Next Article in Journal
Different Drought-Tolerant Mechanisms in Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) and Djulis (Chenopodium formosanum Koidz.) Based on Physiological Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Wheat and Cereal Rye Inter-Row Living Mulches Interfere with Early Season Weeds in Soybean
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 10
Issue 11
10.3390/plants10112278
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Comparative Antibacterial, Antioxidant, and Antineoplastic Potential of Rauwolfia serpentina (L.) Leaf Extract with Its Biologically Synthesized Gold Nanoparticles (R-AuNPs)

by
Mohammad Y. Alshahrani
1,†,
Zeeshan Rafi
2,†,
Nadiyah M. Alabdallah
3,
Ambreen Shoaib
4,
Irfan Ahmad
1,
Mohammed Asiri
1,
Gaffar Sarwar Zaman
1,
Shadma Wahab
5,
Mohd Saeed
6,* and
Salman Khan
2,*
1
Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, P.O. Box 61413, Abha 9088, Saudi Arabia
2
Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine Lab-6(IIRC), Department of Biosciences, Integral University, Lucknow 226026, India
3
Department of Biology, College of Science, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P.O. Box 1982, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Jazan University, P.O. Box 114, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, King Khalid University, P.O. Box 61413, Abha 9088, Saudi Arabia
6
Department of Biology, College of Sciences, University of Hail, P.O. Box 2440, Hail 2440, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Equal Contribution.
Plants 2021, 10(11), 2278; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants10112278
Submission received: 21 September 2021 / Revised: 14 October 2021 / Accepted: 18 October 2021 / Published: 24 October 2021
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Rauwolfia serpentina (R. serpentina), belonging to the family Apocynaceae, is a renowned medicinal herb for its different pharmacological activities such as antibacterial, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, and antiproliferative characteristics. This study has done a comparative assessment of the antibacterial, antioxidant, and anti-cancer activity of R. serpentina aqueous leaf extract (RSALE) with encapsulated gold nanoparticles (R-AuNPs). The R-AuNPs are prepared so that they are significant in size, monodispersed, and extremely stable. Their characterization was done by numerous parameters, including UV-visible spectroscopy (528 nm), transmission electron microscopy (~17 d. nm), dynamic light scattering (~68 d. nm), and zeta-potential (~−17 mV). Subsequently, a potent antibacterial activity was depicted via RSALE and R-AuNPs when examined by disc diffusion against various Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains. The obtained zones of inhibition of RSALE (100 mg/mL) were 34 ± 0.1, 35 ± 0.1, 28.4 ± 0.01, and 18 ± 0.01, although those of R-AuNPs (15 mg/mL) were 24.4 ± 0.12, 22 ± 0.07, 20 ± 0.16, and 17 ± 0.3 against Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), Bacillus subtilis (MTCC 8114), and Streptococcus pyogenes (ATCC 19615), respectively. However, no zone of inhibition was obtained when tested against Proteus vulgaris (MTCC 1771). Furthermore, the obtained MIC values for Staphylococcus aureus were 0.91, 0.61, and 1.15 mg/mL; for Escherichia coli, 0.79, 0.36, and 1.02 mg/mL; for Bacillus subtilis 0.42, 0.27, and 0.474 mg/mL; and for Streptococcus pyogenes, 7.67, 3.86, and 8.5 mg/mL of pure RSALE, R-AuNPs, and Amoxicillin (control), respectively, incorporating that R-AuNPs have been shown to have a 1.4-fold, 2.1-fold, 1.5-fold, and 1.9-fold enhanced antibacterial activity in contrast to pure RSALE tested against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Proteus vulgaris, respectively. Additionally, an enhanced antioxidant potential was detected in R-AuNPs compared to RSALE evaluated by the 2,2-Diphenyl-1-Picryl Hydrazyl Radical Scavenging (DPPH) Ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay. The determined IC 50 values of RSALE and R-AuNPs were 0.131 ± 0.05 and 0.184 ± 0.02 mg/mL, and 0.110 ± 0.1 and 0.106 ± 0.24 mg/mL via the FRAP and DPPH assays, respectively. In addition, the anti-cancer activity against the human cervical cancer (Hela) cell line was evaluated, and the MTT assay results revealed that R-AuNPs (IC50 88.3 µg/mL) had an enhanced anti-cancer potential in contrast to RSALE (171.5 µg/mL). Subsequently, the findings of this study indicated that R. serpentina leaves and their nanoformulation can be used as a potent source for the treatment of the above-mentioned complications and can be used as a possible agent for novel target-based therapies for the management of different ailments.

1. Introduction

The evergreen shrub Rauwolfia serpentina (L.) Benth. ex Kurz., also known as Indian snakeroot, is a member of the Apocynaceae family. There are nearly 100 species of Rauwolfia known to exist in various climates around the world, including tropical to subtropical zones on multiple continents [1]. The stem of this upright herb is smooth, with few or no hairs. The leaf is lance-shaped, tapering with long petioles, and the fruit is spherical and purple. It is small, pink, or white, and the tuberose is prominent [2]. A very diverse range of alkaloids is present in the roots and leaf of R. serpentina [3]. In some cases, however, the percentage of alkaloids can vary according to where the plant is found in the world, the age of the plant, and the season of collection [4,5]. The alkaloid content of bark is over 90%, whereas root alkaloid content ranges from 1.7 to 3.0%. The active constituent of R. serpentina alkaloids includes ajmaline and reserpine. The other phytoconstituents are ajmalinine, reserpinine, rawolscine, serpenticine, isoajmalinerawolfinine, renoxycine rescinamine reserpilline, serpentine, sarpagine, and tetraphyllicine [4].
This plant possesses an extensive spectrum of pharmacological properties against many diseases, including hypertension, insomnia, diarrhea, dysentery, headache, fever, malaria, pneumonia, asthma, skin problems, and immuno-deficiency syndrome. Some practitioners use this plant to soothe patients with paranoia or schizophrenia. [6,7,8,9,10]. Nowadays, multi-drug resistant strains of bacteria are responsible for the diminished effectiveness of antibiotics, resulting in the raised spectra of untreatable bacterial infection [9]. At the same time, many experts in the medical community are still concerned about cancer therapy and the toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents. Given the urgency of finding new drugs with lower side effects, it is essential to locate them as quickly as possible. According to accepted facts, various types of herbs, including raw drugs, their phytoconstituents, and secondary constituents, are utilized in medicine as a whole, and their therapeutic potential is dependent on them [11,12]. These phytoconstituents can act as a precursor informing novel drugs and producing additive effects than the plant source.
In the science of nanomedicine and nanotechnology, gold nanoparticles have an essential role. The introduction of novel technology such as nano enhances the ability to harness nanoparticles and shows better pharmacological activity. It has also been stated that the plant extracts can reduce the inorganic salts into nanoparticles and stabilize them by capping them [13,14]. They are highly effective as antibacterial and anti-inflammatory agents, and they are extensively employed [15]. They enhance the efficacy and affinity of the drug and thus can manage various ailments [16,17].
In light of the explanations mentioned above, this study was designed to synthesize and characterize the R-AuNPs. Further, a comparative research was carried out to analyze the enhanced antibacterial, antioxidant, and anti-cancer potential of R. serpentina aqueous extract of the leaf (RSALE) and R-AuNPs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Collection and Extract Preparation

Fresh plants of Rauwolfia serpentina were obtained from the herbarium garden Integral University Campus, Lucknow, India, in May 2021. The plant specimen was authenticated by the taxonomist at the Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Integral University, Lucknow, U.P., India, with voucher specimen reference no. (IU/PHAR/HRB/21/05). The new leaf of the plant was collected, rinsed repeatedly with distilled water to remove any impurities from their surfaces. Then, leaves were cut into small pieces and air-dried, grounded with double distilled water using pestle mortar placed in a tray filled with ice to avoid protein denaturation. The aqueous extract was prepared by adding 50 g of air-dried powder with 100 mL of double-distilled water. Afterward, the mixture was left to dry at room temperature. The stock concentration of 500 mg/mL of the solution mixture was prepared and stored at 4 °C for future experiments [18].

2.2. R. serpentina Mediated Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles (R-AuNPs)

In-vitro synthesis of AuNPs was performed by incubating 1 mM Chloroauric acid (HAuCl4) prepared in phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.4) and RSALE at a ratio of 1:1 (v/v) to a volume of 30 mL. The reaction was further incubated at 40 °C for 48 h. Another reaction mixture containing only RSALE was used as a control [18]. After a definite period, the sample was ejected and analyzed on a Biospectrum-Kinetics spectrophotometer (Eppendorf) using a quartz cuvette having the path length of 1 cm to affirm the synthesis of R. serpentina encapsulated gold nanoparticles (R-AuNPs). Subsequently, the solution was filtered using a syringe with a filter having a pore size of 2 µm, and the unbound proteins were expelled using 50% v/v ethanol treatment followed by centrifugation (30,000× g) for 30 min. Finally, the samples were washed twice by Milli Q water and utilized for further characterization.

2.3. Characterization of R-AuNPs

The transformation of gold salts into gold nanoparticles was investigated using the Shimadzu UV-1601 dual-beam spectrophotometer. This measurement has a spatial resolution of one nanometer (200 nm to 800 nm). The technique is based on reducing metal salts to synthesized AuNPs results in a color change. A single drop of an AuNPs suspension was applied to carbon-coated copper TEM grids. It was then analyzed using a Hillsboro, Oregon-based Tecnai G2 Spirit transmission electron microscope equipped with a BioTwin lens configuration. An 80 kV80-kV accelerating voltage powers the system. Subsequently, dynamic light scattering (DLS) was used to determine the hydrodynamic radius of the nanoparticles produced. Additionally, a Zetasizer Nano-ZS (ZEN3600 Malvern Instrument Ltd., Malvern, United Kingdom) was used to determine the particle size and zeta potential. The size and shape of gold nanoparticles were also determined using transmission electron microscopy.

2.4. Determination of Antibacterial Activity by Disc Diffusion Method

The disc diffusion method [19] was used to determine the antibacterial properties of RSALE and R-AuNPs. For antibacterial assay analysis, pure cultures of Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), and Streptococcus pyogenes (ATCC 19615) were obtained from American Type Culture Collection. However, Bacillus subtilis (MTCC 8114) and Proteus vulgaris (MTCC 1771) were obtained from the Microbial Type Culture Collection and Gene Bank (MTCC), housed at the Institute of Microbial Technology (IMTECH), Chandigarh, India. The suspensions of the strains tested were standardized to 0.5 McFarland. The suspension was obtained from overnight trypticase soy broth (TSB) cultures and placed on the surface of Mueller–Hinton (M.H.) agar for the study, as mentioned earlier. During the experiment, 50 µL of various concentrations of R-AuNPs (10, 20, 40, 60 and 80 mg/mL) and various concentrations of crude RSALE (10, 25, 50, 75, and 100 mg/mL), negative control (PBS) and positive control amoxicillin (25 mg/mL) were added to the wells of MH agar plates. The experiments were conducted in triplicate, and the agar plates were incubated overnight at 37 °C. Following that, the diameter of the inhibitory zone was determined. The experiment was conducted in triplicates in the same experimental conditions.

2.5. Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Determination

To quantify the antibacterial capabilities and determine the MIC of the pure RSALE, R-AuNPs, and Amoxicillin (used as control), the test was performed on a sterile 96-well plate, as described in many studies [20,21]. The crude RSALE and R-AuNPs were serially diluted in nourishing broth. Then, each well of 96-well plates was incubated for 24 h at 37 °C with a standardized suspension of bacteria (103 cells/mL). After 24 h, an ELISA reader [(Microplate Reader (BIORAD-680)] was used to read the plate at 625 nm, and subsequently, the reading was recorded for further use.
The results of the antibacterial study and MIC values indicated that R. serpentina’s efficacy is significantly increased due to the encapsulation over the AuNPs. At considerably lower doses, it was observed that R-AuNPs hindered the growth of a variety of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial strains. There may be a synergy between the antibacterial characteristics of the AuNPs and the R. serpentina, which may explain why the R. serpentina’s antibacterial activity enhanced after encapsulation over AuNPs. AuNPs exert their antibacterial effects primarily through two mechanisms: collapsing the membrane potential, which inhibits ATPase activity and hence the ATP level; the other is by interfering with the ribosome’s component binding to tRNA. However, AuNPs do not have ROS-related pathways, which are used by many bactericidal drugs and nanomaterials.

2.6. Antioxidant Assay

The 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and ferric reducing ability of plasma or plants (FRAP) assays were used to determine the number of antioxidants in the RSALE and R-AuNPs. At various concentrations (0.0625–1 mg/mL), the RSALE and R-AuNPs were dissolved in methanol. L-ascorbic acid and Trolox were used as a standard for the study, while methanol was employed as a negative control. The experiment was performed on a Biospectrum-Kinetics spectrophotometer (Eppendorf in triplicates and mean values were recorded.

2.6.1. 2,2-Diphenyl-1-Picryl Hydrazyl (DPPH) Radical Scavenging Assay

The extract and R-AuNPs were prepared for the experiment at various concentrations (0.05 to 1 mg/mL). A solution of DPPH (0.1 mM) in ethanol was prepared, and 1.0 mL of this solution was added to 3.0 mL of all the extracts solution in water at different concentrations. This extraction solution was then mixed with 100 mM of DPPH and incubated at 37 °C in the dark. Then, the sample was incubated, and the absorption was recorded at 490 nm on a Biospectrum-Kinetics spectrophotometer (Eppendorf) [22]. L-ascorbic acid was used as a control. To estimate the level of scavenging activity, we used the following formulae:
Scavenging activity (%) = [(Absorbance of control − Absorbance of extract)/(Absorbance of control)] × 100

2.6.2. Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) Assay

The FRAP assay was used to measure the antioxidant potential of RSALE and R-AuNPs spectrophotometrically [23]. The FRAP indicator was made by taking 300 mM acetate buffer, 10 mL TPTZ (2,4,6-tripyridyl-s-triazine) in 40 mM HCl, and 20 mM FeCl3·6H2O in the ratio of 10:1:1 at ambient temperature. The working solution of FRAP was freshly prepared, and 5 µL of plant extract (in various concentrations ranging from 0.05 to 1 mg/mL) and R-AuNPs solution were mixed, then placed in a 37 °C incubator for exactly 1.5 h. Subsequently, the reduction of Fe2+ ions to Fe3+ ions was confirmed by the appearance of intense blue color. Afterward, on a Biospectrum-Kinetics spectrophotometer (Eppendorf), the absorbance was recorded at 593 nm and compared with a blank reagent that includes a 4 mL FRAP reagent with 5 µL of distilled water. The calibration curve was plotted to determine the FRAP values. A graph was developed with ferrous sulfate concentrations versus concentrations of Trolox as standard. Finally, the FRAP values were determined by comparing the absorbance in the test sample at increasing concentration of ferric ion, which was stated as Trolox equivalent/gram of sample.

2.7. Cytotoxicity Analysis against Human Cervical Cancer Cell Hela by MTT Cell Proliferation Assay

A cell proliferation assay was used to estimate the cytotoxic potential using MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) of the RSALE and R-AuNPs. The formation of the purple formazan compound generated in viable cells was determined calorimetrically [24,25]. The cytotoxicity test was performed against the human cervical cancer cell line Hela. Counting and plating were performed in 96-well plates (1 × 104 cells per well) aseptically, and incubation was done at 37 °C for 24 h [26]. Furthermore, during the analysis procedure, the monolayer of cells after treatment with crude RSALE and R-AuNPs was further incubated at 37 °C for another 24 h in a 5% CO2 incubator. Subsequently, the media was removed from the wells, and cells were stained with 50 µL of (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) MTT stain (5 mg/mL in PBS). The plates were then incubated for another 4 h in a 5% CO2 incubator. Then, the plates were incubated for another 4 h in a 5% CO2 incubator. Later, 150 µL of DMSO (Dimethyl sulfoxide) was added to each well to dissolve the formazan complex formed by surviving cells that form purple. Subsequently, the absorbance at 570 nm was recorded using ELISA reader ((Microplate Reader (BIORAD-680)). The results were obtained by calculating percentage inhibition values. The experiment was performed in triplicate, and mean values were determined as IC50 196 µg/mL.

2.8. Data Analysis

All the samples were evaluated in triplicate for each assay, and the findings are reported as mean ± S.D. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the results using GraphPad Prism version 4.02 for Windows (Graph Pad Software, San Di-ego, CA, USA). The significance level for each experiment is represented in the respective figures and tables of this manuscript [27,28].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis of Rauwolfia serpentina Extract Mediated Gold Nanoparticles

This study used RSALE as a reducing and stabilizing agent, whereas 1 mM Chloroauric acid (HAuCl4) served as the gold precursor. It was hypothesized that the aqueous extract induces the formation of R-AuNPs through the action of its reducing enzymes and capping agents such as secondary metabolites, which combine to reduce AuCl4 (+3 oxidation state) to Au (0 oxidation state). The reduction of gold was confirmed visually by the change in color of the extract from green to ruby red, confirming the formation of R-AuNPs [29].

3.2. Characterization of R-AuNPs

In noble metal nanoparticles, an unfamiliar phenomenon is observed due to surface plasmon resonance (SPR). This imparts the quality of intense electromagnetic fields onto the nanoparticle’s surface, resulting in scattering and absorption [17]. Thus, the formation of R-AuNPs was confirmed herein using U.V. vis spectra (Figure 1A). The absorption peak was observed at 528 nm, which corresponds to the SPR band of the R-AuNPs. The phytoconstituents in RSALE reduced the gold salt (HAuCl4) into AuNPs and encapsulated the AuNPs, preventing the nanoparticles from aggregating and providing stability to the R-AuNPs. The change in color from light yellow to ruby red indicated the successful synthesis of R-AuNPs, and the result of the SPR band confirmed that at 528 nm.
However, there was no discernible peak for RSALE. The transmission electron microscope (TEM) was used to determine the precise size, shape, and 2-dimensional morphology of R-AuNPs, which was determined to be 17 d. nm with spherical shape and monodispersed parameter (Figure 1B). The technique of dynamic light scattering (DLS) was used to determine the average particle size and profile of the particle size distribution of R-AuNPs. R-AuNPs had an average particle size of 68 d. nm and a polydispersity index (PDI) of 0.215, indicating a homogeneous size distribution, as shown in Figure 1C.
The zeta potential of R-AuNPs was also investigated (Figure 1D). Generally, a zeta value of −20 mV is needed for the colloidal stability of nanoparticles [30]. The zeta potential of the prepared R-AuNPs was −17 mV, indicating the high strength of the particles. When the aqueous dispersion of R-AuNPs was observed at room temperature, no clumping or accumulation was observed. This was most likely due to the electrostatic repulsive forces of the gold nanoparticles. This repulsion prevents the nanoparticles from coming into contact with one another.

3.3. Antibacterial Activity

There are different microbial pathogens known for causing several infectious diseases. These pathogens have developed mutation and resistance to several antibiotics due to inappropriate use. Hence, several researchers are finding alternative systems of medicine for the treatment. The present study analyzed the antibacterial potential of crude Rauwolfia serpentina aqueous extract and R-AuNPs against Gram-negative (Escherichia coli, and Proteus vulgaris) and Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Bacillus subtilis) bacterial strains by the disc diffusion method. The Rauwolfia serpentina aqueous extract and R-AuNPs showed potent antibacterial activity against all the aforementioned bacterial strains except P. vulgaris.
The maximum activity against S. aureus, E. coli, B. subtilis, and S. pyogenes was observed at a concentration of 100 mg/mL crude aqueous extract of R. serpentina, with inhibitory zones of 34 ± 0.1, 35 ± 0.1, 28.4 ± 0.01, and 18 ± 0.01, respectively (Table 1). However, no zone of inhibition was observed in the analysis against Proteus vulgaris. Additionally, in the case of positive control amoxicillin (25 mg/mL), the obtained zone of inhibition was 8 ± 0.02 **, 7 ± 0.5 **, 6 ± 0.3 **, 11 ± 0.02 *** against S. aureus, E. coli, B. subtilis, and S. pyogenes, respectively, with no zone of inhibition observed against Proteus vulgaris.
However, R-AuNPs have shown a significantly high zone of inhibition at a poor concentration (15 mg/mL) comparative to the crude RSALE and Amoxicillin. R-AuNPs established the zone of inhibition of 24.4 ± 0.12, 22 ± 0.07, 20 ± 0.16, and 17 ± 0.3 against S. aureus, E. coli, Bacillus subtilis, and Streptococcus pyogenes Table 2). However, no zone of inhibition was observed against Proteus vulgaris. During the experiment, Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was used as a negative control. The enhanced antibacterial activity observed against the aforesaid bacterial strains might be due to the synergistic effect of the gold nanoparticles and active phytoconstituents of the R. serpentina, which are present over the surface of the gold nanoparticle that resulted from the synthesis process.

3.4. Determination of Minimal Inhibitory Concentration of RSALE and R-AuNPs

The MIC is the lowest concentration of RSALE and AuNPs that completely inhibits bacterial growth, and MIC50 is the concentration of RSALE and R-AuNPs that inhibits 50% of the bacterial population. The MIC50 of RSALE and R-AuNPs against several Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial strains were recorded. However, Amoxicillin was used as a standard antibiotic during the experiment. The quantified MIC50 values were Staphylococcus aureus, 0.91 mg/mL, 0.61 mg/mL, and 1.15 mg/mL (Figure 2A); Escherichia coli, 0.79 mg/mL, 0.36 mg/mL, and 1.02 mg/mL (Figure 2B); Bacillus subtilis, 0.42 mg/mL, 0.27 mg/mL, and 0.474 mg/mL (Figure 2C); Streptococcus pyogenes, 7.67 mg/mL, 3.86 mg/mL, and 8.5 mg/mL (Figure 2D) of pure RSALE, R-AuNPs, and Amoxicillin (control), respectively. The findings, as mentioned earlier, indicated that R-AuNPs had a 1.4-fold, 2.1-fold, 1.5-fold, and 1.9-fold increased antibacterial potential compared to pure RSALE when tested against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, and Streptococcus pyogenes, respectively. However, compared to the control (Amoxicillin), R-AuNPs showed an enhanced antibacterial potential of 1.8 folds, 2.8 folds, 1.7 folds, and 2.2 folds against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, and Streptococcus pyogenes, respectively. The potent antibacterial activity observed is might be due to the presence of phytoconstituents present in the plant. Recent studies reported that plant rich in alkaloids resembles the significant amount of antibacterial activity. Additionally, our extracts also contain flavonoids, tannins, saponins, gums, and mucilages in a significant amount which might be the reason for its extraordinary antibacterial potential [31]. A study by Sarika et al. in the year 2012 reported the presence of four different indole alkaloids like ajmalicine, ajmaline, yohimbine, and reserpine in R. serpentine [32,33].
Our MIC results suggest that the R-AuNPs are much more effective at lower doses than pure RSALE and Amoxicillin used against the aforesaid bacterial strains. The encapsulation of the R-AuNPs with active phytoconstituents present in R. serpentina resulted in the decreased quantity of the R. serpentina and the increased efficacy and stability of R-AuNPs. As the AuNPs are acting as a carrier for the R. serpentina, they (AuNPs) are also exerting the antibacterial potential by collapsing the membrane potential, hindering the ATPase activities and resulting in a change in the ATP level of the bacterial cell wall [34]. The combined antibacterial capabilities of the R. serpentina and the AuNPs could boost the antibacterial effectiveness of the R-AuNPs.
Previous studies have demonstrated similar findings of antibacterial activity in aqueous and methanolic extracts of R. serpentina root, examined against Enterococcus faecalis, Micrococcus luteus, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus pneumoniae by the agar well diffusion method [21].

3.5. Antioxidant Activity Analysis

RSALE and R-AuNPs exhibited high antioxidant activity and a high capacity for scavenging free radicals. The FRAP assay portrayed the IC50 values of RSALE and R-AuNPs to be 0.131 ± 0.05 and 0.110 ± 0.1 mg/mL, respectively. However, the L-Ascorbic acid (standard) portrayed an IC50 value of 0.20 ± 0.2 mg/mL, as shown in Figure 3.
The DPPH assay represented IC50 values of RSALE and R-AuNPs to be 0.184 ± 0.02 and 0.106 ± 0.24 mg/mL, respectively. However, the L-Ascorbic acid (standard) portrayed an IC50 value of 0.394 ± 0.1 mg/mL, as shown in Figure 4. Similar findings are obtained in a 2015 study according to which R. serpentina exhibited significant antioxidant activity verified by the DPPH method, with flavonoids being identified as the active ingredient [35].

3.6. Cytotoxicity by MTT Cell Proliferation Assay

The MTT cell propagation assay was used to determine the cytotoxicity analysis of R. serpentina extract and R-AuNPs against normal human keratinocyte HaCat cells. The anti-cancer potential of the RSALE and R-AuNPs against cancerous cell lines (Hela). Our cytotoxicity analysis results over HaCat cells demonstrated that RSALE and R-AuNPs have an IC50 value of 208.30 and 157.7 µg/mL against HaCat cells (Figure 5). However, when the samples above were investigated for anti-cancer potential, it was found that the RSALE and R-AuNPs inhibited Hela (cervical carcinoma) by 50% at 171.5 µg/mL and 81.3 µg/mL, respectively (Figure 6). Microscopically, significant morphological changes were observed in treated cancer cell lines compared to controls. Hela cells treated with RSALE and R-AuNPs demonstrated a cytotoxic effect, as indicated by cellular morphology changes. The morphological changes include cytoplasmic condensation and cell clumping, as well as growth inhibition (Figure 6). The cytotoxic effects on Hela cells were dose-dependent and resulted in cell death and senescence. Cell death and AuNPs-induced apoptosis are two morphological changes observed in Hela (Figure 7). Our results also portrayed that RSALE and R-AuNPs are cytotoxic to cancerous Hela cells at much lower concentrations than normal human keratinocyte HaCat cells. This can be justifying the IC50 doses of the RSALE, and R-AuNPs obtained during the anti-cancer potential analysis are safer than the normal cells.
Similarly, an ethanolic leaf extract of R. serpentina was found to have antiproliferative activity against the cancerous cell line Hela, with an IC50 value of 196 µg/mL [3] Similarly, in a recent study [36], the hexane extract of Rauvolfia tetraphylla demonstrated cytotoxicity against a variety of cancer cell lines, including cervical (HeLa), lung (A549), colon (Caco 2), and breast (MCF7 and MDA MB 231).
Additionally, anti-cancer analysis of pure RSALE and R-AuNPs against the human cervical cancer cell line, Hela, demonstrated that both R. serpentina and R-AuNPs are cytotoxic to the cancer cells. Nonetheless, R-AuNPs are significantly more effective than RSALE at low concentrations. The same results are observed in our studies; that indicated that the stable gold bioconjugates (AuNPs coupled with drug) choose endocytosis as a mode of entry into the cells and are known to perform far better than pure medicines at a considerably lower concentration, with significantly fewer side effects, which makes targeted drug delivery to cancerous cells a very appealing use of nanotechnology [37,38]. However, the ability of the R-AuNP conjugates to enter the cell may depend on the physical and interfacial properties of the N.P.s, such as surface charge, size, shape, and hydrophobicity. Additionally, it is dependent on the cell type and plasma membrane characteristics [39], such as receptor density, receptor type, receptor recycling rate, and membrane fluidity [40]. They can then deliver the drug straight into the cancer cells’ cytoplasm, followed by their entrance into the nucleus.
Additionally, the natural anti-cancer products can cause cell death by various mechanisms, including cell cycle regulation and activation of apoptotic and nonapoptotic pathways (such as autophagy, necrosis, mitotic catastrophe, and senescence). The apoptotic pathway has received more interest in research in the case of plant-derived compounds. During cell development, programmed death is characterized by distinct morphological and biochemical changes. The morphological alterations include decreased cell size, increased cytoplasmic density, organelle compression, and chromatin condensation [41].
On the other hand, biochemical alterations include protein cleavage, cross-linking of proteins, DNA fragmentation, mitochondrial fragmentation, and phagocytic recognition. The intrinsic (mitochondrial) and extrinsic (death receptor) apoptotic pathways involved overlap and interact. The p53 and lysosomal routes are two possible sub-pathways [42]. Therefore, R-AuNPs show a potent anti-cancer effect aiding its entry into the cancer cell and exerting the anti-cancer activities synergistically with the couples of R. serpentina molecules.

4. Conclusions

The current study demonstrates that the aqueous leaf extract of R. serpentina has less stability than R-AuNPs. The size of a chemically synthesized gold nanoparticle (R-AuNPs) was 17 d. nm and we conclude that our preparation is monodispersed, spherical in morphology, and highly stable (zeta potential ~ −17 mV). Our FRAP and DPPH assay results also indicated that when R. serpentina is coupled with gold nanoparticles, its antioxidant potential and free radical scavenging activity are enhanced (R-AuNPs). In conclusion, we can say that R-AuNPs (offered at a lower dose than pure R. serpentina) can substitute for R. serpentina due to the increased antibacterial, antioxidant, and anti-cancer potential. Thus, the study’s findings indicate that the crude R. serpentina aqueous leaf extract and R-AuNPs may effectively treat bacterial infections and act as an anti-cancer agent. However, additional investigations are required to determine the active phytoconstituent of the R. serpentina, which might be responsible for reducing gold salt into its nano form and coupling on its surface to stabilize the synthesized R-AuNPs. Additionally, more research is also needed to determine the in vivo activity of R-AuNPs before they can be declared suitable drug carriers in the medical domain.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.Y.A., M.S. and S.K.; methodology, Z.R., S.K. and A.S.; software, N.M.A., I.A. and M.A.; validation, G.S.Z., S.W. and M.Y.A.; formal analysis, M.Y.A., Z.R. and I.A.; investigation, S.K. and M.S.; resources, Z.R.; data curation, M.S. and I.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S., A.S. and S.K.; writing—review and editing, A.S., M.Y.A., G.S.Z. and N.M.A.; visualization, S.W., M.A. and I.A.; supervision, S.K.; project administration, Z.R.; funding acquisition, M.Y.A. and S.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Scientific Research Deanship at King Khalid University and the Ministry of Education in KSA, project number IFP-KKU-2020/14.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not Applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not Applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Scientific Research Deanship at King Khalid University and the Ministry of Education in KSA for funding this research work through the project number IFP-KKU-2020/14.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vanhaelen, M.; Lejoly, J.; Hanocq, M.; Molle, L. Climatic and geographical aspects of medicinal plant constituents. In The Medicinal Plant Industry; Routledge: London, UK, 2017; pp. 59–76. [Google Scholar]
  2. Biradar, N.; Hazar, I.; Chandy, V. Current insight to the uses of Rauwolfia: A review. Res. Rev. J. Pharmacogn. 2016, 3, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  3. Deshmukh, S.R.; Ashrit, D.S.; Patil, B.A. Extraction and evaluation of indole alkaloids from Rauwolfia serpentina for their antimicrobial and antiproliferative activities. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 4 (Suppl. S5), 329–334. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dymock, W. Rauwolfia alkaloids. Pharmacol. Indica 1891, 2, 415. [Google Scholar]
  5. Van Wyk, B.-E.; Wink, M. Medicinal Plants of the World; CABI: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lobay, D. Rauwolfia in the Treatment of Hypertension. Integr. Med. (Encinitas) 2015, 14, 40–46. [Google Scholar]
  7. Shitiz, K.; Gupta, S.P. Rauwolfia serpentina. Himal. Med. Plants 2021, 111–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mia, M.M.-u.-K.; Kadir, M.F.; Hossan, M.S.; Rahmatullah, M. Medicinal plants of the Garo tribe inhabiting the Madhupur forest region of Bangladesh. Am. Eurasian J. Sustain. Agric. 2009, 3, 165–171. [Google Scholar]
  9. Huh, A.J.; Kwon, Y.J. “Nanoantibiotics”: A new paradigm for treating infectious diseases using nanomaterials in the antibiotic’s resistant era. J. Control. Release 2011, 156, 128–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hossain, M.T.; Hoq, M.O. Therapeutic use of Adhatoda vasica. Asian J. Med. Biol. Res. 2016, 2, 156–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yalavarthi, C.; Thiruvengadarajan, V. A review on identification strategy of phyto constituents present in herbal plants. Int. J. Res. Pharma. Sci. 2013, 4, 123–140. [Google Scholar]
  12. Shendge, P.N.; Belemkar, S. Therapeutic Potential of Luffa acutangula: A Review on Its Traditional Uses, Phytochemistry, Pharmacology and Toxicological Aspects. Front. Pharm. 2018, 9, 1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Das, R.K.; Pachapur, V.L.; Lonappan, L.; Naghdi, M.; Pulicharla, R.; Maiti, S.; Cledon, M.; Dalila, L.M.A.; Sarma, S.J.; Brar, S.K. Biological synthesis of metallic nanoparticles: Plants, animals and microbial aspects. Nanotechnol. Environ. Eng. 2017, 2, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Usman, A.I.; Aziz, A.A.; Noqta, O.A. Application of green synthesis of gold nanoparticles: A review. J. Teknol. 2019, 81, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Al-Rashed, S.; Baker, A.; Ahmad, S.S.; Syed, A.; Bahkali, A.H.; Elgorban, A.M.; Khan, M.S. Vincamine, a safe natural alkaloid, represents a novel anti-cancer agent. Bioorg. Chem. 2021, 107, 104626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Liang, X.J.; Chen, C.; Zhao, Y.; Jia, L.; Wang, P.C. Biopharmaceutics and therapeutic potential of engineered nanomaterials. Curr. Drug Metab. 2008, 9, 697–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Baker, A.; Wahid, I.; Hassan Baig, M.; Alotaibi, S.S.; Khalid, M.; Uddin, I.; Dong, J.J.; Khan, M.S. Silk Cocoon-Derived Protein Bioinspired Gold Nanoparticles as a Formidable Anticancer Agent. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2021, 17, 615–626. [Google Scholar]
  18. Soliman, W.E.; Khan, S.; Rizvi, S.M.D.; Moin, A.; Elsewedy, H.S.; Abulila, A.S.; Shehata, T.M. Therapeutic Applications of Biostable Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized Using Peel Extract of Benincasa hispida: Antibacterial and Anticancer Activities. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pratap, G.M.S.; Manoj, K.M.; Sai, S.A.; Sujatha, B.; Sreedevi, E. Evaluation of three medicinal plants for anti-microbial activity. Ayu 2012, 33, 423–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Akinyemi, K.O.; Oladapo, O.; Okwara, C.E.; Ibe, C.C.; Fasure, K.A. Screening of crude extracts of six medicinal plants used in South-West Nigerian unorthodox medicine for anti-methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus activity. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2005, 5, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Deshwal, V.; Vig, K. Study on the antibacterial effect of Rauwolfia serpentina on Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Pharm. Invent. 2012, 2, 45–50. [Google Scholar]
  22. Chauhan, S.; Kaur, A.; Vyas, M.; Khatik, G.L. Comparison of antidiabetic and antioxidant activity of wild and cultivated variety of Rauwolfia serpentina. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2017, 10, 404–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Benzie, I.F.; Strain, J.J. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: The FRAP assay. Anal. Biochem. 1996, 239, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Mosmann, T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Methods 1983, 65, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ansari, I.A.; Ahmad, A.; Imran, M.A.; Saeed, M.; Ahmad, I. Organosulphur Compounds Induce Apoptosis and Cell Cycle Arrest in Cervical Cancer Cells via Downregulation of HPV E6 and E7 Oncogenes. Anti-Cancer Agents Med. Chem. 2021, 21, 393–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kumari, R.; Maheshwar, P.T.; Prasad, B. Comparative influences of manures and NPK fertilizer on growth performance, root yield and reserpine content of Rauvolfia spp. Int. J. Agron. Agric. Res. 2015, 6, 100–111. [Google Scholar]
  27. Alvi, S.S.; Ansari, I.A.; Khan, I.; Iqbal, J.; Khan, M.S. Potential role of lycopene in targeting proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type-9 to combat hypercholesterolemia. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2017, 108, 394–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Alvi, S.S.; Ansari, I.A.; Ahmad, M.K.; Iqbal, J.; Khan, M.S. Lycopene amends LPS induced oxidative stress and hypertriglyceridemia via modulating PCSK-9 expression and Apo-CIII mediated lipoprotein lipase activity. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 96, 1082–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Khan, S.; Haseeb, M.; Baig, M.H.; Bagga, P.S.; Siddiqui, H.H.; Kamal, M.A.; Khan, M.S. Improved efficiency and stability of secnidazole—An ideal delivery system. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2015, 22, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Baker, A.; Syed, A.; Alyousef, A.A.; Arshad, M.; Alqasim, A.; Khalid, M.; Khan, M.S. Sericin-functionalized GNPs potentiate the synergistic effect of levofloxacin and balofloxacin against MDR bacteria. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 148, 104467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rohela, G.K.; Bylla, P.; Korra, R.; Reuben, C. Phytochemical screening and antimicrobial activity of leaf, stem, root and their callus extracts in Rauwolfia tetraphylla. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2016, 18, 1814–9596. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kumar, B.; Kumar, S.; Bajpai, V.; Madhusudanan, K.P. Phytochemistry of Plants of Genus Rauvolfia; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  33. Joshi, A.S.; Singh, P.; Mijakovic, I. Interactions of Gold and Silver Nanoparticles with Bacterial Biofilms: Molecular Interactions behind Inhibition and Resistance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gupta, J.; Gupta, A. Isolation and extraction of flavonoid from the leaves of Rauwolfia serpentina and evaluation of DPPH-scavenging antioxidant potential. Orient. J. Chem. 2015, 31, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Santiago-Cruz, J.A.; Arrieta, J.; García-Machorro, J.; Arrieta-Baez, D.; Sánchez-Mendoza, M.E. Cytotoxic activity of Rauvolfia tetraphylla L. on human cervical cancer (HeLa) cells. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2019, 15, 631. [Google Scholar]
  36. Tsang, R.Y.; Al-Fayea, T.; Au, H.J. Cisplatin overdose. Drug Saf. 2009, 32, 1109–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kou, L.; Sun, J.; Zhai, Y.L.; He, Z. The endocytosis and intracellular fate of nanomedicines: Implication for rational design. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 2013, 8, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Verma, A.; Stellacci, F. Effect of surface properties on nanoparticle–cell interactions. Small 2010, 6, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Mailander, V.; Landfester, K. Interaction of nanoparticles with cells. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10, 2379–2400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gali-Muhtasib, H.; Hmadi, R.; Kareh, M.; Tohme, R.; Darwiche, N. Cell death mechanisms of plant-derived anti-cancer drugs: Beyond apoptosis. Apoptosis 2015, 20, 1531–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Baranova, E.N.; Gulevich, A.A. Asymmetry of Plant Cell Divisions under Salt Stress. Symmetry 2021, 13, 1811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ainslie, A.; Huiting, W.; Barazzuol, L.; Bergink, S. Genome instability and loss of protein homeostasis: Converging paths to neurodegeneration? Open Biol. 2021, 11, 200296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 10 02278 g001 550
Figure 1. The figure shows results of diverse characterization characteristics of Rauwolfia serpentina extract mediated gold nanoparticles (R-AuNPs). (A) U.V. visible spectroscopy shows absorption, (B) the transmission electron microscope illustrations of the precise size, shape, and 2-dimensional morphology of R-AuNPs, (C) the dynamic light scattering technique shows average particle size and profile of the particle size distribution of R-AuNPs, and (D) the Zeta potential displays the colloidal stability of nanoparticles (R-AuNPs).
Figure 1. The figure shows results of diverse characterization characteristics of Rauwolfia serpentina extract mediated gold nanoparticles (R-AuNPs). (A) U.V. visible spectroscopy shows absorption, (B) the transmission electron microscope illustrations of the precise size, shape, and 2-dimensional morphology of R-AuNPs, (C) the dynamic light scattering technique shows average particle size and profile of the particle size distribution of R-AuNPs, and (D) the Zeta potential displays the colloidal stability of nanoparticles (R-AuNPs).
Plants 10 02278 g001
Plants 10 02278 g002 550
Figure 2. Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of pure RSALE, R-AuNPs, and amoxicillin (positive control) against (A) Staphylococcus aureus (B) Escherichia coli (C) Bacillus subtilis, and (D) Streptococcus pyogenes. The experiment was repeated in triplicate, and the data shown are the means ± S.D. mean (n = 3). Significantly different from control at *** p < 0.001, Significantly different from control at ** p < 0.01, Non-significantly different from control at ns p > 0.05.
Figure 2. Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of pure RSALE, R-AuNPs, and amoxicillin (positive control) against (A) Staphylococcus aureus (B) Escherichia coli (C) Bacillus subtilis, and (D) Streptococcus pyogenes. The experiment was repeated in triplicate, and the data shown are the means ± S.D. mean (n = 3). Significantly different from control at *** p < 0.001, Significantly different from control at ** p < 0.01, Non-significantly different from control at ns p > 0.05.
Plants 10 02278 g002
Plants 10 02278 g003 550
Figure 3. The scavenging effect of RSALE, R-AuNPs, and L-ascorbic acid (standard) by FRAP Assay. The different concentrations of extracts used were 0.05 to 1 mg/mL. The data represent the percentage inhibition values and are expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 3). Significantly different from control at *** p < 0.001, Significantly different from control at ** p < 0.01, Non-significantly different from control at ns p > 0.05.
Figure 3. The scavenging effect of RSALE, R-AuNPs, and L-ascorbic acid (standard) by FRAP Assay. The different concentrations of extracts used were 0.05 to 1 mg/mL. The data represent the percentage inhibition values and are expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 3). Significantly different from control at *** p < 0.001, Significantly different from control at ** p < 0.01, Non-significantly different from control at ns p > 0.05.
Plants 10 02278 g003
Plants 10 02278 g004 550
Figure 4. The scavenging effect of RSALE, R-AuNPs, and L-ascorbic acid (standard) by the DPPH method. The different concentrations of extracts used were 0.05 to 1 mg/mL. The data represent the percentage of DPPH inhibition, and values are expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 3). Significantly different from control at *** p < 0.001, Significantly different from control at ** p < 0.01, non-significantly different from control at ns p > 0.05.
Figure 4. The scavenging effect of RSALE, R-AuNPs, and L-ascorbic acid (standard) by the DPPH method. The different concentrations of extracts used were 0.05 to 1 mg/mL. The data represent the percentage of DPPH inhibition, and values are expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 3). Significantly different from control at *** p < 0.001, Significantly different from control at ** p < 0.01, non-significantly different from control at ns p > 0.05.
Plants 10 02278 g004
Plants 10 02278 g005 550
Figure 5. Comparative IC50 values of RSALE and R-AuNPs by MTT cell proliferation assay tested against normal human keratinocyte HaCat cells. The different concentrations of extracts and R-AuNPs used ranged from 12.5 to 800 µg/mL. The data represent the percentage inhibition values and are expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 3). Significantly different from control at *** p < 0.001, Significantly different from control at ** p < 0.01, Non-significantly different from control at ns p > 0.05.
Figure 5. Comparative IC50 values of RSALE and R-AuNPs by MTT cell proliferation assay tested against normal human keratinocyte HaCat cells. The different concentrations of extracts and R-AuNPs used ranged from 12.5 to 800 µg/mL. The data represent the percentage inhibition values and are expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 3). Significantly different from control at *** p < 0.001, Significantly different from control at ** p < 0.01, Non-significantly different from control at ns p > 0.05.
Plants 10 02278 g005
Plants 10 02278 g006 550
Figure 6. Comparative IC50 values of RSALE and R-AuNPs by MTT cell proliferation assay tested against human cervical cancer cell line, Hela. The different concentrations of extracts and R-AuNPs used ranged from 12.5 to 800 µg/mL. The data represent the percentage inhibition values and are expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 3). Significantly different from control at *** p < 0.001, Significantly different from control at ** p < 0.01, Non-significantly different from control at ns p > 0.05.
Figure 6. Comparative IC50 values of RSALE and R-AuNPs by MTT cell proliferation assay tested against human cervical cancer cell line, Hela. The different concentrations of extracts and R-AuNPs used ranged from 12.5 to 800 µg/mL. The data represent the percentage inhibition values and are expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 3). Significantly different from control at *** p < 0.001, Significantly different from control at ** p < 0.01, Non-significantly different from control at ns p > 0.05.
Plants 10 02278 g006
Plants 10 02278 g007 550
Figure 7. Anti-cancer effects of RSALE and R-AuNPs against Hela cells evaluated by MTT assay: (A) Photomicrograph of the control group, (B) RSALE treated Hela cells, and (C) R-AuNPs treated Hela cells at obtained I.C. 50 concentrations.
Figure 7. Anti-cancer effects of RSALE and R-AuNPs against Hela cells evaluated by MTT assay: (A) Photomicrograph of the control group, (B) RSALE treated Hela cells, and (C) R-AuNPs treated Hela cells at obtained I.C. 50 concentrations.
Plants 10 02278 g007
Table
Table 1. Antibacterial activity of RSALE and Amoxicillin (used as positive control) against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
Table 1. Antibacterial activity of RSALE and Amoxicillin (used as positive control) against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
Conc. of SampleZone of Inhibition (mm)
Staphylococcus aureusEscherichia coliBacillus subtilisStreptococcus pyogenesProteus vulgaris
R. serpentina Leaf ExtractAmoxicillin (Positive Control)R. serpentina Leaf ExtractAmoxicillin (Positive Control)R. serpentina Leaf ExtractAmoxicillin (Positive Control)R. serpentina Leaf ExtractAmoxicillin (Positive Control)R. serpentina Leaf ExtractAmoxicillin (Positive Control)
Negative Control0-0-0-0-0-
10 mg/mL9 ± 0.5 ***-10 ± 0.05 ***-8 ± 0.02 **-N.Z. ns-N.Z. ns-
25 mg/mL13 ± 0.05 ***8 ± 0.02 **12 ± 0.07 ***7 ± 0.5 **10 ± 0.01 ***6 ± 0.3 **NZ ns11 ± 0.02 ***NZ nsNZ ns
50 mg/mL25.4 ± 0.3 ***-20 ± 0.5 ***-18 ± 0.2 ***-N.Z. ns-N.Z. ns-
75 mg/mL32.3 ± 0.4 ***-30 ± 0.6 ***-19 ± 0.05 ***-13 ± 0.05 ***-N.Z. ns-
100 mg/mL34 ± 0.1 ***-35 ± 0.1 ***-28.4 ± 0.01 ***-18 ± 0.01 ***-N.Z. ns-
Significantly different from control at *** p < 0.001, significantly different from control at ** p < 0.01, non-significantly different from control at ns p > 0.05. Note: N.Z.—No zone of inhibition; the values are mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).
Table
Table 2. Antibacterial activity of R-AuNPs against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains.
Table 2. Antibacterial activity of R-AuNPs against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains.
Conc. Of R-AuNPsZone of Inhibition (mm)
Staphylococcus aureusEscherichia coliBacillus subtilisProteus vulgarisProteus vulgaris
Control00000
15 mg/mL24.4 ± 0.12 ***22 ± 0.07 ***20 ± 0.16 ***17 ± 0.3 ***NZ ns
Significantly different from control at *** p < 0.001, non-significantly different from control at ns p > 0.05. Note: N.Z—No zone of inhibition; the values are mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alshahrani, M.Y.; Rafi, Z.; Alabdallah, N.M.; Shoaib, A.; Ahmad, I.; Asiri, M.; Zaman, G.S.; Wahab, S.; Saeed, M.; Khan, S. A Comparative Antibacterial, Antioxidant, and Antineoplastic Potential of Rauwolfia serpentina (L.) Leaf Extract with Its Biologically Synthesized Gold Nanoparticles (R-AuNPs). Plants 2021, 10, 2278. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants10112278

AMA Style

Alshahrani MY, Rafi Z, Alabdallah NM, Shoaib A, Ahmad I, Asiri M, Zaman GS, Wahab S, Saeed M, Khan S. A Comparative Antibacterial, Antioxidant, and Antineoplastic Potential of Rauwolfia serpentina (L.) Leaf Extract with Its Biologically Synthesized Gold Nanoparticles (R-AuNPs). Plants. 2021; 10(11):2278. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants10112278

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alshahrani, Mohammad Y., Zeeshan Rafi, Nadiyah M. Alabdallah, Ambreen Shoaib, Irfan Ahmad, Mohammed Asiri, Gaffar Sarwar Zaman, Shadma Wahab, Mohd Saeed, and Salman Khan. 2021. "A Comparative Antibacterial, Antioxidant, and Antineoplastic Potential of Rauwolfia serpentina (L.) Leaf Extract with Its Biologically Synthesized Gold Nanoparticles (R-AuNPs)" Plants 10, no. 11: 2278. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants10112278

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop