Next Article in Journal
Integrating Syngas Fermentation into a Single-Cell Microbial Electrosynthesis (MES) Reactor
Next Article in Special Issue
Expanding the Family of Octahedral Chiral-at-Metal Cobalt(III) Catalysts by Introducing Tertiary Amine Moiety into the Ligand
Previous Article in Journal
Editorial: Special Issue on “Advanced Strategies for Catalyst Design”
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Catalysts
Volume 11
Issue 1
10.3390/catal11010039
catalysts-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Catalytic Systems Based on Cp2ZrX2 (X = Cl, H), Organoaluminum Compounds and Perfluorophenylboranes: Role of Zr,Zr- and Zr,Al-Hydride Intermediates in Alkene Dimerization and Oligomerization

by
Lyudmila V. Parfenova
1,*,
Pavel V. Kovyazin
1,
Almira Kh. Bikmeeva
1 and
Eldar R. Palatov
2
1
Institute of Petrochemistry and Catalysis of Russian Academy of Sciences, Prospekt Oktyabrya, 141, 450075 Ufa, Russia
2
Bashkir State University, st. Zaki Validi, 32, 450076 Ufa, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2021, 11(1), 39; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/catal11010039
Submission received: 10 December 2020 / Revised: 23 December 2020 / Accepted: 27 December 2020 / Published: 31 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Homogeneous Catalysis with Earth-Abundant Metal Complexes)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The activity and chemoselectivity of the Cp2ZrCl2-XAlBui2 (X = H, Bui) and [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlEt2 catalytic systems activated by (Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] or B(C6F5)3 were studied in reactions with 1-hexene. The activation of the systems by B(C6F5)3 resulted in the selective formation of head-to-tail alkene dimers in up to 93% yields. NMR studies of the reactions of Zr complexes with organoaluminum compounds (OACs) and boron activators showed the formation of Zr,Zr- and Zr,Al-hydride intermediates, for which diffusion coefficients, hydrodynamic radii, and volumes were estimated using the diffusion ordered spectroscopy DOSY. Bis-zirconium hydride clusters of type x[Cp2ZrH2∙Cp2ZrHCl∙ClAlR2]∙yRnAl(C6F5)3−n were found to be the key intermediates of alkene dimerization, whereas cationic Zr,Al-hydrides led to the formation of oligomers.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Among the catalytic methods for alkene di-, oligo-, and polymerization, approaches that use Ziegler–Natta-type catalytic systems, based on metallocenes or post-metallocenes, typically Group 4 transition metal complexes, in combination with organoaluminum or organoboron activators, have great potential for development [1,2,3,4,5]. Apart from the known action of alkyl cations [(L2MAlk)+X−] as polymer chain growth centers, the idea of the participation of [(L2MH)+X−]-type hydride complexes as catalytic active species in the reactions of alkene di-, oligo-, and polymerization has been repeatedly pointed out [2,4,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. This assumption follows both from the structure of the reaction products (the presence of vinylidene terminal groups, arising upon chain termination via β-H elimination, which generates intermediates with M–H bond) and from the fact that the efficiency of catalytic systems increases upon the introduction of hydride-generating additives such as AlBui3 [13,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Moreover, there are several studies on the synthesis and identification of catalytically active hydride Zr,B-complexes (Scheme 1). For example, complexes [Cp’2ZrH]+[MeB(C6F5)3]− and [Cp’2ZrH]+[HB(C6F5)3]− were found to be active in the ethylene and propylene polymerization [26,27]. Additionally, hydride complexes [Cp′4Zr2H3][B(C6F4R)4] (R = F, SiPri3), highly active initiators for the isobutene homopolymerization and isobutene–isoprene copolymerization, were described [28].
A number of Zr borohydride complexes were prepared by Piers et al. by the reaction of alkylzirconocenes with HB(C6F5)2 [29,30,31]. The complexes were found to be active in ethylene polymerization provided that additional alkylation with MAO takes place [30]. Zr,B-hydride complexes were also obtained in the reaction of rac-ethylenebis(4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1-indenyl)]zirconium difluoride with HAlBui2 and B(C6F5)3 [32,33]. The activation of hafnocenes with AlBui3/(Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] yielded hydrido-bridged species of the type [LHf(µ-H)2AlBui2]+ or [LHf(µ-H)2Al(H)Bui]+, which were more active in alkene polymerizations than methyl-bridged heterobinuclear intermediates [LHf(µ-Me)2Al(µ-Me)2][MeMAO] and [LHf(µ-Me)2Al(µ-Me)2][B(C6F5)4] [34]. Conversely, the formation of a similar intermediate, [Cp2Zr(µ-H)2AlMe2]+, observed in the [Cp2Zr(μ-Me)2AlMe2]+[B(C6F5)4]--1-alkene system by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), is interpreted as a pathway for catalyst deactivation [35]. The reaction of zirconocenes with excess AlBui3 and boron activators gave an oily product that contained hydride complexes [LZr(μ-H)(μ-C4H7)-AlBui2][B(C6F5)4] [36,37], which were proposed as the thermodynamic sink of the catalyst in alkene polymerization [37]. As a result of studying the polymerization reactions in the presence of dialkyl ansa-complexes [Me2C(Cp)IndMMe2] (M = Zr; Hf), activated with B(C6F5)3, hydride intermediates Me2C(Cp)IndMMe(µ-H)B(C6F5)3, which were unreactive towards monomer insertion and, therefore, represented dormant states, were found [38]. Modification of Zr,Al-hydride complexes Cp’2ZrH3AlH2 (Cp’ = C5Me5, C5H4SiMe3) by B(C6F5)3 was accompanied by the formation of di- or polynuclear metallocenium ion pairs containing terminal and bridging counteranions HB(C6F5)3, appearing due to hydride abstraction, which showed the ability to polymerize ethylene [39]. Heterometallic complexes formed in the reactions of L2ZrCl2 with XAlBui2 (X = H, Cl, Bui) [40] being transformed into the cationic species by [Ph3C][B(C6F5)4)] also become capable of alkene polymerization [10,11].
Our recent study was concerned with the structure, dynamics, and reactivity of hydride complexes generated in the following systems: L2ZrCl2-XAlBui2 (X = H, Cl, Bui) [41,42,43,44,45] and [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlR2 (R = Et, Bui)-methylaluminoxane (MMAO-12) [46,47] (Scheme 2). Among the hydride complexes, novel Zr,Zr-structures were identified and their high affinity to MAO with the ability to give x[Cp2ZrH2∙Cp2ZrHCl∙ClAlR2]∙yMAO-type adducts was shown [46]. Moreover, the adducts were found to be reactive towards alkenes to specifically give dimerization products in high yields [47].
In continuation of this research, we studied the activation of Zr,Zr- and Zr,Al-hydride complexes, formed in the Cp2ZrCl2 –XAlBui2 (X = H, Bui) and [Cp2ZrH2]2 –ClAlEt2 systems, by organoboron compounds (Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] or B(C6F5)3 and the ability of the corresponding adducts to act as active intermediates in the alkene di- and oligomerization.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Study of 1-Hexene Transformations in Cp2ZrCl2-XAlBui2 (X = H, Bui) and [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlEt2 Catalytic Systems Modified with Boron Activators

The L2ZrCl2-XAlBui2 (X = H, Bui) and [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlR2 bimetallic systems perform alkene hydrometalation providing zirconium and aluminum alkyls [48,49]. The addition of (Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] or B(C6F5)3 to the Cp2ZrCl2 -XAlBui2 system (X = H, Bui) (X = H, Bui) (catalytic system A) gives alkene dimers (4) and oligomers (5) (Scheme 3, Table 1). The product yield and chemoselectivity markedly depend on the reagent ratio and reaction temperature. For example, the reaction carried out at [Zr]:[Al]:[B]:[1-alkene] ratio of 1:16:1:1000 and a temperature of 40 °C for 90 min results in 60% conversion of 1-hexene (Table 1, Entry 1). In the mixture of oligomeric products, dimer 4 predominates (41% yield). The increase of the reaction temperature to 60 °C leads to higher monomer conversion (at the level of 95%) and maximizes the percentage of oligomeric products (Table 1, Entry 2).
An increase in Cp2ZrCl2 and HAlBui2 content up to [Zr]:[Al]:[B]:[alkene] = 4:16:1:1000 increases the conversion of the substrate to 90% and the yield of dimers up to 67% (Table 1, Entry 3). As in the previous case, the relative amount of oligomeric products grows with the rise of the reaction temperature (Table 1, Entry 4). The replacement of HAlBui2 with AlBui3 (Table 1, Entry 5) or increase in the HAlBui2 concentration (Table 1, Entry 7) also leads to a higher oligomer yield. In all experiments, the yield of hydroalumination product (hexane) after the hydrolysis was no more than 1%. It should be noted that, in almost all cases, the dimerization product significantly prevailed, which may be a consequence of different pathways to dimers and oligomers in these catalytic systems.
The reaction pathway can be completely shifted towards the formation of dimers by using zirconocene hydride. Thus, in the course of studying the properties of catalytic system B, [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlEt2-(Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4], in the reaction with 1-hexene, it was found that the activity of the system significantly depends on the initial reagent ratio. For example, when [Zr]:[Al]:[B]:[1-alkene] = 1:3:1:400, the degree of alkene conversion is 30% in 150 min at 60 °C (Table 1, Entry 9). An increase in the (Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] content to [Zr]:[B] = 1:(3–10) leads to a complete loss of catalytic system activity. An increase in [Cp2ZrH2]2 and ClAlEt2 concentration in system B substantially elevates the conversion of the substrate. At the ratio [Zr]:[Al]:[B]:[1-alkene] = 4:8:1:400 and a temperature of 40 °C, 81% of dimers with vinylidene double bond are formed in 150 min of the reaction (Table 1, Entry 10).
The replacement of (Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] by B(C6F5)3 results in a more selective formation of dimerization products in up to 93% yield in the presence of either Cp2ZrCl2 or [Cp2ZrH2]2 (Table 1, Entries 6,11).
In order to identify the intermediates responsible for alkene dimerization and oligomerization, we further studied the structure and activity of hydride complexes formed in the Cp2ZrCl2-HAlBui2-(Ph3C)[B(PhF5)4] (B(C6F5)3) and [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlEt2-(Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] (B(C6F5)3) systems by means of NMR spectroscopy.

2.2. NMR Study of Hydride Intermediate Structure in the Cp2ZrY2 (Y = H, Cl)-OAC Systems Activated by (Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] or B(C6F5)3

Our investigation of the reaction of Cp2ZrCl2 with HAlBui2 at low content of organoaluminum compound (OAC) and [Zr]:[Al] = 1:(3–5) showed the existence of a Zr,Zr-hydride intermediate 7 [47], along with the well-known Zr,Al-hydride clusters 6 [41,44,50] and 8 [41,42] (Figure 1a, Scheme 4, Table 2). As we have previously demonstrated [46], an equilibrium mixture of complexes 6–8 is also formed upon the interaction of [Cp2ZrH2]2 with ClAlEt2 taken in 1: 3 ratio. In this case, a larger relative amount of complex 7 is observed (Figure 2a). This complex, in fact, is the product of replacing one hydride atom in the zirconocene dihydride dimer with chlorine. Therefore, it can be considered as a complex formed in the reaction of the Cp2ZrH2 monomer with Cp2ZrHCl. The dialkylaluminum hydride, produced as a result of the chloride/hydride exchange, reacts with Cp2ZrH2 and ClAlEt2, providing trihydride complex 6.
The 1H NMR spectrum of complex 7a exhibits a distinct triplet signal at δH −6.53 ppm, which was assigned to the hydride atom of the Zr-H-Zr bridge. This signal correlates with a doublet at δH −1.39 ppm in the COSY HH spectrum. The observed signals correspond to the AX2 spin system, denoting a symmetrical arrangement of hydride ligands in the molecule. For these hydrides, the geminal constants 2J = 17 Hz of the hydrides in 7 were greater than that of analogous atoms in 6 or 8 (2J = 4–8 Hz) [41,42,44,50]. The sharp multiplet signals of hydride atoms and the absence of their exchange in the exchange spectroscopy (EXSY) spectra in the case of 7 are consequences of higher stability of the structure, whereas complexes 6 and 8 could be involved in the dynamic processes [44]. The intensity ratio being 1 (Zr–H): 2 (Zr–H): 20 (Cp) indicates the presence of two ZrCp2 moieties in the molecule. A study of the reaction of complex 7a with B(C6F5)3 (Figure S15, Supplementary Materials) shows that the adducts 9 and 10 contain one diethylaluminum chloride molecule. Indeed, the 1H NMR spectrum exhibits quartet signals of CH2 groups of ethyl substituents at Al in the range of −0.2 to –0.3 ppm, the intensity of which corresponds to one AlEt2 moiety. The signals correlate both with high-field hydride signals and with a low-field signal of the cyclopentadienyl group in the NOESY spectra (Figure S13, Supplementary Materials). Moreover, HMBC spectra show cross-peaks between the doublet of hydrides at δH −1.39 ppm and the signal of α-carbon atom of the AlCH2 group at δC 3.3 ppm (Figure S16). Therefore, we can conclude that complexes 7, 9, and 10 contain one ClAlR2 molecule per bis-zirconium core. This is in agreement with the structure of the adducts formed in the presence of methylaluminoxane (MAO) [47]. Thus, as follows from NMR data and our preliminary quantum-chemical calculations, complex 7 probably has a cyclic structure shown in Scheme 4.
The addition of (Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] to the Cp2ZrCl2-HAlBui2 system brings about changes in the NMR spectra (Figure 1b–d). First, the signals of the dimeric complex 8 disappear. Second, the signals of the hydride atoms of complex 6 begin to split, which may be attributable to the formation of cationic species similar to those described previously [11,26,27,39]. Third, new high-field doublet and triplet signals corresponding to adducts 9 and 10 arise. A similar behavior of the complexes is observed in the [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlEt2 system upon the addition of (Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] or B(C6F5)3 (Figure 2 and Figure S15). The diffusion coefficients of adducts 9 and 10 are much lower than those of complex 7 (Table 2, Figure 3). During the reaction, as in the case of methylaluminoxane [46,47], the formation of a heavy fraction is observed at the bottom of the NMR tube. The NOESY spectra of adduct 10 (Figure S13, Supplementary Materials) show a negative NOE effect inherent in large molecules [51,52]. Since the lineshape of the hydride atom signals of complexes 7, 9, and 10 does not change, it can be concluded that the bis-zirconium core in complex 7, which is neutral, is preserved after the addition of a boron activator.
We assume that 7 interacts with perfluorophenylaluminum (Scheme 5), which may be generated via the reaction of (Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] with dialkylaluminum hydride, formed in the [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlEt2 system (Scheme 4). Indeed, NMR monitoring of the reaction of HAlBui2 with (Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] showed the appearance of Ph3CH (δH 5.40 ppm), BuinAl(C6F5)3−n and BuinB(C6F5)3−n within 5 min (Figures S5 and S6, Supplementary Materials). The latter (BuinAl(C6F5)3−n and BuimB(C6F5)3−m) are generated as a result of [AlBui2]+[B(C6F5)4]− degradation (Scheme 5) [53,54]. The coordination of complex 7 with the organoaluminum compound BuinAl(C6F5)3−n, which gives adducts 9 and 10, follows from the cross-correlation of doublet signal of the hydride atom at −1.51 ppm with the signal of o-F atoms of the perfluorophenyl group in OAC at −120.78 ppm in the 1H-19F HMBC spectra (Figure S8, Supplementary Materials).
A change in the order of reagent mixing, namely, the addition of ClAlEt2 and then [Cp2ZrH2]2 to the activator, provides an increase in the content of Zr,Zr-hydride clusters 9 and 10 (Figure 2e and Figure S15). This fact can be explained as follows. Compound (Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4], which is initially present in the system, quickly reacts with HAlR2, generated in the [Cp2ZrH2]2−ClAlEt2 system (Scheme 4), to give RnAl(C6F5)3−n (Scheme 5). The latter is coordinated to complex 7, resulting from the reaction of Cp2ZrH2 with Cp2ZrHCl and ClAlEt2. A low concentration of HAlR2 does not allow complex 6 to be formed.
An estimation of the hydrodynamic radii and volumes of complexes 6–10 through the diffusion coefficients determined using the diffusion ordered spectroscopy (DOSY) is shown in Table 2. The hydrodynamic radii Rh were calculated using the modified Stokes–Einstein equation, Equation (1) [55,56], as follows:
D t =   k T [ 1 + 0.695 ( R s o l v R h ) 2.234 ] 6 π η R h
where Rh is the hydrodynamic radius of the solute, Rsolv is the hydrodynamic radius of the solvent (d6-benzene; the van der Waals radius is 2.7 Å), k is the Boltzmann constant, T is the temperature, Dt is the diffusion coefficient, and η is the viscosity of the solution.
The hydrodynamic volumes (Vh) of complexes as spherical particles were calculated according to Equation (2) as follows:
R h = 3 V h 4 π 3
Adduct 10 reacts with 1-hexene to give dimer 4 (Figure 4, Scheme 6). It should be noted that complexes 7 and 9 were inactive towards the alkene. Thus, complex 7 activated by an organoboron compound is the intermediate that selectively affords dimers in the studied systems. The same activity towards the alkene was observed for the adducts of complex 7 with MAO [47].
The trihydride complex 6, mainly formed both in system A and in system B with an excess of OAC, reacts with (Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] to give a mixture of intermediates, which give rise to signals in the −6.6 to −0.1 ppm range for hydride atoms (Figure 1a–c, Figure 2c and Figure 5b) and which are in intermolecular exchange, as follows from the EXSY spectra (Figure S22, Supplementary Materials). The composition of the mixture depends on the [Zr]:[Al]:[B] ratio and the order of reagent mixing. The observed 1H NMR signal splitting is probably caused by the hydrogen atom removal with the formation of Ph3CH and cationic complexes structurally similar to those described previously [11,26,27,39]. The addition of 1-hexene to this system leads to the appearance of oligomers as soon as in the 5th minute of the reaction (Figure 5c, Scheme 6).
Thus, the Cp2ZrCl2-XAlBui2 (X = H, Bui) and [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlEt2 systems activated by (Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] or B(C6F5)3 are able to accomplish selective dimerization and oligomerization of alkenes to give head-to-tail vinylidene products, similarly to systems based on Zr complexes and MAO [3,6,7,8,13,57,58,59]. Among the post-metallocene Zr and Hf complexes with [ONNO]-type amino-bis(phenolate) ligands activated by neutral B(C6F5)3, the best selectivity to 1-hexene dimers (up to 97%) was found to hafnium catalysts [60]. Nevertheless, data on the direct participation of metal hydrides in chemo- and regioselective dimerization of alkenes are limited and are mainly concerned with Sc [61], Y [62], Ta [63], and Ru [64] complexes.
The bis-zirconium hydride complexes we discovered, in combination with either an MAO activator [46,47] or organoboron compounds ((Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] or B(C6F5)3), provide the selective formation of dimers in reactions with alkenes. It is evident that the first step is hydrometalation of the alkene (Scheme 7). The addition of a second alkene molecule and subsequent β-H elimination to give dimers could occur with the involvement of one or two metal sites. Similar two-site catalysis is known for alkene polymerization in the presence of group 4 metal complexes [65]. Nevertheless, certain issues remain unanswered: how the bis-zirconium structures are activated; what is the principle of formation of the heavy fraction that is active towards alkenes; and how dimerization of alkenes with the participation of these adducts takes place. Further development of our study would be concerned with the determination of the structure of active sites and the mechanism of alkene dimerization under the action of bimetallic complexes.

3. Materials and Methods

1D (1H, 13C, and 19F) and 2D (COSY HH, HSQC, HMBC, NOESY) NMR spectra were recorded on spectrometer Bruker AVANCE-400 (400.13 MHz (1H), 100.62 MHz (13C), 376.44 (19F)) (Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany) using standard Bruker pulse sequences. Toluene-d8 and benzene-d6 were used as the solvents and the internal standards. 19F spectra were referenced externally to CFCl3. 1D and 2D DOSY spectra were obtained using the ledbpgp2s pulse sequence (LED with bipolar gradient pulse pair, 2 spoil gradients) with acquisition parameters δ = 1 ms, Δ = 0.1–0.2 s. The spectra were recorded at 296–298 K and temperature stabilization accuracy within 0.1 K. For the calibration of gradient strength the self-diffusion coefficient of HDO in D2O was measured at 298 K (1.902·10−9 m2/s) [66,67]. The diffusion coefficients were defined using NMR relaxation Guide implemented into the Bruker TopSpin program v.3.2 following the known procedure (see, for example, Refs. [68,69]).
The product composition was determined using a gas chromatograph mass spectrometer GCMS-QP2010 Ultra (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with the GC-2010 Plus chromatograph (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan), TD-20 thermal desorber (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan), and an ultrafast quadrupole mass-selective detector (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). Details on the GC-MS analysis of dimers and oligomers are given in the Supplementary Materials.

3.1. General Procedures

All operations for organometallic compounds were carried out under argon according to the Schlenk technique. Complex 1 was synthesized from ZrCl4 (99.5%, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) according to a known procedure [70]. The zirconocene dihydride [Cp2ZrH2]2 (2) was obtained from (1) as described previously [41,42,50]. Commercially available ClAlEt2 (97%, Strem, Newburyport, MA, USA), HAlBui2 (99%, Merck), AlBui3 (95%, Strem), (Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] (97%, Abcr, Karlsruhe, Germany), B(C6F5)3 (95%, Merck), and terminal alkene 1-hexene (97%, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.) were used. The solvents (toluene, benzene) were dried over AlBui3 and distilled immediately prior to use.
CAUTION: The pyrophoric nature of aluminum hydrides and aluminum alkyls require special safety precautions in their handling.

3.2. Reaction of Cp2ZrCl2 with HAlBui2 (AlBui3), (Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] (B(C6F5)3), and 1-hexne

A flask equipped with a magnetic stirrer and filled with argon was loaded with 0.022–0.088 mmol (6.3–25.7 mg) of Cp2ZrCl2, 0.062–0.352 mmol (0.011–0.063 mL) of HAlBui2 or 0.14 mmol (0.035 mL) of AlBui3, 0.022 mmol of (Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] (20 mg) or B(C6F5)3 (11 mg), and 0.22–22 mmol (0.03–2.7 mL) of 1-hexene. The reaction was carried out with stirring at temperatures 40 or 60 °C. The samples (0.1 mL) were syringed into tubes under argon after 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 min of the reaction; then the samples were immediately decomposed with 10% HCl at 0 °C. Products were extracted with benzene, and the organic layer was dried over Na2SO4. The yields of dimers and oligomers were determined by GC/MS.

3.3. Reaction of [Cp2ZrH2]2 with ClAlEt2, (Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] (B(C6F5)3), and 1-Hexene

A flask equipped with a magnetic stirrer and filled with argon was loaded with 0.088 mmol (20 mg) of [Cp2ZrH2]2 (all ratios are given relative to monomer), 0.176 mmol (0.022 mL) of ClAlEt2, 0.022 mmol of (Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] (20 mg) or B(C6F5)3 (11 mg), and 8.8 mmol (1.1 mL) of 1-hexene. The reaction was carried out with stirring at temperatures 40 or 60 °C. The samples (0.1 mL) were syringed into tubes under argon after 15, 20, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 min of the reaction; then the samples were immediately decomposed with 10% HCl at 0 °C. Products were extracted with benzene, and the organic layer was dried over Na2SO4. The yields of dimers and oligomers were determined by GC/MS.

3.4. NMR Study of the Reaction of Cp2ZrCl2 with HAlBui2, (Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4], and 1-Hexene

Method A. The NMR tube was filled with 0.05–0.1 mmol (14.6–29.2 mg) of Cp2ZrCl2 and 0.5 mL of benzene-d6 under argon. Then 0.15–0.3 mmol (0.027–0.054 mL) of HAlBui2 was added at room temperature. The mixture was stirred and the formation of complexes 6–8 was monitored by NMR. Further 0.025 mmol (22.8 mg) of (Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] was added, and the mixture was analyzed by NMR. Method B. The NMR tube was filled with 0.025 mmol (22.8 mg) of (Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4], 0.15–0.3 mmol (0.027–0.054 mL) of HAlBui2, and 0.5 mL of benzene-d6 under argon at room temperature. The mixture was stirred and 0.05–0.1 mmol (14.6–29.2 mg) of Cp2ZrCl2 was added. The formation of complexes was monitored by NMR.

3.5. NMR study of the Reaction of [Cp2ZrH2]2 with ClAlEt2 and (Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] (B(C6F5)3)

Method A. The NMR tube was filled with 0.05 mmol (11.2 mg) of [Cp2ZrH2]2 (2) and 0.5 mL of benzene-d6 under argon. Then 0.15 mmol (18.6 mg) of ClAlEt2 was added dropwise at 0 °C. The mixture was stirred and the formation of complexes 6–8 was monitored by NMR at room temperature. After addition of 0.025 mmol (22.8 mg) of (Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] or B(C6F5)3 (12.8 mg) a division of the reaction media into two fractions was observed. Method B. The NMR tube was filled with 0.025 mmol (22.8 mg) of (Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] or B(C6F5)3 (12.8 mg), 0.15 mmol (18.6 mg) of ClAlEt2, and 0.5 mL of benzene-d6 under argon. Further 0.05 mmol (11.2 mg) of [Cp2ZrH2]2 were added at 0 °C. The mixture was stirred and studied by NMR at room temperature.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we found the conditions for the synthesis of alkene dimers or oligomers in the Cp2ZrCl2-XAlBui2 (X = H, Bui) and [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlEt2 catalytic systems activated by (Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] or B(C6F5)3. NMR studies showed that adducts with the bis-zirconium core of type x[Cp2ZrH2∙Cp2ZrHCl∙ClAlR2]∙ yRnAl(C6F5)3-n are key intermediates of the alkene dimerization. The oligomerization pathway in these systems is realized due to the existence of cationic Zr,Al-hydride species formed in the reaction of the complex Cp2Zr(μ-H)3(AlBui2)2(μ-Cl) with boron activators. Therefore, it is relevant to continue studies of the reaction mechanism in order to identify the activation principle of bis-zirconium complexes by organoboron compounds and understand the necessity of participation of bimetallic sites for selective dimerization of alkenes.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/2073-4344/11/1/39/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.V.P.; methodology, P.V.K.; validation, L.V.P., P.V.K. and A.K.B.; formal analysis, P.V.K.; investigation, P.V.K., A.K.B. and E.R.P.; data curation, L.V.P. and P.V.K.; writing—original draft preparation, P.V.K.; writing—review and editing, L.V.P.; visualization, L.V.P.; supervision, L.V.P.; project administration, L.V.P.; funding acquisition, L.V.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, grant number 18-03-01159a. The structural studies were carried out on unique equipment at the “Agidel” Collective Usage Center (Ufa Federal Research Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ufa, Russian Federation) with the financial support of the Russian Ministry of Education and Science (project No. 2019-05-595-000-058).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or supplementary material.

Acknowledgments

Part of the research was carried out in accordance with federal program № AAAA-A19-119022290004-8.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Collins, R.A.; Russell, A.F.; Mountford, P. Group 4 Metal Complexes for Homogeneous Olefin Polymerisation: A Short Tutorial Review. App. Petrochem. Res. 2015, 5, 153–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Chen, E.Y.-X.; Marks, T.J. Cocatalysts for Metal-Catalyzed Olefin Polymerization:  Activators, Activation Processes, and Structure−Activity Relationships. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1391–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Nifantev, I.; Ivchenko, P.; Tavtorkin, A.; Vinogradov, A.; Vinogradov, A. Non-traditional Ziegler-Natta catalysis in a-olefin transformations: Reaction mechanisms and product design. Pure Appl. Chem. 2017, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nifant’ev, I.; Ivchenko, P. Fair Look at Coordination Oligomerization of Higher α-Olefins. Polymers 2020, 12, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hlatky, G.G. Oligomerization & Polymerization by Homogeneous Catalysis. In Encyclopedia of Inorganic and Bioinorganic Chemistry; Scott, R.A., Ed.; Wiley Online Library: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Janiak, C. Metallocene and Related Catalysts for Olefin, Alkyne and Silane Dimerization and Oligomerization. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006, 250, 66–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Christoffers, J.; Bergman, R.G. Catalytic Dimerization Reactions of α-Olefins and α,ω-Dienes with Cp2ZrCl2/Poly(methylalumoxane):  Formation of Dimers, Carbocycles, and Oligomers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 4715–4716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Christoffers, J.; Bergman, R.G. Zirconocene-Alumoxane (1:1)—A Catalyst for the Selective Dimerization of α-Olefins. Inor. Chim. Acta 1998, 270, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Baldwin, S.M.; Bercaw, J.E.; Brintzinger, H.H. Alkylaluminum-Complexed Zirconocene Hydrides: Identification of Hydride-Bridged Species by NMR Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 17423–17433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Baldwin, S.M.; Bercaw, J.E.; Brintzinger, H.H. Cationic Alkylaluminum-Complexed Zirconocene Hydrides as Participants in Olefin Polymerization Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 13969–13971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Baldwin, S.M.; Bercaw, J.E.; Henling, L.M.; Day, M.W.; Brintzinger, H.H. Cationic Alkylaluminum-Complexed Zirconocene Hydrides: NMR-Spectroscopic Identification, Crystallographic Structure Determination, and Interconversion with Other Zirconocene Cations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 1805–1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Bochmann, M. Highly Electrophilic Organometallics for Carbocationic Polymerizations: From Anion Engineering to New Polymer Materials. Acc. Chem. Res. 2010, 43, 1267–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nifant’ev, I.E.; Vinogradov, A.A.; Vinogradov, A.A.; Ivchenko, P.V. Zirconocene-Catalyzed Dimerization of 1-Hexene: Two-stage Activation and Structure–Catalytic Performance Relationship. Cat. Commun. 2016, 79, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nifant’ev, I.; Vinogradov, A.; Vinogradov, A.; Karchevsky, S.; Ivchenko, P. Zirconocene-Catalyzed Dimerization of α-Olefins: DFT Modeling of the Zr-Al Binuclear Reaction Mechanism. Molecules 2019, 24, 3565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Shamiri, A.; Chakrabarti, M.H.; Jahan, S.; Hussain, M.A.; Kaminsky, W.; Aravind, P.V.; Yehye, W.A. The Influence of Ziegler-Natta and Metallocene Catalysts on Polyolefin Structure, Properties, and Processing Ability. Materials 2014, 7, 5069–5108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Soga, K.; Kaminaka, M. Polymerization of Propene with the Heterogeneous Catalyst System Et[IndH4]2ZrCl2/MAO/SiO2 Combined with Trialkylaluminium. Die Makromol. Chem. Rapid Commun. 1992, 13, 221–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Resconi, L.; Piemontesi, F.; Nifant’ev, I.E.; Ivchenko, P.V. Metallocene Compounds, Process for their Preparation, and Their Use in Catalysts for the Polymerization of Olefins. U.S. Patent 6051728, 18 April 2000. [Google Scholar]
  18. Becke, S.; Rosenthal, U. Aluminoxane Free Catalyst System, Useful for Polymerization of Alpha-olefins, Comprises Fluorine Containing Metal Complex and Trialkyl or Triaryl Boron or Aluminum Compound. U.S. Patent DE19932409A, 18 January 2001. [Google Scholar]
  19. Becke, S.; Rosenthal, U. Composition Based on Fluorine-Containing Metal Complexes. U.S. Patent 6303718B1, 16 October 2001. [Google Scholar]
  20. Becke, S.; Rosenthal, U.; Baumann, W.; Arndt, P.; Spannenberg, A. Metallocyclocumulene Compounds Useful as Polymerization Catalysts Are New. U.S. Patent DE10110227A1, 5 September 2002. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sanginov, E.A.; Panin, A.N.; Saratovskikh, S.L.; Bravaya, N.M. Metallocene Systems in Propylene Polymerization: Effect of Triisobutylaluminum and Lewis Bases on the Behavior of Catalysts and Properties of Polymers. Polym. Sci. Ser. A 2006, 48, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bravaya, N.M.; Khrushch, N.E.; Babkina, O.N.; Panin, A.N. Formation and Catalytic Properties of Metallocene Systems with Combined Cocatalyst of Al(i-Bu)3 Perfluorophenyl Borate. Ross. Khimicheskij Zhurnal 2001, 45, 56–68. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bravaya, N.M.; Panin, A.N.; Faingol’d, E.E.; Babkina, O.N.; Razavi, A. C2-symmetry Dimethylated Zirconocenes Activated with Triisobutyl Aluminum as Effective Homogeneous Catalysts for Copolymerization of Olefins. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 2010, 48, 2934–2941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sacco, M.; Nifant’ev, I.; Ivchenko, P.; Bagrov, V.; Focante, F. Metallocene Compounds. U.S. Patent US7803887B2, 28 September 2010. [Google Scholar]
  25. Nifantev, I.E.; Vinogradov, A.A.; Vinogradov, A.A.; Sedov, I.V.; Dorokhov, V.G.; Lyadov, A.S.; Ivchenko, P.V. Structurally uniform 1-hexene, 1-octene, and 1-decene oligomers: Zirconocene/MAO-catalyzed preparation, characterization, and prospects of their use as low-viscosity low-temperature oil base stocks. Appl. Cat. A Gen. 2018, 549, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yang, X.; Stern, C.L.; Marks, T.J. Cationic Metallocene Polymerization Catalysts. Synthesis and Properities of the First Base-Free Zirconocene Hydride. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1992, 31, 1375–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, X.; Stern, C.L.; Marks, T.J. Cationic Zirconocene Olefin Polymerization Catalysts Based on the Organo-Lewis Acid Tris(pentafluorophenyl)borane. A Synthetic,Structural, Solution Dynamic, and Polymerization Catalytic Study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 10015–10031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Carr, A.G.; Dawson, D.M.; Thornton-Pett, M.; Bochmann, M. Cationic Zirconocene Hydrides:  A New Type of Highly Effective Initiators for Carbocationic Polymerizations. Organometallics 1999, 18, 2933–2935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Spence, R.E.V.H.; Parks, D.J.; Piers, W.E.; MacDonald, M.-A.; Zaworotko, M.J.; Rettig, S.J. Competing Pathways in the Reaction of Bis(pentafluorophenyl)borane with Bis(η5-cyclopentadienyl)dimethylzirconium: Methane Elimination versus Methyl–Hydride Exchange and an Example of Pentacoordinate Carbon. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1995, 34, 1230–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sun, Y.; Spence, R.E.v.H.; Piers, W.E.; Parvez, M.; Yap, G.P.A. Intramolecular Ion−Ion Interactions in Zwitterionic Metallocene Olefin Polymerization Catalysts Derived from “Tucked-In” Catalyst Precursors and the Highly Electrophilic Boranes XB(C6F5)2 (X = H, C6F5). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 5132–5143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Spence, R.E.v.H.; Piers, W.E.; Sun, Y.; Parvez, M.; MacGillivray, L.R.; Zaworotko, M.J. Mechanistic Aspects of the Reactions of Bis(pentafluorophenyl)borane with the Dialkyl Zirconocenes Cp2ZrR2 (R = CH3, CH2SiMe3, and CH2C6H5). Organometallics 1998, 17, 2459–2469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Arndt, P.; Baumann, W.; Spannenberg, A.; Rosenthal, U.; Burlakov, V.V.; Shur, V.B. Reactions of Titanium and Zirconium Derivatives of Bis(trimethylsilyl)acetylene with Tris(pentafluorophenyl)borane: A Titanium(III) Complex of an Alkynylboranate. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1414–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Arndt, P.; Jäger-Fiedler, U.; Klahn, M.; Baumann, W.; Spannenberg, A.; Burlakov, V.V.; Rosenthal, U. Formation of Zirconocene Fluoro Complexes: No Deactivation in the Polymerization of Olefins by the Contact-Ion-Pair Catalysts [Cp’2ZrR]+[RB(C6F5)3]−. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4195–4198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bryliakov, K.P.; Talsi, E.P.; Voskoboynikov, A.Z.; Lancaster, S.J.; Bochmann, M. Formation and Structures of Hafnocene Complexes in MAO- and AlBui3/CPh3[B(C6F5)4]-Activated Systems. Organometallics 2008, 27, 6333–6342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Joshi, A.; Zijlstra, H.S.; Collins, S.; McIndoe, J.S. Catalyst Deactivation Processes during 1-Hexene Polymerization. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 7195–7206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Götz, C.; Rau, A.; Luft, G. Ternary Metallocene Catalyst Systems Based on Metallocene Dichlorides and AlBu3i/[PhNMe2H][B(C6F5)4]: NMR Investigations of the Influence of Al/Zr Ratios on Alkylation and on Formation of the Precursor of the Active Metallocene Species. J. Mol. Cat. A Chem. 2002, 184, 95–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bryliakov, K.P.; Talsi, E.P.; Semikolenova, N.V.; Zakharov, V.A.; Brand, J.; Alonso-Moreno, C.; Bochmann, M. Formation and Structures of Cationic Zirconium Complexes in Ternary Systems rac-(SBI)ZrX2/AlBu3i/[CPh3][B(C6F5)4] (X=Cl, Me). J. Organomet. Chem. 2007, 692, 859–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Al-Humydi, A.; Garrison, J.C.; Mohammed, M.; Youngs, W.J.; Collins, S. Propene Polymerization Using Ansa-metallocenium Ions: Catalyst Deactivation Processes During Monomer Consumption and Molecular Structures of the Products Formed. Polyhedron 2005, 24, 1234–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. González-Hernández, R.; Chai, J.; Charles, R.; Pérez-Camacho, O.; Kniajanski, S.; Collins, S. Catalytic System for Homogeneous Ethylene Polymerization Based on Aluminohydride−Zirconocene Complexes. Organometallics 2006, 25, 5366–5373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Parfenova, L.V.; Khalilov, L.M.; Dzhemilev, U.M. Mechanisms of Reactions of Organoaluminium Compounds with Alkenes and Alkynes Catalyzed by Zr Complexes. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2012, 81, 524–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Parfenova, L.V.; Pechatkina, S.V.; Khalilov, L.M.; Dzhemilev, U.M. Mechanism of Cp2ZrCl2-catalyzed Olefin Hydroalumination by Alkylalanes. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2005, 54, 316–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Parfenova, L.V.; Vil’danova, R.F.; Pechatkina, S.V.; Khalilov, L.M.; Dzhemilev, U.M. New Effective Reagent [Cp2ZrH2·ClAlEt2]2 for Alkene Hydrometallation. J. Organomet. Chem. 2007, 692, 3424–3429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pankratyev, E.Y.; Tyumkina, T.V.; Parfenova, L.V.; Khursan, S.L.; Khalilov, L.M.; Dzhemilev, U.M. DFT and Ab Initio Study on Mechanism of Olefin Hydroalumination by XAlBui2 in the Presence of Cp2ZrCl2 Catalyst. II. Olefin Interaction with Catalytically Active Centers. Organometallics 2011, 30, 6078–6089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Parfenova, L.V.; Kovyazin, P.V.; Nifant’ev, I.E.; Khalilov, L.M.; Dzhemilev, U.M. Role of Zr,Al- Hydride Intermediate Structure and Dynamics in Alkene Hydroalumination with XAlBui2 (X = H, Cl, Bui), Catalyzed by Zr η5-Complexes. Organometallics 2015, 34, 3559–3570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pankratyev, E.Y.; Tyumkina, T.V.; Parfenova, L.V.; Khalilov, L.M.; Khursan, S.L.; Dzhemilev, U.M. DFT Study on Mechanism of Olefin Hydroalumination by XAlBui2 in the Presence of Cp2ZrCl2 Catalyst. I. Simulation of Intermediate Formation in Reaction of HAlBui2 with Cp2ZrCl2. Organometallics 2009, 28, 968–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Parfenova, L.V.; Kovyazin, P.V.; Tyumkina, T.V.; Islamov, D.N.; Lyapina, A.R.; Karchevsky, S.G.; Ivchenko, P.V. Reactions of Bimetallic Zr,Al- Hydride Complexes with Methylaluminoxane: NMR and DFT Study. J. Organomet. Chem. 2017, 851, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Parfenova, L.V.; Kovyazin, P.V.; Bikmeeva, A.K. Bimetallic Zr,Zr-Hydride Complexes in Zirconocene Catalyzed Alkene Dimerization. Molecules 2020, 25, 2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Dzhemilev, U.M.; Ibragimov, A.G. Hydrometallation of Unsaturated Compounds; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2008; pp. 447–489. [Google Scholar]
  49. Dzhemilev, U.M.; Ibragimov, A.G. Metal Complex Catalysis in the Synthesis of Organoaluminium Compounds. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2000, 69, 121–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shoer, L.I.; Gell, K.I.; Schwartz, J. Mixed-metal Hydride Complexes Containing Zr-H-Al Bridges. Synthesis and Relation to Transition-Metal-Catalyzed Reactions of Aluminum Hydrides. J. Organomet. Chem. 1977, 136, 19–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Claridge, T.D.W. Chapter 8—Correlations through Space: The Nuclear Overhauser Effect; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009; Volume 27, pp. 247–302. [Google Scholar]
  52. Hassinen, A.; Martins, J.C.; Hens, Z. Solution NMR Toolbox for Colloidal Nanoparticles; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 273–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bochmann, M.; Sarsfield, M.J. Reaction of AlR3 with [CPh3][B(C6F5)4]:  Facile Degradation of [B(C6F5)4]- by Transient “[AlR2]+”. Organometallics 1998, 17, 5908–5912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Janiak, C.; Lassahn, P.-G. 19F NMR Investigations of the Reaction of B(C6F5)3 with Different Tri(alkyl)aluminum Compounds. Macromol. Symp. 2006, 236, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chen, H.C.; Chen, S.H. Diffusion of Crown Ethers in Alcohols. J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 5118–5121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zuccaccia, C.; Stahl, N.G.; Macchioni, A.; Chen, M.-C.; Roberts, J.A.; Marks, T.J. NOE and PGSE NMR Spectroscopic Studies of Solution Structure and Aggregation in Metallocenium Ion-Pairs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1448–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Slaugh, L.H.; Schoenthal, G.W. Vinylidene Olefin Process. U.S. Patent 4658078, 14 April 1987. [Google Scholar]
  58. Nakata, N.; Nakamura, K.; Ishii, A. Highly Efficient and 1,2-Regioselective Method for the Oligomerization of 1-Hexene Promoted by Zirconium Precatalysts with [OSSO]-Type Bis(phenolate) Ligands. Organometallics 2018, 37, 2640–2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Nakata, N.; Nakamura, K.; Nagaoka, S.; Ishii, A. Carbazolyl-Substituted [OSSO]-Type Zirconium(IV) Complex as a Precatalyst for the Oligomerization and Polymerization of α-Olefins. Catalysts 2019, 9, 528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Gunasekara, T.; Preston, A.Z.; Zeng, M.; Abu-Omar, M.M. Highly Regioselective α-Olefin Dimerization Using Zirconium and Hafnium Amine Bis(phenolate) Complexes. Organometallics 2017, 36, 2934–2939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Piers, W.E.; Shapiro, P.J.; Bunel, E.E.; Bercaw, J.E. Coping With Extreme Lewis Acidity: Strategies for the Synthesis of Stable, Mononuclear Organometallic Derivatives of Scandium. Synlett 1990, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kretschmer, W.P.; Troyanov, S.I.; Meetsma, A.; Hessen, B.; Teuben, J.H. Regioselective Homo- and Codimerization of α-Olefins Catalyzed by Bis(2,4,7-trimethylindenyl)yttrium Hydride. Organometallics 1998, 17, 284–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Gibson, V.C.; Kee, T.P.; Poole, A.D. Selective Catalytic Dimerisation of Ethylene to But-1-ene by [(η-C5Me5)Ta(PMe3)(H)(Br)(η2-CHPMe2)]. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1990, 1720–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lee, D.W.; Yi, C.S. Chain-Selective and Regioselective Ethylene and Styrene Dimerization Reactions Catalyzed by a Well-Defined Cationic Ruthenium Hydride Complex: New Insights on the Styrene Dimerization Mechanism. Organometallics 2010, 29, 3413–3417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. McInnis, J.P.; Delferro, M.; Marks, T.J. Multinuclear Group 4 Catalysis: Olefin Polymerization Pathways Modified by Strong Metal–Metal Cooperative Effects. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 2545–2557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Longsworth, L.G. The Mutual Diffusion of Light and Heavy Water. J. Phys. Chem. 1960, 64, 1914–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Mills, R. Self-diffusion in Normal and Heavy Water in the Range 1-45.deg. J. Phys. Chem. 1973, 77, 685–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Johnson, C.S. Diffusion Ordered Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: Principles and Applications. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 1999, 34, 203–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Macchioni, G.C.; Zuccaccia, C.; Zuccaccia, D. Diffusion Ordered NMR Spectroscopy (DOSY). Supramol. Chem. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Freidlina, R.K.; Brainina, E.M.; Nesmeyanov, A.N. The Synthesis of Mixed Pincerlike Cyclopentadienyl Compounds of Zirconium. Dokl. Acad. Nauk SSSR 1961, 138, 1369–1372. [Google Scholar]
Catalysts 11 00039 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Examples of Zr(Hf),B-hydride complexes.
Scheme 1. Examples of Zr(Hf),B-hydride complexes.
Catalysts 11 00039 sch001
Catalysts 11 00039 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Structures of Zr,Al-hydride complexes studied in Refs. [41,42,43,44,45,46,47].
Scheme 2. Structures of Zr,Al-hydride complexes studied in Refs. [41,42,43,44,45,46,47].
Catalysts 11 00039 sch002
Catalysts 11 00039 sch003 550
Scheme 3. 1-Hexene dimerization and oligomerization under the action of catalytic systems A or B.
Scheme 3. 1-Hexene dimerization and oligomerization under the action of catalytic systems A or B.
Catalysts 11 00039 sch003
Catalysts 11 00039 g001 550
Figure 1. 1H NMR of the Cp2ZrCl2 -HAlBui2 -(Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] system in C6D6 (T= 299 K): (a) [Zr]:[Al]:[B] = 1:5:0; (b) [Zr]:[Al]:[B] = 1:3:0.25; (c) [Zr]:[Al]:[B] = 1:3:0.45; and (d) [Zr]:[Al]:[B] = 1:3:0.5. The order of mixing the reagents in the experiments (b–d) is HAlBui2–(Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4]–Cp2ZrCl2.
Figure 1. 1H NMR of the Cp2ZrCl2 -HAlBui2 -(Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] system in C6D6 (T= 299 K): (a) [Zr]:[Al]:[B] = 1:5:0; (b) [Zr]:[Al]:[B] = 1:3:0.25; (c) [Zr]:[Al]:[B] = 1:3:0.45; and (d) [Zr]:[Al]:[B] = 1:3:0.5. The order of mixing the reagents in the experiments (b–d) is HAlBui2–(Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4]–Cp2ZrCl2.
Catalysts 11 00039 g001
Catalysts 11 00039 g002 550
Figure 2. 1H NMR of the [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlEt2-(Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] system in C6D6 (T= 299 K): (a) [Zr]:[Al]:[B] = 1:4:0; (b) [Zr]:[Al]:[B] = 1:4:0.15; (c) [Zr]:[Al]:[B] = 1:4:0.2, upper layer; (d) [Zr]:[Al]:[B] = 1:4:0.2, heavy fraction; and (e) [Zr]:[Al]:[B] = 1:3:0.5. The order of mixing the reagents is (Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4]–ClAlEt2–[Cp2ZrH2]2.
Figure 2. 1H NMR of the [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlEt2-(Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] system in C6D6 (T= 299 K): (a) [Zr]:[Al]:[B] = 1:4:0; (b) [Zr]:[Al]:[B] = 1:4:0.15; (c) [Zr]:[Al]:[B] = 1:4:0.2, upper layer; (d) [Zr]:[Al]:[B] = 1:4:0.2, heavy fraction; and (e) [Zr]:[Al]:[B] = 1:3:0.5. The order of mixing the reagents is (Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4]–ClAlEt2–[Cp2ZrH2]2.
Catalysts 11 00039 g002
Catalysts 11 00039 sch004 550
Scheme 4. Reaction of Cp2ZrCl2 and [Cp2ZrH2]2 with organoaluminum compounds (OACs).
Scheme 4. Reaction of Cp2ZrCl2 and [Cp2ZrH2]2 with organoaluminum compounds (OACs).
Catalysts 11 00039 sch004
Catalysts 11 00039 sch005 550
Scheme 5. Possible way for the formation of adducts 9 and 10.
Scheme 5. Possible way for the formation of adducts 9 and 10.
Catalysts 11 00039 sch005
Catalysts 11 00039 g003 550
Figure 3. DOSY of the [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlEt2-B(C6F5)3 (1:3:0.5) system in C6D6 (T = 297.1 K), heavy phase.
Figure 3. DOSY of the [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlEt2-B(C6F5)3 (1:3:0.5) system in C6D6 (T = 297.1 K), heavy phase.
Catalysts 11 00039 g003
Catalysts 11 00039 sch006 550
Scheme 6. Reaction of complex 6 and adduct 10 with 1-hexene.
Scheme 6. Reaction of complex 6 and adduct 10 with 1-hexene.
Catalysts 11 00039 sch006
Catalysts 11 00039 g004 550
Figure 4. NMR monitoring of the reaction of complexes 7, 9, and 10 with 1-hexene in d6-benzene (intensity of upfield signals is increased): (a) [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlEt2-(Ph3C)[B(PhF5)4] system, [Zr]:[Al]:[B] = 1:3:0.5; (b) [Zr]:[Al]:[B]:[1-alkene] = 1:3:0.5:3.5, 5 min; and (c) [Zr]:[Al]:[B]:[1-alkene] = 1:3:0.5:3.5, 10 min.
Figure 4. NMR monitoring of the reaction of complexes 7, 9, and 10 with 1-hexene in d6-benzene (intensity of upfield signals is increased): (a) [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlEt2-(Ph3C)[B(PhF5)4] system, [Zr]:[Al]:[B] = 1:3:0.5; (b) [Zr]:[Al]:[B]:[1-alkene] = 1:3:0.5:3.5, 5 min; and (c) [Zr]:[Al]:[B]:[1-alkene] = 1:3:0.5:3.5, 10 min.
Catalysts 11 00039 g004
Catalysts 11 00039 g005 550
Figure 5. The formation of cationic complexes in the Cp2ZrCl2-HAlBui2-(Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] system and their reactivity towards 1-hexene (intensity of upfield signals is increased): (a) Cp2ZrCl2-HAlBui2 system, [Zr]:[Al] = 1:5; (b) Cp2ZrCl2-HAlBui2-(Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] system, [Zr]:[Al]:[B] = 1:5:0.5; and (c) Cp2ZrCl2–HAlBui2–(Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] system after the 1-hexene addition.
Figure 5. The formation of cationic complexes in the Cp2ZrCl2-HAlBui2-(Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] system and their reactivity towards 1-hexene (intensity of upfield signals is increased): (a) Cp2ZrCl2-HAlBui2 system, [Zr]:[Al] = 1:5; (b) Cp2ZrCl2-HAlBui2-(Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] system, [Zr]:[Al]:[B] = 1:5:0.5; and (c) Cp2ZrCl2–HAlBui2–(Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4] system after the 1-hexene addition.
Catalysts 11 00039 g005
Catalysts 11 00039 sch007 550
Scheme 7. Proposed mechanism: one or two Zr reaction centers?
Scheme 7. Proposed mechanism: one or two Zr reaction centers?
Catalysts 11 00039 sch007
Table
Table 1. Catalytic activity and chemoselectivity of systems A and B in the reaction with 1-hexene.
Table 1. Catalytic activity and chemoselectivity of systems A and B in the reaction with 1-hexene.
EntryCatalytic Systems A or B[Zr]:[Al]:[B]:[1-alkene]T, °CTime, minAlkene Conversion, %Product Composition, %
Zr Complex OAC aOrganoboron Activator45
n = 1n = 2n = 3n = 4n = 5
1Cp2ZrCl2HAlBui2(Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4]1:16:1:10004090604110422 1
260909529161513129
3HAlBui2(Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4]4:16:1:100040909067105322
4HAlBui2(Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4]609097521413873
5AlBui3(Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4]4090953814161097
6HAlBui2B(C6F5)34060> 99933----
7HAlBui2(Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4]4:25:1:1000409099521711963
8HAlBui2(Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4]4:16:1:4004090>99591310755
9[Cp2ZrH2]2ClAlEt2(Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4]1:3:1:400601503028-----
10ClAlEt2(Ph3C)[B(C6F5)4]4:8:1:400401508181-----
11ClAlEt2B(C6F5)340909186-----
a OAC—organoaluminum compound.
Table
Table 2. 1H and 13C NMR (δ, ppm, 400.13 MHz (1H), 100.62 (13C), T = 298 K), diffusion coefficients, hydrodynamic radii, and volumes of complexes 6–10 obtained by the diffusion ordered spectroscopy DOSY.
Table 2. 1H and 13C NMR (δ, ppm, 400.13 MHz (1H), 100.62 (13C), T = 298 K), diffusion coefficients, hydrodynamic radii, and volumes of complexes 6–10 obtained by the diffusion ordered spectroscopy DOSY.
ComplexδH CpδC CpδH Zr-HδH AlRDt,
10−10 m2 s−1		Rh, ÅVh,
Å3
6a a5.61
(s, 10H)		104.7−1.09 (br.t, 6.3 Hz, 1H)
−2.28 (br.d, 6.3 Hz, 2H)		0.32 (m)
1.25 (m)		9.34.2319
7a a5.48
(s, 20H)		107.6−1.39 (d, 17.0 Hz, 2H)
−6.53 (t, 17.0 Hz, 1H)		0.17 (q, 8.1 Hz, 4H)
1.35 (t, q, 8.1 Hz, 4H)		7.54.9505
8a a5.73
(s, 10H)		107.2−1.66 (br.s, 1H)
−2.63 (br.s, 1H)		0.32 (m)
1.25 (m)		8.34.6403
9a b5.30
(s, 20H)		107.7−1.51 (d, 16.8 Hz, 2H)
−6.62 (t, 16.8 Hz, 1H)		0.14 (q, 8.1 Hz, 4H)
1.33 (t, q, 8.1 Hz, 4H)		5.06.91344
10 b5.06
(s, 20H)		107.5−1.72 (br.d, 16.8 Hz, 2H)
−6.87 (br.t, 16.8 Hz, 1H)		−0.11 (br.q, 7.2 Hz, 4H)
0.88–1.01 (m)		1.817.221236
a Complexes are obtained in the [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlEt2, d8-toluene system. b Complexes are obtained in the [Cp2ZrH2]2-ClAlEt2-(Ph3C)[ B(C6F5)4], d6-benzene system.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Parfenova, L.V.; Kovyazin, P.V.; Bikmeeva, A.K.; Palatov, E.R. Catalytic Systems Based on Cp2ZrX2 (X = Cl, H), Organoaluminum Compounds and Perfluorophenylboranes: Role of Zr,Zr- and Zr,Al-Hydride Intermediates in Alkene Dimerization and Oligomerization. Catalysts 2021, 11, 39. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/catal11010039

AMA Style

Parfenova LV, Kovyazin PV, Bikmeeva AK, Palatov ER. Catalytic Systems Based on Cp2ZrX2 (X = Cl, H), Organoaluminum Compounds and Perfluorophenylboranes: Role of Zr,Zr- and Zr,Al-Hydride Intermediates in Alkene Dimerization and Oligomerization. Catalysts. 2021; 11(1):39. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/catal11010039

Chicago/Turabian Style

Parfenova, Lyudmila V., Pavel V. Kovyazin, Almira Kh. Bikmeeva, and Eldar R. Palatov. 2021. "Catalytic Systems Based on Cp2ZrX2 (X = Cl, H), Organoaluminum Compounds and Perfluorophenylboranes: Role of Zr,Zr- and Zr,Al-Hydride Intermediates in Alkene Dimerization and Oligomerization" Catalysts 11, no. 1: 39. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/catal11010039

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop