was received from Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (FCT/MCT) and from European Funds (PRODER/COMPETE) for the projects M-ERA-NET-0004/2015-PAIRED and UIDB/04469/2020 (strategic fund), co-financed by FEDER, under the Partnership Agreement PT2020. Authors thank the support of the project: Nutraceutica come supporto nutrizionale nel paziente oncologico; CUP: B83D18000140007.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bremer-Hoffmann, S.; Amenta, V.; Rossi, F. Nanomedicines in the European translational process. Eur. J. Nanomed. 2015, 7, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kohler, M. Regulatory pathways in the European Union. mAbs 2011, 3, 241–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Ebbers, H.C.; Langedijk, J.; Bouvy, J.C.; Hoekman, J.; Boon, W.P.C.; de Jong, J.P.; De Bruin, M.L. An analysis of marketing authorisation applications via the mutual recognition and decentralised procedures in Europe. Eur. J. Clin. Pharm. 2015, 71, 1237–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Paller, C.J.; Bradbury, P.A.; Ivy, S.P.; Seymour, L.; LoRusso, P.M.; Baker, L.; Rubinstein, L.; Huang, E.; Collyar, D.; Groshen, S.; et al. Design of Phase I Combination Trials: Recommendations of the Clinical Trial Design Task Force of the NCI Investigational Drug Steering Committee. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 20, 4210–4217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Sharma, M.R.; Stadler, W.M.; Ratain, M.J. Randomized Phase II Trials: A Long-term Investment with Promising Returns. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2011, 103, 1093–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Thall, P.F. A review of phase 2–3 clinical trial designs. Lifetime Data Anal. 2008, 14, 37–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tierney, R.; Hermina, W.; Walsh, S. The pharmaceutical technology landscape: A new form of technology roadmapping. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80, 194–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Umscheid, C.A.; Margolis, D.J.; Grossman, C.E. Key Concepts of Clinical Trials: A Narrative Review. Postgrad. Med. 2011, 123, 194–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Souto, E.B.; Freitas, G.; Dias-Ferreira, J.; Zielinska, A.; Ventura, F.; Lucarini, M.; Novellino, E.; Santini, A. Nanopharmaceutics: Part I—Clinical trials legislation and good manufacturing practices (GMP) of nanotherapeutics in the EU. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Galindo-Rodriguez, S.A.; Puel, F.; Briancon, S.; Allemann, E.; Doelker, E.; Fessi, H. Comparative scale-up of three methods for producing ibuprofen-loaded nanoparticles. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2005, 25, 357–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Landesman-Milo, D.; Peer, D. Transforming Nanomedicines From Lab Scale Production to Novel Clinical Modality. Bioconjug. Chem. 2016, 27, 855–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Auffan, M.; Rose, J.; Bottero, J.-Y.; Lowry, G.V.; Jolivet, J.-P.; Wiesner, M.R. Towards a definition of inorganic nanoparticles from an environmental, health and safety perspective. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4, 634–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Teixeira, M.C.; Carbone, C.; Souto, E.B. Beyond liposomes: Recent advances on lipid based nanostructures for poorly soluble/poorly permeable drug delivery. Prog. Lipid Res. 2017, 68, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Clares, B.; Calpena, A.C.; Parra, A.; Abrego, G.; Alvarado, H.; Fangueiro, J.F.; Souto, E.B. Nanoemulsions (NEs), liposomes (LPs) and solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) for retinyl palmitate: Effect on skin permeation. Int. J. Pharm. 2014, 473, 591–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pashirova, T.N.; Zueva, I.V.; Petrov, K.A.; Lukashenko, S.S.; Nizameev, I.R.; Kulik, N.V.; Voloshina, A.D.; Almasy, L.; Kadirov, M.K.; Masson, P.; et al. Mixed cationic liposomes for brain delivery of drugs by the intranasal route: The acetylcholinesterase reactivator 2-PAM as encapsulated drug model. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2018, 171, 358–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Pashirova, T.N.; Sapunova, A.S.; Lukashenko, S.S.; Burilova, E.A.; Lubina, A.P.; Shaihutdinova, Z.M.; Gerasimova, T.P.; Kovalenko, V.I.; Voloshina, A.D.; Souto, E.B.; et al. Synthesis, structure-activity relationship and biological evaluation of tetracationic gemini Dabco-surfactants for transdermal liposomal formulations. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 575, 118953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alvarado, H.L.; Abrego, G.; Souto, E.B.; Garduno-Ramirez, M.L.; Clares, B.; Garcia, M.L.; Calpena, A.C. Nanoemulsions for dermal controlled release of oleanolic and ursolic acids: In vitro, ex vivo and in vivo characterization. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2015, 130, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Macedo, A.S.; Quelhas, S.; Silva, A.M.; Souto, E.B. Nanoemulsions for delivery of flavonoids: Formulation and in vitro release of rutin as model drug. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2014, 19, 677–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zielinska, A.; Ferreira, N.R.; Durazzo, A.; Lucarini, M.; Cicero, N.; Mamouni, S.E.; Silva, A.M.; Nowak, I.; Santini, A.; Souto, E.B. Development and Optimization of Alpha-Pinene-Loaded Solid Lipid Nanoparticles (SLN) Using Experimental Factorial Design and Dispersion Analysis. Molecules 2019, 24, 2683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Carbone, C.; Fuochi, V.; Zielinska, A.; Musumeci, T.; Souto, E.B.; Bonaccorso, A.; Puglia, C.; Petronio Petronio, G.; Furneri, P.M. Dual-drugs delivery in solid lipid nanoparticles for the treatment of Candida albicans mycosis. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2019, 186, 110705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zielinska, A.; Martins-Gomes, C.; Ferreira, N.R.; Silva, A.M.; Nowak, I.; Souto, E.B. Anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer activity of citral: Optimization of citral-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) using experimental factorial design and LUMiSizer(R). Int. J. Pharm. 2018, 553, 428–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sanchez-Lopez, E.; Espina, M.; Doktorovova, S.; Souto, E.B.; Garcia, M.L. Lipid nanoparticles (SLN, NLC): Overcoming the anatomical and physiological barriers of the eye—Part I—Barriers and determining factors in ocular delivery. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2017, 110, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sanchez-Lopez, E.; Espina, M.; Doktorovova, S.; Souto, E.B.; Garcia, M.L. Lipid nanoparticles (SLN, NLC): Overcoming the anatomical and physiological barriers of the eye—Part II—Ocular drug-loaded lipid nanoparticles. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2017, 110, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Vieira, R.; Severino, P.; Nalone, L.A.; Souto, S.B.; Silva, A.M.; Lucarini, M.; Durazzo, A.; Santini, A.; Souto, E.B. Sucupira Oil-Loaded Nanostructured Lipid Carriers (NLC): Lipid Screening, Factorial Design, Release Profile, and Cytotoxicity. Molecules 2020, 25, 685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Doktorovova, S.; Kovacevic, A.B.; Garcia, M.L.; Souto, E.B. Preclinical safety of solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers: Current evidence from in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2016, 108, 235–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Doktorovova, S.; Souto, E.B.; Silva, A.M. Nanotoxicology applied to solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers—A systematic review of in vitro data. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2014, 87, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Doktorovova, S.; Silva, A.M.; Gaivao, I.; Souto, E.B.; Teixeira, J.P.; Martins-Lopes, P. Comet assay reveals no genotoxicity risk of cationic solid lipid nanoparticles. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2014, 34, 395–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Doktorovova, S.; Souto, E.B.; Silva, A.M. Hansen solubility parameters (HSP) for prescreening formulation of solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN): In vitro testing of curcumin-loaded SLN in MCF-7 and BT-474 cell lines. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2018, 23, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Martins, S.; Silva, A.C.; Ferreira, D.C.; Souto, E.B. Improving oral absorption of Salmon calcitonin by trimyristin lipid nanoparticles. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2009, 5, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Almeida, A.J.; Souto, E. Solid lipid nanoparticles as a drug delivery system for peptides and proteins. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2007, 59, 478–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Campos, J.R.; Fernandes, A.R.; Sousa, R.; Fangueiro, J.F.; Boonme, P.; Garcia, M.L.; Silva, A.M.; Naveros, B.C.; Souto, E.B. Optimization of nimesulide-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) by factorial design, release profile and cytotoxicity in human Colon adenocarcinoma cell line. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2019, 24, 616–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Araujo, J.; Garcia, M.L.; Mallandrich, M.; Souto, E.B.; Calpena, A.C. Release profile and transscleral permeation of triamcinolone acetonide loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (TA-NLC): In vitro and ex vivo studies. Nanomedicine 2012, 8, 1034–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Souto, E.B.; Muller, R.H. Lipid nanoparticles: Effect on bioavailability and pharmacokinetic changes. Handb. Exp. Pharm. 2010, 197, 115–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Souto, E.B.; Wissing, S.A.; Barbosa, C.M.; Muller, R.H. Development of a controlled release formulation based on SLN and NLC for topical clotrimazole delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 2004, 278, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Souto, E.B.; Doktorovova, S.; Campos, J.R.; Martins-Lopes, P.; Silva, A.M. Surface-tailored anti-HER2/neu-solid lipid nanoparticles for site-specific targeting MCF-7 and BT-474 breast cancer cells. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 128, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Souto, E.B.; Souto, S.B.; Zielinska, A.; Durazzo, A.; Lucarini, M.; Santini, A.; Horbańczuk, O.K.; Atanasov, A.G.; Marques, C.; Andrade, L.N.; et al. Perillaldehyde 1,2-epoxide loaded SLN-tailored mAb: Production, physicochemical characterization and in vitro cytotoxicity profile in MCF-7 cell lines. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ataide, J.A.; Gerios, E.F.; Cefali, L.C.; Fernandes, A.R.; Teixeira, M.D.C.; Ferreira, N.R.; Tambourgi, E.B.; Jozala, A.F.; Chaud, M.V.; Oliveira-Nascimento, L.; et al. Effect of Polysaccharide Sources on the Physicochemical Properties of Bromelain-Chitosan Nanoparticles. Polymers 2019, 11, 1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Jose, S.; Fangueiro, J.F.; Smitha, J.; Cinu, T.A.; Chacko, A.J.; Premaletha, K.; Souto, E.B. Cross-linked chitosan microspheres for oral delivery of insulin: Taguchi design and in vivo testing. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2012, 92, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jose, S.; Prema, M.T.; Chacko, A.J.; Thomas, A.C.; Souto, E.B. Colon specific chitosan microspheres for chronotherapy of chronic stable angina. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2011, 83, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sanchez-Lopez, E.; Egea, M.A.; Davis, B.M.; Guo, L.; Espina, M.; Silva, A.M.; Calpena, A.C.; Souto, E.M.B.; Ravindran, N.; Ettcheto, M.; et al. Memantine-Loaded PEGylated Biodegradable Nanoparticles for the Treatment of Glaucoma. Small 2018, 14, 1701808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Canadas, C.; Alvarado, H.; Calpena, A.C.; Silva, A.M.; Souto, E.B.; Garcia, M.L.; Abrego, G. In vitro, ex vivo and in vivo characterization of PLGA nanoparticles loading pranoprofen for ocular administration. Int. J. Pharm. 2016, 511, 719–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Abrego, G.; Alvarado, H.; Souto, E.B.; Guevara, B.; Bellowa, L.H.; Parra, A.; Calpena, A.; Garcia, M.L. Biopharmaceutical profile of pranoprofen-loaded PLGA nanoparticles containing hydrogels for ocular administration. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2015, 95, 261–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Jose, S.; Sowmya, S.; Cinu, T.A.; Aleykutty, N.A.; Thomas, S.; Souto, E.B. Surface modified PLGA nanoparticles for brain targeting of Bacoside-A. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 63, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Andreani, T.; Fangueiro, J.F.; Jose, S.; Santini, A.; Silva, A.M.; Souto, E.B. Hydrophilic Polymers for Modified-Release Nanoparticles: A Review of Mathematical Modelling for Pharmacokinetic Analysis. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2015, 21, 3090–3096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sanchez-Lopez, E.; Ettcheto, M.; Egea, M.A.; Espina, M.; Cano, A.; Calpena, A.C.; Camins, A.; Carmona, N.; Silva, A.M.; Souto, E.B.; et al. Memantine loaded PLGA PEGylated nanoparticles for Alzheimer’s disease: In vitro and in vivo characterization. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2018, 16, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sanchez-Lopez, E.; Egea, M.A.; Cano, A.; Espina, M.; Calpena, A.C.; Ettcheto, M.; Camins, A.; Souto, E.B.; Silva, A.M.; Garcia, M.L. PEGylated PLGA nanospheres optimized by design of experiments for ocular administration of dexibuprofen-in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo characterization. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2016, 145, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Jose, S.; Cinu, T.A.; Sebastian, R.; Shoja, M.H.; Aleykutty, N.A.; Durazzo, A.; Lucarini, M.; Santini, A.; Souto, E.B. Transferrin-Conjugated Docetaxel-PLGA Nanoparticles for Tumor Targeting: Influence on MCF-7 Cell Cycle. Polymers 2019, 11, 1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Silva, A.M.; Alvarado, H.L.; Abrego, G.; Martins-Gomes, C.; Garduno-Ramirez, M.L.; Garcia, M.L.; Calpena, A.C.; Souto, E.B. In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Oleanolic/Ursolic Acids-Loaded in PLGA Nanoparticles in Different Cell Lines. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Severino, P.; da Silva, C.F.; Andrade, L.N.; de Lima Oliveira, D.; Campos, J.; Souto, E.B. Alginate Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery and Targeting. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2019, 25, 1312–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cano, A.; Ettcheto, M.; Chang, J.H.; Barroso, E.; Espina, M.; Kuhne, B.A.; Barenys, M.; Auladell, C.; Folch, J.; Souto, E.B.; et al. Dual-drug loaded nanoparticles of Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG)/Ascorbic acid enhance therapeutic efficacy of EGCG in a APPswe/PS1dE9 Alzheimer’s disease mice model. J. Control. Release 2019, 301, 62–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Souto, E.B.; Ribeiro, A.F.; Ferreira, M.I.; Teixeira, M.C.; Shimojo, A.A.M.; Soriano, J.L.; Naveros, B.C.; Durazzo, A.; Lucarini, M.; Souto, S.B.; et al. New Nanotechnologies for the Treatment and Repair of Skin Burns Infections. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Barbosa, G.P.; Debone, H.S.; Severino, P.; Souto, E.B.; da Silva, C.F. Design and characterization of chitosan/zeolite composite films—Effect of zeolite type and zeolite dose on the film properties. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 60, 246–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Müller, R.H.; Mäder, K.; Gohla, S. Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) for controlled drug delivery—A review of the state of the art. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2000, 50, 161–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Martins, S.; Tho, I.; Ferreira, D.C.; Souto, E.B.; Brandl, M. Physicochemical properties of lipid nanoparticles: Effect of lipid and surfactant composition. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2011, 37, 815–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Souto, E.B.; Doktorovova, S.; Zielinska, A.; Silva, A.M. Key production parameters for the development of solid lipid nanoparticles by high shear homogenization. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2019, 24, 1181–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Severino, P.; Santana, M.H.; Souto, E.B. Optimizing SLN and NLC by 2(2) full factorial design: Effect of homogenization technique. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2012, 32, 1375–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Souto, E.B.; Muller, R.H. Investigation of the factors influencing the incorporation of clotrimazole in SLN and NLC prepared by hot high-pressure homogenization. J. Microencapsul. 2006, 23, 377–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Souto, E.B.; Baldim, I.; Oliveira, W.P.; Rao, R.; Yadav, N.; Gama, F.M.; Mahant, S. SLN and NLC for topical, dermal and transdermal drug delivery. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2020, 17, 357–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Souto, E.B.; Almeida, A.J.; Müller, R.H. Lipid Nanoparticles (SLN®, NLC®) for Cutaneous Drug Delivery:Structure, Protection and Skin Effects. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2007, 3, 317–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Charcosset, C.; El-Harati, A.; Fessi, H. Preparation of solid lipid nanoparticles using a membrane contactor. J. Control. Release 2005, 108, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chirio, D.; Peira, E.; Dianzani, C.; Muntoni, E.; Gigliotti, C.L.; Ferrara, B.; Sapino, S.; Chindamo, G.; Gallarate, M. Development of Solid Lipid Nanoparticles by Cold Dilution of Microemulsions: Curcumin Loading, Preliminary In Vitro Studies, and Biodistribution. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Shah, R.M.; Malherbe, F.; Eldridge, D.; Palombo, E.A.; Harding, I.H. Physicochemical characterization of solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) prepared by a novel microemulsion technique. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 428, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Fangueiro, J.F.; Gonzalez-Mira, E.; Martins-Lopes, P.; Egea, M.A.; Garcia, M.L.; Souto, S.B.; Souto, E.B. A novel lipid nanocarrier for insulin delivery: Production, characterization and toxicity testing. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2013, 18, 545–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Barbosa, T.C.; Nascimento, L.E.D.; Bani, C.; Almeida, T.; Nery, M.; Santos, R.S.; Menezes, L.R.O.; Zielinska, A.; Fernandes, A.R.; Cardoso, J.C.; et al. Development, Cytotoxicity and Eye Irritation Profile of a New Sunscreen Formulation Based on Benzophenone-3-poly(epsilon-caprolactone) Nanocapsules. Toxics 2019, 7, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Silva, A.C.; Gonzalez-Mira, E.; Garcia, M.L.; Egea, M.A.; Fonseca, J.; Silva, R.; Santos, D.; Souto, E.B.; Ferreira, D. Preparation, characterization and biocompatibility studies on risperidone-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN): High pressure homogenization versus ultrasound. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2011, 86, 158–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Gonzalez-Mira, E.; Egea, M.A.; Garcia, M.L.; Souto, E.B. Design and ocular tolerance of flurbiprofen loaded ultrasound-engineered NLC. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2010, 81, 412–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lim, K.; Hamid, Z.A.A. 10—Polymer nanoparticle carriers in drug delivery systems: Research trend. In Applications of Nanocomposite Materials in Drug Delivery; Asiri, A.M., Mohammad, A., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2018; pp. 217–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Guo, P.; Hsu, T.M.; Zhao, Y.; Martin, C.R.; Zare, R.N. Preparing amorphous hydrophobic drug nanoparticles by nanoporous membrane extrusion. Nanomedicine 2013, 8, 333–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Cefali, L.C.; Ataide, J.A.; Eberlin, S.; da Silva Goncalves, F.C.; Fernandes, A.R.; Marto, J.; Ribeiro, H.M.; Foglio, M.A.; Mazzola, P.G.; Souto, E.B. In vitro SPF and Photostability Assays of Emulsion Containing Nanoparticles with Vegetable Extracts Rich in Flavonoids. Aaps Pharmscitech 2018, 20, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. de Waard, H.; Frijlink, H.W.; Hinrichs, W.L. Bottom-up preparation techniques for nanocrystals of lipophilic drugs. Pharm. Res. 2011, 28, 1220–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Cardea, S.; De Marco, I. Cellulose Acetate and Supercritical Carbon Dioxide: Membranes, Nanoparticles, Microparticles and Nanostructured Filaments. Polymers 2020, 12, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Andrade, L.N.; Oliveira, D.M.L.; Chaud, M.V.; Alves, T.F.R.; Nery, M.; da Silva, C.F.; Gonsalves, J.K.C.; Nunes, R.S.; Correa, C.B.; Amaral, R.G.; et al. Praziquantel-Solid Lipid Nanoparticles Produced by Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extraction: Physicochemical Characterization, Release Profile, and Cytotoxicity. Molecules 2019, 24, 3881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Diniz, F.R.; Maia, R.C.A.P.; Rannier, L.; Andrade, L.N.; Chaud, M.V.; da Silva, C.F.; Corrêa, C.B.; de Albuquerque Junior, R.L.C.; da Costa, L.P.; Souto, E.B.; et al. Silver nanoparticles-composing alginate/gelatin hydrogel improves wound healing in vivo. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Charitidis, C.A.; Georgiou, P.; Koklioti, M.A.; Trompeta, A.-F.; Markakis, V. Manufacturing nanomaterials: From research to industry. Manuf. Rev. 2014, 1, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Nassiri Koopaei, N.; Abdollahi, M. Opportunities and obstacles to the development of nanopharmaceuticals for human use. Daru J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 24, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Weissig, V.; Guzman-Villanueva, D. Nanopharmaceuticals (part 2): Products in the pipeline. Int. J. Nanomed. 2015, 10, 1245–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Berkner, S.; Schwirn, K.; Voelker, D. Nanopharmaceuticals: Tiny challenges for the environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2016, 35, 780–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Weissig, V.; Pettinger, T.K.; Murdock, N. Nanopharmaceuticals (part 1): Products on the market. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014, 9, 4357–4373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Wang, R.; Billone, P.S.; Mullett, W.M. Nanomedicine in Action: An Overview of Cancer Nanomedicine on the Market and in Clinical Trials. J. Nanomater. 2013, 2013, 629681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Abenavoli, L.; Izzo, A.A.; Milic, N.; Cicala, C.; Santini, A.; Capasso, R. Milk thistle (Silybum marianum): A concise overview on its chemistry, pharmacological, and nutraceutical uses in liver diseases. Phytother. Res. 2018, 32, 2202–2213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Santini, A.; Novellino, E. Nutraceuticals: Beyond the diet before the drugs. Curr. Bioact. Compd. 2014, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Santini, A.; Novellino, E. To Nutraceuticals and Back: Rethinking a Concept. Foods 2017, 6, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Santini, A.; Novellino, E. Nutraceuticals in hypercholesterolaemia: An overview. Br. J. Pharm. 2017, 174, 1450–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Santini, A.; Tenore, G.C.; Novellino, E. Nutraceuticals: A paradigm of proactive medicine. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 96, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Santini, A.; Novellino, E. Nutraceuticals-shedding light on the grey area between pharmaceuticals and food. Expert Rev. Clin. Pharm. 2018, 11, 545–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Daliu, P.; Santini, A.; Novellino, E. A decade of nutraceutical patents: Where are we now in 2018? Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2018, 28, 875–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Durazzo, A. Extractable and Non-extractable polyphenols: An overview. In Non-Extractable Polyphenols and Carotenoids: Importance in Human Nutrition and Health; Saura-Calixto, F., Pérez-Jiménez, J., Eds.; Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2018; pp. 1–37. [Google Scholar]
  88. Durazzo, A.; D’Addezio, L.; Camilli, E.; Piccinelli, R.; Turrini, A.; Marletta, L.; Marconi, S.; Lucarini, M.; Lisciani, S.; Gabrielli, P.; et al. From Plant Compounds to Botanicals and Back: A Current Snapshot. Molecules 2018, 23, 1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Daliu, P.; Santini, A.; Novellino, E. From pharmaceuticals to nutraceuticals: Bridging disease prevention and management. Expert Rev. Clin. Pharm. 2019, 12, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Durazzo, A.; Lucarini, M. Extractable and Non-Extractable Antioxidants. Molecules 2019, 24, 1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Durazzo, A.; Lucarini, M.; Souto, E.B.; Cicala, C.; Caiazzo, E.; Izzo, A.A.; Novellino, E.; Santini, A. Polyphenols: A concise overview on the chemistry, occurrence, and human health. Phytother. Res. 2019, 33, 2221–2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Durazzo, A.; Lucarini, M. A current shot and re-thinking of antioxidant research strategy. Braz. J. Anal. Chem. 2018, 5, 9–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Santini, A.; Cammarata, S.M.; Capone, G.; Ianaro, A.; Tenore, G.C.; Pani, L.; Novellino, E. Nutraceuticals: Opening the debate for a regulatory framework. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2018, 84, 659–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Watkins, R.; Wu, L.; Zhang, C.; Davis, R.M.; Xu, B. Natural product-based nanomedicine: Recent advances and issues. Int. J. Nanomed. 2015, 10, 6055–6074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Pimentel-Moral, S.; Teixeira, M.C.; Fernandes, A.R.; Arráez-Román, D.; Martínez-Férez, A.; Segura-Carretero, A.; Souto, E.B. Lipid nanocarriers for the loading of polyphenols—A comprehensive review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 260, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Singh, B. Nanonutraceuticals, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018; 326p. [Google Scholar]
  97. Fangueiro, J.F.; Souto, E.B.; Silva, A.M. Encapsulation of nutraceuticals in novel drug delivery systems. In Nutraceuticals; Grumezescu, A.M., Ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2016; Volume 4, pp. 305–358. [Google Scholar]
  98. Iolascon, G.; Gimigliano, F.; Moretti, A.; Riccio, I.; Di Gennaro, M.; Illario, M.; Monetti, V.M.; Orlando, V.; Menditto, E. Rates and reasons for lack of persistence with anti-osteoporotic drugs: Analysis of the Campania region database. Clin. Cases Miner. Bone Metab. 2016, 13, 127–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Menditto, E.; Cahir, C.; Aza-Pascual-Salcedo, M.; Bruzzese, D.; Poblador-Plou, B.; Malo, S.; Costa, E.; González-Rubio, F.; Gimeno-Miguel, A.; Orlando, V.; et al. Adherence to chronic medication in older populations: Application of a common protocol among three European cohorts. Patient Prefer. Adherence 2018, 12, 1975–1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Menditto, E.; Guerriero, F.; Orlando, V.; Crola, C.; Di Somma, C.; Illario, M.; Morisky, D.E.; Colao, A. Self-Assessment of Adherence to Medication: A Case Study in Campania Region Community-Dwelling Population. J. Aging Res. 2015, 2015, 682503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Putignano, D.; Bruzzese, D.; Orlando, V.; Fiorentino, D.; Tettamanti, A.; Menditto, E. Differences in drug use between men and women: An Italian cross sectional study. BMC Women’s Health 2017, 17, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Scala, D.; Menditto, E.; Armellino, M.F.; Manguso, F.; Monetti, V.M.; Orlando, V.; Antonino, A.; Makoul, G.; De Palma, M. Italian translation and cultural adaptation of the communication assessment tool in an outpatient surgical clinic. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2016, 16, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Souto, E.B.; Souto, S.B.; Campos, J.R.; Severino, P.; Pashirova, T.N.; Zakharova, L.Y.; Silva, A.M.; Durazzo, A.; Lucarini, M.; Izzo, A.A.; et al. Nanoparticle Delivery Systems in the Treatment of Diabetes Complications. Molecules 2019, 24, 4209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Vieira, R.; Souto, S.B.; Sanchez-Lopez, E.; Machado, A.L.; Severino, P.; Jose, S.; Santini, A.; Fortuna, A.; Garcia, M.L.; Silva, A.M.; et al. Sugar-Lowering Drugs for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Syndrome-Review of Classical and New Compounds: Part-I. Pharmaceuticals 2019, 12, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Vieira, R.; Souto, S.B.; Sánchez-López, E.; Machado, A.L.; Severino, P.; Jose, S.; Santini, A.; Silva, A.M.; Fortuna, A.; García, M.L.; et al. Sugar-Lowering Drugs for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Syndrome-Strategies for In Vivo Administration: Part-II. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Wiwanitkit, V. Delivery of nutraceuticals using nanotechnology. Int. J. Pharm. Investig. 2012, 2, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Lopes, C.M.; Martins-Lopes, P.; Souto, E.B. Nanoparticulate carriers for oral pharmaceutics and nutraceutics. Pharmazie. 2010, 65, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  108. Campos, J.R.; Severino, P.; Ferreira, C.S.; Zielinska, A.; Santini, A.; Souto, S.B.; Souto, E.B. Linseed Essential Oil–Source of Lipids as Active Ingredients for Pharmaceuticals and Nutraceuticals. Curr. Med. Chem. 2019, 26, 4537–4558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nanomaterials 10 00455 g001 550
Figure 1. Distribution per scientific category of 2332 scientific works published between 2000 and 2020 using “clinical trials” and “nanoparticles” as keywords. 1274 research articles, 1001 reviews, 88 book chapters, 53 proceedings, 22 early accesses, 20 editorials, 11 meeting abstracts, 1 corrigendum. A total of 2341 publications are indexed in the Web of Knowledge (search on the 20 January 2020).
Figure 1. Distribution per scientific category of 2332 scientific works published between 2000 and 2020 using “clinical trials” and “nanoparticles” as keywords. 1274 research articles, 1001 reviews, 88 book chapters, 53 proceedings, 22 early accesses, 20 editorials, 11 meeting abstracts, 1 corrigendum. A total of 2341 publications are indexed in the Web of Knowledge (search on the 20 January 2020).
Nanomaterials 10 00455 g001
Nanomaterials 10 00455 g002 550
Figure 2. Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) and steps of research and development of a pharmaceutical product.
Figure 2. Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) and steps of research and development of a pharmaceutical product.
Nanomaterials 10 00455 g002
Nanomaterials 10 00455 g003 550
Figure 3. Publication trends on the types of nanoparticles being developed for clinical trials from 2000 to 2020. Source: Web of Knowledge, keywords: “lipid nanoparticles” or “polymeric nanoparticles” or “metal nanoparticles” and “clinical trials” (search on 20 January 2020).
Figure 3. Publication trends on the types of nanoparticles being developed for clinical trials from 2000 to 2020. Source: Web of Knowledge, keywords: “lipid nanoparticles” or “polymeric nanoparticles” or “metal nanoparticles” and “clinical trials” (search on 20 January 2020).
Nanomaterials 10 00455 g003
Nanomaterials 10 00455 g004 550
Figure 4. Most commonly used methods for the production lipid-, polymeric-, and metal-based nanopharmaceutics, and the critical factors determining their choice.
Figure 4. Most commonly used methods for the production lipid-, polymeric-, and metal-based nanopharmaceutics, and the critical factors determining their choice.
Nanomaterials 10 00455 g004
Nanomaterials 10 00455 g005 550
Figure 5. Number of papers indexed in the Web of Knowledge dealing with nanopharmaceuticals, nanonutraceuticals and clinical trials. Source: Web of Knowledge, keywords: “nanopharmaceuticals or nanopharmaceutics” and “nanonutraceuticals or nanonutraceutics” and “clinical trials” (search on 20 January 2020).
Figure 5. Number of papers indexed in the Web of Knowledge dealing with nanopharmaceuticals, nanonutraceuticals and clinical trials. Source: Web of Knowledge, keywords: “nanopharmaceuticals or nanopharmaceutics” and “nanonutraceuticals or nanonutraceutics” and “clinical trials” (search on 20 January 2020).
Nanomaterials 10 00455 g005
Table
Table 1. Examples of currently ongoing or upcoming clinical trials of treatments containing nanopharmaceuticals (source: https://clinicaltrials.gov/).
Table 1. Examples of currently ongoing or upcoming clinical trials of treatments containing nanopharmaceuticals (source: https://clinicaltrials.gov/).
IdentifierTitleNanopharmaceuticsPurpose
NCT03752424Topical Silver Nanoparticles for Microbial ActivitySilver nanoparticles
Topical approved anti-microbial gel		Foot Infection Fungal
Infection, Bacterial
NCT04000386A Study of Efficacy of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Coated Socks in Prevention of Unpleasant Foot OdorZinc oxide nanoparticles coated socks
Placebo socks		Zinc Oxide
Foot Dermatoses
NCT03635138Effect of the Incorporation of Copper and Zinc Nanoparticles into Dental AdhesivesMetal nanoparticles (Zn and Cu)
Dental Adhesive pure		Caries, Dental
NCT03774680Targeted Polymeric Nanoparticles Loaded with Cetuximab and Decorated with Somatostatin Analogue to Colon CancerCetuximab nanoparticles
Oral approved anticancer drug		Colon Cancer
Colo-rectal Cancer
NCT03478150Evaluation of the Antibacterial Effect of Laser Diode and Zinc Oxide Nano-Particles in Cavity DisinfectionZinc oxide nanoparticles
Laser diode		Caries, Dental
NCT03659864The Role of Eicosanoids in the Cardiovascular Actions of Inhaled NanoparticlesDiesel exhaust particulate
Carbon nanoparticles
Small graphene oxide		Blood Biomarkers
Vasodilation
Blood Clotting
NCT03666195The Anti-microbial Effect of Titanium Dioxide Nano-Particles in Complete Dentures Made for Edentulous PatientsTitanium dioxide nanoparticlesCandida Infection
Denture Stomatitis
NCT03550001Carbon Nanoparticles (CNP) as Lymph Node Tracer in Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant RadiochemotherapyProcedure: Injection CNP before NATRectal cancer
NCT03003546Nab-paclitaxel/Rituximab-coated Nanoparticle AR160 in Treating Patients with Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin LymphomaLaboratory Biomarker Analysis
Nab-paclitaxel/Rituximab-coated Nanoparticle AR160		Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
CD20 Positive
Recurrent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
NCT04094077Evaluating AGuIX® Nanoparticles in Combination with Stereotactic Radiation for Brain MetastasesBrain MetastasesDrug: AGuIX
NCT03700489Mycological Comparative Study on Maxillary Dentures of Two Different MaterialsEffect of Tio2 Nanoparticles on Candida AggregationOther: titanium dioxide denture
NCT04138342Topical Fluorescent Nanoparticles Conjugated Somatostatin Analogue for Suppression and Bioimaging Breast CancerQuantum dots coated with veldoreotide
Topical approved placebo		Breast Cancer
Skin Cancer
Skin Diseases
NCT04148833Treatment of Patients with Atherosclerotic Disease with Paclitaxel-associated to low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-Like NanoparticlesDrug: LDE-Paclitaxel
Drug: LDE-Placebo		Coronary Artery Disease
Atherosclerosis
Inflammation
NCT04240639An Extension Study MRI/US Fusion Imaging and Biopsy in Combination with Nanoparticle Directed Focal Therapy for Ablation of Prostate TissueAuroShell particle infusionNeoplasms of the Prostate
NCT03692286Assessment of Postoperative Pain After Using Various Intracanal Medication in Patients with Necrotic PulpSilver nanoparticle/Calcium hydroxide
Silver Nanoparticles in gel form
Calcium Hydroxide Intracanal medication		Postoperative Pain

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Souto, E.B.; Silva, G.F.; Dias-Ferreira, J.; Zielinska, A.; Ventura, F.; Durazzo, A.; Lucarini, M.; Novellino, E.; Santini, A. Nanopharmaceutics: Part II—Production Scales and Clinically Compliant Production Methods. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 455. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nano10030455

AMA Style

Souto EB, Silva GF, Dias-Ferreira J, Zielinska A, Ventura F, Durazzo A, Lucarini M, Novellino E, Santini A. Nanopharmaceutics: Part II—Production Scales and Clinically Compliant Production Methods. Nanomaterials. 2020; 10(3):455. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nano10030455

Chicago/Turabian Style

Souto, Eliana B., Gabriela F. Silva, João Dias-Ferreira, Aleksandra Zielinska, Fátima Ventura, Alessandra Durazzo, Massimo Lucarini, Ettore Novellino, and Antonello Santini. 2020. "Nanopharmaceutics: Part II—Production Scales and Clinically Compliant Production Methods" Nanomaterials 10, no. 3: 455. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nano10030455

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop